The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Kevin MacDonald Archive
Jewish Fear and Loathing of Donald Trump
Would Trump’s Defeat Be Blamed On Jews?
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>
Donald Trump gives a pro-Israel speech to AIPAC--which then apologized for hosting him.

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Almost exactly a year ago, VDARE.com Editor Peter Brimelow raised the question of whether America’s Jewish groups would turn on Donald Trump (who after all has Jewish grandchildren and a lifetime of Jewish business associates) with the hysteria they employed against Patrick J. Buchanan. I have been tracking the matter ever since and the answer is now in: yes—clearly triggered by visceral reaction against Trump’s nationalist acceptance speech in Cleveland and outright panic at his subsequent poll lead (July 25-29 according to the Real Clear Politics average). I suspect, however, that we have crossed a watershed and that, regardless of the results of this election, this will not end well for them.

Before the convention, Wall Street Journal Deputy Editorial Page Editor Bret Stephens [Email him] said with astonishing arrogance: “It’s important that Donald Trump and what he represents—this kind of ethnic quote, ‘conservatism,’ or populism be so decisively rebuked that the Republican Party, the Republican voters will forever learn their lesson…” WSJs Bret Stephens: Trump Must Lose So Badly That the GOP Voters ‘Learn Their Lesson’, by Sam Reisman, Mediaite, May 29 2016.

Just on Friday, Paul Krugman [Email him]writing in the New York Times continued the now-widespread theme: any expression of ethnic identity by America’s whites, no matter how implicit, was “bigoted” and “white nationalist”:

Recently Avik Roy, a leading Republican health-policy expert, had the personal and moral courage to admit what liberals (and political scientists) have been saying for years: “In reality, the gravitational center of the Republican Party is white nationalism.”

Just to be clear, I’m not saying that top Republicans were or are personally bigoted—but that doesn’t matter. What does matter is that they were willing to curry favor with bigots in the service of tax cuts for the rich and financial deregulation. Remember, Mitt Romney eagerly accepted a Trump endorsement in 2012, knowing full well that he was welcoming a racist conspiracy theorist into his camp.

All that has happened this year is a move of those white nationalists from part of the supporting cast to a starring role.

Pieces of Silver, August 12, 2016 (links in original)

Trump has been hit with a deafening crescendo of hostility from the Main Stream Media, as well as blatantly-orchestrated defections and denunciations from prominent Republicans. [Which Republicans Oppose Donald Trump? A Cheat Sheet, by David A. Graham, The Atlantic, August 11, 2016.]

These tend to come down to moralizing about Trump’s character and temperament. This is not surprising given that the elite consensus favoring mass immigration and multiculturalism is usually justified as a moral imperative—far too many respectable, intelligent white people desperately want to be in sync with the moral pronouncements of NPR and the New York Times editorial page to look out for their own interests. And to make it worse, Trump has not backed down or pivoted from his statements on a moratorium on Muslims, deporting illegals and making immigration policy work for America since winning the nomination.

At this time, there is not one MSM outlet on board with Trump, and the coverage given to manufactured crises about Trump vastly outstrips coverage given to the very real Clinton corruption:

mrc2mrc1

This for a candidate who received more votes than any other Republican candidate in history.

It’s obvious, of course that not all Jews are in the #nevertrump bandwagon. Jews who support Trump—likely a dwindling number—claim to do so for the same reasons many non-Jews do: the domination of US politics by lobbyists and big money, as well as honesty and willingness to be unconventional. [To understand American Jews who support Trump, read this, By Uriel Heilman, Jewish Telegraphic Agencey, March 8, 2016] But it is also obvious that, if only because of historical patterns, the vast majority of Jews will not vote for any Republican candidate—let alone Trump.

And, as always, what’s really important in thinking about Jewish issues is to focus on media power and financial donations, as well as tracking what the major Jewish organizations are up to. All three of the major networks mentioned in the above charts are managed by Jews (CBS: Leslie Moonves; NBC: Bob Greenblatt;ABC: Ben Sherwood) and that CBS (Sumner Redstone’s Viacom) and NBC (the Roberts family’s Comcast) are controlled by Jewish corporations. CNN is managed by Jeff Zucker.

Quite simply, Jews have far more power in the media than any other identifiable group. And yes, Jewish identity makes a difference in content (See Culture Of Critique, Preface to the Paperback Edition , xlvi–lvi).

The issues that have particularly triggered the broad Jewish community have had specific Jewish overtones—the alleged delay in disavowing the support of David Duke, the ridiculous claim of a “Roman salute” at a rally in Florida, Trump’s use of the “America First” slogan (reminiscent of the pre-World War II movement that explicitly noted Jewish influence in promoting a war with Hitler), and the “Star of David” incident in which a picture of Hillary appeared with a 6-sided star over a mass of cash with the caption “Most Corrupt Politician Ever.”

hillarystar

I have to admit that when I saw this (which was before all the fuss), I knew it was going to be trouble. I figured that the imagery would be way over the head of most people but would definitely provoke outrage among Jews. And indeed, a Washington Post article claimed it was decisive for many Jews:

The concern expressed by many Jews is that Trump, who earlier this year was slow to condemn former Ku Klux Klan leader David Duke and has on several occasions retweeted messages from white supremacists, is bringing into the mainstream a sentiment that has largely been relegated to the dark underworld of the Internet.

Trump’s vigorous defense of anti-Semitic image a ‘turning point’ for many Jews, By Jose A. DelReal and Julie Zauzmer, Washington Post, July 8, 2016

The image was quickly removed and replaced with a circle. But Trump, as is his style, did not apologize or back down, arguing that the image was generic (seen also in a poster for Walt Disney’s Frozen and resembling a sheriff’s badge).

Not being as confrontational as Trump, I would have advised him to simply apologize and move on, given that this is really a no-win situation for Trump and because the financial corruption implied by the image goes far beyond any Jewish angle.

ORDER IT NOW

(Nevertheless, there is no question that Clinton’s key financial contributors are wealthy Jewish Democrats and hedge fund operators, including Jews like Seth Klarman who donated to Romney in 2012; other members of the Republican Jewish Coalition are not contributing to Trump, although some, most prominently, Sheldon Adelson have promised to do so.)

But no matter. Such attempts at exoneration by the Trump campaign are framed by activists as nothing more than implausibly deniable dog whistles to his “white supremacist” base.

A New York Times article linked the star symbolism to a pattern in which Trump is supposedly appealing to white identity politics. It quoted ADL leader Jonathan Greenblatt:

“I think what we really find troubling is the mainstreaming of these really offensive ideas,” said Jonathan Greenblatt, the national director of the Anti-Defamation League, which tracks hate groups. “It’s allowed some of the worst ideas into the public conversation in ways we haven’t seen anything like in recent memory.”

For Whites Sensing Decline, Donald Trump Unleashes Words of Resistance By Nicholas Confessore, NYT, July 13, 2016

In fact, I agree that Trump’s candidacy is an implicitly White revolt motivated by fears about what being a white minority in a majority black and brown America would mean for the future for their families and our institutions— entirely reasonable concerns. But the point here is that the organized Jewish community is consciously determined that this issue be kept out of public debate

The ADL is unusual among Jewish organizations in directly condemning Trump, likely because of IRS rules on political involvement by non-profits. But a long list of Jewish organizations have skirted the taxation issue by criticizing particular Trump pronouncements, especially his comments on Muslims and other issues related to immigration and multiculturalism. For example,

The Religious Action Center of Reform Judaism has … taken tangible steps to address bigotry and xenophobia raised by the Trump campaign. The organization, said director Rabbi Jonah Dov Pesner, launched a community-wide effort to welcome refugees and reach out to immigrant communities. [Why Is the Anti-Defamation League Calling Out Donald Trump by Name? , by Nathan Guttman, Forward, May 20, 2016]

Again, the main problem the Jewish community has with Trump is that he has challenged elite consensus on immigration and multiculturalism.

Another interesting angle is that one might think that Jews who fund “Islamophobic” organizations, such as the abovementioned Seth Klarman, or are known as “Islamophobic” critics of the Muslim community, like Daniel Pipes, are not supporting Trump. This may seem surprising because one of Trump’s signature proposals has been a moratorium on Muslim immigration, while Hillary wants to ramp up the number of refugees and other immigrants from Muslim countries. Pipes is particularly interesting given his status as a pro-Israel activist (Klarman is also a major contributor to pro-Israel groups). Why would these “Islamophobes” not support the candidate who will actually do something about Muslim immigration?

Actually, it should not be surprising that Pipes is anti-Trump given that he favors a “house-broken Islam” in Western countries. What neocons like Pipes want is continued immigration of Muslims and the creation of Muslim communities that do not threaten the status quo on Israel. They are quite content with the demographic decline of White populations, whether in Europe or the US.

Indeed, Pipes just quit the GOP over this issue, complaining about Trump’s “pro-fascistic tendencies”:

The United States, the world’s oldest democratic republic, faces an internal danger unlike any in the past 1½ centuries, one with the potential to degrade domestic life and reduce the country’s standing in the world. Nothing is as important as resisting and defeating Donald J. Trump and the neo-fascist virus he wishes to bring to the White House.

Needless to say, this is especially bizarre given that Trump’s proposals unmistakably parallel the policies of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in Israel.

Jewish publications like the Tablet continue hyperbolic denunciations of Trump. Thus an article by Eric D. Weitz [Email him] drew an explicit analogy between the rise of Hitler and the possibility of a Trump presidency, arguing that mainstream conservatives were crucial to Hitler’s ultimate success as well as Trump’s. As is typical of such writing, there is no attempt to appreciate the very real interests that Trump voters have in supporting their candidate—interests that should be obvious to Jews supporting the moral imperative of Israel as a Jewish state, a Tablet staple):

Today’s Republicans and similarly-minded figures in Europe are like the conservatives who put Adolf Hitler in power: delusional about their influence, playing dangerously with the structures of our democracy. Few Republicans in the United States are willing to follow Sen. [Lindsay] Graham on the “exit ramp,” as he termed it, from the Trump highway. And much of the reason lies in the fact that Trump’s political language is only more blatant than what many Republicans have been saying for decades.

That is the lesson from the right-wing populist upsurge in Weimar Germany, which culminated in the Nazi assumption of power. The political language of fear and hostility directed at “foreign” elements (never mind the fact that many and even most of those so-called foreigners had been residents and citizens for generations) enables moderate and radical conservatives to come together. The moderates make the radicals salonfähig, acceptable in polite society. That is the real and pressing danger of the current moment.

Weimar Germany and Donald Trump, July 18, 2016

Other recent articles explicitly assert the importance of Jewish identity in opposing Trump: e.g., Jews have a special responsibility this US election to fight back against Donald Trump, by Matthew Rozsa, Quartz, July 09, 2016

And a writer at the Forward, Rabbi Michael Rothbaum, linked Trump to Rep. Steve King (R-IA) made after a suggestion on MSNBC that “soon there won’t be enough white people to elect Republicans to national office.”

King had responded by saying the unsayable:

I’d ask you to go back through history and figure out where are these contributions that have been made by these other categories of people that you are talking about? Where did any other subgroup of people contribute more to civilization?”

And then he doubled down by linking the contributions of whites to Christianity. Horrors!

Of course, this argument actually has respectable academic support e.g. Oxford University professor Sir Larry Siedentop’s Inventing the Individual: The Origins of Western Liberalism .But Rothman looks at Christianity exclusively from a narrow Jewish perspective, seeing only persecution of Jews, and dragging Trump:

Let’s recognize that Donald Trump, by openly demonizing Mexicans, Muslims and many other groups, has emboldened people like King to directly engage in racism. And then let’s realize that King’s racist comments on MSNBC serve to reinforce one of the truly important lessons of this election cycle: If nothing else, the rise of Trump has proven that white supremacy almost always lives next-door to Christian hegemony—and that one form of bigotry will always bolster another.

For every racist meme that Trump tweets about African-American criminals, there’s an anti-Semitic meme that Trump culls from a white supremacist forum. For every unctuous remark Trump makes about “my African-American,” there’s another one labeling a room full of Jews “negotiators.”

Why Jews Need To Band Together With ‘Subgroups’ That Steve King Attacked, Forward, July 19, 2016

ORDER IT NOW

(In fact, of course, King supported Ted Cruz in the GOP primaries and like other orthodox conservatives has been noticeably slow to endorse Trump. But maybe Trump’s rhetoric has been a breath of fresh air—for example, college students stood up to a hyper-feminist demonstration at a Milo Yiannopoulos lecture by chanting “Trump, Trump, Trump!”).

The lesson for Rabbi Rothman: Jews should form alliances with all the other groups:

All of us “subgroups” who stand outside of “Western civilization” are in danger. If we’re going to stand against this rising tide of hate, we’ve got to stand together. So let’s keep building bridges. Surely that’s something even we lowly “subgroups” can contribute.

But building bridges with various subgroups in American society has been the Jewish strategy for decades, beginning at least by the early twentieth century—making alliances with blacks (the NAACP) and any other group whose interests could be construed as opposing the traditional power structure of America. See my essay Jews, Blacks, And Race, from Samuel Francis’s Race And The American Prospect, 2006.

Since World War II and especially since the sea change in immigration policy of 1965, the big shift has been away from attempts to make alliances with the white working class in favor of making alliances with non-White ethnic groups as well as with sexual non-conformists.

The white working class has responded by becoming by far the most enthusiastic Trump supporters.

While Jewish identity has often been in the forefront of Trump denunciations, the #NeverTrump neoconservatives are a special case. Obviously concerned that a Trump administration might fail to provide foreign policy jobs for the usual pro-Israel and anti-Russia suspects, the neocon assault on Trump is typically carried on with assertions of US patriotism, their Jewish identity submerged under thick layers of professed allegiance to American interests. Jewish #NeverTrump neocons with access to the elite media, notably Jennifer Rubin [email her] Max Boot, Bill Kristol and the aforementioned Bret Stephens, all of whom were featured in Part 4 of this series, have continued their onslaught against Trump, often with complaints about Trump’s supposed racism and fascist tendencies.

Recently Stephens complained that Trump was appealing to the “privileges of a white ethnic bloc.” He has also attacked Sean Hannity who is perhaps the most prominent MSM figure who is firmly in the Trump camp, complaining that Trump was departing from “genuine Reaganites: pro-trade, pro-immigration, pro-NATO, pro-entitlement reform.” [Sean Hannity’s Veneration of Ignorance, WSJ, Aug. 8, 2016]

Who would have thought that socially and demographically transformative immigration was a conservative value?

The exchange shows that any MSM figure who dares to show wholehearted support for Trump should expect nothing but wall-to-wall hostility from the neocon wing of the GOP.

But of course, neocons are not really conservatives and would be more than happy with a Democrat party committed to Leftist domestic policies (particularly massive non-white immigration) and a staunchly pro-Israel, anti-Russia foreign policy (which is near and dear to Hillary Clinton’s donor base as described above). They will most likely end up going back to the Democrats whence they came.

The Stephens-Hannity exchange also raises the real possibility that if Trump loses in November, neocons and other #neverTrump Republicans will be blamed. And given the role of Jewish neocons in the GOP and its mouthpieces like The Weekly Standard and National Review, to say nothing of the Jewish organizations’reckless commitment to mass immigration and multiculturalism at the expense of the historic American nation, it is hard to see how the issue of Jewish power can be kept out of public debate.

But the good news: the pre-Trump GOP which was dependent on a neocon media and foreign policy establishment and with a big business, pro-Israel donor base, is dead—and, in my view, it can’t be resuscitated.

That GOP got completely out of touch with the interests of its white middle and working class voters. These voters will not go back to the pro-immigration globalism of the Republican elites. But without this base, the GOP cannot win.

Conservatism Inc. is finished. Its operatives who dream of reclaiming the Republican Party after a Trump disaster will inherit a corpse.

Kevin MacDonald [email him] is emeritus professor of psychology at California State University–Long Beach. His research has focused on developing evolutionary perspectives in developmental psychology, personality theory, Western culture, and ethnic relations (group evolutionary strategies). He edits and is a frequent contributor to The Occidental Observer and The Occidental Quarterly. For his website, click here.

(Republished from VDare by permission of author or representative)
 
• Category: Ideology • Tags: 2016 Election, American Jews, Donald Trump 
Hide 176 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    Diversity is a strength! (nonwhites into white places only)
    Noone is Illegal! (where white people live only)
    Minority rights! (when white people are the majority only)

    “Diversity is a strength” really means “White people are a weakness”

    Open Borders is the White ‘Privilege’

    That’s why they say antiracist is code for Antiwhite
    That’s why they say diversity is code for White Genocide

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  2. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    Now that the German economy has recovered from the effects of the second world war, it is obvious that the fundamental difference between a Germanic country run by natives acting on behalf of its native population and a Germanic economy dominated by Jews is that the former becomes an economic giant punching far above its weight in terms of exports of highly technical goods and precision machinery while the latter becomes a net importer due to its loss of manufacturing and technical expertise. The latter, an economy dominated by financial swindlers, becomes extractive; the only exports are raw materials or farm produce. The former country, running trade surpluses, can afford social programs for its people and state of the art infrastructure.

    The verdict of history is clear and unequivocal.

  3. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @Anonymous

    What about American Indians? Why do they promote diversity for American Indians?

  4. MacDonald’s overview is very insightful. Unacknowledged Zionist pressures go a long way towards explaining why candidate Trump’s political rise is now being sabotaged.

    Trump will continue to get bad press until he becomes “more centrist”. But this seemingly-innocuous term (‘centrist’) is code. Centrism is an political Trojan Horse–even for conservatives–since it’s designed to promote more of the same. ‘Centrism’ is a secretly designed to enforce conformity and continuity.

    And a ‘centrist’ jihad in Washington is now underway. It’s Hillary they want.

    Indeed, another jihadist command came Trump’s way via the (allegedly) ‘conservative’ Wall St Journal. ‘Shape up!’ declared the Journal’s editorial page. (change your tune, Trump).

    All this chatter and outrage over Trump’s ‘un-Presidential’ conduct and speech crimes are a clever mischaracterization. The big story here is undue media influence and unfair political manipulation via news gathering institutions during a supposedly free election. But ‘democracy’ is just a nebulous concept describing a complex and often opaque political process involving elite individuals, groups and institutions.

    The fact remains that most of the big insiders want Hillary. Just ask Bernie. He found out the hard way.

    And the endless charges of ‘racism’ used against Trump are media-speak. They function as politically-correct denunciations. Warning: public figures who show sympathy for the collective interests of white Americans may be purged.

    The whole ‘racism’ bugaboo is now basically about the privilege to create and use a political sledgehammer. Charges of ‘anti-Semitism’ function similarly. Both impose silence.

    But Trump is tweaking these taboos–or so it would seem. This makes the political establishment boiling mad. And Trump was already on probation. Have you forgotten?

    Don’t think for a moment that the Israels or their domestic brethren have.

    The Zions will never forget Trump’s unforgivable gaffe of suggesting the the US be “more neutral” in the Middle East. What!?! Are you serious?

    How dare he! Equal treatment under law? Outrageous. Israel must always get special treatment from Washington.

    This poisonous mindset is American ‘centrism’ in full regalia.

    Yes, the system is “rigged”, children, just like The Donald says.

    Trump is still off-script. How long can it last?

    Indeed, Trump is making noises that cater just a bit too much to America’s founding stock. That’s fascism!–or so the neocons (and their neo-liberal cousins) would have us believe.

    What is neo-conservativism? It is a concocted, war-seeking ideology cooked up and condensed by Irving Kristol with the help of a handful of ex-Trotskyites and their minions. This ‘ideology’ has served the Zions very well.

    Neo-conservativism mixes together militant Zionism, anti-communism (allegedly) along with political correctness, fraudulent egalitarianism, borderless free markets, as well as the manipulation of political terminology and American law.

    Its become a back door assault on the cultural, political and economic interests of European-derived Americans. Like liberal ‘interventionism’, it’s a prescription for non-essential serial warfare and a death pill for white America.

    Like liberalism, neocon values elevate Israel and eschew ‘white privilege’.

    Ironically, as the status of European-derived Americans declines, Washington has assumed the task of 1) sustaining Israel’s military preeminence, 2) assuring Israel’s internal security, and 3) guaranteeing to continuity of Israel’s unapologetic and dominant Jewish character.

    This mission now constitutes a core American value–at least as far as Washington and our dominant media are concerned. How has this unique mission to advance the parochial interests of a tiny and distant foreign state ‘conservative’? It boggles the mind.

    Unfortunately, there shall never be any sort of national referendum on the Israel question.

    Israel’s artificial centrality in American life cannot be questioned. The very idea of such a thing is ‘anti-Semitic’.

    On this issue, both major Parties are 100% unified. It’s a bi-partisan consensus.

    Unfortunately, due to hard political realities, Trump may now be steering his campaign into less turbulent waters. After all, a Trump ‘crisis’ can easily be manufactured each and every day. It does not pay for any politician to take on you-know-who.

    So Trump is coming to grips with this ubiquitous force. He’s facing death by 1000 cuts. Thus, Trump is re-adjusting his ‘America First’ rhetoric. Policies will surely follow.

    Mr. Outsider is starting to sound a bit like Hillary. Trump is now making louder and louder noises about crushing ISIS–as if this non-state terror group is some kind of a military threat to the United States. Ridiculous.

    ISIS cannot even re-take Iraq, which is where most ISIS fighters were born.

    Meanwhile, the growing mayhem in Chicago, St. Louis and Baltimore remains a far bigger threat to national security than ISIS. Just count the bodies. Moreover, we’re protected from ISIS by two vast oceans. And ISIS doesn’t even have a fleet of row boats.

    So why does Trump choose to focus on ISIS while Milwaukee burns and thousands more illegals walk into the US each and every week?

    Might Trump be sending a message to his tormentors?

    Trump’s rising focus on fighting ISIS is his signal that, as president, he will continue to wage war in the Middle East until all ‘terror’ (resistance) to Zio-Washington’s interventions is crushed.

    This pro-war dog whistle is meant for Israeli ears.

    But the Israelis and their domestic operatives aren’t buying it. For American Jews, Trump has crossed the line. He’s ‘pro-white’. Unacceptable.

    And the idea that white people in majority-white nations (where many Jews live!) can maintain communities and make alliances along racial/ethic lines is unacceptably threatening to the usual victims. That’s racism! (white racism).

    Only certain minorities can think and operate that way. (And we needn’t name them.) Trump must therefore be reviled and defeated.

    This is why the media is boiling mad over Trump. He’s a patriarchal white supremacist, a nativist, a racist, a xenophobe, and an anti-Semite.

    Have I forgotten anything?

    For better or worse, MacDonald is right in his forecast that, however the election goes, ‘Conservatism, Inc’ is doomed.

    • Replies: @Rurik
  5. Personally I oppose all those who seek to harm the white people of the white world, and their heritage, which is why for example I was a leading member of the South Africa Society in Britain, and a founder member of Majority Rights. If Jews are engaged in such harmful activities, I oppose them whatever their numbers or influence, but I never attack Jews just because they were born Jews. There are Jews opposed to mass-immigration, and not just Muslim immigration. I have opposed multi-racialism and communism publicly since student days in the 1960s, at considerable personal cost at times. I am a white Englishman of Christian parentage.

    The perennial problem, especially after WW2, is that Jews will act collectively if, and only if, they feel collectively or existentially threatened. This is exactly what the posts on MacDonald’s “Occidental Observer” site do. Recent contributions come close to advocating hunting “the Jews” down, seizing their property, even killing them. The context usually includes irrational fantasies about the extent of the world power (I am not referring to documented facts about e.g. US finance or the Israeli lobbies), including suggestions by regular contributors that all nuclear weaponry and events like the Nice atrocity are Jewish lies like The Holocaust and 9/11, a recent proposal for a Oklahoma City-style atrocity, and the bright idea that the rest of the white world should gang up against the British people with a “punitive” boycott.

    If you venture a criticism or even a nuanced analysis, you can expect a torrent of grotesque miscellaneous abuse, or claims that you must be a (((Jew))), a (((“Hasbara Troll”))), a (((“Jewish patsy”))) or an (((Bitch))). MacDonald’s Moderator then suppresses your replies, in my case with a dark threat that I was “skating on very thin ice”.

    I came to TOO after reading MacDonald’s books, but thought at first the response to my contributions (when published) was surprise by club members at an unexpected intruder in an antisemitic “safe space”; then I felt as if I had wandered into a mental ward for what we English call “green ink” patients; but I have begun to suspect that some contributions could actually be the work of clever Jews, who know how to produce crazy, crude, cruel and criminal parodies of anti-Jewish scribble, the object being to discredit the Charles Martel Society by alienating decent and well-informed Gentiles, and reinforcing their own “defense” organizations.

    MacDonald may not care. But if he has been burning his boats, he would well advised to jump off before they sink altogether.

  6. Alden says:
    @David Ashton

    David Ashton
    I’ve been reading your comments on amren for many years and recently your comments on TheOccidentalObserver
    The commentators are as you say, insane The comments section was closed down entirely a few years ago because of the comments.
    The comments often have nothing to do with the article, just babbling about their favorite obsession

    They are not White Nationalist at all Most believe that if your ethnic origins are not north of the Rhine or west of the Elbe rivers you are not White. There are often statements such as Italians are not White due to negro invasions Occidental Observer readers claim even the French and Poles are not White, the French being mulattoes and the Poles Mongolians.

    Occidental Observer is listed on all the pro White sites but attracts only the lunatic fringe. The new moderator appears to be the same kind of lunatic as the commenters.
    There is a lot of admiration for Hitler as well. He may have built the autobahn S, built housing projects and all the rest of the standard socialist benefits but he lost the war and Germany was occupied for 50 years. Whatever heaven on earth Hitler envisioned, it ended in disaster after only 12 years.
    A few weeks ago someone posted that every Catholic Church in America should be closed down Writing about the misdeeds of specific Jews like Madoff etc is one thing, but that they all worship Lucifer????
    The worst thing about Occidental Observer is the moderator who allows the insanity to be posted but band people who dare refute the insanity.

  7. Mark Green says: • Website
    @Alden

    Dear Bon- I am not an expert on the Comments section at the Occidental Observer but your description does not jibe with what I’ve read and observed there in general. And Kevin MacDonald is very a sober and insightful editor.

    The abject racism and anti-Catholic extremism that you describe is not what is normally found there. Indeed, the general tone among the readers at TOO is quite similar to what I see here at Unz (even accepting your claim that a few individuals have gone rhetorically overboard).

    In general, there is a good deal of prescient, taboo-shattering commentary at at the Occidental Observer. And for this American, that is a very healthy and necessary step forward.

    • Replies: @Santoculto
    , @Alden
    , @Alden
    , @Marcus
  8. Dave Pinsen says: • Website
    @Anonymous

    A Germanic Germany just imported over one million Muslim migrants on behalf of its native population.

  9. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    Who is this Terrorist’s Father referred in one of the bar charts?


    This should be noted by every fool who joins the Evil Empire’s army.

  10. TheBoom says:

    I have always been pro Israel (partly because I feel the Muslim side is so dreadful) and used to live on a kibbutz for half a year when I was young even though I’m not Jewish. Now, though, I’m neutral and think US should cut all financial support for Israel.

    The turning point for was what this article is about: all the Jews in the press, entertainment industry and on social media informing us that anyone who wants an immigration policy at all like Israel’s is a Nazi. There is a lot of hypocrisy out there but this is one that is particularly infuriating given that the left, which Jews love and are very active in, is staunchly anti-Israel and pro-Muslim. Fine, let the Jews get support for Israel from them. The rest of us should abandon Israel and let the Jews and their leftist buddies fund it.

    We can use all that aid to Israel the help build the wall if Trump wins. Since the wall will be similar to Israel’s, that will be an appropriate use of money we save.

    • Replies: @annamaria
    , @Hibernian
  11. anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    it is hard to see how the issue of Jewish power can be kept out of public debate

    Yeah, especially if the facts about 9/11 ever get a full public airing (in Trump’s acquiescence-not-so-much speech I hope). Saudi prince Bandar was recently thrown under the bus in order to obfuscate the larger truth of Zionist involvement.

    • Agree: Seamus Padraig
  12. @Anonymous

    Nope, the Euro has destroyed Southern European economies by feeding their growth to Germany.

  13. Lot says:

    There’s quite a lot of dumb stuff in MacDonald’s writing as usual.

    His prediction that the old GOP establishment will fall from power if Trump loses makes no sense. Paul Ryan will continue to be Speaker and senate Republicans will continue to be elitists with a few exceptions and sometimes not for the few months before primary season. The Kochs will continue to run the shadow party, bigger and more important than the RNC by an order of magnitude, since they spend hundreds of millions of dollars a year on it.

    Would Trump’s Defeat Be Blamed On Jews?

    I can say with 100% certainty that MacDonald will blame it on the Jews. But few others care, and the American right’s extreme philosemitism seems to only grow each year.

    What MacDonald never stops to contemplate is how much the antics of the small anti-Semitic minority of US white nationalists stains the rest of the movement and hurts its ability to take over the GOP (not just win a presidential primary with plurality wins in multi-candidate fields).

    • Agree: iffen
    • Replies: @helena
    , @Mr. Anon
  14. @Alden

    They are not White Nationalist at all Most believe that if your ethnic origins are not north of the Rhine or west of the Elbe rivers you are not White.

    Saturday Night Live Transcripts Season 14: Episode 3
    October 22, 1988
    (Note the picture)

    Vote Bush III
    [ show each President’s head encircled over a North European country ]
    Announcer: Franklin Delano Roosevelt was of white northern European heritage.
    Thomas Jefferson was of white northern European heritage.
    John F. Kennedy was of white northern European heritage.
    George Herbert Walker Bush is of white northern European heritage.
    [ show Dukakis’ encircled just above the Mediterranean Sea ]
    But Michael Dukakis?
    Bush. He’s whiter.
    [ SUPER: “Bush. He’s Whiter.” ]

    • Replies: @Alden
  15. alexander says:

    Dear Mr. Macdonald,

    If the United States took a turn towards fascism, that day began the moment the Patriot Act passed into law fifteen years ago.

    Any simultaneous reading of the Reichstag Fire Decree,( passed unanimously in 1933 and leading to the rise of Nazism in Germany)and our own Patriot Act passed in 2001, will bring home that point….with a vengeance.

    One is virtually a “carbon copy” of the other.

    Except in our case, the Patriot Act led to the inexorable rise of the Neocons, their consolidation of power, and the subsequent belligerent rampage of unending criminal wars throughout the middle east,based on wholly fraudulent and mendacious (Neocon) claims.

    If initiating the supreme crime of war of aggression, as we did in 2003, is not the hallmark of a militant fascism, Mr Macdonald, what is ?

    The Neocons have gotten a free pass for fifteen years of unconscionable death and destruction and immense pain and suffering ,against nations that never attacked the US and certainly never intended to.

    Please explain to me how this is not the high water mark of a militant fascism ?

    There needs to be reckoning for this heinous War Fraud and the immense cost in lives and treasure it has exacted upon the US and the world.

    Forgive me if many of the most powerful Neocons are of Jewish extraction, but that should in no way deter our country from seeking accountability, and righting the pernicious wrongs committed through their stewardship, over the last decade and a half.

    The Neocons have gotten a free pass for jettisoning our constitutional mandates, our bill of rights and our civil liberties.. Somehow in your mind, Mr Macdonald, this isn’t Fascism and wasn’t Fascism…. 15 years ago, when it all began ?

    Pray tell, why not ?

    Lets discuss for a moment the horrific gouging of our nations balance sheet under Neocon tutelage .

    The United states has OVERSPENT what it has taken in, by 15 trillion dollars in 16 years.

    This level of debt creation, under Neocon stewardship, is unprecedented in our nations history. Never has our country accumulated such titanic amounts of debt, in so little time, than since the Neocons took over the shop in 2001.

    Considering that nearly all this overspending went specifically to the results of enacting the Neocons playbook on Terror Fraud , War Fraud and Banking Fraud…there needs to be a reckoning for this immense theft of taxpayer wealth ,wouldn’t you say ?

    Both “The Donald” and “The Bern”, have been guilty of doing what no other candidate for President has even dared to consider……that is having the courage to open the basement door of the house the Neocons built ,and take a good hard look at all the “Ogres” of grotesque criminality hidden there by the dominant media’s penchant for obfuscation.

    Do the Neocons actually want to be held to “account” for the catastrophic disasters they have created, and the immense wealth they have pilfered from us all ,in the process ?.

    Hell no!

    Donald Trump, perhaps even more so than Bernie Sanders, holds out the truest hope of reigning in this twisted (and yes, Fascistic) siege the Neocons has set upon us all.

    The prospect of actual “accountability” terrifies the Neocons right down to their very marrow.

    They will spare NO expense in upending this potentiality, and keep their Ogres “safely locked”, behind the basement door.

  16. Rehmat says:

    Kevin MacDonald is one of those self-denying White racists who find very convenient to blame Jews and Muslims to blame for everything their fellow White Christian sell-outs do for money and power aka licking ‘Jewish AZZ’.

    Uri Avnery, the Israeli journalist exposed the corrupt American Judeo-Christian lawmakers by saying that if Israel put a motion that the Ten Commandment is a forgery, there would be 70 Senators and 300 Congressmen ready to endorse that.

    The Organized Jewry loves Donald Trump for his Islamophobia but fears him as next president of the United States. Why? The answer comes from Trump’s response to the question on Jerusalem being ‘eternal capital of Israel’.

    “A lot will have to do with Israel and whether or not Israel wants to make the deal – whether or not Israel is willing to sacrifice certain things. They may not be, and I understand that, and I’m OK with that. But then you’re just not going to have a deal,” said Trump.

    https://rehmat1.com/2016/08/20/us-election-2016-and-the-jewish-temptress/

  17. helena says:
    @Lot

    if name-calling is an antic, mind-reading must qualify as a super-antic?

  18. annamaria says:
    @TheBoom

    There are irrefutable facts that the leading Jews in the US government have been aggressively anti-muslim and pro-neo-Nazi. All these squeaking about the memory of Holocaust and such are only intended for gullible. That the bloody Clinton became the Jewish choice makes an enormous stain on the US Jewry.
    1. Clinton = about 3 mln. of dead muslim, including tens if not hundreds of thousands of dead children in the Middle East. (See Clinton role in Iraq war and destruction of Libya and Syria).
    2. Clinton = supporter of the ideological descendants of Bandera (a Nazi collaborator): https://consortiumnews.com/2016/01/29/ukraine-merges-nazis-and-islamists-2/ (see Clinton’ protege Nuland-Kagan fraternizing with neo-Nazis and supporting their aspiration for governance in Kiev).
    “The Banderas, or Banderites, are activists in the Ukrainian Ultra Nationalist movement that is now in control of the government in Ukraine. Under the militant leadership of Stepan Bandera in World War II, the ultra-nationalists organized the Ukrainian Waffen SS Galician, Nichtengall, and Roland Divisions that collaborated with the Nazis and were responsible for the genocide of over 500,000 people. Following the war, however, Ukrainian Nazis were the only group to escape trial at Nuremburg for crimes against humanity. Moreover, neither the Banderas, the Ukrainian Waffen SS, nor any other Ukrainian collaborators have ever apologized for their participation in genocide.” Moreover, the Ukrainian neo-Nazis have become the darlings of the US ziocons.

    “The Nazis Even Hitler Was Afraid of:” http://www.opednews.com/articles/1/The-Nazis-Even-Hitler-was-by-George-Eliason-Exile_Genocide_Hitler-Brownshirts_Hitler-Youth-140316-321.html “Even though the German SS had units dedicated to genocide, the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN) approached this mission with a zeal and barbarity that Hitler’s own units could not muster. They routinely tortured people with saws and axes, and used the most painful methods they could devise as means to kill them.”

    The Jewish organizations in the US have been cheerleading for the ardent supporters of neo-Nazis, namely for Mrs. Clinton and her ziocons-infested State Dept. There is no way the influental American Jewry could extricate itself form a label of collaborator with neo-Nazis. So instead of “never again” the US ziocons are promoting “please lets have it again!”

    • Replies: @Druid
  19. Jason Liu says:

    Honestly, all the right wing Jews (minus neocons) I’ve spoken with have been heads above the average gentile conservative. Their analysis is more precise, their predictions more realistic, and their tactics more pragmatic and workable. Few, if any, are prone to the ridiculous conspiracy theories and fearmongering you see among Republicans, and even parts of the alt-right.

    Instead of flipping out over Jews all the time, the white right should embrace them as strategists and promote them as beacons of intellectualism.

    • Replies: @Priss Factor
    , @SFG
    , @Art
    , @Dr. X
  20. Dr. X says:

    The Jews are working earnestly to ensure Trump’s defeat. Jonah Goldberg, Ben Shapiro, Mark Zuckerberg, Charles Krauthammer, Mortimer Zuckerman, and hundreds of others in the media are furiously against him. This explains the ridiculous Trump/David Duke meme. Duke hasn’t been a “somebody” since he ran for the Louisiana legislature in the 1990s and was disowned by the Republican Party. Half the country wasn’t even born then. Yet the Jewish media keeps trying to associate Trump with Duke. Zuckerman’s New York Post even tried to allege that Trump’s long-dead father was a member of the Klan in the 1920s… of course there was no proof whatsoever.

    So if Trump loses, the Jews should get blamed. In true Jewish fashion, however, they will accuse people who state the obvious fact of Jewish opposition to Trump of being anti-Semites — and blame the victims of their perfidy.

    • Replies: @SFG
  21. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    I have a completely different take on the structure of modern Jewish/Euro interaction.

    The most recent research with respect to the Ashkenazi genome suggests that “Jews” are 60% European. So called” Jews” then would be more accurately regarded as Europeans with Jewish admixture. They are our cousins, albeit one’s who wear strange little hats and practice bizarre rites such as cutting off the ends of their baby boy’s peepees.

    Northwestern Europeans are makers; they build things. Because of the feedback loop involving making, using, evaluating and reformulating plans for the next iteration, NWEuros perfected many practical sciences. These eventually evolved into the theoretical sciences which gave NWEuros dominance over the world.

    The Ashkenazis’s high intelligence is of a different kind. Their’s was selected for in an environment in which they were propertyless. It is largely theoretical. They are not known as builders. They are clearly brilliant theorists. Words and numbers are their thing.

    The two types are not inherently incompatible. However, there is a strain in Ashkenazi thinking to regard the practical intelligence of Euros as inferior. There is, in Judaism, a deep contempt for “making stuff” that goes back to the proto-Semitic prohibition against graven images and worshipping the golden calf.

    But Euroman derives his very sense of selfhood from the things he makes. He is Homo Habilis, handy man. In making stuff, the Euroman transforms the world from its raw state, indifferent or alien to him, into a familiar world that is for him. This relieves his existential anxiety. In doing so he posits himself, projects himself into the world. His creations are his best self concretized. They are who he is put into tangible form.

    His creations are his legacy. They reflect his presence in the world. He builds them to last. They are monuments to who he was. He builds for his children and grandchildren. Maybe even for a thousand years.

    But the Ashkenazi will have none of that. He sees all that as eventual ash and dust. What is Real is Mental. What is real is what can be carried away when ones’s people are the victims of a recurrent persecution and must flee for their lives, preserving only what they can carry in their Minds.

    And so, as Prof. MacDonald has noted, they set themselves up as Critique[rs] of Culture. They see their role as being designated debunkers of the junk thinking of the culture in which they live.

    Here’s a quote from Michael Ledeen,

    “Creative destruction is our middle name both within our own society and abroad. We tear down the old order every day, from business to science, literature, art, architecture and cinema to politics and the law.

    Our enemies have always hated this whirlwind of energy and creativity which menaces their traditions (whatever they may be) and shames them for their inability to keep pace. We must destroy them to advance our historic mission.”

    Note that his definition of what their role is has basically made and enemy (his term) out of everybody. Everyone who is the inheritor of a culture that includes science, literature, art, architecture et al–and those are the very essence of culture–must suffer to watch their civilization reduced to rubble by these whirlwinds of energy which bring death and destruction to their lifestyle.

    So is it surprising that the diverse peoples of the world have rallied and furiously lashed back at the menacing (his word) Jews?

    I believe that Jews prosper when they act harmoniously with their European cousins. When they become arrogant like the Neocons and Neolibs and begin to believe that they don’t need to be part of a Euro culture, that they are above it and can kick it away, then they make the mistake of thinking that the head can survive without the body.

    And this, in code, is what Freud was trying to tell his fellow Jews. Their hysterical neuroticism, their paranoia of persecution is proportionate to their rejection of the body, the concrete world of things, personified in their Euro cousins and concretized in the Euro cultural creations. Inasmuch as Ashkenazis are 60% Euro genes, then, disdain for the thing world of Euro culture is analogous to cutting themselves off from their bodies. In destroying Euro cultural artifacts the Jew is literally tearing himself asunder. He is split off from himself, alienated from his biological roots, he lives in a state of panic. He does not recognize that when he wrecks the Euro world he flogs himself.

    Ashkenazis need Euros to survive. When Jews begin to believe that they can do without Euros, they become hubristic and their hubris leads them to excesses which call forth the inevitable backlash which results in their being hurled down, cast out and driven forth.

    Nothing better expresses this alienation than the modern economist’s definition of “value”. Krugman subscribes to this notion. Value, we are told, is just what someone is willing to pay for something.

    To an Euro this definition is wide off the mark. Euro man still believes in the labor theory of value. A thing has intrinsic worth. They know this because they made the thing. They put care and intelligence into it so that the thing will last and be of use to his children. A good bridge is safe, lasts well, beautiful etc. It is useful, not a net drain.

    But to the Jewish economist, the notion that an object has inherent worth is ridiculous. It is only worth what someone else is willing to pay for it. It has extrinsic worth.

    Do you see how alienated this is? A thing, one of your possessions, is to be regarded only in light of what it is worth to someone else. It’s aptness is irrelevant.

    This is the mentality of a deeply alienated person. Alienation drags fear and paranoia in its wake. Fear and paranoia lead the Jew to further hostility against the Euro world which turns into resentment. Resentment leads the Jews to destroy that of which they are not the author. That “creative destruction” (Ledeen’s words) evokes a protective instinct in Euros. Euros retaliate in defense of the inherent good of their culture–and it is inherent–because it is rooted in the very nature of things, in the Natural Law of Physics, Chemistry and Mechanics.

    And so the wheel turns.

  22. [Use a regular handle or Anonymous/Anon. If you use multiple handles, your comments may be trashed or your other identity revealed.]

    I cannot blame Jews for being neurotic to the point of distraction over anything that even superficially resembles nationalism. But the country can’t cater to the neuroses of a tiny minority. We can’t accept a million Syrian refugees just so that some Jews will stop having nightmares about the S.S. St. Louis.

  23. Richard S says:

    Wow, I’m impressed that VDare is based enough to publish Prof KMac (or as the $PLC call him, Obergruppenmufti Haman-Himmler von Birkenau).

    He’s right though. Trump is a billionaire New Yorker with Jewish family. There’s no way he can plausibly be accused of antisemitism. But these media liars have to hang their hatred, and fear of losing control of policy direction through PC Thought Policing, on something.

    Trump is anti corporate-globalist-shill. Therefore the corporate globalist shills are trying their level best to attack him. They will fail. Trump Will Triumph.

    • Replies: @Priss Factor
  24. SFG says:
    @Dr. X

    All of what you say is true–Trump has no high-profile Jewish media supporters outside of Drudge and Breitbart, and many guys like Shapiro and Goldberg who were formerly Republicans have switched sides to oppose him.

    That said, there’s plenty of blame to go around, a lot of which can be directed at Trump himself. The guy has made a lot of campaign mistakes even without the headwinds from the media. He’s not a professional pol, and it shows. The Khizr Khan thing was a trap by the Democrats, and he walked right into it. I hate PC too, but it’s one thing to talk about radical Islam being a threat and another to make dick jokes during a presidential debate.

    The GOP establishment also has a lot of donors, many of whom are gentiles, who don’t want to support him because (a) his commitment to free markets (and thus more money for them) is weak and (b) cutting immigration deprives them of cheap labor.

    Don’t get me wrong–I support him as the last chance to limit immigration and even if he fails, he’s shifted the Overton window on the right on this issue permanently. The man has done his nation a great service and I will be voting for him.

    • Replies: @dahoit
    , @SolontoCroesus
  25. Priss Factor [AKA "Anonymny"] says: • Website
    @alexander

    “Please explain to me how this is not the high water mark of a militant fascism?”

    That’s globo-neo-imperialism, not fascism. I’m the only true fascist.

    Calling anything that is aggressive ‘fascist’ is ridiculous.

    Britain had representative government but was the most aggressive imperialist power from 18th century to the end of WWII. So, was it ‘fascist’?

    Indeed, even Fascist Italy and Imperial Japan got into the expansionist game only because the democratic powers were masters at it. They wanted a few pieces since democratic UK, France, and US seem to have grabbed everything and even aiming for more, esp in the Middle East following the fall of the Ottoman Empire.

    True fascism is nationalism and peace.

    • Replies: @Stonehands
  26. Priss Factor [AKA "Anonymny"] says: • Website
    @Richard S

    “He’s right though. Trump is a billionaire New Yorker with Jewish family. There’s no way he can plausibly be accused of antisemitism.”

    Ironically, it’s his chutzpah that the Jews can’t stand.

    Jews want to own chutzpah for themselves.
    Jews fear that Trump and his minions will do with chutzpah what Christians did with Yahweh.
    Christian Jehovah emboldened Europeans with moral sanctimony and righteousness. Christians used the Jewish God against the Jews.
    Trump’s chutzpah is brazen, and Jews fear it as a template that encourages whites to go off the reservation.

  27. Priss Factor [AKA "Anonymny"] says: • Website
    @Jason Liu

    I think people like Ilana Mercer are maybe 2% of the Jewish population.

    They exist but have no pull in the system.

  28. AndrewR says:
    @Alden

    MacDonald has had some good insights about Jewish power and habits, but ultimately he is a sadistic nutjob and his site attracts the same. I appreciate Unz’s commitment to free speech but it is a bit silly. MacDonald would not raise a finger to save Unz from a violent Jew-hater.

    • Replies: @Alden
  29. dahoit says:
    @SFG

    The Khan episode was a Trump victory,as only knuckleheads couldn’t see the total hypocrisy of the corrupt father backing an instrument of his son’s needless and futile death.
    How someone could say otherwise is a reflection of brain dead thinking.

    • Replies: @SFG
  30. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    A so-called Canadian political scientist by the name Salim Mansur has long been advocating a ban on Muslim immigration into Canada. See his presentations on YouTube. He is a darling of the neo-conservatives in Canada and the US including Daniel Pipes. Mansur’s is a complete and permanent ban, while Donald Trump’s is a temporary halt. In addition, both Mansur and his neo-conservative friends are ardent supporters of Israel’s wall and its Jews-only immigration policy. Something is rotten in the state of Denmark.

  31. AndrewR says:

    Trump’s biggest enemy is his poor impulse control combined with his small knowledge base.

  32. macilrae says:

    Fundamentally we must suppose that Trump is seen as a loose cannon – likely to operate unpredictably and beyond the usual control of the deep state actors and who, had there been sufficient dirt available to sink him, would have floundered many months ago.

    And for Hillary – as if she was not willing enough to support any and all Jewish causes – further incentives assuring her compliance probably include her 30,000 ‘missing’ emails (and God knows what else), safely tucked away in the hands of Israeli intelligence.

  33. @alexander

    Robustly stated, in your usual rhetoric style, Alexander.

    But re your opening statement:

    If the United States took a turn towards fascism,

    could you please define fascism — with excruciating precision, if you will. Since it’s the central focus of your argument, i.e.

    Please explain to me how this is not the high water mark of a militant fascism ?

    it’s important what the term, or ideology, or phenomenon, means.

    Also, you wrote:

    If initiating the supreme crime of war of aggression, as we did in 2003, is not the hallmark of a militant fascism, Mr Macdonald, what is ?

    Am I correct in assuming that your argument is that the “initiation” — the beginning point — of “America’s turn toward [militant] fascism” was 2003, the George W. Bush-led invasion of Iraq?

    If that is correct, then how do you characterize the 12 years of sanctions and occupation-via-no-fly-zone that USA and its allies carried on since the George H. W. Bush – prosecuted Gulf War?
    That war, and more especially the subsequent years of sanction and occupation, cost the lives of a million Iraqi men, women and children, a price that Madeleine Albright deemed “worth it.”

    As you compose a response to this question, in your usual, robust rhetorical style, take a look at this short argument: Politics Without Principle: Sovereignty, Ethics, and the Narratives of the Gulf War (Critical Perspectives on World Politics) – June, 1993
    by David Campbell

    for your convenience, here’s a bit about the book from reviews:

    This study examines the discursive practices and political strategies that obscured the issues involved in the Gulf region and moved the crisis toward conflict. In particular, it probes the discourse of moral certitude through which the United States and its allies located with Iraq – in unambiguous ethical terms – the responsibility for evil. . . .

    Campbell offers an alternative narrative of the Gulf conflict. His discussions of
    Kuwait’s border,
    Iraq’s relations with the West,
    the complex nature of the grievances behind the conflict,
    the possibilities for non-military resolution of the crisis,
    the moral turpitude of the participants, and
    the conduct of the war
    all serve to challenge the way IR theory has conventionally understood the questions of agency, power, ethics, responsibility and sovereignty.

    . . .

    [Campbell’s book] serves as a reminder that the politics of identity has always been and will remain to be a dimension of foreign and security policy-making. By choosing to look at such a recent crisis, Campbell successfully points to those policy decisions that were taken not in order to ‘solve’ the crisis, but to reinscribe US identity as the only superpower in the post-Cold War era.

    • Replies: @alexander
  34. @Mark Green

    Anti-”catholic” is just: be sane…

    almost of the ‘religions’ look exactly like a culturally adapted psychosis…

    what many people like to say: ”christians are just amalgamated jews”

    hypocrisy in very higher levels, milenar ”safe spaces” or atomization about what the world really is.

    And this nuanced manipulations just prove my point of views about so-called ”religions”.

    • Replies: @Alden
  35. SFG says:
    @dahoit

    Oh, there is much to dislike about the father backing an instrument of his son’s death–there is a profound masochism there.

    Still, Trump’s standing fell in the polls quite a bit afterward, giving Hillary a safe lead.

  36. @SFG

    even if he fails, he’s shifted the Overton window

    Given the forces arrayed against Trump at this point, if he fails you believe that Overton window will not be re-aligned, slammed back to its former position, if not over-compensated in the other direction?

    And if he succeeds, do you suppose the forces arrayed against him will roll over and play dead? Do you imagine that no Dennis Ross or Benji Netanyahu will knock on the White House door and demand favors or maneuver Pres. Trump into their corner?

  37. Remember when there was a boatload of candidates vying for the GOP nomination?

    And most of them did their shuck-and-jive routine before the Jewish influence-peddlars and money-bags in December, including Donald Trump?

    https://www.c-span.org/search/?searchtype=All&query=republican+jewish+coalition

    Ben Carson
    Marco Rubio
    Jim Gilmore (?)
    Chris Christie
    Rick Santorum
    Mike Huckabee
    Jeb Bush (!)
    Ted Cruz
    Carley Fiorina
    John Kasich
    Lindsey Graham
    George Pataki
    Donald Trump

  38. SFG says:
    @Jason Liu

    I see this argument all the time, mostly from people new to politics who think the whole thing is rather strange. The alt-right believes white people are superior due to their cultural and civilizational achievements, well, Jews have done a lot of that, right? All the Nobel prizes and stuff? Israel going from zero to regional power in a few decades?

    The backstory is that Jews have always been on the cultural left in the Western world since the Enlightenment, and before that were always for the anticlerical party because, well, less institutionalized religion is better if you’re a religious minority. In recent years there was strong support of the Civil Rights movement and then of political correctness, and lately opposition to Trump.

    How much of this is action and how much is reaction is hard to say (and depends on your sympathies), and is always something of a chicken-and-egg question–Jewish fear of white nationalism is a result of Nazi ideology on the far right, which is a response to the strong affinity Jews had for Communism and integration during the cold war, which is a result of the fact that Communists were one of the few dependably antifascist forces in the WW2 era and Hitler was obsessed with killing Jews even to the point of damaging his own war effort…and he was reacting against the heavy Jewish presence in the Communist movement in Germany, which itself was a reaction against antisemitism among the old conservative forces in Germany…it bounces back and forth and probably goes back to the Middle Ages (and I know I missed a step or three in there).

    • Replies: @anonymous
  39. anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @SFG

    Hitler was obsessed with killing Jews even to the point of damaging his own war effort

    idiotic comment

    and boring.

    are Jews incapable of coming up with new material?

  40. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @David Ashton

    the problem is jews always feel existentially threatened so always seek influence in adopted nations and with talent and hard work end up like they are now 2% of the population with 50% of the power which they use against the founders of the nation they adopted. In the end it doesnt matter that they did it because they were worried it will be dealt with as it always is. Its like they have this death wish all they had to do was be the most american of americans just don’t repeat what you did 50 years earlier in germany but noooo they moved over hear and immediately set up the frankfurt school riled up the blacks and arranged the 64 immigration invasion and orchestrated the entire leftist campaign. I honestly hope to god they come to their senses and repent soon.
    otherwise this end really badly for them once again, whites will either wake up and fight off the bio terror brown invasion and realize it was the jews behind it yet again, or the stupid jews will continue to win and the us will fill with more blacks arabs chinese and hispanics who all hate them unlike whites and Israel will lose its protector

    • Replies: @DaveE
    , @David Ashton
  41. DaveE says:

    Did you see the real-time ABC internet poll asking “Who Will You Vote For?” a few days ago?

    Was up for about 24 hours. In that time they had a whopping 170,000 votes. The site gave real-time totals.

    Trump was getting a whopping 71% against a pathetic 9% for Hillary when the site was taken down, and these percentages went virtually unchanged for hours before.

    Say what you want, but polls like this, which allow one-vote per IP address, are difficult to fake. They’ve been around for years. You could watch the totals change when the site was refreshed. On any given computer only one vote was allowed. Furthermore, the site had no way of knowing whether the respondents were Democrat, GOP, black, white, whatever and there’s no particular reason to think that Trump voters were more likely to respond than Killary fans.

    Furthermore, 170,000 is an ENORMOUS sample size compared to the typical Reuters propaganda-poll of 2,000 or less.

    Compared to a Zogby-style “this is the total because I say so” so-called “poll”, these polls are models of integrity and truthfulness. Furthermore, it’s near-watertight proof the polls have been off-the-charts lying for months, for Killary.

    So why would ABC expose all the others, Zogby, Reuters, etc. as blatant liars? (Not that this surprises anyone…..) Aren’t they in this together?

    IMHO this was done for Hillary. It was probably the only way the Democrat bosses could convince her she didn’t have a snowball’s chance in Hell of winning. Also, the site was only up for 24 hours, so only about 170,000 people actually saw it. The damage was minimal.

    I give it 48 hours before Killary quits the race. She’s made many deals with the devil to get where she is, but she still knows what the devil is capable of.

    “Who’s Next?” We’ll find out soon. I just hope we “Won’t Get Fooled Again”.

    • Replies: @DaveE
  42. Alden says:
    @AndrewR

    That was my point. MacDonalds articles are informative but the comments are just lunatic fringe and often have nothing to do with the articles

    For instance, there will be an article about Jewish communists in 1920s Russia.
    But all the comments will be about how Italians French etc are mulattoes because of “negro” invasions in the past. Or maybe some confederate revanchist claiming that the north won the civil war only because of
    Irish Catholic, not British and German Protestant immigrant draftees.

    The commenters never comment about the article, just post their obsessions

  43. annamaria says:
    @alexander

    some attempts at independence by the US citizenry from ziocons: https://www.rt.com/usa/356079-us-government-sued-aid-israel/

    “A Washington DC non-profit group is suing the US government challenging its authority to provide Israel with foreign aid, arguing that its status – a nuclear power which didn’t sign the Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty – means that aiding it contravenes US law…
    In 2012, according to the complaint, the Department of Energy under the Department of State [Secretary H. Clinton] passed the Guidance on Release of Information relating to the Potential for an Israeli Nuclear Capability. That guidance “unlawfully conspired to codify ‘nuclear ambiguity’ through a new secret gag law targeting any US federal government employee or contractor from publicly communicating about Israel’s nuclear weapons program under threat of immediate employment loss, fines and imprisonment.
    ”The complaint gives as an example of the effect of the gag the saga of Los Alamos National Laboratory nuclear analyst James Doyle who wrote candidly about Israel’s nuclear weapons for a magazine in 2013. “After a congressional staffer read the article, which had passed a classification review, it was referred to classification for a second review. Doyle’s pay was then cut, his home computer searched and he was fired,” quoted the complaint.

    Looks like occupation of the US by ziocons.

  44. Alden says:
    @Santoculto

    It’s one thing to be anti Catholic in the pro secular sense. It’s one thing to advocate abolishing Christmas trees and ending Christmas Day as a public holiday
    Lenin actually did that as soon as he took over Russia. In 1924 he made a law decreeing that anyone who did not come to work in Christmas Day would be executed without trial.
    The anti Catholics on MacDonalds site have often advocated that the Catholic, but not their lunatic fringe Christian sect of bible thumpers be abolished
    One can be reasonably anti Catholic and extremely pro secular without claiming that the Pope and the Devil meet in a conference room under the Vatican to plot their evil ways. And those claims have been posted on MacDonalds site.

    • Replies: @Santoculto
    , @utu
  45. schmenz says:

    Interesting article, though I remain unconvinced that Jewish opinion has necessarily turned on Trump. They tend to hedge their bets by insinuating themselves into both campaigns, as is well known.

    In any case, here is a sober look at these issues which does contradict some of Mr McDonald’s ideas:

    http://www.thornwalker.com/ditch/snieg_trump_antisemite.htm

  46. DaveE says:
    @DaveE

    So, if this isn’t absolute proof of Jewish near-hysteria at the prospect of a Putin / Trump / Erdogan (perhaps) alliance, I don’t know what is.

  47. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    Above I gave the G-rated version of this speech because I didn’t want to offend Jewish men in front of their wives, Mothers and children. But now that they are gone, I can speak more plainly.

    You Jews are screw ups.

    Every task you are assigned, you screw up.

    Given control of the nation’s investment banks you promptly engineer the greatest financial disaster in American history. (And this from the guys who had assured us that they were the smartest guys in the room. If these were the smartest, what’s the second team look like?)

    Given control of the news media, you reduce it to blatantly, biased propaganda, worthless as a source of true information and impotent to fulfill its function as balance-restoring critic speaking truth to power.

    Given control of music, movies and television, you churn out nothing but trash and reality-distorting, agenda-driven lies pandering to what is worst and most loathsome in human nature.

    You have destroyed the greatest economy the world has ever known with your misguided economic theories. While this has made some of you immensely wealthy, it will rebound against you. Wrecking the lives of Americans will and has turned them against you. They will rise up.

    Unfortunately, those Jews who were most responsible for looting our nation will make good their escape with their gold and diamonds, leaving America awash in worthless paper greenbacks. And leaving their less-favored, hapless Jewish compatriots behind as well, to face the wrath and suffer the consequences for policies over which they had no more control than the rank and file white American does over the doings of the Elites who purport to represent him.

    And then, after the hammer has fallen, these self-same reptilian Jewish elite will have the audacity to weep and moan for those whom they deserted whilst casting all the blame on the poor whites who were disenfranchised and destroyed by those Jewish elites for having vented their wrath on the nearest substitute.

    This is the cycle of history. It can only be broken if you, the Jewish Elite, step down now. Admit that you are bumbling fools whose policies backfire and go awry. Accept your inadequacies. Know that in your strength lies your weakness. Your intelligence carries within it a fatal flaw which blinds you to your inadequacies.

    “Know thyself”.

    Learn from us. We of the West have wellsprings of wisdom besides which your Abrahamic Law is childish superstition. Know that you cannot, on your own, create and sustain a great civilization.

    Read the Greeks. Our civilization is far wiser than yours. Give up your pretensions. Accept your lower station humbly. We are willing to reach out and give you a hand up. Take it. Raise yourself from the tyranny of your ignorance. Let us rule. Accept the subordinate role that is your lot. Only thus can you save yourselves from yourselves.

    • Replies: @SolontoCroesus
    , @dcite
    , @Lot
  48. Dr. Macdonald,

    Trump’s two kids married Jews. He said Obama has been bad for our relationship with Israel. He said that his election will be “good news for Israel”.

    You of all people should know the games that Jews play. Trump isn’t for us, he’s for the Elite oligarchs, the Jews. He wouldn’t be in this position if he didn’t show any type of allegiance to Jews.

    • Replies: @Lot
    , @Corvinus
  49. alexander says:
    @SolontoCroesus

    Campbells book may well be accurate.

    We have engaged before (in these comments sections) on the 91 gulf war.

    There are many reasons to doubt our integrity in engaging Iraq to remove its occupation forces from Kuwait in 1991.

    Suffice to say we had international law on our side when we did, as well as numerous unanimous UNSC resolutions to back up our actions.

    Did Iraq have a valid rationale for entering Kuwait, militarily ?

    Maybe .

    Did we “mousetrap” Saddam into entering Kuwait ?

    Maybe.

    Did He make the choice to Invade Kuwait ?.

    Yes , he did.

    So thats it.

    I can say, too, the post 91 war sanctions on Iraq were designed primarily to prevent Saddam Hussein from reconstituting his military, not specifically to starve a half a million Iraqi children.

    At least that was my understanding.

    But I am sorry, I don’t see the 91 Iraq war through the same lens of criminality as the Iraq invasion of 2003.

    for me , they are an issue of “kind” not “degree”.

    Iraq War 91 was meant to send a message AGAINST the act of “criminal invasion”.

    Iraq War 03 was the very essence of one.

    And we have fleshed out, too, Bush Sr’s rationales for not taking out Saddam when he had the chance.

    They were precisely the same reasons we should never have gone in, in 03.

    I have also mentioned that our near “overwhelming” supremacy, in our 91 engagement was quite shocking to just about everyone, US forces took no more than(what ?) a dozen war casualties during the entire operation.

    This was such a “bone-crushing” rout, I think its success stirred the pot of our budding Neocons (less than honorable) ambitions…….The first point, driven home most convincingly, was that we can “win” !

    ….and “win” decisively…..with a minimum of US casualties……

    You are telling me ,S2C, these kinds of “results” don’t send our more belligerent warmongers daydreaming of “conquest”.

    Of course they do.

    In regards to the second issue, the issue of how I define Fascism, I define it quite simply as the false supposition that the objectives of the STATE “transcend” the shared values of the INDIVIDUALS within it , for whom it is tasked to represent.

    An earmark of nascent “fascism” is usually found when the “individual” is forced to surrender their rights and liberties for the cause of belligerent “war making”.

    And when that form of “state fascism” rears its head, by defrauding the people into criminal actions they would normally never undertake, it is truly a pernicious thing.

    • Replies: @SolontoCroesus
  50. Rurik says:
    @Mark Green

    Hey Mark,

    excellent comments as usual

    Neo-conservativism mixes together militant Zionism, anti-communism (allegedly) along with political correctness, fraudulent egalitarianism, borderless free markets, as well as the manipulation of political terminology and American law.

    and we shouldn’t forget that neo-connism also has no interest in prosecuting the criminal fraudsters who looted the world’s economy with the sub-prime housing bubble swindle.

    it was Bubba (with Rubin riding herd) that killed Glass, but these neocon, Israeli-firsters like things just the way they are- with Goldman Sachs running the Fed and the SEC and the Treasury all while bloating the ticks on Wall Street with the ill-gotten lucre to the tune of trillion$.

    while Main Street languishes

    such a deal!

    How has this unique mission to advance the parochial interests of a tiny and distant foreign state ‘conservative’? It boggles the mind.

    you can thank William Buckley for that. He was the ultimate apostle of treason, selling out American conservatism (and Joe and true conservatives) to assuage his vanity and be on TV. He set the trajectory that all the Gentile (traitorous$ scum) neoconservatives followed in order to toss white Christendom’s babies into Moloch’s pyre.

    Trump is now making louder and louder noises about crushing ISIS–as if this non-state terror group is some kind of a military threat to the United States. Ridiculous.

    a paean and a pander to the MIC

    perhaps Trump simply knows you can not threaten the MIC with constraint and live to become the president.

    perhaps Trump knows that the MIC don’t much care where the slop in the trough comes from or for which ‘enemies’, so long as it flows in abundance

    Trump’s rising focus on fighting ISIS is his signal that, as president, he will continue to wage war in the Middle East until all ‘terror’ (resistance) to Zio-Washington’s interventions is crushed.

    but his rhetoric is not business as usual. Zio-Washington wants the Assad regime to fall, (so Israel can steal the Golan Heights. Duh). The reason they’re calling Putin = Hitler, is because Putin, (and now China [perhaps Turkey?!]) are preventing the neocons from realizing their hopes and dreams vis-a-vis that real estate and the trillion$ of oil reserved there. When Trumps talks of making nice with Putin, and stomping ISIS (the neocons’ mercs sent to kill Assad), he is mollifying the MIC (and the US military that has no stomach for fighting alongside stone-age Muslims that crucify Christians and enslave young women- in arrangements that tweak the moral sensibilities of the Western [even military] man).

    If we were to join forces with Russia and Assad (can you even imagine?!) to crush ISIS- the MIC would be humored, and the military would for once finally relish the idea of destroying some very loathsome and sinister human shitstains (instead of allying with them). A win/win for the world and a loss for the neocons.

    But the Israelis and their domestic operatives aren’t buying it. For American Jews, Trump has crossed the line. He’s ‘pro-white’. Unacceptable.

    I don’t know of any specifically pro-white things he’s ever done or said. I don’t think it’s because he’s pro-white, rather I would posit that their problem with him is that he doesn’t seem to be decidedly anti-White. Being neutral on the question of white aspiration vs. their genocide, is the same as being neutral on the question of Palestinian genocide. If you talk of whites or Palestinians as having any rights whatsoever, then you’re obviously full to the brim with hatred and want to push all Jews into ovens.

    Have I forgotten anything?

    perhaps worst of all for the Jewish supremacists, Trump said he wants to bring back “Merry Christmas’

    this is nothing less than another Holocaust!

    MacDonald is right in his forecast that, however the election goes, ‘Conservatism, Inc’ is doomed.

    what happens if they JFK Trump?

    do you know of anyone capable of picking up the mantle? That Christian-Zio cuck from Indiana?!

  51. DaveE says:
    @Anonymous

    Talent, hard work and more stolen money than even a central banker can imagine.

    These are the keys to Jewish success.

  52. annamaria says:

    Implementation of Clinton plans in Syria: preserving the precious war from ending.

    “On July 31 – three days after Clinton gave her acceptance speech – Syrian rebels led by Al Nusra, the local Al Qaeda affiliate, launched its powerful offensive in Aleppo.
    Whether or not Washington OK’d the offensive – citing reports of massive arms shipments to the rebels, the well-informed Moon of Alabama website argues persuasively that it did – there is no doubt that it encouraged and helped coordinate a powerful propaganda campaign that has followed in its wake. http://www.moonofalabama.org/2016/08/who-now-leads-the-war-on-syria-the-cia-or-turkey.html
    Omran Daqneesh, the dazed and dirt-encrusted five-year-old boy who has become “a symbol of Aleppo’s suffering,” according to The New York Times, is one example of how the [Clinton] campaign has borne fruit.”
    https://consortiumnews.com/2016/08/21/us-hawks-advance-a-war-agenda-in-syria/
    “While trumpeting the fate of Omran Daqneesh, who was shaken but apparently not seriously hurt, why has The New York Times failed to report the plight of 12-year-old Abdullah Issa, whose throat was slit last month by members of a U.S.-backed rebel force known as Harakat Nour al-Din al-Zinki because he had allegedly fought on the government side?
    “We are even worse than ISIS,” the fighters bragged before finishing the boy off. Yet even though the entire gruesome image was caught on video, the “paper of record” has refused to report a single word.”
    USA! USA! USA!

  53. @Anonymous

    Read the Greeks. Our civilization is far wiser than yours. Give up your pretensions. Accept your lower station humbly. We are willing to reach out and give you a hand up. Take it. Raise yourself from the tyranny of your ignorance. Let us rule. Accept the subordinate role that is your lot. Only thus can you save yourselves from yourselves.

    Read the Greeks ???

    you sh&&in me? Isn’t that what Paul did, turning on the Jewish elites, the Pharisees, to “read the Greeks . . . and follow their rule?

    Our civilization is far wiser than yours.

    You betcha. Why just look at the great state of Greek civilization today.
    Take your hand? Why? You want Jewish moneymen to drag you out of the quicksand that is your economy not to mention your culture?

    Yossi Alpher confused Bruce Reidel with his therapist and accidentally revealed what Jews really really want; the civilization that Jews know is superior to theirs and with which they passionately wish to be associated: it’s not the Greeks, it’s the Persians, sobbed Alpher —

    check it out for yourself

    you can download the talk from the Brookings Institute website https://www.brookings.edu/events/israels-periphery-doctrine-and-search-for-middle-east-allies/

    (btw Brookings used to be a fine, white American nationalist WASPy think-tank; best in breed. Then Haim Saban sold his cartoon business, took the profits thru a tax haven, and bought a chunk of Brookings with less than he would have paid in taxes, had he paid taxes. Now Brookings is reliably in the hands of the Jewish elites. Not even a Persian bazaari could pull off such a stunt — at the end of the day, Persians are pretty honest fellows — it’s an Aryan thing

    “A vow, once uttered, was eternally binding, and a lie was absolutely evil because it perverted the holy power inherent in the spoken word. The Aryans would never lose this passion for absolute truthfulness.” “The Great Transformation,” Karen Armstrong, author )

    • Replies: @geokat62
  54. @Anonymous

    Brilliant. If I weren’t so lazy, I would have tried to describe this, but you have done it better. Bravo!

    • Replies: @SolontoCroesus
  55. Alden says:
    @Hippopotamusdrome

    All our presidents have their ethnic roots in either Britian, including Ireland several Protestant presidents and one Catholic or the Netherlands

    So what? Does that mean that French people who live in France are mulattoes who are mulattoe because of negro invasions?
    The Occidental Observer Nordic supremacists are making comments about various European people living in Europe.
    They are not all that enamored of the British either. Mostly they yammer on about Scandinavians and Germans being superior to the rest of the European peoples
    I’m not aware of any American presidents of Scandinavian or German ethnicity although some may have some German ancestors.

    The lunatics at Occidental Observer aren’t posting about American Presidents but Europeans living in Europe.

    • Replies: @dcite
  56. @alexander

    Did He make the choice to Invade Kuwait ?.
    Yes , he did.
    So thats it.

    Did you read the reviews of Campbell’s analysis, that the

    [the Bush administration’s discourse] obscured the issues involved in the Gulf region and moved the crisis toward conflict.
    In particular, it probes the discourse of moral certitude through which the United States and its allies located with Iraq – in unambiguous ethical terms – the responsibility for evil.

    So that’s it
    demonstrates the same “discourse of moral certitude” through which Iraq was tagged with “responsibility for evil,” even if Bush I’s administration had to set up teen-aged girls to lie to the American Congress and people in order to work out their “moral certitude.”

    Alexander wrote:

    I can say, too, the post 91 war sanctions on Iraq were designed primarily to prevent Saddam Hussein from reconstituting his military, not specifically to starve a half a million Iraqi children.

    In other words, you are in agreement with Madeleine Albright: starving half-a-million Iraqi children was “worth the price.”

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RM0uvgHKZe8https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RM0uvgHKZe8

    got it.

    I assume you will vote avoid hell and vote for Hill.

    • Replies: @alexander
  57. dcite says:
    @Alden

    Eisenhower had German ancestry, which is ironic for he was by far the most anti-German president.

    • Replies: @Alden
  58. Art says:
    @Jason Liu

    Instead of flipping out over Jews all the time, the white right should embrace them as strategists and promote them as beacons of intellectualism.

    What total crap – we have been listening to Jews about foreign policy for 20 years and look where we are – war after war – hated by billions of people (all most as many as Israel).

    It is true that Jews are masters of deceit and the use of deceptive language – they know how manipulate people. They are master at creating situations that benefit them – they manipulate people in an endless series of divisive events. Look at Israel – it wins every battle – but the final outcome is in doubt – Israel just gets darker and darker.

    Jews are the masters of the dark arts.

    Clearly – we already suffer from the deep Jew state in our government.

  59. alexander says:
    @SolontoCroesus

    If you are asking me, S2C, if the expressed “intent” of the sanctions was to starve Iraqi children and NOT prevent Iraq from reconstituting its military, I can tell you that was not my understanding of the sanctions when they were put in place.

    Nor was it the “implied” intent of the sanctions, to the best of my knowledge.

    Nor , S2C, am I aware just how “high on the hog” the Saddam Regime was existing while its scores of children were starving in the streets…..Are you ?

    And obviously Madeline Albright made a stupid comment.

    But the key issue for me, is fraud, S2C.

    It was never a “bogus allegation” Saddam invaded Kuwait….he truly did.

    Sorry to rain on your parade, but its a fact.

    Whereas it was a wholly bogus allegation Saddam deposited his anthrax spores in our news rooms and capitol building.

    One is fact, the other is fraud.

    I understand your revisionist bent in attempting to reinterpret the past through the prism of the awfulness we have been reduced to today….and your attempts at seeing it as one giant continuum of evil from the past through to the present.

    But honestly, I just don’t buy it.

  60. Alden says:
    @Mark Green

    Especially in the last couple years the comments are getting more and more off topic and more and more lunatic fringe.

    I think the problem is the moderator He or she objects to David Ashton. David Ashton is an English teacher who has been fighting for the native British against the non White immigrants since he graduated from University 45 years ago.

    He posts good information about the great influence English Jews have had in the pro non White immigration, affirmative action the media campaigns that black and brown criminals are innocent but that a White who resists a robbery or rape by an African or Muslim is an evil vicious racist

    But the moderator wants to ban Ashton and allow all the lunatic fringe posters full range of their insanity such ax that the French are 25& black.

    David Ashton is new to Occidebtal Observer. But he so noticed how looney many of the posters are

    I’ve been reading Vdare, amren Occidental Ibserver since the websites came online maybe 18 years ago.
    Occidental Observer comments used to be balanced between sane and insane but in the last 2 years the lunatics have taken over

    For instance there is one guy who insists that no Scots, Irish or Scots/Irish ever immigrated to America until the late 19th century. Only British of of “pure” Anglo Saxon “race” immigrated to America from 1607 to 1845.
    That’s his obsession, but what does it have to do with what Russian Jews have been doing in America since 1880?

    The articles are fine but it’s best to skip the comments

  61. Alden says:
    @dcite

    Right, forgot about him

  62. dcite says:
    @Anonymous

    I’ve just finished reading Factory Man about the Bassett furniture company of North Carolina. One Bassett heir did his best to fight China. It seems that the old families — gentile as far as I can tell — were their own sellouts. They kept wealth by turning their companies predominantly retail and having their goods made in China. When Bassett was giving his speech before Congress, and before other manufacturers and businessmen, they would ask, why should we make any less and try to fight when it’s easier to go with the tide. He’d point to the flag behind him and bellow, “Because we’re all Americans!” It worked, or at least they got the point enough to feel shame. Interesting footnote: the Bassetts took business away from the furniture manufacturers in Grand Rapids around 1900, leading to its demise as the “Paris of North America.” That’s the nature of business in a way — North Carolina had the wood and the cheap labor. Still, it was still America so we overlook it. Greed, it seems, knows no boundaries.

  63. Rurik says:
    @Anonymous

    But to the Jewish economist, the notion that an object has inherent worth is ridiculous. It is only worth what someone else is willing to pay for it.

    from 1920s Weimar Berlin to Hollywood today, this is true of all kinds of “objects” created by Western man

    the allies and their civilian followers had a lot of u$e for all those German orphans at the end of those wars

    I’ll never forget reading about how many Gentiles were appalled at how German children were being pimped out once Germany was in smoking ruins and the people literally starving to death by the millions.

    there is a serious chasm between Gentile character and that of some Jews when it comes to the acceptability of such things. All you have to do is look at who is foisting porn and cultural, degenerate sewage to see this glaring reality.

    good and interesting post

    • Replies: @SolontoCroesus
  64. Art says:

    He has also attacked Sean Hannity who is perhaps the most prominent MSM figure who is firmly in the Trump camp

    Unbelievable – because he supports Trump – the Jews are attacking Hannity. He is the most pro-Israel Gentile brainstem on FOX JEWS.

    Once again we see a complete lack of character on the part of the Jews. Zero gratitude for all that Hannity has done to protect Israel and promote their wars.

    In Jew think – Hannity is product of their manipulation – not a loyal supporter. They think he supports Israel because they have manipulated his situation – not because he has any genuine feelings for them or Israel.

  65. Sean says:

    Mearsheimer :-
    This situation, however, is unsustainable over time. Once it is widely recognized that the two-state solution is dead and Greater Israel is a reality, the righteous Jews will have two choices: support apartheid or work to help create a democratic bi-national state. I believe that almost all of them will opt for the latter option, in large part because of their deep-seated commitment to liberal values, which renders any apartheid state abhorrent to them.

    It has already started. The Jerusalem Post Israel News‎ – 2 days ago:

    Barak accused the prime minister of poor judgement and putting political concerns before security. He blasted Netanyahu for his handling of the new defense aid package from the US, in a speech to the anti-Netanyahu organization Darkenu. According to Barak, Israel would receive $3.8 billion in aid, instead of $4.5 billion, because of Netanyahu’s poor relationship with US President Barack Obama, and the aid will be conditional on not asking Congress for additional funds

    Again, http://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/clinton-palestinian-state-achieved-through-negotiations-is-inevitable-1.330001

    Ehud Barak understood this.

    The Barak government resumed peace negotiations with the PLO, stating that “Every attempt [by the State of Israel] to keep hold of this area [the West Bank and Gaza] as one political entity leads, necessarily, to either a nondemocratic or a non-Jewish state. Because if the Palestinians vote, then it is a binational state, and if they don’t vote it is an apartheid state.” As part of these negotiations, Barak took part in the Camp David 2000 Summit which was meant finally to resolve the Israeli–Palestinian conflict but failed.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ehud_Barak#Prime_Minister_of_Israel

    The US foreign policy establishment and Hillary do too, again, http://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/clinton-palestinian-state-achieved-through-negotiations-is-inevitable-1.330001
    The mentionable option is withdrawal from the West Bank, see http://www.martin-van-creveld.com/?p=594

    But there is another

    http://www.martin-van-creveld.com/?p=433

    With so many interests, native and foreign, involved, a way out does not seem in sight. Nor can the outcome be foreseen any more than that of the Thirty Years’ War could be four years after the beginning of the conflict, i.e. 1622. In fact there is good reason to believe that the hostilities have just begun. Additional players such as Lebanon and Jordan may well be drawn in. That in turn will almost certainly bring in Israel as well. Some right-wing Israelis, including several ministers, actually dream of such a scenario. They hope that the fall of the Hashemite Dynasty and the disintegration of Jordan will provide them with an opportunity to repeat the events of 1948 by throwing the Palestinians out of the West Bank and into Jordan.

    In the south Assad is clearing the way for ISIS as a cats paw against his southerly neighbouring family dictatorship state of Hashemite Jordan, which backed the original uprising against Assad.With his Russian condor legion blasting the Free Syrian Army rebels of the Southern front, Assad might have created the possibility of a radical Sunni infiltration of Jordan, but the US is desperately trying to stop that

    The US is doing its utmost to keep the war out away from Jordan, because a ISIS or similar organisation controlling large parts of Jordan would create a war like 1948, whereby Israel could throw the Palestinians into the country of Jordan. If ISIS or something like it were to overthrow the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan (official title) that would go some way to unraveling the Gordian knot of Arabs inside what now calls itself the ” “Jewish and democratic state”. https://news.vice.com/article/the-great-wall-of-jordan-how-the-us-wants-to-keep-the-islamic-state-out The US army issued the contracts. Obama gave Jordan half a billion to fund it

    Israel can obey the US and be given subsidies, or remain Jewish. Not both. If a Sunni majority country wants radical Sunni government is not the US’s job to hang Isis (or any other faction) on a hook. Israel shouldn’t be protected by direct US intervention, neither should it be restrained, because there is no such thing as a limited liability war. Only Trump would allow Israel to solve its problems. Sadly, US Jews are not all that concerned, and by destroying Trump they are destroying any prospect of Israel remaining a Jewish state.

  66. Mr. Anon says:
    @Lot

    “What MacDonald never stops to contemplate is how much the antics of the small anti-Semitic minority of US white nationalists stains the rest of the movement and hurts its ability to take over the GOP (not just win a presidential primary with plurality wins in multi-candidate fields).”

    And yet similar considerations – about the malign influence of many wealthy, influential, and powerful Jews who act in ways that are hostile to the white, gentile majority of this country – never seem to be entertained by most Jews. Why is that? If Kevin MacDonald should feel concerned about how some random internet commenter (with no real power or influence at all) reflects upon him, why shouldn’t a Jew (Democrat or Republican) feel concerned about how Paul Singer or George Soros – billionaires with real power and influence – reflects upon him?

    • Replies: @Lot
  67. Lot says:
    @RaceRealist88

    Trump’s two kids married Jews.

    I’m pretty sure only one of them did, Ivanka.

    He said Obama has been bad for our relationship with Israel.

    That’s overstating the case, as Trump often does. Obama has tried to nudge the status quo of a very strong relationship in the wrong direction, mostly without succeeding.

    He said that his election will be “good news for Israel”.

    Electing Trump would certainly push the USA into an even stronger alliance with Israel as they’d be the two major western democracies with elected leaders that explicitly reject muslim and african mass-migration. Along with a few central european countries like Hungary and Slovakia, that might be enough to let such leaders also break through in Western Europe. Maybe you could add Australia to the list, their mainstream right party is one of the best on these issues.

    • Replies: @KenH
  68. @Buzz Mohawk

    Perhaps you are too easily impressed, Buzz Mohawk.

    Anonymous @ 22 compresses crucial details.

    1. “The most recent research with respect to the Ashkenazi genome suggests that “Jews” are 60% European. So called” Jews” then would be more accurately regarded as Europeans with Jewish admixture. They are our cousins”

    An article published at Ars Technica focuses on the bottleneck that resulted in Ashkenazi Jews being genetically distinguishable from Sephardim and Mizrahi Jews:

    Ashkenazi Jews hail from Eastern Europe—”Ashkenaz” is the Hebrew word for Germany—and comprise the bulk of the Jewish population in the US. Ashkenazi Jews are a genetically distinct population, and the analysis of 128 complete Ashkenazi genomes shows just how distinct they are. Compared to genomes of modern Europeans—in this case, the genomes of 26 Flemish people—the Ashkenazi genomes have 47 percent more novel DNA differences per genome. These DNA variants, while novel, are population specific; sequence sharing, where two individuals have a set of the same variants, is eight percent more abundant among the Ashkenazi Jews than it is between the two populations or even among the Flemish genomes.

    Using the length of the shared genetic segments, researchers determined that the current Ashkenazi Jewish population underwent a bottleneck 25-32 generations back, approximately 600-800 years ago. Caused by the Plague in the mid 1300s, perhaps? . . . Whatever the cause, this bottleneck reduced the founder population to between 250 and 420 individuals.

    When populations undergo bottlenecks that reduce their founder sizes, rare and recessive mutations become amplified. That is exactly what happened to Ashkenazi Jews.

    wikipedia tracks Ashkenazi from that bottleneck, locating their origin in Central and Eastern Europe, and only much later into Germany:

    [Askhenazi] settled and established communities throughout Central and Eastern Europe, which had been their primary region of concentration and residence from the Middle Ages until recent times, evolving their own distinctive characteristics and diasporic identities.[17]

    In the late Middle Ages, the center of gravity of the Ashkenazi population shifted steadily eastward,[18] out of the German lands into Poland and Lithuania (including present-day Belarus and Ukraine).[19][20]

    In the course of the late 18th and 19th centuries, those Jews who remained in or returned to the German lands experienced a cultural reorientation; under the influence of the Haskalah and the struggle for emancipation, as well the intellectual and cultural ferment in urban centers, they gradually abandoned the use of Yiddish, while developing new forms of Jewish religious life and cultural identity. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashkenazi_Jews

    The wikipedia entry then indulges in some of the usual Jewish supremacist twaddle spiced with heavy doses of holocaustism, but other sources fill in actual historic facts that give a less tendentious, more informative picture:

    First, it’s important to note that it was Sephardic, not Askkenazi, Jews who settled in Amsterdam. According to Jerry Muller’s work on Jews as originators or capitalism, Jews in the Netherlands participated in the radical shift from a society dominated by religion to one that concentrated on trade and commerce, with the Dutch East India Company the prime example.

    Nevertheless, as wikipedia notes, and as many Jewish historians of holocaust such as David Engel teach, “Poland was the location of the greatest number of Jews in the early 20th century, numbering about 3 million.” https://www.amazon.com/Holocaust-Third-Reich-Seminar-Studies-ebook/dp/B00GXBCJJU/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1468446482&sr=8-2&keywords=engel%2C+david#nav-subnav

    Wikipedia’s explanation that “those Jews who [in the late 18th and 19th century] remained in or returned to the German lands experienced a cultural reorientation; under the influence of the Haskalah and the struggle for emancipation, as well the intellectual and cultural ferment in urban centers . . . [they] developed new forms of cultural identity” is incomplete; it fails to incorporate a broader context.

    Industrialization took hold in Germany (and in England) in that era, and German unification came about in the same period.
    Teachers of Jewish history have observed that because of its particular form of governance and management of its economic affairs, Poland was not equipped to take advantage of industrialization and its concomitant fruits, increased personal liberty.

    In contrast, German unification was a result of Germany’s ability to benefit from industrialization. Jews, experiencing for perhaps the first time in millennia the headiness of liberation from rabbinic controls over their daily lives; Jews from Poland seeking greater economic opportunities; Jews from Netherlands eager to profit from German industrial success — all flocked to Germany and rather overwhelmed the newly unified German state and people. In 1881 the Eclectic magazine published an article titled The Jews in Germany that tells how the German people experienced the influx of so many and diverse groups of Jews seeking to benefit from German success.

    2. Anonymous #22’s contrast between “makers” and “thinkers” is insightful — although a tad overboard and perhaps even racist in the Jews-as-brilliant meme (does it not take brilliance to plan and build a communications tower on a mountaintop? Where would you be without that kind of muscular brilliance? Has anyone here ever repaired his own dishwasher? or mastered the draught of an effective chimney flue?) — but only as far as it goes. Anonymous #22 fails to include in his analysis the impact of the Rothschilds on all of European history in the late 18th to the 19th and indeed into the 21st century.

    As the 1881 Eclectic article notes, Jewish credit lending dominance in post-unification Germany led to the devastation of many, many of Germany’s farming, merchant, and middle class families, precipitating displacement and migration that was not yet resolved when war with Russia and France loomed. The situation morphed from that credit crisis to WWI to Revolution to Weimar to WWII to the psychological and political brainwashing* of the entire German populace — or those who were left, after Germans experienced firebombing, starvation, rape and ethnic transfer of millions.

    Megan McCardle of Bloomberg News was a guest on C Span on Jul 30 2016. McCardle mentioned in passing that the Great Depression of the 1920s began “when a bank in Austria closed and the ripple effects . . .” That was a Rothschild bank. Recall that when the finance system in the USA was threatened, J P Morgan locked the wealthiest men in the city into a room until they had pledged sufficient funds to avert catastrophe. You complete the comparison.

    Anonymous #22’s analysis is woefully incomplete without consideration of Dave E’s terse analysis @ #52. The power of money — Theodore Herzl warned of it —

    Anti-Semitism increases day by day and hour by hour among the nations; indeed, it is bound to increase, because the causes of its growth [91]continue to exist and cannot be removed. Its remote cause is our loss of the power of assimilation during the Middle Ages; its immediate cause is our excessive production of mediocre intellects, who cannot find an outlet downwards or upwards—that is to say, no wholesome outlet in either direction. When we sink, we become a revolutionary proletariat, the subordinate officers of all revolutionary parties; and at the same time, when we rise, there rises also our terrible power of the purse. http://www.gutenberg.org/files/25282/25282-h/25282-h.htm

    Rurik has warned of it also:

    End the Fed.

    • Replies: @Lot
  69. Lot says:
    @Anonymous

    Given control of the nation’s investment banks you promptly engineer the greatest financial disaster in American history.

    If you think the 2007-2010 financial crisis was “the greatest financial disaster in American history” you don’t know what you are talking about. It was nothing compared to the Great Depression in the 1930’s and the Long Depression of the 1870’s and 1880’s.

    And leaving their less-favored, hapless Jewish compatriots behind as well, to face the wrath and suffer the consequences

    A man can dream.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  70. KenH says:

    It all boils down to is Trump good or bad for Jews and Israel? Given the level of spitting, hissing and bile emanating from prominent Jews in the media and elsewhere in the establishment I think we have our answer at least from their worthless perspective. Just like when I was listening to Breitbart radio the other morning and a caller identifying himself as Jewish shrieked that we are importing anti-semitism and therefore must ban Muslim immigration because of the danger it poses not to all Americans and Western civilization, but to Jews.

    Jewish selfishness and self centeredness was on display.

  71. annamaria says:
    @alexander

    “…your revisionist bent in attempting to reinterpret the past through the prism of the awfulness we have been reduced to today…”
    You mean, the concept of sovereignty is not in vogue anymore?

    “…if the expressed “intent” of the sanctions was to starve Iraqi children and NOT prevent Iraq from reconstituting its military, I can tell you that was not my understanding of the sanctions when they were put in place….”
    Then google for info. For instance,
    http://www.globalresearch.ca/gulf-war-documents-meeting-between-saddam-hussein-and-ambassador-to-iraq-april-glaspie/31145
    http://www.accuracy.org/44-autopsy-of-a-disaster-the-u-s-sanctions-policy-on-iraq/
    or this: http://www.nytimes.com/1995/12/01/world/iraq-sanctions-kill-children-un-reports.html

  72. @Rurik

    I’ll never forget reading about how many Gentiles were appalled at how German children were being pimped out once Germany was in smoking ruins and the people literally starving to death by the millions.

    I thought I would never get over reading C Paul Vincent’s account of the starvation of Germany in WWI that cost the lives of 800,000 German civilians. The Politics of Hunger:Allied Blockade of Germany, 1915-1919 by C Paul Vincent, a review by Ralph Raico

    then it got worse

    I heard Jörg Friedrich speak about his book, The Fire: The Bombing of Germany, 1940-1945.

    I hadn’t known that.
    I learned about Dugway, where Allies perfected their ability to create firestorms to incinerate the maximum number of German working-class civilians, including infants in their cribs. The US Department of the Interior has documented the construction and present status of those buildings at Dugway, which home to Tooele Indians before 1938, when FDR acquired the property, and is now a chemically devastated wasteland.

    I learned of the involvement of “the Jewish architect,” Erich Mendelsohn, and of Jewish film studios in Hollywood in creating the buildings at Dugway.
    When Anonymous #22 wrote this following, he described the psychology of Erich Mendelsohn —

    In destroying Euro cultural artifacts the Jew is literally tearing himself asunder. He is split off from himself, alienated from his biological roots, he lives in a state of panic. He does not recognize that when he wrecks the Euro world he flogs himself.

    I still can’t get over what I learned from Friedrich about the firebombing of Germany, but then it got worse.
    I was invited to a birthday party for Jon Utley and I learned about the work his mother, Freda, did in reporting on the bestial treatment the US and Allies meted out to German civilians in the post-war years. http://www.vho.org/GB/Books/thcov/index.html

    Just the other day, that got worse, too.

    I learned that the USA participated — competed, really — in producing Books as Weapons: Propaganda, Publishing, and the Battle for Global Markets in the Era of World War II

    Within weeks of the capitulation of Germany, US publishers seized the opportunity to flood Germany with tons of books — millions of books, to gain market share from the formerly-superior German publishing market; create networks for mass marketing of US publications; oh, and to brainwash Germans.
    The project was managed within the US military’s Psychological Warfare Division of General Eisenhower’s Supreme Headquarters, Allied Expeditionary Force, under the direction of Paul Warburg.

    The government desired to use books to help “disintoxicate” the minds of these people from the Nazi and Japanese propaganda and censorship machines; [to assist the re-education and rehabilitation of the defeated enemy nations] and to win their friendship [see Freda Utley, above]. This objective dovetailed perfectly with U.S. publishers’ ambitions to find new profits in international markets, which had been dominated by Britain, France, and Germany before their book trades were devastated by the war.

    Remember the holocaust!

    • Replies: @Rurik
  73. annamaria says:
    @alexander

    And who exactly have been helping Iraq in building “its military?” – Well, Reagan administration. Should we starve the GOP and their progeny then, along with the bloody advisors like the murderous Madeleine Albright (Korbelová)?
    http://www.counterpunch.org/2004/06/17/how-reagan-armed-saddam-with-chemical-weapons/
    This subhuman is not only ugly like death, she also has no conscience and she likes joking about her Iraq experience: “In September 2009, Albright opened an exhibition of her personal jewelry collection at the Museum of Art and Design in New York City… The collection highlighted the many pins she wore while serving at the United Nations and State Department, including the famous pin showing a snake and apple she wore after the Iraqi press called her “an unparalleled serpent.” Iraqis were correct. She is indeed a reptiloid.

  74. Dr. X says:
    @Jason Liu

    Instead of flipping out over Jews all the time, the white right should embrace them as strategists and promote them as beacons of intellectualism.

    The white right would probably do exactly this, IF American Jews would support the same policies here for white Americans as Jews do for their kin in Israel. For instance, Israel has built an enormous border wall. Israel has extremely strict immigration policies that favor Jews over everyone else. Israel does not allow the marriage of Jews to non-Jews, and outlaws gay marriage as well. Israel promotes Judaism over every other religion. Israel has a strong, professional military, universal conscription, and a lot of guns in civilian hands to deter terrorism. In other words when it comes to Israel, Jews are extremely nationalistic.

    Yet outside of Israel, where Jews are a minority, they are everywhere engaged in left-wing rabble-rousing. Outside of Israel, Jews tend to favor communism, socialism, open borders, removing Christianity from the public sphere, gun control, miscegenation, race-mixing, homosexuality, abortion, etc.

    I used to admire Israel very much, until I discovered that Jews have an extreme double-standard. What is good for Israel and good for the Jews is always 180 degrees opposite of how they tell everyone else to act. There’s always an exception for the Chosen People. “Do as I say, not as I do” ought to be chiseled onto the Wailing Wall as the motto of the Jew.

    (When you get right down to it, that was the accusation Jesus leveled at the Pharisees — hypocrisy).

  75. Priss Factor [AKA "Anonymny"] says: • Website

    Trump is just a bellwether of bigger things to come… if whites have the will(unlike passive natives of Latin America who just accepted foreign rule and go about their lives dazed and humble). In the end, he will far less important than what he may have set off… if it has traction.

    The funny thing is Trump, who fired up the white identitarian Alt Right, is also trying to appeal to blacks(who are being overwhelmed by mass immigration too). Strange alliance if indeed such alliance is possible.

    I would say we should support multi-culturalism for the time being, especially among the non-whites because multi-culturalism is essentially separatist. Indeed, we should argue against race-mixing on the basis of multi-culturalism. Multi-culturalism is ANTI-ASSIMILATIONIST. It says various minority groups shouldn’t assimilate into the ‘oppressive’ and ‘conformist’ melting pot of the majority. They should maintain their own rich & unique cultures, values, and identities. I say FINE and YES. The more non-whites stick to their own cultures, the less they will mix with whites.
    We don’t want miscegenation, which is what assimilation comes to.

    The funny thing is that the PROGLOBs(progressive-globalists) push both multi-culturalism and interracism. On the one hand, they say that non-white minorities shouldn’t be pressured into adopting Western, European, or white identities, values, and norms. They should be allowed, even encouraged, to keep their own identities and values. But then, these very PROGLOBs advocate all races to mix into a vast mulatto or mestizo race, thus making all of the West look like Mexico or North Africa.
    Why the contradiction? Well, the GLOB see value in both multiculturalism and interracism. GLOB doesn’t want non-whites to identify with white greatness and instead see whites as the oppressors, the enemy. That way, non-whites won’t politically side with whites against the GLOB. Instead, the GLOB can use non-whites against whites. That is why multi-culturalism is useful the likes of Soros.

    But the GLOB also want to weaken white identity; and race-mixing does the trick. After all, if both your parents are white, you will imprint on whiteness as your identity from the moment you open your eyes. You will look upon your white father as the figure of authority, affection, and respect. Your mind will imprint on his face, voice, and manners as the essence of your identity. But suppose your mother had sex with a Negro. You will imprint on the Negro man as the figure of authority, power, and identity. You will grow up seeing his face and hearing his voice as the essence of what you are. Of course, you will also identify with your white mother, but the male is always the bigger figure of authority in the house — after all, even feminists look for alpha men who are manly and proud than wimpy and dorky. So, growing up with a black father and white mother, you will come to assume that the black race is superior since your white mother rejected white men and offered her womb for a Negro dude to plant his seed in.
    A person’s father plays a very big role in one’s psycho-politics of identification. Obama was abandoned by his black father and raised by white people, but he still sought out his father’s identity to declare himself black. So, fatherhood is very important to identity. When a baby opens his or her eyes, he or she imprints on the first things he or she sees. Not as powerfully as ducklings do, but humans do imprint onto things at an early age. So, if you’re a young child and the first thing you imprint on is a Negro as father who kisses and hugs a white woman, you will mainly identify with blackness(as dominant) and you will grow up to believe that white wombs exist only to serve black seed(while banning white seed)… .like your white mama done.
    And then, as you grow older, you will look in the mirror and gain self-consciousness as a darker-hued nappy-headed boy or girl, and you will see that you’re not white. And then, PC education will fill you with sanctimonious narratives of how noble blacks are and how wicked whites are, and so, even if you’re half-white, you will identify fully as black. White female race-traitors are the worst creatures in the universe. They are race-traitors, the benedict arnolds or anns of heredity. If traitors in espionage hand over secrets to the other side, traitors in sex hand over wombs(home of life) to the enemy race.

    [MORE]

    White women are acting like Saigon women during Vietnam War. They have no sense of loyalty to race and culture. They are just cheap sluts who will even betray their own race for their thrills. In FULL METAL JACKET, we see two Vietnamese whores who act just like white girls today. But the last woman is real patriot as she guns down US invaders. She doesn’t put out to the invaders but fights them for her homeland. The white race needs more women like that sniper-bitch at the end of FULL METAL JACKET. Sadly, so many white girls in the West are mental slaves of the GLOB, and body-slaves of Negroes. With millions of African men headed to EU and with cucked out EU elites encouraging white women to have babies with the invaders, the West is faced with an existential crisis of titanic proportions. Of course, much of this invasion is sweetened with hedonism. It’s like the US seduced the South Vietnamese with candy bars, cigarettes, sunglasses, and all sorts of fun stuff. So, even though South Vietnam was reduced to whoredom to the US, the people could drink Coca Cola and listen to pop music. The collaborators got hooked to the goodies. Likewise, the invasion of EU is sweetened with rap music, porn, night clubs, celebrity-mania, cult of narcissism, and sports where black men are promoted as heroes and champions.

    Anyway, by supporting multi-culturalism, the Eurospherists should make the case that interracism goes against the spirit of multi-culturalism. If indeed the whole point of Diversity and Multi-culturalism is to maintain the distinctness and uniqueness of various peoples with different identities, values, and interests, then race-mixing muddles everything up and confuses the meaning of culture. After all, if someone is 1/8 African, 1/8 Chinese, 1/8 German, 1/8 Arab, 1/8 Jewish, 1/8 Turk, 1/8 Hindu, and 1/8 Amish, what would his or her culture be? It would be just some deracinated globo-cosmo crap that means nothing and has no roots or heritage in anything. If you’re everything, you’re nothing. You have no core loyalty. Surely, even Jews must know this. If every Jew were only 1/16th Jewish, very few Jews(who are only 1/16th Jewish) would care much about Jewishness as identity, tradition, territory, and history.

    It might also help to stop using the term ‘American’ for whites because it confuses matter. America is really just New Europe or Neurope. It is a mere extension of Europe. It was not the development of a new civilization but the mere outgrowth of European civilization. By rejecting the notion of ‘American’, white Americans or Neuropeans will come to identify more with Europeans, their racial brethren, than with non-white Americans. The notion of ‘American’ creates the illusion that white Americans have more in common with non-white Americans than with Europeans. But in fact, even liberal white Americans will fit in better in Europe than in Black America or Mexican-America. Even a white Liberal American will feel more at home in white Germany or white Netherlands than in Hindu-America or Muslim-America or Chinatown-America.

    So, we should see White America as just New Europe or Neurope. There is Old Europe(or First Europe) and New Europe(or Second Europe). The hell with ‘America’.
    America should just mean the land mass of the United States. But white Americans should think in terms of creating their own cultural space called Neurope in America.

    Indeed, this is why the GLOB is not only hellbent on undermining White America but White Europe. As long as Europe remains white and as long as ‘European’ means whiteness, white Americans will have a particular, unique, and special identity and tradition to hark back to. But if mass migration and race-mixing turns Europe into a land mass teeming with Negroes, Muslims, Arabs, and Hindus, what is a ‘European’? Look at the Olympics. Even Ukraine and Azerbaijan have black athletes representing them. In European track events, so many representatives of nations are black. So, if African is the New European, then white Americans don’t even have white Europe to look back to as a historical and cultural model.

    Anyway, for the time being, patriotic white folks should support multi-culturalism and the cult of Diversity as a means to thwart assimilation and melting-pot-ism. As America becomes
    less white, the last thing we want is assimilation and melting-pot-ism since it will just muddy up the races and turn more and more children of white race-traitor parents into mestizos, mulattos, eurasians, and etc.

    There was a time when assimilation and melting pot ideal were good for America. Until the 60s, almost all immigrants were white. Even though there are subtle(and even not-so-subtle) differences among the various white ethnic groups(Germanics, Celtics, Latins, Slavs, Finns, Baltics, Greeks, etc.), they are more or less similar. So, even though many white immigrants of yesteryear were not Anglo, by adopting Anglo-American culture, manners, and ideas(and by intermarrying with Anglos), they could become more or less like any other white American. They couldn’t be Anglo but could be Angloistic. If a Polish American or Croatian American learned English and picked up Anglo-American ways, he would be mostly like an Anglo-American. So, the melting pot ideal was good for America when most immigrants were white and European. Even though some Anglo-Americans purists rejected the assimilation of ‘lesser whites’ with Anglo stock, time has proved that most white Europeans, if adoptive of Anglo ways, could be almost as good as any Englishmen, in some cases even better(as some Anglo types in both UK and US have fallen into ‘white trash’ culture). Also, back then, melting pot mostly meant the racial mixing of white ethnic groups. There were strong social taboos and even legal bans on race-mixing with the ghastly Negroes.

    Today, things are different. Because of the mass arrival of the Hindus, Muslims, Africans, Asians, Mexicans, Central Americans, and all sorts of different peoples from every corner of the world(as well as promotion of miscegenation with Negroes), the ideal of the melting pot will simply destroy whiteness.

    If an Anglo-American has a kid with a Polish-American, Russian-American, or even Italian-American(some of them tend to be a bit swarthy), the kid would be white like any other. But if whites mix with the darkies from non-Europe, the next generation will not be white, and this is especially true with blacks.

    Because of some degree of racial similarity between whites and Arabs, a child of white and Arab might be someone like Steve Jobs. Acceptable. And some Latinos are white or mostly white. But blacks are a totally different race, almost verging on a different species. And because they are tougher and more aggressive, they pose an existential threat to white males. Black men have the power to beat up and pussywhip white men, take away their manly pride, and conquer white wombs to create mulatto-Negro children. Negroes are the biggest existential threat to the white race, and the GLOB knows it, which is why the likes of Soros especially encourage the mixing of black males and white females. Hollywood is doing everything to make the next 007 a Negro who will hump tons of white women.
    This existential threat is psychological and physical. Indeed, the two are related. Once white ‘boys’ come to psychologically admire black males as superior, they get to thinking, ‘May the best man win. Since the Negro can whup my ass and has a bigger dong, he DESERVES to have the white girl while I should meekly accept my role as cuckaroo.’ Look at the white kid in the movie SPECTACULAR NOW. He surrenders his blonde white girlfriend to a bigass Negro and just pees in his pants about it. If you destroy the psychology, you destroy the physical will to fight and defend one’s race and honor. It’s like a warrior without the will to fight will not fight for his land. South Vietnamese had more war material than North Vietnamese, but they lost because they had no will to fight. France had more war material than Germany in 1940, but they lost because they had no will to fight.

    In a way, the idea of ‘multi-culturalism’ is right-wing in origin, and it became ‘leftist’ due to accident of history.
    There was a time when the Marxian left had no use for culture. It saw Culture or Kultur as atavistic, irrational, particularist, traditional, tribal, and close-minded. In contrast to Kultur, there was Civilization of universal, rational, and enlightened ideals, values, and methodology. Karl Marx was no romanticist of cultures around the world. He thought there was only one purpose to history: economic history that would eventually lead to capitalism, wealth creation, revolution, communism, and equality for all. And he posited this Hegelian process as the one that all societies would or should go through. The West was the most advanced and was best positioned to undergo revolution first. But the rest of the world would eventually go through the same process fueled by class antagonism and materialist dialectics of history.
    Also, even though Marx found imperialism to be exploitative, he saw value in its spreading of rational, materialist, and scientific values all over the world where non-whites were trapped in backwardness, local tyranny, savagery, barbarism, religions, superstitions, stupid customs, crazy rituals, and etc.
    Marx thought there was only one truth for all mankind. And so, for much of the first half of the 20th century, the Left emphasized universalism of ‘rational, scientific, and materialist’ values for ALL mankind. The Left saw Culture or Kultur of all peoples to be obstacles to progress and enlightenment.

    But then, universalism got a bad rap. It came to be associated with Western Imperialism, not least because Europeans justified invasion and plunder on the basis of bringing light of civilization to the rest of the world. Also, the rise of anthropology as a discipline led to the romanticization of non-westerners, especially the primitives. There were already elements of such in Romanticism and (post)Impressionism(consider artists like Gauguin) , but anthropology gave intellectual sheen to the idealization of non-white folks(especially those living in close proximity with nature) as noble savages. Also, the rise of Modernism in art led to rejection of Western Traditions(that became associated with the bourgeoisie, snotty upper classes, and insecure philistines seeking respectability) and fascination with non-Western art, e.g. Picasso’s fascination with African Art. Also, the trauma of WWI and WWII shook the West’s confidence in its morality and values. So, Westerns thought maybe the answer was with the non-whites in exotic cultures that were idealized as more ‘spiritual’ and ‘living in harmony with nature or something’. Terrence Malick is at it with NEW WORLD and THIN RED LINE. Ah, those primitives and nature.
    Also, the rise of popularity of ‘black music’ made Western music sound stuffy, dull, and boring by comparison. Black music made whites feel black in soul. Consider the reverence for the blues in the UK that led to Stones, Eric Clapton, and Led Zeppelin. Also, with the prospect of atomic clouds hanging over the world during the Cold War, people began to wonder about the goodness of Western Science.

    Also, after WWII, there were so many anti-imperialist struggles all over the world. So, the core of leftism went from “spreading radical scientitic-materialist universalism all over the world” to “idealizing third world anti-imperialists as brave heroes at war with the Technological West as the cancer of history.” Side with the Indians(or Ewoks) against the Cowboys(or the Empire). Though Western leftists tended to sympathize most with Third World Marxists, they also sided with Asian-Indians against the British, Algerians against the French, Palestinians against the Israelis(seen as outpost of Western imperialism), and the Iranian Islamists against the Shah(who was seen as a US puppet).

    So, the Western Left, which had at one time denounced Culture or Kultur(as irrational, atavistic, and backward), suddenly found great value in it. It was the precious property of non-whites whose way of life, values, and rich customs were threatened by the West with its soulless science, technology, materialism, greed, commoditization, and etc. Susan Sontag denounced the West as cancer.
    In the 60s, so many Western leftists idealized India as some holy place filled with wise gurus strumming sitars and making profound statements about spirituality, cosmos, love, and peace. Go see Sexy Sadie for the truth. John Lennon, ever the cynical wit, caught onto this BS quicker than most(though too much drugs and Yoko made him fall for more frauds in the near future).

    https://www.beatlesbible.com/songs/sexy-sadie/

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wK3mq_wMiDw

    Well, since the Left ‘stole’ or appropriated the idea of Kultur from the Right for their own purposes(to use as weapon against the West), it is about time for the Right to re-appropriate the idea of Kultur back from the Left. The Right should not only accept but support the Ideal of preserving different and separate cultural identities. The more non-whites stick to their own identities and communities, the less they will mix with whites who can then maintain their own identities and communities. And the more non-whites feel hostile to whites, the more whites will be ‘red-pilled’ and join the community of white identity, history, and unity.

    Look at Mormons. They are just a small percentage of Americans, but they have a rich and powerful world to themselves because they have a tightknit community of shared identity and values. (The Mormon effort to convert non-whites is the stupidest thing it came up with, and it may eventually finish off the community, just like the darkie-ization of the Catholic Church pretty much destroyed it.)

    Now, the term ‘white’ is too generic, bland, and blank. So, we need a new term that delves into the history, mythology, and the legend of the West. Since the core of High Western Civilization began with the Greeks, maybe whites should call themselves Neo-Hellenists. It is the Greek Fire that is still passed down generation after generation in the Eurosphere.

    • Replies: @Alden
    , @Corvinus
    , @Alden
  76. fnn says:

    Even the supposedly politically conservative Orthodox Jews are turning on Trump:

    http://www.cleveland.com/opinion/index.ssf/2016/08/orthodox_rabbis_condemn_donald.html

    Orthodox rabbis condemn Donald Trump’s ‘hateful rhetoric and intolerant policy proposals’

  77. @alexander

    Alexander, almost a decade ago I heard Patrick Clawson speak and it impacted my life in enormous ways.

    One of the things that came out of that experience was a day spent at the Library of Congress, where I found a monograph Clawson wrote for the Navy War College (iirc, might have been Army War College; either way, it was for US DoD).

    Clawson produced tables on the calories available to Iraqi men, women, children; old, young, rich, poor; he wrote that Saddam’s government set up governmental units to ensure food sufficiency and to ensure that what food was available was distributed as equitably as possible, although a black market did exist.

    The monograph included an essay on the morality of sanctions — USA DoD was, therefore, keenly aware that people in Iraq were dying as a result of US-imposed sanctions.

    Clawson argued that although Iraq was not a democracy, which meant that the people of Iraq could not be held responsible for having voted for Saddam, therefore, were responsible for their fate; nevertheless, they knew Saddam was a tyrant and had not risen up against him, therefore, they were responsible for their fate.

    My “revisionist history” is based on what I have learned about what my government is doing with my loyalty to it and with my tax dollars.

    You can buy it or not, Alexander, it does not change the facts.

    • Replies: @alexander
  78. KenH says:
    @Lot

    I’m pretty sure only one of them did, Ivanka.

    Eric Trump’s wife, Lara Yanuska, is Jewish and they had a Jewish wedding.
    http://www.tabletmag.com/scroll/186935/another-jewish-trump-wedding-for-the-books

    • Replies: @Lot
  79. alexander says:
    @SolontoCroesus

    So are you suggesting the facts are that :

    a) Saddam did not invade Kuwait in 1990.

    b) The post war sanctions were designed to exterminate Iraqi children not prevent Iraq from reconstituting its military.

    Is that correct ?

  80. Alden says:
    @Mark Green

    Go over to Occidental Observer and check out the August 21 article. One of the steadfast commenters, RoyalAlbrecht commented that Talmudic Jews whoever they are have a century old custom of gang raping, beating to death and then eating Young White children.
    You can’t call that a reasonable comment.
    Unfortunately the lunatics have taken over and people like Mari, Bon and David Ashton have disappeared from the comments section

  81. Alden says:
    @Priss Factor

    What about the millions of White men race traitors who took advantage of black women from 1620 to 1960? Those men are responsible for about 2/3s of the black population. Were it not for those White men blacks would be only about 4& of the population instead of 12&

    Jesse Jacksons father was White. It was a teen age romance The official biography says the father was a married black man but the truth is that his father was White.

    Ever seen Jackson? I have. African features but his skin is literally lemon yellow, the legacy of his White father.
    Take a look at Obama’s partners in crime, Jarret and Holder, almost White and no White women ancestors.

    • Replies: @Priss Factor
  82. Lot says:
    @KenH

    Eric Trump’s wife, Lara Yanuska, is Jewish and they had a Jewish wedding.

    Nope.

    32-year-old Lara Yunaska wаѕ born Lara Lеа Yunaska October 12, 1982 in Nеw Hanover, North Carolina tо Robert Luke Yunaska аnd Linda Ann Sykes.

    Lara Yunaska graduated frоm North Carolina State University, аnd thе French Culinary Institute with a degree in Pastry Arts. Lara аn avid equestrian worked аѕ a journalist fоr CBS Inside Edition until ѕhе bесаmе CBS producer.

    “Robert Luke” is not a very Jewish name, and “Linda Ann Skykes” is a very non-Jewish name.

    More details:

    http://ethnicelebs.com/lara-trump

    I can see how the fact they had a semi-Jewish wedding, she was a reporter, and her Slavic last name could throw people off. On the other hand “born in North Carolina” and “avid equestrian” indicate a non-Jewish background. I think it was more the bride thinks a few aspects of Jewish weddings, like the dance and glass break, are kind of fun and would bring her closer to her brother and sister in law and their children if incorporated into her lavish secular wedding.

    • Replies: @KenH
  83. Corvinus says:
    @RaceRealist88

    It always amazes me when you of all people, given YOUR own heritage, feverishly link everything bad to Jews.

    • Replies: @RaceRealist88
  84. Corvinus says:
    @Priss Factor

    “So, if you’re a young child and the first thing you imprint on is a Negro as father who kisses and hugs a white woman, you will mainly identify with blackness(as dominant) and you will grow up to believe that white wombs exist only to serve black seed(while banning white seed)… .like your white mama done.”

    That is one of the most ridiculous arguments you have made, and trust us, you have a number of them. The first thing a child looks to when his parents, regardless of race, is how human and humane they treat themselves, others, but most importantly, he or she. He has no concept of what you are talking about unless someone actually brings it up and explains it to him when he is much older.

    • Replies: @Priss Factor
  85. @alexander

    Whether those statements are true or not is irrelevant, Alexander.

    as to #1: It was not a just war.
    As you surely recall, Just War theory requires that All Options to resolve the conflict should be exhausted before war is waged.
    There were options to going to war that George H W Bush deliberately ignored and disdained. I linked to Vernon Loeb’s book about the US lawyer who was friend and counselor to the King of Jordan; together, they worked out an agreement to which Saddam acquiesced, that would have resolved the conflict without violence. Did you read any of the reviews or pages at the link?

    Numerous Arab leaders pleaded with Bush to let the Arabs work out their own problems; they understood best, they insisted. Bush would not listen.

    In addition, Mikhael Gorbachev was in frequent communication with Bush 41. He pestered Bush not to go to war; he insisted to him that war would be a disastrous choice. Bush yelled at him and told him, basically, to butt out.

    As to #2: a. US had no business being in Iraq in the first instance (see #1).
    b. Who gave USA the right and warrant to “Prevent Iraq from reconstituting its army” anyway? (see #1)
    c. Starving civilians to achieve an allegedly geostrategic or military goal flies against the minimum norms of vaunted western civilization. The fact that the originating event — the US-led invasion — was illegitimate only compounds the criminality of the sanctions.

    A review of D Campbell’s book noted that Campbell posited that George H W Bush led the invasion in a bid “to reinscribe US identity as the only superpower in the post-Cold War era.”
    Campbell’s view is ratified by Jeffrey Engel, who did research in George H W Bush’s archives to determine how the Bush 41 team made the decision to go to war. Engel is director of the Center for Presidential History at Southern Methodist University, the home of George W. Bush’s presidential library.
    Here’s what Engel told an audience at Texas A&M University:

    “We should be frank about what moved them [the Bush 41 team] to act.
    It was NOT the argument that Kuwaiti independence mattered much at all.
    Neither was it that Hussein’s particular brand of evil and tyranny required an American response. Nor was Bush persuaded that Iraq’s aggression carried immediate concerns, or that Iraq might someday turn its oil wealth into dangerous weapons of mass destruction.
    Each of these reasons, in time, influenced Bush’s thoughts, his actions and his statements in the months to come.
    None, however, not freedom, evil, human rights, democracy or WMDs affected his thinking in those first fateful days of August.

    Bush was instead, and this is important, Bush was instead persuaded by the growing realization that he stood at a pivot moment in the course of history.

    . . .

    During the Spring and Summer of 1990 Bush told Global leaders that their alliance required an enemy to survive. . . .

    {snip}
    Bush saw in the Gulf War AN OPPORTUNITY as well as an invasion, a point that I will make by way of conclusion. .. He saw within it a chance to demonstrate that Washington would continue to lead. Leading it in particular towards the kind of world promised to His generation as their reward for service in World War II. . . .
    Ultimately this vision of a new world order what drove his thinking when Saddam Hussein invaded Kuwait. In a similar vein he said, “The prospect of a global peace continues to depend on an American forward presence. ” End quote.”

    In sum, Alexander, in the context of the fall of the Berlin Wall, which made USA the sole remaining superpower, George H. W. Bush took advantage of the opportunity presented to him by Saddam’s invasion of Kuwait, to wage a war to cement USA’s superpower dominance.
    He lied to the US Congress and the American people to get their democratic buy-in to a war-for-power.
    He waged an illegitimate war, then starved children when events did not turn out the way he — and his team — thought they would; namely, “the Bush team was 99% certain that the Iraqi people would turn against Saddam and overthrow the government, joining forces with USA.” (Engel, above). That is why the Bush team was not prepared to pursue the war to Baghdad: they did not think they would have to; they thought the Iraqi people would capitulate.

    Saddam’s invasion of Kuwait may or may not have been green lighted by US foreign service officer in Iraq April Glaspie, in order to create the opportunity Bush sought.

    In Secret Dossier: The Hidden Agenda Behind the Gulf War, Pierre Salinger, former White House press secretary, explained the economic/financial blackmail that Kuwait was exercising over Kuwait that precipitated the conflict.

    Any more questions?

  86. @Corvinus

    My own heritage?

    A lot of things can be linked to Jews. If you don’t see that, that’s on you.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  87. @SolontoCroesus

    correction:

    In Secret Dossier: The Hidden Agenda Behind the Gulf War, Pierre Salinger, former White House press secretary, explained the economic/financial blackmail that Kuwait was exercising over Kuwait IRAQ that precipitated the conflict.

  88. Lot says:
    @Mr. Anon

    If Kevin MacDonald should feel concerned about how some random internet commenter (with no real power or influence at all) reflects upon him

    You misunderstand my point, which is that the anti-semite crowd, and in particular the anti-semite obsessives, tarnish the entire alt-right not for “random internet commentators” but for regular apolitical Americans, who tend to like Jews and increasingly have Jewish ancestry themselves or within their family.

    To win elections, the GOP now needs about 65% of the white vote. You do that by promoting our unity, not with anti-semitism. And I will also note that anti-semites seems to usually dislike southern europeans as well.

    why shouldn’t a Jew (Democrat or Republican) feel concerned about how Paul Singer or George Soros – billionaires with real power and influence – reflects upon him?

    I do think many of the groups Soros funds is awful (and that includes the extremely anti-israel/pro-palestinian groups he funds), and yes I am concerned about the bad effects of what he does. As for supposedly indirectly reflecting badly on me, I don’t really care about that compared to the directly bad effects of what he does.

    Moreover, I don’t think the anti-semitic right is the least concern to the safety and prosperity of Jews. We are completely ensconced into the institutions and families of America’s (and England’s) elites and upper-middle class in a way that is both popular and permanent. Outside of those groups, I can’t really see evangelical Christian philo-semitism ever changing.

    I am far more concerned about mass Muslim and African migration degrading the USA into a combination Brazil of Algeria. The anti-semitic right’s main threat to us is that it hurts people like Trump, Le Pen, and Farange who are working to stop these problems. The best strategy in my view is over-the-top pro-Israel policies and rhetoric of the sort we see especially from Geert Wilders and Trump himself. The stronger the alt-right supports for Israel, the more local Jewish support and the more Israel’s admirable policies like natalism and border walls are legitimated in both popular and elite minds.

    • Replies: @anonymous
    , @Art
  89. alexander says:
    @SolontoCroesus

    That is very interesting stuff, S2C.

    But I think if you examine UNSC resolution 661 you will find a unanimous vote from ALL the permanent members of the council as well as all but two of the non permanent members that Iraq should remove itself immediately from Kuwait and that punitive sanctions would be in full force until it did so.

    If the entire world and all the world powers, including China, the UK, the Soviet Union, France as well as the US, all felt the same way….why is that fact irrelevant to the events that transpired ?

    I do not believe we would have gone to war, at all, in 91, if Iraq chose never to invade Kuwait in the first place.

    You seem to believe Iraq’s invasion which was the very catalyst for the sanctions AND the war, was wholly irrelevant to the conflict that ensued ?

    I don’t.

  90. anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @Lot

    There are a lot more Muslims in the world than there are Jews. Smarter bet is for Americans to partner with Muslims and support them more favorably.

    The USA with Jews “completely ensconced into the institutions and families of America’s (and England’s) elites and upper-middle class in a way that is both popular and permanent” is a mess like it’s seldom been before. Isn’t an increase of support for Israel/Jews going to produce more of the same only worse?

    How much more support could USA possibly give to Israel, and why should it?
    It’s not the way US founders counseled the American people to conduct their affairs.

    Why should support for Israel and Jews be given special status; why not support for Germans, or Chinese — a closer relationship between US and China makes a lot more economic sense than more US money/support to Israel.

    • Replies: @Lot
  91. KenH says:
    @Lot

    Yep. Per the link below “Eric Trump, Donald’s 30-year-old son, married Jewish TV producer Lara Yunaska on Saturday in front of 450 people.”

    http://jpupdates.com/2014/11/11/donald-trump-marries-son-jewish-celeb-crystal-chuppah/

    Equestrianism is typically associated with upper class WASP’s but that doesn’t mean a few people of Jewish descent don’t dabble in it. If I had to guess I would say her parents wanted her to blend in with her privileged surroundings.

    • Replies: @Lot
  92. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    McDonald is alluding to a potential nuclear war with Russia, should Clinton become president. Which seems the more likely by the day.

  93. Lot says:
    @SolontoCroesus

    wikipedia tracks Ashkenazi from that bottleneck, locating their origin in Central and Eastern Europe, and only much later into Germany:

    Not really. The general path is Ashkenazi were “founded” when Italian Jews, unclear if an old population or Levantine, moved north, took local brides in Northern Italy/Southern France, then started intermarrying and moving into Germany in the period 800-1000AD where.

    The population moved into Eastern Europe when Christian princes were able to reconquer and secure the area from Mongol/Tatar domination, which left vast and fertile areas nearly depopulated. The new Christian rulers of these areas very much wanted to repopulate them, and welcomed all comers, principally Russians, Poles, Germans, and Jews, all of whom experienced very rapid population growth given the low cost of very fertile land.

    It is true that the Jewish population of Germany grew in the 19th century, but that was part of a broader movement away from the Prussian countryside, including newly conquered areas with large Jewish and Polish populations, and into Berlin and wealthier western German cities and to the United States. That, in turn, was motivated by improvements in agriculture that reduced rural wages, and further the opening of the very large and fertile Midwest to grain farming and world markets.

    So while it is true that rapid population increase of Ashkenazi happened in eastern europe, their development as a people and culture had already happened in culturally-German areas of the Holy Roman Empire, and they took those genes and culture into Eastern Europe.

    Going south a bit, Austria proper hand a long-standing Jewish population in its cities, but conquered areas of Eastern Europe with much larger and partly rural Jewish populations and strongly encouraged their integration into Austrian-German society:

    [MORE]

    After Maria Theresa’s death in 1780, her son Joseph II, Holy Roman Emperor succeeded her and started working on the integration of the Jewish population into Austrian society. The emperor determined that they would be obligated to enlist to the army, and established governmental schools for the Jewish population. The 1782 Edict of Tolerance canceled different limitations that had been placed upon the Jewish population previously, such as the restriction to live only in predetermined locations and the limitation to certain professions. They were now allowed to establish factories, hire Christian servants and study at higher education institutions, but all this only on the condition that Jews would be obligated to attend school, that they would use German only in the official documents instead of Hebrew and Yiddish, that dorsal tax would be forbidden, that the trials held within the community would be condensed, and that those who would not get an education would not be able to marry before the age of 25. The emperor also declared that the Jewish population would establish Jewish schools for their children, but they opposed that because he forbade them organizing within the community and establishing public institutions. In the aftermath of different resistances, also from the Jewish party, which opposed the many conditions held upon them, and also from the Christian party, which opposed many of the rights given to the Jewish population, the decree was not fully implemented.

    In 1812, a Jewish Sunday school was opened in Vienna. During the same period of time a number of limitations were placed on the Jewish population, such as the obligation to study in Christian schools and to pray in German.

    Between 1848 and 1938, the Jewish Austrian population enjoyed a period of prosperity beginning with the start of regime of Franz Joseph I of Austria as the Emperor of the Austria–

    Emperor Franz Joseph I of Austria bestowed on the Jewish population equal rights, saying “the civil rights and the country’s policy is not contingent in the people’s religion”. The emperor was well liked by the Jewish population, which, as a token of appreciation, wrote prayers and songs about him that were printed in Jewish prayer books. In 1849 the emperor canceled the prohibition against the Jewish population organizing within the community, and in 1852 new regulations of the Jewish community were set. In 1867 the Jewish population formally received full equal rights.

    In 1869 the emperor visited Jerusalem and was greeted in great admiration by the Jewish population there. The emperor established a fund aimed at financing the establishment of Jewish institutions and in addition established the Talmudic school for rabbis in Budapest. During the 1890s several Jews were elected to the Austrian parliament.

    During the regime of Franz Joseph and after, Austria’s Jewish population contributed greatly to Austrian culture despite their small percentage in the population. Contributions came from Jewish lawyers, journalists (among them Theodor Herzl), authors, playwrights, poets, doctors, bankers, businessmen and artists. Vienna became a cultural Jewish center, and became a center of education, culture and Zionism.

    Other notable influential Jews contributing greatly to Austrian culture included composers Gustav Mahler, Arnold Schoenberg, and the authors Stefan Zweig, Arthur Schnitzler, Karl Kraus, Elias Canetti, Joseph Roth, Vicki Baum and the doctors Sigmund Freud, Viktor Frankl and Alfred Adler, the philosophers Martin Buber, Karl Popper, and many others.

    The prosperity period also affected the sports field: the Jewish sports club Hakoah Vienna was established in 1909 and excelled in football, swimming and athletics.

    With Jewish prosperity and equality, several Jewish scholars converted to Christianity in a desire to assimilate into Austrian society. Among them were Karl Kraus and Otto Weininger.

  94. Lot says:
    @anonymous

    “Smarter bet?” Interesting choice of words for Muslims, who are highly inbred and who are largely incapable of science and high culture.

    a closer relationship between US and China makes a lot more economic sense than more US money/support to Israel.

    You really should get into politics with your anti-semitism and “closer relations with Muslim countries and China” platform. You’ll do great, that’s just what America is looking for!

    • Replies: @anonymous
  95. Lot says:
    @KenH

    Did you look at my second link? They did a family tree of Yunaska and there is no evidence she has any Jewish ancestry and ample evidence of Christian ancestry.

    Equestrianism is typically associated with upper class WASP’s but that doesn’t mean a few people of Jewish descent don’t dabble in it.

    Sure, horsey Jews exist. I even know one such family in rural NE San Diego County. But the horsey set is very disproportionately white protestants.

    • Replies: @KenH
  96. I can’t really see evangelical I can’t really see evangelical Christian philo-semitism ever changing. ever changing.

    Why not? Protestant philo-semitism has waned as well as waxed in the past.

  97. fnn says:

    But I think if you examine UNSC resolution 661 you will find a unanimous vote from ALL the permanent members of the council as well as all but two of the non permanent members that Iraq should remove itself immediately from Kuwait and that punitive sanctions would be in full force until it did so.

    Maybe I’m wrong, but I thought was mainly about the post-WWII taboo against one UN-approved sovereign state attacking another UN-approved sovereign state. Bill Clinton did away with that one when he attacked Yugoslavia in 1999, as the Russians keep reminding us.

  98. anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @Lot

    “closer relations with Muslim countries and China” platform. You’ll do great, that’s just what America is looking for!

    it’s not hard to show that the dominance of Jews in US culture has not been a net positive for US — popular culture is a swamp; finance is deeply skewed in favor of elites, a large proportion of elites are Jews. Jews dominate media, which many white bread Americans are gradually realizing is a snake pit of liars. So it’s becoming apparent that Jewish dominance of US culture is not a happy situation.

    US support for Israel has been an even greater disaster. US is in debt and has lost its strategic and moral bearings.

    So yes, I repeat: US alliance with Muslims and Chinese, particularly Muslims like Indonesians and Iranians, who have a long history of US relations and of representative government — as well as significant accomplishments in “science and high culture,” would be a tremendous benefit to USA, culturally and economically.

    Both groups are far more pacific, have deeper real history, and they’re less meddlesome than Jews and less trouble than Israel.

  99. @alexander

    if he aint saying it I am. saddam invaded Kuwait after we gave him the green light and the sanctions spearheaded by the demonic inbred jew albright was meant to kill iraqi kids. no matter how big saddams military got it was just target practice and slaughter for our military to destroy.

  100. Art says:
    @Lot

    To win elections, the GOP now needs about 65% of the white vote.

    Correction:

    To win elections, the GOP now needs about 65% of the Gentile white vote.

    Jews most often vote against Euro whites with traditional American values.

    Elite Euro whites have already signed on with the Jews – they do kissy face together.

  101. Hibernian says:
    @TheBoom

    Were you in a program that encouraged non-Jewish people to live on kibbutzes?

  102. Svigor says:

    Hi KMac, welcome to Unz.com!

    Recently Avik Roy, a leading Republican health-policy expert, had the personal and moral courage to admit what liberals (and political scientists) have been saying for years: “In reality, the gravitational center of the Republican Party is white nationalism.”

    Subcon joins Republican party, now “admits guilt on their behalf.” Sorry Mr Wog, you speak for you, not the Republican Party. You have no power to admit guilt or responsibility on the part of others.

    Subcons are congenital moral cripples, so they need this stuff explained to them. In simple terms, like one might explain to a child.

    Unless Avik isn’t actually a Republican at all, and he’s just making the usual non-white, leftist accusations from the outside, while pretending to be on the inside. That would make better sense.

  103. KenH says:
    @Lot

    Yes I did, but there are Jews who conceal their Jewishness. I checked and re-checked and there seems to be a great deal of contradictory news articles about Lara Yunaska’s Jewishness. Some say yes while others say no. Looks like it’s inconclusive.

    Jewishness is a racial connotation, and not simply a religious one. The fact that she’s ‘Christian” is meaningless as that wouldn’t change the fact that she has Jewish DNA if in fact she’s Jewish.

    • Replies: @Beefcake the Mighty
  104. Svigor says:

    P.S., India’s one of the most racist, bigoted places on Earth. Extremely backwards, if you’ll forgive the pun, compared to the rest of the world. Read up on their caste system for details. Shameful race, even more shameful when they presume to lecture others on the very sins that are India’s national pastime. Inexcusably arrogant.

    Paul Krugman

    Jews should remove the beam from their own eyes, before expecting anyone to listen to them on anyone else’s bigotry. Jews should clean up their own back yard in Apartheid Israel, and STFU on ethnic issues until they do. They’re the last people who should be lecturing anyone about racism or bigotry.

    Quite simply, Jews have far more power in the media than any other identifiable group. And yes, Jewish identity makes a difference in content (See Culture Of Critique, Preface to the Paperback Edition , xlvi–lvi).

    The ability to see this is a litmus test for seriousness. If the Jewish influence over American mass media isn’t obvious to you, then you either aren’t very bright, you aren’t paying attention, or both. It’s gobsmackingly obvious. Watch a show like The 100 for a couple seasons, and tell me you don’t see anything hinky. If you don’t, you should excuse yourself when the grownups talk politics.

    “I think what we really find troubling is the mainstreaming of these really offensive ideas,” said Jonathan Greenblatt, the national director of the Anti-Defamation League, which tracks hate groups. “It’s allowed some of the worst ideas into the public conversation in ways we haven’t seen anything like in recent memory.”

    ADL is packed full of Jews who ignore Israeli Apartheid and Jewish Supremacy in Israel, or at the very least, give it insufficient attention (according to their own ostensible values, mind you). Nothing they say about anyone else has any real relevance, except that given them by fools.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  105. @Alden

    What many people on the right and those who self clamed to be pro white is that “religion” never was a entirely pro European people’s (and frankly speaking for any people even Judaism). The incapacity of the European crowd about objective morality today just show for us what this cult has caused, selecting for servile workers and not for independent thinkers.

  106. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @Lot

    If it wasn’t it was only because of massive, emergency intervention by the Fed. Otherwise, as Krugman and Paulson warned (threatened, blackmailed, extorted) the cancer would have spread throughout the banking system causing systemic, cataclysmic collapse of money markets etc. C’mon, everybody knows this.

  107. Corvinus says:
    @RaceRealist88

    “My own heritage?”

    Yes. You are Roy Cohn to a tee. Why do you deny your own people?

    “A lot of things can be linked to Jews. If you don’t see that, that’s on you.”

    Just because you make a connection does not mean that it is accurate.

  108. Corvinus says:
    @Svigor

    “P.S., India’s one of the most racist, bigoted places on Earth. Extremely backwards, if you’ll forgive the pun, compared to the rest of the world. Read up on their caste system for details. Shameful race, even more shameful when they presume to lecture others on the very sins that are India’s national pastime. Inexcusably arrogant.”

    Well, considering that system is predicated upon the philosophies of white nationalism and race realism–the philosophies you espouse–one would think you would be less harsh in assessing its significance.

  109. Druid says:
    @annamaria

    They always get away with it, though. Through the media and triple-speak!

  110. Svigor says:

    Recent contributions come close to advocating hunting “the Jews” down, seizing their property, even killing them. The context usually includes irrational fantasies about the extent of the world power (I am not referring to documented facts about e.g. US finance or the Israeli lobbies), including suggestions by regular contributors that all nuclear weaponry and events like the Nice atrocity are Jewish lies like The Holocaust and 9/11, a recent proposal for a Oklahoma City-style atrocity, and the bright idea that the rest of the white world should gang up against the British people with a “punitive” boycott.

    Quotes or it didn’t happen.

    in my case with a dark threat that I was “skating on very thin ice”.

    K, take your meds now. Neurotypical people know what that means in context (i.e., from an internet moderator, lol), and it’s nothing “dark.”

    As for nutty commenters, they’re the price of free speech. I find it amusing how people fret so over nutty commenters. So, the comments section at Occidental Observer isn’t worth reading, oh noes!

    There’s quite a lot of dumb stuff in MacDonald’s writing as usual.

    So, describe, or at least enumerate, the dumb stuff for us. Because 1 thing != “quite a lot” by any sane person’s measure.

    • Replies: @David Ashton
  111. Svigor says:

    Well, considering that system is predicated upon the philosophies of white nationalism and race realism–the philosophies you espouse–one would think you would be less harsh in assessing its significance.

    Please do tell us all about how White Nationalism predates the Indian caste system.

    This should be good.

    As for my philosophies, you don’t know them, and aren’t capable of learning them.

  112. Svigor says:

    E.g., part of my “philosophy” is being mentally flexible enough to put on my Devil’s Advocate cap and critique people using other ideologies, including their own, mainstream leftism, etc., without going full ‘sperg and explaining to everyone that I am doing so, every time I do it, as if I’m surrounded with ‘spergy children.

    But you’re too stupid and ‘spergy to understand that; don’t bother overheating your smooth gray matter trying to get it.

    • Replies: @utu
  113. utu says:
    @Svigor

    Why don’t you use “REPLY” click when you reply? I read you comments and I have not idea what or who are you commenting.

  114. utu says:
    @Alden

    MacDonald’s anti-Catholic bias – it is very strong- is really puzzling to me. I thought that the anti-papists sentiments were still alive only among evangelical simpletons.

  115. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    Plenty of high-profile (and not-so-high-profile) Jews support Trump. Bringing up a few misfit neocons and trying to make a case out of it is ridiculous anti-Semitism. Trump has made a lot of establishment figures go haywire. Trump’s breaking the system. Instead of a few notable neocon Jews, what about gentile Republican governors not supporting Trump? E.g.: Nikki Haley (SC), Charlie Baker (MA), John Kasich (OH), Larry Hogan (MD), et al.

  116. kim says:

    Everyday a new Jew comes out on Jew-TVee to attack Trump, when it isn’t a Jew its someone who work for Jews in Hollywood or music industry.
    The Jews are to blame, they have attacked him for over a year.
    Next it will be bank tellers attacking Trump…lol

  117. Priss Factor [AKA "Anonymny"] says: • Website
    @Alden

    Men being men, they will take advantage of women when they can.

    But due to Anglo racial policies and due to presence of white women as wives, there was far less messing with black women by white men in America than there was the messing of native women by the Spanish in Latin America. After all, blacks are genetically 80% black. I think mestizos are at least 50% white or more.

    This was where Anglo-racism was actually good for the darkies. It meant less messing with the women of other races. French were more likely to hump the women of the conquered folks. More sexual colonization and imperialism.

    Also, white men didn’t find black women all that attractive. But then, horny guys will even hump sheep.
    I remember reading WHATEVER HAPPENED TO THE CLASS OF 65.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/What_Really_Happened_to_the_Class_of_%2765%3F

    Some fat Jewish guy said he lost his virginity with a black maid.

    • Replies: @gwynedd1
  118. Priss Factor [AKA "Anonymny"] says: • Website
    @Corvinus

    “The first thing a child looks to when his parents, regardless of race, is how human and humane they treat themselves, others, but most importantly, he or she.”

    No, kids pick up on identity pretty early.

    It’s like the Newsweek article ‘are babies racist’.

    And kids recognize faces and fixate on those of parents.

    This is why kids will still prefer abusive parent over nice stranger. Even if parent is far from ideal, the emotional/visceral connection between kid and parent makes the bond stronger than with a nice stranger.

    • Replies: @helena
    , @Corvinus
  119. helena says:
    @Priss Factor

    It would be interesting to study whether having a black mother/white father or white mother/black father makes any difference in adult mating patterns, because face recognition, which takes place about 4 months i.e. a lot earlier than any other object visual recognition, tends to focus on the mother. Do mixed race boys with a black mother gravitate towards black partners more than boys with a white mother and black father?

  120. Priss Factor [AKA "Anonymny"] says: • Website

    Avik Roy: “the gravitational center of the Republican Party is white nationalism.”

    No, it is white survivalism. The fact is most whites, liberal and conservative, were accepting of new immigrants since the 60s. The problem is TOO MANY.

    Whites, even conservatives, didn’t mind(for the most part) the appearance of new faces. Sure, some felt uncomfortable at first, but most people got along. Indeed, whites often got along better with newcomers than with Negroes(or even with some elements of ‘white trash’ community). But Too Many is Too Many. When so many immigrants come and threaten to demographically eclipse the white population, that is some crazy shit. I mean what are whites supposed to accept? America becoming 40% non-white(already the case)? 50%? 60% 70% 80% 90% Where does it end? So, if whites were to be reduced to 10% of America, a nation founded by their forebears, there is nothing wrong with it? Whites should welcome it or be labeled ‘haters’? Where do these curry-smelling dotkins get the nerve?

    If anything, it’s been the prospect of demographic displacement that fires up the politics of white identity. In the past, whites could take things for granted since ‘American’ was almost synonymous with white(and with black in certain areas like sports and pop music). There was no need for ‘white nationalism’. But now, the immigrant tide is so huge that whites have no choice but to wake up.
    White identity was strongest when whites felt they were in some ‘existential’ conflict with other peoples. When whites had to settle the America, they had to fight Indians. Since they felt threatened by Indian reprisals, whites had to think in terms of race. And in the south, the large presence of Negroes left no choice for whites but to think in racial terms. But it’s the same with Jews in Israel. The large numbers of Arabs makes Jews more conscious of Jewishness. There was a lull in white national consciousness in the 50s and 60s since the times were good and getting better and since 90% of all Americans were white. Feeling affluent and confident, whites could go easier on white identity. But now, massive immigration and globalism’s ‘coming apart’ impact on the white race(whereupon white elites abandon the white masses and join forces with fellow elites around the world) leave the white masses no choice but to look to their own identity and interests.

    Now, white Libs are less bothered by this since many are part of the affluent. If one looks at affluent parts of nice Lib cities, they are overwhelmingly white. So, Libs in those areas don’t see what the big deal is. Their world looks solidly white. Look at Portland or good parts of NY. Also, even when POC are around, they tend to work as servants for the White Lib elites, so white Libs feel power over them. In elite circles, POC and blacks defer to whites. But among the masses, People of Diversity often threaten the well-being of white masses.
    Immigrants are direct competitors to them. Also, people with less money and affluence find meaning in tribe, culture, and community. But even that is being eroded by too much diversity. Who wants to bowl alone?

    And if Avik Roy hates ‘white racism’, why isn’t he in India? Doesn’t he like his own people? Why did he leave them to go live among whites? Whites want to live in white nations, but Indians don’t want live in India. Why? Roy must be ‘racist’ in preferring the white community over the brown community. Damn dotkin. He berates whites for not wanting to live with Too Many foreigners, but he obviously cannot stand to live with too many of his kind who shit all over in India.

    [MORE]

    “These tend to come down to moralizing about Trump’s character and temperament.”

    Did LBJ have personal character? Did Clinton? Bush II? Obama?
    And speaking of temperament, Hillary has to be one of the bitchiest and nastiest wenches that ever lived.

    Not that Trump is big on character. He is a hustler alright. But I was never bothered by his temperament. People say he blows up and gets angry. No, he shoots back and engages with others. They fire at him, he fires back, and he relishes the fight. More honest that way, and it’d be nice to have someone who speaks his mind sometimes than always go by the script. If the president should only say what elites want him to, then US government should hire an actor to play president who reads lines provided by others.

    “the ‘Star of David’ incident in which a picture of Hillary appeared with a 6-sided star over a mass of cash with the caption ‘Most Corrupt Politician Ever.’”

    Trump didn’t do the star obviously. Someone did, and it was either very foolish or a willful inside sabotage job. I mean the Jewish Star immediately. I mean how could anyone in the campaign not see that? Trump surely has fake supporters in his campaign working as saboteurs and wreckers.

    Jonathan Greenblatt:

    “It’s allowed some of the worst ideas into the public conversation in ways we haven’t seen anything like in recent memory.”

    Trump’s one bad ideas is total ban on Muslims that makes no sense. So many Muslim nations are free of terror, so why target all Muslims? He could have avoided this controversy by just naming the nations notorious for terrorism.

    But what other bad idea is espoused by the Trump campaign? Border control is bad? Sending illegals back is bad? Americanism instead of globalism is bad?
    Americans vote for an American president, not president of the world. So, why should Americans support the globalist open borders crap? If US should be open borders, then US elections should let the entire world to vote.

    American voters should vote for American interests, and American leaders should favor the interests of American people. That’s why Americans vote in America and not in Japan, and that is why Japanese vote in Japan and not in America.
    I mean Turks vote for Turkish leader to serve Turkish interest. Jews in Israel vote for Jewish leader to serve Jewish interests. But the idea of Americans voting for American interests is one of those ‘worst’ ideas? Of course, when Jews like Greenblatt favor ‘world’ or ‘global’ interests, they really mean the interests of the globalist elites, many of whom are Jewish.

    “Actually, it should not be surprising that Pipes is anti-Trump given that he favors a ‘house-broken Islam’ in Western countries.”

    It is also because Trump’s anti-Islam rhetoric makes it more difficult for US to wage wars in the Muslim World and intervene. If Trump as president talks about the Muslim world like he does now, he will be making Huntington’s case of CLASH OF CIVILIZATIONS. America will have declared ‘Muslims are the enemy’. Paradoxically however, this makes US wars in Middle East less likely. With such a hostile stance on the part of the US, all Muslims will see US as unfriendly and will be hostile to US meddling. And it also means even pro-American Muslim nations won’t be able to work closely with the US to mess up other Muslim nations. With Trump the anti-Muslim president in white house, Saudis will have to think twice about working so closely with US. Muslims will see Saudis as working with enemy of Islam.

    Since ‘Islamophobes’ like Pipes want more US intervention in the Middle East, he doesn’t support a US government that talks like he does. He wants a US leader who will say things that will soothe the Muslims, thereby using as cover to mess up the Middle East ever more.

    “Jewish publications like the Tablet continue hyperbolic denunciations of Trump. Thus an article by Eric D. Weitz [Email him] drew an explicit analogy between the rise of Hitler and the possibility of a Trump presidency, arguing that mainstream conservatives were crucial to Hitler’s ultimate success as well as Trump’s.”

    Talk about the paranoid style of American politics. This makes Joseph McCarthy look sound and balanced in comparison.

    I think in a way… the Liberals deserve much scorn for having overlooked Obama’s far left ties. Though not a far-leftist, Obama had some ties with loathsome characters like Wright, Ayers, and others. But in 2008, the Lib media made it a non-issue. They made sure it got no traction. They touched upon it objectively but infused no emotion or judgement on the matter.
    A healthy democracy is one where moderate liberals feel closer to moderate conservatives than to far left and where moderate conservatives feel closer to moderate liberals than to far right.

    But Obama’s candidacy violated this principle. Though just a self-centered opportunistic snake, Obama did attract some loathsome figures on the far left. But the media shrugged its off and said ‘big deal’. Though Obama hasn’t been radical leftist economically, he’s been a radical force in American Culture, especially with the decadent filth of homomania. Also, the media have been totally batshit crazy with stuff like UVA rape hoax and other hysteria. And all the madness in colleges are the product of ‘progressive’ and ‘leftist’ PC. Libs created a climate of hate, hysteria, lunacy, and panic all over campus. Girls see ‘rape culture’ all over. People see KKK all over. There are hate hoaxes or truth-rapes all over. In US colleges, ‘leftist’ hysteria is the norm over every nonsense. And the ‘left’ unleashed BLM that has caused so much havoc and even dead people. Even Liberal college professors say they are scared of their own students who are trigger-warning-happy about every dumb micro-aggression. Libs created a culture like this, but they whine about Trump unleashing ‘hate’? So far, almost all the violence has been by anti-Trump lunatics of PC-brainwashing. But Trump is to blame. He is Haven Monahan.

    http://www.vox.com/2015/6/3/8706323/college-professor-afraid

    “Today’s Republicans and similarly-minded figures in Europe are like the conservatives who put Adolf Hitler in power: delusional about their influence, playing dangerously with the structures of our democracy… That is the lesson from the right-wing populist upsurge in Weimar Germany, which culminated in the Nazi assumption of power.”

    First of all, Trump is not Hitler.
    Secondly, we need to give the Germans some credit. They’d suffered traumatic defeat in World War I and then one terrible economic depression after another. Yet, most Germans tried their darnest to make democracy work. Despite unceasing economic horrors, they stuck with democracy and rejected both far left and far right. And even when Hitler won, it was only with 1/3 the national vote.
    Also, given the times, much of what the National Socialism offered made good sense. The lesson of NS is not that everything about it was bad but that Hitler and his henchmen used the good ideas to hide the evil ones. Hitler had war on his mind, not just restoration of German sovereignty. It would be fallacious to say that since National Socialism unleashed evil wars and led Germany to ruin, EVERYTHING about it was evil and necessarily led to war. Using that logic, Liberals should attack universal socialized medicine since Nazi Germany had it.

    Also, Hitler was a radical racist and imperialist. (Btw, much of his imperialist mindset was informed and inspired by the world conquests by democratic powers like UK and US. And he sure loved Western novels and movies made by Jewish Hollywood that celebrated the white man’s mowing down of red savages.) Trump isn’t in any shape or form a radical racist. And he is certainly no imperialist. If anything, it’s his call for de-escalation of empire that seems to bother Jews so much. Jews have this grand plan to bring down Russia and swallow it, but Trump talks of peace. That suggests Jews(who ceaselessly seek confrontations) are more like Hitler than Trump is.

    Another thing. It is amazing how unreflective and un-self-critical Jews are about their role in the rise of National Socialism. True, Jews got burned real bad by the Holocaust, but that doesn’t mean they were historically innocent in the interwar period. It’s like Japanese suffered horribly in WWII(even beyond what they deserved, esp in Hiroshima and Nagasaki), but they played a key role in messing up the world that came back to bite them real bad. They provoked much of the mess that led to the confrontation with the US and defeat.
    Likewise, it is crazy to see Jews as pure innocent victims. Why did so many German conservatives, industrialists, and Christians turn to the far right? Because Jewish far leftists took over Russia and began to slaughter millions of people. Prior to 1939, Jews had killed many more people than Hitler’s regime did. (Indeed, if Hitler had died in 1939 and if WWII had been avoided, the biggest killers of the 20th century would have been Stalin and Jewish Bolsheviks.)
    Jewish Bolsheviks and Stalin count as one of the all-time great killers. Also, there was an attempted communist takeover in Germany itself and Jews led it. So, naturally many Germans became wary of Jews. Jewish leftist radicalism pushed many Germans to the far right. Jews need to consider the larger context.
    And then, there was finance capitalism. Many Jews acted during the interwar yrs not unlike what Jews pulled in Russia in the 90s. With their financial knowhow and wizardry, they took advantaged and made obscene fortunes when so many Germans lost their entire savings just to buy bread. Were most Jews into such vileness? No, but many of the financiers were Jewish. Jews need to draw some lessons from this.
    But Jews just scream ‘anti-semite’ at anyone who notices. Why did Putin rise to power and gain popularity? Because of oligarchic greed in the 90s that led to such horrors in Russia. Thankfully, Russia ended up with a sane statesman like Putin than someone like Hitler. But Jews even say Putin is like Hitler while never ever critically examining their own role in the rise of Putinism. In 2008, we had massive financial crisis, and Wall Street got huge bailouts while rest of nation suffered. And while economy was dragging along, Wall Street made record profits. George Soros is said to have broke the Bank of England. Bernie Madoff was allowed to fleece people forever before he finally got caught. Why did it take so long? Trump isn’t Hitler, but there is a lot of anger in the US against the 1% and the collusion between Wall Street and the Warfare Street. Occupy Wall Street was from the ‘left’. Sanders roused up the same kind of anger that is found among Trumpers.

    Now, it is true that Trump tends to scapegoat Muslims and Mexicans. But for someone who is compared with Hitler, he hardly mentions Jews in a negative light. Trump, for all his brash style, is too chicken to touch on Jewish power even as it shits on him 24/7. His worst aspect is acting the bully and picking on easier targets like Mexers and Muslims.
    Even so, his point about Mexers makes some good sense because so many Mexers are breaking and entering into US illegally. Also, so many Mexer illegals and their kids are arrogant, demanding, and rotten. They break into America and act like they are entitled to everything. And there have been Muslim attacks all over. Trump is also decent enough to mention that it was US wars in the Middle East that set off the refugee crisis, a fact overlooked by Hillary and Jewish media.
    Indeed, when it comes to foreign policy, it is Hillary who is more like Hitler. She is a War Criminal who destroyed nations. Just look at Libya in ruins. And like Hitler, she warns of war with Russia. In contrast, Trump’s foreign policy is rather dovish. It calls for less intervention and more minding our own business. Indeed, if such had been Hitler’s policy, there wouldn’t have been WWII.
    So, to any honest observer, it is Hillary who is the hateful and bellicose war-monger. It is Trump who seems the dove who calls for a strong military but less intervention. He did call for war on ISIS, but that is more doable than taking down entire nations or seeing a major nation like Russia as the enemy.
    When we survey recent history, no one has been more like Hitler than the Neocons. They keep bitching about Axis this and Axis that, but they are the ones who are calling for invasion, regime change, bombing other nations, and staring new cold wars that may turn into hot ones.

    Anyway, Germans have reflected from WWII. But it seems Jews didn’t learn any lesson. The Holocaust as a cult emboldened Jews to see themselves as completely blameless salt of the earth, totally innocent lambs slaughtered for no reason.
    Even as Nazis went crazy and committed horrors, the reason why there was so much hostility against Jews cannot be blamed only on gentiles. While there was the garden variety ‘antisemitism’ all over Europe, there were many legitimate gripes against Jews for their roles in far left, finance, and decadent culture. Nazis went too far, just like communists went too far. But just like communists had legit criticism of capitalism, even anti-semites had some legit gripes about Jews.

    But both Jews and Gentiles ultimately learned the wrong lesson from WWII. Instead of seeing Jews as tragic victims who suffered at the hands of radical Nazis who took Jew-hatred too far, the world came to see Jews as pure-as-snow innocents. It would be like seeing the Japanese dead in WWII as pure innocents than as a people who got burned beyond what they deserved. Surely, even anti-Japper people can see the evil of dropping nukes that were bound to wipe out everyone from newborn babe to old person breathing his last over a significant urban area. But Japanese as a people were not pure innocents in WWII. Too many supported the reckless war that was bound to end badly.

    Likewise, International Jewry was one of the Great Powers in the world during the interwar period. Though Jews didn’t have a nation of their own, the combined power of Jewish networks in US, UK, USSR, France, and other nations made for formidable power. And Jewish machinations and wars led to great suffering among many peoples.
    In this respect, Jews, along with Germans-Japanese-Russians-Italians-Anglos-French, were among the great players who provokes events that led to WWII.
    And Jewish radicalism threatened many peoples, especially in light of what as happening in Russia. The reports of mass destruction of churches, expansion of vast prison systems, mass killings, and etc. all fed to anti-Jewish sentiments. But if anyone mentions this, Jews just say ‘anti-semite!!’

    The lesson of Nazism is that gentiles must not given into total radical hatred even against their enemies. But there is a lesson for Jews too. Don’t mess up the world to the point where people are driven to such hatred. After what Jews did to Russia in the 90s(and continue to do now), after Jewish promotion of homomania, Jewish promotion of anti-white hatred, Jewish support of BLM, Jewish-engineered sanctions and wars in Muslim world that may killed over a million people, Jewish-encouraged mass invasion of Europe, Jews gloating about death of White America, Jewish promotion of garbage like Miley Cyrus and Lena Dunham, Jewish mass theft on Wall Street, and etc., do Jews really feel that there isn’t going to be rising rage and resentment? Really? Have their self-righteousness, arrogance, and chutzpah blinded them to the fact that Jews can commit evil too since they are human like rest of humanity?
    It is incredible how upside down the world is due to Jewish power. Given what happened to Russia in the 90s, Russians should be angry as hell with Jews. Given the ongoing Jewish War on Russia, Russians should be even more upset. But Putin’s Russia showers praise on Jews and protects them. In contrast, Jews feel nothing but hate and more hate toward Russia. The hate is so extreme that it approaches Nazi hatred of Slavs.

    “If nothing else, the rise of Trump has proven that white supremacy almost always lives next-door to Christian hegemony—and that one form of bigotry will always bolster another.”

    When Jews bitch about ‘white nationalism’ or ‘white supremacism’, they are not against nationalism and supremacism per se. After all, Jews have no problem with Jewish nationalism(Zionism) and Jewish-centrism in American politics. If Jews really believe in the color-blind ideal, why do they push AIPAC on US Congress and presidency?
    Why are Jews ‘more equal’ than others? Is there Mormon-pac that pressures all politicians of both parties to pledge to Mormonism? Is there Chinapac that pressures all politicians of both parties to praise Chinese-Americans and pledge to China as a special friend of US?

    When Jew bitch about ‘white nationalism’, what they really mean is they oppose whites caring more about their own kind than about Jews. Jews are not about all peoples surrendering tribalism. They are for whites abandoning their own tribalism in order to serve Jewish tribalism. After all, Jews seem to be worried about white Liberals who are ideologically consistent in opposing Jewish nationalism/imperialism(Zionism and occupation of West Bank) as well as their own: white nationalism. Such ideologically consistent white libs believe(however naively) in equal treatment for everyone. In contrast, the Jewish elites, even as they vilify and denounce white identity and interests, incessantly demand that whites get behind Jewish identity and interests.
    This is why National Review’s Neocons and Cuckservativs are most dishonest when they invoke ‘principles’ of universal justice and equality. If so, why do they favor Jewish-Americans and Zionists over Palestinians and Iranians(and Iranian-Americans, most of whom oppose the sanctions)?

    If anything, Alt Right is more principled because it believes in self-identity and self-interests for All Peoples. So, Alt Right has nothing against Jews for Jewish identity and interests, blacks for black identity and interests, and Mexicans for Mexican identity and interests. All that the Alt Right is saying is that whites have their own identity and interests and will serve them. THIS is what pisses Jews off. Jews want whites to serve Jewish identity and interests. Jews are not saying “You whites lose your identity/interests, and we Jews will do the same.” Instead, they are saying, “You give up yours and serve ours.” This is weasel stuff.

    Incidentally, Alt Right has almost nothing to do with rise of Trump, most of whose supporters are Middle Class and Working Class and never heard of the Alt Right before the Media played it up. Trump didn’t call on the Alt Right for special support. Most of his supporters were just working people or those worried about economic prospects and broken borders. Of course, Alt Right community supported Trump, but even then, MOST Trump supporters never heard of the Alt Right. It was the media that exaggerated the role of Alt Right because they wanted to taint Trump via association with extremists. This is easy to do with Alt Right because there’s a porous boundary between it and the lowlife 14/88 community. Either Alt Right is too stupid to distance itself from neo-nazi types, or too many in the Alt Right are fellow-travelers of the degenerate far right. Even Kevin MacDonald has carelessly associated with the likes of Greg Johnson who praise Hitler. Granted, there was a time when such alliances may have been necessary since any critic of Jewish power was blacklisted by the media and had to wander in the wilderness. When you got nothing, you have no choice but to seek shared refuge with other exilses. But there are dangers to associating too closely with sociopaths like Johnson.

    http://www.counter-currents.com/2014/04/the-burden-of-hitler-2014/

    And Richard Spencer dishonored his movement from the beginning by associating with loonies like Alex Kurtagic who is clearly neo-Nazi. He once made a list of admirable women, and half were Nazi women.

    Granted, some of this ‘fashy’ stuff may be goofing around or just plain nihilism. Many on the Alt Right grew up in the Age of Tarantino and Southpark that wallow in hipster anti-humanism. Their sensibility is akin to one in PULP FICTION that is so glib and nasty about blood-letting and sadism. Such mentality feels reverence for nothing. Even its moral content is but a perversion of morality, like in this explanation of US foreign policy. Nothing is sacred to these people. It’s like Jared Taylor complains of excessive irreverence on the Alt Right.

    I thought Jews were stupid to promote a movie like INGLORIOUS BASTERDS. True, it shows Jews taking revenge on Hitler, but it also promotes a kind of cold-blooded psychotic murderousness not unlike that of the SS and others that thought themselves ‘beyond good and evil’. INGLORIOUS BASTERDS isn’t about humanity in struggle against inhumanity. It is about inhumanity as ‘good guy’ vs inhumanity as ‘bad guy’. The Jews in the movie act like SS thugs. Given that the Liberal elites praised this kind of inhuman trash and junk — as well as rap music and gangsta culture — , it is rather amusing to see them now bitch about how Trump represents decline in civility and decency.

    Anyway, Alt Right generation grew up with cultural nihilism as their core sensibility, and this is reflected in their ‘fashy’ memes that sometimes even flirt with Nazi imagery. Because of the Southpark/Tarantino-esque trollish aspects of the Alt Right, one can never be sure how serious they are about this. But one thing for sure, even if Alt Right isn’t a media creation, the Alt Right as phenomenon is totally a media creation. If not for media spotlight, no one would know of it outside the Alt Right circles itself.
    Media just want to use Alt Right to smear Trump. Alt Right has no money and no organization.
    To be sure, some in the Media may be genuinely intrigued with Alt Right because Conservatism Inc has grown so dull and dreary reading from the same script over and over. In contrast, as loathsome as Alt Right views may seem to MSM, at the very least Alt Right is saying things that offer some fresh perspectives on the direction of American politics.

    Avik Roy has said GOP always played on ‘white nationalism’. But under Neocon domination, it is more accurate to say that ‘white nationalist’ tendencies were subsumed into Jewish nationalism(Zionism) and Jewish globo-supremacism. Because the natural passions of whites were suppressed, they sought some kind of outlet, and Neocons channeled them to serving Jewish identity, pride, and glory.

    But with debacle of Iraq, Wall Street meltdown, and the dawning realization that Jews were behind Obama(whose cultural war on US has been extreme, esp with ‘gay marriage’ and homomania and push for amnesty that will only encourage more massive illegal immigration), more and more white conservatives came to feel that it makes no sense to serve Jewish identity and interests since Jews will never reciprocate in kind.

    When Bill Buckley made a pact with Neocons, the hope was “we white conservatives will go all out to favor Jewish identity and Zionist interests, and you Jewish Neocons do something for white conservative identity and interests.” But it was a one-way movement of favors. White conservatives served Jewish identity and interests to the hilt, but Jews not only refused to serve white identity and interests but did everything to weaken them further. It would have been one thing for whites to wave the Zionist flag and for Neocons to tolerate the Confederate flag(at the very least). Instead, Neocons demand that whites wave the Zionist flag while Neocons burn the Confederate flag. While whites must praise Zionists who continue to occupy Palestinian territory, Neocons constantly remind white southerners that they are bad bad ‘racists’ who must repent forever and raise their daughters to surrender their wombs to Negroes.

    So, increasing numbers of white conservatives grew sour about Neocons and decided to pursue their own identity and interests than Jewish ones. After all, if Jews really hate ‘racism’, why do they cling to their own identity? Why do they say Israel has a ‘special’ relationship with the US. When Mitt Romney in 2012 said UK has a special history with the US — indeed, what nation was more crucial in the creation of America? — , Jews criticized him for singling it out over others. Geek, how unequal and unfair.
    But these very same Jews say that white conservatives must wave the Zionist flag and say loud and clear that Israel has a special relationship with the US.
    So, these Jews are not against nationalism and even supremacism per se. They jus abhor any kind of identity and interests that might interfere with the centrality of Jewish identity and interests.
    Indeed, even the mere notion of white interests angers Jews.
    Suppose a bunch of whites are adamantly opposed to white supremacism and believe all races to be equal. But suppose they do identify as whites and believe whites have certain interests that need to be addressed. That is all they ask. But even that would be seen as ‘extreme’ by Jews because the notion of ‘white interests’ implies that whites should favor their own interests over those of others. Jews think “Thou shalt have no Interest before Ours.” Jews are like a lover who wants freedom to sleep around with whomever but demands that his partner sleep ONLY with him.

    For increasing numbers of whites, this is no longer tenable even though white libs and white cons react differently to Jewish-centrism.
    White Libs(who are sincerely committed to universal equality) now sympathize just as much with Palestinians as with Jews. Indeed, even more with Palestinians because they are clearly the underdogs. In this way, they reject Jewish-centrism.

    In contrast, white cons(those who support Trump) react to Jewish-centrism by embracing a centrism of their own. White-centrism. Their view isn’t opposed to Jews being for Jewish power. That’s all very fine as long as whites are for white power.

    In that sense, white libs and white cons who reject Jewish-centrism are both principled in their own way.
    White libs(of those in BDS movement) believe in ‘equal justice’ for all.
    White cons(of those in Trump movement) believe in equal nationalism for all. Let Jews be for ‘Jewish nationalims’, let blacks be for ‘black nationalism’, and let whites be for ‘white nationalism’.
    Besides, as Diversity looms larger in the US, there will be more competition for resources and rewards by many groups on the basis of identity and interests. Back when whites dominated the US, they could afford to be magnanimous to non-whites. But that is no longer the case since Jews are the real ruling elites of America. Also, in the past, there was a bond between white elites and white masses. White elites led the white masses. Even FDR and Truman were ‘racist’ in this regard.
    But with white elites serving the GLOB than leading the white masses, the latter are looking for new leadership that will represent their interests and listen to their frustrations. And from the Neocon camp, they just want to walk away. They had enough. It’s goodbye yellowbrick road to all those crazy wars with no end in sight.

    • Replies: @Stonehands
  121. @David Ashton

    I mostly agree with you re anti-Semitic bozos. Where I differ is this: I’ve read MacDonald’s books & from what I know, he is correct in many particular points. But, Kevin MacDonald is wrong in most generalizations; his knowledge of, say, October Revolution is superficial & the whole idea of “group evolutionary strategy” is nonsense. Yet, he’s a good read.

    In this article MacDonald is mostly correct about Jewish elite’s media power; on the other hand, I think he is wrong about Jewish voters, who are far – very far- from being as homogeneous or anti-Trump as he imagines them to be.

    • Replies: @David Ashton
  122. schmenz says:
    @alexander

    “a) Saddam did not invade Kuwait in 1990.”

    yes he did, with the connivance of the US via April Glaspie.

    “b) The post war sanctions were designed to exterminate Iraqi children”

    yes, because the heirs of the Morgenthau Plan are still very active in the US government.

  123. Just watched Rio Bravo (again)
    Six point star on John Waine chest did not have a small circles at the ends.

  124. dahoit says:

    [You have been repeatedly warned to begin using proper punctuation and grammar in your comments but have not done so. All your other eight comments have already been trashed, and that will continue until you begin observing these very minimal standards.]

  125. gwynedd1 says:
    @Priss Factor

    The Arabs were even worse. I think 3 Caliphs in Baghdad were not born of slave women. Its ionic how quickly a situation morphs one of the most tribal societies where first cousin is common to when they have access to women of conquered peoples.

    That might be one reason why white hegemony are more lasting. They prefer their own women. The Arabs quickly lost their cultural integrity for their love of Persians and Slavs.

  126. Art says:

    This article is published on Rense.com today – 8/22

  127. Rurik says:
    @SolontoCroesus

    “when we rise, there rises also our terrible power of the purse”.

    when I first read that quote, I never really understood the implications. I just figured he meant how Jews were relatively more well-to-do than their Gentile neighbors and therefor could contribute more to political campaigns. It wasn’t until much later than I realized he was talking about the collective (and ill-gotten) wealth of the Rothschild’s enterprise. And how that wealth is used for global domination and wars and the destruction of all peoples and countries that the global Zionists have in their crosshairs at any given moment.

    that was an ‘ah ha’ moment

    there is no way out but through the Fed (Federal Reserve Bank swindle of biblical portent; owned and controlled by Zionist Jews)

    I thought I would never get over reading C Paul Vincent’s account of the starvation of Germany in WWI that cost the lives of 800,000 German civilians.

    the story here isn’t just the sadistic cruelty of their suffering, but the momentous betrayal that preceded it. Germany was promised honorable treatment if they’d just lay down their arms. Pres. Wilson had guaranteed all the war participants fair terms under his Fourteen Points. The German leadership trusted ‘Perfidious Albion’ and the assorted treacherous scum of the allies and laid down their arms nobly. Only to be tricked and betrayed into a mass-starvation campaign that drove them to agree to permanent slavery of the German people to the Allied maggots who had tricked them.

    As for the history books, I remember having access to lots of old British history books at one time, and once I took an interest in these things, I began to pour over some of these books for insights into how the first world war was started, and invariably, the British history books would describe how a treacherous and power-crazed Germany was hell bent on war with England and all the rest. It was all lies, and from every book from the period that I could find.

    Like the lies about the Lusitania, and the lies about Belgian babies tossed onto bayonets. All lies, just like the lies about Iraqi incubators and so many others.

    How little things change

    nothing new under the sun I guess..

    End the Fed!

  128. @Anonymous

    That Ledeen quote is significant – source, please?

    • Replies: @utu
    , @Anonymous
  129. @Svigor

    My paraphrasing of just some of the torrent of false personal abuse directed at me, and of various outlandish or menacing contributions on TOO in recent weeks, is completely accurate, and the originals can ALL BE VERIFIED from the blog-site archives. I believe in free speech (apart from criminal incitement) all round, but when I am subjected to a hail of insults, I would appreciate my freedom to make a factual response, or when someone like “Rerevisionist” announces e.g. that nuclear weapons are a Jewish lie, I would welcome a different view even if I am the only one to present it. My two successive attempts to disagree with the proposal that the whites of the world should impose a punitive boycott upon my fellow-whites in Britain were simply suppressed.

    There is just too much pseudonymous “nutty comment” on TOO and not enough sensible stuff permitted. MacDonald’s trilogy was an important contribution, and these crazy contributions do his reputation no credit, and his campaign, no help. They serve only one interest – that of the ADL or the SPLC – only to pleased to have (0r provide) gross parodies of “antisemitic argument”, to reinforce their Never Again organizations and their funding, and to put barriers between the Charles Martel Society and normal, thoughtful and decent Gentiles.

    • Replies: @Alden
  130. Boris says:

    At this time, there is not one MSM outlet on board with Trump, and the coverage given to manufactured crises about Trump vastly outstrips coverage given to the very real Clinton corruption:

    Trump’s stupid actions are very real and quite newsworthy. Instead of whining about the press you might consider the reality that you have a uniquely terrible candidate.

  131. Boris says:

    In fact, I agree that Trump’s candidacy is an implicitly White revolt motivated by fears about what being a white minority in a majority black and brown America would mean for the future for their families and our institutions— entirely reasonable concerns. But the point here is that the organized Jewish community is consciously determined that this issue be kept out of public debate

    I would love to see this debate. You think that Trump complaining that America had too many brown and black people would be a winning campaign move? Even he’s not that dumb.

  132. annamaria says:
    @utu

    Yes, http://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/flirting-with-fascism/

    and more: “Ledeen… was a student of fascism in Italy, where he acquired his beliefs for his book ‘Universal Fascism’ (fascism with the anti-Semitic components removed)…”
    http://aangirfan.blogspot.com/2007/08/michael-ledeen-gladio-and-9-11.html
    https://wikispooks.com/wiki/Operation_Gladio/B

    “In contradiction of CIA denials about the true purpose of Gladio and the scope of its operations and neoconservative lies that there was no Gladio, the following excerpt, from joint resolution (EP 22.11.90) of the European Parliament condemns actions of US and allied intelligence agencies involved. http://users.westnet.gr/~cgian/gladio.htm

    “According to former weapons inspector Scott Ritter, the “evidence” on Iran’s nuclear program actually came from the Mossad”

    • Replies: @alexander
  133. alexander says:
    @annamaria

    Annamarina,

    Gareth Porter, in his book “Manufactured Crisis” does an extraordinary job in pulling back the curtain on the manufactured “evidence” supplied to the IAEA that was central to the Iran sanctions being implemented.
    There is a strong suspicion the infamous “phony laptop” was supplied by either the MEK, the Mossad or both.

    What strikes me, is not so much the sanctions on Iran, but Israels “timing” in launching its tsunami of condemnatory hasbara which facilitated the Iran issue moving onto the front burner of the Obama administration……This strategy was highly successful in wholly derailing the peace process which looked like it was headed, at the time, to the UNSC for a definitive vote.

    Israel, and its powerful organs of persuasion in the US were able to scream so loudly “IRAN”, they literally, by force of will, moved the P5 plus One, out of drawing up the final resolution on Israel /Palestine and instead spending the next 14 months hammering out the details of the Iran Nuke deal.

    All thanks to “phony” evidence most probably supplied by yours truly.

    • Replies: @annamaria
  134. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @David Ashton

    From his book The War Against The Terror Masters.

  135. Barbara says:

    The whole thing makes me feel like puking. We haven’t had a real reporter since Helen Thomas who was fired for putting them in their place. This is for you Helen. The so-called media are nothing but lying fascist rags and teleprompter readers just like the puppets obum and kill. It’s pretentious beyond belief, un-American, and needs to be shut down immediately. Traitors. Our country was sold to the highest bidder by criminals who had no right to sell it. They got filthy stinking rich and we got screwed. Who else got screwed? The entire Mideast and the rest of the world. We may as well change the name of our country to israel-west so the truth would be exposed to all. We never elected them and it’s the biggest damn scam ever known to humankind that they’ve taken us and most of the globe over. There would be world peace tomorrow if their influence ended. I call for it right here and now.

    We need to take our country back. We need America-firsters, not israeli-firsters. Money needs to be taken out of elections 100%. What a farce. Drama of the absurd. Feigned outrage, Trump and Putin demonizing, and lies lies lies. The agencies we pay to prosecute crimes need to put these traitors/criminals in jail or get fired. Guantanamo. They love torture, so be it. Past criminals too. The reason this country is in deep doggie-doo-doo is because of these psychopaths agendas and their dupes. Corrupt is not a powerful enough word for the utter filth, depravity, and evil that permeates every corner of the cesspools they control:

    washington d.c., congress, white house, wall street, media, law/courts, pentagon,alphabet agencies, health (destroying) industry, hollywood, las vegas, state dept., academia, silicon valley, military industrial complex, federal reserve, central bank fraud, commerce, and more. These vile sub-human parasites need to be put in jail and the wealth they hoovered through crimes-against-the-world needs to be nationalized to repair the damage. Global wealth nationalized.

    [MORE]

    We lost our sovereignty. We’re attacking, stalking, spying on, and harassing just about every country on the face of the earth for them. They want no less than to control entire globe. The military is being used, at our expense, as their hitmen in their illegal theft of resources, human trafficking, drug trade, and worse. Syria and Lebanon are being destroyed because they are the next Palestine. We’re all Palestinians. I’ve lost count as to how many countries have been destroyed and many millions slaughtered. Iraq, Afghanistan, Yemen, Ukraine, Yugoslavia, Libya, Vietnam. Many other countries in Africa, South and Central America, etc… Has any country been untouched by their “regime” changes? They call democratically elected governments “regimes”. It’s our turn for regime change.

    Ignore their insane, deceptive, idiotic accusations such anti-semite. It’s called pro-America and pro-world you turds. We’re way past sick to death of it. Not one more apology. They aren’t even semites, the Palestinians are. THEY are the anti-semites. They’re Turks and Mongols as proven through genetic research. One more intervention, free saudi arabia, israel, and us. This cuts off the paychecks to isis (daesh). The axis of evil is them and that’s where the weapons of mass destruction are. Shut down ngo’s, special interests, the cfr, vatican, rothschild money racket, rockefeller/soros/kissinger and the rest of the psychopaths that are our problem. Impeach the traitors. Get a new form of governance impervious to takeover by an fraudulent invisible government and all corruption. Cooperate with other countries, not control them. Shut down 800 plus military bases. Defense only. Slash the gargantuan military by 90% or more. Stop corporate person-hood. Do brain scans to make psychopaths ineligible for public service. They don’t serve others, they serve themselves. There’s no bigger conflict of interest.

    The whistleblowers need to be elevated to the status of hero. Political and drug related prisoners released. I hereby declare the term anti-semite invalid. This is the United States of America. If you don’t like it, leave! Good riddance.

  136. RobinG says:
    @SolontoCroesus

    Reading the Engel quote, it’s not clear if he thinks Bush 41’s “decision to act” came before or after Saddam moved into Kuwait. I’ve always favored the enticement scenario, an idea sparked by Dan Rather’s “old soldier” Iraq expert – who never appeared again after that first night. (Anybody know who that man was?)

    Here’s what “Andrea” said at Amazon,
    “Dennis Ross cut his teeth in the ‘negotiations’ that resulted in the Persian Gulf war, a war that did not have to happen. It’s been a while since I read Salinger’s book, but I recall that the Arabs were working hard to resolve the crisis amongst themselves; the Americans — Kissinger, James Baker, Dennis Ross — flush with the triumph of the fall of Soviet Union, intervened in the Arabs’ efforts and derailed them.
    In his most recent book, Ross praises the ‘statecraft’ that brought an international coalition into the arena to fight the Gulf war, but he does not acknowledge that THE WAR DID NOT HAVE TO OCCUR, as the conflict was being resolved internally.
    It would be terrific if Salinger’s book were re-released as a counterpoint to neocon — now chameleonized to ‘neoliberal’ — hasbara.”

    • Replies: @alexander
  137. annamaria says:
    @alexander

    After 9/11 the Empire put to Guantanamo and Abu Ghraib and “renditioned” scores of innocent people, some were teens, whose lives were deserted by confinement or tortures (some were simply murdered for the entertainment), whereas the real culprits have been enjoying the loot of war profiteering (for instance, where are the $6.5 trillions “lost” by Pentagon?). The humiliation of muslim world by way of the the illegal wars and regime changes has been accomplished along certain plans conceived by the sick psychopathic minds in the US/Israel.
    As if a bunch of serial murderers cannot stop themselves from the thrill of killing human beings, even if the thrill is leading to apocalypse.

    • Replies: @alexander
  138. alexander says:
    @annamaria

    It really is a horrific disaster, isn’t it ?

  139. Corvinus says:
    @Priss Factor

    “No, kids pick up on identity pretty early.”

    Not in the manner you prescribed.

  140. alexander says:
    @RobinG

    Its worth it to revisit Ambassador Joe Wilson’s statements on the matter.

    As I recall he was the last US representative, to engage Saddam directly before the onset of Desert Storm.

    Perhaps his take on Saddam’s reticence to remove his military from Kuwait should have some bearing on your (and S2C’s) revisionist inclinations ?

    • Replies: @RobinG
    , @utu
  141. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    Would Jews be blamed for Trump’s defeat? Yes, by Trump and his following of near-do-wells, dupes, professional provocateurs and stooges. How is it you might suppose otherwise?

    • Agree: Boris
  142. @Priss Factor

    “That’s globo-neo-imperialism, not fascism. I’m the only true fascist.”

    Who cares what you are?

    “True fascism is nationalism and peace.”

    Hitler lost the war and Germany was occupied for 50 years. So much for that theory.

    You must be shyster lawyer- sophist dunce, SO WE’LL REPEAT IT LOUDER:

    Reichstag Fire Decree= Patriot Act

    Kudo’s Alexander.

  143. nickels says:

    It is blatantly obvious to anyone who hasn’t a stone for a brain that the combination of Jewishness anf Jewish power are incompatible with Western, Christian civilization. Jews chose the Talmud over Christ; they can only blame themselves for what is to come.

  144. RobinG says:
    @alexander

    Sorry, A. Grape, but the understanding accrued in real time: nothing revisionist about it.

    No internet search required, it was on network TV: Kuwait was stealing oil from mutually held reserves. Saddam complained – for a long time and to no avail – to the UN. He told the US that he’d take matters in his own hands, Gillespie said, not our concern, BAM — into the mouse trap. (Incubator babies and other nonsense ensue. Why the propaganda if H.W. had a good case?)

    Maybe you were still in diapers in ’91, so after you read Wikipedia, you think we’re revising.

    • Replies: @alexander
    , @Sam Shama
  145. alexander says:
    @RobinG

    Don’t apologize to me Robin.

    I never said Saddam wasn’t “mouse trapped”.

    What I said is that he and “only he” , chose to stick his foot in the trap , when he was.

    He made the decision to invade, No one else did.

    Maybe Kuwait’s drilling into shared reserves was an authentic bone of contention.

    Were it that Iraq had no other WELLS, perhaps true grounds for a “dust up”.

    How long did Saddam work the UN track to force Kuwait to stop …. 5 yrs , 10 yrs, 15 yrs ?

    There are a lot of people who owe me money, who I would love to just punch in the nose, but I use my lawyer to do the punching, and get a judge to order a ruling, even if it takes ten times longer.

    I don’t like to have to wait that long for justice, but you know Robin, sometimes you just have to.

    Saddam made HIS choice, no one else made it for him.

    • Replies: @alexander
  146. alexander says:
    @alexander

    And may I add, Robin(Grape?)

    If you are so cock sure, it was only over “Kuwait’s drilling into shared reserves”, why didn’t Saddam merely commandeer the wells by force, and hold them until the UN would address the issue ?

  147. @Bardon Kaldian

    @ Bardon Kaldian. Explanation of the role of Jews in the Bolshevik revolution is indeed actually much more complicated than presented in “Culture of Critique” or in the booklets by e.g. Britton, Duke or Fahey, &c. But in my view MacDonald is excellent on the Freudian racket, very good on the New Left/PC/Critical Studies/Marcuse impacts, and possibly understates the effect of Boas and his craftily promoted acolytes on anthropology.

    It is important to get into the minds of Jewish thinkers to understand their reactions since Hitler and Israel, whether or not we welcome their propensity for multiculturalism, migration, and the internationalism of both capitalism and communism. No-one can help how they are born or even raised, but there are some specifically Jewish interests and activities inimical to western nationhood. The answer is not screaming hatred, paranoid fantasy or violence on any scale.

    “Our age is not only the most Jewish but also the most effeminate…an age for which history, life, science, everything has become nothing but economics….” (Otto Weininger).

    • Replies: @Beefcake the Mighty
  148. Sam Shama says:
    @RobinG

    I don’t mean to push in, but I recall reading about the disputed drilling and extraction by Kuwait and Saddam’s resulting furor over it, followed by a not idle threat to march on to the KSA?

  149. RobinG says:

    That could have been interesting: kick out the monarchy, give women equal rights… Do you really think he would have marched? Hard to say which threats are idle, but that’s the whole point of the US-KSA oil for protection agreement. I doubt if he would have.

    Funny story though. A friend of mine was working in Dhahran at the time. They were outside playing football when they watched one of Saddam’s scuds sail over the Saudi buildings and land in the American compound. Pure luck, of course. You have to remember, by that time the US had their troops all over KSA and were moving against Saddam. The US being there, that’s what started all the trouble, Bin Laden, etc.

    Whoever in this thread (S2C ?) said that the US, Kuwait, the UN, etc. failed to exhaust all options and negotiation before they committed to force was quite right. That’s the point.

    • Replies: @Sam Shama
  150. Sam Shama says:
    @RobinG

    Not idle in the sense that he matched his words with action on Kuwait. Was he baited? Most likely.
    Would he have marched on to the KSA? Hard to say, but on balance I think not, seeing as he waited long enough [3-4 months wasn’t it?] , during which, U.S. forces in strength were scrambled to the KSA.

    Wild story about that scud landing in the U.S. compound. [We were visiting Tel Aviv, and I had turned ‘teen that year, ready to go to battle and such, and looked upon Bibi who was deputy minister in the PM’s office with admiration [he was on TV all the time]. Needless to say my views on him as I move on to the middle years have moved a bit 🙂 ]

  151. utu says:
    @alexander

    I remember that G.H. Bush seemed to be very reluctant to go to war against Iraq. Media were not warmongering. Some were saying that it was just an internal matter among Arabs states. However after the meeting with Margaret Thatcher (was it in Aspen) everything has changed. It seemed as if Bush got his orders to pursue the war. So he did.

  152. @Priss Factor

    That was awesome, its tough to parse the various anons here- but we know who YOU are…

    Keep up your unique analysis of the peculiar times we are enduring, hopefully better angels will prevail.

  153. Alden says:
    @David Ashton

    You are right about the comments bring lunatic fringe. I’ve read TOO for years and it seems normal people have just disappeared from the comments section.

    The lunatics did unleash a torrent of abuse at you and the moderator jumped in. You have been fighting for Whites for about 40 years while all the commenters did is claim that Italians are not White and Germany is entitled to Poland.

    • Replies: @David Ashton
  154. Alden says:
    @Priss Factor

    Babies of most black men never get a chance to I print on Daddy because black men practice squirt and scram reproduction.

  155. @Anonymous

    First, Jews act as a collective only when they perceive rightly or wrongly threatened collectively, which in the case of Hitler is undeniable in view of all his statements on the subject from 1920 through 1945. This is quite separate from the credibility of industrialized mass-asphyxiation and cremation of three million of them.

    Secondly, Jews like other groups both exhibit negative and positive characteristics, particularly in the eyes of other ethnic and/or faith groups. This issue has become more important, since WW2 and the creation of Israel. The question is how to handle it, and reduce adverse impacts, in an accurately informed and morally decent manner.

    Thirdly, generally Jewish political sympathy has shifted from the New Jerusalem in Eastern Europe, Trotsky and anti-Nazism to the Old Jerusalem in the Middle East, Herzl and anti-Islamism. Gentile patriots can work constructively with this sea-change without giving blind support to neo-con interventions, Likud or Zionism.

    Finally, Jews in the US and Europe are not united in support of mass-immigration from the Near East or Global South, whether or not they are motivated solely by ethnic self-interest. My view is that these are welcome on board the “Aryan” chariot but not in its driving seat.

    To write more would require a book, and that is no longer possible in my case, unfortunately.

    • Replies: @utu
  156. @Alden

    Thanks to Alden and Bon, for support re TOO postings, and to others re Ledeen.

    My main political activity in opposition to communism and mass-immigration has always been support for “white identity, interests and culture” (especially England), starting as a student – when e.g. I publicly confronted Professor Klineberg over black IQ, and later the South African communists Goldreich and Volpe, who (as I guessed) were on their way to get weapons. This preceded MacDonald’s departure from leftist activism with Jewish comrades.

    It would be vain to detail more about my lifelong activities, except to note that TOO’s chief “resident nutter” tried to find out my “real” identity with all the assiduity of Zionist “Defense” Black-listers, but none of their competence; it was enough for him to dismiss me as a (((Jewish patsy))), although I am an Anglo-Saxon of Christian parentage, whose writings over five decades are publicly available.

    MacDonald’s “Moderator” did indeed “jump in” – entirely against me, adding his own innuendo to those in several direct questions to which replies were suppressed in each case. This site is now a gratuitous asset to MacDonald’s worst enemies.

  157. utu says:
    @David Ashton

    “To write more would require a book, and that is no longer possible in my case, unfortunately.” – Do not write it. It would not be original. Rather read Israel Shamir’s Zeno’s Arrow where he demolishes Jewish argument (like yours) against generalization.

    http://www.israelshamir.net/English/Zeno_Arrow.htm

    “This ‘generalisation ban’ is an integral part of Jewish Stealth technology. Without some ability to generalise, we can’t answer even an innocent question, say, how many apples are there on the desk? Otherwise, you will be answered: these apples are all different, and can’t be counted. In order to count, you have to generalise. No political discourse is possible without generalisations. And people generalise without difficulty.”

    • Replies: @Sam Shama
    , @David Ashton
  158. @KenH

    Jews were recognized as a national group in the Soviet Union and it was not unusual for some to convert to Christianity. You are right, the issue concerns race, not religion (Judaism).

  159. Sam Shama says:
    @utu

    While that might appear a reasonable position on the surface, a more introspective one would surely say that generalisation as a method is bounded by the degree of uniformity of the underlying subject or population. Ordinary conversational generalisation may be fine, but any serious work demands greater attention to distributional issues. Ignore that, and the entire argument becomes specious.

  160. Marcus says:
    @Mark Green

    When I perused it regularly a few years back there was a lot of Nordicist crap. Not that I believe in white multiculturalism, but have a better argument than claiming all of Spain and Italy looked Estonian before the Moors showed up and raped everyone a la True Romance.

  161. @utu

    @ utu
    I have read the Zeno_Arrow article & will download it to my extensive files when I replace my “recently deceased” printer. There is good sense in it, including the final para re “Jewish Communism”, but there are many other relevant books and articles also to consider. I shall not attempt to list the two hundred or so I possess and/or have read. They keep on coming, from the upper stratosphere like David Nirenberg’s “Anti-Judaism: The History of a Way of Thinking” (2013) down to the Zionist hysterics of Alan Dershowitz.

  162. @Beefcake the Mighty

    @ Beefcake the Mighty
    Thanks for the reference to an English translation of Solzhenitsyn; I read the Udo Walendy summary in the “Barnes Review”, and of course his “Gulag Archipelago” and various other pieces, including a defense of nationalism.

    I shall resist the temptation to add an extensive list selected from the already innumerable writings on the Jews and Communism, except to say that the following few items should not be ignored in any comprehensive review: Julius Carlebach, “Karl Marx & the Radical Critique of Judaism” (1973); Andre Gerrits, “The Myth of Jewish Communism” (2009); Jerry Z. Muller, “Capitalism and the Jews” (2015) [esp. reff. pp.246-250]; Dan Diner & Jonathan Frankel, “Dark Times, Dire Decisions: Jews and Communism” (2004); Norman F. Cantor, “The Sacred Chain: A History of the Jews” (1995); Philip Mendes, “Jews, Ukrainians….”, Patterns of Prejudice, April 1996, pp.59-62; Stephen M. Cullen, “Left Turn Ahead”, The Jewish Chronicle, August 11, 2016.

    The notion of a self-consciously Jewish conspiracy behind communism was reinforced by the manufactured “Protocols of the Elders of Zion”, regarding which there is fairly recent fresh research.

    Another far from unrelated issue is “The Holocaust” as a quasi-religion.

    • Replies: @utu
  163. utu says:
    @David Ashton

    The role of Jews in Bolshevik revolution is covered pretty well in film “In the Shadow of Hermes” by Jüri Lina (2009). But what is more interesting is the funding of the revolution by US bankers which pretty well covered in the film.

    • Replies: @David Ashton
  164. joe webb says:

    like communism coming at western europe after 1920 and normal white folks alarmed and turning to fascism, now the latter-day communists (now race not class ) are coming at us again.
    Fascism will be what White resistance right now will be called when it becomes even stronger.

    First come the commies, then come the fascists. This time Whites will win. Call it whatever you want all you eunuchs and shabbas goyem.

    War is coming and traitors always get it first.

    Joe Webb

  165. @utu

    Paying the piper, US & UK, then & now.

    Re foreign finance for Soviet Communism, see e.g.: Antony C. Sutton, “Wall Street & the Bolshevik Revolution” (1974/2011); Michael Futrell, “Northern Underground” (1963); Z. A. B. Zeman and W. B. Scharlau, “Merchant of Revolution” (1965); Arsene Goulevitch, “Czarism & Revolution” (1962), pp.223-234; Simon Sebag Montefiore, “Young Stalin” (2008), pp.206-208; Wikipedia entries, Olof Aschberg, Karl Moor, Armand Hammer, Joseph Fels, Alexander Helphand-Parvus, Sisson Documents. Cf. studies by Joseph Finder, Charles Levinson, Miles Costick, Karen LaFollette.

    In Britain, the contrast in Labour Party funds between Zionist Blair and pro-Palestine Corbyn is significant. See e.g. Center for Media & Democracy, SourceWatch, “Labour Friends of Israel” online. Supermarket owner David Sainsbury ($ 1.3 billion net-worth) has donated £8 million to various anti-Brexit groups “under different aliases” (“Sun”, August 26); he has mixed Dutch-Jewish and English ancestry.

  166. nickels says:
    @David Ashton

    E Michael Jones ‘Jewish Revolutionary Spirit’ has a rather excellent development of the tribes role in the Russian tragedy.

    • Replies: @David Ashton
  167. @nickels

    @ nickels

    I am familiar with earlier RC writings on Jews, from Denis Fahey and Leon de Poncins to Hilaire Belloc (1937 rev) and Christopher Dawson, but I have not yet perused this book, which sounds like a “Papist” counterpart to the “Protestant” volumes on Rabbinical Judaism v Christianity by Jonas E. Alexis.

    The role of Jews in 20th century communism is a surprisingly complex matter, beset by fantasy and disinformation; examples on request, with patient Moderator consent. Meanwhile, please consult the sources given above.

    I think the “Protocols” originated in a French Catholic response – satire, parody and forgery are not quite the right words – to the undeniable Mason-Jew alliance and gold crisis at the end and turn of the 19th-century. Combined with the Maurice Joly plagiarism (whose insight into autocratic government led Boris Souvarine to suggest that it provided Stalin’s guidelines in duplicity and ruthlessness), those contemporary references are sufficient to explain why it “uncannily” fits similar subsequent facts.

    Much new research has occurred since Alexander Baron put an excellent bibliography online; and modern investigators (including David Duke) should consider all the diverse material from e.g. Cesare G. De Michelis, Michael Hagemeister, Kerry Bolton, Esther Webman and even Peter Myers.

    Nearly a century ago the eccentric English doyenne of conspiracy theory, Nesta Webster (who did NOT regard the “Protocols” as authentic), warned of the worldwide revolutionary movement that intended to abolish national sovereignty, monarchy, private property inheritance, the church and the traditional family. Maybe not so “paranoid” after all!

  168. geokat62 says:
    @SolontoCroesus

    “Just when I thought I was out… they pull me back in.” – Michael Corleone

    Please excuse this cameo appearance, but given my Hellenic roots I just could not allow this comment to go uncontested.

    you sh&&in me?… Why just look at the great state of Greek civilization today.

    While it’s undoubtedly true that Greece is currently floundering in dire financial straits, this in no way diminishes the tremendous legacy their ancestors left behind, laying the foundations of Western civilization.

    Yossi Alpher confused Bruce Reidel with his therapist and accidentally revealed what Jews really really want; the civilization that Jews know is superior to theirs and with which they passionately wish to be associated: it’s not the Greeks, it’s the Persians, sobbed Alpher –

    check it out for yourself

    Guess what, I took your advice… and I checked it out myself. I listened to YA’s talk including the Q&A (approx. 90 minutes) and nowhere did I here Alpher “sob” that “the civilization that [we] know is superior to [ours] and with which [we] passionately wish to be associated” is Iran.

    Perhaps you could set the record straight by providing us the precise time in the audio he purportedly “sobbed” this admission.

    Speaking of admissions, here is what rabbi Ken Spiro had to say about the one civilization that gave his co-religionists the most angst:

    In short, the Greeks introduced into human consciousness an idea which is going to come into play as one of the most powerful intellectual forces in modern history ― humanism. The human being is the center of all things. The human mind and its ability to understand and observe and comprehend things rationally is the be-all-and-end-all. That’s an idea which comes from the Greeks.

    Above all, the Greeks thought that this was enlightenment, the highest level of civilization. They had a strong sense of destiny and believed that their culture was ordained to become the universal culture of humanity.

    The Jews had a different vision. The Jews believed that a world united in the belief in one God and ascribing to one absolute standard of moral values ― including respect for life, peace, justice, and social responsibility for the weak and poor ― was the ultimate future of the human race.

    This Jewish ideology was wedded to an extreme, uncompromising exclusivity of worship (as demanded by the belief in one God) and a complete intolerance of polytheistic religious beliefs or practices. There was only one God and so only one God could be worshipped, end of story.

    To the Jews, human beings were created in the image of God. To the Greeks, gods were made in the image of human beings. To the Jews, the physical world was something to be perfected and elevated spiritually. To the Greeks the physical world was perfect. In short, to Greeks, what was beautiful was holy; to the Jews what was holy was beautiful.

    Such disparate views were bound to clash, sooner or later.

    http://kenspiro.com/article/history-crash-course-27-the-greek-empire/

    Got to run, I have to finish watching the Godfather.

  169. @Beefcake the Mighty

    Agreed, re Brexit – “open to the world” plus its cheap imports and its cheap labor, an “Afro-Asian” island instead of a “European” province &c. From a frying-pan into a fire, whatever “Their” role, before or after. Nothing to do with David Icke’s Lizards from Lost Lemuria, however.

  170. Understand says: • Website
    @Anonymous

    Eustace Mullins OUTED DAVID DUKE as a Zionist owned puppet, as are almost all the “opposition”.

    On a more basic level, remember that “they” always control all sides, they fund and instigate all revolutions (consider the French Revolution and what they did, and the heavily documented Russian Revolution).

    Remember that the Nazi party was an all Zionist AshkeNAZI
    creation, a union of the failed socialists and the failed Zionists in Germany.

    Understand that none of the actors on the stage are independent and real in the sense that they are portrayed. Elections are and always have been nothing more than entertainment. Ron Mazak is the stage name of the actor playing the role of Donald Trump. The player who feigned trying to attack “Trump” is Brett Greenberg, grandson of Maurice Greenberg, son of Michael Greenberg. He appears in many faked events to the point where it is now the equivalent of a modern parlor game to see who can spot Brett first in the photos and footage of the staged events.

    Academics seem incapable of questioning their given reality, so will be the last to notice the all-pervasive media fakery.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Kevin MacDonald Comments via RSS
PastClassics
What Was John McCain's True Wartime Record in Vietnam?
Are elite university admissions based on meritocracy and diversity as claimed?