The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Robert Weissberg Archive
Is President Trump a Racist?
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>
shutterstock_604604009

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New Reply
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Is President Trump a racist? If an impartial trial were held today, the President could certainly muster a formidable defense. After all, under his administration black unemployment is at an all time low, his re-industrialization policy is perfectly suited to provide even more jobs for African Americans and trillions spent on rebuilding our infrastructure will only add to the total. It is also arguable that reducing Hispanic immigration will help blacks compete economically. Equally important, his administration has barely laid a hand on the sacred cows of the Civil Rights movement—affirmative action, racial jerrymandering, the racially segregated system of historically black colleges and universities, and all the government agencies explicitly responsible for enforcing the civil rights agenda. Recall that his State of the Union speech mentioned post-prison vocational training, a policy favored by countless civil rights activists. To be sure, the Justice Department has here and there rolled back (or ignored) some “pro-black” Obama era regulations, for example, racially proportional school expulsions, but these measures are relatively insignificant and may in fact have hindered, not helped, African Americans.

Indeed, the evidence that would be introduced to convict him of racism is of the dog whistle variety, if that. Did he use the term “shithole” to depict Haiti and some African nations? But it could have been far worse—accurately applying the term to Detroit or East St. Louis. Does saying that there were good people on both sides in the Charlottesville, VA riot really an endorsement of the Klan? Was his hesitation in denouncing David Duke a tip-off to his secret aversion to blacks? Does his repeated support for the police, the flag and standing for the national anthem signify an attack on blacks? Has anybody ever recorded the Donald using the “N” word or otherwise demeaning blacks? And on and on.

Alas, all this iffy evidence doesn’t matter. Who needs a smoking gun? Denouncing Trump as a certified white racist has become a mini-industry (a Google search on “Is Trump a Racist” received 34.2 million hits) and his accusers are rarely challenged. Charles Blow, a columnist for the New York Time recently said, “It is not a stretch to say that Trump is racist. It’s not a stretch to say that he is a white supremacist. It’s not a stretch to say that Trump is a bigot.” In case you failed to grasp Blow’s point, he clarifies it bit: “Trump is a racist. We can put that baby to bed. ‘Racism’ and ‘racist’ are simply words that have definitions, and Trump comfortably and unambiguously meets those definitions.” Case closed.

What can possibly explain this compulsion to label Trump as a racist despite the paucity of strong confirming evidence? Is this the cheap shot equivalent of denouncing one’s enemies as “commies” during the 1950s?

The place to begin understanding this strange phenomenon is to distinguish between a race realist—people who recognizes racial differences even if they put blacks in a bad light–and a racist, a believer in a racial hierarchy with whites on top and blacks at the bottom. A race realist acknowledges that blacks are more crime prone than whites and leaves it at that; a racist uses this fact as proof of black inferiority. Though conceptionally distinct, the two terms (along with “White Supremacist”) are now conflated so pointing out, for example, that blacks do relatively poorly in school (an empirical fact) is, according to some, identical to saying that whites are superior to blacks (an opinion). Peter Brimelow of VDARE acknowledges this conflation by labelling demonstrable facts that draw the epithet “racist” as hate facts.

Trump is undoubtedly a race realist, though not necessarily a racist, for the simple reason that as a successful businessman he must accept reality as it is. Business is Darwinian—personnel and strategy mistakes invariably bring ruin. Even bleeding-heart liberal entrepreneurs eventually learn that survival requires hard-headed realism, or else. Recall Eastern Airlines, Woolworths, Blockbuster Video and hundreds of other long-gone business that got it wrong. To be sure, these bankruptcies seldom involved race, but racial consideration can play a role in business successes (for example, Chicken George, a defunct black-owned food restaurants that started in Baltimore) but such race-related failures as can be seen by the notable absence of major chains in black-dominated neighborhoods thanks to shop-lifting, vandalism, bad checks and other practices that raise operating costs to unacceptable levels. .

The attentiveness to an inescapable economic reality is unlike the academy where the sociology department can hire an alcoholic airhead, award him tenure for a bizarre screed on the white patriarchy and still flourish as if nothing happened. Government agencies and non-profits similarly enjoy the luxury of hiring incompetents, so the pursuit of a social justice agenda has no downside. Businesses are fundamentally different.

Now for the reality that dare not speak its name: race and ethnicity often play key roles in hotel industry decisions though for legal reasons these are never acknowledged. After some trial and error, a restaurant owner may discover that his Ecuadorian waiters are superb, so why interview non-Ecuadorians? Similarly, if customers of a certain ilk disproportionately cause trouble, for example, being unruly, just keep them away by eliminating their favorite menu items. Racial/ethnic stereotypes are typically cheap and accurate ways of judging potential employees and customers.

ORDER IT NOW

I do not have access to profiles of Trump employees and customers, but I’d bet my last nickel that as befitting a luxury brand, the Trump’s empire does not exactly hang out the “Welcome” sign to African Americans. A penchant for over-the-top prices is the most obvious but only the beginning. I’d further speculate that as is typical with American businesses, there are few blacks in top executive positions while the Group Sales division rarely target black churches and fraternal organizations. Nor do Trump casinos bus in inner-city residents by enticing them with a free drink, cheap all-you-can-eat buffets, and “loose” slot machines. And these exclusionary “racist” tactics must number in the dozens, and while some may be devious, most are perfectly legal. Nor is Trump unique is favoring some ethnic groups over others. It is no accident that Los Vegas has a thriving community of Asians—they make excellent hotel employees. Similarly, top New York City clubs and restaurants disproportionately hire Hispanics, and Trump once boasted of this partiality in a campaign speech.

All and all, those in the Trump organization (and many comparable luxury brands) know full well that their affluent, nearly all-white and increasingly gambling-loving Asian clientele are loath to mix with crowds of down-market blacks. Business managers also know from past experiences that if they need low-level employees, from hotel maids to line cooks, they are better off hiring Chinese immigrants, young recent arrivals from Eastern Europe, Filipinos and hard-working Hispanics. To repeat, such tactics are not KKK-like white racism; all reflect sound, hard-headed business choices and it is the very soundness of these obvious choices that enrages many blacks.

So, for the countless enemies of President Trump he is man who absolutely refuses to drink the racial Kool Aid by celebrating social justice at the expense of profits. These daily business decisions in his empire tell the world what he honestly thinks of blacks—with perhaps few exceptions they are not especially worthy employees, they don’t deserve executive positions and are undesirable customers. And, no doubt, if he were pressed on this dreary assessment of blacks, his likely rejoinder would be: why else must the government spend millions and issue endless coercive edicts to pressure employers to hire blacks? Truly a case of actions speaking louder than words and only by incorrectly conflating race realism with racism is he is a racist.

Now imagine an alternative universe where Trump retires from business and to make amends for past sins, builds the “Trump Great America” complete with a championship golf course, a spa, a casino and all the other top-of- the-line amenities. This time around, however, he embraces multiculturalism, diversity and inclusion. The staff top to bottom would “look like America,” training programs recruit perpetually jobless inner-city kids (many with criminal records and drug addictions) and he allocates 250 rooms for historically under-served populations unable to pay full price. Security would be handled entirely by former DACA kids. Brochures and TV ads will feature gays, the disabled, the obese and people of every hue and shade romping in the pool or playing roulette. Entertainment features over-the-top Hip Hop spectaculars with Dr. Dre, Wu-Tang Clan, Snoop Dogg and Coolio but at affordable prices.

Let me offer three guaranteed predictions. First, the Trump America would be a troubled property thanks to its “non-traditional clientele” though customer ratings would be ever so delicate regarding the source of the trouble. Second, being a savvy businessman Trump would demand huge up-front tax-payer supplied subsidies and promises of future bailouts to cover anticipated losses. After all, providing fantastic jobs for the “wonderful” hard-core unemployed who might otherwise enter the school-to-prison pipelines will not come cheap.

Lastly, he’d finally get to address the NAACP annual meeting where he would receive a standing all-is-forgiven ovation. Maxine Waters would come out of retirement to hug and kiss the Donald and hail him as a man who truly believes in America. She tells the beaming Donald, that the Congressional Black caucus (including all staff and their families and significant others) has already reserved every “affordable” below market rate rooms for its next convention. The Donald is now officially cured of his racism.

 
• Category: Ideology • Tags: Blacks, Donald Trump, Racism 
Hide 106 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Thomm says:

    1) No, he is not.
    2) Whatever he is, he is better than Obama.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
    AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
    These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
    Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
    More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  2. Jesus H. God — is there any end at all to the race huckstering of Weissberg’s tribe, whose own murderous, supremacist creed puts pale to any other that has sprung up in 4 billion years on this planet?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    When your mind is not at leisure it might be too much to think well but do try writing idiomatic English. E.g. not "puts pale to".
    , @DaveE
    Yes, the Jew has taught us well. Now EVERYONE wants a piece of the "eternal victim" game.

    Blacks against whites, women against men, management against labor, homos against straights, professors against their naive students, Russia against America, banksters against anyone who contributes ANYTHING worthwhile, career-makers against would-be starlets, Jewish judges against ANY Goy, fake Jewish "Christians" against the teachings of Christ, neocons against anything not Jewish, "liberals" against real reformers, "Administration" against real science, the list is endless.

    ALL set-up and brought to you by The Chosen Ones, with stupid Goyim playing along for a piece of the action.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  3. Truth says:

    Trump is undoubtedly a race realist,

    Well apparently he is; all of his children married Khazars, ain’t that right Thommy?

    heh heh heh heh.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    That Khazar business isn't even insulting: it's merely silly since it is the product of a trivial mind that prefers playground jeers to easily ascertainable fact. Just try Googling something like "Why did Arthur Koestler cook up the Khazar origins for German (Yiddish) speaking Jews?" The absurd answer seems to have been that building on the slender origims of that fairy tale might mitigate anti Semitism because Khazars aren't Semites!
    , @jilles dykstra
    To me it seems more likely that his children married sephardic jews, the sensible jews, the semitic jews.
    In the Ottoman empire asjkenazi jews were hated, not so the sephardic jews.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  4. Put it to bed already !

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  5. Wally says:

    “I give interracial couples a look. Daggers. They get uncomfortable when they see me on the street.”
    – Spike Lee

    “We got to do something about these Asians coming in and opening up businesses and dirty shops. They ought to go.”
    – Marion Barry

    Black achiever & role model Marion Barry smoking crack in a police surveillance photo in 1990 (Washington Post)

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth
    You really ripped these stories straight from the headlines.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  6. MAWA says:

    No, he’s an American.

    Make America White Again

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  7. President Trump is the “least racist person you will ever meet” except for all the people calling him racist. He will be in line behind them at the Pearly Gates, but with any luck, they will all get in.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  8. Asking this question as if it were serious proves what kind of character you have.

    You don’t have “access” to profiles of his employees? That’s a lie. Unless you mean “I didn’t try”.

    No, the place to begin understanding is in the profit to race-baiting. You attack people of good conscience as “racists” in order to shake them down.

    There’s nothing to gain in calling a real racist that name. He will be happy to detail. You can’t shake that person down because he has no guilty conscience about it. He believes in his racism.

    You guilt-trip and shame the innocent to extract resources from them. To exert power over them. To benefit yourself.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  9. helena says:

    By the Unliberal definition he is because he,

    doesn’t use Correct Words

    doesn’t pay Homage to Africans

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  10. Discussion without defining racism is as pointless as debating fascism and nazi’ism, without defining the words.
    Any article I saw about giving definitions was followed by a confused discussion, where sentiments were far more important than facts.
    In these days, in my opinion, the real debate is about nationalism against globalism, and nationalism against what is called ‘open society’.

    This ‘open society’ I see as ‘let anyone come who wants to, to benefit from welfare and medical aid’, anyone who never contributed to the national incomes of the nations, who get the burden.
    On top of that, the uninvited guests have the audacity to try to change the cultures of the nations that feed them.

    Just now German organisations of migrants, and/or naturalised Germans, demand of the coming Merkel-Schuld government to declare that Germany is a multi cultural state.
    In other words, integration or assimilation, rejected.

    We see the results in France, areas for especially Muslims, where police hardly dares to come, a situation more and more resembling civil war.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Curmudgeon

    Discussion without defining racism is as pointless as...
     
    The terms racism and racist are relatively new. One of the original "racists", Enoch Powell, when asked, in a TV interview 50 years ago, if he was a racist,replied "If by racist, you mean that there are differences between races, then yes I am a racist. If by racist you mean that one race is inherently better than another, then no, I am not a racist." I have used Powell's definitions since that time. Powell was a real race realist.

    The term race realist is a very new addition, and Weissberg's definition goes beyond Powell's definition, and gives the opportunity for the follow up "White supremacist" attack. Keep it simple: there are differences, period. Some better, some worse. If you are lost in an African jungle, who do you think would be better able to get you out, a local Black, or Albert Einstein? I know who I'd pick.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  11. The anti-white boogeyman should be put to rest. The time has come.

    Next to dysfunctional (and browner) Brazil, the US is the most diverse society in world history. Enough is enough. With ‘diversity’ comes rising racial tensions and less freedom. Why is this?

    Races are different.

    Despite all this, America’s greatest political shortcomings no longer even involve race. Not by a long shot. Yet few seem to notice.

    Instead, our nation’s greatest failings concern ‘intolerance’ and aggression of a different kind. This involves Zio-America’s predatory relationship with certain weaker peoples outside our borders.

    You haven’t you noticed?

    Washington keeps bombing and ruining entire nations in order to make them ‘democratic’ and more tolerant.

    How sweet.

    Millions are dead, wounded, homeless or emotionally damaged by America’s pro-democracy jihad.

    Anyone care?

    Entire countries have been annihilated. And we’re not done yet.

    But the important message here at home is this: Don’t say anything racist or anti-Semitic. It’s really really bad!

    Meanwhile, within Empire America, our glorious black-brown-yellow-white-LGBTQ culture is getting all the more ‘diverse’ and more soaked with foreigners each and every day. You can just smell the tolerance.–(or is it the burning of tires?)

    Ironically, this politically correct trajectory may kill the golden goose itself. Time will tell.
    Unfortunately, this ongoing ‘experiment’ is irreversible. So please keep your fingers crossed.

    But shouldn’t we discuss the societal risks of unsought, hyper-diversity going forward? Or is doing so ‘racist’?

    Unfortunately, the race hustlers and hate-whitey activists will unhesitatingly crush Free Speech when needed. And they will never let their anger go.

    Envy can be an incurable disease.

    Thus, this smear of ‘racist’ is designed to coerce and silence without leaving a mark. This tactic is similar to the accusation of ‘anti-Semitism’, a related topic that ‘conservative’ Weissberg strenuously avoids.

    The bad news is that not everyone is attractive or smart or gets to be rich or famous. Some people never even get invited to the prom.

    Also, some people make unfit company.

    I demand the right to avoid them and live separately from them.

    So scolding whites (and only whites) for the universal tendency of favoring people most like themselves (‘kin selection’) or avoiding uncouth peoples is a direct assault on freedom.

    Weissberg falls into this anti-white trap by defining ‘racism’ thusly: “A believer in a racial hierarchy with whites on top and blacks at the bottom.”

    Why such a narrow definition, Mr. Weissberg?

    Any race or ethnic group that believes itself to be innately superior to another is ‘racist’. This surely fits the popular definition. And Weissberg knows this. So why the constricted definition?

    Weissberg sidesteps the broader issue since it might put his favorite (((tribe))) under the microscope. As usual, Weissberg’s Zionist sympathies are showing. Does this make him ‘racist’?–or just a phony?

    Also, Weissberg should concede that Trump’s Great Wall pledge resonates with white Americans. It is a race issue. And deservedly so. Trump’s proposed wall puts a world class damper on the rise of Hispanic power in America. This is shocking? Racist?

    Why can’t we discuss these issues honestly? And the White/Hispanic tug-of-war has little to do with Blacks. Jews are obsessed with blacks and their ‘inequality’ with whites. This is a game of deception.

    When Trump (who just happens to be a non-Jewish white guy) as well as President, takes a tough stand on illegal immigration (by mostly Hispanics) it’s depicted as a secret endorsement of ‘keeping America white’.

    How about this: it’s about time!

    White Americans have legitimate ethnic/racial interests. Isn’t it time we said so?

    So is Trump being a ‘racist’?

    Or his he just doing his job?

    Both.

    Whites want to preserve their advanced, orderly, English-speaking culture. What’s wrong with that?

    The USA is a (mostly) white-created civilization that is lawful, prosperous, scientific, innovative and industrious. Central America and sub-Saharan Africa don’t create civilizations of this kind. Just take a look. As we chart our demographic future, this enduring fact must not be ignored.

    So question should be this: why fix America if it’s not (ethnically) in need of repair?

    ‘Racism’ is a false charge and a red herring. Today, the charge is designed to keep whites from defending the civilization that they and their ancestors created. So let’s be honest. Whites should be allowed to look into their future and take race and ethnicity (and language) into consideration.

    An diversity is not our strength. Absurd.

    The Chinese don’t believe that ‘diversity’ is strength. Nor the Japanese. Nor the Koreans. And even some ‘less progressive’ European countries insist on the right to retain their ‘national character’. This is sensible and normal. Homogeneity and continuity is strength. These peoples know it. And so do we.

    And certainly Israel won’t sacrifice its demographic future to appease the ‘we are all one’ lobby. Ha! Israel even dares to expel its native (non-Jewish) inhabitants so that future Jewish immigrants from the US, Russia and Europe can immigrate there and create a cohesive, unified Jewish society. This is the Zionist ideal. Whites however are prohibited from thinking this way. Why?

    It’s racist! (This is why Jews like Weissberg like to keep the focus only on ‘white racism’).

    Ironically, Jews in America merchandise the diversity Kool Aid to white audiences via ((Hollywood)) movies and tv shows, as well as courses they teach in schools, textbooks they write, laws they draft and politicians they fund. It’s a slick and insidious campaign.

    Who are the racists here?

    And who are the fools?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Ilyana_Rozumova
    Brilliant and most comprehensive analysis. One of the best on this site.
    Multiculturalism is evil and it has detrimental effect on native culture.
    There is nothing wrong with limited controlled emigration. But emigrant must blend in into native culture and also into native religion.
    , @wayfarer
    Damn, you sure as hell, conduct some spooky carpet bombing missions.

    Most excellent dude, I mean sir!

    https://bigpotato.com/assets/img/logos/truth-bombs.png
    ...
    ...
    , @Mike K
    a must read... for this author

    http://mondoweiss.net/2017/08/supremacy-zionist-exception/
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  12. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @Truth

    Trump is undoubtedly a race realist,
     
    Well apparently he is; all of his children married Khazars, ain't that right Thommy?

    heh heh heh heh.

    That Khazar business isn’t even insulting: it’s merely silly since it is the product of a trivial mind that prefers playground jeers to easily ascertainable fact. Just try Googling something like “Why did Arthur Koestler cook up the Khazar origins for German (Yiddish) speaking Jews?” The absurd answer seems to have been that building on the slender origims of that fairy tale might mitigate anti Semitism because Khazars aren’t Semites!

    Read More
    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
    Nothing to cook up:
    Shlomo Sand, ‘The Invention of the Jewish People’, London, New York, 2009, 2010 (Tel Aviv, 2008, hebrew)
    , @Truth
    Well it seems that there are a scheissload of 10th century sources that disagree with you:

    http://www.khazaria.com/khazar-diaspora.html
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  13. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @Leisure Larry
    Jesus H. God --- is there any end at all to the race huckstering of Weissberg's tribe, whose own murderous, supremacist creed puts pale to any other that has sprung up in 4 billion years on this planet?

    When your mind is not at leisure it might be too much to think well but do try writing idiomatic English. E.g. not “puts pale to”.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Leisure Larry
    Why? And who are you to judge, Jethro?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  14. Of course he is. Proudly upholding an American tradition.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  15. utu says:

    Mr. Weissberg, who do you imagine is your target audience? Who are you writing your articles for? Are you trying to convince somebody or rather provide belief confirmation to people who already agree with you?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  16. padre says:

    Next thing, you’ll be asking “Is the KKK really racist organisation”!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  17. Randal says:

    A good attempt to address the underlying dishonesty of all of the pc smear terms – racist, antisemite, homophobe, islamophobe, sexist etc.

    The basic truth common to all these terms is that they attempt to conflate a nasty extreme, which is actually rather rare, with a much more widespread legitimate opinion that the purveyors of political correctness wish to see suppressed. This approach tries to mitigate the harm caused by the widespread use of that smear term (in the particular context of racism) by identifying the false conflation and introducing a term (“race realism”) for one of the conflated positions, in an attempt to separate them.

    Either being racist is genuinely the inherently nasty thing it is portrayed as (in which case almost nobody is actually racist), or being racist is not an inherently bad thing to be. The vast majority of those smeared as “racist” are in fact “race realists”.

    Either being antisemite is genuinely the inherently nasty thing it is portrayed as (in which case almost nobody is actually antisemitic), or being antisemitic is not an inherently bad thing to be. The vast majority of those smeared as “antisemites” are in fact just people who notice and say things that jewish people and those with an interest in promoting their group interests want to see suppressed.

    Either being homophobic is genuinely the inherently nasty thing it is portrayed as (in which case almost nobody is actually homophobic), or being homophobic is not an inherently bad thing to be. The vast majority of those smeared as “homophobic” are in fact just people who disapprove of homosexual behaviour

    Etc ad nauseam. This is the fundamental truth needed to understand the problem of political correctness in the modern societies of the US sphere. It would be nice if it could be taught as such compulsorily in all schools (except that in reality schoolteachers as a class are more likely to be actively and enthusiastically part of the pc problem than of any solution to it).

    Read More
    • Replies: @iffen
    … the underlying dishonesty …
    … The basic truth …
    … This is the fundamental truth …

    Aargh! “The Truth” again.

    Will some kind soul call a code blue for iffen? He has been struck down by “The Truth” one time too many. At least no fanatic is shining a bright light in his eyes.

    , @helena
    The Left wants power (preferably permanently) and they try to get it anyway they can. All this moral-shaming is working well for them in the media but it remains to be seen how people will vote. At least in the UK, Hindus and Sikhs are breaking ranks with the ethnic-first agenda.
    , @Twodees Partain
    Randal, central to your observation is the capture of the language used to control the narrative. The use of politically correct language and the insistence on its use in any venue of discussion ensures that those who control the language control the narrative, so that there is no chance at refuting those who have set the terms of the debate.

    I know that this is pointing out the obvious to many participating here, but I mention it for the benefit of anybody who isn't already aware of the tactic. Refusing to use PC language is one way of being heard while pointing out the ridiculous nature of politically correct speech and the mendacity behind the insistence on the use of fallacious terminology as a condition for participation in the dialogue.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  18. @Anonymous
    When your mind is not at leisure it might be too much to think well but do try writing idiomatic English. E.g. not "puts pale to".

    Why? And who are you to judge, Jethro?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    Good boy, you're getting there.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  19. iffen says:
    @Randal
    A good attempt to address the underlying dishonesty of all of the pc smear terms - racist, antisemite, homophobe, islamophobe, sexist etc.

    The basic truth common to all these terms is that they attempt to conflate a nasty extreme, which is actually rather rare, with a much more widespread legitimate opinion that the purveyors of political correctness wish to see suppressed. This approach tries to mitigate the harm caused by the widespread use of that smear term (in the particular context of racism) by identifying the false conflation and introducing a term ("race realism") for one of the conflated positions, in an attempt to separate them.

    Either being racist is genuinely the inherently nasty thing it is portrayed as (in which case almost nobody is actually racist), or being racist is not an inherently bad thing to be. The vast majority of those smeared as "racist" are in fact "race realists".

    Either being antisemite is genuinely the inherently nasty thing it is portrayed as (in which case almost nobody is actually antisemitic), or being antisemitic is not an inherently bad thing to be. The vast majority of those smeared as "antisemites" are in fact just people who notice and say things that jewish people and those with an interest in promoting their group interests want to see suppressed.

    Either being homophobic is genuinely the inherently nasty thing it is portrayed as (in which case almost nobody is actually homophobic), or being homophobic is not an inherently bad thing to be. The vast majority of those smeared as "homophobic" are in fact just people who disapprove of homosexual behaviour

    Etc ad nauseam. This is the fundamental truth needed to understand the problem of political correctness in the modern societies of the US sphere. It would be nice if it could be taught as such compulsorily in all schools (except that in reality schoolteachers as a class are more likely to be actively and enthusiastically part of the pc problem than of any solution to it).

    … the underlying dishonesty …
    … The basic truth …
    … This is the fundamental truth …

    Aargh! “The Truth” again.

    Will some kind soul call a code blue for iffen? He has been struck down by “The Truth” one time too many. At least no fanatic is shining a bright light in his eyes.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Randal
    zzzz....wake me up when you've something other than snideness to offer.
    , @Anon

    Alas, all this iffy evidence doesn’t matter.
     
    , @Truth

    He has been struck down by “The Truth” one time too many.
     
    Luckily I have a few years left and plenty of free time, so the strikedowns can continue.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  20. Greg Bacon says: • Website

    This time around, however, he embraces multiculturalism, diversity and inclusion.

    Those that keep pumping the noxious poison of multiculturalism and diversity, are either mindless buffoons with no grasp of history or part of the Deep State apparatus that is using the flooding of migrants into Europe and the US to bust up those nations so the people will no longer rally around a common cause.

    Israel realizes unlimited migration–That is why Israel is deporting close to 40,000 blacks who entered illegally–is bad for their country, if they want to retain their original character, which any nation should be allowed to do, except our sleazy, back-stabbing politicians don’t serve Americans, they serve the Deep State.
    For the record, Trump is a lover of Mammon, so it would be impossible for him to be a racist based on color.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  21. n230099 says:

    “Is President Trump a Racist?”

    How is the ‘writer’ here using ‘is’ and just what is a ‘racist’?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  22. wayfarer says:

    Are the Trump administration puppet masters and global Rothschild Zionist deep state, just another bunch of greasy good ol’ boy racists?

    “ Mass Expulsion Underway as Israel Plans to Deport 40,000 African Migrants “
    source: http://www.middleeasteye.net/news/mass-expulsion-underway-israel-plans-deport-40000-african-migrants-2016476429

    “ Cash or Custody: Israel Kicks Off Deportation of African Migrants “
    source: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-israel-africa-migrants/cash-or-custody-israel-kicks-off-deportation-of-african-migrants-idUSKBN1FP214

    “ 52% of Israeli Jews Agree: African Migrants Are ‘a Cancer’ “
    source: https://www.timesofisrael.com/most-israeli-jews-agree-africans-are-a-cancer/

    Read More
    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
    I would not use the word cancer, but I'd be quite happy if a lot of migrants in the Netherlands went back to where they, or their parents and great parents, came from.
    More than half the Dutch inhabitants, including those with migrant background, are of the opinion that integration is a failure.
    Bart de Wever; Antwerpen mayor, talks about 'anti cultures'.
    A plot to murder St Nicholas at his national entrance was just discovered.
    This plot indeed was by a splinter group, but a statement 'bone and brain material on the heads of children', was found.
    The group calls itself 'Grey Century', a parody on 'Golden Century'.
    To aa certain extent they are right, this century with us was not golden for anyone, alas I suppose no century anywhere ever was for anyone.
    The present century in about the richest countries pro capita, USA and Germany, is not golden for anyone.
    , @Twodees Partain
    How about this one?

    http://hamodia.com/2018/02/04/netanyahu-george-soros-behind-campaign-migrant-deportation/

    Netanyahu is griping that Soros is doing the same thing to Israel that he does to the goy countries.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  23. helena says:
    @Randal
    A good attempt to address the underlying dishonesty of all of the pc smear terms - racist, antisemite, homophobe, islamophobe, sexist etc.

    The basic truth common to all these terms is that they attempt to conflate a nasty extreme, which is actually rather rare, with a much more widespread legitimate opinion that the purveyors of political correctness wish to see suppressed. This approach tries to mitigate the harm caused by the widespread use of that smear term (in the particular context of racism) by identifying the false conflation and introducing a term ("race realism") for one of the conflated positions, in an attempt to separate them.

    Either being racist is genuinely the inherently nasty thing it is portrayed as (in which case almost nobody is actually racist), or being racist is not an inherently bad thing to be. The vast majority of those smeared as "racist" are in fact "race realists".

    Either being antisemite is genuinely the inherently nasty thing it is portrayed as (in which case almost nobody is actually antisemitic), or being antisemitic is not an inherently bad thing to be. The vast majority of those smeared as "antisemites" are in fact just people who notice and say things that jewish people and those with an interest in promoting their group interests want to see suppressed.

    Either being homophobic is genuinely the inherently nasty thing it is portrayed as (in which case almost nobody is actually homophobic), or being homophobic is not an inherently bad thing to be. The vast majority of those smeared as "homophobic" are in fact just people who disapprove of homosexual behaviour

    Etc ad nauseam. This is the fundamental truth needed to understand the problem of political correctness in the modern societies of the US sphere. It would be nice if it could be taught as such compulsorily in all schools (except that in reality schoolteachers as a class are more likely to be actively and enthusiastically part of the pc problem than of any solution to it).

    The Left wants power (preferably permanently) and they try to get it anyway they can. All this moral-shaming is working well for them in the media but it remains to be seen how people will vote. At least in the UK, Hindus and Sikhs are breaking ranks with the ethnic-first agenda.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Malla

    At least in the UK, Hindus and Sikhs are breaking ranks with the ethnic-first agenda.
     
    What do you mean by this? Support of the Conservatives? Conservatives are only a little less traitorous to the native Britons than Labour. They support Conservative as many of them Hindus/Sikhs are now rich and do not want to support outsiders (outside their tribe) blacks, muslims and poor Whites with their tax dollars.
    If you are talking about the EDL, then you must know hatred for Muslims is huge in the Hindu/Sikh community and recently this hatred has overtaken their hatred for Whitey. Also Hindus/Sikhs gain nothing in a Sharia Britain, it brings them horrible nightmares of India's own Islamic past. They do not want it repeated in Britain.
    Do not be deluded, Hindus are ALWAYS ethnic first, there might be a few exceptional individuals, but Hindu culture is very pro self ethnic first. Sikhs are a much more universalistic compared to Hindus but still not as much as Whites.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  24. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @Leisure Larry
    Why? And who are you to judge, Jethro?

    Good boy, you’re getting there.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  25. Randal says:
    @iffen
    … the underlying dishonesty …
    … The basic truth …
    … This is the fundamental truth …

    Aargh! “The Truth” again.

    Will some kind soul call a code blue for iffen? He has been struck down by “The Truth” one time too many. At least no fanatic is shining a bright light in his eyes.

    zzzz….wake me up when you’ve something other than snideness to offer.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  26. Racism is trait Mother Nature gifted to ALL living organisms.
    PC tyrants will of course never accept that, unless it is approved and accepted form of racism.
    How you say in ruskie: “Birds of a feather flock together”?
    Why is it that Blacks of certain stature are not welcomed in many of Atlanta’s affluent African-Amerikanski neighborhood?
    Human zoos are not that different from animal zoos.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  27. It all boils down to this “Axiom” :

    “Anybody who does not vote democrat is a racist” period.

    And I have been saying for eons : Turn it around on them and start labeling them as : “racists”

    If it works for them, in spite of being a lie, it will most certainly work for us, seeing as they actually are racists.

    Authenticjazzman “Mensa” qualified since 1973, airborne trained U S Army Vet, and pro jazz musician.

    Read More
    • Replies: @helena
    Totally agree. Open borders are racist. Do what the Left does and repeat it ad infinitum until all the people who don't think for themselves are trained.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  28. @Anonymous
    That Khazar business isn't even insulting: it's merely silly since it is the product of a trivial mind that prefers playground jeers to easily ascertainable fact. Just try Googling something like "Why did Arthur Koestler cook up the Khazar origins for German (Yiddish) speaking Jews?" The absurd answer seems to have been that building on the slender origims of that fairy tale might mitigate anti Semitism because Khazars aren't Semites!

    Nothing to cook up:
    Shlomo Sand, ‘The Invention of the Jewish People’, London, New York, 2009, 2010 (Tel Aviv, 2008, hebrew)

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    Sorry. I've lost a long reply.Shlomo Ssnd goes nowhere near justifying some fantasy about how German (Yiddish) speaking Jews made welcome by a Polish king,and who wete about half Celtic in gemetic ancestry, were really a lot of Khazars!
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  29. Which race ever made discoveries like this ?

    https://www.nature.com/articles/s41567-017-0017-4

    Unless you want to believe that indeed the vimana’s in the Veda’s were real flying machines.
    I have no idea if they were or not.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  30. To see the cause of all the turmoil in America, read THE PROTOCOLS OF ZION, there it is all laid out, ie the Zionist plan for America.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  31. @wayfarer
    Are the Trump administration puppet masters and global Rothschild Zionist deep state, just another bunch of greasy good ol' boy racists?

    “ Mass Expulsion Underway as Israel Plans to Deport 40,000 African Migrants “
    source: http://www.middleeasteye.net/news/mass-expulsion-underway-israel-plans-deport-40000-african-migrants-2016476429

    “ Cash or Custody: Israel Kicks Off Deportation of African Migrants “
    source: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-israel-africa-migrants/cash-or-custody-israel-kicks-off-deportation-of-african-migrants-idUSKBN1FP214

    “ 52% of Israeli Jews Agree: African Migrants Are ‘a Cancer’ “
    source: https://www.timesofisrael.com/most-israeli-jews-agree-africans-are-a-cancer/

    I would not use the word cancer, but I’d be quite happy if a lot of migrants in the Netherlands went back to where they, or their parents and great parents, came from.
    More than half the Dutch inhabitants, including those with migrant background, are of the opinion that integration is a failure.
    Bart de Wever; Antwerpen mayor, talks about ‘anti cultures’.
    A plot to murder St Nicholas at his national entrance was just discovered.
    This plot indeed was by a splinter group, but a statement ‘bone and brain material on the heads of children’, was found.
    The group calls itself ‘Grey Century’, a parody on ‘Golden Century’.
    To aa certain extent they are right, this century with us was not golden for anyone, alas I suppose no century anywhere ever was for anyone.
    The present century in about the richest countries pro capita, USA and Germany, is not golden for anyone.

    Read More
    • Replies: @wayfarer
    We're livin' the dream, problem is, it ain't our dream.

    It's their dream, you know the House of Rothschild's dream, and it's a dark dream.

    I'm wrestling with just how I'd like to go down, either in the footsteps of Jesus the Christ or in the legacy of Genghis Khan.

    I'll no doubt find out when my back's to the wall, which at this rate, shouldn't be too much longer.

    Humanity's history has always been messed up, it's now just our time to experience, just how messed up.

    Have a beautiful day!

    https://i.pinimg.com/236x/6e/82/07/6e82074f1704df31e62dffe8d5bcf7cf--smiley-faces-skull-art.jpg

    ...
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  32. @wayfarer
    Are the Trump administration puppet masters and global Rothschild Zionist deep state, just another bunch of greasy good ol' boy racists?

    “ Mass Expulsion Underway as Israel Plans to Deport 40,000 African Migrants “
    source: http://www.middleeasteye.net/news/mass-expulsion-underway-israel-plans-deport-40000-african-migrants-2016476429

    “ Cash or Custody: Israel Kicks Off Deportation of African Migrants “
    source: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-israel-africa-migrants/cash-or-custody-israel-kicks-off-deportation-of-african-migrants-idUSKBN1FP214

    “ 52% of Israeli Jews Agree: African Migrants Are ‘a Cancer’ “
    source: https://www.timesofisrael.com/most-israeli-jews-agree-africans-are-a-cancer/

    How about this one?

    http://hamodia.com/2018/02/04/netanyahu-george-soros-behind-campaign-migrant-deportation/

    Netanyahu is griping that Soros is doing the same thing to Israel that he does to the goy countries.

    Read More
    • Replies: @MarkinLA
    You would think Bibi should have had Mossad assassinate Soros by now.
    , @englishmike
    O.T.
    How about this one?

    George Soros's foundation backs campaign to reverse Brexit
    US business magnate has given £400,000 to Best for Britain group since June 2017 election

    A key pro-EU campaign to reverse the Brexit vote has been given more than £400,000 of funding by American billionaire George Soros’s foundation, the Guardian can disclose.

    Jessica Elgot: Political correspondent
    The Guardian
    Wed 7 Feb 2018
     
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  33. @mark green
    The anti-white boogeyman should be put to rest. The time has come.

    Next to dysfunctional (and browner) Brazil, the US is the most diverse society in world history. Enough is enough. With 'diversity' comes rising racial tensions and less freedom. Why is this?

    Races are different.

    Despite all this, America's greatest political shortcomings no longer even involve race. Not by a long shot. Yet few seem to notice.

    Instead, our nation's greatest failings concern 'intolerance' and aggression of a different kind. This involves Zio-America's predatory relationship with certain weaker peoples outside our borders.

    You haven't you noticed?

    Washington keeps bombing and ruining entire nations in order to make them 'democratic' and more tolerant.

    How sweet.

    Millions are dead, wounded, homeless or emotionally damaged by America's pro-democracy jihad.

    Anyone care?

    Entire countries have been annihilated. And we're not done yet.

    But the important message here at home is this: Don't say anything racist or anti-Semitic. It's really really bad!

    Meanwhile, within Empire America, our glorious black-brown-yellow-white-LGBTQ culture is getting all the more 'diverse' and more soaked with foreigners each and every day. You can just smell the tolerance.--(or is it the burning of tires?)

    Ironically, this politically correct trajectory may kill the golden goose itself. Time will tell.
    Unfortunately, this ongoing 'experiment' is irreversible. So please keep your fingers crossed.

    But shouldn't we discuss the societal risks of unsought, hyper-diversity going forward? Or is doing so 'racist'?

    Unfortunately, the race hustlers and hate-whitey activists will unhesitatingly crush Free Speech when needed. And they will never let their anger go.

    Envy can be an incurable disease.

    Thus, this smear of 'racist' is designed to coerce and silence without leaving a mark. This tactic is similar to the accusation of 'anti-Semitism', a related topic that 'conservative' Weissberg strenuously avoids.

    The bad news is that not everyone is attractive or smart or gets to be rich or famous. Some people never even get invited to the prom.

    Also, some people make unfit company.

    I demand the right to avoid them and live separately from them.

    So scolding whites (and only whites) for the universal tendency of favoring people most like themselves ('kin selection') or avoiding uncouth peoples is a direct assault on freedom.

    Weissberg falls into this anti-white trap by defining 'racism' thusly: "A believer in a racial hierarchy with whites on top and blacks at the bottom."

    Why such a narrow definition, Mr. Weissberg?

    Any race or ethnic group that believes itself to be innately superior to another is 'racist'. This surely fits the popular definition. And Weissberg knows this. So why the constricted definition?

    Weissberg sidesteps the broader issue since it might put his favorite (((tribe))) under the microscope. As usual, Weissberg's Zionist sympathies are showing. Does this make him 'racist'?--or just a phony?

    Also, Weissberg should concede that Trump's Great Wall pledge resonates with white Americans. It is a race issue. And deservedly so. Trump's proposed wall puts a world class damper on the rise of Hispanic power in America. This is shocking? Racist?

    Why can't we discuss these issues honestly? And the White/Hispanic tug-of-war has little to do with Blacks. Jews are obsessed with blacks and their 'inequality' with whites. This is a game of deception.

    When Trump (who just happens to be a non-Jewish white guy) as well as President, takes a tough stand on illegal immigration (by mostly Hispanics) it's depicted as a secret endorsement of 'keeping America white'.

    How about this: it's about time!

    White Americans have legitimate ethnic/racial interests. Isn't it time we said so?

    So is Trump being a 'racist'?

    Or his he just doing his job?

    Both.

    Whites want to preserve their advanced, orderly, English-speaking culture. What's wrong with that?

    The USA is a (mostly) white-created civilization that is lawful, prosperous, scientific, innovative and industrious. Central America and sub-Saharan Africa don't create civilizations of this kind. Just take a look. As we chart our demographic future, this enduring fact must not be ignored.

    So question should be this: why fix America if it's not (ethnically) in need of repair?

    'Racism' is a false charge and a red herring. Today, the charge is designed to keep whites from defending the civilization that they and their ancestors created. So let's be honest. Whites should be allowed to look into their future and take race and ethnicity (and language) into consideration.

    An diversity is not our strength. Absurd.

    The Chinese don't believe that 'diversity' is strength. Nor the Japanese. Nor the Koreans. And even some 'less progressive' European countries insist on the right to retain their 'national character'. This is sensible and normal. Homogeneity and continuity is strength. These peoples know it. And so do we.

    And certainly Israel won't sacrifice its demographic future to appease the 'we are all one' lobby. Ha! Israel even dares to expel its native (non-Jewish) inhabitants so that future Jewish immigrants from the US, Russia and Europe can immigrate there and create a cohesive, unified Jewish society. This is the Zionist ideal. Whites however are prohibited from thinking this way. Why?

    It's racist! (This is why Jews like Weissberg like to keep the focus only on 'white racism').

    Ironically, Jews in America merchandise the diversity Kool Aid to white audiences via ((Hollywood)) movies and tv shows, as well as courses they teach in schools, textbooks they write, laws they draft and politicians they fund. It's a slick and insidious campaign.

    Who are the racists here?

    And who are the fools?

    Brilliant and most comprehensive analysis. One of the best on this site.
    Multiculturalism is evil and it has detrimental effect on native culture.
    There is nothing wrong with limited controlled emigration. But emigrant must blend in into native culture and also into native religion.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  34. Anon • Disclaimer says:
    @iffen
    … the underlying dishonesty …
    … The basic truth …
    … This is the fundamental truth …

    Aargh! “The Truth” again.

    Will some kind soul call a code blue for iffen? He has been struck down by “The Truth” one time too many. At least no fanatic is shining a bright light in his eyes.

    Alas, all this iffy evidence doesn’t matter.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  35. Malla says:
    @helena
    The Left wants power (preferably permanently) and they try to get it anyway they can. All this moral-shaming is working well for them in the media but it remains to be seen how people will vote. At least in the UK, Hindus and Sikhs are breaking ranks with the ethnic-first agenda.

    At least in the UK, Hindus and Sikhs are breaking ranks with the ethnic-first agenda.

    What do you mean by this? Support of the Conservatives? Conservatives are only a little less traitorous to the native Britons than Labour. They support Conservative as many of them Hindus/Sikhs are now rich and do not want to support outsiders (outside their tribe) blacks, muslims and poor Whites with their tax dollars.
    If you are talking about the EDL, then you must know hatred for Muslims is huge in the Hindu/Sikh community and recently this hatred has overtaken their hatred for Whitey. Also Hindus/Sikhs gain nothing in a Sharia Britain, it brings them horrible nightmares of India’s own Islamic past. They do not want it repeated in Britain.
    Do not be deluded, Hindus are ALWAYS ethnic first, there might be a few exceptional individuals, but Hindu culture is very pro self ethnic first. Sikhs are a much more universalistic compared to Hindus but still not as much as Whites.

    Read More
    • Replies: @helena
    yeah I know what you're saying. I'm not under the delusion that Sikhs and Hindus are supporting Europeans. Words, words, words. Maybe ethnic-first was a poor choice of them.

    I don't think Sikhs and Hindus are buying the leftist narrative in the way Muslims and Afros seem to be doing. For the reason you point out, they are more entrepreneurial.

    I do believe that Sikhs and Hindus in the UK can help diffuse the rush to open borders. And I do believe that they appreciate European culture more than Muslims or Afros do. Sikhs and Hindus appreciate history.

    Things are so desperate I take any glimmer of hope available. Europeans need allies and I've found that Hindus I've known share a disposition to participate in a public space in a way that I haven't found with Muslims and Afros.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  36. Trump is undoubtedly a race realist, though not necessarily a racist …

    I doubt that very much. Trump is probably, at most, a civic nationalist, about like Steve Sailer.

    Business is Darwinian—personnel and strategy mistakes invariably bring ruin.

    Libertarians like to believe that–and for your neighborhood barbershop, bar or restaurant, that may even be true. But it’s definitely not true of any of our monopolistic/oligopolistic mega-sectors: high finance, defense, Silicon Valley, etc. They’re almost totally insulated from any real competition, and often propped up by the government, so they can pursue ‘diversity’ all they want. If you don’t believe me, go ask James Damore.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  37. AnonFromTN [AKA "Anon"] says:

    Anon from TN
    I don’t know whether Trump is a racist. However, I do know that BLM and many “civil rights activists” are blatantly racist. Anti-white racism is just as abhorrent as an anti-black variety. I know for sure that real “color blindness” (fairly judging people exclusively by their personal qualities, totally ignoring their skin color) would be considered “racist” by many who pretend to be anti-racist.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  38. Truth says:
    @Wally
    "I give interracial couples a look. Daggers. They get uncomfortable when they see me on the street."
    -- Spike Lee

    "We got to do something about these Asians coming in and opening up businesses and dirty shops. They ought to go."
    -- Marion Barry

    Black achiever & role model Marion Barry smoking crack in a police surveillance photo in 1990 (Washington Post)
    http://admin.americanthinker.com/images/bucket/2017-10/201792_5_.gif

    You really ripped these stories straight from the headlines.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  39. Truth says:
    @Anonymous
    That Khazar business isn't even insulting: it's merely silly since it is the product of a trivial mind that prefers playground jeers to easily ascertainable fact. Just try Googling something like "Why did Arthur Koestler cook up the Khazar origins for German (Yiddish) speaking Jews?" The absurd answer seems to have been that building on the slender origims of that fairy tale might mitigate anti Semitism because Khazars aren't Semites!

    Well it seems that there are a scheissload of 10th century sources that disagree with you:

    http://www.khazaria.com/khazar-diaspora.html

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    Thank you for the interesting reference but maybe you should read it as it refers to both the absence of archsrologicsal evidence and, most relevant, the absence of genetic evidence of Khazar ancestry. So the 10th centrury stuff is, as I say, interesting - but irrelevant.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  40. Truth says:
    @iffen
    … the underlying dishonesty …
    … The basic truth …
    … This is the fundamental truth …

    Aargh! “The Truth” again.

    Will some kind soul call a code blue for iffen? He has been struck down by “The Truth” one time too many. At least no fanatic is shining a bright light in his eyes.

    He has been struck down by “The Truth” one time too many.

    Luckily I have a few years left and plenty of free time, so the strikedowns can continue.

    Read More
    • Replies: @iffen
    Not Truth, "The Truth."
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  41. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @jilles dykstra
    Nothing to cook up:
    Shlomo Sand, ‘The Invention of the Jewish People’, London, New York, 2009, 2010 (Tel Aviv, 2008, hebrew)

    Sorry. I’ve lost a long reply.Shlomo Ssnd goes nowhere near justifying some fantasy about how German (Yiddish) speaking Jews made welcome by a Polish king,and who wete about half Celtic in gemetic ancestry, were really a lot of Khazars!

    Read More
    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
    Do not worry, Sand's book is very well researched.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  42. wayfarer says:
    @jilles dykstra
    I would not use the word cancer, but I'd be quite happy if a lot of migrants in the Netherlands went back to where they, or their parents and great parents, came from.
    More than half the Dutch inhabitants, including those with migrant background, are of the opinion that integration is a failure.
    Bart de Wever; Antwerpen mayor, talks about 'anti cultures'.
    A plot to murder St Nicholas at his national entrance was just discovered.
    This plot indeed was by a splinter group, but a statement 'bone and brain material on the heads of children', was found.
    The group calls itself 'Grey Century', a parody on 'Golden Century'.
    To aa certain extent they are right, this century with us was not golden for anyone, alas I suppose no century anywhere ever was for anyone.
    The present century in about the richest countries pro capita, USA and Germany, is not golden for anyone.

    We’re livin’ the dream, problem is, it ain’t our dream.

    It’s their dream, you know the House of Rothschild’s dream, and it’s a dark dream.

    I’m wrestling with just how I’d like to go down, either in the footsteps of Jesus the Christ or in the legacy of Genghis Khan.

    I’ll no doubt find out when my back’s to the wall, which at this rate, shouldn’t be too much longer.

    Humanity’s history has always been messed up, it’s now just our time to experience, just how messed up.

    Have a beautiful day!



    Read More
    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
    I wonder if the Rothschilds, this time without the end 't', do more than try to protect their wealth.
    I would not be surprised if they disapprove of AIPAC, AEI , neocons and Soros.
    See
    Simon Schama, ´Two Rothschilds and the land of Israel’, London, 1978
    The book describes the conflicts between the Rothschilds and the zionist settlers.
    Contrary to popular opinion, bankers do not like wars.
    JP Morgan in WWI saw in the war just a business opportunity, they passed the financial, risks as soon as possible, to ordinary USA citizens.
    Charles Callan Tansill, 'Amerika geht in den Krieg', Stuttgart 1939 (America goes to War, 1938)
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  43. iffen says:
    @Truth

    He has been struck down by “The Truth” one time too many.
     
    Luckily I have a few years left and plenty of free time, so the strikedowns can continue.

    Not Truth, “The Truth.”

    Read More
    • Replies: @helena
    Iffen you don't know by now.

    (I expect that's crass but I've wanted to write it ever since I saw your name.)

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  44. DaveE says:
    @Leisure Larry
    Jesus H. God --- is there any end at all to the race huckstering of Weissberg's tribe, whose own murderous, supremacist creed puts pale to any other that has sprung up in 4 billion years on this planet?

    Yes, the Jew has taught us well. Now EVERYONE wants a piece of the “eternal victim” game.

    Blacks against whites, women against men, management against labor, homos against straights, professors against their naive students, Russia against America, banksters against anyone who contributes ANYTHING worthwhile, career-makers against would-be starlets, Jewish judges against ANY Goy, fake Jewish “Christians” against the teachings of Christ, neocons against anything not Jewish, “liberals” against real reformers, “Administration” against real science, the list is endless.

    ALL set-up and brought to you by The Chosen Ones, with stupid Goyim playing along for a piece of the action.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  45. Moi says:

    Is the earth flat? I duno. But I do think he is a shabbos goy who is egotistical, greedy and should never have been elected. Not that I’d vote for Hillary–ever.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  46. helena says:
    @Authenticjazzman
    It all boils down to this "Axiom" :

    "Anybody who does not vote democrat is a racist" period.

    And I have been saying for eons : Turn it around on them and start labeling them as : "racists"

    If it works for them, in spite of being a lie, it will most certainly work for us, seeing as they actually are racists.

    Authenticjazzman "Mensa" qualified since 1973, airborne trained U S Army Vet, and pro jazz musician.

    Totally agree. Open borders are racist. Do what the Left does and repeat it ad infinitum until all the people who don’t think for themselves are trained.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Authenticjazzman
    "Totally agree"

    The whole thing is painfully obvious : the democrats/leftists have gained immense power and have taken over all of society simply by repeating these untrue mantras over and over and over for the last sixty years : Racist, anti-women, homophobe, etc.

    We must capture their most potent bludgeons : these very same accusations, which are most certainly true in their case, and start relentlessly catapulting them back at them, and it won't take long before things start to change.

    DT should open every tweet with : " To the racist democrats".

    Authenticjazzman "Mensa" qualified since 1973, airborne trained US Army vet, and pro jazz musician.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  47. helena says:
    @Malla

    At least in the UK, Hindus and Sikhs are breaking ranks with the ethnic-first agenda.
     
    What do you mean by this? Support of the Conservatives? Conservatives are only a little less traitorous to the native Britons than Labour. They support Conservative as many of them Hindus/Sikhs are now rich and do not want to support outsiders (outside their tribe) blacks, muslims and poor Whites with their tax dollars.
    If you are talking about the EDL, then you must know hatred for Muslims is huge in the Hindu/Sikh community and recently this hatred has overtaken their hatred for Whitey. Also Hindus/Sikhs gain nothing in a Sharia Britain, it brings them horrible nightmares of India's own Islamic past. They do not want it repeated in Britain.
    Do not be deluded, Hindus are ALWAYS ethnic first, there might be a few exceptional individuals, but Hindu culture is very pro self ethnic first. Sikhs are a much more universalistic compared to Hindus but still not as much as Whites.

    yeah I know what you’re saying. I’m not under the delusion that Sikhs and Hindus are supporting Europeans. Words, words, words. Maybe ethnic-first was a poor choice of them.

    I don’t think Sikhs and Hindus are buying the leftist narrative in the way Muslims and Afros seem to be doing. For the reason you point out, they are more entrepreneurial.

    I do believe that Sikhs and Hindus in the UK can help diffuse the rush to open borders. And I do believe that they appreciate European culture more than Muslims or Afros do. Sikhs and Hindus appreciate history.

    Things are so desperate I take any glimmer of hope available. Europeans need allies and I’ve found that Hindus I’ve known share a disposition to participate in a public space in a way that I haven’t found with Muslims and Afros.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Malla
    I would not have high hopes with respect to Hindus if I were you. You can make better allies out of Sikhs though who are less snotty and more friendlier and trustworthy (by South Asian standards). But you can make even better allies out of Eastern Europeans, East Asians and even educated elite Persians (even though they are muslims). Just some days back in some other site in a heated argument an Iranian guy accused Indians and Pakistanis of turning parts of Britain into slums.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  48. helena says:
    @iffen
    Not Truth, "The Truth."

    Iffen you don’t know by now.

    (I expect that’s crass but I’ve wanted to write it ever since I saw your name.)

    Read More
    • LOL: iffen
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  49. MarkinLA says:
    @Twodees Partain
    How about this one?

    http://hamodia.com/2018/02/04/netanyahu-george-soros-behind-campaign-migrant-deportation/

    Netanyahu is griping that Soros is doing the same thing to Israel that he does to the goy countries.

    You would think Bibi should have had Mossad assassinate Soros by now.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Twodees Partain
    That might be on his to-do list.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  50. Malla says:
    @helena
    yeah I know what you're saying. I'm not under the delusion that Sikhs and Hindus are supporting Europeans. Words, words, words. Maybe ethnic-first was a poor choice of them.

    I don't think Sikhs and Hindus are buying the leftist narrative in the way Muslims and Afros seem to be doing. For the reason you point out, they are more entrepreneurial.

    I do believe that Sikhs and Hindus in the UK can help diffuse the rush to open borders. And I do believe that they appreciate European culture more than Muslims or Afros do. Sikhs and Hindus appreciate history.

    Things are so desperate I take any glimmer of hope available. Europeans need allies and I've found that Hindus I've known share a disposition to participate in a public space in a way that I haven't found with Muslims and Afros.

    I would not have high hopes with respect to Hindus if I were you. You can make better allies out of Sikhs though who are less snotty and more friendlier and trustworthy (by South Asian standards). But you can make even better allies out of Eastern Europeans, East Asians and even educated elite Persians (even though they are muslims). Just some days back in some other site in a heated argument an Iranian guy accused Indians and Pakistanis of turning parts of Britain into slums.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  51. @helena
    Totally agree. Open borders are racist. Do what the Left does and repeat it ad infinitum until all the people who don't think for themselves are trained.

    “Totally agree”

    The whole thing is painfully obvious : the democrats/leftists have gained immense power and have taken over all of society simply by repeating these untrue mantras over and over and over for the last sixty years : Racist, anti-women, homophobe, etc.

    We must capture their most potent bludgeons : these very same accusations, which are most certainly true in their case, and start relentlessly catapulting them back at them, and it won’t take long before things start to change.

    DT should open every tweet with : ” To the racist democrats”.

    Authenticjazzman “Mensa” qualified since 1973, airborne trained US Army vet, and pro jazz musician.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  52. wayfarer says:
    @mark green
    The anti-white boogeyman should be put to rest. The time has come.

    Next to dysfunctional (and browner) Brazil, the US is the most diverse society in world history. Enough is enough. With 'diversity' comes rising racial tensions and less freedom. Why is this?

    Races are different.

    Despite all this, America's greatest political shortcomings no longer even involve race. Not by a long shot. Yet few seem to notice.

    Instead, our nation's greatest failings concern 'intolerance' and aggression of a different kind. This involves Zio-America's predatory relationship with certain weaker peoples outside our borders.

    You haven't you noticed?

    Washington keeps bombing and ruining entire nations in order to make them 'democratic' and more tolerant.

    How sweet.

    Millions are dead, wounded, homeless or emotionally damaged by America's pro-democracy jihad.

    Anyone care?

    Entire countries have been annihilated. And we're not done yet.

    But the important message here at home is this: Don't say anything racist or anti-Semitic. It's really really bad!

    Meanwhile, within Empire America, our glorious black-brown-yellow-white-LGBTQ culture is getting all the more 'diverse' and more soaked with foreigners each and every day. You can just smell the tolerance.--(or is it the burning of tires?)

    Ironically, this politically correct trajectory may kill the golden goose itself. Time will tell.
    Unfortunately, this ongoing 'experiment' is irreversible. So please keep your fingers crossed.

    But shouldn't we discuss the societal risks of unsought, hyper-diversity going forward? Or is doing so 'racist'?

    Unfortunately, the race hustlers and hate-whitey activists will unhesitatingly crush Free Speech when needed. And they will never let their anger go.

    Envy can be an incurable disease.

    Thus, this smear of 'racist' is designed to coerce and silence without leaving a mark. This tactic is similar to the accusation of 'anti-Semitism', a related topic that 'conservative' Weissberg strenuously avoids.

    The bad news is that not everyone is attractive or smart or gets to be rich or famous. Some people never even get invited to the prom.

    Also, some people make unfit company.

    I demand the right to avoid them and live separately from them.

    So scolding whites (and only whites) for the universal tendency of favoring people most like themselves ('kin selection') or avoiding uncouth peoples is a direct assault on freedom.

    Weissberg falls into this anti-white trap by defining 'racism' thusly: "A believer in a racial hierarchy with whites on top and blacks at the bottom."

    Why such a narrow definition, Mr. Weissberg?

    Any race or ethnic group that believes itself to be innately superior to another is 'racist'. This surely fits the popular definition. And Weissberg knows this. So why the constricted definition?

    Weissberg sidesteps the broader issue since it might put his favorite (((tribe))) under the microscope. As usual, Weissberg's Zionist sympathies are showing. Does this make him 'racist'?--or just a phony?

    Also, Weissberg should concede that Trump's Great Wall pledge resonates with white Americans. It is a race issue. And deservedly so. Trump's proposed wall puts a world class damper on the rise of Hispanic power in America. This is shocking? Racist?

    Why can't we discuss these issues honestly? And the White/Hispanic tug-of-war has little to do with Blacks. Jews are obsessed with blacks and their 'inequality' with whites. This is a game of deception.

    When Trump (who just happens to be a non-Jewish white guy) as well as President, takes a tough stand on illegal immigration (by mostly Hispanics) it's depicted as a secret endorsement of 'keeping America white'.

    How about this: it's about time!

    White Americans have legitimate ethnic/racial interests. Isn't it time we said so?

    So is Trump being a 'racist'?

    Or his he just doing his job?

    Both.

    Whites want to preserve their advanced, orderly, English-speaking culture. What's wrong with that?

    The USA is a (mostly) white-created civilization that is lawful, prosperous, scientific, innovative and industrious. Central America and sub-Saharan Africa don't create civilizations of this kind. Just take a look. As we chart our demographic future, this enduring fact must not be ignored.

    So question should be this: why fix America if it's not (ethnically) in need of repair?

    'Racism' is a false charge and a red herring. Today, the charge is designed to keep whites from defending the civilization that they and their ancestors created. So let's be honest. Whites should be allowed to look into their future and take race and ethnicity (and language) into consideration.

    An diversity is not our strength. Absurd.

    The Chinese don't believe that 'diversity' is strength. Nor the Japanese. Nor the Koreans. And even some 'less progressive' European countries insist on the right to retain their 'national character'. This is sensible and normal. Homogeneity and continuity is strength. These peoples know it. And so do we.

    And certainly Israel won't sacrifice its demographic future to appease the 'we are all one' lobby. Ha! Israel even dares to expel its native (non-Jewish) inhabitants so that future Jewish immigrants from the US, Russia and Europe can immigrate there and create a cohesive, unified Jewish society. This is the Zionist ideal. Whites however are prohibited from thinking this way. Why?

    It's racist! (This is why Jews like Weissberg like to keep the focus only on 'white racism').

    Ironically, Jews in America merchandise the diversity Kool Aid to white audiences via ((Hollywood)) movies and tv shows, as well as courses they teach in schools, textbooks they write, laws they draft and politicians they fund. It's a slick and insidious campaign.

    Who are the racists here?

    And who are the fools?

    Damn, you sure as hell, conduct some spooky carpet bombing missions.

    Most excellent dude, I mean sir!



    Read More
    • Agree: Rurik
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  53. Mike K says:
    @mark green
    The anti-white boogeyman should be put to rest. The time has come.

    Next to dysfunctional (and browner) Brazil, the US is the most diverse society in world history. Enough is enough. With 'diversity' comes rising racial tensions and less freedom. Why is this?

    Races are different.

    Despite all this, America's greatest political shortcomings no longer even involve race. Not by a long shot. Yet few seem to notice.

    Instead, our nation's greatest failings concern 'intolerance' and aggression of a different kind. This involves Zio-America's predatory relationship with certain weaker peoples outside our borders.

    You haven't you noticed?

    Washington keeps bombing and ruining entire nations in order to make them 'democratic' and more tolerant.

    How sweet.

    Millions are dead, wounded, homeless or emotionally damaged by America's pro-democracy jihad.

    Anyone care?

    Entire countries have been annihilated. And we're not done yet.

    But the important message here at home is this: Don't say anything racist or anti-Semitic. It's really really bad!

    Meanwhile, within Empire America, our glorious black-brown-yellow-white-LGBTQ culture is getting all the more 'diverse' and more soaked with foreigners each and every day. You can just smell the tolerance.--(or is it the burning of tires?)

    Ironically, this politically correct trajectory may kill the golden goose itself. Time will tell.
    Unfortunately, this ongoing 'experiment' is irreversible. So please keep your fingers crossed.

    But shouldn't we discuss the societal risks of unsought, hyper-diversity going forward? Or is doing so 'racist'?

    Unfortunately, the race hustlers and hate-whitey activists will unhesitatingly crush Free Speech when needed. And they will never let their anger go.

    Envy can be an incurable disease.

    Thus, this smear of 'racist' is designed to coerce and silence without leaving a mark. This tactic is similar to the accusation of 'anti-Semitism', a related topic that 'conservative' Weissberg strenuously avoids.

    The bad news is that not everyone is attractive or smart or gets to be rich or famous. Some people never even get invited to the prom.

    Also, some people make unfit company.

    I demand the right to avoid them and live separately from them.

    So scolding whites (and only whites) for the universal tendency of favoring people most like themselves ('kin selection') or avoiding uncouth peoples is a direct assault on freedom.

    Weissberg falls into this anti-white trap by defining 'racism' thusly: "A believer in a racial hierarchy with whites on top and blacks at the bottom."

    Why such a narrow definition, Mr. Weissberg?

    Any race or ethnic group that believes itself to be innately superior to another is 'racist'. This surely fits the popular definition. And Weissberg knows this. So why the constricted definition?

    Weissberg sidesteps the broader issue since it might put his favorite (((tribe))) under the microscope. As usual, Weissberg's Zionist sympathies are showing. Does this make him 'racist'?--or just a phony?

    Also, Weissberg should concede that Trump's Great Wall pledge resonates with white Americans. It is a race issue. And deservedly so. Trump's proposed wall puts a world class damper on the rise of Hispanic power in America. This is shocking? Racist?

    Why can't we discuss these issues honestly? And the White/Hispanic tug-of-war has little to do with Blacks. Jews are obsessed with blacks and their 'inequality' with whites. This is a game of deception.

    When Trump (who just happens to be a non-Jewish white guy) as well as President, takes a tough stand on illegal immigration (by mostly Hispanics) it's depicted as a secret endorsement of 'keeping America white'.

    How about this: it's about time!

    White Americans have legitimate ethnic/racial interests. Isn't it time we said so?

    So is Trump being a 'racist'?

    Or his he just doing his job?

    Both.

    Whites want to preserve their advanced, orderly, English-speaking culture. What's wrong with that?

    The USA is a (mostly) white-created civilization that is lawful, prosperous, scientific, innovative and industrious. Central America and sub-Saharan Africa don't create civilizations of this kind. Just take a look. As we chart our demographic future, this enduring fact must not be ignored.

    So question should be this: why fix America if it's not (ethnically) in need of repair?

    'Racism' is a false charge and a red herring. Today, the charge is designed to keep whites from defending the civilization that they and their ancestors created. So let's be honest. Whites should be allowed to look into their future and take race and ethnicity (and language) into consideration.

    An diversity is not our strength. Absurd.

    The Chinese don't believe that 'diversity' is strength. Nor the Japanese. Nor the Koreans. And even some 'less progressive' European countries insist on the right to retain their 'national character'. This is sensible and normal. Homogeneity and continuity is strength. These peoples know it. And so do we.

    And certainly Israel won't sacrifice its demographic future to appease the 'we are all one' lobby. Ha! Israel even dares to expel its native (non-Jewish) inhabitants so that future Jewish immigrants from the US, Russia and Europe can immigrate there and create a cohesive, unified Jewish society. This is the Zionist ideal. Whites however are prohibited from thinking this way. Why?

    It's racist! (This is why Jews like Weissberg like to keep the focus only on 'white racism').

    Ironically, Jews in America merchandise the diversity Kool Aid to white audiences via ((Hollywood)) movies and tv shows, as well as courses they teach in schools, textbooks they write, laws they draft and politicians they fund. It's a slick and insidious campaign.

    Who are the racists here?

    And who are the fools?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  54. @MarkinLA
    You would think Bibi should have had Mossad assassinate Soros by now.

    That might be on his to-do list.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  55. Jason Liu says:

    I don’t attack people for their race, but if the west’s definition of racism is recognition of racial differences or having in-group preference, then anyone with half a brain is and should be a racist. Don’t trust people who AREN’T racist.

    Read More
    • Agree: mark green
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  56. gp says:

    Give us an unambiguous definition of racism. Until then, the question “Is X racist?” is invalid.

    I define racism as “An awareness of the differences among the races of man.”
    Progressives define racism as “Desire for genocide of another race.”
    The average white American defines racism as simply “Bad.” as they were carefully taught.

    Let’s hear some more definitions please!

    Read More
    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
    Any nationalism these days is labeled as racism.
    What I see as racism is looking down on other groups.

    When, in 1976 or so, I was on a guided tour in Sri Lanka, I had my first encounter with racism as I see it, the guide was very negative about Tamils.
    The civil war came.

    Even if one accepts scientific results about average IQ's of non white groups, there is no reason to feel contempt for them, in my opinion.
    We should consider how to change this, possibly by education.

    But, I must admit, when I see stupid behaviour by people with migrant background with us, such as a few days ago in traffic, I also grumble to myself 'stupid foreigner'.
    In this case, the 'foreigner' took a risk I never would have taken.
    I prefer not taking my right to being in hospital with my right.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  57. @Randal
    A good attempt to address the underlying dishonesty of all of the pc smear terms - racist, antisemite, homophobe, islamophobe, sexist etc.

    The basic truth common to all these terms is that they attempt to conflate a nasty extreme, which is actually rather rare, with a much more widespread legitimate opinion that the purveyors of political correctness wish to see suppressed. This approach tries to mitigate the harm caused by the widespread use of that smear term (in the particular context of racism) by identifying the false conflation and introducing a term ("race realism") for one of the conflated positions, in an attempt to separate them.

    Either being racist is genuinely the inherently nasty thing it is portrayed as (in which case almost nobody is actually racist), or being racist is not an inherently bad thing to be. The vast majority of those smeared as "racist" are in fact "race realists".

    Either being antisemite is genuinely the inherently nasty thing it is portrayed as (in which case almost nobody is actually antisemitic), or being antisemitic is not an inherently bad thing to be. The vast majority of those smeared as "antisemites" are in fact just people who notice and say things that jewish people and those with an interest in promoting their group interests want to see suppressed.

    Either being homophobic is genuinely the inherently nasty thing it is portrayed as (in which case almost nobody is actually homophobic), or being homophobic is not an inherently bad thing to be. The vast majority of those smeared as "homophobic" are in fact just people who disapprove of homosexual behaviour

    Etc ad nauseam. This is the fundamental truth needed to understand the problem of political correctness in the modern societies of the US sphere. It would be nice if it could be taught as such compulsorily in all schools (except that in reality schoolteachers as a class are more likely to be actively and enthusiastically part of the pc problem than of any solution to it).

    Randal, central to your observation is the capture of the language used to control the narrative. The use of politically correct language and the insistence on its use in any venue of discussion ensures that those who control the language control the narrative, so that there is no chance at refuting those who have set the terms of the debate.

    I know that this is pointing out the obvious to many participating here, but I mention it for the benefit of anybody who isn’t already aware of the tactic. Refusing to use PC language is one way of being heard while pointing out the ridiculous nature of politically correct speech and the mendacity behind the insistence on the use of fallacious terminology as a condition for participation in the dialogue.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Randal
    Dealing with this issue is certainly among the greatest problems of the societies of the modern US sphere.

    Imo we can safely say that anybody who regularly uses the main smear terms (racist, anti-Semite, homophobe, islamophobe) in their "official" sense and without careful qualification is part of the problem and not part of any solution, regardless of their more general claimed views, or any official party or political allegiance they might claim.

    Whether the approach attempted by Weissberg here in relation to one of the smear terms will work remains to be seen, but at least he's trying to move in the right direction.
    , @anarchyst
    "Racism" is a made-up word that was introduced by the inventors of communism . . . in order to destabilize non-communist cultures and make them ripe for takeover.
    True "racism" is desirable as it promotes the advancement of the culture and forges a "common bond" between the members of the race. True "racism" merely recognizes commonality of purpose among like-minded individuals with a common culture.
    Every race is expected to promote and advance its own culture; hence, the NAACP and "congressional black caucus" for blacks, the ADL and $PLC for jews and la raza and mecha for hispanics.
    It is the unique sense of white altruism that has made so-called "civil-rights (for some)" laws possible. "Affirmative action", contract set-asides and preferences, other government "programs" for minorities only unrestricted immigration from third-world countries while white immigrants "need not apply". . .and other unequal treatment has resulted in more-qualified whites being denied opportunities that would rightly be theirs. This is white altruism in action. . . NO OTHER RACE has EVER given people of other races a "break" . . . It has never happened in the history of humanity, save our own. . . white altruism will spell the demise (and destruction) of the white race. . .
    It is only whites that are expected to shed all vestiges of racial cohesiveness.
    Guess which race maintains the most racial and cultural insularity and cohesiveness yet decries racial cohesiveness by whites??
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  58. gp says:

    White American schoolteachers have various definitions of racism:

    “The belief that Shakespeare’s plays are more meritorious than The Works of Maya Angelou.”
    “Denial of the significance of the giants of The African Canon.”
    “There is no such thing as race, but racism is the worst characteristic of human souls and minds.”
    “An irrational desire to speak one’s mind in academic settings.”

    This would be really fun if it didn’t nauseate me.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    So let's replace weak and silly whites with able realistic Asians and half Asian whites.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  59. anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    Whites do have racial enemies. Blacks and Jews are the racial enemies of whites. Blacks and Jews hate whites and want all whites dead.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    My family of Anglo-Celtic descent have found the solution. Marry and breed with commercially successful Jewish and Asian families who produce mostly STEM professors. Amazing what solidariy grandchildren brings about.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  60. Rurik says:
    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  61. Randal says:
    @Twodees Partain
    Randal, central to your observation is the capture of the language used to control the narrative. The use of politically correct language and the insistence on its use in any venue of discussion ensures that those who control the language control the narrative, so that there is no chance at refuting those who have set the terms of the debate.

    I know that this is pointing out the obvious to many participating here, but I mention it for the benefit of anybody who isn't already aware of the tactic. Refusing to use PC language is one way of being heard while pointing out the ridiculous nature of politically correct speech and the mendacity behind the insistence on the use of fallacious terminology as a condition for participation in the dialogue.

    Dealing with this issue is certainly among the greatest problems of the societies of the modern US sphere.

    Imo we can safely say that anybody who regularly uses the main smear terms (racist, anti-Semite, homophobe, islamophobe) in their “official” sense and without careful qualification is part of the problem and not part of any solution, regardless of their more general claimed views, or any official party or political allegiance they might claim.

    Whether the approach attempted by Weissberg here in relation to one of the smear terms will work remains to be seen, but at least he’s trying to move in the right direction.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  62. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @Truth
    Well it seems that there are a scheissload of 10th century sources that disagree with you:

    http://www.khazaria.com/khazar-diaspora.html

    Thank you for the interesting reference but maybe you should read it as it refers to both the absence of archsrologicsal evidence and, most relevant, the absence of genetic evidence of Khazar ancestry. So the 10th centrury stuff is, as I say, interesting – but irrelevant.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth
    How can it be less relevant than what is proffered by Khazar media sources a thousand years later?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  63. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @anonymous
    Whites do have racial enemies. Blacks and Jews are the racial enemies of whites. Blacks and Jews hate whites and want all whites dead.

    My family of Anglo-Celtic descent have found the solution. Marry and breed with commercially successful Jewish and Asian families who produce mostly STEM professors. Amazing what solidariy grandchildren brings about.

    Read More
    • Replies: @anonymous
    And there is no denying the hatred is there?? And that hatred is born of a hatred of an innocent man murdered in cold blood for refusing to enslave the world for the benefit of the Jews. And you are proud to have the blood of such evil in your family?? You sicken me.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  64. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @gp
    White American schoolteachers have various definitions of racism:

    "The belief that Shakespeare's plays are more meritorious than The Works of Maya Angelou."
    "Denial of the significance of the giants of The African Canon."
    "There is no such thing as race, but racism is the worst characteristic of human souls and minds."
    "An irrational desire to speak one's mind in academic settings."

    This would be really fun if it didn't nauseate me.

    So let’s replace weak and silly whites with able realistic Asians and half Asian whites.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  65. anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @Anonymous
    My family of Anglo-Celtic descent have found the solution. Marry and breed with commercially successful Jewish and Asian families who produce mostly STEM professors. Amazing what solidariy grandchildren brings about.

    And there is no denying the hatred is there?? And that hatred is born of a hatred of an innocent man murdered in cold blood for refusing to enslave the world for the benefit of the Jews. And you are proud to have the blood of such evil in your family?? You sicken me.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    Unless your "anonymous" tag conceals mischievous trolling you are a sad case. I obviouly can't deny your "hate" because I don't know you or the sad circumstances which have brought you to the condition where you write such insane and unhappy twaddle.

    You haven't even learned the lessons of clear expression that masters of hate like Goebels might have taught you. In particular your second sentence conveys no sensible meaning at all as it leaves one guessing whether you just possibly have some very peculiar distorted view of what allegedly happened to a chap we call Jesus, and why. What are you talking about?

    BTW have you found out from 23andme or ancestry.com where your very odd genes come from?

    And whose is this hate you say can't be denied? And against what? A very Christian hate perhaps?

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  66. Truth says:
    @Anonymous
    Thank you for the interesting reference but maybe you should read it as it refers to both the absence of archsrologicsal evidence and, most relevant, the absence of genetic evidence of Khazar ancestry. So the 10th centrury stuff is, as I say, interesting - but irrelevant.

    How can it be less relevant than what is proffered by Khazar media sources a thousand years later?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    You are I take it aware of the major fallacy termed petitio principii. It is a fatal fallacy, so why insult people by thrusting it on them as if they wouldn't notice? I refer, in case you are a bit slow on the uptake to your calling today's Jews "Khazars" as though it was established fact.

    BTW how do you explain the main Ashkenazi language being a German dialect?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  67. gp says:

    “So let’s replace weak and silly whites with able realistic Asians and half Asian whites.” I don’t see where I said that. But considering it, unlikely as your fantasy is, it is preferable to the current demographic forecast for the rest of the century, isn’t it? If not, why not?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  68. gp says:

    Anybody living in a crime-infested, Rust Belt urban sh!thole like I do, knows there are differences among the races of man. It’s a fact, just as true as the fact that males (of all races) commit violence at ten times the rate that females do. I don’t expect any (non-criminal) black person to feel guilty about that awful fact, just as I cannot bear the burden of the behavior of my entire gender cohort.

    All I ask for is an honest acknowledgement of those measurable racial differences.

    I’m retired and didn’t save enough to move out of here. So it’s Fort Apache here. Thugs (yes, mostly black; no Japanese) terrorize us with daily shootings, carjackings, armed home invasion _teams_, often juveniles whose only source of respect is violence, inspired by that insidious damnable gangsta culture.

    This is not an indictment of all black people. It’s not a call for genocide, or even segregation. It’s just facts.

    But it’s “problematic” to point out obvious truth. It will get you fired or thrown out of college if you say it out loud. The Cult of Diversity is enforced. You can whisper these things only in places like this, exchanging secret notes in the gulag. This is wrong. Who says this is not wrong, and why?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  69. @Anonymous
    Sorry. I've lost a long reply.Shlomo Ssnd goes nowhere near justifying some fantasy about how German (Yiddish) speaking Jews made welcome by a Polish king,and who wete about half Celtic in gemetic ancestry, were really a lot of Khazars!

    Do not worry, Sand’s book is very well researched.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    I wasn't commenting on his research but what he himself says. You should read his work carefully, snd of coursr his critics. BTW why do you say his book is very wrll researched? And what do you know about the critical genetic evidence?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  70. @gp
    Give us an unambiguous definition of racism. Until then, the question "Is X racist?" is invalid.

    I define racism as "An awareness of the differences among the races of man."
    Progressives define racism as "Desire for genocide of another race."
    The average white American defines racism as simply "Bad." as they were carefully taught.

    Let's hear some more definitions please!

    Any nationalism these days is labeled as racism.
    What I see as racism is looking down on other groups.

    When, in 1976 or so, I was on a guided tour in Sri Lanka, I had my first encounter with racism as I see it, the guide was very negative about Tamils.
    The civil war came.

    Even if one accepts scientific results about average IQ’s of non white groups, there is no reason to feel contempt for them, in my opinion.
    We should consider how to change this, possibly by education.

    But, I must admit, when I see stupid behaviour by people with migrant background with us, such as a few days ago in traffic, I also grumble to myself ‘stupid foreigner’.
    In this case, the ‘foreigner’ took a risk I never would have taken.
    I prefer not taking my right to being in hospital with my right.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  71. @wayfarer
    We're livin' the dream, problem is, it ain't our dream.

    It's their dream, you know the House of Rothschild's dream, and it's a dark dream.

    I'm wrestling with just how I'd like to go down, either in the footsteps of Jesus the Christ or in the legacy of Genghis Khan.

    I'll no doubt find out when my back's to the wall, which at this rate, shouldn't be too much longer.

    Humanity's history has always been messed up, it's now just our time to experience, just how messed up.

    Have a beautiful day!

    https://i.pinimg.com/236x/6e/82/07/6e82074f1704df31e62dffe8d5bcf7cf--smiley-faces-skull-art.jpg

    ...

    I wonder if the Rothschilds, this time without the end ‘t’, do more than try to protect their wealth.
    I would not be surprised if they disapprove of AIPAC, AEI , neocons and Soros.
    See
    Simon Schama, ´Two Rothschilds and the land of Israel’, London, 1978
    The book describes the conflicts between the Rothschilds and the zionist settlers.
    Contrary to popular opinion, bankers do not like wars.
    JP Morgan in WWI saw in the war just a business opportunity, they passed the financial, risks as soon as possible, to ordinary USA citizens.
    Charles Callan Tansill, ‘Amerika geht in den Krieg’, Stuttgart 1939 (America goes to War, 1938)

    Read More
    • Replies: @Twodees Partain
    "Contrary to popular opinion, bankers do not like wars."

    Maybe you're saying that bank tellers don't like war. Maybe bank employees whose sons are sent to die in wars don't like wars, but bank employees aren't bankers. Bankers, by which the term defines autonomous heads of central banks, certainly do promote wars and use the chaos produced by war to increase profits. They can definitely be said to like wars.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  72. @Truth

    Trump is undoubtedly a race realist,
     
    Well apparently he is; all of his children married Khazars, ain't that right Thommy?

    heh heh heh heh.

    To me it seems more likely that his children married sephardic jews, the sensible jews, the semitic jews.
    In the Ottoman empire asjkenazi jews were hated, not so the sephardic jews.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  73. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @anonymous
    And there is no denying the hatred is there?? And that hatred is born of a hatred of an innocent man murdered in cold blood for refusing to enslave the world for the benefit of the Jews. And you are proud to have the blood of such evil in your family?? You sicken me.

    Unless your “anonymous” tag conceals mischievous trolling you are a sad case. I obviouly can’t deny your “hate” because I don’t know you or the sad circumstances which have brought you to the condition where you write such insane and unhappy twaddle.

    You haven’t even learned the lessons of clear expression that masters of hate like Goebels might have taught you. In particular your second sentence conveys no sensible meaning at all as it leaves one guessing whether you just possibly have some very peculiar distorted view of what allegedly happened to a chap we call Jesus, and why. What are you talking about?

    BTW have you found out from 23andme or ancestry.com where your very odd genes come from?

    And whose is this hate you say can’t be denied? And against what? A very Christian hate perhaps?

    Read More
    • Replies: @anonymous
    Why haven't the Jews apologized for the cold blooded killing Christ? Not once, not one time not ever in 2,000 years?? If that is not hatred what is it?? And you want your kids to breed with such filth??

    Signed Robert Browning
    , @anonymous
    Do you know why Christ was killed?? The Jews had and still have certain expectations of their messiah. The Jews expected and still expect their messiah to enslave their enemies, enslave the non-Jew for the benefit of the Jews. Christ message of forgiveness and peace making was seen as blasphemy by the Jews so they killed him. Christ died because he refuse the Jew demands to enslave the world and the Jews, the killers, you feel such adoration for, have never forgiven him for refusing their demands and not enslaving YOU, Mr. non-Jew. Now tell me again, what affection you have for the Jews.

    Signed Robert Browning

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  74. @Twodees Partain
    How about this one?

    http://hamodia.com/2018/02/04/netanyahu-george-soros-behind-campaign-migrant-deportation/

    Netanyahu is griping that Soros is doing the same thing to Israel that he does to the goy countries.

    O.T.
    How about this one?

    George Soros’s foundation backs campaign to reverse Brexit
    US business magnate has given £400,000 to Best for Britain group since June 2017 election

    A key pro-EU campaign to reverse the Brexit vote has been given more than £400,000 of funding by American billionaire George Soros’s foundation, the Guardian can disclose.

    Jessica Elgot: Political correspondent
    The Guardian
    Wed 7 Feb 2018

    Read More
    • Replies: @Twodees Partain
    Yes, that seems to fit what is usually reported about Soros and his manipulations.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  75. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @jilles dykstra
    Do not worry, Sand's book is very well researched.

    I wasn’t commenting on his research but what he himself says. You should read his work carefully, snd of coursr his critics. BTW why do you say his book is very wrll researched? And what do you know about the critical genetic evidence?

    Read More
    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
    I did read the book.
    And I know of desperate efforts to prove descendancy, even of jewish priests of two thousand years ago.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  76. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @Truth
    How can it be less relevant than what is proffered by Khazar media sources a thousand years later?

    You are I take it aware of the major fallacy termed petitio principii. It is a fatal fallacy, so why insult people by thrusting it on them as if they wouldn’t notice? I refer, in case you are a bit slow on the uptake to your calling today’s Jews “Khazars” as though it was established fact.

    BTW how do you explain the main Ashkenazi language being a German dialect?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth
    A Sephardi named "Yanuska?"
    , @Truth

    The Yiddish language – which consists of Hebrew, German, Slavic elements and is written in Aramaic – has been spoken at least since the 9th century AD, but its origins have been debated by linguists for several centuries. While some have suggested a German origin, others believe a more complex beginning for the language, starting in Slavic lands in Khazaria – the Middle Age Khazar Empire that covered present-day southern Russia, Kazakhstan, Ukraine, and parts of the Caucasus – and followed by Ukraine, and finally Germany. Although the language adopted a German vocabulary it retained its Slavic grammar – which is why Yiddish is often referred to as “bad German”.
     
    http://theconversation.com/uncovering-ancient-ashkenaz-the-birthplace-of-yiddish-speakers-58355
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  77. anarchyst says:
    @Twodees Partain
    Randal, central to your observation is the capture of the language used to control the narrative. The use of politically correct language and the insistence on its use in any venue of discussion ensures that those who control the language control the narrative, so that there is no chance at refuting those who have set the terms of the debate.

    I know that this is pointing out the obvious to many participating here, but I mention it for the benefit of anybody who isn't already aware of the tactic. Refusing to use PC language is one way of being heard while pointing out the ridiculous nature of politically correct speech and the mendacity behind the insistence on the use of fallacious terminology as a condition for participation in the dialogue.

    “Racism” is a made-up word that was introduced by the inventors of communism . . . in order to destabilize non-communist cultures and make them ripe for takeover.
    True “racism” is desirable as it promotes the advancement of the culture and forges a “common bond” between the members of the race. True “racism” merely recognizes commonality of purpose among like-minded individuals with a common culture.
    Every race is expected to promote and advance its own culture; hence, the NAACP and “congressional black caucus” for blacks, the ADL and $PLC for jews and la raza and mecha for hispanics.
    It is the unique sense of white altruism that has made so-called “civil-rights (for some)” laws possible. “Affirmative action”, contract set-asides and preferences, other government “programs” for minorities only unrestricted immigration from third-world countries while white immigrants “need not apply”. . .and other unequal treatment has resulted in more-qualified whites being denied opportunities that would rightly be theirs. This is white altruism in action. . . NO OTHER RACE has EVER given people of other races a “break” . . . It has never happened in the history of humanity, save our own. . . white altruism will spell the demise (and destruction) of the white race. . .
    It is only whites that are expected to shed all vestiges of racial cohesiveness.
    Guess which race maintains the most racial and cultural insularity and cohesiveness yet decries racial cohesiveness by whites??

    Read More
    • Replies: @Twodees Partain
    "Guess which race ..." etc.

    If I'm to guess, the answer is no race, but a group masquerading as a religion, and proclaiming its members as a race.
    , @Anonymous
    That "made up word" and communist origins rubbish in the first par put me off to the point where I Googled "when was the word racism first used" and found this interesting essay which notes its 1902 OED record.

    https://www.npr.org/sections/codeswitch/2014/01/05/260006815/the-ugly-fascinating-history-of-the-word-racism

    Then Wikipedia notes a 1903 usage and discusses its displacing "racialism" which you could hardly say was made up and propagated by communists. It notes that the 1930s saw "racism's" much increased use for obvious reasons.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  78. Is Mr. Trump racist? No, I don’t think so. I think he is like me. I wish them well, and hope for the best. But, I am tired. And, I do cross the street when I see a group of them coming.

    Read More
    • Replies: @gp
    We cross the street, we arm ourselves, we lock our car doors. It makes President Obama cry: "And there are very few African-American men who haven’t had the experience of walking across the street and hearing the locks click on the doors of cars."

    There is literally nothing a person can do that will not offend blacks! They wail that we don't even have the right to defend ourselves against their armed attacks, or take prudent safety precautions based on clear statistical evidence of their propensity for predation.

    Would that a competent debater ask Mr. Obama exactly why he thinks it is racist or unjust when a woman "clutch[es] her purse nervously and hold[s] her breath until she had a chance to get off [the elevator]. Why, Mr. Obama? Why is that? Is her reaction irrational, unfounded, ignorant, or what? Is it because so-called "stereotypes" are "bad?" Mr. O, please do tell us why women alone should not be afraid of black males in an elevator!
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  79. Truth says:
    @Anonymous
    You are I take it aware of the major fallacy termed petitio principii. It is a fatal fallacy, so why insult people by thrusting it on them as if they wouldn't notice? I refer, in case you are a bit slow on the uptake to your calling today's Jews "Khazars" as though it was established fact.

    BTW how do you explain the main Ashkenazi language being a German dialect?

    A Sephardi named “Yanuska?”

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    A bit top cryptic for me though I have tried Googling Yanuska....
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  80. Truth says:
    @Anonymous
    You are I take it aware of the major fallacy termed petitio principii. It is a fatal fallacy, so why insult people by thrusting it on them as if they wouldn't notice? I refer, in case you are a bit slow on the uptake to your calling today's Jews "Khazars" as though it was established fact.

    BTW how do you explain the main Ashkenazi language being a German dialect?

    The Yiddish language – which consists of Hebrew, German, Slavic elements and is written in Aramaic – has been spoken at least since the 9th century AD, but its origins have been debated by linguists for several centuries. While some have suggested a German origin, others believe a more complex beginning for the language, starting in Slavic lands in Khazaria – the Middle Age Khazar Empire that covered present-day southern Russia, Kazakhstan, Ukraine, and parts of the Caucasus – and followed by Ukraine, and finally Germany. Although the language adopted a German vocabulary it retained its Slavic grammar – which is why Yiddish is often referred to as “bad German”.

    http://theconversation.com/uncovering-ancient-ashkenaz-the-birthplace-of-yiddish-speakers-58355

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    Thanks. A fascinating start for my updating of what started with my finding myself sitting next to a rabbi with whom I raised the Khazar story that I had read decades before. To my point about Yiddish being a German dialect unlikely to have come from the East he observed inter alia that there were Jews in the Rhineland before there were Germsns so I said that, on the presumption that we were both descended from lively Celtic girls that I would thenceforth call him cousin. Now I find myself setting off on a fascinating updating. My Yiddish is non-existent so, for the moment I am biased toward relying on genetic studies and probabilities. I am disinclined to accept the view that there are many Turkic genes in the Ashkenazi gene pool though I note with interest that a good part of the *Semitic*genes could come from NE Turkey and Ashkenazi redheads might have got their colour from Khazars as much as Celts.

    Still I shall go on pulling up trolls who go on with the full blooded Koestler nonsense so they can at least enjoy educating themselves

    Try http://www.khazaria.com/khazar-history.html.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  81. @jilles dykstra
    I wonder if the Rothschilds, this time without the end 't', do more than try to protect their wealth.
    I would not be surprised if they disapprove of AIPAC, AEI , neocons and Soros.
    See
    Simon Schama, ´Two Rothschilds and the land of Israel’, London, 1978
    The book describes the conflicts between the Rothschilds and the zionist settlers.
    Contrary to popular opinion, bankers do not like wars.
    JP Morgan in WWI saw in the war just a business opportunity, they passed the financial, risks as soon as possible, to ordinary USA citizens.
    Charles Callan Tansill, 'Amerika geht in den Krieg', Stuttgart 1939 (America goes to War, 1938)

    “Contrary to popular opinion, bankers do not like wars.”

    Maybe you’re saying that bank tellers don’t like war. Maybe bank employees whose sons are sent to die in wars don’t like wars, but bank employees aren’t bankers. Bankers, by which the term defines autonomous heads of central banks, certainly do promote wars and use the chaos produced by war to increase profits. They can definitely be said to like wars.

    Read More
    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
    Any proof ?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  82. @englishmike
    O.T.
    How about this one?

    George Soros's foundation backs campaign to reverse Brexit
    US business magnate has given £400,000 to Best for Britain group since June 2017 election

    A key pro-EU campaign to reverse the Brexit vote has been given more than £400,000 of funding by American billionaire George Soros’s foundation, the Guardian can disclose.

    Jessica Elgot: Political correspondent
    The Guardian
    Wed 7 Feb 2018
     

    Yes, that seems to fit what is usually reported about Soros and his manipulations.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  83. @anarchyst
    "Racism" is a made-up word that was introduced by the inventors of communism . . . in order to destabilize non-communist cultures and make them ripe for takeover.
    True "racism" is desirable as it promotes the advancement of the culture and forges a "common bond" between the members of the race. True "racism" merely recognizes commonality of purpose among like-minded individuals with a common culture.
    Every race is expected to promote and advance its own culture; hence, the NAACP and "congressional black caucus" for blacks, the ADL and $PLC for jews and la raza and mecha for hispanics.
    It is the unique sense of white altruism that has made so-called "civil-rights (for some)" laws possible. "Affirmative action", contract set-asides and preferences, other government "programs" for minorities only unrestricted immigration from third-world countries while white immigrants "need not apply". . .and other unequal treatment has resulted in more-qualified whites being denied opportunities that would rightly be theirs. This is white altruism in action. . . NO OTHER RACE has EVER given people of other races a "break" . . . It has never happened in the history of humanity, save our own. . . white altruism will spell the demise (and destruction) of the white race. . .
    It is only whites that are expected to shed all vestiges of racial cohesiveness.
    Guess which race maintains the most racial and cultural insularity and cohesiveness yet decries racial cohesiveness by whites??

    “Guess which race …” etc.

    If I’m to guess, the answer is no race, but a group masquerading as a religion, and proclaiming its members as a race.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  84. gp says:
    @Rhett Hardwick
    Is Mr. Trump racist? No, I don't think so. I think he is like me. I wish them well, and hope for the best. But, I am tired. And, I do cross the street when I see a group of them coming.

    We cross the street, we arm ourselves, we lock our car doors. It makes President Obama cry: “And there are very few African-American men who haven’t had the experience of walking across the street and hearing the locks click on the doors of cars.”

    There is literally nothing a person can do that will not offend blacks! They wail that we don’t even have the right to defend ourselves against their armed attacks, or take prudent safety precautions based on clear statistical evidence of their propensity for predation.

    Would that a competent debater ask Mr. Obama exactly why he thinks it is racist or unjust when a woman “clutch[es] her purse nervously and hold[s] her breath until she had a chance to get off [the elevator]. Why, Mr. Obama? Why is that? Is her reaction irrational, unfounded, ignorant, or what? Is it because so-called “stereotypes” are “bad?” Mr. O, please do tell us why women alone should not be afraid of black males in an elevator!

    Read More
    • Replies: @anarchyst
    Even Jesse Jackson once remarked that "if he heard footsteps behind him, he was (secretly)relieved that it was a white person behind him".
    Sorta tells you something about stereotypes...
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  85. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @Truth
    A Sephardi named "Yanuska?"

    A bit top cryptic for me though I have tried Googling Yanuska….

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  86. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @Truth

    The Yiddish language – which consists of Hebrew, German, Slavic elements and is written in Aramaic – has been spoken at least since the 9th century AD, but its origins have been debated by linguists for several centuries. While some have suggested a German origin, others believe a more complex beginning for the language, starting in Slavic lands in Khazaria – the Middle Age Khazar Empire that covered present-day southern Russia, Kazakhstan, Ukraine, and parts of the Caucasus – and followed by Ukraine, and finally Germany. Although the language adopted a German vocabulary it retained its Slavic grammar – which is why Yiddish is often referred to as “bad German”.
     
    http://theconversation.com/uncovering-ancient-ashkenaz-the-birthplace-of-yiddish-speakers-58355

    Thanks. A fascinating start for my updating of what started with my finding myself sitting next to a rabbi with whom I raised the Khazar story that I had read decades before. To my point about Yiddish being a German dialect unlikely to have come from the East he observed inter alia that there were Jews in the Rhineland before there were Germsns so I said that, on the presumption that we were both descended from lively Celtic girls that I would thenceforth call him cousin. Now I find myself setting off on a fascinating updating. My Yiddish is non-existent so, for the moment I am biased toward relying on genetic studies and probabilities. I am disinclined to accept the view that there are many Turkic genes in the Ashkenazi gene pool though I note with interest that a good part of the *Semitic*genes could come from NE Turkey and Ashkenazi redheads might have got their colour from Khazars as much as Celts.

    Still I shall go on pulling up trolls who go on with the full blooded Koestler nonsense so they can at least enjoy educating themselves

    Try http://www.khazaria.com/khazar-history.html.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  87. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @anarchyst
    "Racism" is a made-up word that was introduced by the inventors of communism . . . in order to destabilize non-communist cultures and make them ripe for takeover.
    True "racism" is desirable as it promotes the advancement of the culture and forges a "common bond" between the members of the race. True "racism" merely recognizes commonality of purpose among like-minded individuals with a common culture.
    Every race is expected to promote and advance its own culture; hence, the NAACP and "congressional black caucus" for blacks, the ADL and $PLC for jews and la raza and mecha for hispanics.
    It is the unique sense of white altruism that has made so-called "civil-rights (for some)" laws possible. "Affirmative action", contract set-asides and preferences, other government "programs" for minorities only unrestricted immigration from third-world countries while white immigrants "need not apply". . .and other unequal treatment has resulted in more-qualified whites being denied opportunities that would rightly be theirs. This is white altruism in action. . . NO OTHER RACE has EVER given people of other races a "break" . . . It has never happened in the history of humanity, save our own. . . white altruism will spell the demise (and destruction) of the white race. . .
    It is only whites that are expected to shed all vestiges of racial cohesiveness.
    Guess which race maintains the most racial and cultural insularity and cohesiveness yet decries racial cohesiveness by whites??

    That “made up word” and communist origins rubbish in the first par put me off to the point where I Googled “when was the word racism first used” and found this interesting essay which notes its 1902 OED record.

    https://www.npr.org/sections/codeswitch/2014/01/05/260006815/the-ugly-fascinating-history-of-the-word-racism

    Then Wikipedia notes a 1903 usage and discusses its displacing “racialism” which you could hardly say was made up and propagated by communists. It notes that the 1930s saw “racism’s” much increased use for obvious reasons.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  88. anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @Anonymous
    Unless your "anonymous" tag conceals mischievous trolling you are a sad case. I obviouly can't deny your "hate" because I don't know you or the sad circumstances which have brought you to the condition where you write such insane and unhappy twaddle.

    You haven't even learned the lessons of clear expression that masters of hate like Goebels might have taught you. In particular your second sentence conveys no sensible meaning at all as it leaves one guessing whether you just possibly have some very peculiar distorted view of what allegedly happened to a chap we call Jesus, and why. What are you talking about?

    BTW have you found out from 23andme or ancestry.com where your very odd genes come from?

    And whose is this hate you say can't be denied? And against what? A very Christian hate perhaps?

    Why haven’t the Jews apologized for the cold blooded killing Christ? Not once, not one time not ever in 2,000 years?? If that is not hatred what is it?? And you want your kids to breed with such filth??

    Signed Robert Browning

    Read More
    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
    There is an interesting theory that Jesus never existed, that he was invented by Paulus, who, as a secret agent of the Roman emperor, invented christianity to undermine judaism.
    Rome had twice sent enormous armies to Palestine to crush jewish rebellion, maybe the emperor thought that propaganda might do the trick cheaper.

    Michael Baigent, Richard Leigh, ‘Verschlusssache Jesus, Die Wahrheit über das frühe Christentum’, (The Dead Sea Scrolls Deception, 1991), 2005, Bergisch Gladbach

    Philip M. Taylor, 'Munitions of the Mind, A History of Propaganda from the Ancient World to the Present Day', 1995, Manchester
    , @anarchyst
    Jews cannot apologize for Jesus Christ's murder and crucifixion as their Talmud forbids it.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  89. anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @Anonymous
    Unless your "anonymous" tag conceals mischievous trolling you are a sad case. I obviouly can't deny your "hate" because I don't know you or the sad circumstances which have brought you to the condition where you write such insane and unhappy twaddle.

    You haven't even learned the lessons of clear expression that masters of hate like Goebels might have taught you. In particular your second sentence conveys no sensible meaning at all as it leaves one guessing whether you just possibly have some very peculiar distorted view of what allegedly happened to a chap we call Jesus, and why. What are you talking about?

    BTW have you found out from 23andme or ancestry.com where your very odd genes come from?

    And whose is this hate you say can't be denied? And against what? A very Christian hate perhaps?

    Do you know why Christ was killed?? The Jews had and still have certain expectations of their messiah. The Jews expected and still expect their messiah to enslave their enemies, enslave the non-Jew for the benefit of the Jews. Christ message of forgiveness and peace making was seen as blasphemy by the Jews so they killed him. Christ died because he refuse the Jew demands to enslave the world and the Jews, the killers, you feel such adoration for, have never forgiven him for refusing their demands and not enslaving YOU, Mr. non-Jew. Now tell me again, what affection you have for the Jews.

    Signed Robert Browning

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  90. Anon • Disclaimer says:

    A conundrum.

    Jews use Diversity as a weapon against whites.
    Then, whites should naturally call out on Jews.
    But the JewTaboo means Jews can never do wrong. They are a perfect people who are always wise, angelic, or tragic(as innocent victims).
    So, even as Jews use Diversity against whites, whites cannot call out the Jews.
    Since Jews are so holy, whites can only say and do things that are complimentary to Jews.
    So, the most whites can do is argue against Diversity on grounds that it hurts Jews.
    Now, it may well be that some of Diversity do hurt Jews. But overall, Jews see it a big advantage because Diversity divided the gentile masses into warring clans, all the easier to manipulate via divide-and-rule. So, all said and done, most Jews do decide to use Diversity to hurt whites.
    But because of the JewTaboo, this cannot be spelled out.

    Imagine a Jewish guy grabbing a mallet to hit a white guy in the head. The most obvious thing for the white guy is to call out on the Jewish guy for hitting him on the head. But that simply can’t be done because of the JewTaboo that says Jews are always holy and innocent. So, the MOST that the white guy can do is condemn the mallet on grounds that it may sprain the Jew’s wrist. Never mind his own aching skull due to being hit on the head by the Jewish guy. His main concern must be the well-being of the holy Jew. So, the most he can do is condemn the mallet for the danger it might pose to the Jewish guys’ wrist. But as time passes, he gets hit harder and harder because no one respects a stupid cowardly cuck.

    Read More
    • Replies: @anarchyst
    "the jew cries out in pain as he is striking you"...
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  91. WhiteWolf says:

    I ask a serious question. Is there anyone out there that isn’t racist?

    The word racist has been used almost exclusively to describe White behaviour, in particular ANY behaviour or attitude that puts the interests of their own race first. By that definition I have personally not met anyone of any race who isn’t racist. Have you?

    Read More
    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
    My encounter with outspoken racism was around 1976, guided tour on Sri Lanka.
    I was astonished how the guide spoke about the Tamils.
    , @anarchyst
    I am PROUD to be considered to be "racist". When I am called out for my "racism", I respond enthusiastically and thank my accuser(s) for noticing. The bewildered, confused looks on their faces is priceless.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  92. @Anonymous
    I wasn't commenting on his research but what he himself says. You should read his work carefully, snd of coursr his critics. BTW why do you say his book is very wrll researched? And what do you know about the critical genetic evidence?

    I did read the book.
    And I know of desperate efforts to prove descendancy, even of jewish priests of two thousand years ago.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  93. @WhiteWolf
    I ask a serious question. Is there anyone out there that isn't racist?

    The word racist has been used almost exclusively to describe White behaviour, in particular ANY behaviour or attitude that puts the interests of their own race first. By that definition I have personally not met anyone of any race who isn't racist. Have you?

    My encounter with outspoken racism was around 1976, guided tour on Sri Lanka.
    I was astonished how the guide spoke about the Tamils.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  94. @anonymous
    Why haven't the Jews apologized for the cold blooded killing Christ? Not once, not one time not ever in 2,000 years?? If that is not hatred what is it?? And you want your kids to breed with such filth??

    Signed Robert Browning

    There is an interesting theory that Jesus never existed, that he was invented by Paulus, who, as a secret agent of the Roman emperor, invented christianity to undermine judaism.
    Rome had twice sent enormous armies to Palestine to crush jewish rebellion, maybe the emperor thought that propaganda might do the trick cheaper.

    Michael Baigent, Richard Leigh, ‘Verschlusssache Jesus, Die Wahrheit über das frühe Christentum’, (The Dead Sea Scrolls Deception, 1991), 2005, Bergisch Gladbach

    Philip M. Taylor, ‘Munitions of the Mind, A History of Propaganda from the Ancient World to the Present Day’, 1995, Manchester

    Read More
    • Replies: @anonymous
    Christ named the Jews, the Jews. Jew means those that reject Christ. Those that reject the teachings of Christ and those that reject the Gospel. Do you reject the teaching of Christ Jilles Dykstra?? Are you a Jew Jilles Dykstra?? And are you proud of it, Jilles Dykstra??

    Signed Robert Browning
    , @Ilyana_Rozumova
    Garbage, And Rome had no army's Rome had legions. And Rome never send more to Palestine than one legion, So stop talking BS,
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  95. @Twodees Partain
    "Contrary to popular opinion, bankers do not like wars."

    Maybe you're saying that bank tellers don't like war. Maybe bank employees whose sons are sent to die in wars don't like wars, but bank employees aren't bankers. Bankers, by which the term defines autonomous heads of central banks, certainly do promote wars and use the chaos produced by war to increase profits. They can definitely be said to like wars.

    Any proof ?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Twodees Partain
    Of course not. It's simply a product of my diseased mind.
    , @Malla
    Wanna read a book? Read this.

    https://archive.org/download/WarIsARacket/WarIsARacket.pdf

    War Is A Racket by Major General Smedley Butler
    And who was this General Butler?
    Why he was United States Marine Corps Major General and two-time Medal of Honor recipient on that. Based on his career military experience, Butler frankly discusses how business interests commercially benefit (including war profiteering) from warfare in his book.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  96. anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @jilles dykstra
    There is an interesting theory that Jesus never existed, that he was invented by Paulus, who, as a secret agent of the Roman emperor, invented christianity to undermine judaism.
    Rome had twice sent enormous armies to Palestine to crush jewish rebellion, maybe the emperor thought that propaganda might do the trick cheaper.

    Michael Baigent, Richard Leigh, ‘Verschlusssache Jesus, Die Wahrheit über das frühe Christentum’, (The Dead Sea Scrolls Deception, 1991), 2005, Bergisch Gladbach

    Philip M. Taylor, 'Munitions of the Mind, A History of Propaganda from the Ancient World to the Present Day', 1995, Manchester

    Christ named the Jews, the Jews. Jew means those that reject Christ. Those that reject the teachings of Christ and those that reject the Gospel. Do you reject the teaching of Christ Jilles Dykstra?? Are you a Jew Jilles Dykstra?? And are you proud of it, Jilles Dykstra??

    Signed Robert Browning

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  97. @jilles dykstra
    There is an interesting theory that Jesus never existed, that he was invented by Paulus, who, as a secret agent of the Roman emperor, invented christianity to undermine judaism.
    Rome had twice sent enormous armies to Palestine to crush jewish rebellion, maybe the emperor thought that propaganda might do the trick cheaper.

    Michael Baigent, Richard Leigh, ‘Verschlusssache Jesus, Die Wahrheit über das frühe Christentum’, (The Dead Sea Scrolls Deception, 1991), 2005, Bergisch Gladbach

    Philip M. Taylor, 'Munitions of the Mind, A History of Propaganda from the Ancient World to the Present Day', 1995, Manchester

    Garbage, And Rome had no army’s Rome had legions. And Rome never send more to Palestine than one legion, So stop talking BS,

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  98. Soxtory says:

    If you want racism in the White House look at LBJ or Woodrow Wilson!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  99. @jilles dykstra
    Any proof ?

    Of course not. It’s simply a product of my diseased mind.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  100. anarchyst says:
    @gp
    We cross the street, we arm ourselves, we lock our car doors. It makes President Obama cry: "And there are very few African-American men who haven’t had the experience of walking across the street and hearing the locks click on the doors of cars."

    There is literally nothing a person can do that will not offend blacks! They wail that we don't even have the right to defend ourselves against their armed attacks, or take prudent safety precautions based on clear statistical evidence of their propensity for predation.

    Would that a competent debater ask Mr. Obama exactly why he thinks it is racist or unjust when a woman "clutch[es] her purse nervously and hold[s] her breath until she had a chance to get off [the elevator]. Why, Mr. Obama? Why is that? Is her reaction irrational, unfounded, ignorant, or what? Is it because so-called "stereotypes" are "bad?" Mr. O, please do tell us why women alone should not be afraid of black males in an elevator!

    Even Jesse Jackson once remarked that “if he heard footsteps behind him, he was (secretly)relieved that it was a white person behind him”.
    Sorta tells you something about stereotypes…

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  101. anarchyst says:
    @WhiteWolf
    I ask a serious question. Is there anyone out there that isn't racist?

    The word racist has been used almost exclusively to describe White behaviour, in particular ANY behaviour or attitude that puts the interests of their own race first. By that definition I have personally not met anyone of any race who isn't racist. Have you?

    I am PROUD to be considered to be “racist”. When I am called out for my “racism”, I respond enthusiastically and thank my accuser(s) for noticing. The bewildered, confused looks on their faces is priceless.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  102. anarchyst says:
    @Anon
    A conundrum.

    Jews use Diversity as a weapon against whites.
    Then, whites should naturally call out on Jews.
    But the JewTaboo means Jews can never do wrong. They are a perfect people who are always wise, angelic, or tragic(as innocent victims).
    So, even as Jews use Diversity against whites, whites cannot call out the Jews.
    Since Jews are so holy, whites can only say and do things that are complimentary to Jews.
    So, the most whites can do is argue against Diversity on grounds that it hurts Jews.
    Now, it may well be that some of Diversity do hurt Jews. But overall, Jews see it a big advantage because Diversity divided the gentile masses into warring clans, all the easier to manipulate via divide-and-rule. So, all said and done, most Jews do decide to use Diversity to hurt whites.
    But because of the JewTaboo, this cannot be spelled out.

    Imagine a Jewish guy grabbing a mallet to hit a white guy in the head. The most obvious thing for the white guy is to call out on the Jewish guy for hitting him on the head. But that simply can't be done because of the JewTaboo that says Jews are always holy and innocent. So, the MOST that the white guy can do is condemn the mallet on grounds that it may sprain the Jew's wrist. Never mind his own aching skull due to being hit on the head by the Jewish guy. His main concern must be the well-being of the holy Jew. So, the most he can do is condemn the mallet for the danger it might pose to the Jewish guys' wrist. But as time passes, he gets hit harder and harder because no one respects a stupid cowardly cuck.

    “the jew cries out in pain as he is striking you”…

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  103. anarchyst says:
    @anonymous
    Why haven't the Jews apologized for the cold blooded killing Christ? Not once, not one time not ever in 2,000 years?? If that is not hatred what is it?? And you want your kids to breed with such filth??

    Signed Robert Browning

    Jews cannot apologize for Jesus Christ’s murder and crucifixion as their Talmud forbids it.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  104. Malla says:
    @jilles dykstra
    Any proof ?

    Wanna read a book? Read this.

    https://archive.org/download/WarIsARacket/WarIsARacket.pdf

    War Is A Racket by Major General Smedley Butler
    And who was this General Butler?
    Why he was United States Marine Corps Major General and two-time Medal of Honor recipient on that. Based on his career military experience, Butler frankly discusses how business interests commercially benefit (including war profiteering) from warfare in his book.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  105. @jilles dykstra
    Discussion without defining racism is as pointless as debating fascism and nazi'ism, without defining the words.
    Any article I saw about giving definitions was followed by a confused discussion, where sentiments were far more important than facts.
    In these days, in my opinion, the real debate is about nationalism against globalism, and nationalism against what is called 'open society'.

    This 'open society' I see as 'let anyone come who wants to, to benefit from welfare and medical aid', anyone who never contributed to the national incomes of the nations, who get the burden.
    On top of that, the uninvited guests have the audacity to try to change the cultures of the nations that feed them.

    Just now German organisations of migrants, and/or naturalised Germans, demand of the coming Merkel-Schuld government to declare that Germany is a multi cultural state.
    In other words, integration or assimilation, rejected.

    We see the results in France, areas for especially Muslims, where police hardly dares to come, a situation more and more resembling civil war.

    Discussion without defining racism is as pointless as…

    The terms racism and racist are relatively new. One of the original “racists”, Enoch Powell, when asked, in a TV interview 50 years ago, if he was a racist,replied “If by racist, you mean that there are differences between races, then yes I am a racist. If by racist you mean that one race is inherently better than another, then no, I am not a racist.” I have used Powell’s definitions since that time. Powell was a real race realist.

    The term race realist is a very new addition, and Weissberg’s definition goes beyond Powell’s definition, and gives the opportunity for the follow up “White supremacist” attack. Keep it simple: there are differences, period. Some better, some worse. If you are lost in an African jungle, who do you think would be better able to get you out, a local Black, or Albert Einstein? I know who I’d pick.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
Current Commenter says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS
PastClassics
The “war hero” candidate buried information about POWs left behind in Vietnam.
What Was John McCain's True Wartime Record in Vietnam?
The major media overlooked Communist spies and Madoff’s fraud. What are they missing today?
The evidence is clear — but often ignored