The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 James Kirkpatrick Archive
Hungary, Poland Spends Money On Motherhood, Not Migrants. Why Not U.S.?
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Only a few years ago, motherhood was something seen as so self-evidently good that praising it was an unnecessary banality. Yet, like the Boy Scouts, supporting motherhood has now gone from uncontroversial to “far-right” in Western countries, akin even to Nazism. Thus Sweden’s “Social Security Minister” Annika Strandhäll blasted policies by the Hungarian government to support motherhood, calling it “alarming” and something that “reeks of the 30s” . [Intl Row as Swedish Minister Likens Hungary PM’s ‘More Kids’ Call to Nazi Policy, Sputnik, February 18, 2019] The Hungarian government formally protested the comments and Hungary’s Foreign Minister Peter Szijjarto concisely described the difference between the two countries: “Hungary is spending money on families and Sweden is spending it on migrants”. [Hungary plan ‘reeks of 1930s’: Swedish minister, The Local, February 16, 2019] Unfortunately, the same can be said of most Western countries.

It is worth noting that Sweden, like other Western European countries, is not free. There is no free speech for patriots in Sweden. There is a de facto ban on even discussing immigration policy in Sweden that has only been challenged by the rise of the Sweden Democrats. Despite a record performance by the patriotic party in the last election, the other parties formed a coalition explicitly designed to keep them from any influence. [Sweden’s parties reach deal to keep far-Right Sweden Democrats from influence, by Richard Orange, Telegraph, January 11, 2019] In times of great crisis, different parties in parliamentary systems have joined together to form a government of “national unity.” In the face of rising restrictionist sentiment, Sweden’s government is something closer to a government of national annihilation.

Hungary has chosen a different path. In a recent speech, Hungarian president Viktor Orban announced that Hungarian women with four or more children will no longer pay any income tax. Needless to say, Western media outlets were scathing about the policy. The New York Times sneered that Orban’s was willing to do “anything to avoid immigration”. [Orban encourages mothers in Hungary to have four or more babies, by Patrick Kingsley, New York Times, February 11, 2019] It also quoted one Andrea Peto, a “gender studies professor at the Central European University,” who argued that tax breaks somehow constitute “a regulation of women’s bodies.” Unmentioned in The New York Times report: the Central European University was bankrolled by George Soros and serves as a kind of forward base for left-liberal activists in Hungary. [Why Hungary Forced George Soros-Backed Central European University To Leave The Country, by Susan Adams, Forbes, December 4, 2018] Also unmentioned: Hungary cutting funding for “gender studies” programs, which could also explain the professor’s opposition.

Still, The New York Times is hardly alone in scoffing at the policy. Now This video said “the motives behind the [pro-child] policy stem from xenophobia.” The London Daily Express quoted a random academic to denounce Orban’s policies as the equivalent of those favored by Romanian communist dictator Nicolae Ceausescu—a direct insult considering Orban’s role in helping to topple the Communist puppet government in the late 1980s. [Hungary shock warning: Orban tax reform for families have Ceausescu echoes claims academic, by Ciaran McGrath, February 15, 2019] In an especially groan-inducing reference, Peter Murphy at AFP wrote, “Meme-creators on Hungarian social media have even caught a whiff of the hit TV series ‘The Handmaid’s Tale’, based on Margaret Atwood’s dystopian novel of an America ruled by a misogynistic theocracy” [.Hungary’s Orban bets on baby boom to boost population, Yahoo News, February 18, 2019]

One is tempted to ask why foreigners care so much. What difference does it make to them if Hungary’s government wants to promote Hungarian babies instead of importing foreigners?

Furthermore, if some Hungarian women don’t want to take advantage of the program, it is not as though they are being forced to breed, the television fueled fears/fantasies of hysterics notwithstanding.

Of course, one of the corollaries of the “diversity” creed is that no-one is allowed to escape. There must not be one Western country (or U.S. state)spared mass Third World immigration, lest that country’s survival put the entire program into question. And Hungary is particularly targeted because it has become the spearhead of a larger movement against the current leadership of the European Union, especially the pro-migration governments of France and Sweden.

Thus, Sweden’s Foreign Minister is calling for an “offensive for democracy” in Europe designed to push back against populism. By “democracy,” what is meant is not popular self-rule, but rule by the European Union. “I cannot forgive them for this,” said Foreign Minister Margot Wallstrom of the decision to allow Brexit [Sweden ‘cannot forgive’ UK politicians for ‘historic mistake’ of allowing Brexit, by Chris Tomlinson, Breitbart, January 31, 2019].

Yet Hungary is also not without allies, and other countries are also trying to increase birthrates instead of importing migrants. In Poland, another enemy of the international press, the conservative government directly subsidizes families, “albeit only of the traditional heterosexual sort,” as The Economist sneers. This includes direct handouts for children, with proposed bonuses for having several children in quick succession. [Subsidizing babies has bolstered Poland’s ruling party—so far, May 10, 2018]

Estonia recently increased money provided for having families and the result has been something of a baby boom. [Rising amount of two-child Estonian families adding a third to the brood, ERR, May 31, 2018] What’s more, a recent survey showed Estonian women want to have even larger families if economic circumstances permit. [Survey: Half of Estonian women would like three or more children, ERR, October 20, 2018]

Italy is also taking steps to prevent population decline, though its policies are mixed. One town in Italy is offering huge subsides for foreigners willing to settle in the area, with the mayor hoping for “young professionals,” though American reporter suggests “one solution might be to populate the dying towns with the migrants who flock to Italy on boats across the Mediterranean, fleeing peril or hardship in Africa or the Middle East” . [Town in Italy will pay you $10,000 to move there, NBC 2, January 28, 2019] But Italy’s national government has a more productive proposal, offering unused agricultural land for free to rural families that have a third child. [Italy launches ‘land for children’ plan to fight declining birthrate, by Sabina Castelfranco, Voice of America, November 2, 2018]

Of course, once again, anything that might help actual Italians maintain families draws condemnation in the international media. Thus, Eric Lyman penned a largely negative article making comparisons to fascism and linking the policy to Benito Mussolini’s “Battle for Births” . [News Analysis: Italy recalls controversial past with policies to increase birthrate, Xinhua, November 15, 2018]

In the United States, the “neglected key” to Republican victory is what Steve Sailer has called “affordable family formation.” These European policies are a direct response to this kind of impulse. Yet there has been no discussion of such policies since President Trump took office, even though Democrats are likely to target the voters with policies designed to lift the burden of student loans and education.

Instead, President Trump is governing as a conventional Republican, a dangerous approach for 2020, especially as his combative style alienates the suburban voters normally welcoming of moderate, fiscally conservative policies. [Trump Edges Toward A Conventional Republican Approach, At Least On Policy, by Jeremy Peters, New York Times, February 19, 2019]

Ultimately, the question of migration or boosting the birthrate is the National Question in a different form. What is the purpose of the nation-state? If it is merely a geographic entity, then it makes sense to simply replace a population that isn’t reproducing to keep the economy going, though assuming Third Worlders will produce at the same levels is a dangerous gamble. However, if the nation-state is the political expression of a nation, of a particular people, then working to increase the birthrate and make it easier to create families is part of its core purpose. Even if such efforts don’t fully succeed and population declines, that is not a disaster, and is preferable to simply being replaced.

But journalists and national governments in countries like Sweden seem to believe Western nations (and only Western nations) have a moral obligation to replace themselves. Thus, the usual support for welfare programs suddenly vanishes if it might help white people have children.

Which tells us the real battle of this century isn’t about “capitalism” or “socialism”—but whether Western nations will survive or be extirpated.

James Kirkpatrick [Email him] is a Beltway veteran and a refugee from Conservatism Inc.

(Republished from VDare by permission of author or representative)
 
Hide 6 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Sweden is so sick in _ better time it would be invded by Norwy/Denmrk/Finlnd & Russ & hve it’s govt toppled…

  2. Given Sweden’s miserable failures as a (relatively short-term) colonial power, I don’t understand why they feel this compulsion to apologise their nation and their posterity to extinction.

    One practical observation: There is one continent whose principle occupants in most of its 54 countries have flatly stated that there is no room for descendants of European peoples to live there, where there is currently ongoing ethnic cleansing bordering on outright genocide of peoples of European descent, and there is nary a peep in the Western media, but when two or three European states decide they’d like to remain European and not accept migrants from Africa and other regions, the Western Media considers that tantamount to crimes against humanity.

  3. Dante says:

    I really enjoyed the article and will share far and wide, Unz review is the best site out there. As to the National Question I personally am optimistic about Europeans taking our own side, The trends are there and the declining MSM and politics as usual are losing control of the discourse.

  4. whether Western nations will survive or be extirpated

    Last year, Prime Minister Orbán came within a whisker of naming the enemy:

    ‘I know that this battle is difficult for everyone. I understand if some of us are also afraid. This is understandable, because we must fight against an opponent which is different from us. Their faces are not visible, but are hidden from view; they do not fight directly, but by stealth; they are not honourable, but unprincipled; they are not national, but international; they do not believe in work, but speculate with money; they have no homeland, but feel that the whole world is theirs. They are not generous, but vengeful, and always attack the heart—especially if it is red, white and green.’

  5. c matt says:

    Sweden’s “Social Security Minister” Annika Strandhäll blasted policies by the Hungarian government to support motherhood

    Tell me Annika, how are your policies working out for you? How much longer before Sweden’s official language becomes some dialect of Arabic? I think she’s jealous.

  6. If you think US taxpayers fail to spend money on motherhood, you must be unfamiliar with the USA’s extensive pay-per-birth welfare system for citizens & noncitizens in single-breadwinner households, including EBT food assistance that increases “per person, per household.” Beyond 3 months of EBT-only every 3 years, with few exceptions, welfare is available almost exclusively to single-breadwinner moms and legal / illegal immigrants in male-breadwinner households.

    The overwhelming number of recipients are single moms.

    They qualify when they stay strategically under the earned-income limits for various welfare programs by working part time or in temporary jobs, going back on the welfare during months when their income goes over the programs’ income limits. A part-time-working mom with 2 kids gets as much in just free EBT food as a college-educated employee made in a week, working as a caseworker a decade ago—probably more now.

    Monthly cash assistance is provided in an almost equal amount, depending on whether the kids’ father(s) are named and whether their births fall within the cash-assistance program’s time constraints. Rental assistance is granted in increasing amounts per kid produced. It sets up many part-time-working single moms in “independent” apartments, while record numbers of their non-welfare-eligible, full-time-working, non-womb-productive colleagues cannot afford the dignity of rent since rent alone consumes more than half of their earned-only income.

    Electricity assistance is likewise provided to the womb producers, and Obamacare upped the pay-per-birth payoff with more free healthcare, extending free healthcare beyond the former instant allotment of Medicaid upon presentation of pregnancy test results that used to end 6 months after each little money-fetcher’s birth. Medicaid pays for most births in the USA, and surprise, most births are now to single moms.

    Best of all, in addition to monthly bills covered by Uncle Sam, “low-income” moms making under $26k are awarded with up to $6,431 in refundable child tax credit cash to spend however they want. Many boast to non-tax-favored, non-welfare-eligible colleagues about spending that child tax credit money on things like master bedroom furniture, expensive tattoos and beach trips with boyfriends. Those mom-pampering treats are very important to baby.

    Welfare-supported moms who do not need higher pay or adequate hours are often above firing and a favorite in America’s many absenteeism-friendly “voted-best-for-moms” workplaces. Feminist America could not be more womb-focused. Government-paid daycare for the mostly part-time-working moms, in a country where the average employed person works part time, is one of the few ways in which moms are not currently indulged to the max to reward them for sex and reproduction, which used to be regarded by Republicans as a matter of personal responsibility.

    Today’s Republicans, no less than Democrats, regard parenthood as a state of being that absolves citizens and noncitizens from personal responsibility, with only the single and childless citizens held to responsibility standards. Isn’t this what some conservatives of yesteryear might call a** backwards?

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All James Kirkpatrick Comments via RSS
PastClassics
The “war hero” candidate buried information about POWs left behind in Vietnam.
Are elite university admissions based on meritocracy and diversity as claimed?
What Was John McCain's True Wartime Record in Vietnam?
Hundreds of POWs may have been left to die in Vietnam, abandoned by their government—and our media.