The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Tobias Langdon Archive
Gas-Chamber Blues Revisited
More on the “Stain and Shame” of Labour Anti-Semitism
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Everything is connected, but some things are more connected than others. Let’s start with Margaret Hodge, the arrogant Jewish Labour MP whose criticism of Jeremy Corbyn and support for censorship I discussed in “Labour’s Gas-Chamber Blues.” After Hodge was threatened with disciplinary action for what she said about Corbyn, her high-powered lawyers wrote a letter to the party complaining about the way she was being treated. The letter was seven pages long and won’t have come cheap. But Hodge is a millionaire and can well afford it.

Legal eagles

Then again, maybe she got a discount or even free service, because her high-powered lawyers are an anti-Brexit Jewish firm called Mishcon de Reya. The firm’s leading light and deputy chairman is a Jewish activist and literary scholar called Anthony Julius, whose extreme ethnocentrism and ability to find anti-Semitism in the most surprising places were described by Andrew Joyce at the Occidental Observer in 2013. I myself have discussed him here too. In “High-Voltage Hate” I described how he had written a glowing review of his friend Nick Cohen’s anti-censorship polemic You Can’t Read This Book (2012), which he said “stands alongside” libertarian classics like “Milton’s Areopagitica (1644) and Mill’s On Liberty (1859).”

Anthony Julius, Friend/Foe of Free Speech
Anthony Julius, Friend/Foe of Free Speech

It appeared, then, that Anthony Julius was a passionate supporter of free speech. But appearances were deceptive. In “Moshe Is Monitoring You,” I described how he had been the lawyer for Ronnie Fraser, a Jewish academic who made a pro-Israeli, anti-Palestinian claim against the University and College Union. The claim was dismissed by a panel of judges as “an impermissible attempt to achieve a political end by litigious means.” The judges condemned the academic and his supporters for betraying “a worrying disregard for pluralism, tolerance and freedom of expression.” I concluded that Julius did not genuinely believe in free speech and that he was happy to support censorship when he and his fellow Jews could benefit from it. Now more proof has arrived of his hostility to free speech.

Legal beagles

Let’s visit the ancient Mediterranean island of Malta, which was the setting, as Anthony Julius is no doubt well-aware, of Christopher Marlowe’s poisonously anti-Semitic tragedy The Jew of Malta (c. 1590). In 2017 a real tragedy struck Malta when the campaigning journalist Daphne Caruana Galizia was blown up with a car-bomb by some of the corrupt businessmen and politicians whose activities she had been trying to expose. The Guardian has noted that, at the time of her death, “she was fighting 47 civil and criminal defamation lawsuits from an array of business people and politicians, brought by multiple law firms.”

Censored by death: Daphne Caruana Galizia
Censored by death: Daphne Caruana Galizia

Can you guess the name of one of those bullying, pro-censorship law firms? That’s right: Mishcon de Reya was a leading member of the legal pack hounding Caruana Galizia at the time of her death. According to the Guardian it “specializes in … defamation cases,” but that didn’t stop its leading light Anthony Julius being appointed in December to the board of trustees at the “writers’ campaign group English PEN,” whose “mission is to defend writers and freedom of speech.” Understandably enough, Caruana Galizia’s sons have complained to English PEN about Julius’s appointment, saying that his firm Mishcon de Reya “sought to cripple her financially with libel action in UK courts. … Had our mother not been murdered, they would have succeeded.”

Jewnited They Stand

Free-speech campaigners in Britain have often complained bitterly about wide-ranging British libel laws and the way they’re used by rich foreigners to intimidate and silence critics who are subject to penalties here, whether or not they are actually based here. But Britain’s censorship-friendly laws obviously don’t bother Anthony Julius. Quite the reverse: he and his firm make large sums of money from them. Mishcon de Reya are therefore the perfect lawyers for Margaret Hodge. Like her, they don’t believe in free speech. In particular, Hodge and Mishcon de Reya want to severely restrict criticism of Israel and to end all criticism of Jewish behaviour in general.

Joint Jewry: three identical front pages
Joint Jewry: three identical front pages

So do the “68 rabbis from across UK Judaism” who signed an “unprecedented letter condemning Labour antisemitism.” And so do the editors of Britain’s three main Jewish newspapers, the Jewish Chronicle, the Jewish News and the Jewish Telegraph, which took the “unprecedented step” of “publishing the same front page” attacking Jeremy Corbyn at the end of July 2018. The joint front pages claimed that the “stain and shame of antisemitism has coursed through Her Majesty’s Opposition since Jeremy Corbyn became leader in 2015” and complained about “the existential threat to Jewish life in this country that would be posed by a Jeremy Corbyn-led government.”

The Jewish community are campaigning for Labour to fully adopt an “internationally recognized” definition of anti-Semitism that will make it much easier to intimidate and silence critics of Israel. The coordination and unity of the campaign have been remarkable. Like wasps from a threatened nest, Jews have risen in a swarm and descended on a common enemy, buzzing furiously and stinging viciously. They’ve put aside some bitter antagonisms to do so. For example, the Orthodox rabbis who signed the joint letter would not even recognize their fellow signatory Laura Janner-Klausner, daughter of the alleged paederast Greville Janner, as a valid rabbi. As Kevin MacDonald and Steve Sailer have noted, one long-lasting strategy of Jewish life has been to turn aggression and hostility outwards on the goyim, thereby minimizing internal disputes and schisms.

Axioms of anti-racism

Another important feature of the campaign has been the way it is founded on a ludicrous but unassailable axiom of anti-racism: that a minority is always in the right and must never be accused of employing dishonest means or pursuing selfish ends. A complementary axiom of anti-racism states the exact opposite of the White majority, namely, that it is always in the wrong and constantly employs dishonest means to pursue selfish ends.

But I suspect that many members of the White majority in Britain are now seeing Jews in a new light. It’s very difficult to mistake the hysteria and hyperbole of the Jewish campaign against “anti-Semitism” or to overlook the selfish ends that it is certainly meant to serve. British Jews believe in freedom of screech, not in freedom of speech. I’m sure that many more British goys now wish the screechers would just shut up and go away.

(Republished from The Occidental Observer by permission of author or representative)
 
Hide 128 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. FKA Max says: • Website

    The unsavoury alliance between oligarchs and London’s top lawyers

    https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/may/26/unsavoury-alliance-between-oligarchs-and-london-top-lawyers

    One day, the security and intelligence services will have to ask when law firms that seek the lucrative business of repressive states and organisations, or threaten investigative journalists, become a threat to the national interest. It’s hard to pose the question because the people involved aren’t so bad when away from work. I know Anthony Julius vaguely and Geraldine Proudler, one of the Olswang lawyers who went for Browder, was on the board of the Scott Trust that oversees the Guardian and Observer. (She is now on the board of an English PEN that never seems to learn.) I’m sure that in private they love investigative journalism, freedom of thought and expression, democracy and the right to hold the powerful to account. Perhaps the firms to which they belong love money more.

    The UK has been selling its real estate, etc. to the oligarchs and sheiks et al. at a higher rate than any other country I’m aware of, maybe with the exception of Cyprus, Malta and Monaco, in the case of Russian oligarchs.

    https://www.unz.com/article/revisiting-litvinenko-what-really-happened/#comment-2399919

    UK ‘has turned a blind eye’ towards Russian money-laundering

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  2. shredder says:

    FMax

    Are these money laundering Russian oligarchs discussed in the BBC video really Russian, or just former elite of the USSR who were in position to make obscene profits? Often with the help of co-ethnics, not Russians from outside of the country. The are “white,” or “Russian” when it serves the narrative, a persecuted religious minority deserving of special protection when not.

    • Replies: @FKA Max
    , @TheJester
  3. Anon[425] • Disclaimer says:

    Hungarians have more sense.

    https://www.counter-currents.com/2018/08/say-goodbye-to-the-entire-elite-of-68/#more-84511

    But it seems like the globalists are misrepresenting what is really happening in Hungary. Hungarians do what is necessary, but the Glob twists it all around.

  4. It is a criminal cult not a religion. I was raised Jewish but realized I was in a cult and left. In fourth grade we were told in Sunday school not to tell anyone on the outside what we heard because outsiders would not understand and use it against us. What we heard was how stupid everyone outside the synagogue was and how one day they would be slaves. While waiting for that day, always try to put one over on the stupid cattle. I guess I am angry it took me so long to leave a cult.

  5. I don’t think I’ve ever come across such a compelling case for something to actually like about Corbyn.
    If only he showed as much support for Brexit and the actual British people as he appears to condemnation for Israel.

    A complementary axiom of anti-racism states the exact opposite of the White majority, namely, that it is always in the wrong and constantly employs dishonest means to pursue selfish ends.

    They just wouldn’t be the rootless cosmopolitans we all know and loathe if they weren’t up to this same old shtick.

    I suspect that many members of the White majority in Britain are now seeing Jews in a new light.

    Here’s hoping so. In the US, between the alt-right and the emergent (openly) socialist left, the formerly immutable protected status of Jewry/Israel is being steadily chipped away at from both sides. Their money isn’t buying voters or politicians the way it used to before the dawn of MAGA and nowadays they seem to be doing more harm than good for themselves whenever the SPLC or ADL open their traps to cry victim.

    Oops, now I’m the one hunched over at the computer desk wringing my hands like some Jew caricature meme out of /pol/.

  6. Tyrion 2 says:

    Hopeless! The anti-white party get hoisted up on their own petard of ethnic grievance mongering and the Unz crowd can’t wait to untie and save them as long as it’ll get the Jews…

    Truly a bizarre seminar for a Japanese History prof to deliver in 2100…

    • Replies: @AndrewR
  7. Tyrion 2 says:
    @Steve Kastl

    T-R-O-L-L.

    I’ve never heard anything like that. The message is literally the opposite. You should visit a synagogue, pretend to be Jewish, and you’ll see. What city do you live in?

  8. Not so long ago, a week or so, I copied here a part of Corbyn’s speech.
    Despite that the quote was preceded by the URL some her thought I gave my views, I should have put the quote between “”.

    Anyhow, the things Corbyn gave as examples of antisemitism by Labour members all were, again, in my opinion, just truths, or very probable truths.
    The worst example, according to Trump was someone who had written that Hitler is and was misunderstood.
    But this in my view again is true.

    Hitler never wanted war, he dit not intend to exterminate jewry.
    As I stated before, after WWI was there was extensive revisionism, that is the WWI propaganda was debunked.
    To this day WWII propaganda has not, in any case not in meanstream media, been debunked, on the contrary.

    On European tv yesterday Merkel and the present Spanish prime minister appeared, they agree on letting in migrants.
    Greece, Italy and France no longer cooperating, a new route has been found.
    What moves sfinx Merkel, anybody’s guess, but her mentioning WWII makes me thing that se wants to enter history as the woman who changed the evil German people, who started tw world wars and perpetrated the holocaust.

    The idea that Germans were the victims of two world wars, and did not try to exterminate jews, does not enter her mind.
    That Hitler intended to deport al jews to Madagascar, after the war, true.
    That jews and others died in the camps, also true, but because of the self management of the camps.
    Jews also died of hunger in the self managed Warsaw ghetto.
    Jew Poliakov explains it in great detail.
    If Hitler, and the SS who guardeed the camps, knew of how an why people died in the camps, I do not know.
    Official letters have been published with complaints about missing jews, complaints because of missing labour.

    • Replies: @Miggle
    , @Miggle
  9. @Steve Kastl

    A great example of the hidden identity one finds in
    Abba Eban, ‘An Autobiography’, 1977, New York

  10. Regarding the great lie that MUST be exposed, the lie that makes the WW2 slaughter of Jews “special”, the lie that destroys the ability of decent people to think honestly, the lie that founded a new (and dominant) world religion against which heresy is forbidden, the lie that humanity might not survive, the Auschwitz ‘human gas chambers’ lie:
    1) The corpses of people who have died from cyanide poisoning are bright pink/red (Google image it). This is a FACT. There is not one single “eyewitness” who reported seeing such corpses in spite of the fact that there should have been one million+ of them in transit through the camp if we accept the current narrative. Furthermore the “eyewitnesses” whose testimony has been published report seeing the “blue” bodies of the gas chamber victims. That proves they are liars.
    2) The real gas chamber at Auschwitz (which still exists but ‘tourists’ are not shown) was small (10m^3) and used for killing the lice on clothes that spread typhoid amongst the inmates (which killed about 60,000 inmates in the late summers of ’42 and ’43). So we are supposed to believe that there was one gas chamber for killing inmates and another for keeping them healthy.
    3) The ferrocyanide level in the real (hygenic) gas chamber is 5000 parts per million. The walls of this chamber are turquoise to this very day. The chemical evidence persists. The walls of the alleged “human gas chamber” contains 2/3 ppm, the same as dormitories and kitchens. this has been measured by serious professional chemists. In fact young Jewish researcher, David Cole, forced the Auschwitz museum director to admit that the “human gas chamber” had been built between 1946 and 1948 by the Soviets. That’s AFTER the war, for your information.
    4) Carlo Mottagno, an Italian researcher examined the coke delivery records at Auschwitz and, because the amount of coke required to incinerate a body in a crematorium is known, he worked out how many corpses could have been cremated by this volume of coke. His results showed approximate equivalence (no contradiction) between the possible numbers and the numbers of cremations/deaths recorded in the OFFICIAL Auschwitz records.
    5) The Head of the British Secret Services, one Mr. Cavendish-Bentinck, wrote to the BBC in 1943 asking them to stop broadcasting the “human gas chambers” war propaganda for which “there is no evidence” because this horror story was undermining propaganda relating to real German atrocities that the Secret Services were broadcasting.
    The Letter:

    http://www.whatreallyhappened.info/decrypts/Cavendish_Bentinck.pdf

    David Cole Auschwitz Documentary:

  11. There are some people complaining about the fact that Labor didn’t adopt the full definition of antisemitism that they prefer. The full definition mentions accusations of double loyalty, that means that people accused of double loyalty are more loyal to Isr. than to their own countries. Right after that, people who complain about talk of loyalty to Isr. go on to complain about critic against Isr.. This seems to be all they think about. They didn’t care to demand a code forbidding excessive critic of the UK, they don’t seem to care about critic against the UK, only of Isr. They didn’t demand that the Palestinians be protected against injustice and violence of any kind.

    Those people have been making campaigns to expell from Labor people whom they accuse of antisemitism. But the quesiton should be whether Labor shouldn’t expell Zionists and people who defend Isr. Those people don’t care about human rights, they don’t care about justice, they justify violence.

    The commisions in the UK spent years discussing the right definition of antisemitism. They presented the final results and it was possible to show in 10 minutes that the definition of antisemitism was itself highliy antisemitic.

    Jonathan Cook wrote a very good text about this question (The Crisis in Corbyn’s Labour Party…..).

    In Germany the question of antisemitism seems to be the most important question of the country. If you ask boys and girls what they want to be when they grow up, a lot of them answer that they want to be experts on antisemitism, not nurses and firemen. But the whole thing of antisemitism is quite questionable. Let’s imagine a man who doesn’t like foreigners. By chance he has a neighbour who is an African and another who is a Jew. Well, if he one day offends his African neigbour, he will be guilty of a minor offense for calling someone a name. If he says exactly the same thing the next day to his Jewish neighbour, he will be guilty of a grave offense of antisemitism even if what he says is exactly the same and for the very same reasons. Imagine also a dispute between a Muslim and a Jew in Germany because of a place to park their cars. They both offend the other saying about the same things about each other. Well, the offense commited by the Muslim will be reported to the government office against antisemitism and to all experts on antisemitim at universities. They will spend years studying the case and will come to the conclusion that this was a case of Muslim antisemitism. But they wont be able to say a word about the offense made against the Muslim. They would have to leave the space of what was said to the Muslim empty.

  12. Miggle says:
    @Steve Kastl

    Steve Kastl you are to be congratulated for all of that. Yes, it’s not a religion but a cult. It’s not a race but the self-deception that it is is central. If not, they can’t be called Jews, another self-deception.

    More, Judaism is a cage that’s hard to escape from, but you did. Congratulations. The D’Israeli family struggled for three generations to escape, till their father had Sarah and Ben baptized. Even then, Ben didn’t completely get away..

    It’s interesting, the inherent conspiracy that you were enrolled in at Sunday school, which is made the universal Jewish attitude. The “use it against us” is an expression of the hatred of Jews for non-Jews. The insistence that Jews are inevitably victims of non-Jews and the drumming up of examples for which there must ever be remembrance is another of the bars of the cage.

    But all Jews really are victims, victims of their rabbis, prisoners in that cage.

    Israel Shahak in the book recently reviewed by Ron Unz pointed out further, far from being always the victims of those outside the cage, that Jews have always been privileged. That is what we are seeing in the organized rage against Corbyn: the conspiracy, the use of the privilege to bully.

    • Replies: @Tyrion 2
  13. anon[141] • Disclaimer says:
    @Steve Kastl

    I have a Jewish partner and have learned a lot over the years.

    She is an interesting person, being quite traditional in many ways but also a bit of a black sheep (which is why she is with me). So, I have met a lot of Jewish people and heard lots of things that are not for public consumption.

    She is also comes from a well connected family, and she knows many high profile figures personally or through mutual friends. Again, I have picked up lots of interestsing information.

    For example, there might be a member of the Jewish establishment on TV ponitificating about some issue or another. My partner will spill some juicy bit of gossip about said person and I can never think about him without laughing.

    Where anyone to publish any of this stuff, they get shouted down in the usual way.

    As for calling them a cult – there certainly is a bizarre belief system, which would be deeply embarrassing if made public.

    It took me quite a long time to understand some of their ideas – especially as they do not express them explicitly, but have private meanings.

    Finally, a lot of Jews don’t buy the whole package and often have very mixed feelings about their culture.

  14. Anonymous[271] • Disclaimer says:
    @Steve Kastl

    Thanks for your candor, Steve. People like you (and Ron Unz, and Gilad Atzmon, and Israel Shamir) are starting to make a real difference.

    • Replies: @Miggle
  15. Moi says:

    I’m betting Corbyn will fold–just like any other politician. Corbyn is no Tony Benn.

    • Replies: @Herald
  16. Nice title and ending. I expected more though.

  17. In 2017 a real tragedy struck Malta when the campaigning journalist Daphne Caruana Galizia was blown up with a car-bomb by some of the corrupt businessmen and politicians whose activities she had been trying to expose.

    Now our masters wouldn’t do that, would they? What a shock. ;) ;)

    • Replies: @Jeff Stryker
  18. Miggle says:
    @jilles dykstra

    The English common law is a deception of its essence. Inherently biased, essentially about wealth for lawyers, born of two notable deceptions, the organized campaign to demonize the Star Chamber when it was very popular, and intrinsically unbiased because it was investigative, so inherently objective, and the personal prejudices of each judge were balanced by the fact that there was more than one, never a “judge sitting alone”. And of course it was relatively low-cost despite having more than one judge at first instance because it didn’t depend on well-paid lawyers doing everything to influence the judges, so was straightforward, not hugely elaborate.

    The slipping of a totally irrelevant sentence deep into a long single-paragraph 1701 Act of Settlement written on a parchment roll, an insertion not noticed for decades, was the other. It made a judge more powerful than any king. Today the judges eagerly mention it and boast that it gives “independence of the judiciary”. Sounds good till you look closely.

    The unbalanced inherent bias of a single judge in every Assange hearing when there is another fraud there, arrest for extradition on suspicion without charge, the imposition of bail conditions for release from arbitrary detention, so making out that Assange breached bail when he could never have been validly imprisoned, the single judge supporting that concocted nonsense… just an example of the English common law at work.

    • Replies: @Anon
  19. Iberiano says:

    “There’s a consensus, agreed-upon narrative about what’s going on in the world that is advanced by all mass media outlets regardless of what political sector those outlets market themselves to….Let’s consider a hypothetical scenario, though. Let’s imagine a world where there were no official narratives. About anything. At all. What if there was no dominating elite class telling the public how they were meant to interpret events and situations?” — Caitlin Johnstone

    https://medium.com/@caityjohnstone/what-if-there-were-no-official-narratives-4de3ee54ed0c

    • Replies: @jacques sheete
  20. @FKA Max

    I read the whole of that article by Nick Cohen on the Guardian website that you linked. Very sneaky the way you have not quoted the bits that would make the Russian team on UR threads (actually enthusiastic amateurs I think, like most of the one eyed blog commenters for India, Pakistan or China) spit chips :-)

    • Replies: @mcohen
    , @FKA Max
    , @Them Guys
  21. Miggle says:
    @jilles dykstra

    The Nazis did terribly, murderously oppress the German Jews, many of them patriotic Germans who had fought for Germany 20 years earlier. Many were very secular. There was much intermarriage. Most were anti-Zionist. Kristallnacht was a pogrom, huge destruction of Jewish property. There were freight trains taking German Jews to Poland, I’m sure of that, having read Bernt Engelman “In Hitler’s Germany”. Or, before the war, trainloads going to concentration camps. Any Jew released by a court was immediately re-arrested “for his own protection” but soon was reported to have died while trying to escape.

    One of the tragedies is that Hitler insisted on regarding the Jews as a race, so there was no escape. But then, the rabbis stood shoulder-to-shoulder with Hitler on that.

    If he’d just taken away their citizenship, made them wear the star and forbidden them to work in finance or news media and a few things like that, it would have solved all the real and imagined problems, the Jewish Question. There were massive killings. For nothing.

    Of course the number of six million is conclusively disproved by the fact that people are sent to prison for denying it. Who were behind the introduction of that law in Germany and Austria? Who employed their influence to obtain such laws?

  22. @Tyrion 2

    You are so silly. It does not work.
    Here is something that will work.
    Put a candle in the window few days before Christmas. Keep it there burning until somebody contacts you. You must explain seriously that you need help.
    Only than you can go to synagogue. (but it will not be necessary.)

  23. I don’t think the attacks on Jeremy Corbyn have really anything to do with the Jews. It’s all about Brexit. Corbyn came very close to winning the last election and he could well win the next one. He took the Remain side in the referendum and favours a customs union with the EU, even after Brexit. The attacks on Corbyn strike me as a panic reaction to that possibility, most probably inspired by Brexit’s American backers and their classic misperception of Europeans as nothing more than Americans who talk funny. In the US, criticism of Israel, which is what Corbyn is accused of, would indeed end a politician’s career. Not so in Europe, not because people in Europe are particularly hostile to Israel but, quite simply, because they are indifferent to Israel, on way or the other. Thus, at most, people will shrug their shoulders at such accusations and say “so what?” and they might even see the accusations as Jewish bullying. Thus, I see the accusations as simply part of the wider panicking of the Brexiteers and their American backers as public opinion in Britain turns against them. By the way, I can find nothing to indicate that a person called “Tobias Langdon” actually exists.

  24. Anon[273] • Disclaimer says:
    @Miggle

    Are you a lawyer or law graduate? If nay, where do you get your knowledge of legal history and practice sufficient to give you confidence to make that comment?

    • Replies: @Miggle
  25. Let’s start with Margaret Hodge, the arrogant Jewish Labour MP whose criticism of Jeremy Corbyn and support for censorship I discussed in “Labour’s Gas-Chamber Blues.” After Hodge was threatened with disciplinary action for what she said about Corbyn, her high-powered lawyers wrote a letter to the party complaining about the way she was being treated.

    Wow.

    Some pretty sick stuff in that article. A “must read.”

  26. mcohen says:
    @Steve Kastl

    Steve kastl

    Sunday school is called sunday school for a reason.this is when jewish kids are taught about the sun and how important it is to human existence. The ancient Egyptians worshipped the sun god Ra and the jews inherited this tradition from them and adopted it into Jewish spiritual prayer.one of the reasons Jews are dark is because we have worshipped the sun god Ra over many centuries.
    Not sure about all that crap you learnt at Sunday school.you sure they were not bugger da vitas.sounds like something they would do.by the way regards to lisa.

    • Replies: @Bardon Kaldian
  27. Miggle says:
    @Anonymous

    Starting to make a real difference? Hmm. Have you read Noam Chomsky, “Power and Terror”, published 2003? Is it starting to make a real difference, transformed the US government? Oh, it hasn’t happened yet?

    Have the Placards started to make a real difference? Hung up all over Paris in 1534, totally, conclusively demonstrating the fraud that all the people were victims of? How long did it take for them to start to make a real difference, for the people to rise up against the fraudsters? Oh, it hasn’t happened yet?

    I do appreciate the work of the three you mention, and Philip Weiss of mondoweiss and others, but our rulers are our rulers.

    We need those good works, but we need something else if they are ever to make a difference.

    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
  28. mcohen says:
    @Wizard of Oz

    Yes there does seem to be a few teams around ,sucked in by the flashy unz headliners,all hoping that there vpn’s will hide there identities. In my opinion corbyn has no chance of being elected until he shaves his beard off.however the weak chin is a problem on TV.maybe some botox or a diet of chicken soup could putty him up.unfortunately corbyn knows that once he defines anti semitism correctly,the vultures will have him.
    The Brits have always been low key anti Semites but generally accepted the Jews.however labour has attracted a fair amount of Muslim support and money and so the politicians must dance.criticism of Israel is becoming a problem for labour as it tries to balance loyalties. Criticism of Israel is also a money spinning charge by the hour enterprise for politicians and charges of anti Semitism cause cash flow problems.labour need to play it straight and fair otherwise they will struggle.

    • Replies: @FKA Max
  29. @jacques sheete

    Maltese are basically Sicilians with more Arab blood and this was likely a mafia hit.

  30. @Miggle

    It is said that nobody can defend his own case.
    This is excellently shown in two books written by jews:
    Ismar Schorsch, ‘Jewish Reactions to German Anti-Semitism, 1870 – 1914′, New York 1972
    ‘Christianity and the Holocaust of the Hungarian Jewry’, Moshe Y Herclz, 1993 New York University press
    Both books show the disproportionate influence of jews in Germany and Hungary.
    Then there is
    Fritz Stern, ‘Gold and Iron, Bismarck, Bleichröder, and the Building of the German Empire’, New York, 1977.
    This book, also written by a jew, shows the stupid social behaviour of jewish banker Bleichröder.
    Then there is
    ‘From prejudice to destruction’, Jacob Katz, 1980, Cambridge MA
    The one and only jewish historian I know who explains anti semitism out of jewish behaviour.
    Jews, not all of them of course, I therefore never write the jews, seem to miss a sense of socially acceptable behaviour.
    Solsjenytsyn describes it for jewry in tsarist Russia.
    We here now have an article about jewish power in GB, and how possibly public feeling in GB about jews is changing.
    I often wonder if jews realise how much the present situation on the USA resembles the Weimar Republic situation.
    About the Kristallnacht
    René d’Argile, etc., Das Geheimnis um die Ursachen des Zweiten Weltkrieges, Wiesbaden 1958 ( Les Originals Secrêtes de la Guerre 1939 – 1945, Paris 1958).
    These French writers argue that it was deliberately provoked by jews.
    About Hitler’s asserted mass killings, in a 1939 speech he threatened jewry with ‘ausrotten’, I do not not translate the word, the meaning extermination it got much later, ‘if they again started a world war’.
    Well, they did, see for example:
    Bruce Allen Murphy, ‘The Brandeis/Frankfurter Connection, The Secret Political Activities of Two Supreme Court Justices’, New York, 1983
    Frankfurter’s 1937 diary disappeared from the library where his diaries could be read, I suppose the 1937 one exposed too much of war preparation.
    LendLease was written by Franfurter.
    Hitler’s plan for European jews: deportation after the war to Madagaskar, the concentration camps were meant to be temporarily
    Hans Jansen, ‘Der Madagaskar Plan, Die beabsichtigte Deportation der europäischen Juden nach Madagaskar’, München 1997

  31. Tyrion 2 says:
    @Miggle

    Clever to write a doctrinaire SJW exegesis about white people in general but substitute in Jews.

    I guess the hope is that Jews will read it and be innoculated against SJWism.

    The problem is that the more liberal the Jew theologically, the more SJW, and it is absurd to say liberal Jews are caged by their Rabbis.

    Thus they’d often be sympathetic to you and double down on the SJWism.

  32. Miggle says:
    @Anon

    You’re asking for advice and I don’t give advice without payment.

    • Replies: @Anon
  33. @Michael Kenny

    CIDI, the Dutch AIPAC, one might say, stated that Wilders, pro Israel, he lived there for two years, as anti Islam as possible, is an antisemite because he is against the EU.
    Jews seem to feel safe in multi ethnic states, maybe they’re right, they had hardly any problems in the multicultural Habsburg empire

    • Replies: @Tyrion 2
  34. @Miggle

    You seem to be unaware of many risings, such as
    Wilhelm Zimmermann, ‘Der grosse deutsche Bauernkrieg’, 1856, 1982, Berlin
    From memory, early 16th century.
    The German writer remarks that the mistake of the farmers was not to exterminate aristocracy and the priest class.
    In France too there were many risings.
    Jean-Paul Bertaud, ´La Révolution francaise’, 1989, 2006, Paris
    The writer wonders what the 1791 revolution in fact changed.
    In my opinion, despite the guillotine, just the beginning of a long social transformation, the end of monarchy just in 1870.
    Even until 1940 in France money fought the people:
    Jean-Noël Jeanneney, ‘Francois de Wendel en République, L’Argent et le Pouvoir 1914-1940, Paris 1976
    Even now, France resembles a monarchy with an elected king.
    I must add that in France socialists between the world wars acted very stupidly, not the slightest understanding of economy and of monetary policy
    Jean-Noël Jeanneney, ‘La faillite dus Cartel, Lecon d’histoire pour une gauche au pouvoir’, Paris, 1977

  35. Anon[273] • Disclaimer says:
    @Miggle

    Given that you exhibit that standard of logic I wouldn’t pay you for legal advice even if you were a lawyer. After all I was clearly not asking for advice but for information which would help me determine whether your opinion was worth anything. No problem now in inferring the answer.

    • Replies: @Miggle
  36. Is the title a deliberate wordplay on Prussian Blue?
    If so, unforgivable.

    • Replies: @mcohen
  37. Tyrion 2 says:
    @jilles dykstra

    Given that arguably the most successful politician of the 19th C in the UK was a Jew, I think Jews were quite fine here. Thanks!

  38. anarchyst says:
    @Miggle

    There is NOT ONE DOCUMENT outlining any extermination plan for jews or others. In fact, prominent Zionists collaborated with the German government and formulated plans at the highest level of the German government for the “transfer” of jews to what was then known as Palestine. Absolutely nothing about extermination.

    Official International Red Cross figures for all camp “deaths” total around 731,000–NOT “6 million”. In fact, population totals pre-WW2 and post-WW2 show an INCREASE in the jewish population in post-WW2 Europe immediately after the cessation of the war…

    [MORE]

    If a country were hell-bent on genocide, WHY WOULD IT KEEP RECORDS?? WHY would it build “camps” hundreds (if not thousands) of miles away with sanitary facilities, housing, medical, recreational and other ancillary facilities? Would it not have been easier to just “eliminate” them without going through all of this trouble? Why would they expend massive effort on logistical movement utilizing their limited energy resources if the goal was extermination? Things do not “add up”…

    Something BIG “stinks” in this whole jewish “holocaust ™” deal. It is no secret that jewish Zionists made “deals” with the German government in order to make life “uncomfortable” for jewish Germans. In fact, it was jewish Zionist leaders who first proposed that all jews wear the “yellow Star of David” armband so that they could be easily identified. German jews considered themselves Germans first and had no desire to emigrate.

    The establishment of a “homeland” along with the 6,000,000 figure was a Zionist “dream” since the 1800s. Many periodicals of the day starting with the 1800s touted the “six-million” figure.

    What better way to encourage “emigration” to a foreign land than to make things difficult for the “cream of German society” (jews)?? The TRUTH about the so-called jewish “holocaust ™” is out . . .

    As cremation of ONE human body takes hours, the amount of time claimed by holocaust ™ promoters is a physical, scientific and statistical impossibility. Their claims also do not account for the “downtime” that crematoria require for maintenance, etc. In addition, there are no mass burial sites that are commensurate with the claims of “six-million” or even “one-million”. There is also a jewish prohibition on excavation of claimed possible burial sites. WHY?? Because THEY DO NOT EXIST. There is even a prohibition on the use of ground penetrating radar to search for burial sites. WHY?? If millions were gassed and cremated, the activities would have lasted well into the 1950s.

    The so-called jewish “holocaust ™” has been turned into a de-facto “religion” in which no deviation from orthodoxy is permitted. In fact, in most European countries, independent investigation into jewish “holocaust ™” truths is strictly forbidden under pain of fines and imprisonment. In the USA, things are not quite as bad, only job loss and personal and professional destruction at the hands of those of the “tribe” that FEAR the real truth of the jewish “holocaust ™” being exposed is evident. A questionable judicial “trick” used in “holocaust ™” trials is that of “judicial notice” in which TRUTH CANNOT BE USED AS A DEFENSE OR ENTERED INTO EVIDENCE IN THE “KANGAROO COURTS” THAT PROSECUTE THOSE WHO DARE TO INVESTIGATE THIS HISTORICAL EVENT. Judicial notice, once invoked against a defendant, disallows the introduction of evidence that does not conform to “commonly accepted beliefs” about the “holocaust ™”, EVEN IF THE EVIDENCE EXPOSES THE “HOLOCAUST ™” LIES AND FABRICATIONS THAT CAN EASILY BE DEBUNKED. A question for you “holocaust ™” promoters–why are there laws that criminalize the search for truth?? What are you afraid of??

    When the truth about this historical event comes out, it will change much of the world’s perception about those that are using this event as a “cash cow” that “keeps on giving”. . . “there’s NO business like “SHOAH business”. Zionist complicity in this event is carefully “covered up”.

    A good example of present-day censorship is the fate that awaits those that dare question “official” jewish “holocaust” orthodoxy. Most European countries have criminalized ANY line of thought that deviates from the “official” jewish “holocaust” story. WHY?? In fact, TRUTH is no defense when it comes to “all things holocaust ™”. Ask noted WW2 researcher David Irving, who was forced to recant TRUTH in order to avoid punishment.

    The latest “vicitms” of “holocaustianity ™” are Ursula Haverbeck and Monika Schaefer, both grandmothers who have been prosecuted and sentenced to maximum-security prisons in Germany for “incorrect thoughts”.

    If people only knew of the planning that took place (among those of the “chosen”) to engineer the jewish “holocaust”, there would be a pogrom of massive size. You see, the jewish “holocaust” was necessary in order to force the establishment of a jewish state. In this case, the ENDS justified the MEANS. There have been many “holocausts” of much greater misery throughout human history, yet the jewish “holocaust ™” is the only one that counts . . . It is interesting to note that the term “holocaust ™” to mean “mass extermination” was never used during or immediately after WW2, only coming to vogue in the 1960s, when it was noted that “guilt” could be assigned and reparations could be procured.

    Look at the “commercialization of the so-called jewish “holocaust ™” while the much larger communist (true) holocaust is conveniently forgotten. To assure a continuing supply of jewish “holocaust ™” “survivors”, jews are tattooing their ATM (oops, I mean “camp” numbers) on their children and grandchildren. In addition, jewish psychologists have come up with a new concept, and “disease”–”holocaust ™ “transference syndrome”. You see, children and grandchildren of jewish “holocaust ™” survivors are infected with this “disease” and should also be considered “holocaust ™” survivors, eligible for “holocaust ™” reparations. According to these jewish psychiatrists, even unrelated individuals can be “infected” with this “malady”.

    Since the Zionist jews declared war on Germany in 1933 (yes, 1933), the Germans had no choice but to complete the Zionist plan of marginalizing German jews (to say the least).. This fulfilled the Zionist plan of forcing German jews to emigrate to Palestine while making the world grant jews a “homeland”–Israel. It is interesting to note that the German boycott of jewish businesses lasted for one day, whil the jewish boycott (actually the jews’ declaration of war on Germany) started in 1933 and lasted until the summation of WW2.

    Zionists have been predicting a jewish “homeland” for the last two-hundred years while predicting a “holocaust ™” of 6 million for the same amount of time. The ACTUAL number of non-combatant deaths in the European theater of operations is approximately 731,000, NOT 6 million (official International Red Cross figures). The International Red Cross had full access to all of the camps for the duration of the war, yet reported NOT ONE INSTANCE of extermination or mass murder.

    Regarding that “holocaust ™” “showplace” Auschwitz, there are engineering inconsistencies in the design of the so-called “gas chambers”. The doors are not of a gas-tight design; it would have been impossible to retrieve the bodies, and there is no means to ventilate the rooms after the so-called “gassing” took place”. There is a “gas chamber” chimney that is not connected to anything. From an engineering standpoint, these are very serious errors that would have caused the deaths of the “operators” of these supposed “gas chambers”. As Germans were excellent engineers, it is difficult to observe the glaring engineering errors that presently exist in these “camps”.

    American execution expert, Fred Leuchter travelled to Auschwitz, surreptitiously obtained samples from the purported “gas chambers”, had them tested and published his results. The absence of Prussian blue (ferricyanide) in ALL of the samples, save one, was PROOF that the “gas chambers” did not exist. The one positive sample was taken from a room used to disinfect clothing. In fact, the “chimney” for the supposed “gas chamber” does not connect to anything.

    Mr. Leuchter’s was rewarded for his search for TRUTH by his professional and personal character assassination by those of the “tribe”. He lost all of his federal and state contracts, and was prosecuted under an obscure Massachusetts “law” for “practicing engineering without a license”–a law which had never been used vindictively before or since. . .After his report was published, he was harassed by Israeli “deep state” types (mossad) who he successfully “outed”.

    It is no secret that after WW2, the Soviets attempted to “create” the “death camps” for propaganda purposes. Yes, there was extreme deprivation and suffering–many people perished. The prime cause of death was typhus. As allied bombings destroyed most of the infrastructure, typhus was at epidemic levels. THIS is what caused the massive amounts of human deaths . . .NOT gassing.

    It is interesting to note that, before the camps were “liberated” by the “allies”, the camp occupants chose to flee with the German troops, rather than be “liberated” by the Russian “allies”.

    It is said that “the light of day is the best disinfectant in the search for truth” Unfortunately this quote does not apply to “all things holocaust ™”. It appears that there are those “holocaust ™” promoters who are afraid of the TRUTH. Hence the prosecution and incarceration of those who dare question aspects of this historical event.

  39. @Miggle

    The Nazis did terribly, murderously oppress the German Jews…

    Now tell us who the “Reds” (international Commies) were, who backed them financially and what they were doing to Germany.

    And don’t think no one noticed what you attempted to do here, i.e., switch German antipathy for the criminal Red element to German antipathy for Jews qua Jews.

    Meanwhile, the uproar about Hitler grew and, as I have shown, his
    persecution of men [Commie goons and thugs] was subtly transformed into a “persecution of Jews”.

    -Douglas Reed, “the Controversy of Zion,” p 318-

    https://archive.org/stream/TheControversyOfZion/TheControversyOfZion_djvu.txt

    So please try to exercise a bit of intellectual honesty or at a minimum a bit of personal dignity and quit parroting nearly century old and extremely mindless war propaganda.

    PS: You may not realize where you are, but yer at UR, and trying to spread unsubstantiated BS like that will often get you called out. Now, go away and do some homework on the subject or just pipe down.

  40. @Michael Kenny

    I think you have it back to front. Corbyn is seen as too soft on Brexit. If he was replaced then the anti-Brexiteers would gain ascendancy within the party and be better placed to frustrate it.

  41. A member of Labour’s National Policy Forum has been suspended from the party over an alleged anti-Semitic post.

    George McManus said deputy leader Tom Watson had received “£50,000+ from Jewish donors,” adding: “At least Judas only got 30 pieces of silver”.

    Labour has launched an investigation after Labour MP Luciana Berger submitted a formal complaint about his “anti-Semitic” comments.

    Mr McManus has apologised to Mr Watson and deleted the Facebook post.

    He told BBC News: “It was a stupid, crass error that was insensitive, wrong, inappropriate and hurtful.”

    Mr Watson has faced calls to quit as deputy leader from supporters of Jeremy Corbyn after he criticised the Labour leadership’s handling of an anti-Semitism row.

    Some critics have accused him of taking money from the “Israel lobby”.

    Mr McManus made reference to donations Mr Watson has received from businessman Sir Trevor Chinn, who is vice-president of the Jewish Leadership Council.

    Mr McManus, followed up his post by suggesting that Mr Watson had been “bought” or “compromised”.

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-45086365

    This is so very typical of the MSM’s reporting. They’re usually honest enough to report the basic facts of a story, but quite unable/unwilling to analyse it any further.

  42. @Tyrion 2

    ‘…T-R-O-L-L.

    I’ve never heard anything like that. The message is literally the opposite. You should visit a synagogue, pretend to be Jewish, and you’ll see. What city do you live in?’

    What Steve describes are more or less the teachings of Satmar Jews: when the Messiah comes, he will send the bad gentiles to hell but the good gentiles will be allowed to serve Jews as slaves for all eternity.

    On the bright side, Satmar Jews don’t support the modern state of Israel. So I’ll take that, and as to what happens when the Messiah comes, well, we’ll all just have to wait and see.

  43. @Michael Kenny

    ‘I don’t think the attacks on Jeremy Corbyn have really anything to do with the Jews. It’s all about Brexit…’

    Please. It’s obviously all about muzzling criticism of Israel. Why would you pretend otherwise?

  44. @Iberiano

    That’s a pretty good article, but then she ruins it by trying to slip this load of BS in:

    What if everyone decides the Holocaust never happened…?

    Just to be clear, holocausts have happened, but “the Holocaust” never happened the way we’re all supposed to think it did. In fact, it was certain goons, calling themselves Jews, who inflicted many holocausts on the goyim and completely perverted the truth.

  45. Wally says:
    @Miggle

    said:
    “1. The Nazis did terribly, murderously oppress the German Jews, many of them patriotic Germans who had fought for Germany 20 years earlier. Many were very secular. There was much intermarriage. Most were anti-Zionist. Kristallnacht was a pogrom, huge destruction of Jewish property. There were freight trains taking German Jews to Poland, I’m sure of that, having read Bernt Engelman “In Hitler’s Germany”. Or, before the war, trainloads going to concentration camps. Any Jew released by a court was immediately re-arrested “for his own protection” but soon was reported to have died while trying to escape.
    2. One of the tragedies is that Hitler insisted on regarding the Jews as a race, so there was no escape. But then, the rabbis stood shoulder-to-shoulder with Hitler on that.
    3. If he’d just taken away their citizenship, made them wear the star and forbidden them to work in finance or news media and a few things like that, it would have solved all the real and imagined problems, the Jewish Question. There were massive killings. For nothing.”
    ===
    1. There was no ‘terribly, murderous actions’ and you have no proof there was.
    Kristallnacht, over stated, was a reaction to a Jew murdering a German diplomat.
    Many Jews, not all, were sent to labor camps on trains. So what? Japanese-Americans were too.
    You have shown us no proof for “Any Jew released by a court was immediately re-arrested “for his own protection” but soon was reported to have died while trying to escape”. Why?

    2. Since it’s easily demonstrated that Hitler did not ‘exterminate’ Jews, you’re talking out of your derriere.

    “we’ve often fantasized about drawing up an indictment against Adolf Hitler himself. And to put into that indictment the major charge: the Final Solution of the Jewish question in Europe, the physical annihilation of Jewry. And then it dawned upon us, what would we do? We didn’t have the evidence.”
    - so called “holocaust historian” Raul Hilberg

    3. There were no alleged “massive killings”, and you have no proof there was.
    Even though Jews claim that immense Jew remains exist in allegedly know locations, we do not / will not ever see them.

    It’s revealing how the ‘holocau$t’ fraud falls apart just by asking for proof. That’s why we see free speech about it being banned in Europe and attempts to do so in the US. The fake story cannot withstand scientific, rational scrutiny.

    http://www.codoh.com

  46. FKA Max says: • Website
    @Wizard of Oz

    I think the UK is just now learning the lesson the Institut Le Rosey had to learn in the 1990s:

    Prior to the introduction of the 10% quota, wherein no more than 10% of the student body may come from one country, different nationalities made up the majority of students at Le Rosey.[23] In the 1950s and 1960s, the majority of students were Americans, Italians, and Greeks, in the 1970s came the Arabs and Iranians, in the 1980s came the Japanese and Koreans, and in the 1990s came the Russians.[23] During the 1990s, the children of Russian oligarchs, who made up a third of the student body,[24] gained notoriety for “terrorizing” other students, resulting in the withdrawal of at least one non-Russian student.[23][25]

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Institut_Le_Rosey#History

    The gangsters and corrupt officials who have made huge fortunes from Russia’s disintegration flocked to place their kids in the right schools. When the Russians arrived at Le Rosey in the mid-1990s they began to reenact their parents’ lifestyle, ganging together, fighting, getting drunk and generally terrorizing the other students. At least one non-Russian family withdrew their son from Le Rosey in consequence.

    http://members.forbes.com/global/1999/0705/0213126a.html#4048365412c4

    And speaking of the unspeakable, the nouveaux Russkies are capped at 10 per cent in Kitzbühel, one of the most gemütlich resorts of the alpine persuasion.

    Bravo, Kitzbühel. I wish the Swiss would do the same, but I won’t hold my breath. I know it sounds racist, but billionaire Russian kleptocrats are not as yet classified as victims, so one can let ‘em have it.

    Courchevel, the French Riviera, even St Moritz have been Dresdened by the Russians, their obnoxious spending and lack of basic manners amounting to a grotesque deformity. Here in Gstaad we live in fear of the coming oligarch invasion. When I say we, I don’t mean the locals. Sublimely blind to the disaster of Courchevel, the Bernese would welcome them with open pocketbooks. And why not? They see us as one and the same.

    Foreigners, with lotsa moolah, flashy cars, pulled women and incapable of yodelling.

    https://web.archive.org/web/20081225043226/http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3724/is_200702/ai_n18621914

    • Replies: @DFH
  47. Art says:
    @Michael Kenny

    I don’t think the attacks on Jeremy Corbyn have really anything to do with the Jews.

    Sorry but that is an outrageous proposition. Jews are obsessed with anything that denigrates Israel.

    Bold in your face lies, big and small, will be use to deflect criticism away from themselves. They insult us.

    Jeremy Corbyn will be PM and he will not totally abandon the Palestinians – he will criticize Israel.

    Think Peace — Do No Harm — Art

  48. FKA Max says: • Website
    @shredder

    I think they are both. Some are just Russians, some are Russian Jews.

    I briefly commented on this here:

    Half of the top 25 billionaires in Russia, I believe, come from a Jewish background.http://www.unz.com/tsaker/no-fifth-column-in-the-kremlin-think-again/#comment-2396189

    Keynes made an interesting observation on Russians, Russian Jews and their collaboration and influence in the rise of Leninism/Communism in Russia:

    Keynes sometimes explained the mass murder that took place during the first years of communist Russia on a racial basis, as part of the “Russian and Jewish nature”, rather than as a result of the communist rule. After a trip to Russia, he wrote in his Short View of Russia that there is “beastliness on the Russian and Jewish natures when, as now, they are allied together”.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Maynard_Keynes#Views_on_race

    Essays in Persuasion/A Short View of Russia

    https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Essays_in_Persuasion/A_Short_View_of_Russia Archived link: http://archive.is/qGAJT

    In one respect Communism but follows other famous religions. It exalts the common man and makes him everything. Here there is nothing new. But there is another factor in it which also is not new but which may, nevertheless, in a changed form and a new setting, contribute something to the true religion of the future, if there be any true religion. Leninism is absolutely, defiantly non-supernatural, and its emotional and ethical essence centres about the individual’s and the community’s attitude towards the Love of Money.

    I do not mean that Russian Communism alters, or even seeks to alter, human nature, that it makes Jews less avaricious or Russians less extravagant than they were before. I do not merely mean that it sets up a new ideal. I mean that it tries to construct a framework of society in which pecuniary motives as influencing action shall have a changed relative importance, in which social approbations shall be differently distributed, and where behaviour, which previously was normal and respectable, ceases to be either the one or the other.
    [...]
    In part, perhaps, it is the fruit of some beastliness in the Russian nature—or in the Russian and Jewish natures when, as now, they are allied together.

  49. @Steve Kastl

    If I had been a cult leader then you would have been kicked out of the cabal a long time ago, before you had become a nuisance… just saying!

  50. Wally says:

    How revealing, the title here is: Gas-Chamber Blues Revisited, More on the “Stain and Shame” of Labour Anti-Semitism

    It is the lack of blue staining (aka: ‘Prussian blue’, caused by hydrogen cyanide / HCN residue) on the alleged ‘gas chamber’ walls & ceilings, that would be in abundance if the story was factual, which is one of the many reasons to dispassionately & completely reject the alleged & impossible ‘Auschwitz gas chambers’ on scientific grounds.

    highly recommended:
    The Rudolf Report / Expert Report on Chemical and Technical Aspects of the ‘Gas Chambers’ of Auschwitz: http://vho.org/GB/Books/trr/index.html
    and:
    ‘Some Technical and Chemical Considerations about the ‘Gas Chambers’ of Auschwitz and Birkenau’
    by Master Chemist Germar Rudolf: http://www.vho.org/GB/Books/dth/fndgcger.html
    and:
    Lectures on the Holocaust / Controversial Issues Cross Examined

    https://codoh.com/library/document/1196/?lang=en

    and:
    Chemistry of Auschwitz / Birkenau: https://youtu.be/SUc6Y_E5zb0

  51. TheJester says:
    @shredder

    I thought “Russian oligarch” was a euphemism for “persecuted Soviet-era Jew”?

    This can work both ways. If it is useful to be known as a “Russian oligarch”, then they are Russian oligarchs. If it is useful to be known as a “persecuted Soviet-era Jew”, then they are persecuted Soviet-era Jews.

    Self-interested shapeshifting of the first order …!

    The former lets one make billions through questionable business practices. The latter lets one keep billions made through questionable business practices by hiding behind alleged anti-Semitism on the part of prosecuting authorities.

    Al Capone and Vito Genovese did not have this privilege. So, is this a strictly a Jewish privilege … or, something like that? Is this what the notorious Magnitsky Act is all about … opportunistic Jewish shapeshifting?

    P.S. Israeli citizenship without fear of extradition is part of the package.

  52. Herald says:
    @Moi

    If he is a true politician and not a principled person then he will fold. The bullying of the Rabbis and some other opportunists will have worked, as it almost always does.

  53. AndrewR says:
    @Tyrion 2

    Many people on both sides see Global Jewish Supremacy as a bigger threat than anything else.

  54. DFH says:
    @FKA Max

    I was acquainted with the children of some post-Soviet oligarchs, and they never seemed very rowdy to me.

    • Replies: @Anon
  55. anon[162] • Disclaimer says:
    @Michael Kenny

    Can the China towns in NY and CA take out ads on billboards on the interstates and condemn Trump? Can they condemn GOP for attracting antiChinese policy ,diatribes,hatred ? Can they say they fear the rise of 19 th century’s anti Chinese behaviors ,the white is guilty of ? Can the person of Chinese background in administration denocune government ,Trump,and GOP?

    They can . But that should not be seen as advancing Chinese causes.
    They are actually bolstering American values,American interests,and American ecceptionalism. They are really.

    How will it be seen in that light?
    Here comes the use of cacophony and echo of NYT,CNN,WSJ,and FOX on American part and the reciprocated silence from the same group on Chinese angle.

  56. annamaria says:
    @Tyrion 2

    “Jews believe in freedom of screech, not in freedom of speech.” Indeed.

  57. @mcohen

    one of the reasons Jews are dark is because we have worshipped the sun god Ra over many centuries.

    Most texts & comments on Jews are, frankly, funny. Whichever the perspective….

  58. The article taken as a whole overall was kind-of interesting – one group of professional parasites trying to change the leadership of another group of professional parasites by playing a hackneyed race-based trope: no use of the phrase “New Hitler” yet, so there’s that.

    Two things did grab my attention, though: the first was the structure of the summary, which is what made me click on the article – it is a nice example of how ‘nudging’ works sometimes on those who are wary of nudges.

    ① the subtle (subtil? lol) linking of ‘gas chambers’, ‘blue’ and ‘stain’: quite David Cole, that. In modern France, that kind of writing would get you in trouble: if you’re ever accused of ‘negationnisme‘, Procurateurs hew to Richelieu’s (perhaps apocryphal) maxim “give me six lines”. (Been there, done that – for a blog post in 2005 about the inherent wrongness of laws that imprison people for ideas);

    ② the almost unbelievable tin-earedness of professional Zionists[1]. Given the schlock we’re told to believe about Jewish IQ (fully σ above us goyim)[2], you would seriously think that a group of élite übermenschen would be able to craft a narrative that is not obviously a cartoon. (That said: the median adult has the cognitive chops of a dim 13 year old, so perhaps the Zionists aren’t that silly… if they’re aiming to change public perceptions, perhaps that’s best achieved with something at the level of a TV advert for tampons or face cream).

    Footnotes

    [1] Let’s not be coy: the agitators are Jewish (but almost exclusively Atheist), sure – but their behaviour has fuck-all to do with their desire to represent, defend or otherwise interact with the run-of-the-mill Red Sea Pedestrian, and everything to do with their deep desire to
    (a) make money the easiest way possible; and
    (b) protect, defend and extend the political power of the current occupiers of Palestine, and the rivers of public money that flow thereto.

    [2] Two things on the supposed ‘seichel‘ of Ashkenazim:
    (a) it seems that the purported higher average IQ of Ashkenazim has about the same basis in fact as the median high-profile Holocaust memoir (Unz has seen the light on the Final Solution to the ‘Seichel’ Question: the numbers simply don’t hold water);
    (b) an average is a slippery beast: it is trivial to set up a little example where a population average for X goes up despite the overwhelming majority of the population experiencing a fall in X; all that’s required is for there to be a more-than-offsetting increase in X for a small proportion of the population. Income distributions are a prime example. Income distributions are best thought of as lognormal (with 0.5 < σ < 1 – 'σ' here is the s.d. of the logarithm of the variable) rather than symmetric; from three decades’ casual observation I think that the IQ distribution is becoming lognormal or Weibull (even if the IQ distribution is N(100,15) by construction; it just means that the actual population prevalence of IQs kσ below the median will be greater than those above, ∀ k > 0).

    The cognitive bifurcation that is manifesting in goyim now has been present in Western European Ashkenazim for three centuries at least – since rabbis’ sons stopped becoming rabbis, and started becoming merchants, academics and so forth. The further East you look (and/or the more rural the population), the later that happened (generally speaking, although Trier’s quite ‘West’, and Karl Marx was only the second generation non-rabbi in a family that had led the rabbinate of Trier for 3 generations by the time Marx was born). Gilad Atzmon has a fun YouTube talk about it (until someone bleats that it’s hate speech and it gets pulled).

  59. Miggle says:
    @Anon

    I think you’re saying that English common law is a conspiracy and I’ve exposed myself as not being a co-conspirator. Perhaps. But this is a side issue to a side issue and for me to pull together the information needed for a full reply would take hours.

  60. annamaria says:

    This is an old news, but from a new angle: “‘Nazi’ Azov battalion receives armaments from Israel. This explains Azov’s continued presence on ‘anti-hate’ Social Media” https://www.fort-russ.com/2018/08/exposed-nazi-azov-battalion-receives-armaments-from-israel/
    “Israeli armaments are being sent to the Ukrainian Nazi-Banderist Azov Battalion that is part of the security forces of the post-Maidan oligarchic-Zionist government (ally of the West and enemy of Russia). Even Azov’s online advertisement does not hide the connection, as they do not shy away from exposing photographs of militiamen carrying Tavor rifles, weapons licensed by Israel.
    That’s probably why they’re still allowed on YouTube, Twitter, Facebook, and more, while normal, healthy, radical dissent of the left, right, and center are now routinely banned from the – yes – Zionist loyal online multi-media platform complex.
    On the Battalion’s own Youtube channel, for example, a video review shows copies of locally produced Israeli Tavor rifles, as can be seen below:”
    Is Anthony Julius ready to accuse the authors of the paper on the Jewish State cooperation with Ukrainian neo-Nazi in antisemitism?

    • Replies: @mcohen
  61. Jeremy Corbyn has a strong personal affinity for revolutionary fighters, including not only Palestinian groups whose target of choice is Jews, but also the Provisional IRA in the days when it used to shoot and bomb British people. This personality defect makes him unsuitable to become British Prime Minister.

    Mr Corbyn never expected to become party leader, and so he never bothered to hide what he actually believes. His past is coming back to haunt him – including laying wreaths for the Black September terrorists who killed Israeli athletes at the Munich Olympics in 1972; and praise for his “brothers” and “friends” in Hamas and Hezbollah.

    He will not emerge from this episode unscathed. The best thing he could do is to resign before the next Labour Party conference in September. If he continues as leader he will doom Labour to lose the next General Election.

    • Replies: @Dave Bowman
    , @Iris
  62. Jews used to claim Jesus was a Jew.

    Insofar as Jesus was a Judean (i.e. a ‘Jew’) this was correct. But since Judaism grew in competition with Christianity by converting gentiles modern Jews are not Judeans.

    Nor was Jesus united by religion to today’s Jews. Judaism was invented by the Pharisees. Jesus knew their teaching in oral form as the Mishnah. Jesus said the Pharisees put the wisdom of men ahead of the word of God delivered by Moses and the Prophets.

    Since Jews have failed in their claim to Jesus they have switched field and claim Jews are the Messiah.

    They assert, though innocent, to have been crucified at Auschwitz and resurrected as the State (sic) of Israel. Crucifiction and Resurrection have been the meat and potatoes of Christianity for two millennia. Now some people would make this a Jewish franchise.

    Jews call their suffering the Holocaust. Was the word chosen because complete destruction by burning accurately describes Jewish experience or because holocaust resembles Holy Ghost, third person of the Christian trinity?

    Jews define antisemitism as hatred of Jews. But this makes no distinction between prejudice and righteous anger. Who but the divine never inspires righteous anger?

    There is considerable reason to be concerned about the spiritual health of our Jewish friends. Christ can save them. They can save no one, especially not themselves.

    Who won WWll? We should not permit the repeated equation of Jew-gassing with National Socialism to blind us to the prevalence of Nazi policies in the western world today.

    Hitler was a vegetarian.

    • Replies: @mcohen
    , @anonymous
    , @Anon
    , @Anon
  63. Anon[396] • Disclaimer says:
    @DFH

    Perhaps they needed to hunt in packs.

  64. renfro says:

    NEWS FLASH

    It wasn’t Hitler after all ! It was that dirty Arab that told Hitler to burn the Jews…so now they gotta hunt down and kill the Arabs for their revenge.

    Netanyahu: Hitler Didn’t Want to Exterminate the Jews
    Prime minister tells World Zionist Congress that Hitler only wanted to expel the Jews, but Jerusalem’s Grand Mufti convinced him to exterminate them, a claim that was rejected by most accepted Holocaust scholars.

    https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/netanyahu-absolves-hitler-of-guilt-1.5411578

    • Replies: @Wally
    , @Art
  65. mcohen says:
    @annamaria

    Hi annamarie
    we all know the so called Ukrainian “neo nazi” smear is Russian propaganda.

    • Replies: @annamaria
  66. Wally says:
    @renfro

    The liars can’t keep their lies straight.

    ‘O, what a tangled web they weave when first they practise to deceive.’

    http://www.codoh.com

    List of Auschwitz takedowns:

    https://forum.codoh.com/search.php?keywords=chose&t=11716&sf=msgonly

  67. annamaria says:

    Thanks for providing an opportunity to reference western articles on Ukrainian Banderites (neo-Nazis).
    First about the banderites, the best friends of zionists: “During World War II, the Ukrainian guerrilla supporters of the Bandera faction known as Banderites had been engaged in various atrocities, including murder of civilians, predominantly Jews and Poles under the Nazi German administration.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banderites
    – In short, the joy of Holo-biz

    2014 – “Exposing troubling ties in the U.S. to overt Nazi and fascist protesters in Ukraine,” by Max Blumenthal: https://www.alternet.org/tea-party-and-right/us-backing-neo-nazis-ukraine: “Svoboda’s openly pro-Nazi politics have not deterred Senator John McCain from addressing a EuroMaidan rally alongside Tyahnybok, nor did it prevent Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland from enjoying a friendly meeting with the Svoboda leader this February.”
    2015 – “US House Admits Nazi Role in Ukraine,” by Robert Parry https://www.commondreams.org/views/2015/06/14/us-house-admits-nazi-role-ukraine
    2016 – “French documentary exposes neo-Nazi role in Ukraine,” by Greg Butterfield: https://www.workers.org/2016/02/11/french-documentary-exposes-neo-nazi-role-in-ukraine/
    “The 55-minute film shines a bright light on the massacre carried out by ultra-right forces at the House of Trade Unions in the multinational port city of Odessa on May 2, 2014, where at least 48 anti-fascists and trade unionists were brutally murdered.”
    2017 – “Not Kremlin Propaganda: Neo-Nazis in Ukraine, ” by IPA
    “The most infamous neo-Nazi group in Ukraine is the 3,000-strong Azov Battalion, founded in 2014. Prior to creating Azov, its commander, Andriy Biletsky, headed the neo-Nazi group Patriot of Ukraine, members of which went on to form the core of Azov. Biletsky had stated that the mission of Ukraine is to ‘lead the White Races of the world in a final crusade for their survival … against the Semite-led Untermenschen.”
    – Fantastik. Jabotinsky would have been elated.
    2018 – “Rights groups demand Israel stop arming neo-Nazis in Ukraine,” by Haaretz: https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/rights-groups-demand-israel-stop-arming-neo-nazis-in-the-ukraine-1.6248727
    “Ukraine Holocaust Monument Vandalized With Swastikas:” https://www.haaretz.com/jewish/ukraine-holocaust-monument-vandalized-1.5244685

    • Replies: @Wally
  68. Deschutes says:

    When the UK’s Zionists accuse Corbyn of being ‘anti-semitic’, an accusation that has absolutely ZERO credibility, they only reveal how rabidly right wing they have become in the exact same way that Israel’s political spectrum has gone to the extreme right wing (Likkud party). The Zionists hate liberal or progressive values because a cornerstone liberal value is accepting diversity: Israel is based on the opposite of diversity, i.e. ethnic cleansing of Arabs from Palestine (aka Israel), and is a de facto apartheid segregation regime.

    Corbyn is without question a ‘let’s all get along’ old fashioned liberal. That he has criticized the numerous and ongoing violence perpetrated against Palestinians by the Israeli Zionist apartheid regime indicates he is a man with a spine, who stands for human decency, morality and ethics.

    And what a Zionist scumbag Anthony Julius is: his law firm tries to sue journalist Galizia into bankruptcy, to silence her from writing articles, then later manages to get himself appointed to UK writers’ campaign group English PEN,” whose “mission is to defend writers and freedom of speech.” That’s like having Rodrigo Duterte preside over a ‘fairness in drug crime sentencing laws’ group in the Philippines.

    Zero tolerance for Zionist “anti-semitism” laws, and vicious smear campaigns against Corbyn. Don’t let these scumbags get away with it!

  69. Them Guys says:
    @Tyrion 2

    “What is the basis of Judaism? A practical passion and greed for profit. To what can we reduce his (the Jew’s) religious worship? To extortion. What is his real God? Cash!”
    — Karl Marx, founder of Communism, quoted in the British Guardian, July-August, 1924.

    “I hardly exaggerate. Jewish life consists of two elements: Extracting money and protesting.”
    — Nahum Goldmann “The Jewish Paradox” 1978

    “Jewish history has been tragic to the Jews and no less tragic to the neighboring nations who have suffered them. Our major vice of old as of today is parasitism. We are a people of vultures living on the labor and good fortune of the rest of the world.”
    — Samuel Roth, “Jews Must Live,” page 18.

    “To communicate anything to a Goy about our religious relations would be equal to the killing of all Jews, for if the Goyim knew what we teach about them, they would kill us openly.”
    — The Talmud: Libbre David 37

    “The modern Jew is the product of the Talmud.”
    — Michael Rodkinson, in preface of Babylonian Talmud, page XI.

    “The Talmud is to this day the circulating heart’s blood of the Jewish religion. Whatever laws, customs, or ceremonies we observe — whether we are Orthodox, Conservative, Reform, or merely spasmodic sentimentalists — we follow the Talmud. It is our common law.”
    — Herman Wouk, “This is My God.” Wouk wrote the book and screenplay “Winds of War,” popular back in the 1970’s.

    • Replies: @anonymous
  70. mcohen says:
    @Gordon Pratt

    Gordon says

    “Christ can save them”

    how would you know,are you God.

    • Replies: @Gordon Pratt
  71. mcohen says:
    @Linus Lavoisier

    Do you mean this

    Prussian blue, also known as potassium ferric hexacyanoferrate, is used as a medication to treat thallium poisoning or radioactive cesium poisoning.[

  72. @mccohen
    n
    No I thought it might be a tasteless pun on the cyan residue found as Prussian Blue (Berlinerblau) on the walls of the Birkenau gas chamber.

  73. Them Guys says:
    @Wizard of Oz

    Are those….. ” Russian team on UR threads (actually enthusiastic amateurs I think, like most of the one eyed blog commenters for India, Pakistan or China) spit chips”……Anything like all of those Unz Forum reply posters, who claim to Not be Jewish, yet seem to have devoted their entire online live’s to, constant, 24/7/365 effort’s of always defending and supporting Jew’s, and literally every possible issue or thing Jewish….No Matter What… Jews do or did good or bad?

    • Replies: @Anon
  74. @mcohen

    Personal experience. He rescued me from the dung heap.

    The worst form of Jew hating is to refrain from sharing with Jews the gospel of salvation.

  75. Art says:
    @renfro

    Netanyahu: Hitler Didn’t Want to Exterminate the Jews
    Prime minister tells World Zionist Congress that Hitler only wanted to expel the Jews, but Jerusalem’s Grand Mufti convinced him to exterminate them

    renfro,

    Oh my’ – the clown protector of all the Jews of the world – made an even bigger ass of himself and his Talmudic people with that statement.

    He added to notion that the “six million lie” is just that – a lie – a scam – a con – that the Jews will get in our face and jam down our throats anything they want too.

    Think Peace — Do No Harm — Art

    • LOL: Iris
    • Replies: @Iris
    , @renfro
  76. @Michael Kenny

    I can find nothing to indicate that a person called “Tobias Langdon” actually exists.

    Help me out here… Are you seriously telling me that you don’t understand the concept of a “pen-name” – quite popular and necessary in these circles, and otherwise known as a “pseudonym” ?

    In your case, any grammatical / Talmudic hair-splitting stick is good enough to beat the dog with, right ?

  77. @James N. Kennett

    If he continues as leader he will doom Labour to lose the next General Election.

    That’s certainly where I’ll be putting my money – and hopefully a decisive result in that direction will also embolden the useless, spineless, traitorous idiot Conservative Party finally to take a completely ruthless and offensive line with Brexit – to the immense hatred and rage of the Jews in Parliament who want otherwise.

    What’s not to like ?

  78. Iris says:
    @James N. Kennett

    Your grotesque comment is well-suited for the Daily Mail, where you belong.

    Mr Corbyn never “bothered to hide what he believes” because unlike the politicians of your ilk, or the ones under your control, he is not a paedophile, is not corrupt, and owes nothing to the banking cabal who controls the UK.

    For your education;

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/jan/08/israeli-diplomat-shai-masot-plotted-against-mps-set-up-political-groups-labour

    • Replies: @James N. Kennett
  79. Iris says:
    @Art

    One has to give that to Netanyahu: he brought the level of buffoonery to levels unheard of at the United Nations.

  80. Anon[285] • Disclaimer says:
    @Them Guys

    Although mccohen and Tyrion a Sam Shama engage in responses to attacks on Israel and Jews in a fairly discriminating, even nuanced, way – not your style one understands – I challenge you to justify your totally overblown statement about some commenters who are not Jews (or, as you put it, claim not to be) or are you content to be seen as just a blustering uneducated boor?

    • Replies: @Them Guys
  81. renfro says:
    @Art

    Jewish saying…..” a lie a day keeps the money on the way’.

  82. Them Guys says:
    @Anon

    Justify myself? To another “anon” who cannot even pick a decent screen name. I have no need to justify what I wrote, as its truth. Unz has several who claim to not be a Jew, yet act like a typical Jewey Jew with no regards for proven facts etc. And will Always, Always, constantly, Jump up and do kneejerk defense of any and all Jews and Israel. If you have not seen these posts nor read them?…Maybe You need to do some justifications eh.

    I somehow get the feeling that based on those poster names you listed, that perhaps you too fit quite well in same category of Jew defender eh. It is too bad there still are so many otherwise smart folks, who remain in very Deep Denial whenever the issue revolves around Jews. Seems even if every Jew in the world said publically that, for example, Wally’s WW II and Holohoax event infos are 100% correct.

    We’d still suffer so many Deep Denial folks. Maybe nothing is ever going to awaken some people.

    I am just very glad I am not one of them. It must play havok upon their minds to read and hear so much counter info of the many Jewish lies and false holohoax claims, and know that no matter what, they are unable to snap the fuck out of it huh? Perhaps it is males who think like emotional based females is main reason they fall so hard for such Jewish hoax claims, and simply cannot shake it off and accept that, Yes we all have been totally lied to and nobody has lied more so than Jews.

    PS: You and those guys you named, should start a club of holohoax facts deniars….Even get a Yellow Jewish Star Tattoo on your foreheads eh…Show how proud you can be when defending the, indefensible Liars, and Nation Wreckers. A Blue six point star like Nuttyahoos favorite flag has would look swell too, if blue works better than yellow for you.

    You could also invent your very own Fist Pump and shout out of, Blue Power! similar to African Negros do at rallies and major Riots….Just don’t copycat their slogan of “Black Power” with Fist Pumps. Personally I like Blue better than Yellow, as it rhymes with Jew.

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  83. Wally says:
    @annamaria

    said:
    During World War II, the Ukrainian guerrilla supporters of the Bandera faction known as Banderites had been engaged in various atrocities, including murder of civilians, predominantly Jews and Poles under the Nazi German administration.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banderites&#8221;

    Except that tall tale never happened and there is no proof that it did. Post it if you have it.

    And why do you cite Wikipedia for anything that is in the interest of Zionists / Jews to lie about?
    see:
    Zionist Wikipedia Editing Course: http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/139189

    How Israel and Its Partisans Work to Censor the Internet: http://www.unz.com/article/how-israel-and-its-partisans-work-to-censor-the-internet/?highlight=wikipedia

    http://www.codoh.com

  84. anonymous[221] • Disclaimer says:
    @Gordon Pratt

    Gordon Pratt: “They [Jews] can save no one.”
    John 4:22: “Salvation is from the Jews.”

  85. anonymous[221] • Disclaimer says:
    @Them Guys

    Jews extracting money, say you?

    “For if the Gentiles have shared in the Jews’ spiritual blessings, they owe it to the Jews to share with them their material blessings.” Romans 15:27

    Vultures living on the labor and good fortune of the rest of the world, indeed.

  86. pB says:
    @Steve Kastl

    real jewish people don’t have “Sunday school” they go to yeshiva full time.

    i went to hebrew yeshiva. (1st grade to 12th grade) sunday- to friday, Hebrew studies from 800 am to 100 pm and english studies from 200pm to 600 pm(with sunday being only hebrew class from 900am to 1 pm)

    if you thing going to a study class at your shul once a week is a proper jewish education you don’t know any actual religious jews.

    you were at best reformed and know very little about real judaism.

    not to say your wrong, but going to a world history course and sitting in for five minutes will not make you an expert on that subject.

    • Replies: @UnzReader
    , @UnzReader
  87. Bukowski says:

    President of Austrian Engineers Association stated that claims of “gas chambers” at Auschwitz and Mauthausen are not possible from a technical point of view -

    https://codoh.com/library/document/2383/

  88. UnzReader says:
    @pB

    (1st grade to 12th grade) sunday- to friday, english studies from 200pm to 600 pm(with sunday being only hebrew class from 900am to 1 pm)”….. you’re VS your …..very disappointing.

  89. UnzReader says:
    @pB

    I think I understand your last sentence, please correct me if I am wrong (!)…
    ——
    “not to say your wrong, but going to a world history course and sitting in for five minutes will not make you an expert on that subject.”
    ——-
    You mean “not to say it is your fault”, right?

    Ah, American English, my bad….but very interesting comment all the same.

    • Replies: @pB
  90. anarchyst says:
    @Them Guys

    It’s worse than that. If one honestly investigates the jewish holocaust ™ and comes to the conclusion that many of the claims concerning the jewish holocaust ™ are not only false but scientifically impossible, one can still be prosecuted for “improper thoughts”.
    You see, in Canada, and in many European countries, ANY deviation from the official holocaust ™ fable is punishable by fines and imprisonment. In addition, Canadian and European courts utilize the concept of “judicial notice” in which “commonly accepted beliefs” are sacrosanct, even if they can be proven false. Defendants in these “kangaroo courts” are not permitted to enter into evidence PROOF that certain holocaust ™ claims are indeed false, EVEN IF THEY CAN BE PROVEN SO. “Judicial notice”, in itself, turns the concept of “equal justice under law” on its head, and lends credibility to the fact that these “kangaroo courts” are not interested in the TRUTH, but have a deeper, far more insidious purpose–keeping the (false) claims of the jewish holocaust ™ alive and safe from scrutiny.
    You see, TRUTH is not part of these “kangaroo courts”. The jewish holocaust ™ has been turned into a “religion” in which NO deviation from the “official story” (orthodoxy) is allowed–even when holocaust ™ claims can be proven to be false.
    It is said that the light of day is the best disinfectant–except when it comes to “all things holocaust ™”.
    Monika Schaefer…
    Ursula Haverbeck…
    Both are grandmothers who are serving hard-time in German maximum-security prisons for daring to deviate from the “official” jewish holocaust ™ story.
    Question to holocaust ™ promoters…why are you so afraid of the TRUTH?

    • Agree: Them Guys
    • Replies: @Erebus
  91. @Iris

    I am flattered that you believe I have politicians “under my control”!

    There are plenty of politicians who are not paedophiles, are not corrupt, and owe nothing to the bankers. Corbyn’s liking for revolutionary violence is a fact that he has never bothered to conceal. Most voters don’t like revolutionary violence, and that is why Corbyn is a liability.

    Corbyn’s deputy John McDonnell advises that if you don’t win an election, you can bring down the government by insurrection. He thinks that enemies of the working class should have their homes and offices occupied.

    To see where they are coming from, you need to look at the student union politics of 40 to 50 years ago. Corbyn and McDonnell have never grown up.

    • Replies: @Iris
  92. pB says:
    @UnzReader

    well since you have exceptional concern with proper grammar and spelling i will assume your reading comprehension is at a similarly high level and that you may have picked up on the fact that English was not the priority of my education.

    “You mean “not to say it is your fault”, right”

    no i mean to say “not that you are wrong,- “you are not wrong,”

    as in your assessment even though based on very little is still technically correct.

    • Replies: @UnzReader
  93. asdfasdf says:

    Imagine replacing “Europe” with “Israel”.
    Imagine the outrage and indignation.
    Imagine the whailing and screetching.

    • Replies: @Them Guys
  94. Them Guys says:
    @asdfasdf

    That Jewish Bitch, is grade-A, Prime poster women, example of why every European White Nation, aka the Western nations World, aka the First World countries….All need to re-examine National defense policies, and Foreign Policy, and agree to make Rule .308, It’s main number one agenda to rid the entire planet of such Nation Wreckers, whom Live to Ruin White Folk and their first world nations.

    PS: for them what may not know as to what “Rule, .308″ refers to?…It is a reference to a .308 Cal round typically used globally as a Top Nato approved Rifle Round/bullet size. And Yes..It can work wonders at solving current problems perpetrated by these type commies, and their fellow traveler Cohort’s.

    Euro-White’s & White Christian’s, working as a global team of Today….In order to Halt and thwart off, all Future problem’s associated with her Ilk, and their many typical method’s used in too many past event eras to list here. Fix it Now, Today…For a Better, More prosperous and Safe world and Future…For, You and Yours, eh. Let’s get busy folks. Time won’t wait.

  95. UnzReader says:
    @pB

    Thanks for your response, very sporting of you. It is just that I think of characters like Robert Sapolsky when I read of yeshiva boys who have charted their own course, though he himself would probably say – There but for the grace of God, Nature, Luck, go I…

    • Replies: @pB
  96. Erebus says:
    @anarchyst

    … these “kangaroo courts” are not interested in the TRUTH, but have a deeper, far more insidious purpose–keeping the (false) claims of the jewish holocaust ™ alive and safe from scrutiny.

    Actually, it’s worse than that.

    When one asks why the Holocaust™ is so sacred, or how came to be the case that the power of the State is being brought to bear in its defence, it’s hard to avoid the conclusion that either State power must in some way be dependent on Holocaust™’s acceptance in the general population, or that State power has been usurped by a group who’s position allows them to bend State power to their will to ends not generally in line with the public interest.

    Either way, if the keystone on which the West’s socio-political structure rests, along with its plans for managing the West’s future, is the legally unquestionable Holocaust™, then the West’s political structure has become ipso facto illegitimate, and knows itself to be so.

    • Agree: Iris, anarchyst
    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
    , @Iris
  97. @Erebus

    Since it is now illegal in both Germany and France to say or write that there never was an Armenian genocide your conclusion is wrong.
    Nobody assumes or asserts that Armenians control governments.
    Since jewry supports the asserted Armenian genocide, it may be that jewish power is behind the Armenian genocide laws.
    The Armenian genocide that never was, in my opinion, based on several books, of course fits into the present anti Muslim propaganda: terrorism is just caused by Islam and Quran.

    Yet, how crazy some in the west are can be seen in Germany, when the law was passed making denying the Armenian genocide a crime, even German guilt in relation to this genocide was acknowledged.
    Very weird people, the Germans, on the one hand the most capable in the world, on the other, except for a few exceptions such as Schulze Rhonoff and Sarrazin, unable to analyse their present and past.

    The only site in Germany with good political analyses I know is Die Achse des Guten.
    Good developments in Germany are that AfD gets more and more votes, AfD also dares to say controversial things as that in WWII Germans were professional soldiers, and that more and more Germans discover that the migrants are a disaster.

    As to why the holocaustTM is so important, well, the excuse for Israel stealing Palestinian land, running the concentration camp Gaza, ‘defending’ itself against blood thirsty Arabs that already in WW II cooperated with Hitler, claiming an exceptional position in the world, exacting payments from Germany, including the most advanced submarines for free, adapted for Mossad operations and firing Israeli cruis missiles with atomic heads, and, the last move, trying, now that Poland no longer is a poor country, also to get money out of Poland.
    Imagine the consequences if the world would realise that just lice were killed in gas chambers.
    On top of that, realise what would happen if it became known that, when Zyklon B no longer was available, USA attacks, many died of typhoid, such as Anne Frank.

    • Replies: @Erebus
  98. Iris says:
    @Erebus

    This is a remarkably comprehensive, yet succinct summary of how the Western world is being ruled.

  99. Iris says:
    @James N. Kennett

    Don’t be too flattered: comments like yours don’t rate vey high in my personal hierarchy of ideas.

    Not sure what motivates your attacks on Corbyn and McDonnell.

    - Option 1: you are a Zionist supporter, in which case you are deeply deluded if you believe you are fooling anybody. Zionists want Corbyn out because he is anti-apartheid, not because he is anti-Semite. Every time the obedient Theresa May digs herself deeper into the Brexit black hole, the allegations of Corbyn’s anti-Semitism pops out of the Cabal’s hat.

    Corbyn is a quintessential Englishman; he embodies and represents very well the virtues of tolerance and liberalism that characterise the British people, which is why he promoted dialogue with the IRA (brought to fruition by the very commendable John Major). Such a philosophy forbids racism, against Jews or otherwise.

    The UK powers-that-be organise political life around obedient politicians who are either paedophiles (Heath, Janner), corrupt (Blair), have covert tribal allegiances (Cameron, Osborne, Mandelson), are creatures of the financial industry (Thatcher), or any combination of these criteria.
    This is why Corbyn does not fit in: he is none of those.

    - Option 2: you are a grocer-minded, brainwashed Daily Mail reader who maintains a secret shrine to M. Thatcher in his commode.
    In which case, you are in for a big and nasty surprise: you will see very soon what nefarious long time effect the economic policies opposed by McDonnell and initiated in the 80′s by your Evita will have on the UK.

    For your education:

    https://www.opendemocracy.net/neweconomics/the-ten-graphs-which-show-how-britain-became-a-wholly-owned-subsiduary-of-the-city-of-london-and-what-we-can-do-about-it/

    • Replies: @James N. Kennett
  100. pB says:
    @UnzReader

    well then let me dox myself a bit, i was actually adopted by religous jewish family so im actual not biologically jewish, but i have a more intensive orthodox education id say 90-95% of all jews so im fairly competent in things like what mishna and kemerah say on various subjects, also after highschool went to further 3 years of yeshiva in israel.

    now im the furthest thing from a yeshiva bochar.

  101. @Iris

    Not sure what motivates your attacks on Corbyn and McDonnell.

    Neither of your Options 1 or 2 – try Option 3:

    Corbyn and McDonnell are not leadership material. This should be obvious from Corbyn’s choice of friends, and McDonnell’s belief in overthrowing the duly elected government by “insurrection”.

    There are numerous Labour politicians who, having noticed the popularity of Corbyn’s slogan “for the many, not the few”, would be glad to lead the party on a platform of wealth redistribution. The crucial point is that they would not bring along Corbyn’s Marxist and Trotskyite baggage, or his peculiar liking for pathological killers.

    I have read a little about the dialogue that led to peace in Northern Ireland, and I don’t recall Jeremy Corbyn’s name being mentioned. I suspect that, rather than taking part in this dialogue, Corbyn simply enjoyed hanging out with revolutionary killers.

    Thank you for the financial data on private debt. The private debt problem was indeed started by Margaret Thatcher, when she relaxed the credit controls on mortgage lending; and by globalization of the financial markets. The article is correct in describing debt as a Faustian bargain, at multiple levels. Most especially, it is hard for government policy to reduce debt without reducing GDP – and no one votes for a recession.

    The corresponding figures for public debt are different. The global crash of 2007-8 hit Britain hard, partly because the Labour government of Blair/Brown/Mandelson had not been paying attention to the regulation of banking. This has greatly reduced the scope for addressing the problems with private debt. The government might consider stricter credit controls, to reduce indebtedness and the size of the asset bubble, but combined with a burst of inflation, so that mortgagors do not become trapped in negative equity. They cannot do so because the inflation would destroy their own credit rating, and they need a strong line of credit because they owe so much money.

    So we are well and truly screwed. Margaret Thatcher started it, and Tony Blair finished the job. Property prices, and private rents, are so high that they need two wage earners to pay them. The only people who can afford to have 2.4 children per family are the professional classes, and those who have all their bills paid by the state. But hey ho, we needn’t worry about not having enough children, because we can always import people from Eritrea and Somalia to take the place of the unborn generation. This is literally what is happening.

    National governments are so impotent that their agenda includes such weighty matters as the use of plastic bags. Jeremy Corbyn is part of the problem – he is more concerned about people in Gaza than he is about the destruction of his own country.

    • Replies: @Miro23
    , @Iris
  102. Miro23 says:
    @James N. Kennett

    Corbyn and McDonnell are not leadership material. This should be obvious from Corbyn’s choice of friends…

    Jeremy Corbyn is part of the problem – he is more concerned about people in Gaza than he is about the destruction of his own country.

    It’s true that Corbyn is a friend to the Palestinians, and calls out their abuse in Gaza (and he is viciously attacked for it 24/7 by the British Establishment and Media). This is a very rare and principled stand for a UK politician.

    And with regard to the globalized, debt ridden, low interest rate, speculative UK economy, this is the creation of Thatcher, Blair, Cameron and May – happily wrecking it for profit (along US Neoliberal lines) for the benefit of their globalist financial looter friends.

    “For the many not the few” aims to deflect this elite attack on the British people.

    • Replies: @DFH
  103. DFH says:
    @Miro23

    It’s true that Corbyn is a friend to the Palestinians, and calls out their abuse in Gaza (and he is viciously attacked for it 24/7 by the British Establishment and Media). This is a very rare and principled stand for a UK politician.

    Maybe he could be a friend to the British people instead and call out the non-whites who rape, rob and murder native British people and the Jews who invite them in and protect them.

  104. Iris says:

    Jeremy Corbyn IS a friend of the British people:

    - He does not support illegal immigration, just requires the respect of the Geneva convention with regard to war refugees. Difficult to do less without going back to the barbarian stage.

    -For over two years, Jeremy Corbyn has been the main target of the Zionist cabal who owns the UK . No political leader has been so fiercely attacked, ever. They made a mockery of Labour’s internal selection process, and of democracy in general.

    Instead of blaming him for the sad status quo, for the UK and its entire political structure being totally owned and controlled by Zionists for their own benefit, you should recognise that this man is a hero for trying to oppose them in the limits of his means. We live in the real world.

  105. Iris says:
    @James N. Kennett

    Thank you for the detailed and considerate answer, with which I completely disagree.

    - Regarding Corbyn and McDonnell, I can only say that you are just so wrong about them. You should listen and read about their economic and political agendas directly, instead of judging them through press organs owned by vested interests who are out to destroy them.
    Jeremy Corbyn is exceptional by his integrity and selfless commitment; political leaders of this stature appear may be only once in a generation.

    He is also very well advised by John McDonnell: they are not deluded communists, they know that the economy has been wrecked beyond repair by a grotesque and unpayable level of debt and are trying to prepare for that.
    (See Steve Keen’s ” Can we avoid another financial crisis”. He is one of their advisors)

    - Regarding “Marxist wealth distribution” , the problem statement should be: productive capitalism is not the same as financial speculation.

    The parasitic financial industry has set up an efficient system to extract ever increasing levels of wealth from had working people and productive capitalistic enterprises, through the instrument of debt. Debt has now reached unsustainable levels, which in turn translates into social instability and the people looking for alternative solutions: voting for Brexit, voting for Corbyn, voting for UKIP. All these non-politically correct options, although they seem antagonistic, stem from the same voters disenfranchisement.
    Corbyn is NOT to blame if M. Thatcher, her banking masters and the rest of their political poodles have wrecked the UK.

    • Replies: @James N. Kennett
  106. @Iris

    (See Steve Keen’s ” Can we avoid another financial crisis”. He is one of their advisors)

    By the time I’ve read this book this comment thread will have ended. However, I’ve read a couple of articles about it, and Keen appears to have the right ideas.

    The real economy is a thin layer on top of a much larger financial edifice. Currency transactions alone in the City of London amount to more than a trillion dollars a day – several times the GDP of the entire world.

    Most people with a Marxist leanings fret about the “capitalist mode of production”, but the real problem 170 years after Marx is the extraction of economic rent, mostly through the instrument of debt. Yet debt served us well until less than 40 years ago, so the issue is really one of regulation. Firstly, what regime of rules do we need on the use of debt, and of capital in general? Secondly, how do we establish that regime, starting from where we are now?

    Some of the bankers, and some of our wealthy creditors are Jewish; many are not. Claiming that there is a “Zionist cabal who owns the UK” is not the best way to announce a new political programme. Most British Jews are not financiers, and many lost grandparents in the Holocaust. They are genuinely affronted by what they see as a gratuitous anti-semitic attack that is reminiscent of the propaganda of the early Third Reich. If this is your opening shot in a battle to change the way we regulate the financial sector, then you have automatically disqualified yourself before you have achieved anything.

    The ruling classes are delighted that students are taught Marxist ideas from two centuries ago, because these ideas do not help people to identify the economic problems of today. They are equally delighted when a radical leader like Jeremy Corbyn is anti-semitic, because it gives them a useful lever for removing him. It would not surprise me if they actually promote anti-semitic ideas about a Jewish banking cabal in order to distract people from what is really happening.

    • Replies: @Iris
    , @Wally
  107. Iris says:
    @James N. Kennett

    First , “Zionist cabal who owns the UK” is a phrase I, a lambda citizen, wrote, which expresses my opinion, gained from my personal observations. It has nothing to do with anything Corbyn has said or done, so using it to further your criticism of Corbyn is simply disingenuous. It is also very indicative of the peremptoriness with which you form your opinions.

    Second, your minimisation of the role the Zionist party plays in controlling the UK political system is at best naïve. You read the Unz Review, where so many valid arguments are outlined about USA’s policies being driven by the Zionist party, but want to believe that the UK is immune to such plight? Really? Are you that deluded? The UK, just like the USA, and France, are controlled by Israel-firsters. If anything, at least Americans are more lucid about it.

    Third, apart from gratuitously calling Corbyn names, what act of “anti-Semitism” did he exactly commit that he is being crucified for? Any fact, proof, statement, anything precise against him or Labour? Nothing, just the usual roller-coaster of mercenary media, striking out of the blue every time infighting occurs within the Conservative Party.

    Fourth, don’t waste your time using the vomitory “Holocaust” argument: while one must respect every people’s suffering, continuously banging the drum of how “unique” this particular genocide was has become simply unbearable. Just stop thinking that people are stupid.

    You see, I am not a Black person, and in my therefore completely unbiased opinion, the worst genocide to have ever existed was the Atlantic trade slave, 100 million people treated worse than animals over 3 centuries. So pardon me if I don’t bow to the Holocaust’s uniqueness.

    Incidentally, there still is now in 2018, a massive concentration camp called Gaza where children are shot like ducks, worst then ducks, with explosive bullets that shatters them in pieces, and this does not hurt the feelings of philo-Semites in the UK. On the contrary, they belly-dance to the Kapo-In-Chief Netanyahu every time he visits England. So they can shove their lessons-in-morality down their throats.

    Finally, I left the-cherry-on-top-of the-cream-on-top-of-the-cake to the end, to finish on a cheerful note. Lol, you want to reform the financial industry? You think the financial industry will surrender its privileges? Hahaha, good luck with that .

    “There’s class warfare, all right, but it’s my class, the rich class, that’s making war, and we’re winning.” Warren Buffett.

    • Replies: @James N. Kennett
  108. @Iris

    I am sorry that I did not make myself clearer. When I wrote “you”, I literally meant you, Iris. I did not attribute your opinions to Jeremy Corbyn.

    Why the obsession with Gaza in any case? We don’t have a dog in that particular fight, and if the concern is purely humanitarian, there are many other issues in the world that demand equal attention. For example, China has effectively colonised East Turkestan and Tibet, and currently imprisons a million Uighur Muslims in “re-education” camps. Sudan has ruthlessly suppressed minorities in Darfur. Saudi Arabia is bombing Shia areas of Yemen back to the Stone Age. Saudi Arabia and Qatar financed the catastrophic ISIS takeover of Sunni Arab areas of Iraq and Syria.

    Yes, I do want to reform the financial industry. No, it will not willingly surrender its privileges, but it will be forced to give them up after a political fight. The data that you provided suggests that this is long overdue. If you do not want to reform the financial industry, what do you want?

  109. Erebus says:
    @jilles dykstra

    Since it is now illegal in both Germany and France to say or write that there never was an Armenian genocide your conclusion is wrong.

    I haven’t time to look it all up now, but I recall that the French Constitutional Court struck down the French law, and that the German version was just a resolution “recognizing” the AG, but doesn’t criminalize doubters. Have things changed recently?

    If what you’re saying has become true, it’s an interesting development. Aside from giving the Turks a geo-political poke in the ribs, it legitimises the laws against doubting the Holocaust™. Or rather, it dilutes the illegitimacy of the laws criminalizing doubts about the patently false Holocaust™ narrative by spreading the remit to include narratives that are at least partially true.

    Put yet another way, doubting a patently false narrative becomes, from the legal perspective, the equivalent of doubting something that’s (at least partially) true. This puts “Truth” entirely at the whim of legislators and the enforcement apparatus.

  110. Wally says:
    @James N. Kennett

    antisemitic: any thought or person that a Jew doesn’t like

    you said:
    “Most British Jews are not financiers, and many lost grandparents in the Holocaust.”

    No they didn’t. Simple as that.
    Which of them say that & what precisely do they say?
    There is simply no proof for the fake & impossible ’6M Jews & gas chambers’.
    You, nor anyone else, can produce such proof.
    Always ask, ‘Who benefits?

    Revisionists are just the messengers, the absurd impossibility of the’holocaust’ storyline is the message.
    See the ‘holocaust’ scam easily & thoroughly debunked here: http://codoh.com
    No name calling, level playing field debate here: http://forum.codoh.com

  111. @Wally

    You, nor anyone else, can produce such proof.

    I know one thing for sure: I will never be able to produce proof that will convince you.

    The former SS Unterscharführer Oskar Gröning was surprised and offended when he encountered holocaust denialism in the 1980s.

    “I saw everything,” he writes. “The gas chambers, the cremations, the selection process. One and a half million Jews were murdered in Auschwitz. I was there.”

    When he was tried at the age of 96 for his complicity in these crimes, he could have defended himself by pretending that he had made up his stories. He did not, and he was sentenced to four years in prison. He died before beginning his sentence.

    Ask then, “who benefits?” If Oskar Gröning’s stories were untrue, what did he have to gain by telling them, and by affirming their truth in court when he was on trial?

    Of course the Holocaust happened. It was one of the gravest crimes of the 20th Century. It is how we respond to it that is important. Dealing with the lessons of World War 2, and generalizing these lessons for the future, seems to be extraordinarily difficult. Many people commit grave errors while trying to do so. Among the false beliefs are:

    - that victimhood (in this case Jewish victimhood) confers permanent moral superiority not only over the victimizers, but also over the non-participants;
    - victimhood gives the persecuted group a “get out of jail free” card for any crimes that they might commit;
    - anyone who claims to be a refugee should be treated as if they are a Jew fleeing Nazi Germany;
    - Western Christendom is so morally tainted that it deserves to be extinguished, by the instrument of mass immigration from the Muslim world.

    This false worldview needs to be confronted head-on. The way to do so is not to deny that the Holocaust happened, or to affect an exaggerated sympathy for Gazans above all the other oppressed people in the world. Instead, challenge the false lessons that people attempt to draw from the Holocaust.

  112. @James N. Kennett

    ” When he was tried at the age of 96 for his complicity in these crimes, he could have defended himself by pretending that he had made up his stories. He did not, and he was sentenced to four years in prison. He died before beginning his sentence.”

    His lawyer had told him that confession would lower the sentence, I suppose.
    The examples of those who denied the gassings were very convincing, in the sixties an apparently healthy former Auschwitz under commander, who denied the gas chambers, suddenly died in jail before the public trial began.
    It has been the same in all trials of this kind, those accused of Oradour sur Glane also confessed, and got light sentences.
    Paul Rassinier, ´Was ist Wahrheit ?, Die Juden und das Dritte Reich´, Leoni am Starnberger See, 7th printing, 1981 (Le véritable procès Eichmann ou les vainqueurs incorrigibles, 1963; The Real Eichmann Trial or the Incorrigible Victors. ISBN: 0911038485, 1983)
    Vincent Reynouard, ‘Die Wahrheit über Oradour, Rekonstruktion und Forschungsbericht eines Franzosen, Was geschah am 10. Juni 1944 wirklich ?’, Stegen am Ammersee, 2005 (Le Massacre d’Oradour, Antwerpen 1997)

  113. FKA Max says: • Website
    @mcohen

    Yes there does seem to be a few teams around ,sucked in by the flashy unz headliners,all hoping that there vpn’s will hide there identities.

    I made an interesting discovery.

    For many months, according to Alexa Siteinfo, Sudan has been ranked one of the top visitor countries to the Unz Review.

    [MORE]

    Monthly Unique Visitor Metrics

    Past 30 Days — Last Updated August 17, 2018
    [...]
    Audience Geography

    Where are this site’s visitors located?
    [...]
    Country Percent of Visitors Rank in Country
    United States 39.3% 11,084
    United Kingdom 9.3% 7,509
    France 8.9% 7,929
    Sweden 5.1% 2,956
    Sudan 5.0% 1,411

    https://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/unz.com

    This didn’t make sense to me for various reasons, e.g. low internet penetration http://www.internetlivestats.com/internet-users/sudan/ , etc.

    After reading your comment and then discovering this article:

    But Beijing wants not only to prevent the United States from interfering with its domestic cyber policies: It also wants to set the tone for how the rest of the world governs the internet. To exert influence on its partners, it uses direct outreach to foreign governments, as well as massive investments in internet technologies through the Belt and Road Initiative, extensive military-to-military cooperation, and growing participation in international institutions.

    In 2015, for instance, China selected Tanzania (China is Tanzania’s largest trade partner) as a pilot country for China–Africa capacity-building, giving Beijing substantial influence over Tanzania’s government. China used that influence to foster collaboration around cyberspace governance. Since 2015, Tanzania has passed a cyber-crime law and subsequent restrictions on internet content and blogging activity that parallel China’s content controls. Both have been informed by technical assistance from the Chinese government. At a roundtable in Dar es Salaam sponsored by Beijing, Edwin Ngonyani, Tanzania’s deputy minister for transport and communications, explained, “Our Chinese friends have managed to block such media in their country and replaced them with their homegrown sites that are safe, constructive, and popular.” Among other countries where China invests heavily, Nigeria has adopted measures requiring that consumer data be hosted in Nigeria, while Egypt has pending legislation that would mandate ride-sharing companies to store data in-country while also making it more accessible to authorities. Chinese partners like Ethiopia, Sudan, and Egypt engage in aggressive online content control.

    https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2018/06/zte-huawei-china-trump-trade-cyber/563033/

    I’m wondering if Chinese internet users use Sudan (i.e. servers in Sudan and/or Sudanese IP addresses) as an intermediary country to conceal their true location/identity?

    Sudan: China’s Original Foothold in Africa

    https://thediplomat.com/2017/06/sudan-chinas-original-foothold-in-africa/

    • Replies: @Erebus
  114. Erebus says:
    @James N. Kennett

    I know one thing for sure: I will never be able to produce proof that will convince you.

    You won’t convince Wally, nor any other thinking person who thinks there should be physical evidence for physical events that would have produced such evidence had they happened.

    That we have more evidence of neolithic atrocities than we have of the Holocaust™ narrative, an event whose scale and temporal proximity would normally yield mountains of physical evidence, should speak volumes about its historical veracity. Instead, after spending 30 years looking for it, the Holocaust™’s premier researcher concluded that there’s no there there. No-one has gainsaid him since. In the end, the final edition of Hilberg’s magnum opus, The Destruction of the European Jews achieves the opposite of its intended goal and stands as the single greatest proof that the story is bunkum. To the extent that, in the physical world an absence of evidence is evidence of absence, Hilberg succeeded in proving the narrative false.

    You believe the Holocaust™ for the same reasons half of America believes that the Russians hacked the election, that Saddam did 9/11, that the USM knocked ISIS out of Syria, or that it won WWII. Uncritical persons, however keen or uninterested, will believe anything, however preposterous, if it’s repeated often enough to convince them. The keen ones then go on to repeat the stories they’ve so eagerly internalized. It works, but only with other uncritical persons, and of course imbeciles.

    • Agree: Them Guys
    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
    , @Anon
  115. Erebus says:
    @FKA Max

    Hmmm….

    Also interesting is that Saker’s site is equally popular with the Sudanese, who come ahead of even the Canadians.
    That the Chinese have set up govt web portals in Sudan and doubtless other places, to monitor the world’s social & alt-media is unsurprising. That The Saker and Unz have caught their attention to the extent that they have, is.

    • Replies: @FKA Max
  116. @Erebus

    Hilberg, indeed,
    Butz strongly advised his readers to read Hilberg:
    Arthur R. Butz, ´The hoax of the twentieth century, The case against the presumed extermination of European Jewry’, Costa Mesa CA, 1977, 1989
    I did read
    Raul Hilberg, ‘The destruction of the European Jews’, student edition, Teaneck, 1985
    ‘already’ on page 300 or so Hilberg mentions that Auschwitz was a huge industrial center, out of abundant water, ground water level at grass roots (this of course Hilberg does not mention, it makes the fire pits for burning bodies impossible), and coal, synthetic rubber, lubrication oil and aviation fuel was produced.
    Neufeld and Berenbaum, editors ‘The bombing of Auschwitz’, 2000, New York:
    Jewish council at the end of 1944, Jerusalem, Ben Gurion chairman, when the bombing of Auschwitz industries had began from N Italy, ‘if the camps should be bombed ?’, ‘no, jews might be killed’.

    • Replies: @Erebus
  117. You forgot to mention the CO2 fairy tale

  118. @Wally

    Imprecise statements, jews were deported, many, or most, of them died in the camps.
    The holocaust discussion is about if there were gas chambers for humans, alas the discussion hardly is about why and how camp inmates died.

  119. Erebus says:
    @jilles dykstra

    The Holocaust™ narrative’s proponents can’t enter a single piece of evidence, while the counterfactuals litter the ground as far as the eye can see. Yet, they carry on in apparent earnestness. Extraordinary behaviour on the part of what otherwise appear to be rational humans.

    One encounters this phenomena from time to time on other subjects. Blind adherence to some elaborate, but nonsensical narrative without any apparent connection to actual facts. Sometimes I wonder what the word sanity really means.

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  120. FKA Max says: • Website
    @Erebus

    I have been tracking Unz Review web traffic/demographics through Alexa Siteinfo for a while now and I noticed an uptick in web traffic from China after the Unz Review published Godfree Roberts’ https://www.unz.com/author/godfree-roberts/ “Mao Reconsidered” article.

    At that time China actually showed up as a country in the web statistics, at about the same percentage as does now Sudan (~5%), which made sense to me since I figured that there would be a lot of interest in that sort of article in China.

    After a couple of weeks China disappeared from the rankings and Sudan took its place instead, which was more than a little bit curious to me.

    But I figured that maybe there was interest in Sudan around all the race realist articles published on the Unz Review, particularly Chanda Chisala’s https://www.unz.com/author/chanda-chisala/ articles, I thought, might have been the main source of the Sudanese web traffic to the Unz Review.

    But after Sudan kept staying towards the top of the rankings without too many controversial/contentious race realist articles being published/featured by Mr. Unz that might have attracted African nationalists, supremacists, etc. readers and commenters to the Unz Review, I thought that that theory/possibility probably was not correct/it.

    When I read commenter mcohen‘s comment upthread about VPNs, etc. I thought it either must be Russians, Israelis or Chinese who use Sudan as a gateway to conceal their true location, because they seem to be the three countries/governments who would be and are most likely interested to influence and steer conversations and discussions in the Unz Review comments sections into certain directions which are sympathetic and supportive to/of their respective government’s point of view and policies, etc.

    Since many Unz Review readers and commenters are naturally and justifiably suspicious of the U.S. government and the Israelis and most of them are generally sympathetic towards Russia and China it is easier, for Russia and China, to insert their propaganda and point of view in the conversations and discussions here since they are less likely to be rejected or opposed.

    That I think is the reason why “The Saker and Unz have caught their attention to the extent that they have”.

    After I did some research on Sudan and its relations with Russia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russia%E2%80%93Sudan_relations , Israel https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israel%E2%80%93Sudan_relations and China https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/China%E2%80%93Sudan_relations , and after I found the above-linked Atlantic article on the Sudanese-Chinese internet monitoring cooperation it became clear to me that China, since it has had the longest-standing and deepest ties with Sudan of the three countries, is most likely behind the Sudanese web traffic to the Unz Review.

    But I could, of course, be wrong and completely off-base with these speculations of mine…

  121. anarchyst says:
    @James N. Kennett

    Judicial notice”, a legal doctrine, is used to turn a “commonly accepted belief”, however wrong, or even scientifically and physically impossible, into the equivalent of “religious orthodoxy” from which no dissent or counter-argument is permitted. THIS is the tool that jews use to legitimize even the most outlandish and ridiculous holocaust claims.
    This tactic was used in the Nuremberg trials to good effect, and is used in today’s “kangaroo courts” against those who dare question the lies, fabrications, and claims of witnesses about any aspect of the holocaust .
    The two latest victims of “judicial notice” and “holocaustianity ” are grandmothers Monika Schaefer and Ursula Haverbeck who are incarcerated in German high-security prisons as we speak.
    TRUTH cannot be used as a defense when “judicial notice” is invoked..

    • Replies: @Amber Dekstris
  122. @anarchyst

    Please do not talk nonsense, and especially please do not present it as “legal doctrine” where non-legal people have no way of knowing that the assertion is false.

    Judicial notice is when a fact presented by a party is so “notorious” (the legal term in this context for widely known) that it is accepted by the court without being proved, because the widely-known-ness is the proof. There is nothing to stop a party leading evidence contrary to the fact that was accepted under judicial notice.

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  123. anarchyst says:
    @Amber Dekstris

    You have proven my point by calling evidence contrary to popular beliefs “nonsense”. When evidence that is contrary to “popularly accepted beliefs” is not allowed to be entered into evidence by the courts, THAT is “judicial notice” which perpetuates the falsehoods and leads to honest people being convicted of “thoughtcrimes”. Your notion that certain ideas are “notorious”, once again bolsters my claim that judicial notice is a court-approved SCAM which denies the TRUTH. My assertion stands.
    Why are Ursula Haverbeck and Monika Schaefer in prison?

  124. anarchyst says:
    @Erebus

    It’s called “holocaustianity ™” and has been turned into jewish religious dogma, in which no deviation from it can be allowed. In fact, this “dogma” is commonly used by the courts to persecute those who dare to question “holocaustianity ™” even having PROOF that this jewish “dogma” is defective, on its face.
    Lampshades and soap, oh my….

  125. annamaria says:
    @mcohen

    “…“neo nazi” smear is Russian propaganda.”
    — Hey, mcohen, this is factual information:
    “WHO INVENTED GAS CHAMBER? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gas_van
    https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/soc.culture.jewish/nBYdz5icdLA/qVEDk_NODoQJ “The mobile gassing truck was invented and tested by Isay Davidovich Berg, head of the NKVD Economics Division in the Moscow region. In 1937, a second highpoint in the Great Purge, prisoners were sentenced to death in conveyor-belt fashion, packed into trucks, taken to the places of execution, shot in the back of the neck, and buried. In the economic sense, Isay Berg found this method of liquidation inefficient, time-consuming and cost-intensive. He, therefore, in 1937 designed the mobile asphyxiation chamber, the gassing truck (Russian: dushegubka, p. 297). The doomed were loaded into a tightly sealed, completely airtight Russian Ford; during the drive, the deadly exhaust from a gasoline engine was directed into the section containing those sentenced to death. Upon reaching the mass gravesite, the truck dumped the corpses into the burial ditch.”

    Some other interesting quotes, that probably make this book unpublishable in
    America:
    “On the basis of document analysis, Solzhenitsyn states that Lenin had three reasons for elevating young secular, revolutionary-minded Jews to the State’s elite, in effect replacing the Tsarist bureaucracy. First, because of the deadly hate the young Jews had for Russian traditions, religious rites, historical models, hate for everything Russian and Russia itself.
    Second, their willingness to cross the last taboo borders in morality. And third, their readiness to physically liquidate the enemy.”

    “Solzhenitsyn lists the names of about fifty mass murderers, desk criminals, and murderers of prisoners. (p. 300f.) Their first names betray the ethnic origin of these monsters. Moise Framing, Mordichai Chorus, Josef Khodorovsky, Isaak Solz, Naum Zorkin, Moise Kalmanovich, Samuel Agurski, Lazar Aronstam, Israel Weizer, Aron Weinstein, Isaak Grindberg, Sholom Dvoylazki, Max Daitsh, Yesif Dreiser, Samuel Saks, Jona Jakir, Moise Kharitonov, Frid Markus, Solomon Kruglikov, Israel Razgon, Benjamin Sverdlov, Leo Kritzman…”

  126. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @Gordon Pratt

    I’m not prejudiced against Jews. I’m post judiced against Jews. I formed my judgement about Jews after I began looking at the lists of attorneys litigating the anti White pro black side of school desegregation school bussing pro criminal anti victim and affirmative action lawsuits.

    The majority of the attorneys were Jewish and most of the finding of the anti White lawsuits came from Jews.

    Jews are the friends of blacks Asians Hispanics gays trannies and the enemy of Whites; extremely successful and triumphant enemies.

  127. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @Gordon Pratt

    Who cares what Jesus was or if he even existed?

  128. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @Erebus

    Has there been an objective unbiased poll on what percentage of people believe Russia hacked the election?

    It’s my impression only the media believes Russia hacked the election.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS
PastClassics
Are elite university admissions based on meritocracy and diversity as claimed?
The evidence is clear — but often ignored
What Was John McCain's True Wartime Record in Vietnam?
Hundreds of POWs may have been left to die in Vietnam, abandoned by their government—and our media.