The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Alexander Hart Archive
First They Ignore You, Then You Laugh At Them, Then You Win
How The “Cuckservative” Meme Is Undermining Conservatism Inc.
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
Jeb Bush as \"Cuckservative.\" Credit: VDare.com
Jeb Bush as "Cuckservative." Credit: VDare.com

mattlewsGandhi probably never uttered his most quoted aphorism: “First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.” but many dissident movements–both before and after the misquote—have adopted it to describe their hoped-for trajectory from marginalization to victory. [The 10 most famous things never actually said, by Eoin O’Carroll,Christian Science Monitor, June 3, 2011]

For the past several years, Conservatism Inc. and the Main Stream Media have effectively ignored theDissident Right and all other heretical thinkers on race. In fact, the only time groups like American Renaissanceor VDARE.com typically receive any attention is when the Left tries to tie them tenuously to Conservatism Inc. and/or nutjobs like Dylann Roof.

Well, now, the Establishment. Left and Right, is paying attention to race realists—but they aren’t laughing at us, we’re laughing at them. Over the past few months, snarky right wingers have popularized the term “cuckservative”—a portmanteau of cuckold and conservative—on social media and message boards, most notably the website and Facebook group, The Right Stuff, My Posting Career, and twitter accounts like @Cuckservative and Snark Enlightenment.[VDARE.com note: This marks the first time the term has appeared on VDARE.com, because of Editor Peter Brimelow’s notorious prudishness]

Some of these memes were vulgar and even more Politically Incorrect than sites like VDARE and American Renaissance. Yet many were original, funny, and struck at the truth of the Republican Party and Conservatism Inc.’s failure to actually conserve the people who created and support it. A couple of examples:

  • “Cuckservatives… A person who wishes for America’ return to 1950’s values/strength, without admitting the nation was 90% white then”
  • White children need to become a minority and the USA a third world country through LEGAL, not illegal immigration
  • “Immigration isn’t a winning issue, let’s talk about tax cuts for corporations with rainbow avatars instead.” –

[Important: Roundup of #Cuckservative articles and memes, Occam’s Razor Mag, July 26, 2015]

While most of this was tongue-in-cheek, Alfred Clark published a serious definition of it on Radix Journal: a white conservative or libertarian “who thinks he’s promoting his own interests but really isn’t.” He further noted that the cuckservative will try to attack the Left by calling Democrats “the real racists” or by suggesting that abortion is “racist” because blacks and Hispanicsdisproportionately choose to have the procedure. And in contrast to opposition to abortion or strident support for Israel,

…the cuckservative feels uncomfortable about issues like immigration. If the cuckservative is not an outright open-borders shill, he will only give lip service about “securing the border” or “opposing illegal but favoring legal immigration” but he will never talk about immigration very much. After all, immigration has very serious implications for Western Civilization, so it doesn’t concern the cuckservative.

[“Cuckservative,” A Definition, July 16, 2015]

After inquiring why people called him a “cuckservative,” RedState’s Erick Ericksonstumbled upon the Radix Journal article and described it as “a slur against Christian voters coined by white-supremacists.” Erickson doubled down on this interpretation without finding a single quote from anti-cuckservative activists critical of Christianity. Instead he cited various quotes like “anyone voting to destroy Christian lands by importing or breeding a horde of hostile minorities is a cuckold” and “you’re like Esau selling his birthright for a bowl of pottage” as proof of anti-Christian animus. [Cuckservative” is a Racist Slur and an Attack on Evangelical Christians, July 29, 2015]

The Daily Caller’s Matt Lewis was at least capable of looking up cuckold on Wikipedia and wrote,

A cuckold, of course, is a legitimate word for the husband of an adulterous wife — but that doesn’t really do justice to what they’re suggesting here, either. The people who throw this term around are most likely referencing a type of pornography whereby a (usually, white) man is “humiliated” (or ironically thrilled) by being forced to watch his wife having sex with another (usually, black) man.

Lewis argued that his critics believed that “by supporting immigration reform, criminal justice reform, etc., a white conservative is therefore surrendering his honor and masculinity (and it won’t be long before his women folk are compromised, as well!).” [What’s Behind The ‘Cuckservative’ Slur?, July 23, 2015]

This prompted the same Leftists who enthusiastically embraced much more vulgar terms like “Teabagger” pompously to psychoanalyze the supposed sexual insecurities of “white supremacists”. For example, Buzzfeed noted that the point was to allude “to a genre of porn in which passive white husbands watch their wives have sex with black men, it casts its targets as impotent defenders of white people in America.” [Joseph Bernstein, Behind The Racist Hashtag That Is Blowing Up Twitter, July 27, 2015] Mediaite said the users of the word were both “racist” and “sexually anxious.” [Trump Fans Target ‘Mike Cuckabee’ for Being a ‘Cuckservative,’ By Tommy Christopher, July 29, 2015] The New Republic did the most psychoanalyzing of the joke:

the term cuckservative is popular because it pushes psycho-sexual hot buttons. Racism and sexism have always been connected, with one of the prime justifications for racial hierarchy being the supposed need to protect white women from black men and also, more implicitly, to keep black women sexually submissive to white men. A cuckservative thus conjures up one of the supreme nightmares of the white supremacist imagination, the fear that white men will assume a submissive role (or position) in the sexual hierarchy.

Conservatives Are Holding a Conversation About Race, By Jeet Heer, July 26, 2015

Meanwhile, Matt Lewis became completely unhinged in the Daily Beast, describing his twitter antagonists as “evil and primitive.” Even worse, many of them “haveConfederate flag avatars”! After this preening, Lewis got to his point.

I think it’s fair to say that we on the center-right have been defending ourselves and our movement against charges of racism for so long that we’ve forgotten that, well, our side has some racists…whereas they were once confined to the nether regions of the Internet, now Twitter allows them to spread their pernicious message, and Trump has given them a candidate to get behind.

Lewis then declared his goal to purge them: “I can’t police the left, but my hope in writing this is to sound the alarm on the right.” [Twitter’s Right-Wing Civil War, July 28, 2015].

Yet unlike the past victims of would-be right wing excommunicators, Lewis’s targets are largely anonymous and independent. Rather than marginalizing theDissident Right, he and his other cuckservative allies have merely given it more attention.

And not all the attention has been un-objective. Dave Weigel of the Washington Post just published a piece that gave Radix Journal Editor Richard Spencer an opportunity to explain the insult in an intelligent and reasonable manner:

The ‘cuck’ slur is vulgar, yes, but then piercingly accurate. It is the cuckold who, whether knowingly or unknowingly, loses control of his future. This is an apt psychological portrait of white ‘conservatives,’ whose only identity is comprised of vague, abstract ‘values,’ and who are participating in the displacement of European Americans — their own children.

[‘Cuckservative’ — the conservative insult of the month, explained, July 29, 2015]

Weigel also linked (!) to an American Renaissance article that explained: “While cuckservatives claim to adhere to abstract principles, wiser men and women understand that ideology is often the echo of racial, cultural, and ethnic interests. And since cuckservatives no longer bother concealing they care nothing for their own white supporters, frustrated whites are looking for alternatives.” [What is a Cuckservative? by Gregory Hood, July 24, 2015]

Moreover, not all mainstream conservative outlets are following Lewis and Erickson’s lead. While distancing himself from more of its extreme proponents, Milo Yiannopoulos defended the term in a lead Breitbart.com Op Ed, noting that

cuckservative memes are about GOP spinelessness on immigration, lies the political left tells about racism in America today, or simple frustration with the perceived limp-wristedness of the right-wing Establishment in the face of the vast left-wing smear machine.

[‘Cuckservative’ Is a Gloriously Effective Insult That Should Not Be Slurred, Demonized, or Ridiculed, July 28, 2015]

Instead of marginalizing the Dissident Right, the cuckservatives have exposed hundreds of thousands, if not millions of conservatives to intelligently-expressed heterodox opinions that undermine Conservatism Inc.’s basic premises and conceptualize it as a problem. The comment threads suggest this is resonating.

P.J. O’Rourke once said that “Satire doesn’t effect change.” and is just about blowing off steam. [The New Statesman Interview — P.J. O’Rourke, by Samira Shackle, January 9, 2012]. This may be true when O’Rourke just makes a few jokes in a Cato Institute amicus brief. Yet the Dissident Right has been so marginalized that it has taken satire for it to get noticed.

Of course, it is premature to call a few mentions in the Daily Beast andWashington Post meaningful change. But it’s a lot more than I would expect from a few internet trolls.

Alexander Hart (email him) is a conservative journalist.

(Republished from VDare.com by permission of author or representative)
 
    []
  1. “Conservatism Inc.” gave us Bush & Cheney, McCain, Palin and Romney (and hence Obama, twice); and soon will deliver the presidency to Hillary.

    Meanwhile the nation is fast-approaching third-world status, and these losers fight over how best to accelerate the process.

    The sooner “Conservatism Inc.” expires, the better.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Cagey Beast
    Yes the best thing would be for them to lose because too many White guys stayed home on election day or voted for protest candidates. That's the only way the cuckservatives will learn.
    , @Realist
    Well said. But Conservatism Inc. is supported by lots of money.
    , @Jay
    The Cloward-Piven strategy may just be the way forward. Were civilization to falter sufficiently, it would be white male conservatives who would pick up the pieces and rebuild.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
    AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
    These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
    Sharing Comment via Twitter
    /article/first-they-ignore-you-then-you-laugh-at-them-then-you-win/#comment-1037910
    More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  2. @Kyle McKenna
    "Conservatism Inc." gave us Bush & Cheney, McCain, Palin and Romney (and hence Obama, twice); and soon will deliver the presidency to Hillary.

    Meanwhile the nation is fast-approaching third-world status, and these losers fight over how best to accelerate the process.

    The sooner "Conservatism Inc." expires, the better.

    Yes the best thing would be for them to lose because too many White guys stayed home on election day or voted for protest candidates. That’s the only way the cuckservatives will learn.

    Read More
  3. Priss Factor [AKA "The Priss Factory"] says:

    “A cuckservative thus conjures up one of the supreme nightmares of the white supremacist imagination, the fear that white men will assume a submissive role (or position) in the sexual hierarchy.”

    Didn’t Bill Maher say of Mitt Romney that, following his election loss, he looked like a white guy whose wife had been fuc*ed by a black guy?

    And who can forget the Newsweek cover with Obama as the victor over Old White Guys?

    This is how Jews feel about white gentiles, but white boys in the GOP suck up to Jews and blacks.

    They should be shouting WE ARE ALL PALESTINIANS.

    Read More
    • Replies: @OilcanFloyd
    "Didn’t Bill Maher say of Mitt Romney that, following his election loss, he looked like a white guy whose wife had been fuc*ed by a black guy?

    And who can forget the Newsweek cover with Obama as the victor over Old White Guys?"

    Bill Maher is a typical Jewish race baiter. If he said those things in public, he might get his ass kicked and have his own wife fucked by a hated white guy. What a dickhead. It's a wonder we haven't had pogroms already.
  4. Priss Factor [AKA "The Priss Factory"] says:

    All those bitching about the meme are Goppets of the globalist oligarchs.

    Read More
  5. Realist says:
    @Kyle McKenna
    "Conservatism Inc." gave us Bush & Cheney, McCain, Palin and Romney (and hence Obama, twice); and soon will deliver the presidency to Hillary.

    Meanwhile the nation is fast-approaching third-world status, and these losers fight over how best to accelerate the process.

    The sooner "Conservatism Inc." expires, the better.

    Well said. But Conservatism Inc. is supported by lots of money.

    Read More
  6. Jason says:

    The term stings because it identifies them.

    Pushing memes like this is powerful. Short, violent thrusts right in the guts of the anti-White.

    Get on a consistent message, refuse to shut up, and find out how fragile the other side really is.

    Read More
  7. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer

    It’s funny to me how some on the left are so hung up on the idea that the “cuck” portion of “cuckservative” references “white supremacist insecurity” vis-a-vis black male/white female relationships, whereas in reality it’s mostly about Latin American mestizo immigration into the US. The whole “white racists are all just insecure about black men taking their women!” meme of the left seems pervasive enough that it pops up in such otherwise unrelated contexts.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wally
    The whole thing is built upon the false notion that somehow the majority of white women just cannot resist the low IQ black primate. Most educated white women wouldn't be caught dead with such vocabulary deprived morons. The entire matter is manufactured leftist clap-trap.

    Speaking of clap, maybe we should mention how more times blacks carry STD's compared to whites.

    , @IA
    'The whole “white racists are all just insecure about black men taking their women!” meme of the left seems pervasive enough that it pops up in such otherwise unrelated contexts.'

    Probably springs from deeply buried anxiety starting in the 60s, I reckon. Normal men should never back down when threatened with violence by another, especially, weaker group. When you do this the threatening group can quite rightly conclude that your group is cowardly. Boys used to learn this very early on in playground fights. It establishes a pecking order and maintains stability within the group. Instead of standing up to black violence beginning in the 60s white men caved, again and again. Blacks, and now many other non-whites, learned a lesson, i.e., if you threaten YT he will cave.

    This general feeling of anxiety probably exacerbates sexual liberation uncertainties also developed since the 60s.
    , @NickG

    It’s funny to me how some on the left are so hung up on the idea that the “cuck” portion of “cuckservative” references “white supremacist insecurity” vis-a-vis black male/white female relationships, whereas in reality it’s mostly about Latin American mestizo immigration into the US.
     
    Yup, and the parsimonious explanation here, is projection.
  8. Isn’t Unz a cuckservative?

    Read More
    • Replies: @tunglet
    "Isn’t Unz a cuckservative?"

    quote from Kevin MacDonald's article "The Cuckservative Phenomenon"

    "Which brings up the point that in general Jews are not cuckservatives because I have yet to see any substantial body of Jews do anything apart from pursuing Jewish ethnic interests as they see them. Nobody is cuckolding them, but, given their role as a central component of our hostile elite, they have cuckolded a huge proportion of Whites. The Jewish left focuses their energies on pursuing strategies to make Western societies as user-friendly to Jews as possible — displacing previous White elites and overwhelming White societies with non-Whites to prevent any mass movement of Whites against Jews and to provide a counterbalance and eventual antidote to White political power. They have created the dominant culture of the left that cuckservatives bow down to."

    http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2015/07/the-cuckservative-phenomenon/
    , @DH
    He isn't, but the Derb certainly is.
  9. Sunbeam says:

    You guys.

    Look the number of people that look at any of these online political sites is a very small fraction of the population. I’d wager a guess that blizzard’s forums for World of Warcraft draw more viewers than ALL of them put together. Maybe some media type somewhere cares, but most people don’t.

    This word, cuckservative. It doesn’t have legs. It appeals to the mind of only a certain type of person. Not that the average person would be offended by it, they just wouldn’t care. At all. The most you’d get from using it in a conversation is a puzzled look, and maybe a polite chuckle if you read your target right. Then they would shake their head with a WTF look, when the conversation is over.

    It’s kind of like when the talking head shows were full of people like Lindsay Graham constantly harping on Benghazi. No one cared. No one payed any attention. Basically the attitude was: “This is BS. The government does BS. What else could you expect from them anyway? Nothing to see here, so let’s move along.”

    Yet they went on and on, like this was some kind of … well anything anyone cared about.

    And to address another point, if anyone thinks there is some kind of groundswell out there to lower corporate taxes and that is a great campaign issue… well they live in a very peculiar kind of echo chamber.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Ozymandias
    "The most you’d get from using it in a conversation is a puzzled look, and maybe a polite chuckle if you read your target right. Then they would shake their head with a WTF look, when the conversation is over."

    I have no idea who you're associating with, but the vast majority of white people that I know are angry. About half of the white democrats I know feel as though they have been double crossed by labor and are talking about Trump. Several of the businesses in my immediate area have voted their union out within the last year.
    , @Marty
    My audience is GROWING!
  10. tunglet says:
    @Daniel Antinora
    Isn't Unz a cuckservative?

    “Isn’t Unz a cuckservative?”

    quote from Kevin MacDonald’s article “The Cuckservative Phenomenon”

    “Which brings up the point that in general Jews are not cuckservatives because I have yet to see any substantial body of Jews do anything apart from pursuing Jewish ethnic interests as they see them. Nobody is cuckolding them, but, given their role as a central component of our hostile elite, they have cuckolded a huge proportion of Whites. The Jewish left focuses their energies on pursuing strategies to make Western societies as user-friendly to Jews as possible — displacing previous White elites and overwhelming White societies with non-Whites to prevent any mass movement of Whites against Jews and to provide a counterbalance and eventual antidote to White political power. They have created the dominant culture of the left that cuckservatives bow down to.”

    http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2015/07/the-cuckservative-phenomenon/

    Read More
  11. Flower says:

    Americans and their labels. If we can’t waste time talking about it, we’ll waste time labeling it. I suppose that’s why the most prevalent label in the grocery store is “New and Improved”, which, in the political world, comes out “Cuckservative”.

    Now we just make up shite. Here’s some more for next week, when this crop of labels starts to grow stale.
    BlowMeLibber, CucksuckingRadical, DontStickItInTooFarervative, TheOtherGuysLieism, JustGimmeTheFarkingMoneyAlreadyeratrive, LeftyDipShiteerism, MightyTightyRightyism, HumptyDumptyProgresive, BugsBunnyBlatherism.

    Read More
    • Replies: @OilcanFloyd
    I don't mind calling names, but I prefer labeling these politicians by their actions, which would make them traitors, butchers, thieves or corrupt politicians. If I want to get cute, maybe something like subservatives, disservatives, commiecons, comicons or progservtives, but calling them exactly what they are makes more sense to me.
  12. Tom_R says:

    REPUBLICAN PARTY IS SHAM OPPOSITION CONTROLLED BY THE SAME OLIGARCHS.
    THIRD MOST POPULOUS NATION ON EARTH MUST BAN IMMIGRATION.

    Thanks for the interesting article, Sir. Though I like the idea of using strong deprecatory terms to describe the RINO’s (Republicans in Name Only), and other left wingers, this particular term is profane, so I am not comfortable using it, but, on the other hand, the RINO’s do need to be made uncomfortable.

    Secondly, I agree that we have too much immigration (legal and illegal) and this is the 3rd most populous nation on earth, and immigration needs to be banned. This country gives about 3 millions visas per year and about 3 million enter illegally. This country lets in more immigration than the rest of the world combined.

    Thirdly, it really does NOT matter what the people prefer, because all 3 branches of our govt. are controlled by the Jewish Oligarchs and they are behind massive 3rd world immigration and libbarbarianism. Eg:

    Jewish Groups Gang Up To Push For Amnesty For 3rd World Illegals In USA–While Building Huge Prison For Africans In Israel

    See:

    http://www.thejewishweek.com/news/breaking-news/wide-range-jewish-groups-urge-faster-path-citizenship

    http://www.mediafreedominternational.org/2011/04/04/israel-building-immigrant-prison-camp-for-africans/

    Joe Biden admitted that Judaists are behind the alien invasion here:

    http://ihr.org/other/biden_jewish_role

    http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/349155/joe-biden-attributes-social-liberalism-jewish-control-hollywood-and-social-media

    The Judaists own and operate both parties and big media (MSM). 50% of the campaign contributions to the Demograts comes from the Jewish lobby (40% for Republicans). 10 times as much money flows under the table in secret bribes and secret deals. That is why these politicians support Israel blindly and even openly flood their own nations with 3rd world aliens, and utterly destroy their own country, as ordered by the Lobby. The Republican party is a sham opposition to fool the public.

    Read More
  13. Priss Factor [AKA "The Priss Factory"] says:

    Any conservative who uses the term ‘racism’ in a negative way is a cuckonservative.

    Race-ism should mean race + ism = belief in the existence of race and racial differences; the need for racial identity, survival, and consciousness.

    We must say we are proud to be race-ists.

    Otherwise, you are a cuckon.

    —————-

    One problem with ‘cuckservative’.

    A real cuckold neither wants nor knows that his wife cheated on him and that he’s raising another man’s child.

    In that, at least, he is honorable. He has solid values and principles, and he is really a victim of his cheating wife and her lover.

    A cuckold does NOT want to be cuckolded.

    The current social phenomenon where white guys get off from observing black men do their women is not really cuckolding since the white knows about it, wants it, plans it, agrees to it, and gets sexually excited by it and gets off on it.

    It is a case of willful masochism than victimization via cuckolding.
    The white guy is an active agent and participant in the game of humilation than a victim.
    A true cuckold, upon discovering the truth, would want to kill the woman and her secret lover.
    A masochist, on the other hand, wants the humiliation.

    Thus, the white guy who willfully submits to the black sexual domination of his woman is a masochist. And cuckservatives are really masoconservatives or masocons.

    They are White Toms, or white uncle toms.

    In a way, all white males are white toms, even alt right guys.

    They are avid fans of sports where blacks dominate and are worshiped and offered sex by white girls.
    So, when white males cheer for black stars, they are cheering for black studs taking white cheerleaders.
    And even many white cons are into rap music, which is about black thugs sexually dominating white women.

    It is the beta-ization of white males vis-a-vis blacks.

    beta-cons are the natural outgrowth of the greater phenomenon of white male defeat in sports and pop music.

    Read More
  14. Maybe this ‘cuckservative’ thing has some legs overseas. SyrianGirl just cut a video giving the word her own little spin: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wNtd-f01eNg&feature=youtu.be

    Read More
  15. @Sunbeam
    You guys.

    Look the number of people that look at any of these online political sites is a very small fraction of the population. I'd wager a guess that blizzard's forums for World of Warcraft draw more viewers than ALL of them put together. Maybe some media type somewhere cares, but most people don't.

    This word, cuckservative. It doesn't have legs. It appeals to the mind of only a certain type of person. Not that the average person would be offended by it, they just wouldn't care. At all. The most you'd get from using it in a conversation is a puzzled look, and maybe a polite chuckle if you read your target right. Then they would shake their head with a WTF look, when the conversation is over.

    It's kind of like when the talking head shows were full of people like Lindsay Graham constantly harping on Benghazi. No one cared. No one payed any attention. Basically the attitude was: "This is BS. The government does BS. What else could you expect from them anyway? Nothing to see here, so let's move along."

    Yet they went on and on, like this was some kind of ... well anything anyone cared about.

    And to address another point, if anyone thinks there is some kind of groundswell out there to lower corporate taxes and that is a great campaign issue... well they live in a very peculiar kind of echo chamber.

    “The most you’d get from using it in a conversation is a puzzled look, and maybe a polite chuckle if you read your target right. Then they would shake their head with a WTF look, when the conversation is over.”

    I have no idea who you’re associating with, but the vast majority of white people that I know are angry. About half of the white democrats I know feel as though they have been double crossed by labor and are talking about Trump. Several of the businesses in my immediate area have voted their union out within the last year.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Sunbeam
    They may be angry about immigration.

    But do you think anyone is worked up because they heard the word "cuckservative" somewhere?
  16. @Priss Factor
    "A cuckservative thus conjures up one of the supreme nightmares of the white supremacist imagination, the fear that white men will assume a submissive role (or position) in the sexual hierarchy."

    Didn't Bill Maher say of Mitt Romney that, following his election loss, he looked like a white guy whose wife had been fuc*ed by a black guy?

    And who can forget the Newsweek cover with Obama as the victor over Old White Guys?

    http://www.theblaze.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/A7NFNZjCcAA9wiv1.jpg

    This is how Jews feel about white gentiles, but white boys in the GOP suck up to Jews and blacks.

    They should be shouting WE ARE ALL PALESTINIANS.

    “Didn’t Bill Maher say of Mitt Romney that, following his election loss, he looked like a white guy whose wife had been fuc*ed by a black guy?

    And who can forget the Newsweek cover with Obama as the victor over Old White Guys?”

    Bill Maher is a typical Jewish race baiter. If he said those things in public, he might get his ass kicked and have his own wife fucked by a hated white guy. What a dickhead. It’s a wonder we haven’t had pogroms already.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Lepanto
    Yah, but Obama really didn't 'victor' over the old white guys, so that cover was intended to get certain numbers. Don't you see that?
    , @Lepanto
    Pogroms? How about a civil war too? And even a race war? You will give the left just what it wants. How about unifying the country instead?
  17. “The Jewish left focuses their energies on pursuing strategies to make Western societies as user-friendly to Jews as possible — displacing previous White elites and overwhelming White societies with non-Whites to prevent any mass movement of Whites against Jews and to provide a counterbalance and eventual antidote to White political power.”

    It’s difficult to believe that it never occurs to them what a perilous activity this might be.

    Read More
  18. rod1963 says:

    Cuckservative is a apt label for those that are part of Conservatism Inc, it’s insulting and that’s good. The faux Conservatives need a nice insulting label attached to their slimy hides.

    The fact that some of the Conservative Inc, bloggers are whining like stuck hogs over the cuckservative label tells it gets to them. They know they aren’t Conservatives like that Lewis creep.

    Look these traitors deserve a nasty label. They took over the GOP, froze out populist and grass candidates, pretended to be Conservatives via clever propaganda and selective focus on certain hot button wedge issues while putting others in the memory hole. And then promoted policies that have been a disaster for country and people. From illegal immigration, bad trade treaties, off-shoring, in-shoring, getting us into illegal wars to name a few. None of these acts are Conservative, they were just actions that benefit some very wealthy and powerful people who fly under the Jolly Roger.

    But the cuckservative will always wrap himself in the flag and say his actions are patriotic and hence Conservative. They aren’t, they merely serve the .01% of the people at the top of food chain.

    You can see that with Rove, Boehner and McConnell who despise the Tea Party and traditional conservatives and work against them while supporting the same policies as Obama. Or presidential candidates like Jeb, Rubio, Walker, etc. All would welcome the U.S. being turned into a 3rd world pest hole as long as they get their payout.

    Cuckservative can also be applied to the various foundations and institutes like CATO and AEI or Brookings that support polices that are destructive to those of European ancestry, their culture and the economic health of the country. They certainly don’t have American interests at heart. You could also call them traitors, that would work to.

    Read More
  19. Marty says:
    @Sunbeam
    You guys.

    Look the number of people that look at any of these online political sites is a very small fraction of the population. I'd wager a guess that blizzard's forums for World of Warcraft draw more viewers than ALL of them put together. Maybe some media type somewhere cares, but most people don't.

    This word, cuckservative. It doesn't have legs. It appeals to the mind of only a certain type of person. Not that the average person would be offended by it, they just wouldn't care. At all. The most you'd get from using it in a conversation is a puzzled look, and maybe a polite chuckle if you read your target right. Then they would shake their head with a WTF look, when the conversation is over.

    It's kind of like when the talking head shows were full of people like Lindsay Graham constantly harping on Benghazi. No one cared. No one payed any attention. Basically the attitude was: "This is BS. The government does BS. What else could you expect from them anyway? Nothing to see here, so let's move along."

    Yet they went on and on, like this was some kind of ... well anything anyone cared about.

    And to address another point, if anyone thinks there is some kind of groundswell out there to lower corporate taxes and that is a great campaign issue... well they live in a very peculiar kind of echo chamber.

    My audience is GROWING!

    Read More
  20. Wally says:
    @Anonymous
    It's funny to me how some on the left are so hung up on the idea that the "cuck" portion of "cuckservative" references "white supremacist insecurity" vis-a-vis black male/white female relationships, whereas in reality it's mostly about Latin American mestizo immigration into the US. The whole "white racists are all just insecure about black men taking their women!" meme of the left seems pervasive enough that it pops up in such otherwise unrelated contexts.

    The whole thing is built upon the false notion that somehow the majority of white women just cannot resist the low IQ black primate. Most educated white women wouldn’t be caught dead with such vocabulary deprived morons. The entire matter is manufactured leftist clap-trap.

    Speaking of clap, maybe we should mention how more times blacks carry STD’s compared to whites.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth

    Most educated white women wouldn’t be caught dead with such vocabulary deprived morons.
     
    LMFAO! You getting a lot of pussy writing beautiful and romantic sonnets there, Lord Byron?
    , @Whytpryd
    I don't know what white women you are acquainted with, but the "majority" of them I have been acquainted with all my life look down at Blacks openly, or they pretend to be "worldly" and promote "acceptance and equality" but do not want they themselves to be anywhere near Black people.
  21. Sunbeam says:
    @Ozymandias
    "The most you’d get from using it in a conversation is a puzzled look, and maybe a polite chuckle if you read your target right. Then they would shake their head with a WTF look, when the conversation is over."

    I have no idea who you're associating with, but the vast majority of white people that I know are angry. About half of the white democrats I know feel as though they have been double crossed by labor and are talking about Trump. Several of the businesses in my immediate area have voted their union out within the last year.

    They may be angry about immigration.

    But do you think anyone is worked up because they heard the word “cuckservative” somewhere?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wyrd
    Given the amount of wailing and gnashing of teeth over the term cuckservative these past two weeks, it's highly effective and necessary. Cuckservative! It rolls right off the tongue.
  22. soren says:

    This word, cuckservative. It doesn’t have legs.

    Cuckservative was a fun and sly little insult made hilarious by the doofuses like Matt Lewis and Erick Erickson taking it too seriously… and then made silly by pro WN goofballs like Richard Spencer and Jared Taylor taking it too seriously.

    It’s an extremely apt and accurate label but it’s also too yucky and really no one comes out clean for it.

    And really the only two articles on this dust up worth reading are:

    http://www.returnofkings.com/68170/10-signs-you-might-be-a-cuckservative

    http://mitrailleuse.net/2015/07/30/whats-behind-the-cuckservative-phenomenon-a-reply-to-ace/

    Read More
  23. Good article and some good comments. One reader wrote, “beta-cons are the natural outgrowth of the greater phenomenon of white male defeat in sports and pop music.” That caught my eye, the part about sports anyway. I remember that years ago some Negro wrote an article, “White Men Can’t Jump.” Janet Maslin (in the New York Times yet) responded, “oh well, jumping isn’t everything.” And that brings to mind the great article by Fred Reed replying to Cornell West, published here, the one that ended, memorably, “Damn! that was some fine dust.”

    Read More
  24. Truth says:
    @Wally
    The whole thing is built upon the false notion that somehow the majority of white women just cannot resist the low IQ black primate. Most educated white women wouldn't be caught dead with such vocabulary deprived morons. The entire matter is manufactured leftist clap-trap.

    Speaking of clap, maybe we should mention how more times blacks carry STD's compared to whites.

    Most educated white women wouldn’t be caught dead with such vocabulary deprived morons.

    LMFAO! You getting a lot of pussy writing beautiful and romantic sonnets there, Lord Byron?

    Read More
  25. Wyrd says:
    @Sunbeam
    They may be angry about immigration.

    But do you think anyone is worked up because they heard the word "cuckservative" somewhere?

    Given the amount of wailing and gnashing of teeth over the term cuckservative these past two weeks, it’s highly effective and necessary. Cuckservative! It rolls right off the tongue.

    Read More
    • Replies: @tunglet
    This is the fourth round I read about the cuck insult just being a fad. '

    First round was when the cuck insult had been changed to include biological cuckoldry, and used as an insult against anti-whites of any kind on pol.

    Next it was when the cuck insult spread to the rest of the chan culture, and the third time was when it took the pro-white bloggers with storm, but then mutated to cuckservative as the selling narrative , rather than the swedecucks and britcucks of the two first times.

    What has happened each time so far, when a group is taught the cuck meme, is that enough people feel cucked enough, to immediately start using the cuck concept to understand the world around them, and since they feel it so enlightening, they start teaching it to others.
  26. Tom_R says:

    YOU ARE A CUCKSERVATIVE IF—
    YOU ARE A CHRISTIAN!

    Eric Ericson’s post above is funny because he is attacking his critics by calling them anti-Christian, meaning he is pro-Christian, which only proves that his critics are right to call him a cuckservative, because, Christianity is Cuckservative to the core. Here’s why.

    According to the Bible, Jesus (by the way, see jesusneverexisted.com) was a Jew and a son of God (or God himself?) and if the “believe” in him, they will go to heaven, be “saved”. According to the OT part of the Bible (which term includes Torah, Tanakh) Jews are children of Abraham and related to Moses. Abraham was a pimp who sold his wife to an Egyptian and therefore negro Pharaoh. Moses, a “Jew”, was so black, the Pharaoh raised him as one of his own grandson and never once doubted otherwise. Therefore Jesus (if he existed), a descendant of Avram, was probably black.

    It is therefore logical to conclude that white Christians believe that if they “believe” in this mythical black man who died on a Cross, they will go to heaven.

    No wonder they think it is okay to adopt black children.

    Thus Christianity is the root problem of many white Christian cuckservatives. It is better to get out of this African cult and instead adopt the religions of our ancestors, such as Odinism, Deism, etc.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Cagey Beast
    Save it for Stormfront dude. There's no shortage of Christians like me who are happy to see the cuckservatives named and called out for what they are.
    , @GW
    Jesus never existed yet he existed as a black man?

    What? I think you've just made everyone dumber with that gem.
  27. @Tom_R
    YOU ARE A CUCKSERVATIVE IF—
    YOU ARE A CHRISTIAN!

    Eric Ericson’s post above is funny because he is attacking his critics by calling them anti-Christian, meaning he is pro-Christian, which only proves that his critics are right to call him a cuckservative, because, Christianity is Cuckservative to the core. Here's why.

    According to the Bible, Jesus (by the way, see jesusneverexisted.com) was a Jew and a son of God (or God himself?) and if the “believe” in him, they will go to heaven, be “saved”. According to the OT part of the Bible (which term includes Torah, Tanakh) Jews are children of Abraham and related to Moses. Abraham was a pimp who sold his wife to an Egyptian and therefore negro Pharaoh. Moses, a “Jew”, was so black, the Pharaoh raised him as one of his own grandson and never once doubted otherwise. Therefore Jesus (if he existed), a descendant of Avram, was probably black.

    It is therefore logical to conclude that white Christians believe that if they “believe” in this mythical black man who died on a Cross, they will go to heaven.

    No wonder they think it is okay to adopt black children.

    Thus Christianity is the root problem of many white Christian cuckservatives. It is better to get out of this African cult and instead adopt the religions of our ancestors, such as Odinism, Deism, etc.

    Save it for Stormfront dude. There’s no shortage of Christians like me who are happy to see the cuckservatives named and called out for what they are.

    Read More
  28. GW says:

    The term is clever enough because many white conservatives and Republicans are unwittingly beholden to liberal paradigms regarding race and human behavior. I doubt it shames many mainstream conservatives into adopting a race-realist or nationalist perspective on race and immigration though. For one most mainstream conservatives in the media or in the body politic aren’t shrewd or insightful enough to recognize these liberal paradigms as liberal. (Hence you get the “liberals are the true racists” inanity). This type of thinking was demonstrated perfectly when Sean Hannity opined that his thinking on immigration/amnesty had “evolved.” This statement has since been mostly taken back, in large part to the backlash he received, but it perfectly encapsulates a situation where a conservative dunce unwittingly uses a lame liberal trope he’s heard and thinks sounds sensible. Liberals talk about societal mores and ethics “evolving” all the time as if this is good and natural; any conservative worth his salt knows how foolish this is.

    But the main problem is that most mainstream conservatives have fairly pure motives and see the term, if they understand its meaning, as a slur akin to “teabagger” or “racist.” You can’t really shame them, you have to reason with them.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Ozymandias
    "...you have to reason with them."

    That has to be one of the most naive statements I've ever heard here.
    , @rod1963
    How many of them are really "conservative". It has little to do with "race realism", that's just a dodge.

    I suspect many of are not "conservatives" but well off statists or "Gracchites" as Wilmot Robinson calls them. They sold out for their 2o pieces of silver and life is great for them and their ilk. These are the sort of "conservatives" who like Free Trade; globalization; they consider the deindustrialization of the U.S. as the price of doing business; who don't care one way or another if Americans lose their jobs because it's the price of progress and besides they're making bank and that's all that matters. They are the ones who Hannity and the business shows cater to.

    This is why they haven't noticed the economic devastation caused by NAFTA, PNTR with China. The systematic off-shoring of jobs to Asia, importing foreign workers to replace Americans by the millions. This shit has been going for 20+ years.

    Ditto for not noticing their towns and cities are looking like 3rd world places. Yet they aren't demanding secure borders or enforcing immigration laws or 3 strikes. Why? Because they live in upscale neighborhoods and cities where the prices freeze out wetbacks and blacks.

    In short if they're aren't worried and angry now at the state of affairs in this country, nothing is going to change them.
  29. GW says:
    @Tom_R
    YOU ARE A CUCKSERVATIVE IF—
    YOU ARE A CHRISTIAN!

    Eric Ericson’s post above is funny because he is attacking his critics by calling them anti-Christian, meaning he is pro-Christian, which only proves that his critics are right to call him a cuckservative, because, Christianity is Cuckservative to the core. Here's why.

    According to the Bible, Jesus (by the way, see jesusneverexisted.com) was a Jew and a son of God (or God himself?) and if the “believe” in him, they will go to heaven, be “saved”. According to the OT part of the Bible (which term includes Torah, Tanakh) Jews are children of Abraham and related to Moses. Abraham was a pimp who sold his wife to an Egyptian and therefore negro Pharaoh. Moses, a “Jew”, was so black, the Pharaoh raised him as one of his own grandson and never once doubted otherwise. Therefore Jesus (if he existed), a descendant of Avram, was probably black.

    It is therefore logical to conclude that white Christians believe that if they “believe” in this mythical black man who died on a Cross, they will go to heaven.

    No wonder they think it is okay to adopt black children.

    Thus Christianity is the root problem of many white Christian cuckservatives. It is better to get out of this African cult and instead adopt the religions of our ancestors, such as Odinism, Deism, etc.

    Jesus never existed yet he existed as a black man?

    What? I think you’ve just made everyone dumber with that gem.

    Read More
  30. Wyrd says:
    @Cagey Beast
    Save it for Stormfront dude. There's no shortage of Christians like me who are happy to see the cuckservatives named and called out for what they are.

    +1

    Read More
  31. tunglet says:
    @Wyrd
    Given the amount of wailing and gnashing of teeth over the term cuckservative these past two weeks, it's highly effective and necessary. Cuckservative! It rolls right off the tongue.

    This is the fourth round I read about the cuck insult just being a fad. ‘

    First round was when the cuck insult had been changed to include biological cuckoldry, and used as an insult against anti-whites of any kind on pol.

    Next it was when the cuck insult spread to the rest of the chan culture, and the third time was when it took the pro-white bloggers with storm, but then mutated to cuckservative as the selling narrative , rather than the swedecucks and britcucks of the two first times.

    What has happened each time so far, when a group is taught the cuck meme, is that enough people feel cucked enough, to immediately start using the cuck concept to understand the world around them, and since they feel it so enlightening, they start teaching it to others.

    Read More
  32. @GW
    The term is clever enough because many white conservatives and Republicans are unwittingly beholden to liberal paradigms regarding race and human behavior. I doubt it shames many mainstream conservatives into adopting a race-realist or nationalist perspective on race and immigration though. For one most mainstream conservatives in the media or in the body politic aren't shrewd or insightful enough to recognize these liberal paradigms as liberal. (Hence you get the "liberals are the true racists" inanity). This type of thinking was demonstrated perfectly when Sean Hannity opined that his thinking on immigration/amnesty had "evolved." This statement has since been mostly taken back, in large part to the backlash he received, but it perfectly encapsulates a situation where a conservative dunce unwittingly uses a lame liberal trope he's heard and thinks sounds sensible. Liberals talk about societal mores and ethics "evolving" all the time as if this is good and natural; any conservative worth his salt knows how foolish this is.

    But the main problem is that most mainstream conservatives have fairly pure motives and see the term, if they understand its meaning, as a slur akin to "teabagger" or "racist." You can't really shame them, you have to reason with them.

    “…you have to reason with them.”

    That has to be one of the most naive statements I’ve ever heard here.

    Read More
  33. Mr. Anon says:

    “Flower says:

    Americans and their labels. If we can’t waste time talking about it, we’ll waste time labeling it.”

    Labels are important. Words mean things. Thought is constrained by language. That is why the left spends so much time and effort defining the language of public discourse to prepare the ground for future political victories.

    The alt-right should stop taking lessons in the politics of the culture war from mainstream conservatives (i.e., the losers) and start taking to heart the lessons taught by the left (i.e., the winners).

    Read More
    • Replies: @Flower
    You're correct, labels are important. Without labels, we might actually have to think about it. Oh, the horror.
  34. pyrrhus says:

    Alexander Hart doesn’t get it either, and his reference to “internet trolls” is just plain stupid. #cuckservatives has nothing to do with trolling, it is a brilliant shorthand way of describing the mainstream GOP and its corporate supporters, happy to destroy our culture and civilization in return for being eaten last by the marxist crocodile…..

    Read More
  35. Svigor says:

    The alt-right should stop taking lessons in the politics of the culture war from mainstream conservatives (i.e., the losers) and start taking to heart the lessons taught by the left (i.e., the winners).

    Indeed. One of the hardest things to get through WN skulls is the idea that we should be fighting fire with fire, not proclaiming how we’re too good to sink to their level.

    Read More
  36. Flower says:
    @Mr. Anon
    "Flower says:

    Americans and their labels. If we can’t waste time talking about it, we’ll waste time labeling it."

    Labels are important. Words mean things. Thought is constrained by language. That is why the left spends so much time and effort defining the language of public discourse to prepare the ground for future political victories.

    The alt-right should stop taking lessons in the politics of the culture war from mainstream conservatives (i.e., the losers) and start taking to heart the lessons taught by the left (i.e., the winners).

    You’re correct, labels are important. Without labels, we might actually have to think about it. Oh, the horror.

    Read More
    • Replies: @rod1963
    The Left, MSM and the establishment Conservatives use labels to great effect, it's time we do the same to a gang of sell outs and traitors.

    And really what is there to think about? The fact that the GOP boss class along with the mega donors have been systematically selling out the white working and middle class for a long time. Not to mention betraying our cultural heritage and country.

    There is nothing conservative about them. Nothing.

    Just look at Boehner, McCain, Rubio, Walker, McConnell, the Bushes - nothing but self-serving POS's that are actively supporting policies that are destroying the country.

    The label cuckservative is a good one for these traitors and whores. They shit on us, it's time we do a little of our own on them and their apologists.
  37. Lepanto says:

    Mexicans and most Latin Americans are Christians, so if you really are worried about keeping America Christian, then they are not your problem here.

    When the Southern and Eastern Europeans came at the turn of the last century, the Anglo-Saxons then had the cogliones and brains to Americanize them. It seems to me that their descendents – the “whites”…the “conservatives” – are giving up the fight to the Left. Forget about illegals for a minute – most legal immigrants are ‘non-white’ and that ain’t going to change. They want to be Americans and by the third (if not second) their kids are Americans. Let them – help them. You will gain allies.

    Otherwise, you will be what your starting to sound like – loosers.

    Read More
  38. Lepanto says:
    @OilcanFloyd
    "Didn’t Bill Maher say of Mitt Romney that, following his election loss, he looked like a white guy whose wife had been fuc*ed by a black guy?

    And who can forget the Newsweek cover with Obama as the victor over Old White Guys?"

    Bill Maher is a typical Jewish race baiter. If he said those things in public, he might get his ass kicked and have his own wife fucked by a hated white guy. What a dickhead. It's a wonder we haven't had pogroms already.

    Yah, but Obama really didn’t ‘victor’ over the old white guys, so that cover was intended to get certain numbers. Don’t you see that?

    Read More
    • Replies: @OilcanFloyd
    "Yah, but Obama really didn’t ‘victor’ over the old white guys, so that cover was intended to get certain numbers. Don’t you see that?"

    My comment was about Bill Mahrer and the Jewish influence, not Obama. Obama won both elections because the Republicans refused to run anyone worth a damn. McCain probably was a traitor, given how easily he betrays the American public today, but mostly he's just a mediocre old fool. Romney wasn't much better. I wrote in my own name instead of voting for either one of those assholes.

    "Pogroms? How about a civil war too? And even a race war? You will give the left just what it wants. How about unifying the country instead?"

    What makes you think anyone wants to unify with "old America"? I don't see it. Besides, these people aren't assimilating, not in any real sense of the word. What's happening is that America changes a bit with each group that comes here, and we call the ugly result assimilation, when it's nothing of the sort. Why should I make peace with a much worse nation that is largely being forced on me at my own expense? Not much I can do about it, anyway.

    Besides, I was commenting on Jews like Mahrer who are nothing but toxic race baiters. Anti-semitism among white Americans should be a natural reaction to a people and culture that produces and promotes people like Bill Mahrer and the many others just like him. I wouldn't care if Jews were attacked in the streets for their efforts, but I'm not advocating that they should be. I'm just surprised that they aren't.
  39. Lepanto says:
    @OilcanFloyd
    "Didn’t Bill Maher say of Mitt Romney that, following his election loss, he looked like a white guy whose wife had been fuc*ed by a black guy?

    And who can forget the Newsweek cover with Obama as the victor over Old White Guys?"

    Bill Maher is a typical Jewish race baiter. If he said those things in public, he might get his ass kicked and have his own wife fucked by a hated white guy. What a dickhead. It's a wonder we haven't had pogroms already.

    Pogroms? How about a civil war too? And even a race war? You will give the left just what it wants. How about unifying the country instead?

    Read More
  40. rod1963 says:
    @Flower
    You're correct, labels are important. Without labels, we might actually have to think about it. Oh, the horror.

    The Left, MSM and the establishment Conservatives use labels to great effect, it’s time we do the same to a gang of sell outs and traitors.

    And really what is there to think about? The fact that the GOP boss class along with the mega donors have been systematically selling out the white working and middle class for a long time. Not to mention betraying our cultural heritage and country.

    There is nothing conservative about them. Nothing.

    Just look at Boehner, McCain, Rubio, Walker, McConnell, the Bushes – nothing but self-serving POS’s that are actively supporting policies that are destroying the country.

    The label cuckservative is a good one for these traitors and whores. They shit on us, it’s time we do a little of our own on them and their apologists.

    Read More
  41. rod1963 says:
    @GW
    The term is clever enough because many white conservatives and Republicans are unwittingly beholden to liberal paradigms regarding race and human behavior. I doubt it shames many mainstream conservatives into adopting a race-realist or nationalist perspective on race and immigration though. For one most mainstream conservatives in the media or in the body politic aren't shrewd or insightful enough to recognize these liberal paradigms as liberal. (Hence you get the "liberals are the true racists" inanity). This type of thinking was demonstrated perfectly when Sean Hannity opined that his thinking on immigration/amnesty had "evolved." This statement has since been mostly taken back, in large part to the backlash he received, but it perfectly encapsulates a situation where a conservative dunce unwittingly uses a lame liberal trope he's heard and thinks sounds sensible. Liberals talk about societal mores and ethics "evolving" all the time as if this is good and natural; any conservative worth his salt knows how foolish this is.

    But the main problem is that most mainstream conservatives have fairly pure motives and see the term, if they understand its meaning, as a slur akin to "teabagger" or "racist." You can't really shame them, you have to reason with them.

    How many of them are really “conservative”. It has little to do with “race realism”, that’s just a dodge.

    I suspect many of are not “conservatives” but well off statists or “Gracchites” as Wilmot Robinson calls them. They sold out for their 2o pieces of silver and life is great for them and their ilk. These are the sort of “conservatives” who like Free Trade; globalization; they consider the deindustrialization of the U.S. as the price of doing business; who don’t care one way or another if Americans lose their jobs because it’s the price of progress and besides they’re making bank and that’s all that matters. They are the ones who Hannity and the business shows cater to.

    This is why they haven’t noticed the economic devastation caused by NAFTA, PNTR with China. The systematic off-shoring of jobs to Asia, importing foreign workers to replace Americans by the millions. This shit has been going for 20+ years.

    Ditto for not noticing their towns and cities are looking like 3rd world places. Yet they aren’t demanding secure borders or enforcing immigration laws or 3 strikes. Why? Because they live in upscale neighborhoods and cities where the prices freeze out wetbacks and blacks.

    In short if they’re aren’t worried and angry now at the state of affairs in this country, nothing is going to change them.

    Read More
  42. @Lepanto
    Yah, but Obama really didn't 'victor' over the old white guys, so that cover was intended to get certain numbers. Don't you see that?

    “Yah, but Obama really didn’t ‘victor’ over the old white guys, so that cover was intended to get certain numbers. Don’t you see that?”

    My comment was about Bill Mahrer and the Jewish influence, not Obama. Obama won both elections because the Republicans refused to run anyone worth a damn. McCain probably was a traitor, given how easily he betrays the American public today, but mostly he’s just a mediocre old fool. Romney wasn’t much better. I wrote in my own name instead of voting for either one of those assholes.

    “Pogroms? How about a civil war too? And even a race war? You will give the left just what it wants. How about unifying the country instead?”

    What makes you think anyone wants to unify with “old America”? I don’t see it. Besides, these people aren’t assimilating, not in any real sense of the word. What’s happening is that America changes a bit with each group that comes here, and we call the ugly result assimilation, when it’s nothing of the sort. Why should I make peace with a much worse nation that is largely being forced on me at my own expense? Not much I can do about it, anyway.

    Besides, I was commenting on Jews like Mahrer who are nothing but toxic race baiters. Anti-semitism among white Americans should be a natural reaction to a people and culture that produces and promotes people like Bill Mahrer and the many others just like him. I wouldn’t care if Jews were attacked in the streets for their efforts, but I’m not advocating that they should be. I’m just surprised that they aren’t.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Seamus Padraig

    What makes you think anyone wants to unify with “old America”? I don’t see it. Besides, these people aren’t assimilating, not in any real sense of the word. What’s happening is that America changes a bit with each group that comes here, and we call the ugly result assimilation, when it’s nothing of the sort.
     
    True. The old culture is no more, so what's left? Multi-culturalism? But immigrants can't assimilate to multi-culturism; immigrants can only assimilate to a particular culture. Since the old culture is now gone, the age of assimilation (such as it was) is now over. The only ones being assimilated in today's America are the cuckservative blowhards, who are being gradually conditioned to reject and disavow their own European/Occidental heritage in exchange for... a mess pottage.
  43. Anymouse says:

    “It’s a wonder we haven’t had pogroms already.”

    Your sentence structure gives you away. Try harder.

    Read More
    • Replies: @OilcanFloyd
    "Your sentence structure gives you away. Try harder."

    Your point? Is there something I should clarify for you?
  44. @OilcanFloyd
    "Yah, but Obama really didn’t ‘victor’ over the old white guys, so that cover was intended to get certain numbers. Don’t you see that?"

    My comment was about Bill Mahrer and the Jewish influence, not Obama. Obama won both elections because the Republicans refused to run anyone worth a damn. McCain probably was a traitor, given how easily he betrays the American public today, but mostly he's just a mediocre old fool. Romney wasn't much better. I wrote in my own name instead of voting for either one of those assholes.

    "Pogroms? How about a civil war too? And even a race war? You will give the left just what it wants. How about unifying the country instead?"

    What makes you think anyone wants to unify with "old America"? I don't see it. Besides, these people aren't assimilating, not in any real sense of the word. What's happening is that America changes a bit with each group that comes here, and we call the ugly result assimilation, when it's nothing of the sort. Why should I make peace with a much worse nation that is largely being forced on me at my own expense? Not much I can do about it, anyway.

    Besides, I was commenting on Jews like Mahrer who are nothing but toxic race baiters. Anti-semitism among white Americans should be a natural reaction to a people and culture that produces and promotes people like Bill Mahrer and the many others just like him. I wouldn't care if Jews were attacked in the streets for their efforts, but I'm not advocating that they should be. I'm just surprised that they aren't.

    What makes you think anyone wants to unify with “old America”? I don’t see it. Besides, these people aren’t assimilating, not in any real sense of the word. What’s happening is that America changes a bit with each group that comes here, and we call the ugly result assimilation, when it’s nothing of the sort.

    True. The old culture is no more, so what’s left? Multi-culturalism? But immigrants can’t assimilate to multi-culturism; immigrants can only assimilate to a particular culture. Since the old culture is now gone, the age of assimilation (such as it was) is now over. The only ones being assimilated in today’s America are the cuckservative blowhards, who are being gradually conditioned to reject and disavow their own European/Occidental heritage in exchange for… a mess pottage.

    Read More
  45. @Anymouse
    "It’s a wonder we haven’t had pogroms already."

    Your sentence structure gives you away. Try harder.

    “Your sentence structure gives you away. Try harder.”

    Your point? Is there something I should clarify for you?

    Read More
  46. IA says:
    @Anonymous
    It's funny to me how some on the left are so hung up on the idea that the "cuck" portion of "cuckservative" references "white supremacist insecurity" vis-a-vis black male/white female relationships, whereas in reality it's mostly about Latin American mestizo immigration into the US. The whole "white racists are all just insecure about black men taking their women!" meme of the left seems pervasive enough that it pops up in such otherwise unrelated contexts.

    ‘The whole “white racists are all just insecure about black men taking their women!” meme of the left seems pervasive enough that it pops up in such otherwise unrelated contexts.’

    Probably springs from deeply buried anxiety starting in the 60s, I reckon. Normal men should never back down when threatened with violence by another, especially, weaker group. When you do this the threatening group can quite rightly conclude that your group is cowardly. Boys used to learn this very early on in playground fights. It establishes a pecking order and maintains stability within the group. Instead of standing up to black violence beginning in the 60s white men caved, again and again. Blacks, and now many other non-whites, learned a lesson, i.e., if you threaten YT he will cave.

    This general feeling of anxiety probably exacerbates sexual liberation uncertainties also developed since the 60s.

    Read More
    • Replies: @OilcanFloyd
    Whites cave in to other whites. I don't think anyone takes black power or mystique seriously. Even most of the black superman athletes are roided to the gills, and black entertainment is mostly forced.
  47. @IA
    'The whole “white racists are all just insecure about black men taking their women!” meme of the left seems pervasive enough that it pops up in such otherwise unrelated contexts.'

    Probably springs from deeply buried anxiety starting in the 60s, I reckon. Normal men should never back down when threatened with violence by another, especially, weaker group. When you do this the threatening group can quite rightly conclude that your group is cowardly. Boys used to learn this very early on in playground fights. It establishes a pecking order and maintains stability within the group. Instead of standing up to black violence beginning in the 60s white men caved, again and again. Blacks, and now many other non-whites, learned a lesson, i.e., if you threaten YT he will cave.

    This general feeling of anxiety probably exacerbates sexual liberation uncertainties also developed since the 60s.

    Whites cave in to other whites. I don’t think anyone takes black power or mystique seriously. Even most of the black superman athletes are roided to the gills, and black entertainment is mostly forced.

    Read More
  48. @Flower
    Americans and their labels. If we can't waste time talking about it, we'll waste time labeling it. I suppose that's why the most prevalent label in the grocery store is "New and Improved", which, in the political world, comes out "Cuckservative".

    Now we just make up shite. Here's some more for next week, when this crop of labels starts to grow stale.
    BlowMeLibber, CucksuckingRadical, DontStickItInTooFarervative, TheOtherGuysLieism, JustGimmeTheFarkingMoneyAlreadyeratrive, LeftyDipShiteerism, MightyTightyRightyism, HumptyDumptyProgresive, BugsBunnyBlatherism.

    I don’t mind calling names, but I prefer labeling these politicians by their actions, which would make them traitors, butchers, thieves or corrupt politicians. If I want to get cute, maybe something like subservatives, disservatives, commiecons, comicons or progservtives, but calling them exactly what they are makes more sense to me.

    Read More
  49. IA says:

    ” I don’t think anyone takes black power or mystique seriously.”

    no, but they sure take being labelled as a “racist” seriously.

    Before the 60s whites didn’t think much about blacks at all. The very fact that we’re forever preoccupied with their problems/demands means Negroes won and are winning.

    Whites caving to other whites is part of group pecking order. The point is whoever caves loses face. Blacks lump all whites into the same group. So, when the money, quotas, affirmative action, disparate impact lawsuits started rolling in after the riots blacks gained, middle class whites lost. Middle class whites at first thought they were doing Negroes a big favor and they would be thanked at some point. Big mistake. The demands are getting uglier.

    Status-marking Eloi whites cannot bring themselves to admit all this because that would make them crackers, haters bigots, racists, etc. But, sooner or later the consequences are going to become too obvious to ignore. Maybe they don’t care and are willing to tolerate high crime, disease, and corruption rates and bad schools. But, if you look at gentrifying areas, say Washinton, DC, feminized whites really don’t like Negroes at all (and vice versa).

    Read More
    • Replies: @MarkinLA
    The problem with dealing with blacks is having the government force you to do things you don't want or prosecute you when you don't toe their line. The best solution is to avoid having them around.
  50. Whytpryd says:
    @Wally
    The whole thing is built upon the false notion that somehow the majority of white women just cannot resist the low IQ black primate. Most educated white women wouldn't be caught dead with such vocabulary deprived morons. The entire matter is manufactured leftist clap-trap.

    Speaking of clap, maybe we should mention how more times blacks carry STD's compared to whites.

    I don’t know what white women you are acquainted with, but the “majority” of them I have been acquainted with all my life look down at Blacks openly, or they pretend to be “worldly” and promote “acceptance and equality” but do not want they themselves to be anywhere near Black people.

    Read More
  51. MarkinLA says:
    @IA
    " I don’t think anyone takes black power or mystique seriously."

    no, but they sure take being labelled as a "racist" seriously.

    Before the 60s whites didn't think much about blacks at all. The very fact that we're forever preoccupied with their problems/demands means Negroes won and are winning.

    Whites caving to other whites is part of group pecking order. The point is whoever caves loses face. Blacks lump all whites into the same group. So, when the money, quotas, affirmative action, disparate impact lawsuits started rolling in after the riots blacks gained, middle class whites lost. Middle class whites at first thought they were doing Negroes a big favor and they would be thanked at some point. Big mistake. The demands are getting uglier.

    Status-marking Eloi whites cannot bring themselves to admit all this because that would make them crackers, haters bigots, racists, etc. But, sooner or later the consequences are going to become too obvious to ignore. Maybe they don't care and are willing to tolerate high crime, disease, and corruption rates and bad schools. But, if you look at gentrifying areas, say Washinton, DC, feminized whites really don't like Negroes at all (and vice versa).

    The problem with dealing with blacks is having the government force you to do things you don’t want or prosecute you when you don’t toe their line. The best solution is to avoid having them around.

    Read More
    • Replies: @IA
    College-educated (brainwashed) whites need to experience, daily, the grinding idiocy of "diversity." Even then, they pretend to "care" because of the fear of loss of status in appearing "redneck." However, behind all the anti-white rhetoric they are learning race realism. Millions of gentrifying feminized whites carefully programmed by academia and pop culture their whole lives are very much worried about Negroes - especially crime and schools. They want the public housing projects out of their neighborhoods. There is zero difference between them and Darren Wilson or George Zimmerman. Content is the same but the form is different.
  52. As far as cuckold fantasies go, that’s basically a liberal left thing – it’s left liberal males who are sexually insecure about their wives sleeping with more dominate males, which is why they never admit to being uncomfortable about it, or experiencing ego-dystonic sexual arousal at the idea of watching black guys having sex with white women.

    There’s probably a bit of truth to the old-leftist claim that a minority of small C conservatives are closet masochists and autogynephiliacs, but the new left can’t make fun of repressed moderate conservatives for having unusual or submissive sexual fantasies since the mainstream left is now pushing trans rights and considers BDSM and swinging socially acceptable activities.

    Read More
  53. IA says:
    @MarkinLA
    The problem with dealing with blacks is having the government force you to do things you don't want or prosecute you when you don't toe their line. The best solution is to avoid having them around.

    College-educated (brainwashed) whites need to experience, daily, the grinding idiocy of “diversity.” Even then, they pretend to “care” because of the fear of loss of status in appearing “redneck.” However, behind all the anti-white rhetoric they are learning race realism. Millions of gentrifying feminized whites carefully programmed by academia and pop culture their whole lives are very much worried about Negroes – especially crime and schools. They want the public housing projects out of their neighborhoods. There is zero difference between them and Darren Wilson or George Zimmerman. Content is the same but the form is different.

    Read More
  54. Jay says:
    @Kyle McKenna
    "Conservatism Inc." gave us Bush & Cheney, McCain, Palin and Romney (and hence Obama, twice); and soon will deliver the presidency to Hillary.

    Meanwhile the nation is fast-approaching third-world status, and these losers fight over how best to accelerate the process.

    The sooner "Conservatism Inc." expires, the better.

    The Cloward-Piven strategy may just be the way forward. Were civilization to falter sufficiently, it would be white male conservatives who would pick up the pieces and rebuild.

    Read More
  55. tunglet says:

    I think this post on the fear of being shunned and the cuck meme is very good.

    “Understand this. The enemy will not stop until we have made this tactic (Shaming people for being racist) irrelevant. You rightly fear the notions that you are not good citizens. You fear for your job, for your home, for the approval of your friends. You fear these things more than you fear physical pain and death. And the other side uses this fear to destroy you, to take your earnings away, to take your home, to turn your friends against you, to turn all of society against you.

    You cannot mollify them by giving in to them, by adhering to their rules for Political Correctness. They will simply continue to move the bar higher and higher until eventually you simply cannot reach it.

    http://thedeclination.com/fear-is-the-mind-killer/

    Read More
  56. guest says:

    For a people apparently obsessed with sex, we’re oddly reductive about it. They can’t even talk about actual cuckolds. No, they only understand the term in the context of pornography. Sex to them isn’t something out of which a family grows; it’s masturbation.

    Read More
  57. NickG says:
    @Anonymous
    It's funny to me how some on the left are so hung up on the idea that the "cuck" portion of "cuckservative" references "white supremacist insecurity" vis-a-vis black male/white female relationships, whereas in reality it's mostly about Latin American mestizo immigration into the US. The whole "white racists are all just insecure about black men taking their women!" meme of the left seems pervasive enough that it pops up in such otherwise unrelated contexts.

    It’s funny to me how some on the left are so hung up on the idea that the “cuck” portion of “cuckservative” references “white supremacist insecurity” vis-a-vis black male/white female relationships, whereas in reality it’s mostly about Latin American mestizo immigration into the US.

    Yup, and the parsimonious explanation here, is projection.

    Read More
Current Commenter says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS
PastClassics
Are elite university admissions based on meritocracy and diversity as claimed?
A simple remedy for income stagnation
Confederate Flag Day, State Capitol, Raleigh, N.C. -- March 3, 2007
The major media overlooked Communist spies and Madoff’s fraud. What are they missing today?
The evidence is clear — but often ignored