The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Tobias Langdon Archive
Fifteen Years for Reading This
Authoritarianism, Immigration and Obeying the Tribe
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New Reply
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks
Amber Rudd
Amber Rudd

Amber Rudd. It sounds like the name of a fish, a variety of apple or a herbal medicine. In fact, it’s the name of a shabbosshiksa, that is, a non-Jewish female who, like Hillary Clinton and Theresa May, is dedicated to serving Jewish interests. Here is the shabbos-shiksa in action:

Amber Rudd: viewers of online terrorist material face 15 years in jail

People who repeatedly view terrorist content online could face up to 15 years behind bars in a move designed to tighten the laws tackling radicalisation the home secretary, Amber Rudd, is to announce on Tuesday. A new maximum penalty of 15 years’ imprisonment will also apply to terrorists who publish information about members of the armed forces, police and intelligence services for the purposes of preparing acts of terrorism.

The tightening of the law around viewing terrorist material is part of a review of the government’s counter-terrorism strategy following the increasing frequency of terrorist attacks in Britain this year “I want to make sure those who view despicable terrorist content online, including jihadi websites, far-right propaganda and bomb-making instructions, face the full force of the law,” said Rudd. (Amber Rudd: viewers of online terrorist material face 15 years in jail, The Guardian, 3rd October 2017)

Amber Rudd promises crackdown on antisemitism and online extremism

Amber Rudd has outlined her intention to clamp down on violent and non-violent extremism, including antisemitism and neo-Nazism. The Home Secretary also told the Conservative Party conference in Manchester that social media companies must “act now, honour your moral obligations” to use new technology to stop radical material appearing on their platforms.

Ms Rudd said: “Violent and non-violent extremism in all its forms — antisemitism, neo-Nazism, Islamophobia, intolerance of women’s rights — these, and others, cannot be permitted to fester. Our values are far, far better than this. And we owe it to ourselves to root this hatred out wherever it emerges. The safer Britain I want to help build as Home Secretary is a united one.” (Amber Rudd promises crackdown on antisemitism and online extremism, The Jewish Chronicle, 3rd October 2017 / 13th Tishri 5778)

If Amber Rudd is so concerned about building a “safer Britain,” why does she permit mass immigration from the Third World? For the past fifty years and more, Britain’s liberal elite has imported non-Whites with high tendencies to crime and low tendencies to civilization. The results have included suicide bombing, rape-gangs, honour killings, female genital mutilation, inbreeding and exotic diseases. In truth, Amber Rudd doesn’t want a safer Britain: she wants a more authoritarian Britain. She’s a shabbos-shiksa, after all. She follows a Jewish strategy of importing non-White pathologies in order to justify laws against “extremism.”

Realism is extremism

You’re reading “extremism” right now. The Occidental Observer is an “extremist” website. In other words, it is a realistic website: it details in calm, rational and thoroughly sourced fashion the numerous ways in which, to paraphrase the late great Father Feeney, “the Jewish race constitutes a united anti-White bloc within White society, and is working for the overthrow of that society by every means at its disposal.” I don’t think that, at the moment, anyone would receive “15 years’ imprisonment” for reading the Occidental Observer, but Amber Rudd and her controllers certainly want to frighten people away from politically heterodox sites. And jail time for reading an article like this is certainly what Jewish activists like Moshe Kantor and Jeremy Newmark would like to see. They don’t want any discussion of Jewish power, because power that can’t be discussed is also power that can’t be challenged.

Shabbos-shiksa Theresa May
Shabbos-shiksa Theresa May

Free speech isn’t a Jewish value. Censorship, on the other hand, is definitely a Jewish value. So is self-worship. That’s why the Jewish community never tires of sycophancy from the politicians whom it funds and supplies with friendly coverage in the media. Here is the shabbos-shiksa Theresa May doing the goy-grovel:

‘Jewish values will prevail,’ Theresa May tells Rosh Hashanah reception

Theresa May welcomed dozens of Jewish community leaders, volunteers and religious figures to Downing Street today for what was thought to be the first ever Rosh Hashanah reception held at Number 10. The Prime Minister said she wanted to thank British Jews, and show her “personal support and appreciation for everything that you contribute to our country”.

She told guests: “Here today, we have people from all parts of our Jewish community and all parts of our society — from business to the arts, from politics to our public services. We also have some of our country’s greatest philanthropists, leading charities and some of our most outstanding volunteers.” …

Ahead of next week’s announcement on the winning design for the national memorial to the Holocaust, Mrs May said: “Whichever design team is chosen, this national memorial and educational centre will stand next to our Parliament as a permanent reminder of what can happen when a civilised, democratic society allows hatred to go unchecked. It will say to the world: we will never forget. And it will bring our country together in a national mission to fight hatred for generations to come.”

She urged British Jews to mark Rosh Hashanah with “confidence that together we will keep Jewish people in our country safe and defeat the scourge of antisemitism. And confidence that it is the values that we share — Jewish values, British values — that will in the end prevail. Let me wish you and all your families a sweet New Year.” … (‘Jewish values will prevail,’ Theresa May tells Rosh Hashanah reception, The Jewish Chronicle, 13th September 2017 / 22nd Elul 5777)

I have long suspected that Theresa May has Jewish ancestry. Either way, that article reads like something issued by the Ministry of Truth in Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four. It is full of double-think and contradictions. When May grovelled about Jews being some of “our country’s greatest philanthropists,” she was using the term “philanthropist” in a special sense. To her audience of “Jewish community leaders, volunteers and religious figures,” philanthropy means “helping Jews.” As a Jewish commentator on the Talmud says: “… helping a single individual is equivalent to sustaining an entire world. (This is one of the best-known passages in the Talmud, though it is often universalized to refer to ‘a human soul,’ rather than nefesh echat mi’Yisrael, ‘a single soul from Israel.’)”

Don’t wait for hate

May also claimed that Jewish values are British values. If that were true, Israel would have open borders and Jewish politicians would make grovelling speeches to Christians, smarmily insisting that “Christian values are Israeli values.” But Israel has sealed borders and politicians like Benjamin Netanyahu do not grovel to Christians or any other goyim. Instead, they keep goyim firmly in second place. Jewish values are unashamedly supremacist and designed to preserve and extend Jewish power. And just as May’s use of “philanthropist” has a special Jewish sense, so does her use of “hatred.” It doesn’t mean expressing hatred towards Jews, but expressing views that Jews hate.

Jewish values: Rejecting enrichment
Jewish values: Rejecting enrichment

That’s why the high-flying Irish journalist Kevin Myers lost his job for pointing out, first, that the two highest-paid women at the BBC were both Jewish and, second, that “Jews are not generally noted for their insistence on selling their talent for the lowest possible price.” Myers is a dedicated philosemite and his comments were entirely factual, but that made no difference. He had drawn attention to Jewish power and broken a strict taboo. Mark Gardner, the “communications director” at the Community Security Trust, gloated that “Myers’s squalid example of blatant antisemitic language was swiftly dealt with.”

The “Jewy perviness of Harvey Weinstein”

With Myers and many other victims of the Jewish Inquisition in mind, no mainstream goy would now dare to draw heretical conclusions from the Harvey Weinstein scandal now in the headlines. Weinstein’s abusive behaviour is yet another example of how minority dominance is bad for the White majority — recall how minorities in the Soviet Union tyrannized and slaughtered Russian and Ukrainian Whites. But only a Jewish journalist could have written about “The Specifically Jewy Perviness of Harvey Weinstein” and claimed that the “disgraced film producer is a character straight out of Philip Roth, playing out his revenge fantasies on the Goyim.”

It goes without saying that nearly every one of these women—Rose McGowan, Ambra Batillana, Laura Madden, Ashley Judd, etc.—was a Gentile, all the better to feed Weinstein’s revenge-tinged fantasy of having risen above his outer-borough, bridge-and-tunnel Semitic origins.

Jewish power: Harvey Weinstein with shabbos-shiksa
Jewish power: Harvey Weinstein with shabbos-shiksa

The article, written by Mark Oppenheimer, indirectly raises some very interesting questions about the consequences of Jewish power. For example, why do Jews like Roth and Weinstein feel “vengeful” towards Whites when they are part of the richest and most successful ethnic group in America? If it’s because Jews nurse historical grudges against Whites, how else is their vengefulness manifesting itself? On one reading, Weinstein is a blatant hypocrite for supporting Hillary Clinton and the Democrat Party at the same time as he was molesting shiksas all over the world for decades. On another and more accurate reading, Weinstein’s crimes are entirely consistent with his politics. Liberal elitists like Weinstein and Clinton want power and wealth for themselves, not improved lives for ordinary women.

Divide and Rule

That’s why liberal elitists like Weinstein and Clinton are so strongly in favour of mass immigration from the Third World. Immigration atomizes Western societies and introduces pathologies that justify authoritarian laws and the surveillance state. And authoritarian liberalism is what the Lebanese writer Nassim Taleb would call anti-fragile: the worse it works, the stronger it gets. After 9/11 demonstrated the incompetence of the surveillance state and the clear danger of mass immigration by Muslims, guess what? The NSA’s budget and Muslim immigration both increased. After mass killings by Muslim fanatics in Manchester and London, guess what? The British government has a further excuse to censor “far-right propaganda” that protests against the Muslim colonization of Britain.

But Amber Rudd, the shabbos-shiksa who announced more censorship, wasn’t entirely lying when she made this claim: “The safer Britain I want to help build as Home Secretary is a united one.” She doesn’t want more safety, but she does want more unity. She wants Britain united in obedience to the Tribe. Traitors like Rudd serve Jewish interests and want everyone else to do the same. Ordinary Whites are expected to serve Jewish interests by becoming a dispossessed minority in their own nations.

My response is simple: Non serviam — “I will not serve.” Thanks to sites like the Occidental Observer, more and more Whites are saying the same.

(Republished from The Occidental Observer by permission of author or representative)
 
Hide 80 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
    []
  1. Ron Unz says:

    All earlier comments were lost in Monday’s server crash. My sincerest apologies.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jake
    Was Monday's crash perhaps caused by advocates of Free Speech But Not For Thee?
    , @lavoisier
    Cannot in any universe accuse Ron Unz of censorship.

    The man has risked a great deal by putting up this incredibly informative site.

    I have nothing but admiration for the man and could care less that he is Jewish.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
    AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
    These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
    Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
    Sharing Comment via Twitter
    /article/fifteen-years-for-reading-this/#comment-2058345
    More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  2. Tom Welsh says:

    The concept of “better values” is an intriguing one. Values are generally understood to be matters of opinion and personal choice; they are opposed to facts, which remain the same however anyone might feel about them.

    Now “goodness” and “badness” are themselves values. It makes no sense to say that something is “good” or “bad”, except in the opinion of some person or group of people.

    So to talk about “good values” or “better values” is to confuse facts and values inextricably. Even if one accepts the validity of such expressions, they can still be considered “good” or “better” only subjectively – from some person’s point of view.

    To lay down any set of values for a whole community, and presumably to punish anyone who chooses different values, is the essence of tyranny.

    Incidentally, it is amazing how often politicians nowadays prate about values, without ever once venturing to declare what exactly those values are. No doubt this is because any specific set of values would constitute far too stable a target for criticism. It would hardly do for Amber Rudd to declare that her values include (for instance) freedom of speech, when she has come out against it; or equal treatment of all people, when – as the article demonstrates – she is in favour of better treatment for Jews.

    Read More
    • Replies: @helena
    The Narrative is about Universal Values. Values elevated to the status of 'right' and 'natural' as in Human Rights - not social or civic but Human to mirror the terms Human Nature and Human Race.

    There seems also to be a general agreement amongst public mediators that facts are material things rather than known things, so evidence is called fact instead of evidence. And a stats model is a fact simply because it exists as a thing, in the same way that an elephant is a fact because we can all see that it exists.

    The Left is good at word games.
    , @AaronB
    Surely, however, there are some universal values.

    Jews promote 'values' and the alt-right promotes 'realism' - do you think realism can defeat values?

    When I look to Steve Sailer for inspiration, I find cold realism, and frank selfishness. I find irony, and cynicism.

    What do Jews offer that is more appealing, and that has allowed them
    so much success?

    Until the alt-right figures this out, they have no chance.

    What is astonishing is the amount of attention the alt-right pays to Jews, without undersranding the source of their success.

    A sensitive, intelligent, young white man, looking for inspiration - can he find it in irony and cynicism? In frank selfishness?

    That is the vision white culture offers.

    Jews may cheat, lie, and pursue selfishness - but that is not the vision they offer themselves or others.

    Even Jewish tribal selfishness, frankly expressed in the Talmud, is not presented as mere tribal self seeking, as Steve Sailer might, or Vox Day, with an ironic smile at the realities of life.

    No, Jews are chosen, favored of God, and their selfishness is in line with the eternal Tao, and represents Goodness.

    The contribution of white culture is the critical spirit - but criticism tears down, does not build up. You cannot live on criticism.

    As we see with the alt-right, despite its attempt to return to religion, all white cultural movements are realistic and critical.

    Yet without an ideal you can't live.

    Jews offer an ideal. Steve Sailer offers irony.

    Jews use criticism as a tactic, whites have adopted it as a metaphysic.

    This is why whites excel at science, but also why whites lose to Jews.

    Perhaps whites are incapable of creating an ideal, and will always attempt to live by cynical realism? If so, then whites will always lose to people who are capable of creating an ideal, whether Jew, Muslim, or Chinese.

    And yet even now, when trying to free themselves, whites false back on realism and cynicism.
    , @Bill

    To lay down any set of values for a whole community, and presumably to punish anyone who chooses different values, is the essence of tyranny.
     
    That's gibberish. Should it be punishment-worthy to kill people who post on unz.com under the name "Tom Welsh?" You can't have a group of people living together without laying down a set of values for the community and enforcing them.
    , @ussr andy

    It makes no sense to say that something is “good” or “bad”, except in the opinion of some person or group of people.
     
    would that there were ways to tell if an opinion comports with reality and/or is held for good reasons.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  3. wayfarer says:

    How the British Welfare System Favors Muslims

    Blaming White People for Multi-Cultural Failures

    Read More
    • Replies: @anarchyst
    The state of Michigan welfare system also favors moslems. Moslems are allowed to have four "wives" on the dole...one "formal" wife and three "relatives"...
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  4. helena says:
    @Tom Welsh
    The concept of "better values" is an intriguing one. Values are generally understood to be matters of opinion and personal choice; they are opposed to facts, which remain the same however anyone might feel about them.

    Now "goodness" and "badness" are themselves values. It makes no sense to say that something is "good" or "bad", except in the opinion of some person or group of people.

    So to talk about "good values" or "better values" is to confuse facts and values inextricably. Even if one accepts the validity of such expressions, they can still be considered "good" or "better" only subjectively - from some person's point of view.

    To lay down any set of values for a whole community, and presumably to punish anyone who chooses different values, is the essence of tyranny.

    Incidentally, it is amazing how often politicians nowadays prate about values, without ever once venturing to declare what exactly those values are. No doubt this is because any specific set of values would constitute far too stable a target for criticism. It would hardly do for Amber Rudd to declare that her values include (for instance) freedom of speech, when she has come out against it; or equal treatment of all people, when - as the article demonstrates - she is in favour of better treatment for Jews.

    The Narrative is about Universal Values. Values elevated to the status of ‘right’ and ‘natural’ as in Human Rights – not social or civic but Human to mirror the terms Human Nature and Human Race.

    There seems also to be a general agreement amongst public mediators that facts are material things rather than known things, so evidence is called fact instead of evidence. And a stats model is a fact simply because it exists as a thing, in the same way that an elephant is a fact because we can all see that it exists.

    The Left is good at word games.

    Read More
    • Replies: @NoseytheDuke
    You have no chance if you persist in perpetuating this Left/Right nonsense, can't you see that it is a pincer movement coming from both sides? In Britain, Amber Rudd is considered truly Hard Right, just like John McCain & Co is in the US. Sheesh!
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  5. WhiteWolf says:

    This from the wikipedia entry for Orwells 1984 pretty much sums up the situation in Britain or more accurately Airstrip One. The US could probably be Airstrip Two.

    Nineteen Eighty-Four, often published as 1984, is a dystopian novel published in 1949 by English author George Orwell.[2][3] The novel is set in Airstrip One, formerly Great Britain, a province of the superstate Oceania. Oceania is a world of perpetual war, omnipresent government surveillance and public manipulation.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  6. @helena
    The Narrative is about Universal Values. Values elevated to the status of 'right' and 'natural' as in Human Rights - not social or civic but Human to mirror the terms Human Nature and Human Race.

    There seems also to be a general agreement amongst public mediators that facts are material things rather than known things, so evidence is called fact instead of evidence. And a stats model is a fact simply because it exists as a thing, in the same way that an elephant is a fact because we can all see that it exists.

    The Left is good at word games.

    You have no chance if you persist in perpetuating this Left/Right nonsense, can’t you see that it is a pincer movement coming from both sides? In Britain, Amber Rudd is considered truly Hard Right, just like John McCain & Co is in the US. Sheesh!

    Read More
    • Replies: @helena
    Well it is difficult getting labels accurate. I do understand the pincer movement in as much as globalists want free movement and so do international socialists but for actually exact opposite reasons - exploitation on the one hand humanitarianism on the other. Although humanitarians probably think that everyone having free healthcare and transport and little else is better than having social classes. But surely the situation that has come about, certainly in Europe, is that left wing voices succeeded in getting all the microaggression stuff moved out of party politics and into 'values' 'who we are' and quite quickly every political party fell in with it for fear of ism accusations, because, ww2. Cameron brought in gay marriage. Don't you know that all uk politicians are now socially liberal apart from some practicing Christians and ukippers. The UK political sphere looks at Christianity and guns in usa and shakes its head. I think maybe, long shot, some Americans could escape this, secede or something. Anyway, thanks for sharing.
    , @Sane Left Libertarian
    Yes, there are some who insist on labeling anyone/anything they don't like as "the left". Ms. Rudd is an operative of the conservative party, and proudly identifies herself that way. I am sure she would tell you that she is conservative because she feels that "there are too many laws", and yet here she is trying to impose prison sentences for reading the internet. Similar to the "conservative" lawmakers in the US who continue to outlaw, or attempt to outlaw, reproductive rights, birth control, pot, "food containing human fetuses" (not kidding), solar power, and on and on. Meanwhile the sjw want to outlaw statues of white men, threatening looks, "hate speech", peaceful assembly by people they don't like, etc.

    It's the owning class and their employees, the ruling class, against the rest of us. They're able to convince enough of the hoi polloi that they're on their side to keep these stupid distractions going while they keep on robbing and killing us (cf. fire anyone who doesn't stand for the national anthem!!!). Our rulers are really good at it though - I'll hand them that.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  7. Ram says:

    ” Shiksas are for Practice “, but do they become “honorary” Pharisees as a consequence ?

    Some segments of the British society are still stunted by their colonial, racist mentality.. and the Palestinians (among others) suffer as a result.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  8. Jake says:
    @Ron Unz
    All earlier comments were lost in Monday's server crash. My sincerest apologies.

    Was Monday’s crash perhaps caused by advocates of Free Speech But Not For Thee?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  9. That’s why liberal elitists like Weinstein and Clinton are so strongly in favour of mass immigration from the Third World. Immigration atomizes Western societies and introduces pathologies that justify authoritarian laws and the surveillance state. And authoritarian liberalism is what the Lebanese writer Nassim Taleb would call anti-fragile: the worse it works, the stronger it gets. After 9/11 demonstrated the incompetence of the surveillance state and the clear danger of mass immigration by Muslims, guess what? The NSA’s budget and Muslim immigration both increased. After mass killings by Muslim fanatics in Manchester and London, guess what? The British government has a further excuse to censor “far-right propaganda” that protests against the Muslim colonization of Britain.

    There is more truth in that one, lone paragraph than in ten full years of New York Times’ articles. Bravo, Mr. Langdon!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  10. Jake says:

    The only comment I made Monday was in reference to this quote: “I have long suspected that Theresa May has Jewish ancestry.”

    It does not matter a whit whether she does. The fact is that in acting as one who places Jewish interests as top priority, May is acting out the logical heritage of WASP culture.

    WASP culture is formed fully, crystalized, with the rise to power of the Anglo-Saxon Puritans, which featured regicide and war against almost everything that marked England, and all of the British Isles as culturally formed by Christendom. Anglo-Saxon Puritanism was a Judaizing heresy. A Judaizing heresy necessarily produces culture that is pro-Jewish and fiercely opposed to – murderously, genocidally focused on – white Christian groups that are not born of Judaizing heresy.

    Thus, from its inception, WASP culture has acted always to ally with Jews against the vast majority of white Christians.

    Oliver Cromwell, that most archetypal WASP, hopped into bed with Jews, inviting Jews back into England legally and granting them special rights and privileges, as part of his war to exterminate at least the cultural futures of all non-WASP white Gentiles the WASPs ruled.

    ‘Paleoconservative’ WASPs like John Derbyshire and Peter Brimelow adore Cromwell.

    Everything produces after its own kind. WASP culture will ALWAYS produce Elites who are staunchly pro-Semitic.

    Read More
    • Agree: Bill
    • Replies: @El Dato

    ‘Paleoconservative’ WASPs like John Derbyshire and Peter Brimelow adore Cromwell.
     
    Why would they admire the Lord Protector of Britain? I don't see what logic links Puritanism to be anti-Christian / pro-Jewish. Isn't it mainly about being a tight-up control-freak asshole who thinks highly of himself, gives everyone a hard time and watches from behind curtains just in case somebody is having fun somewhere?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  11. AaronB says:
    @Tom Welsh
    The concept of "better values" is an intriguing one. Values are generally understood to be matters of opinion and personal choice; they are opposed to facts, which remain the same however anyone might feel about them.

    Now "goodness" and "badness" are themselves values. It makes no sense to say that something is "good" or "bad", except in the opinion of some person or group of people.

    So to talk about "good values" or "better values" is to confuse facts and values inextricably. Even if one accepts the validity of such expressions, they can still be considered "good" or "better" only subjectively - from some person's point of view.

    To lay down any set of values for a whole community, and presumably to punish anyone who chooses different values, is the essence of tyranny.

    Incidentally, it is amazing how often politicians nowadays prate about values, without ever once venturing to declare what exactly those values are. No doubt this is because any specific set of values would constitute far too stable a target for criticism. It would hardly do for Amber Rudd to declare that her values include (for instance) freedom of speech, when she has come out against it; or equal treatment of all people, when - as the article demonstrates - she is in favour of better treatment for Jews.

    Surely, however, there are some universal values.

    Jews promote ‘values’ and the alt-right promotes ‘realism’ – do you think realism can defeat values?

    When I look to Steve Sailer for inspiration, I find cold realism, and frank selfishness. I find irony, and cynicism.

    What do Jews offer that is more appealing, and that has allowed them
    so much success?

    Until the alt-right figures this out, they have no chance.

    What is astonishing is the amount of attention the alt-right pays to Jews, without undersranding the source of their success.

    A sensitive, intelligent, young white man, looking for inspiration – can he find it in irony and cynicism? In frank selfishness?

    That is the vision white culture offers.

    Jews may cheat, lie, and pursue selfishness – but that is not the vision they offer themselves or others.

    Even Jewish tribal selfishness, frankly expressed in the Talmud, is not presented as mere tribal self seeking, as Steve Sailer might, or Vox Day, with an ironic smile at the realities of life.

    No, Jews are chosen, favored of God, and their selfishness is in line with the eternal Tao, and represents Goodness.

    The contribution of white culture is the critical spirit – but criticism tears down, does not build up. You cannot live on criticism.

    As we see with the alt-right, despite its attempt to return to religion, all white cultural movements are realistic and critical.

    Yet without an ideal you can’t live.

    Jews offer an ideal. Steve Sailer offers irony.

    Jews use criticism as a tactic, whites have adopted it as a metaphysic.

    This is why whites excel at science, but also why whites lose to Jews.

    Perhaps whites are incapable of creating an ideal, and will always attempt to live by cynical realism? If so, then whites will always lose to people who are capable of creating an ideal, whether Jew, Muslim, or Chinese.

    And yet even now, when trying to free themselves, whites false back on realism and cynicism.

    Read More
    • Replies: @geokat62

    Perhaps whites are incapable of creating an ideal...
     
    Plato's Republic?
    , @Wizard of Oz
    What/who on earth do you mean by whites? It really does come across as airy wafgle, perfectly harmless in itself but giving license to others with less benign broadbrush lines to peddle.
    , @Eagle Eye
    Good observations.

    Critical observation and thought is the greatest cultural achievement of the West. It lies at the root of the democratic revolution and the scientific revolution.

    At the same time, the relentless, unfettered critical spirit is also the West's greatest weakness in that it prevents the formation of a resilient myth to hold civilization together in the long run.

    A smart 14-year old can enunciate "reasonable" policies that should be adopted in any particular field. What is unstated is that this assumes the existence of a somewhat functioning society and political system. To stay viable, the larger body politic needs a framework of somewhat "irrational" beliefs, just like the human body requires vitamin C. Without it, scurvy will set in before long and may ultimately kill the patient.
    , @renfro
    '' What do Jews offer that is more appealing, and that has allowed them
    so much success?'>>>>>>

    Do you mean financially or in 'ideals?

    Their financial success is unconstrained by any ethics....easy to succeed if you don't have any ethics in business and practice tribal nepotism.
    As for offering ( life) "ideals' or universal ideals.....no one except Jews are clamoring to live in the Jewish state of Israel.
    The self determination of the Jews, as expressed in Israel, is pretty much condemned and despised by the majority of the world.

    So I would have to say they have nothing to offer but perhaps the proof that 'tribalism' can advance a group's success.
    , @Another Realist

    Perhaps whites are incapable of creating an ideal, and will always attempt to live by cynical realism? If so, then whites will always lose to people who are capable of creating an ideal, whether Jew, Muslim, or Chinese.
     
    The Jews and the Muslims stand alone when it comes to creating ideals, no other people can. The Russians can't, that's why communism and the Soviet Union failed. The Chinese can't either, that's why Communism failed in China, the Chinese are the most pragmatic people, no "ism" will ever stick with them. The Indians are hopeless, even their religion has 330 million Gods and goddesses, they can't even stick to just one. Africans are even more hopeless than the Indians. Latin Americans tried Communism, didn't work for them either, Castro's Cuba is a mess. Latin America is now a land of drug cartels and banana republics.

    The WASPs used to have Christianity, then the Jews chipped away at their ties to the religion through their counter culture revolution, strengthened through their control of the media, academia, and Hollywood. After 5 decades of relentless brainwashing, the WASPs have by and large been beaten into submission.

    As you can see, all the world's people are governed by pragmatism, except the Jews and the Muslims, who hold fast to their ideals of Liberalism and Islam.

    The irony is, Liberalism is completely at odds with Islam in every way. Liberalism embraces feminism, homosexuality, hedonism, narcissism, ultimate freedom of sex, drugs, rock 'n roll...all things eschewed by Islam. As more and more Muslims come into the West courtesy of the open border push by Jews, these two groups are heading for a collision. My money is on the Muslims. The Jews and their liberal thugs like Antifa will bend over as soon as they come up against people who are even more irrational and violent.
    , @TrevorSedis
    > "Jews are chosen"

    They certainly were at the Umschlagplatz...where Sophie made HER choice, too.

    >"their selfishness is in line with the eternal Tao"

    Dow Jones, maybe. :>)

    Seriously, though: that excuse is likely what kapos and sonderkommandos told themselves as they fed fellow Tribalists into gas chambers. That what they were doing was somehow "part of the eternal Reuben Sammich of existence."

    So how are Jews more special than cockroaches...who also "survive"?

    Look, any group can justify its existence post-facto. You know: "The reason Germany not only survived, but thrived after having fought half the world is simple: Odin wants the volk to continue moving Jews eastward into ever-smaller enclaves."

    Or Commiethink: "Mao and Stalin lived long and prospered because God is NOT out of his vulcan mind."

    Jews need to get over themselves. They are no better, no worse, than others.

    No one likes the priss at school who constantly brags about how special he is. It tends to attract the million-pound shit-hammer.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  12. geokat62 says:

    The money line for me:

    They don’t want any discussion of Jewish power, because power that can’t be discussed is also power that can’t be challenged.

    Isn’t this ultimately what their accusations of “anti-Semite” or “Jew-hater” are designed to accomplish?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  13. AaronB says:

    I agree with you, Jake.

    English culture seems materialistic and based on the will to power.

    Protestantism seems based on the the will to power and materialism.

    Western civilization rose as it became less and less Christian.

    Colonialism and technology are obviously products of the will to power, and not Christianity.

    In the second half of the 19th century, intelligent Europeans lost their will to power. All groups eventually do.

    Jews filled the vacuum.

    It’s not surprising that those who desire power will get it and those who don’t will lose it.

    That sums up history.

    History is a group seizing power from another group that has lost its will to keep it.

    Napoleon victimizes Germany when its will to power is asleep.

    France then loses its will to power, and becomes the victim of Germany.

    The West victimizes China when its will to power is asleep. Now the West has lost its will to power, and the sequel is predictable.

    Understanding this, history loses all its fascination.

    Jews will lose their will to power, like every power-center and empire has.

    Western civilization as we’ve known it for the past five hundred years was based on the will to power, and it cannot survive the loss of the will to power in Western elites.

    The only viable civilization in the West now must be based on turning away from the will to power, in other words, it would have to be a Buddhist or “true” Christian civilization.

    But without the will to power, science and technology will lose their position at the head of our life, capitalism will be moderated and it’s severities eased, and the West will no longer be “special”.

    The Alt-Right are westerners who still have an unbroken will to power, coming from the second-rate sections of society that have not yet experienced power.

    Maybe we’ll divide, with our best elements forming the nucleus of a Buddhist style civilization, and our second rate elements coalescing into traditional tribal entities, unable to exert much power on the rest of the world.

    This pattern will hold intact even if Islam conquers Europe.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
    More wafflè. What makes you say Western civilisation became less Christian between say 1500 and 1900?

    And why do you suggest that Christianity, (like the other, later, proselytising Abrahamic monotheistic religion ?), is not productive of colonialism?

    , @Anon
    "History is a group seizing power from another group that has lost its will to keep it."

    I disagree. A 'true Christian', gazing deeper, already said it short and sweet: "the history of the world is the story of two loves: love of self, to the point of destroying the world, and love of the world, to the point of surrendering oneself."

    The Greeks also had a better take: man gives meaning to his life by looking for: pleasure, riches, power or honor.

    Power is, but not everything is about power.

    Sailer, however, has said that history is a race between winners and losers. Is he also jewish?
    , @TrevorSedis
    > "The only viable civilization in the West now must be based on turning away from the will to power, in other words, it would have to be a Buddhist or “true” Christian civilization."

    Yes, yes, Obi-wan. Preach!

    Only, er, Buddhists use orphan children as work/sex slaves. And somehow the spirit of the Magna Carta lives on.

    Stop looking for simple answers. Life is mysterious. The glass is not just half full AND half empty, it's a way to quench thirst. As Twain quipped, much predicted doom never occurs: "“I am an old man and have known a great many troubles, but most of them never happened.”

    Humans have always cooperated as much as they competed. You can't raise a barn...or build a city...or stop an army alone.

    Humans have both drives and needs. They can be selfish and self-less. We are complex.

    Love is as real as bombs. Maybe more so.

    Elizabethan English is no more...yet Shakespeare's plays live on.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  14. geokat62 says:
    @AaronB
    Surely, however, there are some universal values.

    Jews promote 'values' and the alt-right promotes 'realism' - do you think realism can defeat values?

    When I look to Steve Sailer for inspiration, I find cold realism, and frank selfishness. I find irony, and cynicism.

    What do Jews offer that is more appealing, and that has allowed them
    so much success?

    Until the alt-right figures this out, they have no chance.

    What is astonishing is the amount of attention the alt-right pays to Jews, without undersranding the source of their success.

    A sensitive, intelligent, young white man, looking for inspiration - can he find it in irony and cynicism? In frank selfishness?

    That is the vision white culture offers.

    Jews may cheat, lie, and pursue selfishness - but that is not the vision they offer themselves or others.

    Even Jewish tribal selfishness, frankly expressed in the Talmud, is not presented as mere tribal self seeking, as Steve Sailer might, or Vox Day, with an ironic smile at the realities of life.

    No, Jews are chosen, favored of God, and their selfishness is in line with the eternal Tao, and represents Goodness.

    The contribution of white culture is the critical spirit - but criticism tears down, does not build up. You cannot live on criticism.

    As we see with the alt-right, despite its attempt to return to religion, all white cultural movements are realistic and critical.

    Yet without an ideal you can't live.

    Jews offer an ideal. Steve Sailer offers irony.

    Jews use criticism as a tactic, whites have adopted it as a metaphysic.

    This is why whites excel at science, but also why whites lose to Jews.

    Perhaps whites are incapable of creating an ideal, and will always attempt to live by cynical realism? If so, then whites will always lose to people who are capable of creating an ideal, whether Jew, Muslim, or Chinese.

    And yet even now, when trying to free themselves, whites false back on realism and cynicism.

    Perhaps whites are incapable of creating an ideal…

    Plato’s Republic?

    Read More
    • Replies: @AaronB
    Actually, through Neo-Platonism, which is essentially a Western version of Buddhism and Hinduism, and which dramatically influenced Christianity, especially it's mystics, Plato has been the preeminent Western ideal-crafter.

    Maybe we should we return to Plato?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  15. Is that picture the Wall Israel and the ADC tells us here in the United States would be “ray-ciss” to build? Seems like it works ok For Israel to keep THEIR civilization White and Tight. Works for China, Japan, the Koreas. All racist nations, all without diversity. Amazing. Some goose, some gander..

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  16. Terrorism is created by the U.S. deep state and Israel and Britain via their AL CIADA and ISIS and NATO via their OPERATION GLADIO , and all of this is part of their NWO agenda of constant terror and the establishment of a police state that will make Orwells 1984 seem like a walk in the park.

    Terrorism is a tool to take away what little freedom we have left, and believe me we have damn little left, and the creators of terror are the elites and they are going to destroy us, unless we Americans wake the hell up and smell the coffee.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  17. @AaronB
    Surely, however, there are some universal values.

    Jews promote 'values' and the alt-right promotes 'realism' - do you think realism can defeat values?

    When I look to Steve Sailer for inspiration, I find cold realism, and frank selfishness. I find irony, and cynicism.

    What do Jews offer that is more appealing, and that has allowed them
    so much success?

    Until the alt-right figures this out, they have no chance.

    What is astonishing is the amount of attention the alt-right pays to Jews, without undersranding the source of their success.

    A sensitive, intelligent, young white man, looking for inspiration - can he find it in irony and cynicism? In frank selfishness?

    That is the vision white culture offers.

    Jews may cheat, lie, and pursue selfishness - but that is not the vision they offer themselves or others.

    Even Jewish tribal selfishness, frankly expressed in the Talmud, is not presented as mere tribal self seeking, as Steve Sailer might, or Vox Day, with an ironic smile at the realities of life.

    No, Jews are chosen, favored of God, and their selfishness is in line with the eternal Tao, and represents Goodness.

    The contribution of white culture is the critical spirit - but criticism tears down, does not build up. You cannot live on criticism.

    As we see with the alt-right, despite its attempt to return to religion, all white cultural movements are realistic and critical.

    Yet without an ideal you can't live.

    Jews offer an ideal. Steve Sailer offers irony.

    Jews use criticism as a tactic, whites have adopted it as a metaphysic.

    This is why whites excel at science, but also why whites lose to Jews.

    Perhaps whites are incapable of creating an ideal, and will always attempt to live by cynical realism? If so, then whites will always lose to people who are capable of creating an ideal, whether Jew, Muslim, or Chinese.

    And yet even now, when trying to free themselves, whites false back on realism and cynicism.

    What/who on earth do you mean by whites? It really does come across as airy wafgle, perfectly harmless in itself but giving license to others with less benign broadbrush lines to peddle.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Van Tolstoy
    "White". You know, the people who are accused of being "white
    supremacists" or "Nazis" or "raycists" or "xenophobes",etc..........
    by Zionist hate groups such as SPLC, ADL, CNN,MSNBC,CBS,ABC.
    Those " whites".
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  18. @AaronB
    I agree with you, Jake.

    English culture seems materialistic and based on the will to power.

    Protestantism seems based on the the will to power and materialism.

    Western civilization rose as it became less and less Christian.

    Colonialism and technology are obviously products of the will to power, and not Christianity.

    In the second half of the 19th century, intelligent Europeans lost their will to power. All groups eventually do.

    Jews filled the vacuum.

    It's not surprising that those who desire power will get it and those who don't will lose it.

    That sums up history.

    History is a group seizing power from another group that has lost its will to keep it.

    Napoleon victimizes Germany when its will to power is asleep.

    France then loses its will to power, and becomes the victim of Germany.

    The West victimizes China when its will to power is asleep. Now the West has lost its will to power, and the sequel is predictable.

    Understanding this, history loses all its fascination.

    Jews will lose their will to power, like every power-center and empire has.

    Western civilization as we've known it for the past five hundred years was based on the will to power, and it cannot survive the loss of the will to power in Western elites.

    The only viable civilization in the West now must be based on turning away from the will to power, in other words, it would have to be a Buddhist or "true" Christian civilization.

    But without the will to power, science and technology will lose their position at the head of our life, capitalism will be moderated and it's severities eased, and the West will no longer be "special".

    The Alt-Right are westerners who still have an unbroken will to power, coming from the second-rate sections of society that have not yet experienced power.

    Maybe we'll divide, with our best elements forming the nucleus of a Buddhist style civilization, and our second rate elements coalescing into traditional tribal entities, unable to exert much power on the rest of the world.

    This pattern will hold intact even if Islam conquers Europe.

    More wafflè. What makes you say Western civilisation became less Christian between say 1500 and 1900?

    And why do you suggest that Christianity, (like the other, later, proselytising Abrahamic monotheistic religion ?), is not productive of colonialism?

    Read More
    • Replies: @AaronB
    By whites I really mean the Western civilization that began around 500 years ago.

    Colonialism is about the will to power. The Gospels tell us to abandon greed and surrender power.

    But Christianity can mean anything. Many today claim it means the pursuit of wealth and power.

    And indeed, Christianity, over the past 500 years, has come to mean the pursuit of wealth and power.

    Which is why Christianity has lost its power as a spiritual tradition, and if the West ever becomes truly Christian, it will do so without the symbols of Christianity.

    I am talking, however, about the message in the Gospels, not what has been variously called Christianity over the centuries.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  19. AaronB says:
    @geokat62

    Perhaps whites are incapable of creating an ideal...
     
    Plato's Republic?

    Actually, through Neo-Platonism, which is essentially a Western version of Buddhism and Hinduism, and which dramatically influenced Christianity, especially it’s mystics, Plato has been the preeminent Western ideal-crafter.

    Maybe we should we return to Plato?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  20. helena says:
    @NoseytheDuke
    You have no chance if you persist in perpetuating this Left/Right nonsense, can't you see that it is a pincer movement coming from both sides? In Britain, Amber Rudd is considered truly Hard Right, just like John McCain & Co is in the US. Sheesh!

    Well it is difficult getting labels accurate. I do understand the pincer movement in as much as globalists want free movement and so do international socialists but for actually exact opposite reasons – exploitation on the one hand humanitarianism on the other. Although humanitarians probably think that everyone having free healthcare and transport and little else is better than having social classes. But surely the situation that has come about, certainly in Europe, is that left wing voices succeeded in getting all the microaggression stuff moved out of party politics and into ‘values’ ‘who we are’ and quite quickly every political party fell in with it for fear of ism accusations, because, ww2. Cameron brought in gay marriage. Don’t you know that all uk politicians are now socially liberal apart from some practicing Christians and ukippers. The UK political sphere looks at Christianity and guns in usa and shakes its head. I think maybe, long shot, some Americans could escape this, secede or something. Anyway, thanks for sharing.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  21. AaronB says:
    @Wizard of Oz
    More wafflè. What makes you say Western civilisation became less Christian between say 1500 and 1900?

    And why do you suggest that Christianity, (like the other, later, proselytising Abrahamic monotheistic religion ?), is not productive of colonialism?

    By whites I really mean the Western civilization that began around 500 years ago.

    Colonialism is about the will to power. The Gospels tell us to abandon greed and surrender power.

    But Christianity can mean anything. Many today claim it means the pursuit of wealth and power.

    And indeed, Christianity, over the past 500 years, has come to mean the pursuit of wealth and power.

    Which is why Christianity has lost its power as a spiritual tradition, and if the West ever becomes truly Christian, it will do so without the symbols of Christianity.

    I am talking, however, about the message in the Gospels, not what has been variously called Christianity over the centuries.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  22. Anon says: • Disclaimer
    @AaronB
    I agree with you, Jake.

    English culture seems materialistic and based on the will to power.

    Protestantism seems based on the the will to power and materialism.

    Western civilization rose as it became less and less Christian.

    Colonialism and technology are obviously products of the will to power, and not Christianity.

    In the second half of the 19th century, intelligent Europeans lost their will to power. All groups eventually do.

    Jews filled the vacuum.

    It's not surprising that those who desire power will get it and those who don't will lose it.

    That sums up history.

    History is a group seizing power from another group that has lost its will to keep it.

    Napoleon victimizes Germany when its will to power is asleep.

    France then loses its will to power, and becomes the victim of Germany.

    The West victimizes China when its will to power is asleep. Now the West has lost its will to power, and the sequel is predictable.

    Understanding this, history loses all its fascination.

    Jews will lose their will to power, like every power-center and empire has.

    Western civilization as we've known it for the past five hundred years was based on the will to power, and it cannot survive the loss of the will to power in Western elites.

    The only viable civilization in the West now must be based on turning away from the will to power, in other words, it would have to be a Buddhist or "true" Christian civilization.

    But without the will to power, science and technology will lose their position at the head of our life, capitalism will be moderated and it's severities eased, and the West will no longer be "special".

    The Alt-Right are westerners who still have an unbroken will to power, coming from the second-rate sections of society that have not yet experienced power.

    Maybe we'll divide, with our best elements forming the nucleus of a Buddhist style civilization, and our second rate elements coalescing into traditional tribal entities, unable to exert much power on the rest of the world.

    This pattern will hold intact even if Islam conquers Europe.

    “History is a group seizing power from another group that has lost its will to keep it.”

    I disagree. A ‘true Christian’, gazing deeper, already said it short and sweet: “the history of the world is the story of two loves: love of self, to the point of destroying the world, and love of the world, to the point of surrendering oneself.”

    The Greeks also had a better take: man gives meaning to his life by looking for: pleasure, riches, power or honor.

    Power is, but not everything is about power.

    Sailer, however, has said that history is a race between winners and losers. Is he also jewish?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wally
    Simply stated:

    'Those who do not protect & nurture their own are destined to be ruled by those that do.'
    , @AaronB
    That true Christian had it right, but we are saying the same thing, differently.

    He who surrenders himself, is outside of history.

    History is the love of self, waxing and waning, between groups.

    Honor is love of self, and the Greeks in their early phase were superficial.

    They only became profound after their great period, when they saw through life.

    Sailer is also saying what I and that true Christian are saying, but from the opposite perspective, as a lover of power, and a superficial man.
    , @renfro
    '' The Greeks also had a better take: man gives meaning to his life by looking for: pleasure, riches, power or honor.>>>>>>


    There is a lot of pseudo intellectual babble going on around this subject.
    Man looks above all for satisfaction in his life ...and what satisfies varies from man to man and his life's time to time.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  23. Wally says: • Website
    @Anon
    "History is a group seizing power from another group that has lost its will to keep it."

    I disagree. A 'true Christian', gazing deeper, already said it short and sweet: "the history of the world is the story of two loves: love of self, to the point of destroying the world, and love of the world, to the point of surrendering oneself."

    The Greeks also had a better take: man gives meaning to his life by looking for: pleasure, riches, power or honor.

    Power is, but not everything is about power.

    Sailer, however, has said that history is a race between winners and losers. Is he also jewish?

    Simply stated:

    ‘Those who do not protect & nurture their own are destined to be ruled by those that do.’

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  24. AaronB says:
    @Anon
    "History is a group seizing power from another group that has lost its will to keep it."

    I disagree. A 'true Christian', gazing deeper, already said it short and sweet: "the history of the world is the story of two loves: love of self, to the point of destroying the world, and love of the world, to the point of surrendering oneself."

    The Greeks also had a better take: man gives meaning to his life by looking for: pleasure, riches, power or honor.

    Power is, but not everything is about power.

    Sailer, however, has said that history is a race between winners and losers. Is he also jewish?

    That true Christian had it right, but we are saying the same thing, differently.

    He who surrenders himself, is outside of history.

    History is the love of self, waxing and waning, between groups.

    Honor is love of self, and the Greeks in their early phase were superficial.

    They only became profound after their great period, when they saw through life.

    Sailer is also saying what I and that true Christian are saying, but from the opposite perspective, as a lover of power, and a superficial man.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    "History is the love of self, waxing and waning"

    You can repeat it, but it still is a superficial understanding. Man can be selfish. Or he can be generous.

    Be their fruits you shall know them. Whenever man's actions are in accord with natural law, they are constructive and perdurable. When those actions are selfish, they are destructive (inevitably self-destructive) and transient.

    As to jewish triumphs and achievements and ultimate triumph... Sounds provoking at Unz's but it is not true. They missed the boat 2000 years ago and are mostly jaded and atheistic. Their triumphs: relative power/prominence in Western countries since 1917 and another good century around King David's time.

    Where are their great works for posterity? Who acclaims them?
    , @TrevorSedis
    AaronB: >"He who surrenders himself, is outside of history....Honor is love of self, and the Greeks in their early phase were superficial....They only became profound after their great period, when they saw through life...Sailer is also saying what I and that true Christian are saying, but from the opposite perspective, as a lover of power, and a superficial man."

    Oy! Such profound argle-bargle: "outside of history... Greeks in their early phase were superficial...saw through life...lover of power...superficial"

    Keerist! You sound like Chauncey Gardner in BEING THERE.

    Or the Pompatus of Love.

    Or Jethro on THE BEVERLY HILLBILLIES:

    "Blue cheesecake.
    A silver spoon in the sand.
    The seaweed barks at me."
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  25. nickels says:

    Why should you fear restrictions on speech unless you have something distasteful to say?

    Read More
    • Replies: @nsa
    Nice ironic shot there, Nick. Why not just paraphrase Goebbels' dictum: "if you just serve the vile jooies, then you have nothing to worry about"?
    , @TrevorSedis
    >"Why should you fear restrictions on speech unless you have something distasteful to say?"

    Spoken like a true Gestapo agent.

    Why do you think the Miranda Warning became law?

    Why does every defense lawyer say never talk to cops other than to give your name and show an ID?

    Because ANYTHING you say can be dubbed "distasteful."

    Antifa thugs say any view they disagree with is "hateful"... thus allowing them to punch the holder of said view.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  26. nsa says:
    @nickels
    Why should you fear restrictions on speech unless you have something distasteful to say?

    Nice ironic shot there, Nick. Why not just paraphrase Goebbels’ dictum: “if you just serve the vile jooies, then you have nothing to worry about”?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  27. anon says: • Disclaimer

    civilization. The results have included suicide bombing, rape-gangs, honour killings, female genital mutilation, inbreeding and exotic diseases.”

    Displacement is a coping mechanism . Talking about nonsense and not about the offending agent is a defense mechanism of the those afraid hurt angry but imbecile and powerless . The pressure within the psyche makes them say something but they never gather the courage to say the right things.
    If you were true to yourself ,you would ask why Zionism has become the arbiter and interlocutor . Why they have become “the decider”. They create and manage the wars .They hide the finger prints. They chide the politicians and those not keen for war. They bribe the politicians and force the politicians change the election promises like not starting new wars like not throwing bad deal but observing it more harshly .
    Wars in middle east has been fought by most of the Europeans countries . Their leaders were not thrown out by their voters. The wars lead to migration . (just try to stay in your apartment after hearing smoking alarm let alone after it being firebombed )
    Migration lead to angers between immigrants and the locals.
    Doesn’t that what is wanted by the arbiter and the decider of the wars? Before , this war was fought over there. But now it is being fought at home . Who benefits from the animosities and the newly created chaos? This fragmentation of the Middle East ( Yoded Plan ) may not have succeeded in ME but sure boy it is being played in all the theaters near you in Western countries. They survive on our weakness and petty fetishes . They survive on the hatred we evince to each other . They make the most while we suffer.

    One thing is sure –one day these faggots (Zionist ) will claim how they helped the Muslim escape the violence and settle in EU.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  28. Eagle Eye says:
    @AaronB
    Surely, however, there are some universal values.

    Jews promote 'values' and the alt-right promotes 'realism' - do you think realism can defeat values?

    When I look to Steve Sailer for inspiration, I find cold realism, and frank selfishness. I find irony, and cynicism.

    What do Jews offer that is more appealing, and that has allowed them
    so much success?

    Until the alt-right figures this out, they have no chance.

    What is astonishing is the amount of attention the alt-right pays to Jews, without undersranding the source of their success.

    A sensitive, intelligent, young white man, looking for inspiration - can he find it in irony and cynicism? In frank selfishness?

    That is the vision white culture offers.

    Jews may cheat, lie, and pursue selfishness - but that is not the vision they offer themselves or others.

    Even Jewish tribal selfishness, frankly expressed in the Talmud, is not presented as mere tribal self seeking, as Steve Sailer might, or Vox Day, with an ironic smile at the realities of life.

    No, Jews are chosen, favored of God, and their selfishness is in line with the eternal Tao, and represents Goodness.

    The contribution of white culture is the critical spirit - but criticism tears down, does not build up. You cannot live on criticism.

    As we see with the alt-right, despite its attempt to return to religion, all white cultural movements are realistic and critical.

    Yet without an ideal you can't live.

    Jews offer an ideal. Steve Sailer offers irony.

    Jews use criticism as a tactic, whites have adopted it as a metaphysic.

    This is why whites excel at science, but also why whites lose to Jews.

    Perhaps whites are incapable of creating an ideal, and will always attempt to live by cynical realism? If so, then whites will always lose to people who are capable of creating an ideal, whether Jew, Muslim, or Chinese.

    And yet even now, when trying to free themselves, whites false back on realism and cynicism.

    Good observations.

    Critical observation and thought is the greatest cultural achievement of the West. It lies at the root of the democratic revolution and the scientific revolution.

    At the same time, the relentless, unfettered critical spirit is also the West’s greatest weakness in that it prevents the formation of a resilient myth to hold civilization together in the long run.

    A smart 14-year old can enunciate “reasonable” policies that should be adopted in any particular field. What is unstated is that this assumes the existence of a somewhat functioning society and political system. To stay viable, the larger body politic needs a framework of somewhat “irrational” beliefs, just like the human body requires vitamin C. Without it, scurvy will set in before long and may ultimately kill the patient.

    Read More
    • Replies: @AaronB
    It is a genuine dilemma that few in the West wish to face, least of all the alt-right.

    What made the West powerful is what made it weak.

    Few can face this squarely.

    The alt-right wants to keep science and the critical spirit. Nothing could be more blind.

    Leopardi called it the barbarism of reason.

    The alt-right are merely men who have not yet fully absorbed, in their bones, the consequences of Western culture.

    They wish to return to what was a transitional phase.

    If they gained power, their grandchildren would be liberals, as the critical spirit they retain would work it's way into their bones.

    If we return to an earlier phase, the pattern would play itself out again, as the consequences inevitably follow the premises.

    A framework of irational beliefs, you say - yet reason is a limiting view, and not the most important thing in life.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  29. lavoisier says: • Website
    @Ron Unz
    All earlier comments were lost in Monday's server crash. My sincerest apologies.

    Cannot in any universe accuse Ron Unz of censorship.

    The man has risked a great deal by putting up this incredibly informative site.

    I have nothing but admiration for the man and could care less that he is Jewish.

    Read More
    • Agree: Seamus Padraig
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  30. edNels says:

    Everybody piles on like a lynch mob on this poor guy Harvey! He don’t look so bad to me. He reminds me of Dominic Strauss-Kahn in the way so many angry women-womyn were ready to believe that ridiculous set up about him chasing around a hotel maid risking a heart attack for some strange african nookie, when he comes from France and should have had ample opportunity it seems to go on safari to darkest continents for the real deal!

    Ridiculous, Harvey seems sort of humble and normal in his photo dipictions, he stands in for the Everyman, and people don’t see that. He gets to get jumped on for… (all our sins…haha… ). Remember this, the idea is still a sin!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  31. Ace says:

    ** The safer Britain I want to help build as Home Secretary is a united one. **

    PS — Anyone who doesn’t buy into my idea of “unity” will be crucified.

    PPS — And if you express intolerance of women’s rights. you will be crucified twice. If you even so much as suggest that a twit like me shouldn’t be walking the streets unsupervised, let alone be Home Secretary, you, a non-violent extremist, will never see the sun again. We make the rules; you obey them.

    Read More
    • Replies: @anon
    Three Jewish students said they were terrified by the cartoon,

    Dershowitz didn’t miss the opportunity. He weighed in on the cartoon, in a long letter to the Daily Cal using the incident to tar the “hard left” as “neo-Nazis” for not criticizing the cartoon

    The Forward has published a defense of the cartoon, using a mostly-black-and-white image of Mayorga’s work that appeared on Twitter, and looks different from the all-color version. Rafael Magaryk said it’s not anti-Semitic, and the cartoon’s critics are demonstrating “an irresponsible use of history.”

    [A]s far as I can tell, it is simply arguing that Dershowitz represents himself as a liberal while actually shilling for Israeli state violence against Palestinians.
    That is not anti-Semitic; it is true" . http://mondoweiss.net/2017/11/californian-dershowitz-unleashes/

    Its the Jews who will decide if it is anti Semitic or not .

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  32. AaronB says:
    @Eagle Eye
    Good observations.

    Critical observation and thought is the greatest cultural achievement of the West. It lies at the root of the democratic revolution and the scientific revolution.

    At the same time, the relentless, unfettered critical spirit is also the West's greatest weakness in that it prevents the formation of a resilient myth to hold civilization together in the long run.

    A smart 14-year old can enunciate "reasonable" policies that should be adopted in any particular field. What is unstated is that this assumes the existence of a somewhat functioning society and political system. To stay viable, the larger body politic needs a framework of somewhat "irrational" beliefs, just like the human body requires vitamin C. Without it, scurvy will set in before long and may ultimately kill the patient.

    It is a genuine dilemma that few in the West wish to face, least of all the alt-right.

    What made the West powerful is what made it weak.

    Few can face this squarely.

    The alt-right wants to keep science and the critical spirit. Nothing could be more blind.

    Leopardi called it the barbarism of reason.

    The alt-right are merely men who have not yet fully absorbed, in their bones, the consequences of Western culture.

    They wish to return to what was a transitional phase.

    If they gained power, their grandchildren would be liberals, as the critical spirit they retain would work it’s way into their bones.

    If we return to an earlier phase, the pattern would play itself out again, as the consequences inevitably follow the premises.

    A framework of irational beliefs, you say – yet reason is a limiting view, and not the most important thing in life.

    Read More
    • Replies: @renfro
    '' A framework of irational beliefs, you say – yet reason is a limiting view, and not the most important thing in life.''>>>>

    I can partly agree.
    But as far as whites or gentiles ( whatever you want to call them) go, history tells us that when push comes to shove they put reason (however you define it) aside and 'might makes right' takes over.
    , @Sin City Milla
    All human societies are transitional. And all function by myth, whether inspired by science or not. There is nothing in the alt-right that makes us less authentic than those movements that condemn us. We lack only two things: ownership of the media heights, n an excess of babies.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  33. @Wizard of Oz
    What/who on earth do you mean by whites? It really does come across as airy wafgle, perfectly harmless in itself but giving license to others with less benign broadbrush lines to peddle.

    “White”. You know, the people who are accused of being “white
    supremacists” or “Nazis” or “raycists” or “xenophobes”,etc……….
    by Zionist hate groups such as SPLC, ADL, CNN,MSNBC,CBS,ABC.
    Those ” whites”.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  34. anarchyst says:

    It all started with criminalizing any honest investigation or difference of opinion concerning that horror of horrors–the jewish “holocaust ™…
    The slippery slope has already been established, at least in those countries who do not have a First Amendment to the Constitution.
    Even Canada is not exempt from this slippery slope…

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  35. renfro says:

    ”I have long suspected that Theresa May has Jewish ancestry….”>>>>>>>

    Doesn’t matter if she does or doesn’t, she’s owned anyway. The Protocols of The Elders may be a forgery but its a good blueprint for any group who wants to dominate a country or the world.

    ”For a time, until there will no longer be any risk in entrusting responsible posts in our States to our brother Jews, we shall put them in the hands of persons whose past and reputation are such that between them and the people lies an abyss, persons who, in case of disobedience to our instructions, must face criminal charges or disappear — this in order to make them defend our interests to their last gasp.” Protocol VIII

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  36. Bill says:
    @Tom Welsh
    The concept of "better values" is an intriguing one. Values are generally understood to be matters of opinion and personal choice; they are opposed to facts, which remain the same however anyone might feel about them.

    Now "goodness" and "badness" are themselves values. It makes no sense to say that something is "good" or "bad", except in the opinion of some person or group of people.

    So to talk about "good values" or "better values" is to confuse facts and values inextricably. Even if one accepts the validity of such expressions, they can still be considered "good" or "better" only subjectively - from some person's point of view.

    To lay down any set of values for a whole community, and presumably to punish anyone who chooses different values, is the essence of tyranny.

    Incidentally, it is amazing how often politicians nowadays prate about values, without ever once venturing to declare what exactly those values are. No doubt this is because any specific set of values would constitute far too stable a target for criticism. It would hardly do for Amber Rudd to declare that her values include (for instance) freedom of speech, when she has come out against it; or equal treatment of all people, when - as the article demonstrates - she is in favour of better treatment for Jews.

    To lay down any set of values for a whole community, and presumably to punish anyone who chooses different values, is the essence of tyranny.

    That’s gibberish. Should it be punishment-worthy to kill people who post on unz.com under the name “Tom Welsh?” You can’t have a group of people living together without laying down a set of values for the community and enforcing them.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  37. renfro says:
    @AaronB
    Surely, however, there are some universal values.

    Jews promote 'values' and the alt-right promotes 'realism' - do you think realism can defeat values?

    When I look to Steve Sailer for inspiration, I find cold realism, and frank selfishness. I find irony, and cynicism.

    What do Jews offer that is more appealing, and that has allowed them
    so much success?

    Until the alt-right figures this out, they have no chance.

    What is astonishing is the amount of attention the alt-right pays to Jews, without undersranding the source of their success.

    A sensitive, intelligent, young white man, looking for inspiration - can he find it in irony and cynicism? In frank selfishness?

    That is the vision white culture offers.

    Jews may cheat, lie, and pursue selfishness - but that is not the vision they offer themselves or others.

    Even Jewish tribal selfishness, frankly expressed in the Talmud, is not presented as mere tribal self seeking, as Steve Sailer might, or Vox Day, with an ironic smile at the realities of life.

    No, Jews are chosen, favored of God, and their selfishness is in line with the eternal Tao, and represents Goodness.

    The contribution of white culture is the critical spirit - but criticism tears down, does not build up. You cannot live on criticism.

    As we see with the alt-right, despite its attempt to return to religion, all white cultural movements are realistic and critical.

    Yet without an ideal you can't live.

    Jews offer an ideal. Steve Sailer offers irony.

    Jews use criticism as a tactic, whites have adopted it as a metaphysic.

    This is why whites excel at science, but also why whites lose to Jews.

    Perhaps whites are incapable of creating an ideal, and will always attempt to live by cynical realism? If so, then whites will always lose to people who are capable of creating an ideal, whether Jew, Muslim, or Chinese.

    And yet even now, when trying to free themselves, whites false back on realism and cynicism.

    ” What do Jews offer that is more appealing, and that has allowed them
    so much success?’>>>>>>

    Do you mean financially or in ‘ideals?

    Their financial success is unconstrained by any ethics….easy to succeed if you don’t have any ethics in business and practice tribal nepotism.
    As for offering ( life) “ideals’ or universal ideals…..no one except Jews are clamoring to live in the Jewish state of Israel.
    The self determination of the Jews, as expressed in Israel, is pretty much condemned and despised by the majority of the world.

    So I would have to say they have nothing to offer but perhaps the proof that ‘tribalism’ can advance a group’s success.

    Read More
    • Replies: @AaronB
    I understand what you are saying, but let me try and elucidate my point.

    You say we should pursue our self interest because that is the law of life, a harsh law perhaps, but such is life, and realism requires we accept it.

    Jews claim that their success represents the triumph of of goodness.

    Jews act selfishly, but have defined it as unselfish promotion of universal goodness. This gives them tremendous motivation, as well as self belief. It is immensely consoling to see oneself this way.

    You offer, what? Realism? Frank and honest selfishness, because that is the way the world works? The critical, sardonic, realistic spirit of the West?

    Ok, you may be right, but you will inspire no one, you will motivate no one, you will console no one.

    Jews are successful precisely because they do not believe themselves to be cynically selfish, but because they believe their success to represent the triumph of goodness.

    Whites lose because they don't believe their success to be anything other than selfish self intetest, and that isn't enough to sustain motivation in the long run.

    Jews are idealists, whites are realists.

    Realists will always lose to idealists in the long run.

    Voltairean irony of the Steve Sailer kind will always lose to passionate moralism in the long run.

    However grotesque Jewish behavior is, they attempt to ground it in a moral vision.

    Whites don't even attempt this - they are frankly amoral.

    Until you grasp this, you are lost.

    Spirit counts for more than flesh. The alt-right still hasn't learned this lesson from the Jews.

    Whites must align themselves with the Tao once again. No nation that leaves the Tao can survive. A vision of frank selfishness, realism, is to have left the Tao far behind.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  38. renfro says:
    @AaronB
    It is a genuine dilemma that few in the West wish to face, least of all the alt-right.

    What made the West powerful is what made it weak.

    Few can face this squarely.

    The alt-right wants to keep science and the critical spirit. Nothing could be more blind.

    Leopardi called it the barbarism of reason.

    The alt-right are merely men who have not yet fully absorbed, in their bones, the consequences of Western culture.

    They wish to return to what was a transitional phase.

    If they gained power, their grandchildren would be liberals, as the critical spirit they retain would work it's way into their bones.

    If we return to an earlier phase, the pattern would play itself out again, as the consequences inevitably follow the premises.

    A framework of irational beliefs, you say - yet reason is a limiting view, and not the most important thing in life.

    ” A framework of irational beliefs, you say – yet reason is a limiting view, and not the most important thing in life.”>>>>

    I can partly agree.
    But as far as whites or gentiles ( whatever you want to call them) go, history tells us that when push comes to shove they put reason (however you define it) aside and ‘might makes right’ takes over.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  39. renfro says:
    @Anon
    "History is a group seizing power from another group that has lost its will to keep it."

    I disagree. A 'true Christian', gazing deeper, already said it short and sweet: "the history of the world is the story of two loves: love of self, to the point of destroying the world, and love of the world, to the point of surrendering oneself."

    The Greeks also had a better take: man gives meaning to his life by looking for: pleasure, riches, power or honor.

    Power is, but not everything is about power.

    Sailer, however, has said that history is a race between winners and losers. Is he also jewish?

    ” The Greeks also had a better take: man gives meaning to his life by looking for: pleasure, riches, power or honor.>>>>>>

    There is a lot of pseudo intellectual babble going on around this subject.
    Man looks above all for satisfaction in his life …and what satisfies varies from man to man and his life’s time to time.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  40. Pontius says:

    Funny how she doesn’t mention far left websites.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  41. anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Ace
    ** The safer Britain I want to help build as Home Secretary is a united one. **

    PS -- Anyone who doesn't buy into my idea of "unity" will be crucified.

    PPS -- And if you express intolerance of women’s rights. you will be crucified twice. If you even so much as suggest that a twit like me shouldn't be walking the streets unsupervised, let alone be Home Secretary, you, a non-violent extremist, will never see the sun again. We make the rules; you obey them.

    Three Jewish students said they were terrified by the cartoon,

    Dershowitz didn’t miss the opportunity. He weighed in on the cartoon, in a long letter to the Daily Cal using the incident to tar the “hard left” as “neo-Nazis” for not criticizing the cartoon

    The Forward has published a defense of the cartoon, using a mostly-black-and-white image of Mayorga’s work that appeared on Twitter, and looks different from the all-color version. Rafael Magaryk said it’s not anti-Semitic, and the cartoon’s critics are demonstrating “an irresponsible use of history.”

    [A]s far as I can tell, it is simply arguing that Dershowitz represents himself as a liberal while actually shilling for Israeli state violence against Palestinians.
    That is not anti-Semitic; it is true” . http://mondoweiss.net/2017/11/californian-dershowitz-unleashes/

    Its the Jews who will decide if it is anti Semitic or not .

    Read More
    • Replies: @Ace
    That is correct. "Anti-Semitic" means absolutely nothing. Like "racist," etc.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  42. ussr andy says:
    @Tom Welsh
    The concept of "better values" is an intriguing one. Values are generally understood to be matters of opinion and personal choice; they are opposed to facts, which remain the same however anyone might feel about them.

    Now "goodness" and "badness" are themselves values. It makes no sense to say that something is "good" or "bad", except in the opinion of some person or group of people.

    So to talk about "good values" or "better values" is to confuse facts and values inextricably. Even if one accepts the validity of such expressions, they can still be considered "good" or "better" only subjectively - from some person's point of view.

    To lay down any set of values for a whole community, and presumably to punish anyone who chooses different values, is the essence of tyranny.

    Incidentally, it is amazing how often politicians nowadays prate about values, without ever once venturing to declare what exactly those values are. No doubt this is because any specific set of values would constitute far too stable a target for criticism. It would hardly do for Amber Rudd to declare that her values include (for instance) freedom of speech, when she has come out against it; or equal treatment of all people, when - as the article demonstrates - she is in favour of better treatment for Jews.

    It makes no sense to say that something is “good” or “bad”, except in the opinion of some person or group of people.

    would that there were ways to tell if an opinion comports with reality and/or is held for good reasons.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  43. renfro says:

    Here you go ……more public figures and officials, even those with positions to lose, are going after Israel

    ”UN rapporteur urges sanctions on Israel for driving Palestinians ‘back to the dark ages’
    US Politics ”

    Philip Weiss

    Last week there was a significant development in the international response to the Israeli occupation when the UN rapporteur for human rights in the occupied territories came out with a harsh report saying the world was too passive about the occupation.

    The “duration of this occupation is without precedent or parallel in today’s world,” the report said. Israel has “driven Gaza back to the dark ages” due to denial of water and electricity and freedom of movement. There is a “darkening stain” on the world’s legal framework because other countries have treated the occupation as normal, and done nothing to resist Israel’s “colonial ambition par excellence,” which includes two sets of laws for Israelis and Palestinians.

    At a press conference about his report, S. Michael Lynk, a Canadian professor of law and human rights expert, said it is time the international community reach into its “toolbox” of enforcement mechanisms, so as to “raise the stakes” against the occupation and change international “opinion” of Israel. The country had been worried by the Goldstone Report in 2009 and is today worried by the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement (BDS), Lynk said; so if the international community took “unified actions on an escalating basis” to declare the occupation illegal and demand Israel’s withdrawal, Israel would respond.

    That means sanctions.

    Israel is very dependent upon trade with the outside world, it’s very dependent upon its market with the United States, it’s very dependent upon its market with Europe. If there was an understanding that all of a sudden Israelis wanting to travel abroad needed to have visas, if all of a sudden Israel wasn’t going to get preferential trading agreements with the EU. If all of a sudden, the many and multitude of forms of military or economic cooperation or academic cooperation with Israel were now going to come to an end as long as Israel continued that, I think you’d begin to see a sea-change in the attitude of ordinary Israelis and in the attitude of the Israeli government…. Every journey of 1000 miles begins with a single step.””

    The US’s Haley at the UN is already barking like the junk yard bitch she is over this unbelievable suggestion.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  44. El Dato says:
    @Jake
    The only comment I made Monday was in reference to this quote: "I have long suspected that Theresa May has Jewish ancestry."

    It does not matter a whit whether she does. The fact is that in acting as one who places Jewish interests as top priority, May is acting out the logical heritage of WASP culture.

    WASP culture is formed fully, crystalized, with the rise to power of the Anglo-Saxon Puritans, which featured regicide and war against almost everything that marked England, and all of the British Isles as culturally formed by Christendom. Anglo-Saxon Puritanism was a Judaizing heresy. A Judaizing heresy necessarily produces culture that is pro-Jewish and fiercely opposed to - murderously, genocidally focused on - white Christian groups that are not born of Judaizing heresy.

    Thus, from its inception, WASP culture has acted always to ally with Jews against the vast majority of white Christians.

    Oliver Cromwell, that most archetypal WASP, hopped into bed with Jews, inviting Jews back into England legally and granting them special rights and privileges, as part of his war to exterminate at least the cultural futures of all non-WASP white Gentiles the WASPs ruled.

    'Paleoconservative' WASPs like John Derbyshire and Peter Brimelow adore Cromwell.

    Everything produces after its own kind. WASP culture will ALWAYS produce Elites who are staunchly pro-Semitic.

    ‘Paleoconservative’ WASPs like John Derbyshire and Peter Brimelow adore Cromwell.

    Why would they admire the Lord Protector of Britain? I don’t see what logic links Puritanism to be anti-Christian / pro-Jewish. Isn’t it mainly about being a tight-up control-freak asshole who thinks highly of himself, gives everyone a hard time and watches from behind curtains just in case somebody is having fun somewhere?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  45. AaronB says:
    @renfro
    '' What do Jews offer that is more appealing, and that has allowed them
    so much success?'>>>>>>

    Do you mean financially or in 'ideals?

    Their financial success is unconstrained by any ethics....easy to succeed if you don't have any ethics in business and practice tribal nepotism.
    As for offering ( life) "ideals' or universal ideals.....no one except Jews are clamoring to live in the Jewish state of Israel.
    The self determination of the Jews, as expressed in Israel, is pretty much condemned and despised by the majority of the world.

    So I would have to say they have nothing to offer but perhaps the proof that 'tribalism' can advance a group's success.

    I understand what you are saying, but let me try and elucidate my point.

    You say we should pursue our self interest because that is the law of life, a harsh law perhaps, but such is life, and realism requires we accept it.

    Jews claim that their success represents the triumph of of goodness.

    Jews act selfishly, but have defined it as unselfish promotion of universal goodness. This gives them tremendous motivation, as well as self belief. It is immensely consoling to see oneself this way.

    You offer, what? Realism? Frank and honest selfishness, because that is the way the world works? The critical, sardonic, realistic spirit of the West?

    Ok, you may be right, but you will inspire no one, you will motivate no one, you will console no one.

    Jews are successful precisely because they do not believe themselves to be cynically selfish, but because they believe their success to represent the triumph of goodness.

    Whites lose because they don’t believe their success to be anything other than selfish self intetest, and that isn’t enough to sustain motivation in the long run.

    Jews are idealists, whites are realists.

    Realists will always lose to idealists in the long run.

    Voltairean irony of the Steve Sailer kind will always lose to passionate moralism in the long run.

    However grotesque Jewish behavior is, they attempt to ground it in a moral vision.

    Whites don’t even attempt this – they are frankly amoral.

    Until you grasp this, you are lost.

    Spirit counts for more than flesh. The alt-right still hasn’t learned this lesson from the Jews.

    Whites must align themselves with the Tao once again. No nation that leaves the Tao can survive. A vision of frank selfishness, realism, is to have left the Tao far behind.

    Read More
    • Replies: @renfro
    ''I understand what you are saying, but let me try and elucidate my point.

    You say we should pursue our self interest because that is the law of life, a harsh law perhaps, but such is life, and realism requires we accept it''


    Nope thats not what I said. You ask what accounted for their success. I asked what success,.... financial or ideals ...?(as in your idea of 'ideals'
    And then simply gave an opinion on their financial success.
    And pointed out that all their parroting of Jewish 'ideals' hasn't fooled any informed people into believing they have any ideals....because the world has seen their ideals in action....in Israel and around the world in their parasitism, lack of honor and the kind of deception they practice.

    What you are saying is that we (whoever we are) cannot defeat/overcome the Jewish propaganda about themselves and their esteemed values because we don't employ inspiring speech and appeals to morals and so forth.

    That is partly true, for this political group and others, because some of us have realized after long experience that moral appeals don't work on people who have no morals---and I mean govs and people who could affect the change we want to see.

    Moral appeals do work on the public as for instance the ordinary people who have joined up to support justice for Palestine and end to the Isr occupation, in the US and around the world thanks to nothing but grassroots efforts.

    Consider for instance if a major US news channel ever did a full true story on Israel....ever revealed the truth about the USS Liberty....ever showed the dead mangled children Isr kills with the regular assaults. ....people would be morally outraged.

    There are people and groups who do use morality and farness and justice appeals in this problem.
    Its not necessary here most of the time because people already know the Jewish horror and are focus on how to end it.

    Moral outrage is what got me involved in the Israel Jews Zionist Palestine disaster to begin with 16 years ago......for what they have done to Palestines and what they have done in the US as well.

    , @renfro
    '' Whites don’t even attempt this – they are frankly amoral.

    Until you grasp this, you are lost.

    Spirit counts for more than flesh. The alt-right still hasn’t learned this lesson from the Jews.

    Whites must align themselves with the Tao once again. No nation that leaves the Tao can survive. A vision of frank selfishness, realism, is to have left the Tao far behind"">>>>

    Tao is for those who spend their lives trying to find the path by studying their own navels.....they all believe they have found the truth or the secret or the answer.

    The Jews studied their own navels for 2000 years and this is the path they found:

    TIMELINE OF JEWISH PERSECUTIONS Date Place Event

    580 B.C. Babylon/Judea Nebuchadnezzar conquers Judea, burns Temple 38 B.C. Alexandria, Egypt Mob Attacks 3 B.C. Egypt Expulsion 66 C.E. Alexandria, Egypt Mob Attacks 70 C.E. Jerusalem Expulsion following revolt 250 C.E. Carthage Expulsion 224 C.E. Italy Forced Conversion 325 C.E. Jerusalem Expulsion renewed by Constantine 351 C.E Persia Book Burning 357 C.E. Italy Property Confiscation 379 C.E. Milan Synagogue Burning 415 C.E. Alexandria Expulsion 418 C.E. Minorca Forced Conversion 468 C.E. Babylon/Judea Expulsion 469 C.E. Ipahan Holocaust 470 C.E. Babylon/Judea Expulsion 489 C.E. Antioch Synagogue Burning 506 C.E. Daphne Synagogue Burning 519 C.E. Ravenna Synagogue Burning 554 C.E. Diocese of Clement (France) Expulsion 561 C.E. Diocese of Uzes (France) Expulsion or Conversion 582 C.E Merovingia Forced Conversion 612 C.E. Visigoth Spain Expulsion 624 C.E. Hejaz Expulsion 628 C.E. Byzantium Forced Conversion 629 C.E. Merovingia Forced Conversion 633 C.E. Toledo Forced Conversion 638 C.E. Toledo Stake Burnings 642 C.E. Visigothic Empire Expulsion 653 C.E. Toledo Expulsion 681 C.E. Spain Forced Conversion 693 C.E. Toledo Jews Enslaved 722 C.E. Byzantium Judaism Outlawed 855 C.E. Italy Expulsion 876 C.E. Sens Expulsion 897 C.E. Narbonne Land Confiscation 945 C.E. Venice Ban on Sea Travel 1009 C.E. Orleans Massacre 1012 C.E. Rouen, Limoges & Rome Massacre 1012 C.E. Mayence, Germany Expulsion 1021 C.E. Rome Jews Burned Alive 1063 C.E. Spain Massacre 1095 C.E. Lorraine Massacre 1096 C.E. Northern France & Germany 1/3 of Jewish Population Massacred as part of the First Crusade 1096 C.E. Hungary Massacre 1096 C.E. Ralisbon Massacre 1099 C.E. Jerusalem Jews Burned Alive 1100 C.E. Kiev Pogrom 1140 C.E. Germany Massacres 1142-1212 C.E. North Africa Massacres 1146 C.E. Rhine Valley Massacre as part of the Second Crusade 1147 C.E. Wurzburg Massacre 1147 C.E. Belitz (Germany) Jews Burned Alive 1147 C.E. Carenton, Ramenu & Sully (France) Massacres 1171 C.E. Blois Stake Burnings 1181 C.E. France Expulsion/Property Confiscation 1181 C.E. England Property Confiscation 1188 C.E. London & York Mob Attacks 1189 C.E. England Mob Attacks against Jews following coronation of Richard the Lionheart/ Property Confiscation. 1190 C.E. Norfolk Jews Burned Alive 1191 C.E. Bray (France) Jews Burned Alive 1195 C.E. France Property Confiscation 1209 C.E. Beziers Massacre 1215 C.E. Rome Jews Forced to Wear Badges 1215 C.E. Toulouse (France) Mass Arrests 1218 C.E. England Jews Forced to Wear Badges 1231 C.E. Rome Inquisition Established 1236 C.E. France Forced Conversion/Massacre 1239 C.E. London Massacre & Property Confiscation 1240 C.E. France Talmud Confiscated 1240 C.E. England Book Burning 1240 C.E. Spain Forced Conversion 1242 C.E. Paris Talmud Burned 1244 C.E. Oxford Mob Attacks 1255 C.E. England Public Hangings 1261 C.E. Canterbury Mob Attacks 1262 C.E. London Mob Attacks 1264 C.E. London Mob Attacks 1267 C.E. Vienna Jews Forced to Wear Horned Hats 1270 C.E. Weissenberg, Magdeburg, Armstadt, Coblenz, Singzig, and Erfurt Jews Burned Alive 1278 C.E. Genoa (Spain) Mob Attacks 1283 C.E. Mayence & Bacharach Mob Attacks 1285 C.E. Munich Jews Burned Alive 1290 C.E. England Expulsion 1298 C.E. Franconia, Bavaria & Austria 100,000 Jews slaughtered underr command of German knight Rindfleisch 1306 C.E. France Expulsion by Philip the Fair (Same King who burned the Templars) 1308 C.E. Strasbourg Jews Burned Alive 1320 C.E. Toulouse & Perpigon 120 Communities Massacred & Talmud Burned 1321 C.E. Teruel Public Executions 1328 C.E. Estella 5,000 Jews Slaughtered 1348 C.E. France & Spain Jews Burned Alive 1348 C.E. Switzerland Expulsion 1349 C.E. Worms, Strasbourg, Oppenheim, Jews Burned Alive 1349 C.E. Heilbronn (Germany) Expulsion 1349 C.E. Hungary Expulsion 1349 C.E. Saxony Expulsion 1354 C.E. Castile (Spain) 12,000 Jews Slaughtered 1360 C.E. Hungary Banned 1368 C.E. Toledo 8,000 Jews Slaughtered 1370 C.E. Belgium Expulsion 1370 C.E. Majorca., Penignon & Barcelona Mob Attack 1377 C.E. Huesca (Spain) Jews Burned Alive 1380 C.E. Paris Mob Attack 1384 C.E. Nordlingen Mass Murder 1388 C.E. Strasbourg Expulsion 1389 C.E. Prague Mass Slaughter & Book Burning 1391 C.E. Castille, Toledo, Madrid, Seville, Forced Conversions & Mass Murder 1394 C.E. Germany Expulsion 1394 C.E. France Expulsion 1399 C.E. Posen (Poland) Jews Burned Alive 1400 C.E. Prague Stake Burnings 1407 C.E. Cracow Mob Attack 1415 C.E. Rome Talmud Confiscated 1420 C.E. Austria Expelled by Albrecht V 1422 C.E. Austria Jews Burned Alive 1422 C.E. Austria Expulsion 1424 C.E. Fribourg & Zurich Expulsion 1426 C.E. Cologne Expulsion 1431 C.E. Southern Germany Jews Burned Alive 1432 C.E. Savory Expulsion 1438 C.E. Mainz Expulsion 1439 C.E. Augsburg Expulsion 1444 C.E. Netherlands Expulsion 1449 C.E. Toledo Public Torture &. Burnings 1453 C.E. Franconia Expulsion 1453 C.E. Breslau Expulsion 1453 C.E. Poland Citzenship revoked 1454 C.E. Wurzburg Expulsion 1456 C.E. Bavaria Expulsion 1463 C.E. Cracow Mob Attack 1473 C.E. Andalusia Mob Attack 1480 C.E. Venice Jews Burned Alive 1481 C.E. Seville Stake Burnings 1484 C.E. Cuidad Real, Guadalupe, Sarago Jews Burned Alive 1485 C.E. Vincenza (Italy) Expulsion 1486 C.E. Toledo Jews Burned Alive 1488 C.E. Toledo Stake Burnings 1490 C.E. Toledo Public Executions 1491 C.E. Astorga Public Torture & Execution 1492 C.E. Sicily Expulsion 1492 C.E. Spain Choice between Expulsion or Conversion (When the Rivero family became Catholic) 1495 C.E. Lithuania Expulsion by Grand Duke Alexander 1497 C.E. Portugal Expulsion 1499 C.E. Germany Expulsion 1506 C.E. Lisbon Mob Attack 1510 C.E. Berlin Public Torture & Execution 1510 C.E. Brandenberg Expulsion 1510 C.E. Prussia Expulsion 1514 C.E. Strasbourg Expulsion 1519 C.E. Regensburg Expulsion 1539 C.E. Cracow & Portugal Stake Burnings 1540 C.E. Naples and Sardinia Expulsion 1542 C.E. Bohemia Expulsion 1550 C.E. Genoa and Venice Expulsion 1551 C.E. Bavaria Expulsion 1553 C.E. Rome Talmud burned 1555 C.E. Pesaro Expulsion 1556 C.E. Sokhachev (Poland) Public Torture & Execution 1559 C.E. Austria Expulsion 1561 C.E. Prague Expulsion 1567 C.E. Wurzburg Expulsion 1569 C.E. Italy and Papal States Expulsion 1571 C.E. Brandenburg Expulsion 1582 C.E. Hungary Banned a second time 1582 C.E. Netherlands Expulsion 1593 C.E. Brunswick Expulsion 1593 C.E. Brandenburg, Austria Expulsion 1593 C.E. Italy Banned a second time 1597 C.E. Cremona, Pavia & Lodi Expulsion 1614 C.E. Frankfort Expulsion 1615 C.E. Worms Expulsion 1619 C.E. Kiev Expulsion 1635 C.E. Vilna Mob Attack 1637 C.E. Cracow Public Torture & Execution 1647 C.E. Lisbon Jews Burned Alive 1648 C.E. Poland 1/3 of Jewry Slaughtered 1649 C.E. Ukraine Expulsion 1649 C.E. Hamburg Expulsion 1652 C.E. Lisbon Stake Burnings 1654 C.E. New Amsterdam Expulled by Peter Stuyvesant (order later retracted) 1654 C.E. Little Russia Expulsion 1656 C.E. Lithuania Expulsion 1660 C.E. Seville Jews Burned Alive 1663 C.E Cracow Public Torture &. Execution 1664 C.E. Lemberg Mob Attack 1669 C.E. Oran (North Africa) Expulsion 1670 C.E. Vienna Expulsion 1671 C.E. Minsk Mob Attacks 1681 C.E. Vilna Mob Attacks 1682 C.E. Marseilles Expulsion 1682 C.E. Cracow Mob Attacks 1687 C.E. Posen Mob Attacks 1712 C.E. Sandomir Expulsion 1727 C.E. Russia Expulsion 1738 C.E. Wurtemburg Expulsion 1740 C.E. Liule Russia Expulsion 1744 C.E Hungary Banned for the third time by Queen Maria Theresa. "Henceforth, no Jew, no matter under what name, will be allowed to remain here without my written permission. I know of no other troublesome pest within the state than this race, which impoverishes the people by their fraud, usury and money-lending and commits all deeds which an honorable man despises. Subsequently, they have to be removed and excluded from here as much as possible." 1744 C.E. Livonia Expulsion 1745 C.E. Moravia Expulsion by order of the King (to halt mob attacks on Jews) 1753 C.E. Kovad (Lithuania) Expulsion 1757 C.E. Kamenetz Talmud Burning 1761 C.E. Bordeaux Expulsion 1768 C.E. Kiev 3,000 Jews Slaughtered 1772 C.E. Russia Expulsion to the Pale of Settlement 1775 C.E. Warsaw Expulsion 1789 C.E. Alsace Expulsion 1790 C.E. Morocco Expulsion, villages destroyed 1801 C.E. Bucharest Mob Attack 1804 C.E. Russian Villages Expulsion 1808 C.E. Russian Countryside Expulsion 1814 C.E. Norway Rescinds ban on Jews 1815 C.E. Lubeck & Bremen Expulsion 1815 C.E. Franconia, Swabia & Bavaria Expulsion 1820 C.E. Bremes Expulsion 1843 C.E. Austria & Prussia Expulsion 1850 C.E. New York City 500 People, Led by Police, Attacked &. Wrecked, Jewish Synagogue 1862 C.E. United States Expelled by Ulysses S. Grant (order later retracted) 1866 C.E Galatz (Romania) Expulsion 1871 C.E. Odena Mob Attack 1882 C.E. Russia Laws banishing Jews relaxed under Alexander II. Following his assassination by a Jewish plot, expulsion of 1772 restored. 1887 C.E. Slovakia Mob Attacks 1897 C.E. Kantakuzenka (Russia) Mob Attacks 1898 C.E. Rennes (France) Mob Attack 1899 C.E. Nicholayev Mob Attack 1900 C.E. Konitz (Prussia) Mob Attack 1902 C.E. Poland Widespread Pogroms 1904 C.E. Manchuria, Kiev & Volhynia Widespread Pogroms 1905 C.E. Zhitomir (Yolhynia) Mob Attacks 1919 C.E Bavaria Expulsion 1915 C.E. Georgia (U.S.A.) Leo Frank Lynched 1919 C.E. Mongolia Pogrom 1919 C.E. Prague Wide Spread Pogroms 1920 C.E. Munich & Breslau Mob Attacks 1922 C.E. Boston, MA Lawrence Lowell, President of Harvard, calls for Quota Restrictions on Jewish Admission 1926 C.E. Uzbekistan Pogrom 1928 C.E. Hungary Widespread Anti-Semitic Riots on University Campuses 1929 C.E. Lemberg (Poland) Mob Attacks 1930 C.E. Berlin Mob Attack 1933 C.E. Bucharest Mob Attacks 1933 C.E. Europe Immigrant Jews banned from citizenship. 1935 C.E. Germany

    Since you are into that let me remind you what Confucius said.....'to know a subject you must first divorce youself from any love or hate of it.'
    Next?
    , @Seamus Padraig

    Spirit counts for more than flesh. The alt-right still hasn’t learned this lesson from the Jews.
     
    What the alt-right learned is what happened to the 'Moral Majority' and the rapture-zionist cucks. Getting duped and then discarded is not the way to power either. It's not that we're opposed to religion as a matter of principle; we're just opposed to the religions we've got.
    , @WhiteWolf
    National Socialism, communism, diversity, Christianity, Judaism or Islam. Take your pick of ideals and battle against the believers of the other ones.

    Someone somewhere is having a big laugh at our expense.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  46. @NoseytheDuke
    You have no chance if you persist in perpetuating this Left/Right nonsense, can't you see that it is a pincer movement coming from both sides? In Britain, Amber Rudd is considered truly Hard Right, just like John McCain & Co is in the US. Sheesh!

    Yes, there are some who insist on labeling anyone/anything they don’t like as “the left”. Ms. Rudd is an operative of the conservative party, and proudly identifies herself that way. I am sure she would tell you that she is conservative because she feels that “there are too many laws”, and yet here she is trying to impose prison sentences for reading the internet. Similar to the “conservative” lawmakers in the US who continue to outlaw, or attempt to outlaw, reproductive rights, birth control, pot, “food containing human fetuses” (not kidding), solar power, and on and on. Meanwhile the sjw want to outlaw statues of white men, threatening looks, “hate speech”, peaceful assembly by people they don’t like, etc.

    It’s the owning class and their employees, the ruling class, against the rest of us. They’re able to convince enough of the hoi polloi that they’re on their side to keep these stupid distractions going while they keep on robbing and killing us (cf. fire anyone who doesn’t stand for the national anthem!!!). Our rulers are really good at it though – I’ll hand them that.

    Read More
    • Replies: @helena
    ok, why did uk conservatives introduce gay marriage - was it something they had been arguing for for some time? No, it was the wholesale takeover of cultural values by people on the left. And now with the reduced minority, the conservative party is having to compromise economic policy as well every time jc opens his mouth because of the fear of his ability to win a general election.

    Antifa says it is left. So, a bit like Muslims who claim Islamic terrorists are not muslim. What you're doing is saying, 'no, that's not the true left'. But it is what it is; people enamoured of marx are successfully deconstructing western civilisation as was. They may be funded by globalists but it is what they the masses believe that is the source of the problem, horse-water, because democracy is a numbers game.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  47. Just do what the Jews tell you and keep importing more Muslims England, the Muslims will do what you WASPs have become too weak to do and take care of the Jews for you. Of course they’ll kill all you WASPs too eventually, but the Jews will get picked off first.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  48. @AaronB
    Surely, however, there are some universal values.

    Jews promote 'values' and the alt-right promotes 'realism' - do you think realism can defeat values?

    When I look to Steve Sailer for inspiration, I find cold realism, and frank selfishness. I find irony, and cynicism.

    What do Jews offer that is more appealing, and that has allowed them
    so much success?

    Until the alt-right figures this out, they have no chance.

    What is astonishing is the amount of attention the alt-right pays to Jews, without undersranding the source of their success.

    A sensitive, intelligent, young white man, looking for inspiration - can he find it in irony and cynicism? In frank selfishness?

    That is the vision white culture offers.

    Jews may cheat, lie, and pursue selfishness - but that is not the vision they offer themselves or others.

    Even Jewish tribal selfishness, frankly expressed in the Talmud, is not presented as mere tribal self seeking, as Steve Sailer might, or Vox Day, with an ironic smile at the realities of life.

    No, Jews are chosen, favored of God, and their selfishness is in line with the eternal Tao, and represents Goodness.

    The contribution of white culture is the critical spirit - but criticism tears down, does not build up. You cannot live on criticism.

    As we see with the alt-right, despite its attempt to return to religion, all white cultural movements are realistic and critical.

    Yet without an ideal you can't live.

    Jews offer an ideal. Steve Sailer offers irony.

    Jews use criticism as a tactic, whites have adopted it as a metaphysic.

    This is why whites excel at science, but also why whites lose to Jews.

    Perhaps whites are incapable of creating an ideal, and will always attempt to live by cynical realism? If so, then whites will always lose to people who are capable of creating an ideal, whether Jew, Muslim, or Chinese.

    And yet even now, when trying to free themselves, whites false back on realism and cynicism.

    Perhaps whites are incapable of creating an ideal, and will always attempt to live by cynical realism? If so, then whites will always lose to people who are capable of creating an ideal, whether Jew, Muslim, or Chinese.

    The Jews and the Muslims stand alone when it comes to creating ideals, no other people can. The Russians can’t, that’s why communism and the Soviet Union failed. The Chinese can’t either, that’s why Communism failed in China, the Chinese are the most pragmatic people, no “ism” will ever stick with them. The Indians are hopeless, even their religion has 330 million Gods and goddesses, they can’t even stick to just one. Africans are even more hopeless than the Indians. Latin Americans tried Communism, didn’t work for them either, Castro’s Cuba is a mess. Latin America is now a land of drug cartels and banana republics.

    The WASPs used to have Christianity, then the Jews chipped away at their ties to the religion through their counter culture revolution, strengthened through their control of the media, academia, and Hollywood. After 5 decades of relentless brainwashing, the WASPs have by and large been beaten into submission.

    As you can see, all the world’s people are governed by pragmatism, except the Jews and the Muslims, who hold fast to their ideals of Liberalism and Islam.

    The irony is, Liberalism is completely at odds with Islam in every way. Liberalism embraces feminism, homosexuality, hedonism, narcissism, ultimate freedom of sex, drugs, rock ‘n roll…all things eschewed by Islam. As more and more Muslims come into the West courtesy of the open border push by Jews, these two groups are heading for a collision. My money is on the Muslims. The Jews and their liberal thugs like Antifa will bend over as soon as they come up against people who are even more irrational and violent.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  49. renfro says:
    @AaronB
    I understand what you are saying, but let me try and elucidate my point.

    You say we should pursue our self interest because that is the law of life, a harsh law perhaps, but such is life, and realism requires we accept it.

    Jews claim that their success represents the triumph of of goodness.

    Jews act selfishly, but have defined it as unselfish promotion of universal goodness. This gives them tremendous motivation, as well as self belief. It is immensely consoling to see oneself this way.

    You offer, what? Realism? Frank and honest selfishness, because that is the way the world works? The critical, sardonic, realistic spirit of the West?

    Ok, you may be right, but you will inspire no one, you will motivate no one, you will console no one.

    Jews are successful precisely because they do not believe themselves to be cynically selfish, but because they believe their success to represent the triumph of goodness.

    Whites lose because they don't believe their success to be anything other than selfish self intetest, and that isn't enough to sustain motivation in the long run.

    Jews are idealists, whites are realists.

    Realists will always lose to idealists in the long run.

    Voltairean irony of the Steve Sailer kind will always lose to passionate moralism in the long run.

    However grotesque Jewish behavior is, they attempt to ground it in a moral vision.

    Whites don't even attempt this - they are frankly amoral.

    Until you grasp this, you are lost.

    Spirit counts for more than flesh. The alt-right still hasn't learned this lesson from the Jews.

    Whites must align themselves with the Tao once again. No nation that leaves the Tao can survive. A vision of frank selfishness, realism, is to have left the Tao far behind.

    ”I understand what you are saying, but let me try and elucidate my point.

    You say we should pursue our self interest because that is the law of life, a harsh law perhaps, but such is life, and realism requires we accept it”

    Nope thats not what I said. You ask what accounted for their success. I asked what success,…. financial or ideals …?(as in your idea of ‘ideals’
    And then simply gave an opinion on their financial success.
    And pointed out that all their parroting of Jewish ‘ideals’ hasn’t fooled any informed people into believing they have any ideals….because the world has seen their ideals in action….in Israel and around the world in their parasitism, lack of honor and the kind of deception they practice.

    What you are saying is that we (whoever we are) cannot defeat/overcome the Jewish propaganda about themselves and their esteemed values because we don’t employ inspiring speech and appeals to morals and so forth.

    That is partly true, for this political group and others, because some of us have realized after long experience that moral appeals don’t work on people who have no morals—and I mean govs and people who could affect the change we want to see.

    Moral appeals do work on the public as for instance the ordinary people who have joined up to support justice for Palestine and end to the Isr occupation, in the US and around the world thanks to nothing but grassroots efforts.

    Consider for instance if a major US news channel ever did a full true story on Israel….ever revealed the truth about the USS Liberty….ever showed the dead mangled children Isr kills with the regular assaults. ….people would be morally outraged.

    There are people and groups who do use morality and farness and justice appeals in this problem.
    Its not necessary here most of the time because people already know the Jewish horror and are focus on how to end it.

    Moral outrage is what got me involved in the Israel Jews Zionist Palestine disaster to begin with 16 years ago……for what they have done to Palestines and what they have done in the US as well.

    Read More
    • Replies: @AaronB
    I assumed you were alt-right, and the alt-right offers honest selfishness on the principle that this is realistic.

    You have one half of the equation right - pointing out the immorality of Jewish behavior is great and needs to be done, but what vision do you offer in its stead?

    If it is mere tribalism, mere honest selfishness, as the alt-right does, that will not go very far in the long run, even if it is what the Jews do rather than say.

    Pointing out bad Jewish behavior simply isn't effective enough as their "intentions" are good, so to speak.

    It is a good start, but you can't stop there.

    The alt-right fails already on the level of intention. It does not even pretend to have intentions beyond tribalism.

    That will be fatal in the long run, altho in the short run it will meet with some success.

    Even the Romans pretended their wars of conquest were wars of self-defense. They were not so reckless as to simply declare themselves honest conquerors. Pax Romana, an ideal. However false.

    Only Vikings are honest conquerors.

    Even the British could not dispense with the moral element with their empire.

    Only the alt-right, HBD-sphere is bold and reckless enough to dispense with the moral element and try and erect the rule of frank selfishness, ruthless competitiveness, and dispense with all ideals.

    In this way it is the ultimate flower of the Western spirit, it's last dying gasp - but remember, the British Empire befan to decline shortly after theories of Darwinian fitness began to possess the minds of the British, and the alt-right is just another phase in the decadence of the West.

    It is why to this day communism is viewed more favorably than national socialism, even though the suffering they caused was similar.

    The Jews have also departed far from the Tao over the past two centuries, and will reap what they sow, like whites have.

    The Jews are merely in their "empire" phase, when they retain the shell of morality but act like pirates. Soon they too will suffer the collapse in morale that follows closely upon any deviation from the Tao.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  50. @AaronB
    It is a genuine dilemma that few in the West wish to face, least of all the alt-right.

    What made the West powerful is what made it weak.

    Few can face this squarely.

    The alt-right wants to keep science and the critical spirit. Nothing could be more blind.

    Leopardi called it the barbarism of reason.

    The alt-right are merely men who have not yet fully absorbed, in their bones, the consequences of Western culture.

    They wish to return to what was a transitional phase.

    If they gained power, their grandchildren would be liberals, as the critical spirit they retain would work it's way into their bones.

    If we return to an earlier phase, the pattern would play itself out again, as the consequences inevitably follow the premises.

    A framework of irational beliefs, you say - yet reason is a limiting view, and not the most important thing in life.

    All human societies are transitional. And all function by myth, whether inspired by science or not. There is nothing in the alt-right that makes us less authentic than those movements that condemn us. We lack only two things: ownership of the media heights, n an excess of babies.

    Read More
    • Replies: @AaronB
    What is your myth?

    HBD, tribalism - these are anti-myths, in a sense. The destruction of myth, rather.

    The language the alt-right uses is that of realism, science, and the critical spirit. This is not the language of myth. HBD will inspire no one to self sacrifice.

    Although I myself have argued that HBD is really a myth rather than science, and science itself is a myth - these myths functions in a destructive fashion, and you can erect nothing on them.

    The alt-right has not returned to myth, but is just one more phase in the long story of Western decadence, which is the story of the critical spirit.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  51. renfro says:
    @AaronB
    I understand what you are saying, but let me try and elucidate my point.

    You say we should pursue our self interest because that is the law of life, a harsh law perhaps, but such is life, and realism requires we accept it.

    Jews claim that their success represents the triumph of of goodness.

    Jews act selfishly, but have defined it as unselfish promotion of universal goodness. This gives them tremendous motivation, as well as self belief. It is immensely consoling to see oneself this way.

    You offer, what? Realism? Frank and honest selfishness, because that is the way the world works? The critical, sardonic, realistic spirit of the West?

    Ok, you may be right, but you will inspire no one, you will motivate no one, you will console no one.

    Jews are successful precisely because they do not believe themselves to be cynically selfish, but because they believe their success to represent the triumph of goodness.

    Whites lose because they don't believe their success to be anything other than selfish self intetest, and that isn't enough to sustain motivation in the long run.

    Jews are idealists, whites are realists.

    Realists will always lose to idealists in the long run.

    Voltairean irony of the Steve Sailer kind will always lose to passionate moralism in the long run.

    However grotesque Jewish behavior is, they attempt to ground it in a moral vision.

    Whites don't even attempt this - they are frankly amoral.

    Until you grasp this, you are lost.

    Spirit counts for more than flesh. The alt-right still hasn't learned this lesson from the Jews.

    Whites must align themselves with the Tao once again. No nation that leaves the Tao can survive. A vision of frank selfishness, realism, is to have left the Tao far behind.

    ” Whites don’t even attempt this – they are frankly amoral.

    Until you grasp this, you are lost.

    Spirit counts for more than flesh. The alt-right still hasn’t learned this lesson from the Jews.

    Whites must align themselves with the Tao once again. No nation that leaves the Tao can survive. A vision of frank selfishness, realism, is to have left the Tao far behind””>>>>

    Tao is for those who spend their lives trying to find the path by studying their own navels…..they all believe they have found the truth or the secret or the answer.

    The Jews studied their own navels for 2000 years and this is the path they found:

    TIMELINE OF JEWISH PERSECUTIONS Date Place Event

    [MORE]

    580 B.C. Babylon/Judea Nebuchadnezzar conquers Judea, burns Temple 38 B.C. Alexandria, Egypt Mob Attacks 3 B.C. Egypt Expulsion 66 C.E. Alexandria, Egypt Mob Attacks 70 C.E. Jerusalem Expulsion following revolt 250 C.E. Carthage Expulsion 224 C.E. Italy Forced Conversion 325 C.E. Jerusalem Expulsion renewed by Constantine 351 C.E Persia Book Burning 357 C.E. Italy Property Confiscation 379 C.E. Milan Synagogue Burning 415 C.E. Alexandria Expulsion 418 C.E. Minorca Forced Conversion 468 C.E. Babylon/Judea Expulsion 469 C.E. Ipahan Holocaust 470 C.E. Babylon/Judea Expulsion 489 C.E. Antioch Synagogue Burning 506 C.E. Daphne Synagogue Burning 519 C.E. Ravenna Synagogue Burning 554 C.E. Diocese of Clement (France) Expulsion 561 C.E. Diocese of Uzes (France) Expulsion or Conversion 582 C.E Merovingia Forced Conversion 612 C.E. Visigoth Spain Expulsion 624 C.E. Hejaz Expulsion 628 C.E. Byzantium Forced Conversion 629 C.E. Merovingia Forced Conversion 633 C.E. Toledo Forced Conversion 638 C.E. Toledo Stake Burnings 642 C.E. Visigothic Empire Expulsion 653 C.E. Toledo Expulsion 681 C.E. Spain Forced Conversion 693 C.E. Toledo Jews Enslaved 722 C.E. Byzantium Judaism Outlawed 855 C.E. Italy Expulsion 876 C.E. Sens Expulsion 897 C.E. Narbonne Land Confiscation 945 C.E. Venice Ban on Sea Travel 1009 C.E. Orleans Massacre 1012 C.E. Rouen, Limoges & Rome Massacre 1012 C.E. Mayence, Germany Expulsion 1021 C.E. Rome Jews Burned Alive 1063 C.E. Spain Massacre 1095 C.E. Lorraine Massacre 1096 C.E. Northern France & Germany 1/3 of Jewish Population Massacred as part of the First Crusade 1096 C.E. Hungary Massacre 1096 C.E. Ralisbon Massacre 1099 C.E. Jerusalem Jews Burned Alive 1100 C.E. Kiev Pogrom 1140 C.E. Germany Massacres 1142-1212 C.E. North Africa Massacres 1146 C.E. Rhine Valley Massacre as part of the Second Crusade 1147 C.E. Wurzburg Massacre 1147 C.E. Belitz (Germany) Jews Burned Alive 1147 C.E. Carenton, Ramenu & Sully (France) Massacres 1171 C.E. Blois Stake Burnings 1181 C.E. France Expulsion/Property Confiscation 1181 C.E. England Property Confiscation 1188 C.E. London & York Mob Attacks 1189 C.E. England Mob Attacks against Jews following coronation of Richard the Lionheart/ Property Confiscation. 1190 C.E. Norfolk Jews Burned Alive 1191 C.E. Bray (France) Jews Burned Alive 1195 C.E. France Property Confiscation 1209 C.E. Beziers Massacre 1215 C.E. Rome Jews Forced to Wear Badges 1215 C.E. Toulouse (France) Mass Arrests 1218 C.E. England Jews Forced to Wear Badges 1231 C.E. Rome Inquisition Established 1236 C.E. France Forced Conversion/Massacre 1239 C.E. London Massacre & Property Confiscation 1240 C.E. France Talmud Confiscated 1240 C.E. England Book Burning 1240 C.E. Spain Forced Conversion 1242 C.E. Paris Talmud Burned 1244 C.E. Oxford Mob Attacks 1255 C.E. England Public Hangings 1261 C.E. Canterbury Mob Attacks 1262 C.E. London Mob Attacks 1264 C.E. London Mob Attacks 1267 C.E. Vienna Jews Forced to Wear Horned Hats 1270 C.E. Weissenberg, Magdeburg, Armstadt, Coblenz, Singzig, and Erfurt Jews Burned Alive 1278 C.E. Genoa (Spain) Mob Attacks 1283 C.E. Mayence & Bacharach Mob Attacks 1285 C.E. Munich Jews Burned Alive 1290 C.E. England Expulsion 1298 C.E. Franconia, Bavaria & Austria 100,000 Jews slaughtered underr command of German knight Rindfleisch 1306 C.E. France Expulsion by Philip the Fair (Same King who burned the Templars) 1308 C.E. Strasbourg Jews Burned Alive 1320 C.E. Toulouse & Perpigon 120 Communities Massacred & Talmud Burned 1321 C.E. Teruel Public Executions 1328 C.E. Estella 5,000 Jews Slaughtered 1348 C.E. France & Spain Jews Burned Alive 1348 C.E. Switzerland Expulsion 1349 C.E. Worms, Strasbourg, Oppenheim, Jews Burned Alive 1349 C.E. Heilbronn (Germany) Expulsion 1349 C.E. Hungary Expulsion 1349 C.E. Saxony Expulsion 1354 C.E. Castile (Spain) 12,000 Jews Slaughtered 1360 C.E. Hungary Banned 1368 C.E. Toledo 8,000 Jews Slaughtered 1370 C.E. Belgium Expulsion 1370 C.E. Majorca., Penignon & Barcelona Mob Attack 1377 C.E. Huesca (Spain) Jews Burned Alive 1380 C.E. Paris Mob Attack 1384 C.E. Nordlingen Mass Murder 1388 C.E. Strasbourg Expulsion 1389 C.E. Prague Mass Slaughter & Book Burning 1391 C.E. Castille, Toledo, Madrid, Seville, Forced Conversions & Mass Murder 1394 C.E. Germany Expulsion 1394 C.E. France Expulsion 1399 C.E. Posen (Poland) Jews Burned Alive 1400 C.E. Prague Stake Burnings 1407 C.E. Cracow Mob Attack 1415 C.E. Rome Talmud Confiscated 1420 C.E. Austria Expelled by Albrecht V 1422 C.E. Austria Jews Burned Alive 1422 C.E. Austria Expulsion 1424 C.E. Fribourg & Zurich Expulsion 1426 C.E. Cologne Expulsion 1431 C.E. Southern Germany Jews Burned Alive 1432 C.E. Savory Expulsion 1438 C.E. Mainz Expulsion 1439 C.E. Augsburg Expulsion 1444 C.E. Netherlands Expulsion 1449 C.E. Toledo Public Torture &. Burnings 1453 C.E. Franconia Expulsion 1453 C.E. Breslau Expulsion 1453 C.E. Poland Citzenship revoked 1454 C.E. Wurzburg Expulsion 1456 C.E. Bavaria Expulsion 1463 C.E. Cracow Mob Attack 1473 C.E. Andalusia Mob Attack 1480 C.E. Venice Jews Burned Alive 1481 C.E. Seville Stake Burnings 1484 C.E. Cuidad Real, Guadalupe, Sarago Jews Burned Alive 1485 C.E. Vincenza (Italy) Expulsion 1486 C.E. Toledo Jews Burned Alive 1488 C.E. Toledo Stake Burnings 1490 C.E. Toledo Public Executions 1491 C.E. Astorga Public Torture & Execution 1492 C.E. Sicily Expulsion 1492 C.E. Spain Choice between Expulsion or Conversion (When the Rivero family became Catholic) 1495 C.E. Lithuania Expulsion by Grand Duke Alexander 1497 C.E. Portugal Expulsion 1499 C.E. Germany Expulsion 1506 C.E. Lisbon Mob Attack 1510 C.E. Berlin Public Torture & Execution 1510 C.E. Brandenberg Expulsion 1510 C.E. Prussia Expulsion 1514 C.E. Strasbourg Expulsion 1519 C.E. Regensburg Expulsion 1539 C.E. Cracow & Portugal Stake Burnings 1540 C.E. Naples and Sardinia Expulsion 1542 C.E. Bohemia Expulsion 1550 C.E. Genoa and Venice Expulsion 1551 C.E. Bavaria Expulsion 1553 C.E. Rome Talmud burned 1555 C.E. Pesaro Expulsion 1556 C.E. Sokhachev (Poland) Public Torture & Execution 1559 C.E. Austria Expulsion 1561 C.E. Prague Expulsion 1567 C.E. Wurzburg Expulsion 1569 C.E. Italy and Papal States Expulsion 1571 C.E. Brandenburg Expulsion 1582 C.E. Hungary Banned a second time 1582 C.E. Netherlands Expulsion 1593 C.E. Brunswick Expulsion 1593 C.E. Brandenburg, Austria Expulsion 1593 C.E. Italy Banned a second time 1597 C.E. Cremona, Pavia & Lodi Expulsion 1614 C.E. Frankfort Expulsion 1615 C.E. Worms Expulsion 1619 C.E. Kiev Expulsion 1635 C.E. Vilna Mob Attack 1637 C.E. Cracow Public Torture & Execution 1647 C.E. Lisbon Jews Burned Alive 1648 C.E. Poland 1/3 of Jewry Slaughtered 1649 C.E. Ukraine Expulsion 1649 C.E. Hamburg Expulsion 1652 C.E. Lisbon Stake Burnings 1654 C.E. New Amsterdam Expulled by Peter Stuyvesant (order later retracted) 1654 C.E. Little Russia Expulsion 1656 C.E. Lithuania Expulsion 1660 C.E. Seville Jews Burned Alive 1663 C.E Cracow Public Torture &. Execution 1664 C.E. Lemberg Mob Attack 1669 C.E. Oran (North Africa) Expulsion 1670 C.E. Vienna Expulsion 1671 C.E. Minsk Mob Attacks 1681 C.E. Vilna Mob Attacks 1682 C.E. Marseilles Expulsion 1682 C.E. Cracow Mob Attacks 1687 C.E. Posen Mob Attacks 1712 C.E. Sandomir Expulsion 1727 C.E. Russia Expulsion 1738 C.E. Wurtemburg Expulsion 1740 C.E. Liule Russia Expulsion 1744 C.E Hungary Banned for the third time by Queen Maria Theresa. “Henceforth, no Jew, no matter under what name, will be allowed to remain here without my written permission. I know of no other troublesome pest within the state than this race, which impoverishes the people by their fraud, usury and money-lending and commits all deeds which an honorable man despises. Subsequently, they have to be removed and excluded from here as much as possible.” 1744 C.E. Livonia Expulsion 1745 C.E. Moravia Expulsion by order of the King (to halt mob attacks on Jews) 1753 C.E. Kovad (Lithuania) Expulsion 1757 C.E. Kamenetz Talmud Burning 1761 C.E. Bordeaux Expulsion 1768 C.E. Kiev 3,000 Jews Slaughtered 1772 C.E. Russia Expulsion to the Pale of Settlement 1775 C.E. Warsaw Expulsion 1789 C.E. Alsace Expulsion 1790 C.E. Morocco Expulsion, villages destroyed 1801 C.E. Bucharest Mob Attack 1804 C.E. Russian Villages Expulsion 1808 C.E. Russian Countryside Expulsion 1814 C.E. Norway Rescinds ban on Jews 1815 C.E. Lubeck & Bremen Expulsion 1815 C.E. Franconia, Swabia & Bavaria Expulsion 1820 C.E. Bremes Expulsion 1843 C.E. Austria & Prussia Expulsion 1850 C.E. New York City 500 People, Led by Police, Attacked &. Wrecked, Jewish Synagogue 1862 C.E. United States Expelled by Ulysses S. Grant (order later retracted) 1866 C.E Galatz (Romania) Expulsion 1871 C.E. Odena Mob Attack 1882 C.E. Russia Laws banishing Jews relaxed under Alexander II. Following his assassination by a Jewish plot, expulsion of 1772 restored. 1887 C.E. Slovakia Mob Attacks 1897 C.E. Kantakuzenka (Russia) Mob Attacks 1898 C.E. Rennes (France) Mob Attack 1899 C.E. Nicholayev Mob Attack 1900 C.E. Konitz (Prussia) Mob Attack 1902 C.E. Poland Widespread Pogroms 1904 C.E. Manchuria, Kiev & Volhynia Widespread Pogroms 1905 C.E. Zhitomir (Yolhynia) Mob Attacks 1919 C.E Bavaria Expulsion 1915 C.E. Georgia (U.S.A.) Leo Frank Lynched 1919 C.E. Mongolia Pogrom 1919 C.E. Prague Wide Spread Pogroms 1920 C.E. Munich & Breslau Mob Attacks 1922 C.E. Boston, MA Lawrence Lowell, President of Harvard, calls for Quota Restrictions on Jewish Admission 1926 C.E. Uzbekistan Pogrom 1928 C.E. Hungary Widespread Anti-Semitic Riots on University Campuses 1929 C.E. Lemberg (Poland) Mob Attacks 1930 C.E. Berlin Mob Attack 1933 C.E. Bucharest Mob Attacks 1933 C.E. Europe Immigrant Jews banned from citizenship. 1935 C.E. Germany

    Since you are into that let me remind you what Confucius said…..’to know a subject you must first divorce youself from any love or hate of it.’
    Next?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  52. helena says:
    @Sane Left Libertarian
    Yes, there are some who insist on labeling anyone/anything they don't like as "the left". Ms. Rudd is an operative of the conservative party, and proudly identifies herself that way. I am sure she would tell you that she is conservative because she feels that "there are too many laws", and yet here she is trying to impose prison sentences for reading the internet. Similar to the "conservative" lawmakers in the US who continue to outlaw, or attempt to outlaw, reproductive rights, birth control, pot, "food containing human fetuses" (not kidding), solar power, and on and on. Meanwhile the sjw want to outlaw statues of white men, threatening looks, "hate speech", peaceful assembly by people they don't like, etc.

    It's the owning class and their employees, the ruling class, against the rest of us. They're able to convince enough of the hoi polloi that they're on their side to keep these stupid distractions going while they keep on robbing and killing us (cf. fire anyone who doesn't stand for the national anthem!!!). Our rulers are really good at it though - I'll hand them that.

    ok, why did uk conservatives introduce gay marriage – was it something they had been arguing for for some time? No, it was the wholesale takeover of cultural values by people on the left. And now with the reduced minority, the conservative party is having to compromise economic policy as well every time jc opens his mouth because of the fear of his ability to win a general election.

    Antifa says it is left. So, a bit like Muslims who claim Islamic terrorists are not muslim. What you’re doing is saying, ‘no, that’s not the true left’. But it is what it is; people enamoured of marx are successfully deconstructing western civilisation as was. They may be funded by globalists but it is what they the masses believe that is the source of the problem, horse-water, because democracy is a numbers game.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  53. This is a very powerful essay; full of truth, insight, and unanswered questions. Thank you, Tobias Langdon.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  54. @AaronB
    I understand what you are saying, but let me try and elucidate my point.

    You say we should pursue our self interest because that is the law of life, a harsh law perhaps, but such is life, and realism requires we accept it.

    Jews claim that their success represents the triumph of of goodness.

    Jews act selfishly, but have defined it as unselfish promotion of universal goodness. This gives them tremendous motivation, as well as self belief. It is immensely consoling to see oneself this way.

    You offer, what? Realism? Frank and honest selfishness, because that is the way the world works? The critical, sardonic, realistic spirit of the West?

    Ok, you may be right, but you will inspire no one, you will motivate no one, you will console no one.

    Jews are successful precisely because they do not believe themselves to be cynically selfish, but because they believe their success to represent the triumph of goodness.

    Whites lose because they don't believe their success to be anything other than selfish self intetest, and that isn't enough to sustain motivation in the long run.

    Jews are idealists, whites are realists.

    Realists will always lose to idealists in the long run.

    Voltairean irony of the Steve Sailer kind will always lose to passionate moralism in the long run.

    However grotesque Jewish behavior is, they attempt to ground it in a moral vision.

    Whites don't even attempt this - they are frankly amoral.

    Until you grasp this, you are lost.

    Spirit counts for more than flesh. The alt-right still hasn't learned this lesson from the Jews.

    Whites must align themselves with the Tao once again. No nation that leaves the Tao can survive. A vision of frank selfishness, realism, is to have left the Tao far behind.

    Spirit counts for more than flesh. The alt-right still hasn’t learned this lesson from the Jews.

    What the alt-right learned is what happened to the ‘Moral Majority’ and the rapture-zionist cucks. Getting duped and then discarded is not the way to power either. It’s not that we’re opposed to religion as a matter of principle; we’re just opposed to the religions we’ve got.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  55. WhiteWolf says:

    “I want to make sure those who view despicable terrorist content online, including jihadi websites, far-right propaganda and bomb-making instructions, face the full force of the law,”

    I guess only far left propaganda is acceptable to her. These people are so transparent.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  56. WhiteWolf says:
    @AaronB
    I understand what you are saying, but let me try and elucidate my point.

    You say we should pursue our self interest because that is the law of life, a harsh law perhaps, but such is life, and realism requires we accept it.

    Jews claim that their success represents the triumph of of goodness.

    Jews act selfishly, but have defined it as unselfish promotion of universal goodness. This gives them tremendous motivation, as well as self belief. It is immensely consoling to see oneself this way.

    You offer, what? Realism? Frank and honest selfishness, because that is the way the world works? The critical, sardonic, realistic spirit of the West?

    Ok, you may be right, but you will inspire no one, you will motivate no one, you will console no one.

    Jews are successful precisely because they do not believe themselves to be cynically selfish, but because they believe their success to represent the triumph of goodness.

    Whites lose because they don't believe their success to be anything other than selfish self intetest, and that isn't enough to sustain motivation in the long run.

    Jews are idealists, whites are realists.

    Realists will always lose to idealists in the long run.

    Voltairean irony of the Steve Sailer kind will always lose to passionate moralism in the long run.

    However grotesque Jewish behavior is, they attempt to ground it in a moral vision.

    Whites don't even attempt this - they are frankly amoral.

    Until you grasp this, you are lost.

    Spirit counts for more than flesh. The alt-right still hasn't learned this lesson from the Jews.

    Whites must align themselves with the Tao once again. No nation that leaves the Tao can survive. A vision of frank selfishness, realism, is to have left the Tao far behind.

    National Socialism, communism, diversity, Christianity, Judaism or Islam. Take your pick of ideals and battle against the believers of the other ones.

    Someone somewhere is having a big laugh at our expense.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  57. Mulegino1 says:

    Antisemitism is merely the immunological alarm bell of a healthy culture, civilization or society to the presence of a potentially deadly pathogen, i.e., invasion of the organism by the Jewish collective hive.

    The problem has never been individual Jews per se, but organized Jewry, whose leaders – whether in politics, Hollywood, finance, law or academia- tend to be the worst, most repulsive and toxic members of the Jewish tribe. Yet another example is the current revelation of widespread sexual predation among the Hollywood elite, which is hardly a surprise, but shocking nonetheless. When Jewish child rapists such as Woody Allen and Roman Polanski are held up as icons of the film industry what should one expect?

    It is the presence of the latter day descendants of Annas and Caiaphas in the forefront of projecting Jewish power which is ultimately responsible for bringing down the opprobrium of the nations upon Jews. Those who still concur in the collective choice of Barabbas over Christ and seek to perpetuate it via the replacement of the good with the bad, the beautiful with the ugly and innocence with corruption want their kosher cake and to eat it too.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  58. AaronB says:
    @renfro
    ''I understand what you are saying, but let me try and elucidate my point.

    You say we should pursue our self interest because that is the law of life, a harsh law perhaps, but such is life, and realism requires we accept it''


    Nope thats not what I said. You ask what accounted for their success. I asked what success,.... financial or ideals ...?(as in your idea of 'ideals'
    And then simply gave an opinion on their financial success.
    And pointed out that all their parroting of Jewish 'ideals' hasn't fooled any informed people into believing they have any ideals....because the world has seen their ideals in action....in Israel and around the world in their parasitism, lack of honor and the kind of deception they practice.

    What you are saying is that we (whoever we are) cannot defeat/overcome the Jewish propaganda about themselves and their esteemed values because we don't employ inspiring speech and appeals to morals and so forth.

    That is partly true, for this political group and others, because some of us have realized after long experience that moral appeals don't work on people who have no morals---and I mean govs and people who could affect the change we want to see.

    Moral appeals do work on the public as for instance the ordinary people who have joined up to support justice for Palestine and end to the Isr occupation, in the US and around the world thanks to nothing but grassroots efforts.

    Consider for instance if a major US news channel ever did a full true story on Israel....ever revealed the truth about the USS Liberty....ever showed the dead mangled children Isr kills with the regular assaults. ....people would be morally outraged.

    There are people and groups who do use morality and farness and justice appeals in this problem.
    Its not necessary here most of the time because people already know the Jewish horror and are focus on how to end it.

    Moral outrage is what got me involved in the Israel Jews Zionist Palestine disaster to begin with 16 years ago......for what they have done to Palestines and what they have done in the US as well.

    I assumed you were alt-right, and the alt-right offers honest selfishness on the principle that this is realistic.

    You have one half of the equation right – pointing out the immorality of Jewish behavior is great and needs to be done, but what vision do you offer in its stead?

    If it is mere tribalism, mere honest selfishness, as the alt-right does, that will not go very far in the long run, even if it is what the Jews do rather than say.

    Pointing out bad Jewish behavior simply isn’t effective enough as their “intentions” are good, so to speak.

    It is a good start, but you can’t stop there.

    The alt-right fails already on the level of intention. It does not even pretend to have intentions beyond tribalism.

    That will be fatal in the long run, altho in the short run it will meet with some success.

    Even the Romans pretended their wars of conquest were wars of self-defense. They were not so reckless as to simply declare themselves honest conquerors. Pax Romana, an ideal. However false.

    Only Vikings are honest conquerors.

    Even the British could not dispense with the moral element with their empire.

    Only the alt-right, HBD-sphere is bold and reckless enough to dispense with the moral element and try and erect the rule of frank selfishness, ruthless competitiveness, and dispense with all ideals.

    In this way it is the ultimate flower of the Western spirit, it’s last dying gasp – but remember, the British Empire befan to decline shortly after theories of Darwinian fitness began to possess the minds of the British, and the alt-right is just another phase in the decadence of the West.

    It is why to this day communism is viewed more favorably than national socialism, even though the suffering they caused was similar.

    The Jews have also departed far from the Tao over the past two centuries, and will reap what they sow, like whites have.

    The Jews are merely in their “empire” phase, when they retain the shell of morality but act like pirates. Soon they too will suffer the collapse in morale that follows closely upon any deviation from the Tao.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  59. AaronB says:
    @Sin City Milla
    All human societies are transitional. And all function by myth, whether inspired by science or not. There is nothing in the alt-right that makes us less authentic than those movements that condemn us. We lack only two things: ownership of the media heights, n an excess of babies.

    What is your myth?

    HBD, tribalism – these are anti-myths, in a sense. The destruction of myth, rather.

    The language the alt-right uses is that of realism, science, and the critical spirit. This is not the language of myth. HBD will inspire no one to self sacrifice.

    Although I myself have argued that HBD is really a myth rather than science, and science itself is a myth – these myths functions in a destructive fashion, and you can erect nothing on them.

    The alt-right has not returned to myth, but is just one more phase in the long story of Western decadence, which is the story of the critical spirit.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  60. anarchyst says:
    @wayfarer
    How the British Welfare System Favors Muslims
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PeZW1XVv3WQ

    Blaming White People for Multi-Cultural Failures
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0elT6-31Af0

    The state of Michigan welfare system also favors moslems. Moslems are allowed to have four “wives” on the dole…one “formal” wife and three “relatives”…

    Read More
    • Replies: @wayfarer
    Muslim “men” are nuts-to-butts as they walk leisurely out of the Middle East, abandoning their Muslim countries and “brothers”, to line-up in western welfare offices so they can be spoon fed.

    “Allah Akbar!”

    http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/11/20/03/2E9EE72D00000578-3326456-image-m-31_1447989907556.jpg

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  61. wayfarer says:
    @anarchyst
    The state of Michigan welfare system also favors moslems. Moslems are allowed to have four "wives" on the dole...one "formal" wife and three "relatives"...

    Muslim “men” are nuts-to-butts as they walk leisurely out of the Middle East, abandoning their Muslim countries and “brothers”, to line-up in western welfare offices so they can be spoon fed.

    “Allah Akbar!”

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  62. Anon says: • Disclaimer

    The Kagan-Maidan revolution in Ukraine continues: http://theduran.com/ukraine-is-being-gripped-by-a-new-maidan-but-the-western-cameras-and-cookies-are-absent/
    “The new Maidan is an expression of continued frustration, but this time without foreign aid, without the false optimism of the last Maidan and without any hope for change. Ukraine is about to hit rock bottom and from where things stand, getting a little bit worse will scarcely be noticeable in the immediate future. This is a reflection of just how bad things have become.”

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  63. The British ruling class are now the biggest cucks in the western world. The entire British aristocracy is in bed deep with the Rothschild family, who’ve been controlling the British banking system since the 1800s, so of course these cucks are falling all over themselves sucking at the Jews’ kneecaps. One of the Rothschild family’s most prized assets in the UK is The Economist magazine, a great propaganda machine for the open borders loving globalist elites. TE’s often trumpeted “universal values” now hang on the mouth of every UK and US politician. Its push for unlimited immigration to the west (“Let them in, let them work” about the migrant crisis) and unlimited wars (“Hit him hard” on Bashar Assad”) are all part of its owners’ master plan for the West, dutifully carried out by their loyal subjects in the UK parliament and US congress.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  64. AndrewR says:

    Maybe it’s time to admit that Jews are indeed superior to whites. Almost all the evidence seems to support this. With the possible exception of the Israeli military, there is really nothing besides white guilt that’s stopping the complete removal of Jews from all positions of power and influence within white countries.

    Read More
    • Replies: @wayfarer

    Maybe it’s time to admit that Jews are indeed superior to whites. Almost all the evidence seems to support this. With the possible exception of the Israeli military, there is really nothing besides white guilt that’s stopping the complete removal of Jews from all positions of power and influence within white countries.
     
    Jews aren't “white?”

    Mugshots, of all the Israeli Prime Ministers.

    source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Prime_Ministers_of_Israel

    They certainly all appear to be “white.”

    In terms of the "Israeli military."

    Arab weekend warriors, draw-and-quarter a professional IDF along with the Merkava tank's reputation.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t3CuDbbr5tA
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wTU3QeKDc8Y
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  65. divide and rule is the same as divide and conquer. except it is now being use on a country’s own citizens.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  66. wayfarer says:
    @AndrewR
    Maybe it's time to admit that Jews are indeed superior to whites. Almost all the evidence seems to support this. With the possible exception of the Israeli military, there is really nothing besides white guilt that's stopping the complete removal of Jews from all positions of power and influence within white countries.

    Maybe it’s time to admit that Jews are indeed superior to whites. Almost all the evidence seems to support this. With the possible exception of the Israeli military, there is really nothing besides white guilt that’s stopping the complete removal of Jews from all positions of power and influence within white countries.

    Jews aren’t “white?”

    Mugshots, of all the Israeli Prime Ministers.

    source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Prime_Ministers_of_Israel

    They certainly all appear to be “white.”

    In terms of the “Israeli military.”

    Arab weekend warriors, draw-and-quarter a professional IDF along with the Merkava tank’s reputation.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    "Mugshots, of all the Israeli Prime Ministers:" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Prime_Ministers_of_Israel
    They all look Arabs/Turks.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  67. Anon says: • Disclaimer
    @wayfarer

    Maybe it’s time to admit that Jews are indeed superior to whites. Almost all the evidence seems to support this. With the possible exception of the Israeli military, there is really nothing besides white guilt that’s stopping the complete removal of Jews from all positions of power and influence within white countries.
     
    Jews aren't “white?”

    Mugshots, of all the Israeli Prime Ministers.

    source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Prime_Ministers_of_Israel

    They certainly all appear to be “white.”

    In terms of the "Israeli military."

    Arab weekend warriors, draw-and-quarter a professional IDF along with the Merkava tank's reputation.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t3CuDbbr5tA
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wTU3QeKDc8Y

    “Mugshots, of all the Israeli Prime Ministers:” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Prime_Ministers_of_Israel
    They all look Arabs/Turks.

    Read More
    • Replies: @wayfarer
    Guess we need to break it down some more, maybe into about 50 shades of "white."

    I believe the majority, which are Ashkenazi Jews, come in this approximate shade of "white."

    source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashkenazi_Jews

    https://www.haaretz.com/polopoly_fs/1.722184!/image/2184049912.jpg_gen/derivatives/headline_609x343/2184049912.jpg
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  68. wayfarer says:
    @Anon
    "Mugshots, of all the Israeli Prime Ministers:" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Prime_Ministers_of_Israel
    They all look Arabs/Turks.

    Guess we need to break it down some more, maybe into about 50 shades of “white.”

    I believe the majority, which are Ashkenazi Jews, come in this approximate shade of “white.”

    source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashkenazi_Jews

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  69. Anon says: • Disclaimer
    @AaronB
    That true Christian had it right, but we are saying the same thing, differently.

    He who surrenders himself, is outside of history.

    History is the love of self, waxing and waning, between groups.

    Honor is love of self, and the Greeks in their early phase were superficial.

    They only became profound after their great period, when they saw through life.

    Sailer is also saying what I and that true Christian are saying, but from the opposite perspective, as a lover of power, and a superficial man.

    “History is the love of self, waxing and waning”

    You can repeat it, but it still is a superficial understanding. Man can be selfish. Or he can be generous.

    Be their fruits you shall know them. Whenever man’s actions are in accord with natural law, they are constructive and perdurable. When those actions are selfish, they are destructive (inevitably self-destructive) and transient.

    As to jewish triumphs and achievements and ultimate triumph… Sounds provoking at Unz’s but it is not true. They missed the boat 2000 years ago and are mostly jaded and atheistic. Their triumphs: relative power/prominence in Western countries since 1917 and another good century around King David’s time.

    Where are their great works for posterity? Who acclaims them?

    Read More
    • Replies: @helena
    Where are their great works for posterity? Who acclaims them?

    The Wailing Wall?

    going forwards - Lots of Holocaust Memorials and art museums? (the UK HM looks set to resist nuclear war).

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  70. KenH says:

    We’re always told that mass third world immigration leads to greater tolerance and freedom by the (((usual suspects))) and their goy minions like Amber Rudd. But the more third worlders screw up, in this case, Muslims in the U.K., the police state noose tightens and whites get castigated and threatened with punitive action for daring to utter any words of protest.

    Oh, and Theresa May is as ugly on the outside as she in on the inside.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Eagle Eye

    But the more third worlders screw up, in this case, Muslims in the U.K., the police state noose tightens and whites get castigated and threatened with punitive action for daring to utter any words of protest.
     
    That is the point. Third Worldization of Europe (and of the U.S.) serves as an excuse and pathway to institute totalitarian rule for the benefit of an incestuous cabal of Inner Party functionaries and billionaires. In other words, to further expand rule by the Deep State.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  71. helena says:
    @Anon
    "History is the love of self, waxing and waning"

    You can repeat it, but it still is a superficial understanding. Man can be selfish. Or he can be generous.

    Be their fruits you shall know them. Whenever man's actions are in accord with natural law, they are constructive and perdurable. When those actions are selfish, they are destructive (inevitably self-destructive) and transient.

    As to jewish triumphs and achievements and ultimate triumph... Sounds provoking at Unz's but it is not true. They missed the boat 2000 years ago and are mostly jaded and atheistic. Their triumphs: relative power/prominence in Western countries since 1917 and another good century around King David's time.

    Where are their great works for posterity? Who acclaims them?

    Where are their great works for posterity? Who acclaims them?

    The Wailing Wall?

    going forwards – Lots of Holocaust Memorials and art museums? (the UK HM looks set to resist nuclear war).

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  72. Eagle Eye says:
    @KenH
    We're always told that mass third world immigration leads to greater tolerance and freedom by the (((usual suspects))) and their goy minions like Amber Rudd. But the more third worlders screw up, in this case, Muslims in the U.K., the police state noose tightens and whites get castigated and threatened with punitive action for daring to utter any words of protest.

    Oh, and Theresa May is as ugly on the outside as she in on the inside.

    But the more third worlders screw up, in this case, Muslims in the U.K., the police state noose tightens and whites get castigated and threatened with punitive action for daring to utter any words of protest.

    That is the point. Third Worldization of Europe (and of the U.S.) serves as an excuse and pathway to institute totalitarian rule for the benefit of an incestuous cabal of Inner Party functionaries and billionaires. In other words, to further expand rule by the Deep State.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  73. So far left propaganda is okay according this fascist cunt, Rudd?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  74. >“Violent and non-violent extremism in all its forms — antisemitism, neo-Nazism, Islamophobia, intolerance of women’s rights — these, and others, cannot be permitted to fester.”

    Meanwhile, the bashing of Palestinians, Christians, whites, men, heterosexuals, and so on will be promoted and expanded.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  75. @AaronB
    Surely, however, there are some universal values.

    Jews promote 'values' and the alt-right promotes 'realism' - do you think realism can defeat values?

    When I look to Steve Sailer for inspiration, I find cold realism, and frank selfishness. I find irony, and cynicism.

    What do Jews offer that is more appealing, and that has allowed them
    so much success?

    Until the alt-right figures this out, they have no chance.

    What is astonishing is the amount of attention the alt-right pays to Jews, without undersranding the source of their success.

    A sensitive, intelligent, young white man, looking for inspiration - can he find it in irony and cynicism? In frank selfishness?

    That is the vision white culture offers.

    Jews may cheat, lie, and pursue selfishness - but that is not the vision they offer themselves or others.

    Even Jewish tribal selfishness, frankly expressed in the Talmud, is not presented as mere tribal self seeking, as Steve Sailer might, or Vox Day, with an ironic smile at the realities of life.

    No, Jews are chosen, favored of God, and their selfishness is in line with the eternal Tao, and represents Goodness.

    The contribution of white culture is the critical spirit - but criticism tears down, does not build up. You cannot live on criticism.

    As we see with the alt-right, despite its attempt to return to religion, all white cultural movements are realistic and critical.

    Yet without an ideal you can't live.

    Jews offer an ideal. Steve Sailer offers irony.

    Jews use criticism as a tactic, whites have adopted it as a metaphysic.

    This is why whites excel at science, but also why whites lose to Jews.

    Perhaps whites are incapable of creating an ideal, and will always attempt to live by cynical realism? If so, then whites will always lose to people who are capable of creating an ideal, whether Jew, Muslim, or Chinese.

    And yet even now, when trying to free themselves, whites false back on realism and cynicism.

    > “Jews are chosen”

    They certainly were at the Umschlagplatz…where Sophie made HER choice, too.

    >”their selfishness is in line with the eternal Tao”

    Dow Jones, maybe. :>)

    Seriously, though: that excuse is likely what kapos and sonderkommandos told themselves as they fed fellow Tribalists into gas chambers. That what they were doing was somehow “part of the eternal Reuben Sammich of existence.”

    So how are Jews more special than cockroaches…who also “survive”?

    Look, any group can justify its existence post-facto. You know: “The reason Germany not only survived, but thrived after having fought half the world is simple: Odin wants the volk to continue moving Jews eastward into ever-smaller enclaves.”

    Or Commiethink: “Mao and Stalin lived long and prospered because God is NOT out of his vulcan mind.”

    Jews need to get over themselves. They are no better, no worse, than others.

    No one likes the priss at school who constantly brags about how special he is. It tends to attract the million-pound shit-hammer.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  76. @AaronB
    I agree with you, Jake.

    English culture seems materialistic and based on the will to power.

    Protestantism seems based on the the will to power and materialism.

    Western civilization rose as it became less and less Christian.

    Colonialism and technology are obviously products of the will to power, and not Christianity.

    In the second half of the 19th century, intelligent Europeans lost their will to power. All groups eventually do.

    Jews filled the vacuum.

    It's not surprising that those who desire power will get it and those who don't will lose it.

    That sums up history.

    History is a group seizing power from another group that has lost its will to keep it.

    Napoleon victimizes Germany when its will to power is asleep.

    France then loses its will to power, and becomes the victim of Germany.

    The West victimizes China when its will to power is asleep. Now the West has lost its will to power, and the sequel is predictable.

    Understanding this, history loses all its fascination.

    Jews will lose their will to power, like every power-center and empire has.

    Western civilization as we've known it for the past five hundred years was based on the will to power, and it cannot survive the loss of the will to power in Western elites.

    The only viable civilization in the West now must be based on turning away from the will to power, in other words, it would have to be a Buddhist or "true" Christian civilization.

    But without the will to power, science and technology will lose their position at the head of our life, capitalism will be moderated and it's severities eased, and the West will no longer be "special".

    The Alt-Right are westerners who still have an unbroken will to power, coming from the second-rate sections of society that have not yet experienced power.

    Maybe we'll divide, with our best elements forming the nucleus of a Buddhist style civilization, and our second rate elements coalescing into traditional tribal entities, unable to exert much power on the rest of the world.

    This pattern will hold intact even if Islam conquers Europe.

    > “The only viable civilization in the West now must be based on turning away from the will to power, in other words, it would have to be a Buddhist or “true” Christian civilization.”

    Yes, yes, Obi-wan. Preach!

    Only, er, Buddhists use orphan children as work/sex slaves. And somehow the spirit of the Magna Carta lives on.

    Stop looking for simple answers. Life is mysterious. The glass is not just half full AND half empty, it’s a way to quench thirst. As Twain quipped, much predicted doom never occurs: ““I am an old man and have known a great many troubles, but most of them never happened.”

    Humans have always cooperated as much as they competed. You can’t raise a barn…or build a city…or stop an army alone.

    Humans have both drives and needs. They can be selfish and self-less. We are complex.

    Love is as real as bombs. Maybe more so.

    Elizabethan English is no more…yet Shakespeare’s plays live on.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  77. @AaronB
    That true Christian had it right, but we are saying the same thing, differently.

    He who surrenders himself, is outside of history.

    History is the love of self, waxing and waning, between groups.

    Honor is love of self, and the Greeks in their early phase were superficial.

    They only became profound after their great period, when they saw through life.

    Sailer is also saying what I and that true Christian are saying, but from the opposite perspective, as a lover of power, and a superficial man.

    AaronB: >”He who surrenders himself, is outside of history….Honor is love of self, and the Greeks in their early phase were superficial….They only became profound after their great period, when they saw through life…Sailer is also saying what I and that true Christian are saying, but from the opposite perspective, as a lover of power, and a superficial man.”

    Oy! Such profound argle-bargle: “outside of history… Greeks in their early phase were superficial…saw through life…lover of power…superficial”

    Keerist! You sound like Chauncey Gardner in BEING THERE.

    Or the Pompatus of Love.

    Or Jethro on THE BEVERLY HILLBILLIES:

    “Blue cheesecake.
    A silver spoon in the sand.
    The seaweed barks at me.”

    Read More
    • Replies: @AaronB
    Your sarcasm, irony, and realism are very good. You are a good child of the West.

    Do you think you will ever see thru realism, tho?

    The problem with the West is that it is not critical enough - it criticises everything except criticism itself.

    It is not scientific enough - it stops short at applying the methods of science to science itself.

    All standpoints, if taken far enough, end up refuting themselves.

    But the West is only half-heartedly critial and scientific, and doesn't take science truly seriously.

    Because science never was about truth, only power over the physical world.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  78. @nickels
    Why should you fear restrictions on speech unless you have something distasteful to say?

    >”Why should you fear restrictions on speech unless you have something distasteful to say?”

    Spoken like a true Gestapo agent.

    Why do you think the Miranda Warning became law?

    Why does every defense lawyer say never talk to cops other than to give your name and show an ID?

    Because ANYTHING you say can be dubbed “distasteful.”

    Antifa thugs say any view they disagree with is “hateful”… thus allowing them to punch the holder of said view.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  79. Ace says:
    @anon
    Three Jewish students said they were terrified by the cartoon,

    Dershowitz didn’t miss the opportunity. He weighed in on the cartoon, in a long letter to the Daily Cal using the incident to tar the “hard left” as “neo-Nazis” for not criticizing the cartoon

    The Forward has published a defense of the cartoon, using a mostly-black-and-white image of Mayorga’s work that appeared on Twitter, and looks different from the all-color version. Rafael Magaryk said it’s not anti-Semitic, and the cartoon’s critics are demonstrating “an irresponsible use of history.”

    [A]s far as I can tell, it is simply arguing that Dershowitz represents himself as a liberal while actually shilling for Israeli state violence against Palestinians.
    That is not anti-Semitic; it is true" . http://mondoweiss.net/2017/11/californian-dershowitz-unleashes/

    Its the Jews who will decide if it is anti Semitic or not .

    That is correct. “Anti-Semitic” means absolutely nothing. Like “racist,” etc.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  80. AaronB says:
    @TrevorSedis
    AaronB: >"He who surrenders himself, is outside of history....Honor is love of self, and the Greeks in their early phase were superficial....They only became profound after their great period, when they saw through life...Sailer is also saying what I and that true Christian are saying, but from the opposite perspective, as a lover of power, and a superficial man."

    Oy! Such profound argle-bargle: "outside of history... Greeks in their early phase were superficial...saw through life...lover of power...superficial"

    Keerist! You sound like Chauncey Gardner in BEING THERE.

    Or the Pompatus of Love.

    Or Jethro on THE BEVERLY HILLBILLIES:

    "Blue cheesecake.
    A silver spoon in the sand.
    The seaweed barks at me."

    Your sarcasm, irony, and realism are very good. You are a good child of the West.

    Do you think you will ever see thru realism, tho?

    The problem with the West is that it is not critical enough – it criticises everything except criticism itself.

    It is not scientific enough – it stops short at applying the methods of science to science itself.

    All standpoints, if taken far enough, end up refuting themselves.

    But the West is only half-heartedly critial and scientific, and doesn’t take science truly seriously.

    Because science never was about truth, only power over the physical world.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
Current Commenter says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS
PastClassics
The “war hero” candidate buried information about POWs left behind in Vietnam.
What Was John McCain's True Wartime Record in Vietnam?
The evidence is clear — but often ignored
Are elite university admissions based on meritocracy and diversity as claimed?
A simple remedy for income stagnation