The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Tobias Langdon Archive
Fake Jews: Deceit and Double-Think in Britain’s Hostile Elite
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New Reply
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Here’s a quiz about Israeli politics. Are there any strongly identified Muslim or Christian Arabs high in Israel’s ruling conservative party? Do those Arabs write for Arab newspapers setting out the central principle of their lives: “Arabs must come first”? Finally, do those Arabs lavish praise on an opposition leader who opened Israel’s borders to the Third World and duped Israel into a hugely expensive and disastrous foreign war?

You have no guesses. You won’t need any. The answer to every question is the same. No, there are no Arabs like that in Israel. Not one. Furthermore, Israel has never opened its borders to the Third World or poured trillions of shekels into a disastrous foreign war. Israel is a Jewish nation where Jews are firmly in control and intend to remain so. That’s why they don’t allow Arabs to have genuine power or influence in politics, culture and academia. Arabs would have their own agenda and would not make Jewish interests their only concern, even if they weren’t hostile to Jews or determined to undermine Jewish power.

Tremendous respect for Tony Blair

In short, Israel is a sane country that keeps its large Arab minority where it belongs: out of power. Now compare the United Kingdom, a White and historically Christian nation. By comparison with Israel, the UK is insane, because it allows outsiders to exercise enormous power and influence. Worse still, those outsiders are both hostile to the White majority and determined to undermine it by promoting mass immigration and minority worship. Here is an article written for the Jewish Chronicle by Daniel Finkelstein, a strongly identified Jew high in the ruling Conservative party:

Corbyn must lose — for our sake [i.e., for the readers of the Jewish Chronicle]

Tony Blair — a man for whom I have tremendous respect — has been arguing that, as Theresa May is going to win, what we really need is a strong opposition. … I have a lot of friends who vote Labour and I understand their dilemma. They have supported Labour all their lives and they don’t want to abandon their party to Jeremy Corbyn. Unfortunately, not abandoning the party to Mr Corbyn means supporting the party while he leads it. Despite the acuteness of the dilemma, this is unconscionable.

I realise that I am a Conservative peer and this point concerns party politics. But, still. Forgive me for this is a point I feel I must make as a Jew. If Jeremy Corbyn and his followers do not suffer a gigantic defeat in this election, it will be an utter, complete, ghastly disaster for Jews. It will mean that despite all that has happened in the past two years, all his supporters have said about Jews, people — even Jews, for goodness sake — can still support him. … Jeremy Corbyn mustn’t just lose. He must be crushed electorally. It must be impossible for his supporters to say that it wasn’t too bad and they should have another go. …

So it needs bravery now to secure the long term future of Jews on the centre left. Maybe I’m not the right person to give this advice. I can see that. But forget it’s me, I am right[,] aren’t I? (Corbyn must lose — for our sake, The Jewish Chronicle, 4th May 2017 / 10th Iyar 5777)


Daniel Finkelstein: “Corbyn Delendus Est!

Beside being a Tory peer, Finkelstein is also an “associate editor” at the influential Times of London. He’s not a good writer, but he sets out his views and psychology with perfect clarity in that article. The British Labour party was founded to defend the interests of the White working-class. It abandoned that group decades ago and, at the behest of strongly identified Jews like Lord Levy, worked to harm their interests instead. Finkelstein doesn’t care. His only concern is that perennial question: “What’s best for Jews?”

Repent or be destroyed

If any political party in Britain doesn’t put Jewish interests first, Jews like Finkelstein see only two options. The first is that the party must be kept out of power until it repents and returns to the path of righteousness. That’s what Finkelstein wants for Labour. Alternatively, the party must be destroyed. That’s what Finkelstein and the rest of the Jewish elite wanted — and got — for the British National Party, which won millions of votes only a few years ago but has now collapsed, losing its two Members of the European Parliament and all but one of its local councillors.

You can see the same unblushing ethnocentrism and selfishness in “How the SDP failed the Jews,” another article in the Jewish Chronicle that puts Jewish interests first and Gentile interests nowhere. The SDP, or Social Democratic Party, was formed by rebels from the Labour party who thought their old party had become too left-wing to win elections. And look who was among those rebels:

Another youthful recruit [to the SDP], Danny Finkelstein — now a Conservative peer and JC columnist — joined Labour as a schoolboy. Delivering literature for the party during a local election campaign, he found some SDP leaflets stuck in a letter box. He fished them out, intending to throw them away but, having read them instead, promptly joined the new party. Two years after the SDP’s launch, Finkelstein became chair of the Young Social Democrats. He went on to become a political adviser to [David] Owen, a member of the party’s National Committee, and fought Ken Livingstone in Brent East in 1987. Indeed, fighting that year’s general election in alliance with the Liberal party, the SDP fielded more Jewish candidates than Labour. (How the SDP failed the Jews, The Jewish Chronicle, 13th March 2017 / 15th Adar 5777)

However, the SDP proved insufficiently pro-Israel, which is why the article concludes that it failed the crucial test for any British political party: are Jewish interests its first priority? The revelation about Daniel Finkelstein’s early political history is no surprise. Is it any wonder that he praises Tony Blair and is a good friend of the Jewish Labour supporter Jonathan Freedland? Finkelstein is a Conservative peer who isn’t actually a conservative — but of course, that’s true for a great many Tories.

That’s why the BBC are happy to allow him on the radio panel-show The News Quiz, where he sits happily with far-left folk like Jeremy Hardy and the Trotskyist Mark Steel (a Sephardic Jew). His appearances there prove that bad writing isn’t his only non-talent. He’s also bad at comedy.

Father and Son

Hugo Rifkind is another true Jew and fake conservative who airs his lack of comedic talent on the News Quiz. He’s the son of the former cabinet minister Sir Malcolm Rifkind, who, like Dianne Feinstein in the United States, has had a vital role overseeing the intelligence services. He became Chairman of the Intelligence and Security Committee in 2010. Are you reassured to hear that Sir Malcolm thinks the surveillance state is doing an excellent job and keeping strictly within the law? You shouldn’t be:

On Tempora, it has been well known that the fibre optic cables that carry a significant proportion of the world’s communications pass close to the British coastline and could provide intelligence opportunities. The reality is that the British public are well aware that its intelligence agencies have neither the time nor the remotest interest in the emails or telephone conversations of well over 99% of the population who are neither potential terrorists nor serious criminals. Modern computer technologies do permit the separation of those that are of interest from the vast majority that are not. (What rubbish, Sir Simon! Our intelligence agencies are not outside the law, The Guardian, 20th September, 2013)

Malcolm Rifkind is yet another strongly identified Jew who has enormous power and influence in the White and historically Christian nation of Britain. The contrast with Israel is even starker when you consider that Jews, at about 1%, are a far smaller minority here than Arabs, at just over 20%, are in Israel. Britain is not a White democracy: it is much more accurately labelled a Jewish oligarchy. When the so-called Labour party was in power, it was firmly under Jewish control. Now the so-called Conservative party is in power and firmly under Jewish control.

Vibrancy and violence

That explains why mass immigration continues as freely under the Tories as it did under Labour. It also explains why the Tories introduced “gay marriage” and, with the fake conservative Theresa May as Home Secretary, told the police to stop persecuting down-trodden Black youths in London and other ethnically enriched cities. The result can be seen in vibrant news at Breitbart: “Knife Crime Soars to Five-Year High After Kerb on ‘Racist’ Police Stop and Search.”

Does this have any connection with vibrant news in the Guardian: “Reported rapes in England and Wales double in four years”? Yes, of course it does. Mass immigration from violent and corrupt Third-World nations inevitably increases crime in Western nations. Israel doesn’t suffer from this crime because it doesn’t allow mass immigration from the Third World.

“It is tough working for the Jews…”

Daniel Finkelstein, the Rifkinds and other members of the Jewish elite don’t care about the harmful effects of mass immigration. They think it’s “Good for Jews,” because it atomizes British society and provides ample excuse for authoritarian laws and mass surveillance. Most of them are wealthy enough to insulate themselves from non-White violence — not that this stops Jews demanding subsidies from the government for security against threats that they themselves created.

And although Jews claim to be deeply concerned about the welfare of minorities in Britain, the minorities in question often have different stories. Here are two extracts from a book called This Is London: Life and Death in the Big City (2016) by the Jewish author Ben Judah:

The Jews, they are a strange people. They like to talk to the Filipinas [who work for them as domestic servants]. “We are an immigrant family like you,” they say. And when the Filipina goes, “Oh, when did you move to Britain?”, the Jews say, “1880.” And the Filipina is stunned and confused. The Jews, they only ever talk about Israel — Israel, Israel, Israel, all day Israel — and it is as if they are living here in St John’s Wood [a wealthy suburb of London] but they are really there, in precious Israel. …

And it is tough working for the Jews. They make many Filipinas cry. They are more likely than anyone else to bring the Filipinas inside the family — but this is mostly a charade. They never, ever want to pay — as little as possible, as late as possible. And there are many, many Filipinas who burst into tears when they realize after seven years that the Jews have been cheating them on national insurance, their weekly salaries, or even more. (Op. cit., “Knightsbridge,” pp. 229 and 231)

If Ben Judah weren’t himself Jewish, he might have risked prosecution for spreading hate-stereotypes about Jewish venality, deceit and ethnocentrism. His book describes an atomized city full of crime, alienation and competing tribes. Twenty-first-century London is a Jewish creation, formed by policies dear to Jews and their liberal allies, but never supported by the White majority. In a supposed democracy, Jews have got their disastrous way on mass immigration.

No to Nassim

If you want to understand how a minority can control the majority like that, an excellent place to start is Nassim Taleb’s essay “The Most Intolerant Wins: The Dominance of the Stubborn Minority.” Taleb is an Arab Christian from Lebanon, a highly intelligent and insightful economist and statistician who predicted — and warned against — the financial crisis. Surely Taleb would make an excellent director at the Bank of Israel or a senior adviser in the Israeli government?

No, not at all. Taleb is precisely the kind of person Israel wants to exclude from power, not invite into it. He’s an Arab and a Christian. He wouldn’t make “What’s best for Jews?” the central principle of his life. In Jewish eyes, his intelligence and insight make him less suitable for high office in Israel, not more. And he’s even dared to suggest that the great Jewish intellectual Susan Sontag was obnoxious and uncouth.

Lascivious Priest

Politics in Britain inverts the Israeli rule: it doesn’t discriminate in favour of the majority, but against it. Any hint that a party seeks what’s best for the White majority will elicit loud accusations of racism, xenophobia and fascism. That’s what happened to Ukip and that’s why Ukip were delighted that their candidate in the mayoral election in Manchester was an Orthodox Jew called Shneur Odze. Alas, Mr Odze has let the party down. The Jewish Chronicle, which doesn’t like Ukip or Orthodox Judaism, was happy to report the following:

A strictly Orthodox man standing as Ukip’s candidate in the Manchester mayoral election has been accused of conducting an affair with a woman he met on a bondage sex website. Shneur Odze, who had declined to shake hands with a female political opponent on “religious grounds” earlier in the election campaign, allegedly posed as a Catholic priest on the site, which is described as a social network for the “fetish and kinky community”.

According to the Mail on Sunday, Mr Odze described himself on his profile as having been into bondage and sadomasochism “for a number of years” during which he said he had “tried a great deal and enjoyed even more”. The Mail reported that Mr Odze had met the woman for sex. She discovered his real identity when she put his mobile number into Google and found his Ukip Facebook page.

Mr Odze is married with four children. He has not responded to requests for comment. His local Ukip branch chairman resigned after the allegations were made, saying he could not support Mr Odze’s actions. A Ukip spokesman said: “This is a personal matter for Mr Odze. He has broken no law.” (Sex claims against Ukip candidate, The Jewish Chronicle, 5th May 2017 / 9th Iyar 5777)

I was struck by the allegation that Shneur Odze “posed as a Catholic priest.” If true, it’s both funny and revealing. Odze was posing as a Catholic rather in the way that Daniel Finkelstein is posing as a conservative. He was both having his own cake and poisoning someone else’s — that is, helping to bring the Catholic church into disrepute. A devout Catholic exposed for posing as a rabbi on an S&M website would surely be denounced for anti-Semitism. Has the devout Jew Odze, posing as a Catholic priest, been denounced for Christophobia or goyophobia? No, not at all. Those concepts don’t exist in the mainstream, even though the phenomena are widespread among British Jews:

Jewish hostility to Christians: the prejudice no one ever writes about

The case of the Oxford lecturer in Jewish studies who says she was sacked after she converted to Christianity has thrown a spotlight on to an acutely sensitive subject. I have no idea whether Dr Tali Argov was treated unfairly — that’s for the employment tribunal to decide — but let’s not pretend that Jews who become Christians don’t face intense disapproval from their own community.

Christian anti-Semitism, Muslim anti-Semitism, Christian Islamophobia, Muslim persecution of Christians [note lack of a term for this] — all of these are acceptable topics of debate. But not Jewish hostility to Christianity [ditto].

You can understand why Jews might dislike the Christian religion: not only does it deify a man, the ultimate blasphemy for pious Jews just as it is for pious Muslims, but it’s also implicated in centuries of anti-Semitism. (I think its role in inspiring the Holocaust has been exaggerated, but that’s an argument for another day.)

Sometimes Jewish antipathy to Christianity spills over into hostility towards Christians. There was a piece in the Independent the other day by Christina Patterson that went way over the top in describing the rudeness of Stamford Hill’s ultra-Orthodox Jews towards non-Jews:

When I moved to Stamford Hill [in London], 12 years ago, I didn’t realise that goyim were about as welcome in the Hasidic Jewish shops as Martin Luther King at a Ku Klux Klan convention. I didn’t realise that a purchase by a goy was a crime to be punished with monosyllabic terseness, or that bus seats were a potential source of contamination, or that road signs, and parking restrictions, were for people who hadn’t been chosen by God. And while none of this is a source of anything much more than irritation, when I see an eight-year-old boy recoiling from a normal-looking woman (because, presumably, he has been taught that she is dirty or dangerous, or, heaven forbid, dripping with menstrual blood) it makes me sad.

Stephen Pollard, the brilliant editor of the Jewish Chronicle, described this as “pure, unrelenting unadulterated anti-Jewish bigotry,” on the part of Ms Patterson and indeed some of its undertones are disturbing. But monosyllabic terseness towards goyim? I’ve experienced it, and it’s maddening. Let me recommend a gripping book called Postville by the secular Jewish journalist Stephen Bloom, who records the extreme bad manners of Lubavitch Jews who moved en masse to a town in rural Iowa to run a huge kosher butchery. In the end, angry Christian townspeople, who had initially been welcoming, voted to annexe the land on which the factory was built, so they could tax and regulate it. Bloom, who felt the Lubavitchers had displayed “despicable” attitudes verging on racism, supported the move.

Jewish hostility towards Christians isn’t confined to the ultra-Orthodox. A woman friend of mine tutored the daughter of a Jewish couple in north London. When she said she wanted to take a break for Christmas, the wife went bananas. “We do not allow that word to be spoken in this house,” she said. An unrepresentative incident, no doubt; but my friend’s attitude towards Judaism changed after it took place. And I could tell other stories, of unbelievable haughtiness by the leaders of Anglo-Jewry, which would have led to diplomatic incidents if the Christians involved weren’t afraid of being accused of anti-Semitism.

[U]ntil now I’ve never written a word about Jewish prejudice against Christians, even though I’ve seen it at close hand, at a series of Jewish-run conferences I attended in America in the 1990s at which evangelical Christian believers were stereotyped as fanatics who needed only the right demagogue to turn them into murderous anti-Semites. If the conferences were being held now, I suspect most of the flak would be taken by Catholics.

It would be interesting read a book on anti-Christian sentiment among modern Jews, including Jewish historians who invest heavily in the notion of Christian or gentile collective guilt for crimes committed by others. But such a book would have to come from the perspective of someone without an axe to grind (ie, not one of the anti-Semitic nutcases who are such a depressing presence in the blogosphere). And something tells me it will never be written. (Jewish hostility to Christians: the prejudice no one ever writes about, The Daily Telegraph, 29th July 2010)

Christianity has been central to Western life and culture for many centuries. Is it wise to allow Jews, who are so hostile to Christianity, so much power and influence in the West? Anti-Semitic nutcases don’t think it is. They want Western nations to act like Israel and defend their majority race and historic religion rather than working to destroy them.

(Republished from The Occidental Observer by permission of author or representative)
 
• Category: Foreign Policy • Tags: Britain, Israel Lobby, Jews 
Hide 195 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
    []
  1. Dan Hayes says:

    Who else except Ron Unz would be daring and courageous enough to republish this article?

    Read More
    • Replies: @windwaves
    Absolutely fantastic. So refreshing.

    These days more than ever, being in the US where the president of the country is the biggest slave of Israel I could possibly ever imagine. Where things are much worse than in the UK when it comes to how jews are in total control of this country.
    , @DaveE
    I agree, kind of. Although it seems more than a little double-standard-ish to THANK someone for telling (or publishing) the truth, it never hurts to acknowledge gratitude.

    Truth telling should be the norm and lies should be punished, in a decent world. The fact that that is definitely NOT the case in our so-called "media" demands that we all step up and do our part to turn it around.

    We'll just live with the meaningless "anti-Semite" noise.

    Thank you, Mr. Unz.
    , @Pachyderm Pachyderma
    It's called conditioning...
    , @CanSpeccy

    Who else except Ron Unz would be daring and courageous enough to republish this article?
     
    I linked to it!

    But what's so daring about that?

    hat's remarkable is that in Britain, virtually the whole of academia, the political class and the press are are self-hating, or gutless cucked slime, or psychopathic traitors who will do nothing to resist the genocide of their own nation.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
    AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
    These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
    Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
    Sharing Comment via Twitter
    /article/fake-jews-deceit-and-double-think-in-britains-hostile-elite/#comment-1891052
    More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  2. wayfarer says:

    And so they take it upon themselves, to edit and rewrite U.S. history for Americans.

    “The most effective way to destroy people is to deny and obliterate their own understanding of their history.” ― George Orwell

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  3. The photos in the article are classic. The only one who doesn’t look like an inbred pervert is Taleb.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  4. None of these people are English. They should be exiled. Or killed

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  5. A chilling article. It will not end well, it never has.

    Personally, I’d settle for true separation of church and state. People can then be free to imagine whatever they wish to be the source of everything, as long as they contribute fair taxes along with everyone else. Surely that isn’t too much to ask or insist upon?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Joe Wong
    You need to move to China.
    , @anon
    Religion is not issue.It is the abuse and rights to abuse under whatever comes to their minds or under whatever excuses /reasons.proxies /imagination/words they find immediately useful .The atheist of these are worst offenders and those atheist hobnob the Christian evangelist

    These psychopaths have been abusing other people's religion after basically basically accepting themselves as God , Israel as the Heaven and the Zionism as Old Testament/Talmud and we as fallen Noahadies of new age serf

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  6. Very persuasive article. Truthful. Stirring. Daring. Insightful. Bursting with common sense.

    Undeniably ‘anti-Semitic’. And appropriately so.

    Thank you, Tobias Langdon.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  7. The Jews, they are a strange people. They like to talk to the Filipinas [who work for them as domestic servants]. “We are an immigrant family like you,” they say. …And it is tough working for the Jews. They make many Filipinas cry. They are more likely than anyone else to bring the Filipinas inside the family — but this is mostly a charade.

    That’s pretty funny.

    It goes to show there are different meanings to ‘minority rights’.
    Which minority are we talking about, and what is meant by ‘rights’?

    After all, both British imperialist elites and the Untouchables were minorities in India.
    But whereas one minority, the Brits, was at the top, the other minority, the Untouchables, was at the bottom.

    For the British, ‘minority rights’ meant the right to rule over Hindu(and Muslim) masses.
    For the Untouchables, ‘minority rights’ would have meant the humble hope that they could enjoy the same protection under the law as other Indians.

    And I think we have a similar kind of confusion in the West.

    In US and UK, Jews are the ruling minority or the minority elites. (Homos also belong to this group.)
    But Mexicans, many blacks, and many immigrant groups are either minority underclass or minority ordinary folks; they have no special power. Asians do better than most other immigrant groups, but their dim sense of identity and servile nature translate much to power. Even in Hawaii where they are the majority, they aren’t known for political muscle.

    So, ‘minority rights’ mean different things to Jews and to other minorities. For Jews, it means the right to rule over US and UK and make demands and dictate policy. Old ‘antisemitism’ used to mean denial of Jews of basic rights and liberties. New ‘antisemitism’ means challenge to the Jewish supremacist right to rule over goyim. And something similar is operative with homos. ‘Gay rights’ used to mean the tolerance of letting homos be homos and do their own thing without persecution. Now, ‘gay rights’ mean we must all celebrate, admire, and worship homos as angels and even change marriage laws to appease the Great Holy Homo. And we must even put homo stuff in churches. It’s as if homos have the right to be admired and adulated, and it is now a mandatory duty of many politicians and citizens to sing hosannas to homos and trannies. Indeed, we mustn’t even joke about someone as ridiculous as Bruce Jenner. (In the UK, a criminal investigation was under way to arrest someone who made an insulting remark to Brucie.)

    Now, there are other minorities that also demand special favors. Blacks demand affirmative action, and Mexicans demand affirmative immigration(amnesty). But many blacks and Mexicans are on the bottom looking up. Their hope is to reach the middle. (To be sure, too many blacks just fantasize about being sports stars or rappers, attainments out of reach for most blacks, but blacks are stupid.) But even if blacks and browns demand special favors, they won’t amount to much. And historically, all they could expect from society was equal treatment under the law.

    In contrast, equality of any kind isn’t good enough for Jews(and homos) anymore. For them, ‘rights’ means something closer to ‘divine right to rule’.

    It’d be like British Imperialist Elites in India siding with the Untouchables as ‘fellow minorities’ against the ‘bigoted’ and ‘populist’ masses of respectable Hindus and Muslims.
    Imagine if the British ruling minority elite hugged the Untouchables, the underclass minority, and claimed shared/collective victimhood as ‘fellow minorities’ regardless of the fact that Brits are the master race minority whereas Untouchables are the marginalized minority. That would be pretty funny. But then, there were times when the Brits did use the Minority Issue to justify their rule over India. In Richard Attenborough’s movie GANDHI, the British ruling minority poses as protectors of the Muslim minority against the Hindu majority.

    [MORE]

    Thankfully for India, it had a leader of Gandhi’s caliber who was witty, cunning, shrewd, and devious enough to match wits with the British and argue like a lawyer. (He would have made Professor Kingsfield of PAPER CHASE proud.) Too bad the West lacks the kind of leader like Gandhi with right combination of cleverness and resolve.

    Back then, the British Imperialists claimed that India is ‘British’.
    Now, the bloody fools in UK say immigrant-invaders are ‘New British’.
    Gandhi urged Indians not to cooperate until the British left.
    Maybe white Europeans can do something similar. Since so much overt resistance has been made illegal, whites can make their voices know through massive non-cooperation. But then, so many whites have been led to believe that Diversity is what their nations are all about and that return to any kind of homogeneity is AWFUL since the true meaning of Europe is spicy exotic restaurants and jungle fever with Negroes. Interestingly enough, Brexit won in UK because of older voters, but Macron won in France with older voters, 80% of whom chose him over Lepen.

    The future of Europe will be determined by whether it can produce leaders like Gandhi, Mao, Lenin, Ataturk, Mussolini, Castro, T. E. Lawrence, Trotsky, and maybe Putin(as fate of Russia is still uncertain).

    Run-of-the-mill leaders won’t do.

    If Europe keeps producing nonentities like Merkel, Macron, Hollande, Sarkozy, Blair, Cameron, May, Berlusconi, and etc, it’s finished. Things are getting radical, and it will take real visionaries of grit, wit, and shi*.

    As for nationalists, the likes of Lepen, Geert Wilders, and others won’t do. The exception may be Orban. They are too much part of the system and try to work by current rules which are totally rigged by media, academia, and deep state.
    Trump made it in the US, but he is not a serious person. He’s a showman and salesman, and he can’t be counted on to do much more than that.

    Also, as enough white people are comfortable enough with bread & circuses and mentally infected with PC for the time being, it will be difficult to shake them out of their doldrums.

    But if Europe is to be saved, it will require the rise of truly remarkable individuals with the power to inspire, lead, and forever alter the trajectory of history.

    Read More
    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
    " Trump made it in the US, but he is not a serious person. He’s a showman and salesman, and he can’t be counted on to do much more than that. "

    The way he undermines NATO makes me wonder if he's not far more clever than most people think.
    , @Pachyderm Pachyderma
    British did hug the 'Untouchables' by converting them to Christianity but the 'blacks' of India have been downtrodden for so long that they will require centuries of affirmative action to overcome the conditioning. As to your wanting a European 'Gandhi', you may want to rethink it considering the old man gave away nearly half of India to Muslims and created a perpetual nemesis on both of its flanks. And your wanting to save Europe is where lies the problem: Thinks like Jews! The world is their oyster... Think about saving the White race and taking over the world again to make it in the image of Europe rather than saving but a small part of terra firma and living in isolation which isn't possible in today's world. As to the other geniuses you have named, Mao helped kill twenty million of his own, Lenin left communism for Orthodox Christians, Ataturk was fool who didn't realize the innate Muslim in himself, Mussolini... What can one say about that should have been a pizza parlor owner in Brooklyn?, Castro might have been a Converso, T.E Lawrence... That fool!, and you know what happened to Trotsky... So much for being a Jew and protected by the richest banker, one of 'his own' of his time and the last, Putin... Methinks he is a philo-semite, who would rather hang out with his oligarchs than the serfs. I am afraid the Christ is the only thing that can save you... Pray for the second coming!
    , @Man on the street
    The Christian Whites in the West have no organization, prevented from organizing, have no leaders or media, and are called racists Islamophobes, anti-Semitics if they attempted to defy the popular PC dictates.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  8. Quite many begin to suppose that destabilising the ME and N Africa, causing massive migration to Europe, is part of the same plan, rule the world through destabilisation, also of the European cultures.
    However, if jews are indeed the main players in this game, it is a dangerous game.
    French jews are leaving France for Israel, because of Muslim attacks on jews, and jewish institutions.
    Once Muslim anger in European countries turns more toward jews, the consequences are unpredictable.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  9. @Priss Factor
    The Jews, they are a strange people. They like to talk to the Filipinas [who work for them as domestic servants]. “We are an immigrant family like you,” they say. …And it is tough working for the Jews. They make many Filipinas cry. They are more likely than anyone else to bring the Filipinas inside the family — but this is mostly a charade.

    That's pretty funny.

    It goes to show there are different meanings to 'minority rights'.
    Which minority are we talking about, and what is meant by 'rights'?

    After all, both British imperialist elites and the Untouchables were minorities in India.
    But whereas one minority, the Brits, was at the top, the other minority, the Untouchables, was at the bottom.

    For the British, 'minority rights' meant the right to rule over Hindu(and Muslim) masses.
    For the Untouchables, 'minority rights' would have meant the humble hope that they could enjoy the same protection under the law as other Indians.

    And I think we have a similar kind of confusion in the West.

    In US and UK, Jews are the ruling minority or the minority elites. (Homos also belong to this group.)
    But Mexicans, many blacks, and many immigrant groups are either minority underclass or minority ordinary folks; they have no special power. Asians do better than most other immigrant groups, but their dim sense of identity and servile nature translate much to power. Even in Hawaii where they are the majority, they aren't known for political muscle.

    So, 'minority rights' mean different things to Jews and to other minorities. For Jews, it means the right to rule over US and UK and make demands and dictate policy. Old 'antisemitism' used to mean denial of Jews of basic rights and liberties. New 'antisemitism' means challenge to the Jewish supremacist right to rule over goyim. And something similar is operative with homos. 'Gay rights' used to mean the tolerance of letting homos be homos and do their own thing without persecution. Now, 'gay rights' mean we must all celebrate, admire, and worship homos as angels and even change marriage laws to appease the Great Holy Homo. And we must even put homo stuff in churches. It's as if homos have the right to be admired and adulated, and it is now a mandatory duty of many politicians and citizens to sing hosannas to homos and trannies. Indeed, we mustn't even joke about someone as ridiculous as Bruce Jenner. (In the UK, a criminal investigation was under way to arrest someone who made an insulting remark to Brucie.)

    Now, there are other minorities that also demand special favors. Blacks demand affirmative action, and Mexicans demand affirmative immigration(amnesty). But many blacks and Mexicans are on the bottom looking up. Their hope is to reach the middle. (To be sure, too many blacks just fantasize about being sports stars or rappers, attainments out of reach for most blacks, but blacks are stupid.) But even if blacks and browns demand special favors, they won't amount to much. And historically, all they could expect from society was equal treatment under the law.

    In contrast, equality of any kind isn't good enough for Jews(and homos) anymore. For them, 'rights' means something closer to 'divine right to rule'.

    It'd be like British Imperialist Elites in India siding with the Untouchables as 'fellow minorities' against the 'bigoted' and 'populist' masses of respectable Hindus and Muslims.
    Imagine if the British ruling minority elite hugged the Untouchables, the underclass minority, and claimed shared/collective victimhood as 'fellow minorities' regardless of the fact that Brits are the master race minority whereas Untouchables are the marginalized minority. That would be pretty funny. But then, there were times when the Brits did use the Minority Issue to justify their rule over India. In Richard Attenborough's movie GANDHI, the British ruling minority poses as protectors of the Muslim minority against the Hindu majority.

    Thankfully for India, it had a leader of Gandhi's caliber who was witty, cunning, shrewd, and devious enough to match wits with the British and argue like a lawyer. (He would have made Professor Kingsfield of PAPER CHASE proud.) Too bad the West lacks the kind of leader like Gandhi with right combination of cleverness and resolve.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CZVsWzIb6Vk

    Back then, the British Imperialists claimed that India is 'British'.
    Now, the bloody fools in UK say immigrant-invaders are 'New British'.
    Gandhi urged Indians not to cooperate until the British left.
    Maybe white Europeans can do something similar. Since so much overt resistance has been made illegal, whites can make their voices know through massive non-cooperation. But then, so many whites have been led to believe that Diversity is what their nations are all about and that return to any kind of homogeneity is AWFUL since the true meaning of Europe is spicy exotic restaurants and jungle fever with Negroes. Interestingly enough, Brexit won in UK because of older voters, but Macron won in France with older voters, 80% of whom chose him over Lepen.

    The future of Europe will be determined by whether it can produce leaders like Gandhi, Mao, Lenin, Ataturk, Mussolini, Castro, T. E. Lawrence, Trotsky, and maybe Putin(as fate of Russia is still uncertain).

    Run-of-the-mill leaders won't do.

    If Europe keeps producing nonentities like Merkel, Macron, Hollande, Sarkozy, Blair, Cameron, May, Berlusconi, and etc, it's finished. Things are getting radical, and it will take real visionaries of grit, wit, and shi*.

    As for nationalists, the likes of Lepen, Geert Wilders, and others won't do. The exception may be Orban. They are too much part of the system and try to work by current rules which are totally rigged by media, academia, and deep state.
    Trump made it in the US, but he is not a serious person. He's a showman and salesman, and he can't be counted on to do much more than that.

    Also, as enough white people are comfortable enough with bread & circuses and mentally infected with PC for the time being, it will be difficult to shake them out of their doldrums.

    But if Europe is to be saved, it will require the rise of truly remarkable individuals with the power to inspire, lead, and forever alter the trajectory of history.

    ” Trump made it in the US, but he is not a serious person. He’s a showman and salesman, and he can’t be counted on to do much more than that. ”

    The way he undermines NATO makes me wonder if he’s not far more clever than most people think.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  10. Tom Welsh says:

    A long overdue declaration; also well-written and, I think, balanced.

    Thanks, Mr Langdon!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  11. I read a book about the British Raj in India, published decades ago, consisting mostly of interviews with people from Britain who had worked in India or grown up there under British rule. Most of these people were very old by the time the book was being prepared and would now be dead – the interviews were a last effort to get their stories before they died.
    One civil servant recalled being tutored in a local language by a Hindu Brahmin. The civil servant actually ruled the Brahmin’s district but the tutor would never shake hands with the civil servant or even hand him anything – he would place the civil servant’s corrected essay on the table. He feared losing caste if he actually handed anything to a non-Hindu. Yet in conventional socio-political terms the civil servant was his ruler.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Pachyderm Pachyderma
    Yet in the psychological sense the 'Brahmin' never lost his sense of superiority notwithstanding his master, the civil servant in question, lording over him...
    , @nsa
    Hindus believe white people are reincarnated as crows. A white person drinks from a glass or touches an eating utensil, a devout Hindu won't touch the item and has an underling discard it as soon as possible.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  12. mcohen says:

    that’s right it is election time in the uk

    another one for to biased

    when is a red pickle kosher.when it comes what may.
    another great joke to go with the red herring.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  13. DanCT says:

    “We Jews shit on you Christians!” as one woman charitably put it. Imagine what we don’t see, and probably would be nauseated if we did, regarding putatively Christian and conservative personalities allowed to appear on TV or run for any public office above dog catcher.

    Read More
    • Replies: @CanSpeccy

    Imagine what we don’t see ... putatively Christian and conservative personalities allowed to appear on TV.
     
    What we do see is pretty amazing. Just a couple of months ago the BBC appointed a Muslim woman as head of Religious Programming. Reflecting her, presumably fat pay packet, her name is Fatima Salaria.

    Is that not amazing? England, after all, is a Christian country — you know, with a state church, the Anglican Church. Appointing a Muslim to head religious programming at Britain's state broadcaster is like appointing a Jesuit to oversee religious broadcasting in Iran providing equal representation to all religion's no doubt including the religion of love motivating the Manchester bomber.

    , @jacques sheete

    “We Jews shit on you Christians!”
     
    That's not just a piece of rhetoric, either.


    WASHINGTON — “I’m not spreading propaganda,” George Stephanopoulos’ orthodox-nun sister vows, but Israeli soldiers last week “defecated” on the floors of a West Bank medical clinic they raided.
    They’re also looting Palestinians’ homes there, claims Sister Maria Stephanopoulos, a nun at the Convent of St. Mary Magdalene in Jerusalem.”

    www.wnd.com/2002/04/13678/

     

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  14. Joe Wong says:
    @NoseytheDuke
    A chilling article. It will not end well, it never has.

    Personally, I'd settle for true separation of church and state. People can then be free to imagine whatever they wish to be the source of everything, as long as they contribute fair taxes along with everyone else. Surely that isn't too much to ask or insist upon?

    You need to move to China.

    Read More
    • Replies: @NoseytheDuke
    For the food? The fresh air? What's your point?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  15. In short, Israel is a sane country

    In short you’re WRONG.

    - manipulate murrican international [and national] policy;

    - create ”conflicts” [bloody ones] in neighborhood;

    - treat non-jews in holy hole as piece of shit…

    ”Their historical ‘religion’ ”

    Pray for JEWsus, pathetic!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  16. Countdown to the cuck brigade and hasbara trolls expressing outrage, 3, 2, 1, …

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  17. A real patriotic Englishman speaks out for the interest of his homeland. America needs its own patriotic men, not corrupted and compromised by bribes and scandals. Who is defending America’s interests in Washington? My guess is that the occupation and control of Washington by the Neo-Cons is far more powerful and comprehensive than the case in London, which explains the quick neutering of President Trump.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  18. Sammy says:

    Jewish hostility towards Christians can be even worse than you describe.

    This book tells in detail how truly bad it can get: Mountebank’s Monster and His Mom: a peculiar resurrection. (https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01BP52LPU?ref_=pe_2427780_160035660)

    From the blurb:

    Dystopian novel about destruction of the individual with an eye to destroying society. The story is “true fiction” based on actual events that include gaslighting, gang stalking, psychosurgery, poison, and betrayal.

    I have personal knowledge of the events recorded in this book and know that this true story is not unique to one person. Highly recommended for those trying to figure out how deep the violence goes and how bad it can be.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  19. windwaves says:
    @Dan Hayes
    Who else except Ron Unz would be daring and courageous enough to republish this article?

    Absolutely fantastic. So refreshing.

    These days more than ever, being in the US where the president of the country is the biggest slave of Israel I could possibly ever imagine. Where things are much worse than in the UK when it comes to how jews are in total control of this country.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  20. DaveE says:
    @Dan Hayes
    Who else except Ron Unz would be daring and courageous enough to republish this article?

    I agree, kind of. Although it seems more than a little double-standard-ish to THANK someone for telling (or publishing) the truth, it never hurts to acknowledge gratitude.

    Truth telling should be the norm and lies should be punished, in a decent world. The fact that that is definitely NOT the case in our so-called “media” demands that we all step up and do our part to turn it around.

    We’ll just live with the meaningless “anti-Semite” noise.

    Thank you, Mr. Unz.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  21. Takimag springs to mind.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  22. The State of Israel was a fraud from the start. A bunch of fake Jews exploited Jewish myth and sentiment to initiate yet another thug run state.

    Uri Avnery offers a glimpse of the truth about Israeli politics. (And you thought they were “special”??)

    WHEN I first entered the Knesset, I was shocked by the low standard of its debates. Speeches were full of clichés, platitudes and party slogans, the intellectual content was almost nil.
    That was 52 years ago…

    Today, looking back, that Knesset looks like an Olympus, compared to the present composition of that non-august body.

    AN INTELLIGENT debate in today’s Knesset would be as out of place as a Pater Noster in a Synagogue.
    Let’s face it, the present Knesset is full of what I would call parliamentary riffraff. (“Editor’s” note: parliamentary riffraff is redundant)
    Men and women I would not drink a cup of coffee with. Some of them look and behave like walking jokes.

    http://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/en/channels/avnery/1495203281

    Walking jokes? No wonder the Trumpster fits right in. The same can be said for Hillary and the rest of the ruling clowns too.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  23. @Dan Hayes
    Who else except Ron Unz would be daring and courageous enough to republish this article?

    It’s called conditioning…

    Read More
    • Replies: @survey-of-disinfo
    Nail, meet hammer.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  24. biz says:

    As I suspected, I could stop reading after the first paragraph because it was already incorrect.

    Here’s an Arab member of parliament in Israel’s ruling coalition (ruling party, in fact): Ayoob Kara

    And here’s another one in the ruling coalition: Hamad Amar

    And bonus fact, just because Israel is that awesome and fascinating, there’s even a Jewish parliamentarian in the anti-Zionist Arab opposition bloc: Dov Khenin

    Read More
    • Replies: @NexusNihilis
    Reading comprehension:

    Are there any strongly identified Muslim or Christian Arabs high in Israel’s ruling conservative party?

    Kara and Amar do not make the answer "Yes."

    http://www.metrolyrics.com/hi-hi-hi-lyrics-paul-mccartney.html

    And even if Kara and Amar had ostensibly important posts, the British Conservative party recently had a Muslim woman as co-chairman with one Lord Feldman. If you think she had any real power compared to Lord Feldman, I have a bridge for sale. (She resigned in a row about Israel.)

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  25. @Priss Factor
    The Jews, they are a strange people. They like to talk to the Filipinas [who work for them as domestic servants]. “We are an immigrant family like you,” they say. …And it is tough working for the Jews. They make many Filipinas cry. They are more likely than anyone else to bring the Filipinas inside the family — but this is mostly a charade.

    That's pretty funny.

    It goes to show there are different meanings to 'minority rights'.
    Which minority are we talking about, and what is meant by 'rights'?

    After all, both British imperialist elites and the Untouchables were minorities in India.
    But whereas one minority, the Brits, was at the top, the other minority, the Untouchables, was at the bottom.

    For the British, 'minority rights' meant the right to rule over Hindu(and Muslim) masses.
    For the Untouchables, 'minority rights' would have meant the humble hope that they could enjoy the same protection under the law as other Indians.

    And I think we have a similar kind of confusion in the West.

    In US and UK, Jews are the ruling minority or the minority elites. (Homos also belong to this group.)
    But Mexicans, many blacks, and many immigrant groups are either minority underclass or minority ordinary folks; they have no special power. Asians do better than most other immigrant groups, but their dim sense of identity and servile nature translate much to power. Even in Hawaii where they are the majority, they aren't known for political muscle.

    So, 'minority rights' mean different things to Jews and to other minorities. For Jews, it means the right to rule over US and UK and make demands and dictate policy. Old 'antisemitism' used to mean denial of Jews of basic rights and liberties. New 'antisemitism' means challenge to the Jewish supremacist right to rule over goyim. And something similar is operative with homos. 'Gay rights' used to mean the tolerance of letting homos be homos and do their own thing without persecution. Now, 'gay rights' mean we must all celebrate, admire, and worship homos as angels and even change marriage laws to appease the Great Holy Homo. And we must even put homo stuff in churches. It's as if homos have the right to be admired and adulated, and it is now a mandatory duty of many politicians and citizens to sing hosannas to homos and trannies. Indeed, we mustn't even joke about someone as ridiculous as Bruce Jenner. (In the UK, a criminal investigation was under way to arrest someone who made an insulting remark to Brucie.)

    Now, there are other minorities that also demand special favors. Blacks demand affirmative action, and Mexicans demand affirmative immigration(amnesty). But many blacks and Mexicans are on the bottom looking up. Their hope is to reach the middle. (To be sure, too many blacks just fantasize about being sports stars or rappers, attainments out of reach for most blacks, but blacks are stupid.) But even if blacks and browns demand special favors, they won't amount to much. And historically, all they could expect from society was equal treatment under the law.

    In contrast, equality of any kind isn't good enough for Jews(and homos) anymore. For them, 'rights' means something closer to 'divine right to rule'.

    It'd be like British Imperialist Elites in India siding with the Untouchables as 'fellow minorities' against the 'bigoted' and 'populist' masses of respectable Hindus and Muslims.
    Imagine if the British ruling minority elite hugged the Untouchables, the underclass minority, and claimed shared/collective victimhood as 'fellow minorities' regardless of the fact that Brits are the master race minority whereas Untouchables are the marginalized minority. That would be pretty funny. But then, there were times when the Brits did use the Minority Issue to justify their rule over India. In Richard Attenborough's movie GANDHI, the British ruling minority poses as protectors of the Muslim minority against the Hindu majority.

    Thankfully for India, it had a leader of Gandhi's caliber who was witty, cunning, shrewd, and devious enough to match wits with the British and argue like a lawyer. (He would have made Professor Kingsfield of PAPER CHASE proud.) Too bad the West lacks the kind of leader like Gandhi with right combination of cleverness and resolve.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CZVsWzIb6Vk

    Back then, the British Imperialists claimed that India is 'British'.
    Now, the bloody fools in UK say immigrant-invaders are 'New British'.
    Gandhi urged Indians not to cooperate until the British left.
    Maybe white Europeans can do something similar. Since so much overt resistance has been made illegal, whites can make their voices know through massive non-cooperation. But then, so many whites have been led to believe that Diversity is what their nations are all about and that return to any kind of homogeneity is AWFUL since the true meaning of Europe is spicy exotic restaurants and jungle fever with Negroes. Interestingly enough, Brexit won in UK because of older voters, but Macron won in France with older voters, 80% of whom chose him over Lepen.

    The future of Europe will be determined by whether it can produce leaders like Gandhi, Mao, Lenin, Ataturk, Mussolini, Castro, T. E. Lawrence, Trotsky, and maybe Putin(as fate of Russia is still uncertain).

    Run-of-the-mill leaders won't do.

    If Europe keeps producing nonentities like Merkel, Macron, Hollande, Sarkozy, Blair, Cameron, May, Berlusconi, and etc, it's finished. Things are getting radical, and it will take real visionaries of grit, wit, and shi*.

    As for nationalists, the likes of Lepen, Geert Wilders, and others won't do. The exception may be Orban. They are too much part of the system and try to work by current rules which are totally rigged by media, academia, and deep state.
    Trump made it in the US, but he is not a serious person. He's a showman and salesman, and he can't be counted on to do much more than that.

    Also, as enough white people are comfortable enough with bread & circuses and mentally infected with PC for the time being, it will be difficult to shake them out of their doldrums.

    But if Europe is to be saved, it will require the rise of truly remarkable individuals with the power to inspire, lead, and forever alter the trajectory of history.

    British did hug the ‘Untouchables’ by converting them to Christianity but the ‘blacks’ of India have been downtrodden for so long that they will require centuries of affirmative action to overcome the conditioning. As to your wanting a European ‘Gandhi’, you may want to rethink it considering the old man gave away nearly half of India to Muslims and created a perpetual nemesis on both of its flanks. And your wanting to save Europe is where lies the problem: Thinks like Jews! The world is their oyster… Think about saving the White race and taking over the world again to make it in the image of Europe rather than saving but a small part of terra firma and living in isolation which isn’t possible in today’s world. As to the other geniuses you have named, Mao helped kill twenty million of his own, Lenin left communism for Orthodox Christians, Ataturk was fool who didn’t realize the innate Muslim in himself, Mussolini… What can one say about that should have been a pizza parlor owner in Brooklyn?, Castro might have been a Converso, T.E Lawrence… That fool!, and you know what happened to Trotsky… So much for being a Jew and protected by the richest banker, one of ‘his own’ of his time and the last, Putin… Methinks he is a philo-semite, who would rather hang out with his oligarchs than the serfs. I am afraid the Christ is the only thing that can save you… Pray for the second coming!

    Read More
    • Replies: @Priss Factor
    As to your wanting a European ‘Gandhi’, you may want to rethink it considering the old man gave away nearly half of India to Muslims... As to the other geniuses you have named, Mao helped kill twenty million of his own, Lenin left communism for Orthodox Christians, Ataturk was fool who didn’t realize the innate Muslim in himself, Mussolini…

    Don't be a dammy.

    I said 'like such and such'. Yes, those men were deeply flawed, and some were evil and pathological. But they had vision, conviction, courage, ruthless determination, and etc.
    So, I'm talking of some of their qualities, not the whole package.

    Extreme times call for powerful personalities.

    The threat that Europe faces is the greatest ever. Past wars and repressions were horrible, but WWI and WWII were still about white Europe. So, even after millions died, it was the same white Europe. And as bad as communism was, it didn't change the demographics in most commie nations.

    But now, it is different. Not only is Europe being colonized physically by foreign masses but European minds have been PC-colonized to 'welcome' this as a good thing.

    We need a new set of leaders and rulers who can eradicate the mental virus from European minds and purge them of this 'guilt' and 'fever'. Indeed, the task is daunting because whites welcome mass invasion not only out of 'white guilt' but because of 'afro-fever', aka jungle fever. European women are turning into sexual deserters who are offering their wombs to the millions of African men who are storming the beaches of Europe. As African birthrate is 6 or 7 children per women and since EU has a policy of 'saving' millions of self-stranded Negroes in the sea, the demographic and sexual math for Europe is horrible.

    White minds are colonized by PC, white lands are colonized by Third World mobs, white males bodies are brutalized by stronger Negro men, and white females' wombs are colonized by Negro genes. It is White Nakba.

    In Jewish history, there were two kinds of cleansers: prophets and warriors. Prophets cleansed Jewish minds of the virus of pagan idolatry and reminded them of the Covenant with God. And the warriors took up arms to do battle with enemies of Jews. (The third kind of Jews were diplomats who used wit and cunning to seek an understanding with rivals, enemies, or overlords of Jews.)

    Anyway, unless warriors have vision and conviction, they are mere mercenaries. In order for white knights to rise, white souls must be cleansed and purged of the PC virus of guilt-and-fever. It's like Islam has two meanings of 'Jihad'. One means to do physical combat against infidel, but there is another meaning that says souls must be cleansed of infidel ideas.

    In the present, even if great white leaders were to rise, majority of white masses will curse them and denounce them since their minds have been infected with the crazy idea that 'racism' is the greatest since, in fact, race-ism is the noblest creed.
    , @mcohen
    better pass the viagra
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  26. The Jew’s are an amazing race. Just imagine, a person thinking “I am one of God’s chosen” . God, who created the WHOLE universe has selected ME & a relatively miniscule number of my race as the special ones, as his chosen ones, the literal focus of divine affairs on earth…in the whole universe. It’s no wonder the Jews’ created the word “chutzpah”….
    Yes, they are the chosen race….but, “race” ? Is it mere genetics ? What about all those so-called “self hating Jew’s” ? What about JESUS ? Wasn’t he a Jew ? Are they “chosen” ? I don’t know, they still believe, even love the old Testament God, but…I get the impression that many Jew’s don’t think such people ARE chosen. I get the impression they’re …traitors…. So, maybe race isn’t the key.
    Perhaps, God’s choice – or, at least the public sense of that exceptuality, lies with the commitment to the interests of the Jewish race & their social embodiment in the state of Israel ? A self hating Jew doesn’t necessarily not love God…no, usually, the self hater has doubted, questioned, or even criticised some aspect of collective Jewish behaviour….like Jesus did.
    A cynic could almost believe that the Jewish religion, as a public entity, is no more than collective SELF LOVE…with it’s partners in crime, ARROGANCE & CONTEMPT for “the others”….

    Read More
    • Agree: jacques sheete
    • Replies: @Delinquent Snail
    If you are religious,you are delusional. Thats why its so easy to claim that you are the center, the chosen, the whatever. If some one is going to lie to themselves for their entire lives, they have to find a way to feel good about it, right?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  27. @Uebersetzer
    I read a book about the British Raj in India, published decades ago, consisting mostly of interviews with people from Britain who had worked in India or grown up there under British rule. Most of these people were very old by the time the book was being prepared and would now be dead - the interviews were a last effort to get their stories before they died.
    One civil servant recalled being tutored in a local language by a Hindu Brahmin. The civil servant actually ruled the Brahmin's district but the tutor would never shake hands with the civil servant or even hand him anything - he would place the civil servant's corrected essay on the table. He feared losing caste if he actually handed anything to a non-Hindu. Yet in conventional socio-political terms the civil servant was his ruler.

    Yet in the psychological sense the ‘Brahmin’ never lost his sense of superiority notwithstanding his master, the civil servant in question, lording over him…

    Read More
    • Replies: @Uebersetzer
    The civil servant was smart enough not to insist that the Brahmin violate his own taboos. Not all rulers in history have done that - sometimes they trample on the sensibilities of the ruled, which never works out well in the long term.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  28. @Joe Wong
    You need to move to China.

    For the food? The fresh air? What’s your point?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Joe Wong
    Aren't you looking for "true separation of church and state?" I'm giving you the pointer, or you don't know what you are talking about like all the Americans who are so confused that they can claim bombing and killing on the fabricated phantom WMD allegation as humanitarian intervention.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  29. It’s funny: years ago the expression “Jewish conspiracy” was a joke, almost a contradiction of terms — now it’s merely a tautology.

    Read More
    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
    The woord conspiracy means something intentional, and well considered.
    In this sense in my opinion there is no conspiracy.
    There is just a common delusion: jews as eternal innocent victims.
    Few people here read french, I suppose.
    Otherwise, read Francine Kaufmann, Pour Relire 'Le Dernier des Justes', 1987, Paris.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  30. @animalogic
    It's funny: years ago the expression "Jewish conspiracy" was a joke, almost a contradiction of terms -- now it's merely a tautology.

    The woord conspiracy means something intentional, and well considered.
    In this sense in my opinion there is no conspiracy.
    There is just a common delusion: jews as eternal innocent victims.
    Few people here read french, I suppose.
    Otherwise, read Francine Kaufmann, Pour Relire ‘Le Dernier des Justes’, 1987, Paris.

    Read More
    • Replies: @animalogic
    If I understand you correctly, I think you are saying Jew's share a common delusion, ie the eternal victim. Like an instinct, they don't need to discuss /debate it. This is similar to ruling elites: they all just KNOW their own class interests. No argument here at all.
    However, I do think they are conscious of their goals, & behind closed doors they discuss strategy & tactics.
    (Perhaps it's not true, but have u heard the story how the Israeli PM (Net-whatever-his-name) had Bush II dragged out of a party or something -- as a JOKE ! ie "hey guys, watch how I can yank the US Pres' chain ! Dopey goy" ) It's not all unconscious delusion.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  31. son of the former cabinet minister Sir Malcolm Rifkind, who, like Dianne Feinstein in the United States, has had a vital role overseeing the intelligence services.

    Do they share Sen Feinstein’s sick fascination with outlawing guns among the common people?

    Oh, wait… it’s too late for that.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  32. Agent76 says:

    Why I Hate Religion, But Love Jesus

    In the scriptures Jesus received the most opposition from the most religious people of his day. At it’s core Jesus’ gospel and the good news of the Cross is in pure opposition to self-righteousness/self-justification.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  33. @jilles dykstra
    The woord conspiracy means something intentional, and well considered.
    In this sense in my opinion there is no conspiracy.
    There is just a common delusion: jews as eternal innocent victims.
    Few people here read french, I suppose.
    Otherwise, read Francine Kaufmann, Pour Relire 'Le Dernier des Justes', 1987, Paris.

    If I understand you correctly, I think you are saying Jew’s share a common delusion, ie the eternal victim. Like an instinct, they don’t need to discuss /debate it. This is similar to ruling elites: they all just KNOW their own class interests. No argument here at all.
    However, I do think they are conscious of their goals, & behind closed doors they discuss strategy & tactics.
    (Perhaps it’s not true, but have u heard the story how the Israeli PM (Net-whatever-his-name) had Bush II dragged out of a party or something — as a JOKE ! ie “hey guys, watch how I can yank the US Pres’ chain ! Dopey goy” ) It’s not all unconscious delusion.

    Read More
    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
    They of course, in any case some of them, discuss strategy and goals, as every group on this earth does.
    However, if your identity is 'eternal innocent victim', you must control the world, I suppose.
    Jews are so under the influence of the holocaust, and the fact that in the thirties indeed hardly any country, also not the USA, accepted jewish refugees, that it maybe is decisive on anything they do.
    Trump, still is my impression, has given up the idea that the USA can and must control the world.
    Those that see world control as their sole way to remain in existence as a people, or a culture, now are, I suppose, desperate.
    They not only lost the perspective of world control, they also lost control of the USA, the USA that is the sole power behind Israel.
    When Trump was in Israel Netanyahu's body language was clear, he's no longer in control.

    see
    http://age-of-treason.com/2013/03/01/stephen-steinlight-on-jewish-power-and-interests/

    , @Man on the street
    The PC culture in the West as it is propagated by the Jews primarily has empowered certain groups over the others, and allowed them to cash in on the victimhood card. Feminist who spew hate for men cannot rationally discuss their bias without resorting to screaming misogynist? Black crimes and ghetto culture is such a taboo that cannot be discussed without being called racist? environmental extremism cannot be discussed without being called climate change denier?Jewish domination of money, media, government cannot be even pointed out as OVERREPRESENTATION without being called anti-Semitic even by the brainwashed gentile. To this end the average person has no source of information to help navigate around the oppression of the minority by the majority.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  34. macilrae says:

    I remember a summer camp for a group which had coalesced around an ancient social website (1990s). Meeting for the first time in person we found ourselves considerably less compatible than when online. In particular, a couple of Israeli girls set up a huge issue over the fact that non-kosher Pepsi had been discovered lurking in the communal fridge and demanded its removal – presumably lest the sanctified Coke therein be irreversibly contaminated (I think I have that the right way round but couldn’t care less if I haven’t!).

    The other members bent over backwards to sooth the raging indignation of those two girls and the Pepsi was removed with alacrity – to be served warm perhaps, or not at all. The two seemed to seize upon every opportunity to loudly emphasize their differentness and implicit superiority and the rest went along with total subservience – the essence of the above excellent article in miniature.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  35. rw95 says:

    I love how “devout Christians” are anti-Semites.

    You realize your God is a literal magic Jew, right?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Santoculto
    Primordial fatal contradiction.

    Hate joos or not?

    Only jewsus deserve our luv!!1

    I ask for myself how a people who worship for a Jewish son of THE MAN who created the universe will fight against THE jooos??!
    , @anon

    I love how “devout Christians” are anti-Semites.

    You realize your God is a literal magic Jew, right?
     
    essence and behavior are separate

    (on a group genetic basis particular traits probably aren't entirely separate but on an individual basis they will be)
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  36. anon says: • Disclaimer

    “The Mail reported that Mr Odze had met the woman for sex. ”

    Whites need to explore, understand ,and dismantle the results the media is seeking from this exposure. Its time tom accept not embrace the “sexual depravity between two adults of normal intelligence . The Jews will lose a lot of power .

    Something similar happened in Indonesia recently

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  37. @animalogic
    If I understand you correctly, I think you are saying Jew's share a common delusion, ie the eternal victim. Like an instinct, they don't need to discuss /debate it. This is similar to ruling elites: they all just KNOW their own class interests. No argument here at all.
    However, I do think they are conscious of their goals, & behind closed doors they discuss strategy & tactics.
    (Perhaps it's not true, but have u heard the story how the Israeli PM (Net-whatever-his-name) had Bush II dragged out of a party or something -- as a JOKE ! ie "hey guys, watch how I can yank the US Pres' chain ! Dopey goy" ) It's not all unconscious delusion.

    They of course, in any case some of them, discuss strategy and goals, as every group on this earth does.
    However, if your identity is ‘eternal innocent victim’, you must control the world, I suppose.
    Jews are so under the influence of the holocaust, and the fact that in the thirties indeed hardly any country, also not the USA, accepted jewish refugees, that it maybe is decisive on anything they do.
    Trump, still is my impression, has given up the idea that the USA can and must control the world.
    Those that see world control as their sole way to remain in existence as a people, or a culture, now are, I suppose, desperate.
    They not only lost the perspective of world control, they also lost control of the USA, the USA that is the sole power behind Israel.
    When Trump was in Israel Netanyahu’s body language was clear, he’s no longer in control.

    see

    http://age-of-treason.com/2013/03/01/stephen-steinlight-on-jewish-power-and-interests/

    Read More
    • Replies: @Delinquent Snail
    I always thought no one accepted jewish refugees because throughout European history, jewish interests were solely jewish. Like gypsies. You dont want to bring in a foreign peoples that dont want to assimilate (atleast that used to be a thing).
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  38. Jake says:

    This is an excellent and much needed article. But even being able to face what is here will do no good if you fail to know when and where and how the process began.

    Let’s start with this sentence from the article: “Now compare the United Kingdom, a White and historically Christian nation.” It is true, but false in the sense that it is incomplete. The UK is a forced political entity based on a very small Elite holding nearly all power, with that Elite leading a large ethno-linguistic group (Protestant Englishmen). That Elite and its English lessers agreed that all Catholics are evil, because they would undermine Anglo-Saxon Protestantism, and they also agreed that Celtic languages must be exterminated, if possible, which should exterminate any viable sense of nationalism in Wales, Scotland, and Ireland.

    So what does all that mean in the real world? It means that the UK was always about a small group of white professed Christians acting to exterminate ‘other’ European languages and cultures. The UK has always been about the UK Elites waging war to exterminate white cultures. The UK Elites have always seen the vast majority of British Isles natives they ruled as ‘white trash’ and ‘rednecks’ far beneath them.

    And that problem has nothing to do with monarchy of with lack of demand for more Parliamentary power. Oliver Cromwell hated all Catholics (and what we would call Anglo-Catholic Church of England Englishmen)n and all Celts like Jews hate Arabs, and he also loved Jews and even more so Jewish money. Cromwell welcomed Jews back into England, in fact promoting them, at the same time he would have been thrilled to inflict genocide on the Irish.

    Anglo-Saxon Puritanism was a Judaizing heresy that longed to be able to exterminate Celtic languages and white Catholics native to the British Isles. And it had centuries of aging in the larger English culture, so much so that the return of the monarchy did not alter the national pattern even a teeny tiny bit. English culture was centrally about hating and acting to destroy white Christian cultures native to the British Isles that were notseen as in full; service to the desires of the English Elites.

    And after Cromwell. Jews became ever more central to that culture war waged by Anglo-Saxon Elites against the vast majority of white Christians they rule.

    Jews have the power they do in London and NYC and LA/Hollywood, etc. because WASP Elites have always been thrilled to ally with Jews against the majority of white Christians ruled by WASP Elites.

    It is impossible to solve the Jewish problem without getting rid of the WASP Elite problem.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Pachyderm Pachyderma
    Old Ironsides must have gotten Jewish money to do his shenanigans in a quid pro quo deal facilitating the latter's return to England after a long exile... Looks like nothing has changed in a thousand years because money still does most of the talking!
    , @ANON
    If this is not elaborate trolling it is the work of some (presumably Catholic anti-Semite) obsessive who knows very little British political,economic or social history in all its variety of regions and sects and entrepreneurial business - and its rapid changes over 250 years and more - and has tried to find bits to psck into his thesis. Kindly explsin Wilberforce and the Anglican Evangelical abolitionists in terms of any Judaising tendencies, or any reference to the Old Testament at all.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  39. @Pachyderm Pachyderma
    British did hug the 'Untouchables' by converting them to Christianity but the 'blacks' of India have been downtrodden for so long that they will require centuries of affirmative action to overcome the conditioning. As to your wanting a European 'Gandhi', you may want to rethink it considering the old man gave away nearly half of India to Muslims and created a perpetual nemesis on both of its flanks. And your wanting to save Europe is where lies the problem: Thinks like Jews! The world is their oyster... Think about saving the White race and taking over the world again to make it in the image of Europe rather than saving but a small part of terra firma and living in isolation which isn't possible in today's world. As to the other geniuses you have named, Mao helped kill twenty million of his own, Lenin left communism for Orthodox Christians, Ataturk was fool who didn't realize the innate Muslim in himself, Mussolini... What can one say about that should have been a pizza parlor owner in Brooklyn?, Castro might have been a Converso, T.E Lawrence... That fool!, and you know what happened to Trotsky... So much for being a Jew and protected by the richest banker, one of 'his own' of his time and the last, Putin... Methinks he is a philo-semite, who would rather hang out with his oligarchs than the serfs. I am afraid the Christ is the only thing that can save you... Pray for the second coming!

    As to your wanting a European ‘Gandhi’, you may want to rethink it considering the old man gave away nearly half of India to Muslims… As to the other geniuses you have named, Mao helped kill twenty million of his own, Lenin left communism for Orthodox Christians, Ataturk was fool who didn’t realize the innate Muslim in himself, Mussolini…

    Don’t be a dammy.

    I said ‘like such and such’. Yes, those men were deeply flawed, and some were evil and pathological. But they had vision, conviction, courage, ruthless determination, and etc.
    So, I’m talking of some of their qualities, not the whole package.

    Extreme times call for powerful personalities.

    The threat that Europe faces is the greatest ever. Past wars and repressions were horrible, but WWI and WWII were still about white Europe. So, even after millions died, it was the same white Europe. And as bad as communism was, it didn’t change the demographics in most commie nations.

    But now, it is different. Not only is Europe being colonized physically by foreign masses but European minds have been PC-colonized to ‘welcome’ this as a good thing.

    We need a new set of leaders and rulers who can eradicate the mental virus from European minds and purge them of this ‘guilt’ and ‘fever’. Indeed, the task is daunting because whites welcome mass invasion not only out of ‘white guilt’ but because of ‘afro-fever’, aka jungle fever. European women are turning into sexual deserters who are offering their wombs to the millions of African men who are storming the beaches of Europe. As African birthrate is 6 or 7 children per women and since EU has a policy of ‘saving’ millions of self-stranded Negroes in the sea, the demographic and sexual math for Europe is horrible.

    White minds are colonized by PC, white lands are colonized by Third World mobs, white males bodies are brutalized by stronger Negro men, and white females’ wombs are colonized by Negro genes. It is White Nakba.

    In Jewish history, there were two kinds of cleansers: prophets and warriors. Prophets cleansed Jewish minds of the virus of pagan idolatry and reminded them of the Covenant with God. And the warriors took up arms to do battle with enemies of Jews. (The third kind of Jews were diplomats who used wit and cunning to seek an understanding with rivals, enemies, or overlords of Jews.)

    Anyway, unless warriors have vision and conviction, they are mere mercenaries. In order for white knights to rise, white souls must be cleansed and purged of the PC virus of guilt-and-fever. It’s like Islam has two meanings of ‘Jihad’. One means to do physical combat against infidel, but there is another meaning that says souls must be cleansed of infidel ideas.

    In the present, even if great white leaders were to rise, majority of white masses will curse them and denounce them since their minds have been infected with the crazy idea that ‘racism’ is the greatest since, in fact, race-ism is the noblest creed.

    Read More
    • Replies: @mcohen
    she says....."its a white nabka"

    indeed there is mounting evidence.well bottoms up old chap.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  40. @Pachyderm Pachyderma
    Yet in the psychological sense the 'Brahmin' never lost his sense of superiority notwithstanding his master, the civil servant in question, lording over him...

    The civil servant was smart enough not to insist that the Brahmin violate his own taboos. Not all rulers in history have done that – sometimes they trample on the sensibilities of the ruled, which never works out well in the long term.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  41. Surely Taleb would make an excellent director at the Bank of Israel or a senior adviser in the Israeli government?

    What’s this all about?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  42. Anti-Semitic nutcases don’t think it is. They want Western nations to act like Israel and defend their majority race and historic religion rather than working to destroy them.

    What about the excluded middle in this false dichotomy: not caring about any mythical ‘races’ or archaic organized religions? This, one hopes, is healthy attitude of an overwhelming majority of the people living in western nations.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Intro
    Oh... indeed, dear Mao. Wouldn't it be great if we could just get along and sing Kumbaya?

    What a wonderful world to live in would that be: the many Zionist Jews wanting to obliterate Iran and Assad and the rest of the enemies of Israel... and keep Palestinians as a second rate citizens in Israel and pushing for mass immigration to the West, the many Muslims refusing to become secularized and respect women, wanting to impose Sharia and avenge his fellow Muslims oppressed in the Middle East by the US, Europe and Israel, by bombing and running us over in our cities in the West, and the many Europeans and Americans of European descent wanting to keep our countries safe and secular, our wages high, our housing in the cities affordable and our troops out of the Middle East... all together holding hands, singing Kumbaya and being... just friends!

    What a nice bubble you must live in dear Mao! but pray tell... how does it feel to be on the inside?

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  43. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer

    Luis Moreno Ocampo is a liar and a tool of the western power. Why didn’t he do a damn thing against Israel when he was at ICC? He said:

    {The former prosecutor of the International Criminal Court (ICC) Luis Moreno Ocampo has said that the investigation being carried out by the ICC concerning the issue of Israeli settlements in the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, will most likely result in condemnation of Israeli officials since the establishment of settlements is considered a continuing war crime.

    He added that the settlements constitute a clear legal violation of the Rome Statute and the rules of international law, which prohibit an occupying power from transferring its civilian population to an occupied territory.}

    http://www.globalresearch.ca/former-icc-official-says-israel-will-be-convicted-of-war-crimes/5592915

    The zionist jews are mass murderers, thieves and terrorists who have stolen the Palestinian land. They have constructed a FAKE HISTORY with more than 4000 ???????? years which is nothing but a LIE. They have NO relation to Palestine. They are Khazaris who were living around the black sea and adopted Judaism in nine century.

    They have forced holocos on the planet as a ‘religion’ to brainwash the population and get sympathy for their crimes against humanity. They have used their economic power by the criminals like Rothschild family to buy the Western ‘leaders’ and forced the Arab head of states into submission. They have forced their fake history to our children in schools from early ages and forced western stooges to exhibit ‘jewish’ fake history at the Western museums. While no real act of crimes against humanity of the zionist criminals and Western stooges have been shown or printed in the media. The main media, including ‘public TV’ has inserted holocos in every single TV program including ‘master pieces’ where WE DON’T WATCH OR READ. We are fed up with these brainwashing programs.

    The mass murdering by the Western brutal regimes including Bush, Obama, Clinton, Tony Blair and trump against the indigenous population, Muslims in Iraq, Afghanistan, Iran, Pakistan, Syria, Libya, Somali, Palestine, Sudan, Lebanon and Africa, which is MILLIONS OF PEOPLE, many children are not discussed or shown.

    These zionist colonists must be transferred to the jewish state in New York. Israel has no right to exist. Trump, the illiterate zionist servant seeking Israel’s interest. His criminal family’s mission is ISRAEL FIRST. He lies when tells the dummies “America frist’. All the facts on the ground show that the zionist trump is here to do the job that criminal zionists are looking for: to bring down Iran. But he will go to hell before doing such a thing. He is so illiterate, he know shit about history, otherwise he would have not make himself as a Israeli’s Clown.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  44. anon says: • Disclaimer
    @NoseytheDuke
    A chilling article. It will not end well, it never has.

    Personally, I'd settle for true separation of church and state. People can then be free to imagine whatever they wish to be the source of everything, as long as they contribute fair taxes along with everyone else. Surely that isn't too much to ask or insist upon?

    Religion is not issue.It is the abuse and rights to abuse under whatever comes to their minds or under whatever excuses /reasons.proxies /imagination/words they find immediately useful .The atheist of these are worst offenders and those atheist hobnob the Christian evangelist

    These psychopaths have been abusing other people’s religion after basically basically accepting themselves as God , Israel as the Heaven and the Zionism as Old Testament/Talmud and we as fallen Noahadies of new age serf

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  45. CanSpeccy says: • Website
    @Dan Hayes
    Who else except Ron Unz would be daring and courageous enough to republish this article?

    Who else except Ron Unz would be daring and courageous enough to republish this article?

    I linked to it!

    But what’s so daring about that?

    hat’s remarkable is that in Britain, virtually the whole of academia, the political class and the press are are self-hating, or gutless cucked slime, or psychopathic traitors who will do nothing to resist the genocide of their own nation.

    Read More
    • Replies: @CanSpeccy
    And anyhow, what's anti-Semitic about pointing out the leading role of Jews in destroying the European people? If you invite people to come into you country and screw you, then obviously they'll come in and screw you. And the Jews, obviously, will join in the screwing. The Brits are just a bunch of self-cucked morons, lead by traitors and fake nationalists in the employ of the security services.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  46. CanSpeccy says: • Website
    @DanCT
    "We Jews shit on you Christians!" as one woman charitably put it. Imagine what we don't see, and probably would be nauseated if we did, regarding putatively Christian and conservative personalities allowed to appear on TV or run for any public office above dog catcher.

    Imagine what we don’t see … putatively Christian and conservative personalities allowed to appear on TV.

    What we do see is pretty amazing. Just a couple of months ago the BBC appointed a Muslim woman as head of Religious Programming. Reflecting her, presumably fat pay packet, her name is Fatima Salaria.

    Is that not amazing? England, after all, is a Christian country — you know, with a state church, the Anglican Church. Appointing a Muslim to head religious programming at Britain’s state broadcaster is like appointing a Jesuit to oversee religious broadcasting in Iran providing equal representation to all religion’s no doubt including the religion of love motivating the Manchester bomber.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    "...religion of love motivating the Manchester bomber."

    You know how the mofer Little Britain broke Libya for no particular reason, right?

    It is called revenge, or blowback, you fucking scum.

    It has nothing to do with the "religion of love," motivating anything.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  47. CanSpeccy says: • Website
    @CanSpeccy

    Who else except Ron Unz would be daring and courageous enough to republish this article?
     
    I linked to it!

    But what's so daring about that?

    hat's remarkable is that in Britain, virtually the whole of academia, the political class and the press are are self-hating, or gutless cucked slime, or psychopathic traitors who will do nothing to resist the genocide of their own nation.

    And anyhow, what’s anti-Semitic about pointing out the leading role of Jews in destroying the European people? If you invite people to come into you country and screw you, then obviously they’ll come in and screw you. And the Jews, obviously, will join in the screwing. The Brits are just a bunch of self-cucked morons, lead by traitors and fake nationalists in the employ of the security services.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  48. @DanCT
    "We Jews shit on you Christians!" as one woman charitably put it. Imagine what we don't see, and probably would be nauseated if we did, regarding putatively Christian and conservative personalities allowed to appear on TV or run for any public office above dog catcher.

    “We Jews shit on you Christians!”

    That’s not just a piece of rhetoric, either.

    WASHINGTON — “I’m not spreading propaganda,” George Stephanopoulos’ orthodox-nun sister vows, but Israeli soldiers last week “defecated” on the floors of a West Bank medical clinic they raided.
    They’re also looting Palestinians’ homes there, claims Sister Maria Stephanopoulos, a nun at the Convent of St. Mary Magdalene in Jerusalem.”

    http://www.wnd.com/2002/04/13678/

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  49. Anon says: • Disclaimer

    Things are getting so crazy that Fareed Zikavirus is speaking out against Illiberals in colleges.

    http://stuartschneiderman.blogspot.com/2017/05/the-closing-of-liberal-mind.html

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  50. mcohen says:
    @Pachyderm Pachyderma
    British did hug the 'Untouchables' by converting them to Christianity but the 'blacks' of India have been downtrodden for so long that they will require centuries of affirmative action to overcome the conditioning. As to your wanting a European 'Gandhi', you may want to rethink it considering the old man gave away nearly half of India to Muslims and created a perpetual nemesis on both of its flanks. And your wanting to save Europe is where lies the problem: Thinks like Jews! The world is their oyster... Think about saving the White race and taking over the world again to make it in the image of Europe rather than saving but a small part of terra firma and living in isolation which isn't possible in today's world. As to the other geniuses you have named, Mao helped kill twenty million of his own, Lenin left communism for Orthodox Christians, Ataturk was fool who didn't realize the innate Muslim in himself, Mussolini... What can one say about that should have been a pizza parlor owner in Brooklyn?, Castro might have been a Converso, T.E Lawrence... That fool!, and you know what happened to Trotsky... So much for being a Jew and protected by the richest banker, one of 'his own' of his time and the last, Putin... Methinks he is a philo-semite, who would rather hang out with his oligarchs than the serfs. I am afraid the Christ is the only thing that can save you... Pray for the second coming!

    better pass the viagra

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  51. mcohen says:
    @Priss Factor
    As to your wanting a European ‘Gandhi’, you may want to rethink it considering the old man gave away nearly half of India to Muslims... As to the other geniuses you have named, Mao helped kill twenty million of his own, Lenin left communism for Orthodox Christians, Ataturk was fool who didn’t realize the innate Muslim in himself, Mussolini…

    Don't be a dammy.

    I said 'like such and such'. Yes, those men were deeply flawed, and some were evil and pathological. But they had vision, conviction, courage, ruthless determination, and etc.
    So, I'm talking of some of their qualities, not the whole package.

    Extreme times call for powerful personalities.

    The threat that Europe faces is the greatest ever. Past wars and repressions were horrible, but WWI and WWII were still about white Europe. So, even after millions died, it was the same white Europe. And as bad as communism was, it didn't change the demographics in most commie nations.

    But now, it is different. Not only is Europe being colonized physically by foreign masses but European minds have been PC-colonized to 'welcome' this as a good thing.

    We need a new set of leaders and rulers who can eradicate the mental virus from European minds and purge them of this 'guilt' and 'fever'. Indeed, the task is daunting because whites welcome mass invasion not only out of 'white guilt' but because of 'afro-fever', aka jungle fever. European women are turning into sexual deserters who are offering their wombs to the millions of African men who are storming the beaches of Europe. As African birthrate is 6 or 7 children per women and since EU has a policy of 'saving' millions of self-stranded Negroes in the sea, the demographic and sexual math for Europe is horrible.

    White minds are colonized by PC, white lands are colonized by Third World mobs, white males bodies are brutalized by stronger Negro men, and white females' wombs are colonized by Negro genes. It is White Nakba.

    In Jewish history, there were two kinds of cleansers: prophets and warriors. Prophets cleansed Jewish minds of the virus of pagan idolatry and reminded them of the Covenant with God. And the warriors took up arms to do battle with enemies of Jews. (The third kind of Jews were diplomats who used wit and cunning to seek an understanding with rivals, enemies, or overlords of Jews.)

    Anyway, unless warriors have vision and conviction, they are mere mercenaries. In order for white knights to rise, white souls must be cleansed and purged of the PC virus of guilt-and-fever. It's like Islam has two meanings of 'Jihad'. One means to do physical combat against infidel, but there is another meaning that says souls must be cleansed of infidel ideas.

    In the present, even if great white leaders were to rise, majority of white masses will curse them and denounce them since their minds have been infected with the crazy idea that 'racism' is the greatest since, in fact, race-ism is the noblest creed.

    she says…..”its a white nabka”

    indeed there is mounting evidence.well bottoms up old chap.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  52. @rw95
    I love how "devout Christians" are anti-Semites.

    You realize your God is a literal magic Jew, right?

    Primordial fatal contradiction.

    Hate joos or not?

    Only jewsus deserve our luv!!1

    I ask for myself how a people who worship for a Jewish son of THE MAN who created the universe will fight against THE jooos??!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  53. AaronB says:

    The English, being most like the Jews, will be the last to free themselves from their influence, if indeed they ever manage to do so at all, which I rather doubt. The English world seems headed for final eclipse, the fate of all empires, into that dark abyss which swallowed up the whole ancient world. There are no Romans anymore, and there will be no Englishmen in the future.

    The English have always been the most materialistic of the European nations – they invented capitalism and industrialism, and have led in science.

    Europeans have always considered the English to be less spiritually gifted than any other European people, and more obsessed with money than any other.

    This is reflected in English philosophy and literature, which lacks the depths found on the continent.

    Curiously, the English also had the exact same reputation as the Jews – that of being uniquely hypocritical, duplicitous, and immoral in their pursuit of power. “Perfidious Albion”.

    What’s even more fascinating, the English had a reputation specifically for “cant” – for using high-sounding moral words to mask self-interested behavior!

    This last is a specifically favored strategy of the Jews.

    The reasons for this curious similarity are not far to seek – power imposes the same demands everywhere. Whoever seeks power has his path laid out before him, which is the same, whether Jews or Englishmen take to it.

    The English were the most materially successful among European nations – the wealthiest, the most powerful, with the most extensive empire – just as the Jews were the most materially successful group “within” European nations.

    The English, too, were viewed with a mixture of jealousy and contempt.

    And in both cases the reasons are obvious – each group chose to sacrifice spirituality in favor of earthly power, consequently, each group had to adopt the same tactics, and came to resemble each other.

    But material success is self-undermining, and leads to loss of morale – the English, who gained success and power earlier than the Jews, and on a far grander scale, suffered the inevitable collapse in morale earlier as well – which left them dramatically vulnerable to the Jews, who are still in the grip of their dark passion for power.

    Read More
    • Agree: Mark Green
    • Replies: @CanSpeccy

    The English, being most like the Jews
     
    Some Brits considered themselves to be Jews. King James I, for example. In a sense, they were. They practiced Judaism as supposedly taught by a Jew named Jesus.

    This is reflected in English philosophy and literature, which lacks the depths found on the continent.
     
    You mean it actually solves real problems instead of providing a bogus spiritual basis for Nazism.

    Europeans have always considered the English to be less spiritually gifted than any other European people, and more obsessed with money than any other.
     
    i.e., French hypocrisy.

    But material success is self-undermining, and leads to loss of morale – the English, who gained success and power earlier than the Jews, and on a far grander scale, suffered the inevitable collapse in morale earlier as well

     

    So let the genocide of the English continue. Resistance is futile. Is that what you are saying?
    , @annamaria
    The naked Deciders. "TERROR IN BRITAIN:WHAT DID THE PRIME MINISTER KNOW?" http://mailchi.mp/johnpilger/terror-in-britain-what-did-the-prime-minister-know?e=aa40b983ec

    "The aim of British policy was to stop pan-Arabism: Arab states developing a modern secularism, asserting their independence from the imperial west and controlling their resources. The creation of a rapacious Israel was meant to expedite this. Pan-Arabism has since been crushed; the goal now is division and conquest.

    In 2011 the LIFG in Manchester were known as the "Manchester boys". Implacably opposed to Mu'ammar Gadaffi, they were considered high risk and a number were under Home Office house arrest when anti-Gadaffi demonstrations broke out in Libya... "Suddenly the control orders were lifted. "I was allowed to go, no questions asked," said one LIFG member. MI5 returned their passports and counter-terrorism police at Heathrow airport were told to let them board their flights.

    The overthrow of Gaddafi, who controlled Africa's largest oil reserves, had been long been planned in Washington and London. According to French intelligence, the LIFG made several assassination attempts on Gadaffi in the 1990s - bankrolled by British intelligence. In March 2011, France, Britain and the US seized the opportunity of a "humanitarian intervention" and attacked Libya. They were joined by Nato under cover of a UN resolution to "protect civilians".

    Last September, a House of Commons Foreign Affairs Select Committee inquiry concluded that then Prime Minister David Cameron had taken the country to war against Gaddafi on a series of "erroneous assumptions" and that the attack "had led to the rise of Islamic State in North Africa".

    The UK/US/Israel-generated stench is unbearable.

    , @Anonymous
    "And in both cases the reasons are obvious – each group chose to sacrifice spirituality in favor of earthly power, consequently, each group had to adopt the same tactics, and came to resemble each other."

    Your idea is absolutely right, except for one minor detail. You focus on the English and the Jews specifically, which kind of betrays your delusionary mind.

    Replace the English with the White (capitalised only for emphasis) race, and your text would probably begin to read right.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  54. mcohen says:

    in my mind the most important question of the day is ……..are Jews white.as some will well know there has been a little colour introduced over the years in places like Israel and that cool white has become a warm white.
    a light unto the nations in warm white.is this the new Jew and more importantly will our white christian fellows love us still.

    Kevin MacDonald of …..old MacDonald had a farm heya heya ho,does my white skin glow encourages these type of articles which I would consider …..online incitement.
    hmmmmm
    good morning sir,how can I help you.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Pachyderm Pachyderma
    Lay off the Viagra...
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  55. CanSpeccy says: • Website
    @AaronB
    The English, being most like the Jews, will be the last to free themselves from their influence, if indeed they ever manage to do so at all, which I rather doubt. The English world seems headed for final eclipse, the fate of all empires, into that dark abyss which swallowed up the whole ancient world. There are no Romans anymore, and there will be no Englishmen in the future.

    The English have always been the most materialistic of the European nations - they invented capitalism and industrialism, and have led in science.

    Europeans have always considered the English to be less spiritually gifted than any other European people, and more obsessed with money than any other.

    This is reflected in English philosophy and literature, which lacks the depths found on the continent.

    Curiously, the English also had the exact same reputation as the Jews - that of being uniquely hypocritical, duplicitous, and immoral in their pursuit of power. "Perfidious Albion".

    What's even more fascinating, the English had a reputation specifically for "cant" - for using high-sounding moral words to mask self-interested behavior!

    This last is a specifically favored strategy of the Jews.

    The reasons for this curious similarity are not far to seek - power imposes the same demands everywhere. Whoever seeks power has his path laid out before him, which is the same, whether Jews or Englishmen take to it.

    The English were the most materially successful among European nations - the wealthiest, the most powerful, with the most extensive empire - just as the Jews were the most materially successful group "within" European nations.

    The English, too, were viewed with a mixture of jealousy and contempt.

    And in both cases the reasons are obvious - each group chose to sacrifice spirituality in favor of earthly power, consequently, each group had to adopt the same tactics, and came to resemble each other.

    But material success is self-undermining, and leads to loss of morale - the English, who gained success and power earlier than the Jews, and on a far grander scale, suffered the inevitable collapse in morale earlier as well - which left them dramatically vulnerable to the Jews, who are still in the grip of their dark passion for power.

    The English, being most like the Jews

    Some Brits considered themselves to be Jews. King James I, for example. In a sense, they were. They practiced Judaism as supposedly taught by a Jew named Jesus.

    This is reflected in English philosophy and literature, which lacks the depths found on the continent.

    You mean it actually solves real problems instead of providing a bogus spiritual basis for Nazism.

    Europeans have always considered the English to be less spiritually gifted than any other European people, and more obsessed with money than any other.

    i.e., French hypocrisy.

    But material success is self-undermining, and leads to loss of morale – the English, who gained success and power earlier than the Jews, and on a far grander scale, suffered the inevitable collapse in morale earlier as well

    So let the genocide of the English continue. Resistance is futile. Is that what you are saying?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Santoculto
    I think he mean (((jewnglish elite)))
    , @AaronB
    Christianity and Judaism are opposites - Judaism is "optimistic", its vision is about flourishing here on earth, Christianity is "pessimistic", it seeks liberation from this world, in favor of a better one.

    Christianity is more Indian, than it is Jewish.

    By all means, reject it, but try and understand it, if you can.

    Its clear that you are very close to Judaism in spirit - you too see no more in life than material success, and you dislike Jews because they have what you would like to have, and they stand in your way.

    I don't dislike Jews, but I oppose the metaphysics of Judaism, and indeed consider Jews the first victims of their own culture and religion.

    I am not saying resisting is futile, or let the genocide continue - I am saying that the English will not resist, because they lack the metaphysical basis from which resistance would be possible. The English share the Jewish approach to life, and have for many centuries now.

    This attitude towards life - power, wealth, empire, materialism - always leads eventually to a collapse in morale, as the English are now experiencing, just as the Assyrians and Babylonians did.

    Aside from that, the English have no moral vision to oppose to that of the Jews, and only a powerful moral vision can provide the foundation for any struggle against the Jews. Indeed, Jews dominate simply and only because others lack a moral vision that might oppose them.

    You seek to provide selfishness and power-hunger as a foundation for opposing the Jews - but people with these motives will always "sell out", and make accommodations with Jews - who will be only too happy to form alliances with people who share their "spirit", as history shows - as selfishness and the desire for power will always find it more expedient and advantageous to join with like-minded others.

    That is history.

    Your vision - selfishness as basis for opposition - cannot work.

    , @Wally
    "instead of providing a bogus spiritual basis for Nazism."

    Which is gibberish.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  56. @CanSpeccy

    The English, being most like the Jews
     
    Some Brits considered themselves to be Jews. King James I, for example. In a sense, they were. They practiced Judaism as supposedly taught by a Jew named Jesus.

    This is reflected in English philosophy and literature, which lacks the depths found on the continent.
     
    You mean it actually solves real problems instead of providing a bogus spiritual basis for Nazism.

    Europeans have always considered the English to be less spiritually gifted than any other European people, and more obsessed with money than any other.
     
    i.e., French hypocrisy.

    But material success is self-undermining, and leads to loss of morale – the English, who gained success and power earlier than the Jews, and on a far grander scale, suffered the inevitable collapse in morale earlier as well

     

    So let the genocide of the English continue. Resistance is futile. Is that what you are saying?

    I think he mean (((jewnglish elite)))

    Read More
    • Replies: @CanSpeccy

    I think he mean (((jewnglish elite)))
     
    Oh, possibly I missed the point.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  57. @Jake
    This is an excellent and much needed article. But even being able to face what is here will do no good if you fail to know when and where and how the process began.

    Let's start with this sentence from the article: "Now compare the United Kingdom, a White and historically Christian nation." It is true, but false in the sense that it is incomplete. The UK is a forced political entity based on a very small Elite holding nearly all power, with that Elite leading a large ethno-linguistic group (Protestant Englishmen). That Elite and its English lessers agreed that all Catholics are evil, because they would undermine Anglo-Saxon Protestantism, and they also agreed that Celtic languages must be exterminated, if possible, which should exterminate any viable sense of nationalism in Wales, Scotland, and Ireland.

    So what does all that mean in the real world? It means that the UK was always about a small group of white professed Christians acting to exterminate 'other' European languages and cultures. The UK has always been about the UK Elites waging war to exterminate white cultures. The UK Elites have always seen the vast majority of British Isles natives they ruled as 'white trash' and 'rednecks' far beneath them.

    And that problem has nothing to do with monarchy of with lack of demand for more Parliamentary power. Oliver Cromwell hated all Catholics (and what we would call Anglo-Catholic Church of England Englishmen)n and all Celts like Jews hate Arabs, and he also loved Jews and even more so Jewish money. Cromwell welcomed Jews back into England, in fact promoting them, at the same time he would have been thrilled to inflict genocide on the Irish.

    Anglo-Saxon Puritanism was a Judaizing heresy that longed to be able to exterminate Celtic languages and white Catholics native to the British Isles. And it had centuries of aging in the larger English culture, so much so that the return of the monarchy did not alter the national pattern even a teeny tiny bit. English culture was centrally about hating and acting to destroy white Christian cultures native to the British Isles that were notseen as in full; service to the desires of the English Elites.

    And after Cromwell. Jews became ever more central to that culture war waged by Anglo-Saxon Elites against the vast majority of white Christians they rule.

    Jews have the power they do in London and NYC and LA/Hollywood, etc. because WASP Elites have always been thrilled to ally with Jews against the majority of white Christians ruled by WASP Elites.

    It is impossible to solve the Jewish problem without getting rid of the WASP Elite problem.

    Old Ironsides must have gotten Jewish money to do his shenanigans in a quid pro quo deal facilitating the latter’s return to England after a long exile… Looks like nothing has changed in a thousand years because money still does most of the talking!

    Read More
    • Replies: @CanSpeccy

    Old Ironsides must have gotten Jewish money to do his shenanigans...
     
    The Lord Protector, had a warm relationship with George Fox, which seems odd since the founder of Quakerism was a committed pacifist. At the time it was thought by some that Quakerism might become England's state religion. According to that crackpot/hoaxer/contrarian Miles Mathis, Fox was a Jew with powerful friends in high places and his objective was to undermine Christianity in England.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  58. Z-man says:

    I knew England was mostly ruled by Jews but I didn’t know how bad it was until I read this article.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  59. @mcohen
    in my mind the most important question of the day is ........are Jews white.as some will well know there has been a little colour introduced over the years in places like Israel and that cool white has become a warm white.
    a light unto the nations in warm white.is this the new Jew and more importantly will our white christian fellows love us still.

    Kevin MacDonald of .....old MacDonald had a farm heya heya ho,does my white skin glow encourages these type of articles which I would consider .....online incitement.
    hmmmmm
    good morning sir,how can I help you.

    Lay off the Viagra…

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  60. AaronB says:
    @CanSpeccy

    The English, being most like the Jews
     
    Some Brits considered themselves to be Jews. King James I, for example. In a sense, they were. They practiced Judaism as supposedly taught by a Jew named Jesus.

    This is reflected in English philosophy and literature, which lacks the depths found on the continent.
     
    You mean it actually solves real problems instead of providing a bogus spiritual basis for Nazism.

    Europeans have always considered the English to be less spiritually gifted than any other European people, and more obsessed with money than any other.
     
    i.e., French hypocrisy.

    But material success is self-undermining, and leads to loss of morale – the English, who gained success and power earlier than the Jews, and on a far grander scale, suffered the inevitable collapse in morale earlier as well

     

    So let the genocide of the English continue. Resistance is futile. Is that what you are saying?

    Christianity and Judaism are opposites – Judaism is “optimistic”, its vision is about flourishing here on earth, Christianity is “pessimistic”, it seeks liberation from this world, in favor of a better one.

    Christianity is more Indian, than it is Jewish.

    By all means, reject it, but try and understand it, if you can.

    Its clear that you are very close to Judaism in spirit – you too see no more in life than material success, and you dislike Jews because they have what you would like to have, and they stand in your way.

    I don’t dislike Jews, but I oppose the metaphysics of Judaism, and indeed consider Jews the first victims of their own culture and religion.

    I am not saying resisting is futile, or let the genocide continue – I am saying that the English will not resist, because they lack the metaphysical basis from which resistance would be possible. The English share the Jewish approach to life, and have for many centuries now.

    This attitude towards life – power, wealth, empire, materialism – always leads eventually to a collapse in morale, as the English are now experiencing, just as the Assyrians and Babylonians did.

    Aside from that, the English have no moral vision to oppose to that of the Jews, and only a powerful moral vision can provide the foundation for any struggle against the Jews. Indeed, Jews dominate simply and only because others lack a moral vision that might oppose them.

    You seek to provide selfishness and power-hunger as a foundation for opposing the Jews – but people with these motives will always “sell out”, and make accommodations with Jews – who will be only too happy to form alliances with people who share their “spirit”, as history shows – as selfishness and the desire for power will always find it more expedient and advantageous to join with like-minded others.

    That is history.

    Your vision – selfishness as basis for opposition – cannot work.

    Read More
    • Replies: @HogHappenin
    Forgive me my lack of understanding but I am not really convinced how this will really translate to stopping the insanity that has gripped the so called global power hungry elite who happen to be mostly Jewish at the moment.

    They are advancing so fast with their plans that even getting people to awaken to the actual reality beneath the facade is proving to be very very tough let alone convincing them to take the moral high ground.

    In this world where is the west is currently THE biblical Babylon, drunk on power which is being harnessed to bring out a total collapse of many smaller nations and the eventual decay and dissolution of the host nation, getting people to awaken spiritually will take a lot more time then helping them see the actual reality.

    Perhaps I could be wrong. Please elaborate
    , @CanSpeccy
    You know a lot about me that is not so, but I will rebut only one comment:

    you dislike Jews because they have what you would like to have
     
    I don't dislike Jews. My oldest friend, a friend of over 60 years, is a Jew and for over twenty years I did business with Jews and was glad of their competence and decency.

    As for wanting what Jews have, what do they have? There are Jews like Mark Zuckerberg (is he a Jew, maybe not) who have a ton of money. But so does Bill Gates who is not a Jew. But as Bill Gates remarked, a hamburger is still a hamburger, and after the first million, what difference does it make?

    No, what I dislike are all those intent on the destruction of the European nations, Jews and gentiles alike, many of the latter apparently in the pay of the former, but they're all scum as far as I am concerned but that has nothing to do with anyone's religion or posessions.


    Your vision – selfishness as basis for opposition – cannot work.
     
    What are you talking about? You seem to be saying: if you want to prevent the genocide of your own people, you are a selfish person who deserves to see their own nation die. Such arguments are imbecile.
    , @HogHappenin
    I am unable to make the connection between 'spiritual awakening' of the people and stopping the immediate aftermath of the (almost) clinical insanity of these elite. People have been literally dumbed down to the level that they cannot even see the world for what it really is, take MSM 'news' as fact, then lament the condition they find themselves in. And this is the case even with decent hard working folks who are not your typical shekel hungry jewish banker. I'm talking 'normal' everyday people.

    Let's take a simple example now:
    If we take things as they 'look' it'll appear that, Muslims lands are now being ravaged on Flimsy pretexts mostly by what appears to be 'white' armies (often in cahoots with Muslim fundamentalists supplied by our 'allies' like Saudi Arabia although this is down played by the MSM). A lot of these Muslims find refuge in surrounding nations but a considerable number of them end up in Europe. Europeans see the 'Muslims' destroying their lands while the Muslims blame the 'white Christians' to have destroyed their lands.

    But the strange connection that very few of these people make is that the people who call for more war on Muslim lands on flimsy pretexts are the same ones who call for more immigration to the (post) Christian west. The people who push that know it would be a deadly combination and hence perhaps encourage it more.

    Now I am unable to fathom how 'spirituality' would enable people to make this connection. What it needs is a more rational analysis and connecting the dots which unfortunately most people can't unless hand held (that too against many odds to add to it). People just don't seem to unlearn all the MSM 'truths' they've been fed with since ages.

    So please elaborate as to how exactly awakening spirituality will get people to see the 'real' world and stop this insanity. I am more of the opinion that we need to be less greedy to an extent even if we may not be completely 'spiritual'

    , @Anonymous
    "Christianity is “pessimistic”, it seeks liberation from this world, in favor of a better one.

    Christianity is more Indian"


    Indian, like pagan Hinduism? In that you are absolutely right!

    Christianity clearly took inspiration from that pagan faith, with its whole man-god dogma. I wonder if your beastly Churchell saw the strong connection, given his "love" for that "beastly" faith? RIH Churchell.

    Then, keeping in mind that "Christianity is more Indian," and the "Indian's" concept of multiple reincarnations into the same world, your two statements above appear to be contradictory.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  61. Wow so much information. So well connected. Anyone save the most dumb/blind person can choose to connect the dots so well presented here on this website (and the saker website)

    The biggest question is, how do we get this information out in to the ‘mainstream’ where many many people Israel and the (fake) Jews have only but contributed to the betterment of the world.

    A lot of us have taken the red pill already and it is like preaching to the converted. How do one get this information out to someone who is still deep in the dark, for instance a flag waving southern baptist? Has anyone been able to ‘convert’ someone of their ‘caliber’ (if you will!)? This is the more important stuff to taking our world back from these hidden monsters. Something that will benefit the world

    ideas please!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  62. @Pachyderm Pachyderma
    It's called conditioning...

    Nail, meet hammer.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  63. The quoted articles by Daniel Finkelstein are quite open about his motives. Nothing is hidden.

    For evidence of writing that deceitfully supported something other than British interests, you might wish to examine journalists’ output concerning the second Gulf War. Jewish journalists tended to be strong supporters of the war, even though at the time most Britons realised we were being told lies about the threat posed by Iraq.

    It is hard to avoid the conclusion that their visceral support for the war had something to do with the military interests of Israel.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  64. CanSpeccy says: • Website
    @Santoculto
    I think he mean (((jewnglish elite)))

    I think he mean (((jewnglish elite)))

    Oh, possibly I missed the point.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  65. Read More
    • Replies: @rw95
    And nothing more needed to be said.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  66. CanSpeccy says: • Website
    @Pachyderm Pachyderma
    Old Ironsides must have gotten Jewish money to do his shenanigans in a quid pro quo deal facilitating the latter's return to England after a long exile... Looks like nothing has changed in a thousand years because money still does most of the talking!

    Old Ironsides must have gotten Jewish money to do his shenanigans…

    The Lord Protector, had a warm relationship with George Fox, which seems odd since the founder of Quakerism was a committed pacifist. At the time it was thought by some that Quakerism might become England’s state religion. According to that crackpot/hoaxer/contrarian Miles Mathis, Fox was a Jew with powerful friends in high places and his objective was to undermine Christianity in England.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jake
    I have no idea if Fox had any Jewish blood, and it does not matter. It is a Germanic thing, as it is a Jewish thing, to assume that blood matters nearly 100%.

    However, blood is linked significantly to culture, and culture maintained over centuries seems to become nearly fixed with genetics. Jews, for example, who truly convert to orthodox historic Christianity, as opposed to Judaizing heresies such as Puritanism or Dispensational Premillennialist Evangelicalism or Unitarian-Universalism or Quakerism or other Anglophone Anglo-Saxon created horrors, must alter their culture. They must leave behind their cultural Jewishness. It will be a process, and it must be done for the Christianity to take.

    What matters about Fox is that his religious views, denying even baptism but more importantly dismissing Trinitarianism as a subject the true believers did not address, fit like a glove with the ways Jews see 'good Gentiles.' Cromwell and his blood-lusting fellow Anglo-Ssxon Puritans could always find a place for any English, or Continental Germanic, group that was heretical in ways that would soother or appease or please Jews.

    WASP culture is inherently a pro-Jewish culture. WASP Elites will always sell out the mass of white Christians to remain BFF with Jews.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  67. Jake says:
    @CanSpeccy

    Old Ironsides must have gotten Jewish money to do his shenanigans...
     
    The Lord Protector, had a warm relationship with George Fox, which seems odd since the founder of Quakerism was a committed pacifist. At the time it was thought by some that Quakerism might become England's state religion. According to that crackpot/hoaxer/contrarian Miles Mathis, Fox was a Jew with powerful friends in high places and his objective was to undermine Christianity in England.

    I have no idea if Fox had any Jewish blood, and it does not matter. It is a Germanic thing, as it is a Jewish thing, to assume that blood matters nearly 100%.

    However, blood is linked significantly to culture, and culture maintained over centuries seems to become nearly fixed with genetics. Jews, for example, who truly convert to orthodox historic Christianity, as opposed to Judaizing heresies such as Puritanism or Dispensational Premillennialist Evangelicalism or Unitarian-Universalism or Quakerism or other Anglophone Anglo-Saxon created horrors, must alter their culture. They must leave behind their cultural Jewishness. It will be a process, and it must be done for the Christianity to take.

    What matters about Fox is that his religious views, denying even baptism but more importantly dismissing Trinitarianism as a subject the true believers did not address, fit like a glove with the ways Jews see ‘good Gentiles.’ Cromwell and his blood-lusting fellow Anglo-Ssxon Puritans could always find a place for any English, or Continental Germanic, group that was heretical in ways that would soother or appease or please Jews.

    WASP culture is inherently a pro-Jewish culture. WASP Elites will always sell out the mass of white Christians to remain BFF with Jews.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  68. @AaronB
    Christianity and Judaism are opposites - Judaism is "optimistic", its vision is about flourishing here on earth, Christianity is "pessimistic", it seeks liberation from this world, in favor of a better one.

    Christianity is more Indian, than it is Jewish.

    By all means, reject it, but try and understand it, if you can.

    Its clear that you are very close to Judaism in spirit - you too see no more in life than material success, and you dislike Jews because they have what you would like to have, and they stand in your way.

    I don't dislike Jews, but I oppose the metaphysics of Judaism, and indeed consider Jews the first victims of their own culture and religion.

    I am not saying resisting is futile, or let the genocide continue - I am saying that the English will not resist, because they lack the metaphysical basis from which resistance would be possible. The English share the Jewish approach to life, and have for many centuries now.

    This attitude towards life - power, wealth, empire, materialism - always leads eventually to a collapse in morale, as the English are now experiencing, just as the Assyrians and Babylonians did.

    Aside from that, the English have no moral vision to oppose to that of the Jews, and only a powerful moral vision can provide the foundation for any struggle against the Jews. Indeed, Jews dominate simply and only because others lack a moral vision that might oppose them.

    You seek to provide selfishness and power-hunger as a foundation for opposing the Jews - but people with these motives will always "sell out", and make accommodations with Jews - who will be only too happy to form alliances with people who share their "spirit", as history shows - as selfishness and the desire for power will always find it more expedient and advantageous to join with like-minded others.

    That is history.

    Your vision - selfishness as basis for opposition - cannot work.

    Forgive me my lack of understanding but I am not really convinced how this will really translate to stopping the insanity that has gripped the so called global power hungry elite who happen to be mostly Jewish at the moment.

    They are advancing so fast with their plans that even getting people to awaken to the actual reality beneath the facade is proving to be very very tough let alone convincing them to take the moral high ground.

    In this world where is the west is currently THE biblical Babylon, drunk on power which is being harnessed to bring out a total collapse of many smaller nations and the eventual decay and dissolution of the host nation, getting people to awaken spiritually will take a lot more time then helping them see the actual reality.

    Perhaps I could be wrong. Please elaborate

    Read More
    • Replies: @survey-of-disinfo
    I agree with @Aaronb.

    There is a spiritual basis to the 'inhumanity' of the ruling class. And that is why there have an existential fear of Islam.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  69. CanSpeccy says: • Website
    @AaronB
    Christianity and Judaism are opposites - Judaism is "optimistic", its vision is about flourishing here on earth, Christianity is "pessimistic", it seeks liberation from this world, in favor of a better one.

    Christianity is more Indian, than it is Jewish.

    By all means, reject it, but try and understand it, if you can.

    Its clear that you are very close to Judaism in spirit - you too see no more in life than material success, and you dislike Jews because they have what you would like to have, and they stand in your way.

    I don't dislike Jews, but I oppose the metaphysics of Judaism, and indeed consider Jews the first victims of their own culture and religion.

    I am not saying resisting is futile, or let the genocide continue - I am saying that the English will not resist, because they lack the metaphysical basis from which resistance would be possible. The English share the Jewish approach to life, and have for many centuries now.

    This attitude towards life - power, wealth, empire, materialism - always leads eventually to a collapse in morale, as the English are now experiencing, just as the Assyrians and Babylonians did.

    Aside from that, the English have no moral vision to oppose to that of the Jews, and only a powerful moral vision can provide the foundation for any struggle against the Jews. Indeed, Jews dominate simply and only because others lack a moral vision that might oppose them.

    You seek to provide selfishness and power-hunger as a foundation for opposing the Jews - but people with these motives will always "sell out", and make accommodations with Jews - who will be only too happy to form alliances with people who share their "spirit", as history shows - as selfishness and the desire for power will always find it more expedient and advantageous to join with like-minded others.

    That is history.

    Your vision - selfishness as basis for opposition - cannot work.

    You know a lot about me that is not so, but I will rebut only one comment:

    you dislike Jews because they have what you would like to have

    I don’t dislike Jews. My oldest friend, a friend of over 60 years, is a Jew and for over twenty years I did business with Jews and was glad of their competence and decency.

    As for wanting what Jews have, what do they have? There are Jews like Mark Zuckerberg (is he a Jew, maybe not) who have a ton of money. But so does Bill Gates who is not a Jew. But as Bill Gates remarked, a hamburger is still a hamburger, and after the first million, what difference does it make?

    No, what I dislike are all those intent on the destruction of the European nations, Jews and gentiles alike, many of the latter apparently in the pay of the former, but they’re all scum as far as I am concerned but that has nothing to do with anyone’s religion or posessions.

    Your vision – selfishness as basis for opposition – cannot work.

    What are you talking about? You seem to be saying: if you want to prevent the genocide of your own people, you are a selfish person who deserves to see their own nation die. Such arguments are imbecile.

    Read More
    • Replies: @AaronB
    Yes, "stopping the genocide of my people" - keeping immigrants out of white countries. That's what you mean.

    That's a purely selfish motive - you're opposing this to a moral vision of universal brotherhood and love, however misguided or dishonest.

    You've already lost purely on rhetorical grounds.

    You have no moral vision, and this fight has always been a moral fight. Everything is always a moral fight.

    Why keep immigrants out? Why not let whites become one element in a diverse community inclusive of many races and cultures based on unity, love, and brotherhood?

    Your answer is material selfishness - you want whites to maintain their wealth and power more than others, in their own countries, to be sure, but so what.

    Sorry, but that will inspire only a few people, and not the best. You will never stir crowds with this.

    There are good moral reasons to keep immigrants out - but you need an inspiring moral vision to frame them, and you do not have one.

    And you've learned nothing from Jewish history and the importance of fighting on the moral level.

    Why do Jews take such care to frame their position in moral terms?

    And in the end, if you seek to oppose White desire for power to Jews desire for power, selfishness to selfishness, you will lose, because Jews are simply more obsessed with power. Whites are on the downward side of the arc of power (a people desires power, obtains it, then loses interest in it), and are no longer capable of being hugely motivated by power.

    Find another way to motivate Whites.
    , @Santoculto

    you dislike Jews because they have what you would like to have
     
    Aaron lost completely my trust and/or respect because this proto-argument, it's sad!!

    Now i will simply despise any comment he write.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  70. @AaronB
    Christianity and Judaism are opposites - Judaism is "optimistic", its vision is about flourishing here on earth, Christianity is "pessimistic", it seeks liberation from this world, in favor of a better one.

    Christianity is more Indian, than it is Jewish.

    By all means, reject it, but try and understand it, if you can.

    Its clear that you are very close to Judaism in spirit - you too see no more in life than material success, and you dislike Jews because they have what you would like to have, and they stand in your way.

    I don't dislike Jews, but I oppose the metaphysics of Judaism, and indeed consider Jews the first victims of their own culture and religion.

    I am not saying resisting is futile, or let the genocide continue - I am saying that the English will not resist, because they lack the metaphysical basis from which resistance would be possible. The English share the Jewish approach to life, and have for many centuries now.

    This attitude towards life - power, wealth, empire, materialism - always leads eventually to a collapse in morale, as the English are now experiencing, just as the Assyrians and Babylonians did.

    Aside from that, the English have no moral vision to oppose to that of the Jews, and only a powerful moral vision can provide the foundation for any struggle against the Jews. Indeed, Jews dominate simply and only because others lack a moral vision that might oppose them.

    You seek to provide selfishness and power-hunger as a foundation for opposing the Jews - but people with these motives will always "sell out", and make accommodations with Jews - who will be only too happy to form alliances with people who share their "spirit", as history shows - as selfishness and the desire for power will always find it more expedient and advantageous to join with like-minded others.

    That is history.

    Your vision - selfishness as basis for opposition - cannot work.

    I am unable to make the connection between ‘spiritual awakening’ of the people and stopping the immediate aftermath of the (almost) clinical insanity of these elite. People have been literally dumbed down to the level that they cannot even see the world for what it really is, take MSM ‘news’ as fact, then lament the condition they find themselves in. And this is the case even with decent hard working folks who are not your typical shekel hungry jewish banker. I’m talking ‘normal’ everyday people.

    Let’s take a simple example now:
    If we take things as they ‘look’ it’ll appear that, Muslims lands are now being ravaged on Flimsy pretexts mostly by what appears to be ‘white’ armies (often in cahoots with Muslim fundamentalists supplied by our ‘allies’ like Saudi Arabia although this is down played by the MSM). A lot of these Muslims find refuge in surrounding nations but a considerable number of them end up in Europe. Europeans see the ‘Muslims’ destroying their lands while the Muslims blame the ‘white Christians’ to have destroyed their lands.

    But the strange connection that very few of these people make is that the people who call for more war on Muslim lands on flimsy pretexts are the same ones who call for more immigration to the (post) Christian west. The people who push that know it would be a deadly combination and hence perhaps encourage it more.

    Now I am unable to fathom how ‘spirituality’ would enable people to make this connection. What it needs is a more rational analysis and connecting the dots which unfortunately most people can’t unless hand held (that too against many odds to add to it). People just don’t seem to unlearn all the MSM ‘truths’ they’ve been fed with since ages.

    So please elaborate as to how exactly awakening spirituality will get people to see the ‘real’ world and stop this insanity. I am more of the opinion that we need to be less greedy to an extent even if we may not be completely ‘spiritual’

    Read More
    • Agree: CanSpeccy
    • Replies: @AaronB
    I give an extended explanation of my reasons for why spirituality is necessary for a return to sanity in the Kevin McDonald post, you might try looking that up. If you have any questions after that I'd be happy to respond.

    Short version is, I believe we have a death wish, ever since we became materialistic and lost our connection to transcendent values. We have made life insipid and empty, and are now obeying an inner impulse of self-destruction.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  71. rw95 says:
    @Santoculto
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dNXg-HnhZKQ

    And nothing more needed to be said.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  72. AaronB says:
    @CanSpeccy
    You know a lot about me that is not so, but I will rebut only one comment:

    you dislike Jews because they have what you would like to have
     
    I don't dislike Jews. My oldest friend, a friend of over 60 years, is a Jew and for over twenty years I did business with Jews and was glad of their competence and decency.

    As for wanting what Jews have, what do they have? There are Jews like Mark Zuckerberg (is he a Jew, maybe not) who have a ton of money. But so does Bill Gates who is not a Jew. But as Bill Gates remarked, a hamburger is still a hamburger, and after the first million, what difference does it make?

    No, what I dislike are all those intent on the destruction of the European nations, Jews and gentiles alike, many of the latter apparently in the pay of the former, but they're all scum as far as I am concerned but that has nothing to do with anyone's religion or posessions.


    Your vision – selfishness as basis for opposition – cannot work.
     
    What are you talking about? You seem to be saying: if you want to prevent the genocide of your own people, you are a selfish person who deserves to see their own nation die. Such arguments are imbecile.

    Yes, “stopping the genocide of my people” – keeping immigrants out of white countries. That’s what you mean.

    That’s a purely selfish motive – you’re opposing this to a moral vision of universal brotherhood and love, however misguided or dishonest.

    You’ve already lost purely on rhetorical grounds.

    You have no moral vision, and this fight has always been a moral fight. Everything is always a moral fight.

    Why keep immigrants out? Why not let whites become one element in a diverse community inclusive of many races and cultures based on unity, love, and brotherhood?

    Your answer is material selfishness – you want whites to maintain their wealth and power more than others, in their own countries, to be sure, but so what.

    Sorry, but that will inspire only a few people, and not the best. You will never stir crowds with this.

    There are good moral reasons to keep immigrants out – but you need an inspiring moral vision to frame them, and you do not have one.

    And you’ve learned nothing from Jewish history and the importance of fighting on the moral level.

    Why do Jews take such care to frame their position in moral terms?

    And in the end, if you seek to oppose White desire for power to Jews desire for power, selfishness to selfishness, you will lose, because Jews are simply more obsessed with power. Whites are on the downward side of the arc of power (a people desires power, obtains it, then loses interest in it), and are no longer capable of being hugely motivated by power.

    Find another way to motivate Whites.

    Read More
    • Replies: @CanSpeccy

    Yes, “stopping the genocide of my people” – keeping immigrants out of white countries. That’s what you mean.

    That’s a purely selfish motive ...

    You’ve already lost purely on rhetorical grounds.
     

    Better to be a survivor of genocide than a victim of genocidal bollocks purveyed by people like you.

    You are a propagandist for the destruction of the nations of Europe. Fuck you.

    , @Art
    There are good moral reasons to keep immigrants out – but you need an inspiring moral vision to frame them, and you do not have one.

    The moral reason to limit emigration, is to maintain cooperation between the existing folks.

    When immigration exceeds a certain point – the society becomes fractured. Cohesion between neighborly peoples is a very valuable asset. Losing cooperation between local peoples, causes the breakup of a local culture or society.

    This is especially true in Christian cultures, because sustaining real moral “cooperation” between folks is the cornerstone of its philosophy for living. Christian philosophy facilitates interaction and cooperation.


    Up to a point - if immigrants wants to assimilate – welcome, we need new blood --- if an immigrant brings in hate – GOOD BYE!

    The people who call a community home – come first.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  73. AaronB says:
    @HogHappenin
    I am unable to make the connection between 'spiritual awakening' of the people and stopping the immediate aftermath of the (almost) clinical insanity of these elite. People have been literally dumbed down to the level that they cannot even see the world for what it really is, take MSM 'news' as fact, then lament the condition they find themselves in. And this is the case even with decent hard working folks who are not your typical shekel hungry jewish banker. I'm talking 'normal' everyday people.

    Let's take a simple example now:
    If we take things as they 'look' it'll appear that, Muslims lands are now being ravaged on Flimsy pretexts mostly by what appears to be 'white' armies (often in cahoots with Muslim fundamentalists supplied by our 'allies' like Saudi Arabia although this is down played by the MSM). A lot of these Muslims find refuge in surrounding nations but a considerable number of them end up in Europe. Europeans see the 'Muslims' destroying their lands while the Muslims blame the 'white Christians' to have destroyed their lands.

    But the strange connection that very few of these people make is that the people who call for more war on Muslim lands on flimsy pretexts are the same ones who call for more immigration to the (post) Christian west. The people who push that know it would be a deadly combination and hence perhaps encourage it more.

    Now I am unable to fathom how 'spirituality' would enable people to make this connection. What it needs is a more rational analysis and connecting the dots which unfortunately most people can't unless hand held (that too against many odds to add to it). People just don't seem to unlearn all the MSM 'truths' they've been fed with since ages.

    So please elaborate as to how exactly awakening spirituality will get people to see the 'real' world and stop this insanity. I am more of the opinion that we need to be less greedy to an extent even if we may not be completely 'spiritual'

    I give an extended explanation of my reasons for why spirituality is necessary for a return to sanity in the Kevin McDonald post, you might try looking that up. If you have any questions after that I’d be happy to respond.

    Short version is, I believe we have a death wish, ever since we became materialistic and lost our connection to transcendent values. We have made life insipid and empty, and are now obeying an inner impulse of self-destruction.

    Read More
    • Replies: @HogHappenin
    Yes there is some merit in what you say however being 'spiritual' alone wouldn't cut it. The Japanese have been as close to 'model citizens' as they get. Crime is virtually non existent and their mannerisms and etiquette would leave quite of a few of us flabbergasted, in short a highly ethical people

    Still, after their total defeat in WWII, their government has become literal slaves to the 'western establishment' (which in turn is totally controlled from the inside by you know who). If tomorrow the insane globalists decide on an all out war with a rising China (and Russia), you think the aforementioned things would make a difference if the Japanese 'rulers' board the war ship (will they even have a choice in that aspect?).

    I believe God only helps those who make an attempt to help themselves. Yes getting more moral and spiritual might give us the right impetus to start the process of reform and get out of the matrix of lust/greed that has apparently become the bed rock of Western (and soon the rest of the world's) society. But then what?

    For instance, now that it has become clear that the electoral process has become a farce since those who wield 'real' power have their claws on either side of the aisle in most nations, do you think being good citizens and voting for the 'right' man would make any difference?

    There has to be a movement that builds on the budding spirituality otherwise the elites would give a rat's ass as to how 'ethical' their populace is. They would continue as ever

    , @anon

    I believe we have a death wish
     
    if that was true the media wouldn't need to lie about the tidal wave of child rape rolling over the West as the result of open borders

    you're trying to deflect attention away from the people who opened the borders for what they saw as their own interests
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  74. Seraphim says:

    It should be stressed that Nassim Nicholas Taleb is an Orthodox Christian, belonging to the only true Church.
    England ceased to be a Christian country centuries ago when it became a “Bible” worshiper and plundered and destroyed monasteries and churches. The Reform opened the gates for the first ‘immigration’ of anti-Christian aliens, the Jews.

    Read More
    • Replies: @CanSpeccy
    Does your Orthodox bigotry have even the slightest relevance to this article about the treason of the British elite?

    Forget Britain's nominal Christianity, if it is even nominally Christian. Why not consider the matter of elite treason on the assumption that the discussion concerns a nation of atheists, Seventh Day Adventists, Mormons, Confucianists, or Ancestor Worshipers.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  75. nsa says:
    @Uebersetzer
    I read a book about the British Raj in India, published decades ago, consisting mostly of interviews with people from Britain who had worked in India or grown up there under British rule. Most of these people were very old by the time the book was being prepared and would now be dead - the interviews were a last effort to get their stories before they died.
    One civil servant recalled being tutored in a local language by a Hindu Brahmin. The civil servant actually ruled the Brahmin's district but the tutor would never shake hands with the civil servant or even hand him anything - he would place the civil servant's corrected essay on the table. He feared losing caste if he actually handed anything to a non-Hindu. Yet in conventional socio-political terms the civil servant was his ruler.

    Hindus believe white people are reincarnated as crows. A white person drinks from a glass or touches an eating utensil, a devout Hindu won’t touch the item and has an underling discard it as soon as possible.

    Read More
    • Replies: @CanSpeccy

    A white person drinks from a glass or touches an eating utensil, a devout Hindu won’t touch the item and has an underling discard it as soon as possible.
     
    In other words, you're saying that a Hindu regards an English person in pretty much the same way they would regard an untouchable. I guess the Brits need a lot more immigrants like that to put them in their place in a way that Aaron B would no doubt approve.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  76. CanSpeccy says: • Website
    @AaronB
    Yes, "stopping the genocide of my people" - keeping immigrants out of white countries. That's what you mean.

    That's a purely selfish motive - you're opposing this to a moral vision of universal brotherhood and love, however misguided or dishonest.

    You've already lost purely on rhetorical grounds.

    You have no moral vision, and this fight has always been a moral fight. Everything is always a moral fight.

    Why keep immigrants out? Why not let whites become one element in a diverse community inclusive of many races and cultures based on unity, love, and brotherhood?

    Your answer is material selfishness - you want whites to maintain their wealth and power more than others, in their own countries, to be sure, but so what.

    Sorry, but that will inspire only a few people, and not the best. You will never stir crowds with this.

    There are good moral reasons to keep immigrants out - but you need an inspiring moral vision to frame them, and you do not have one.

    And you've learned nothing from Jewish history and the importance of fighting on the moral level.

    Why do Jews take such care to frame their position in moral terms?

    And in the end, if you seek to oppose White desire for power to Jews desire for power, selfishness to selfishness, you will lose, because Jews are simply more obsessed with power. Whites are on the downward side of the arc of power (a people desires power, obtains it, then loses interest in it), and are no longer capable of being hugely motivated by power.

    Find another way to motivate Whites.

    Yes, “stopping the genocide of my people” – keeping immigrants out of white countries. That’s what you mean.

    That’s a purely selfish motive …

    You’ve already lost purely on rhetorical grounds.

    Better to be a survivor of genocide than a victim of genocidal bollocks purveyed by people like you.

    You are a propagandist for the destruction of the nations of Europe. Fuck you.

    Read More
    • Agree: Z-man
    • Replies: @HogHappenin
    Don't be too hard on him. Yes he has some strange thoughts regarding immigration but what he says regarding a 'spiritual awakening' is bang on. Without finding meaning in our lives (which at the moment is driven by pure greed and an uncontrolled lust propagated by the dark forces) one will never be able to muster the conviction that is needed for real change.

    As I have answered to him separately (repeating here), without such an awakening, we will never be able to break free of the shackles of this moribund life that has made us weak, cowardly and utterly lazy to do anything about the covert destruction that these people are wrecking on the west, (and also the overt destruction of the third world that too using first world armies which is utterly shameful for the west). A purely materialistic life will never allow the common westerners to muster the courage to confront these sick bastards which could also involve putting one's life on the line (which most won't be able to do as of now). We all know what happened to Seth rich, what has happened to Snowden and others. They did this I believe despite knowing all too well the risk that they were taking. I believe those people had much more conviction and found a purpose in life unlike the rest of us. Only a life that is not completely drenched in the cesspool that we call modernity can do that

    But this spiritual awakening has to be the stepping stone or the first step on a journey or a revolution to ensure sanity and peace to prevail. So quite some part of what he says is very necessary since without that people won't have the courage or the conviction to rise.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  77. CanSpeccy says: • Website
    @Seraphim
    It should be stressed that Nassim Nicholas Taleb is an Orthodox Christian, belonging to the only true Church.
    England ceased to be a Christian country centuries ago when it became a "Bible" worshiper and plundered and destroyed monasteries and churches. The Reform opened the gates for the first 'immigration' of anti-Christian aliens, the Jews.

    Does your Orthodox bigotry have even the slightest relevance to this article about the treason of the British elite?

    Forget Britain’s nominal Christianity, if it is even nominally Christian. Why not consider the matter of elite treason on the assumption that the discussion concerns a nation of atheists, Seventh Day Adventists, Mormons, Confucianists, or Ancestor Worshipers.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  78. CanSpeccy says: • Website
    @nsa
    Hindus believe white people are reincarnated as crows. A white person drinks from a glass or touches an eating utensil, a devout Hindu won't touch the item and has an underling discard it as soon as possible.

    A white person drinks from a glass or touches an eating utensil, a devout Hindu won’t touch the item and has an underling discard it as soon as possible.

    In other words, you’re saying that a Hindu regards an English person in pretty much the same way they would regard an untouchable. I guess the Brits need a lot more immigrants like that to put them in their place in a way that Aaron B would no doubt approve.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  79. @AaronB
    I give an extended explanation of my reasons for why spirituality is necessary for a return to sanity in the Kevin McDonald post, you might try looking that up. If you have any questions after that I'd be happy to respond.

    Short version is, I believe we have a death wish, ever since we became materialistic and lost our connection to transcendent values. We have made life insipid and empty, and are now obeying an inner impulse of self-destruction.

    Yes there is some merit in what you say however being ‘spiritual’ alone wouldn’t cut it. The Japanese have been as close to ‘model citizens’ as they get. Crime is virtually non existent and their mannerisms and etiquette would leave quite of a few of us flabbergasted, in short a highly ethical people

    Still, after their total defeat in WWII, their government has become literal slaves to the ‘western establishment’ (which in turn is totally controlled from the inside by you know who). If tomorrow the insane globalists decide on an all out war with a rising China (and Russia), you think the aforementioned things would make a difference if the Japanese ‘rulers’ board the war ship (will they even have a choice in that aspect?).

    I believe God only helps those who make an attempt to help themselves. Yes getting more moral and spiritual might give us the right impetus to start the process of reform and get out of the matrix of lust/greed that has apparently become the bed rock of Western (and soon the rest of the world’s) society. But then what?

    For instance, now that it has become clear that the electoral process has become a farce since those who wield ‘real’ power have their claws on either side of the aisle in most nations, do you think being good citizens and voting for the ‘right’ man would make any difference?

    There has to be a movement that builds on the budding spirituality otherwise the elites would give a rat’s ass as to how ‘ethical’ their populace is. They would continue as ever

    Read More
    • Replies: @AaronB
    I will try to explain -

    So -

    Bad people will always do what they do...

    But what about the rest of the population? Why are they going along with it? Why are they not fighting back seriously?

    Why do the bad people seem to have the field to themselves? Why can they set the agenda so easily?

    Because the rest of the population suffers from two conditions, to varying degrees -

    1) Self-hate (disgust with modernity, mechanization, living in a flat, meaningless world)

    2) Apathy (a meaningless, mechanized world providing no motivation)

    These two things come from the philosophy of materialism - the idea that nothing exists beyond the material, and that the purpose of life is to extend our power over the material (science as the center of life)

    Yet the best things in life, beauty, nature, love, friendship, art, are non-material, they are "qualities" of material things, but these things themselves are not "visible"...

    But a disbelief in the non-visible makes you lose contact with things like beauty, love, art, etc....as they cannot be located in physical space...

    The resulting way of life - known as the Western way of life, or modernity - inspires varying degrees of disgust and repulsion in the minds of the sensitive (and a "turning against" oneself), and apathy in the minds of the average man...

    In such an environment, the *only* remaining motive that has any power or force to compel intense action and serious sacrifice whatsoever is *selfishness* - yet only a minority of men can be roused to serious effort by this motive, the worst men, the most greedy and power-hungry, also the most fearful and anxious...

    Consequently we have a situation where the "the best lack all conviction, and the worst are filled with passionate intensity"...

    In short, we have the modern West as you see it today. ...
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  80. @biz
    As I suspected, I could stop reading after the first paragraph because it was already incorrect.

    Here's an Arab member of parliament in Israel's ruling coalition (ruling party, in fact): Ayoob Kara

    And here's another one in the ruling coalition: Hamad Amar

    And bonus fact, just because Israel is that awesome and fascinating, there's even a Jewish parliamentarian in the anti-Zionist Arab opposition bloc: Dov Khenin

    Reading comprehension:

    Are there any strongly identified Muslim or Christian Arabs high in Israel’s ruling conservative party?

    Kara and Amar do not make the answer “Yes.”

    http://www.metrolyrics.com/hi-hi-hi-lyrics-paul-mccartney.html

    And even if Kara and Amar had ostensibly important posts, the British Conservative party recently had a Muslim woman as co-chairman with one Lord Feldman. If you think she had any real power compared to Lord Feldman, I have a bridge for sale. (She resigned in a row about Israel.)

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  81. Joe Wong says:
    @NoseytheDuke
    For the food? The fresh air? What's your point?

    Aren’t you looking for “true separation of church and state?” I’m giving you the pointer, or you don’t know what you are talking about like all the Americans who are so confused that they can claim bombing and killing on the fabricated phantom WMD allegation as humanitarian intervention.

    Read More
    • Replies: @NoseytheDuke
    I'll cut you some slack since clearly, English is not your first language. I'm still unsure as to what your point is though or why you're giving me the finger.
    , @Anon
    I don't know whether the Chinese government still regulates Chinese Christians' places of and meetings for worship and the Catholic church's appointments of bishops but I know it still oppresses Falun Gong. But perhaps you are actually unfamiliar with the Western, or merely Anglosphere, notion of separation of church and state???
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  82. @CanSpeccy
    You know a lot about me that is not so, but I will rebut only one comment:

    you dislike Jews because they have what you would like to have
     
    I don't dislike Jews. My oldest friend, a friend of over 60 years, is a Jew and for over twenty years I did business with Jews and was glad of their competence and decency.

    As for wanting what Jews have, what do they have? There are Jews like Mark Zuckerberg (is he a Jew, maybe not) who have a ton of money. But so does Bill Gates who is not a Jew. But as Bill Gates remarked, a hamburger is still a hamburger, and after the first million, what difference does it make?

    No, what I dislike are all those intent on the destruction of the European nations, Jews and gentiles alike, many of the latter apparently in the pay of the former, but they're all scum as far as I am concerned but that has nothing to do with anyone's religion or posessions.


    Your vision – selfishness as basis for opposition – cannot work.
     
    What are you talking about? You seem to be saying: if you want to prevent the genocide of your own people, you are a selfish person who deserves to see their own nation die. Such arguments are imbecile.

    you dislike Jews because they have what you would like to have

    Aaron lost completely my trust and/or respect because this proto-argument, it’s sad!!

    Now i will simply despise any comment he write.

    Read More
    • Replies: @CanSpeccy

    Now i will simply despise any comment he write.
     
    He's adopted the Merkel argument.

    Don't like your country being over-run by rape-culture Muslims (or globalist Jews, caste-conscious Hindus, whoever) many openly avowing their intent to conquer?

    No problem. Be more spiritual: go to church, look at a religious picture!(see after 5 min 25 seconds).
     

    The speaker in that video, Ezra Levant, is a Jew, incidentally — the kind of Jew I like, smart, energetic, sensible and on my side.

    The thing about being more spiritual when you're under genocidal attack is that you cannot be spiritual at all when your dead. That applies as much to today's Europeans slated for destruction by the globalist Money Power as to Jews of Merkel's Germany 75 years ago who were headed for the Nazi work-to-death labor camps.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  83. imbroglio says:

    I must tell the Jews at my church how hostile they are to Christianity!

    It’s the same old story. When foolish nations promote their destruction and their imported enemies seek to displace them, blame the Jews. As for the Jews, when a country starts coming apart at the seams, either get out or make yourselves scarce because the warring factions will turn their wrath on you as the designated scapegoat. Le plus ça change…

    Read More
    • Troll: L.K
    • Replies: @Beefcake the Mighty
    I guess you're unfamiliar with the connection between smoke and fire?
    , @anon

    When foolish nations promote their destruction and their imported enemies seek to displace them, blame the Jews.
     
    The three people most directly culpable for opening the UK's borders - the precursor to a tidal wave of child rape - were Jews: Jack Straw, Barbara Roche and Jonathan Portes.

    They are responsible for the 10s of thousands of child rapes that have followed.

    The reason it only took three people to fully open the UK's borders against the direct wishes of the majority is the Jewish-dominated media spent 50 years preparing the ground in advance so 99% of the people who would oppose such a policy kept their mouth shout out of fear of media persecution.

    All the Western nations are targets of what has become a stealth genocide.

    Now "some Jews" is not the same as "the Jews" and originally it might not even have been intended as a stealth genocide - originally it might have been seen as self-protection - but it's clear now the eventual outcome is genocide.

    It's perfectly reasonable to oppose people who support and promote policies leading to your people's genocide.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  84. annamaria says:
    @AaronB
    The English, being most like the Jews, will be the last to free themselves from their influence, if indeed they ever manage to do so at all, which I rather doubt. The English world seems headed for final eclipse, the fate of all empires, into that dark abyss which swallowed up the whole ancient world. There are no Romans anymore, and there will be no Englishmen in the future.

    The English have always been the most materialistic of the European nations - they invented capitalism and industrialism, and have led in science.

    Europeans have always considered the English to be less spiritually gifted than any other European people, and more obsessed with money than any other.

    This is reflected in English philosophy and literature, which lacks the depths found on the continent.

    Curiously, the English also had the exact same reputation as the Jews - that of being uniquely hypocritical, duplicitous, and immoral in their pursuit of power. "Perfidious Albion".

    What's even more fascinating, the English had a reputation specifically for "cant" - for using high-sounding moral words to mask self-interested behavior!

    This last is a specifically favored strategy of the Jews.

    The reasons for this curious similarity are not far to seek - power imposes the same demands everywhere. Whoever seeks power has his path laid out before him, which is the same, whether Jews or Englishmen take to it.

    The English were the most materially successful among European nations - the wealthiest, the most powerful, with the most extensive empire - just as the Jews were the most materially successful group "within" European nations.

    The English, too, were viewed with a mixture of jealousy and contempt.

    And in both cases the reasons are obvious - each group chose to sacrifice spirituality in favor of earthly power, consequently, each group had to adopt the same tactics, and came to resemble each other.

    But material success is self-undermining, and leads to loss of morale - the English, who gained success and power earlier than the Jews, and on a far grander scale, suffered the inevitable collapse in morale earlier as well - which left them dramatically vulnerable to the Jews, who are still in the grip of their dark passion for power.

    The naked Deciders. “TERROR IN BRITAIN:WHAT DID THE PRIME MINISTER KNOW?” http://mailchi.mp/johnpilger/terror-in-britain-what-did-the-prime-minister-know?e=aa40b983ec

    “The aim of British policy was to stop pan-Arabism: Arab states developing a modern secularism, asserting their independence from the imperial west and controlling their resources. The creation of a rapacious Israel was meant to expedite this. Pan-Arabism has since been crushed; the goal now is division and conquest.

    In 2011 the LIFG in Manchester were known as the “Manchester boys”. Implacably opposed to Mu’ammar Gadaffi, they were considered high risk and a number were under Home Office house arrest when anti-Gadaffi demonstrations broke out in Libya… “Suddenly the control orders were lifted. “I was allowed to go, no questions asked,” said one LIFG member. MI5 returned their passports and counter-terrorism police at Heathrow airport were told to let them board their flights.

    The overthrow of Gaddafi, who controlled Africa’s largest oil reserves, had been long been planned in Washington and London. According to French intelligence, the LIFG made several assassination attempts on Gadaffi in the 1990s – bankrolled by British intelligence. In March 2011, France, Britain and the US seized the opportunity of a “humanitarian intervention” and attacked Libya. They were joined by Nato under cover of a UN resolution to “protect civilians”.

    Last September, a House of Commons Foreign Affairs Select Committee inquiry concluded that then Prime Minister David Cameron had taken the country to war against Gaddafi on a series of “erroneous assumptions” and that the attack “had led to the rise of Islamic State in North Africa”.

    The UK/US/Israel-generated stench is unbearable.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  85. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer

    There is no ‘Left’ organizatio in the US, and those zionist Jews and their victims who claim they are on your side are liars US government agents, like the ‘left forum’ contgrolled by the zionists traitors.

    I have told people don’t trust these them, because majority of the ‘left’ organizations in the West are controlled by the zionist Jews. Majority of the so called ‘socialist’, and ‘labor union’ organizations are under Jewish zionist influence, like ‘International socialism’, and ‘Left forum’. The ‘leaders’ of these zionist organizations are US government informants. Noam Chomsky, Juan Cole and Goodman ‘democracy now’ are few to watch.

    People should be exposing these western intelligence services’ informants and advisors, who POSE AS ‘left’ or ‘progressives’ to keep the dummies in line to support the US government agendas, all over the world . Number of people who have been decieved by ‘left forum’ written the following:

    http://www.globalresearch.ca/left-forum-bans-deep-state-panels-speakers-refuse-to-be-silenced-come-to-the-left-out-forum/5593031

    The Left Forum will be held on June 2-4, 2017, at John Jay Criminal College in New York City. Approximately 3,000 people attend the annual conference to hear up to 250 panels and plenaries. The alternative “Left Out Forum” panels will be on Sunday, June 4.
    The four banned Deep State panels are:
     Political Correctness: The Dangers of Thought Crime Police
     “Terrorism”: Fake Enemies, Fraudulent Wars
     False Flags: Staged, Scripted, Mass Psy-Op Events
     9/11 Truth: Ground Zero for a Resistance Movement
    Due to a pattern of harassment by Zionists elements to shut down free speech, the location of the banned panels will not be announced until Sunday, June 4, 9:00am EST at http://noliesradio.org/secret.
    The Deep State panel line-up on Sunday, June 4 will be:
    ”Left Out Forum” – Banned Panels
    10:00-11:50 – Political Correctness: The Dangers of Thought Crime Police
     Speakers: Dr. Anthony Hall, Jeremy Rothe-Kushel
     Moderator: Cheryl Curtiss
     Location to be announced Sunday, 9:00am EST at http://noliesradio.org/secret
    12:00-1:50 –“Terrorism”: Fake Enemies, Fraudulent Wars
     Speakers: Michael Springmann, Dr. Anthony Hall, Dr. Kevin Barrett
     Moderator: Tom Kiely
     Location to be announced Sunday, 9:00am EST at http://noliesradio.org/secret
    2:00-3:50 – False Flags: Staged, Scripted, Mass Psy-Op Events
     Dr. Kevin Barrett, Dave Lindorff, Ole Dammegard
     Moderator: Dr. Lucy Morgan Edwards
     Location to be announced Sunday, 9:00am EST at http://noliesradio.org/secret
    4:00-5:50 – 9/11 Truth: Ground Zero for a Resistance Movement
     Dr. Kevin Barrett, Barbara Honegger, Richard Gage
     Moderator: Dr. Lucy Morgan Edwards
     Location to be announced Sunday, 9:00am EST at http://noliesradio.org/secret

    Read More
    • Replies: @CanSpeccy
    Interesting conference, which draws attention to the fact that the US Empire is poised between revolution followed by who knows what, on the one hand, and descent into high-tech tyranny on the other hand.

    The fakery and fraudulence of the plutocratic elite is on view for all to see. We are at the turning point. Even the truth from the likes of Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, or dapper bureaucrats like Comey, let alone sinister bastards like Clapper, will never be believed by a growing proportion of the population that now understands that the elite use words not to convey information to the people, but to control them.

    But when lies fail to control, then compulsion will inevitably be used. First, there are firings and non-hirings on the basis of non-PC tendencies or speech. But internment camps, forced labor camps, extermination camps will be used as necessary. The only alternative is revolution followed by who knows what: military dictatorship, National Socialism, Communism?

    There is no way back other than for the existing Money Power elite to resign, which they will never do. But the likes of Gates and Zuckerberg should consider taking a low profile: people are angry and violence may be unconstrained.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  86. Wally says:
    @CanSpeccy

    The English, being most like the Jews
     
    Some Brits considered themselves to be Jews. King James I, for example. In a sense, they were. They practiced Judaism as supposedly taught by a Jew named Jesus.

    This is reflected in English philosophy and literature, which lacks the depths found on the continent.
     
    You mean it actually solves real problems instead of providing a bogus spiritual basis for Nazism.

    Europeans have always considered the English to be less spiritually gifted than any other European people, and more obsessed with money than any other.
     
    i.e., French hypocrisy.

    But material success is self-undermining, and leads to loss of morale – the English, who gained success and power earlier than the Jews, and on a far grander scale, suffered the inevitable collapse in morale earlier as well

     

    So let the genocide of the English continue. Resistance is futile. Is that what you are saying?

    “instead of providing a bogus spiritual basis for Nazism.”

    Which is gibberish.

    Read More
    • Replies: @CanSpeccy
    What's gibberish, Wally?

    You mean the "philosopy and literature found on the continent" (so admired by AaronB) is gibberish of the kind upon which National Socialism was founded.

    Absolutely.

    Here's Heidegger, the philosopher of the modern age:


    Making itself intelligible is suicide for philosophy.
     
    Obviously the philosopher for the Nazi Pary of which he was a member, actively engaged in booting Jews from the faculty at the Albert Ludwigs Universitat Freiburg.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  87. CanSpeccy says: • Website
    @Santoculto

    you dislike Jews because they have what you would like to have
     
    Aaron lost completely my trust and/or respect because this proto-argument, it's sad!!

    Now i will simply despise any comment he write.

    Now i will simply despise any comment he write.

    He’s adopted the Merkel argument.

    Don’t like your country being over-run by rape-culture Muslims (or globalist Jews, caste-conscious Hindus, whoever) many openly avowing their intent to conquer?

    No problem. Be more spiritual: go to church, look at a religious picture!(see after 5 min 25 seconds).

    The speaker in that video, Ezra Levant, is a Jew, incidentally — the kind of Jew I like, smart, energetic, sensible and on my side.

    The thing about being more spiritual when you’re under genocidal attack is that you cannot be spiritual at all when your dead. That applies as much to today’s Europeans slated for destruction by the globalist Money Power as to Jews of Merkel’s Germany 75 years ago who were headed for the Nazi work-to-death labor camps.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Santoculto
    I think some people can be both but by now the most important thing to do is build some personal security.

    Existential perspective must be allied with evolutionary personal perspective and in not in this mutual conflict. That's the great human dilema and the only way to achieve or reach it is transcending in intrapersonal perspective but bear in mind that other people is not in the same levels. Be more self aware than other people can be great advantage.

    I think I dislike all type of Jews specially those who are smarter and energetic.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  88. CanSpeccy says: • Website
    @Wally
    "instead of providing a bogus spiritual basis for Nazism."

    Which is gibberish.

    What’s gibberish, Wally?

    You mean the “philosopy and literature found on the continent” (so admired by AaronB) is gibberish of the kind upon which National Socialism was founded.

    Absolutely.

    Here’s Heidegger, the philosopher of the modern age:

    Making itself intelligible is suicide for philosophy.

    Obviously the philosopher for the Nazi Pary of which he was a member, actively engaged in booting Jews from the faculty at the Albert Ludwigs Universitat Freiburg.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    You're wasting your time. From the standpoint of someone like Wally, ousting Jews from universities is entirely justified.
    , @Wally
    As expected, you have not given us your alleged 'Nazi Philosophy', and cannot.

    No, Zionist controlled Wikipedia will not do.

    And most importantly, there were the ‘Nazis’ with the mythological '6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers' and there were the ‘Nazis’ without the mythological ’6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers’.

    The '6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers' are scientifically impossible frauds.
    see the 'holocaust' scam debunked here:
    http://codoh.com
    No name calling, level playing field debate here:
    http://forum.codoh.com
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  89. CanSpeccy says: • Website
    @Anonymous
    There is no ‘Left’ organizatio in the US, and those zionist Jews and their victims who claim they are on your side are liars US government agents, like the ‘left forum’ contgrolled by the zionists traitors.

    I have told people don’t trust these them, because majority of the ‘left’ organizations in the West are controlled by the zionist Jews. Majority of the so called ‘socialist’, and ‘labor union’ organizations are under Jewish zionist influence, like ‘International socialism’, and ‘Left forum’. The ‘leaders’ of these zionist organizations are US government informants. Noam Chomsky, Juan Cole and Goodman ‘democracy now’ are few to watch.

    People should be exposing these western intelligence services’ informants and advisors, who POSE AS ‘left’ or ‘progressives’ to keep the dummies in line to support the US government agendas, all over the world . Number of people who have been decieved by ‘left forum’ written the following:

    http://www.globalresearch.ca/left-forum-bans-deep-state-panels-speakers-refuse-to-be-silenced-come-to-the-left-out-forum/5593031


    The Left Forum will be held on June 2-4, 2017, at John Jay Criminal College in New York City. Approximately 3,000 people attend the annual conference to hear up to 250 panels and plenaries. The alternative “Left Out Forum” panels will be on Sunday, June 4.
    The four banned Deep State panels are:
     Political Correctness: The Dangers of Thought Crime Police
     “Terrorism”: Fake Enemies, Fraudulent Wars
     False Flags: Staged, Scripted, Mass Psy-Op Events
     9/11 Truth: Ground Zero for a Resistance Movement
    Due to a pattern of harassment by Zionists elements to shut down free speech, the location of the banned panels will not be announced until Sunday, June 4, 9:00am EST at http://noliesradio.org/secret.
    The Deep State panel line-up on Sunday, June 4 will be:
    ”Left Out Forum” – Banned Panels
    10:00-11:50 – Political Correctness: The Dangers of Thought Crime Police
     Speakers: Dr. Anthony Hall, Jeremy Rothe-Kushel
     Moderator: Cheryl Curtiss
     Location to be announced Sunday, 9:00am EST at http://noliesradio.org/secret
    12:00-1:50 –“Terrorism”: Fake Enemies, Fraudulent Wars
     Speakers: Michael Springmann, Dr. Anthony Hall, Dr. Kevin Barrett
     Moderator: Tom Kiely
     Location to be announced Sunday, 9:00am EST at http://noliesradio.org/secret
    2:00-3:50 – False Flags: Staged, Scripted, Mass Psy-Op Events
     Dr. Kevin Barrett, Dave Lindorff, Ole Dammegard
     Moderator: Dr. Lucy Morgan Edwards
     Location to be announced Sunday, 9:00am EST at http://noliesradio.org/secret
    4:00-5:50 – 9/11 Truth: Ground Zero for a Resistance Movement
     Dr. Kevin Barrett, Barbara Honegger, Richard Gage
     Moderator: Dr. Lucy Morgan Edwards
     Location to be announced Sunday, 9:00am EST at http://noliesradio.org/secret

    Interesting conference, which draws attention to the fact that the US Empire is poised between revolution followed by who knows what, on the one hand, and descent into high-tech tyranny on the other hand.

    The fakery and fraudulence of the plutocratic elite is on view for all to see. We are at the turning point. Even the truth from the likes of Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, or dapper bureaucrats like Comey, let alone sinister bastards like Clapper, will never be believed by a growing proportion of the population that now understands that the elite use words not to convey information to the people, but to control them.

    But when lies fail to control, then compulsion will inevitably be used. First, there are firings and non-hirings on the basis of non-PC tendencies or speech. But internment camps, forced labor camps, extermination camps will be used as necessary. The only alternative is revolution followed by who knows what: military dictatorship, National Socialism, Communism?

    There is no way back other than for the existing Money Power elite to resign, which they will never do. But the likes of Gates and Zuckerberg should consider taking a low profile: people are angry and violence may be unconstrained.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  90. Art says:
    @AaronB
    Yes, "stopping the genocide of my people" - keeping immigrants out of white countries. That's what you mean.

    That's a purely selfish motive - you're opposing this to a moral vision of universal brotherhood and love, however misguided or dishonest.

    You've already lost purely on rhetorical grounds.

    You have no moral vision, and this fight has always been a moral fight. Everything is always a moral fight.

    Why keep immigrants out? Why not let whites become one element in a diverse community inclusive of many races and cultures based on unity, love, and brotherhood?

    Your answer is material selfishness - you want whites to maintain their wealth and power more than others, in their own countries, to be sure, but so what.

    Sorry, but that will inspire only a few people, and not the best. You will never stir crowds with this.

    There are good moral reasons to keep immigrants out - but you need an inspiring moral vision to frame them, and you do not have one.

    And you've learned nothing from Jewish history and the importance of fighting on the moral level.

    Why do Jews take such care to frame their position in moral terms?

    And in the end, if you seek to oppose White desire for power to Jews desire for power, selfishness to selfishness, you will lose, because Jews are simply more obsessed with power. Whites are on the downward side of the arc of power (a people desires power, obtains it, then loses interest in it), and are no longer capable of being hugely motivated by power.

    Find another way to motivate Whites.

    There are good moral reasons to keep immigrants out – but you need an inspiring moral vision to frame them, and you do not have one.

    The moral reason to limit emigration, is to maintain cooperation between the existing folks.

    When immigration exceeds a certain point – the society becomes fractured. Cohesion between neighborly peoples is a very valuable asset. Losing cooperation between local peoples, causes the breakup of a local culture or society.

    This is especially true in Christian cultures, because sustaining real moral “cooperation” between folks is the cornerstone of its philosophy for living. Christian philosophy facilitates interaction and cooperation.

    Up to a point – if immigrants wants to assimilate – welcome, we need new blood — if an immigrant brings in hate – GOOD BYE!

    The people who call a community home – come first.

    Read More
    • Replies: @AaronB
    That is indeed a good reason.

    In the current culture, immigration just leads to hate, strife, and discord, group against group, and all the rest. Its quite obvious.

    In the West, every self-defined group is encouraged to hate other groups, see itself as in opposition to them, promote its own interests at the expense of everyone else, etc, etc.

    A society needs a principle of unity if diverse groups are going to live together - a unifying principle, a religion, a creed, a dogma, a way of life, a shared identity of some sort, if hate, strife, jealousy, and discord are to be avoided.

    Yet only does modernity not provide that, it provides the opposite! Everyone is "encouraged" to hate and oppose everyone else...feminism, women against men, men against women, blacks against whites, Mexicans against Americans', Muslims against natives....whatever...

    A specific philosophy of division, discord, hatred, and strife is being promoted and encouraged...

    Under these conditions nothing can be more disastrous than immigration....it is the worst thing possible....for everyone involved...

    Now, if there were an overarching unifying principle, like Christianity, or Buddhism, then it could probably work....

    Multicultural societies only work under imperial rule, where community discord is kept in check by the foreign imperial authority.....

    Ethnically diverse societies only work without multiculturalism....when there is shared culture...

    India had extreme ethnic diversity but shared culture, and worked fine, the Austrian Empire was multicultural and multi-ethnic but had the Imperial Principle as a unifying factor....

    In the end, the idea that ethnic unity - whites only, Jews only, Arabs only! - leads to avoidance of division, discord, and strife, is an utter and puerile fantasy, one of the most a-historical self-delusions imaginable - civil wars are not exactly unheard of .

    How many civil wars and internal revolutions did a mono-ethnic Europe undergo exactly within countries, and between countries? Some of the worst human violence in human history was an internal affair within mono-ethnic and mono-cultural countries, the French Revolution, the Communist Revolution in Russia, the Cambodian atrocities, the Chinese Revolution...

    Compared to the relative harmony of the Austrian Empire, the Ottoman Empire, the Roman Empire...

    Give me a break....

    Human beings will fight over anything, the slightest bit of perceived difference....ethnicity and culture are but one, there are countless others, and history shows they are not necessarily more divisive than other principles of disunity.....

    The important thing is to have a principle of unity...and we have none today...
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  91. @imbroglio
    I must tell the Jews at my church how hostile they are to Christianity!

    It's the same old story. When foolish nations promote their destruction and their imported enemies seek to displace them, blame the Jews. As for the Jews, when a country starts coming apart at the seams, either get out or make yourselves scarce because the warring factions will turn their wrath on you as the designated scapegoat. Le plus ça change...

    I guess you’re unfamiliar with the connection between smoke and fire?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  92. @HogHappenin
    Forgive me my lack of understanding but I am not really convinced how this will really translate to stopping the insanity that has gripped the so called global power hungry elite who happen to be mostly Jewish at the moment.

    They are advancing so fast with their plans that even getting people to awaken to the actual reality beneath the facade is proving to be very very tough let alone convincing them to take the moral high ground.

    In this world where is the west is currently THE biblical Babylon, drunk on power which is being harnessed to bring out a total collapse of many smaller nations and the eventual decay and dissolution of the host nation, getting people to awaken spiritually will take a lot more time then helping them see the actual reality.

    Perhaps I could be wrong. Please elaborate

    I agree with @Aaronb.

    There is a spiritual basis to the ‘inhumanity’ of the ruling class. And that is why there have an existential fear of Islam.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  93. joe webb says:

    Here is a Real Jew.

    Fw: NYTimes.com: George Soros Accuses Viktor Orban of Turning Hungary Into ‘Mafia State’ (jewish humor, enjoy )
    y

    Subject: Fw: NYTimes.com: George Soros Accuses Viktor Orban of Turning Hungary Into ‘Mafia State’ (jewish humor, enjoy )Mr. Soros added,

    Mr. Soros added, “This is the opposite of who I am.”

    The jewboy and his jew ego. I am a jew and you guys need to listen to me. Soros hee hee.

    Joe Webb Speaking of mafias, the jews are the biggest ethnic mafia on the planet, with a terrorist state as their enforcers.

    Sent by webfoote41@yahoo.com:

    George Soros Accuses Viktor Orban of Turning Hungary Into ‘Mafia State’
    BY PALKO KARASZ

    The Hungarian-American philanthropist and financier defended the university he established in Budapest against a government effort to shut it down.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  94. Iasi says:

    Langdon,
    You and Sailer and other Unz people make mistakes when talking about Jewish categories. You miss the details when you talk only about Ashk, Seph and Mizr. When Jews talk about family, friends, colleagues, coworkers, neighbors and others, they do not dwell so much on high level categories. They look at good, not so good and bad too.
    Good are found in doctors, many lawyers, professors, engineers, accountants, a few politicians and other people who help and act following the Ten Commandmants.
    Not so good include some lawyers, some professors, a few accountants and some politicians ad other people who cut the corners or do not act properly enough times.
    Bad include pornography people, frauds, many politicians, criminals, welfare malingerers and others.
    In other words, Jews are like so many other people who struggle to find their way.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Man on the street
    There are many Jews who are scheming against the goyim, or plotting to import Muslim terrorists to exterminate Christianity and the Western culture. But, their leaderships are. Similarly, there are many Muslims who are not out rape Christian girls and convert her to Islam, or join ISIS and behead priests, but Islam as it is documented in Hadith and preached in almost ALL mosques justify such barbaric acts.

    As reasonable people demand that 2% of America (the Jews) should not be afforded 80% of decision making positions of our culture? Such fair question or demand cannot be extrapolated to putting all the Jews into ovens?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  95. @Priss Factor
    The Jews, they are a strange people. They like to talk to the Filipinas [who work for them as domestic servants]. “We are an immigrant family like you,” they say. …And it is tough working for the Jews. They make many Filipinas cry. They are more likely than anyone else to bring the Filipinas inside the family — but this is mostly a charade.

    That's pretty funny.

    It goes to show there are different meanings to 'minority rights'.
    Which minority are we talking about, and what is meant by 'rights'?

    After all, both British imperialist elites and the Untouchables were minorities in India.
    But whereas one minority, the Brits, was at the top, the other minority, the Untouchables, was at the bottom.

    For the British, 'minority rights' meant the right to rule over Hindu(and Muslim) masses.
    For the Untouchables, 'minority rights' would have meant the humble hope that they could enjoy the same protection under the law as other Indians.

    And I think we have a similar kind of confusion in the West.

    In US and UK, Jews are the ruling minority or the minority elites. (Homos also belong to this group.)
    But Mexicans, many blacks, and many immigrant groups are either minority underclass or minority ordinary folks; they have no special power. Asians do better than most other immigrant groups, but their dim sense of identity and servile nature translate much to power. Even in Hawaii where they are the majority, they aren't known for political muscle.

    So, 'minority rights' mean different things to Jews and to other minorities. For Jews, it means the right to rule over US and UK and make demands and dictate policy. Old 'antisemitism' used to mean denial of Jews of basic rights and liberties. New 'antisemitism' means challenge to the Jewish supremacist right to rule over goyim. And something similar is operative with homos. 'Gay rights' used to mean the tolerance of letting homos be homos and do their own thing without persecution. Now, 'gay rights' mean we must all celebrate, admire, and worship homos as angels and even change marriage laws to appease the Great Holy Homo. And we must even put homo stuff in churches. It's as if homos have the right to be admired and adulated, and it is now a mandatory duty of many politicians and citizens to sing hosannas to homos and trannies. Indeed, we mustn't even joke about someone as ridiculous as Bruce Jenner. (In the UK, a criminal investigation was under way to arrest someone who made an insulting remark to Brucie.)

    Now, there are other minorities that also demand special favors. Blacks demand affirmative action, and Mexicans demand affirmative immigration(amnesty). But many blacks and Mexicans are on the bottom looking up. Their hope is to reach the middle. (To be sure, too many blacks just fantasize about being sports stars or rappers, attainments out of reach for most blacks, but blacks are stupid.) But even if blacks and browns demand special favors, they won't amount to much. And historically, all they could expect from society was equal treatment under the law.

    In contrast, equality of any kind isn't good enough for Jews(and homos) anymore. For them, 'rights' means something closer to 'divine right to rule'.

    It'd be like British Imperialist Elites in India siding with the Untouchables as 'fellow minorities' against the 'bigoted' and 'populist' masses of respectable Hindus and Muslims.
    Imagine if the British ruling minority elite hugged the Untouchables, the underclass minority, and claimed shared/collective victimhood as 'fellow minorities' regardless of the fact that Brits are the master race minority whereas Untouchables are the marginalized minority. That would be pretty funny. But then, there were times when the Brits did use the Minority Issue to justify their rule over India. In Richard Attenborough's movie GANDHI, the British ruling minority poses as protectors of the Muslim minority against the Hindu majority.

    Thankfully for India, it had a leader of Gandhi's caliber who was witty, cunning, shrewd, and devious enough to match wits with the British and argue like a lawyer. (He would have made Professor Kingsfield of PAPER CHASE proud.) Too bad the West lacks the kind of leader like Gandhi with right combination of cleverness and resolve.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CZVsWzIb6Vk

    Back then, the British Imperialists claimed that India is 'British'.
    Now, the bloody fools in UK say immigrant-invaders are 'New British'.
    Gandhi urged Indians not to cooperate until the British left.
    Maybe white Europeans can do something similar. Since so much overt resistance has been made illegal, whites can make their voices know through massive non-cooperation. But then, so many whites have been led to believe that Diversity is what their nations are all about and that return to any kind of homogeneity is AWFUL since the true meaning of Europe is spicy exotic restaurants and jungle fever with Negroes. Interestingly enough, Brexit won in UK because of older voters, but Macron won in France with older voters, 80% of whom chose him over Lepen.

    The future of Europe will be determined by whether it can produce leaders like Gandhi, Mao, Lenin, Ataturk, Mussolini, Castro, T. E. Lawrence, Trotsky, and maybe Putin(as fate of Russia is still uncertain).

    Run-of-the-mill leaders won't do.

    If Europe keeps producing nonentities like Merkel, Macron, Hollande, Sarkozy, Blair, Cameron, May, Berlusconi, and etc, it's finished. Things are getting radical, and it will take real visionaries of grit, wit, and shi*.

    As for nationalists, the likes of Lepen, Geert Wilders, and others won't do. The exception may be Orban. They are too much part of the system and try to work by current rules which are totally rigged by media, academia, and deep state.
    Trump made it in the US, but he is not a serious person. He's a showman and salesman, and he can't be counted on to do much more than that.

    Also, as enough white people are comfortable enough with bread & circuses and mentally infected with PC for the time being, it will be difficult to shake them out of their doldrums.

    But if Europe is to be saved, it will require the rise of truly remarkable individuals with the power to inspire, lead, and forever alter the trajectory of history.

    The Christian Whites in the West have no organization, prevented from organizing, have no leaders or media, and are called racists Islamophobes, anti-Semitics if they attempted to defy the popular PC dictates.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  96. @animalogic
    If I understand you correctly, I think you are saying Jew's share a common delusion, ie the eternal victim. Like an instinct, they don't need to discuss /debate it. This is similar to ruling elites: they all just KNOW their own class interests. No argument here at all.
    However, I do think they are conscious of their goals, & behind closed doors they discuss strategy & tactics.
    (Perhaps it's not true, but have u heard the story how the Israeli PM (Net-whatever-his-name) had Bush II dragged out of a party or something -- as a JOKE ! ie "hey guys, watch how I can yank the US Pres' chain ! Dopey goy" ) It's not all unconscious delusion.

    The PC culture in the West as it is propagated by the Jews primarily has empowered certain groups over the others, and allowed them to cash in on the victimhood card. Feminist who spew hate for men cannot rationally discuss their bias without resorting to screaming misogynist? Black crimes and ghetto culture is such a taboo that cannot be discussed without being called racist? environmental extremism cannot be discussed without being called climate change denier?Jewish domination of money, media, government cannot be even pointed out as OVERREPRESENTATION without being called anti-Semitic even by the brainwashed gentile. To this end the average person has no source of information to help navigate around the oppression of the minority by the majority.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  97. @Iasi
    Langdon,
    You and Sailer and other Unz people make mistakes when talking about Jewish categories. You miss the details when you talk only about Ashk, Seph and Mizr. When Jews talk about family, friends, colleagues, coworkers, neighbors and others, they do not dwell so much on high level categories. They look at good, not so good and bad too.
    Good are found in doctors, many lawyers, professors, engineers, accountants, a few politicians and other people who help and act following the Ten Commandmants.
    Not so good include some lawyers, some professors, a few accountants and some politicians ad other people who cut the corners or do not act properly enough times.
    Bad include pornography people, frauds, many politicians, criminals, welfare malingerers and others.
    In other words, Jews are like so many other people who struggle to find their way.

    There are many Jews who are scheming against the goyim, or plotting to import Muslim terrorists to exterminate Christianity and the Western culture. But, their leaderships are. Similarly, there are many Muslims who are not out rape Christian girls and convert her to Islam, or join ISIS and behead priests, but Islam as it is documented in Hadith and preached in almost ALL mosques justify such barbaric acts.

    As reasonable people demand that 2% of America (the Jews) should not be afforded 80% of decision making positions of our culture? Such fair question or demand cannot be extrapolated to putting all the Jews into ovens?

    Read More
    • Replies: @HogHappenin
    There are differences in the interpretation of what the scriptures teach in almost all religions. Even in the gospel especially the old testament that are many verses which can be taken in the context of violence and misused (as the Spanish conquistadors justified when exterminating the native Indians across the Americas). That is not important here. By bringing religion, we in consciously muddy the water and distract us from the true epicenter of this post 9/11 insanity that has been going from bad to worse.

    First things first. The people in the Muslim world were not all dying to jump into the west.Many of those countries are (including many which the western goyim on Jewish scheming destroyed were) middle income countries were people lived quite comfortably. Libya in fact was way better than some of the low tier European ones like Spain/Italy/Portugal in terms of quality of life indices. Even Syria was a pretty cool place which one can see by the easy body language of that celeb chef of the Bizarre food fame Andrew Zimmern when he visited Syria for a food tour. He was hosted by a lovely lady dressed in a skirt (imagine something like that happening in Saudi Arabia, the west's biggest 'ally' in the middle east after Israel). So maintaining borders and sovereignty is very important and not disturbing the peace in those regions goes along with that.

    However what is instead happening is those lands are deliberately being destroyed by Zionist scheming (behind the scenes) with a white facade so as to sow deep hatred and enmity among st those people. And then the same Zionists who wield enormous power in the west facilitate people of these destroyed lands to the very nations which they see has having destroyed their lands. Secondly, the very people who are literally forcing many of those countries to swallow crap like recognizing Gay marriage and same sex couples (through financial threats via IMF which again is mostly controlled by the Jews) are the same ones causing gender confusion and shoving down homosexuality and trans-genderism down the throats in the west (so those groups are now more equal than the others).

    However most Muslims come to think it is the west which has abdicated most of it's Christian past and wants the Muslims to do the same. They don't know it is causing much discomfort among st real Christians in the west too when they see gay marriages being solemnized in the Churches and gay/lesbian bishops conducting services. It is a terrible web of lies and deceit those in the back are weaving and causing immense hatred and confusion with their actions. However both the goyim groups in the east and the west blame each other but no one seems to see who is actually calling the shots.

    Our efforts must be directed at making the common man realize this connection more so in the west as it is the might of the western military that the tribe is now using to undermine and destroy not only the third world but the first world itself

    , @Anonymous
    "but Islam as it is documented in Hadith and preached in almost ALL mosques justify such barbaric acts."

    ALL? Really? You have been to the mosque I visit?

    My Imam does not tell us about how important it is to rape Christian girls, join the ISIS or behead priests.

    The "bugger" obviously doesn't believe!! Off with his head!


    --


    Mendacious fucking bullshitter, is you.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  98. AaronB says:
    @HogHappenin
    Yes there is some merit in what you say however being 'spiritual' alone wouldn't cut it. The Japanese have been as close to 'model citizens' as they get. Crime is virtually non existent and their mannerisms and etiquette would leave quite of a few of us flabbergasted, in short a highly ethical people

    Still, after their total defeat in WWII, their government has become literal slaves to the 'western establishment' (which in turn is totally controlled from the inside by you know who). If tomorrow the insane globalists decide on an all out war with a rising China (and Russia), you think the aforementioned things would make a difference if the Japanese 'rulers' board the war ship (will they even have a choice in that aspect?).

    I believe God only helps those who make an attempt to help themselves. Yes getting more moral and spiritual might give us the right impetus to start the process of reform and get out of the matrix of lust/greed that has apparently become the bed rock of Western (and soon the rest of the world's) society. But then what?

    For instance, now that it has become clear that the electoral process has become a farce since those who wield 'real' power have their claws on either side of the aisle in most nations, do you think being good citizens and voting for the 'right' man would make any difference?

    There has to be a movement that builds on the budding spirituality otherwise the elites would give a rat's ass as to how 'ethical' their populace is. They would continue as ever

    I will try to explain –

    So -

    Bad people will always do what they do…

    But what about the rest of the population? Why are they going along with it? Why are they not fighting back seriously?

    Why do the bad people seem to have the field to themselves? Why can they set the agenda so easily?

    Because the rest of the population suffers from two conditions, to varying degrees –

    1) Self-hate (disgust with modernity, mechanization, living in a flat, meaningless world)

    2) Apathy (a meaningless, mechanized world providing no motivation)

    These two things come from the philosophy of materialism – the idea that nothing exists beyond the material, and that the purpose of life is to extend our power over the material (science as the center of life)

    Yet the best things in life, beauty, nature, love, friendship, art, are non-material, they are “qualities” of material things, but these things themselves are not “visible”…

    But a disbelief in the non-visible makes you lose contact with things like beauty, love, art, etc….as they cannot be located in physical space…

    The resulting way of life – known as the Western way of life, or modernity – inspires varying degrees of disgust and repulsion in the minds of the sensitive (and a “turning against” oneself), and apathy in the minds of the average man…

    In such an environment, the *only* remaining motive that has any power or force to compel intense action and serious sacrifice whatsoever is *selfishness* – yet only a minority of men can be roused to serious effort by this motive, the worst men, the most greedy and power-hungry, also the most fearful and anxious…

    Consequently we have a situation where the “the best lack all conviction, and the worst are filled with passionate intensity”…

    In short, we have the modern West as you see it today. …

    Read More
    • Replies: @HogHappenin
    Yes beautifully put no doubt and I like to think that was the thrust of my latest comment too. It is conviction and selfishness that will be the sole motivator for regular people to fight back (and believe me it will be bloody if at all it happens since the 'gubmint' holds the biggest guns and they won't hesitate to kill and main their 'fellow' {tongue in cheek} citizens so they also need tremendous courage)

    But finding meaning in life (which as you've said has become truly become terribly meaningless and moribund) has to act as the FIRST STEP or rather a stepping stone. People have to rise for any meaningful change to take place. And that will require tremendous conviction and the courage to put your life on the line (which I believe a more meaningful life can facilitate rather easily). So finding meaning in life coupled with a fighting courage can change the course of things (and not mere pacifism). I just hope that course of action is directed at the 'right' people, not at the false targets that those in power present as 'enemies'

    Secondly, my question that has yet to be answered by anyone is, has anyone been able to successfully 'red pill' a 'blue pilled' individual of late? What was your approach? How did it go? I would like to know from people's experiences and also request the OP to put out a (meta) article on how best to use the well of information in this (and other sites) to successfully plan the 'red pilling' of a typical MSM following blue pill popper
    , @anon

    But what about the rest of the population? Why are they going along with it? Why are they not fighting back seriously?
     
    it's not complicated

    1) humans are social animals

    2) the media have the power to make a person "untouchable" - destroy their entire life - by accusing them of "racism" (which the media gets to define as anything they want)

    it's straightforward coercive social control

    #

    in Orwell's 1984 a totalitarian party controlled the media and used it to control the people - what we have is a totalitarian media controlling political parties

    government of the people by the people for the people

    has become

    government of the people by the media for the banking mafia
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  99. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer

    I don’t love the Jews and I dint hate them. Are they the most fantastic folks? Sorry, no.
    What about Jewish Chicks? They will go only with other Jews. Also they have big noses and the and they don’t like Indians, they hate us and only love hashish.
    Fuck America, Fuck Israel.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    "and they don’t like Indians, they hate us "

    And here I thought the two peoples love to blow each other.

    Must be a "The enemy of my enemy...," kind of thing, yeah?


    But, yes... Fuck America, Fuck Israel, and the Fucking White Greedy Psychopathic race.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  100. AaronB says:
    @Art
    There are good moral reasons to keep immigrants out – but you need an inspiring moral vision to frame them, and you do not have one.

    The moral reason to limit emigration, is to maintain cooperation between the existing folks.

    When immigration exceeds a certain point – the society becomes fractured. Cohesion between neighborly peoples is a very valuable asset. Losing cooperation between local peoples, causes the breakup of a local culture or society.

    This is especially true in Christian cultures, because sustaining real moral “cooperation” between folks is the cornerstone of its philosophy for living. Christian philosophy facilitates interaction and cooperation.


    Up to a point - if immigrants wants to assimilate – welcome, we need new blood --- if an immigrant brings in hate – GOOD BYE!

    The people who call a community home – come first.

    That is indeed a good reason.

    In the current culture, immigration just leads to hate, strife, and discord, group against group, and all the rest. Its quite obvious.

    In the West, every self-defined group is encouraged to hate other groups, see itself as in opposition to them, promote its own interests at the expense of everyone else, etc, etc.

    A society needs a principle of unity if diverse groups are going to live together – a unifying principle, a religion, a creed, a dogma, a way of life, a shared identity of some sort, if hate, strife, jealousy, and discord are to be avoided.

    Yet only does modernity not provide that, it provides the opposite! Everyone is “encouraged” to hate and oppose everyone else…feminism, women against men, men against women, blacks against whites, Mexicans against Americans’, Muslims against natives….whatever…

    A specific philosophy of division, discord, hatred, and strife is being promoted and encouraged…

    Under these conditions nothing can be more disastrous than immigration….it is the worst thing possible….for everyone involved…

    Now, if there were an overarching unifying principle, like Christianity, or Buddhism, then it could probably work….

    Multicultural societies only work under imperial rule, where community discord is kept in check by the foreign imperial authority…..

    Ethnically diverse societies only work without multiculturalism….when there is shared culture…

    India had extreme ethnic diversity but shared culture, and worked fine, the Austrian Empire was multicultural and multi-ethnic but had the Imperial Principle as a unifying factor….

    In the end, the idea that ethnic unity – whites only, Jews only, Arabs only! – leads to avoidance of division, discord, and strife, is an utter and puerile fantasy, one of the most a-historical self-delusions imaginable – civil wars are not exactly unheard of .

    How many civil wars and internal revolutions did a mono-ethnic Europe undergo exactly within countries, and between countries? Some of the worst human violence in human history was an internal affair within mono-ethnic and mono-cultural countries, the French Revolution, the Communist Revolution in Russia, the Cambodian atrocities, the Chinese Revolution…

    Compared to the relative harmony of the Austrian Empire, the Ottoman Empire, the Roman Empire…

    Give me a break….

    Human beings will fight over anything, the slightest bit of perceived difference….ethnicity and culture are but one, there are countless others, and history shows they are not necessarily more divisive than other principles of disunity…..

    The important thing is to have a principle of unity…and we have none today…

    Read More
    • Replies: @Art

    A society needs a principle of unity if diverse groups are going to live together – a unifying principle, a religion, a creed, a dogma, a way of life, a shared identity of some sort, if hate, strife, jealousy, and discord are to be avoided.
     
    The principle of unity that society needs for a more benign and stable society, is that "local is good." Private local ownership is the key principle that makes the idea of “local is good” function for all. Local people should have power over local matters. Local people should own the institutions that they use to advance their lives. From food stores to fire departments, local people should hold deed ownership to everything – these organizations should take the form of mutually owned cooperatives.

    When decisions are pushed up the chain of power – the decisions benefit the top. It is no more complicated than that. Far-away ownership is bad.

    As a boy, nine out ten business on Main Street were locally owned --- today nine out of ten business are owned by Wall Street. Wall Street does NOT care about the wellbeing of local folks – period. Local owners care about local folks.

    When local people own the governing institutions, then immigration will be naturally regulated.

    Societies that do not allow immigration, die – cultures all need new ideals and new invigorating blood.

    Peace --- Art
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  101. Anon says: • Disclaimer
    @CanSpeccy
    What's gibberish, Wally?

    You mean the "philosopy and literature found on the continent" (so admired by AaronB) is gibberish of the kind upon which National Socialism was founded.

    Absolutely.

    Here's Heidegger, the philosopher of the modern age:


    Making itself intelligible is suicide for philosophy.
     
    Obviously the philosopher for the Nazi Pary of which he was a member, actively engaged in booting Jews from the faculty at the Albert Ludwigs Universitat Freiburg.

    You’re wasting your time. From the standpoint of someone like Wally, ousting Jews from universities is entirely justified.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wally
    Only if they claim to teach courses which they do not, did not teach. Ouch!!

    But then it is you who has supported ousting Gentiles who refuse to accept, the impossible '6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers'.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  102. @CanSpeccy

    Now i will simply despise any comment he write.
     
    He's adopted the Merkel argument.

    Don't like your country being over-run by rape-culture Muslims (or globalist Jews, caste-conscious Hindus, whoever) many openly avowing their intent to conquer?

    No problem. Be more spiritual: go to church, look at a religious picture!(see after 5 min 25 seconds).
     

    The speaker in that video, Ezra Levant, is a Jew, incidentally — the kind of Jew I like, smart, energetic, sensible and on my side.

    The thing about being more spiritual when you're under genocidal attack is that you cannot be spiritual at all when your dead. That applies as much to today's Europeans slated for destruction by the globalist Money Power as to Jews of Merkel's Germany 75 years ago who were headed for the Nazi work-to-death labor camps.

    I think some people can be both but by now the most important thing to do is build some personal security.

    Existential perspective must be allied with evolutionary personal perspective and in not in this mutual conflict. That’s the great human dilema and the only way to achieve or reach it is transcending in intrapersonal perspective but bear in mind that other people is not in the same levels. Be more self aware than other people can be great advantage.

    I think I dislike all type of Jews specially those who are smarter and energetic.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  103. Intro says:
    @Mao Cheng Ji

    Anti-Semitic nutcases don’t think it is. They want Western nations to act like Israel and defend their majority race and historic religion rather than working to destroy them.
     
    What about the excluded middle in this false dichotomy: not caring about any mythical 'races' or archaic organized religions? This, one hopes, is healthy attitude of an overwhelming majority of the people living in western nations.

    Oh… indeed, dear Mao. Wouldn’t it be great if we could just get along and sing Kumbaya?

    What a wonderful world to live in would that be: the many Zionist Jews wanting to obliterate Iran and Assad and the rest of the enemies of Israel… and keep Palestinians as a second rate citizens in Israel and pushing for mass immigration to the West, the many Muslims refusing to become secularized and respect women, wanting to impose Sharia and avenge his fellow Muslims oppressed in the Middle East by the US, Europe and Israel, by bombing and running us over in our cities in the West, and the many Europeans and Americans of European descent wanting to keep our countries safe and secular, our wages high, our housing in the cities affordable and our troops out of the Middle East… all together holding hands, singing Kumbaya and being… just friends!

    What a nice bubble you must live in dear Mao! but pray tell… how does it feel to be on the inside?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Mao Cheng Ji
    Hey buddy. How does your rant relate to anything I said? Oh, never mind, carry on. I hope it made you feel better.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  104. Wally says: • Website
    @CanSpeccy
    What's gibberish, Wally?

    You mean the "philosopy and literature found on the continent" (so admired by AaronB) is gibberish of the kind upon which National Socialism was founded.

    Absolutely.

    Here's Heidegger, the philosopher of the modern age:


    Making itself intelligible is suicide for philosophy.
     
    Obviously the philosopher for the Nazi Pary of which he was a member, actively engaged in booting Jews from the faculty at the Albert Ludwigs Universitat Freiburg.

    As expected, you have not given us your alleged ‘Nazi Philosophy’, and cannot.

    No, Zionist controlled Wikipedia will not do.

    And most importantly, there were the ‘Nazis’ with the mythological ’6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers’ and there were the ‘Nazis’ without the mythological ’6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers’.

    The ’6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers’ are scientifically impossible frauds.
    see the ‘holocaust’ scam debunked here:

    http://codoh.com

    No name calling, level playing field debate here:

    http://forum.codoh.com

    Read More
    • Replies: @CanSpeccy

    As expected, you have not given us your alleged ‘Nazi Philosophy’, and cannot.
     
    Can't?

    Have you read Hegel, Marx, Nietzsche, Heidegger?

    It's megalomaniacal crap.

    Heidegger, a fully paid up member of the Nazi party, spurned reason and was totally incoherent.

    Nietzsche was stark raving mad and finished up in the bin, where all the others should have been consigned.

    Such was the foundation of Nazi policy: we want land, we'll take it, and the tens of millions in our way we will enslave or kill. In the modern world, pure insanity, as events proved, but fully justified by German philosophy and acted out both in Russia and Germany.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  105. Wally says: • Website
    @Anon
    You're wasting your time. From the standpoint of someone like Wally, ousting Jews from universities is entirely justified.

    Only if they claim to teach courses which they do not, did not teach. Ouch!!

    But then it is you who has supported ousting Gentiles who refuse to accept, the impossible ’6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers’.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  106. @Joe Wong
    Aren't you looking for "true separation of church and state?" I'm giving you the pointer, or you don't know what you are talking about like all the Americans who are so confused that they can claim bombing and killing on the fabricated phantom WMD allegation as humanitarian intervention.

    I’ll cut you some slack since clearly, English is not your first language. I’m still unsure as to what your point is though or why you’re giving me the finger.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  107. Art says:
    @AaronB
    That is indeed a good reason.

    In the current culture, immigration just leads to hate, strife, and discord, group against group, and all the rest. Its quite obvious.

    In the West, every self-defined group is encouraged to hate other groups, see itself as in opposition to them, promote its own interests at the expense of everyone else, etc, etc.

    A society needs a principle of unity if diverse groups are going to live together - a unifying principle, a religion, a creed, a dogma, a way of life, a shared identity of some sort, if hate, strife, jealousy, and discord are to be avoided.

    Yet only does modernity not provide that, it provides the opposite! Everyone is "encouraged" to hate and oppose everyone else...feminism, women against men, men against women, blacks against whites, Mexicans against Americans', Muslims against natives....whatever...

    A specific philosophy of division, discord, hatred, and strife is being promoted and encouraged...

    Under these conditions nothing can be more disastrous than immigration....it is the worst thing possible....for everyone involved...

    Now, if there were an overarching unifying principle, like Christianity, or Buddhism, then it could probably work....

    Multicultural societies only work under imperial rule, where community discord is kept in check by the foreign imperial authority.....

    Ethnically diverse societies only work without multiculturalism....when there is shared culture...

    India had extreme ethnic diversity but shared culture, and worked fine, the Austrian Empire was multicultural and multi-ethnic but had the Imperial Principle as a unifying factor....

    In the end, the idea that ethnic unity - whites only, Jews only, Arabs only! - leads to avoidance of division, discord, and strife, is an utter and puerile fantasy, one of the most a-historical self-delusions imaginable - civil wars are not exactly unheard of .

    How many civil wars and internal revolutions did a mono-ethnic Europe undergo exactly within countries, and between countries? Some of the worst human violence in human history was an internal affair within mono-ethnic and mono-cultural countries, the French Revolution, the Communist Revolution in Russia, the Cambodian atrocities, the Chinese Revolution...

    Compared to the relative harmony of the Austrian Empire, the Ottoman Empire, the Roman Empire...

    Give me a break....

    Human beings will fight over anything, the slightest bit of perceived difference....ethnicity and culture are but one, there are countless others, and history shows they are not necessarily more divisive than other principles of disunity.....

    The important thing is to have a principle of unity...and we have none today...

    A society needs a principle of unity if diverse groups are going to live together – a unifying principle, a religion, a creed, a dogma, a way of life, a shared identity of some sort, if hate, strife, jealousy, and discord are to be avoided.

    The principle of unity that society needs for a more benign and stable society, is that “local is good.” Private local ownership is the key principle that makes the idea of “local is good” function for all. Local people should have power over local matters. Local people should own the institutions that they use to advance their lives. From food stores to fire departments, local people should hold deed ownership to everything – these organizations should take the form of mutually owned cooperatives.

    When decisions are pushed up the chain of power – the decisions benefit the top. It is no more complicated than that. Far-away ownership is bad.

    As a boy, nine out ten business on Main Street were locally owned — today nine out of ten business are owned by Wall Street. Wall Street does NOT care about the wellbeing of local folks – period. Local owners care about local folks.

    When local people own the governing institutions, then immigration will be naturally regulated.

    Societies that do not allow immigration, die – cultures all need new ideals and new invigorating blood.

    Peace — Art

    Read More
    • Replies: @AaronB
    I'm all in favor of local ownership and government. I think that's a wonderful idea.

    I do think there are many practical measures that can improve things, but they all depend on a "waking up" from the nightmare of materialism. In other words there are no purely political solutions. It is not simply a matter of organization.

    As long as we don't believe in the non-visible, only material things will prevail - money, profit, power, etc.

    I should also add that I don't think it is desirable or possible to create paradise on earth - the best society is one that is focused "away" from earthly concerns and towards the transcendent. To the extent that we do that, things will naturally click into place, and we will achieve a happy detachment from the inanity and triviality of earthly things like money, power, status, fame, etc.

    Not of all of us, of course - there will always be bad men, the earth-bound, and the spiritually dead. Such people will be a huge part of any "elite" - we need to accept that. But things can be OK, if not perfect, if some significant section of the populace is "awake" - let the child-men play their game of money and power, so long as we can pursue what really matters.

    One of the most tragic things to have happened is the rupturing of the strange alliance between the evil men and the spiritual men that existed for most of history - the alliance by which spiritual men were content to leave power and wealth to those who burned with desire for them, as things scarcely worth having, while they pursued spiritual treasures and helped make the common people content with their lot by helping them overcome desire and ego.

    Today, the wealth and power of the evil men depend precisely on the common men being discontent and restless , egotistic and burning with desire- so they can be good consumers. Alas, the alliance that held for so long is gone!

    But that's for another time.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  108. AaronB says:
    @Art

    A society needs a principle of unity if diverse groups are going to live together – a unifying principle, a religion, a creed, a dogma, a way of life, a shared identity of some sort, if hate, strife, jealousy, and discord are to be avoided.
     
    The principle of unity that society needs for a more benign and stable society, is that "local is good." Private local ownership is the key principle that makes the idea of “local is good” function for all. Local people should have power over local matters. Local people should own the institutions that they use to advance their lives. From food stores to fire departments, local people should hold deed ownership to everything – these organizations should take the form of mutually owned cooperatives.

    When decisions are pushed up the chain of power – the decisions benefit the top. It is no more complicated than that. Far-away ownership is bad.

    As a boy, nine out ten business on Main Street were locally owned --- today nine out of ten business are owned by Wall Street. Wall Street does NOT care about the wellbeing of local folks – period. Local owners care about local folks.

    When local people own the governing institutions, then immigration will be naturally regulated.

    Societies that do not allow immigration, die – cultures all need new ideals and new invigorating blood.

    Peace --- Art

    I’m all in favor of local ownership and government. I think that’s a wonderful idea.

    I do think there are many practical measures that can improve things, but they all depend on a “waking up” from the nightmare of materialism. In other words there are no purely political solutions. It is not simply a matter of organization.

    As long as we don’t believe in the non-visible, only material things will prevail – money, profit, power, etc.

    I should also add that I don’t think it is desirable or possible to create paradise on earth – the best society is one that is focused “away” from earthly concerns and towards the transcendent. To the extent that we do that, things will naturally click into place, and we will achieve a happy detachment from the inanity and triviality of earthly things like money, power, status, fame, etc.

    Not of all of us, of course – there will always be bad men, the earth-bound, and the spiritually dead. Such people will be a huge part of any “elite” – we need to accept that. But things can be OK, if not perfect, if some significant section of the populace is “awake” – let the child-men play their game of money and power, so long as we can pursue what really matters.

    One of the most tragic things to have happened is the rupturing of the strange alliance between the evil men and the spiritual men that existed for most of history – the alliance by which spiritual men were content to leave power and wealth to those who burned with desire for them, as things scarcely worth having, while they pursued spiritual treasures and helped make the common people content with their lot by helping them overcome desire and ego.

    Today, the wealth and power of the evil men depend precisely on the common men being discontent and restless , egotistic and burning with desire- so they can be good consumers. Alas, the alliance that held for so long is gone!

    But that’s for another time.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Art

    I should also add that I don’t think it is desirable or possible to create paradise on earth – the best society is one that is focused “away” from earthly concerns and towards the transcendent. To the extent that we do that, things will naturally click into place, and we will achieve a happy detachment from the inanity and triviality of earthly things like money, power, status, fame, etc.
     
    Am not into Eastern transcendental philosophy. With that said, here is an interesting valued book on Eastern philosophy and physics. The Dancing Wu Li Masters – by Gary Zukav.

    https://www.amazon.com/Dancing-Wu-Li-Masters-Overview/dp/0060959681

    I am into practical Christian philosophy. I believe in the words of Jesus – I believe they describe a path to a practical everyday idealistic way of life. It is not necessary to be religious Christian to benefit from Jesus’ philosophy. In fact, the world’s best, most idealistic standards for human organization are already derived from Christianity. With the current on slot of Jew tribal coercion, they are losing favor – but if there is going to be a good world, they will be back.

    The idealistic Christian does in the now – what will benefit all those touched (including self) by those actions - tomorrow.

    It is a great joy to realize, that what you did yesterday, actually made things better for all today.

    Within the confines of Christian philosophy, one does not have to be successful every day – just most days. This we can do. We forgive the bad days and take joy in the good ones.

    Peace --- Art
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  109. AaronB says:

    Another striking parallel between British and Jewish tactics -

    The British were famous for fomenting disunity and discord on the Continent to prevent countries from forming alliances against them…

    Exactly what the Jews do internally within Western societies – foment disunity to prevent the majority from possibly ganging up against them…

    Truly, it seems as if Jews studied at the feet of the British, and applied these tactics within societies rather than between societies…except that, these tactics are universal and timeless, you just have to be immoral to follow them

    Read More
    • Replies: @geokat62

    Exactly what the Jews do internally within Western societies – foment disunity to prevent the majority from possibly ganging up against them…
     
    Couldn't agree more. Here's a comment I recently posted under another thread:

    Hi, Aaron. Just wanted to take a crack at providing you with an explanation of where I think most people are coming from on the issue you’ve raised.

    While I obviously don’t pretend to speak for all goyim, I can speak for myself.

    It’s not that goyim are expressing “hatred towards the entire Jewish people” for who they are. I think they are probably expressing their anger towards what organized Jewry has been, and is, actually doing.

    One case in point is the big push towards diversity led by the ADL. Are you familiar with the following material they’ve posted on their website:

    This is America.This is ADL. (NB – disingenuously referring to 9 pictures of distinct-looking individuals)

    The United States is a vibrant mix of cultures, races, religions and ethnic groups. These differences enhance our nation’s strength, beauty and collective wisdom. Together, we all weave the fabric of our pluralistic society.

    For over 100 years, the Anti-Defamation League has upheld this distinctly American concept by leading the fight against anti-Semitism, bigotry and racism. Today, ADL is the nation’s premier human relations and civil rights organization.

    If your company or organization wants to be recognized as a leader in the fight to promote diversity, we invite you to become a member of ADL’s Corporate Leadership Council — the nation’s leading corporate diversity initiative. Additional co-branding, diversity training and recognition benefits are available to Corporate Partners.

    https://www.adl.org/sites/default/files/documents/assets/pdf/about-adl/corporate-partners.pdf
     
    More and more people have come to realize that the ADL has been behind the push towards diversity. They were the ones to actually coin the phrase “Diversity Is Our Strength.”

    Given the historically delicate situation of Diaspora Jewry living in host nations- i.e., the perennial risks of pogroms and other forms of repression – promoting a policy of diversity, while damaging to the host nation, made eminent sense, from their perspective.

    While this policy had been sustainable before the founding of [the Jewish State], it has since become problematic. Let me explain. While there are still goyim who think the ADL is sincere in their promotion of diversity, more and more are beginning to notice the blatant contradiction in Diaspora Jewry’s position: while they support the promotion of diversity in their host nations, they fiercely defend the idea of an ethno-state in the ME. This is becoming an untenable position in the eyes of many goyim – i.e., either one favours multiculturalism or one favours mono-culturalism… one cannot favour both at the same time.

    So if we fast forward this film, what it comes down to is this: Diaspora Jewry must make up their minds and choose one of the following options:

    1) sincerely embrace multiculturalism for all nations by insisting that Israel open its doors to all peoples of the world and let them become equal citizens; or

    2) sincerely embrace mono-culturalism for all nations (and immediately cease and desist from promoting diversity) by either assimilating or making Aliyah.

    If they refuse to choose, because they wish to have their cake and eat it too, I’m afraid that this film will not have a happy ending.

    ————-

    P.S. I, for one, am a big fan of true diversity and sincerely embrace mono-culturalism. That’s why I’m in favour of a rainbow of nations. Because, as the saying goes, “variety is the spice of life.”
     
    , @ANON
    No you don't have to be immoral to "follow" them. Immorality is departure without some exceptional justification from the mores, that is the customs of your community (those anyway that are accepted as impinging on the rights or welfare of others). Briton's balance of power policies were not by any accepted standards immoral. If something comparable was the conscious policy of Jews in relation to a community they pretended to be wholly loyal to and part of thst would be immoral.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  110. Johan nagel says: • Website

    In short, Israel is a sane country that keeps its large Arab minority where it belongs: out of power.

    This is disgusting. An outrage of journalistic thuggery. You are legitimising a genocidal regime causing much of the worlds woes, directing the most brutal campaign against humanity in the middle east, poisoning, torturing, bombing, starving, burning alive…And you call them a sane country.

    Sane by the standards of a sociopath. Not by anyone with a fully functioning set of emotions and sense of right and wrong.

    Israel are the most obvious scourge of humanity to any seeing eyes…

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  111. @Intro
    Oh... indeed, dear Mao. Wouldn't it be great if we could just get along and sing Kumbaya?

    What a wonderful world to live in would that be: the many Zionist Jews wanting to obliterate Iran and Assad and the rest of the enemies of Israel... and keep Palestinians as a second rate citizens in Israel and pushing for mass immigration to the West, the many Muslims refusing to become secularized and respect women, wanting to impose Sharia and avenge his fellow Muslims oppressed in the Middle East by the US, Europe and Israel, by bombing and running us over in our cities in the West, and the many Europeans and Americans of European descent wanting to keep our countries safe and secular, our wages high, our housing in the cities affordable and our troops out of the Middle East... all together holding hands, singing Kumbaya and being... just friends!

    What a nice bubble you must live in dear Mao! but pray tell... how does it feel to be on the inside?

    Hey buddy. How does your rant relate to anything I said? Oh, never mind, carry on. I hope it made you feel better.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Intro
    Oh, everything I'd say.

    What about the excluded middle in this false dichotomy: not caring about any mythical ‘races’ or archaic organized religions?
     
    What "mythical races" and "archaic organized religions" are you talking about?

    Do you mean Jews and Judaism? People of European descent and Christianism?

    If yes, what should we, gentiles, do if certain people, part of a minority ethnic group representing less than 2% of the population (Jews), but being not only part of the group but strongly identified as Jews and with Israel (traditions, Holocaust, persecution, etc) even holding dual citizenship (Israeli-American or European) and overrepresented among the elites - one could argue, thanks to their group evolutionary strategy - are favoring their own kind over the rest of Americans and Europeans?

    What if from those positions of power and/or influence they support and/or promote policies highly beneficial for their own kind - again, less than 2% of the population - here in the West and in certain far away ethno-states, but detrimental for the rest of the country's citizens?

    Isn't this clear conflict of interest a problem to you?

    If yes, shouldn't we first clearly define the problem before trying to solve it?

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  112. @AaronB
    I will try to explain -

    So -

    Bad people will always do what they do...

    But what about the rest of the population? Why are they going along with it? Why are they not fighting back seriously?

    Why do the bad people seem to have the field to themselves? Why can they set the agenda so easily?

    Because the rest of the population suffers from two conditions, to varying degrees -

    1) Self-hate (disgust with modernity, mechanization, living in a flat, meaningless world)

    2) Apathy (a meaningless, mechanized world providing no motivation)

    These two things come from the philosophy of materialism - the idea that nothing exists beyond the material, and that the purpose of life is to extend our power over the material (science as the center of life)

    Yet the best things in life, beauty, nature, love, friendship, art, are non-material, they are "qualities" of material things, but these things themselves are not "visible"...

    But a disbelief in the non-visible makes you lose contact with things like beauty, love, art, etc....as they cannot be located in physical space...

    The resulting way of life - known as the Western way of life, or modernity - inspires varying degrees of disgust and repulsion in the minds of the sensitive (and a "turning against" oneself), and apathy in the minds of the average man...

    In such an environment, the *only* remaining motive that has any power or force to compel intense action and serious sacrifice whatsoever is *selfishness* - yet only a minority of men can be roused to serious effort by this motive, the worst men, the most greedy and power-hungry, also the most fearful and anxious...

    Consequently we have a situation where the "the best lack all conviction, and the worst are filled with passionate intensity"...

    In short, we have the modern West as you see it today. ...

    Yes beautifully put no doubt and I like to think that was the thrust of my latest comment too. It is conviction and selfishness that will be the sole motivator for regular people to fight back (and believe me it will be bloody if at all it happens since the ‘gubmint’ holds the biggest guns and they won’t hesitate to kill and main their ‘fellow‘ {tongue in cheek} citizens so they also need tremendous courage)

    But finding meaning in life (which as you’ve said has become truly become terribly meaningless and moribund) has to act as the FIRST STEP or rather a stepping stone. People have to rise for any meaningful change to take place. And that will require tremendous conviction and the courage to put your life on the line (which I believe a more meaningful life can facilitate rather easily). So finding meaning in life coupled with a fighting courage can change the course of things (and not mere pacifism). I just hope that course of action is directed at the ‘right’ people, not at the false targets that those in power present as ‘enemies’

    Secondly, my question that has yet to be answered by anyone is, has anyone been able to successfully ‘red pill’ a ‘blue pilled’ individual of late? What was your approach? How did it go? I would like to know from people’s experiences and also request the OP to put out a (meta) article on how best to use the well of information in this (and other sites) to successfully plan the ‘red pilling’ of a typical MSM following blue pill popper

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  113. anon says: • Disclaimer

    the Guardian: “Reported rapes in England and Wales double in four years”? Yes, of course it does. Mass immigration from violent and corrupt Third-World nations inevitably increases crime in Western nations.

    i can see how Jews – being a minority – would feel that mass immigration and diversity would make them safer but

    “white flight” is
    - gang-raped 14 yer old white girls
    and
    - gang-stabbed 16 year old white boys

    100,000s of them

    the media-political class have covered it up for 50 years

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    "the Guardian: “Reported rapes in England and Wales double in four years”? Yes, of course it does. Mass immigration from violent and corrupt Third-World nations inevitably increases crime in Western nations."


    LOL! Do you vile racists even understand one implication of the "double" part?

    It simply appears that those wretched third-worlders are just as animal-like as true bred white dicks.

    Does anybody have actual verifiable statistics about the race of these rapists? A quick Google got me this page, which states that rape in Sweden has remained constant even after mass refugee influx.

    http://www.thedailybeast.com/are-migrants-really-raping-swedish-women

    Heck, even Assange who was accused of rape, is suddenly not accused of it anymore.

    Given that mendacity is a core value of the western civilisation, who knows what is really happening. You people make up whatever narrative which suits you.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  114. @CanSpeccy

    Yes, “stopping the genocide of my people” – keeping immigrants out of white countries. That’s what you mean.

    That’s a purely selfish motive ...

    You’ve already lost purely on rhetorical grounds.
     

    Better to be a survivor of genocide than a victim of genocidal bollocks purveyed by people like you.

    You are a propagandist for the destruction of the nations of Europe. Fuck you.

    Don’t be too hard on him. Yes he has some strange thoughts regarding immigration but what he says regarding a ‘spiritual awakening’ is bang on. Without finding meaning in our lives (which at the moment is driven by pure greed and an uncontrolled lust propagated by the dark forces) one will never be able to muster the conviction that is needed for real change.

    As I have answered to him separately (repeating here), without such an awakening, we will never be able to break free of the shackles of this moribund life that has made us weak, cowardly and utterly lazy to do anything about the covert destruction that these people are wrecking on the west, (and also the overt destruction of the third world that too using first world armies which is utterly shameful for the west). A purely materialistic life will never allow the common westerners to muster the courage to confront these sick bastards which could also involve putting one’s life on the line (which most won’t be able to do as of now). We all know what happened to Seth rich, what has happened to Snowden and others. They did this I believe despite knowing all too well the risk that they were taking. I believe those people had much more conviction and found a purpose in life unlike the rest of us. Only a life that is not completely drenched in the cesspool that we call modernity can do that

    But this spiritual awakening has to be the stepping stone or the first step on a journey or a revolution to ensure sanity and peace to prevail. So quite some part of what he says is very necessary since without that people won’t have the courage or the conviction to rise.

    Read More
    • Replies: @CanSpeccy

    Don’t be too hard on him. Yes he has some strange thoughts regarding immigration but what he says regarding a ‘spiritual awakening’ is bang on.
     
    That's just the usual, "the people get the government they deserve" rubbish. The people get the government that the ruling elite brainwash them into voting for, i.e., labor or conservative, republican or democrat, either way the result being the same; namely, whatever the ruling elite want. If the people are mired in porn, trash TV, and an obsession with money, it's because that's what makes the most money most easily for the elite.

    Blaming the people for their own destruction when it is clearly the result of top-down brainwashing is either stupid or the propaganda of a criminal elite.
    , @Anonymous
    "and also the overt destruction of the third world that too using first world armies which is utterly shameful for the west"

    Don't get me wrong, your heart does appear to be somewhat in the right place, but I also sense an attempt at deflecting blame.

    The proven greed and psychopathy of the white race, cannot all be due to Jewish influence only.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  115. anon says: • Disclaimer
    @rw95
    I love how "devout Christians" are anti-Semites.

    You realize your God is a literal magic Jew, right?

    I love how “devout Christians” are anti-Semites.

    You realize your God is a literal magic Jew, right?

    essence and behavior are separate

    (on a group genetic basis particular traits probably aren’t entirely separate but on an individual basis they will be)

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  116. anon says: • Disclaimer
    @AaronB
    I give an extended explanation of my reasons for why spirituality is necessary for a return to sanity in the Kevin McDonald post, you might try looking that up. If you have any questions after that I'd be happy to respond.

    Short version is, I believe we have a death wish, ever since we became materialistic and lost our connection to transcendent values. We have made life insipid and empty, and are now obeying an inner impulse of self-destruction.

    I believe we have a death wish

    if that was true the media wouldn’t need to lie about the tidal wave of child rape rolling over the West as the result of open borders

    you’re trying to deflect attention away from the people who opened the borders for what they saw as their own interests

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    "tidal wave of child rape rolling over the West as the result of open borders"

    You are talking about white christian clergymen, right? But, how does open borders, in the context of refugees, matter to them? Can't they right royally travel all over Europe and America, simply owing to their lily white skins?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  117. @Man on the street
    There are many Jews who are scheming against the goyim, or plotting to import Muslim terrorists to exterminate Christianity and the Western culture. But, their leaderships are. Similarly, there are many Muslims who are not out rape Christian girls and convert her to Islam, or join ISIS and behead priests, but Islam as it is documented in Hadith and preached in almost ALL mosques justify such barbaric acts.

    As reasonable people demand that 2% of America (the Jews) should not be afforded 80% of decision making positions of our culture? Such fair question or demand cannot be extrapolated to putting all the Jews into ovens?

    There are differences in the interpretation of what the scriptures teach in almost all religions. Even in the gospel especially the old testament that are many verses which can be taken in the context of violence and misused (as the Spanish conquistadors justified when exterminating the native Indians across the Americas). That is not important here. By bringing religion, we in consciously muddy the water and distract us from the true epicenter of this post 9/11 insanity that has been going from bad to worse.

    First things first. The people in the Muslim world were not all dying to jump into the west.Many of those countries are (including many which the western goyim on Jewish scheming destroyed were) middle income countries were people lived quite comfortably. Libya in fact was way better than some of the low tier European ones like Spain/Italy/Portugal in terms of quality of life indices. Even Syria was a pretty cool place which one can see by the easy body language of that celeb chef of the Bizarre food fame Andrew Zimmern when he visited Syria for a food tour. He was hosted by a lovely lady dressed in a skirt (imagine something like that happening in Saudi Arabia, the west’s biggest ‘ally’ in the middle east after Israel). So maintaining borders and sovereignty is very important and not disturbing the peace in those regions goes along with that.

    However what is instead happening is those lands are deliberately being destroyed by Zionist scheming (behind the scenes) with a white facade so as to sow deep hatred and enmity among st those people. And then the same Zionists who wield enormous power in the west facilitate people of these destroyed lands to the very nations which they see has having destroyed their lands. Secondly, the very people who are literally forcing many of those countries to swallow crap like recognizing Gay marriage and same sex couples (through financial threats via IMF which again is mostly controlled by the Jews) are the same ones causing gender confusion and shoving down homosexuality and trans-genderism down the throats in the west (so those groups are now more equal than the others).

    However most Muslims come to think it is the west which has abdicated most of it’s Christian past and wants the Muslims to do the same. They don’t know it is causing much discomfort among st real Christians in the west too when they see gay marriages being solemnized in the Churches and gay/lesbian bishops conducting services. It is a terrible web of lies and deceit those in the back are weaving and causing immense hatred and confusion with their actions. However both the goyim groups in the east and the west blame each other but no one seems to see who is actually calling the shots.

    Our efforts must be directed at making the common man realize this connection more so in the west as it is the might of the western military that the tribe is now using to undermine and destroy not only the third world but the first world itself

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  118. anon says: • Disclaimer
    @imbroglio
    I must tell the Jews at my church how hostile they are to Christianity!

    It's the same old story. When foolish nations promote their destruction and their imported enemies seek to displace them, blame the Jews. As for the Jews, when a country starts coming apart at the seams, either get out or make yourselves scarce because the warring factions will turn their wrath on you as the designated scapegoat. Le plus ça change...

    When foolish nations promote their destruction and their imported enemies seek to displace them, blame the Jews.

    The three people most directly culpable for opening the UK’s borders – the precursor to a tidal wave of child rape – were Jews: Jack Straw, Barbara Roche and Jonathan Portes.

    They are responsible for the 10s of thousands of child rapes that have followed.

    The reason it only took three people to fully open the UK’s borders against the direct wishes of the majority is the Jewish-dominated media spent 50 years preparing the ground in advance so 99% of the people who would oppose such a policy kept their mouth shout out of fear of media persecution.

    All the Western nations are targets of what has become a stealth genocide.

    Now “some Jews” is not the same as “the Jews” and originally it might not even have been intended as a stealth genocide – originally it might have been seen as self-protection – but it’s clear now the eventual outcome is genocide.

    It’s perfectly reasonable to oppose people who support and promote policies leading to your people’s genocide.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    "They are responsible for the 10s of thousands of child rapes that have followed."

    Deceit and lies.

    Let me guess, you are a... white guy... and a greedy psychopathic racist scum.

    Am I right?

    Of course I am.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  119. anon says: • Disclaimer
    @AaronB
    I will try to explain -

    So -

    Bad people will always do what they do...

    But what about the rest of the population? Why are they going along with it? Why are they not fighting back seriously?

    Why do the bad people seem to have the field to themselves? Why can they set the agenda so easily?

    Because the rest of the population suffers from two conditions, to varying degrees -

    1) Self-hate (disgust with modernity, mechanization, living in a flat, meaningless world)

    2) Apathy (a meaningless, mechanized world providing no motivation)

    These two things come from the philosophy of materialism - the idea that nothing exists beyond the material, and that the purpose of life is to extend our power over the material (science as the center of life)

    Yet the best things in life, beauty, nature, love, friendship, art, are non-material, they are "qualities" of material things, but these things themselves are not "visible"...

    But a disbelief in the non-visible makes you lose contact with things like beauty, love, art, etc....as they cannot be located in physical space...

    The resulting way of life - known as the Western way of life, or modernity - inspires varying degrees of disgust and repulsion in the minds of the sensitive (and a "turning against" oneself), and apathy in the minds of the average man...

    In such an environment, the *only* remaining motive that has any power or force to compel intense action and serious sacrifice whatsoever is *selfishness* - yet only a minority of men can be roused to serious effort by this motive, the worst men, the most greedy and power-hungry, also the most fearful and anxious...

    Consequently we have a situation where the "the best lack all conviction, and the worst are filled with passionate intensity"...

    In short, we have the modern West as you see it today. ...

    But what about the rest of the population? Why are they going along with it? Why are they not fighting back seriously?

    it’s not complicated

    1) humans are social animals

    2) the media have the power to make a person “untouchable” – destroy their entire life – by accusing them of “racism” (which the media gets to define as anything they want)

    it’s straightforward coercive social control

    #

    in Orwell’s 1984 a totalitarian party controlled the media and used it to control the people – what we have is a totalitarian media controlling political parties

    government of the people by the people for the people

    has become

    government of the people by the media for the banking mafia

    Read More
    • Replies: @AaronB
    I don't think that really addresses my analysis.

    You are describing mechanisms, the machinery of control and repression.

    I am trying to understand why the worst elements of the elite are allowed to set the agenda, why there are no countervailing tendencies - factions - within the elite, and why revolutions from below, which are historically normal, don't occur.

    But I do agree with you that it isn't complicated.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  120. geokat62 says:
    @AaronB
    Another striking parallel between British and Jewish tactics -

    The British were famous for fomenting disunity and discord on the Continent to prevent countries from forming alliances against them...

    Exactly what the Jews do internally within Western societies - foment disunity to prevent the majority from possibly ganging up against them...

    Truly, it seems as if Jews studied at the feet of the British, and applied these tactics within societies rather than between societies...except that, these tactics are universal and timeless, you just have to be immoral to follow them

    Exactly what the Jews do internally within Western societies – foment disunity to prevent the majority from possibly ganging up against them…

    Couldn’t agree more. Here’s a comment I recently posted under another thread:

    Hi, Aaron. Just wanted to take a crack at providing you with an explanation of where I think most people are coming from on the issue you’ve raised.

    While I obviously don’t pretend to speak for all goyim, I can speak for myself.

    It’s not that goyim are expressing “hatred towards the entire Jewish people” for who they are. I think they are probably expressing their anger towards what organized Jewry has been, and is, actually doing.

    One case in point is the big push towards diversity led by the ADL. Are you familiar with the following material they’ve posted on their website:

    This is America.This is ADL. (NB – disingenuously referring to 9 pictures of distinct-looking individuals)

    The United States is a vibrant mix of cultures, races, religions and ethnic groups. These differences enhance our nation’s strength, beauty and collective wisdom. Together, we all weave the fabric of our pluralistic society.

    For over 100 years, the Anti-Defamation League has upheld this distinctly American concept by leading the fight against anti-Semitism, bigotry and racism. Today, ADL is the nation’s premier human relations and civil rights organization.

    If your company or organization wants to be recognized as a leader in the fight to promote diversity, we invite you to become a member of ADL’s Corporate Leadership Council — the nation’s leading corporate diversity initiative. Additional co-branding, diversity training and recognition benefits are available to Corporate Partners.

    https://www.adl.org/sites/default/files/documents/assets/pdf/about-adl/corporate-partners.pdf

    More and more people have come to realize that the ADL has been behind the push towards diversity. They were the ones to actually coin the phrase “Diversity Is Our Strength.”

    Given the historically delicate situation of Diaspora Jewry living in host nations- i.e., the perennial risks of pogroms and other forms of repression – promoting a policy of diversity, while damaging to the host nation, made eminent sense, from their perspective.

    While this policy had been sustainable before the founding of [the Jewish State], it has since become problematic. Let me explain. While there are still goyim who think the ADL is sincere in their promotion of diversity, more and more are beginning to notice the blatant contradiction in Diaspora Jewry’s position: while they support the promotion of diversity in their host nations, they fiercely defend the idea of an ethno-state in the ME. This is becoming an untenable position in the eyes of many goyim – i.e., either one favours multiculturalism or one favours mono-culturalism… one cannot favour both at the same time.

    So if we fast forward this film, what it comes down to is this: Diaspora Jewry must make up their minds and choose one of the following options:

    1) sincerely embrace multiculturalism for all nations by insisting that Israel open its doors to all peoples of the world and let them become equal citizens; or

    2) sincerely embrace mono-culturalism for all nations (and immediately cease and desist from promoting diversity) by either assimilating or making Aliyah.

    If they refuse to choose, because they wish to have their cake and eat it too, I’m afraid that this film will not have a happy ending.

    ————-

    P.S. I, for one, am a big fan of true diversity and sincerely embrace mono-culturalism. That’s why I’m in favour of a rainbow of nations. Because, as the saying goes, “variety is the spice of life.”

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  121. Everything here can be easily summarized like that: j00:00s are brightly malignant and as most of parasites, they will destroy their ”achievements” [why, because they 'are'' dumb], and europeans, on avg, proved lazy, disorganized, predictable, materialistic and stupid. This is a great, a true collective [as well individual] intelligence test and europeans fail absolutely, since a long time, but in more sophisticated ways.

    And east asians too, they are following the same path.

    There are many different, safe and smarter ways to:

    - eliminate white race;

    - dominate the world;

    - eliminate dangers in ME.

    J00:00s choice the worst ones.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  122. Anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Joe Wong
    Aren't you looking for "true separation of church and state?" I'm giving you the pointer, or you don't know what you are talking about like all the Americans who are so confused that they can claim bombing and killing on the fabricated phantom WMD allegation as humanitarian intervention.

    I don’t know whether the Chinese government still regulates Chinese Christians’ places of and meetings for worship and the Catholic church’s appointments of bishops but I know it still oppresses Falun Gong. But perhaps you are actually unfamiliar with the Western, or merely Anglosphere, notion of separation of church and state???

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  123. ANON says: • Disclaimer
    @Jake
    This is an excellent and much needed article. But even being able to face what is here will do no good if you fail to know when and where and how the process began.

    Let's start with this sentence from the article: "Now compare the United Kingdom, a White and historically Christian nation." It is true, but false in the sense that it is incomplete. The UK is a forced political entity based on a very small Elite holding nearly all power, with that Elite leading a large ethno-linguistic group (Protestant Englishmen). That Elite and its English lessers agreed that all Catholics are evil, because they would undermine Anglo-Saxon Protestantism, and they also agreed that Celtic languages must be exterminated, if possible, which should exterminate any viable sense of nationalism in Wales, Scotland, and Ireland.

    So what does all that mean in the real world? It means that the UK was always about a small group of white professed Christians acting to exterminate 'other' European languages and cultures. The UK has always been about the UK Elites waging war to exterminate white cultures. The UK Elites have always seen the vast majority of British Isles natives they ruled as 'white trash' and 'rednecks' far beneath them.

    And that problem has nothing to do with monarchy of with lack of demand for more Parliamentary power. Oliver Cromwell hated all Catholics (and what we would call Anglo-Catholic Church of England Englishmen)n and all Celts like Jews hate Arabs, and he also loved Jews and even more so Jewish money. Cromwell welcomed Jews back into England, in fact promoting them, at the same time he would have been thrilled to inflict genocide on the Irish.

    Anglo-Saxon Puritanism was a Judaizing heresy that longed to be able to exterminate Celtic languages and white Catholics native to the British Isles. And it had centuries of aging in the larger English culture, so much so that the return of the monarchy did not alter the national pattern even a teeny tiny bit. English culture was centrally about hating and acting to destroy white Christian cultures native to the British Isles that were notseen as in full; service to the desires of the English Elites.

    And after Cromwell. Jews became ever more central to that culture war waged by Anglo-Saxon Elites against the vast majority of white Christians they rule.

    Jews have the power they do in London and NYC and LA/Hollywood, etc. because WASP Elites have always been thrilled to ally with Jews against the majority of white Christians ruled by WASP Elites.

    It is impossible to solve the Jewish problem without getting rid of the WASP Elite problem.

    If this is not elaborate trolling it is the work of some (presumably Catholic anti-Semite) obsessive who knows very little British political,economic or social history in all its variety of regions and sects and entrepreneurial business – and its rapid changes over 250 years and more – and has tried to find bits to psck into his thesis. Kindly explsin Wilberforce and the Anglican Evangelical abolitionists in terms of any Judaising tendencies, or any reference to the Old Testament at all.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Santoculto
    Christianism itself is a judaising tendencies...

    It was a cultural appropriation too, ;)
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  124. ANON says: • Disclaimer
    @AaronB
    Another striking parallel between British and Jewish tactics -

    The British were famous for fomenting disunity and discord on the Continent to prevent countries from forming alliances against them...

    Exactly what the Jews do internally within Western societies - foment disunity to prevent the majority from possibly ganging up against them...

    Truly, it seems as if Jews studied at the feet of the British, and applied these tactics within societies rather than between societies...except that, these tactics are universal and timeless, you just have to be immoral to follow them

    No you don’t have to be immoral to “follow” them. Immorality is departure without some exceptional justification from the mores, that is the customs of your community (those anyway that are accepted as impinging on the rights or welfare of others). Briton’s balance of power policies were not by any accepted standards immoral. If something comparable was the conscious policy of Jews in relation to a community they pretended to be wholly loyal to and part of thst would be immoral.

    Read More
    • Replies: @AaronB
    Jews are also not departing from the norms of their community.....

    If there is no universal law, and that's the standard then...
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  125. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @CanSpeccy

    Imagine what we don’t see ... putatively Christian and conservative personalities allowed to appear on TV.
     
    What we do see is pretty amazing. Just a couple of months ago the BBC appointed a Muslim woman as head of Religious Programming. Reflecting her, presumably fat pay packet, her name is Fatima Salaria.

    Is that not amazing? England, after all, is a Christian country — you know, with a state church, the Anglican Church. Appointing a Muslim to head religious programming at Britain's state broadcaster is like appointing a Jesuit to oversee religious broadcasting in Iran providing equal representation to all religion's no doubt including the religion of love motivating the Manchester bomber.

    “…religion of love motivating the Manchester bomber.”

    You know how the mofer Little Britain broke Libya for no particular reason, right?

    It is called revenge, or blowback, you fucking scum.

    It has nothing to do with the “religion of love,” motivating anything.

    Read More
    • Replies: @CanSpeccy

    It is called revenge, or blowback, you fucking scum.
     
    I know the history. So does the Government of the United Kingdom? So why does it admit Muslims who, under the guise of a religion of love, are intent on revenge?

    If you can explain that without resort to use of gerundives, go ahead.
    , @geokat62

    You know how the mofer Little Britain broke Libya for no particular reason, right?
     
    Oh, there was a particular reason for breaking Libya, alright.

    It was one of the 7 countries [Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Iran] on the hit list General Wesley Clark was good enough to disclose to the world .

    And guess who gets to decide which country is lucky enough to be included on this exclusive list?

    Here's an excerpt from one of AIPAC's Guidebook:

    Country Profiles
    Threats in the Region

    Libya
    Libya has used much of its growing oil wealth to accelerate its ballistic missile program and negotiate new arms contracts with Russian and European suppliers. Foreign experts from a range of countries -- including Iran -- have been assisting its ballistic missile programs. Col. Qaddaffi's current arsenal of Scud missiles is outdated and its homegrown "Al-Fatah" missile program was slowed by international sanctions. The end of Libyan sanctions, however, is likely to reinvigorate Tripoli's quest for a means to threaten the region. Western intelligence assessments indicate that Tripoli is seeking to acquire technology related to the North Korean Nodong missile program, and may purchase the Iranian Shahab-3 intermediate-range missile. This would give Libya the ability to strike Israel directly for the first time, as well as place a wide arc of southern Europe in danger. In 2000, North Korean missile components were intercepted en route to Tripoli, a discovery that confirmed suspicions about Libyan activities. Additionally, Libya is seeking a wide range of spare parts for its aging Soviet-supplied arsenal, as well as state-of-the-art Russian air defense missile systems.

    If left unchecked, Libyan leader Qaddafi will be able to target southern NATO allies and Israel with poison gas or germ-tipped rockets, or provide such weapons of mass destruction to terrorist groups. Libya possesses the region's largest chemical weapons production facility. Additionally, Libya is thought to have cooperated with Iraq to manufacture biological weapons. These weapons, when combined with Libya’s growing ballistic missile capability, create the potential for serious threats, especially given Quaddafi’s erratic nature.

    Libya is a state sponsor of terrorist organizations. The January 2001 verdict finding a Libyan intelligence agent guilty of the bombing of Pan Am 103 in 1988, confirmed what has been widely-known for decades: The government of Libya and its intelligence agencies have directly supported and carried out deadly terrorist attacks throughout the world, particularly targeted at Americans. As a result, Libya remains on the State Department’s list of state sponsors of terrorism and the United States maintains tough economic sanctions.
     
    The latest edition of the Guidebook has devoted one chapter to Iran. Let's see how long it takes for them to run the table.
    , @anon

    You know how the mofer Little Britain broke Libya for no particular reason, right?

    It is called revenge, or blowback, you fucking scum.
     
    The banking mafia paid for the destruction of Libya for the usual reason - extend the central banking network.

    The banking mafia couldn't care less about a bunch of prole girls at a pop concert getting killed and they pay the politicians/journalists to not care either.

    If people want revenge or to change Western foreign policy then go after the banks - they're the real rulers.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  126. @ANON
    If this is not elaborate trolling it is the work of some (presumably Catholic anti-Semite) obsessive who knows very little British political,economic or social history in all its variety of regions and sects and entrepreneurial business - and its rapid changes over 250 years and more - and has tried to find bits to psck into his thesis. Kindly explsin Wilberforce and the Anglican Evangelical abolitionists in terms of any Judaising tendencies, or any reference to the Old Testament at all.

    Christianism itself is a judaising tendencies…

    It was a cultural appropriation too, ;)

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  127. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @AaronB
    The English, being most like the Jews, will be the last to free themselves from their influence, if indeed they ever manage to do so at all, which I rather doubt. The English world seems headed for final eclipse, the fate of all empires, into that dark abyss which swallowed up the whole ancient world. There are no Romans anymore, and there will be no Englishmen in the future.

    The English have always been the most materialistic of the European nations - they invented capitalism and industrialism, and have led in science.

    Europeans have always considered the English to be less spiritually gifted than any other European people, and more obsessed with money than any other.

    This is reflected in English philosophy and literature, which lacks the depths found on the continent.

    Curiously, the English also had the exact same reputation as the Jews - that of being uniquely hypocritical, duplicitous, and immoral in their pursuit of power. "Perfidious Albion".

    What's even more fascinating, the English had a reputation specifically for "cant" - for using high-sounding moral words to mask self-interested behavior!

    This last is a specifically favored strategy of the Jews.

    The reasons for this curious similarity are not far to seek - power imposes the same demands everywhere. Whoever seeks power has his path laid out before him, which is the same, whether Jews or Englishmen take to it.

    The English were the most materially successful among European nations - the wealthiest, the most powerful, with the most extensive empire - just as the Jews were the most materially successful group "within" European nations.

    The English, too, were viewed with a mixture of jealousy and contempt.

    And in both cases the reasons are obvious - each group chose to sacrifice spirituality in favor of earthly power, consequently, each group had to adopt the same tactics, and came to resemble each other.

    But material success is self-undermining, and leads to loss of morale - the English, who gained success and power earlier than the Jews, and on a far grander scale, suffered the inevitable collapse in morale earlier as well - which left them dramatically vulnerable to the Jews, who are still in the grip of their dark passion for power.

    “And in both cases the reasons are obvious – each group chose to sacrifice spirituality in favor of earthly power, consequently, each group had to adopt the same tactics, and came to resemble each other.”

    Your idea is absolutely right, except for one minor detail. You focus on the English and the Jews specifically, which kind of betrays your delusionary mind.

    Replace the English with the White (capitalised only for emphasis) race, and your text would probably begin to read right.

    Read More
    • Replies: @AaronB
    Yes, my analysis applies to historical Western Europeans (not Whites) as a whole to some extent, although the English take these tendencies to an extreme, and the Jews take them to an extreme within societies.

    But non-whites have shown themselves to completely lack the spiritual resources to resist adopting the worst traits of European culture...China is today worse than Europe. Asia in general is a horror show today.

    Increasingly, this is a world problem, and indications are that Europeans, having the disease earlier and worse than others, might be the first to find a cure.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  128. AaronB says:
    @Anonymous
    "And in both cases the reasons are obvious – each group chose to sacrifice spirituality in favor of earthly power, consequently, each group had to adopt the same tactics, and came to resemble each other."

    Your idea is absolutely right, except for one minor detail. You focus on the English and the Jews specifically, which kind of betrays your delusionary mind.

    Replace the English with the White (capitalised only for emphasis) race, and your text would probably begin to read right.

    Yes, my analysis applies to historical Western Europeans (not Whites) as a whole to some extent, although the English take these tendencies to an extreme, and the Jews take them to an extreme within societies.

    But non-whites have shown themselves to completely lack the spiritual resources to resist adopting the worst traits of European culture…China is today worse than Europe. Asia in general is a horror show today.

    Increasingly, this is a world problem, and indications are that Europeans, having the disease earlier and worse than others, might be the first to find a cure.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  129. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @AaronB
    Christianity and Judaism are opposites - Judaism is "optimistic", its vision is about flourishing here on earth, Christianity is "pessimistic", it seeks liberation from this world, in favor of a better one.

    Christianity is more Indian, than it is Jewish.

    By all means, reject it, but try and understand it, if you can.

    Its clear that you are very close to Judaism in spirit - you too see no more in life than material success, and you dislike Jews because they have what you would like to have, and they stand in your way.

    I don't dislike Jews, but I oppose the metaphysics of Judaism, and indeed consider Jews the first victims of their own culture and religion.

    I am not saying resisting is futile, or let the genocide continue - I am saying that the English will not resist, because they lack the metaphysical basis from which resistance would be possible. The English share the Jewish approach to life, and have for many centuries now.

    This attitude towards life - power, wealth, empire, materialism - always leads eventually to a collapse in morale, as the English are now experiencing, just as the Assyrians and Babylonians did.

    Aside from that, the English have no moral vision to oppose to that of the Jews, and only a powerful moral vision can provide the foundation for any struggle against the Jews. Indeed, Jews dominate simply and only because others lack a moral vision that might oppose them.

    You seek to provide selfishness and power-hunger as a foundation for opposing the Jews - but people with these motives will always "sell out", and make accommodations with Jews - who will be only too happy to form alliances with people who share their "spirit", as history shows - as selfishness and the desire for power will always find it more expedient and advantageous to join with like-minded others.

    That is history.

    Your vision - selfishness as basis for opposition - cannot work.

    “Christianity is “pessimistic”, it seeks liberation from this world, in favor of a better one.

    Christianity is more Indian”

    Indian, like pagan Hinduism? In that you are absolutely right!

    Christianity clearly took inspiration from that pagan faith, with its whole man-god dogma. I wonder if your beastly Churchell saw the strong connection, given his “love” for that “beastly” faith? RIH Churchell.

    Then, keeping in mind that “Christianity is more Indian,” and the “Indian’s” concept of multiple reincarnations into the same world, your two statements above appear to be contradictory.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    If you want to make sure your ramblings are (correctly) regarded as a waste of space combine being anonymous with misspellings that only the truly, widely and profoundly, ignorant could perpetrate. "Churchell" (sic)! Was that from a comic book history?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  130. AaronB says:
    @anon

    But what about the rest of the population? Why are they going along with it? Why are they not fighting back seriously?
     
    it's not complicated

    1) humans are social animals

    2) the media have the power to make a person "untouchable" - destroy their entire life - by accusing them of "racism" (which the media gets to define as anything they want)

    it's straightforward coercive social control

    #

    in Orwell's 1984 a totalitarian party controlled the media and used it to control the people - what we have is a totalitarian media controlling political parties

    government of the people by the people for the people

    has become

    government of the people by the media for the banking mafia

    I don’t think that really addresses my analysis.

    You are describing mechanisms, the machinery of control and repression.

    I am trying to understand why the worst elements of the elite are allowed to set the agenda, why there are no countervailing tendencies – factions – within the elite, and why revolutions from below, which are historically normal, don’t occur.

    But I do agree with you that it isn’t complicated.

    Read More
    • Replies: @anon

    I don’t think that really addresses my analysis.
     
    of course - your analysis is designed to deflect attention away from the perpetrators of a massive and ongoing crime and onto the victims

    the answers to your questions are

    1) a combination of campaign funding and media pressure has been filtering membership of the political-media class since at least WW2 - with a few exceptions only the corrupt are allowed through the net (which is why the current political class cannot fix the problem - they need to be replaced)

    2) those members of the elite who are outside the political-media class - e.g. big business - are completely unaware of what is really happening e.g. the tidal wave of child rape that has flowed over Europe in the last 20 years as a result of opening the borders because the media covers it up.

    this is all driven by the combination of banking mafia money and control of the media

    the general moral malaise is the result of the media's deliberate moral corruption over the last 50 years and is not the cause of anything - that's just you deflecting

    the simple proof is the media's constant lying about things like inter-ethnic violent crime - if the destruction of the West was suicide the media wouldn't need to lie
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  131. AaronB says:
    @ANON
    No you don't have to be immoral to "follow" them. Immorality is departure without some exceptional justification from the mores, that is the customs of your community (those anyway that are accepted as impinging on the rights or welfare of others). Briton's balance of power policies were not by any accepted standards immoral. If something comparable was the conscious policy of Jews in relation to a community they pretended to be wholly loyal to and part of thst would be immoral.

    Jews are also not departing from the norms of their community…..

    If there is no universal law, and that’s the standard then…

    Read More
    • Replies: @ANON
    You missed the point. Deceit is univetsally regarded as immoral with the possible limited exceptions one reads of in purported (actual, I don't doubt) citations from Muslim scriptures.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  132. CanSpeccy says: • Website
    @Wally
    As expected, you have not given us your alleged 'Nazi Philosophy', and cannot.

    No, Zionist controlled Wikipedia will not do.

    And most importantly, there were the ‘Nazis’ with the mythological '6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers' and there were the ‘Nazis’ without the mythological ’6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers’.

    The '6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers' are scientifically impossible frauds.
    see the 'holocaust' scam debunked here:
    http://codoh.com
    No name calling, level playing field debate here:
    http://forum.codoh.com

    As expected, you have not given us your alleged ‘Nazi Philosophy’, and cannot.

    Can’t?

    Have you read Hegel, Marx, Nietzsche, Heidegger?

    It’s megalomaniacal crap.

    Heidegger, a fully paid up member of the Nazi party, spurned reason and was totally incoherent.

    Nietzsche was stark raving mad and finished up in the bin, where all the others should have been consigned.

    Such was the foundation of Nazi policy: we want land, we’ll take it, and the tens of millions in our way we will enslave or kill. In the modern world, pure insanity, as events proved, but fully justified by German philosophy and acted out both in Russia and Germany.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  133. CanSpeccy says: • Website
    @HogHappenin
    Don't be too hard on him. Yes he has some strange thoughts regarding immigration but what he says regarding a 'spiritual awakening' is bang on. Without finding meaning in our lives (which at the moment is driven by pure greed and an uncontrolled lust propagated by the dark forces) one will never be able to muster the conviction that is needed for real change.

    As I have answered to him separately (repeating here), without such an awakening, we will never be able to break free of the shackles of this moribund life that has made us weak, cowardly and utterly lazy to do anything about the covert destruction that these people are wrecking on the west, (and also the overt destruction of the third world that too using first world armies which is utterly shameful for the west). A purely materialistic life will never allow the common westerners to muster the courage to confront these sick bastards which could also involve putting one's life on the line (which most won't be able to do as of now). We all know what happened to Seth rich, what has happened to Snowden and others. They did this I believe despite knowing all too well the risk that they were taking. I believe those people had much more conviction and found a purpose in life unlike the rest of us. Only a life that is not completely drenched in the cesspool that we call modernity can do that

    But this spiritual awakening has to be the stepping stone or the first step on a journey or a revolution to ensure sanity and peace to prevail. So quite some part of what he says is very necessary since without that people won't have the courage or the conviction to rise.

    Don’t be too hard on him. Yes he has some strange thoughts regarding immigration but what he says regarding a ‘spiritual awakening’ is bang on.

    That’s just the usual, “the people get the government they deserve” rubbish. The people get the government that the ruling elite brainwash them into voting for, i.e., labor or conservative, republican or democrat, either way the result being the same; namely, whatever the ruling elite want. If the people are mired in porn, trash TV, and an obsession with money, it’s because that’s what makes the most money most easily for the elite.

    Blaming the people for their own destruction when it is clearly the result of top-down brainwashing is either stupid or the propaganda of a criminal elite.

    Read More
    • Replies: @AaronB
    This is wrong.

    I am not "blaming" the people. Rather, the people are in the grip of bad metaphysics - materialism. The people must emancipate themselves from these conceptual fetters.

    That is all.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  134. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @Man on the street
    There are many Jews who are scheming against the goyim, or plotting to import Muslim terrorists to exterminate Christianity and the Western culture. But, their leaderships are. Similarly, there are many Muslims who are not out rape Christian girls and convert her to Islam, or join ISIS and behead priests, but Islam as it is documented in Hadith and preached in almost ALL mosques justify such barbaric acts.

    As reasonable people demand that 2% of America (the Jews) should not be afforded 80% of decision making positions of our culture? Such fair question or demand cannot be extrapolated to putting all the Jews into ovens?

    “but Islam as it is documented in Hadith and preached in almost ALL mosques justify such barbaric acts.”

    ALL? Really? You have been to the mosque I visit?

    My Imam does not tell us about how important it is to rape Christian girls, join the ISIS or behead priests.

    The “bugger” obviously doesn’t believe!! Off with his head!

    Mendacious fucking bullshitter, is you.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  135. CanSpeccy says: • Website
    @Anonymous
    "...religion of love motivating the Manchester bomber."

    You know how the mofer Little Britain broke Libya for no particular reason, right?

    It is called revenge, or blowback, you fucking scum.

    It has nothing to do with the "religion of love," motivating anything.

    It is called revenge, or blowback, you fucking scum.

    I know the history. So does the Government of the United Kingdom? So why does it admit Muslims who, under the guise of a religion of love, are intent on revenge?

    If you can explain that without resort to use of gerundives, go ahead.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  136. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @Anonymous
    I don't love the Jews and I dint hate them. Are they the most fantastic folks? Sorry, no.
    What about Jewish Chicks? They will go only with other Jews. Also they have big noses and the and they don't like Indians, they hate us and only love hashish.
    Fuck America, Fuck Israel.

    “and they don’t like Indians, they hate us ”

    And here I thought the two peoples love to blow each other.

    Must be a “The enemy of my enemy…,” kind of thing, yeah?

    But, yes… Fuck America, Fuck Israel, and the Fucking White Greedy Psychopathic race.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  137. AaronB says:
    @CanSpeccy

    Don’t be too hard on him. Yes he has some strange thoughts regarding immigration but what he says regarding a ‘spiritual awakening’ is bang on.
     
    That's just the usual, "the people get the government they deserve" rubbish. The people get the government that the ruling elite brainwash them into voting for, i.e., labor or conservative, republican or democrat, either way the result being the same; namely, whatever the ruling elite want. If the people are mired in porn, trash TV, and an obsession with money, it's because that's what makes the most money most easily for the elite.

    Blaming the people for their own destruction when it is clearly the result of top-down brainwashing is either stupid or the propaganda of a criminal elite.

    This is wrong.

    I am not “blaming” the people. Rather, the people are in the grip of bad metaphysics – materialism. The people must emancipate themselves from these conceptual fetters.

    That is all.

    Read More
    • Replies: @CanSpeccy

    The people must emancipate themselves from these conceptual fetters.
     
    OK. Unfuck you.

    But you're crazy.

    The people will never emancipate themselves. The media, the entertainments industry, and the state-controlled K-middle-age "education" system will ensure that.

    Democracy has been high-jacked.

    It never was intended that the masses would decide anything.

    In Britain, when the suffrage was expanded, it was assumed that the people would vote, deferentially, for their betters, the aristocrats, plutocrats and their agents who had ruled since the Revolution of 1688.

    The Labour Party, funded by the great labour unions, screwed things up by introducing an independent, people-oriented faction into Parliament, but globalization and the off-shoring of high wage jobs from the West to the Rest has destroyed the power and wealth of the unions and things are back in the hands of the elite, the "left-wing" parties having been infiltrated by servants of the globalist elite, people like Blair and Clinton.

    And to make sure the people never raise their voices effectively again, highly concentrated news media, publishing and entertainment industries ensures the Money Power control over the range of political options that the public are able to entertain, i.e., Democratic globalism or Republican globalism (with Trump representing either a dangerous revisionism, or a clever elite-devised distraction, as will become evident in due course). And with its control of government, the globalist elite use their control over education to begin the moral degradation and instupidation of the public from the age of five.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  138. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @anon

    the Guardian: “Reported rapes in England and Wales double in four years”? Yes, of course it does. Mass immigration from violent and corrupt Third-World nations inevitably increases crime in Western nations.
     
    i can see how Jews - being a minority - would feel that mass immigration and diversity would make them safer but

    "white flight" is
    - gang-raped 14 yer old white girls
    and
    - gang-stabbed 16 year old white boys

    100,000s of them

    the media-political class have covered it up for 50 years

    “the Guardian: “Reported rapes in England and Wales double in four years”? Yes, of course it does. Mass immigration from violent and corrupt Third-World nations inevitably increases crime in Western nations.”

    LOL! Do you vile racists even understand one implication of the “double” part?

    It simply appears that those wretched third-worlders are just as animal-like as true bred white dicks.

    Does anybody have actual verifiable statistics about the race of these rapists? A quick Google got me this page, which states that rape in Sweden has remained constant even after mass refugee influx.

    http://www.thedailybeast.com/are-migrants-really-raping-swedish-women

    Heck, even Assange who was accused of rape, is suddenly not accused of it anymore.

    Given that mendacity is a core value of the western civilisation, who knows what is really happening. You people make up whatever narrative which suits you.

    Read More
    • Replies: @anon

    Do you vile racists even understand one implication of the “double” part?
     
    1) the Pakistanis rape gangs are far more racist (and vastly more bigoted) than the average of the native population.

    2) you're implying the previous rape statistics weren't disproportionately committed by men of foreign extraction - which they were
    - partly due to age/gender distribution effect of mass low waged immigration
    - partly due to gang culture being a dominant social form in black communities
    - partly due to the specifically Muslim rape gangs and what they euphemistically call "love jihad"
    - partly due to cultures who believe a woman out on her own without a male relative is asking for it.

    The rape stats haven't actually doubled in four years; they have been steadily going up for years as a result of mass immigration. What's happening is the police are slowly unwinding the rigging of the stats now that knowledge of things like the Muslim rape gangs and their tens of thousands of child victims has broken through the media's wall of silence.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  139. geokat62 says:
    @Anonymous
    "...religion of love motivating the Manchester bomber."

    You know how the mofer Little Britain broke Libya for no particular reason, right?

    It is called revenge, or blowback, you fucking scum.

    It has nothing to do with the "religion of love," motivating anything.

    You know how the mofer Little Britain broke Libya for no particular reason, right?

    Oh, there was a particular reason for breaking Libya, alright.

    It was one of the 7 countries [Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Iran] on the hit list General Wesley Clark was good enough to disclose to the world .

    And guess who gets to decide which country is lucky enough to be included on this exclusive list?

    Here’s an excerpt from one of AIPAC’s Guidebook:

    Country Profiles
    Threats in the Region

    Libya
    Libya has used much of its growing oil wealth to accelerate its ballistic missile program and negotiate new arms contracts with Russian and European suppliers. Foreign experts from a range of countries — including Iran — have been assisting its ballistic missile programs. Col. Qaddaffi’s current arsenal of Scud missiles is outdated and its homegrown “Al-Fatah” missile program was slowed by international sanctions. The end of Libyan sanctions, however, is likely to reinvigorate Tripoli’s quest for a means to threaten the region. Western intelligence assessments indicate that Tripoli is seeking to acquire technology related to the North Korean Nodong missile program, and may purchase the Iranian Shahab-3 intermediate-range missile. This would give Libya the ability to strike Israel directly for the first time, as well as place a wide arc of southern Europe in danger. In 2000, North Korean missile components were intercepted en route to Tripoli, a discovery that confirmed suspicions about Libyan activities. Additionally, Libya is seeking a wide range of spare parts for its aging Soviet-supplied arsenal, as well as state-of-the-art Russian air defense missile systems.

    If left unchecked, Libyan leader Qaddafi will be able to target southern NATO allies and Israel with poison gas or germ-tipped rockets, or provide such weapons of mass destruction to terrorist groups. Libya possesses the region’s largest chemical weapons production facility. Additionally, Libya is thought to have cooperated with Iraq to manufacture biological weapons. These weapons, when combined with Libya’s growing ballistic missile capability, create the potential for serious threats, especially given Quaddafi’s erratic nature.

    Libya is a state sponsor of terrorist organizations. The January 2001 verdict finding a Libyan intelligence agent guilty of the bombing of Pan Am 103 in 1988, confirmed what has been widely-known for decades: The government of Libya and its intelligence agencies have directly supported and carried out deadly terrorist attacks throughout the world, particularly targeted at Americans. As a result, Libya remains on the State Department’s list of state sponsors of terrorism and the United States maintains tough economic sanctions.

    The latest edition of the Guidebook has devoted one chapter to Iran. Let’s see how long it takes for them to run the table.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  140. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @anon

    I believe we have a death wish
     
    if that was true the media wouldn't need to lie about the tidal wave of child rape rolling over the West as the result of open borders

    you're trying to deflect attention away from the people who opened the borders for what they saw as their own interests

    “tidal wave of child rape rolling over the West as the result of open borders”

    You are talking about white christian clergymen, right? But, how does open borders, in the context of refugees, matter to them? Can’t they right royally travel all over Europe and America, simply owing to their lily white skins?

    Read More
    • Replies: @anon

    You are talking about white christian clergymen, right?
     
    No, I'm talking about the Muslim rape gangs in UK, France, Holland etc.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  141. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @HogHappenin
    Don't be too hard on him. Yes he has some strange thoughts regarding immigration but what he says regarding a 'spiritual awakening' is bang on. Without finding meaning in our lives (which at the moment is driven by pure greed and an uncontrolled lust propagated by the dark forces) one will never be able to muster the conviction that is needed for real change.

    As I have answered to him separately (repeating here), without such an awakening, we will never be able to break free of the shackles of this moribund life that has made us weak, cowardly and utterly lazy to do anything about the covert destruction that these people are wrecking on the west, (and also the overt destruction of the third world that too using first world armies which is utterly shameful for the west). A purely materialistic life will never allow the common westerners to muster the courage to confront these sick bastards which could also involve putting one's life on the line (which most won't be able to do as of now). We all know what happened to Seth rich, what has happened to Snowden and others. They did this I believe despite knowing all too well the risk that they were taking. I believe those people had much more conviction and found a purpose in life unlike the rest of us. Only a life that is not completely drenched in the cesspool that we call modernity can do that

    But this spiritual awakening has to be the stepping stone or the first step on a journey or a revolution to ensure sanity and peace to prevail. So quite some part of what he says is very necessary since without that people won't have the courage or the conviction to rise.

    “and also the overt destruction of the third world that too using first world armies which is utterly shameful for the west”

    Don’t get me wrong, your heart does appear to be somewhat in the right place, but I also sense an attempt at deflecting blame.

    The proven greed and psychopathy of the white race, cannot all be due to Jewish influence only.

    Read More
    • Replies: @CanSpeccy

    The proven greed and psychopathy of the white race, cannot all be due to Jewish influence only.
     
    That kind of talk is sheer anti-white racism.

    All groups serve their own interests. What you seem to urge is that white people should off themselves because they're self-serving. But you could just as well say the same thing about everyone including yourself, Black Lives Matter, Jews, Hindus, Muslims and the Chinese.

    The fact is the Europeans are being genocided by an evil Money Power elite, who deserve the fate of all traitors, the gallows.

    , @anon

    The proven greed and psychopathy of the white race, cannot all be due to Jewish influence only.
     
    Arab empire

    http://iranpoliticsclub.net/maps/images/112%20Arab%20Islamic%20Caliphate%20Expansion%20Eras%20632-750%20Map.jpg


    Ottoman empire

    https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/originals/6f/1a/e5/6f1ae59ecb5aa3b57fecf6501cf92deb.jpg

    Mongol empire

    https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/originals/18/24/f3/1824f3c6fbf8f1fef66c5f5adc674e5b.jpg

    Arab slave trade

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arab_slave_trade

    etc
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  142. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @anon

    When foolish nations promote their destruction and their imported enemies seek to displace them, blame the Jews.
     
    The three people most directly culpable for opening the UK's borders - the precursor to a tidal wave of child rape - were Jews: Jack Straw, Barbara Roche and Jonathan Portes.

    They are responsible for the 10s of thousands of child rapes that have followed.

    The reason it only took three people to fully open the UK's borders against the direct wishes of the majority is the Jewish-dominated media spent 50 years preparing the ground in advance so 99% of the people who would oppose such a policy kept their mouth shout out of fear of media persecution.

    All the Western nations are targets of what has become a stealth genocide.

    Now "some Jews" is not the same as "the Jews" and originally it might not even have been intended as a stealth genocide - originally it might have been seen as self-protection - but it's clear now the eventual outcome is genocide.

    It's perfectly reasonable to oppose people who support and promote policies leading to your people's genocide.

    “They are responsible for the 10s of thousands of child rapes that have followed.”

    Deceit and lies.

    Let me guess, you are a… white guy… and a greedy psychopathic racist scum.

    Am I right?

    Of course I am.

    Read More
    • Replies: @CanSpeccy

    Let me guess, you are a… white guy… and a greedy psychopathic racist scum.
     
    Don't know what color you are, but you're evidently a cowardly, anonymous, racist, psycho yourself.
    , @anon
    2000 in one town in the UK - dozens of other towns like it

    same happening in France, Holland etc - tens of thousands

    the media have been covering it up for 20 years
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  143. anon says: • Disclaimer
    @AaronB
    I don't think that really addresses my analysis.

    You are describing mechanisms, the machinery of control and repression.

    I am trying to understand why the worst elements of the elite are allowed to set the agenda, why there are no countervailing tendencies - factions - within the elite, and why revolutions from below, which are historically normal, don't occur.

    But I do agree with you that it isn't complicated.

    I don’t think that really addresses my analysis.

    of course – your analysis is designed to deflect attention away from the perpetrators of a massive and ongoing crime and onto the victims

    the answers to your questions are

    1) a combination of campaign funding and media pressure has been filtering membership of the political-media class since at least WW2 – with a few exceptions only the corrupt are allowed through the net (which is why the current political class cannot fix the problem – they need to be replaced)

    2) those members of the elite who are outside the political-media class – e.g. big business – are completely unaware of what is really happening e.g. the tidal wave of child rape that has flowed over Europe in the last 20 years as a result of opening the borders because the media covers it up.

    this is all driven by the combination of banking mafia money and control of the media

    the general moral malaise is the result of the media’s deliberate moral corruption over the last 50 years and is not the cause of anything – that’s just you deflecting

    the simple proof is the media’s constant lying about things like inter-ethnic violent crime – if the destruction of the West was suicide the media wouldn’t need to lie

    Read More
    • Replies: @AaronB
    I am sorry, but I think you once again missed the point.

    You are describing *how* the system works.

    I am asking *why* it operates this way, what factors allow such a system to be set up and perpetuated.

    I find your analysis to be profoundly superficial - you cannot see beyond the functioning of the system itself, to the environment *in which* it functions, and which enables it to do so.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  144. anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Anonymous
    "the Guardian: “Reported rapes in England and Wales double in four years”? Yes, of course it does. Mass immigration from violent and corrupt Third-World nations inevitably increases crime in Western nations."


    LOL! Do you vile racists even understand one implication of the "double" part?

    It simply appears that those wretched third-worlders are just as animal-like as true bred white dicks.

    Does anybody have actual verifiable statistics about the race of these rapists? A quick Google got me this page, which states that rape in Sweden has remained constant even after mass refugee influx.

    http://www.thedailybeast.com/are-migrants-really-raping-swedish-women

    Heck, even Assange who was accused of rape, is suddenly not accused of it anymore.

    Given that mendacity is a core value of the western civilisation, who knows what is really happening. You people make up whatever narrative which suits you.

    Do you vile racists even understand one implication of the “double” part?

    1) the Pakistanis rape gangs are far more racist (and vastly more bigoted) than the average of the native population.

    2) you’re implying the previous rape statistics weren’t disproportionately committed by men of foreign extraction – which they were
    - partly due to age/gender distribution effect of mass low waged immigration
    - partly due to gang culture being a dominant social form in black communities
    - partly due to the specifically Muslim rape gangs and what they euphemistically call “love jihad”
    - partly due to cultures who believe a woman out on her own without a male relative is asking for it.

    The rape stats haven’t actually doubled in four years; they have been steadily going up for years as a result of mass immigration. What’s happening is the police are slowly unwinding the rigging of the stats now that knowledge of things like the Muslim rape gangs and their tens of thousands of child victims has broken through the media’s wall of silence.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  145. anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Anonymous
    "...religion of love motivating the Manchester bomber."

    You know how the mofer Little Britain broke Libya for no particular reason, right?

    It is called revenge, or blowback, you fucking scum.

    It has nothing to do with the "religion of love," motivating anything.

    You know how the mofer Little Britain broke Libya for no particular reason, right?

    It is called revenge, or blowback, you fucking scum.

    The banking mafia paid for the destruction of Libya for the usual reason – extend the central banking network.

    The banking mafia couldn’t care less about a bunch of prole girls at a pop concert getting killed and they pay the politicians/journalists to not care either.

    If people want revenge or to change Western foreign policy then go after the banks – they’re the real rulers.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  146. AaronB says:
    @anon

    I don’t think that really addresses my analysis.
     
    of course - your analysis is designed to deflect attention away from the perpetrators of a massive and ongoing crime and onto the victims

    the answers to your questions are

    1) a combination of campaign funding and media pressure has been filtering membership of the political-media class since at least WW2 - with a few exceptions only the corrupt are allowed through the net (which is why the current political class cannot fix the problem - they need to be replaced)

    2) those members of the elite who are outside the political-media class - e.g. big business - are completely unaware of what is really happening e.g. the tidal wave of child rape that has flowed over Europe in the last 20 years as a result of opening the borders because the media covers it up.

    this is all driven by the combination of banking mafia money and control of the media

    the general moral malaise is the result of the media's deliberate moral corruption over the last 50 years and is not the cause of anything - that's just you deflecting

    the simple proof is the media's constant lying about things like inter-ethnic violent crime - if the destruction of the West was suicide the media wouldn't need to lie

    I am sorry, but I think you once again missed the point.

    You are describing *how* the system works.

    I am asking *why* it operates this way, what factors allow such a system to be set up and perpetuated.

    I find your analysis to be profoundly superficial – you cannot see beyond the functioning of the system itself, to the environment *in which* it functions, and which enables it to do so.

    Read More
    • Replies: @anon
    "why" it operates this way is one of:

    1) desire for cheap labor
    2) ethnic self-protection that got out of hand
    3) deliberate attempt to destroy cohesive nations by the banking mafia for divide and rule
    4) deliberate and intentional stealth genocide

    the environment *in which* it functions, and which enables it to do so.
     
    the environment has been molded this way over the last 50 years through the corruption of the political class via campaign funding and cultural poisoning by the media
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  147. Intro says:
    @Mao Cheng Ji
    Hey buddy. How does your rant relate to anything I said? Oh, never mind, carry on. I hope it made you feel better.

    Oh, everything I’d say.

    What about the excluded middle in this false dichotomy: not caring about any mythical ‘races’ or archaic organized religions?

    What “mythical races” and “archaic organized religions” are you talking about?

    Do you mean Jews and Judaism? People of European descent and Christianism?

    If yes, what should we, gentiles, do if certain people, part of a minority ethnic group representing less than 2% of the population (Jews), but being not only part of the group but strongly identified as Jews and with Israel (traditions, Holocaust, persecution, etc) even holding dual citizenship (Israeli-American or European) and overrepresented among the elites – one could argue, thanks to their group evolutionary strategy – are favoring their own kind over the rest of Americans and Europeans?

    What if from those positions of power and/or influence they support and/or promote policies highly beneficial for their own kind – again, less than 2% of the population – here in the West and in certain far away ethno-states, but detrimental for the rest of the country’s citizens?

    Isn’t this clear conflict of interest a problem to you?

    If yes, shouldn’t we first clearly define the problem before trying to solve it?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Mao Cheng Ji
    Well, if you want my advice, then here it is: like I said, it's better not to think of individuals (including yourself) as members of homogeneous ethnic groups, sharing essential group-characteristics. To avoid essentializing ethnicity. You might oppose Zionism, that's fine, I oppose it too. Ironically, the author of this piece appears to be admiring it.

    Anyway. I don't suppose you really do want my advice, do you?

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  148. CanSpeccy says: • Website
    @AaronB
    This is wrong.

    I am not "blaming" the people. Rather, the people are in the grip of bad metaphysics - materialism. The people must emancipate themselves from these conceptual fetters.

    That is all.

    The people must emancipate themselves from these conceptual fetters.

    OK. Unfuck you.

    But you’re crazy.

    The people will never emancipate themselves. The media, the entertainments industry, and the state-controlled K-middle-age “education” system will ensure that.

    Democracy has been high-jacked.

    It never was intended that the masses would decide anything.

    In Britain, when the suffrage was expanded, it was assumed that the people would vote, deferentially, for their betters, the aristocrats, plutocrats and their agents who had ruled since the Revolution of 1688.

    The Labour Party, funded by the great labour unions, screwed things up by introducing an independent, people-oriented faction into Parliament, but globalization and the off-shoring of high wage jobs from the West to the Rest has destroyed the power and wealth of the unions and things are back in the hands of the elite, the “left-wing” parties having been infiltrated by servants of the globalist elite, people like Blair and Clinton.

    And to make sure the people never raise their voices effectively again, highly concentrated news media, publishing and entertainment industries ensures the Money Power control over the range of political options that the public are able to entertain, i.e., Democratic globalism or Republican globalism (with Trump representing either a dangerous revisionism, or a clever elite-devised distraction, as will become evident in due course). And with its control of government, the globalist elite use their control over education to begin the moral degradation and instupidation of the public from the age of five.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  149. CanSpeccy says: • Website
    @Anonymous
    "and also the overt destruction of the third world that too using first world armies which is utterly shameful for the west"

    Don't get me wrong, your heart does appear to be somewhat in the right place, but I also sense an attempt at deflecting blame.

    The proven greed and psychopathy of the white race, cannot all be due to Jewish influence only.

    The proven greed and psychopathy of the white race, cannot all be due to Jewish influence only.

    That kind of talk is sheer anti-white racism.

    All groups serve their own interests. What you seem to urge is that white people should off themselves because they’re self-serving. But you could just as well say the same thing about everyone including yourself, Black Lives Matter, Jews, Hindus, Muslims and the Chinese.

    The fact is the Europeans are being genocided by an evil Money Power elite, who deserve the fate of all traitors, the gallows.

    Read More
    • Replies: @ANON
    I am disappointed to see you using such UR ranters words as "The fact is the Europeans are being genocided by an evil Money Power elite". I would, nonetheless, be interested in your spelling out who they are and what their reasoning and the actual causal processes are.

    My scepticism will be maintained if you don't look at the worthy upper middle class people of the 1930s to 1960s who were all quasi Christian social democrats and didn't have a single realistic nasty thought about multiculturalism or race. Consider now Merkel's Protestant Christian background (could have been Catholic and even stupider). To blame the "evil Money Power" who are obviously people who have always done well materially out of the status quo when the obvious haters of the status quo are left wing teachers, journalists and second rate academics seems strangely illogical to me, considering the issue a priori.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  150. CanSpeccy says: • Website
    @Anonymous
    "They are responsible for the 10s of thousands of child rapes that have followed."

    Deceit and lies.

    Let me guess, you are a... white guy... and a greedy psychopathic racist scum.

    Am I right?

    Of course I am.

    Let me guess, you are a… white guy… and a greedy psychopathic racist scum.

    Don’t know what color you are, but you’re evidently a cowardly, anonymous, racist, psycho yourself.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  151. @animalogic
    The Jew's are an amazing race. Just imagine, a person thinking "I am one of God's chosen" . God, who created the WHOLE universe has selected ME & a relatively miniscule number of my race as the special ones, as his chosen ones, the literal focus of divine affairs on earth...in the whole universe. It's no wonder the Jews' created the word "chutzpah"....
    Yes, they are the chosen race....but, "race" ? Is it mere genetics ? What about all those so-called "self hating Jew's" ? What about JESUS ? Wasn't he a Jew ? Are they "chosen" ? I don't know, they still believe, even love the old Testament God, but...I get the impression that many Jew's don't think such people ARE chosen. I get the impression they're ...traitors.... So, maybe race isn't the key.
    Perhaps, God's choice - or, at least the public sense of that exceptuality, lies with the commitment to the interests of the Jewish race & their social embodiment in the state of Israel ? A self hating Jew doesn't necessarily not love God...no, usually, the self hater has doubted, questioned, or even criticised some aspect of collective Jewish behaviour....like Jesus did.
    A cynic could almost believe that the Jewish religion, as a public entity, is no more than collective SELF LOVE...with it's partners in crime, ARROGANCE & CONTEMPT for "the others"....

    If you are religious,you are delusional. Thats why its so easy to claim that you are the center, the chosen, the whatever. If some one is going to lie to themselves for their entire lives, they have to find a way to feel good about it, right?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  152. anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Anonymous
    "tidal wave of child rape rolling over the West as the result of open borders"

    You are talking about white christian clergymen, right? But, how does open borders, in the context of refugees, matter to them? Can't they right royally travel all over Europe and America, simply owing to their lily white skins?

    You are talking about white christian clergymen, right?

    No, I’m talking about the Muslim rape gangs in UK, France, Holland etc.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  153. @Intro
    Oh, everything I'd say.

    What about the excluded middle in this false dichotomy: not caring about any mythical ‘races’ or archaic organized religions?
     
    What "mythical races" and "archaic organized religions" are you talking about?

    Do you mean Jews and Judaism? People of European descent and Christianism?

    If yes, what should we, gentiles, do if certain people, part of a minority ethnic group representing less than 2% of the population (Jews), but being not only part of the group but strongly identified as Jews and with Israel (traditions, Holocaust, persecution, etc) even holding dual citizenship (Israeli-American or European) and overrepresented among the elites - one could argue, thanks to their group evolutionary strategy - are favoring their own kind over the rest of Americans and Europeans?

    What if from those positions of power and/or influence they support and/or promote policies highly beneficial for their own kind - again, less than 2% of the population - here in the West and in certain far away ethno-states, but detrimental for the rest of the country's citizens?

    Isn't this clear conflict of interest a problem to you?

    If yes, shouldn't we first clearly define the problem before trying to solve it?

    Well, if you want my advice, then here it is: like I said, it’s better not to think of individuals (including yourself) as members of homogeneous ethnic groups, sharing essential group-characteristics. To avoid essentializing ethnicity. You might oppose Zionism, that’s fine, I oppose it too. Ironically, the author of this piece appears to be admiring it.

    Anyway. I don’t suppose you really do want my advice, do you?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Intro

    Well, if you want my advice, then here it is: like I said, it’s better not to think of individuals (including yourself) as members of homogeneous ethnic groups, sharing essential group-characteristics. To avoid essentializing ethnicity. You might oppose Zionism, that’s fine, I oppose it too. Ironically, the author of this piece appears to be admiring it.
     
    I am a bit confused now. You haven't answered a single one of my questions. So to my clear questions:

    1.- What should we, gentiles, do if certain people, part of a minority ethnic group representing less than 2% of the population (Jews), but being not only part of the group but strongly identified as Jews and with Israel (traditions, Holocaust, persecution, etc) even holding dual citizenship (Israeli-American/European) and overrepresented among the elites - one could argue, thanks to their group evolutionary strategy - are favoring their own kind over the rest of Americans and Europeans?
     

    2.- What if from those positions of power and/or influence they support and/or promote policies highly beneficial for their own kind - again, less than 2% of the population - here in the West and in certain far away ethno-states, but detrimental for the rest of the country's citizens?

     

    Your answer is:

    It’s better not to think of individuals (including yourself) as members of homogeneous ethnic groups, sharing essential group-characteristics.
     
    So are you suggesting that wishful thinking, i.e. ignoring the ethnic aspect of the phenomenon will help us (people not identified as Jews and opposed to said policies detrimental to us) to better tackle it?

    Do you at least acknowledge the indisputable ethnic aspect of the phenomenon?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  154. @jilles dykstra
    They of course, in any case some of them, discuss strategy and goals, as every group on this earth does.
    However, if your identity is 'eternal innocent victim', you must control the world, I suppose.
    Jews are so under the influence of the holocaust, and the fact that in the thirties indeed hardly any country, also not the USA, accepted jewish refugees, that it maybe is decisive on anything they do.
    Trump, still is my impression, has given up the idea that the USA can and must control the world.
    Those that see world control as their sole way to remain in existence as a people, or a culture, now are, I suppose, desperate.
    They not only lost the perspective of world control, they also lost control of the USA, the USA that is the sole power behind Israel.
    When Trump was in Israel Netanyahu's body language was clear, he's no longer in control.

    see
    http://age-of-treason.com/2013/03/01/stephen-steinlight-on-jewish-power-and-interests/

    I always thought no one accepted jewish refugees because throughout European history, jewish interests were solely jewish. Like gypsies. You dont want to bring in a foreign peoples that dont want to assimilate (atleast that used to be a thing).

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  155. anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Anonymous
    "and also the overt destruction of the third world that too using first world armies which is utterly shameful for the west"

    Don't get me wrong, your heart does appear to be somewhat in the right place, but I also sense an attempt at deflecting blame.

    The proven greed and psychopathy of the white race, cannot all be due to Jewish influence only.

    The proven greed and psychopathy of the white race, cannot all be due to Jewish influence only.

    Arab empire

    Ottoman empire

    Mongol empire

    Arab slave trade

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arab_slave_trade

    etc

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  156. Art says:
    @AaronB
    I'm all in favor of local ownership and government. I think that's a wonderful idea.

    I do think there are many practical measures that can improve things, but they all depend on a "waking up" from the nightmare of materialism. In other words there are no purely political solutions. It is not simply a matter of organization.

    As long as we don't believe in the non-visible, only material things will prevail - money, profit, power, etc.

    I should also add that I don't think it is desirable or possible to create paradise on earth - the best society is one that is focused "away" from earthly concerns and towards the transcendent. To the extent that we do that, things will naturally click into place, and we will achieve a happy detachment from the inanity and triviality of earthly things like money, power, status, fame, etc.

    Not of all of us, of course - there will always be bad men, the earth-bound, and the spiritually dead. Such people will be a huge part of any "elite" - we need to accept that. But things can be OK, if not perfect, if some significant section of the populace is "awake" - let the child-men play their game of money and power, so long as we can pursue what really matters.

    One of the most tragic things to have happened is the rupturing of the strange alliance between the evil men and the spiritual men that existed for most of history - the alliance by which spiritual men were content to leave power and wealth to those who burned with desire for them, as things scarcely worth having, while they pursued spiritual treasures and helped make the common people content with their lot by helping them overcome desire and ego.

    Today, the wealth and power of the evil men depend precisely on the common men being discontent and restless , egotistic and burning with desire- so they can be good consumers. Alas, the alliance that held for so long is gone!

    But that's for another time.

    I should also add that I don’t think it is desirable or possible to create paradise on earth – the best society is one that is focused “away” from earthly concerns and towards the transcendent. To the extent that we do that, things will naturally click into place, and we will achieve a happy detachment from the inanity and triviality of earthly things like money, power, status, fame, etc.

    Am not into Eastern transcendental philosophy. With that said, here is an interesting valued book on Eastern philosophy and physics. The Dancing Wu Li Masters – by Gary Zukav.

    https://www.amazon.com/Dancing-Wu-Li-Masters-Overview/dp/0060959681

    I am into practical Christian philosophy. I believe in the words of Jesus – I believe they describe a path to a practical everyday idealistic way of life. It is not necessary to be religious Christian to benefit from Jesus’ philosophy. In fact, the world’s best, most idealistic standards for human organization are already derived from Christianity. With the current on slot of Jew tribal coercion, they are losing favor – but if there is going to be a good world, they will be back.

    The idealistic Christian does in the now – what will benefit all those touched (including self) by those actions – tomorrow.

    It is a great joy to realize, that what you did yesterday, actually made things better for all today.

    Within the confines of Christian philosophy, one does not have to be successful every day – just most days. This we can do. We forgive the bad days and take joy in the good ones.

    Peace — Art

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  157. anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Anonymous
    "They are responsible for the 10s of thousands of child rapes that have followed."

    Deceit and lies.

    Let me guess, you are a... white guy... and a greedy psychopathic racist scum.

    Am I right?

    Of course I am.

    2000 in one town in the UK – dozens of other towns like it

    same happening in France, Holland etc – tens of thousands

    the media have been covering it up for 20 years

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  158. anon says: • Disclaimer
    @AaronB
    I am sorry, but I think you once again missed the point.

    You are describing *how* the system works.

    I am asking *why* it operates this way, what factors allow such a system to be set up and perpetuated.

    I find your analysis to be profoundly superficial - you cannot see beyond the functioning of the system itself, to the environment *in which* it functions, and which enables it to do so.

    “why” it operates this way is one of:

    1) desire for cheap labor
    2) ethnic self-protection that got out of hand
    3) deliberate attempt to destroy cohesive nations by the banking mafia for divide and rule
    4) deliberate and intentional stealth genocide

    the environment *in which* it functions, and which enables it to do so.

    the environment has been molded this way over the last 50 years through the corruption of the political class via campaign funding and cultural poisoning by the media

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  159. ANON says: • Disclaimer
    @AaronB
    Jews are also not departing from the norms of their community.....

    If there is no universal law, and that's the standard then...

    You missed the point. Deceit is univetsally regarded as immoral with the possible limited exceptions one reads of in purported (actual, I don’t doubt) citations from Muslim scriptures.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  160. Anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Anonymous
    "Christianity is “pessimistic”, it seeks liberation from this world, in favor of a better one.

    Christianity is more Indian"


    Indian, like pagan Hinduism? In that you are absolutely right!

    Christianity clearly took inspiration from that pagan faith, with its whole man-god dogma. I wonder if your beastly Churchell saw the strong connection, given his "love" for that "beastly" faith? RIH Churchell.

    Then, keeping in mind that "Christianity is more Indian," and the "Indian's" concept of multiple reincarnations into the same world, your two statements above appear to be contradictory.

    If you want to make sure your ramblings are (correctly) regarded as a waste of space combine being anonymous with misspellings that only the truly, widely and profoundly, ignorant could perpetrate. “Churchell” (sic)! Was that from a comic book history?

    Read More
    • Replies: @CanSpeccy
    WTF? Why is nearly every comment by Anonymous or Anon. Are these people total devoid of imagination or they simply trying to create confusion?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  161. CanSpeccy says: • Website
    @Anon
    If you want to make sure your ramblings are (correctly) regarded as a waste of space combine being anonymous with misspellings that only the truly, widely and profoundly, ignorant could perpetrate. "Churchell" (sic)! Was that from a comic book history?

    WTF? Why is nearly every comment by Anonymous or Anon. Are these people total devoid of imagination or they simply trying to create confusion?

    Read More
    • Replies: @ANON
    I wouldn't know, but speaking for myself (problematically, because how, even with imagination, am I to know who I am?) I find anon with Caps lock on economical of effort and, so far, a touch distinctive.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  162. Art says:

    London is today paying the price of Jew control of Brit culture. Tony Blair screwed Iraq – today is a small measure of blow back!

    This anger starts with Israel. Just like in America, Jews invited in those hateful Muslims into our countries. The Jews visited those angry Muslims on the Brit folks.

    Why are Christians and Muslims killing each other?

    The last mayor of London was a Jew – the current one is a Muslim – it is time for Christians to reassert Christianity in England – PERIOD!

    Peace — Art

    p.s. Oh my – the Brit prime minister just found her Brit gonads and used the “Terror” word. (but of course – NOT – the “Islamic Terror” words.)

    p.s. Jews escape their evil doings once again (Israel is cheerful.)

    Read More
    • Replies: @anon

    This anger starts with Israel.
     
    Nigeria?
    Philippines?
    China?

    Islam has always been expansionist - it's inherent in the religion - it was temporarily halted for 200 years when western technology was combined with the will to use it.

    Clearly Israel makes it worse - indirectly and probably directly as well - and that weighs on one side of the balance but it also led me to find out what Islam actually says - and what Islam says won't do, at all.

    crusade time imo
    , @geokat62

    Why are Christians and Muslims killing each other?
     
    Great question, Art.

    The answer to that question was revealed by George W Bush back in 2002 when he gave his SOU address in which he coined the phrase Axis of Evil* to refer to Iraq, Iran, and NK (cleverly substituted for Syria so as to not make things too obvious for The Dumb Goyim) a few months after the events of 9/11.

    You see Bush, a born again xtian, along with Blair, also a born again xtian (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/religion/5373525/Tony-Blair-believed-God-wanted-him-to-go-to-war-to-fight-evil-claims-his-mentor.html), were both intent on liberating the Holy Land from the infidels, as was revealed when Bush referred to the newly launched GWOT as a "crusade." He was immediately admonished for doing so, but the cat had already been let out of the bag, for those who were not too steeped in the prevailing Hasbara. These two Shabbos Goy were eager to execute the game plan that had already been set out decades earlier in the Oded Yinon Plan and PNAC's A Clean Break (cofounded by William Kristol and Robert Kaganovich).

    You have to admit that it's a brilliant plan: get the xtians to slaughter the Muslims to secure the villa in the jungle by spending trillions of their own tax dollars and spilling gallons of their own blood, while the Zionists pull out their couches to watch the bloodshed.

    The only risk to this brilliant plan is if western leaders who are less than enthusiastic about waging the phony GWOT should come to power. That explains the dirty tricks they used to defeat Ron Paul in the primaries, the demonization of Donald Trump when he announced he would put an end to more wars for regime change, and Jeremy Corban, for suggesting these regime change wars may have something to do with the spike in terrorist attacks against those countries that participated in the phony GWOT - i.e., the big risk is if The Dumb Goyim come to realize the phony GWOT is not meant to make them more safe. It is really meant to make citizens of the villa more safe, at the expense of making The Dumb Goyim less safe.

    btw - now we know why the term Judeo-Christian had become more popularized just after WWII. It had been preparatory work to launch the 10th Crusade half a century later.

    * Axis of Evil was actually coined by neocon David Frum. This was discovered after his wife boasted about it online to all her friends.

    , @CanSpeccy

    Oh my – the Brit prime minister just found her Brit gonads and used the “Terror” word.
     
    She also said, in that lovely Awxfud accent, "Enough is enough," which may not be enough. In fact, it seems more like a declaration of total cluelessness. So look forward to a Corbyn admin which, it is said, will welcome an increased flood of migrants, who whether intent on cutting English throats, or merely occupying the country will, whether as the result of a coordinated plan or merely astounding ruling class stupidity, result in the:

    destruction of the essential foundations of the life of [the] national group so that [it]wither[s] and die[s] like [a] plant that has suffered a blight. The end may be accomplished by the forced disintegration of political and social institutions, of the culture of the people, of their language, their national feelings and their religion. It may be accomplished by wiping out all basis of personal security, liberty, health and dignity. ...

    Raphael Lemkin, the Polish Jew and legal scholar who coined the term Genocide
     

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  163. ANON says: • Disclaimer
    @CanSpeccy
    WTF? Why is nearly every comment by Anonymous or Anon. Are these people total devoid of imagination or they simply trying to create confusion?

    I wouldn’t know, but speaking for myself (problematically, because how, even with imagination, am I to know who I am?) I find anon with Caps lock on economical of effort and, so far, a touch distinctive.

    Read More
    • Replies: @CanSpeccy
    Sheesh! Another of them.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  164. What this article documents is opportunism, in various forms. If the Jewish Chronicle and/or Finkelstein rejected the SDP, it was not because it was considered insufficiently pro-Israel. It was because it failed as a political force, merging into the Liberals to form the Liberal Democrats, who later gained more seats (in 1997) but still remained in the bronze medal position among British political parties. True believers might stick around in a force not making headway but none of the people described here are true believers, perhaps not even in Judaism.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  165. anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Art
    London is today paying the price of Jew control of Brit culture. Tony Blair screwed Iraq - today is a small measure of blow back!

    This anger starts with Israel. Just like in America, Jews invited in those hateful Muslims into our countries. The Jews visited those angry Muslims on the Brit folks.

    Why are Christians and Muslims killing each other?

    The last mayor of London was a Jew – the current one is a Muslim – it is time for Christians to reassert Christianity in England – PERIOD!

    Peace --- Art

    p.s. Oh my – the Brit prime minister just found her Brit gonads and used the “Terror” word. (but of course - NOT - the “Islamic Terror” words.)

    p.s. Jews escape their evil doings once again (Israel is cheerful.)

    This anger starts with Israel.

    Nigeria?
    Philippines?
    China?

    Islam has always been expansionist – it’s inherent in the religion – it was temporarily halted for 200 years when western technology was combined with the will to use it.

    Clearly Israel makes it worse – indirectly and probably directly as well – and that weighs on one side of the balance but it also led me to find out what Islam actually says – and what Islam says won’t do, at all.

    crusade time imo

    Read More
    • Replies: @Art

    Clearly Israel makes it worse – indirectly and probably directly as well – and that weighs on one side of the balance but it also led me to find out what Islam actually says – and what Islam says won’t do, at all.
     
    Why is Trump building a coalition between Zionism and Wahhabism - Israel and Saudi?

    This is crazy – this is mad! Those ism’s feed ISIS! There is nothing in that policy that is good for the American people or the future of anyone - PERIOD. For sure it means a war on Iran.

    Clearly, Jew Jared is in charge!

    Peace --- Art

    p.s. Jesus said “blessed are the peacemakers.”

    p.s. Where are they?

    p.s. Truth - they are smothered by Jew control of the media.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  166. geokat62 says:
    @Art
    London is today paying the price of Jew control of Brit culture. Tony Blair screwed Iraq - today is a small measure of blow back!

    This anger starts with Israel. Just like in America, Jews invited in those hateful Muslims into our countries. The Jews visited those angry Muslims on the Brit folks.

    Why are Christians and Muslims killing each other?

    The last mayor of London was a Jew – the current one is a Muslim – it is time for Christians to reassert Christianity in England – PERIOD!

    Peace --- Art

    p.s. Oh my – the Brit prime minister just found her Brit gonads and used the “Terror” word. (but of course - NOT - the “Islamic Terror” words.)

    p.s. Jews escape their evil doings once again (Israel is cheerful.)

    Why are Christians and Muslims killing each other?

    Great question, Art.

    The answer to that question was revealed by George W Bush back in 2002 when he gave his SOU address in which he coined the phrase Axis of Evil* to refer to Iraq, Iran, and NK (cleverly substituted for Syria so as to not make things too obvious for The Dumb Goyim) a few months after the events of 9/11.

    You see Bush, a born again xtian, along with Blair, also a born again xtian (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/religion/5373525/Tony-Blair-believed-God-wanted-him-to-go-to-war-to-fight-evil-claims-his-mentor.html), were both intent on liberating the Holy Land from the infidels, as was revealed when Bush referred to the newly launched GWOT as a “crusade.” He was immediately admonished for doing so, but the cat had already been let out of the bag, for those who were not too steeped in the prevailing Hasbara. These two Shabbos Goy were eager to execute the game plan that had already been set out decades earlier in the Oded Yinon Plan and PNAC’s A Clean Break (cofounded by William Kristol and Robert Kaganovich).

    You have to admit that it’s a brilliant plan: get the xtians to slaughter the Muslims to secure the villa in the jungle by spending trillions of their own tax dollars and spilling gallons of their own blood, while the Zionists pull out their couches to watch the bloodshed.

    The only risk to this brilliant plan is if western leaders who are less than enthusiastic about waging the phony GWOT should come to power. That explains the dirty tricks they used to defeat Ron Paul in the primaries, the demonization of Donald Trump when he announced he would put an end to more wars for regime change, and Jeremy Corban, for suggesting these regime change wars may have something to do with the spike in terrorist attacks against those countries that participated in the phony GWOT – i.e., the big risk is if The Dumb Goyim come to realize the phony GWOT is not meant to make them more safe. It is really meant to make citizens of the villa more safe, at the expense of making The Dumb Goyim less safe.

    btw – now we know why the term Judeo-Christian had become more popularized just after WWII. It had been preparatory work to launch the 10th Crusade half a century later.

    * Axis of Evil was actually coined by neocon David Frum. This was discovered after his wife boasted about it online to all her friends.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Art

    These two Shabbos Goy (Bush Blair) were eager to execute the game plan that had already been set out decades earlier in the Oded Yinon Plan and PNAC’s A Clean Break (cofounded by William Kristol and Robert Kaganovich).
     
    Now Jared Trump, under the false flag of attacking ISIS - is building a coalition between Israel and Saudi to attack the last one on the PNAC list - Iran.

    Peace --- Art

    p.s. Sorry, but have to be honest – it looks like Obama is the only one with an ounce of balls.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  167. Intro says:
    @Mao Cheng Ji
    Well, if you want my advice, then here it is: like I said, it's better not to think of individuals (including yourself) as members of homogeneous ethnic groups, sharing essential group-characteristics. To avoid essentializing ethnicity. You might oppose Zionism, that's fine, I oppose it too. Ironically, the author of this piece appears to be admiring it.

    Anyway. I don't suppose you really do want my advice, do you?

    Well, if you want my advice, then here it is: like I said, it’s better not to think of individuals (including yourself) as members of homogeneous ethnic groups, sharing essential group-characteristics. To avoid essentializing ethnicity. You might oppose Zionism, that’s fine, I oppose it too. Ironically, the author of this piece appears to be admiring it.

    I am a bit confused now. You haven’t answered a single one of my questions. So to my clear questions:

    1.- What should we, gentiles, do if certain people, part of a minority ethnic group representing less than 2% of the population (Jews), but being not only part of the group but strongly identified as Jews and with Israel (traditions, Holocaust, persecution, etc) even holding dual citizenship (Israeli-American/European) and overrepresented among the elites – one could argue, thanks to their group evolutionary strategy – are favoring their own kind over the rest of Americans and Europeans?

    2.- What if from those positions of power and/or influence they support and/or promote policies highly beneficial for their own kind – again, less than 2% of the population – here in the West and in certain far away ethno-states, but detrimental for the rest of the country’s citizens?

    Your answer is:

    It’s better not to think of individuals (including yourself) as members of homogeneous ethnic groups, sharing essential group-characteristics.

    So are you suggesting that wishful thinking, i.e. ignoring the ethnic aspect of the phenomenon will help us (people not identified as Jews and opposed to said policies detrimental to us) to better tackle it?

    Do you at least acknowledge the indisputable ethnic aspect of the phenomenon?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Mao Cheng Ji

    Do you at least acknowledge the indisputable ethnic aspect of the phenomenon?
     
    What phenomenon? Why would you (or anyone else) care to psychoanalyze an imprecisely defined group of people, most of whom have little (if anything at all) in common? Again: don't essentialize ethnicity.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  168. CanSpeccy says: • Website
    @ANON
    I wouldn't know, but speaking for myself (problematically, because how, even with imagination, am I to know who I am?) I find anon with Caps lock on economical of effort and, so far, a touch distinctive.

    Sheesh! Another of them.

    Read More
    • Replies: @ANON
    How insulting. Can you not recognise the bold and distinctive individuality in a CAPs locked nameless personage? Think Royal household. Think Romanov. Think Rasputin's nephew....
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  169. CanSpeccy says: • Website
    @Art
    London is today paying the price of Jew control of Brit culture. Tony Blair screwed Iraq - today is a small measure of blow back!

    This anger starts with Israel. Just like in America, Jews invited in those hateful Muslims into our countries. The Jews visited those angry Muslims on the Brit folks.

    Why are Christians and Muslims killing each other?

    The last mayor of London was a Jew – the current one is a Muslim – it is time for Christians to reassert Christianity in England – PERIOD!

    Peace --- Art

    p.s. Oh my – the Brit prime minister just found her Brit gonads and used the “Terror” word. (but of course - NOT - the “Islamic Terror” words.)

    p.s. Jews escape their evil doings once again (Israel is cheerful.)

    Oh my – the Brit prime minister just found her Brit gonads and used the “Terror” word.

    She also said, in that lovely Awxfud accent, “Enough is enough,” which may not be enough. In fact, it seems more like a declaration of total cluelessness. So look forward to a Corbyn admin which, it is said, will welcome an increased flood of migrants, who whether intent on cutting English throats, or merely occupying the country will, whether as the result of a coordinated plan or merely astounding ruling class stupidity, result in the:

    destruction of the essential foundations of the life of [the] national group so that [it]wither[s] and die[s] like [a] plant that has suffered a blight. The end may be accomplished by the forced disintegration of political and social institutions, of the culture of the people, of their language, their national feelings and their religion. It may be accomplished by wiping out all basis of personal security, liberty, health and dignity. …

    Raphael Lemkin, the Polish Jew and legal scholar who coined the term Genocide

    Read More
    • Replies: @CanSpeccy
    UK PM Theresa May confirms she's either a moron or an accomplice in the destruction of England:

    ... says the internet must now be regulated following London Bridge terror attack

    She had the opportunity to show leadership but instead has demonstrated flaccid stupidity.

    She should have invoked emergency powers and rounded up the 23,000 jihadis and 3,000 potential terrorists that the security services say are present in Britain and deported every damn one of them.

    Pathetic.

    This is the way the world ends
    Not with a bang but a whimper.

    A whimper of "enough is a enough" from a limp rag from Awxfud, source of that limp rag, her treasonous predecessor, David Cameron.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  170. @Intro

    Well, if you want my advice, then here it is: like I said, it’s better not to think of individuals (including yourself) as members of homogeneous ethnic groups, sharing essential group-characteristics. To avoid essentializing ethnicity. You might oppose Zionism, that’s fine, I oppose it too. Ironically, the author of this piece appears to be admiring it.
     
    I am a bit confused now. You haven't answered a single one of my questions. So to my clear questions:

    1.- What should we, gentiles, do if certain people, part of a minority ethnic group representing less than 2% of the population (Jews), but being not only part of the group but strongly identified as Jews and with Israel (traditions, Holocaust, persecution, etc) even holding dual citizenship (Israeli-American/European) and overrepresented among the elites - one could argue, thanks to their group evolutionary strategy - are favoring their own kind over the rest of Americans and Europeans?
     

    2.- What if from those positions of power and/or influence they support and/or promote policies highly beneficial for their own kind - again, less than 2% of the population - here in the West and in certain far away ethno-states, but detrimental for the rest of the country's citizens?

     

    Your answer is:

    It’s better not to think of individuals (including yourself) as members of homogeneous ethnic groups, sharing essential group-characteristics.
     
    So are you suggesting that wishful thinking, i.e. ignoring the ethnic aspect of the phenomenon will help us (people not identified as Jews and opposed to said policies detrimental to us) to better tackle it?

    Do you at least acknowledge the indisputable ethnic aspect of the phenomenon?

    Do you at least acknowledge the indisputable ethnic aspect of the phenomenon?

    What phenomenon? Why would you (or anyone else) care to psychoanalyze an imprecisely defined group of people, most of whom have little (if anything at all) in common? Again: don’t essentialize ethnicity.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Intro
    Who is trying to psychoanalyze here anyone?

    Who is essentializing ethnicity?

    My questions in comment 167 superficially *describe* the phenomenon. Check the two following books if you need more detailed information from good and unbiased sources. I am not here to educate you.

    https://www.amazon.de/Jewish-Power-Inside-American-Establishment/dp/0201327988

    https://www.amazon.de/Israel-Lobby-U-S-Foreign-Policy/dp/0374531501


    The IYI pathologizes others for doing things he doesn’t understand without ever realizing it is his understanding that may be limited.

     

    https://medium.com/incerto/the-intellectual-yet-idiot-13211e2d0577

    Check also the link out. A really interesting read describing the condition you suffer intermittently, seemingly in outbreaks.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  171. CanSpeccy says: • Website
    @CanSpeccy

    Oh my – the Brit prime minister just found her Brit gonads and used the “Terror” word.
     
    She also said, in that lovely Awxfud accent, "Enough is enough," which may not be enough. In fact, it seems more like a declaration of total cluelessness. So look forward to a Corbyn admin which, it is said, will welcome an increased flood of migrants, who whether intent on cutting English throats, or merely occupying the country will, whether as the result of a coordinated plan or merely astounding ruling class stupidity, result in the:

    destruction of the essential foundations of the life of [the] national group so that [it]wither[s] and die[s] like [a] plant that has suffered a blight. The end may be accomplished by the forced disintegration of political and social institutions, of the culture of the people, of their language, their national feelings and their religion. It may be accomplished by wiping out all basis of personal security, liberty, health and dignity. ...

    Raphael Lemkin, the Polish Jew and legal scholar who coined the term Genocide
     

    UK PM Theresa May confirms she’s either a moron or an accomplice in the destruction of England:

    … says the internet must now be regulated following London Bridge terror attack

    She had the opportunity to show leadership but instead has demonstrated flaccid stupidity.

    She should have invoked emergency powers and rounded up the 23,000 jihadis and 3,000 potential terrorists that the security services say are present in Britain and deported every damn one of them.

    Pathetic.

    This is the way the world ends
    Not with a bang but a whimper.

    A whimper of “enough is a enough” from a limp rag from Awxfud, source of that limp rag, her treasonous predecessor, David Cameron.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  172. Art says:
    @anon

    This anger starts with Israel.
     
    Nigeria?
    Philippines?
    China?

    Islam has always been expansionist - it's inherent in the religion - it was temporarily halted for 200 years when western technology was combined with the will to use it.

    Clearly Israel makes it worse - indirectly and probably directly as well - and that weighs on one side of the balance but it also led me to find out what Islam actually says - and what Islam says won't do, at all.

    crusade time imo

    Clearly Israel makes it worse – indirectly and probably directly as well – and that weighs on one side of the balance but it also led me to find out what Islam actually says – and what Islam says won’t do, at all.

    Why is Trump building a coalition between Zionism and Wahhabism – Israel and Saudi?

    This is crazy – this is mad! Those ism’s feed ISIS! There is nothing in that policy that is good for the American people or the future of anyone – PERIOD. For sure it means a war on Iran.

    Clearly, Jew Jared is in charge!

    Peace — Art

    p.s. Jesus said “blessed are the peacemakers.”

    p.s. Where are they?

    p.s. Truth – they are smothered by Jew control of the media.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  173. Art says:
    @geokat62

    Why are Christians and Muslims killing each other?
     
    Great question, Art.

    The answer to that question was revealed by George W Bush back in 2002 when he gave his SOU address in which he coined the phrase Axis of Evil* to refer to Iraq, Iran, and NK (cleverly substituted for Syria so as to not make things too obvious for The Dumb Goyim) a few months after the events of 9/11.

    You see Bush, a born again xtian, along with Blair, also a born again xtian (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/religion/5373525/Tony-Blair-believed-God-wanted-him-to-go-to-war-to-fight-evil-claims-his-mentor.html), were both intent on liberating the Holy Land from the infidels, as was revealed when Bush referred to the newly launched GWOT as a "crusade." He was immediately admonished for doing so, but the cat had already been let out of the bag, for those who were not too steeped in the prevailing Hasbara. These two Shabbos Goy were eager to execute the game plan that had already been set out decades earlier in the Oded Yinon Plan and PNAC's A Clean Break (cofounded by William Kristol and Robert Kaganovich).

    You have to admit that it's a brilliant plan: get the xtians to slaughter the Muslims to secure the villa in the jungle by spending trillions of their own tax dollars and spilling gallons of their own blood, while the Zionists pull out their couches to watch the bloodshed.

    The only risk to this brilliant plan is if western leaders who are less than enthusiastic about waging the phony GWOT should come to power. That explains the dirty tricks they used to defeat Ron Paul in the primaries, the demonization of Donald Trump when he announced he would put an end to more wars for regime change, and Jeremy Corban, for suggesting these regime change wars may have something to do with the spike in terrorist attacks against those countries that participated in the phony GWOT - i.e., the big risk is if The Dumb Goyim come to realize the phony GWOT is not meant to make them more safe. It is really meant to make citizens of the villa more safe, at the expense of making The Dumb Goyim less safe.

    btw - now we know why the term Judeo-Christian had become more popularized just after WWII. It had been preparatory work to launch the 10th Crusade half a century later.

    * Axis of Evil was actually coined by neocon David Frum. This was discovered after his wife boasted about it online to all her friends.

    These two Shabbos Goy (Bush Blair) were eager to execute the game plan that had already been set out decades earlier in the Oded Yinon Plan and PNAC’s A Clean Break (cofounded by William Kristol and Robert Kaganovich).

    Now Jared Trump, under the false flag of attacking ISIS – is building a coalition between Israel and Saudi to attack the last one on the PNAC list – Iran.

    Peace — Art

    p.s. Sorry, but have to be honest – it looks like Obama is the only one with an ounce of balls.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  174. Intro says:
    @Mao Cheng Ji

    Do you at least acknowledge the indisputable ethnic aspect of the phenomenon?
     
    What phenomenon? Why would you (or anyone else) care to psychoanalyze an imprecisely defined group of people, most of whom have little (if anything at all) in common? Again: don't essentialize ethnicity.

    Who is trying to psychoanalyze here anyone?

    Who is essentializing ethnicity?

    My questions in comment 167 superficially *describe* the phenomenon. Check the two following books if you need more detailed information from good and unbiased sources. I am not here to educate you.

    https://www.amazon.de/Jewish-Power-Inside-American-Establishment/dp/0201327988

    https://www.amazon.de/Israel-Lobby-U-S-Foreign-Policy/dp/0374531501

    The IYI pathologizes others for doing things he doesn’t understand without ever realizing it is his understanding that may be limited.

    https://medium.com/incerto/the-intellectual-yet-idiot-13211e2d0577

    Check also the link out. A really interesting read describing the condition you suffer intermittently, seemingly in outbreaks.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  175. ANON says: • Disclaimer
    @CanSpeccy
    Sheesh! Another of them.

    How insulting. Can you not recognise the bold and distinctive individuality in a CAPs locked nameless personage? Think Royal household. Think Romanov. Think Rasputin’s nephew….

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  176. ANON says: • Disclaimer
    @CanSpeccy

    The proven greed and psychopathy of the white race, cannot all be due to Jewish influence only.
     
    That kind of talk is sheer anti-white racism.

    All groups serve their own interests. What you seem to urge is that white people should off themselves because they're self-serving. But you could just as well say the same thing about everyone including yourself, Black Lives Matter, Jews, Hindus, Muslims and the Chinese.

    The fact is the Europeans are being genocided by an evil Money Power elite, who deserve the fate of all traitors, the gallows.

    I am disappointed to see you using such UR ranters words as “The fact is the Europeans are being genocided by an evil Money Power elite”. I would, nonetheless, be interested in your spelling out who they are and what their reasoning and the actual causal processes are.

    My scepticism will be maintained if you don’t look at the worthy upper middle class people of the 1930s to 1960s who were all quasi Christian social democrats and didn’t have a single realistic nasty thought about multiculturalism or race. Consider now Merkel’s Protestant Christian background (could have been Catholic and even stupider). To blame the “evil Money Power” who are obviously people who have always done well materially out of the status quo when the obvious haters of the status quo are left wing teachers, journalists and second rate academics seems strangely illogical to me, considering the issue a priori.

    Read More
    • Replies: @anon
    the banking mafia want open borders for cheap labor and therefore bribe / lobby politicians and journalists to provide it for them

    this should be clear to everyone just from the pattern of campaign financing but was made explicit in Clinton's secret speeches to the banks where she agreed to promote a single union of the Americas with freedom of movement aka turning the US into a 3rd world plantation

    so greed for cheap labor is the minimum - with the eventual disappearance of the original population in the target countries (aka genocide) as a side effect.

    personally i believe it's more than that - the banking mafia are actively seeking to wreck all those nations that could be a threat to them through deliberately creating ethnic division. they know diversity doesn't work - that's why they want it, divide and rule. it's insurance against another Hitler (whose rise to power was partly to do with anger at the banking mafia).

    beyond that i also believe they want a long term solution to people rising up against them - they want an 85 IQ planet

    To blame the “evil Money Power” who are obviously people who have always done well materially out of the status quo
     
    generally yes - they are (mostly) a parasite so they do well most of the time but because they are a parasite sooner or later they always cause economic disaster and then there's a hostile reaction - so as a parasite the banking mafia are trying to change the host to be safer for them

    when the obvious haters of the status quo are left wing teachers, journalists and second rate academics seems strangely illogical to me, considering the issue a priori.
     
    i agree there are two halves to it with SJWs being the other half - that's why we currently have the PC uniparty with SJWs and banking mafia effectively on the same side against the middle.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  177. anon says: • Disclaimer
    @ANON
    I am disappointed to see you using such UR ranters words as "The fact is the Europeans are being genocided by an evil Money Power elite". I would, nonetheless, be interested in your spelling out who they are and what their reasoning and the actual causal processes are.

    My scepticism will be maintained if you don't look at the worthy upper middle class people of the 1930s to 1960s who were all quasi Christian social democrats and didn't have a single realistic nasty thought about multiculturalism or race. Consider now Merkel's Protestant Christian background (could have been Catholic and even stupider). To blame the "evil Money Power" who are obviously people who have always done well materially out of the status quo when the obvious haters of the status quo are left wing teachers, journalists and second rate academics seems strangely illogical to me, considering the issue a priori.

    the banking mafia want open borders for cheap labor and therefore bribe / lobby politicians and journalists to provide it for them

    this should be clear to everyone just from the pattern of campaign financing but was made explicit in Clinton’s secret speeches to the banks where she agreed to promote a single union of the Americas with freedom of movement aka turning the US into a 3rd world plantation

    so greed for cheap labor is the minimum – with the eventual disappearance of the original population in the target countries (aka genocide) as a side effect.

    personally i believe it’s more than that – the banking mafia are actively seeking to wreck all those nations that could be a threat to them through deliberately creating ethnic division. they know diversity doesn’t work – that’s why they want it, divide and rule. it’s insurance against another Hitler (whose rise to power was partly to do with anger at the banking mafia).

    beyond that i also believe they want a long term solution to people rising up against them – they want an 85 IQ planet

    To blame the “evil Money Power” who are obviously people who have always done well materially out of the status quo

    generally yes – they are (mostly) a parasite so they do well most of the time but because they are a parasite sooner or later they always cause economic disaster and then there’s a hostile reaction – so as a parasite the banking mafia are trying to change the host to be safer for them

    when the obvious haters of the status quo are left wing teachers, journalists and second rate academics seems strangely illogical to me, considering the issue a priori.

    i agree there are two halves to it with SJWs being the other half – that’s why we currently have the PC uniparty with SJWs and banking mafia effectively on the same side against the middle.

    Read More
    • Replies: @ANON
    I was puzzled at your suggesting that "the banking mafia want open borders for cheap labour" as cheap labour is not an obvious banking interest particularly if you look at Australia, Japan, Germany, the UK, Switzerland amongst other examples other than the US. But I hsve an Aha! moment. I wonder if I am right to translate your argument to one about Jews historically and recently for Israel seeking to destroy WASP (and generally non-Jewish white) power and influence in America???

    Alternatively can you explain how American bankers expect to maximise their profitability through the increase in numbers of low wage immigrants?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  178. ANON says: • Disclaimer
    @anon
    the banking mafia want open borders for cheap labor and therefore bribe / lobby politicians and journalists to provide it for them

    this should be clear to everyone just from the pattern of campaign financing but was made explicit in Clinton's secret speeches to the banks where she agreed to promote a single union of the Americas with freedom of movement aka turning the US into a 3rd world plantation

    so greed for cheap labor is the minimum - with the eventual disappearance of the original population in the target countries (aka genocide) as a side effect.

    personally i believe it's more than that - the banking mafia are actively seeking to wreck all those nations that could be a threat to them through deliberately creating ethnic division. they know diversity doesn't work - that's why they want it, divide and rule. it's insurance against another Hitler (whose rise to power was partly to do with anger at the banking mafia).

    beyond that i also believe they want a long term solution to people rising up against them - they want an 85 IQ planet

    To blame the “evil Money Power” who are obviously people who have always done well materially out of the status quo
     
    generally yes - they are (mostly) a parasite so they do well most of the time but because they are a parasite sooner or later they always cause economic disaster and then there's a hostile reaction - so as a parasite the banking mafia are trying to change the host to be safer for them

    when the obvious haters of the status quo are left wing teachers, journalists and second rate academics seems strangely illogical to me, considering the issue a priori.
     
    i agree there are two halves to it with SJWs being the other half - that's why we currently have the PC uniparty with SJWs and banking mafia effectively on the same side against the middle.

    I was puzzled at your suggesting that “the banking mafia want open borders for cheap labour” as cheap labour is not an obvious banking interest particularly if you look at Australia, Japan, Germany, the UK, Switzerland amongst other examples other than the US. But I hsve an Aha! moment. I wonder if I am right to translate your argument to one about Jews historically and recently for Israel seeking to destroy WASP (and generally non-Jewish white) power and influence in America???

    Alternatively can you explain how American bankers expect to maximise their profitability through the increase in numbers of low wage immigrants?

    Read More
    • Replies: @CanSpeccy

    Alternatively can you explain how American bankers expect to maximise their profitability through the increase in numbers of low wage immigrants?
     
    It's not bankers per se (WTF does per se mean anyhow) but the elite class generally. As George H.W. Bush said back in the eighties, Mexican immigration "solves the servant problem."
    , @CanSpeccy

    cheap labour is not an obvious banking interest
     
    Off-shoring of jobs from the West to the Rest was very much in the Money Power interest, since it increased the profitability of the off-shoring corporations: IBM, MicroSoft, Apple, Amazon, Boeing, GE, etc. But these companies have no particular reason to make things in China or Vietnam, rather than in Britain or the US. So driving down wages at home, will create the option of locating factories where they used to be, in the same country as corporate headquarters. But as anon states, destroying the independent, democratic, sovereign nation states, particularly the most powerful states, i.e., the European states, is the primary reason the Money Power promotes mass migration.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  179. CanSpeccy says: • Website
    @ANON
    I was puzzled at your suggesting that "the banking mafia want open borders for cheap labour" as cheap labour is not an obvious banking interest particularly if you look at Australia, Japan, Germany, the UK, Switzerland amongst other examples other than the US. But I hsve an Aha! moment. I wonder if I am right to translate your argument to one about Jews historically and recently for Israel seeking to destroy WASP (and generally non-Jewish white) power and influence in America???

    Alternatively can you explain how American bankers expect to maximise their profitability through the increase in numbers of low wage immigrants?

    Alternatively can you explain how American bankers expect to maximise their profitability through the increase in numbers of low wage immigrants?

    It’s not bankers per se (WTF does per se mean anyhow) but the elite class generally. As George H.W. Bush said back in the eighties, Mexican immigration “solves the servant problem.”

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  180. anon says: • Disclaimer

    I was puzzled at your suggesting that “the banking mafia want open borders for cheap labour” as cheap labour is not an obvious banking interest

    you can see by looking at campaign contributions around the world that the banking mafia support open borders and it’s even more explicit in Clinton’s private speeches to the banks – so that’s a given

    the question is why?

    i think the more complex reason is they want diversity for divide and rule – they’re parasitic so they always create a backlash and having ethno-sectarian division is a way of protecting themselves

    to that end they built a wider coalition of big business to promote open borders for cheap labor – so they wanted divide and rule and their means of attaining it was to create and lead a wider coalition who want cheap labor

    it’s easier to compress into one sentence i.e. “the banking mafia want open borders for cheap labour” and explain further if people ask

    Read More
    • Replies: @CanSpeccy

    i think the more complex reason is they want diversity for divide and rule
     
    The Money Power promotes diversity because the diversity will vote for the Money Power's globalization project. The diversity supports globalization in the knowledge that the globalists will work with them to knock down barriers to migration. The diversity want more migration because they are settlers not immigrants intent on assimilation ("Make American Mexico Again," "Europe is the Cancer, Islam Is the Answer", etc .) The diversity aims to ensure the occupation and cultural transformation of the European territories by their own kinsmen. By working together, the globalists and the diversity will destroy the nation state, the current basis of democratic rule. Thereafter, rule will be top down from global institutions of governance, which are steered by he Money Power in the service of the Money Power. Then the great depopulation of the globe can begin.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  181. CanSpeccy says: • Website
    @anon

    I was puzzled at your suggesting that “the banking mafia want open borders for cheap labour” as cheap labour is not an obvious banking interest
     
    you can see by looking at campaign contributions around the world that the banking mafia support open borders and it's even more explicit in Clinton's private speeches to the banks - so that's a given

    the question is why?

    i think the more complex reason is they want diversity for divide and rule - they're parasitic so they always create a backlash and having ethno-sectarian division is a way of protecting themselves

    to that end they built a wider coalition of big business to promote open borders for cheap labor - so they wanted divide and rule and their means of attaining it was to create and lead a wider coalition who want cheap labor

    it's easier to compress into one sentence i.e. “the banking mafia want open borders for cheap labour” and explain further if people ask

    i think the more complex reason is they want diversity for divide and rule

    The Money Power promotes diversity because the diversity will vote for the Money Power’s globalization project. The diversity supports globalization in the knowledge that the globalists will work with them to knock down barriers to migration. The diversity want more migration because they are settlers not immigrants intent on assimilation (“Make American Mexico Again,” “Europe is the Cancer, Islam Is the Answer”, etc .) The diversity aims to ensure the occupation and cultural transformation of the European territories by their own kinsmen. By working together, the globalists and the diversity will destroy the nation state, the current basis of democratic rule. Thereafter, rule will be top down from global institutions of governance, which are steered by he Money Power in the service of the Money Power. Then the great depopulation of the globe can begin.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  182. CanSpeccy says: • Website
    @ANON
    I was puzzled at your suggesting that "the banking mafia want open borders for cheap labour" as cheap labour is not an obvious banking interest particularly if you look at Australia, Japan, Germany, the UK, Switzerland amongst other examples other than the US. But I hsve an Aha! moment. I wonder if I am right to translate your argument to one about Jews historically and recently for Israel seeking to destroy WASP (and generally non-Jewish white) power and influence in America???

    Alternatively can you explain how American bankers expect to maximise their profitability through the increase in numbers of low wage immigrants?

    cheap labour is not an obvious banking interest

    Off-shoring of jobs from the West to the Rest was very much in the Money Power interest, since it increased the profitability of the off-shoring corporations: IBM, MicroSoft, Apple, Amazon, Boeing, GE, etc. But these companies have no particular reason to make things in China or Vietnam, rather than in Britain or the US. So driving down wages at home, will create the option of locating factories where they used to be, in the same country as corporate headquarters. But as anon states, destroying the independent, democratic, sovereign nation states, particularly the most powerful states, i.e., the European states, is the primary reason the Money Power promotes mass migration.

    Read More
    • Replies: @ANON
    I know and have known a lot of bankers of all kinds but it takes a simple translation to make sense of your thesis. I just remember the company I keep if I visit UR threads and I translate "Money Power" as "rich or otherwise powerful ethnocentric Jews" and Voila! N'est-ce pas?
    , @CanSpeccy
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  183. ANON says: • Disclaimer
    @CanSpeccy

    cheap labour is not an obvious banking interest
     
    Off-shoring of jobs from the West to the Rest was very much in the Money Power interest, since it increased the profitability of the off-shoring corporations: IBM, MicroSoft, Apple, Amazon, Boeing, GE, etc. But these companies have no particular reason to make things in China or Vietnam, rather than in Britain or the US. So driving down wages at home, will create the option of locating factories where they used to be, in the same country as corporate headquarters. But as anon states, destroying the independent, democratic, sovereign nation states, particularly the most powerful states, i.e., the European states, is the primary reason the Money Power promotes mass migration.

    I know and have known a lot of bankers of all kinds but it takes a simple translation to make sense of your thesis. I just remember the company I keep if I visit UR threads and I translate “Money Power” as “rich or otherwise powerful ethnocentric Jews” and Voila! N’est-ce pas?

    Read More
    • Replies: @CanSpeccy

    I just remember the company I keep if I visit UR threads and I translate “Money Power” as “rich or otherwise powerful ethnocentric Jews” and Voila! N’est-ce pas?
     
    I take the term Money Power from Carroll Quigley (his capitalization) who was Bill Clinton's history mentor at Georgetown U, and inspired young Bill to become what he became, a shill for the New World Order and mass immigration.

    In writing about the Money Power, Quigley refers specifically to bankers, some Jewish others not. Quigley believed that the Money Power sought global governance and that the project was a direct outgrowth of the Cecil Rhodes secret society, which lay at the center of the Round Table Movement, which was the progenitor of the world's most powerful think tank, the Council on Foreign Relations.

    The Round Table Movement was financed by Rhodes, whose will was administered by Lord Rothschild. Rhodes made his money in South African gold and diamonds in ventures financed by Rothschild. Other prominent Jews were involved in what came to be known as the Rhodes-Milner project for global governance under a supposedly benign Anglo-Saxon direction, these including Leo Amery, who was instrumental in making Winston Churchill (half Jewish) Prime Minister of England (Amery's son, John, was hanged for Treason after WW2, for doing Nazis propaganda broadcasts).

    However, the project appears not to have been entirely Jewish controlled. According to Quigley, the intellectual home of the movement was All Souls College, Oxford, where Quigley spent a sabbatical going through papers relating to the Secret Society in order to document a history of the movement, The Anglo American Establishment.

    The drive for globalization is clearly still in existence and gathering momentum. Who are the principal drivers of the scheme, I don't know. There are Jews, obviously, Soros is one name that comes to mind, although as he was an accomplice in the Nazi Jewish Holocaust one wonders how he is regarded as one of them by Jews. In addition, there are surely many enthusiastic goyim: people, like Justin Trudeau, most US Democrats, and probably the leaders of both the Labour and Conservative parties in Britain, and of course Merkel and whatsit in France. Whether the latter are dupes who will find themselves of no account once the New World Ordure is established remains to be seen (or maybe they're crypto Jews).

    , @anon

    I just remember the company I keep if I visit UR threads and I translate “Money Power” as “rich or otherwise powerful ethnocentric Jews” and Voila!
     
    What percentage of Sicilians are in the Sicilian mafia?

    The banking mafia are high IQ organized crime - that's all.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  184. CanSpeccy says: • Website
    @CanSpeccy

    cheap labour is not an obvious banking interest
     
    Off-shoring of jobs from the West to the Rest was very much in the Money Power interest, since it increased the profitability of the off-shoring corporations: IBM, MicroSoft, Apple, Amazon, Boeing, GE, etc. But these companies have no particular reason to make things in China or Vietnam, rather than in Britain or the US. So driving down wages at home, will create the option of locating factories where they used to be, in the same country as corporate headquarters. But as anon states, destroying the independent, democratic, sovereign nation states, particularly the most powerful states, i.e., the European states, is the primary reason the Money Power promotes mass migration.
    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  185. CanSpeccy says: • Website
    @ANON
    I know and have known a lot of bankers of all kinds but it takes a simple translation to make sense of your thesis. I just remember the company I keep if I visit UR threads and I translate "Money Power" as "rich or otherwise powerful ethnocentric Jews" and Voila! N'est-ce pas?

    I just remember the company I keep if I visit UR threads and I translate “Money Power” as “rich or otherwise powerful ethnocentric Jews” and Voila! N’est-ce pas?

    I take the term Money Power from Carroll Quigley (his capitalization) who was Bill Clinton’s history mentor at Georgetown U, and inspired young Bill to become what he became, a shill for the New World Order and mass immigration.

    In writing about the Money Power, Quigley refers specifically to bankers, some Jewish others not. Quigley believed that the Money Power sought global governance and that the project was a direct outgrowth of the Cecil Rhodes secret society, which lay at the center of the Round Table Movement, which was the progenitor of the world’s most powerful think tank, the Council on Foreign Relations.

    The Round Table Movement was financed by Rhodes, whose will was administered by Lord Rothschild. Rhodes made his money in South African gold and diamonds in ventures financed by Rothschild. Other prominent Jews were involved in what came to be known as the Rhodes-Milner project for global governance under a supposedly benign Anglo-Saxon direction, these including Leo Amery, who was instrumental in making Winston Churchill (half Jewish) Prime Minister of England (Amery’s son, John, was hanged for Treason after WW2, for doing Nazis propaganda broadcasts).

    However, the project appears not to have been entirely Jewish controlled. According to Quigley, the intellectual home of the movement was All Souls College, Oxford, where Quigley spent a sabbatical going through papers relating to the Secret Society in order to document a history of the movement, The Anglo American Establishment.

    The drive for globalization is clearly still in existence and gathering momentum. Who are the principal drivers of the scheme, I don’t know. There are Jews, obviously, Soros is one name that comes to mind, although as he was an accomplice in the Nazi Jewish Holocaust one wonders how he is regarded as one of them by Jews. In addition, there are surely many enthusiastic goyim: people, like Justin Trudeau, most US Democrats, and probably the leaders of both the Labour and Conservative parties in Britain, and of course Merkel and whatsit in France. Whether the latter are dupes who will find themselves of no account once the New World Ordure is established remains to be seen (or maybe they’re crypto Jews).

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
    There's a lot of interesting stuff connected to Rhodes, Milner's Kindergarten and Churchill's own early adventures in India, the Sudan and South Africa to which I was introduced in an indirect way by an old friend of the family lending me F.S.Oliver's "The Endless Adventure" when I was 18 - a huge boost to a naive young chap's sophistication. However, you spoil your case by falling into one of the UR threads' Jew-obsessed modes when you can't refrain from throwing in "half Jewish" to characterise Churchill. What makes it particularly unfortunate is that it is easy to find a meticulous takedown of such rubbish in a post on Razib Khan's Gene Expression by "DavidB" in September 2007. You wouldn't want to be thought related to Wally would you? :-)
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  186. @CanSpeccy

    I just remember the company I keep if I visit UR threads and I translate “Money Power” as “rich or otherwise powerful ethnocentric Jews” and Voila! N’est-ce pas?
     
    I take the term Money Power from Carroll Quigley (his capitalization) who was Bill Clinton's history mentor at Georgetown U, and inspired young Bill to become what he became, a shill for the New World Order and mass immigration.

    In writing about the Money Power, Quigley refers specifically to bankers, some Jewish others not. Quigley believed that the Money Power sought global governance and that the project was a direct outgrowth of the Cecil Rhodes secret society, which lay at the center of the Round Table Movement, which was the progenitor of the world's most powerful think tank, the Council on Foreign Relations.

    The Round Table Movement was financed by Rhodes, whose will was administered by Lord Rothschild. Rhodes made his money in South African gold and diamonds in ventures financed by Rothschild. Other prominent Jews were involved in what came to be known as the Rhodes-Milner project for global governance under a supposedly benign Anglo-Saxon direction, these including Leo Amery, who was instrumental in making Winston Churchill (half Jewish) Prime Minister of England (Amery's son, John, was hanged for Treason after WW2, for doing Nazis propaganda broadcasts).

    However, the project appears not to have been entirely Jewish controlled. According to Quigley, the intellectual home of the movement was All Souls College, Oxford, where Quigley spent a sabbatical going through papers relating to the Secret Society in order to document a history of the movement, The Anglo American Establishment.

    The drive for globalization is clearly still in existence and gathering momentum. Who are the principal drivers of the scheme, I don't know. There are Jews, obviously, Soros is one name that comes to mind, although as he was an accomplice in the Nazi Jewish Holocaust one wonders how he is regarded as one of them by Jews. In addition, there are surely many enthusiastic goyim: people, like Justin Trudeau, most US Democrats, and probably the leaders of both the Labour and Conservative parties in Britain, and of course Merkel and whatsit in France. Whether the latter are dupes who will find themselves of no account once the New World Ordure is established remains to be seen (or maybe they're crypto Jews).

    There’s a lot of interesting stuff connected to Rhodes, Milner’s Kindergarten and Churchill’s own early adventures in India, the Sudan and South Africa to which I was introduced in an indirect way by an old friend of the family lending me F.S.Oliver’s “The Endless Adventure” when I was 18 – a huge boost to a naive young chap’s sophistication. However, you spoil your case by falling into one of the UR threads’ Jew-obsessed modes when you can’t refrain from throwing in “half Jewish” to characterise Churchill. What makes it particularly unfortunate is that it is easy to find a meticulous takedown of such rubbish in a post on Razib Khan’s Gene Expression by “DavidB” in September 2007. You wouldn’t want to be thought related to Wally would you? :-)

    Read More
    • Replies: @CanSpeccy
    You are you saying that Jenny Jerome, Churchill's mother, daughter of Leo Jacobsen Jerome, New York financier, and son of Isaac Jerome was not of Jewish extraction?

    Maybe not. The question to which I responded was the role of Jews in the globalist movement so I noted what I believed, without much research, to be Churchill's supposedly Jewish roots. But it has been argued that, despite the appearance of Jenny Jerome's mother to the contrary (which was attributed to Iroquois descent), Churchill had not a drop of Jewish blood.

    But certainly Churchill was not in any way Jewish by upbringing, which was largely in the hands of his nanny, Mrs. Everest, a low church Christian. However, according to his official biographer, renowned Jewish historian, Martin Gilbert, Churchill was a special friend of the Jews. Certainly, he backed the Zionist project in Israel. However, despite having been saved from bankruptcy by a Jewish financier following the Great Crash, and having been financed in his political activities prior to become Prime Minister by a Jewish group, some Jews claim Churchill to have been a rampant anti-Semite.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  187. anon says: • Disclaimer
    @ANON
    I know and have known a lot of bankers of all kinds but it takes a simple translation to make sense of your thesis. I just remember the company I keep if I visit UR threads and I translate "Money Power" as "rich or otherwise powerful ethnocentric Jews" and Voila! N'est-ce pas?

    I just remember the company I keep if I visit UR threads and I translate “Money Power” as “rich or otherwise powerful ethnocentric Jews” and Voila!

    What percentage of Sicilians are in the Sicilian mafia?

    The banking mafia are high IQ organized crime – that’s all.

    Read More
    • Replies: @ANON
    My point was that the Money Power or banking mafia or whatever you want to call them are very hard to associate with those who seek to undermine European civilisation unless you equate them with the Jews (American Jews anyway) who supposedly want to make themselves safe from WASPs (or take them down) by creating diversity.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  188. ANON says: • Disclaimer
    @anon

    I just remember the company I keep if I visit UR threads and I translate “Money Power” as “rich or otherwise powerful ethnocentric Jews” and Voila!
     
    What percentage of Sicilians are in the Sicilian mafia?

    The banking mafia are high IQ organized crime - that's all.

    My point was that the Money Power or banking mafia or whatever you want to call them are very hard to associate with those who seek to undermine European civilisation unless you equate them with the Jews (American Jews anyway) who supposedly want to make themselves safe from WASPs (or take them down) by creating diversity.

    Read More
    • Replies: @anon

    My point was that the Money Power or banking mafia or whatever you want to call them are very hard to associate with those who seek to undermine European civilisation...
     
    it is incredibly easy to link them just by looking at campaign funding

    the banking mafia fund open borders parties and pro-immigration NGOs

    Clinton's private speeches to the banks gave her support for their desire to see completely open borders across all of north and south America

    it couldn't be easier to associate them
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  189. CanSpeccy says: • Website
    @Wizard of Oz
    There's a lot of interesting stuff connected to Rhodes, Milner's Kindergarten and Churchill's own early adventures in India, the Sudan and South Africa to which I was introduced in an indirect way by an old friend of the family lending me F.S.Oliver's "The Endless Adventure" when I was 18 - a huge boost to a naive young chap's sophistication. However, you spoil your case by falling into one of the UR threads' Jew-obsessed modes when you can't refrain from throwing in "half Jewish" to characterise Churchill. What makes it particularly unfortunate is that it is easy to find a meticulous takedown of such rubbish in a post on Razib Khan's Gene Expression by "DavidB" in September 2007. You wouldn't want to be thought related to Wally would you? :-)

    You are you saying that Jenny Jerome, Churchill’s mother, daughter of Leo Jacobsen Jerome, New York financier, and son of Isaac Jerome was not of Jewish extraction?

    Maybe not. The question to which I responded was the role of Jews in the globalist movement so I noted what I believed, without much research, to be Churchill’s supposedly Jewish roots. But it has been argued that, despite the appearance of Jenny Jerome’s mother to the contrary (which was attributed to Iroquois descent), Churchill had not a drop of Jewish blood.

    But certainly Churchill was not in any way Jewish by upbringing, which was largely in the hands of his nanny, Mrs. Everest, a low church Christian. However, according to his official biographer, renowned Jewish historian, Martin Gilbert, Churchill was a special friend of the Jews. Certainly, he backed the Zionist project in Israel. However, despite having been saved from bankruptcy by a Jewish financier following the Great Crash, and having been financed in his political activities prior to become Prime Minister by a Jewish group, some Jews claim Churchill to have been a rampant anti-Semite.

    Read More
    • Replies: @CanSpeccy
    And here's a picture of Clarissa Hall, mother of Jenny Jacobsen/Jerome. She certainly had a fine Schnozz.
    , @Wizard of Oz
    I imagine that Churchill was as free in the old English upper class style with what he said about Jews as he was speaking of Indians, Australians and the lower classes amongst others. But insouciant ignorance abounds in the media and entertainment industries. I have been watching "Genius" a National Geographic docudrama series on Einstein and it is hard to know which is more risible: astronomers from Berlin heading fof the Crimea to make observations having their trip aborted by the outbreak of WW1 but shown in the snow in Crimea, or a British scientist named as "Sir Crookes".
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  190. anon says: • Disclaimer
    @ANON
    My point was that the Money Power or banking mafia or whatever you want to call them are very hard to associate with those who seek to undermine European civilisation unless you equate them with the Jews (American Jews anyway) who supposedly want to make themselves safe from WASPs (or take them down) by creating diversity.

    My point was that the Money Power or banking mafia or whatever you want to call them are very hard to associate with those who seek to undermine European civilisation…

    it is incredibly easy to link them just by looking at campaign funding

    the banking mafia fund open borders parties and pro-immigration NGOs

    Clinton’s private speeches to the banks gave her support for their desire to see completely open borders across all of north and south America

    it couldn’t be easier to associate them

    Read More
    • Agree: CanSpeccy
    • Replies: @ANON
    You have still not grasped that I am objecting to your generalisations based on facts (or alleged facts) not shown to apply to anywhere but America.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  191. CanSpeccy says: • Website
    @CanSpeccy
    You are you saying that Jenny Jerome, Churchill's mother, daughter of Leo Jacobsen Jerome, New York financier, and son of Isaac Jerome was not of Jewish extraction?

    Maybe not. The question to which I responded was the role of Jews in the globalist movement so I noted what I believed, without much research, to be Churchill's supposedly Jewish roots. But it has been argued that, despite the appearance of Jenny Jerome's mother to the contrary (which was attributed to Iroquois descent), Churchill had not a drop of Jewish blood.

    But certainly Churchill was not in any way Jewish by upbringing, which was largely in the hands of his nanny, Mrs. Everest, a low church Christian. However, according to his official biographer, renowned Jewish historian, Martin Gilbert, Churchill was a special friend of the Jews. Certainly, he backed the Zionist project in Israel. However, despite having been saved from bankruptcy by a Jewish financier following the Great Crash, and having been financed in his political activities prior to become Prime Minister by a Jewish group, some Jews claim Churchill to have been a rampant anti-Semite.

    And here’s a picture of Clarissa Hall, mother of Jenny Jacobsen/Jerome. She certainly had a fine Schnozz.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  192. ANON says: • Disclaimer
    @anon

    My point was that the Money Power or banking mafia or whatever you want to call them are very hard to associate with those who seek to undermine European civilisation...
     
    it is incredibly easy to link them just by looking at campaign funding

    the banking mafia fund open borders parties and pro-immigration NGOs

    Clinton's private speeches to the banks gave her support for their desire to see completely open borders across all of north and south America

    it couldn't be easier to associate them

    You have still not grasped that I am objecting to your generalisations based on facts (or alleged facts) not shown to apply to anywhere but America.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  193. @CanSpeccy
    You are you saying that Jenny Jerome, Churchill's mother, daughter of Leo Jacobsen Jerome, New York financier, and son of Isaac Jerome was not of Jewish extraction?

    Maybe not. The question to which I responded was the role of Jews in the globalist movement so I noted what I believed, without much research, to be Churchill's supposedly Jewish roots. But it has been argued that, despite the appearance of Jenny Jerome's mother to the contrary (which was attributed to Iroquois descent), Churchill had not a drop of Jewish blood.

    But certainly Churchill was not in any way Jewish by upbringing, which was largely in the hands of his nanny, Mrs. Everest, a low church Christian. However, according to his official biographer, renowned Jewish historian, Martin Gilbert, Churchill was a special friend of the Jews. Certainly, he backed the Zionist project in Israel. However, despite having been saved from bankruptcy by a Jewish financier following the Great Crash, and having been financed in his political activities prior to become Prime Minister by a Jewish group, some Jews claim Churchill to have been a rampant anti-Semite.

    I imagine that Churchill was as free in the old English upper class style with what he said about Jews as he was speaking of Indians, Australians and the lower classes amongst others. But insouciant ignorance abounds in the media and entertainment industries. I have been watching “Genius” a National Geographic docudrama series on Einstein and it is hard to know which is more risible: astronomers from Berlin heading fof the Crimea to make observations having their trip aborted by the outbreak of WW1 but shown in the snow in Crimea, or a British scientist named as “Sir Crookes”.

    Read More
    • Replies: @CanSpeccy

    I imagine that Churchill was as free in the old English upper class style with what he said about Jews as he was speaking of Indians, Australians and the lower classes amongst others.
     
    And in what he said there was a force, logic, and a historian's grasp of the facts that must have deterred all but the most intrepid critic from challenging him directly. Moreover, because his views were complex Churchill cannot easily be characterized. Thus, although he hated Soviet Communism without reserve and held Jews responsible for the Russian revolution, he was also a staunch Zionist. And in his comments on the Jewish character, he was critical while acknowledging Jewish intellectual and cultural superiority.

    Churchill's origins seem obscure. Was his mother half Jewish? A biography of Jennie Jerome published a long time ago, possibly that by Anita Leslie (1969), which I no longer have to hand, referred to Leonard Jerome as the former Leonard Jacobsen. If in fact Jennie Jerome's father, a NY stock market speculator, Rothschild associate, owner of the NY Times, etc., changed his name from Jacobsen to Jerome, then we can assume that Churchill was of Jewish extraction. However, apart from a reference to a Jerusalem Post article published on January 15, 1993, there seems to be no confirmation available on the Web.

    One does wonder, however, who Churchill's father may have been. Churchill made a big deal of his descent from John Churchill Duke of Malborough, and wrote a biography of his distant ancestor, but was Churchill, in fact, the son of the syphilitic Lord Randolph Churchill? One story is that he was the son of one of Jennie Jerome's numerous lovers, namely, Milan Obrenovic, who subsequent to Churchill's birth became King of Serbia!

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  194. CanSpeccy says: • Website
    @Wizard of Oz
    I imagine that Churchill was as free in the old English upper class style with what he said about Jews as he was speaking of Indians, Australians and the lower classes amongst others. But insouciant ignorance abounds in the media and entertainment industries. I have been watching "Genius" a National Geographic docudrama series on Einstein and it is hard to know which is more risible: astronomers from Berlin heading fof the Crimea to make observations having their trip aborted by the outbreak of WW1 but shown in the snow in Crimea, or a British scientist named as "Sir Crookes".

    I imagine that Churchill was as free in the old English upper class style with what he said about Jews as he was speaking of Indians, Australians and the lower classes amongst others.

    And in what he said there was a force, logic, and a historian’s grasp of the facts that must have deterred all but the most intrepid critic from challenging him directly. Moreover, because his views were complex Churchill cannot easily be characterized. Thus, although he hated Soviet Communism without reserve and held Jews responsible for the Russian revolution, he was also a staunch Zionist. And in his comments on the Jewish character, he was critical while acknowledging Jewish intellectual and cultural superiority.

    Churchill’s origins seem obscure. Was his mother half Jewish? A biography of Jennie Jerome published a long time ago, possibly that by Anita Leslie (1969), which I no longer have to hand, referred to Leonard Jerome as the former Leonard Jacobsen. If in fact Jennie Jerome’s father, a NY stock market speculator, Rothschild associate, owner of the NY Times, etc., changed his name from Jacobsen to Jerome, then we can assume that Churchill was of Jewish extraction. However, apart from a reference to a Jerusalem Post article published on January 15, 1993, there seems to be no confirmation available on the Web.

    One does wonder, however, who Churchill’s father may have been. Churchill made a big deal of his descent from John Churchill Duke of Malborough, and wrote a biography of his distant ancestor, but was Churchill, in fact, the son of the syphilitic Lord Randolph Churchill? One story is that he was the son of one of Jennie Jerome’s numerous lovers, namely, Milan Obrenovic, who subsequent to Churchill’s birth became King of Serbia!

    Read More
    • Replies: @CanSpeccy
    But here's one critical assessment of Churchill that offers an explanation of his relationship with the Zionists. Essentially, it argues that Churchill was a ruthless, often inebriated, psychopath who would stop at nothing to advance his own interest and that he served Zionist interests because the Zionists repeatedly saved him from the consequences of his personal financial recklessness. Probably a fair assessment, although applicable, with or without the drunkenness, to most leaders, including the Bushes, Tony Blair, the Clintons, among those recently to have had the exits and their entrances upon the world stage.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  195. CanSpeccy says: • Website
    @CanSpeccy

    I imagine that Churchill was as free in the old English upper class style with what he said about Jews as he was speaking of Indians, Australians and the lower classes amongst others.
     
    And in what he said there was a force, logic, and a historian's grasp of the facts that must have deterred all but the most intrepid critic from challenging him directly. Moreover, because his views were complex Churchill cannot easily be characterized. Thus, although he hated Soviet Communism without reserve and held Jews responsible for the Russian revolution, he was also a staunch Zionist. And in his comments on the Jewish character, he was critical while acknowledging Jewish intellectual and cultural superiority.

    Churchill's origins seem obscure. Was his mother half Jewish? A biography of Jennie Jerome published a long time ago, possibly that by Anita Leslie (1969), which I no longer have to hand, referred to Leonard Jerome as the former Leonard Jacobsen. If in fact Jennie Jerome's father, a NY stock market speculator, Rothschild associate, owner of the NY Times, etc., changed his name from Jacobsen to Jerome, then we can assume that Churchill was of Jewish extraction. However, apart from a reference to a Jerusalem Post article published on January 15, 1993, there seems to be no confirmation available on the Web.

    One does wonder, however, who Churchill's father may have been. Churchill made a big deal of his descent from John Churchill Duke of Malborough, and wrote a biography of his distant ancestor, but was Churchill, in fact, the son of the syphilitic Lord Randolph Churchill? One story is that he was the son of one of Jennie Jerome's numerous lovers, namely, Milan Obrenovic, who subsequent to Churchill's birth became King of Serbia!

    But here’s one critical assessment of Churchill that offers an explanation of his relationship with the Zionists. Essentially, it argues that Churchill was a ruthless, often inebriated, psychopath who would stop at nothing to advance his own interest and that he served Zionist interests because the Zionists repeatedly saved him from the consequences of his personal financial recklessness. Probably a fair assessment, although applicable, with or without the drunkenness, to most leaders, including the Bushes, Tony Blair, the Clintons, among those recently to have had the exits and their entrances upon the world stage.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
Current Commenter says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS
PastClassics
The evidence is clear — but often ignored
The “war hero” candidate buried information about POWs left behind in Vietnam.
Are elite university admissions based on meritocracy and diversity as claimed?
A simple remedy for income stagnation
Confederate Flag Day, State Capitol, Raleigh, N.C. -- March 3, 2007