The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Martin Witkerk Archive
Eric Kaufmann’s WHITESHIFT: Repressing Whites Won’t Work—Maybe Pacification Will
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

See also Eric Kaufmann’s WHITESHIFT On Brimelow, O’Sullivan And The Paleos

Adapted from the Summer 2019 issue of The Social Contract Magazine

Eric Kaufmann’s Whiteshift: Populism, Immigration, and the Future of White Majorities is a book about the future of white majorities in Western nations written by someone whose biography reads like a send up of multiculturalism: born in Hong Kong to a Jewish father and mixed Costa Rican/Chinese mother, raised in Vancouver, he spent eight years in Tokyo before becoming professor of politics at the University of London. Professor Kaufmann is not hostile to whites, but his prescriptions are unlikely to satisfy anyone who truly values Western civilization.

This reviewer’s suspicions were aroused from the book’s second paragraph: “Whites can no more hold back demography than King Canute could command the tides.” Apparently, America’s Hart-Celler Act, which did away with National Origins quotas, did not result from the free actions of Sen. Philip Hart and Rep. Emanuel Celler; rather, it just sort of rolled onto America’s shores like the incoming tide one day in 1965.

Doubly suspicious is that this supposedly inevitable tide failed to operate in all parts of the world, for just a few pages later we read:

In East Asia, automation and guest worker programs drawing on South-East Asian labor are ensuring that the region’s demographic deficit will not produce multicultural nation-states. These nations remain attached to what I call closed ethnic nationalism, in which proscriptive boundaries coexist with immigration policies designed to maintain majority ethnic predominance.

This raises the obvious question of why Americans and Europeans cannot control their own demographic future just as the Japanese and South Koreans are doing. Kaufmann never tells us, but like all who appeal to inevitability, he is in favor of the tendency he wishes his readers to consider inevitable:

I am not arguing that [the West] should adopt the exclusive East Asian model. A better solution is to balance liberal and minority preferences for more immigration with the restrictionism of ethnic-majority conservatives. The key is that the majority be an open rather than a closed ethnic group.

Yet in 537 pages, the author never pauses to explain to readers why the modern West—the most open and universalistic society in the history of the world—is obliged to become still more open and universalistic, while everyone else is fine the way they are. But in this book, as in contemporary politics, such is the assumption throughout.

The book’s title is a misnomer: the only demographic shift presently occurring is one away from whiteness. Kaufmann forecasts a greatly increasing rate of racial intermixture:

In a century those of mixed-race will be the largest group in countries like Britain and America. In two centuries, few people living in urban areas of the West will have an unmixed racial background.

He does not argue that such a change is desirable; at this point, we are back to a rhetoric of inevitability. The only freedom he would permit us regards how we respond to this supposedly unavoidable future.

Kaufmann distinguishes four possibilities, which he calls fight, repress, flee, and join.

  • “Fight” means attempting to avoid the inevitable, as the Japanese have mysteriously been able to do, by maintaining inherited majorities.
  • “Repress” refers to intensified state repression of white opposition to their own dispossession under color of fighting “racism.”
  • “Flee” refers to what has long been known as white flight, with whites colonizing areas where they maintain a supermajority. “Join” refers to a Brazilian-style acceptance of admixture whereby whites would continue to exist as a social category even as most become mixed to some extent.
  • “Join” is Kaufmann’s own preference: firstly, to convince whites that resistance is futile (hence the inevitability tropes) and, secondly, to assure them their mixed-race future won’t really be so bad.

Kaufmann wishes to “draw the sting of right-wing populism,” but realizes that repression alone cannot succeed. “Conservative whites need to have a future,” he warns, because “even if [they] don’t win elections, they are in a position to obstruct change, damage social cohesion and, perhaps, pose a security threat.”

Once this white pacification is accomplished, however, the West “can begin to refocus on priorities such as democratization, climate change, economic growth and inequality” (which we are apparently not focused on enough already).

The book is divided into four parts, nominally corresponding to the possible responses of fighting, repressing, fleeing and joining.

But Part 1: Fight, which occupies over half the book, never seriously tries to imagine what a successful strategy for countering white dispossession would look like. Such an approach might be alright for the Japanese, but Kaufmann is not about to consider it for the West. So what we get instead is largely reportage on the rise of right-wing populism. Two chapters are devoted to the United States: the first summarizes the transition from the country’s original Anglo-Saxon Protestant cultural core to its more generally “white” cultural core in the twentieth century; the second narrates the rise of Donald Trump as a movement of resistance by the embattled white majority. The focus then shifts to Britain, narrating the rise and fall of the BNP and the surprise success of the Brexit campaign. One chapter chronicles the rise of the populist right in mainland Europe and one more covers developments in Canada and Australia.

In Part 2: Repress, Kaufmann devotes two chapters to what he calls Left-Modernism. This roughly corresponds to the sort of thinking familiar to us from the Southern Poverty Law Center: an authoritarian (if not totalitarian) program of white dispossession accompanied by draconian suppression of any glimmerings of positive white racial identity.

To his credit, Kaufmann explicitly recognizes that combining an affirmation of non-white identities with the suppression of white identity is an indefensible double standard. Coming from a contemporary academic, this is a generous admission.

Also in Part 2, the author attempts to rescue the term “racism” from verbal inflation, an undertaking this reviewer suspects is a fool’s errand. In Kaufmann’s usage, “racism” is an umbrella term for three distinct things he considers morally objectionable: antipathy to racial outgroups, the quest for racial purity, and racial discrimination.

His discussion demonstrates, however, that none of these principles are unambiguous.

Kaufmann’s principle example of “antipathy to racial outgroups” is “attacking Muslims,” by which he means criticizing them. He claims that forbidding immigration by Muslims as a class would injure them by generating hostility toward them and threatening their safety.

One really does not know where to begin: we might point out that Muslims are not a racial group, of course, or that antipathy is distinct from criticism (which is distinct from “attacking”). Furthermore, forbidding the immigration of a group need not imply antipathy to that group: I might forbid sick people from entering my home to keep my family healthy and not out of any irrational antipathy toward the sick. But Kaufmann speaks as if America were bound to allow the immigration of at least one resident of the Cannibal Coast in order to avoid generating hostility toward cannibals.

This is one of those principles that only appears to apply to Western nations, however. Kaufmann nowhere criticizes the limitation of Israel’s Law of Return to Jews, nor demands that Christians be made welcome in Saudi Arabia.

Kaufman also rejects any concern for what he calls “racial purity,” saying that it “results in outgroups being viewed as pollutants, which leads to ill-treatment of minorities and carries an enhanced risk of genocide.”

But just what sort of person counts as a racial purist? Madison Grant, who thought anyone with a 1024th part African ancestry should be considered “black,” is an obvious candidate. But how about the conservative after the manner of Russell Kirk, who in The Conservative Mind expressed “affection for the proliferating variety…of human existence,” and feared something valuable would be lost in a perfectly blended humanity? Or the ordinary guy who doesn’t want his daughter marrying one of “those people?”

Any of these attitudes, different as they are, might be described as racial purism, and Kaufmann offers us no rule for determining which are illicit (“racist”) and which acceptable.

He does say, however, that his principle forbids Western nations from defining themselves as either white or Christian. Once again, no word on how or whether the same principle applies to nonwestern countries. Does Liberia’s Law of Citizenship, which restricts naturalization to persons of Black African descent, result in other races being viewed as pollutants, or increase the risk of their genocide?

Even the condemnation of racial discrimination can be problematic, as Kaufmann admits: should French restaurants have the right to hire only French waiters? Should a black singer be free to hire only black backing musicians in order to create an all-black “look” on stage?

We are forced to conclude that the author has not succeeded in providing a useful or workable definition for “racism.” But then neither has anybody else.

Kaufmann devotes just one chapter to Part 3: Flee. Whites have a measurable tendency to move to places whiter than they left. The author mentions that the only ethnic group in the Greater London area to become more segregated from others during the first decade of this century was the white British! They are hunkering down in the areas which remain reassuringly British, while nonwhites rub shoulders with one another in superdiverse areas from which whites are increasingly absent.

White flight does not correlate well with political preferences; much of it involves those with progressive views, whereas more conservative whites have a stronger attachment to the neighborhoods where they live, even amid demographic change. And all whites, regardless of location or political views, maintain disproportionately white social networks. With the browning of suburbia, any continuation of the white flight strategy will increasingly require recolonizing rural areas.

Part 4, Join outlines the manner in which Kaufmann would like to see the West evolve, through mixed marriages and an expanded concept of “whiteness.”

Unlike many champions of racial mixture, he understands all hope of “solving” the race problem once and for all through perfect panmixia is a utopian fantasy. The actual result of continuing intermixture will be what we observe in Brazil: a more complicated social reality with fuzzier boundaries, but one in which people still identify by race and such identification continues to “matter” in all sorts of ways.

The author notes that people’s understanding of their own ancestry is inevitably an oversimplification. Turks, e.g., like to imagine themselves as coming from Central Asia, since this is where the Turkish language originated; in fact, most of their ancestry is local to Anatolia. The Greeks have “absorbed massive demographic incursions” of Slavs and others over the centuries, but still think of themselves as descended from the ancient Hellenes. Many similar examples could be cited.

Some Americans of mixed ancestry already identify with the American mainstream; indeed, polling indicates that minority Republicans are more attached to the white tradition of American nationhood than white Democrats. Kaufman expects that the future mixed-race population of a Brazilianized West will continue, in an analogous way, to identify culturally with Europe.

Kaufmann calls this “an open form of white identity,” writing hopefully that “when the majority sees itself as having a largely mixed-race future, it may become more open to immigration.” It thus appears that whites’ reward for accepting admixture will be getting hit with even greater admixture in the future. Unmixed whites can be expected to survive for a time in ever-shrinking rural areas, rather as Gaelic speakers persist in remote corners of Ireland, but they will be more like museum specimens than a civilization.

A writer’s deepest convictions often emerge less from his explicit arguments than in casual, throw-away remarks, and a particularly revealing one pops up on p. 451 of Whiteshift: “The American state can work with almost any ethnic or religious configuration, adopt any official language, and still function pretty well.”

Kaufmann does not believe that institutions reflect the specific character of the people who created them; he thinks race only matters insofar as people suppose it does. It follows that the West will survive by some people continuing to “identify” with it.

This may allow us some hope for civil peace and reduced racial tension in the future, which is the author’s primary concern. But it does not bode well for the survival of the uniquely inventive and dynamic societies Europeans have historically created.

Martin Witkerk [Email him] is an independent philosopher.

(Republished from VDare by permission of author or representative)
 
Hide 298 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Ron Unz says:

    These sorts of racial/ethnic issues had traditionally been my main area of focus and I’d liked Kaufmann’s previous Anglo-America book, so I ordered this one a couple of months ago and took a look. Unfortunately, I was rather disappointed, and gave up after just a sliver of his 600pp.

    I can’t really judge his analysis of the European context, but his American discussion really seemed rather unsophisticated and mistaken, probably reflecting his lack of familiarity. I got the sense that he interviewed a few Alt-Rightist leaders and activists and a few “anti-racist” types, and tried to make sense of the picture without having a good understanding of American society.

    After all, I don’t think he’s ever lived here, and watching some FoxNews and some MSNBC can’t quite make up for that lack.

  2. Rational says:

    JEWISH TACTIC #5 TO EXTERMINATE WHITE GOY: INDUCE LEARNED HELPLESSNESS.

    The fact that this book is written by a Judaist makes me suspicious from the start. Chances are, he is trying a new tactic to exterminate white goyim, using some mumbo jumbo.

    His tactic is called “learned helplessness.”

    In psychology, when a person is abused again and again, and suffers misfortune after misfortune (like whites do), he basically gives up and stops fighting. This is called learned helplessness.

    So to make whites stop fighting against the invasion and theft of their own nations and women by colored hordes, Judaists are trying to INDUCE learned helplessness in white goy, by posing as fellow whites and constantly telling them that the alien invasion CANNOT BE STOPPED, it is a matter of this and that, it is the reality of the world, it is happening all over, “the world is on the move” (Judaist Editor at Nat Geo), and that there is NOTHING THEY CAN DO, so all the fighting they are doing is useless, so they better give up and accept their extermination by colored hordes, proxy for the Judaists out to exterminate them.

    Don’t listen to them!

    • Agree: geokat62, Robert Dolan
    • Replies: @DanFromCT
    , @Charles Pewitt
  3. Alfa158 says:

    I haven’t read the book but I think you have caught the jist of it succinctly in your closing paragraph.
    “This may allow us some hope for civil peace and reduced racial tension in the future, which is the author’s primary concern. But it does not bode well for the survival of the uniquely inventive and dynamic societies Europeans have historically created.”
    How far off am I in reducing the 537 pages down to the following synopsis?:
    1. The future of White majorities mentioned in the subtitle is the same as the future of the Carrier Pigeon. They don’t have a future.
    2. That’s perfectly OK.
    3. Here are some potential approaches for boiling the frog with as little unseemly splashing, disruption, and attempts to jump out of the pot as possible.
    4. Once the frog has been boiled and the carcass disposed of there is no reason to think things will not go on as if nothing had changed.

    • Agree: TTSSYF
    • Replies: @ben tillman
  4. Can’t wait to hear what other Nazis think about this book!

  5. After all…..he’s just another anti-white jew.

    • Agree: Sick of Orcs
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    , @Sick of Orcs
  6. “The Greeks have “absorbed massive demographic incursions” of Slavs and others over the centuries, but still think of themselves as descended from the ancient Hellenes. Many similar examples could be cited.”

    Based on the evidence so far, this is simply incorrect.

    Genetics of the peloponnesean populations and the theory of extinction of the medieval peloponnesean Greeks

    https://www.nature.com/articles/ejhg201718

    Genetic origins of the Minoans and Mycenaeans

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5565772/

    This meme is a favourite of multi-culti and globalist morons hoping that Greece gets inundated by millions of foreigners

    • Replies: @F. Roger Devlin
  7. sally says:

    “Whites can not hold back location demographics =sum the ratios ((ethnic element/total ethnic density)) for local each area selected and

    “location specific tidal exclusion from tidal demographics [“closed ethnic nationalism”] interrupts the inevitable tides suggests the tides are no more inevitable than the appearance of a sunny day every day for ever.

    Eric Kaufmann’s demographic world view model may lack a few influential variables. but the idea raises the ?,
    what does control “exclusion”. I think awareness of the power of demographics and the unwillingness on the part of those with sufficient control to intercept and redirect tidal demographic <=suggests the global default setting to be indifference to tidal demographics, but that preference dynamic can be set to exclude <=by conscious effort of the locals.

    In ans to the obvious question of why Americans and Europeans cannot control their own demographic future just as the Japanese and South Koreans are doing suggest federalism plays a major part in denying to the locals the power needed to reset and maintain the demographic setting = exclude.

  8. Nick J says:

    Ive come to realize that “white” is of no real significance. Culture is everything. That I’m white is totally secondary to my cultural history of fifteen hundred years of Christianity, the two and a half thousand years inheritance of classical antiquity, and the specific geo cultural and linguistic peculiarities of Europe. I am the product of that tradition, I can’t divorce it and won’t apologize for it.

    If a foreigner criticises my culture and whiteness, well whoopy look to your own. What have I got you want? Am I denigrating yours?

    If one of my own for some warped reason dismisses their inheritance, well good, stand aside from all the benefits. You will miss them when you have to live by other cultures standards, not because they are wrong but because they are not yours.

    • Agree: Montefrío, bruce county
  9. Svigor says:

    This reviewer’s suspicions were aroused from the book’s second paragraph: “Whites can no more hold back demography than King Canute could command the tides.”

    Sounds pretty hostile to me: “lay back and think of England as (((we))) give you a fatal dose of morphine, goy.”

    “It isn’t happening.”
    “It’s happening, but it’s good.”
    “It’s happening, and it’s bad, but you deserve it, goy.”
    “It’s inevitable.”

    These seem to be the four main messages Jews give to goyim who notice.

    Note how nothing is inevitable for Jews except they’re exempt from all of this.

    “It’s inevitable” is kind of an obvious lie, btw. E.g., I don’t make a habit of going ’round disabusing people of their delusional beliefs about things they think they can change, but I think are inevitable. That would be kind of pointless. I might do it for someone I love, who I think is wasting his time, but Jews sure as fuck don’t love pro-Whites.

    On the other hand, it makes a metric fuckload of sense to tell your enemies to give up and surrender, because their defeat is inevitable.

    • Agree: Herbert West
  10. I have not read the book but if your piece is accurate I agree with Ron that it’s naive to say the least. The first thing that strikes me for a guy that was raised and lived in various places is his simplistic outlook on how societies evolve and the history of such societies. If you look at the so called “colored” whatever that refers to from Africa to the rest of the world these places are not where you would want to live due to poor infrastructure, disease, crime, and host of other problems. I am not referring to the US government’s crime of trying to bomb the rest of the world but the civil crime of these nations. And the statistics are worse than they show because of a number reasons including a lack of truth in reporting factual data.

    He basically believes in the “Magic Dirt Theory” that these people will just blend in. In most instances and sorry Ron to your love of Mexicans but once these people arrive in the US crime increases within their group and overall. Real reporting of the facts including counting Mexicans as white in some areas as well the charging of lesser offenses is rampant in this country. They also drain the social system by staying on welfare and other services. He must be from “Women of Color Congresswoman” that everything is free. Checkout what these wonderful illegal immigrants cost America (over 135 billion a year). The Left, Government and Media continually underestimate the total number of illegals in this country. They claim 11-12 million when it’s actually closer to over 30 million.

    Robotics, Artificial Intelligence and sophistication of new hardware will eliminate a very high percentage of jobs. Disease from the Middle Ages is now making a come back in many US cities due to the overwhelming of the system which produces massive homelessness, crime and no go zones. Does he believe this just going to go away?

    The only purpose of immigration and illegal immigration is for cheap labor and to wipe out Western Civilization and whites from existence. Their Multicolored Utopia wont work because if it did Africans wouldn’t keep killing other Africans of different color as well as the violence in this country against their own. Hell, it’s almost impossible to get 5 blacks in the NBA to pass the ball to each other let alone not play “King of the Hill” in the real world.

    No one knows what the future in these domains will bring or if mankind even has a future. But this guy should realize one thing: If disease, civil unrest, and severe environmental problems occur he might be a bit surprised that many of the “White Folks” might not just go “Softly into this Good Night but will Rage and Rage against the Color Light.”

  11. leomarka says:

    I have always had sympathy for the idea of Greatness of a “people” because such thinking leads away from bean-counterism and its close ally, militarism. I sometimes lose my sympathy when I contemplate the Battle of the Somme. There the Greatness’ hold on the people led to slaughter of the people themselves, not because of mindlessness but because of an excess of mind beholden to the idea of Greatness. Is something wrong with Greatness?

  12. Kaufmann devotes just one chapter to Part 3: Flee. Whites have a measurable tendency to move to places whiter than they left.

    A trait they share with immigrants.

    Well, not the Poles. But the rest of them.

    • Replies: @schrub
  13. leomarka says:

    That pesky 1024th fraction again. I sense a connection between Madison Grant and Elizabeth Warren, yet I cannot believe Warren has the mind to connect it herself. She is no ironist, that is for sure.
    I have always hated the term “white flight” because it obviously implies whites are fleeing in a cowardly fashion and somehow by default other-than-white are then simultaneously ennobled, when in actuality given the race-baiting that occurs it seems weirdly incongruous that non-whites would want to be around whites at all.

  14. J.Ross says:

    Interesting that he uses King Cnut; Asian rulers rarely have any doubts about the extent of their power.

  15. We are forced to conclude that the author has not succeeded in providing a useful or workable definition for “racism.” But then neither has anybody else.

    Weapons don’t need a “definition”. Just aim.

  16. syonredux says:
    @Ron Unz

    After all, I don’t think he’s ever lived here, and watching some FoxNews and some MSNBC can’t quite make up for that lack.

    According to his WIKIPEDIA bio, he was a fellow at the Belfer Center in 2008-09. Also, he was raised in Canada, which is culturally part of Anglo-America (well, at least the non Francophone parts).

    As for the book, I thought that it was too sanguine. Of course, my perceptions are colored by the fact that I work in an environment (academia) where anti-White hatred is the norm….

    • Replies: @Sbaker
    , @Svigor
  17. Yadayada says:

    I’m really beginning to hope that Iran bombs the hell out of Israel. My reasoning is that this might interrupt the Jews in their obsessive plan to annihilate us. After all, Mr. Kauffman lets the cat out of the bag. He hopes that whatever ‘soma’ they use will render us grateful for our destruction.

  18. Miro23 says:

    He does say, however, that his principle forbids Western nations from defining themselves as either white or Christian.

    So China may not define itself as Chinese and the historic home of the Chinese people, or Africa may not define itself as African and the historic home of the African people.

    This is familiar Jewish sophistry to legitimize minority ethnic Jewish power in the West.

    And, Kaufmann will of course, make a point of avoiding Israel , where Israelis define themselves as Jews and claim that Israel is the historic and exclusive homeland of ethnically Jewish people.

    The problem here, is that most Jews are actually mixed race, maybe not so extreme as Kaufmann, but they’re still mixed race and don’t like it. They don’t like being part Semite and lash out against pure Semites (Arabs), and they’re not really Europeans either and do the same to pure European whites.

    The general rule is, “If I’m mixed-race, then you’re going to be mixed-race too – and preferably Anglo-African that I can feel superior to, and since we have the power, this is what you’re going to get (open frontiers + multiculturalism + SJW + media/education propaganda)”.

    • Replies: @sally
  19. Anon[276] • Disclaimer says:

    In the case of the U.K, since the level of immigration was 5 times lower before 1998 and the population of a small city is being added to the population of the country every year through immigration at the moment and for the last several years, I think it’s quite reasonable to ask the government to lower immigration back to the level it was before 1998.

    The politicians that have increased immigration by 3, 4 and 5 times the level since 1998 and done nothing to reduce it at least back to the level it was before this deliberate change under new Labour (whose leadership has been discredited in many ways) do not work in the interests of most of the British public. Only in the narrow interests of certain business owners who want to keep wages down, make it easier to hire and fire people and have more potential consumers in the country, but even that doesn’t explain the governments reckless willingness to allow or invite so many people from certain groups that consistently seem to have certain elements of their families that are a lot less likely to work.

    It’s completely reasonable for the public not to want the governments immigration policy to allow immigration at a level that replaces the British public within a few decades, especially when a lot of the people they invite into the country aren’t even worth replacing anyone with imo…

  20. I think Kaufmann’s “solution” is a reflection of his own (troubled) mixed identity, plus of course the typical anti-White attitude which he has inherited from his Jewish side. Whites should mainly disappear due to miscegenation (which is as “inevitable” as any natural phenomenon), but the resultant mixed people still could “identify as White” and thus keep Western civilization going on. Thus people like Kaufmann himself could still profit from a comfortable lifestyle while the rest of the population devolves into a kind of Brazilian situation (which is : a mainly racially mixed population with the darkest types at the social bottom and the lightest types at the top, rampant corruption, mismanagement and crime, with a rich bandit elite at the top). To promote such a “reasonable Utopia” and prevent concerned Whites from stopping it, Kaufmann has written his infamous book. Well, thank you very much !

    • Agree: Miro23
  21. Altai says:

    Kaufmann calls this “an open form of white identity,” writing hopefully that “when the majority sees itself as having a largely mixed-race future, it may become more open to immigration.”

    I don’t know why he wrote a whole book, this one sentence is all he appears to have written. The ‘immigrant’ identity has self-determination to terraform the country, but the native does not. Isn’t this outcome exactly why natives resent immigrants and descendants of immigrants getting involved in politics and the outcome they seek to avoid?

    Similarly, he is obsessed with racial purity as if the difference between Iceland admitting 1 West African and 50,000 doesn’t exist. But doesn’t this line of thinking just imply that it’s like a dumping ground, eventually people stop trying to clean it up, it’s mentally lost to any sense of value. Ultimately this is somebody pleading that any sense of identity or ethnic ownership of the country is invalid because they feel excluded and is classically Jewish.

    It would have been nice if he contemplated his own ancestry constrained as it is almost entirely from a population that emerged only several hundred years ago from a tiny pool of people. Does he regret his existence? Would he wish to be an ethnicity other than Ashkenazi Jewish or perhaps a modern composite man with no identity? Would he have considered attempts to make his own ancestors melt away into their host societies a problem?

    Kauffman also doesn’t mention that the institutions which worked pretty well in the US were the federal ones that had clear mandates. State and local governments in the US in places which bore heavy immigration became exceedingly more corrupt from both the great wave and current immigration. New York and New Jersey come to mind. Can you imagine if California was an independent country? Even if you absolved it of all the poverty and inequality it has imported, it would be hugely corrupt and inept by Western standards. Has he been to what were until recently ethnically homogeneous countries in Northern Europe? America is highly corrupt and inefficient in it’s institutions by comparison. Their very ethnic homogeneity is what causes such strong social solidarity, sense of duty and trust in the first place.

    Hell, much of the relative lack of noblesse oblige present in the English upper classes can be traced to their sense of themselves as descendants of the conquering Norman invaders. And let’s not even deal with India.

    It’s simply astounding to me to see a prominent Jewish public intellectual write a book about managing the ethnic displacement of the native peoples of Europe and whites in the US because that is the price they have to pay for hosting a Kaufmann and not realise that this is why people hate you, this is a bad thing to do to them and for no mainstream media to comment on what could easily be a 4chan parody.

    • Agree: Bill Jones
  22. Richard B says:
    @Ron Unz

    Do you have any articles of your own on this subject here at TUR that you might direct your readers to?

    • Replies: @Ron Unz
  23. @Ron Unz

    I am wondering, if Eric Kaufmann is related to Theodore Kaufmann?

    Red book cover, check, hating Caucasians, check, Jew obviously, check.

    Kaufmann means btw merchant, quite a fitting name for a criminal maniac Jew with genocidal tendencies.

  24. Anon[276] • Disclaimer says:

    “Whites can no more hold back demography than King Canute could command the tides”

    If they can’t it is only because there are people in control of immigration policy that don’t want to.

    Otherwise they could reduce the level of immigration back to a reasonable level that existed before 1998 (in the U.K anyway) and place an emphasis on having a family.

    Obviously birth rates aren’t what they were before the introduction of contraception (should they be?), but infant mortality rates are far lower than they were in the 18th century and as a result there are still far more British people in Britain today than there was in the early 19th century (despite the much higher birth rate in those days).

    Also, I never really see anyone question if all the people being encouraged to move to places like Britain are actually worth replacing the British public with.

    The only two groups that I can see that tend to be particularly hard workers are eastern Europeans and men from India, correct me if I’m wrong…

  25. Alfred says:

    I suspect that a society that is under real stress will have no difficulty demonizing those with different origins and sending their descendants back to their “homeland”.

    All it needs is for control of the mass media and social media to change hands. People are infinitely malleable IMHO.

    • Replies: @sulu
  26. GMC says:

    Many of us commented for years , that when the Jewish lobby pushed their Open,Unlimited,Unvetted Immigration/Refugee Laws in 65 – it was the end to the chance for an educated European/American society. This is what the author was referring to, when we read ” the incoming tide in 65. Before Washington/Johnson destroyed our successful immigration laws, 80% of our immigrants were picked from Europe and only 700,000 were let in – out of the 100% limit. Afterwards , only 8% Europeans were let in, and as the Jewish lobby said – ” Open the Flood gates”. Today we have a 330 million Heinze 57 society, instead of 240 million European Society, that would have been quite a match for the Zionist bastards. Of course, we can thank all the greedy traitors that have walked the Halls of Washington and the corrupt Supreme Court as well. Europe never got the drift either – now they will look like a Heinz 57 society – Shortly. Thanks Unz Rev.

  27. Vinnie O says:

    I would note that the “mixing” approach has repeatedly NOT worked in any city in which it was attempted. That is, in places like Baltimore and Detroit when the White majority finally becomes a minority, they vote with their feet and quietly move away, perhaps saying, “OK, it’s yours. Keep it.” The city then collapses in poverty and violence until even the new majority Minority don’t want to live in a city of their own creation.

    • Agree: sulu
  28. Renoman says:

    You seem to forget, we have most of the money, most of the guns and are the meanest Son’s a Bitches in the Valley. When the blood starts running the vast majority of it will not be white.

    • Replies: @sulu
  29. Amasius says:

    On pp. 230-231 of the book, Kaufmann has this to say about the 2015 mass moslem invasion of Europe:

    If I were in their shoes and had the guts, I would have done precisely the same thing, and it is hard not to be impressed by their perseverance and pluck. Watching it on television, many of us wanted them to succeed, and I am sure they are disproportionately endowed with entrepreneurship, intelligence and grit.

    He writes very little concerning the rape jihad against women of all ages and little boys, the terrorism, and defecating in pools. On page 250 he briefly mentions Charlie Hebdo and Bataclan, and the 2015 Cologne mass molestation event where “many of the perpetrators were reported to be immigrants.” Nothing about Rotherham.

  30. Ron Unz says:
    @Richard B

    Do you have any articles of your own on this subject here at TUR that you might direct your readers to?

    Sure. Over the last 25 years, I’ve published hundreds of thousands of words on race, ethnicity, and social policy, probably more than just about anyone else in America, and all of it is available on this website by clicking my name and exploring my personal archive. Probably a dozen or so of those pieces ran in the NYT, WSJ, or LAT.

    My most substantial articles are conveniently grouped together in a Race/Ethnicity collection listed on the Sidebar:

    http://www.unz.com/page/race-ethnicity-articles/

    You might be especially interested in a long article I published back in 2011 on a theme somewhat similar to Kaufmann’s:

    http://www.unz.com/runz/immigration-republicans-and-the-end-of-white-america-singlepage/

    • Replies: @Richard B
  31. Richard B says:

    “The American state can work with almost any ethnic or religious configuration, adopt any official language, and still function pretty well.”

    How can he possibly know this?

    It’s never happened before. Not the way it’s happening now. And, as far as that’s concerned, as things stand at the moment, the country’s not functioning well at all.

    The USA is already the most multicultural country ever and is also the largest debtor nation in the history of nations.

    Meanwhile, racially homogenous countries like China and Israel are doing ok, relatively speaking. Same with Japan and South Korea.

    But what really gets me, what really sticks out in books and commentary on the subject of race, nations, social-institutions, etc. is how shallow they are.

    One mostly gets a lot of superficial sophistication and magical thinking dressed up in fancy talk designed to impress the easily impressed. In short, propaganda.

    The reason for this is that the intellectual fundamentals of rigorous thinking, consistent reasoning and cautious judgment, applicable to all subject matter, is not taught anymore, anywhere.

    Nor are the rudiments of thought, the fuction of language and the conditions of explanation.

    One odd result is that you have people who are essentially professional explainers who can’t explain Explanation itself.

    Not knowing its conditions they don’t know how it works. Specifically, they don’t know how it works in the one place it matters most, our social-institutions.

    Here’s a simple exam question:

    What connects language to the world?

    And one could add, “And what does that have to do with anything?”

    Of course, it has everything to do with everything. But this is obviously not the place to go into that.

    The point is we have a legion of professional explainers who can’t explain Explanation itself and so know nothing about its relationship to the social-institutions those explanations are attempting to control (by the very thing that connects language to the world) telling us under no uncertain terms that their explanation of the world is unambiguous, perfect and final and that as a result their predictions about things as complex and abstract as “Race” and “The State” are going to come true simply because the say so!

    Never before in history has an elite been this powerful and incompetent at the same time.

    It’s because of this that human beings shouldn’t laugh at the dinosaurs for getting themselves extinct.

    After all, they lasted a lot longer than we have so far.

  32. Anon[276] • Disclaimer says:
    @Not a nazi

    “Can’t wait to hear what other Nazis think about this book!”

    Goebbels might have said something like…

    “Kaufmann has nothing to say about German questions. He is a foreigner, an alien, who only enjoys the rights of a guest, rights that he always abuses”

    I’m not a nazi either, but I’d tend to agree with a statement like that…

  33. El Dato says:
    @Not a nazi

    While my swastika underwear is being ironed, consider:

    1. Flight.
    2. Repress
    3. Flee
    4. Join

    But there is also “Remove from Premises”. Societal change can happen suddenly and without warning.

  34. Richard B says:
    @Ron Unz

    Thank you for your response and for the links. I look forward to reading them.

    • Replies: @syonredux
  35. gotmituns says:

    The time for reading books is at an end. It’s time to Lock & Load.

  36. Anonymous[230] • Disclaimer says:
    @Robert Dolan

    Exactly. Unsurprisingly, he’s trying to sell the lie that the euthanasia of the white race is inevitable, mostly painless and ultimately beneficial. None of those things are true.

  37. schrub says:
    @Reg Cæsar

    Here is a perfect example of whites holding out particularly well while living in that multi ethnic paradise known as Brazil:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blumenau

    89% white! The most prosperous area in the entire country. The world’s second largest Oktoberfest celebration after Munich’s.

    WOW!

    • Replies: @Agathoklis
    , @Reg Cæsar
  38. @niteranger

    Robotics, Artificial Intelligence and sophistication of new hardware will eliminate a very high percentage of jobs.

    No. This idiotic and irredeemably shit-corked trope has been endlessly repeated around here and it’s time that the whole stupid notion was forcibly blown out the asshole and discharged for the nonsense it is.

    The industrial revolution reached the point of diminishing returns a long time ago. Further attempts at automation at this point do not result in productivity gains; they result in productivity losses. Although this can be easily enough observed by anyone who cares to notice it, the idea is not part of the general consciousness and it is therefore never remarked upon. As such, it is one of the hidden factors, along with demographics, causing the global economy to stagnate. If anything, it is even more of a taboo subject than demographics is. Immigration, ageing, birth dearth, and racial differences all have their chroniclers, but nobody challenges the notion that more technology inevitably equals bigger, better, and faster.

    But just because people are not aware of something does not mean that it does not exist. I think the year 2020 (a nice round number) will end up being a tipping point, albeit visible to most only in retrospect. People will soon need to grapple with the fact that spending evermore sums of money on computerization and data harvesting just isn’t paying off. We aren’t getting any bang for these bucks; the money is just disappearing down a silicon rat-hole and padding the fortunes of a few tech billionaires who are increasingly unhinged from reality.

    The cultural fallout from this realization is going to be immense, indeed earthshaking. I do not think that governments, policy makers, or corporations even know how to do anything except pursue “more tech.” The idea that the only way forward lies along different lines simply has not and probably cannot occur to them. There is really no literature, no philosophy, and certainly no practical economic or political theories devoted to exploring what happens when we crash into the wall of diminishing returns.

    I venture to point out here I am not talking about a limit to further technical development. You may, if you wish, continue to find ways of squeezing even more processors onto a solid-state chip, for instance, just as you may create a Rube Goldberg contraption for flipping burgers (which is nowadays all that the field of “robotics” amounts to). But I am saying that these endeavors will no longer be profitable. It will require more capital, more labor, and more time to go on attending to the machine than the machine itself will save. In effect, we will all end up “working for the machine”—and working even harder and for lower wages than before—scurrying around performing the ancillary tasks necessary for the machine to keep doing its job.

    Once these conditions obtains, market forces will eventually bring it about that the more efficient, lower tech firms will out-compete their wasteful, higher tech counterparts. At that point the reign of the machine will be effectively over, but the cultural crisis will be just beginning. For the West, the machine was never really about mere efficiency per se; it was a symbol of our whole way of thinking and living. When this god dies, the whole enterprise known as “science,” mistakenly believed by our savants to be a universally valid addition to the stock of human wisdom, must also fade into oblivion. Technique will remain, but not theory. There will be chemical plants in the future but not “chemistry,” machines but not “physics.” All will become handicraft. Science, which is basically just the contemplation of nature in terms of causality, concludes once it has thought its form-world out to completion.

    But in the meantime, the economic growth that untold millions depend upon is coming to an end. They will be replaced not by automation but by nothing. With the passing of the machine, the world which called the into being and significance is also passing away.

    • Agree: Fuerchtegott
  39. @Richard B

    “…Never before in history has an elite been this powerful and incompetent at the same time…”

    I don’t think it is “incompetence”, I think it is deliberate deception, and that to an audience that has been deliberately dumbed down for that purpose.

    • Replies: @Richard B
  40. I can’t believe you’re taking a sociologist seriously. This is a guy who can’t do math or write fiction but nevertheless had to have an advanced degree so he could please his parents. He cranks out this insulting drivel looking for a fight to distract him from his self-loathing. Don’t take the bait. Let him live with his pathetic self in silence so his thoughts about his insignificance are all he has to keep him company.

    Sociology!

    • Replies: @Eric Novak
  41. @Robert Dolan

    Getting advice or help from one’s enemies isn’t recommended.

    Reminds me of pre-Trump (and post) Retardicans trying to communicate ideas. Not only are they bad at it, after 60+ years they still haven’t figured out fake news hates them and will twist their already- flimsy messages.

  42. I started to read and…ceased. Another guy projecting his personal preferences as a kind of scientific inevitability. Pass the salt.

    • Replies: @anon
  43. DaveE says:

    I haven’t read Kaufman’s book, but gosh, what a great review! An HONEST review, not paid for by Amazon or the like…. so rare these days. I highly doubt I would be more enlightened by the book than by this review!

    I’m not sold on Kaufman in the slightest, but Martin Witkerk is a name to remember.

    Thanks once again for a great truth-nugget.

  44. @schrub

    There are many isolated European communities that endure in the most trying of places:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greeks_in_Zimbabwe

  45. @Franklin Ryckaert

    I’ve noticed that mixed race people tend to get excited about the prospect of a future where “everyone is mixed”, they view this as a highly desirable thing. They also get extremely angry at anyone who stands in the way of their ideal future (ie. “racists”). It’s all quite self-absorbed.

    • Replies: @Bookish1
    , @marylou
  46. mikemikev says:

    born in Hong Kong to a Jewish father and mixed Costa Rican/Chinese mother

    Wasn’t Lenin a similar blend?

  47. THE NATIVE BORN WHITE AMERICAN WORKING CLASS CAN NOT ADAPT to the demands of the Democratic Party….How exactly does one adapt to WHITE GENOCIDE?

    • Replies: @sulu
  48. DanFromCT says:
    @Rational

    Forget Kaufman. The hand wringing on Fox News is serious learned helplessness subtly coming through our TV’s 24/7 . Years of Russiagate and an ongoing coup d’etat and there’s nothing we can do about it, they tell us, except listen to empty jawing from Lou Dobbs and his feeble guests. The Dems are brazenly shaping the post-2020 future around a homicidal coalition of white-hating racist POCs, and we’re told getting out the vote guaranteeing more of the same is the solution. Endless wars for Israel that for every dollar borrowed correspond to losing three from our private economy, and they tell us to prepare for more wars on behalf of a people who’ve done more espionage damage to America than all official enemies put together in our history. I’ve also noticed on Fox that their formerly pumped up patriotism is being transitioned into a sickly reflection of itself that I’d guess is meant to embed the notion open patriotism is now dangerous behavior that should be avoided because the pencil-necked geeks and fat slobs from Antifa now own the streets of our cities.

  49. White Shift?………..

    YOU WILL NOT REPLACE US!!!!!!!!!!

  50. @mikemikev

    No…..Lenin was of cockroach-bedbug ancestry…..

    • LOL: Svigor
  51. sally says:
    @Miro23

    while the end demographics are as you say, the question seems to me to be about control power over polices designed to exclude or impose gated admission criterion.. and for that I see federalism (as the great resistor).. where there is a central government over a mass of highly differentiated states (as in the USA or in EU) you find those small states lack sufficient power to control selection or impose gates. America began to homogenize just after the Civil War 1865.. Jewish invasions began in earnest in 1890s. before that it was the Irish. the Dispersion of Jews by the Ottoman following failed Zionist (not the same as Jewish) controlled CUP coup attempt, in 1908 and then the great Salonika fire about 1913.. and so forth..

  52. Agent76 says:

    Mar 20, 2015 The Cycle of The State (by Daniel Sanchez)

    [MORE]

    Daniel Sanchez combines the theories of Robert Higgs and Hans-Hermann Hoppe to form a theory of the cycle of the state.

    Sep 4, 2015 Corporations versus The Market

    My reading of the article by Roderick Long published at Cato Unbound.

    May 5, 2016 The Myth of Authority

    This video, created and submitted by”GeoShifter,” was the winner of the recent video contest, to see who could make the best video to go along with the narration.

  53. At this point is readily apparent that the “Bad Austrian” really did see the future and did everything he could to stop it from being realized. The horror that the remaining “Greatest generation” must have now in their twilight in how they enabled the very destruction they were told they were fighting.

    A world ruled by Germany would have been far kinder to the Greatest Generation’s descendants than the genocide they now are in the middle of.

    Truly sad. All of their effort served the very agenda that meant their grandchildren the most harm.

    • Replies: @sulu
    , @Sunshine
  54. @Rational

    Eric Kaufmann’s Whiteshift: Populism, Immigration, and the Future of White Majorities is a book about the future of white majorities in Western nations written by someone whose biography reads like a send up of multiculturalism: born in Hong Kong to a Jewish father and mixed Costa Rican/Chinese mother, raised in Vancouver, he spent eight years in Tokyo before becoming professor of politics at the University of London.

    Eric Kaufmann is pushing mass legal immigration and mass illegal immigration because he wants to continue to use mass immigration as a demographic weapon to attack and destroy European Christian nations.

    Eric Kaufmann’s obvious hatred of European Christian nations and European Christians in general is highly representative of the hostile Jew component of the evil ruling classes in European Christian nations who are flooding their nations with non-Europeans and non-Christians. Jews have infiltrated and infested may of the ruling classes in England and Australia and the USA and France and many other European Christian nations, and the Jews in these ruling classes are always agitating for nation-wrecking mass legal immigration and mass illegal immigration.

    Eric Kaufmann is a half Jew but he is a full-bore Bolshevik is in desire to destroy European Christians and European Christian nations and European Christendom.

    Eric Kaufmann’s hatred for European Christians brings up the JEW QUESTION.

    JEW QUESTION EXPLAINED:

    Jews form a nation within a nation everywhere they reside. Can Jews ever be considered to be part of the larger nation in which they reside when they are genetically and culturally predisposed to put the interests of the Jew Nation over and above the interests of the larger nations in which they reside?

    • Replies: @Bookish1
  55. Bookish1 says:

    The jew Kaufman isn’t saying anything different than any other white hating jew is saying. He is simply trying to present the end of whites with a supposedly different angle to the general argument why the world would be better off without whites.

  56. Bookish1 says:
    @Herbert West

    If you were bred into inferior genetics wouldn’t you resent the pure races that retain their superior qualities.

  57. Charlemagne says: • Website
    @Not a nazi

    I don’t wish to be eliminate = Nazi.

  58. Republic says:

    White replacement type books, such as Whiteshift, by Jewish/white leftists writers seem to be very popular among the Jews, who seem to have an insatiable appetite or addiction for such publications , as it fulfills their relentless tribal quest spanning centuries to destroy the Whites.

    The term, White replacement used to be used only by obscure white nationalist sites, but now the term is increasingly being used by the mainstream press, and so it raises racial awareness by the Whites who were heretofore unaware of what was happening to them.

    Indeed some Jewish activists have warned against informing the Whites of this danger

  59. @niteranger

    perhaps, pose a security threat

    Laughing out loud at that one–there won’t be any “threats” when it gets to that point because the only competent security professionals will turn out to be “enemy” moles who act.

  60. sally says:
    @Intelligent Dasein

    The notion that more technology inevitably equals bigger, better, and faster yields to a truth that approaches its diminishing wall, but just as all it about to still, a new innovation diminishes the wall..

    Education is a bureaucracy, learning is a biological activity activated only by (real, imaginary, animated, etc.) the force of experience. (Experience is a set of forces?) The automation to date has not been intelligent, even the so-called intelligent robot is pre-programmed mostly uploaded instructions. There is no malleable structure and no set after set of substructures for the automaton to process its experiences through to develop mazes from all its prior experiences. Self developed methods are needed to digest those experiences into what some call knowledge <=when that happens the learning effort will produce a quantity with some utility for the self function of the automaton.. I predict that era is coming .. soon the robots will be able to out think, out plan the human..not just in a closed system such a chess. Learning is a multifaceted, phased, highly mixed set of highly interactive, most binary bio weighted algorithmic self emergent processes that work their way into a cognitive working space. <=no one can put them there, they have to be developed by the robot itself.. from exposure to real experience multi many times.. to do that requires an operating system similar to the biological processing systems that function in biology species. Mimic the process of biology exposed to experience is the task. Just the development of that system will replace the lost jobs. We are learning to write programs that work like the biological systems.

    But the self automaton might be replacing economics itself. Economics is a owner:slave ideology that serves only the rich..and presumes most people have to work for one of the monopoly powered corporations in slave like jackets called jobs. What is challenged is not a jobless society, but the need for jobs at all.

  61. TyRade says:

    For your entertainment, my review of Kaufmann below…bumped by Amazon (probably because of the ‘pickaninnies’ references, even though I was quoting Kaufmann quoting Enoch Powell):
    No White Wash

    44 Post-it tags for memorable and/or enraging statements; multiple margin scribbles (just below tagging status) on almost all the 537 pages – I could not say this painstakingly balanced, so potentially bland tome left me unmoved.

    It’s a hard book to like though. The very first sentence “We need to talk about white identity”, is the the high point, stylistically. Uneven style means it’s hard to warm to the substance. Why didn’t prof Kaufmann learn from the pithiness of Margaret Thatcher, whose “tough language” in 1978 he quotes: “if you want good race relations, you have got to allay people’s fears on numbers”? 15 words making as much sense as 537 pages. Or follow the forensic thinking of a power in the first Thatcher government, David Willets, here quoted on diversity grating against solidarity: “If values become more diverse…then it becomes more difficult to sustain the legitimacy of a universal risk-pooling welfare state”?

    [MORE]

    Deterrent too are the awkward analogies. Eg. “like a nuclear plant, people who live close enough to diversity to be comfortable with it, or too far away to think about it, are less radicalised that those just close enough to be fearful.” And the Chernobyl moment?!

    For all that, I think prof Kaufmann should be cut considerable slack. His biggest achievement is that he straddles bubbles, balances biases – quite an intellectual acrobat!

    He throws a now compulsory yet perfunctory bone to the Left – minorities are “vibrant”, majorities “enduring”. Signals his virtue blatantly – “when I give my charity contributions each year, it always goes to those at the very bottom of the pile”. Ticks several diversity boxes, in bold – he’s “quarter Latino”, “quarter Chinese”, part “Hispanic” (“Costa Rica, one of my ancestral homelands”). And he parts “company with those on the right who believe group sentiments are a problem and we should simply identify as individuals.” What, like Dr Martin Luther King?!

    But these few forelock tugs to the Left are more than balanced by his academic cahones. Even raising white interests these days is to risk being de-platformed or de-fenestrated; ‘punching down’, so Verboten. “It’s time to pull back from this cosmopolitan overreach” is almost a Jordan Peterson-ism. “The religion of anti-racism ministers to white progressives’ symbolic need for the absolution of sin” is heresy. And “the drive to purify language of putatively offensive speech reduces expressive liberty” evokes the spirit (if not eloquence) of Orwell. Meanwhile “it may be that liberals and conservatives both have ethnic preferences but liberals are less willing to own up to them” is red meat to the black hooded on campus. Undeterred, he advances: “Invoking the history of races to justify harsher treatment of whites reflects a Hatfield-McCoy theory of justice that leans on pre-Hobbesian notions of inter-generational culpability, collective punishment, eternal sin and retributive justice.” In short: “one cannot visit the sins of the fathers on the children.” Tell that to Democrats now baying for reparations? Or on CNN? Only with bodyguards. As for “Countries have a right to regulate membership”, Open Borders zealots just declared open season on him.

    So plough on, through teeth-grating howlers like: “right wing populism dominates the news” and “affirmative action…doesn’t usually apply in Europe”. Grind through inexplicable lapses in research. Eg 1: he claims Enoch Powell in his 1968 ‘Rivers of Blood’ speech used “a derogatory term suggesting blacks are inferior” when, in fact, Powell was citing a letter from a constituent observing “charming, wide-grinning pickaninnies”; and Kaufmann left out the “charming” too. (Fast forward 40 years from Powell, as Kaufmann does, to a verbatim record of a conversation between a Midlands Labour MP and a constituent complaining about immigration in her face; “Margaret, would you please live here for two or three weeks and see what it’s like?” The MP sloped off. So ‘that was a ‘no’ then’.) Eg 2: The claim that “other racial groups are outbreeding whites…can be dispensed with fairly quickly.” Well yes, if you ignore the data! Total fertility rates, ie babies per woman (UN data) today are: Africa 4.43, Central Asia 2.56, Europe 1.63. Trends are lower, but the ‘outbreeding’ now, and for some time, is fact. Kaufmann himself un-dispenses with his contention ‘fairly quickly’: “In 1950 there were 3.5 Europeans and North Americans for every African. The UN’s medium projection tells us that by 2050 there will be two Africans for every Westerner, and four Africans per Westerner by 2100. This is probably an underestimate.” Pre-order your copy of ‘The Scramble FROM Africa’ on Amazon… Oh, and “the future is unknowable, but the safest prediction in the social sciences is that the West can only become less white.”

    You’ll be rewarded with ice-breakers at your next Cosmopolitan party like:

    – Randolph Bourne a century ago overlaid WASP self-loathing onto multiculturalism: “ethnic minorities should preserve themselves while the majority should dissolve itself.” And essentially wrote the Democrat party platform 2020.

    – “the demographic momentum of decades past will continue to drive ethnic change [in the US] for half a century even if Latino immigration slows to a trickle.” Too late…to ‘build that wall’, Mr President.

    – “Whites gravitate to neighbourhoods that are over 85% white.” Which includes white elites mouthing hypocritically about diversity being who ‘we’ are, presumably.

    – 19 out of 21 studies from 1995 to 2016 measuring ethnic change “found this to be associated with native white opposition to immigration.” In global warming ‘debate’ terms – ‘science proves immigration is unpopular’. By now the BBC would have banned dissent.

    – Similarly, of 90 studies of “diversity and social cohesion” “diversity was linked with lower neighbourhood trust in the majority of studies.” David Willetts indeed has two brains.

    – the ratio of liberals to conservatives among US psychology academics was 4 in the 1960s to 1980s and it’s o 14 now. “The 2010s represents a renewed period of left-modernist innovation, incubated by near-universal left-liberal hegemony among non-STEM faculty and administrators.” Institutionally left-liberal, then.

    – according to “ethical experiments”, “liberals are significantly less willing to sacrifice a person with a black-sounding name to save white lives than to sacrifice an individual with a white name to save black lives. Conservatives, by contrast, are colour-blind.” Who knew, reading the NY Times or watching MSM?

    And you’ll be treated to a peep at a more or less scary future. Hobson arguably had better choices. For “English Canada”.. it’s either “Guyana or Belize”. For the UK: Nicaragua by 2200, and Bolivia by 2300 (at 350,000 pa immigration) or Mexico/Costa Rica by 2200 and Brazil by 2300 (at 50,000 pa immigration). Plus all the attendant, vibrant cultural benefits (unstable government, juntas, drug cartels) one hopes. More generally, there’s a “positive-sum outlook” for whites if they “adopt a Hawaiian/Creole strategy, opening up to those of mixed background who identify with their European roots.” But if white men can’t jump, can they hula hula or play jazz?

    Kaufmann manages (admirably) to put the above jaw-droppers in a rigorous structure, framing Hobson’s, sorry white choices into 4:

    Fight? This, to summarise brutally, is tribal, the historic way, so bad. Note that whites, even dying out, can “obstruct change, damage social cohesion, and, perhaps, pose a security threat” ‘Future threat’ is the successor to ‘historic guilt’, then? There’s an illogic to Kaufmann’s analysis here however: he intimates that it’s alright for black Harlem to resist, or slow ‘gentrification’ (by whites) but not for whites to resist ‘de-gentrification’ by mass immigration (by non-whites).

    Repress? Apply the PC gag, let diversity porn wash over you. But, Kaufmann argues, you can’t tattoo taboos on the subconscious. So “permitting freer expression of the majority group’s sense of cultural loss…is, in the long run, probably less dangerous than repressing them.” Tell that to Repression Inc, today’s ‘coalition of the fringes’, for whom the “frenzy” against “heretics” (ie straight white males above all) provides “an internal scapegoat to unify a group against.”

    Flee? In which whites circle the wagons, vote with their feet since other forms are not on offer or allowed. Start dusting off ‘Atlas Shrugged.’ Kaufmann usefully hints that the best ‘hidden valleys’ for whites are in Mormon Utah. Having sects is one means of white ethnic survival. Indeed, there might be 307 million prolific Amish in the USA by 2265, Kaufmann teases. A more serious white preservative might be the example of Haredi Jews. They’ve countered being surrounded by ‘hostiles’ with an extraordinary birth rate. Surely the right-on Swedes can’t teach future whites much here? Well, in the ‘enlightened Land’ “Sweden’s residential segregation …is a result of decisions taken by the Swedish majority, who tend to cluster in Swedish-dense neighbourhoods and avoid immigrant-dense housing estates.” Obviously, “It’s not that white liberals are hypocrites who flee diversity”…oh no, not at all.

    Join? Have more sex, inter-ethnically – ’screw for peace’, ‘beige is the colour’. This is Kaufmann’s preferred, consensual choice. Interestingly, the prospect of this “melting”, assimilation – especially whites incorporating Hispanics – caused one “centre-left” writer to “revise his thesis that America’s changing demographics will automatically produce Democrat victories in the future.” Meanwhile, in The Enlightened Land, because Muslim immigrants in Sweden are ethnically different, the “pool of eligible Muslim partners” is reduced so they’ll “marry non-Muslims at higher rates” (than say mono-ethnic Muslims of Belgium, Netherlands). But surely they’ll have to pin down the Swedes already fleeing this diverse offer’?

    Much, if not all, depends on today’s minorities identifying ‘white-ly’ tomorrow. And this in turn assumes a white welcoming mat/bed is proffered; if “Asian groups typically maintain stronger proscriptions against intermarriage” why won’t whites, learning by example from a well-documented higher IQ group, in the future? Transitioning to this mixed-race idyll also needs ”cultural work to adapt white majority myths of origin and symbol systems to the new mixed population.” But this is already well underway – see the broad-brush ‘beiging’ in progress of TV adverts and programmes, of even ancient history, of your Google home-page celebrating minority figures of less-than-Newtonian achievement.

    Kaufmann’s latte future also hangs on “symmetrical multicultiralism”, the (brave/quaint/heretic – delete according to bias) notion that whites have an ethnic identity deserving of respect too. But doesn’t this depend on a sense of ‘fair play’, heretofore a concept, arguably, that’s a monopoly of white nations? As for “multi-vocal understanding” – Babel, anyone? And in the background to let’s “celebrate the different ways we identify in common” you can almost hear the Kumbaya chorus.

    Might inter-racial angst all ‘melt’ away more quietly than Kaufmann implies? Charles Murray, in his ‘Coming Apart – the state of white America 1960-2010’ (a much better book all round than this, though Murray consistently sets the highest of benchmarks) argues that unless successful whites ‘preach what they practise’ – the Founding, so coincidentally white values of family, honesty, and industry – underclasses (here only white ones examined) will wallow in their broken-family idleness and suck nations down. So, the ‘culture’ which immigrants are being asked to ‘join’ might not set such a high bar on ‘membership’. Should we laugh or cry?

  62. Sbaker says:
    @Not a nazi

    Can we we assume you are of Semitic origin? Muslim or Jewish?

    • Replies: @Not a nazi
  63. Sbaker says:
    @syonredux

    Of course, my perceptions are colored by the fact that I work in an environment (academia) where anti-White hatred is the norm….””

    Tell me more. That is exactly why I took the tenure buyout. Well, the money too was considered. The hostility for normal white males is palpable. The title IX lawyers have taken the reins of education and they are shaking down white males.

    • Replies: @JackOH
  64. anon[108] • Disclaimer says:
    @Bardon Kaldian

    Another guy projecting his personal preferences as a kind of scientific inevitability.

    which guy are you talking about, Kaufmann or Witkerk?


    Germanicus said it first, #23:

    https://www.unz.com/article/eric-kaufmanns-whiteshift-repressing-whites-wont-work-maybe-pacification-will/#comment-3421425

    • Replies: @Bardon Kaldian
  65. @Intelligent Dasein

    I have no idea which world you live in but you appear to be a non conscious being from another planet. You can’t compare the Industrial Revolution to what is happening now. It just doesn’t work! Your world may eventually happen but it won’t for a very long time and if it ever makes it to that time there may be enough wars to send us back to a more primitive time.

    Total automation in some fields will have machines building other machines with little help real people once they are built. Many of these machines will require little maintenance. Replacement of computer boards and other lightweight stuff that anyone can do. You confuse Analog with Digital. You also confuse “Science” with “Technology.” There is a difference. Science isn’t going anywhere. You have obviously never built anything. You also confuse “Machines” with a generic domain. All “Machines” are not alike as an example 3 D Printing. What took a massive amount of money and huge factory to build guns can be done in one’s basement. Three D printers are capable of producing an entire AR-15 without a factory and the printers are cheap! This will open up new markets. Of course, the government will step in to stop this stuff because they want control of the “market place.” Intelligent men will always figure out how to build things whether it’s Henry Ford or some kid down the street who has figured it out when no one else has by thinking outside Society’s Reality. When Western Civilization collapses it will cause a domino effect because no other group has shown more innovation and ingenuity in building things.

    Your theory on “Market Forces” is another Utopian Dream. There is no such thing as a free market. If there was we wouldn’t have a Military Industrial Complex which is funded by Governments for Corporations.

    You assume this world will take place in some linear fashion but that won’t happen either. These systems are chaotic and unbalanced. Disease, environmental disasters, wars, overpopulation and just plain stupidity will collapse society before we reach your point of some Science Fiction Narrative.

  66. escobar says:

    Why would the Jews of America (5 1/2 million of them) want to “destroy” a society that’s been so good to them? The 1st Commandment of/for the Jews “Thou shalt prosper” has been followed. Jews have become establishment “insiders”–from Kissinger (oy!) to the boys from Goldman Sachs in every administration since Reagan. Jewish dentists played a major role in giving the greatest nation the greatest oral health in the world. They entertained America, from vaudeville to Seinfeld. They have had Jewish presidents of every (yes?) member college.
    And this they want to destroy? For what—a world of Jewish carping and self-loathing? Constant strife and a revival of delis for a health-conscious professional class? Are they stupid or self-destructive?
    And, do they even have the time (and energy) to plot such destruction, given how busy they are making money, pursuing professional suycces, not to mention purasuing nubile young shiksas if your name ends in “stein” from Ep-to Wein-stein.

    • Replies: @anon
    , @Miro23
  67. I’ve done some research on the recent Neo-Nazi movement. What I found most shocking was the fact that many Asians and Latinos were for it until learning that they weren’t going to be around after the Final Solution. For follow up, I’ll demonstrate that Slavics/Russians must be behind this racially eclectic white supremacism as they were also not preferred by the original Nazis. There were some comments about inclusiveness and that they didn’t realize Nazis had anything to do with the holocaust.

  68. Anon[304] • Disclaimer says:

    It’s a legitimate question to ask. What if these writers advocating replacement of whites are being paid by the Chinese, etc to push these ideas? Someone had been start investigating their finances.

  69. @anon

    Kauffman. It’s “because I have a problem with identity, everybody should be like me”. And his theses are idiotic:

    The American state can work with almost any ethnic or religious configuration, adopt any official language, and still function pretty well.

    Alright, let’s get it straight.

    Russian state can work with almost any ethnic or religious configuration, adopt any official language, and still function pretty well.

    So it goes with China.

    Also, Israel.

    Also, Saudi Arabia.

    Also, Morocco.

    Also, Argentina.

    Also, France.

    Also, Denmark

    Also, Mexico.

    All I can say abut that kind of “reasoning” is:

    • Replies: @Germanicus
  70. I was about to make a comment like this…. “Make America Gentile Again”

    but I froze when I read this:

    “prof” Lipstadt: “Governments must treat anti-Semitic attacks as domestic terrorism”

    How about, if ……..Governments treat Zionism and Israel like lepers.

    • Replies: @jack daniels
    , @Wally
  71. Anon[346] • Disclaimer says:

    “He does say, however, that his principle forbids Western nations from defining themselves as either white or Christian”

    The man is delusional.

    Britain is a white country (was about 99.9℅ white up to about the 1950’s, was about 92.1% white in 2001 and was about 81.9% white in 2011), and has been a christian country for about 1300 years, although there are also agnostics and atheists.

    There are only about  290,000 to 300,000 jewish people in Britain, and all other religions other than christianity are recent additions that were not in Britain in any significant number before the 1950’s.

    Immigrants that have chosen to move to Britain, regardless of if they aren’t christian or white themselves, knew that before choosing to move to Britain. And those thinking of moving to Britain should be aware of this, and if it is a problem for them, should consider moving elsewhere where the culture and people suit them better. Because the British public don’t have to change for them. Although I do appreciate that the impression that the British public should change because outsiders who don’t even live in Britain yet or recent immigrants have a problem with them is fed to them by the vacuous, delusional, sneering and contemptuous (towards the British public) liberal elite and most would probably not be thinking that way if it wasn’t for the propaganda that the ‘liberal’ establishment put out.

    If the way the British public are before you move to Britain is really not to your liking or preference, then find somewhere else to move to that’s more to your liking.

    Most of the British public are too busy to realise what game’s being played, but when they’re made aware most of them don’t appreciate it and their opinion doesn’t usually conform to the ‘liberal’ propaganda…

  72. @Ron Unz

    Thanks so much for the excellent review Mr. Witkert. And thanks also to Mr. Unz for his follow-up comment. Even halfway thru the review, I had decided that I wouldn’t waste my time reading the book.

  73. Yadayada says:
    @Amasius

    Yeah, rape, murder and genocide are pluck and intelligence. Typical Jewspeak. Whatever is done to destroy our people is the height of resourcefulness to Shylock.

  74. Anon[242] • Disclaimer says:
    @miss marple

    “I’ve done some research on the recent Neo-Nazi movement. What I found most shocking was the fact that many Asians and Latinos were for it until learning that they weren’t going to be around after the Final Solution”

    That’s interesting because most people aren’t aware of this ‘recent neo nazi movement’ you’re referring to, it must be a very small ‘movement’.

    “For follow up, I’ll demonstrate that Slavics/Russians must be behind this racially eclectic white supremacism as they were also not preferred by the original Nazis”

    You’ll have evidence for that it take it?

    • Replies: @jack daniels
  75. syonredux says:
    @Richard B

    Thank you for your response and for the links. I look forward to reading them.

    Bear in mind, Ron likes the idea of Whites being replaced by POC.

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
    , @Richard B
  76. @Anon

    -The man is delusional-

    Noooo!
    He is not delusional! He is a bastard.

    • Replies: @Anon
  77. This man is playing a dangerous game.

    Whites designed societies where power grids, water infrastructure, distribution of clean foods and other large scale requirements to keep the masses alive and in comfort that Brown nations struggle with and Black nations have never done on their own.

    There is a reason for this and its tied to the correlation of a race to its IQ, culture and large scale social behavioral traits manifested in how the country is run politically and economically.

    BTW…….Asians have the IQ but lacked the culture and behavioral traits to develop modern first world countries until Whites pretty much showed them how to…..but once shown they manage them well……contrast that to Black countries where once Whites are gone they revert back to the Black mean of existence….

    So this author figures that if you mix Brown/Black and in some cases Asians with Whites it will still work?

    One must ask how much mixing can be done before you water down the White racial attributes and still have enough of it to maintain let alone innovate a first world technological society where everyone’s needs have the potential to be met?

    Where is the threshold in a mixed White population that delineates between what can and what can no longer be achieved when measured against what Whites as a race have accomplished in the past independent from any other race?

    Racial groups are not a plug and play game in race mixing in which we can have any reliable indicator of where that leaves humanity in the long run……….

    Its a dangerous game to play ……if you expect humanity to progress.

    The only real solution is to limit the reproduction of non-Whites so that their overpopulation misery of problems is reduced first and foremost for their own sake and for Whites as well…..

    • Replies: @Corvinus
    , @Justvisiting
  78. “Kaufmann” huh?

    Every Fucking Time,

  79. @Intelligent Dasein

    This idiotic and irredeemably shit-corked trope has been endlessly repeated around here and it’s time that the whole stupid notion was forcibly blown out the asshole and discharged for the nonsense it is.

    How many leading minds at Amazon, Apple, CIA, DARPA, Facebook, Google, Harvard, Microsoft, MIT, NSA and Stanford do you think you will be able to influence with these ideas?

  80. @syonredux

    He can afford the resulting rents.

  81. @Bardon Kaldian

    Half the countries you named are financuially broke and sucked dry by the Jews.

    I doubt a muslim China would work, or a Hindu Argentina, France whatever.
    Multicultural mess the Jews enforce has never worked, never, it is a weapon to destroy the host population.

    Also, Saudi Arabia.

    It is perhaps why the Saudi deported a million plus foreigners back home where they came from.

    Also, Israel.

    Are you proposing a Christian Palestine? Afaik, the Israeli Jews rip the NT apart in their Knesset. Are you a bit deluded or what? They sterilize the Ethiopian Jews.

  82. anarchyst says:

    “We need to talk about white identity”
    NO! “We need to talk about jewish supremacy”…

    • Agree: geokat62
  83. Jason Liu says:

    The reason he doesn’t apply the same standards to East Asian countries is because he expects Western countries to conform to Western values. It’s not as hypocritical as you think. Whether or not Western values of freedom and individualism are better than the collectivist nationalism elsewhere remains to be seen.

    • Replies: @jack daniels
    , @Saxon
  84. @Nick J

    Race is more important than culture. At some point, you’re defined by your enemies, whether you like it or not. Playing these little games isn’t going to work.

    • Replies: @bookish1
    , @Corvinus
    , @Nick J
  85. @miss marple

    Lol, well, I’m not sure what you were “researching,” but you’re a little off the mark.

  86. I have no problem with Hispanic immigration in small numbers but I don’t want to walk into a McDonald’s in Virginia and find I am the only native English speaker in the room. I welcome Muslim immigrants because I am a reactionary on social policy and welcome the addition of “people of color” who oppose feminism and gay lib. Even more, I welcome the addition of any people who will dare to talk back to the all-powerful Jewish lobby. Before Tlaib and Omar there were zero critics of Israel out of 541 senators and congressmen. Since the public has always had a decent-sized minority siding with the Palestinians, the 0-for-541 number testifies to an amazing ability to squelch dissent where it matters.

    I am surprised that I am nearly the only right-winger around (save Patrick Little!) who would like to see more Muslims. For that matter, I would like to see more Hispanics if only they were observant Catholics and fans of sharply-drawn sex-roles. In Ann Coulter’s latest column she complains about Latin machismo driving young immigrants to ignore traffic laws. But Ann, isn’t that a small price to pay if they pinch girls’ asses, wolf-whistle, and make gay jokes? I’d love to see a crowd of mixed Latinos and Muslims with torches and pitchforks storming the local office of the NEA to complain about Tranny Story Hour. One could die of old age waiting for us whiteys to complain, especially with college football starting up. I’m sure Ann would agree if she took the time to reflect.

  87. @Jason Liu

    Not only is there “collectivist nationalism” but there is “individualist nationalism” which is what “populism” amounts to. Populism places a high value on maintaining a coherent culture but wants this to happen through voluntary alliances of average individuals rather than through a government or elite ramming a national agenda down the throats of the little people. Populism is the higher synthesis of collectivism and individualism. It allows people to keep their liberties while having government policy that promotes a shared vision.

    To make populism viable it is helpful to limit immigration on the part of people who don’t share the nation’s defining values, which in America’s case are mainly Christian and Anglo-Saxon in origin.

  88. @Agathoklis

    That may be true of the Peloponnesus, but Slavic admixture is much greater in Northern Greece.

    • Replies: @Agathoklis
  89. @Sbaker

    No, my father’s side of the family all come from Germany, my mother’s side from several different western European countries. I’m neither muslim nor jewish, I’m a christian atheist (jesus as a moral philosopher, not a god). And it’s the moral philosophy of christianity, and it’s focus on loving our neighbors and caring for refugees that brought me here. I’m just really surprised that there are so many people openly espousing racist views. To me, racism is antithetical to the teachings of Jesus. I really don’t understand what leads a white person to feel they are superior to others. After reading the comments here, I still don’t know.

    • Troll: German_reader
    • Replies: @sulu
    , @jack daniels
  90. Saxon says:
    @Jason Liu

    They’re not “western values,” though. That’s all recent astroturfed top-down diktat. Go read the way, say, Cecil Rhodes talked about his own people. Not very individualist.

    • Agree: ben tillman
  91. @Anon

    Most contemporary white nationalists take it for granted that they should be hostile to all non-whites. However, Hitler himself was mainly concerned about the Jews. He allied with the Japanese and Bosnian Muslims and despite having invaded Poland got a fair amount of support from Ukrainians and Poles when advancing on the Soviet Union. (Also white nationalists on the defensive know that speaking critically of Jews is considerably more dangerous than complaining about Muslims, so they tend to emphasize the latter and play down the former.) As I see it, the problem with Jews is that, taken as a group, they have all the wrong politics (by my yardstick) and yet are able to dominate the political landscape by weaponizing nonwhite minorities via the rhetoric of victimhood and anti-racism. Nonwhites vote for Dems who then implement a radical sexual agenda favored by Jews but not by nonwhites.

    White nationalists pay a fearsome price for ignoring the JQ in order to make meaningless assaults on Muslims, blacks, Latinos, Slavs, and Catholics, who could be allies in the struggle to reduce Jewish left power to manageable levels, not by progroms but by simple democratic voting.

    • Replies: @Not a nazi for sure
    , @Anon
  92. bookish1 says:
    @AlbionRevisited

    True that race is more important than culture. Study nature and see what mother nature says about the race question. All animals mate within their own kind and their own kind only. A ‘blue bird’ would never mate with a Robin even if the ‘blue bird’ couldn’t find another ‘blue bird’ to mate with. Never. It would die before it would mate with another species of bird. Even sub-species(if my terminology of species is correct) never mate with another bird of a like sub species. For instance there are more than 40 sub species of Warbler birds. They look a lot alike but there are a few subtle differences like one sub species might have a certain color somewhere on its body that other Warblers don’t have. But none of those sub species will ever mate with any other sub species but their own. If they did there wouldn’t be over 40 sub species of Warblers. There would be only one if they all mixed. So whats wrong with that? Mother nature says there is something wrong with that and that is why they don’t mate across sub species lines. So what is mother nature telling us about race. Mother nature is telling us that race is the most important thing in the world. We are born, live and die for the purpose of continuing our racial species. Learn from nature.

  93. @Patrikios Stetsonis

    Why not treat attacks on our First Amendment liberties as domestic terrorism? Then we could lock up Prof. Lipstadt.

  94. @jack daniels

    I’m really glad your side lost world war II.

    • Agree: Bliss
  95. sulu says:
    @Alfred

    Agreed. The recent Trump rally where the White crowd was chanting,”Send them back” was such a clear and spontaneous message that even Trump took some effort to distance himself from it. It tells me that Whites are looking for a leader that will embrace that and other more radical sentiments. All that would be necessary to embolden the White majority in America would be a leader that had the guts to nationalize the media and change the message 180 degrees. The Jewish narrative that has taken decades to carefully construct would be reversed in a year. I have some slight hope that Trump might do such a thing in his second term but I wouldn’t hold my breath. If Trump is not the man then my fervent hope is that Trump is merely John the Baptist and a man with true vision and a plan of action is yet to come.
    I don’t know how realistic it is to say that America might eventually descend into an actual Civil War but for the last decade it has been my opinion that America looks more and more like Wiemar Germany every day. I see this similarity accelerating with little chance of reversal. If we do not have an actual armed conflict I could see a Balkanization of America with California becoming its own country. The one good thing that might happen as a result of this would be the remainder of the country would occupy the far right while those on the far left would flock to California.

    • Replies: @anonymous
  96. @bookish1

    Humans are all the same species. I’m white, my wife is Asian, and our child is awesome. Racism is stupid, my brother. You can do better.

    • Replies: @Wally
    , @Anon
    , @Wolfsangel
  97. Corvinus says:
    @AlbionRevisited

    “Race is more important than culture.”

    Culture is more important than race.

    • Replies: @sulu
    , @Kudzu Bob
  98. Corvinus says:
    @bookish1

    “Mother nature is telling us that race is the most important thing in the world. We are born, live and die for the purpose of continuing our racial species. Learn from nature.”

    Humans have learned from nature since they, unlike the Warbler birds, employ reason and logic. They are well equipped to make their own decisions about race and culture.

    Indeed, from a psychological standpoint, we have an easier time identifying and sympathizing with people who look like us or who belong to the same in-group as us, even though that grouping ultimately was constructed arbitrarily. Recall that in the 1800 and 1900’s race group divisions were based on skin color and physical appearance according to scientists, and then divided into white, black, yellow, and red. Then scientists stated there were more gradient subtypes based on other characteristics. Where is this line drawn between “the races”? Does it not lead to a potential fractioning all the way down to the individual? Think about it. Attempts to divide humanity into race has used as few as three, then up to more than thirty. Humans have been migrating back and forth across the continents for over 200,000 years. Genetic traits have been mixed and remixed over and over. So it really boils down to how many races of humans exist depends on one’s meaning of the word…race.

    Spoke another way–Hans F. K. Günther, in his work Kleine Rassenkunde des deutschen Volkes (1929), came up with five sub-races: Nordic, Alpine, Mediterranean, East Baltic, and Dinaric. He defined each subtype general physical appearance and their psychological qualities including their “racial soul” – referring to their emotional traits and religious beliefs, and provided detailed information on their hair, eye, and skin colors, facial structure, and body type, as well as their typical behaviors. On the lower end of the totem pole, those groups were identified as possessing undesirable traits.

    Furthermore, the Anglo-Saxons were insistent that certain European groups were utterly incapable of understanding republican values . Even Alt-Right leader Vox Day makes the case–Europeans, most notably the **Germans, the Irish, the Italians, and the Polish**, lack the ability to comprehend and put into practice Anglo-Saxon ideals. Yet, those same people whose ancestors had been deemed “unfit” for American inclusion by nativists in the 1850’s and 1890’s, today claim to possess the inherent qualities required to perpetuate Western Civilization. Nativists held those groups** in contempt for “alien ways of life”, yet by the power of magic dirt, they have transformed themselves into one of the natives.

    You do understand the hypocrisy here, right?

  99. Corvinus says:
    @option one

    “Whites designed societies where power grids, water infrastructure, distribution of clean foods and other large scale requirements to keep the masses alive…”

    “White inventions” or “western science”, while noteworthy in their original ideas and innovations, of course owe much to gunpowder, paper, the compass, and movable type (Chinese), to the number 0 (India), and to the idea of a rule-based, law-giving universal Creator (Middle East).

    The rise of white people to jackbooting status, I mean bearers of civilization, was built on these discoveries.

    “BTW…….Asians have the IQ but lacked the culture and behavioral traits to develop modern first world countries until Whites pretty much showed them how to…”

    It is clear you are historically ignorant. Bear in mind that there are few inventions that are “purely” white. Take this comment for example. It depends on the Internet and computers – “white inventions”. But it also depends on the alphabet, a Phoenician invention, and the idea of writing itself, which in the West comes from Egypt. At any point in history, most inventions will come from one part of the world because it is the most advanced at that particular time. So while most important inventions of the past few hundred years were made by white people, that is only because they have been on top during that time frame. The Egyptians and the Chinese had a far longer reign compared to Europeans when it came to technological advancements.

    “The only real solution is to limit the reproduction of non-Whites so that their overpopulation misery of problems is reduced first and foremost for their own sake and for Whites as well…..”

    OK, so you are in charge of making this solution a reality. I mean, since this course of action is near and dear to your heart, I take it you are willing to do whatever it takes to come to fruition. In a month, give us a field report of your progress. Otherwise, all you are is an armchair warrior.

    • Replies: @Bookish1
    , @option one
  100. If take the existence of other minds as a fact….and believe that Folk Psychology is obvious and a fact(notwithstanding what the very fucking stupid and very creepy and bombastic Philosopher Pat Churchland thinks)…….we can conclude with 100 percent certainty the following:

    When Professor Emeritus of MURDER-KILL WHITEY!!!!!!! Studies Noel Iganatieve dreams at night he dreams this and only this:”WHITE MALES YOU MUST DIE DIE DIE DIE DIE DIE DIE YOU DERSEVE TO HAVE YOUR FUCKING SKULLS CRUSHED IN!!!!!!”

    You don’t have to be Psychic mind reader to know that Professor Noel Iganatieve has these thoughts…every night……

  101. sulu says:
    @Not a nazi

    “I really don’t understand what leads a white person to feel they are superior to others.”

    Perhaps you should reflect on the demonstrable fact that the White race has invented more things that are instrumental for civilization than any other race in the world. Whites basically invented civilization and all that goes along with it. Cell phones, computers, cars, refrigerators, antibiotics, calculus, space travel, all are a creation of the White mind. But we are constantly invaded by people of color that played no part in any of it yet are quite content to use all the things afforded them by White culture. And while that in itself might be tolerable if the invaders were relatively benign instead they attack us with violence at every turn and then have the temerity to decry us as devils and oppressors in our own land while feeding their children with the charity afforded to them by the labor of our hands. This attitude is one that has lead to some of the worst pogroms in history and I can even now see the slumbering giant that is White America waking up to the threat.
    I once saw a couple pictures that I found quite illustrative. The first was a black riot with about three blacks jumping up and down on a police car. The caption was,”When blacks have had enough.”
    The second was a large group of B-29’s in formation from horizon to horizon obviously flying off to annihilate some target. The caption read, “When Whites have had enough.” The message is quite clear but I know in my heart it is wasted on the intellect of the brown invaders. They will have to learn the hard way.

    • Replies: @Not a nazi
  102. Wally says: • Website
    @miss marple

    You simply do not know what you are talking about.

    It boils down to this:

    There were the ‘Nazis’ with the impossible ‘6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers’ and there were the ‘Nazis’ without the impossible ’6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers’.

    “I owe my permission to submit the Zionist plan for the final solution of the Jewish Question.”
    – ‘a Father of Zionism’ Theodor Herzl, letter to the Czar, November 22, 1899.

    War-time German documents & writings mentioning the “Final Solution”: https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=12296

    http://www.codoh.com

  103. @jack daniels

    Not certain if you’re facetious, but demographics are a lot harder to reverse than cultural and religious trends. The ‘Current Year’ is a a religious fervor, and like others it will eventually pass. Maybe not for the better – because the human instinct towards religious-type thought can manifest itself in many different ways – but it will pass. By contrast, the situation in California will not pass. Along with the Southwest it is essentially lost, and as beautiful as it is I’m not really sure we want to pay the price to have it back (all out war).

    In an alternate universe where slavery never happened, or Blacks were repatriated – whatever, and the US was, say, 94% White and 6% various browns and Asians (but not a single large minority as we have with Hispanics today) I could actually live with the SJW frenzy. Yes, it’s really annoying, but like bell bottoms, witch burning, and facial hair (I’m a bearded Jew fwiw) it’s only temporary. And in a majority (90%+) White country things will basically work just fine short adopting actual communism.

    But yes, for pure schadenfreude I do enjoy watching the Muslims push the SJWs to the limits of cognitive dissonance. I’m also neutral on the Middle East (ie it’s none of our business and we shouldn’t take sides one way or another) so I even enjoy them fighting the Israel lobby/orthodoxy.

    • Replies: @jack daniels
  104. @F. Roger Devlin

    Probably slightly higher but do you have any evidence for you claim?

    • Replies: @F. Roger Devlin
  105. The Democratic Party says:”When it comes to Working Class White Males…..the proper labor policy for them is CHATTEL SLAVERY!!!!”

    MECHA:”THE LAST GASP OF WHITE AMERICA”

    What could MECHA possibly mean by that?

    The Democratic Party=THE MECHA PARTY!!!!

  106. Wally says:
    @Patrikios Stetsonis

    LOL.
    “Professor of Judaism” and discredited True Believer Deborah Lipstadt supports strict Israeli immigration laws which specify JEWS ONLY, while demanding massive 3rd world immigration into the US & Europe.

    The Lies and Deceptions of Deborah Lipstadt, By Germar Rudolf : https://codoh.com/library/document/4637/

  107. @option one

    Its a dangerous game to play ……if you expect humanity to progress.

    Great points–and of course the “progressives” are the ones who will end all progress with a boot on our faces–forever.

  108. Wally says:
    @Not a nazi for sure

    – Is that why Asian countries do not accept the absurd mantra of “diversity”?

    – Is that why Israel allows in Jews Only?

    -You come off as a beat down loser who calls himself “white” rather than European while you call your wife “Asian” rather than yellow.

    BTW, your “Nazis” did not do what is alleged and you have no proof they did.

    • Replies: @Not a nazi
  109. Segar says:

    This is the prize we pay for not killing the jews, we gave them every oportunity to integrate for 2000 years embracing cristianity where every soul have the same value and being part of the comunity but they refused and embraced judaism an ethno religious supremacist doctrine that see the rest as cattle while they were living as guest in foreign land, tell me how is not justified to kill every one of them?

    We had hundred of oportunities to end the problem once and for all every time they were expulsed but we didnt, i wish we were as bad as they claim we are, we wouldnt have this problems today if it was true.

    HEIL HITLER!!!

    • Replies: @Not a nazi
    , @E. Macher
  110. sulu says:
    @Sic Semper

    I had uncles on both sides of my family plus a father who was an American soldier in WWII, as well as several assorted cousins of my father all who fought in the European theater. One of the most bitter epiphanies of my life was the realization that America was on the wrong side of the conflict. Of course the Japanese had to be defeated but America and England should have sided with Germany. That would have allowed the Germans to go on to defeat the Russians and unify Europe. When you consider how well and long Germany fought even while being bombed to pieces day and night by America and England it seems a forgone conclusion that if they had not been so hindered they could have crushed the Russians. And that is by themselves. If they had the active help of America and England there could be no doubt of the outcome.

    One of the most puzzling things about the war was the fact that England issued the ultimatum to Germany that they would declare war if Germany invaded Poland. In hindsight is seems to be an act of extreme incompetence and foolishness. And despite that it still seems that Hitler looked for a solution to fighting a two front war. One can only speculate how history might have gone if the flight of Rudolph Hess had not gone astray.

    I realize some might be horrified by my conclusion and in an effort to heap scorn on the idea be inclined to point out some of the atrocities committed by Germany during the war. My defense would be that it was, after all, war. And war is the time for atrocities. American men under uniform have been guilty of brutal acts during wartime. One has to look no further than Mi lay for an illustration.

    But I contend that after Germany subdued Europe and Russia the rule of law would have been instituted and atrocities would have stopped. And, in a generation, what was a huge fighting machine would have given way to a huge bureaucracy that would have eventually become largely benign. Old soldiers would retire and in their place would be a generation of bureaucrats who had never seen war and would have little inclination for it. And I suspect the world might now be a better place had history played this way.

    • Replies: @Not a nazi
    , @Miro23
    , @Bookish1
  111. Anon[242] • Disclaimer says:
    @jack daniels

    “White nationalists pay a fearsome price for ignoring the JQ in order to make meaningless assaults on Muslims, blacks, Latinos, Slavs, and Catholics, who could be allies in the struggle to reduce Jewish left power to manageable levels”

    I agree…

  112. @niteranger

    Well put niteranger. Kaufmann is just another smug, arrogant leftist academician. He probably is like Karl Marx by never getting his fingernails dirty. He is actually very naive and stupid about what really goes on in our worlds outside academia.
    It is too bad that 440,000 American service members died in WW2 and the majority were these whites he so despises.
    When I think of what my father, his two brothers, and millions of other men went through in WW2- hearing loss, life long tinnitus, a few mssing limbs, trenchfoot, lung injuries, it was not worth it. We did have a country united . Race relations were not the horror that the media makes it out to be. I am white and grew up in a mainly black area.
    Cowards like Kaufmann have no idea about what white men have done for him so that he can get on his throne and pebble his leftist trash. Hopefully someday people like Kaufmann will no longer have clean water, flush toilets, electricity, and hot showers.
    Iserved in US Marine Corps and the US Army. I would tell young men and women to do nothing for these leftists. Do not fight in wars or go out of your way.
    Kaufmann and Bill Maher and millions like these two are not worth doing anything for-smug, spoiled, well paid, arrogant. Enough is enough.

    • Replies: @Richard B
    , @Germanicus
  113. @sulu

    I’m actually pretty sure fighting against the fascists was a good thing.

    • Replies: @sulu
    , @sulu
  114. @Segar

    Dude. War is over. Nazis lost. Get over it.

  115. @Wally

    You know there is a holocaust museum in DC if you want to learn about it. Let me guess: Fake News?

    • Replies: @Theodore
    , @anarchyst
  116. Anon[242] • Disclaimer says:
    @Not a nazi for sure

    Complaining about the governments irresponsible and reckless immigration policy is not ‘racism’, nor is complaining about politicians trying to use immigration as an anti democratic weapon against the public.

    A lot of countries have nowhere near the liberal immigration policies of countries like Britain.

    Racism isn’t the public complaining about immigration levels that are 5 times higher than they were before 1998 and the population of a small city being added to the country every year, and politicians, the mainstream media and phony ‘academics’ using some of these new immigrants as a weapon in identity politics and race baiting in order to weaken democracy in the country and play divide and rule, and distract the public from other issues. They have a right to complain about that.

    The word ‘racism’ either works all ways or can’t work at all, and it’s so often incorrectly used that it’s becoming redundant anyway. And people less and less have the luxury to indulge these accusations.

    Again, a lot of countries have far stricter immigration policies…

  117. @sulu

    Well, I understand that you seem to pay attention only to the accomplishments of white people and ignore those of others. That kind of close minded thinking could certainly lead one to the fallacy that white people are somehow better. But I am very optimistic for the future. Previously, white people would shout this racist drivel in public, but now it is relegated to anonymous online forums. You’re losing and you’re scared. Good. Confederacy? Losers. Nazis? Losers. Jim Crow? Largely undone. Society is slowly moving in the right direction, and there is still time for you to join the winning team.

  118. Art says:

    The key is that the majority be an open rather than a closed ethnic group.

    Total BS!

    The key to Christian Western success is local cooperative communities – where the well being of the community comes first and personal activity is moderated by Christian idealism.

    Open societies where anything goes, degenerate into chaos and police states.

  119. Are ‘ ever shrinking rural areas’ “ inevitable “ too?

    Zero population growth is the only viable subject matter and the most effective argument for immigration cessation.

  120. Nick J says:
    @AlbionRevisited

    Race? WTF is race? Yes white people share common DNA but it doesn’t exclude other inputs. My wife is white, blond, but she’s got African blood six generations ago. Who’d know or care? Her culture British to the core.

    I know I have cultural enemies, in the case of some their colour can be predicted rather well. That to me says I have a cultural enemy who is probably another colour, or maybe not.d3

  121. Miro23 says:
    @sulu

    One of the most bitter epiphanies of my life was the realization that America was on the wrong side of the conflict. Of course the Japanese had to be defeated but America and England should have sided with Germany. That would have allowed the Germans to go on to defeat the Russians and unify Europe.

    Not really. Stalin had disposed of the Bolshevik Jews by 1938. Ethnic Russians were fighting for their survival against German Imperialism. It came to be known as the Great Patriotic War. The existential battles of Stalingrad and Kursk are engraved in the minds if Russian nationalists. Russians did not want to be a colony of Imperial Germany.

    • Replies: @jack daniels
  122. @Not a nazi

    “Superior” is half-way between being a factual term and a moral term. The factual part, pertaining to IQ or disease-resistance or whatever is open to scientific investigation, and a number of investigators such as Murray and Herrnstein have found significant differences between races. As to what to do with that information, if it is true, that is obviously up for debate.
    As for Jesus, if you reject his divinity, why is it important to follow his teachings? Your position boils down to: “Jesus agrees with ME.”

    • Agree: Herbert West
  123. sulu says:
    @Corvinus

    “Culture is more important than race.” Poppycock!

    When I hear someone say, “Race is more important than culture.” What I hear is, “Genetics is more important than culture. When I hear someone say, “Culture is more important than race.” What I hear is, “Culture is more important than genetics.”

    If you will allow me that rather obvious interpretation then by simple scientific method(ie observation) it is quite obvious that genetics is more important than culture. If it were the other way around you would think that blacks, once exposed to years of White culture might become de facto Whites. That is they would emulate White culture and their crime rate and rate of education and achievement would soon be much the same as Whites. This, however, is not the case. Despite all the help in the world and years of association with White culture blacks continue to be, in most part, a dysfunctional minority embedded within White society.

    As a more extreme thought experiment if culture trumped genetics then one might suppose that all one had to do would be to expose a horse to college level mathematics or to the control room at NASA and in no time at all said horse would be performing calculus and planning trips to outer space. Of course no one would suppose that would really happen. In other words a canary may study all he wants he will never be a hawk.

    Genetics(race) is quite obviously orders of magnitude more instrumental in determining what a creature will do as opposed to culture.

    Oh, by the way. In my second paragraph when I said,”If you will allow me that rather obvious interpretation…..” Please don’t suppose you can seize upon that and disallow it to negate my argument. I was just using polite language. I was not asking your or any one else’s permission to equate race with genetics. The two are so obviously the same thing that I find it hard to imagine any one with a scientific education that would try and honestly refute it. In my experience people that try and do so are either abysmally ignorant and probably uneducated on the subject or they are being disingenuous for their own selfish reasons.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  124. buckwheat says:

    The death of the white culture will result in the death of civilization. Look no further than Afrika or Mexico to see how screwed up those two are. The only hope is that blacks and browns kill each other off, its working somewhat but not fast enough.

  125. @Anonymous Jew

    I was sort of half-serious, half-joking. The issue of which is the worse evil reminds me of Woody Allen’s “My Address to Graduates.”

  126. @Franklin Ryckaert

    He’s not troubled by his mixed identity. He knows he’s a Jew and thus he is not a Western male. What he thinks about himself does not matter. Jews are not Western and he needs to move to Israel. He’s using the typical Jewish tactic of positioning himself from both the left and right side of an issue.

    I’m sure he believes he is “chosen.” He is a miscegenated, meshuggah shmegegge.

  127. sulu says:
    @Not a nazi

    If you want to accuse me of ignoring the achievements of other races please feel free to list them in comparison to Whites. I would love to see a list of inventions by non whites compared to Whites. The only other race that has any achievements are Asians. The invention rate for blacks is so close to zero to be considered zero so they don’t count at all.

    What I find hilarious is the fact that you are now using an invention of the White race (your computer) in an effort to refute the superior invention rate of Whites. The hypocrisy of that is overwhelming. But of course you don’t want to see that, so you won’t.

    And as far as “joining the winning team is concerned” no one can switch sides. You were born wearing your uniform. You can’t take it off.

    As for being scared? No, not at all. I’m an old man and the odds are I won’t live to see the carnage that is probably coming.

    If you think by winning you mean the eventual extinction of Whites, I have news for you. Before that happens there will be a major conflict. Perhaps even a World War. And if you happen to be a person of color I will have to point out that even if you win by your own definition you will have lost. The reason being when you look at several American cities, Baltimore, Detroit, whenever the percentage of blacks goes over a certain amount the entire city goes straight to hell for the simple reason that black are simply not capable of running a city. If Whites were to suddenly disappear from the globe tomorrow the standard of living for everyone left would plummet. Latinos, blacks, Asians, all would suffer. Hell, if White people vanished tomorrow the blacks would no longer have their free checks from the government and would starve. America would descend into anarchy.

    For better or for worse you need to accept the fact that at present the White race is carrying the torch of civilization. And if we are some how forced to pass the torch who ever tries to take it will drop it.

    Oh, and if you happen to be among the chosen people please keep in mind that population wise you are about 2% of the US. I wouldn’t be too confident if I were you.

    • Replies: @Not a nazi
  128. sulu says:
    @Not a nazi

    Wow! Amazing! You managed to refute my entire argument with one sentence. How did you do that? Oh, wait, you didn’t.

  129. Theodore says:
    @Not a nazi

    Most of what is there is not “The Holocaust” and doesn’t prove the “Deniers” wrong at all. They mostly resort to the fallacy of equivocation, it’s a trick

  130. @sulu

    “I’m an old man and the odds are I won’t live to see the carnage that is probably coming.” At least there was one sentence in there that filled me with good cheer. Good riddance to racist trash.

    • Replies: @Robjil
    , @sulu
  131. Bookish1 says:
    @Charles Pewitt

    To answer your question, no they cant because they cannot change the genetics of who they are. Why doesn’t George soros just retire and relax in comfort like most retired folk do. Because he Carrie’s the same destiny inside him as all Jews do.(or most jews).

  132. Bookish1 says:
    @sulu

    Nobody with any knowledge of the situation would be horrified at your conclusion because it is becoming common knowledge now.

    • Replies: @sulu
  133. marylou says:
    @Herbert West

    Ah yes, Kalergi in the same boat.

    • Replies: @Herbert West
  134. Bookish1 says:
    @Corvinus

    Here we go again trying to hijack white achievements. Whites were in China over 1,500 years before Marco polo got there. So who invented the compass, gunpowder, etc. Chinese? Then all of a sudden they stopped inventing for thousands of years? My guess it was whites who invented those things and never stopped inventing. Same with India and middle east.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  135. Robjil says:
    @Not a nazi

    The winning team so far is the Top crazies. Darwin said that humans are a wild species. Why? They are led around by a wild group of people at top. He thought humans needed to be tamed by an alien species.

    No alien species is coming down soon. Muslims and Christians think Jesus will come down and tame the top people of our species.

    There is another way to tame our top people – Free speech.

    I think you are one of many people who listen to lala news. It is not lala land in the nations that the US sanctions, bombs, invades, sends in terrorists, etc.

    It is not lala land in the world. The top people are wild and crazy dangerous. This site exposes the wild crazies at the top of our society.

  136. @marylou

    I hadn’t even been thinking of Kalergi! So true. He’s virtually the prototype.

  137. Robjil says:
    @Not a nazi

    You are not a wise old man then. Little people are not the problem and never were. It is the top people who are the problem.

    In a sane world we would have the Nulandberg trials.

    Some items addressed at the trials.

    Full Spectrum Dominance

    Wars against Yugoslavia

    1991 and 2003 War against Iraq

    2011 war against Libya

    Sanctions against Russia, Iran, Venezuela

    Seven Nations to Destroy

    Why Purim date used to start or end wars in Iraq and Libya?

    Why did US/Israel create Al-Qaeda and Isis?

    Why did US/Israel do nine eleven?

    Why the US/Israel does coups in Latin America, Ukraine,etc?

  138. anarchyst says:
    @Not a nazi

    “Holocaust museums” are taxpayer-funded “jewish freak shows” and have no place anywhere on earth…

    • Replies: @Not a nazi for sure
  139. Theodore says:
    @miss marple

    For follow up, I’ll demonstrate that Slavics/Russians must be behind this racially eclectic white supremacism as they were also not preferred by the original Nazis

    Of course. The original “Nazis” and in fact the only “Nazis” ever (Nazi = member of the NSDAP) were German people. It was a movement for Germany, for the German people. Slavs are not German, nor are Russians, although various Slavs did volunteer in WWII to fight against Bolshevism with the Germans.

    Regardless, Hitler did consider Slavs and Russians to be “Aryan” (or, in other words, “White people”) so long as they didn’t have Mongoloid (typically “Asian”) admixture; and only a minority did/do. The Slavic languages are in fact Indo-European or “Aryan” languages, just like German and English; the word “Aryan” was replaced with “Indo-European” after the Second World War. So Hitler certainly recognized Slavic people as Aryan, although Russians were enslaved to Jewish Bolshevism at the time.

    Recommended:

    Did Hitler consider Slavs / Eastern Europeans to be “Subhuman” or racially inferior?
    https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?t=12690

  140. @Not a nazi

    You are saying you cheer the disappearance of freedom of speech, since racist drivel is more popular now than 50 years ago. Yes, the racist majority is running scared of the racist minority that hates them and is morally comfortable with locking them up.

    What should it matter to you if people prefer the company of their own race? It seems to be a widespread phenomenon, by no means limited to the USA. What you object to is honesty. How many Americans would prefer to live in a society where they were a tiny racial minority? Race is mainly a proxy for other characteristics that actually matter, such as language, religion, national or regional culture, and so on. What does your neighborhood look like?

  141. Theodore says:
    @miss marple

    What I found most shocking was the fact that many Asians and Latinos were for it until learning that they weren’t going to be around after the Final Solution

    White Nationalism, often fraudulently called “White Supremacism” or “Neo-Nazism” is a separatist movement. It means separate living spaces for White people.

    If you oppose that, it only means you believe “White racists” (with guns of course) should be forced to live around Blacks, Browns, and Jews. They shouldn’t be allowed to live in all-White neighborhoods, they should be forced to live in the same neighborhoods, with their guns, and watch Black and Jewish children walk to school every day. These “armed, white racists” should be forced to go the the exact same grocery stores as you, and your Black/Brown/Jewish neighbors. Isn’t that delightful?

    Check out:

    Lessons of the Holocaust: Diversity + Proximity = War?
    https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?t=12362

  142. @Miro23

    I’m no expert on Russian history but you may be exaggerating the “achievements” of Stalin. When I was in 8th grade one of my teachers visited the Soviet Union and gave a talk on what he had found. Since the school was mostly Jewish the issue of persecution was central. The teacher, perhaps somewhat biased, reported that the persecution of the Orthodox Christians was by far the greatest evil. This was in the mid-sixties. That would be an unlikely situation if Russian nationalism was by then the dominant ideology.

  143. Theodore says:
    @Anon

    There are only about 290,000 to 300,000 jewish people in Britain

    And where do their loyalties lie?

    There are 100 British Jews fighting in the IDF (Israel Defense Forces): https://archive.is/asqz3#selection-632.0-632.1

    There are only 60 Jews in the British army: http://web.archive.org/web/20190831013829/https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/315082/PUBLIC_1391420325.pdf

    and another 10 each in the Air Force and Navy, making a total of 80… Still, 100 is greater than 80.

    Really makes you think!

    • Replies: @Anon
  144. Art says:

    The book’s title is a misnomer: the only demographic shift presently occurring is one away from whiteness.

    The irony.

    Tucker Carlson is totally right, “white supremacy” in America is a hoax? What supremacy?

    (The anti-Christian West) — Jews and elitist whites are giving everything away.

    Our children attend liberal government schools – coming away with their heads bowed and genuflecting to other inferior “victim” cultures.

    We are living a Jew divide and conquer identity cabal.

    Do No Harm — Art

  145. AWM says:

    Whites are excellent and efficient killers, certainly the best in history by a large margin.
    And they have an organizational and scientific abilities unmatched by any other group.
    The cream always rises to the top.
    The news of their death is premature, very premature.

    • Agree: Sick of Orcs
  146. @Agathoklis

    I cannot cite genetic studies, but I know that there are still some Slavic speakers in Northern Greece and that there used to be many more than there are now. They have partially assimilated linguistically, but are of Slavic descent.

    • Replies: @Agathoklis
  147. Svigor says:
    @syonredux

    As for the book, I thought that it was too sanguine. Of course, my perceptions are colored by the fact that I work in an environment (academia) where anti-White hatred is the norm….

    What’s interesting to me about that norm is that it’s enforced. E.g., at the least, if you are pro-White you’re persecuted and if you’re anti-White you’re tolerated, encouraged, rewarded. So what we have is not anything genuine, but a bunch of conformist trained seals performing for massa.

    Not that this will avail them on the day of cordage.

  148. @anarchyst

    Yes! I can feel your antisemitic rage! You are truly … ok you’re just an ignorant racist. Good news is I think we will have fewer and fewer of you racist incels. You don’t reproduce because no woman would touch with a 10 foot pole.

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  149. sulu says:
    @War for Blair Mountain

    They want Whites to go quietly into that great night. I will be happy to disappoint them.

  150. sulu says:
    @Not a nazi

    If I were you I would kiss your computer screen and thank it for keeping you safe. If you said such a thing to my face were I bare handed or with weapons I promise you that you would suffer. When I said I was an old man it’s just in relative terms. But you are a coward and if what you have stated about yourself is true a race traitor to boot. Perhaps I am mistaken and what is to come will be soon. If so I hope I have the chance to “wink” at you.

  151. sulu says:
    @Bookish1

    Thank you. Your reply is like a drink of water when you are in the desert. The Jews have vilified Hitler from even before WWII started. They (Judea) declared war on Germany in March of 33. Now I’m sure it was economic war as opposed to actual war but it does easily explain Hitler’s treatment of the Jews. If you have individuals living in your country that are members of a group that has declared war, economic or otherwise upon you, you would tend to view them with suspicion and eventually with open hostility. It prompted Hitler to state, “Soon these Jews will know whom they have declared war upon.” One of my favorite WWII quotes.
    But the Jews learned their lessons from WWII and they have been committing slow genocide on the White race ever since. For the simple reason that we are the only race numerous enough and smart enough to destroy them. The sad thing is with the Jewish mastery of propaganda most Whites are only dimly aware of what is happening. Or not at all.

  152. Richard B says:
    @syonredux

    Bear in mind, Ron likes the idea of Whites being replaced by POC.

    Yes. Unfortunately, that’s true. And I think he’s wrong to feel that way.

    But I’m grateful for his website and it never hurts to be polite.

    • Replies: @Sean McBride
  153. @F. Roger Devlin

    There are a very small number of Bulgarian speakers that either did not side with the Communists during and after WWII and there are Grecomans who identified with Hellenism/Romiosyni although they are of Slavic heritage. However, the presence of a very small number of Slavic speakers does not mean that neighbouring Greeks in that region have a very high Slavic admixture. It is just slightly higher than Pelopnesian Greeks and higher than Cretan and Cypriot Greeks which never experienced Slavic raids in the Middle Ages.

  154. Richard B says:
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    I don’t think it is “incompetence”, I think it is deliberate deception, and that to an audience that has been deliberately dumbed down for that purpose.

    There’s a lot of truth in that. There’s no question about the deliberate deception or about the dumbed down and gullible who fall for their deception hook, line and sinker, every time.

    But I also have no doubt that there is a lot of incompetence going on.

    The explanation for this can be found in a number of things.

    First, it can found in the very thing that accounts for their success (in infiltration, subversion, deception and destruction), ie; their Single-Mindedness of Purpose.

    Second, their Myth Of Innocence. Which says, in effect, “We never do anything wrong. Things are done to us.”

    A third explanation, connected to the second, but worth distinguishing, is their Delusion.

    They actually believe their own lies.

    Fourth, their Over-Conformity.

    And the shadown of conformity is stupidity.

    Stupidity has nothing to do with intelligence in this case. It has to do with judgment.

    So, between their single-mindedness, myth of innocence, delusion and conformity they have never learned to quesiton their own assumptions. They are incapable of genuine self-criticism.

    They basically think they’re perfectly competent in every situation when that’s obviously not true.

    Plus, it has to be said, that many who are against them still insist on attributing supernatural powers to them. As if they’re insuperable and invincible. Nothing could be further from the truth.

    They might be able to come up with new and improved methods of deception. But even that doesn’t work like it used to. Our brief exchange here is only too apt an example. Here’s two people who don’t know each other having an exchange about what we know about them. And we’re both hitting the bullseye from different perspectives.

    Anyway, all in all, and beyond the deception, there’s lots of incompetence.

    Nothing quite fails like their success. Their great achievement, the acquisition of Western civilization, is turning out to be the greatest Pyrrhic Victory in the history of the world.

  155. Richard B says:
    @Lost american

    One of the best comments I’ve ever read on this site. Thanks.

    My father and uncle served in WWII. My uncle didn’t make it back. My father did. But it pretty much destroyed him. He put on his best brave face. No one talked about their time in the war or complained. It just wasn’t done. But it was clear that the impact was devastating.

    Fortunately, his son found a way to go No Contact with the Kaufmann’s and Bill Maher’s of this world.

    Happiness in life depends in large measure in avoiding such people.

    But I’m well aware of the fact that I’m one of the lucky few.

    Not everyone figures it out or is able to get away if they do happen to figure out what’s happening to them and who is doing it and why.

    Thanks again for your comment. It really hit home.

  156. E. Macher says:
    @Segar

    This is the prize we pay for not killing the jews

    HEIL HITLER!!!

    Thank you for revealing the kind of people who want to blame all their problems on Jews. Maybe it’s anti-semites who take up to much space above ground.

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
  157. @schrub

    Nearby Curitiba is held up as a progressive, environmental model for the rest of us. And they appear to deserve some acclaim, especially in their part of the world. What the press neglects to inform you is that the population is 75% white, and the rest? Probably one of the many, many gradations on the way to black, and maybe a few Japanese, of which Brazil has more than America.

    By the way, if you want to tell friends about this place, be aware that the T is pronounced CH. Just like in “Portuguese”.

    https://www.lonelyplanet.com/brazil/the-south/curitiba

  158. @E. Macher

    I say, pit the paranoids on both sides against one another, and leave the rest of us alone. To discuss issues seriously.

    That’s what iSteve is for.

    • Agree: Bubba
  159. Martin Witkerk: “Apparently, America’s Hart-Celler Act, which did away with National Origins quotas …”

    The Hart-Celler Act, which superseded the 1924 Immigration Act, established quotas by country for immigration from Europe, but not for any countries in the Western Hemisphere. In fact, immigrants from the Western Hemisphere were classified under the 1924 Act as “non-quota”, or in other words., allowed in unlimited quantities. In relevant part, the Act defines them:

    Non-quota immigrants.

    Sec. 4. (c) An immigrant who was born in the Dominion of Canada, Newfoundland, the Republic of Mexico, the Republic of Cuba, the Republics of Haiti, the Dominican Republic, the Canal Zone, or an independent country of Central or South America, and his wife, and his unmarried children under 18 years of age, if accompanying or following to join him;

    Notice that this provision also enshrines in law the central idea of the notorious “chain migration”. Kevin MacDonald deserves a lot of the credit, if you want to call it that, for popularizing the misconception of the 1924 Act as a good thing, an explicitly racial act of self-defense by American whites. He also claims the Act was anti-semitic, although the text of the law doesn’t mention Jews at all — surely a curious oversight if prohibiting Jews from entering was its purpose.

    The United States essentially laid claim to the entire Western hemisphere with the Monroe Doctrine of 1823. This Doctrine, along with its corollary concept of Manifest Destiny, was used to justify the acquisition of the several states acquired by the US victory over Mexico in the Mexican war, including both Texas and California. It has since been used to justify all sorts of interventions in Latin America, e.g., in Cuba, in Panama, Nicaragua and El Salvador. In effect, the United States has treated the Western hemisphere as its own property for a long time now, and as the border with Mexico dissolves, this is becoming more and more obvious. The mixing of populations is an integral part of having an empire. If America had truly wanted to remain a white country, it should have turned away from this path. Instead, today’s demographic realities are making it clear that American whites have chosen their own racial obliteration.

  160. In context to many Jews openly calling for genocide, here is the legalese by the criminal muppet show and war alliance U(nited)N(ations).

    [MORE]

    The Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide was adopted by the United Nations General Assembly on 9 December 1948 as General Assembly Resolution 260. The Convention entered into force on 12 January 1951

    Article 2 of the Convention defines genocide as

    … any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

    (a) Killing members of the group;
    (b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
    (c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
    (d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
    (e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.
    — Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, Article 2[4]

    Article 3 defines the crimes that can be punished under the convention:

    (a) Genocide;
    (b) Conspiracy to commit genocide;
    (c) Direct and public incitement to commit genocide;
    (d) Attempt to commit genocide;
    (e) Complicity in genocide.
    — Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, Article 3[4]

    According to this statue, what the Jews do, Mrs Specter, Rabbi Touitou and others, actually matche the definition of genocide.

  161. anarchyst says:
    @Not a nazi for sure

    I am PROUD to be a “racist” and thank you for noticing…
    Shalom, hasbara…

    • Replies: @Commentator Mike
  162. @Amasius

    He writes very little concerning the rape jihad against women of all ages and little boys,

    Well, that would show good judgment on his part. All of that “rape jihad” or “Muslim rape army” narrative is just bullshit, a typical product of Islamophobia, inc. — Paul Joseph Watson, Pam Geller, Breitbart… Gatestone Institute…

    The simple truth of the matter is that crime in most European countries is at multi-decade lows. Certainly, in Germany it is:

    Germany’s crime rate fell to lowest level in decades in 2018

    Crime in Germany at lowest level since reunification

    the terrorism, and defecating in pools.

    The Islamic terrorism in Europe is transparently a bunch of false flags and hoaxes.

    As for defecating in swimming pools, I never even heard about that. But it doesn’t matter. How can anybody take that kind of thing seriously? I mean, obviously, there are people out there who must be paid six-figure salaries to just sit around and make up malicious stories. (Though one must think they were having a bit of a “creative crisis” when they came up with stories of people shitting in swimming pools.)

    On page 250 he briefly mentions Charlie Hebdo and Bataclan,

    Hoaxes

    2015 Cologne mass molestation event

    Another blatant hoax.

    Nothing about Rotherham.

    Well, funny that he (briefly) mentions 3 obvious hoaxes and then doesn’t mention Rotherham, the one event that, as far as I can tell, really did happen.

    Of course, the harping on Rotherham is basically innumerate. Rotherham is a small city of about 100,000 people in Northern England and there are 66 million people in the U.K. So about 0.15% of the U.K. population lives in Rotherham, or in turn, it is about 0.03% of the European population. And there are 1.2 million Pakistani ethnics in the U.K. and the Rotherham thing involves about a dozen criminals of that ethnicity.

    • Replies: @Germanicus
    , @Anon
  163. Corvinus says:
    @Bookish1

    “Here we go again trying to hijack white achievements.”

    LOL.

    “Whites were in China over 1,500 years before Marco polo got there.”

    Sources?

    “So who invented the compass, gunpowder, etc. Chinese?”

    Yes, the Chinese.

    “Then all of a sudden they stopped inventing for thousands of years?”

    Actually, they were continually inventing things.

    https://china.usc.edu/sites/default/files/forums/Chinese%20Inventions.pdf

    “My guess it was whites who invented those things and never stopped inventing. Same with India and middle east.”

    A guess is not truth.

  164. @Jonathan Revusky

    The truth is in between. The right wing Jews such as Geller or the AfD etc exaggerate, while the leftist Jews of “Green” and the Red sickness downplay it.
    It is neither invented, nor are the official numbers worth anything.
    These numbers have been politically adjusted by a criminal occupation regime made up of former communist Agitprop Stasi criminals, eg Merkel.

    You want to claim nothing is happening? Try again, I will counter it, I have first hand information on that, and how massively angry the “THE POLICE”(TM) corporation have become due to political dictates.
    Go home with DW sources, ridiculous.

    • Replies: @Jonathan Revusky
  165. @Richard B

    Bear in mind, Ron likes the idea of Whites being replaced by POC.

    Where does Ron Unz express these views? Quotes? Pointers to specific articles?

    • Replies: @Ron Unz
    , @syonredux
    , @Richard B
  166. Anonymous[308] • Disclaimer says:
    @Ron Unz

    Here Mr. Unz. I was going to write an article for you and submit it. but I thought it too forward of me and quit after the first draft. The article I had in mind seems to touch the issues that interest you. Here is the rough draft enjoy!

    [MORE]

    The problem with American “White” Nationalism.

    I.History
    The core beliefs are wrong. The United States was founded as a nation of immigrants, brought in immigrants, welcomed low-quality immigrants and was founded by deists. Claims of this being a white supremacist/segregationist country such as South Africa or Rhodesia are not valid.

    The world faces a real refugee crisis, people fleeing for their lives but sending refugees to new parts comes at the cost of juxtoposing people with different cultures in values and the conflict that arises from that. What would be the ideal solution would be to declare some country refugee-stan and the price of admission be that the citizens would have to accept certain precepts as new members of this state, in short a proposition nation. Real refugees being people fleeing for their lives would gladly accept this and it would be required to keep the peace among the various ethnic and racial groups. But I thought what nation would be so generous to donate land to such a project. Then I realized that such a state already exists and although its intention wasn’t to be a refugee-stan by creating a proposition nation it functions as one. That state is the united States of America. The evidence points to it being a proposition nation, but one that was not focused on creating a new society for the world’s dispossesed, but one instead focused on creating the world’s most powerful market entity, at all costs especially the immigrants exploited by the market, the immigrants who were enslaved and brought here against their will, the immigrants who fought and died in various market expanding wars.

    This history of the united States makes ethnic nationalism impossible in the United States. First there is no ethnicity known as American, therefore a made-up term “white” is used, despite the fact that there has never been a “white” nation-state. There has been nation-state of ethnic groups that “white” proponents claim as their own, such as the German state, the Swedish state etc. But a state composing all “white” people in the world under one flag has never existed, to be fair, that is a high bar and the last state that did include most “white” people in the world was the Holy Roman Empire. Quite simply “white-nationalism” is an American creation born from heavily mixed European descended Americans being unable to end imperialism at home and abroad. What I mean by imperialism at home is the side-effects of globalization(loss of domestic industry, military-industrial capture of the state, loss of family and community life, increased wealth inequality, untrustowrthy media), White-theorists propose that there exists a “core” set of Americans that should remain in the majority at all costs(they believe if the core population dwindles then Democrats will control the government, then they will institute a combination of race-war and communism which means loss of domestic industry, military industrial capture of the state, loss of family and community, increased wealth inequality, untrustworthy media), they point to WASPs as the core and as their guide and their saviors. However it is these market oriented WASPs that have brought about the economic displacement and mass immigration white-theorists blame on others(Jews, bleeding heart liberals, communists). No one forced the WASPs to engage in imperial wars starting from the Mexican-American war, no one forced the WASPs to bring in African slaves(the allegations that Jews were the slave-traders can easily be countered by asking who bought the slaves? and who permitted such an awful trade in the first place? If one accepts the idea that slavery in America is an exclusively Jewish plot then the Mexican-American war was fought for the expansion of Jewish power and the civil war was fought to on the Union side to halt such a Jewish practice), to recruit Chinese workers, to destabilize Latin America for cheap labor and products. Had Latin America gone communist, they would have paid for a border wall themselves. But can the WASPs afford all third world countries propping up an Iron curtain around the territory and people? The real threat of communism wasn’t one of war, it was the fact that Westerners would have to face a drop in living standards because the world refused explotation. The nukes came into the picture as a threat to any country that dared oppose the West and understandably those countries built nukes as deterrents.

    I give this background on WASP elite actions, because you need to understand that the supposed “core” population will not save you, Enoch Powell is remembered for his anti-mass-immigration speech, but men should be remembered for their actions and not soley their words, Enoch happily imported south Asian nurses to help break the anglo-nurses union in his homeland. I personally do not place my faith in an elite that is so cynical. Nothing will ever be done about immigration, because both political sides can’t afford to lose such a voter mobilizing issue and furthermore both political sides can’t financially afford to lose the backing of the individuals who rely on cheap immigrant labor(illegal and legal) for profits and foreign women for marriages.

    II. Culture

    One issue that demonstrates the loss of European character and mixed-origins of the Americans. Is that white-theorists place themselves as the victims of an international conspiracy of globalist (or the less-PC might name as Jews), at issue is not the validity of such a conspiracy but of what motivates it. Unable to remove themselves from the center of the world white-theorists claim they are hated by Jews, that Jews harbor an irrational hatred of ‘white’ people and they are teaming up with all non-“whites”, who also harbor an irrational of “whites.” What white-theorists fail to imagine is that “whites” might simply be a punching bag to keep racial tensions simmering so that the populace at large cannot unite to end the privilege of elite Jews and other elites.

    Had white-theorist retained the best of European modes of thought they would have realized that anti-whiteness in the media does not originate in a plot to destroy “white” nations, but a plot to destroy all nations and all communities. To make the Earth into one big international market. But such a view would require one to conduct analysis that accords with the facts instead of concoct conspiracy that strokes the ego of its victim. “White” civilization is not under attack because of some great nobleness that obliges that Jews destroy it out of jealousy or evil. All local barriers(national and cultural) to a global market are being erased. Had white-theorist been a little less self-centered they would realize that as much as Westerners fear “browning” or Islamization, brown people and Muslims fear westernization. Not too mention the unfortunate who live in countries where they also have to legitimately fear western drone missiles and Western-backed terrorists.

    At issue is also the making into an enemy of regular brown people. It is absolutely idiotic to think that the brown people you see in the street give a fuck about displacing “white” people. The immigrants come here for a better life, the blacks are just looking to survive, I am not saying they always do these things in legal and noble ways. But it is ridiculous to think someone in rural Central America wakes up one day and decides he or she wants to displace “white” people for the glory of Moctezuma. That is not to say these people are being used as puppets of the global market expansionist, but they certainly aren’t being motivated by hatred or jingoism. Desperate poor people don’t flee towards race-war. No one is coming into the U.S seeking race war, they are seeking respite from poverty and violence. It is also the case that by second and third generation children of immigrants are already heavily Americanized and don’t even speak the language of their grandparents. It is the immigrants who lose their culture not the natives.

    III.
    The Jewish Question.
    I do not intend the above to be a dismissal of claims of Jewish malfeasance. Quite the contrary. It is my critique that American “White” nationalism is so fucked because it relies on approriated Zionist and Jewish arguments for supremacy and also into falling into the discourse trap of “white”-privilege, A trap that unfortunately brown people also fall into, particularly the ones that serves as content for Jewish owned media’s ire-inducing rage hormone manipulating articles intended to keep the brain from reaching higher levels of thought. The appropriation of Jewish arguments also makes it impossible to confront the core from which Jewish malfeasance originates, that is Jewish supremacism. More pathetically the arguments for “white” supremacy are even stronger for Jewish supremacy and even stronger for East Asian supremacy. The nationalist argument that nations should be left alone to pursue their own destiny without foreign intervention, clearly does not apply to Israel where such ideals were thrown out of the window when Palestinians were removed from their lands, and does not apply to the United States that has done the same to many peoples and has been engaged in colonialist wars for most of its existence.

    Every single argument that Zionist make is the same as American “White” nationalist make. Why should “whites”/Jews have dominion over land(United States/Israel) that natives contest is being stolen from them? The answer: “because we are more stronger or more civilized” In essence colonialism is okay because we can. The reliance on such an argument makes the two natural allies, which is why American “white” nationalism will forever be plagued by its inability to become independent from Israel. Sadly, such American brand thinking has spread into Europe where the nationalist cozy up to the Zionist oblivious as to the reason why there are refugees in the first place.

    As a result of the above the American “white” nationalist cannot oppose Jewish control of the media. The other factors as to why is the Market-orientation of the American “white” nationalist that prohibits any action or even analysis to question the distribution of ownership of private property(such as media companies) and the Christian and “white” Zionism partially born out of identification with Jews and Zionism but being unable to accomplish a similar return to Europe because of loss of European heritage due to mixing and remaining in the new world for generations and thus having to do as the Zionist do and claim a stolen land as exclusively yours. Once again I do not advocate open borders, but the recognition that this land was never exclusively anybody’s, but the Indians who were mostly vanquished.

    Claims of racial superiority based on things such a IQ, income and noncriminality can even be de-racialized and turned sideways to justify elitism, where the role of “white” or “core” is played by an elite class of mixed ethnicities. If brown people are to be either removed from their land(as is the case of the Palestinians) or deemed too dysfunctional for Western civilization because they are too stupid, criminal and poor then what logic is to prevent the removal or expulsion of low-income “whites”? Why not evacuate low-income regions of the U.S to build golfcourses and inland seas for yacht racing? Do you now see the distinction between elitism and nationalism. The nationalist respects that people may be inferior or superior in various qualities, but they have a right to be left alone. Which is why I support calls for closing the border, but not imperialism and expulsion.

    The above is not meant to distract that the seed of Jewish supremacism is the Jewish religion.

    IV.
    What is to be done

    Orientation away from the market and abolishing the ability to hire illegal labor. Ending imperialist wars and sanctions. Embracing the proposition nation idea (I know it is unnatural, it has no historical precedent, but the U.S has no other option), a more evidenced based analysis of globalization and immigration instead of badly evidenced conspiracy. Conspiracy does exists, but before that can be said it has to be well evidenced. If not a moratorium on immigration then judicious vetting that immigrants do believe in the American proposition, and of course ending birthright citizenship for future births, I have heard of ending birthright citizenship for those already born and that seems incredibly punitive and harsh and is not necesarry to end that incentive to migrate.

    • Replies: @Anon
  167. @Lost american

    Iserved in US Marine Corps and the US Army. I would tell young men and women to do nothing for these leftists. Do not fight in wars or go out of your way.

    Please tell them the same for the right wing Jews that control the US equally.
    Its not the US’ business to play the policeman on this planet, it will return as a boomerang one day. Especially if the US has been run by a crime syndicate since at least 1913.

    What I don’t get, what motivates a US soldier to fight wars in foreign lands for Israel/Jews? Is there such a low awareness within the US troops regarding all these destructive adventures and the pretty obvious reasons behind it?

    Why have the US been basically almost all of its existence at war somewhere with some other people? About iirc 30 years peace in only 250 years existence. Why? Is there no reflection on these facts within US military, and if it correlates to the US decline? Why have “US values”(better said masonic values) to be spread by force?

  168. sulu says:
    @Renoman

    I like your attitude and I agree with you 100% The left, as usual, have no clue who they are dealing with and don’t realize that if they start it Whites will finish it.

  169. Ron Unz says:
    @Sean McBride

    Bear in mind, Ron likes the idea of Whites being replaced by POC.

    Where does Ron Unz express these views? Quotes? Pointers to specific articles?

    Well, here’s a link to my most recent article on that topic. Those so interested are welcome to read it and decide for themselves:

    http://www.unz.com/runz/immigration-building-a-wall-and-hispanic-crime/

    • Replies: @Germanicus
    , @Sean McBride
  170. @miss marple

    Kaufman is a political scientist. I suffered through all 600 pp. of the book if for anything, to grasp the full workings of this kind of mind and to have a look at all of its research references.

  171. @Ron Unz

    There is from my own experience a problem with militarized walls.
    They can serve to keep people out, but they can also serve to keep people in.
    Any attempt to pass the wall is answered by minefields and shooting.
    What happens, if the US drift fully communist, say Sanders or a nutty AOC 2024? Would this wall be repurposed eventually, eg to prevent dissidents from traveling, social credit score too low? Does a wall prevent the cocaine trafficking by the CIA?

    In my opinion, a wall changes nothing in a broke and corrupt system. The system is rotten from within, in fact treason, not only in the US.

  172. Anon[346] • Disclaimer says:
    @Theodore

    “Still, 100 is greater than 80.

    Really makes you think!”

    It is a bit worrying when you consider some of the people in government…

    “Ms Patel’s spectacular fall from grace began last Friday, with a report that she held two meetings, with an Israeli politician and a disability charity, during a family holiday in Israel in August.

    A string of subsequent revelations about many more undisclosed meetings, including with Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, and reports Ms Patel had suggested breaking UK policy by sending aid to the Israeli army, finally sealed her fate”

    Priti Patel RESIGNS: Patel quits Cabinet after Theresa May showdown at Downing Street
    https://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/876809/Priti-Patel-Theresa-May-Foreign-aid-Conservative-Israel-Secretary-of-State-politics

    “But Ms Patel’s promotion will raise eyebrows due to the manner of her departure from government less than two years ago, which involved a plan to funnel UK foreign aid money to the Israeli army, while she was international development secretary”

    Priti Patel: Disgraced former minister who previously supported death penalty named home secretary by Boris Johnson
    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/priti-patel-cabinet-home-secretary-boris-views-beliefs-israel-ireland-death-penalty-a9018616.html

  173. @Ron Unz

    I didn’t see any evidence in your article that “Ron likes the idea of Whites being replaced by POC.”

    I did see careful statistical analysis making this persuasive argument:

    I believe there is absolutely overwhelming evidence that most Hispanic groups have crime rates approximately the same as those of whites of the same age, and I have obviously been irritated by the stubborn refusal of so many anti-immigration activists to accept this obvious reality. But I do believe that in most cases this position is based upon ignorance and innumeracy rather than deliberately dishonest intent. Furthermore, I feel that a great deal of the blame must be be placed upon the shoulders of our mainstream media and academic elites.

    This paragraph will of course be highly controversial:

    As noted above, exactly the same statistical evidence that suggests that whites and Hispanics have roughly similar crime rates also demonstrates the exceptionally high rate of black criminality, and this latter fact has surely dissuaded most journalists and scholars from publicly discussing racial crime in quantitative detail. The resulting vacuum of solid information has naturally been filled by rumor, anecdotes, and speculation, often severely skewed by ideological leanings.

  174. @Not a nazi

    Segregation is de facto law in the United States.

  175. Anon[346] • Disclaimer says:
    @Jonathan Revusky

    I agree that a lot of the ‘islamic extremist’ attacks of only about 2 years ago were false flags in order to try and manipulate public opinion and try and provide an *appearance* of ‘justification’ for attacks on muslims countries (2 of them in Britain actually appeared to be designed to affect the outcome of the 2017 general election, and happened in the 2 weeks preceding it), I also think that 9/11 was a false flag.

    And I also think that most of the current ‘right wing extremist’ attacks are psyops to also try and manipulate public opinion.

    It’s interesting how the ‘Al Qaeda’ attacks suddenly changed to ‘ISIS’ attacks and then we didn’t hear much from ‘Al Qaeda’, and then how suddenly ‘ISIS attacks’ quickly changed to ‘right wing extremist’ attacks in keeping with current establishment agendas.

    Of course they still want to *appear* ‘justified’ for the attacks in muslim countries they still want, but they also want continuous mass immigration and the ‘Al Qaeda’ and ‘ISIS’ terror attacks can’t have been doing much to gain public approval of that…

    They now want to *try* and discredit those who critise immigration policy, hence ‘right wing extremist’ attacks. Though in real life it’s not only ‘right wing extremists’ that have criticisms in regard to immigration policy…

    There was more to the muslim grooming gang thing than just Rotherham though…

    “Grooming gangs abused more than 700 women and girls around Newcastle with “arrogant persistence” after police appeared to punish victims while letting the perpetrators walk free, a case review has found.

    The report into the response by authorities to child sexual exploitation found that before a large-scale police operation was launched in 2014, officers’ actions were sending an “unhelpful” message to perpetrators”

    Grooming gangs abused more than 700 women and girls around Newcastle after police appeared to punish victims
    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/grooming-gangs-uk-britain-newcastle-serious-case-review-operation-sanctuary-shelter-muslim-asian-a8225106.html

    [MORE]

    “So far those towns have included: 

    * Rotherham – The issue of child abuse in the town first came to light in 2010 when five Asian men were jailed for sexual offences against under-age girls.

    A 2014 inquiry found there were more than 1,400 victims of grooming and sex exploitation in Rotherham between 1997 and 2013.

    * Rochdale – The trial of nine Asian men for grooming young white girls for sex attracted widespread public outrage and sparked a national debate when they were convicted in 2012.

    The gang received jail sentences of between four and 19 years for offences committed against five girls – aged between 13 and 15 – in and around Rochdale between 2008 and 2010″

    ” * Oxford – In 2013, five members of a sadistic paedophile ring were handed life sentences, while two others were each jailed for seven years at the Old Bailey.

    The court heard how six girls, aged between 11 and 15, were plied with alcohol and drugs before being forced to perform sex acts.

    All of the men were of Pakistani origin apart from two brothers, who were from north Africa.

     Bristol – Some 13 Somali men were jailed for more than a total of more than 100 years after they were convicted in 2014 of running an inner city sex ring.

    Victims as young as 13 were preyed upon, sexually abused and trafficked across Bristol to be passed around the men’s friends for money.

    * Aylesbury – Six Asian men were jailed in 2015 for grooming vulnerable under-age white girls between 2006 and 2012.

    The Old Bailey heard victims would be plied with alcohol and forced to perform sex acts for as little as “the price of a McDonalds”.

    * Peterborough – A total of 10 men were convicted of child sex crimes in the town, including “predatory” restaurant boss Mohammed Khubaib, who was originally from Pakistan.

    He was jailed for 13 years at the Old Bailey in 2015, after he was found guilty of forcing a 14-year-old girl to perform a sex act on him and nine counts of trafficking for sexual exploitation, involving girls aged from 12 to 15, between 2010 and 2013.

    And now, of course, Newcastle has been added to the list”

    The list of Britain’s towns and cities shamed by Asian grooming gangs
    https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/839509/Britain-towns-cities-asian-grooming-gangs-Newcastle-Rochdale-Rotherham

  176. anon[227] • Disclaimer says:
    @escobar

    Best Comment on UNZ ever! I just wish the world would understand that all Jews are is a collective WALKING CONTRADICTION–even the non-Talmudic ones! So, if the Jews destroy whites (heck they’ve already destroyed blacks…you think rock music is sickening? Rap and hip-hop and Jay-Hova and his satanic crew make rock music seem almost classical!), then who is next? Asians? They are already messing with China, leaving the west in the dump…gee thanks, Jews, for stealing western culture and now wanting to steal Asian…Chabad Lubavitch helping to destroy Philippines now that they’ve destroyed Brazil…the Syn of Sat strikes again…come quickly dear Jesus. You said the tribulation would be shortened…

    • Replies: @Anon
  177. Ron Unz: “Well, here’s a link to my most recent article on that topic. ”

    Overall, a good article, especially the point you lead with. The 1924 Act certainly wasn’t a defense of the white race, and its 1965 replacement was not as big a deal as some people would like to pretend. I think probably you are being faulted for not showing sufficient concern about whites losing demographic supremacy in their country, and this is interpreted as “Ron likes the idea of Whites being replaced by POC.” But then, why should you care about whites? Whites themselves apparently don’t care. A quibble though: Your stats don’t (and can’t) take account of unreported crime, or jiggered crime statistics. Government-produced stats are always suspect, or should be, given its history of lying.

    Also, there’s a perceptible vibe of hostility toward whites that emanates from these immigrants, probably not noticeable to you living as you do in upscale Palo Alto. But your typical white nationalist/white advocate/racist does not live in Palo Alto, and is quite conscious of that hostility, perhaps even presently experiencing its effects firsthand. How much of the “hispanic” crime is directed at whites, and how much stays within their own communities? I didn’t see an attempt to answer that question in your article. Having lived in California myself, the impression I got was of a slow-burning race war. If most of the “hispanic” crime is directed at the hated gringos, while the reverse is not true, the crime rates of “hispanics” and whites might superficially appear to be roughly equal, but the practical result would be quite different than what your article might lead one to suspect.

    • Replies: @Ron Unz
    , @syonredux
  178. Ron Unz says:
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    Your stats don’t (and can’t) take account of unreported crime, or jiggered crime statistics. Government-produced stats are always suspect, or should be, given its history of lying…If most of the “hispanic” crime is directed at the hated gringos, while the reverse is not true, the crime rates of “hispanics” and whites might superficially appear to be roughly equal, but the practical result would be quite different than what your article might lead one to suspect.

    No, I think you’re entirely incorrect. I actually went to great pains in my Hispanic Crime analysis to circumvent the exact “measurement problems” you describe, and I’m quite confident that I generally managed to do so. You really should consider reading a couple of my detailed articles focused on exactly those issues:

    http://www.unz.com/runz/the-myth-of-hispanic-crime/

    http://www.unz.com/runz/race-and-crime-in-america/

    Also, there’s a perceptible vibe of hostility toward whites that emanates from these immigrants,

    I’d strongly disagree here as well, and I think I have strong statistical evidence supporting my contrary position. Here’s another article you might consider reading:

    http://www.unz.com/runz/immigration-republicans-and-the-end-of-white-america-singlepage/

    I really should emphasize that for nearly all of the last 25 years, these exact issues of race, ethnicity, and social policy were my overwhelming focus, and I’ve probably published something like 400,000 words on the topic. I think there are very few other writers anywhere who can match that.

  179. Corvinus says:
    @sulu

    “it is quite obvious that genetics is more important than culture”.

    That’s called an opinion, not fact.

    “If it were the other way around you would think that blacks, once exposed to years of White culture might become de facto Whites”.

    Definitional error on your part. It’s not “white culture”, it’s American culture.

    “That is they would emulate White culture and their crime rate and rate of education and achievement would soon be much the same as Whites.”

    You are discounting significant historical and environmental factors.

    “Despite all the help in the world and years of association with White culture blacks continue to be, in most part, a dysfunctional minority embedded within White society.”

    A segment of any racial and ethnic group is dysfunctional.

    “I was not asking your or any one else’s permission to equate race with genetics. The two are so obviously the same thing…”

    Race is linked to biology; ethnicity is linked to culture. Race is a biological and social construct. Ethnicity is a social construct. Ethnicity is the term for the culture of people in a given geographic region, including their language, heritage, religion and customs. To be a member of an ethnic group is to conform to some or all of those practices. Certainly, race and ethnicity overlap, but they are distinct. For example, a Japanese-American would probably consider himself a member of the Asian race, but, if he does not engage in any of the practices or customs of his ancestors, he might not necessarily identify with the ethnicity, but rather consider himself to be American.

    Of course, American is not a “race”, it is a conglomeration of distinct ethnic groups all rolled into one, with a common cultural bond. Scandanavians, which are from the white race, are descendants from several distinct (North) Germanic tribes. Through intermarriage, they developed a unique set of customs that incorporated Old Norse traditions. So, in a nutshell, race refers to a group of people who possess similar and distinct physical characteristics, while ethnicity refers to a a category of people who regard themselves to be different from other groups based on common ancestral, cultural, national, and social experience.

    Remember, natural science consists of mental constructs, created with the objective of explaining sensory experience of our world. Human beings affix labels to make sense of our environment. For example, the California spotted owl is an animal, i.e. biological construct. The name of the creature is a human designation—strix occidentalis, i.e. human construct. That is, binomial nomenclature refers to a formal system, developed by people, to name species. The California owl was not a “California owl” until someone actually and specifically labeled it. Race, biology, ethnicity–all are concepts created by man as an organizational tool to offer a consistency about the natural world in which they observe.

  180. syonredux says:
    @Sean McBride

    Bear in mind, Ron likes the idea of Whites being replaced by POC.

    Where does Ron Unz express these views? Quotes? Pointers to specific articles?

    Why not just ask Ron his opinion about the USA becoming majority POC?

  181. syonredux says:
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    The 1924 Act certainly wasn’t a defense of the white race, and its 1965 replacement was not as big a deal as some people would like to pretend.

    The ’65 Act marked the point the USA decided that people could not be barred from immigrating to the USA on the grounds of race/ethnicity/national origin. That’s a big deal.

  182. syonredux: “The ’65 Act marked the point the USA decided that people could not be barred from immigrating to the USA on the grounds of race/ethnicity/national origin. That’s a big deal.”

    Given that the 1924 Act permitted unlimited immigration from any country in the Western Hemisphere, this is nonsense. It’s true that the first Naturalization Act, in 1790, limited naturalization to whites only, but that was abolished by the Fourteenth Amendment, which granted citizenship to anyone born in the United States, whatever their race or national origin. So the ’65 Act was no turning point. The turning point occurred long before; actually, even before the Civil War when the Monroe Doctrine made a claim to the entirety of the Western Hemisphere, as I mentioned above in #160. This represented a turning away from race as the highest value (if it ever was, which is dubious in a nation shaped by Christianity) towards empire.

    Also, a great many non-whites became citizens automatically when states such as California, Texas and Florida were added to the Union, and in all of the future states ceded by Mexico to the United States as a result of the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo in 1848. So, there were a couple of ways to become a US citizen other than just naturalization. If whites had truly wanted to keep the country for whites only, they wouldn’t have followed such a course of action.

    • Replies: @syonredux
  183. Kudzu Bob says:
    @Corvinus

    That’s not what your mom tells me.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  184. Bronson says:

    The Kalergi – Cloudhoven plan written by a guy very much like the original Kalergi.

    The destruction of the White race being their goal, the end result is a (sic) “mongoloid brown race with no culture, no history, no pride – other than what (((we))) give them.

    • Replies: @Intelligent Dasein
  185. syonredux says:
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    syonredux: “The ’65 Act marked the point the USA decided that people could not be barred from immigrating to the USA on the grounds of race/ethnicity/national origin. That’s a big deal.”

    Given that the 1924 Act permitted unlimited immigration from any country in the Western Hemisphere, this is nonsense.

    Nah. Immigration from Latinx America was quite low prior to the ’60s. Plus,prior to the ’65 Act, the USA was still willing to engage in a little old fashioned ethnic cleansing:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexican_Repatriation

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Wetback

    The turning point occurred long before; actually, even before the Civil War when the Monroe Doctrine made a claim to the entirety of the Western Hemisphere, as I mentioned above in #160.

    Rubbish. Ruling over a territory doesn’t mean that you have to accept aliens as citizens. Again, note how Latinx immigration was minimal prior to the ’60s.

    Also, a great many non-whites became citizens automatically when states such as California, Texas and Florida were added to the Union, and in all of the future states ceded by Mexico to the United States as a result of the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo in 1848.

    Lightly populated regions that were swamped by European immigrants.

  186. syonredux: “Nah. Immigration from Latinx America was quite low prior to the ’60s.”

    Even so, there was no concern for race, and no statutory limitation on the number of non-white immigrants accepted regardless of race, so long as they were from the Western Hemisphere. The fact that American whites didn’t foresee the population explosions that would come later and drive non-white immigrants north, or the improvements to transportation networks that would make such migrations easy may be unfortunate, but even after the fact it hasn’t meant they’ve become more racist. They’ve continued on the same course, and if anything, they are much less racist now than they used to be, as your links show. Even in the past though, their racism was always very situation-dependent. The Mexican repatriation and Operation Wetback were more responses to economic problems than based on racism. The granting of citizenship and the vote to negroes after the Civil War was nothing less than a proclamation by American whites that they no longer regarded race as being of prime importance; it was a formalization of the idea of the US as a proposition nation.

    syonredux: “Ruling over a territory doesn’t mean that you have to accept aliens as citizens.”

    You may not have to, but if you want to build an empire, you do; and as I wrote, the US was already doing it. It’s important to remember that the US government was laid out on the Roman model, a republic which also became an empire, and the Romans made citizens of all inhabitants of the empire following the decree of emperor Caracalla. Unless they are willing to engage in genocide, empire builders can’t afford to worry too much about race.

    syonredux: “Lightly populated regions that were swamped by European immigrants.”

    And now are being demographically swamped in reverse. This is a cost of empire.

    • Replies: @syonredux
  187. Anon[346] • Disclaimer says:

    ” ‘syonredux: “Ruling over a territory doesn’t mean that you have to accept aliens as citizens.”

    You may not have to, but if you want to build an empire, you do; and as I wrote, the US was already doing it. It’s important to remember that the US government was laid out on the Roman model, a republic which also became an empire, and the Romans made citizens of all inhabitants of the empire following the decree of emperor Caracalla”

    Not all empires have been the same as the Roman one, the British empire wasn’t, and I don’t think that English people were allowed to just up sticks and move to Rome when England (I think it was called ‘Britannia’ at the time) was under Roman rule.

    The government decides immigration policy, not immigrants themselves and the U.S has a good enough army to keep people out if the government wanted to, they don’t want to, they want mass immigration and encourage it so they don’t.

    The Mongol empire was the 2nd biggest empire in the world and it didn’t feel the need to accept anyone it didn’t want to…

    “Though foreigners now make up less than 0.4 percent of the population, Ulaanbaatar has used high fees and quotas to rein in immigration”

    Mongolia lawmakers to consider strict immigration cap
    https://www.google.com/amp/s/mobile.reuters.com/article/amp/idUSKBN1FR0KO

    If a government of a country doesn’t want to accept people into the country and has the means to protect it’s borders, they don’t have to accept them.

    The U.S government does want immigrants though, to help keep wages down, make it easier to fill job positions and fire people, and have more potential consumers in the country…

  188. @Germanicus

    The truth is in between. The right wing Jews such as Geller or the AfD etc exaggerate,

    No, not really. People like Pamela Geller and Gatestone Institute and the lot are not exaggerating some existing crime epidemic in Germany. They are simply lying.

    These numbers have been politically adjusted by a criminal occupation regime made up of former communist Agitprop Stasi criminals, eg Merkel.

    I’ve seen it claimed in right-wing circles that the official crime statistics in Germany are falsified and there really is this horrendous crime wave taking place, women getting raped all over the place, but I have never seen a shred of proof of this.

    Besides, obviously, if you are going to claim that there is some huge crime wave, and it is nowhere to be found in the official statistics, by logical necessity, you then have to claim that the official statistics are false.

    But, again, there is this matter of proof.

    You want to claim nothing is happening?

    Well, not “nothing”. After all, there are 80 million people in German. At least that is what they say. I assume that is from the census data. I suppose you think there may be 40 million people in Germany. Or 120 million, maybe, that these data are falsified, but I actually do believe that there are roughly 80 million people in Germany.

    Regardless of that, in a country with millions of people, there has to be some crime, but the claims that there is some big crime wave, more specifically some “Muslim rape epidemic”, these are really just obviously lies.

    I have first hand information on that

    Oh really? What specific “first hand information” are you referring to?

    I was in Germany a couple of months ago. Well, not for long and I was only in a couple of places, in Bavaria but I know people who spend much more time in Germany and know the country. Nobody has ever described Germany as a dangerous crime-ridden place at all. In fact, any run-of-the-mill German invariably scoffs at the very idea.

    But, you say you have first-hand information, so I am curious as to what this is…

    Go home with DW sources, ridiculous.

    Oh, c’mon, dude, that’s soooo weak. It’s completely irrelevant that one link I gave was from Deutsche Welle. In that piece, DW is simply reporting the official government statistics. Those numbers, like inflation and unemployment or how many traffic fatalities there were last year, or whatever else, would be the same whether reported by Deutsche Welle or Spiegel or Stern or whatever other publication. Or you can just get such data directly from the website of the government ministry in question.

  189. syonredux says:
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    syonredux: “Nah. Immigration from Latinx America was quite low prior to the ’60s.”

    Even so, there was no concern for race, and no statutory limitation on the number of non-white immigrants accepted regardless of race, so long as they were from the Western Hemisphere.

    Because no one anticipated the flood that was to come*. And Big Agro interests in the Southwest were keen on making sure that they had access to docile Mestizo stoop-labor.

    and if anything, they are much less racist now than they used to be, as your links show.

    That’s the problem. Back in the ’20s, people knew that the USA was a White Man’s country.

    The Mexican repatriation and Operation Wetback were more responses to economic problems than based on racism.

    More like economic problems + racism.

    The granting of citizenship and the vote to negroes after the Civil War was nothing less than a proclamation by American whites that they no longer regarded race as being of prime importance; it was a formalization of the idea of the US as a proposition nation.

    Nah. That was just Radical Republicans shoving their beliefs down the nation’s throat.If only the South hadn’t attempted to secede…..

    syonredux: “Ruling over a territory doesn’t mean that you have to accept aliens as citizens.”

    You may not have to, but if you want to build an empire, you do;

    No you don’t.

    and as I wrote, the US was already doing it. It’s important to remember that the US government was laid out on the Roman model, a republic which also became an empire, and the Romans made citizens of all inhabitants of the empire following the decree of emperor Caracalla. Unless they are willing to engage in genocide, empire builders can’t afford to worry too much about race.

    That’s nonsense. Just don’t let them into the Metropole.No need to kill anyone.After all, Britain only started getting large numbers of South Asian immigrants after they granted independence to India…..

    syonredux: “Lightly populated regions that were swamped by European immigrants.”

    And now are being demographically swamped in reverse. This is a cost of empire.

    No, it’s a choice.We went over 100 years without a major influx of Latinx from Mexico and Central America. Our traitorous elites have decided that they want to make the USA majority POC.

    *Maybe Lothrop Stoddard. I seem to recall him presciently noting that a future influx of Latinx was a possibility that needed to be guarded against….

  190. Mihilus says:
    @Intelligent Dasein

    People are extremely inclined to rationalize things for their own benefit. Just as you cant convince most diaspora Jews that diversity is bad, you also wont be able to convince most whites that technology has its limits or that capitalism cant create cornucopia. As you can see in replies to your comment: its pointless.

    Sometimes I wonder if all of global developments arent just result of some clever plan to destroy these myths using reductio ad absurdum. I can certainly see this outcome coming to fruition. Sadly only after massive destruction and death. But then again depopulation is probably part of the plan as well. So it checks out.

    • Replies: @Anon
  191. @anarchyst

    Not a nazi for sure and Not a nazi seem to be very new to this site and are probably just your typical normies who have stumbled upon UR and haven’t had time to think about things properly and are shocked by what they read. The world is full of them – not necessarily hasbaras. No need to alienate them.

    Sulu is also brand new on UR according to his posting history and he’s brimming with confidence and certitude that the whites will win and survive, but are they even aware and fighting? According to what we read on this site we find that the views of the regulars on UR are not widespread in society.

    Both types need working on, and those like Sulu have to persuade some of those Not a nazis if they want to get things going. But then he’s got problems recruiting to his doctrinaire HH, 18, 88 column too – doubt he’ll raise an army on that.

  192. JackOH says:
    @Sbaker

    Sbaker, I’m something of a close observer of my local less selective state university.

    At first dazzled. Ph. D.’s, life of the mind, search for truth. All that. A non-academic myself, I respond to that sort of vibe. Then I learned. I was horrified.

    I am 99+% certain the state attorney general has quietly demanded corrective action of the university administrators regarding irregularities in moneys, and wholesale falsification in writing and oral statements under oath. There’s plenty more, trust me.

    I’m sort of mildly confident that student loan debt delinquency, if nothing else, has politicians and maybe federal prosecutors wondering what’s going on in higher education.

    “The hostility for normal white males is palpable.” I think something like 38% of the student body is made up of White males of European extraction. In other words, they’re a minority, and likely a declining one. There’s no way in the universe they can form a campus minority identity group without appearing KKK/Nazi and all that. Won’t happen.

    Still, whenever there’s a diversity kerfuffle, it’s about women, Blacks, and international students, who together constitute a majority. I’m nowhere close to being a redneck, but I don’t know what to say to this sort of rubbish.

  193. @Jonathan Revusky

    Oh, c’mon, dude, that’s soooo weak. It’s completely irrelevant that one link I gave was from Deutsche Welle. In that piece, DW is simply reporting the official government statistics.

    That is the problem. Official “government” statistics are manipulated to match the red dogma. You are either naive, or totally clueless about occupied Germany.

    As official media reported, Police have started to reporte the ethnic background of criminals again. There had been a blockade on this information in official statistics and media.
    It then happens, that “cultural enrichment2 from Africa are reported to be German. That is absurd.

    You are obviously a genocide promoter, in line with the occupation regime, run by a former Stasi agitprop spy called Merkel.

    Your claim that the event that transpired in Cologne was fake is ridiculous It could only happen, because Police were commanded to stand by.

    • Replies: @Anon
    , @Jonathan Revusky
  194. Anon[279] • Disclaimer says:
    @Mihilus

    “People are extremely inclined to rationalize things for their own benefit. Just as you cant convince most diaspora Jews that diversity is bad, you also wont be able to convince most whites that technology has its limits or that capitalism cant create cornucopia”

    Judaism is a belief system, ‘white’ is a colour or shade, and a description of appearance, not a belief system. The entirety of views held by the various many people that happen to be white are not necessarily displayed on this comment section.

    A lot of people believe what they’ve been conditioned to believe by the people around them, and often the mainstream media and education system, though what people are conditioned to believe can vary from place to place…

  195. Anon[279] • Disclaimer says:
    @Germanicus

    I can’t speak for what happened in Germany, but it wasn’t a surprise to me when I read about it either, though I did think it might have been sensationalised a bit.

    When I was in Amsterdam in 2004 at new year as well, me and my friends encountered lots of sleazy muslim men, my friend commented ‘it’s as if there’s this machine that just churns out sleazy men’, lol (I found the situation in Amsterdam mildly amusing at the time, though I can see that many wouldn’t, especially if one of these men got someone on their own)…

    So I wasn’t surprised at the German case, though I did wonder if it had maybe been sensationalised a bit…

    • Replies: @Germanicus
  196. syonredux: “That’s the problem. Back in the ’20s, people knew that the USA was a White Man’s country.”

    A “white man’s country” in which negroes and many other non-whites were already full citizens. A white “man’s” country in which women had just (in 1920) been given the vote. Your narrative is the standard right wing one. Radical Republicans … traitorous elites … big agro interests … feminists (you forgot to mention) … rising tide of color — to you everything is a conspiracy against the white man. You see the white man as a helpless victim of external forces, while I see him as agent, the creator of empire, the source. But empire has costs as well as benefits.

    syonredux: ” Just don’t let them into the Metropole.”

    The metropole comes to them. That’s how empires grow. If we look carefully, we can already begin to discern the image of some future American President extending American citizenship to everyone in the Western Hemisphere, a region where independent nations, if they still exist at all, will only exist as vestigial relics of no practical importance.

    • Replies: @Anon
    , @syonredux
  197. Eric Kaufmannstein
    Author of………
    “White Shift”
    Living parody.

  198. Anon[423] • Disclaimer says:
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    “syonredux: ” Just don’t let them into the Metropole.”

    The metropole comes to them. That’s how empires grow. If we look carefully, we can already begin to discern the image of some future American President extending American citizenship to everyone in the Western Hemisphere, a region where independent nations, if they still exist at all, will only exist as vestigial relics of no practical importance”

    That sounds more like a union than an empire.

  199. @Jonathan Revusky

    Jonathan,

    I don’t get it. So according to you they invite all these hordes of immigrants who then behave like model citizens, and then they invent all these false flag hoaxes of terrorist attacks and make up all these rapes and murders to turn the public against the immigrants. Why bother? With what purpose? There must be a reason for doing this. To turn the public against the immigrants and send them back after just having invited them in? If what you claim is true there must be something more to it. So what is it? Whatever it is, the same purpose could be served by actually having these immigrants doing the terror attacks and going on their crime sprees instead of having to make them up. Can you elaborate on why in Germany they have to pull these hoaxes on the public. Or Sweden, the UK, France, Italy, etc.

    • Replies: @Franklin Ryckaert
  200. Anon[279] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anonymous

    “The world faces a real refugee crisis”

    I don’t know if it’s a similar case with America but most of the people that have moved to Britain haven’t actually been ‘refugees’.

    In Britain the level of immigration tripled after 1997 under New Labour due to a deliberate change in immigration policy, the level of immigration to Britain is now about 5 times higher than it was in 1997, and higher than it’s ever been.

    That said, although ‘refugees’ don’t account for most immigration to Britain, I do think that we need to get to the root of what is behind this ‘refugee crisis’ and put a stop to it and take action against those responsible. Because it can’t continue to go on.

    P.s I don’t actually know that most American white nationalists are talking about throwing people that aren’t white (other than very recent immigrants or illegal immigrants) out the country, it seems to me that most of them want their own country, which would seem to imply dividing the country rather than taking the whole lot and just throwing people that aren’t white out, that would be very unlikely to work in real terms, the only practical option would seem to me, if certain people want to be separate so bad (and the way certain politicians and the mainstream media are carrying on at the moment I wouldn’t blame them just now), to be to divide the country or have a section of it break away to form a separate country…

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  201. @Commentator Mike

    Some of those terror attacks by Muslims are genuine, some are false flags. The false flags are staged by the respective governments to keep the idea of the “Global War on Terror” alive, which then “justifies” destroying Muslim countries for Israel (Iraq, Libya, Syria, Iran etc.). But on the other hand, mass non-white immigration into white countries is also on the agenda, and resistance against it needs to be repressed. Thus the governments of white countries follow a contradictory policy : on the one hand demonizing Muslims but on the other hand fighting “Islamophobia”.

    • Replies: @Anon
    , @Jonathan Revusky
  202. Anon[423] • Disclaimer says:
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    Some of those terror attacks by Muslims are genuine, some are false flags. The false flags are staged by the respective governments to keep the idea of the “Global War on Terror” alive, which then “justifies” destroying Muslim countries for Israel (Iraq, Libya, Syria, Iran etc.). But on the other hand, mass non-white immigration into white countries is also on the agenda, and resistance against it needs to be repressed. Thus the governments of white countries follow a contradictory policy : on the one hand demonizing Muslims but on the other hand fighting “Islamophobia”

    Exactly.

  203. Corvinus says:
    @Kudzu Bob

    Second grade comment from a fourth-rate intellect. Try a wee harder next time.

    • Replies: @Kudzu Bob
  204. Ben says:

    The only whites that are allowed to control their immigration policy are Jews. All other whites are racists

  205. Anon[390] • Disclaimer says:
    @anon

    On the narrow sub-topic of music, Jewish influence has really failed with Jazz. The music is vibrant and fresh amd largely devoid of Jewish promotion. I am listening to it as I write.

  206. @Franklin Ryckaert

    Some of those terror attacks by Muslims are genuine, some are false flags.

    No, they’re all fake.

    I used to think more like you and considered the possibility that some of the events were real, but at some point it dawned on me that they really all had to be fake. It has to do with them controlling the narrative.

    • Replies: @Jon Orton
  207. Anonymous[308] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anon

    I don’t think most migrants to U.K and the west are actually refugees. But there are many refugees but they tend to live in refugee camps in the middle-east and africa, Turkey has taken in the most syrian refugees, while hypocritically the gulf arab neocolonies have not. But there is a refugee crisis, and in all honesty there does need to exist some sort of refugee-stan for real refugees especially when in large numbers.

    the only practical option would seem to me, if certain people want to be separate so bad (and the way certain politicians and the mainstream media are carrying on at the moment I wouldn’t blame them just now), to be to divide the country or have a section of it break away to form a separate country

    here is the crux of the problem that might be called minority/diaspora-nationalism. people without a majority in a state or in states they find themselves outside of, want the land of that state but they are too much of a minority to breakaway or to have any appreciable land without ethnic cleansing. That is why american-white-nationalism is so joined at the hip with zionism. Zionists were a minority everywhere, they couldn’t have a state because they simply were not concentrated and in high enough numbers to make it viable, thus they relied on imperial powers and the balfour declaration. well american-white nationalist are a minority, the majority of white americans find ethnic cleansing or separatism untenable and will oppose it. Unfortunately for the american white nationalist the reigning superpower(the U.S) won’t support their version of zionism, so they are stuck with the present situation. Because a white-american-ethno-state never existed(there were always blacks, natives and cheap labor from foreign countries being imported, with no ethnic restrictions on citizenship in the constitution or laws, blacks and basically anyone else (maybe not natives) have always been able to become citizens) the white-american nationalist is yearning for a non-existent state like the Jews yearning for Israel which disputably might or might have not existed, but certainly didn’t exist for more than a thousand years and whose original genetic make-up has been diminished and lost in the zionist of the 20th century.

    Which brings up the last point, are zionist and white american nationalist arguing for separatism or supremacism/apartheid. when secession is impossible ethnic-cleansing and apartheid are the only option and both latter options are a form of supremacism combined with the American predilection for immigrants it is obvious why the WASP elite in the original article-comment is pursuing supremacist talk instead of nationalist talk, because nationalism is impossible in the American context and the loss of immigration would collapse many sectors of the economy(not that h1-b visa holders are necessary for the economy, but they are necessary for the greed of the WASP elite)

    Thanks for reading 🙂

    • Replies: @Anon
  208. syonredux says:
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    A “white man’s country” in which negroes and many other non-whites were already full citizens.

    Back in the ’20s? It was a Black-and-White country. Non-Black minorities (Latinx, Amerinds, East Asians, etc) were utterly insignificant.And Blacks knew their place……

    A white “man’s” country in which women had just (in 1920) been given the vote.

    Were White women voting against White interests back then?

    Your narrative is the standard right wing one. Radical Republicans … traitorous elites … big agro interests … feminists (you forgot to mention) … rising tide of color — to you everything is a conspiracy against the white man. You see the white man as a helpless victim of external forces, while I see him as agent, the creator of empire, the source.

    Yeah. Big Agro is White. The guys who imported hundreds of thousands of Black slaves were White. Lots of feminists are White. White guys do a lot of stupid/short-sighted/evil stuff.

    But empire has costs as well as benefits.

    Yeah, but the costs that I’m complaining about (massive amounts of non-White immigration into the West) are self-imposed.

    syonredux: ” Just don’t let them into the Metropole.”

    The metropole comes to them. That’s how empires grow. If we look carefully, we can already begin to discern the image of some future American President extending American citizenship to everyone in the Western Hemisphere, a region where independent nations, if they still exist at all, will only exist as vestigial relics of no practical importance.

    You’re being too optimistic. I can foresee a day when the leadership of the USA declares that everyone in Africa has the right to immigrate to the USA….the ultimate compensation for the “national sin” of slavery……

    • Replies: @Anon
  209. Richard B says:
    @Sean McBride

    Bear in mind, Ron likes the idea of Whites being replaced by POC.

    That’s not my quote.

  210. Anon[279] • Disclaimer says:
    @syonredux

    “You’re being too optimistic. I can foresee a day when the leadership of the USA declares that everyone in Africa has the right to immigrate to the USA….the ultimate compensation for the “national sin” of slavery……”

    Even though it had been going on for many centuries longer in a lot of parts of Africa, despite flagrant cultural Marxist lies, they were often treated much worse in Africa, sometimes even purchased for food in some parts, and some leaders complained when the British government said British slave traders would no longer be buying slaves.

    Apparently one chief even suggested having the plantations in Africa instead of America…

    Slavery wasn’t made illegal in Ethiopia until about the 1930’s…

    Most ordinary people had nothing to do with slavery or the slave trade in America aanyway.

    I think this guy has an agenda though.

    He probably wants American people to conquer South and central America, do all the donkey work, thinking, it’ll really be zionists in charge once that’s achieved…

    Some ’empire’ that gives all the subjects the vote, lmao, yeah that’d work.

    Americans, regardless who they are, would probably find that their vote becomes irrelevant in a lot of cases in such a huge and widely spread territory…

  211. syonredux: “Back in the ’20s? It was a Black-and-White country. Non-Black minorities (Latinx, Amerinds, East Asians, etc) were utterly insignificant.And Blacks knew their place……”

    Every flood begins with a trickle. I wouldn’t call the Jews insignificant, and at the time they probably were a smaller part of the population than mestizos. Blacks knew their place? Already in 1912 a high-profile negro athlete named Jack Johnson had married a white woman. Not all states had segregation or laws against miscegenation.

    syonredux: “Were White women voting against White interests back then?”

    That depends on what you mean by white interests. Around the same time as Jack Johnson was publicly cavorting with white women, Margaret Sanger was spearheading the drive to make birth control available to women, without which modern feminism would be unthinkable. Scientific birth control has now reduced the white birth rate to below replacement levels. Was that in white interests? Certainly it was a political issue influenced by the woman’s vote.

    syonredux: “Yeah. Big Agro is White. The guys who imported hundreds of thousands of Black slaves were White. Lots of feminists are White. White guys do a lot of stupid/short-sighted/evil stuff.”

    My view is that virtually all the white man’s problems are self-caused. He likes the benefits of empire, i.e., of the technological civilization he invented and proliferated, but doesn’t want to pay the price.

    syonredux: “Yeah, but the costs that I’m complaining about (massive amounts of non-White immigration into the West) are self-imposed. ”

    If the path to empire is a choice, all the costs are self-imposed. Today the Christian churches are behind a lot of it. Christianity doesn’t value race at all, so that makes it an excellent ideology for a multi-racial empire. But its humanitarian and egalitarian notions are proving to be the white man’s undoing.

    syonredux: “You’re being too optimistic. I can foresee a day when the leadership of the USA declares that everyone in Africa has the right to immigrate to the USA….the ultimate compensation for the “national sin” of slavery……”

    Yep. A one-world government is the end to which all paths seem to be converging. The problems created by technological civilization won’t be soluble without it. Global problems demand a global solution. Unless technological civilization suffers a worldwide collapse, that result seems inevitable.

    • Replies: @Anon
    , @Anon
  212. @Anon

    So I wasn’t surprised at the German case, though I did wonder if it had maybe been sensationalised a bit…

    I would not call it sensationalized, if the media had been forced to report it 3 days later, after tons of mobile video footage appeared the during these 3 days of media blackout.

    The true scandal is, that the Police was commanded by the red mafia politics to allow it to happen, they knew a bunch of North African animals besieged the train station long before it happened.

    • Replies: @Jonathan Revusky
  213. Tsigantes says:

    The give away occurs in the first paragraph, that this crass Canadian propagandist with no ties to Europe is hired by the politics department at Birkbeck, University of London.

    This absurd and rubbishy pamphlet says everything about standards of British academia.

    • Agree: Commentator Mike
  214. Anon[128] • Disclaimer says:
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    “If the path to empire is a choice, all the costs are self-imposed”

    Allowing free movement of people throughout an empire isn’t a necessary feature, it wasn’t for the British or Mongol empires, and I doubt the Roman one.

  215. Anon[128] • Disclaimer says:
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    “But its humanitarian and egalitarian notions are proving to be the white man’s undoing”

    Not really, the government isn’t encouraging mass immigration for those reasons at all, it’s to make it easier to hire and fire people, help keep wages down, have more potential consumers and customers in the country and to increase GDP, not GDP per capita though.

    Some politicians also hope that it’ll be a way that they can affect people’s votes, I think this would be temporary though, so they want to continue with mass immigration permanently so the public are never settled.

  216. @Germanicus

    Official “government” statistics are manipulated to match the red dogma.

    Well, I asked you for some proof that the official government statistics were manipulated. Is your proof of the claim going to be to simply repeat the claim? (I suspect so, but you are free to surprise me…)

    Anyway, I was responding to your lame non-sequitir about the link being to Deutsche Welle. These crime statistics don’t come from DW and actually, they don’t come from Angela Merkel either. They come from the German civil service.

    I’ve looked into this question as best I can and I see no reason to think that the official crime statistics are falsified. I think they’re broadly correct.

    But if you say they’re falsified, then produce some proof of this claim. And to go around in circles simply repeating the claim as your proof of the claim…

    [MORE]

    You are obviously a genocide promoter,

    Oh, I see…

    Pointing out that there is no big crime wave taking place in Germany = Promoting Genocide

    Look, I know you’re not the sharpest tool in the shed, but still, maybe you have the capacity to think a bit.

    Dude, what is the point of all this?

    I mean, c’mon. If you really are a German living in Germany you know perfectly that there is no big crime problem in Germany. You must know that. So what is the point of all this?

    Well, I understand the “Theory of the Big Lie” but is it lost on you that that really only works when you control the media. And you guys don’t control the media.

    Your claim that the event that transpired in Cologne was fake is ridiculous It could only happen, because Police were commanded to stand by.

    I really investigated the question of the event in Cologne and it clearly did not really happen. If you examine the timeline of the events, you can actually get a sense for what really did happen. There were some incidents, yes, but of a scale typical of these sorts of public festival days. In the days after, the police simply said that the festivities had gone off quite well and then they came under political pressure to go along with the emerging mediatic hoax that something incredible had happened that night.

    They compiled a police report that is 1532 pages long and if you look through it carefully, it’s all fluff. You can look at the official police report here:

    https://www.landtag.nrw.de/portal/WWW/dokumentenarchiv/Dokument/MMD16-14450.pdf

    It’s deliberately massive and unreadable. It’s as long as the Warren Commission and the 9/11 Commission reports combined, by the way. I am not a native speaker of German, and even if I was, I wouldn’t read 1500 pages of this, but I recruited the help of a native German speaker to help me go through this. He scanned over it with keyword searches and stuff and wrote me the following executive summary:

    There is a grand total of one (1) young woman whose “body cavities” were penetrated with fingers. There is lots of arguing back and forth between different levels of officialdom whether this constitutes “rape.” After legal texts and experts have been consulted, the conclusion prevails that it does. That is the only case of “rape” there is in those 1352 pages.

    Otherwise, a few dozen cases of stealing and groping, which seems to not be in dispute. You know, that is not really all that different from what goes on in Cologne on carnival every year.

    That’s it. Based on an analysis of that relevant final commission report, which was the last word from officialdom on the whole thing. One “digital rape”. Apparently. No consummated normal rape. Not one. That is all that happened on a major public festival day in a German city of a couple of million people.

    That’s it. The whole 1500 page report is basically just a snow-job. They know nobody will read it. The reason I became aware of it and had the link to it is that some guy I was arguing with (a German guy) in private email pointed it to me and said “Here is the official report and look at how much stuff happened!” He obviously never really looked at it himself.

    It’s fairly clear that New Year’s Eve 2015 in Cologne was not very different in character from any previous NYE celebration. In fact, when the police reported in the days afterwards that everything had been normal they were telling the truth and then must have come under pressure to go along with the story. But they didn’t exactly lie. They produced a monster 1500 page report, that if you look at it carefully, shows pretty clearly that nothing much happened, but by design, it’s such that hardly anybody will really look at it!

    I have no idea if this is typical modus operandi of the German Civil Service in such situations, but I suspect it might be. Anyway, I explained in a short article that it’s really a case where it’s just Critical Thinking 101 to see through this Cologne hoax:

    https://heresycentral.is/revusky/ghost-of-john-morton/

  217. @Germanicus

    I would not call it sensationalized, if the media had been forced to report it 3 days later, after tons of mobile video footage appeared the during these 3 days of media blackout.

    Dude, this is precisely the problem. There is no video footage!

    Not only is there not “tons” of mobile video footage of this, there is not even a few seconds of video that corresponds to what they claim happened that night. Just go try to find it.

    Actually, just what an audacious hoax this is is really quite aw inspiring in a way. One is supposed to believe that hundreds of women were sexually assaulted in a wide open space like the Köln Hauptbanhof and not even a few seconds of video footage ever emerged of any of this. At the end of 2015 when EVERYBODY effectively has a video camera in his pocket.

    But the key to this kind of thing is not how transparent the hoax is. It has to do with people’s emotional commitment to believing it. And you see this continually — with 9/11, the moon landings.. If people have a desperate need to be duped by something, then they’ll believe it regardless.

  218. @Richard B

    Shallow is an understatement.

    This clown is a “professor of politics” who actually gets paid to engage in “scholarship”, and whose flimsy work product is full of contradictions.

  219. Kudzu Bob says:
    @Corvinus

    But your mom thought it was hilarious.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  220. sleekster says:

    “federalism plays a major part in denying to the locals the power needed to reset and maintain the demographic setting = exclude.”

    The “Founders” of our country wager war against a MONARCH who held ABSOLUTE power over them and all HIS subjects. Then, for a VERY brief period of time, they experienced a degree of freedom from totalarianism.

    The problem is that MONOPLIZATION (CONCENTRATION) of power by the few is a recurrent “meme” all thru human history. It is evidenced in every facet of human endeavor….politicial, societal, religious, educational, scientific, economic, etc. For some reason(s) the “Alpha” types desire for DOMINANCE transcends race, ethnicity, gender, etc., and results in this type of aggressive struggle for power and control of the masses.

    Mask it with whatever tribal attributes you like…but the problem, if you define an obsessive compulsion to control and dominate others to be a problem, is a problem of the HUMAN RACE, and not likely to change anytime soon.

    That said, it is unfortunate that the highest concentration of these types of individuals ALWAYS seems to be found in GOVERNMENT. And that is because it is the locus of power in any society, and those able to buy and control the government, will in the end do WHATEVER is necessary to maintain their control.

    That is apparently why REVOLUTIONS occur sporadically down thru human history.

    Unfortunately, none of them has brought any fundamental change in human nature.

  221. @Jonathan Revusky

    Funny gate keeping.
    You have no reason to doubt official statistics takes really the biscuit.
    Pure Chutzpah, you liar.
    Its hardly doable to find any mobile footage, all purged, censored, removed during the 2.5 years.

    Official Spiegel propaganda, a multicult and German hostile magazine, they can’t hide was is so obvious, roaming gangs of north Africans, Arabs, Kurds, Afghans, Gypsies, Eastern Europeans, clans fighting for territory, since years.

    The truth about crimes committed by illegal aliens (“asylum seekers”) had cost Kirsten Heisig, a Berlin judge her life. She wrote a book about the political dogma, and was murdered for it. “Suicided”. You know very well, the official narrative goes, these invaders are all engineers, doctors, highly educated “enrichment”. Why would someone manipulate statistics if this is the official dogma, you joker?

    • Replies: @Jonathan Revusky
  222. Mhumped says:
    @niteranger

    Good post well thought out.

  223. @Jonathan Revusky

    If the mass rape in Cologne was a “hoax” as you claim, one has to ask : “for what purpose?” You know very well like me that all governments in the Western world are controlled by an elite wedded to the promotion of mass non-white immigration. Usually they depict the immigrants as an “enrichment” to the receiving countries. Mass rape of their women does not exactly send that message. No people act against their own interest*). The Western hostile elite would not spoil their own immigration plans by depicting the immigrants as raping barbarians. Ergo, this was not a hoax, whether there were video recordings of it or not.

    ______________
    *)For this idea, see Wikipedia, Statement against interest:
    https://en.wikipedia.org>wiki>Statement_against_int&#8230;

    • Replies: @Jonathan Revusky
  224. @Germanicus

    You have no reason to doubt official statistics takes really the biscuit.

    Well, I asked you for proof that the official crime statistics in Germany were being falsified. You never provided any.

    Of course, the other aspect of this is that, as far as I can see, the reason you are insisting (with no proof) that hte official statistics are falsified is simply because they don’t show what you want them to show. I’m pretty sure that, if the official government statistics said there was some huge crime wave, then you would take them to be gospel. You would be pointing to them and saying: these are the official statistics, how can anybody doubt them?

    I’ve been around the block with people like you and I am so aware of how you guys burn the candle on both ends. You go through whatever data there is and then, if you find something that you think supports your argument, you run with that, but then if somebody points out other data that contradicts your position, you just say the data is falsified.

    But it’s not just the official statistics. Whenever you get into a conversation with anybody who actually lives in Germany or spends much time there, and this comes up, they invariably laugh at the idea that there is some huge crime problem in Germany. There is this huge crime problem in Germany but somehow the actual people living there are blissfully unaware of it. Go figure…

    • Replies: @Sunshine
  225. Corvinus says:
    @Kudzu Bob

    LOL, doubling down on your necrophilia fetish ain’t no way to live.

  226. Spanman says:

    The Jewish Oligarchy are a non-Semitic Khazarian race, that has used Judaism as its Carte Blanche for a pseudo historical real estate contract for the Holy Land and beyond, with a God they do not believe in and a Messiah they reject whole heartedly. They are a self-worshipping “race” that has rejected “logos” and who desire a world order in which they, and only they, control; while deconstructing Traditional Western-Christian morals and accomplishments. They are the enemy of the human race.

  227. “Race” is a myth, and we’ve known since the genome map was completed in 2001. But, the topic is a blockbuster and sells, just look over these comments.

    I’m Norge, German, Lapp, Russian, Jewish (or Khazar) and “White”. Also, left-handed and a voracious reader and have often wondered at western civilization’s obsession with writing books – many have I flung into to ocean.

    We produce as much non-sense, as we produce sense: I must discriminate. Hahahahaha

  228. In my best selling book, Canada in Decay: Mass Immigration, Diversity, and the Ethnocide of Euro-Canadians (https://www.amazon.ca/Canada-Decay-Immigration-Diversity-Euro-Canadians/dp/1912759985/ref=dp_ob_title_bk), I reached the same conclusion about Kaufmann before the publication of White Shift: Non-European groups have a right to remain apart and not assimilate, whereas whites have a moral obligation to welcome diversity, spend billions in assimilation programs, while never affirming their own racial integrity. He takes for granted the cultural Marxist infiltration of liberalism and the ridiculous notion that diversity is an intrinsic tenet of this ideology.

  229. Sunshine says:
    @Sic Semper

    “It is necessary that I should die for my people. But my spirit shall rise from the grave and the whole world will see that I was right”.

    You would perhaps be shocked to know how often I have a reason to quote this. That Austrian painter was right. Comments all over the internet, say the same thing. His spirit IS rising from the grave, and the world is beginning to see that he WAS right.

  230. Sunshine says:
    @Jonathan Revusky

    Obviously someone with the last name ”Revusky”, is someone I’d totally trust to tell the truth to the stupid goyim. I’d worry that the goyim are starting to notice, if I was you. Hmm, that’s probably why you’re here.

    • Replies: @Jonathan Revusky
  231. Anon[128]: “Allowing free movement of people throughout an empire isn’t a necessary feature, it wasn’t for the British or Mongol empires, and I doubt the Roman one.”

    Both the technological situation and the understanding of race have changed quite a bit from those times. Owing to technological “advances” in transportation networks, masses of people can move between continents much more quickly. Demographic changes that would have taken centuries in Roman times can now be accomplished in only a few years.

    Broadly though, in the growth of any empire, there will occur four successive phases. First, an economic relationship between the metropole and the outlying peoples is established. Then, social mixing occurs. Then political rights are granted to the outsiders. Then, large-scale genetic mixing occurs. The speed with which these phases succeed each other and how quickly the terminal phase is arrived at can vary, but the progression itself appears inevitable.

    I’ll illustrate this using the example of chattel slavery in America. The economic relationship was established because using the negro as slave labor was of benefit to whites in their homeland. In order to use them, they had to be transported to America. This led to social mixing, particularly as the negroes began also to be used as servants within their masters’ house. Political rights were granted to them after the Civil War. Now the final phase of large-scale genetic mixing has begun.

    Is this progression “necessary”? It seems to be. There always seem to be compelling reasons to embark upon a course of action, or people wouldn’t do it. Of course, if people were other than what they are, and if human nature were different, things might turn out differently. But as it happens, they value wealth and prosperity over preserving racial purity. Also, they are lustful, and prone to race mixing when living in daily close contact with alien races. We can, perhaps, imagine a race of white people who have the genius to invent technologies of mass transportation, but not to use them to bring aliens into their midst in order to increase their own wealth; or even if they did, white people who are in control of their passions enough to live in close contact with alien races and not have sex with them. But, that wasn’t reality, nor is it likely to be. To bring the point home, we can translate your question of necessity into our own times. Is it “necessary” that the negroes (or any non-whites) continue to dwell in white societies? Couldn’t they be evicted? Of course they could, in theory. But anyone proposing that solution will run into a host of objections and practical problems. Similar objections and practical problems existed in previous eras too, and they weren’t overcome. I see no reason to think the pattern won’t repeat.

    • Replies: @Thinking in Code
    , @Anon
  232. Baregil says:

    A Jew addressing the racial and ethnic issue, in historically white western nations, but ignoring Israel and the Jews in this regard, is a quite dishonest proposition, anyway you see it.

  233. @Sunshine

    Obviously someone with the last name ”Revusky”, is someone I’d totally trust to tell the truth

    Well, there’s no reason to trust anybody particularly, but offhand, I think that somebody who consistently signs his real name (and Jonathan Revusky is my real name) to what he writes is more likely to be honest than somebody who is too much of a coward to sign his name and always writes under an alias — like “Germanicus” or “Sunshine”.

    Anyway, the conversation you’re butting into is not about ME telling the truth. In fact, there is no issue regarding that. The official German statistics say what I said they say. I provided the link. As for whether those numbers are truthful, I have no way of being absolutely certain. But if you’re going to insist that they are falsified, you ought to have some proof, I think. And besides, as I said, you can’t really be citing whatever government statistics when you think they support your argument and then when somebody points out things that go against what you’re saying, you just turn on a dime and say the statistics are falsified.

  234. @Franklin Ryckaert

    If the mass rape in Cologne was a “hoax” as you claim, one has to ask : “for what purpose?”

    Well, yeah, that is obviously the next logical question. And, actually, that is a far more interesting question.

    The question of whether the “mass rape” in Cologne is a hoax is not even very interesting really. Of course it is. I’m pretty sure that there is no way that anybody could investigate the question honestly and come to any other conclusion.

    [MORE]

    All you have to do really is just seriously consider the claim that hundreds of women were sexually assaulted in some wide open space in 2015 and it produced absolutely no visual record. I’m pretty sure that people of my daughter’s generation (she’s 15) just can realize immediately how impossible this is. By that point in time EVERYBODY has a smartphone! Ergo, everybody has a video camera in their pocket. So, really, nothing of that scale can happen in a wide open space with hundreds or thousands of people around and produce absolutely no photographic evidence. It’s just a total non-starter.

    Anyway, I went the whole nine yards on this and even enlisted the help of a German friend to go through the 1532 (!) page police report and the whole thing is such a total snow-job, it’s crazy.

    You know very well like me that all governments in the Western world are controlled by an elite wedded to the promotion of mass non-white immigration.

    Well… that’s a loaded statement. It is based on the assumption that the Deep State elements who orchestrate these hoaxes are a single group with unified, coherent agenda. That might or might not be. It could well be that there are different factions with different agendas. There is obviously a political faction utterly obsessed with demonizing Muslims. (The Ziocons basically.) There may also be a separate faction more interested in promoting immigration for whatever reasons, but they may not overlap that much with the other faction.

    Now, obviously, a common thread in almost all of these hoax events is the demonization of Muslims, so in that sense, it’s in-line. if the goal is to encourage open immigration of people who are mostly Muslims, then, it doesn’t further that agenda, so there, yes, your point is valid, but….

    Look, getting into first principles here…. the only thing that is necessarily consistent logically and factually is the truth. If people are going to perpetrate hoaxes, i.e. lie, then it is entirely possible (and probably even inevitable) that the falsehoods contain contradictions.

    Even leaving aside the question of different Deep State factions, one individual, if he plays fast and loose with the truth, could tell one lie one day and another contradictory one the next day. Like, if I was trying to get in some woman’s pants, I could try to mouth off exaggerating how rich I am. And the next day, I’m trying to negotiate the price of a house or car, and I exaggerate how poor I am. Different hoax narratives can serve different agendas at different times and they don’t have to be logically or factually consistent.

    In any case, the fact that you can see that something is a hoax does not mean that you know exactly who is behind it and what their agenda is exactly. Identifying it as a hoax is just the first step. The problem is that all these people just keep denying the obvious on such a question. So the conversation never gets beyond that first step.

    The Western hostile elite would not spoil their own immigration plans by depicting the immigrants as raping barbarians. Ergo, this was not a hoax, whether there were video recordings of it or not.

    LOL. So, let me get this straight. You are arguing that, since, based on your world view, you would not expect this “Western hostile elite” to run such a hoax, therefore it was not a hoax.

    But the problem is that the event is demonstrably a hoax.

    Well, this is a certain kind of bizarre backward reasoning that I see frequently. You’re basically arguing that objective reality is constrained by your understanding of it. So, if you cannot readily understand why something happened, then it did not happen. With this kind of reasoning, you could encounter a bullet-ridden corpse, and since you cannot figure out what the motive for the killing is, it must not have been a homicide.

    Except it obviously was… (LOL.)

    Can’t you see that this is a very corrupted kind of ass backward reasoning???

  235. @Jonathan Revusky

    Well, if people did record the mass rape on their smart phones they would have to publish it on… YouTube, and who controls YouTube again? YouTube could easily refuse to publish it.

    • Replies: @Jonathan Revusky
  236. @Jonathan Revusky

    No video evidence was released of those attacks in US of August 3rd but I suppose most people were more concerned with trying to run away than hang around and record. So the German police wrote more than a thousand pages to report just one minor incident ?! I suppose they can be long winded. Still there is no denying that there have been instances of immigrant crime and those incidents would not have happened if they hadn’t been there, and it’s natural for people to be more revolted by crimes committed by foreigners, or it should be, if it isn’t in Germany or elsewhere in white society. But the presence of immigrants can contribute to violence statistics in other ways too, or should, when the local population retaliate with violence to their crimes, but again whites may have been denatured in this respect too, or at least to a great extent if not completely. By “should” I am not advocating it but merely commenting on how it was historically and how it is in more “natural” societies, although some may say more “uncivilised” societies but then it begs the question of why import people from such places.

  237. @Franklin Ryckaert

    Well, if people did record the mass rape on their smart phones they would have to publish it on… YouTube,

    Right, because YouTube is the only site on the internet where a video can be posted.

    YouTube could easily refuse to publish it.

    Well, this is again an example of a very corrupt reasoning process. Rather than deal with the fact, which is that there are no videos, you start constructing stories, just stories basically, about there being the “tons” of video but YouTube suppressing it…

    [MORE]

    Well, yes, YouTube has censored a lot of material recently, quite notoriously. But we know about it. Have you ever come across anybody claiming that they put video of this incident up and then it was removed by Youtube?

    Again, rather than dealing with the facts of the matter, you start constructing stories. Like this Germanicus idiot…. you point out to him that there are crime statistics from the appropriate German ministry that show that crime in Germany is at multi-decade lows. Rather than deal with this fact, he just constructs the story that the data is manipulated.

    Proof? None, of course. It’s just that when the available facts don’t match work for you, you start constructing stories.

    Look, as best I can figure, here are the raw facts:

    (a) There is no video of the mass event in question because it didn’t really happen.

    (b) The German government crime statistics show crime at multi-decade lows because crime in Germany is, in fact, at multi-decade lows.

    Constructing stories because you don’t want to deal with inconvenient facts… well, ultimately this is how you construct an unfalsifiable belief system.

  238. eah says:

  239. eah says:

    OT

    I see that dumb boomer faggot Jonathan Revusky is trying to soft-peddle Flüchtings- und Ausländer-kriminalität in “Germoney” again here on unz.com.

    I commented definitively about the events in Köln during Silvester 2015/2016 in a comment here on unz.com some time ago; I won’t waste any more time on it (or trying to unravel any misapprehensions that may have resulted from the way it was reported in English language media) — anyone interested can look at the German language Wikipedia page: Sexuelle Übergriffe in der Silvesternacht 2015/16 — it has a lot of detailed info from a number of official sources — use an online translator if you don’t read German.

    Below is a chart compiled from the latest Bundeskriminalitätsstatistik (2018) — it clearly shows that both “Ausländer” (foreigners) and “Flüchtlinge” (refugees) are over-represented in a number of different categories of serious crime — reading down, these categories are delineated by “100%” in the first column “Ingesamt” (total): “Gewaltkriminalität” (violent crime); “Mord” (murder); Vergewaltigung (rape); “Gefährliche und schwere Körperveletzung” (assault/battery resulting in serious injury).

    For example, “Flüchtlinge” were 13x over-represented in arrests for murder, 11x for rape, and 10x for assault — it’s similar for “Ausländer” (those without German citizenship but who are not refugees): they are 13% of the population but were 43% of arrests for murder and 38.5% for rape.

    Keep this in mind: the BKA (Bundeskriminalamt) specifically says in their report that they don’t distinguish between Germans (“Deutsche”) with and without “Migrationshintergrund” (an immigrant background) — so the column “Deutsche” includes both “Biodeutsch” (ethnic Germans) as well as those with an immigrant background who now have German citizenship — this is like counting Hispanics as “White” in the US, and no doubt seriously overstates crimes committed by “Deutsche”.

    • Replies: @Jonathan Revusky
    , @eah
  240. Commentator Mike: “But the presence of immigrants can contribute to violence statistics in other ways too, or should, when the local population retaliate with violence to their crimes, but again whites may have been denatured in this respect too, or at least to a great extent if not completely.”

    Yes, whites prefer to flee immigrant violence rather than fight back. At least, that’s how it is in America, where the phenomenon is called by the notorious name “white flight”. For example, according to census data, California’s white population dropped by over 2 million (over 12%) from 1990-2010, at the same time as the “hispanic” population almost doubled from about 7.5 million to over 14 million. This fits the scenario of a targeted crime wave I mentioned above in #178, unless you want to believe that all of the 2 million whites who fled California were leaving for other reasons entirely. “White flight” no doubt occurs for a variety of reasons, but I think actual crime committed by immigrants against whites has got to be high on the list.

    I think you’re right that some of this is due to what you’ve described as whites having been “denatured”. That’s one of the side effects of civilization. But it also should be considered by statistics mavens like Ron Unz that the system has been hostile to white interests and concerns for a long time now. If there is a conflict between a white man and a minority, the system will frequently take the minority’s side, many times even to the extent that they will charge whites with crimes related to defending themselves, as we recently saw in both the Proud Boys case and the James Fields case. Prosecutorial and judicial discretion are important ways that the system jiggers statistics to make minorities appear less violent than they really are, and whites more violent than they are. The net result is a system in which whites choose to flee rather than stand and fight, perhaps not even reporting crimes against them, since they correctly calculate that the system will probably do nothing to defend them in any case.

    • Replies: @Commentator Mike
  241. Susan says:

    We might be able to stop the decline of white civilization if we can convince other whites to vote! We need to change the government and not elect blacks, Hispanics, Muslims, and other groups who are flagrantly against white primacy! The fact that Trump won the election against the anti-white machine headed by Hillary is a big deal! I don’t particularly like Trump as a person, but he campaigned against the establishment, so I voted for him. I think many feel like that about him. We don’t owe anyone anything, least of all blacks, Muslims, Hispanics, etc. This is a white country created, developed, and maintained by whites for other whites! That’s all that matters. We don’t need to apologize for that! So what if that attitude is racist or white supremacist. This is a white country—I’ll be a racist if I want to; and why wouldn’t I be a white supremacist in my white country! We must stop apologizing for our preference for our own race over others! This book seems defeatist to me, based on this review. We whites don’t have to listen to defeatist crap. This is our country! Vote for white primacy!

  242. Doesn’t matter what you think or what you decide, if you even get close to trying to administer this in my direction I will smack you down so fast your ancestors will be trying to pay me reparations.

  243. @eah

    For example, “Flüchtlinge” were 13x over-represented in arrests for murder, 11x for rape, and 10x for assault — it’s similar for “Ausländer” (those without German citizenship but who are not refugees): they are 13% of the population but were 43% of arrests for murder and 38.5% for rape.

    I had never seen those statistics before. You have a nice graphic, but do you have the original web page where these numbers come from?

    Also, these are apparently the statistics for arrests. What about convictions?

    Well, aside from that, there is another strange aspect to this. I thought all the official statistics were fictitious! That’s what Germanicus says. But now you’re using the official statistics (apparently,… I’m a bit dubious on whether this graph shows the real statistics…) to prove your case!

    Do you see any problem with that?

    • Replies: @Ricardo Duchesne
  244. eah says:
    @eah

    OT

    Here is a tweet with a foto of one of the more spectacularly gruesome and bloody recent killings by a Merkel Ehrengast — someone now known to be Jordanien entered Germany during the refugee chaos of 2015, claiming asylum as a Palestinian (the Germans regard Jordan as a ‘safe country’ and generally do not grant asylum to Jordanians) — here he is slaughtering his roommate with a sword on a street in Stuttgart (end of July) — at least one witness filmed the murder; this is a still foto — not much info has been released, other than the false identity — but it seems the roommate discovered his false identity and informed authorities — the faux Palestinian (who was “Polizeibekannt”, as they say: known to police due to other crimes) found out and stabbed and hacked the roommate to death right on the street — you might be able to find a video: it is ghastly, to say the least — the victim’s 11 y/o daughter was there and saw it all happen.

    I think the murder of the 8 y/o boy, who, along with his mother, was pushed in front of an incoming train in Frankfurt by an Eritrean, was fairly widely reported outside of Germany.

    • Replies: @eah
  245. @Dr. Robert Morgan

    Dr. Robert Morgan,

    Under civilisation the citizens expect the government authority and its police and army to protect their security and safety from criminals and invading barbarians. But consider the situation in the West now – is that the case? Maybe some barbarism on the part of what are law abiding citizens is called for if government authority is failing in its duty to them. If the government fails the people what then? It still pretends that it does its job, and partly it does, but not much in this respect. The betrayal is quite unbelievable considering the government are the elected representatives of their own people, or the majority of their people, and not some minority or foreigners from wherever.

    • Replies: @peterAUS
  246. @Jonathan Revusky

    What about the many articles at Gatestone Institute documenting continuous sexual assaults by migrants, Muslims and Africans, in Germany?

    https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/12066/germany-rape-crisis

    https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/12066/germany-rape-crisis

    • Replies: @Jonathan Revusky
  247. peterAUS says:
    @Commentator Mike

    If the government fails the people what then?

    Several options.

    Preferable, apparently, is “do nothing”, at the moment. Well, apart from some online blathering, that is.

    There are some other options but it feels it’s too early to talk about them even on the Internet.

    In time things could change. Short time, preferably.

  248. @Ricardo Duchesne

    What about the many articles at Gatestone Institute documenting continuous sexual assaults by migrants, Muslims and Africans, in Germany?

    ROTFL. Do you have any idea what the Gatestone Institute is???

    You might as well quote Pamela Geller or Paul Joseph Watson as your information source.

    • Replies: @Ricardo Duchesne
  249. Jon Orton says:
    @Jonathan Revusky

    “No, they’re all fake”

    Troll. And a rather inferior one at that.

  250. Commentator Mike: “The betrayal is quite unbelievable considering the government are the elected representatives of their own people, or the majority of their people, and not some minority or foreigners from wherever.”

    Betrayal is one way to look at it, but not the only way. It could simply be, as I’ve put it before, an expression of the white man’s civilizational confidence that these short term problems will work out and eventually result in a larger, stronger empire. For America, taking in the populace of the entire Western Hemisphere makes a kind of sense if, two hundred years ago, you laid claim to it all, as did the Monroe Doctrine in 1823. The resources of the N. American continent were sufficient for a while, but now the technological system needs more. It wants the whole hemisphere, indeed, even the world. It could be the elites are aware of this and are doing what they’re doing consciously, or it could be that they aren’t, and are ostensibly doing it for the “other reasons” Unz writers and commenters like to discuss so obsessively. In the end why they think they’re doing it doesn’t make any difference, so long as the system spreads. The technological system and its requirements are anti-human; it can’t respond to human values and needs and remain efficient.

    Of course, as we’ve touched on before, another side effect of civilization is atomization and estrangement, anomie. Even if the common man wanted to do something about what is happening, he can’t, because it’s virtually impossible to organize resistance. By himself, he’s almost helpless. The surveillance state that’s been set up by technological “progress” makes coming together with others of like mind difficult, but the combined ideologies of church and state, which dominate his worldview, make defiance impossible. Christianity-derived morality tells him to welcome the immigrants; to turn the other cheek if assaulted by them. The state tries to keep order by asserting a monopoly on the use of force, and would not hesitate to kill him if he resists, and he knows it, and even approves. So he does nothing except flee the incoming tide of human garbage if he can, and hope for the best.

    • Replies: @Commentator Mike
  251. @Dr. Robert Morgan

    Dr. Robert Morgan,

    The Far East is developing technologically and automating faster than the West and is even in far greater need of resources that the US. I heard ages ago that Australian scrap dealers and European recyclers were selling garbage to resource starved China to use as raw materials. This demand for resources could well lead to conflict as it has throughout history and whether this will prevent, or just delay, the NWO is hard to tell. In communist countries people were controlled and under surveillance, although not so much by technological means but by a widespread network of informers, stool pigeons, and spies throughout society from homes to the workplaces, but still they were able to rise up, unfortunately to install western liberal capitalism instead of moving in some other direction, so maybe others too could one day overcome their fear of authority. Yes we can note obvious trends but it’s hard to predict the future or settle on certain outcomes.

  252. Commentator Mike: “The Far East is developing technologically and automating faster than the West and is even in far greater need of resources that the US.”

    China and Japan are in the technological sense part of the Western empire. This is particularly evident in the case of Japan, which the US conquered by force just a few decades ago. Meanwhile China was once looked at as a great place to relocate Western factories because of its huge labor pool; but that is changing. Of course, they are all rivals in the political sense, and have slightly different interests, but as technology comes more and more to dominate life, that matters less and less. A shopping mall in Tokyo or Shanghai no doubt looks much the same as one in San Francisco or New York. Though local conflicts may stimulate demand, a worldwide nuclear war would be bad for business.

    Commentator Mike: “… a widespread network of informers, stool pigeons, and spies throughout society from homes to the workplaces … ”

    In the West, the network also exists. The people keep an eye on each other, policing themselves for forbidden beliefs. In practice they are the greatest supporters of the state. The ideology of universal brotherhood shares an ancestry with Christian churches, who are some of the biggest supporters of immigration. Racists are the new witches, who ritually are denounced and burned at the stake as a lesson to the rest.

    • Replies: @Commentator Mike
  253. anonymous[404] • Disclaimer says:
    @sulu

    If California or parts of it becomes a country then I think coastal parts of Washington and Oregon will follow. Hawaii too. That’s good for America in another way. It diminishes US interest in the western end of the Pacific and a fight with China for dominance can be avoided.

  254. @Dr. Robert Morgan

    Is it “necessary” that the negroes (or any non-whites) continue to dwell in white societies? Couldn’t they be evicted? Of course they could, in theory. But anyone proposing that solution will run into a host of objections and practical problems.

    Yes, a host of objections by people who don’t want a solution. Practical problems created by people who don’t want a solution.

    “Not. Going. To. Happen.” The last refuge of the condescending anti-white.

    • Replies: @peterAUS
  255. @Dr. Robert Morgan

    Dr. Robert Morgan

    I confess it’s hard to keep consistent in one’s views and convictions and we’re just exploring ideas in these discussions. The mood here on UR swings from pessimism to mild optimism, excepting some wild outliers, when one considers the range of opinions, assessments, and predictions presented by the authors and commenters. Still it’s good to partake in the debate for whatever it’s worth, even just increasing one’s knowledge.

  256. @Jonathan Revusky

    You are making the same error you accuse others of: I am referring to articles by Soeren Kern, not Geller or Watson: https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/author/Soeren+Kern

    ——– and it looks like you don’t have an argument against his vast compilation of statistics about sexual assaults across Europe by Muslims and immigrants.

    I understand the limitations of Gatestone, but at least he supports Salvini, and Salvini is on our side, https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/14817/italy-matteo-salvini

    • Replies: @Jonathan Revusky
  257. peterAUS says:
    @Thinking in Code

    Yes, a host of objections by people who don’t want a solution. Practical problems created by people who don’t want a solution.

    Yep.

  258. Thinking in Code: ““Not. Going. To. Happen.” The last refuge of the condescending anti-white.”

    Optimism is good, but it’s no substitute for action.

  259. Anon[949] • Disclaimer says:
    @Jonathan Revusky

    “The question of whether the “mass rape” in Cologne is a hoax is not even very interesting really. Of course it is. I’m pretty sure that there is no way that anybody could investigate the question honestly and come to any other conclusion

    All you have to do really is just seriously consider the claim that hundreds of women were sexually assaulted in some wide open space in 2015 and it produced absolutely no visual record”

    Let me guess, are you either a smug dishonest so called ‘liberal’ trying to evade reality in line with current perceived ‘liberal’ fads? (people like that are certainly ‘liberal’ with the truth a lot these days right enough).

    Or is it that you aren’t familiar with the subject matter?  Haven’t encountered many muslim men on a night out or spoken to women that have?

    ‘Rape’ and ‘sexual assault’ aren’t always described as the same thing, which I suspect you’re possibly aware of, and what is often described as sexual assault often either happens quickly or to areas of the body a lot of people wouldn’t be pointing a camera often.

    Yes there might be CCTV.  I’d be more surprised if a review of that after new years eve night in a busy city showed no creeps trying to grope people or in some way molest someone, I’ve seen similar behaviour myself quite a few times and spoken to people I know, that had no axe to grind, that have as well.

    If it is that you’re not being deliberately dishonest, and are just acting on presumptions of the innate goodness and civility of muslim men then I apologise, and I might suggest a little holiday in somewhere like Somalia or Morroco, I wouldn’t be so cruel as to suggest bringing your female family members or friends and have them wander out alone, but you can maybe get talking to some female tourists while you’re there, see what they have to say…

    “Sexual assault meaning

    According to the United States Department of Justice, sexual assault is “any type of sexual contact or behavior that occurs without the explicit consent of the recipient.” Sexual assault is basically an umbrella term that includes sexual activities such as rape, fondling, and attempted rape”

    https://www.bing.com/search?q=Sexual+assault+meaning&qs=n&form=QBRE&sp=-1&pq=sexual+assault+meaning&sc=1-22&sk=&cvid=103D8F74A3784AEC9A3B97D04D185290

    • Replies: @Jonathan Revusky
  260. Anon[213] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anonymous

    “I don’t think most migrants to U.K and the west are actually refugees. But there are many refugees but they tend to live in refugee camps in the middle-east and africa, Turkey has taken in the most syrian refugees, while hypocritically the gulf arab neocolonies have not. But there is a refugee crisis, and in all honesty there does need to exist some sort of refugee-stan for real refugees especially when in large numbers”

    If I was in that situation I possibly wouldn’t want to go and live in an enemy country anyway, although, with regard to Syria,Turkey was involved as well.

    The politicians causing this need stopped and brought to justice, it can’t be allowed to continue.

    I think the neo con agenda seems to be wearing down as more people have become aware of it and are a lot less likely to fall for the propaganda, but apparently the American government has a deal with Saudi Arabia that they can use the U.S army for their own objectives as well.

    A-R-A-B Countries Offered To Pay U.S. To INVADE S-Y-R-I-A

    It looks like the Syrian government are trying to get Syrians to return home now…

    [MORE]

    “With the situation becoming ever more stable, Mr. Moualem invited the millions of refugees who have fled their homeland over the past seven years to return. “All conditions are now present for the voluntary return of Syrian refugees to the country they had to leave because of terrorism and the unilateral economic measures that targeted their daily lives and their livelihoods,” he declared.

    “The return of every Syrian refugee is a priority for the Syrian State. Doors are open for all Syrians abroad to return voluntarily and safely,’ he said, adding that thanks to Russian help his Government will spare no effort to meet the basic needs of the returnees”

    At UN, Syria slams US for ‘supporting terrorism’, thanks Russia for cooperation
    https://news.un.org/en/story/2018/09/1021632

    “well american-white nationalist are a minority, the majority of white americans find ethnic cleansing or separatism untenable and will oppose it”

    Yes from what I can tell, the concept of ‘white nationalism’ was a very very fringe thing that a lot, possibly most, people hadn’t even heard of until very recently.

    I don’t live in America and am not an American citizen, but it appears to me that very recently, within the last year probably, certain politicians and the mainstream media have been trying to mount a grossly dishonest hate campaign against white American citizens, and white people in general, and it’s relatively recent so a lot of people haven’t picked up on it yet, and most people are just too busy from what I can see. But when I’ve brought the issue up with ordinary people in Britain (they’ve been trying to use similar propaganda tropes in Britain too recently), they’re usually a bit baffled, they don’t understand the current ‘liberal’ dogma of ‘white’ = automatically ‘bad’, not white = automatically ‘good’ unless they go against ‘liberal’ dogma. It’s also obvious that these ‘liberal’ propagandists have little regard for the truth or reality. What’s important to them is spreading propaganda and dogma.

    I’ve also noticed some them suggesting that mass immigration is a way to get the public voting a certain way and in favour of certain policies. I think that it is possibly they that are engaging in stereotypes there.

    True newer immigrants will possibly be a lot more likely to support further mass immigration because they would like to make it easier for others from the counties they came from to move to America as well, but once these new immigrants settle and have families in America, that opinion could eventually change. Hence one of the reasons why the establishment would want continuous mass immigration to try and counter changing views of current citizens and older immigrants that don’t suit them.

    (I know you have to have been living in America for about 6 years in order to be able to vote in the elections, but that’s not a particularly long time), although I find the view that people from certain racial groups will be more likely to vote a certain way for that reason alone in general presumptuous and stupid, if certain politicians actually believe that and that’s one of the reasons they support mass immigration (they also probably like to try and play different groups off against each other as a way of trying to distract from other issues and to try and make the public less likely to unite against them), I think that that makes a mockery of the idea of democracy. It’s like they’re saying ‘oh, the citizens of this country won’t give us what we want, let’s import a new electorate’. Democracy can’t work if the government can just import a new electorate when they don’t get their own way, or the opposition can use it’s influence in the mainstream media to spread propaganda in support of certain immigration policies with believing that it will eventually affect election outcomes in mind (at least if too much of the public aren’t aware of the extent to which the mainstream media and propaganda from certain politicians can be dishonest, manipulative and unreliable).

    Also, the democrats were in office for 8 years prior to Trump’s election, it doesn’t look like the electorate are that unwilling to vote democrat. And in the run up to the 2016 election I saw some people say that if they had to vote for either Hillary Clinton or Trump, they’d probably vote for Trump because they thought Hillary was more of a war monger.

    Also, if the current race baiting and hate campaign against the white population of America is going to be more than just a passing fad (it was muslims in the firing line only about 2 years ago) it could result in more tensions and a change in general attitudes to what they are currently.

    A lot of people that aren’t white in America probably don’t automatically subscribe to all mainstream media propaganda either, I’ve not noticed these attitudes with black Americans I’ve met, but you do see it online and in the mainstream media a lot.

    But if the race baiting continues and gets worse and it results in much greater animosity and tensions, attitudes towards dividing the country or a part of it leaving could change more and the notion could gain more support.

    There are quite a few precedents for countries or unions being divided due to seemingly irreconcilable differences between different groups.

    As for Israel, the area of Palestine was never big enough to house even a small percentage of jews in the world, and was apparently only big enough to take a small proportion of jews from Germany and the zionists knew that at the time (and it had been in the pipeline since WW1). America is a lot bigger than Palestine/Israel so I don’t think the situation of dividing the country or a portion of it leaving the United states (I’m not saying that it should happen, but hypothetically, and if it ever became an option to try and avoid worse issues and conflicts) would necessarily have to cause as many problems as there are with Palestine/Israel.

  261. @Ricardo Duchesne

    You are making the same error you accuse others of: I am referring to articles by Soeren Kern, not Geller or Watson: https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/author/Soeren+Kern

    I don’t get your point. I know that Kern, Geller, and Watson are all different individuals! However, I am also aware that they are part of the same faction or configuration. They are basically all Ziocon shills.

    Now, I will be straight-out honest here. I very strongly suspect that you work for the Gatestone Institute. I’m not 100% sure of that, but this site is just infested with shills and my baseline assumption is that you are one of them.

    I know it’s pointless to ask, but I will anyway: Do you work for the Gatestone Institute?

    In any case, Gatestone is a Ziocon operation. Allan Dershowitz is on the board, I think. And for a good while, John Bolton was the chairman of the thing.

    The other day, I came across an interesting article about Judeo-Zionist infiltration of the alt-right. https://christiansfortruth.com/jews-are-leading-the-alt-right-white-nationalist-movements/

    Gatestone is #4 on their list. Here is what they say about Gatestone:

    The Gatestone Institute seems to be the largest among the kosher-approved anti-Islam websites.

    The goal of these websites is simple: lead the opposition by criticizing Islam, but don’t go anywhere near the topic of who is enabling, funding, and supporting Muslim immigration into the West. Because if you go there, then that would be antisemitic, of course.

    These are what we call the Kosher Crusaders. They will appear to oppose Islam, but they’ll never let you know the root cause of the problem.

    The Gatestone Institute is right out of the jewish playbook for creating a fake opposition movement:

    In any case, Gatestone (along with Breitbart, which is #2 on their list) is one of these Zionist outfits that is pushing this “Muslim rape epidemic” psy-op. Aside from their typical goal of demonizing Muslims, the purpose of the psy-op, I have to think, is to discredit the real white nationalist types. Obviously, as that above-linked article details, some of the WN figures are shills, but some of the ones who are not shills get all invested in this “Muslim rape epidemic” narrative and the main result of it is that they end up discrediting themselves. After all, basically everybody who actually lives in Germany knows perfectly well that there is no “rape epidemic” taking place, so the people going on and on about this just self-identify as wingnuts and it discredits anything they say that is actually legitimate!

    So that would be the other main purpose of the psy-op. But, actually, you know, you can even see right on this site, in the comments section that this is a Zionist psy-op. The same commentators who are always defending whatever Zionist BS are typically pushing this nonsense. It really is horrendous nonsense, you know. Like, here is one example of this “genre”:

    https:///infowars.com/who-is-to-blame-for-the-rape-epidemic-that-is-sweeping-across-europe/

    That one is one of very many, but it’s just staggering, like the article opens:

    Millions of women in Europe are now deathly afraid to walk outside their own homes at night, and with each passing day more news reports of absolutely horrific rapes and sexual assaults come pouring in from all over the continent.

    It’s not even that one is claiming that no woman in Europe ever gets raped, or even that in some portion of the cases, the perpetrator is of a Muslim background, but this portrayal of the situation that women across Europe can’t walk on the street and yah dee dah. A friend of mine who speaks fluent German (he is half-German) was trying to talk to people (I mean, actual Germans) here in Spain about this a while back, asking them about this huge rape epidemic. They just all looked at him like he was nuts, told him that there was no such thing going on in Germany, it was perfectly safe.

    So, a lot of the purpose of all this is to suck the dumbass white boys into discrediting themselves by going on about this nonsense. Must be.

    • Replies: @Anon
    , @Ricardo Duchesne
  262. @Anon

    Let me guess, are you either a smug dishonest so called ‘liberal’ trying to evade reality in line with current perceived ‘liberal’ fads? (people like that are certainly ‘liberal’ with the truth a lot these days right enough).

    You know, it really just gets so tedious and tiresome. First of all, in any sane setting (which this site definitely IS NOT) it should be considered absolutely illegitimate to address somebody in this kind of personal way when you yourself are hiding behind a cloak of anonymity.

    Second of all, this is a straight-out factual question and has nothing to do with ME personally anyway.

    It also has nothing to do with the exact definition of “sexual assault”. The specific case of New Year’s Eve 2015 Cologne is really quite simple. Whatever your definition of sexual assault is, there is no way that hundreds of sexual assaults can occur in a Grand Central Station setting without producing any visual record. Not in recent years.

    I am satisfied that anybody who really thinks about this question in a serious way would have to see that it is impossible.

    And if it’s impossible, then it simply didn’t happen!

    • Replies: @Wolfsangel
  263. Anon[213] • Disclaimer says:
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    “Broadly though, in the growth of any empire, there will occur four successive phases. First, an economic relationship between the metropole and the outlying peoples is established. Then, social mixing occurs. Then political rights are granted to the outsiders. Then, large-scale genetic mixing occurs. The speed with which these phases succeed each other and how quickly the terminal phase is arrived at can vary, but the progression itself appears inevitable”

    As I said, that didn’t happen in Britain with the British empire, which no longer exists, and immigration levels to Britain were relatively low (5 times lower) before 1998 than they are today and the increase is due to a deliberate change in immigration policy after New Labour got in in 1997, a change that didn’t have to be made, but as yet doesn’t appear to have caused ‘large scale genetic mixing’.

    And doesn’t appear to have really happened in Mongolia either…

    “Though foreigners now make up less than 0.4 percent of the population, Ulaanbaatar has used high fees and quotas to rein in immigration”

    Mongolia lawmakers to consider strict immigration cap
    http://news.trust.org/item/20180207061416-2eviz

    “I’ll illustrate this using the example of chattel slavery in America. The economic relationship was established because using the negro as slave labor was of benefit to whites in their homeland”

    Yeah, I’m sure it was beneficial to most of the ordinary public that didn’t own slaves, especially the many that lived in squalor until about the first half of the 20th century and often couldn’t afford the products produced in the factories, from materials grown on the plantations…

    “To bring the point home, we can translate your question of necessity into our own times. Is it “necessary” that the negroes (or any non-whites) continue to dwell in white societies? Couldn’t they be evicted? Of course they could, in theory. But anyone proposing that solution will run into a host of objections and practical problems. Similar objections and practical problems existed in previous eras too, and they weren’t overcome. I see no reason to think the pattern won’t repeat”

    Yeah yeah, with regard to Britain, they could simply put a limit on the level of immigration so that it is back to what it was before 1998, they don’t need to ‘evict’ people who came to Britain legally.

    America could also adopt a more sensible immigration policy, though there is probably more room in America from a higher level of immigration than countries the size of Britain.

    “We can, perhaps, imagine a race of white people who have the genius to invent technologies of mass transportation, but not to use them to bring aliens into their midst in order to increase their own wealth”

    Mass immigration or an increase in population can increase GDP, but doesn’t necessarily increase GDP per capita, and in Britain, as far as I’ve been able to discern, it seems to only really have been people from eastern and central Europe and Indian men that have been particularly hard workers, and again, while most people are ok with some immigration, it doesn’t need to be at such a high level as it is today, it wasn’t before 1998, and if extra workers are needed in certain areas they could be invited as temporary guest workers instead, which some people would see as an opportunity to see another country, make some money, and then go home, plenty people have done that in the past.

    “or even if they did, white people who are in control of their passions enough to live in close contact with alien races and not have sex with them”

    I think you probably mean white adolescent girls who are assertive enough not to cave into constant harassment from pervy creeps who probably see them as objects.

  264. Whitewolf says:
    @Nick J

    Ive come to realize that “white” is of no real significance. Culture is everything.

    Culture is an expression of a race/ethnic group. The culture you identify with is inseparable from the people who created it. The people who created it were Europeans. Asians and Africans have different cultures even in today’s more globalized world.

    Take away Whites from western civilization and you’ll find the new civilization will have a culture totally different from what it is now. Just try and imagine everyone in the US disappearing overnight except for African Americans. You might recognize the music in the new culture but the rest of it would soon resemble a random country in Africa. Better yet imagine just leaving Mexicans and the US would be indistinguishable from Mexico.

  265. Anon[398] • Disclaimer says:
    @Jonathan Revusky

    “They just all looked at him like he was nuts, told him that there was no such thing going on in Germany, it was perfectly safe”

    Well I suppose if you view being followed and harassed by creepy men if you dare walk out alone in one of the cities in the evening, particularly in the evening, though not just the evening, as safe…

    • Troll: Jonathan Revusky
  266. @Jonathan Revusky

    Just a cop out reply; we are supposed to believe that insomuch as Gatestone is Zionist, it follows that all the facts Kern has compiled should be dismissed. What is worse, you surmise that I must work for Gatestone simply because I referenced some articles packed with multiple cases of sexual assaults, which is far better than your conclusion that assaults are hardly a reality simply because your German friends living in safe areas told you so. All crimes are committed by a minority, and only relatively few suffer from sexual assaults in German; this does not negate the fact that migrants have been disproportionately responsible, very much so, for sexual assaults in many European nations.

    • Replies: @Jonathan Revusky
  267. @Corvinus

    Let me make this simple……………Whites discovered the scientific method of understanding their environment……

    ….that resulted in the all the applied technologies implemented in 1st world existence of the West.

    There is a reason why Whites had infrastructure in place, split the atom and walked on the moon while the majority of Non-Whites were still trying to figure out how to source enough clean water and/or food to eat let alone what to do with their waste from that………..

    BTW…..There are people whom I don’t mention who are working as we speak on designer viral pathogens that target DNA correlated to racial make up which can sterilize a given individual of that genetic profile…

    .. so it doesn’t matter whether I sit in an armchair or not………

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  268. Anon[213]: “As I said, that didn’t happen in Britain with the British empire, which no longer exists, and immigration levels to Britain were relatively low (5 times lower) before 1998 than they are today …”

    How anyone can look at the goings on in the UK and not understand what I wrote baffles me. What’s taking place right now is the fourth, terminal phase. From what I’ve read, even London is no longer a white city.

    Anon[213]: “… as yet doesn’t appear to have caused ‘large scale genetic mixing’.”

    You mean because Britain is still majority white, I guess. Don’t worry, that will probably change soon enough. The question you need to ask yourself is, “What is the trend?” Will the white race as it is today still exist in England in a century or two? If it does, likely it will have shrunk to a tiny minority of the overall population, if I’m correct. Most “whites” will by that time be of mixed race.

    Anon[213]: “Yeah, I’m sure it was beneficial to most of the ordinary public …”

    It doesn’t have to be, and I didn’t say or imply it did. A good course on reading comprehension might help you quite a bit.

    Anon[213]: “Yeah yeah, with regard to Britain, they could simply put a limit on the level of immigration so that it is back to what it was before 1998 …”

    Why don’t they then? Ah, that’s right. A host of objections and practical problems…

    Anon[213]: “I think you probably mean white adolescent girls who are assertive enough not to cave into constant harassment from pervy creeps who probably see them as objects.”

    Rotheram?

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rotherham_child_sexual_exploitation_scandal

    Thanks for bringing that up and illustrating my point about the terminal phase. But I actually had in mind the white slave owners of early America, who did enough genetic mixing to contribute about 20% of the modern American negro’s DNA.

    • Replies: @Jonathan Revusky
    , @Anon
  269. @Ricardo Duchesne

    Just a cop out reply; we are supposed to believe that insomuch as Gatestone is Zionist, it follows that all the facts Kern has compiled should be dismissed.

    I never said that. However, I did say, or at least strongly implied, that a Zionist propaganda outfit such as Gatestone should not be considered a reliable information source. Granted, that does not logically imply that everything they say must be false.

    BUT… it does logically imply that anything they say should be carefully fact checked!

    As best I understand, you are trying to represent that Gatestone is a reliable information source because, for some reason, you want very much to believe what they are saying. In this instance. Of course, if they separately say something you don’t want to believe, you will then dismiss it, saying that Gatestone is just a Zionist propaganda outfit! LOL.

    [MORE]

    That’s literally how you guys operate! Just look back at the conversation I’ve been having. I pointed out that the German government crime statistics show that crime in Germany is currently at multi-decade lows. Then these guys, like “Germanicus” show up expressing indignation that I could believe this. Okay, I say, fine, what is the proof that the statistics are falsified?

    Well, aside from hurling personal insults at me, his response is just to repeat the claim.

    Then another guy, “eah” provides some statistics about arrests in Germany. Apparently people of a foreign background are arrested at a much higher rate for crimes than native Germans. Probably true. Of course, the statistics are not corrected for the different age/gender distribution of the populations and they are arrests, not convictions.

    But leaving all that aside, the same guy had told me separately in another conversation the same thing as Germanicus. He told me that the official German statistics on crime were all fabricated. Yet, where did his statistics on arrests come from? Take a guess.

    German government, of course.

    I mean to say, the whole thing is a joke. The German government’s crime statistics are correct when you think they back what you are saying, but if you point out some statistics they don’t like, then all the government statistics are false. Go figure.

    It’s just ridiculous. That guy had separately claimed that there was some sort of “stand-down”, that the German cops were (God knows why… they’re just cucks…) just standing down and letting foreigners rape German girls. But now he’s saying that the German cops are arresting foreigners at 5 or 10 times the rate that they are arresting native Germans. So, hold on… where is the “stand-down”? There’s no logical consistency! And again, either the German government statistics are fabricated or they aren’t. But if they are, then you can’t really turn around and quote them when you think they back your argument.

    What is worse, you surmise that I must work for Gatestone

    I didn’t express certainty about it. I asked you the question and you have not yet answered.

    your conclusion that assaults are hardly a reality simply because your German friends living in safe areas told you so

    Well, first of all, do you understand the “beg the question” fallacy? You are the one (along with the other jerks) claiming that there is a huge crime epidemic in Germany, when the official government data says there is not. Moreover, people who actually live in Germany or spend much time there invariably say that there is no big crime problem in Germany.

    So, if you are going to claim that there is this big problem, isn’t there an onus on you to actually provide some proof of this?

    But, okay, where do we stand on this? Rewind a bit… A friend of mine who speaks fluent German was curious about this. He asked various Germans about the horrid “rape epidemic” taking place in Germany and they told him it was bullshit.

    Okay, maybe they’re wrong and women really are getting raped all over the place, because these people (according to you) live in “safe areas” and are blissfully unaware of this. You, however, know better than people who actually live in Germany. You know that there is this huge problem. Why? Because Soeren Kern, who works for a Zionist propaganda outfit, called Gatestone, says there is.

    The German authorities report that crime in Germany (which was never very high in the first place) is currently at multi-decade lows. But they are lying and Soeren Kern has better information. You know better than to believe the German government. The go-to guy is Soren Kern of the Gatestone Institute. He gives you the real facts.

    Okay, here is some reality check sorts of questions we can pose.

    1. If Soeren Kern, of the Gatestone Institute knows that there is a huge rape epidemic taking place in Germany that does not appear in the official crime statistics that the German government compiles then:

    How does Soeren Kern know this?

    Where does he get his data from?

    Does he, or Gatestone Institute, have some real research effort on the ground in Germany to get the data — the real data, according to you?

    2. You say that the regular Germans who are blissfully unaware of the huge crime problem because they live in “safe areas”. So…

    Could you point out on Google Maps some of these very unsafe neighborhoods in Germany where women are getting raped all over the place?

    I know that would take a bit of research, but we’re serious people here, right? So, can you do that?

    I think the above questions are reasonable and focused. Are you willing to try to answer them?

  270. @Dr. Robert Morgan

    Rotheram?

    Rotherham is a town in Northern England. The conversation was about Germany.

  271. Anon[140] • Disclaimer says:
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    ”How anyone can look at the goings on in the UK and not understand what I wrote baffles me. What’s taking place right now is the fourth, terminal phase. From what I’ve read, even London is no longer a white city”

    The British empire ended decades ago, immigration levels were at a fairly reasonable level (most people aren’t against some immigration) until 1998 (long after the British empire ended, and a huge amount of the immigration hasn’t been from regions that were even part of the British empire in the past anyway). The level of immigration was deliberately increased by New Labour as a matter of choice and without consulting or anywhere near properly informing the public.

    This isn’t hard for normal people to understand, those that pretend not to have an agenda.

    You say ‘even London’ as if you don’t understand that that would likely be one of the most, if not the most, popular place for people from other countries to move to, being the capital, and it’s British people that are no longer the majority in London, white people in general are still the majority for now.

    “Anon[213]: “Yeah yeah, with regard to Britain, they could simply put a limit on the level of immigration so that it is back to what it was before 1998 …”

    Why don’t they then? Ah, that’s right. A host of objections and practical problems…”

    Because the public have been generally mislead by politicians and the mainstream media about the truth of the issue and the implications of it.

    The government (Labour or Conservative) won’t solve the problem, because they are the problem, most, if not all, of the current mainstream political parties need to go imo.

    It wouldn’t be an issue if Labour hadn’t changed the rules around immigration in the first place.

    If Mongolia can adopt a strict immigration policy, then other countries can too, but as I said before, immigration levels returning to what they were prior to 1998 would probably suffice.

    “Though foreigners now make up less than 0.4 percent of the population, Ulaanbaatar has used high fees and quotas to rein in immigration”

    Mongolia lawmakers to consider strict immigration cap
    http://news.trust.org/item/20180207061416-2eviz

    You are talking utter jewbberish.

  272. YelpMelp says:

    If you’re of European descent and know the gist of the Kalergi Plan,
    you can’t find this book or the author amusing.
    I unwittingly bought a paper copy,
    read it, gouged out the red pills,
    and now use the thing as a doorstop

  273. Anonymous[593] • Disclaimer says:

    Frankly, many non-White and/or non-European minorities in America have a lot of gall to try to overturn Whiteness and take over (they’ll make a mess of things, of course).

    They are, of course, being helped by Democrats and the Left.

    Jewish Americans also hope to divide and conquer America and come out on top. And if that does not work they’ll all move to Israel and nuke the rest of the Middle East.

    It is just beyond belief that so many White Christians Americans, including Trump, are afraid of Jews and won’t speak up publicly. Fox News makes me sick. Only Tucker Carlson comes close to exposing Jewish and minority games.

    Hannity, Ingraham, and others such as Limbaugh and Anne Coulter know better but don’t have the guts to tell the truth about Jews. Will they keep their mouths shut forever?

    • Replies: @Anon
    , @anarchyst
  274. Anon[213]: “The British empire ended decades ago,…”

    Don’t be so dense. Just because it no longer calls itself an empire doesn’t mean anything. It may have changed its name to “The Commonweath of Nations”, but it still is an empire in the sense of having intricate economic, cultural, and demographic ties to foreign lands. I was trying to give you credit for having a little intelligence and thought you’d be able to work that out for yourself, but it appears I overestimated you.

    Anon[213]: “Because the public have been generally mislead by politicians and the mainstream media about the truth of the issue and the implications of it… [plus other excuses]”

    Yep. A long list of objections and practical problems, again proving my point.

    Anon[213]: “If Mongolia can adopt a strict immigration policy, then other countries can too,…”

    Non sequitur. Just because Peter can do something doesn’t mean Paul can do it, or would want to. What’s true for individuals is equally true for countries, which are just collections of individuals. Despite its past glory, Mongolia remains a poor country today; only about 3 million people in it. No economic need for bringing in immigrants. Nevertheless, during its heyday, the Mongols engaged in plenty of race mixing with their slaves. Genghis Khan himself sired hundreds children with conquered women. It’s estimated that about 1 in 200 Asian men, about 16 million all told, have him as a direct ancestor.

    http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2010/08/1-in-200-men-direct-descendants-of-genghis-khan/

    The bottom line is that empire always promotes race mixing.

    Anon[213]: “You are talking utter jewbberish.”

    This juvenile level of discourse is more your speed.

    • Replies: @Anon
  275. Jonathan Revusky: “Rotherham is a town in Northern England. The conversation was about Germany.”

    Yes, your conversation was, but mine wasn’t. Since you’ve butted in though, let me ask you, do you believe Rotherham was a hoax too? If not, then why would you think that these same types of people would behave any differently in Germany than they do in England?

    • Replies: @Jonathan Revusky
  276. Anon[161] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anonymous

    It’s jewish people that have come in an set out to destroy America from inside in what they probably believe is in the interests of jews, and in the case of the zionists Israel.

    I don’t think America and so many other countries would be experiencing this is issue if it wasn’t for that.

    It used to go over my head, but the ‘project for a new American century’ was written by zionist jews, the neo conservatives were started by zionist jews, mostly to serve what they think are the interests of zionists and Israel, a lot of zionists tried to drum up support of the invasion of Iraq (although oil companies had interests in that too), but ‘the project for a new American century’ laid out a plan in 2000 that seems eerily similar to what’s been put into motion from 2001 onwards, and the twin towers and building 7 had recently been purchased by a man called Larry Silverstein who apparently insured them against terror attacks a few weeks before.

    Bare in mind no plane was claimed to hit building 7, and yet it went down in the exact same way as the other two buildings, like a controlled demolition. They try and claim that a bomb proof building (as building 7 apparently was) went down like that due to a small part of it catching fire and the fire spreading, that wouldn’t happen in reality.

    America apparently gives $10 million a day in aid to Israel, and yet a lot of the entitled i***** blame everyone but zionists or other s**** stirring jews for their problems, a country is ‘bad’ merely not for taking their side enough, even when it’s not deserved. Apparently there have been threats to nuke other countries if they won’t help Israel.

    This situation can’t go on forever, something has to be done to change the situation…

  277. anarchyst says:
    @Anonymous

    Hannity has always been a jewish shill.
    I damn near fell out of my chair while listening to Hannity’s radio show when a caller inquired about the deliberate israeli attack on the USS Liberty on 8 June 1967.
    Hannity’s response was that “israel is our friend and would never have done such a thing”. The caller was cut off from responding after that.
    Hannity is just another shill in a long line of media shills for israel.

  278. @Dr. Robert Morgan

    Since you’ve butted in though, let me ask you, do you believe Rotherham was a hoax too?

    No, I assume that Rotherham happened.

    Cologne, on the other hand, is obviously a hoax. This is for a very simple reason. Hundreds of sexual assaults cannot happen in a wide open place full of people in recent years without leaving some visual record. Since it is impossible, it did not happen.

    The Cologne event is actually a fairly trivial exercise in critical thinking, as I point here:

    https://heresycentral.is/revusky/ghost-of-john-morton/

    [MORE]

    Rotherham, on the other hand, is a completely different matter. All of the sex with underage girls would presumably have happened behind closed doors, in seedy motels or wherever, with no (or very few) witnesses and there is no reason to think that it would have left any photographic record.

    If not, then why would you think that these same types of people would behave any differently in Germany than they do in England?

    Well, that’s a ridiculous question really. First of all, my conclusions on Cologne are not based primarily on speculating about what different kinds of people would do. The most important indicator that it is a hoax is simply the lack of any visual evidence that such a mass event in an open public place would produce. That consideration does not apply to Rotherham.

    That is the main point. However, besides that, the question you are posing is based on some mentally squalid sorts of reasoning anyway.

    For starters: the Pakistani ethnics convicted in the Rotherham case are not “the same types of people” as the refugees in Germany. The Pakistanis in that case were mostly born in the U.K. or moved there as infants. The refugees in Germany are recent arrivals. Aside from that, Middle Eastern Arabs are actually completely different people from South Asians. The only thing that the Pakistanis in Rotherham have in common with Arabs in Cologne is that both groups are nominally Muslims, though I very much doubt that the Rotherham criminals were religious people!

    So, the two groups might have as much in common as Poles do with Mexicans insofar as both Poland and Mexico are majority Catholic countries.

    Another point, and probably the most offensive aspect of what you are insinuating is the notion that the behavior of a handful of criminals in Rotherham characterizes the behavior of Pakistanis in Britain. Actually, in Rotherham, you had about dozen criminals of that ethnic background, and there are 1.2 million ethnic Pakistanis in the U.K. and the overwhelming majority of them are law-abiding people.

    I am quite certain that you would never make the argument that the behavior of a dozen Italian-American mafiosos characterizes the behavior of all Italian ethnics. You would only make such a mentally squalid argument in the case of a non-European people.

    In any case, that, out of the 1.2 million Pakistanis in the U.K., you have a dozen of these criminals, now in prison, does not say anything even about the typical behavior of Pakistanis in Britain, but it certainly says absolutely NOTHING about the typical behavior of Arab refugees in Germany.

    In other words, your implicit reasoning is multiple degrees away from making any sense at all.

    In short, you are a complete idiot. (But I already knew that from previous interactions with you.)

    • Replies: @Anon
  279. Anon[767] • Disclaimer says:
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    “Anon[213]: “The British empire ended decades ago,…”

    Don’t be so dense. Just because it no longer calls itself an empire doesn’t mean anything. It may have changed its name to “The Commonweath of Nations”, but it still is an empire in the sense of having intricate economic, cultural, and demographic ties to foreign lands. I was trying to give you credit for having a little intelligence and thought you’d be able to work that out for yourself, but it appears I overestimated you”

    The commonwealth countries aren’t under British rule and immigration from them is subject to control, there isn’t ‘free movement’ to Britain from the commonwealth countries, and they only account for about half of the immigration that comes from countries outside the E.U.

    “Nevertheless, during its heyday, the Mongols engaged in plenty of race mixing with their slaves. Genghis Khan himself sired hundreds children with conquered women. It’s estimated that about 1 in 200 Asian men, about 16 million all told, have him as a direct ancestor”

    Whatever they did it was mostly through choice, and they don’t seem to let agenda driven nut cases dictate their immigration policy now.

    Britain had little immigration until about the 1950’s, and even then it was at a relatively low level until 1998, when the level of immigration had tripled within a year of Labour taking office…

  280. Corvinus says:
    @option one

    “Let me make this simple……………Whites discovered the scientific method of understanding their environment……”

    Actually, components of the scientific method were a combination of Greek, Muslim, and European efforts, which was formalized by Sir Francis Bacon.

    “….that resulted in the all the applied technologies implemented in 1st world existence of the West.”

    Except a number of those applied technologies owe their foundations to Mesopotamian influence.

    “There is a reason why Whites had infrastructure in place, split the atom and walked on the moon while the majority of Non-Whites were still trying to figure out how to source enough clean water and/or food to eat let alone what to do with their waste from that”

    Indeed, Europeans jackbooted the resources from Africa and Asia to fund that infrastructure and scientific endeavors.

    “There are people whom I don’t mention who are working as we speak on designer viral pathogens that target DNA correlated to racial make up which can sterilize a given individual of that genetic profile…”

    Praytell, do you work for Mossad?

    “.. so it doesn’t matter whether I sit in an armchair or not………”

    Actually, it does matter.

    • Replies: @Anon
  281. Anon[767] • Disclaimer says:
    @Jonathan Revusky

    “So, the two groups might have as much in common as Poles do with Mexicans insofar as both Poland and Mexico are majority Catholic countries”

    Possibly.

    “In any case, that, out of the 1.2 million Pakistanis in the U.K., you have a dozen of these criminals, now in prison”

    Rotherham wasn’t the only case…

    “Grooming gangs abused more than 700 women and girls around Newcastle with “arrogant persistence” after police appeared to punish victims while letting the perpetrators walk free, a case review has found.

    The report into the response by authorities to child sexual exploitation found that before a large-scale police operation was launched in 2014, officers’ actions were sending an “unhelpful” message to perpetrators”

    Grooming gangs abused more than 700 women and girls around Newcastle after police appeared to punish victims
    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/grooming-gangs-uk-britain-newcastle-serious-case-review-operation-sanctuary-shelter-muslim-asian-a8225106.html

    “So far those towns have included: 

    * Rotherham – The issue of child abuse in the town first came to light in 2010 when five Asian men were jailed for sexual offences against under-age girls.

    A 2014 inquiry found there were more than 1,400 victims of grooming and sex exploitation in Rotherham between 1997 and 2013.

    * Rochdale – The trial of nine Asian men for grooming young white girls for sex attracted widespread public outrage and sparked a national debate when they were convicted in 2012.

    The gang received jail sentences of between four and 19 years for offences committed against five girls – aged between 13 and 15 – in and around Rochdale between 2008 and 2010″

    ” * Oxford – In 2013, five members of a sadistic paedophile ring were handed life sentences, while two others were each jailed for seven years at the Old Bailey.

    The court heard how six girls, aged between 11 and 15, were plied with alcohol and drugs before being forced to perform sex acts.

    All of the men were of Pakistani origin apart from two brothers, who were from north Africa.

     Bristol – Some 13 Somali men were jailed for more than a total of more than 100 years after they were convicted in 2014 of running an inner city sex ring.

    Victims as young as 13 were preyed upon, sexually abused and trafficked across Bristol to be passed around the men’s friends for money.

    * Aylesbury – Six Asian men were jailed in 2015 for grooming vulnerable under-age white girls between 2006 and 2012.

    The Old Bailey heard victims would be plied with alcohol and forced to perform sex acts for as little as “the price of a McDonalds”.

    * Peterborough – A total of 10 men were convicted of child sex crimes in the town, including “predatory” restaurant boss Mohammed Khubaib, who was originally from Pakistan.

    He was jailed for 13 years at the Old Bailey in 2015, after he was found guilty of forcing a 14-year-old girl to perform a sex act on him and nine counts of trafficking for sexual exploitation, involving girls aged from 12 to 15, between 2010 and 2013.

    And now, of course, Newcastle has been added to the list”

    The list of Britain’s towns and cities shamed by Asian grooming gangs
    https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/839509/Britain-towns-cities-asian-grooming-gangs-Newcastle-Rochdale-Rotherham

    “Mehmood was jailed for life in October 2001 after he was convicted of murdering his girlfriend Lucy Lowe, 16, her sister Sarah, 17, and her mother Eileen, 49, in Telford.

    All three victims died in the blaze in Halifax Drive, Leegomery, after Mehmood, formerly of Manor Road, Hadley, used petrol to spark a fire.

    He was also convicted of the attempted murder of Mr Lowe, who escaped the fire by climbing out of a bedroom window.

    Mehmood was jailed for life and ordered to serve a minimum of 18 years – but last week top judges at London’s Royal Courts of Justice threw out an appeal to cut his sentence. He will not be eligible to apply for parole until 2019 at the earliest.

    Mr Lowe, who now lives in Wellington, said: “We knew absolutely nothing about the appeal.

    “I drink in The Station pub in Wellington and the first I knew of it was when I went in there and the landlord showed me the paper and asked me if I had seen it.

    “I had tears in my eyes, it brought it all flooding back.”

    The fire was started with petrol by Azhar Mehmood, the then 26-year-old boyfriend of Mr Lowe’s teenage daughter, Lucy.

    The 16-year-old had told her family earlier that day she was pregnant with the couple’s second child.

    They already had a 15-month-old baby, who was found wrapped in a blanket underneath an apple tree in the back garden while the fire was raging”

    Telford victim’s anguish over killer’s appeal snub
    https://www.shropshirestar.com/news/2014/10/28/telford-victims-anguish-over-killers-appeal-snub/

    • Replies: @Jonathan Revusky
  282. @Not a nazi for sure

    You’re a fucking brainwashed idiot. Stop posting.
    It’s embarrassing.
    Race is the ONLY thing that matters in this world. Everyone plays this game but brainwashed “White Trash”.
    You already fucked up with your asian wife, that’s why you HAVE to believe this kike crap. But you know deep down, you’re full of shit, and what’s coming can’t be stopped.
    And when it comes, your skin will be your uniform.
    Good luck.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  283. @Jonathan Revusky

    You’re too arrogant to recognize your own glow, aren’t you?
    You’re so full of shit, it hurts.
    It’s beyond obvious you’re jewish.
    I know you can’t, but I’ll request it anyway.
    Stop lying, yid!

    • Troll: Jonathan Revusky
  284. Anon[151] • Disclaimer says:
    @Corvinus

    “Indeed, Europeans jackbooted the resources from Africa and Asia to fund that infrastructure and scientific endeavors”

    Is that how the rail ways in ‘Europe’ were built?

    The History of Steam Trains and Railways
    https://www.historic-uk.com/HistoryUK/HistoryofBritain/Steam-trains-railways/

    When Was the First Train Invented?
    https://www.reference.com/history/first-train-invented-2605692cfd100fc6

    Europe’s not a country like America, it’s a continent made up of several countries with various laws, backgrounds, histories, in case you didn’t know that.

    In the late 19th century a lot of areas of Africa still didn’t have written languages (christian missionaries helped create written versions of some African languages in certain areas), decent roads, wheeled transportation (so things mostly had to be carried by people and transport was usually on foot), some of central Africa was still uncharted, and practices such as human sacrifice, ritualistic killing, mutilation and even cannibalism were a lot more widespread.

    And a lot resources in Africa weren’t actually in use then, and some things, like the cocoa tree, were brought to west Africa from elsewhere.

    “Roads make a crucial contribution to economic development and growth and bring important social benefits. They are of vital importance in order to make a nation grow and develop. In addition, providing access to employment, social, health and education services makes a road network crucial in fighting against poverty. Roads open up more areas and stimulate economic and social development. For those reasons, road infrastructure is the most important of all public assets”

    The importance of road maintenance
    https://www.worldhighways.com/categories/maintenance-utility/features/the-importance-of-road-maintenance/

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  285. Corvinus says:
    @Anon

    “Is that how the rail ways in ‘Europe’ were built?”

    Red herring. The fact of the matter is that Europeans built railroads in Africa for one of three purposes to suit their own needs.

    1. Military domination: the line was built to quickly dispatch troops to quell native rebellions

    2. Mining: the line was built into the interior to further mining interests

    3. Cash crops: the line was built to connect agriculturally rich areas

    The colonial railroads in Uganda, built between 1896 to 1901, bypassed highly populated native areas in order to transport raw materials. In Kenya, railroad placement was to primarily transport coffee and tea. In Ghana, the gold-mining lobbies convinced the governor to built railroad lines in the early 1900’s for their interests.

    “In the late 19th century a lot of areas of Africa still didn’t have written languages (christian missionaries helped create written versions of some African languages in certain areas)…”

    Africa transmitted their history through oral traditions.

    “wheeled transportation (so things mostly had to be carried by people and transport was usually on foot)”

    This type of transportation system was not needed, since Africans traveled by foot and by boat.

    “practices such as human sacrifice, ritualistic killing, mutilation and even cannibalism were a lot more widespread.”

    Not as much as you think.

    “And a lot resources in Africa weren’t actually in use then, and some things, like the cocoa tree, were brought to west Africa from elsewhere.”

    Actually, gold, salt, and rubber were used by natives.

    • Replies: @Anon
    , @Anon
    , @Anon
  286. Corvinus says:
    @Wolfsangel

    “Race is the ONLY thing that matters in this world.”

    Actually, religion and ideology trump race.

    “And when it comes, your skin will be your uniform.”

    I see you enjoy being an armchair warrior. Why aren’t you at the front lines taking matters into your own hands if things are so bleak?

  287. Anon[151] • Disclaimer says:
    @Corvinus

    ” “Is that how the rail ways in ‘Europe’ were built?”

    Red herring. The fact of the matter is that Europeans built railroads in Africa for one of three purposes to suit their own needs”

    I was actually referring to the railways built in ‘Europe’ in response to this…

    “There is a reason why Whites had infrastructure in place, split the atom and walked on the moon while the majority of Non-Whites were still trying to figure out how to source enough clean water and/or food to eat let alone what to do with their waste from that”

    Indeed, Europeans jackbooted the resources from Africa and Asia to fund that infrastructure and scientific endeavors”

    The first railroads in ‘Europe’ were built to transport raw materials too.

    “Africa transmitted their history through oral traditions”

    I dare say a lot of people did before they learned to read and write. It’s not particularly reliable though, information can get lost or distorted due to chinese whispers etc.

    Writing and reading are useful, people don’t just use it to record ‘history’, they use it to pass on information to people and record things so they can come back to it later, it means less things are likely to be forgotten, and reading can expand your mind/knowledge etc…

    “This type of transportation system was not needed, since Africans traveled by foot and by boat”

    Did they travel by boat in areas that weren’t near rivers or other bodies of water as well?

    Wheeled transportation and decent roads are useful too…

    “Roads make a crucial contribution to economic development and growth and bring important social benefits. They are of vital importance in order to make a nation grow and develop. In addition, providing access to employment, social, health and education services makes a road network crucial in fighting against poverty. Roads open up more areas and stimulate economic and social development. For those reasons, road infrastructure is the most important of all public assets”

    The importance of road maintenance
    https://www.worldhighways.com/categories/maintenance-utility/features/the-importance-of-road-maintenance/

    “Actually, gold, salt, and rubber were used by natives”

    I said a lot of the resources weren’t in use, not none of them…

  288. Anon[151] • Disclaimer says:
    @Corvinus

    ” “practices such as human sacrifice, ritualistic killing, mutilation and even cannibalism were a lot more widespread.”

    Not as much as you think”

    “Police suspect the victim was a West African child slave, after forensic evidence points to a ritual killing, report Martin Bright and Paul Harris”

    Thames torso boy was sacrificed | UK news  | The Guardian
    https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2002/jun/02/ukcrime.paulharris

    “Bald men in Mozambique could be targets of ritual attacks, police have warned, after the recent killing of five men for their body parts.

    Two suspects have been arrested in the central district of Milange, where the killings occurred.

    “The belief is that the head of a bald man contains gold,” said Afonso Dias, a police commander in Mozambique’s central Zambezia province.

    Albino people have also been killed in the region for ritual purposes.

    Three men have been killed in the past week alone”

    [MORE]

    Mozambique police warn bald men after ritual attack
    https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bbc.com/news/amp/world-africa-40185359

    Malawi albinos kidnapped and sacrificed by witchdoctor gangs on the hunt for election charms
    https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.telegraph.co.uk/global-health/terror-and-security/malawi-albinos-kidnapped-sacrificed-witchdoctor-gangs-hunt-election/amp/

    “In this episode of Africa Investigates, Tanzanian journalist Richard Mgamba, albino community representative, Isaack Timothy, and Ghanaian investigative journalist Anas Aremeyaw Anas set out to discover what lies behind the attacks against albinos”

    Africa Investigates – The spell of the Albino – YouTube

    “Two-year-old Nigerian boy accused of being a witch rescued by aid workers

    ‘Thousands of children are being accused of being witches and we’ve both seen torture of children, dead children and frightened children’ ”

    Two-year-old Nigerian boy accused of being a witch rescued by aid workers
    https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.independent.co.uk/news/world/africa/two-year-old-nigerian-boy-accused-of-being-a-witch-rescued-by-aid-workers-a6875706.html%3famp

    “Beliefs in demonic possession are still prevalent in many African countries, meaning thousands of kids who come over to the UK from them are at risk of abuse and cruel torture in the name of religion”

    HORRIFYING ABUSE Drowned in the bath, slashed with knives and chillies in eyes: the torment of the children being accused of witchcraft in the UK
    https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.thesun.co.uk/news/6862627/children-accused-of-witchcraft-uk/amp

    “Police searched the mother’s home and found evidence of witchcraft.

    The prosecutor said: “Two cow tongues, they were bound in wire with nails and a small blunt knife also embedded in them,

    40 limes were found and other fruit which when opened contained pieces of paper with names on them.

    “The names embedded included both police officers involved in the investigation of the case, the social worker, her own son and the then director of public prosecutions.

    “These people were to ‘shut up’ and ‘freeze their mouths’. There was a jar with a picture of a social worker in pepper found hidden behind the toilet in the bathroom. Another spell was hidden under the bed.” ”

    FGM trial: First ever person convicted of practice in UK jailed for 13 years after mutilating 3-year-old daughter
    https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/fgm-sentencing-trial-uganda-mother-guilty-old-bailey-conviction-a8814051.html%3famp

    “Moroccan traveler Ibn Battuta visited the court of the Mansa (emperor) Suleiman of the Islamic West African Empire of Mali in the mid-1300s, and reported that the Mansa gave some “unbeliever” visitors a “hospitality gift” of a slave girl whom they butchered and ate.

    So while the Mansa and his subjects were not cannibals, he seemed quite willing to respect and enable the horrible customs of his foreign guests”

    HERE BE CANNIBALS
    https://hauda.org/2018/08/24/here-be-cannibals/

    “Two years ago the king gave orders for a kiwendo and 2,000 innocent people were slaughtered in one day.

    Less than a year ago a similar atrocity was committed. Two thousand poor peasants were caught, fastened in forked sticks, kept in pens and murdered on the set day, as an expiatory offering to the departed spirit of the former king, Suna.

    Now another kiwendo is about to take place, because the king is ill and a sorcerer has told him that only a great slaughter can heal his sickness.”

    Risking his life, Mackay wrote the king a letter, pleading for their lives, but his plea was disregarded”

    Mackay College Nateete, Uganda, The life of Mackay
    http://www.mackaycollege.info/lifeMackay.html

    “Their small, unprotected villages are constantly attacked by the powerful roving tribes of the Lufembe and Ngombe.

    These two tribes are voracious cannibals. They surround the Lolo
    villages at night, and at the first signs of dawn pounce down upon the unsuspecting Balolo, killing all the men who resist and catching all the rest. They then select the stronger portion of their captives, and shackle them hand and foot to prevent their escape. The remainder they kill, distributing the flesh among themselves.

    As a rule, after such a raid they form a small encampment; they light their fires, seize all the bananas in the village, and gorge upon the human flesh. They then march over to one of the numerous slave- markets on the river, where they exchange the captives with the slave- traders of the Lulungu River for beads, cloth, brass wire, and other trinkets. The slave-traders pack the slaves into their canoes and take them down to the villages on the Lulungu River where the more important markets are held.

    Masankusu, situated at the junction of the Lupuri and Malinga tributaries, is by far the most important slave- trading center. The people of Masankusu buy their slaves from the Lufembe and Ngombe raiders, and sell them to the Lulungu natives and traders from down river.

    The slaves are exhibited for sale at Masankusu in long sheds, or rather under simple grass roofs supported on bare poles. It is heartrending to see the inmates of one of these slave- sheds. They are huddled together like so many animals”

    “A large trade is carried on between the Ubangi and Lulungu rivers. The people inhabiting the mouth of the Ubangi buy the Balolo slaves at Masankusu and the other markets. They then take them up the Ubangi River and exchange them with the natives there for ivory.

    These natives buy their slaves solely for food. Having purchased slaves they feed them on ripe bananas, fish, and oil, and when they get them into good condition they kill them. Hundreds of the Balolo slaves are taken into the river and disposed of in this way each month.

    A great many other slaves are sold to the large villages on the Congo, to supply victims for the execution ceremonies”

    1890 The Slave Trade In The Congo Basin
    https://archive.org/stream/1890TheSlaveTradeInTheCongoBasin/1890%20The%20slave%20trade%20in%20the%20Congo%20Basin_djvu.txt

    Six years of adventure in Congo-land
    https://archive.org/stream/insavageafricao00glavgoog/insavageafricao00glavgoog_djvu.txt

    “CANNIBALISM AMONG NIGERIAN TRIBESMEN 93

    The Rev. E. Deas, of the United Presbyterian Mission, confirmed the many reports of the existence of cannibal markets in many parts of Nigeria, and Bishop Crowther wrote :

    Cannibalism is widespread from the delta of the Niger for a long
    way up its course. Among the Okrika Tribe, a hundred and fifty prisoners were taken from a tribe on the opposite side of the river and divided amongst the chiefs.

    With the exception of eleven, who fell to the lot of converted chiefs, and were therefore spared, the remaining 139 prisoners were divided up among the chiefs and the men who had captured them, and killed and devoured by them.

    A correspondent of The Saturday Review wrote of the unmistakable lust for human flesh among the tribesmen of West Africa, and Nigeria in particular, and added: “Young boys are brought from the dark interior, kept in pens, fattened upon bananas, and finally killed and baked.” ”

    “All the Mambila groups were cannibal until recendy, and most  of them would be cannibal still were it not for fear of the Administration. They ate the flesh of their enemies killed in war, and among their enemies might be members of a neighbouring village with whom they had intermarried when at peace. Thus it might happen that a man would kill and eat one of his own relatives.

    Instances have been reported of a man killing and eating his wife’s
    brother during an affray between two villages. But it was stated that if a man killed and ate his father-in-law, he would fall ill and die.

    There is evidence, too, that these groups sometimes sold their own dead for food.

    Religious ideas were not prominent in the cannibalism of the Mambila. Tribesmen who were willing to answer questions stated clearly that they ate human flesh purely as meat.

    When they killed an enemy, they cut pieces off his body and ate them raw, in situ, without any formalities. Pieces were taken home and given to the old men, who ate them from sheer lust of flesh. In such cases the flesh might be eaten raw or cooked.

    Even the intestines were eaten, being ripped up, cleaned and boiled.

    On the other hand, it was stated that young men were compelled to eat, in order to become brave; the conception being, apparently, that by eating the flesh of a slain warrior they absorbed his courage.

    The skulls of enemies were preserved, and when the young men first went to war they were made to drink beer and a certain medicine from one of the skulls, with a view to making them fearless. Women, however, were not permitted to eat human flesh, and it was not permissible for married men to eat the flesh of women who had been killed during an attack on a village. But wifeless old men might eat the flesh of a woman with impunity”

    “Directly an enemy was slain, his head – and sometimes his body, if the people were strongly cannibalistic – was taken to the village and a great dance given, either at once or after the skull has been cleaned of its flesh by boiling, or by being buried for a time in the ground.

    At the feast, every man-slayer of the village danced round, generally with a skull in one hand and his machete in the other. Sometimes the body of the enemy was brought in whole; sometimes it was cut in pieces in advance to facilitate transport.

    It was then boiled in native pots and shared out, occasionally among the man-slayer’s family and friends, but sometimes among all the people of the village, until it was wholly consumed.

    In some tribes it was forbidden for women and children to partake of human flesh; in others, for example among the Kalabari, the eldest sister of the hut was forced to taste it, however strongly she might protest.

    Among the Abadja, the whole body of anyone slain was ordinarily taken back to the village and there consumed, though it was tabu to eat women or children. A man only divided his ‘kill’ among his own family.

    The body was cut up and cooked in pots; the fingers, palms of the hands, and toes were considered the best eating. Sometimes, if a family had been satisfied, part of the body would be dried and put away for later.

    When an Nkanu warrior brought a head back, everyone who heard of the deed gave him a present, and much palm-wine was drunk. The trophy was boiled, and the flesh cut away.

    The skull was then taken out, accompanied with all the others in the village, and the flesh was then boiled and eaten.

    Much cruelty was practised among certain of these tribes. For example, the Bafum-Bansaw, who frequently tortured their prisoners before putting them to death.

    Palm-oil was boiled in a big pot, and then by means of a gourd enema it was pumped into the bowels and stomachs of the prisoners. This practice was said to make the bodies much more succulent than they would otherwise have been.

    The bodies were left until the palm-oil had permeated them, and then cut up and devoured…”

    Full text of “Cannibalism And Human Sacrifice”
    https://archive.org/stream/in.ernet.dli.2015.104059/2015.104059.Cannibalism-And-Human-Sacrifice_djvu.txt

    “9TH Century CE

    Kanem is founded. Kanuri-speaking nomads founded the Sudanic Empire of Kanem, which achieved power through trans-Saharan trade. Slavery was practiced & slaves were captured from the south & traded for horses from North Africa.

    The Kingdom of Nri rises under the leadership of the Eze Nri. Democratically run, men and occasionally women in the Kingdom’s villages took part in decision-making processes”

    Africa Timeline
    https://www.sahistory.org.za/article/africa-timeline

    “By the 11th century some Hausa states – such as Kano, Katsina, and Gobir – had developed into walled towns engaging in trade, servicing caravans, and the manufacture of various goods.

    Until the 15th century these small states were on the periphery of the major Sudanic empires of the era. They were constantly pressured by Songhai to the west and Kanem-Bornu to the east, to which they paid tribute. Armed conflict was usually motivated by economic concerns, as coalitions of Hausa states mounted wars against the Jukun and Nupe in the middle belt to collect slaves or against one another for control of trade”

    “Bornu’s prosperity depended on the trans-Sudanic slave trade and the desert trade in salt and livestock. The need to protect its commercial interests compelled Bornu to intervene in Kanem, which continued to be a theater of war throughout the fifteenth and into the sixteenth centuries”

    History of Nigeria before 1500
    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Nigeria_before_1500

  289. Anon[151] • Disclaimer says:
    @Corvinus

    In 2004…

    “Moeletsi Mbeki, head of the South African Institute of International Affairs, told a meeting in Durban that Africa was in a spiral of decline.

    “The average African is poorer than during the age of colonialism,” the president’s younger brother said. He accused Africa’s post-colonial rulers of neglecting development and wasting money on “enormous entourages of civil servants”.

    He contrasted this with the record of colonial governments who built the roads and cities that Africa depends on today. Mr Mbeki pointed out that China had lifted 400m people out of penury during the past 20 years while, over the same period, 90m Nigerians had fallen below the poverty line despite their country’s oil wealth.

    A UN report published in July found that Africa was the only continent where most people were poorer than they were two decades ago”

    Africans ‘better off under colonialism’
    https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.independent.ie/world-news/africa/africans-better-off-under-colonialism-25899046.html

  290. @Anon

    Rotherham wasn’t the only case…

    That is true, but even if you add it all up, once you ponder seriously that the U.K. is a country with 66 million people, you would probably have to admit that it is not a very major phenomenon on a national scale.

    If somebody told you that there are a few dozen Puerto Rican rapists in the Northeast of the United States, how would you react to that? Or a few dozen Mexican lowlifes abusing children in California….

    These aren’t good things, but to try to present things of that scale as characterizing the behavior of an entire demographic of millions of people…

    In any case, this all began when I pointed out that, at least according to official government statistics, crime in German is at a multi-decade low.

    Is your proof to the contrary going to be that there are some Pakistani criminals in Northern England?

    • Replies: @comprimarius
  291. eah says:
    @eah

    An Eritrean who arrived in 2015 is on trial for raping 4 different women:

    pi_news.com — Memmingen: Kriminologe findet Entschuldigung für Serienvergewaltiger

    In DE the national media generally does not report these crimes — they explain/excuse this practice by saying such cases are only of regional interest: “regionale Bedeutung”.

  292. Miro23 says:
    @escobar

    The UK branch is just as hard at work.

    “What are the different gender identities?” asks a little boy in one of the nine new BBC Teach films put out to support the personal, social and health education (PSHE) curriculum in schools – to which his head teacher replies: “That’s a really, really exciting question…”

    Thanks Kate Daniels.

    But children, insists the BBC’s Relationships and Sex Education teacher Kate Daniels in the film, might well find these too limiting…

    Even by today’s Emperor’s New Clothes gender diversity narrative, 100 is pushing it. ‘Woke’ Facebook currently lists 71 complex and hilariously repetitive options for those who feel manacled by the oh-so-reductive ‘male’ and ‘female’.

    From The Telegraph.

  293. @jack daniels

    I welcome Muslim immigrants because I am a reactionary on social policy and welcome the addition of “people of color” who oppose feminism and gay lib.

    May I suggest you come for a short holiday to Birmingham, England, spend some time in the majority-Asian areas, and then let us know if your socially-useful Muslims are as desirable as you claim.

    Oh, and BTW, don’t bring any young white females with you if you value their health and safety.

  294. @Jonathan Revusky

    Rotherham has the 20th biggest Muslim population in the UK.

    People who know the real extent of this problem estimate the potential victims of young girls and boys to number in the hundreds of thousands.

    These aren’t good things, but to try to present things of that scale as characterizing the behavior of an entire demographic of millions of people…

    If you were repeatedly drugged, beaten, raped and prostituted by men from a particular demographic, do you think you would consider it to be serious, or would your supercilious attitude protect you from physical and psychological injury?

    It may be a good idea in future to gain an understand of a serious issue before commenting.

  295. @Alfa158

    4. Once the frog has been boiled and the carcass disposed of there is no reason to think things will not go on as if nothing had changed.

    That can’t be right. The whole point of the exercise is to make things go differently by effecting a change.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Martin Witkerk Comments via RSS