The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Robert Weissberg Archive
Eliminating Future Fergusons: The Unspeakable Solution
shutterstock_166376882
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Strings  Include Comments

Are the recent disturbances in Ferguson, New York City and elsewhere the opening act of yet more race-related urban rioting? Are we about to return to the 1960s when a “minor” traffic stop gone awry can lead to dozens of deaths and urban landscape that resembled Berlin circa 1945?

Such racial turmoil is conceivable. Few people today can recall that troubled era, let alone the more recent LA’s Rodney King riot. For them, a peaceful black population is perfectly natural so why worry about hamstringing police? Further add current government’s timidity when confronting looters and arsonists lest (it is believed) “excessive” force exacerbate the disorder. In cost/benefit terms, today’s protestors falsely believe that violent anti-police outrage is cost-free—clogging the streets, disrupting traffic, smashing windows and setting fires will surely bring “social justice” and this “social justice” can happily substitute for policing to keep the peace—“no justice, no peace” implies that “justice” ensures tranquility

Meanwhile, the Left-dominated mass media happily fuels this anger. Pictures of looters unhampered by police inexpensively fill hours of airtime and there is no shortage of self-designated expert talking heads explaining why “understandable” frustration make this violence almost praiseworthy (sending a message that must be heard, so to speak).

Now for the good news: We will not return to the violent 1960s of long hot summers. Nor will we once more squander billions fixing the “root causes” of the poverty that, supposedly, instigates this violence. America has learned countless lessons from the riotous 1960s though much of it is publicly unspeakable.

Yogi Berra said that making predictions is difficult, especially about the future. But, that acknowledged, let me offer a plausible scenario about any future Fergusons.

Let’s start with the most likely events. Outside of a few professional agitators, disgruntled blacks will not be encouraged to riot beyond what has already occurred. Yes, disruptive incidents still happen, often involving clueless whites, but these noisy, festive marches are a far cry from the violence that plagued Newark, Detroit, and Los Angeles where dozens died and property damage was in the hundreds of millions ( a billion plus in damage and 53 killed in the 1992 LA riot). The old rhetoric of “burn baby burn” and “the long hot summer” will not return.

Instead, black leaders will call for “national discussions on race” and hector whites to fix a “broken system” in which blacks themselves escape responsibility. Cities will probably hire more African American police officers, spend millions on compulsory racial sensitivity training and seminars denouncing “white privilege.” Expensive body cameras will be bought whose purpose, it is assumed, will be to reign in aggressive racist cops (but see here). Whites will also learn how to repress racial stereotyping and avoid offensive language. In other words, the aim will be to reform white society, not destroy cities.

But the most successful, anti-riot measures will be dialing down aggressive pro-active policing such as stop and frisk and, most of all, adjusting the broken windows strategy to reflect community preferences.

Here’s the scenario. According to broken windows, petty violations–public drinking, spray painting graffiti, airmailing garbage out the window, in-your-face panhandling and vandalism and the like– signal a tolerance for more serious criminality. It is therefore essential that police aggressively arrest all law-breakers, no matter how slight the offense even if the crime appears victimless (e.g., drunks sleeping it off in doorways) to cut more serious crime preemptively. Broken windows policing as an added bonus also helps solving major crimes since it is easier to apprehend petty criminals. In New York City, for example, those arrested jumping subway turnstiles, a misdemeanor, were often also found to have outstanding warrants for felonies.

Broken windows policing explains the explosive events in both Ferguson and New York City. Officer Wilson initially stopped Michael Brown for walking down the middle of the street and only then did his convenience store robbery surface. Similarly, Eric Garner was detained for illegally selling cigarettes, a behavior that is only marginally illegal given that hawking cigarettes per se is not illegal; his offense is selling cigarettes on the sidewalk without a New York tax stamp. None of the outrage would have happened if wandering down the middle of the road and peddling individual cigarettes sans a tax stamp were decriminalized.

Now for the big problem: the “quality of life” element of broken windows is inherently ambiguous and constantly evolves. Smoking, for example, has gone from a sign of sophistication to, in many circumstances, a crime. Performing sex for money is technically prostitution, certainly a crime but what about standing on the corner with a sign, “Buy me an expensive dinner and I’ll love you”? In many instances what was once a capital offense is no longer even noticed. New York still criminalizes adultery (and there is a $25 fine for flirting) but imagine the outrage if police took enforcement seriously? Hester Prynne of “Scarlet Letter” fame was obviously born several centuries too early.

Now for the unspeakable: the current broken windows approach assumes universal quality of life standards, that is, every decent person wants clean streets, safe schools, no dog poop, public civility, and drug-free parks, among dozens of other admirable things. Reality, however, is more complicated; no precise consensus exists on “quality of life” and truth be told, today’s law enforcement defined “quality of life” is only consistent with Northern European values. Strict implementation is, to be blunt, cultural imperialism insofar as quality of life standard vary enormously. Behavior acceptable in Calcutta brings a public canning in Singapore.

ORDER IT NOW

Given that not every American cherishes Northern European public values, adjustments are necessary. New York City’s Chinatowns abounds with loud venders blocking sidewalks, litter everywhere, pedestrians routinely disregard “don’t walk” signs to obstruct traffic, and so on. In my occasional sojourns to Chinatown, I have never, never witnessed any pedestrian or sidewalk vendor being warned for unambiguously illegal behavior. At most, cops periodically arrest store clerks for selling counterfeit merchandize on behest of manufactures whose pocketbooks and watches are being knocked off.

Chinatown is hardly unique. Elsewhere in New York’s ethnic neighborhoods public intoxication is tolerated provided it is done discreetly via wrapping the bottle in a brown paper bag. In trendy Tribecca, absent a specific complaint police generally ignore inebriated bar patrons congregating outside bars at 2:00AM. On the other hand, all of these activities are unacceptable in, say, the WASPY Upper Eastside. And on and on–each to their own interpretation of broken windows so as to keep the peace.

The bottom line is that police can readily apply these “cultural sensitivity” principles to neighborhoods populated by lower-class blacks even if crimes are committed in plain sight and outrage middle class sensibilities. No law needs to be altered and I’d guess that local police cooperation would be forthcoming. Just pay no heed to petty drug-dealing, hookers soliciting johns, illegal gambling, broken bottles, groups of feral children wandering around past midnight, open public drinking, or motorists disregarding traffic lights.

Needless to say, this “hands-off” policy will hurt countless law-abiding people and legitimate businesses in black neighborhoods. In fact, in cost benefit terms abandoning energetic policing of minor offenses might be judged anti-black, and perhaps correctly so. But, on the other hand, if the price of violent rioting is factored into the equation, the overall negative outcomes of this policy shift are less clear. Would Ferguson be better off today if police consciously overlooked teenagers parading down the middle of the street unless there is an imminent threat of serious bodily harm? How much tax revenue was actually lost from Eric Garner’s sidewalk cigarette business? All hard to say.

And now for the really unspeakable: Abandoning broken windows and similar preemptive police measures is feasible since the African American “community spokesman industry” hardly gains from the benefits bestowed by broken windows policing. The Rev. Al Sharpton and fellow rabble rousers don’t run for office and so cleaning up a crime infested neighborhood or lowering grocery prices adds nothing to their community activist bona fides. More political clout is to be achieved by organizing well-publicized marches against police brutality, real and imagined. Indeed, pro-police elected officials who bring peace and prosperity (e.g., NYC’s Mayor Rudy Giuliani) undermine the self-appointed community activists and are thus despised by them. Promoting prosperity and safety are off the activist agenda regardless of local preferences.

But in all fairness let me add that others beyond the community agitator industry will tolerate relaxing broken windows provided, of course, this occurs only in black areas. Libertarians have traditionally endorsed de-criminalizing public intoxication, small time drug- dealing and similar petty “victimless” offenses. Skin-flint conservatives will be thankful for cheaper criminal justice, especially lower rates of incarceration. Nor are many conservatives threatened by black-on-black crime or gentle giants victimizing Pakistani or Korean run 7-11’s. And let’s not forget opportunistic politicians of all ideological stripes always happy to take credit for declining crime albeit a reduction that only reflects under-reporting crimes.

And now for the best news: Many of the Ferguson protestors got it right. The nearly all-white Ferguson police force is really a “foreign” occupying army, a legacy of the white values that dominated a nearly all-white Ferguson of the 1990’s, not the two-thirds black Ferguson of today. And of the utmost importance, existing demographic trends are minimizing the likelihood of future Fergusons. Specifically, as certain cities and a few suburbs are increasingly dominated by lower-class African Americans thanks to Section 8 housing, and court-ordered school desegregation among other heavy-handed government efforts at diversity and inclusion, the growing political clout of black residents is translated into more culturally acceptable police practices. This progression has long been visible Detroit, MI, Jackson, MS, Miami Gardens, FL, East St. Louis, Il., East Cleveland, OH and countless other sizable cities where blacks now govern or at least exert substantial political influence. To my knowledge, Fergusons-like incidents are unknown is these predominantly black cities.

Let’s be clear: we are not claiming that the blackening of a city somehow enhanced the quality of life for blacks since they can now define “quality of life” to mirror their values. The opposite is probably true as measured by dysfunctional schools, fewer decent shopping options, endemic crime and random shootings killing innocent bystanders. In fact, many residents of such hellholes might prefer to move to localities with fewer blacks, even if whites impose “white” values, but may be unable to afford such a relocation.

Our point is much narrower—Ferguson-like incidents, and even larger racial confrontations, are less likely where blacks enjoy a near monopoly on power. If Michael Brown resided in overwhelmingly black East St. Louis, his shoplifting would probably have been ignored since his thievery was already included in merchandise mark-ups while walking down the middle of the street was judged normal, comparable to residents periodically halting traffic by stopping their cars in the middle of the road to gossip. If he were stopped for blocking traffic, it would be by a black police officer.

There is nothing illegal or racist about these measures that selectively go light on crime. Short of murder and perhaps a few other major felonies, no police department can possibly enforce every law (recall New York’s criminalization of adultery) and there’s no point in being too zealous. What police officer looks forward to take into custody a gathering of elderly men peacefully sipping wine in the park? The issue is one of whose values receive priority, not lawlessness per se.

ORDER IT NOW

The selectivity of law enforcement can also go in many directions. White yuppies gentrifying an African American community can certainly pressure the police department to crack down on local now ignored public crap games all the while requesting officers to overlook illegally parked cars at Saturday Farmers’ Market. Imagine the chief of police, invoking broken windows, insisting that, “yes only a few illegally parked cars but this little violation might lead to more serious offenses, things like parents serving homemade, untaxed organic wine to their children, and that is felonious child endangerment.”

What all of this adds up to is that if avoiding large scale racial confrontations is the over-riding aim, race/class segregation is probably the best solution. Moreover, judging by the reactions of most African Americans living in overwhelmingly black cities, such non-coerced segregation is an acceptable cost/benefit arrangement. Such political domination also guarantees well-paying employment in education, law enforcement and public administration that might be less available where blacks were 20% or less of the population. It is hardly accidental that the word “apartheid” goes unmentioned when discussing today’s black dominated cities mired in poverty. Those who doubt black antipathy to racial diversity need only look at their resistance to white gentrification.

Such freely decided segregation is undoubtedly cheaper than past (and failed) solutions like Urban Renewal, Empowerment Zones, Model Cities, Head Start, gold-plated schools and all the myriad efforts at eliminating the root causes of poverty and crime. And contrary to what Mr. Holder and President Obama insist, culturally sensitive policing will certainly out-perform national dialogues on race, mandatory sensitivity training , similar measures to alter America’s racist psychology. In a nutshell, the issue is not one of white police brutality; it is whose laws will be enforced.

 
• Category: Race/Ethnicity • Tags: Blacks, Ferguson Shooting, Race/Crime 
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
[]
  1. This is a brilliant piece by Weissberg. It verges on A Modest Proposal, but I know he’s more than half serious.

    It’s almost reductio ad absurdum too, but again, the clarity this essay brings to several issues is anything but absurd.

    This is the same, honest writer who authored Bad Students, Not Bad Schools, one of the most accurate books on education today. In that vein, his essay here could almost be titled, Bad Neighborhoods, Not Bad Police.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
    AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
    These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
    Sharing Comment via Twitter
    http://www.unz.com/article/eliminating-future-fergusons-the-unspeakable-solution/#comment-802737
    More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  2. anon says:     Show CommentNext New Comment

    White flight accelerated will lead to further resegregation. Not good but that’s what they want.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Epaminondas
    If you think resegregation is bad, move into a black neighborhood. Be a martyr for "justice".
    , @Anonymous
    Wealthy blacks have already flown, see e.g. Barry O in North Hyde Park.
    The real test is for middle-class blacks - there do they go and what police standards will they require?
  3. This is pretty common sense. Take San Diego. Stuff is tolerated in the latter day hippie hang out that is Ocean Beach (like people living in their campers parked on the streets) that would never go on the other side of Mission Bay in Pacific Beach, let alone in La Jolla. And we are talking a mostly white, virtually no black area here.

    But the concept needs to be taken further. Clearly the majority of whites really don’t want to live in the sort of atmosphere created in majority black areas, and vice versa. So…let’s think about undoing the ties that bind us together. Little by little… the above is a first step, others can follow

    Read More
  4. The whole argument is based on the unstated assumption that all Negros are the same; a homogeneous mass of dysfunctional, subnormal thugs. In fact, a substantial minority of the Negro community in Ferguson and elsewhere aspires to nothing more than the same placid and productive lifestyle desired and enjoyed by the majority of residents in White neighborhoods. It is this Negro minority that contributes to society and in return deserves society’s concern and support. Rather than abandoning the deserving Negro community and pandering to Negro thugs and idiots; we should be striving to suppress and eradicate these subpar specimens s so that decent Negroes stand a chance at achieving a decent life.

    Read More
    • Replies: @midtown
    I don't read it to say that all blacks will be herded onto reservations -- the ones who want to live in areas dominated by, as he puts it, Northern European standards of quality of lie, may do so. He is simply saying that the majority of blacks (and other groups) have their own standards and would prefer to be governed by those standards. It's an interesting argument. It isn't a hard segregration but rather a simple acknowledgement that people want to be with their own kind and to live by their group's rules. Now, what would also be interesting is to divvy up the school system based on this idea.
    , @The Anti-Gnostic
    Rather than abandoning the deserving Negro community and pandering to Negro thugs and idiots; we should be striving to suppress and eradicate these subpar specimens s so that decent Negroes stand a chance at achieving a decent life.

    Then they can stay as leaders in their community and take care of the problem-children themselves. Because when we do it, people scream 'disparate impact!' and 'racism!'

    Somebody needs to figure out how to clone Paul Kagame.
    , @coyote
    eugenics is indeed the answer. not likely in a culture dominated by myths driven into our heads since pre-school.
    , @another fred
    /crickets
    , @Gadsden Flag
    Yes, law-abiding blacks would be the losers here. Elderly blacks, families with young children, small businessmen, et al., would all be at greater risk. These are the people who could, and should, speak out within the black community. They should condemn criminality and violence and they should insist on the need for strict policing. But they don't...or, if they do, their voices are drowned out by the much louder voices of cynical race-baiters and the masses they so easily manipulate.
    , @Mark
    Wrong. Dead wrong. Everything that you stated is countered by the repeated and correct assertions of this website and the alt-right. You ignore the foundational assumptions of this side of the political spectrum.

    Te refresh your memory: Society precisely reflects the statistical behaviors of its members. These behaviors are manifested, and rather uniformly, as any racial group grows in number. Therefore, it doesn't matter if there are 'good members'. The statistical behavior of the group will always result in what it always results in, and therefore the group must be held accountable or otherwise managed as a group. The libertarian individualist argument is one that is often a last resort of the left when they begin to lose these arguments. Most here have moved past the 'special individuals' perspective long ago.

    Blacks need to deal with black problems. Furthermore, segregating the 'good' blacks from black society removes critical human resources from beleaguered communities. Their presence is required to assist their lesser members. It's ironically a better argument than the one against white flight, as the 'better' blacks at least share black culture and are thus better able to help wayward blacks. Whatever the perspective of blacks and how they resolve their perspective on their problems and their better behaving members, the truth is that non-black communities are not and should not be obligated to accept members of a greater community that is so perpetually troublesome. Once blacks fix their culture and communities, perhaps then we can have a conversation about the better blacks. However, do you know what? At that point in time, blacks won't need to segregate themselves from one another and will be happy to live away from the judgment and civic control of the white man. Its rather ironic how that works.
    , @Seminumerical
    Bur, regression towards the mean.
  5. bomag [AKA "doombuggy"] says:     Show CommentNext New Comment

    This is a spot-on essay.

    Right now the “community activists” demand an utter equality of outcomes. If we can start to add some context to the debate, maybe we can start to craft some better public policy.

    Read More
  6. A major part of the problem is the collapse of the nuclear family. Charles Murray has suggested that all welfare be replaced by a $20,000 per year grant to each adult. If this were done a black male would make a good husband, he would be bringing in some money. This might solve a lot of the Negro problem. Of course outcomes would not be the same over the entire population because of genetics, but it might be good enough. Of course we could never have such a policy unless we got immigration under control. The entire world would want to show up.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar

    Of course we could never have such a policy unless we got immigration under control. The entire world would want to show up.
     
    Not if you charged the immigrants to pay for it. 95% of the present ones probably wouldn't qualify.
    , @Anonymous
    Huh?? 20k a year will make a black male a good husband? I can't tell if this is sarcasm or not...so please clarify for our benefit.
  7. To believe this ‘solution’ is to believe that blacks really care about Trayvon Martin, Mike Brown or Eric Garner. They don’t. These guys were simply bodies behind which the black grievance industry could mobilize to extract money from whites and maintain political control of blacks. There will always be incidents of these kind because blacks gradually destroy their own communities and, having done so, are allowed and even encouraged to then move on to a still functioning area and resettle there. As noted, Ferguson was 20 years ago a majority white community. Open housing laws, Section 8 vouchers and lax enforcement of residency requirements to attend public schools are the vehicles through which these communities are destroyed and it happens with startling speed as black ‘communities’ are inherently unstable due to the peculiar social pathologies of black people and the mobility of government transfer payments. The Reverend Jim Jones was able to relocate a sizable percentage of San Francisco’s Fillmore ghetto to a remote jungle plantation in Guyana in less than a year! No jobs had to be found only a change of address form submitted to forward the government transfer payments that had been the economic backbone of the ghetto.

    While the authors solution may seem reasonable it ignores the itinerant nature of the American negro and the predatory nature of young black men. If there are no stores in their own community to steal from or rob they don’t cease that activity, they simply head for the closest targets of opportunity thus they will always come into hostile contact with law enforcement. The real danger is that, as security systems advance and police technology improves the ability of the negro to commit the traditional crimes like shoplifting and holdups will deteriorate and the ONLY way for black criminals to function will be through mass attacks like looting where the risk of apprehension is limited. We are seeing this already with flash mobs and smash and grab attacks.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    This is more or less what I wanted to say, I'm glad I read through the comments first!

    This article taken seriously would be the start of a slippery slope to lax policing in every city and neighborhood. We'd have a constant white flight being chased around the country by black predators and the problem would never end.

    Shoot the looters and rioters and it will stop.
    , @Jay
    Your comment is far more informed and logical than the article is.
  8. @Jus' Sayin'...
    The whole argument is based on the unstated assumption that all Negros are the same; a homogeneous mass of dysfunctional, subnormal thugs. In fact, a substantial minority of the Negro community in Ferguson and elsewhere aspires to nothing more than the same placid and productive lifestyle desired and enjoyed by the majority of residents in White neighborhoods. It is this Negro minority that contributes to society and in return deserves society's concern and support. Rather than abandoning the deserving Negro community and pandering to Negro thugs and idiots; we should be striving to suppress and eradicate these subpar specimens s so that decent Negroes stand a chance at achieving a decent life.

    I don’t read it to say that all blacks will be herded onto reservations — the ones who want to live in areas dominated by, as he puts it, Northern European standards of quality of lie, may do so. He is simply saying that the majority of blacks (and other groups) have their own standards and would prefer to be governed by those standards. It’s an interesting argument. It isn’t a hard segregration but rather a simple acknowledgement that people want to be with their own kind and to live by their group’s rules. Now, what would also be interesting is to divvy up the school system based on this idea.

    Read More
  9. @Jus' Sayin'...
    The whole argument is based on the unstated assumption that all Negros are the same; a homogeneous mass of dysfunctional, subnormal thugs. In fact, a substantial minority of the Negro community in Ferguson and elsewhere aspires to nothing more than the same placid and productive lifestyle desired and enjoyed by the majority of residents in White neighborhoods. It is this Negro minority that contributes to society and in return deserves society's concern and support. Rather than abandoning the deserving Negro community and pandering to Negro thugs and idiots; we should be striving to suppress and eradicate these subpar specimens s so that decent Negroes stand a chance at achieving a decent life.

    Rather than abandoning the deserving Negro community and pandering to Negro thugs and idiots; we should be striving to suppress and eradicate these subpar specimens s so that decent Negroes stand a chance at achieving a decent life.

    Then they can stay as leaders in their community and take care of the problem-children themselves. Because when we do it, people scream ‘disparate impact!’ and ‘racism!’

    Somebody needs to figure out how to clone Paul Kagame.

    Read More
  10. Make the media bear responsibility for agitation. A few ruinous lawsuits that shuts down organizations like the NY Times or CBS would be all it would take. A new day would dawn.

    Read More
  11. @anon
    White flight accelerated will lead to further resegregation. Not good but that's what they want.

    If you think resegregation is bad, move into a black neighborhood. Be a martyr for “justice”.

    Read More
    • Replies: @anon
    Resegregation is simply happening. The old melting pot model was ideal but is happening no more. We moved to a much less diverse town intentionally. Don't miss a bit of the Vibrancy.
  12. Interesting article, well thought-out, and fair. I would say you misunderstand a few fundamental points, which I am tired of repeating, such as who really profits off crime, but FAR superior to the impotent bloviation which generally masquerades as commentary here.

    Read More
    • Replies: @TWS
    You do know he's kidding right? Clueless as usual.
  13. It’s an interesting idea. Fred Reed has written along a similar vein in the past in terms of culture/biology. Basically, we are imposing Northern European standards of behavior on non-Northern Europeans. Some can adapt (East Asians, South Asians, talented tenth browns and blacks) and some can’t (vast majority of blacks, many browns, Native Americans).

    I’m no fan of the black community, and I could do without much of the Hispanic community and, normally, abhor their complaining about getting to live far better than they could do for themselves; however, I have to admit that they do have a right to be pissed about being asked to play and succeed in a game that was designed for someone else. I mean, if I was considered a failure if I didn’t have the brains of a physicist and the demeanor of a quiet Japanese person, I’d be a failure.

    Blacks and Mestizos, with their 85 and 90 IQs and no genetic culling of the herd due to large-scale agriculture and cities for millennia, are being asked to compete in a society that rewards brains and the ability to organize and work with others peacefully. They don’t stand a chance, and it’s cruel for us to bitch about how they’re failing. (Of course, it’s also pathetic of them to bitch about us while taking our stuff, but cut them some slack, they’re not the brightest bulbs on the planet, so I’m not certain they realize the irony.)

    This article asks whites (and Asians) to acknowledge two things. First, the vast, vast majority of blacks and most Mestizos will never be able to live by white standards. They just won’t. Second, they’re not going anywhere.

    Once you acknowledge those two facts, you do your best to make a workable plan. Segregate and let each area live by its own culture/biology. It’s the only thing that has a chance. The only alternative is forced integration, violence and eventual race wars.

    Read More
  14. What Weissberg describes in this article as the best policy sounds a lot like the American South in the years before the Civil Rights movement.

    Read More
  15. “Expensive body cameras will be bought”… This will be favored by libs until it highlights even more the dysfunction of AAs. They won’t be able to deny what the real problem is, so bring on the body cameras, and invest into those companies that make them.

    Read More
  16. In other words, the entire civil rights movement of the 60s was a mistake and integration was a foolish idea.

    I think that is probably true.

    Whites (including me) thought that what blacks wanted was the white concept of “equality” and “justice.” That turned out not to be true. Blacks wanted quotas and racial revenge.

    Blacks wanted whites to abandon their tribal identification and surrender what they had won, while blacks held on for dear life to their tribal identification and got a big share of what whites had.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Crawfurdmuir
    'Whites (including me) thought that what blacks wanted was the white concept of “equality” and “justice.” That turned out not to be true. Blacks wanted quotas and racial revenge.'

    This sort of differing interpretation of the same idea has characterized black/white interaction since the end of slavery.

    Abraham Lincoln, when asked what the freed slaves should do with themselves, reportedly said, "Root, hog - or die." In other words, freedom meant that they would have to work to support themselves, as other free men did.

    Yet at the same time he said that, vast numbers of blacks, "emancipated" by the Union Army from the control of their former masters, wandered through the South aimlessly expecting the "year of jubilo," as Faulkner describes in his novel "The Unvanquished." They thought that freedom meant they shouldn't have to work.

    The problem of American race relations is rooted in the persistence of these two differing views. Lyndon Johnson was quite aware of the black view of freedom; he understood it well when he said that his Great Society programs "would have those n*****s voting Democratic for the next 200 years." From that point of view, they have been a great success.
  17. In Memphis, a majority black city, the Ferguson style protests have been surprisingly tame. The crime rate is still very high. The police is understaffed due to a pension crisis and the resulting walkouts. I wonder if the scarcity of policing here (and the black police chief) have led to the un-energetic protests?

    Read More
  18. @ Robert Hume

    No, a reverse income tax is just about the most moronic thing Charles Murray has come up with. Its just reparations by another name. Throwing money at people with problems does not solve the problem or help the people, and money is wasted. Plus massive inflation, etc.

    Read More
  19. @Shouting Thomas
    In other words, the entire civil rights movement of the 60s was a mistake and integration was a foolish idea.

    I think that is probably true.

    Whites (including me) thought that what blacks wanted was the white concept of "equality" and "justice." That turned out not to be true. Blacks wanted quotas and racial revenge.

    Blacks wanted whites to abandon their tribal identification and surrender what they had won, while blacks held on for dear life to their tribal identification and got a big share of what whites had.

    ‘Whites (including me) thought that what blacks wanted was the white concept of “equality” and “justice.” That turned out not to be true. Blacks wanted quotas and racial revenge.’

    This sort of differing interpretation of the same idea has characterized black/white interaction since the end of slavery.

    Abraham Lincoln, when asked what the freed slaves should do with themselves, reportedly said, “Root, hog – or die.” In other words, freedom meant that they would have to work to support themselves, as other free men did.

    Yet at the same time he said that, vast numbers of blacks, “emancipated” by the Union Army from the control of their former masters, wandered through the South aimlessly expecting the “year of jubilo,” as Faulkner describes in his novel “The Unvanquished.” They thought that freedom meant they shouldn’t have to work.

    The problem of American race relations is rooted in the persistence of these two differing views. Lyndon Johnson was quite aware of the black view of freedom; he understood it well when he said that his Great Society programs “would have those n*****s voting Democratic for the next 200 years.” From that point of view, they have been a great success.

    Read More
  20. “…Mestizos, with … no genetic culling of the herd due to large-scale agriculture and cities for millennia”: when the Conquistadores arrived in Mexico, many of the Indians indeed lived in a city. As WKPD says, moreover: “the territory of Mexico roughly corresponds with that of Mesoamerica, which was one of the cradles of plant domestication. Archeological research in the Gulf coast of Tabasco shows the earliest evidence of corn cultivation in Mexico. The first fields were along the Grijalva River delta with fossilized pollen evidence showing forest clearing around 5100 BCE.”

    There’s every chance that a Mestizo is descended from people who had adopted agriculture for longer than my ancestors had, and possibly yours.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Citizen of a Silly Country
    @dearieme

    Good point. I shouldn't have lumped them together with blacks. My apologies to the Mestizos.

    However, I stand by the low-90s IQ of Mestizos statement. They may be better suited to living in cities and working in large groups, but they're not particularly suited for a high-tech economy. Indeed, many lower-IQ whites are dealing with the same problem. We'll have enough issues with our own lower IQ citizens, no need to import millions more.
  21. @Jus' Sayin'...
    The whole argument is based on the unstated assumption that all Negros are the same; a homogeneous mass of dysfunctional, subnormal thugs. In fact, a substantial minority of the Negro community in Ferguson and elsewhere aspires to nothing more than the same placid and productive lifestyle desired and enjoyed by the majority of residents in White neighborhoods. It is this Negro minority that contributes to society and in return deserves society's concern and support. Rather than abandoning the deserving Negro community and pandering to Negro thugs and idiots; we should be striving to suppress and eradicate these subpar specimens s so that decent Negroes stand a chance at achieving a decent life.

    eugenics is indeed the answer. not likely in a culture dominated by myths driven into our heads since pre-school.

    Read More
  22. @Robert Hume
    A major part of the problem is the collapse of the nuclear family. Charles Murray has suggested that all welfare be replaced by a $20,000 per year grant to each adult. If this were done a black male would make a good husband, he would be bringing in some money. This might solve a lot of the Negro problem. Of course outcomes would not be the same over the entire population because of genetics, but it might be good enough. Of course we could never have such a policy unless we got immigration under control. The entire world would want to show up.

    Of course we could never have such a policy unless we got immigration under control. The entire world would want to show up.

    Not if you charged the immigrants to pay for it. 95% of the present ones probably wouldn’t qualify.

    Read More
  23. @dearieme
    "...Mestizos, with ... no genetic culling of the herd due to large-scale agriculture and cities for millennia": when the Conquistadores arrived in Mexico, many of the Indians indeed lived in a city. As WKPD says, moreover: "the territory of Mexico roughly corresponds with that of Mesoamerica, which was one of the cradles of plant domestication. Archeological research in the Gulf coast of Tabasco shows the earliest evidence of corn cultivation in Mexico. The first fields were along the Grijalva River delta with fossilized pollen evidence showing forest clearing around 5100 BCE."

    There's every chance that a Mestizo is descended from people who had adopted agriculture for longer than my ancestors had, and possibly yours.

    Good point. I shouldn’t have lumped them together with blacks. My apologies to the Mestizos.

    However, I stand by the low-90s IQ of Mestizos statement. They may be better suited to living in cities and working in large groups, but they’re not particularly suited for a high-tech economy. Indeed, many lower-IQ whites are dealing with the same problem. We’ll have enough issues with our own lower IQ citizens, no need to import millions more.

    Read More
  24. @Truth
    Interesting article, well thought-out, and fair. I would say you misunderstand a few fundamental points, which I am tired of repeating, such as who really profits off crime, but FAR superior to the impotent bloviation which generally masquerades as commentary here.

    You do know he’s kidding right? Clueless as usual.

    Read More
  25. anon says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @Epaminondas
    If you think resegregation is bad, move into a black neighborhood. Be a martyr for "justice".

    Resegregation is simply happening. The old melting pot model was ideal but is happening no more. We moved to a much less diverse town intentionally. Don’t miss a bit of the Vibrancy.

    Read More
  26. We can apply the same strategy to same-sex marriage. The usual restrictions on regular marriage– bigamy and incest bans, waiting periods for marriage and divorce, health tests, etc– cease to have meaning unless both sexes are present.

    So we repeal them. For one “orientation”, but not the other.

    That will be fun to watch!

    Read More

  27. The article seems serious to me.
    I would imagine it is emasculating and humiliating to be policed by men of a different race.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Ace
    @Lara

    It's not "emasculating and humiliating to be policed by men of a different race."

    It's humiliating to be policed by men who are your inferiors. I was stopped by a black Highway Patrolman in Missouri years ago. Professional, intelligent, correct in his judgment of my offense, lenient.

    What's not to like about that?
  28. And now for the really unspeakable:

    Imagine a future where genetically engineered plagues are released on the USA. A large portion of the population, concentrated in enclaves, is unproductive and constitutes a drain on the “system”. Sophisticated medical supplies are in short supply and facilities are overburdened.

    Who gets the medicine and care?

    We are not that many years away from a time when the ability to manipulate genes is widely available to all sorts of people with all sorts of agendas.

    Read More
    • Replies: @rod1963
    You don't need a designer plague, just cut off the water, electricity and supply lines to our major cities and they become charnel houses within a short period of time. The weak, stupid and acutely ill will start dying within 1-2 days, the healthy within 3-4 and it just gets really bad after that.

    Or simply have a massive economic collapse and the end of EBT cards and watch the culling/die off begin.

    The problem with our largest cities today is largely due to 50 years of stupid, crooked politicians and businessmen mismanaging social policies for their own ends and inducing what amounts a dysgenics program into the country's urban centers with disastrous consequences. As a result our largest cities have become ticking time bombs, barely manageable in the best of times thanks to large segments of the population consisting of violent, low IQ wards of the state. Who can and will burn down the urban centers should their bread and circus cease for any reason.
  29. @Jus' Sayin'...
    The whole argument is based on the unstated assumption that all Negros are the same; a homogeneous mass of dysfunctional, subnormal thugs. In fact, a substantial minority of the Negro community in Ferguson and elsewhere aspires to nothing more than the same placid and productive lifestyle desired and enjoyed by the majority of residents in White neighborhoods. It is this Negro minority that contributes to society and in return deserves society's concern and support. Rather than abandoning the deserving Negro community and pandering to Negro thugs and idiots; we should be striving to suppress and eradicate these subpar specimens s so that decent Negroes stand a chance at achieving a decent life.

    /crickets

    Read More
  30. If white officers are an occupation force, even if they worked in the town before blacks showed up, how should the 98% majority of Americans of all backgrounds feel about a Jewish elite that shoves Israel and Jewishness down our throats, and which can only rule through toxic divide and conquer tactics? Is it time for shtetl again? How can the rest of us get the hell away from them?

    Read More
  31. Anonymous says:     Show CommentNext New Comment

    Obviously, much of this piece (like the Untz generally) includes a lot of unnecessarily “honest” views on race. (And that’s why I like it!)

    The core of the argument here is that prioritizing enforcement of laws based on the norms of the community being served by police, would decrease levels of unrest, diminishing the likelihood of racial protests etc.

    The author admits this is not really that controversial and provides ample evidence. While, he must include the necessary digs at the “grievance industry” and Federal programs (because why waste money for pre-K on Black children who will never have IQs above 95 etc.? ) to satisfy his audience, the point is really anodyne.

    However, the reason such measures have not been implemented far enough already, is not some ironic, look the “Black people want to be equal, but don’t want the consequences of equality bit.” It is the predictable outcome of stupid drug laws, militarized police, private prisons and race-bating politicians. It has generally been a political loser to be seen as “soft on crime”. It has until very recently, been a political loser to be seen as anti-drug war.

    Prisons, sellers of military gear, politicians and yes on some level, police departments have for decades profited from aggressive “broken windows” policing. Let’s not pretend too much this is the fault of Koombaya blank-slate SJWs etc. etc.

    Read More
    • Replies: @anon
    Let’s not pretend too much this is the fault of Koombaya blank-slate SJWs etc. etc.

    While the prison-industrial complex, Christians, Republicans, and other reactionary elements contributed to the urban police state, so did bourgeois nanny-state liberalism. Liberal cant about equalizing healthcare outcomes, fighting de facto segregation, promoting diversity and inclusion, and the need for early childhood-interventions made it politically and legally impossible to ignore deleterious Black behavior.

    Consider, for example, the liberal nanny-state policies which led to Eric Garner being publicly choked to death by New York City police.

    In order to reduce tobacco usage and improve healthcare outcomes among New York city residents of color, then-Mayor Michael Bloomberg (a Jew) began working with then-NYC health commissioner Thomas Frieden (same) and consultant Jonathan Gruber (same) to restrict what New Yorkers can eat, drink, buy, and smoke. (Frieden and Gruber would later play prominent roles in the Obama administration, becoming, respectively, head of the CDC and the architect of Obamacare.) Ignoring warnings that increased tobacco taxes and tax enforcement would expand the market for black market tobacco, the trio successfully pushed for more tobacco taxation and enforcement at both the state and local levels.

    Shortly after taking office on January 1, 2014, left-liberal Mayor Bill de Blasio (White) ordered city agencies – including the NYPD-- to aggressively enforce state and local laws governing the black-market, gray-market, and legal sale of tobacco. Working with the state's liberal Democratic governor (Italian-American), the NYPD began coordinating its efforts with a state-wide Strike Force on tobacco law violations. What motivated de Blasio (who is married to a bisexual African-American woman) and the state? Concerns over poor health outcomes in minority communities and lost tax revenue.

    By March, pressure on the NYPD to enforce Bloomberg-era tobacco laws soon escalated to the point that the senior uniformed officer on the NYPD, Chief of Department Philip Banks III, took personal charge of enforcement efforts. Banks, who is Black, reportedly even named one tobacco law violator he wanted targeted: “a man named Eric,” who illegally sold loosies on Staten Island. Banks' orders – as recorded in memos and videos – soon reached the operational levels of the NYPD, which found and began targeting “a man named Eric,” now known to the world as Eric Garner.

    On July 17, 2014, a group of NYPD officers, reportedly supervised by African-American police sergeant Kizzy Adonis, found, detained, and killed Garner. Adonis – the supervising officer on scene – stood by and watched as Garner begged for his life. Nor was Adonis the only non-White there: one of the other arresting officers as a Filipino-American named Mark Ramos and one of the responding paramedics was a (probable) Jewess named Stephanie Greenberg. Later, Adonis and another African-American police sergeant who arrived later, Dhanan Saminath, wrote out a report painting the officers' actions in a favorable light. Many of the non-Whites would later be granted immunity in exchange for testifying before the grand jury investigating the matter.

    Who gets blamed for this excursion in multicultural liberalism? Not the Blacks and Jews! No, in the politically correct version, the whole affair is the fault of an Italian-American police officer named Daniel Pantaleo, the Italian-American residents of Staten Island, conservatives, and Whites in general. It would have been better for Whites-- especially Panteleo – had he stood back and done nothing, allowing his diminutive colleagues of color to struggle with their 350-pound arrestee of color. Remind me again, why should Whites become involved in what would have been a dispute within and between the African-, Jewish-, and Filipino-American communities?
    , @Ace
    The idea of police, politicians, and prisons profiting from broken-window policing is absurd.

    I practiced law in a certain midwest state and it's just laughable that prosecutors and judges did anything but enforce your garden variety laws against DWI, burglary, assault, drug dealing, drug consuming, non-support, and domestic violence.
  32. @another fred
    And now for the really unspeakable:

    Imagine a future where genetically engineered plagues are released on the USA. A large portion of the population, concentrated in enclaves, is unproductive and constitutes a drain on the "system". Sophisticated medical supplies are in short supply and facilities are overburdened.

    Who gets the medicine and care?

    We are not that many years away from a time when the ability to manipulate genes is widely available to all sorts of people with all sorts of agendas.

    You don’t need a designer plague, just cut off the water, electricity and supply lines to our major cities and they become charnel houses within a short period of time. The weak, stupid and acutely ill will start dying within 1-2 days, the healthy within 3-4 and it just gets really bad after that.

    Or simply have a massive economic collapse and the end of EBT cards and watch the culling/die off begin.

    The problem with our largest cities today is largely due to 50 years of stupid, crooked politicians and businessmen mismanaging social policies for their own ends and inducing what amounts a dysgenics program into the country’s urban centers with disastrous consequences. As a result our largest cities have become ticking time bombs, barely manageable in the best of times thanks to large segments of the population consisting of violent, low IQ wards of the state. Who can and will burn down the urban centers should their bread and circus cease for any reason.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jim
    Your comment reminds me of what happened in New Orleans after Katrina. What will happen in California after "the big one"?
  33. Anonymous says:     Show CommentNext New Comment

    The problem with letting standard of law and order slide in black areas is what if ‘broken windows’ theory is correct? What happens when crime increases in black areas?

    The blame will simply be shifted to ‘society’ (meaning white society) I think there is ALREADY a lower standard of law and order in black areas, I have no problem with this if its what blacks truly prefer…but again, there is going to be more crime, and of course whites are going to ultimately be blamed for this.

    I think the great majority of whites would be more than happy to have blacks run their own show…the issue is the show is always a debacle, shitshow which is blamed on white racism.

    There is really no escape for whites, the welfare of blacks will always be their responsibility, blacks hate this (but demand it at the same time)

    Read More
  34. anon says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @Anonymous
    Obviously, much of this piece (like the Untz generally) includes a lot of unnecessarily "honest" views on race. (And that's why I like it!)

    The core of the argument here is that prioritizing enforcement of laws based on the norms of the community being served by police, would decrease levels of unrest, diminishing the likelihood of racial protests etc.

    The author admits this is not really that controversial and provides ample evidence. While, he must include the necessary digs at the "grievance industry" and Federal programs (because why waste money for pre-K on Black children who will never have IQs above 95 etc.? ) to satisfy his audience, the point is really anodyne.

    However, the reason such measures have not been implemented far enough already, is not some ironic, look the "Black people want to be equal, but don't want the consequences of equality bit." It is the predictable outcome of stupid drug laws, militarized police, private prisons and race-bating politicians. It has generally been a political loser to be seen as "soft on crime". It has until very recently, been a political loser to be seen as anti-drug war.

    Prisons, sellers of military gear, politicians and yes on some level, police departments have for decades profited from aggressive "broken windows" policing. Let's not pretend too much this is the fault of Koombaya blank-slate SJWs etc. etc.

    Let’s not pretend too much this is the fault of Koombaya blank-slate SJWs etc. etc.

    While the prison-industrial complex, Christians, Republicans, and other reactionary elements contributed to the urban police state, so did bourgeois nanny-state liberalism. Liberal cant about equalizing healthcare outcomes, fighting de facto segregation, promoting diversity and inclusion, and the need for early childhood-interventions made it politically and legally impossible to ignore deleterious Black behavior.

    Consider, for example, the liberal nanny-state policies which led to Eric Garner being publicly choked to death by New York City police.

    In order to reduce tobacco usage and improve healthcare outcomes among New York city residents of color, then-Mayor Michael Bloomberg (a Jew) began working with then-NYC health commissioner Thomas Frieden (same) and consultant Jonathan Gruber (same) to restrict what New Yorkers can eat, drink, buy, and smoke. (Frieden and Gruber would later play prominent roles in the Obama administration, becoming, respectively, head of the CDC and the architect of Obamacare.) Ignoring warnings that increased tobacco taxes and tax enforcement would expand the market for black market tobacco, the trio successfully pushed for more tobacco taxation and enforcement at both the state and local levels.

    Shortly after taking office on January 1, 2014, left-liberal Mayor Bill de Blasio (White) ordered city agencies – including the NYPD– to aggressively enforce state and local laws governing the black-market, gray-market, and legal sale of tobacco. Working with the state’s liberal Democratic governor (Italian-American), the NYPD began coordinating its efforts with a state-wide Strike Force on tobacco law violations. What motivated de Blasio (who is married to a bisexual African-American woman) and the state? Concerns over poor health outcomes in minority communities and lost tax revenue.

    By March, pressure on the NYPD to enforce Bloomberg-era tobacco laws soon escalated to the point that the senior uniformed officer on the NYPD, Chief of Department Philip Banks III, took personal charge of enforcement efforts. Banks, who is Black, reportedly even named one tobacco law violator he wanted targeted: “a man named Eric,” who illegally sold loosies on Staten Island. Banks’ orders – as recorded in memos and videos – soon reached the operational levels of the NYPD, which found and began targeting “a man named Eric,” now known to the world as Eric Garner.

    On July 17, 2014, a group of NYPD officers, reportedly supervised by African-American police sergeant Kizzy Adonis, found, detained, and killed Garner. Adonis – the supervising officer on scene – stood by and watched as Garner begged for his life. Nor was Adonis the only non-White there: one of the other arresting officers as a Filipino-American named Mark Ramos and one of the responding paramedics was a (probable) Jewess named Stephanie Greenberg. Later, Adonis and another African-American police sergeant who arrived later, Dhanan Saminath, wrote out a report painting the officers’ actions in a favorable light. Many of the non-Whites would later be granted immunity in exchange for testifying before the grand jury investigating the matter.

    Who gets blamed for this excursion in multicultural liberalism? Not the Blacks and Jews! No, in the politically correct version, the whole affair is the fault of an Italian-American police officer named Daniel Pantaleo, the Italian-American residents of Staten Island, conservatives, and Whites in general. It would have been better for Whites– especially Panteleo – had he stood back and done nothing, allowing his diminutive colleagues of color to struggle with their 350-pound arrestee of color. Remind me again, why should Whites become involved in what would have been a dispute within and between the African-, Jewish-, and Filipino-American communities?

    Read More
    • Replies: @WowJustWow
    Great post, except Garner wasn't "publicly choked to death". I'm surprised you'd parrot SJWs' patently false talking points in the process of exposing hatefacts.
  35. Mr. Weissberg has a good grasp of the truth, and it can only work against him. The approach of the white American southerner to race relations in the early 20th century is (very) slowly revealing some of it’s insight and wisdom when you look at the collapse of black America today. These whites who lived closely with blacks back then knew the nature of black people (in general) far better than their northern counterparts – to them, segregation and extra-legal retribution were just ways that social order could be maintained in black communities. Pretty unimaginative ways, no doubt, but rather effective ways, nevertheless. To say that the Jim Crow system was based entirely in fear and hatred is to say that a drill sergeant’s discipline is based entirely in fear and hatred. Or that a parent’s punishment is based entirely in fear and hatred. The greatest fear, in fact, was in the loss of social order by having two fundamentally different types of people live together without separation.

    But what kind of reputation has this insight and wisdom earned the Southerner of 80 years ago nowadays? Something akin to Hitler and Stalin and Pol Pot. Lesser third world tyrants and dictators pale in comparison to the evil of the pre-war working class white Southerner, in modern eyes.

    And what has been the modern alternative to the southern black experience of the 1920′s been? Violence unheard of in the Jim Crow South. Social collapse that was unheard of in the Jim Crow South. Out of wedlock births that were unheard of in the Jim Crow South. And a model of externalized blame that was unheard of in the Jim Crow South.

    Good luck with your thesis, Mr. Weissberg. You’re going to need it. Still, the truth needs to be spoken. For future generations, if nothing else.

    Read More
  36. Jus’ Sayin’… says:
    December 17, 2014 at 9:25 am GMT
    The whole argument is based on the unstated assumption that all Negros are the same; a homogeneous mass of dysfunctional, subnormal thugs. In fact, a substantial minority of the Negro community in Ferguson and elsewhere aspires to nothing more than the same placid and productive lifestyle desired and enjoyed by the majority of residents in White neighborhoods.

    I don’t mean to sound crude or cruel but for once, why don’t we let the black middle class put down their underclass brethren? As Mr. Weissberg points out, it sure is better than asking white to take care of the black underclass.

    Read More
  37. I’m all for people picking their own standards. The problem is Whites are not allowed the same courtesy. Blacks and others are allowed to infringe on what is considered White territory and we are attacked if we move into theirs. Segregation would be fine. Jews, Blacks and others are always quick to tell Whites what their obligations are but they never agree to follow any themselves.

    Read More
  38. Whites have to tell Jews, blacks and others to get effed, and then act in their own best interests. There is no other way around the issue.

    Read More
  39. Anonymous says: • Website     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @unit472
    To believe this 'solution' is to believe that blacks really care about Trayvon Martin, Mike Brown or Eric Garner. They don't. These guys were simply bodies behind which the black grievance industry could mobilize to extract money from whites and maintain political control of blacks. There will always be incidents of these kind because blacks gradually destroy their own communities and, having done so, are allowed and even encouraged to then move on to a still functioning area and resettle there. As noted, Ferguson was 20 years ago a majority white community. Open housing laws, Section 8 vouchers and lax enforcement of residency requirements to attend public schools are the vehicles through which these communities are destroyed and it happens with startling speed as black 'communities' are inherently unstable due to the peculiar social pathologies of black people and the mobility of government transfer payments. The Reverend Jim Jones was able to relocate a sizable percentage of San Francisco's Fillmore ghetto to a remote jungle plantation in Guyana in less than a year! No jobs had to be found only a change of address form submitted to forward the government transfer payments that had been the economic backbone of the ghetto.

    While the authors solution may seem reasonable it ignores the itinerant nature of the American negro and the predatory nature of young black men. If there are no stores in their own community to steal from or rob they don't cease that activity, they simply head for the closest targets of opportunity thus they will always come into hostile contact with law enforcement. The real danger is that, as security systems advance and police technology improves the ability of the negro to commit the traditional crimes like shoplifting and holdups will deteriorate and the ONLY way for black criminals to function will be through mass attacks like looting where the risk of apprehension is limited. We are seeing this already with flash mobs and smash and grab attacks.

    This is more or less what I wanted to say, I’m glad I read through the comments first!

    This article taken seriously would be the start of a slippery slope to lax policing in every city and neighborhood. We’d have a constant white flight being chased around the country by black predators and the problem would never end.

    Shoot the looters and rioters and it will stop.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Ace
    >> We’d have a constant white flight being chased around the country by black predators and the problem would never end. <<

    In short, exactly what we have now. Flight, pursuit, crime/decay; flight, pursuit, crime/decay; flight, pursuit, crime/decay. The perfect formula for the destruction of white urban civilization.

    One of these days, fleeing California whites will collide with fleeing New Jersey whites and then ye old light bulb will . . . finally . . . go on.

    But not before it's either too late or catastrophically deadly and expensive to remedy.
  40. @anon
    Let’s not pretend too much this is the fault of Koombaya blank-slate SJWs etc. etc.

    While the prison-industrial complex, Christians, Republicans, and other reactionary elements contributed to the urban police state, so did bourgeois nanny-state liberalism. Liberal cant about equalizing healthcare outcomes, fighting de facto segregation, promoting diversity and inclusion, and the need for early childhood-interventions made it politically and legally impossible to ignore deleterious Black behavior.

    Consider, for example, the liberal nanny-state policies which led to Eric Garner being publicly choked to death by New York City police.

    In order to reduce tobacco usage and improve healthcare outcomes among New York city residents of color, then-Mayor Michael Bloomberg (a Jew) began working with then-NYC health commissioner Thomas Frieden (same) and consultant Jonathan Gruber (same) to restrict what New Yorkers can eat, drink, buy, and smoke. (Frieden and Gruber would later play prominent roles in the Obama administration, becoming, respectively, head of the CDC and the architect of Obamacare.) Ignoring warnings that increased tobacco taxes and tax enforcement would expand the market for black market tobacco, the trio successfully pushed for more tobacco taxation and enforcement at both the state and local levels.

    Shortly after taking office on January 1, 2014, left-liberal Mayor Bill de Blasio (White) ordered city agencies – including the NYPD-- to aggressively enforce state and local laws governing the black-market, gray-market, and legal sale of tobacco. Working with the state's liberal Democratic governor (Italian-American), the NYPD began coordinating its efforts with a state-wide Strike Force on tobacco law violations. What motivated de Blasio (who is married to a bisexual African-American woman) and the state? Concerns over poor health outcomes in minority communities and lost tax revenue.

    By March, pressure on the NYPD to enforce Bloomberg-era tobacco laws soon escalated to the point that the senior uniformed officer on the NYPD, Chief of Department Philip Banks III, took personal charge of enforcement efforts. Banks, who is Black, reportedly even named one tobacco law violator he wanted targeted: “a man named Eric,” who illegally sold loosies on Staten Island. Banks' orders – as recorded in memos and videos – soon reached the operational levels of the NYPD, which found and began targeting “a man named Eric,” now known to the world as Eric Garner.

    On July 17, 2014, a group of NYPD officers, reportedly supervised by African-American police sergeant Kizzy Adonis, found, detained, and killed Garner. Adonis – the supervising officer on scene – stood by and watched as Garner begged for his life. Nor was Adonis the only non-White there: one of the other arresting officers as a Filipino-American named Mark Ramos and one of the responding paramedics was a (probable) Jewess named Stephanie Greenberg. Later, Adonis and another African-American police sergeant who arrived later, Dhanan Saminath, wrote out a report painting the officers' actions in a favorable light. Many of the non-Whites would later be granted immunity in exchange for testifying before the grand jury investigating the matter.

    Who gets blamed for this excursion in multicultural liberalism? Not the Blacks and Jews! No, in the politically correct version, the whole affair is the fault of an Italian-American police officer named Daniel Pantaleo, the Italian-American residents of Staten Island, conservatives, and Whites in general. It would have been better for Whites-- especially Panteleo – had he stood back and done nothing, allowing his diminutive colleagues of color to struggle with their 350-pound arrestee of color. Remind me again, why should Whites become involved in what would have been a dispute within and between the African-, Jewish-, and Filipino-American communities?

    Great post, except Garner wasn’t “publicly choked to death”. I’m surprised you’d parrot SJWs’ patently false talking points in the process of exposing hatefacts.

    Read More
  41. Anonymous says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @Robert Hume
    A major part of the problem is the collapse of the nuclear family. Charles Murray has suggested that all welfare be replaced by a $20,000 per year grant to each adult. If this were done a black male would make a good husband, he would be bringing in some money. This might solve a lot of the Negro problem. Of course outcomes would not be the same over the entire population because of genetics, but it might be good enough. Of course we could never have such a policy unless we got immigration under control. The entire world would want to show up.

    Huh?? 20k a year will make a black male a good husband? I can’t tell if this is sarcasm or not…so please clarify for our benefit.

    Read More
  42. @Jus' Sayin'...
    The whole argument is based on the unstated assumption that all Negros are the same; a homogeneous mass of dysfunctional, subnormal thugs. In fact, a substantial minority of the Negro community in Ferguson and elsewhere aspires to nothing more than the same placid and productive lifestyle desired and enjoyed by the majority of residents in White neighborhoods. It is this Negro minority that contributes to society and in return deserves society's concern and support. Rather than abandoning the deserving Negro community and pandering to Negro thugs and idiots; we should be striving to suppress and eradicate these subpar specimens s so that decent Negroes stand a chance at achieving a decent life.

    Yes, law-abiding blacks would be the losers here. Elderly blacks, families with young children, small businessmen, et al., would all be at greater risk. These are the people who could, and should, speak out within the black community. They should condemn criminality and violence and they should insist on the need for strict policing. But they don’t…or, if they do, their voices are drowned out by the much louder voices of cynical race-baiters and the masses they so easily manipulate.

    Read More
  43. @unit472
    To believe this 'solution' is to believe that blacks really care about Trayvon Martin, Mike Brown or Eric Garner. They don't. These guys were simply bodies behind which the black grievance industry could mobilize to extract money from whites and maintain political control of blacks. There will always be incidents of these kind because blacks gradually destroy their own communities and, having done so, are allowed and even encouraged to then move on to a still functioning area and resettle there. As noted, Ferguson was 20 years ago a majority white community. Open housing laws, Section 8 vouchers and lax enforcement of residency requirements to attend public schools are the vehicles through which these communities are destroyed and it happens with startling speed as black 'communities' are inherently unstable due to the peculiar social pathologies of black people and the mobility of government transfer payments. The Reverend Jim Jones was able to relocate a sizable percentage of San Francisco's Fillmore ghetto to a remote jungle plantation in Guyana in less than a year! No jobs had to be found only a change of address form submitted to forward the government transfer payments that had been the economic backbone of the ghetto.

    While the authors solution may seem reasonable it ignores the itinerant nature of the American negro and the predatory nature of young black men. If there are no stores in their own community to steal from or rob they don't cease that activity, they simply head for the closest targets of opportunity thus they will always come into hostile contact with law enforcement. The real danger is that, as security systems advance and police technology improves the ability of the negro to commit the traditional crimes like shoplifting and holdups will deteriorate and the ONLY way for black criminals to function will be through mass attacks like looting where the risk of apprehension is limited. We are seeing this already with flash mobs and smash and grab attacks.

    Your comment is far more informed and logical than the article is.

    Read More
  44. @Jus' Sayin'...
    The whole argument is based on the unstated assumption that all Negros are the same; a homogeneous mass of dysfunctional, subnormal thugs. In fact, a substantial minority of the Negro community in Ferguson and elsewhere aspires to nothing more than the same placid and productive lifestyle desired and enjoyed by the majority of residents in White neighborhoods. It is this Negro minority that contributes to society and in return deserves society's concern and support. Rather than abandoning the deserving Negro community and pandering to Negro thugs and idiots; we should be striving to suppress and eradicate these subpar specimens s so that decent Negroes stand a chance at achieving a decent life.

    Wrong. Dead wrong. Everything that you stated is countered by the repeated and correct assertions of this website and the alt-right. You ignore the foundational assumptions of this side of the political spectrum.

    Te refresh your memory: Society precisely reflects the statistical behaviors of its members. These behaviors are manifested, and rather uniformly, as any racial group grows in number. Therefore, it doesn’t matter if there are ‘good members’. The statistical behavior of the group will always result in what it always results in, and therefore the group must be held accountable or otherwise managed as a group. The libertarian individualist argument is one that is often a last resort of the left when they begin to lose these arguments. Most here have moved past the ‘special individuals’ perspective long ago.

    Blacks need to deal with black problems. Furthermore, segregating the ‘good’ blacks from black society removes critical human resources from beleaguered communities. Their presence is required to assist their lesser members. It’s ironically a better argument than the one against white flight, as the ‘better’ blacks at least share black culture and are thus better able to help wayward blacks. Whatever the perspective of blacks and how they resolve their perspective on their problems and their better behaving members, the truth is that non-black communities are not and should not be obligated to accept members of a greater community that is so perpetually troublesome. Once blacks fix their culture and communities, perhaps then we can have a conversation about the better blacks. However, do you know what? At that point in time, blacks won’t need to segregate themselves from one another and will be happy to live away from the judgment and civic control of the white man. Its rather ironic how that works.

    Read More
  45. No doubt, NGB is referring specifically here to Prof. Weissberg, whose essay contains a secret pro-shtetl Joooo subtext accessible to those with the right decoder ring. Jeeesh… there’s plenty of interesting writing posted at Unz’s place nowadays, but these creeps with their own sullen agenda show up in nearly every thread on every possible topic and really bring down the property values around here.

    Read More
  46. @rod1963
    You don't need a designer plague, just cut off the water, electricity and supply lines to our major cities and they become charnel houses within a short period of time. The weak, stupid and acutely ill will start dying within 1-2 days, the healthy within 3-4 and it just gets really bad after that.

    Or simply have a massive economic collapse and the end of EBT cards and watch the culling/die off begin.

    The problem with our largest cities today is largely due to 50 years of stupid, crooked politicians and businessmen mismanaging social policies for their own ends and inducing what amounts a dysgenics program into the country's urban centers with disastrous consequences. As a result our largest cities have become ticking time bombs, barely manageable in the best of times thanks to large segments of the population consisting of violent, low IQ wards of the state. Who can and will burn down the urban centers should their bread and circus cease for any reason.

    Your comment reminds me of what happened in New Orleans after Katrina. What will happen in California after “the big one”?

    Read More
  47. @Lara
    @TWS
    The article seems serious to me.
    I would imagine it is emasculating and humiliating to be policed by men of a different race.

    It’s not “emasculating and humiliating to be policed by men of a different race.”

    It’s humiliating to be policed by men who are your inferiors. I was stopped by a black Highway Patrolman in Missouri years ago. Professional, intelligent, correct in his judgment of my offense, lenient.

    What’s not to like about that?

    Read More
  48. @Hanoi Paris Hilton– I don’t own a decoder ring. Is it not allowed to point out the obvious, which is that a Jewish elite probably isn’t in the best interest of non-Jews? Or do you claim that America would be as awash in Jewishness or rabidly support Israel against its own interests if Jews were not a major component of the elite class? Can I borrow your decoder ring?

    Read More
  49. @Anonymous
    Obviously, much of this piece (like the Untz generally) includes a lot of unnecessarily "honest" views on race. (And that's why I like it!)

    The core of the argument here is that prioritizing enforcement of laws based on the norms of the community being served by police, would decrease levels of unrest, diminishing the likelihood of racial protests etc.

    The author admits this is not really that controversial and provides ample evidence. While, he must include the necessary digs at the "grievance industry" and Federal programs (because why waste money for pre-K on Black children who will never have IQs above 95 etc.? ) to satisfy his audience, the point is really anodyne.

    However, the reason such measures have not been implemented far enough already, is not some ironic, look the "Black people want to be equal, but don't want the consequences of equality bit." It is the predictable outcome of stupid drug laws, militarized police, private prisons and race-bating politicians. It has generally been a political loser to be seen as "soft on crime". It has until very recently, been a political loser to be seen as anti-drug war.

    Prisons, sellers of military gear, politicians and yes on some level, police departments have for decades profited from aggressive "broken windows" policing. Let's not pretend too much this is the fault of Koombaya blank-slate SJWs etc. etc.

    The idea of police, politicians, and prisons profiting from broken-window policing is absurd.

    I practiced law in a certain midwest state and it’s just laughable that prosecutors and judges did anything but enforce your garden variety laws against DWI, burglary, assault, drug dealing, drug consuming, non-support, and domestic violence.

    Read More
  50. @Anonymous
    This is more or less what I wanted to say, I'm glad I read through the comments first!

    This article taken seriously would be the start of a slippery slope to lax policing in every city and neighborhood. We'd have a constant white flight being chased around the country by black predators and the problem would never end.

    Shoot the looters and rioters and it will stop.

    >> We’d have a constant white flight being chased around the country by black predators and the problem would never end. <<

    In short, exactly what we have now. Flight, pursuit, crime/decay; flight, pursuit, crime/decay; flight, pursuit, crime/decay. The perfect formula for the destruction of white urban civilization.

    One of these days, fleeing California whites will collide with fleeing New Jersey whites and then ye old light bulb will . . . finally . . . go on.

    But not before it's either too late or catastrophically deadly and expensive to remedy.

    Read More
  51. @OilcanFloyd
    @Hanoi Paris Hilton-- I don't own a decoder ring. Is it not allowed to point out the obvious, which is that a Jewish elite probably isn't in the best interest of non-Jews? Or do you claim that America would be as awash in Jewishness or rabidly support Israel against its own interests if Jews were not a major component of the elite class? Can I borrow your decoder ring?

    “Awash in Jewishness”?

    How’s that again?

    Read More
  52. — Pay attention! Are you really going to claim that our nation’s media and politicians don’t spend lots of time dealing with Jewish issues and concerns? If you ever want to sell that cave you are living in, I’d be interested in buying.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Andrew E. Mathis
    Other than Israel, which I grant you, what are the other "Jewish issues and concerns" of which you speak?
  53. @Nice Gentile Boy
    @Andrew E. Mathis -- Pay attention! Are you really going to claim that our nation's media and politicians don't spend lots of time dealing with Jewish issues and concerns? If you ever want to sell that cave you are living in, I'd be interested in buying.

    Other than Israel, which I grant you, what are the other “Jewish issues and concerns” of which you speak?

    Read More
  54. Anonymous says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @anon
    White flight accelerated will lead to further resegregation. Not good but that's what they want.

    Wealthy blacks have already flown, see e.g. Barry O in North Hyde Park.
    The real test is for middle-class blacks – there do they go and what police standards will they require?

    Read More
  55. The libertarian individualist argument is one that is often a last resort of the left when they begin to lose these arguments. Most here have moved past the ‘special individuals’ perspective long ago.

    The problem is that the individualist preference is just that, a preference, and so unenforceable. Worse, it leaves its adherents at a disadvantage relative to those who pursue collectivism. It’s not just unfeasible, it’s also stupid.

    No doubt, NGB is referring specifically here to Prof. Weissberg, whose essay contains a secret pro-shtetl Joooo subtext accessible to those with the right decoder ring. Jeeesh… there’s plenty of interesting writing posted at Unz’s place nowadays, but these creeps with their own sullen agenda show up in nearly every thread on every possible topic and really bring down the property values around here.

    Man has a point. Jews have a lot of money and power. You can find quite a few who will talk about blacks the way we talk about blacks and Jews (and everyone else), but essentially none who will stand for the way we talk about Jews. In fact, they tend to deploy the exact same arguments in defense of Jews that leftists (many of them Jews) deploy in defense of blacks. And there are a great many Sabbath “goy”/Uncle Tom whites on their side.

    I bet our property values would rise even more if we’d just go full-blown leftist.

    This site would certainly be more interesting, vibrant, and diverse if it joined the corporate media, and the other 99.999% of the web, and banned “ANTI-SEMITISM!!!”

    Read More
  56. Heck, if we were just nicer to Jews, I bet they never would’ve done all the nasty $%@! they’ve been doing to us for the last 75 years. If only we could have silenced the last 10 “ANTI-SEMITES!!!” years ago, none of this would have happened. Clearly we forced them into it.

    Read More
  57. ROBERT WEISSBERG SAYS:

    Such racial turmoil is conceivable.
    hardly. The 1960s was a time of broad ferment, Vietnam, Civil Rights, Great Society etc. No one seriously comparing eras expects anywhere near the turmoil today.

    Further add current government’s timidity when confronting looters and arsonists lest (it is believed) “excessive” force exacerbate the disorder.
    Who says government has been “timid”? By what measure? Give a concrete example.

    Meanwhile, the Left-dominated mass media happily fuels this anger. Pictures of looters unhampered by police inexpensively fill hours of airtime
    Another strange claim. In fact there have been scores of arrests. WHo says looters are “unhampered”? Such “freedom to loot” certainly does not prevail in the sphere of reality.

    Outside of a few professional agitators, disgruntled blacks will not be encouraged to riot beyond what has already occurred. Yes, disruptive incidents still happen, often involving clueless whites, but these noisy, festive marches are a far cry from the violence that plagued Newark, Detroit, and Los Angeles ..
    This is glaringly obvious. In what way does America learn anything here? That the 1960s in not 2014?

    Instead, black leaders will call for “national discussions on race” and hector whites to fix a “broken system” in which blacks themselves escape responsibility.
    In which fantasy world do blacks “escape” responsibility? Scores were arrested in Ferguson for looting an other disorders. Where has responsibility been waived aside?

    Expensive body cameras will be bought whose purpose, it is assumed, will be to reign in aggressive racist cops (but see here).
    Body cameras all agree are no panacea- there are pros and cons such as malfunction or distraction. But one positive aspect that seems to have been missed by the usual fulminating right white wingers is that said cameras expose citizens behaving badly and expose FALSE citizen charges of “police brutality.”

    But the most successful, anti-riot measures will be dialing down aggressive pro-active policing such as stop and frisk
    Wo says “stop and frisk” is some sort of panacea? It has several drawbacks, including as court cases show, quotas imposed on officers to “prove” they are working, and more negative police interaction over minor infractions. As one retired ex-cop tells me- in the old days we would just tell people to move on, and that would be that. Today they are “vectored” by computer program to hottspots, they have to meet a quota of people to frisk, and they have to trump up charges to justify a lot of the quota stops, and six cops with their little computer gizmos have to show up to tell this fat guy selling two-bit cigarettes to move on.

    According to broken windows, petty violations–public drinking, spray painting graffiti, airmailing garbage out the window, in-your-face panhandling and vandalism and the like– signal a tolerance for more serious criminality.
    And several studies show that “broken windows” is not all its cracked up to be. It is ONE of a mix of factors that have helped lower crime rates. Among other things, in cities where there was NO “broken windows” program crime rates kept going down anyway. See for example Illusion of Order: The False Promise of Broken Windows Policing, 2005 by Bernard E. Harcourt

    Broken windows policing as an added bonus also helps solving major crimes since it is easier to apprehend petty criminals. In New York City, for example, those arrested jumping subway turnstiles, a misdemeanor, were often also found to have outstanding warrants for felonies.
    Sure. Cracking down on knuckleheads will dredge up their rap sheet, and the repeat offenders. Police departments have done this for years before tidy “broken windows” theories appeared. Any strict policing approach will yield this kind of result. NYPD could have done such things long before alleged “saviour” Guilliani appeared.

    Broken windows policing explains the explosive events in both Ferguson and New York City.

    Certainly in NYC. Ferguson, who knows? Officer Wilson may just have wanted another knucklehead to get out of the street- a routine thing cops do in towns everywhere, without computerized hotspots, stop and frisk quotas or “broken windows” theory.

    Reality, however, is more complicated; no precise consensus exists on “quality of life” and truth be told, today’s law enforcement defined “quality of life” is only consistent with Northern European values. Strict implementation is, to be blunt, cultural imperialism insofar as quality of life standard vary enormously. Behavior acceptable in Calcutta brings a public canning in Singapore.
    What you fail to mention here is that “northern European values” would include the white Irish, notorious in the history of New York for violence, disorder and substance abuse. All the ghetto riots in the 1960s do not even begin to approach the body count of one midsized Irish riot in the 1800s as scholars like Thomas Sowell show.

    The bottom line is that police can readily apply these “cultural sensitivity” principles to neighborhoods populated by lower-class blacks even if crimes are committed in plain sight and outrage middle class sensibilities. No law needs to be altered and I’d guess that local police cooperation would be forthcoming. Just pay no heed to petty drug-dealing, hookers soliciting johns, illegal gambling, broken bottles, groups of feral children wandering around past midnight, open public drinking, or motorists disregarding traffic lights.
    But your neat formula is shaky on 2 counts.

    1) There are numerous white communities in America, including the rural south, Appalachia and assorted trailer parks, and tonier hoods where a higher class of white crooks operate prostitution, sex slavery, massive drug sales and the like. Your “modest proposal” curiously, exempts these WHITE venues that also seem to NOT share alleged “northern European values.”

    2) Disorder such as ” petty drug-dealing, hookers soliciting johns, illegal gambling, broken bottles, groups of feral children wandering around past midnight, open public drinking..” were staples of lower class WHITE Irish hoods in times past, and they were a lot worse than today. In NYC itself over 10,000 white children “roamed the streets” homeless for example. 50% of the arrests were of the white Irish even though they made up just 25% of the population. And things like violence and substance abuse among them are legend. And by the way, the white Irish themselves, are, wait for it.. “Northern European,”

    Let’s be xclear: we are not claiming that the blackening of a city somehow enhanced the quality of life for blacks since they can now define “quality of life” to mirror their values. The opposite is probably true as measured by dysfunctional schools, fewer decent shopping options, endemic crime and random shootings killing innocent bystanders. In fact, many residents of such hellholes might prefer to move to localities with fewer blacks, even if whites impose “white” values,
    The fatal weakness of your argument is that “white values” themselves embrace violence, substance abuse and disorder, as documented extensively by historians. Random killings for example were a routine occurrence among such “northern European “role models” as were high out of wedlock rates. As for urban corruption- who are the foremost “role models” of such but white people- from the machines of Tammany Hall, to the Daley machine in Chicago- all dominated by those reputed paragons of virtue- northern Europeans? What changed things is a surging expanding economy in the 19th and 20th centuries, and continued pressure by public and private agencies, including churches to clean up personal behavior, AND clean up corrupt municipal and state bureaucracies. And by the way many of those bureaucracies were and to some extent still are dominated by “northern Europeans.” The classic “Irish cop” for example had the quaint habit sometimes of arresting Jewish VICTIMS of crime while letting perps go free. See Howe’s classic World of Our Fathers) Now imagine that- another example of “northern European values” anyone?

    Read More
  58. Anonymous says:     Show CommentNext New Comment

    A well-written piece that echoes what many Whites are thinking.

    Black cops for black people.
    Then, a black justice system for blacks, with black courts, DA’s, attorneys, bailiffs and judges.

    Incrementally, a return to segregation.
    Most Whites, even if they would die before they would admit it, prefer to not live around blacks.

    However, this can never work.
    Blacks cannot exist without Whites.
    Blacks know this and hate themselves and despise Whites for it.
    Without White civilizational structure and near-total financial support for blacks, blacks cannot exist.
    To call for segregating blacks from Whites is tantamount to calling for the extinction of American blacks.

    I’m okay with that, but few are. Not yet. Not yet…..

    Read More
    • Replies: @jack shindo
    dude. you ain't right! You cannot pass laws to deny, deny, curtail, abrogate, etc the rights of US citizens then pretend those laws never existed. In nature, we reap what we sow. You don't beat down anyone when they are unable to defend themselves then are shocked the day when retribution is passed out. I don;t know what White civilization but if it involves abrogating rights of some of the citizenry to uphold the priviledge then that type of white civilization is useless and should be destroyed by any neans necessary.

    Upholding the merits of justice and equity of the law for all should be the cornerstone of any civilization, if it calls itself that.
  59. Presumably under Weissberg’s “New Order” white police no longer need plant evidence.

    —————————————————————————————————-
    ARTICLE EXCERPT:
    A former NYPD narcotics detective snared in a corruption scandal testified it was common practice to fabricate drug charges against innocent people to meet arrest quotas.

    The bombshell testimony from Stephen Anderson is the first public account of the twisted culture behind the false arrests in the Brooklyn South and Queens narc squads, which led to the arrests of eight cops and a massive shakeup.

    http://www.nydailynews.com/news/crime/fabricated-drug-charges-innocent-people-meet-arrest-quotas-detective-testifies-article-1.963021

    ^^More “northern European values” at work…

    Moving along, Weissberg’s “new order” proposal has been tried elsewhere- separate out “troublesome” ethnic groups and let them be policed by their own kind, in their own teeming ghettoes. Northern Europeans have extensive experience with such things. Only 60 years ago a similar proposal was in full blown operation, and it worked! The “trouble” minorities then were called Jews, and after they were separated out into their respective ghettoes, good white northern Europeans, called Germans, appointed members of their own race, the Jüdischer Ordnungsdienst, to police said minorities.

    Ever generous, northern European values were not afraid to contemplate the “unspeakable..” As expected, the troublesome minority numbers were whittled down by starvation, disease and murder, after which, their ghetto dwellings were cleansed and the inhabitants shipped “elsewhere.” One final joke- the faithful minority police, the Jüdischer Ordnungsdienst, were themselves shipped off for cleansing in the final states. There you have it- its all there: bothersome minorities, a necessary ethnic separation from those bothersome uttermensch, confinement to their wasted locales, and so on. Weissberg’s “Northern European values” at work…

    Read More
    • Replies: @midtown
    It isn't that whites don't break laws sometimes, it's whether or not society at large condones the behavior. And your segue into Nazism is just silly to bring up here. Treat your fever.
  60. @Enrique Cardova
    Presumably under Weissberg's "New Order" white police no longer need plant evidence.

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    ARTICLE EXCERPT:
    A former NYPD narcotics detective snared in a corruption scandal testified it was common practice to fabricate drug charges against innocent people to meet arrest quotas.

    The bombshell testimony from Stephen Anderson is the first public account of the twisted culture behind the false arrests in the Brooklyn South and Queens narc squads, which led to the arrests of eight cops and a massive shakeup.

    http://www.nydailynews.com/news/crime/fabricated-drug-charges-innocent-people-meet-arrest-quotas-detective-testifies-article-1.963021

    ^^More "northern European values" at work...

    Moving along, Weissberg's "new order" proposal has been tried elsewhere- separate out "troublesome" ethnic groups and let them be policed by their own kind, in their own teeming ghettoes. Northern Europeans have extensive experience with such things. Only 60 years ago a similar proposal was in full blown operation, and it worked! The "trouble" minorities then were called Jews, and after they were separated out into their respective ghettoes, good white northern Europeans, called Germans, appointed members of their own race, the Jüdischer Ordnungsdienst, to police said minorities.

    Ever generous, northern European values were not afraid to contemplate the "unspeakable.." As expected, the troublesome minority numbers were whittled down by starvation, disease and murder, after which, their ghetto dwellings were cleansed and the inhabitants shipped "elsewhere." One final joke- the faithful minority police, the Jüdischer Ordnungsdienst, were themselves shipped off for cleansing in the final states. There you have it- its all there: bothersome minorities, a necessary ethnic separation from those bothersome uttermensch, confinement to their wasted locales, and so on. Weissberg's "Northern European values" at work...

    It isn’t that whites don’t break laws sometimes, it’s whether or not society at large condones the behavior. And your segue into Nazism is just silly to bring up here. Treat your fever.

    Read More
  61. @Anonymous
    A well-written piece that echoes what many Whites are thinking.

    Black cops for black people.
    Then, a black justice system for blacks, with black courts, DA's, attorneys, bailiffs and judges.

    Incrementally, a return to segregation.
    Most Whites, even if they would die before they would admit it, prefer to not live around blacks.

    However, this can never work.
    Blacks cannot exist without Whites.
    Blacks know this and hate themselves and despise Whites for it.
    Without White civilizational structure and near-total financial support for blacks, blacks cannot exist.
    To call for segregating blacks from Whites is tantamount to calling for the extinction of American blacks.

    I'm okay with that, but few are. Not yet. Not yet.....

    dude. you ain’t right! You cannot pass laws to deny, deny, curtail, abrogate, etc the rights of US citizens then pretend those laws never existed. In nature, we reap what we sow. You don’t beat down anyone when they are unable to defend themselves then are shocked the day when retribution is passed out. I don;t know what White civilization but if it involves abrogating rights of some of the citizenry to uphold the priviledge then that type of white civilization is useless and should be destroyed by any neans necessary.

    Upholding the merits of justice and equity of the law for all should be the cornerstone of any civilization, if it calls itself that.

    Read More
  62. @Jus' Sayin'...
    The whole argument is based on the unstated assumption that all Negros are the same; a homogeneous mass of dysfunctional, subnormal thugs. In fact, a substantial minority of the Negro community in Ferguson and elsewhere aspires to nothing more than the same placid and productive lifestyle desired and enjoyed by the majority of residents in White neighborhoods. It is this Negro minority that contributes to society and in return deserves society's concern and support. Rather than abandoning the deserving Negro community and pandering to Negro thugs and idiots; we should be striving to suppress and eradicate these subpar specimens s so that decent Negroes stand a chance at achieving a decent life.

    Bur, regression towards the mean.

    Read More
Current Commenter says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS
PastClassics
The major media overlooked Communist spies and Madoff’s fraud. What are they missing today?
Which superpower is more threatened by its “extractive elites”?
The “war hero” candidate buried information about POWs left behind in Vietnam.