The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Peter Brimelow Archive
DUNKIRK: “People Should be Hung from Lampposts, They Should be Burned Alive, for What They've Done to Britain”
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>
dunkirk-672x281

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New Reply
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

So I went to see this movie DUNKIRK at the urging of James Kirkpatrick, VDARE.com’s lead tweetmeister and our ambassador to popular culture. In the process, I made the interesting discovery that my young Texan wife had never heard of Dunkirk. For me, it brought flocking back a host of memories and emotions sternly repressed since I left Britain for U.S. in 1970. Chief among them now: lethal rage.

If you grew up in Britain in the 1950s, as John Derbyshire and I did, the myth of the Dunkirk evacuation—using “myth” in its affirming and sustaining sense—was everywhere. I remember reading illustrated stories about it in children’s comics when I was about Felicity’s age (now 6).

Of course, the British were wrong to believe this was the decisive turning point in World War II—there were, as we are incessantly reminded, far bigger battles on the Eastern Front. But it was pretty decisive for Britain: the loss (or, politically even more awkward, capture) of the 200,000-plus U.K. troops retrieved from the beaches after being cut off by the German panzers would have been devastating, perhaps fatal, for a country that could field only ten infantry divisions in 1939. As it was, casualties were very heavy—one of many arresting points made by Dunkirk is how terrifyingly quickly combat-damaged ships can sink.

Moreover, Dunkirk was in a real sense a people’s battle. Some 700 civilian craft were recruited to get the men off the beaches and (as the movie recounts) their owners sometimes went with them. When my father took charge of the municipal-socialist public transport operation in Birkenhead in the 1960s, he had Mersey ferrymen who had gone. It was an intense popular effort and it struck deep personal roots.

Although aimed at a mass audience, Dunkirk is a very sophisticated movie and a remarkable technical achievement by writer-producer director Christopher Nolan. It’s also a political achievement. Nolan’s subject is one of the Anglosphere’s great patriotic epics and thus ripe for anti-West snark, but it has actually been well received by the Leftist cultural Establishment e.g.

Nolan seems to have flown under the radar, partly by eliminating virtually all dialog and hence minimizing the chance of jarring Politically Correct sensibilities.

Even Churchill’s sacralized “We shall fight on the beaches” June 4 oration announcing the evacuation to the House of Commons, hearing which was so much an inescapable part of growing up in England in the 1950s, like listening to Kathleen Ferrier, that I could recite it from memory and never without a thrill, appears here only as haltingly read, from a newspaper, by an exhausted, wondering survivor as his train finally reaches London.

But Nolan’s achievement goes far beyond avoiding trouble. Quietly, possibly inadvertently, he has made a movie that celebrates national identity.

He does this simply by showing a real nation in action. USA Today’s reviewer Brian Truit has been beaten up for observing that “the fact that there are only a couple of women and no lead actors of color may rub some the wrong way”. [Review: Christopher Nolan’s ‘Dunkirk’ examines WWII heroism up close, July 17, 2017] This is a little unfair: as Steve Sailer recently pointed out, director Tim Burton was indeed attacked for not including people of color in a movie set on a Welsh island in World War II, although as late as 1951 the proportion of “visible minorities” in Britain was just 0.19% (!). And the 2007 movie Atonement did prominently insert a wholly fictitious black soldier i nto its famous five-minute continuous tracking shot of the scene at Dunkirk. [Presenting the Black Past—How History Must Change The Media, by Miranda Kaufman, MirandaKaufman.com, November 14, 2013]

But the British army in Nolan’s Dunkirk is totally, completely and stunningly white.

(One of the “couple of women,” a nurse, is unsparingly shown, in a horrible below-decks underwater shot, dying an Equal Opportunity death by drowning after her hospital ship is torpedoed. Is this an implicit criticism of putting women in the front line?)

The result of this homogeneity, as the Chicago Tribune’s John Kass wrote in a brilliant column:

The star of “Dunkirk” is the character of the British people at that time, in the worst days of the war, long before America joined in, when the British Expeditionary Force was humiliated in Europe and almost destroyed.

And so it is a movie about a people of a certain time, a people who knew who they were, a people who firmly understood their culture and their obligations to it, and to their nation, and to each other.

‘Dunkirk’: Decency on a murderous beach, July 21, 2017

I am old enough to remember that Britain. And it looks like Christopher Nolan, born in 1970 in London to a British father and an American mother, caught some sense of it too.

One small sign: Nolan has the British troops standing in orderly, quiet queues (= lines in American), waiting to be taken off. This is apparently what happened at Dunkirk. The British of that era were very good at queuing. Significantly, the working class was best at it. It used to irritate my father that everyone would queue for his buses except in affluent areas, where people would just stand around and block the pavement (=sidewalk in American). “They think they’re too good to queue,” he said. Social rot in Britain started from the top.

(Nolan also has his troops being handed slices of bread and jam by rescue workers. Known in the North of England as “jam butties,” these were also omnipresent when I was a child. Reportedly, they’ve died out, along with so much else).

So is it inadvertent? Does Nolan realize what he’s done? It’s very hard to believe that anyone with deviant political views could hide them well enough to survive in Hollywood. Nolan does seem generally to avoid political statements, not typical of Leftists, but he reportedly donated to Obama in 2012 [The Religious And Political Views of Christopher Nolan, by Caitlin Frye, Hollowverse.com, November 25, 2012]. Still, it is a curious fact that his The Dark Knight Rises, last in a Batman trilogy, was seen as “fascist” by Left [“The Dark Knight Rises”: Christopher Nolan’s evil masterpiece, by Andrew O’Hehir, Salon, July 18, 2012] and Right [The Dark Right Rises:Christopher Nolan as Fascist Filmmaker?, by Gregory Hood and Luke Gordon, Counter-Currents, December 7, 2012] alike. The villain Bane has emerged as a sort of Alt-Right antihero—and Donald Trump (known to be a fan of The Dark Knight Rises) is widely believed to have offered him an homage [Donald Trump’s Inauguration Speech Borrows Line from Batman Villain Bane, by Aaron Couch , Hollywood Reporter, January 20, 2017 ).

But the real reason that Dunkirk’s inconveniently honest portrayal of Britain and its army in 1940 is so stunning: successive British governments have, in the twinkling of an eye (to quote Handel’s Messiah) utterly destroyed that world through immigration policy. Incredibly, whites—that is to say, the British—are projected to go into a minority, in a land they have exclusively occupied for millennia, not long after the same event is estimated to occur in the U.S. [RIP this Britain: With academic objectivity, Oxford Professor and population expert DAVID COLEMAN says white Britons could be in the minority by the 2060s – or sooner, by David Coleman, Daily Mail, May 28, 2016].

In 2009, Nicholas Pringle published The Unknown Warriors, a book of interviews with 150 of what in America is called the “Greatest Generation”—those who fought and lived through World War II:

Sarah Robinson was just a teenager when World War II broke out.

She endured the Blitz, watching for fires during Luftwaffe air raids armed with a bucket of sand.

Often she would walk ten miles home from work in the blackout, with bombs falling around her.

As soon as she turned 18, she joined the Royal Navy to do her bit for the war effort.

Hers was a small part in a huge, history-making enterprise, and her contribution epitomises her generation’s sense of service and sacrifice.

Nearly 400,000 Britons died. Millions more were scarred by the experience, physically and mentally.

But was it worth it? Her answer—and the answer of many of her contemporaries, now in their 80s and 90s—is a resounding No.

Immigration tops the list of complaints…Many writers are bewildered and overwhelmed by a multicultural Britain that, they say bitterly, they were never consulted about nor feel comfortable with.

`This isn`t the Britain we fought for,` say the `unknown warriors` of WWII, by Tony Rennell, London Daily Mail, November 21, 2009. Link added.

In 1940, my father, already in the British Army in which he was to spend 6½ years, was stationed on the English Channel at Folkstone, looking right at Dunkirk. Years later, reading about the German plans for Operation Sea Lion, the invasion of England, I realized he was right where paratroopers were to land and asked him what kind of resistance his unit would have been able to mount.

He said: “They would have had to give us rifles.”

The Germans never came—but Britain was invaded anyway. By 1990, when my father died, he was bitterly in agreement with Pringle’s interviewees: it wasn’t worth it.

My considered reaction to Dunkirk: People should be hung from lampposts—they should be burned alive—for what they’ve done to Britain.

God send, if only for the sake of my three little daughters, born almost exactly 100 years after my father, that America can be saved from this terrible fate.

Peter Brimelow [Email him | Tweet him]is the editor of VDARE.com. His best-selling book, Alien Nation: Common Sense About America’s Immigration Disaster , is now available in Kindle format.

(Republished from VDare.com by permission of author or representative)
 
Hide 373 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
    []
  1. Diversity is like Venereal Disease.

    It might as well be called Diversyphilis or Globorrhea.

    Now, diversity per se is not the problem. All nations are diverse to some extent. Even in homogeneous nations, there is diversity if dialects and regions. And there can be good things arising from some diversity.

    The problem of what goes by ‘diversity is our strength’ or DIOS is that is a cancerous or viral process that NEVER STOPS. Enough is never enough.

    So, SOME Africans, Asians, and Muslims in London isn’t enough. There must be more and more and more and more. Also, these minorities don’t respect the host culture but make demands. Now, BBC is making history shows with blacks in white roles. Diversity even goes ‘time machine’ and alters past history like Stalin used to alter photos. Also, many whites get a virtue high from beating their chest about how they are infected with Diversyphilis.

    PC acts like HIV. It attacks the immune system.

    In any national order, patriots are most valuable for they are the guardians of what constitutes the nation in terms of identity/core ethnicity, territory, narrative, history, and culture. Patriots are the warriors, storytellers, guardians, and preservers. So, patriots must be highly regarded. Without them, the national order no longer has defenders.

    Likewise, an organism depends on immune system to survive. Immune system defends and sustains the organism. All around there are germs and stuff. Immune system must constantly resist and filter the hostile germs. Without such force, the organism will succumb to germs and toxins.

    What does HIV do? It attacks the immune system so that the organism cannot resist hostile germs and toxins, and gradually, the body succumbs to all sorts of infection. Indeed, even what were mild seeming infections keep festering and getting out of control.

    PC works the same way on nations. It attacks patriotism and patriotic forces, the very people most essential to protect and preserve the territory, ethnicity, history, and spirituality of the order. PC re-programs the organism so that it regards patriots as germs and toxins and tries to kill them off. And that weakens the national immune system and then tons of foreigners invade without resistance.

    The West has the money and technology to defend itself but it doesn’t because PC has reprogrammed the Western mind to see patriots as germs/toxins while welcoming germs/toxins as the New Patriots. So, Africans, Muslims, and etc are to be welcomed as New Britons, New Irish, New Swedes, and New Germans while true European patriots are seen as ‘far right toxic odious noxious rabid and virulent evil nazis’.

    David Horowitz used to run a alternative mag called Heterodoxy in the early 90s before internet became a big thing. It had a small audience but it could have done so much more if the net was big back then.

    Horowitz is a problematic figure, but he understood the dangers missed by most Cons because he’d been at the center of the New Left in the 60s. He knew them from inside out. He understood the radical mind like the back of his hand. And he warned National Review that nice guy Conservatism Inc is defenseless against this virulent form of ideology(that under Clinton would forge an alliance with Big Money).

    And all the things he warned about ‘culture war’ back then has come to be.

    http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/viewSubCategory.asp?id=337

    There was one satirical piece about how Hollywood is going to release old movies with blacks computerized over whites. It sounded outlandish then but now, we have BBC and Hollywood filling white roles with blacks in all these movies about european past.

    Coal-staining, not whitewashing, is the great crime of Hollywood.

    Read More
    • Replies: @animalogic
    "Enough is never enough."
    Without getting into the whole "germ" analogy, there is something to what you say. Enough seems never enough. A culture has a right to retain its substance & form. However, we live in times in which substance/form are relative, if not innately nebulous.
    At the conclusion of WW II the British people voted for a Labour government that delivered, as best it could, a social safety net. People wanted "something" for their sacrifice...because what WWII did do, was demonstrate that government, business & citizens, working for a COMMON good could SUCCEED. It's THAT which has been drowned slowly in a bathtub over the last 40 odd years. We are back to the same class riven days of the 1890's.
    Regardless of the deep state politics, average people believed their sacrifice meant something....what it meant was an intermission in business-as-usual....
    , @nsa
    Your hero, Horrorvitz, is the actual virus in your germ theory analogy. Started his traitorous Izzy-firster career as a typical vile jooie Trotskyite in the 1960s......morphing into an even more vile jooie neocon traitor in the 1980s as the cultural currents reversed.
    , @Joe Wong
    I hope the author would mean Winston Churchill, Robert Vansittart, and a gang of ruthless colonial imperialist warmongers are the “People Should be Hung from Lampposts, They Should be Burned Alive, for What They've Done to Britain.”

    Mind you, the British troops were in the foreign land, it is not right for the invader to bear such bitter feeling and victimhood sentiment by being kicked out of their occupied land. On the other hand people said the British imitates the Roman, while the American is born out the British; the Roman called destroying Carthaginian and salted their land "creating peace," no wonder the American and the British go berserk when people kicks the American and British out of their homeland, and resort to bombing, killing and waterboarding on the fabricated phantom WMD allegation as humanitarian intervention to avenge their "humiliation."
    , @Jay Igaboo
    A splendid and well-reasoned analogy, Priss Factor.
    Regrettably, it misses to mention The Tribe who did the most to inflict this pox upon us, The Tribe who secured their survival at the expense of the Allies sons, The Tribe who STILL use or sons (and a tiny few of our daughters) to fight their enemies.
    My father served in the RAF during WW2,(he got a 30-day deferment to his call up to build a one-room shack for my then 18 months old oldest brother and my pregnant mother after they were blitzed out of Clydebank, a town of 40.000 souls that had only SIX houses undamaged by the two-night blitz.
    Two uncles died in service.
    Was it worth it?
    Was it hell.
    They wished no harm to anyone of any race, like most Britons they were appalled by the way Blacks were treated in the US, but by the 80s,when Britain was beginning to be swamped by ever-more demanding, more criminal and ungrateful minorities, that was beginning to turn thin.
    They would be revolted and utterly amazed at what the Left and greedy business has done to destroy Britain.
    As it Talleyrand who wrote that "Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel"?
    That is true in some cases, but anti-patriotism (and active support of, or passive virtue -signalling of PC is the immediate refuge of the most malicious of many a modern scoundrel.
    , @Rhett hardwick
    My idea of Diversity is dating a Canadian.
    , @Corvinus
    Peter and Priss...

    "But the real reason that Dunkirk’s inconveniently honest portrayal of Britain and its army in 1940 is so stunning: successive British governments have, in the twinkling of an eye (to quote Handel’s Messiah) utterly destroyed that world through immigration policy."

    While of course Brian Truit should be taken to task for not realizing Dunkirk is a period piece, in a similar vein both of you are also forgetting that eras also change. That is the result of human interactions. Great Britain was the direct result of diversity--the Britons, Celts, Romans, Picts, and others fighting, intermingling, and intermarrying.

    Speaking of diversity being a strength...

    www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3146070/Mixed-race-relationships-making-taller-smarter-Children-born-genetically-diverse-parents-intelligent-ancestors.html
    , @Erik Sieven
    antiracist have no idea what to do when their final goal is achieved: let´s say Sweden has 50 million inhabitants with 5 million of them half white, the rest African. What´s then? After all the work they would discover that history does not stop with their glorious victory. Suddenly they would have to do the mentally hard work of finding a sense of life. They would have to find new final goals. Everybody fears this situation, so they just continue with mass migration, they have no idea what else to do.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
    AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
    These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
    Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
    Sharing Comment via Twitter
    /article/dunkirk-people-should-be-hung-from-lampposts-they-should-be-burned-alive-for-what-theyve-done-to-britain/#comment-1948451
    More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  2. 1/ A bit of a complication. There may have been no non-Whites at Dunkirk, but there were lots of them in Burma, Singapore and Hong Kong, and there had been many in the trenches in the previous go-round.

    2/ Wasn’t it the Dunkirk generation who began the opening of the doors. Between 1945 and Powell’s speech who was doing the voting?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wade
    Yes, but as Brimelow states:

    Nearly 400,000 Britons died. Millions more were scarred by the experience, physically and mentally.
     
    I often wonder whether all the crazy far left political assaults on the home team in the west are due precisely to the fact that WWII took the lives of so many of the brave leaving us with proportionately more people predisposed to cowardice.

    I'm sure among those 400,000 would have arisen many civic leaders and perhaps some top notch political leaders who unfortunately died to protect Britain from invaders.
    , @Jay Igaboo
    Your first point is absolutely correct, and it was not really acknowledged enough for many years. The Western Desert also had many Indian (i.e. what was then India, Pakistan, Ceylon, etc.)
    Many fought well, and they undoubtedly helped defeat Rommel.
    It may surprise many that the British media and political Establishment have been ever more wacist to another ethic group who played a very large part not only with The Eighth Army in North Africa, but in The Battle of Britain. They have been completely airbrushed out of the modern historical recollection.
    I knew, because my Dad, and two uncles were in various theatres of war in WW2, plus I grew up and later worked surrounded by WW2 veterans.
    I really only noticed how shamefully this ethic group had been treated when I recently read Stephen Bungay’s excellent account “Alemein”and discovered how many had answered the call to arms.
    It wasn’t those who came from what was then India.
    It wasn’t those who came from Africa.
    It wasn’t those who came from The Caribbean.

    It was those who came from South Africa and Rhodesia.
    White South Africans and Rhodesians, of course, and therefore modern day untouchables.
    Most Indian troops had joined The army pre-war for the usual reasons—three squares a day, a career, maybe, to travel or to stay out of jail to, or joined because the sought adventure, etc.but the three squares alone was a huge incentive in India then. Comparatively few joined during the war, save when the Japs were knocking on the door at Imphal.
    Like almost all soldiers, because they were already in the Army pre-war, they went where they were ordered to go, although a fair few Indians became Jhats—they fought for the invading Japanese, and most Indian politicians were ambivalent about which side to jump.
    Quite rightly, they wanted what was best, in their opinion, for Indians, and independence was the quid pro pro they demanded and no doubt the examples of Japanese behaviour in Manchuria, Indonesia , Hong Kong or Malaya, etc helped make up their minds.
    , @James N. Kennett

    Between 1945 and Powell’s speech who was doing the voting?
     
    I'm not sure anyone voted for non-white immigration. It began in 1948 because, with so many British cities bombed by the Luftwaffe, there was huge amount of reconstruction to be done, and there was a labour shortage. At least, that is what we were told. If this had been the whole truth, then mass immigration would have ended after, say, 15 years. Instead it has accelerated.
    , @anon
    Your mischaracterizing the situation. NOBODY ever voted for non-white immigration. Had it EVER been put to a vote in ANY white country it would have been annihilated at the voting booth.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  3. utu says:

    that America can be saved from this terrible fate

    It’s more far gone than Britain. Always was. It all started with slavery.

    Read More
    • Agree: Delinquent Snail
    • Replies: @Jake
    WRONG!

    Slavery does not cause PC.

    'It' began with the Judaizing heresy that was Anglo-Saxon Puritanism. That heresy first and foremost meant that Elite WASPs would promote philoSemitism. Judaizing heresy leads inevitably to a culture that facilitates Jews, who, being Jews, will eventually come to be the managing partner.

    America's problem was not slavery; it was the WASP culture of the northeastern Elites.

    The WASPs who forged Modern England and the UK and the British Empire were not merely philoSemitic products of a Judaizing heresy. They also despised the vast majority natives of the British Isles.

    The start was Anglo-Saxon Puritianism.
    , @Colleen Pater
    No many nation s have survived slavery, it started with making slaves niggers slaves at that citizens and then giving women the vote
    , @Priss Factor
    Russia had serfs.
    China had slaves.

    So, why don't they have race problems like the US?

    Because Russian serfs were Russian and Chinese slaves were Chinese. So, when the system was eradicated, the once-serfs or once-slaves could be like everyone else.

    In contrast, the slaves were black in America. So, when black slaves were freed, they were no longer slaves but still black, and THAT was the problem. Slavery or no slavery, blacks remained stronger, more muscular, more aggressive, more psychopathic, louder, booty-shaking, and bigger-donged.
    In a way, end of slavery caused more problems for whites since stronger and more aggressive blacks could now run free and kick the white boy's ass and get white girls.

    Blackness, not slavery, was the main problem. We see this in EU and Australia today. These blacks come as free men but they act much like crazy American blacks. Why? They are black.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simon_Mol

    Mol tried to turn Poland into Moland by sticking his dong into jungle-feverized Polish womenfolk. Polish women are known to be skanks.

    Suppose whites had enslaved other whites in America. Or the Chinese. Once freed, white ex-slaves would have melded in with other whites. Once freed, ex-slave Chinese would have looked up to bigger stronger whites and tried to fit in, like Mexican peasants used to saying 'si, senor'.

    Even if 400,000 blacks had been brought over as free people, they would have caused the same problems in the US.
    Because blacks were slaves in the US, we have this fallacy that slavery caused all the problem. But if we hypothetically change the race of the slaves, and we see it isn't so.

    No, the real problem was whites brought stronger, meaner, and more psychopathic black savages to the New World.
    , @syonredux
    Eh. In terms of numbers, the Latinx are Anglo-America's real enemy:

    The share of the population that is Hispanic has been steadily increasing over the past half century. In 2014, Hispanics made up 17.3% of the total U.S. population, up from 3.5% in 1960. According to the latest projections from the U.S. Census Bureau (2014), the Hispanic share of the U.S. population is expected to reach 28.6% by 2060.
     
    http://www.pewhispanic.org/2016/04/19/statistical-portrait-of-hispanics-in-the-united-states-key-charts/
    , @Ace
    There has hardly been one minute of our national existence where we have not had to deal with the pathologies of the black presence. Damn those who brought black slaves to this land.
    , @Wally
    Black researcher, Dr. Tony Martin, let's us know who the prime sellers & owners of slaves really were, Jews.
    Dr. Tony Martin - The Jewish Role in the African Slave Trade
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ut7I75Q_-zA

    fact:
    blacks also owned slaves in the US south
    fact:
    Africans had massive slavery, it was black Africans who sold black African slaves to the slave traders
    fact:
    slavery of black Africans would have never happened without black Africans selling black African slaves

    JEWS AND THE SLAVE TRADE
    http://wethoughttheywerewhite.weebly.com/jews--the-slave-trade.html

    http://wethoughttheywerewhite.weebly.com/uploads/5/3/4/9/53499197/6585841.jpg?296
    http://wethoughttheywerewhite.weebly.com/uploads/5/3/4/9/53499197/8785931.jpg?277
    http://wethoughttheywerewhite.weebly.com/uploads/5/3/4/9/53499197/3328022_orig.jpg
    http://wethoughttheywerewhite.weebly.com/uploads/5/3/4/9/53499197/892816_orig.jpg
    http://wethoughttheywerewhite.weebly.com/uploads/5/3/4/9/53499197/1507471.jpg?717

    "Prof. Martin was indeed correct when he said “75% of Jewish households owned slaves” or “more than twice as many Jews owned slaves as compared to whites (36%),” as these statistics were drawn from Ira Rosenwaike’s analysis that attempted to do an apples-to-apples comparison with Lee Soltow’s study, which focused on the 14 Southern slave states. It should be noted that it was these two Jewish scholars that decided to base their comparisons on the 14 Southern slave states and not Prof. Martin, who was merely relaying the results of these two studies.?"
     
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  4. Dan Hayes says:

    “People should be hung from lampposts, they should be burned alive, for what they’ve done to Britain.”

    I agree with the author, Peter Brimelow, except with Ireland being substituted for Britain.

    What Blair did to Britain, Allan Shatter has done to Ireland. And in Ireland the populace seems to be blissfully unaware of the transformation taking place.

    Interestingly, quite some time ago Brimelow expressed the same general thoughts to me regarding Ireland (although in a more moderate tone)!

    Read More
    • Replies: @Dan Hayes
    For those interested in the continuing Irish autogenocide engineered in no small part by Allan Shatter, feel free to consult the "Irish Savant" website for many of the gory details.
    , @Old Palo Altan
    First of all: pictures are hung; people are hanged.

    But I am in complete agreement. In fact one day some years ago walking past Buckingham Palace I looked up and saw a lamppost looming over me. "That one will be for Blair" I said to myself.

    I still know exactly where it is.
    , @cecilhenry
    Canada too. Toronto has been destroyed. ITs 50% non-White and hell.

    Meanwhile, Trudeau celebrates 'new Canadians' as the most real Canadians.

    Mulroney, Chretien, T1, Harper, T2 and all the government elite and bureaucracy are complicit in this invasion and crime. They all must answer.

    There is ONE problem: Africa for Africans, Asia for Asians, White countries for everyone IS White Genocide.
    ITs a crime, not a policy option.
    Canadians Speak: The Prime Minister's 150th anniversary 'dialogue' on Canada's future.
    https://ddswaterloo.wordpress.com/2017/02/09/a-dialogue-on-canadas-150th-anniversary/
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  5. jim jones says:

    David Aaronovitch of the Times says his history graduate daughters had never heard of Dunkirk:

    https://www.mercatornet.com/features/articles/20142/

    Read More
    • Replies: @German_reader
    David Aaronovitch is a vile piece of shit from a family of Jewish communists, his being part of Britain's media establishment is a perfect illustration how sick and rotten the modern UK has become.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  6. I think that it is ironic that some of the people who now say World War II was fought for nothing, were the very people who either made, or acquiesced in public policy decisions, in the 1960s through the 1980s (approximately the time that the “Greatest Generation” matured) that are at least partially reponsible for the population replacement we see today in Western Europe. “It all seemed like a good idea at the time!”

    The two world wars of the first half of the 20th Century altered the mindset of Europeans (including North American transplants) in ways that we are only now beginning to understand.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Barnard
    Did these places have any way to stop it? Were there candidates they could have voted for that were running to repeal laws that opened up immigration? I think in large part, the elites pushed it through over their objections.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  7. How can anyone can look at what has happened to every White country in the West, against the will of the populations, and not see that these were truly genocidal policies.

    It is far too late for most countries like the UK.

    If members of the “Greatest Generation” had spoken out in the 50s and the 60s, this could have been avoided.

    Read More
    • Agree: TomSchmidt
    • Replies: @Newsel
    Some (Enoch) did and were castigated and fired.

    A decade later (5 decades later wrt to Powell) what did we learn? This is where the PC political crowd has taken its citizens. Ditto the EU and ditto the US. Where to now given that there is nowhere for the PC crowd to hide?
    https://www.spectator.co.uk/2007/11/nigel-hastilows-real-crime-was-to-dare-to-mention-enoch-powell-at-all/#
    http://conservativehome.blogs.com/goldlist/2007/11/candidate-who-s.html
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  8. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer

    Yes, you are a Mack Daddy. Respect.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  9. Dan Hayes says:
    @Dan Hayes
    "People should be hung from lampposts, they should be burned alive, for what they've done to Britain."

    I agree with the author, Peter Brimelow, except with Ireland being substituted for Britain.

    What Blair did to Britain, Allan Shatter has done to Ireland. And in Ireland the populace seems to be blissfully unaware of the transformation taking place.

    Interestingly, quite some time ago Brimelow expressed the same general thoughts to me regarding Ireland (although in a more moderate tone)!

    For those interested in the continuing Irish autogenocide engineered in no small part by Allan Shatter, feel free to consult the “Irish Savant” website for many of the gory details.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  10. It’s said that Nazi victory threatened the death to Western Civilization.

    Where do they get this? Sure, fvictorious Nazi Empire would have been evil, but the Nazis never threatened the core of Western Civilization except in Poland.

    Nazi’s main threat were to Russian Slavs and Jews. Jews did play a key role in European Culture esp with Emancipation, but most of Western Civilization would be intact even without Jewish input.

    But Nazis did pose a real threat to Polish and then Russian civilization. Less to Poles because Nazis were half-convinced that Poles were fellow ‘Aryans’. But it was hell for Russia. Hitler planned to raze Moscow and kill millions and enslave the rest. But then, going by today’s hysteria about Russia, Russia, Russia, why should globalists be bothered by this? Globalists raped Russia real good in the 90s and then sought to destroy its culture with Homomania. Today, globalists say Putin is evil, Russia is the greatest threat to the world, etc. Those who call Putin ‘new hitler’ sound as crazed as hitler.

    Anyway, as evil as the Nazis were, they posed no threat to Core of Western Civilization. Nazis saw Scandies as fellow ‘Aryans’. Even if Germans had invaded UK, most people would have been treated well and fairly. And Germans were pretty decent to the French(except Jews), much more so than the French were with their imperial subjects. And even though Hitler thought Italians weren’t as good as northern Europeans, he admired Mussolini and wanted good relations with Italy. And Germany was for good relations with most Eastern European nations. With most European nations, Germans wanted dominance but didn’t seek to tyrannize or exploit them.

    So, the only nations that were threatened by Germany in a big way were Poland and esp Russia.
    It would have been a great great crime if Nazis had destroyed Russia, but Russia was not part of ‘Western Civilization’.

    When it came to the arts, letters, and music of most of Western history, the Nazis were admiring and reverent. Their contempt was for Jews and Russian Slavs. If anything, Hitler and Nazis had more respect for Western arts and culture than the modernists did who would embark on one radical attack after another on everything European in race, history, narrative, arts, expression, etc.

    Nazis can be blamed for lots of evil, but they were not a threat to Western Civilization unless one defines the West as Want of Diversity and Minority Priority.

    At any rate, a civilization doesn’t vanish because an evil prevails over it. Romans had some evil emperors. China and Persia had some nutty tyrants. Russia was under evil Stalin, but Russia didn’t vanish as civilization.

    Nazis were not like Germanic barbarian looters who had no use for arts and culture. If anything, Hitler’s evil was he preferred arts & culture over human lives. A little humanism would have done him some good.

    Anyway, this stuff about how Nazis threatened Western Civilization is all the funnier coming from PC globalists whose plan for Europe is Diversity Cancer, mass invasion, race-mixing into Brazil-North-Africa, rap music as main music, Hollywood trash as main culture, homomaia as religion, and pornification of mainstream culture and even children’s culture(just check out some Ariana Grande videos meant for young girls).

    Nazis would have been horrible for Russia, but a Nazi-conquered Britain would have been better than today’s Britain and its dire future. Germans would have crushed British liberty, but they never would have threatened British race, culture, and history. And with a friendly government in place, the Germans might have left and restored sovereignty.

    Nazis were not uniform everywhere. If communists treated all peoples the same — prole cattle though wrong class elements could be in big trouble –, the Nazis treated some people very well and treated others brutally depending on their ethnicity.
    So, Nazis posed little threat to Western Civilization but posed a real great threat to Russia.

    Nazis would have crushed democracy, but who says Europe needs democracy to be European or Western? After all, for most of Western history, there was NO democracy. And Polish experiment with democracy made it weak, and it was torn apart by stronger powers of Russia and Prussia.

    Nazis were evil and had to be defeated, but let’s do away with the fiction that they posed a threat to Western Civilization. In their demented way, they were trying to save it from degeneracy. Alas, Germans were blind to the fact that their fuhrer himself was a pathological, a rabid dog barking against rabies.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Hippopotamusdrome


    Hitler planned to raze Moscow and kill millions and enslave the rest.

     

    Given they were living under Communism, it would be a step up.
    , @Beckow
    Nazis were also planning to remove, or exterminate over time, the Czechs. They murdered 20% of Belorussians, and they did a fairly convincing genocide on Serbs. We can quibble where the mythical "West" starts and where it ends, but I would say that Prague is probably in it, and so is Beograd. If you add up the European nations that Nazis wanted gone one way or another, you get about 40% of white European population. Almost all in the east.

    How is that consistent with 'Nazis not threatening European civilisation'?

    The problem is the same: Western Europeans seem to hate the white eastern Slavs. Not all by any means, but the general instinct is always there. Nazis were just an extreme case, and were more open about it. What we see today in US, German, French or British media with regard to Russia (and sometimes also Poland or Hungary) is something that would never - ever - be said about any other group. Try to substitute any other group, from Irish to Chinese, from Arabs to Africans, this level of public and media hysteria would never be allowed to flourish. But when it comes to Russia it is ok. At some point, if you "Westerners" cannot police your own, aren't you really passively supporting this hysteria? These politicians get voted in, the media is your media - they represent you.

    This seems a replay of Nazism, on that I agree with you. But where are the voices of reason? Why should a 'civilisation' capable of this level of hatred and hypocrisy be saved anyway? You are misty-eyed about Dunkirk. Good. But at the same time you muse openly about 'wiping Moscow off the face of earth' and how that would not be such a tragedy. Well, when next Dunkirk comes, I can see the despised white easterners not giving a damn. Those are the fruits of hundreds of years of quiet and not so quiet hatred.

    , @Johnnydub
    You touch on what's going on but never nail it.

    The Jews will never forgive or forget the Holocaust. And it's not just Nazis, it's white western civilisation they blame. Which is why the globalist agenda is dominated by Jews - The banks, Hollywood, George Soros.

    They are going to genocide any potential threat (ie the West) to them going forward. It's their interpretation of "never again"
    , @europeasant
    I have no problem with NAZIS in Germany but when they crossed borders, all bets were off.
    The Nazis should have stayed in Germany.
    They supposedly were National Socialists and not Internationalist Socialists.
    The Internationalist Socialists were the Communists.
    The Germans (nazis) had big street battles with the Communists and came out on top.
    Anyway itz fun speculating what would have happened if the stupid Nazis had stayed at home.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  11. whoever says: • Website

    I made the interesting discovery that my young Texan wife had never heard of Dunkirk.

    I know of it from reading Walter Lord’s The Miracle of Dunkirk when I was a kid. Otherwise, I probably never would have heard of it.
    My grandfather was apparently a fan of Lord’s and had a bunch of his books, which I read, so I learned about the Titanic, coast watchers, the Alamo and all sorts of interesting history, including Dunkirk.
    To defend your wife, I wonder how many Britishers have heard of Corregidor.
    As far as war movies showing women nurses in combat zones, So Proudly We Hail did it in 1943 in a film well worth watching even today.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  12. Art says:

    Scotland should go its own way – Northern Ireland should return to Ireland – The Welsh should have their own cutout.

    Then the English can live in servitude to their Jew overlords.

    It is obvious – the overarching Western nation state has been corrupted by the Jews.

    Seek peace in local control of everything.

    Peace — Art

    Read More
    • Agree: Druid
    • Replies: @Expletive Deleted
    Can you imagine a three-cornered fight over a penny between a Jew, a Dutchman, and a Scotsman? Must be how the fidget-spinner was invented.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  13. I have the same feeling about the Netherlands, my country no longer exists.
    We now need riot police when shortly before Deember 5 Sinterklaas arrives on a steam boat from Spain, on his white horse, Black Pete’s accompanying him.
    Black Pete nowadays is a symbol of slavery, so colored Dutch demonstrate against him.

    In Austria a politicologist is writing his book Der Letzte Europäer, The Last European.
    Predictions based on current immigrants and the number of children they get is that in 25 years from now 40% of the European population will be Muslim.
    Long before that the present social state will be gone, even after ten years here some 90% of immigrants live of welfare.
    75% of those in the city of Utrecht who live on welfare have a migration background.

    Maybe a connection is that in Sept in Germany the second book about journalism will appear.
    The first one was by Udo Ulfkotte, Gekaufte Journalismus, hope I got the title right, translated Bought Journalism.
    The second one is Lügenpresse, Press of Lies.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Alden
    Every December we in America read about the disturbances caused by Sinterklaas and his servant black Pete.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  14. No idea what this fuss is about. Brits were able to evacuate because Hitler still hoped to get along with them. Germans could get them all if an order were given. But it shows nicely how this machine works. Make some dramatic movies about even this shameful event in Britain history, ignore completely true great battles that turned the tide of war because those were fought by USSR and do it consistently over decades. And here we have what we have. Completely distorted history of WW2 in the West and ignorant public.

    Read More
    • Agree: Ace
    • Replies: @iffen
    Completely distorted history of WW2 in the West and ignorant public.

    Ignorant publican here.

    I guess this means that the people who won the Great Patriotic War all by their lonesome can't make good movies.

    , @Anon
    Evacution from Dunkirk as well as 'strange war' (broken Western promise to defend Poland) before are clear examples of match-fixing in WW2. Hitler was all the way playing with the rest of the West, that's why not too much resistance was observed, and too much waffen-SS from France, Belgium etc. volunteered. Hitler's empire was in fact a prototype of European Union, and Nazi ideology was only a concentrated, ultimate ideology of the West. Hopefully, the Russian bayonet destroyed the nefarious dreams. The D-day was, in fact, an attempt of the West to save chunks of Europe from USSR - obvious winner already, and to steal some spoils (e.g. nuclear and rocket techs). Western mythology still tries to save inexistent private Ryan. Besides this, Dunkirk as a massive loss of obsolete weaponry and vehicles was beneficial to British and American manufacturers.
    , @mobi

    Make some dramatic movies about even this shameful event in Britain history, ignore completely true great battles that turned the tide of war because those were fought by USSR and do it consistently over decades. And here we have what we have. Completely distorted history of WW2 in the West and ignorant public.
     
    Please,

    Has any people in history ever got their asses so thoroughly kicked, lost so much territory so quickly, or collapsed so incompetently on the battlefield, as Russians in the first 6 months of invasion? (6 months, mind you, not 6 weeks).

    Russia defeated Germany, not Russians.

    Cling firmly, though, because, as always, it's all you have to cling to.
    , @James N. Kennett
    The Germans did bomb the beaches in Dunkirk where British troops were assembled, but the ground was soft sand which absorbed much of the explosive power of the bombs. By this stroke of good luck, most of the British Expeditionary Force escaped, though about a quarter were captured along with French soldiers who were defending the retreat.

    This was good luck for the USSR as well as the British - if the escape had not occurred, Germany would have been unopposed in the West, which would have meant an even greater onslaught on the Eastern Front, and no British contribution to the Arctic convoys. At Dunkirk Britain narrowly escaped a humiliating defeat and an armistice with Germany or even an invasion.

    The decisive battles against Nazi Germany were of course fought by the USSR, with help from the UK and USA with supplies delivered by the Arctic convoys.

    , @Philip Owen
    To repeat my comments on another thread, 30 destroyers and 3 battleships with guns of 20 mile range would have destroyed panzers in column before they reached the cover of the town. Germans had about 300 tanks, maybe 200 operational. They could have lost them all to naval gunfire. The BEF was too weak to attack the Germans and the Germans were too weak to attack the BEF on the ground. The British heavy tanks were not bad but there were hardly any of them.

    Now I've seen the film I can understand why it is not a vehicle for Brexiteer triumphalism. The main Army character is a deserter who teams up with a French deserter. He could have reported to the beach HQ and returned to his regiment, as my father-in-law's company did. Instead he tries to queue jump and board a hospital ship. Actual medical orderlies would have stayed with their regiments.

    Most of the army hid in the dunes where the bombing was ineffective. They stayed in regimental order until called. They expected the evacuation to succeed.
    , @Steve Naidamast
    Britain also was quite deceitful as to how they handled the Dunkirk evacuation. While evacuation proceeded they were telling the French that they were re-positioning their troops leaving the French completely on their own to defend the retreating British. French soldiers who fought alongside the retreating British and landed up on the beaches with them were nevertheless refused rescue until all British troops were rescued.

    Britain and Poland were primarily responsible for WWII with a lot of help from their friend, FDR who was illegally partaking in the war efforts by helping to supply Britain's armaments programs.

    If you read the diplomatic histories of the inter-war period you get a completely different view of who was responsible for this atrocity but Western psychology will never allow that to presented in a rational and honest format to population or to students in school. You have to dig to find this information...
    , @iffen
    Completely distorted history of WW2 in the West and ignorant public.

    Why is this a problem for you?

    Are you worried that the loons will bomb Moscow?

    You ain't skeered are you?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  15. Parsifal says:

    Fun piece of historical trivia: Titanic’s Second Officer Charles Lightholler participated with his yacht in the Dunkirk evacuation. When one of the troops heard Lightholler was on the Titanic he wanted to jump overboard but another trooper said that if Lightholler survived the Titanic, he’ll survive anything so it’s all the more reason to stay. They made it safe back to England.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  16. anon says: • Disclaimer

    A Stalin may be the only way to save Britain, but he’d want to show up soon.

    Read More
    • Replies: @jacques sheete

    A Stalin may be the only way to save Britain, but he’d want to show up soon.
     
    All it takes is some money bags and, "Presto!," done deal. (Those cats can flip-flop on a dime.)
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  17. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer

    Zero Sympathy towards the British.

    They are getting what they deserve. The elite pushed globalism and multiculturalism and the average bloke was either too dumb to notice what was going on or was too busy trying to figure out how he could profit from it.

    Meanwhile the British took part in wrecking many many other cultures who just wanted to be left alone.

    Well guess what British people, you were a rotten people, and now you are reaping what you sowed.

    Read More
    • Agree: Beefcake the Mighty
    • Replies: @The True and Original David
    It's said that official British enmity toward Germany's industrial ascendancy in the last half of the 19th century was instrumental in fomenting WWI, which led inevitably to WW2.

    In any case, the West might well have been saved had Hitler defeated Britain.

    The "inglourious basterds" at Dunkirk were not fighting on the side of Western man; quite the opposite. But Hitler was merciful to them. Proving, once again, that good deeds are always punished.

    That we are invited to celebrate Dunkirk -is- the PC political agenda of this movie. People really think that anything coming out of Hollywood could be any different?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  18. delmas says:

    I think the main thrust of Christopher Nolan’s film comes across as the idea that when it gets down to the nut-cutting, all the fashionable diversity, virility bashing fads and shilly-shally relativism will prove their shallowness and worthlessness in combatting evil, and if there are ten good men left, they will have their finest hour.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  19. Looks like the text in the article has been posted twice.

    There were four companies of the Indian Army Service Corps who were at Dunkirk, of whom three servicemen were awarded the Indian Distinguished Service medal.

    http://dunkirk1940.org/index.php?&p=1_412

    “The Indian Distinguished Service Medal was the third-highest medal awarded to Indian forces after the Victoria Cross and the Indian Order of Merit. Three awards were made for services with the British Expeditionary Force in 1940. One was to junior officer Jemadar Maula Dad Khan for courage displayed in France; the citation reads:

    On 24 May 1940 when approaching Dunkerque, Jemadar Maula Dad Khan showed magnificent courage, coolness and decision. When his troop was shelled from the ground and bombed from the air by the enemy he promptly reorganised his men and animals, got them off the road and under cover under extremely difficult conditions. It was due to this initiative and the confidence he inspired that it was possible to extricate his troop without loss in men or animals.’”

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  20. If you run around the right circles, you will meet many immigrant Britons who you’d think were quintessential English if you were deprived of your sight. They are all over the Beeb day and night. The reflect well on the country, for the most part, and they would hardly engender any doubt about the country’s future if they weren’t so significantly outnumbered by teeming hordes who are the antithesis of Western Culture and assimilation to it.

    These latter are the folks Mr. Pringle’s interviewees ran into on the streets of Britain, not the polished types paraded by the Beeb and the elites as paragons of virtue, and it is easy to understand the resentment Peter voices here.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  21. @Priss Factor
    Diversity is like Venereal Disease.

    It might as well be called Diversyphilis or Globorrhea.

    Now, diversity per se is not the problem. All nations are diverse to some extent. Even in homogeneous nations, there is diversity if dialects and regions. And there can be good things arising from some diversity.

    The problem of what goes by 'diversity is our strength' or DIOS is that is a cancerous or viral process that NEVER STOPS. Enough is never enough.

    So, SOME Africans, Asians, and Muslims in London isn't enough. There must be more and more and more and more. Also, these minorities don't respect the host culture but make demands. Now, BBC is making history shows with blacks in white roles. Diversity even goes 'time machine' and alters past history like Stalin used to alter photos. Also, many whites get a virtue high from beating their chest about how they are infected with Diversyphilis.

    PC acts like HIV. It attacks the immune system.

    In any national order, patriots are most valuable for they are the guardians of what constitutes the nation in terms of identity/core ethnicity, territory, narrative, history, and culture. Patriots are the warriors, storytellers, guardians, and preservers. So, patriots must be highly regarded. Without them, the national order no longer has defenders.

    Likewise, an organism depends on immune system to survive. Immune system defends and sustains the organism. All around there are germs and stuff. Immune system must constantly resist and filter the hostile germs. Without such force, the organism will succumb to germs and toxins.

    What does HIV do? It attacks the immune system so that the organism cannot resist hostile germs and toxins, and gradually, the body succumbs to all sorts of infection. Indeed, even what were mild seeming infections keep festering and getting out of control.

    PC works the same way on nations. It attacks patriotism and patriotic forces, the very people most essential to protect and preserve the territory, ethnicity, history, and spirituality of the order. PC re-programs the organism so that it regards patriots as germs and toxins and tries to kill them off. And that weakens the national immune system and then tons of foreigners invade without resistance.

    The West has the money and technology to defend itself but it doesn't because PC has reprogrammed the Western mind to see patriots as germs/toxins while welcoming germs/toxins as the New Patriots. So, Africans, Muslims, and etc are to be welcomed as New Britons, New Irish, New Swedes, and New Germans while true European patriots are seen as 'far right toxic odious noxious rabid and virulent evil nazis'.

    David Horowitz used to run a alternative mag called Heterodoxy in the early 90s before internet became a big thing. It had a small audience but it could have done so much more if the net was big back then.

    Horowitz is a problematic figure, but he understood the dangers missed by most Cons because he'd been at the center of the New Left in the 60s. He knew them from inside out. He understood the radical mind like the back of his hand. And he warned National Review that nice guy Conservatism Inc is defenseless against this virulent form of ideology(that under Clinton would forge an alliance with Big Money).

    And all the things he warned about 'culture war' back then has come to be.

    http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/viewSubCategory.asp?id=337

    There was one satirical piece about how Hollywood is going to release old movies with blacks computerized over whites. It sounded outlandish then but now, we have BBC and Hollywood filling white roles with blacks in all these movies about european past.

    Coal-staining, not whitewashing, is the great crime of Hollywood.

    “Enough is never enough.”
    Without getting into the whole “germ” analogy, there is something to what you say. Enough seems never enough. A culture has a right to retain its substance & form. However, we live in times in which substance/form are relative, if not innately nebulous.
    At the conclusion of WW II the British people voted for a Labour government that delivered, as best it could, a social safety net. People wanted “something” for their sacrifice…because what WWII did do, was demonstrate that government, business & citizens, working for a COMMON good could SUCCEED. It’s THAT which has been drowned slowly in a bathtub over the last 40 odd years. We are back to the same class riven days of the 1890′s.
    Regardless of the deep state politics, average people believed their sacrifice meant something….what it meant was an intermission in business-as-usual….

    Read More
    • Replies: @Priss Factor
    Enough seems never enough. A culture has a right to retain its substance & form.

    It is not a matter of 'right'. It is a matter of passion. Such passion would be there if people were stilled and hardened with sense of history, identity, territory, and unity, or HITU.
    A people instilled with such passion will feel a 'natural' drive to defend their land and culture when they sense the threat.
    Lacking such passion, a people might still defend their people and culture out of a sense of duty and obligation. Even if they don't feel the passion, they might feel the weight of history and heritage, a sense of burden. It's like George Bailey wants to leave Bedford Falls. He has no passion for it. But he feels a sense of duty to his father and the community.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O4ne13Zft9Q

    But what if a people aren't instilled with HITU? What if they lack patriotic passion and fervor because the system doesn't imbue them with deep emotions about ethnos and narrative?
    Worse, what if they weren't even instilled with a sense of duty and obligation?

    Also, what if family culture is dead in a nation where sex before/outside marriage is high, where divorce is common, where single mothers are all over the place, where old people are sent to nursing homes to just die without anyone caring? Thus, a sense of continuity and roots have been lost. What if the main culture is dumb movies, trashy TV, mindless pop music, and sports dominated by ghastly Negroes?

    Then, they might not feel any passion about defending the order, the culture, the heritage.
    They might be ignorant of most of it. Or just regard it as museum piece, dead history that has no relevance to today. They might see the pursuit of momentary pleasure as the highest value. And in such vain-and-hedonistic society, homos will naturally gain cultural dominance since they are obsessed with egotism.

    But there is worse. What if the System, taken over by globo elites, instill or infect people with Diversyphilis and teach people that their nation was always a nation that 'welcomed' immigrants(or invaders). What if the System rewrites history so that white Britons of the past are portrayed as blacks or Hindus or Arabs? Indeed, to make a movie where all whites in the past were white is considered a thought-crime and culture-crime. What if the System says European migrants who made Britain in the distant past were just like African, Hindu, Muslim invaders of today. They are all the same.

    Then, the problem will not be the lack of patriotic passion but the virulence of anti-patriotic passion that rabidly favors alien parasitism. And that is what has happened to generations of Brits raised by radicals and 'progressives'.

    Worse, even among Britons who don't buy into PC and simply cannot muster any anti-patriotic passion, there is a totally misplaced sense of duty to the Other. Even though they dread diversyphilis and see all the dangers, they've been made to feel that it is the DUTY of white Britons to welcome the world to either atone for the past, to be compassionate to darkies, or celebrate diversity as an unconditional good.

    Consider Douglas Murray. He has no passion for PC. He feels some patriotic urges. But his sense of DUTY compels him to welcome Diversyphilis even as he knows it will destroy Europe and UK. Also, PC infected his mind to the extent that he wants a patriotism without 'racism'. But patriotism without sense of ethnos is ludicrous. Imagine Japan or Israel without a sense of ethnos.

    https://www.amren.com/features/2017/07/the-strange-death-of-europe-migrant-crisis-islam-terrorism/

    Of the economic migrants who are pushing into Europe, Mr. Murray writes, “Most of us do not want to eject most or many of them . . . .” He is aware of “send-them-back rhetoric” but calls it “ugly.” Is Mr. Murray content to be a passive chronicler of decline, or does he care enough to try to save Europe?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  22. mp says:

    People should be hung from lampposts—they should be burned alive—for what they’ve done to Britain.

    Um…what people are you talking about, Peter? Who needs to hang? I thought that problem was solved at Mezzegra, and the show trials at Nuremberg ? Are you telling us that the wrong people were executed? It’s time to get serious. Name the Jew and their fellow travelers. Otherwise, remain a clown.

    Read More
    • Replies: @attilathehen
    John Derbyshire needs to be strung up first. He married a Chinese woman and has Chinese offspring. He is an avid philosemite.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  23. Old fogey says:

    Excellent post. Please note that the first two paragraphs are repeated midway within the document – a simple editing problem.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  24. KenH says:

    The Jewish MSM doesn’t like any movies that contradict their false and misleading historical narrative that the West, in this case Britain, has always been heavily multiracial. Not only that but that Africans, Mexicans, Asians and Muslims are the very essence of who we are.

    The last thing they want is the younger generation learning that Britain was virtually 100% white and much more peaceful and cohesive than it is today with millions of third world barbarians. That is why there is carping and whining from the usual suspects about Dunkirk being “too white”.

    My considered reaction to Dunkirk: People should be hung from lampposts—they should be burned alive—for what they’ve done to Britain.

    Ditto for America, France, Sweden and Germany. And that will just be for starters.

    Read More
    • Replies: @SolontoCroesus

    My considered reaction to Dunkirk: People should be hung from lampposts . . . for what they’ve done to Britain.
     
    Churchill & FDR are already dead.
    Altho -- Mussolini's corpse was hung ---

    My considered reaction to Dunkirk: People should be . . . burned alive— for what they’ve done to Britain.
     
    The people who sought to ally with Britain and save European civilization WERE burned alive, by the British and the successor to European Christianity, the USA.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  25. Arclight says:

    The West has allowed an elite to take hold of academia, politics, and culture that believe that the penance for the perceived sins of the past must be the destruction of our civilization and the people who helped form it. There has been little pushback against this notion and so here we are.

    Although I had been hopeful when Trump was elected that we had a president that was committed to arresting our decline, so far his political instincts have been confused and ineffective, and I fear that in 2020 the left will be back in power with a renewed assault on America’s institutions.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  26. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer

    Incredibly, whites—that is to say, the British—are projected to go into a minority, in a land they have exclusively occupied for millennia

    Yes, they won’t be white. They won’t be Christian. They will traffic little English girls in sex slavery. They will create Sharia patrols and eventually a Sharia legal system. But hey, at least they’re not German-speaking, high-IQed blonds! A horrific thought and a reality which all those Englishmen died fighting against.

    Now the remnant of whites in the West have their sights on the last bastion of non-cuck, independent white Christians. Russia.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  27. To my mind the great betrayers of Post-war Britain, were the politicians (Attlee, McMillan, Churchill & Co.) who so readily hitched the British trailer to the US Bandwagon and followed it slavishly into the Cold War. Those and the media moguls who were a big part of that.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  28. iffen says:

    and no lead actors of color may rub some the wrong

    Well, it did have prominent roles for the French soldiers.

    And as for the PC narrative, most of the common soldiers were downright hurtful toward the Frogs, but of course not the upper class officer who stayed behind to aid in their evacuation.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  29. Dr. X says:

    People should be hung from lampposts

    A scene straight out of the Turner Diaries.

    What’s fascinating about the plot in the Turner Diaries, in which civilian disarmament and government-forced race mixing is central, is that it has largely come to fruition in the UK before it has in the U.S.

    But there will be no civil war or “Day of the Rope.” What Brimelow fails to recognize is that the elite consensus regarding racial egalitarianism and anti-nationalism was formed as a result of the very event he sees as Britain’s finest hour. World War II, in which whites committed racial fratricide and butchered each other by the tens of millions, betrayed the 19th century belief that whites were superior and more civilized than naked jungle savages.

    The evacuation at Dunkirk may have been a moment of national pride before 1970, but we oughtn’t forget that it was other whites trying to kill the BEF, who had gone from their secure island to the continent to defend someone else’s borders, not their own.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Avery
    {...who had gone from their secure island to the continent to defend someone else’s borders, not their own.}

    Didn't British BIF* leave their secure island a couple of centuries prior to create an empire over which the sun never set? It's not like it was the first time they had left the island....... And their imperial presence was rarely to defend someone else.

    Regarding ' defend someone else’s borders': I doubt very much Brits sent BEF to defend someone else's border. It was the case of "We fight them there, so we don't have to fight them here". Brits, for a couple centuries or so, got themselves involved in the European continental affairs because they always feared European continental powers being united. Brits, being on a resource poor island, always feared a united continental Europe could starve them. So were always creating conflict between the great powers of the continent.

    UK got itself involved in WW2 to prevent Nazi Germany from creating a Gross Germania in Europe, not because they gave a hoot about Poland. Which would most certainly have taken place had Hitler not invaded USSR.

    Notwithstanding the 'heroic' myth of Dunkirk, where Brits and French ran like chickens in front of the Panzers, and Hitler pretty much _let_ them escape at Dunkirk.
    _________
    * British Imperial Forces
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  30. anonymous says: • Disclaimer

    Social rot in Britain started from the top.

    The ‘elites’, or whatever one prefers to call them, are the culprits in all this. They’re the true believers and purveyors of the religion of PC-cult-think mind-rot. It’s something that’s been imposed on everyone else and has been mandated throughout the educational system to brainwash the younger people growing up in it, creating new generations of true believers. This was never due to any grassroots demand but has been a top-down imposition. It’s a problem throughout the world where the leadership class despise the average person and consider them to be merely fungible protoplasm. Is it too late for Britainistan or other countries such as the US or Germany? Perhaps, but lets not count someone out until the count of ten has been reached. It’s going to be close; bad times loom ahead. I’m not optimistic, however.

    Read More
    • Replies: @jacques sheete

    It’s a problem throughout the world where the leadership class despise the average person and consider them to be merely fungible protoplasm.
     
    Yup.
    , @CanSpeccy

    The ‘elites’, or whatever one prefers to call them, are the culprits in all this. They’re the true believers and purveyors of the religion of PC-cult-think mind-rot.
     
    The British elite and their European counterparts have hated the common people for at least 200 years. Hence as a character in Disreali's novel, Sybil, stated, there are:

    Two nations; between whom there is no intercourse and no sympathy; who are as ignorant of each other's habits, thoughts, and feelings, as if they were dwellers in different zones, or inhabitants of different planets; who are formed by a different breeding, are fed by a different food, are ordered by different manners, and are not governed by the same laws . . . . THE RICH AND THE POOR.
     
    The thing was, during the 19th and most of the 20th century the working classes were needed to operate the industrial machine and die for their country in wars among national elites. Yet even then, the elites debated how to cull the masses. Fabian socialists such as H.G. Wells and George Bernard Shaw, as well as Charles Darwin's son Francis, and many others talked about lethal chambers as a means to dispose of the unproductive. Trouble was, the Nazis gave gas chambers a bad name.

    But now, with manufacturing offshored and an increasing proportion of the remaining jobs being automated, the common people have become largely superfluous, and in any case they can be replaced by cheaper more subservient immigrant labor. At the same time, a practical mode of genocide has emerged: sex "education" which teaches every kind of sexual perversion while branding only reproduction as a vice, this combined with mass replacement immigration, which will make the Brits a minority in their own homeland by 2060.

    Now the common man of England sees his posterity destroyed, his job taken by an Asian or African or Middle-Easter coolie with no roots, no concept of rights, and long experience of, and submission to, a corrupt and tyrannical ruling class. All the while, the process of genocide is pushed forward by government and educational bureaucracies, and by the police, whileit is cheered on by cucks, ruling class traitors, the media and people like Corvinus.

    The powers of persuasion are overwhelming and unstoppable. It's game over for Britain, short of a nationalist dictator.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  31. iffen says:
    @Sergey Krieger
    No idea what this fuss is about. Brits were able to evacuate because Hitler still hoped to get along with them. Germans could get them all if an order were given. But it shows nicely how this machine works. Make some dramatic movies about even this shameful event in Britain history, ignore completely true great battles that turned the tide of war because those were fought by USSR and do it consistently over decades. And here we have what we have. Completely distorted history of WW2 in the West and ignorant public.

    Completely distorted history of WW2 in the West and ignorant public.

    Ignorant publican here.

    I guess this means that the people who won the Great Patriotic War all by their lonesome can’t make good movies.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Parsifal
    I recommend "Go and see" and "Only old men go to battle". Among others...
    , @Avery
    {...won the Great Patriotic War all by their lonesome can’t make good movies.}

    No they didn't win the GPW all by their lonesome: they won it by 80%some: that's the percentage of Wehrmacht they destroyed on the Eastern Front: a pretty healthy percentage.

    USSR/Russia made very good WW2 movies.
    Very realistic. Very brutal.
    Always showing massive KIA of Soviet troops, and Nazis as very capable.
    Authentic.
    Not like in American or British movies where a couple guys kill 1,000s of incompetent Germans, without nary a scratch on themselves.
    But the movies are in Russian, so.....

    In all fairness, movies are made here to make money, ROI.
    American movie going audiences would not be interested in what happened on the Eastern Front. They want to see Anglo-American guys doing heroic deeds.
    Very normal and natural.
    'Enemy at the Gates' did so-so (Budget $68 million. Box office $97 million), even after the Stalingrad story was distorted to appeal to American audiences.
    , @Sergey Krieger
    We did. But in Russian and for mostly internal use. Also, considering Russian character even in those movies that were shown in the West it was not about great battles but rather people like Ballad about soldier and few others. Anglo Saxon like to boast but in reality are not that good as history shows in military matters.
    , @EugeneGur

    the people who won the Great Patriotic War all by their lonesome
     
    Largely, yes - not 100%, perhaps, but about 80% would be acurate. Even your Churchill once said that you don't win wars by evacuations. Rushing through Europe when there are spoils to be collected and bombing cities into rubble is a nice military endeavors, but it is not what wins wars, either.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  32. @Priss Factor
    It's said that Nazi victory threatened the death to Western Civilization.

    Where do they get this? Sure, fvictorious Nazi Empire would have been evil, but the Nazis never threatened the core of Western Civilization except in Poland.

    Nazi's main threat were to Russian Slavs and Jews. Jews did play a key role in European Culture esp with Emancipation, but most of Western Civilization would be intact even without Jewish input.

    But Nazis did pose a real threat to Polish and then Russian civilization. Less to Poles because Nazis were half-convinced that Poles were fellow 'Aryans'. But it was hell for Russia. Hitler planned to raze Moscow and kill millions and enslave the rest. But then, going by today's hysteria about Russia, Russia, Russia, why should globalists be bothered by this? Globalists raped Russia real good in the 90s and then sought to destroy its culture with Homomania. Today, globalists say Putin is evil, Russia is the greatest threat to the world, etc. Those who call Putin 'new hitler' sound as crazed as hitler.

    Anyway, as evil as the Nazis were, they posed no threat to Core of Western Civilization. Nazis saw Scandies as fellow 'Aryans'. Even if Germans had invaded UK, most people would have been treated well and fairly. And Germans were pretty decent to the French(except Jews), much more so than the French were with their imperial subjects. And even though Hitler thought Italians weren't as good as northern Europeans, he admired Mussolini and wanted good relations with Italy. And Germany was for good relations with most Eastern European nations. With most European nations, Germans wanted dominance but didn't seek to tyrannize or exploit them.

    So, the only nations that were threatened by Germany in a big way were Poland and esp Russia.
    It would have been a great great crime if Nazis had destroyed Russia, but Russia was not part of 'Western Civilization'.

    When it came to the arts, letters, and music of most of Western history, the Nazis were admiring and reverent. Their contempt was for Jews and Russian Slavs. If anything, Hitler and Nazis had more respect for Western arts and culture than the modernists did who would embark on one radical attack after another on everything European in race, history, narrative, arts, expression, etc.

    Nazis can be blamed for lots of evil, but they were not a threat to Western Civilization unless one defines the West as Want of Diversity and Minority Priority.

    At any rate, a civilization doesn't vanish because an evil prevails over it. Romans had some evil emperors. China and Persia had some nutty tyrants. Russia was under evil Stalin, but Russia didn't vanish as civilization.

    Nazis were not like Germanic barbarian looters who had no use for arts and culture. If anything, Hitler's evil was he preferred arts & culture over human lives. A little humanism would have done him some good.

    Anyway, this stuff about how Nazis threatened Western Civilization is all the funnier coming from PC globalists whose plan for Europe is Diversity Cancer, mass invasion, race-mixing into Brazil-North-Africa, rap music as main music, Hollywood trash as main culture, homomaia as religion, and pornification of mainstream culture and even children's culture(just check out some Ariana Grande videos meant for young girls).

    Nazis would have been horrible for Russia, but a Nazi-conquered Britain would have been better than today's Britain and its dire future. Germans would have crushed British liberty, but they never would have threatened British race, culture, and history. And with a friendly government in place, the Germans might have left and restored sovereignty.

    Nazis were not uniform everywhere. If communists treated all peoples the same -- prole cattle though wrong class elements could be in big trouble --, the Nazis treated some people very well and treated others brutally depending on their ethnicity.
    So, Nazis posed little threat to Western Civilization but posed a real great threat to Russia.

    Nazis would have crushed democracy, but who says Europe needs democracy to be European or Western? After all, for most of Western history, there was NO democracy. And Polish experiment with democracy made it weak, and it was torn apart by stronger powers of Russia and Prussia.

    Nazis were evil and had to be defeated, but let's do away with the fiction that they posed a threat to Western Civilization. In their demented way, they were trying to save it from degeneracy. Alas, Germans were blind to the fact that their fuhrer himself was a pathological, a rabid dog barking against rabies.

    Hitler planned to raze Moscow and kill millions and enslave the rest.

    Given they were living under Communism, it would be a step up.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Avery
    {Given they were living under Communism, it would be a step up.}

    You consider living under whatever conditions a, quote, 'a step down' from being killed? Too bad the Red Army left any of you SS jackboots alive when they raised the Red Banner over the alleged "1,000 year Reich" and pissed on the ashes of the coward who had the notion that his alleged Master Race could exterminate the Slavic peoples and take their lands.

    Adolf got so Master F____ by those Untermenschen, that Germany was ruined forever. The psychologically damaged German people have voluntarily prostrated themselves against all sorts of invaders and are slowly being erased as a distinct ethnos.

    Heil Hitler!
    Sieg Heil!

    , @Priss Factor
    Given they were living under Communism, it would be a step up.

    LOL.

    Right, given Japanese were living under brutal military rule, good thing people of Hiroshima were liberated with the bomb.

    A step up ... to heaven.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  33. it would have been better for everyone white if hitler had won

    Read More
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    "it would have been better for everyone white if hitler had won..."

    Actually, it worked out for the best for white people when Hitler and Germany lost.
    , @TomSchmidt
    Leave aside the Jews. If Slavs are white, you're wrong.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  34. Avery says:
    @Dr. X

    People should be hung from lampposts
     
    A scene straight out of the Turner Diaries.

    What's fascinating about the plot in the Turner Diaries, in which civilian disarmament and government-forced race mixing is central, is that it has largely come to fruition in the UK before it has in the U.S.

    But there will be no civil war or "Day of the Rope." What Brimelow fails to recognize is that the elite consensus regarding racial egalitarianism and anti-nationalism was formed as a result of the very event he sees as Britain's finest hour. World War II, in which whites committed racial fratricide and butchered each other by the tens of millions, betrayed the 19th century belief that whites were superior and more civilized than naked jungle savages.

    The evacuation at Dunkirk may have been a moment of national pride before 1970, but we oughtn't forget that it was other whites trying to kill the BEF, who had gone from their secure island to the continent to defend someone else's borders, not their own.

    {…who had gone from their secure island to the continent to defend someone else’s borders, not their own.}

    Didn’t British BIF* leave their secure island a couple of centuries prior to create an empire over which the sun never set? It’s not like it was the first time they had left the island……. And their imperial presence was rarely to defend someone else.

    Regarding ‘ defend someone else’s borders’: I doubt very much Brits sent BEF to defend someone else’s border. It was the case of “We fight them there, so we don’t have to fight them here”. Brits, for a couple centuries or so, got themselves involved in the European continental affairs because they always feared European continental powers being united. Brits, being on a resource poor island, always feared a united continental Europe could starve them. So were always creating conflict between the great powers of the continent.

    UK got itself involved in WW2 to prevent Nazi Germany from creating a Gross Germania in Europe, not because they gave a hoot about Poland. Which would most certainly have taken place had Hitler not invaded USSR.

    Notwithstanding the ‘heroic’ myth of Dunkirk, where Brits and French ran like chickens in front of the Panzers, and Hitler pretty much _let_ them escape at Dunkirk.
    _________
    * British Imperial Forces

    Read More
    • Replies: @Dr. X

    Regarding ‘ defend someone else’s borders’: I doubt very much Brits sent BEF to defend someone else’s border.
     
    They most certainly did. They had treaty obligations to Poland and France. They were members of the League of Nations, which required them to engage in collective defense to uphold the Treaty of Versailles.

    UK got itself involved in WW2 to prevent Nazi Germany from creating a Gross Germania in Europe, not because they gave a hoot about Poland.
     
    And how would a "Gross Germania" on the Continent have affected an island empire with largely Third World colonies? It wouldn't have. Dumb move on the part of the British to interpose themselves onto the Continent.

    Which would most certainly have taken place had Hitler not invaded USSR.
     
    This shows a gross misunderstanding of WWII in Europe on your part. The entire purpose of Hitler launching W0rld War II in 1939 was to defeat the Soviet Union and "Jewish Bolshevism." Jewish communists, inspired and trained by Moscow, had launched revolutions in Berlin, Bavaria, and Hungary in 1919. Trotsky trained Bela Kuhn (Cohn), the Jewish communist who established the Hungarian Soviet. The Jewess Rosa Luxembourg led a communist coup in Berlin, and Jew Eugen Levine created the Bavarian Soviet before being shot to death by the Freikorps.

    You need to study some real history, not merely repeat propaganda cliches.

    , @Expletive Deleted

    Brits, being on a resource poor island, always feared a united continental Europe could starve them
     
    Resource-poor relative to which other European nations?

    This island is made mainly of coal and surrounded by fish.
    Only an organizing genius could produce a shortage of coal and fish at the same time.
    - Aneurin Bevan
     
    The rest is made of iron, copper and tin. The place fairly seethes with dairying, wool and malting barley, and the winters and summers are so pathetic and vague your cabbages will stand all year round.
    The only thing we're short of is timber. Have been since the Bronze Age or thereabouts. Extra food is imported via shipping, at which we have historically excelled. It's the Continental Powers with tiny coastlines that fear the blockade [Kiel Canal cough cough].
    , @Expletive Deleted
    Tanks held up because they outpaced their fuel bowsers. And then they started to break down, being highly precise and superb pieces of engineering which weren't easily ghetto-rigged. The most crucial factor was the lack of infantry support.
    http://www.strijdbewijs.nl/breakout/bocage.jpg
    Normandy bocage and hollow-ways isn't the Steppes. It's basically a narrow green tunnel, and heading over the tiny fields is like crossing a giant cattle grid. One Gitane-dragging beret-bonce could block a column with an IED or a bazooka and they'd never know he was there till it was too late, due to the infernal racket their beautiful heavy Panzers made. No infantry, no flank cover. No fuel, you're just a fancy pillbox. Which is why the generals "diplomatically" ignored Adolf's explicit orders to advance, for a bit, until those deficiencies were made good. Unlike him, they weren't stupid.
    Later statements suggesting it was for ethical considerations are simply a meme, and retconning by Hortler just before he sucked the Luger.
    , @Winnetou1889
    Yes, Hitler let them escape at Dunkirk. At least that's the German point of view. They admit that it was a great blunder. http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/dunkirk-75th-anniversary-real-reason-hitler-let-british-troops-go-1503201
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  35. nsa says:
    @Priss Factor
    Diversity is like Venereal Disease.

    It might as well be called Diversyphilis or Globorrhea.

    Now, diversity per se is not the problem. All nations are diverse to some extent. Even in homogeneous nations, there is diversity if dialects and regions. And there can be good things arising from some diversity.

    The problem of what goes by 'diversity is our strength' or DIOS is that is a cancerous or viral process that NEVER STOPS. Enough is never enough.

    So, SOME Africans, Asians, and Muslims in London isn't enough. There must be more and more and more and more. Also, these minorities don't respect the host culture but make demands. Now, BBC is making history shows with blacks in white roles. Diversity even goes 'time machine' and alters past history like Stalin used to alter photos. Also, many whites get a virtue high from beating their chest about how they are infected with Diversyphilis.

    PC acts like HIV. It attacks the immune system.

    In any national order, patriots are most valuable for they are the guardians of what constitutes the nation in terms of identity/core ethnicity, territory, narrative, history, and culture. Patriots are the warriors, storytellers, guardians, and preservers. So, patriots must be highly regarded. Without them, the national order no longer has defenders.

    Likewise, an organism depends on immune system to survive. Immune system defends and sustains the organism. All around there are germs and stuff. Immune system must constantly resist and filter the hostile germs. Without such force, the organism will succumb to germs and toxins.

    What does HIV do? It attacks the immune system so that the organism cannot resist hostile germs and toxins, and gradually, the body succumbs to all sorts of infection. Indeed, even what were mild seeming infections keep festering and getting out of control.

    PC works the same way on nations. It attacks patriotism and patriotic forces, the very people most essential to protect and preserve the territory, ethnicity, history, and spirituality of the order. PC re-programs the organism so that it regards patriots as germs and toxins and tries to kill them off. And that weakens the national immune system and then tons of foreigners invade without resistance.

    The West has the money and technology to defend itself but it doesn't because PC has reprogrammed the Western mind to see patriots as germs/toxins while welcoming germs/toxins as the New Patriots. So, Africans, Muslims, and etc are to be welcomed as New Britons, New Irish, New Swedes, and New Germans while true European patriots are seen as 'far right toxic odious noxious rabid and virulent evil nazis'.

    David Horowitz used to run a alternative mag called Heterodoxy in the early 90s before internet became a big thing. It had a small audience but it could have done so much more if the net was big back then.

    Horowitz is a problematic figure, but he understood the dangers missed by most Cons because he'd been at the center of the New Left in the 60s. He knew them from inside out. He understood the radical mind like the back of his hand. And he warned National Review that nice guy Conservatism Inc is defenseless against this virulent form of ideology(that under Clinton would forge an alliance with Big Money).

    And all the things he warned about 'culture war' back then has come to be.

    http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/viewSubCategory.asp?id=337

    There was one satirical piece about how Hollywood is going to release old movies with blacks computerized over whites. It sounded outlandish then but now, we have BBC and Hollywood filling white roles with blacks in all these movies about european past.

    Coal-staining, not whitewashing, is the great crime of Hollywood.

    Your hero, Horrorvitz, is the actual virus in your germ theory analogy. Started his traitorous Izzy-firster career as a typical vile jooie Trotskyite in the 1960s……morphing into an even more vile jooie neocon traitor in the 1980s as the cultural currents reversed.

    Read More
    • Agree: Z-man, Alden
    • Replies: @attilathehen
    He has black grandkids. How this degenerate can try and pass himself off as some kind of conservative trying to save the West is unreal.
    , @Priss Factor
    Your hero, Horrorvitz, is the actual virus in your germ theory analogy.

    You nutzi freak, I didn't say Horowitz is my hero. I said he understood something about the newly mutating 'left' that the Right failed to grasp. He understood how this 'culture war' would be fought in guerrilla and then institutional manner like the commies in China and Vietnam first used harassment and infiltration and then all-out assault and then the institutions.
    And he understood how demented and pathological it would become. And he understood how the 'left' didn't make a distinction between political/ideological and personal/cultural. Today, even comic books are used to promote tranny stuff. He knew because he'd been among the 60s radicals from the inside.

    Also, he understood how 60s radicalism would grow neo-stalinist.

    Though radicals in the 60s were nutty, there was naturalness about them. They were young, and young tend to be idealistic and passionate. Also, the rise of youth culture and rock culture and drugs and sex meant great changes regardless of radical politics. So, there was at least vitality and exuberance about 60s radicalism. Some of it was crazy and insane, but we could say they were young, passionate, and naive. Eventually, the fire would burn out.

    But then, the radicals didn't just learn their lessons but entered the very centers of power. So, even the saving grace of 60s radicalism -- excitement, energy, passion, and idealism -- were gone. Instead, it just became a grinding humorless neo-stalinist institutional game of power and as such, these radicals would make accommodations with Big Money as the neo-clergy. The rich would fund them, and the they would offer indulgences to the rich. They would also shape the minds of the rich in elite institutions. Like in Saudi Arabia where the rich monarchy cut a deal with the Wahabis.

    Horowitz saw the dangers, and in this regard, he was very different from company men like William Kristol and John Podhead.

    Now, the problem isn't Horowitz's Zionism. As a rightist, he feels nationalism about Jewishness. That was never the problem. The problem was 'nationalism for us, but not for you'. This is what David Brooks and William Kristol peddle.

    Horowitz wasn't part of that gang.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  36. Parsifal says:
    @iffen
    Completely distorted history of WW2 in the West and ignorant public.

    Ignorant publican here.

    I guess this means that the people who won the Great Patriotic War all by their lonesome can't make good movies.

    I recommend “Go and see” and “Only old men go to battle”. Among others…

    Read More
    • Replies: @Sergey Krieger
    I would recommend Red snow, They fought for motherland, Dawn's are quiet here too.
    , @Beefcake the Mighty
    I think you mean Come And See, which is only slightly more entertaining than watching paint dry.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  37. Avery says:
    @iffen
    Completely distorted history of WW2 in the West and ignorant public.

    Ignorant publican here.

    I guess this means that the people who won the Great Patriotic War all by their lonesome can't make good movies.

    {…won the Great Patriotic War all by their lonesome can’t make good movies.}

    No they didn’t win the GPW all by their lonesome: they won it by 80%some: that’s the percentage of Wehrmacht they destroyed on the Eastern Front: a pretty healthy percentage.

    USSR/Russia made very good WW2 movies.
    Very realistic. Very brutal.
    Always showing massive KIA of Soviet troops, and Nazis as very capable.
    Authentic.
    Not like in American or British movies where a couple guys kill 1,000s of incompetent Germans, without nary a scratch on themselves.
    But the movies are in Russian, so…..

    In all fairness, movies are made here to make money, ROI.
    American movie going audiences would not be interested in what happened on the Eastern Front. They want to see Anglo-American guys doing heroic deeds.
    Very normal and natural.
    ‘Enemy at the Gates’ did so-so (Budget $68 million. Box office $97 million), even after the Stalingrad story was distorted to appeal to American audiences.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Sergey Krieger
    USSR did won lonesome. Those 80% were the best of the best and when it mattered. After 1944 it did not matter how many Germans would Allies KIA. The matter was settled before they landed. Germany lost in the East and then it was just agony. USSR would finish this business regardless of western allies entering the war or not. Hence lonesome but with a little help in the end.
    , @Jeff77450
    I'm not disagreeing with you but in what way was the Stalingrad story distorted to appeal to American audiences? I've read _Stalingrad_ by Antony Beevor, which I thought was excellent, and so I know the basics. I liked _Enemy at the Gates_ but I learned many years ago the makers of historical films take liberties with the facts.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  38. Z-man says:

    What’s the age difference between you and your young Texan wife?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Delinquent Snail
    She graduated in 2006, he claims to have beed raised in the 1950s, so 25-35 years. Some might say he was robbing the craddle, i like to think shes robbing the grave.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  39. @iffen
    Completely distorted history of WW2 in the West and ignorant public.

    Ignorant publican here.

    I guess this means that the people who won the Great Patriotic War all by their lonesome can't make good movies.

    We did. But in Russian and for mostly internal use. Also, considering Russian character even in those movies that were shown in the West it was not about great battles but rather people like Ballad about soldier and few others. Anglo Saxon like to boast but in reality are not that good as history shows in military matters.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    That's because Anglos specialize in divide and conquer, just like the jews. And don't like to get their hands dirty unless they have guns and they are fighting against people who have spears.
    , @Wilkey
    "Anglo Saxon like to boast but in reality are not that good as history shows in military matters."

    Well there was that part about conquering North America. And Australia. And South Africa. And New Zealand. And winning Word War II. And World War I. And the Napoleonic Wars. And holding onto Wales and Scotland and Ireland for all so very long.

    How many European countries, for all their wars, can truly be said to have come out ahead in teritorrially terms? Even if its former colonies are no longer under its political control they are genuine extensions of its culture and, most importantly, its DNA. Militarily Britain's disadvantage is the same as its advantage - it is an island, and has to send forth its armies across an ocean - or at least a channel - to place them in battle.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  40. “My considered reaction to Dunkirk: People should be hung from lampposts—they should be burned alive—for what they’ve done to Britain.”
    while I think allowing mass migration from muslim countries and from subsaharan African countries was a huge mistake I`d still rather live in any European country in its current state than in a society where political enemies get burned alive or hung from lampposts.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Achmed E. Newman

    I`d still rather live in any European country in its current state than in a society where political enemies get burned alive or hung from lampposts.
     
    You won't be able to live long in any (western) European country in it's current state - that's the problem, Eric. The demographic and political situation is not static. If you and your family move there, 15 years later, you may wish people HAD been hanged from lampposts.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  41. @Parsifal
    I recommend "Go and see" and "Only old men go to battle". Among others...

    I would recommend Red snow, They fought for motherland, Dawn’s are quiet here too.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  42. Alden says:
    @jilles dykstra
    I have the same feeling about the Netherlands, my country no longer exists.
    We now need riot police when shortly before Deember 5 Sinterklaas arrives on a steam boat from Spain, on his white horse, Black Pete's accompanying him.
    Black Pete nowadays is a symbol of slavery, so colored Dutch demonstrate against him.

    In Austria a politicologist is writing his book Der Letzte Europäer, The Last European.
    Predictions based on current immigrants and the number of children they get is that in 25 years from now 40% of the European population will be Muslim.
    Long before that the present social state will be gone, even after ten years here some 90% of immigrants live of welfare.
    75% of those in the city of Utrecht who live on welfare have a migration background.

    Maybe a connection is that in Sept in Germany the second book about journalism will appear.
    The first one was by Udo Ulfkotte, Gekaufte Journalismus, hope I got the title right, translated Bought Journalism.
    The second one is Lügenpresse, Press of Lies.

    Every December we in America read about the disturbances caused by Sinterklaas and his servant black Pete.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  43. @Avery
    {...won the Great Patriotic War all by their lonesome can’t make good movies.}

    No they didn't win the GPW all by their lonesome: they won it by 80%some: that's the percentage of Wehrmacht they destroyed on the Eastern Front: a pretty healthy percentage.

    USSR/Russia made very good WW2 movies.
    Very realistic. Very brutal.
    Always showing massive KIA of Soviet troops, and Nazis as very capable.
    Authentic.
    Not like in American or British movies where a couple guys kill 1,000s of incompetent Germans, without nary a scratch on themselves.
    But the movies are in Russian, so.....

    In all fairness, movies are made here to make money, ROI.
    American movie going audiences would not be interested in what happened on the Eastern Front. They want to see Anglo-American guys doing heroic deeds.
    Very normal and natural.
    'Enemy at the Gates' did so-so (Budget $68 million. Box office $97 million), even after the Stalingrad story was distorted to appeal to American audiences.

    USSR did won lonesome. Those 80% were the best of the best and when it mattered. After 1944 it did not matter how many Germans would Allies KIA. The matter was settled before they landed. Germany lost in the East and then it was just agony. USSR would finish this business regardless of western allies entering the war or not. Hence lonesome but with a little help in the end.

    Read More
    • Replies: @iffen
    but with a little help in the end.

    Thanks for the shout-out; you're welcome.
    , @Thomas O. Meehan
    Without western allied material help, the USSR would have lost and lost badly. Soviet troops rode to battle on Studebaker trucks, running on American gas, while stuffing themselves with Spam and breat made from American wheat. The Soviets couldn't even supply themselves with telephone wire. Soviet fighters flew on high octain aviation gas. The Soviet airforce was suplemented with fighters, bombers and transports from the West.

    Bear in mind that the Brits and the US fought both Germany/Italy etc. and the empire of Japan. The soviets only joined the fight when Japan was collapsing. Before that they were happy to have a nonaggression pact with the Japanese.

    The people of the Soviet Union were fighting for their lives against a regime every bit as evil as their own. But without our help they would have been destroyed. Keepm that in mind before you brag about the great Russian people.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  44. Joe Wong says:
    @Priss Factor
    Diversity is like Venereal Disease.

    It might as well be called Diversyphilis or Globorrhea.

    Now, diversity per se is not the problem. All nations are diverse to some extent. Even in homogeneous nations, there is diversity if dialects and regions. And there can be good things arising from some diversity.

    The problem of what goes by 'diversity is our strength' or DIOS is that is a cancerous or viral process that NEVER STOPS. Enough is never enough.

    So, SOME Africans, Asians, and Muslims in London isn't enough. There must be more and more and more and more. Also, these minorities don't respect the host culture but make demands. Now, BBC is making history shows with blacks in white roles. Diversity even goes 'time machine' and alters past history like Stalin used to alter photos. Also, many whites get a virtue high from beating their chest about how they are infected with Diversyphilis.

    PC acts like HIV. It attacks the immune system.

    In any national order, patriots are most valuable for they are the guardians of what constitutes the nation in terms of identity/core ethnicity, territory, narrative, history, and culture. Patriots are the warriors, storytellers, guardians, and preservers. So, patriots must be highly regarded. Without them, the national order no longer has defenders.

    Likewise, an organism depends on immune system to survive. Immune system defends and sustains the organism. All around there are germs and stuff. Immune system must constantly resist and filter the hostile germs. Without such force, the organism will succumb to germs and toxins.

    What does HIV do? It attacks the immune system so that the organism cannot resist hostile germs and toxins, and gradually, the body succumbs to all sorts of infection. Indeed, even what were mild seeming infections keep festering and getting out of control.

    PC works the same way on nations. It attacks patriotism and patriotic forces, the very people most essential to protect and preserve the territory, ethnicity, history, and spirituality of the order. PC re-programs the organism so that it regards patriots as germs and toxins and tries to kill them off. And that weakens the national immune system and then tons of foreigners invade without resistance.

    The West has the money and technology to defend itself but it doesn't because PC has reprogrammed the Western mind to see patriots as germs/toxins while welcoming germs/toxins as the New Patriots. So, Africans, Muslims, and etc are to be welcomed as New Britons, New Irish, New Swedes, and New Germans while true European patriots are seen as 'far right toxic odious noxious rabid and virulent evil nazis'.

    David Horowitz used to run a alternative mag called Heterodoxy in the early 90s before internet became a big thing. It had a small audience but it could have done so much more if the net was big back then.

    Horowitz is a problematic figure, but he understood the dangers missed by most Cons because he'd been at the center of the New Left in the 60s. He knew them from inside out. He understood the radical mind like the back of his hand. And he warned National Review that nice guy Conservatism Inc is defenseless against this virulent form of ideology(that under Clinton would forge an alliance with Big Money).

    And all the things he warned about 'culture war' back then has come to be.

    http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/viewSubCategory.asp?id=337

    There was one satirical piece about how Hollywood is going to release old movies with blacks computerized over whites. It sounded outlandish then but now, we have BBC and Hollywood filling white roles with blacks in all these movies about european past.

    Coal-staining, not whitewashing, is the great crime of Hollywood.

    I hope the author would mean Winston Churchill, Robert Vansittart, and a gang of ruthless colonial imperialist warmongers are the “People Should be Hung from Lampposts, They Should be Burned Alive, for What They’ve Done to Britain.”

    Mind you, the British troops were in the foreign land, it is not right for the invader to bear such bitter feeling and victimhood sentiment by being kicked out of their occupied land. On the other hand people said the British imitates the Roman, while the American is born out the British; the Roman called destroying Carthaginian and salted their land “creating peace,” no wonder the American and the British go berserk when people kicks the American and British out of their homeland, and resort to bombing, killing and waterboarding on the fabricated phantom WMD allegation as humanitarian intervention to avenge their “humiliation.”

    Read More
    • Replies: @Achmed E. Newman
    Between the Russians and Chinese commenters here, I can't understand half of what people are saying. It may be somewhat annoying, but you all should think about turning grammar-check on. Just try to put up a comment that is not ALL underlined in wavy green, and we'd really appreciate it.

    (We have Daniel Cheih (sp?) on here as an example of how to write correctly - with great commentary, I might add - even while being Chinese. For Russian, there is a guy on Zerohedge named Boris Alotovkrap.)
    , @Expletive Deleted

    Mind you, the British troops were in the foreign land, it is not right for the invader to bear such bitter feeling and victimhood sentiment by being kicked out of their occupied land.
     
    My sides! AngloSaxon horde invades and occupies Normandy. Loyal German allies rally to the defence of the violated Dukedom of Normandy and the Kingdom of the Franks. Heathen Khaki Army repulsed with great loss and driven into the sea.
    Can I get a premiere ticket for that movie when it comes out please? Please don't just be another troll, I want you to really believe your assertions. Priceless.
    , @Priss Factor
    Mind you, the British troops were in the foreign land, it is not right for the invader to bear such bitter feeling and victimhood sentiment by being kicked out of their occupied land.

    Brits could be brutal, and this dark side has to be remembered. But no people did as much to transform the whole world in the past 300 yr, mostly for the good.

    So, on balance, the Brits owe the world nothing. They took but also gave.

    If not for European invasion of China, your mother would still have bound feet and you would be kissing Manchu butt.

    Also, who killed more Chinese than Mao?
    , @anon
    If only their was a logical point to anything you said sport.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  45. Dr. X says:
    @Avery
    {...who had gone from their secure island to the continent to defend someone else’s borders, not their own.}

    Didn't British BIF* leave their secure island a couple of centuries prior to create an empire over which the sun never set? It's not like it was the first time they had left the island....... And their imperial presence was rarely to defend someone else.

    Regarding ' defend someone else’s borders': I doubt very much Brits sent BEF to defend someone else's border. It was the case of "We fight them there, so we don't have to fight them here". Brits, for a couple centuries or so, got themselves involved in the European continental affairs because they always feared European continental powers being united. Brits, being on a resource poor island, always feared a united continental Europe could starve them. So were always creating conflict between the great powers of the continent.

    UK got itself involved in WW2 to prevent Nazi Germany from creating a Gross Germania in Europe, not because they gave a hoot about Poland. Which would most certainly have taken place had Hitler not invaded USSR.

    Notwithstanding the 'heroic' myth of Dunkirk, where Brits and French ran like chickens in front of the Panzers, and Hitler pretty much _let_ them escape at Dunkirk.
    _________
    * British Imperial Forces

    Regarding ‘ defend someone else’s borders’: I doubt very much Brits sent BEF to defend someone else’s border.

    They most certainly did. They had treaty obligations to Poland and France. They were members of the League of Nations, which required them to engage in collective defense to uphold the Treaty of Versailles.

    UK got itself involved in WW2 to prevent Nazi Germany from creating a Gross Germania in Europe, not because they gave a hoot about Poland.

    And how would a “Gross Germania” on the Continent have affected an island empire with largely Third World colonies? It wouldn’t have. Dumb move on the part of the British to interpose themselves onto the Continent.

    Which would most certainly have taken place had Hitler not invaded USSR.

    This shows a gross misunderstanding of WWII in Europe on your part. The entire purpose of Hitler launching W0rld War II in 1939 was to defeat the Soviet Union and “Jewish Bolshevism.” Jewish communists, inspired and trained by Moscow, had launched revolutions in Berlin, Bavaria, and Hungary in 1919. Trotsky trained Bela Kuhn (Cohn), the Jewish communist who established the Hungarian Soviet. The Jewess Rosa Luxembourg led a communist coup in Berlin, and Jew Eugen Levine created the Bavarian Soviet before being shot to death by the Freikorps.

    You need to study some real history, not merely repeat propaganda cliches.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Miro23

    The entire purpose of Hitler launching W0rld War II in 1939 was to defeat the Soviet Union and “Jewish Bolshevism.” Jewish communists, inspired and trained by Moscow, had launched revolutions in Berlin, Bavaria, and Hungary in 1919. Trotsky trained Bela Kuhn (Cohn), the Jewish communist who established the Hungarian Soviet. The Jewess Rosa Luxembourg led a communist coup in Berlin, and Jew Eugen Levine created the Bavarian Soviet before being shot to death by the Freikorps.
     
    This is all true that Hitler had a long term plan to invade the East, but finishing with Jewish Bolshevism was secondary since by 1941 Stalin had mostly completed the job already, having morphed from an employee of the Jewish Bolshevik leadership, to collaborator, to dictator and then to executioner.

    Hitler's main non-military topic of conversation while Barbarossa was underway was the post war organization of Germany's Empire in the East (Urals in the East to the Black Sea in the South) involving the physical destruction of Moscow and St Petersburg, the wholesale removal of Slavs from the Ukraine to make way for German only zones (the whole Black Sea coast), construction of Germans only autobahns across Greater Germany (Russia) and the large scale construction of exclusive German towns for German settlers with Slavs banished to a distance of 20km and being kept in a state of essential slavery. The plan was for a European land empire to rival the British Empire (which he admired) but run on much harsher lines.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  46. TheJester says:

    If I can follow the above narrative, the British won the battle for WWII … but then quickly lost the war for survival. The British held off an invasion by the Germans (close relatives in language, religion, history, and culture) only to be swallowed whole a few years later by an invasion from a basket of Third World peoples with alien languages, religions, cultures, and a significantly lower average IQ.

    At Dunkirk and throughout WWII, the British stood united as a people with purpose as they fought for their survival as a free people. However, they were never consulted about the follow-on invasion. The second invasion was quietly implemented by the Foreign Office and other government apparatchiks. It was undemocratic and, in practical terms, forthrightly treasonous.

    The new reality: London has a Muslim mayor. The country is filled with mosques and “no-g0″ areas policed by Muslim religious police enforcing Islamic-sanctioned social behaviors. Sharia Law has official status in British civil cases. Gangs of Muslim youth roam the streets beating up whites because they are white. Other Muslims traffick white teenage girls into drugs and prostitution. London is experiencing a brash of random acid attacks on innocent people. Female circumcision and honor killings are quietly tolerated.

    A short stint of occupation by the Wehrmacht in WWII might have been preferable to this reality. It is doubtful that Chancellor Hitler would have tolerated open borders and a massive invasion by alien peoples and cultures. Indeed, Hitler admired his British cousins and their empire. He, in fact, sought a peace treaty with Britain that would have given Britain a free hand in their overseas empire in return for the Germans having a free hand in Europe. He wanted a partnership, not conquest.

    The open question is, Why did the British fight WWII against enormous odds … only to quickly fold as gelded “cucks” to an invasion that is marking the end of Britain as a country and the British as a people? Losing their army at Dunkirk, suing Germany for peace, or suffering a short occupation would not have had such a disastrous outcome.

    So, in the final analysis, Dunkirk was a Pyrrhic victory. An uplifting story or fortitude and heroism that, in the final analysis, did little to protect the survival of Britain as a country and the British as a people.

    Read More
    • Agree: SMK
    • Replies: @ThreeCranes
    "The open question is, Why did the British fight WWII against enormous odds … only to quickly fold as gelded “cucks” to an invasion that is marking the end of Britain as a country and the British as a people?"

    Because during the war the propaganda ginned up by the Bernays inspired British Ministry of Information focused the people's attention on one single demonic enemy whereas today, the same ministry of disinformation uses its powers to diffuse and distract our awareness of our danger.
    , @Dr. X

    The British held off an invasion by the Germans (close relatives in language, religion, history, and culture) only to be swallowed whole a few years later by an invasion from a basket of Third World peoples... A short stint of occupation by the Wehrmacht in WWII might have been preferable to this reality.
     
    The Germans were never going to invade Britain. Sure, they had plans drawn up -- Operation Sea Lion. But militaries draw up all sorts of contingency plans that have no practical chance of seeing the light of day.

    Practically speaking, Germany as a land power had no tactical ability to actually accomplish such an invasion. Strategically, it was unnecessary. The grand German strategy was to conquer Eastern Europe and the USSR. Their only concern in the West was keeping France and Britain off their backs so that they didn't have to fight a two-front war when they launched Barbarossa, and this was largely accomplished between Dunkirk and D-Day.

    Indeed, Hitler wanted peace with the British once they were off the Continent... Rudolf Hess went on his secret flight to Britain to attempt to negotiate peace.

    Finally, I think you're presenting a false choice between "a short stint" of German occupation vs. being overrun by Third Worlders. France experienced a short German occupation, but today they're allowing themselves to be inundated by Third World Arabs, Muslims, and blacks.

    , @SMK
    Only an end to Muslim and African immigration, immediately, and mass deportations/expulsions, will save the UK and Western Europe. But that will never happen, of course. Even Douglas Murray, author of "The Strange Death of Europe," opposes a ban on Muslim and African immigration, and mass expulsions, and is contemptuous of the people and groups who'd enact such laws and policies and thus save the UK and Western Europe.
    , @James N. Kennett

    The open question is, Why did the British fight WWII against enormous odds … only to quickly fold as gelded “cucks” to an invasion that is marking the end of Britain as a country and the British as a people?

    So, in the final analysis, Dunkirk was a Pyrrhic victory.
     

    I'm not convinced that one follows from the other.

    Germany has overcompensated for its crimes in WWII, to the point that Germans have become ethno-masochistic. This was not inevitable: Japan committed grave atrocities of its own in the Pacific Theatre, but has managed to renounce militarism without abolishing the idea of Japan itself.

    The reaction of other European countries has been similar to that of Germany, though less intense. We follow the argument that the lessons of the Nazi era are not something that are unique to Germans (as criminals) and Jews (as victims), but rather are a hideous aspect of the human condition that can emerge anywhere given the right conditions ... but then we apply this lesson only to ourselves, and then only as possible perpetrators, not as possible victims.

    We try to renounce racism, but we keep just enough of it to believe that other races are untouched by the same Original Sin as ourselves.

    The Left welcomes Arab and African immigrants to Europe, while lecturing us about colonialism, imperialism, and slavery. It ignores the history of the immigrant cultures themselves, whose historic vices are not dissimilar to our own, and which continue in the form of brutal ethnic and tribal civil wars right up to the present day.

    This boneheaded narrative is the norm among the intellectual classes. If you ask, for example, why Pakistan is a poor country, the fact that it is a tribal, inbred, corrupt, and low-trust society is the wrong answer - and in fact an answer that makes you a racist. The only answer acceptable to the left-leaning intellectual is that the British colonised Pakistan and stole their wealth.

    I don't understand how we have fallen so low in only 70 years.

    , @anon
    Have to agree 100% with what you say. If the goal was to preserve the racial and cultural integrity of Britain then the two German wars were completely pointless and the real rape of Britain (non-whites arriving) should have been prevented at any cost.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  47. @Priss Factor
    Diversity is like Venereal Disease.

    It might as well be called Diversyphilis or Globorrhea.

    Now, diversity per se is not the problem. All nations are diverse to some extent. Even in homogeneous nations, there is diversity if dialects and regions. And there can be good things arising from some diversity.

    The problem of what goes by 'diversity is our strength' or DIOS is that is a cancerous or viral process that NEVER STOPS. Enough is never enough.

    So, SOME Africans, Asians, and Muslims in London isn't enough. There must be more and more and more and more. Also, these minorities don't respect the host culture but make demands. Now, BBC is making history shows with blacks in white roles. Diversity even goes 'time machine' and alters past history like Stalin used to alter photos. Also, many whites get a virtue high from beating their chest about how they are infected with Diversyphilis.

    PC acts like HIV. It attacks the immune system.

    In any national order, patriots are most valuable for they are the guardians of what constitutes the nation in terms of identity/core ethnicity, territory, narrative, history, and culture. Patriots are the warriors, storytellers, guardians, and preservers. So, patriots must be highly regarded. Without them, the national order no longer has defenders.

    Likewise, an organism depends on immune system to survive. Immune system defends and sustains the organism. All around there are germs and stuff. Immune system must constantly resist and filter the hostile germs. Without such force, the organism will succumb to germs and toxins.

    What does HIV do? It attacks the immune system so that the organism cannot resist hostile germs and toxins, and gradually, the body succumbs to all sorts of infection. Indeed, even what were mild seeming infections keep festering and getting out of control.

    PC works the same way on nations. It attacks patriotism and patriotic forces, the very people most essential to protect and preserve the territory, ethnicity, history, and spirituality of the order. PC re-programs the organism so that it regards patriots as germs and toxins and tries to kill them off. And that weakens the national immune system and then tons of foreigners invade without resistance.

    The West has the money and technology to defend itself but it doesn't because PC has reprogrammed the Western mind to see patriots as germs/toxins while welcoming germs/toxins as the New Patriots. So, Africans, Muslims, and etc are to be welcomed as New Britons, New Irish, New Swedes, and New Germans while true European patriots are seen as 'far right toxic odious noxious rabid and virulent evil nazis'.

    David Horowitz used to run a alternative mag called Heterodoxy in the early 90s before internet became a big thing. It had a small audience but it could have done so much more if the net was big back then.

    Horowitz is a problematic figure, but he understood the dangers missed by most Cons because he'd been at the center of the New Left in the 60s. He knew them from inside out. He understood the radical mind like the back of his hand. And he warned National Review that nice guy Conservatism Inc is defenseless against this virulent form of ideology(that under Clinton would forge an alliance with Big Money).

    And all the things he warned about 'culture war' back then has come to be.

    http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/viewSubCategory.asp?id=337

    There was one satirical piece about how Hollywood is going to release old movies with blacks computerized over whites. It sounded outlandish then but now, we have BBC and Hollywood filling white roles with blacks in all these movies about european past.

    Coal-staining, not whitewashing, is the great crime of Hollywood.

    A splendid and well-reasoned analogy, Priss Factor.
    Regrettably, it misses to mention The Tribe who did the most to inflict this pox upon us, The Tribe who secured their survival at the expense of the Allies sons, The Tribe who STILL use or sons (and a tiny few of our daughters) to fight their enemies.
    My father served in the RAF during WW2,(he got a 30-day deferment to his call up to build a one-room shack for my then 18 months old oldest brother and my pregnant mother after they were blitzed out of Clydebank, a town of 40.000 souls that had only SIX houses undamaged by the two-night blitz.
    Two uncles died in service.
    Was it worth it?
    Was it hell.
    They wished no harm to anyone of any race, like most Britons they were appalled by the way Blacks were treated in the US, but by the 80s,when Britain was beginning to be swamped by ever-more demanding, more criminal and ungrateful minorities, that was beginning to turn thin.
    They would be revolted and utterly amazed at what the Left and greedy business has done to destroy Britain.
    As it Talleyrand who wrote that “Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel”?
    That is true in some cases, but anti-patriotism (and active support of, or passive virtue -signalling of PC is the immediate refuge of the most malicious of many a modern scoundrel.

    Read More
    • Replies: @David In TN
    It was supposedly Samuel Johnson, not Talleyrand, who said "Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel."
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  48. @Anonymous
    Zero Sympathy towards the British.

    They are getting what they deserve. The elite pushed globalism and multiculturalism and the average bloke was either too dumb to notice what was going on or was too busy trying to figure out how he could profit from it.

    Meanwhile the British took part in wrecking many many other cultures who just wanted to be left alone.

    Well guess what British people, you were a rotten people, and now you are reaping what you sowed.

    It’s said that official British enmity toward Germany’s industrial ascendancy in the last half of the 19th century was instrumental in fomenting WWI, which led inevitably to WW2.

    In any case, the West might well have been saved had Hitler defeated Britain.

    The “inglourious basterds” at Dunkirk were not fighting on the side of Western man; quite the opposite. But Hitler was merciful to them. Proving, once again, that good deeds are always punished.

    That we are invited to celebrate Dunkirk -is- the PC political agenda of this movie. People really think that anything coming out of Hollywood could be any different?

    Read More
    • Replies: @The True and Original David
    Plus, the film is a back-handed slap at Russia. Russia defeated Germany. (US and British forces merely mopped up in the west.) In the Current Year, the film doesn't exactly disturb the anti-Russian campaign of the Deep State.

    From the standpoint of white interests, portraying and celebrating the Dunkirk losers as valiant little fighters 4 Democracy who are resisting Undemocratic Deplorableness is more than a bit reminiscent of Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign (which is still going, by the way). It's like Hillary voters - Harry Potter grokkers and Maury Povich Show guests - vs. Putin/Trump.

    Sure, there is a lot of white skin on the screen, to put the show over. (Most blacks couldn't be bothered to see this movie even if Denzel played Patton.) And sure, even Deep State mouthpieces can't help going off-message a little and interlarding their critical raves with reflexive grumbles about "lack of POC." But is this a pop culture victory for the white man, then? You tell me. I don't think so.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  49. Barnard says:
    @Diversity Heretic
    I think that it is ironic that some of the people who now say World War II was fought for nothing, were the very people who either made, or acquiesced in public policy decisions, in the 1960s through the 1980s (approximately the time that the "Greatest Generation" matured) that are at least partially reponsible for the population replacement we see today in Western Europe. "It all seemed like a good idea at the time!"

    The two world wars of the first half of the 20th Century altered the mindset of Europeans (including North American transplants) in ways that we are only now beginning to understand.

    Did these places have any way to stop it? Were there candidates they could have voted for that were running to repeal laws that opened up immigration? I think in large part, the elites pushed it through over their objections.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Rod1963
    Quite so. Your average white American in 1965 would not have supported the 1964 Immigration Act had many known about it.

    They didn't support forced busing either. They abandoned the cities to avoid having their children suffer at the hands of those black savages. Forced busing was the result of the elites using the courts to enforce social engineering on society

    Most of what constitutes race replacement was slipped under our collective noses since the elites had total control of the news in the U.S. up until the Internet matured enough to support alternative news sites. IOW we were kept in the dark.

    A lot was done via the courts.

    Politically we never had a say in immigration at the national level. Both sides worked for the elites and broke every promise they made to us once they got in. Some openly supported race replacement like McCain, Graham and Jeb Bush.

    The people who promote this s**t need to be fed to pit bulls.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  50. The British nation wreckers who opened up Britain to mass immigration from the former areas of the British Empire starting in 1948 were the evil rodents who started the demographic destruction of Britain.

    The American nation wreckers who passed the 1965 Immigration Act into law were the evil globalizers who started the demographic destruction of the United States.

    In 1990 the United States passed a law that dramatically increased legal immigration. This immigration increase was added to the massive increase of immigration caused by the 1965 Immigration Act. In 1997 Tony Blair opened up the mass immigration floodgates into Britain. This added to the mass immigration of Third Worlders that had started in the late 1940s.

    The baby boomers saw the destruction caused by the mass immigration and mass importation of Third Worlders into Britain and the United States, but they either did nothing or pushed for more nation-wrecking immigration.

    The baby boomers are not to blame for the nation-wrecking 1965 Immigration Act, that is true. The baby boomers were not the dumb bastards that got the American Empire bogged down in Vietnam either.

    It was the generations born before 1924 that got the disastrous 1965 Immigration Act passed into law. LBJ was born in 1908. All the way with LBJ — right off the mass immigration invasion cliff.

    Tom Brokaw’s “Greatest Generation” crap is just a smokescreen to cover up all the evil horseshit done by people like Brokaw and his ilk. “Greatest Generation” of nation wreckers is more like it.

    Read More
    • Agree: anarchyst, Alden
    • Replies: @geokat62

    The American nation wreckers who passed the 1965 Immigration Act into law were the evil globalizers who started the demographic destruction of the United States.
     
    A little evidence to support your assertion:

    Jewish Involvement in Shaping American Immigration Policy, 1881-1965: A Historical Review

    Kevin MacDonald

    California State University-Long Beach

    This paper discusses Jewish involvement in shaping United States immigration policy. In addition to a periodic interest in fostering the immigration of co-religionists as a result of anti-Semitic movements, Jews have an interest in opposing the establishment of ethnically and culturally homogeneous societies in which they resideas minorities. Jews have been at the forefront in supporting movements aimed at altering the ethnic status quo in the United States in favor of immigration of non-European peoples. These activities have involved leadership in Congress, organizing and funding anti-restrictionist groups composed of Jews and gentiles, and originating intellectual movements opposed to evolutionary and biological perspectives in the social sciences.
     
    An excerpt from p. 300:

    A congruent opinion is expressed by prominent Jewish social scientist and political activist Earl Raab' who remarks very positively on the success of revised American immigration policy in altering the ethnic composition of the United States since 1965. Raab notes that the Jewish community has taken a leadership role in changing the Northwestern European bias of American immigration policy (1993a, p. 17), and he has also maintained that one factor inhibiting anti-Semitism in the contemporary United States is that "(a)n increasing ethnic heterogeneity, as a result of immigration, has made it even more difficult for a political party or mass movement of bigotry to develop" (1995, p. 91). Or more colorfully:

    The Census Bureau has just reported that about half of the American population will soon be non-white or non-European. And they will all be American citizens. We have tipped beyond the point where a Nazi-Aryan party will be able to prevail in this country. We [i.e., Jews] have been nourishing the American climate of opposition to bigotry for about half a century. That climate has not yet been perfected, but the heterogeneous na- ture of our population tends to make it irreversible—and makes our constitutional constraints against bigotry more practical than ever (Raab, 1993b, p. 23).
     
    Indeed, the "primary objective" of Jewish political activity after 1945 "was ... to prevent the emergence of an anti-Semitic reactionary mass movement in the United States" (Svonkin 1997,1998).
     
    , @Achmed E. Newman
    I don't think it's very helpful to try to break it down into "this generation did this." and "this generation did that." There are the same types who want to control people and/or ruin their way of life, call 'em Commies, Globalists, progressives, the cntrl-left, or whatever, in each generation. I don't think there'd be enough lampposts for the whole Baby Boomer generation, anyway. The millennials would build more, but they first would have to find a lamppost manufacturing and installation "APP" for that.
    , @Rev. Spooner
    Rubbish, tosh, racist crap. The American Landmass is usurped from the natives. The only way to justify it is to say "Might is right". You cannot justify it any other way. Once you agree to this, then you agree to the law of the jungle.
    The Europeans, after plundering the world and losing their colonies, discovered "Ethics". They loved their own rhetoric. After setting up the UN, they drafted laws that showed them as Noble and Enlightened people.
    But an Empire, any empire, has to be brutally honest.
    These hollow European claims are being challenged today by the reality of the refugee influx.
    The flood of refugees and the dissatisfaction of the populace
    The European politician still clings 'European values; while the general public is being dumbed down.
    The migrant population in France, UK, Holland etc., were initially imported to do jobs that the whites were unwilling to do. These people, along with a small minority like doctors, nurses and then IT coolies were all beneficial to the local economies.
    20 years went by without any mass migration with a steady and manageable immigrant stream.
    So what changed?
    Let me list the reasons. FUCKING AROUND IN PLACES YOU DON'T NEED TO.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  51. Wade says:
    @anony-mouse
    1/ A bit of a complication. There may have been no non-Whites at Dunkirk, but there were lots of them in Burma, Singapore and Hong Kong, and there had been many in the trenches in the previous go-round.

    2/ Wasn't it the Dunkirk generation who began the opening of the doors. Between 1945 and Powell's speech who was doing the voting?

    Yes, but as Brimelow states:

    Nearly 400,000 Britons died. Millions more were scarred by the experience, physically and mentally.

    I often wonder whether all the crazy far left political assaults on the home team in the west are due precisely to the fact that WWII took the lives of so many of the brave leaving us with proportionately more people predisposed to cowardice.

    I’m sure among those 400,000 would have arisen many civic leaders and perhaps some top notch political leaders who unfortunately died to protect Britain from invaders.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  52. Durruti says:

    Hate to Rain on your parade:

    The British Expeditionary Force of 250,000 heavily armed soldiers war poorly led. Its commanders did not intend to resist the German Army. They abandoned their positions in Belgium and opened the Belgian and French Armies to flanking moves by the advancing and more mobile German attackers.

    The British, who suffered few casualties from actual combat, were only able to effectively retreat, because of the dogged, and brave resistance of the almost completely surrounded Belgian and French armies.

    As the British Divisions waited for rescue at Dunkirk, (and abandoned 95% of their military equipment, the French troops held the perimeter (under orders from their superiors), so that the British, the BEF could escape.

    History According to Jewish Hollywood (The Official Fairy Tale – Repeated ad Nauseum)

    As a History Prof., I can testify that our texts continue to insist that it was the Belgian Army surrender that opened the flanks of the British Army and forced it to retreat – in the early days of World War II. The texts continue with a fallback criticism of the lack of military prowess of the French. A careful check shows they have their chronology wrong.

    The Movie is Shit:

    It is not until one reads the writings of Winston Churchill, that you encounter the admission that Britain could (and would) not reliably battle the Axis until General Montgomery had assumed Command in North Africa, and that was not until late 1942. By then, the British Ruling Elite, and the American Elite, and their Jewish Controllers, had decided, with the Jewish Marxist Lemonists, to crush the Casino Trumpies – er Nasties in the Center, and Rule all, in the Name of the Rothschilds, and the lovely boy who marries his Grandmother/teacher, and the Chocolate store owner, and the German lady who hates her flag, and the Londoner who is a Muslim, and the French Comedian who is banned..

    My dad was a Belgian: He served in the Belgian & American Armies. Taught me Patriotism. He is buried in the American cemetery in Farmingdale LI.

    The coffee is wearing off.

    My girlfriend wants sex.

    I’m not in the mood.

    Durruti

    For the Anarchist Collective

    Read More
    • Replies: @Astuteobservor II
    wow this is new. thanks for sharing. and yes, you are 100% right that is exactly what I learned back in school.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  53. iffen says:
    @Sergey Krieger
    USSR did won lonesome. Those 80% were the best of the best and when it mattered. After 1944 it did not matter how many Germans would Allies KIA. The matter was settled before they landed. Germany lost in the East and then it was just agony. USSR would finish this business regardless of western allies entering the war or not. Hence lonesome but with a little help in the end.

    but with a little help in the end.

    Thanks for the shout-out; you’re welcome.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Sergey Krieger
    It was a whisper. Just a reminder of reality so that you won't get carried away.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  54. @Priss Factor
    Diversity is like Venereal Disease.

    It might as well be called Diversyphilis or Globorrhea.

    Now, diversity per se is not the problem. All nations are diverse to some extent. Even in homogeneous nations, there is diversity if dialects and regions. And there can be good things arising from some diversity.

    The problem of what goes by 'diversity is our strength' or DIOS is that is a cancerous or viral process that NEVER STOPS. Enough is never enough.

    So, SOME Africans, Asians, and Muslims in London isn't enough. There must be more and more and more and more. Also, these minorities don't respect the host culture but make demands. Now, BBC is making history shows with blacks in white roles. Diversity even goes 'time machine' and alters past history like Stalin used to alter photos. Also, many whites get a virtue high from beating their chest about how they are infected with Diversyphilis.

    PC acts like HIV. It attacks the immune system.

    In any national order, patriots are most valuable for they are the guardians of what constitutes the nation in terms of identity/core ethnicity, territory, narrative, history, and culture. Patriots are the warriors, storytellers, guardians, and preservers. So, patriots must be highly regarded. Without them, the national order no longer has defenders.

    Likewise, an organism depends on immune system to survive. Immune system defends and sustains the organism. All around there are germs and stuff. Immune system must constantly resist and filter the hostile germs. Without such force, the organism will succumb to germs and toxins.

    What does HIV do? It attacks the immune system so that the organism cannot resist hostile germs and toxins, and gradually, the body succumbs to all sorts of infection. Indeed, even what were mild seeming infections keep festering and getting out of control.

    PC works the same way on nations. It attacks patriotism and patriotic forces, the very people most essential to protect and preserve the territory, ethnicity, history, and spirituality of the order. PC re-programs the organism so that it regards patriots as germs and toxins and tries to kill them off. And that weakens the national immune system and then tons of foreigners invade without resistance.

    The West has the money and technology to defend itself but it doesn't because PC has reprogrammed the Western mind to see patriots as germs/toxins while welcoming germs/toxins as the New Patriots. So, Africans, Muslims, and etc are to be welcomed as New Britons, New Irish, New Swedes, and New Germans while true European patriots are seen as 'far right toxic odious noxious rabid and virulent evil nazis'.

    David Horowitz used to run a alternative mag called Heterodoxy in the early 90s before internet became a big thing. It had a small audience but it could have done so much more if the net was big back then.

    Horowitz is a problematic figure, but he understood the dangers missed by most Cons because he'd been at the center of the New Left in the 60s. He knew them from inside out. He understood the radical mind like the back of his hand. And he warned National Review that nice guy Conservatism Inc is defenseless against this virulent form of ideology(that under Clinton would forge an alliance with Big Money).

    And all the things he warned about 'culture war' back then has come to be.

    http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/viewSubCategory.asp?id=337

    There was one satirical piece about how Hollywood is going to release old movies with blacks computerized over whites. It sounded outlandish then but now, we have BBC and Hollywood filling white roles with blacks in all these movies about european past.

    Coal-staining, not whitewashing, is the great crime of Hollywood.

    My idea of Diversity is dating a Canadian.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  55. Durruti says:

    For those of you still counting.

    The withdrawal – cowardly retreat of the 250,000 BEF Eliminated a front of Half a Million+ armed troops that were – in place – facing the German Army. [Belgian 400,000 British 250,000, French 150,000+ Dutch 100,000-had just surrendered]

    This absence of 1/2 a million armed troops, with their equipment abandoned, allowed the unsullied, fresh German armies, to sweep, directly, almost undisturbed, into Paris.

    But don’t let the FACTS interfere with your preconceptions! or Jewish Hollywood brainwashing mis education!

    The most surprised by the ease of their victory were, in order, Hitler, Stalin, and the entire German Higher Army command, who were prepared for a serious slogging match comparable to WWI. Specially, as the Maginol Line (not present in WWI) and Alsace Lorraine (not in French possession in WWI), were in place. Hitler and his advisers were almost catatonic (positively), and at odds at what to do with their victory. Does anyone recall Hess’ visit to England? His visit was an END-Run around the Rothschilds.

    Where is my Vikidin?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  56. EugeneGur says:
    @iffen
    Completely distorted history of WW2 in the West and ignorant public.

    Ignorant publican here.

    I guess this means that the people who won the Great Patriotic War all by their lonesome can't make good movies.

    the people who won the Great Patriotic War all by their lonesome

    Largely, yes – not 100%, perhaps, but about 80% would be acurate. Even your Churchill once said that you don’t win wars by evacuations. Rushing through Europe when there are spoils to be collected and bombing cities into rubble is a nice military endeavors, but it is not what wins wars, either.

    Read More
    • Replies: @iffen
    Rushing through Europe

    Yes, that was part of our only one front strategy. Never mind that it stretched from Europe thru Africa and into the Pacific. And thanks to the Red Army sweeping through the Imperial Army culls in Manchuria at the early date of August 1945, the Japanese Empire was brought to its knees, no thanks to Midway, Iwo, Guadalcanal, Philippines, etc., etc., etc.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  57. iffen says:
    @EugeneGur

    the people who won the Great Patriotic War all by their lonesome
     
    Largely, yes - not 100%, perhaps, but about 80% would be acurate. Even your Churchill once said that you don't win wars by evacuations. Rushing through Europe when there are spoils to be collected and bombing cities into rubble is a nice military endeavors, but it is not what wins wars, either.

    Rushing through Europe

    Yes, that was part of our only one front strategy. Never mind that it stretched from Europe thru Africa and into the Pacific. And thanks to the Red Army sweeping through the Imperial Army culls in Manchuria at the early date of August 1945, the Japanese Empire was brought to its knees, no thanks to Midway, Iwo, Guadalcanal, Philippines, etc., etc., etc.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  58. @anony-mouse
    1/ A bit of a complication. There may have been no non-Whites at Dunkirk, but there were lots of them in Burma, Singapore and Hong Kong, and there had been many in the trenches in the previous go-round.

    2/ Wasn't it the Dunkirk generation who began the opening of the doors. Between 1945 and Powell's speech who was doing the voting?

    Your first point is absolutely correct, and it was not really acknowledged enough for many years. The Western Desert also had many Indian (i.e. what was then India, Pakistan, Ceylon, etc.)
    Many fought well, and they undoubtedly helped defeat Rommel.
    It may surprise many that the British media and political Establishment have been ever more wacist to another ethic group who played a very large part not only with The Eighth Army in North Africa, but in The Battle of Britain. They have been completely airbrushed out of the modern historical recollection.
    I knew, because my Dad, and two uncles were in various theatres of war in WW2, plus I grew up and later worked surrounded by WW2 veterans.
    I really only noticed how shamefully this ethic group had been treated when I recently read Stephen Bungay’s excellent account “Alemein”and discovered how many had answered the call to arms.
    It wasn’t those who came from what was then India.
    It wasn’t those who came from Africa.
    It wasn’t those who came from The Caribbean.

    It was those who came from South Africa and Rhodesia.
    White South Africans and Rhodesians, of course, and therefore modern day untouchables.
    Most Indian troops had joined The army pre-war for the usual reasons—three squares a day, a career, maybe, to travel or to stay out of jail to, or joined because the sought adventure, etc.but the three squares alone was a huge incentive in India then. Comparatively few joined during the war, save when the Japs were knocking on the door at Imphal.
    Like almost all soldiers, because they were already in the Army pre-war, they went where they were ordered to go, although a fair few Indians became Jhats—they fought for the invading Japanese, and most Indian politicians were ambivalent about which side to jump.
    Quite rightly, they wanted what was best, in their opinion, for Indians, and independence was the quid pro pro they demanded and no doubt the examples of Japanese behaviour in Manchuria, Indonesia , Hong Kong or Malaya, etc helped make up their minds.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Pachyderm Pachyderma
    This paen is dedicated to the blood, sweat and tears of sacrifices made by the Whites; who asked you to bring up the half naked fakirs of the Indian Subcontinent here and now, regardless of their contributions? Are you a fair minded simpleton or something?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  59. @The True and Original David
    It's said that official British enmity toward Germany's industrial ascendancy in the last half of the 19th century was instrumental in fomenting WWI, which led inevitably to WW2.

    In any case, the West might well have been saved had Hitler defeated Britain.

    The "inglourious basterds" at Dunkirk were not fighting on the side of Western man; quite the opposite. But Hitler was merciful to them. Proving, once again, that good deeds are always punished.

    That we are invited to celebrate Dunkirk -is- the PC political agenda of this movie. People really think that anything coming out of Hollywood could be any different?

    Plus, the film is a back-handed slap at Russia. Russia defeated Germany. (US and British forces merely mopped up in the west.) In the Current Year, the film doesn’t exactly disturb the anti-Russian campaign of the Deep State.

    From the standpoint of white interests, portraying and celebrating the Dunkirk losers as valiant little fighters 4 Democracy who are resisting Undemocratic Deplorableness is more than a bit reminiscent of Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign (which is still going, by the way). It’s like Hillary voters – Harry Potter grokkers and Maury Povich Show guests – vs. Putin/Trump.

    Sure, there is a lot of white skin on the screen, to put the show over. (Most blacks couldn’t be bothered to see this movie even if Denzel played Patton.) And sure, even Deep State mouthpieces can’t help going off-message a little and interlarding their critical raves with reflexive grumbles about “lack of POC.” But is this a pop culture victory for the white man, then? You tell me. I don’t think so.

    Read More
    • Replies: @The True and Original David
    In short, the movie is a Deep State stinker with the usual diversity wisely stripped out to impress the goobers. Just another enlistment movie.

    I'm surprised there aren't Army recruiting tables set up in the theater lobbies. (Perhaps there are, somewhere.) It would be timely thing to do....
    , @Wilkey
    "Plus, the film is a back-handed slap at Russia. Russia defeated Germany."

    Russia, eh? Russia was not a sovereign nation in 1940. It was part of the USSR. At that time it was allied with the Third Reich, and would continue to be allied with the Third Reich for another year, until Hitler launched Operation Barbarossa. If Stalin hadn't foolishly decapitated his military and allowed Mannerheim to utterly embarrass him in Finland then the Soviets might have remained Hitler's ally throughout the war.

    In short, the USSR got zero mention in "Dunkirk." So far as the Russians are concerned that was all for the better, because nothing that could have been said about them in a movie set entirely in a one week period in 1940 would have been nice.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  60. The main reason that I comment anonymously under a username is the same reason that Mr. Brimelow would be wise not to return( even on an uncheduled stop-over) to Britain:
    What we have witten, however reasoned and logical they might be, however truthful they might be, is regarded by the British State as “hate speech” and thus likely to result in incarceration.
    Treasure your Ist and Second Amendments, Americans.
    Use the First in Preference to the Second, but use’em or lose ‘em, the Left want to rob you of them.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  61. Jake says:
    @utu
    that America can be saved from this terrible fate

    It's more far gone than Britain. Always was. It all started with slavery.

    WRONG!

    Slavery does not cause PC.

    ‘It’ began with the Judaizing heresy that was Anglo-Saxon Puritanism. That heresy first and foremost meant that Elite WASPs would promote philoSemitism. Judaizing heresy leads inevitably to a culture that facilitates Jews, who, being Jews, will eventually come to be the managing partner.

    America’s problem was not slavery; it was the WASP culture of the northeastern Elites.

    The WASPs who forged Modern England and the UK and the British Empire were not merely philoSemitic products of a Judaizing heresy. They also despised the vast majority natives of the British Isles.

    The start was Anglo-Saxon Puritianism.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  62. geokat62 says:
    @Charles Pewitt
    The British nation wreckers who opened up Britain to mass immigration from the former areas of the British Empire starting in 1948 were the evil rodents who started the demographic destruction of Britain.

    The American nation wreckers who passed the 1965 Immigration Act into law were the evil globalizers who started the demographic destruction of the United States.

    In 1990 the United States passed a law that dramatically increased legal immigration. This immigration increase was added to the massive increase of immigration caused by the 1965 Immigration Act. In 1997 Tony Blair opened up the mass immigration floodgates into Britain. This added to the mass immigration of Third Worlders that had started in the late 1940s.


    The baby boomers saw the destruction caused by the mass immigration and mass importation of Third Worlders into Britain and the United States, but they either did nothing or pushed for more nation-wrecking immigration.

    The baby boomers are not to blame for the nation-wrecking 1965 Immigration Act, that is true. The baby boomers were not the dumb bastards that got the American Empire bogged down in Vietnam either.

    It was the generations born before 1924 that got the disastrous 1965 Immigration Act passed into law. LBJ was born in 1908. All the way with LBJ — right off the mass immigration invasion cliff.

    Tom Brokaw’s “Greatest Generation” crap is just a smokescreen to cover up all the evil horseshit done by people like Brokaw and his ilk. “Greatest Generation” of nation wreckers is more like it.

    The American nation wreckers who passed the 1965 Immigration Act into law were the evil globalizers who started the demographic destruction of the United States.

    A little evidence to support your assertion:

    Jewish Involvement in Shaping American Immigration Policy, 1881-1965: A Historical Review

    Kevin MacDonald

    California State University-Long Beach

    This paper discusses Jewish involvement in shaping United States immigration policy. In addition to a periodic interest in fostering the immigration of co-religionists as a result of anti-Semitic movements, Jews have an interest in opposing the establishment of ethnically and culturally homogeneous societies in which they resideas minorities. Jews have been at the forefront in supporting movements aimed at altering the ethnic status quo in the United States in favor of immigration of non-European peoples. These activities have involved leadership in Congress, organizing and funding anti-restrictionist groups composed of Jews and gentiles, and originating intellectual movements opposed to evolutionary and biological perspectives in the social sciences.

    An excerpt from p. 300:

    A congruent opinion is expressed by prominent Jewish social scientist and political activist Earl Raab’ who remarks very positively on the success of revised American immigration policy in altering the ethnic composition of the United States since 1965. Raab notes that the Jewish community has taken a leadership role in changing the Northwestern European bias of American immigration policy (1993a, p. 17), and he has also maintained that one factor inhibiting anti-Semitism in the contemporary United States is that “(a)n increasing ethnic heterogeneity, as a result of immigration, has made it even more difficult for a political party or mass movement of bigotry to develop” (1995, p. 91). Or more colorfully:

    The Census Bureau has just reported that about half of the American population will soon be non-white or non-European. And they will all be American citizens. We have tipped beyond the point where a Nazi-Aryan party will be able to prevail in this country. We [i.e., Jews] have been nourishing the American climate of opposition to bigotry for about half a century. That climate has not yet been perfected, but the heterogeneous na- ture of our population tends to make it irreversible—and makes our constitutional constraints against bigotry more practical than ever (Raab, 1993b, p. 23).

    Indeed, the “primary objective” of Jewish political activity after 1945 “was … to prevent the emergence of an anti-Semitic reactionary mass movement in the United States” (Svonkin 1997,1998).

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  63. @The True and Original David
    Plus, the film is a back-handed slap at Russia. Russia defeated Germany. (US and British forces merely mopped up in the west.) In the Current Year, the film doesn't exactly disturb the anti-Russian campaign of the Deep State.

    From the standpoint of white interests, portraying and celebrating the Dunkirk losers as valiant little fighters 4 Democracy who are resisting Undemocratic Deplorableness is more than a bit reminiscent of Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign (which is still going, by the way). It's like Hillary voters - Harry Potter grokkers and Maury Povich Show guests - vs. Putin/Trump.

    Sure, there is a lot of white skin on the screen, to put the show over. (Most blacks couldn't be bothered to see this movie even if Denzel played Patton.) And sure, even Deep State mouthpieces can't help going off-message a little and interlarding their critical raves with reflexive grumbles about "lack of POC." But is this a pop culture victory for the white man, then? You tell me. I don't think so.

    In short, the movie is a Deep State stinker with the usual diversity wisely stripped out to impress the goobers. Just another enlistment movie.

    I’m surprised there aren’t Army recruiting tables set up in the theater lobbies. (Perhaps there are, somewhere.) It would be timely thing to do….

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  64. iffen says:

    RE: The PC Narrative

    Don’t lock your doors (borders) to keep out dangerous people because you will only traumatize them further and they should not be held responsible (PTSD) for responding to your provocations by committing manslaughter (not even an unkind word about that).

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  65. Anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Sergey Krieger
    No idea what this fuss is about. Brits were able to evacuate because Hitler still hoped to get along with them. Germans could get them all if an order were given. But it shows nicely how this machine works. Make some dramatic movies about even this shameful event in Britain history, ignore completely true great battles that turned the tide of war because those were fought by USSR and do it consistently over decades. And here we have what we have. Completely distorted history of WW2 in the West and ignorant public.

    Evacution from Dunkirk as well as ‘strange war’ (broken Western promise to defend Poland) before are clear examples of match-fixing in WW2. Hitler was all the way playing with the rest of the West, that’s why not too much resistance was observed, and too much waffen-SS from France, Belgium etc. volunteered. Hitler’s empire was in fact a prototype of European Union, and Nazi ideology was only a concentrated, ultimate ideology of the West. Hopefully, the Russian bayonet destroyed the nefarious dreams. The D-day was, in fact, an attempt of the West to save chunks of Europe from USSR – obvious winner already, and to steal some spoils (e.g. nuclear and rocket techs). Western mythology still tries to save inexistent private Ryan. Besides this, Dunkirk as a massive loss of obsolete weaponry and vehicles was beneficial to British and American manufacturers.

    Read More
    • Replies: @El Dato

    Nazi ideology was only a concentrated, ultimate ideology of the West. Hopefully, the Russian bayonet destroyed the nefarious dreams.
     
    Just what.

    The SOVIET bayonet and the NAZI bayonet were equal except that one was intensely internationalist and one was intensely nationalist. Deal with it.

    Russian? Well they have their own agenda. Post-WWI would have needed more Russians, less Soviets.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  66. Will you consent to be governed by the Hindu-Jamaican POTUS Kamala Harris?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  67. Jeff77450 says:
    @Avery
    {...won the Great Patriotic War all by their lonesome can’t make good movies.}

    No they didn't win the GPW all by their lonesome: they won it by 80%some: that's the percentage of Wehrmacht they destroyed on the Eastern Front: a pretty healthy percentage.

    USSR/Russia made very good WW2 movies.
    Very realistic. Very brutal.
    Always showing massive KIA of Soviet troops, and Nazis as very capable.
    Authentic.
    Not like in American or British movies where a couple guys kill 1,000s of incompetent Germans, without nary a scratch on themselves.
    But the movies are in Russian, so.....

    In all fairness, movies are made here to make money, ROI.
    American movie going audiences would not be interested in what happened on the Eastern Front. They want to see Anglo-American guys doing heroic deeds.
    Very normal and natural.
    'Enemy at the Gates' did so-so (Budget $68 million. Box office $97 million), even after the Stalingrad story was distorted to appeal to American audiences.

    I’m not disagreeing with you but in what way was the Stalingrad story distorted to appeal to American audiences? I’ve read _Stalingrad_ by Antony Beevor, which I thought was excellent, and so I know the basics. I liked _Enemy at the Gates_ but I learned many years ago the makers of historical films take liberties with the facts.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  68. @utu
    that America can be saved from this terrible fate

    It's more far gone than Britain. Always was. It all started with slavery.

    No many nation s have survived slavery, it started with making slaves niggers slaves at that citizens and then giving women the vote

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  69. Beckow says:
    @Priss Factor
    It's said that Nazi victory threatened the death to Western Civilization.

    Where do they get this? Sure, fvictorious Nazi Empire would have been evil, but the Nazis never threatened the core of Western Civilization except in Poland.

    Nazi's main threat were to Russian Slavs and Jews. Jews did play a key role in European Culture esp with Emancipation, but most of Western Civilization would be intact even without Jewish input.

    But Nazis did pose a real threat to Polish and then Russian civilization. Less to Poles because Nazis were half-convinced that Poles were fellow 'Aryans'. But it was hell for Russia. Hitler planned to raze Moscow and kill millions and enslave the rest. But then, going by today's hysteria about Russia, Russia, Russia, why should globalists be bothered by this? Globalists raped Russia real good in the 90s and then sought to destroy its culture with Homomania. Today, globalists say Putin is evil, Russia is the greatest threat to the world, etc. Those who call Putin 'new hitler' sound as crazed as hitler.

    Anyway, as evil as the Nazis were, they posed no threat to Core of Western Civilization. Nazis saw Scandies as fellow 'Aryans'. Even if Germans had invaded UK, most people would have been treated well and fairly. And Germans were pretty decent to the French(except Jews), much more so than the French were with their imperial subjects. And even though Hitler thought Italians weren't as good as northern Europeans, he admired Mussolini and wanted good relations with Italy. And Germany was for good relations with most Eastern European nations. With most European nations, Germans wanted dominance but didn't seek to tyrannize or exploit them.

    So, the only nations that were threatened by Germany in a big way were Poland and esp Russia.
    It would have been a great great crime if Nazis had destroyed Russia, but Russia was not part of 'Western Civilization'.

    When it came to the arts, letters, and music of most of Western history, the Nazis were admiring and reverent. Their contempt was for Jews and Russian Slavs. If anything, Hitler and Nazis had more respect for Western arts and culture than the modernists did who would embark on one radical attack after another on everything European in race, history, narrative, arts, expression, etc.

    Nazis can be blamed for lots of evil, but they were not a threat to Western Civilization unless one defines the West as Want of Diversity and Minority Priority.

    At any rate, a civilization doesn't vanish because an evil prevails over it. Romans had some evil emperors. China and Persia had some nutty tyrants. Russia was under evil Stalin, but Russia didn't vanish as civilization.

    Nazis were not like Germanic barbarian looters who had no use for arts and culture. If anything, Hitler's evil was he preferred arts & culture over human lives. A little humanism would have done him some good.

    Anyway, this stuff about how Nazis threatened Western Civilization is all the funnier coming from PC globalists whose plan for Europe is Diversity Cancer, mass invasion, race-mixing into Brazil-North-Africa, rap music as main music, Hollywood trash as main culture, homomaia as religion, and pornification of mainstream culture and even children's culture(just check out some Ariana Grande videos meant for young girls).

    Nazis would have been horrible for Russia, but a Nazi-conquered Britain would have been better than today's Britain and its dire future. Germans would have crushed British liberty, but they never would have threatened British race, culture, and history. And with a friendly government in place, the Germans might have left and restored sovereignty.

    Nazis were not uniform everywhere. If communists treated all peoples the same -- prole cattle though wrong class elements could be in big trouble --, the Nazis treated some people very well and treated others brutally depending on their ethnicity.
    So, Nazis posed little threat to Western Civilization but posed a real great threat to Russia.

    Nazis would have crushed democracy, but who says Europe needs democracy to be European or Western? After all, for most of Western history, there was NO democracy. And Polish experiment with democracy made it weak, and it was torn apart by stronger powers of Russia and Prussia.

    Nazis were evil and had to be defeated, but let's do away with the fiction that they posed a threat to Western Civilization. In their demented way, they were trying to save it from degeneracy. Alas, Germans were blind to the fact that their fuhrer himself was a pathological, a rabid dog barking against rabies.

    Nazis were also planning to remove, or exterminate over time, the Czechs. They murdered 20% of Belorussians, and they did a fairly convincing genocide on Serbs. We can quibble where the mythical “West” starts and where it ends, but I would say that Prague is probably in it, and so is Beograd. If you add up the European nations that Nazis wanted gone one way or another, you get about 40% of white European population. Almost all in the east.

    How is that consistent with ‘Nazis not threatening European civilisation’?

    The problem is the same: Western Europeans seem to hate the white eastern Slavs. Not all by any means, but the general instinct is always there. Nazis were just an extreme case, and were more open about it. What we see today in US, German, French or British media with regard to Russia (and sometimes also Poland or Hungary) is something that would never – ever – be said about any other group. Try to substitute any other group, from Irish to Chinese, from Arabs to Africans, this level of public and media hysteria would never be allowed to flourish. But when it comes to Russia it is ok. At some point, if you “Westerners” cannot police your own, aren’t you really passively supporting this hysteria? These politicians get voted in, the media is your media – they represent you.

    This seems a replay of Nazism, on that I agree with you. But where are the voices of reason? Why should a ‘civilisation’ capable of this level of hatred and hypocrisy be saved anyway? You are misty-eyed about Dunkirk. Good. But at the same time you muse openly about ‘wiping Moscow off the face of earth’ and how that would not be such a tragedy. Well, when next Dunkirk comes, I can see the despised white easterners not giving a damn. Those are the fruits of hundreds of years of quiet and not so quiet hatred.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Priss Factor
    "Nazis were also planning to remove, or exterminate over time, the Czechs....
    How is that consistent with ‘Nazis not threatening European civilisation’?"

    If true, that is horrible. But, there is more to Western Civ than Czech freedom.
    After all, Brits sometimes treated the drunken Irish like savages. But it didn't mean end of British Civ.
    The crazy Thirty Years War killed 1/3 of Germans. But it didn't end German civilization.
    Swedes once invaded Poland and caused much havoc. But that didn't end Western Civ.
    Moors once had Spain and Turks once had Greece and much of Balkans. That didn't end Western Civ.

    Nazis would have set things back, but they would not have destroyed the core of Western Civ. Their main threat was to Slavs(with their own great civilization) and Jews(with their own great culture).

    Nazis had to be defeated for their great crimes against Slavs and Jews, but it's wrong to say they were a threat to the Western Core. If anything, their pathological obsession with it made them arrogant and aggressive.
    Anyway, PC and globalism are far greater threats to the Western Core today.

    Some might argue that Nazis nullified Western Civilization by acting cruel and inhuman. So, even if Hitler wanted to save European peoples(except Slavs) and arts & culture, his brutality negated Western values.
    But using this logic, Western Civilization died long ago when Spanish did horrible things to natives of New World, Anglos wiped out Aborigines, Belgians killed millions of Congolese, and Chinese were forced to buy and get addicted on opium.
    , @German_reader

    and they did a fairly convincing genocide on Serbs.
     
    They got a lot of help with that from Croatians though (and to a lesser extent from Bosniaks and Albanians).
    I agree with your main point though, given German intentions towards the Slavic peoples it's absurd to claim Nazi Germany was defending European civilization.
    , @Wally
    What a load of baseless Zionist propaganda recited like a parrot, or more than likely by another lying Zionist.
    Reads like something from the creepy supremacist Jew, Martin Gilbert.

    Of course you can't back up any of it, History Channel for you all the way.

    "Some stories are true that never happened."
    - Elie Wiesel

    There were the ‘Nazis’ with the mythological '6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers' and there were the ‘Nazis’ without the mythological ’6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers’.

    The '6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers' are scientifically impossible frauds.
    see the 'holocaust' scam debunked here:
    http://codoh.com
    No name calling, level playing field debate here:
    http://forum.codoh.com


    "One should not ask, how this mass murder was made possible. It was technically possible, because it happened. This has to be the obligatory starting-point for any historical research regarding this topic. We would just like to remind you: There is no debate regarding the existence of the gas chambers, and there can never be one."
    - endorsed by 34 "reputable historians" and published in the French daily Le Monde on February 21, 1979

    “Ach,” he said, “we’ve often fantasized about drawing up an indictment against Adolf Hitler himself. And to put into that indictment the major charge: the Final Solution of the Jewish question in Europe, the physical annihilation of Jewry. And then it dawned upon us, what would we do? We didn’t have the evidence.”
    - "holocaust historian" Raul Hilberg, from https://youtu.be/2q51wqEE1fM
     

    , @Jake
    "The problem is the same: Western Europeans seem to hate the white eastern Slavs."

    That is not quite it. The Spanish and French, for example, have no history of labeling slaves sub-human or even inherently inferior and thus in need of superior Romance people's conquering, so the Slavs allowed to survive can be serfs.

    Germans are the source. Germanic culture is the problem. Germans on the Continent want to force Slavs to be their permanent serf class. Anglo-Saxons (Angles and Saxons were German tribes) want the same for Celts. Cultural and linguistic Germans have destroyed far more European cultures and languages than the rest of the world combined.

    Add 'faith only' and 'once saved always saved' and Luther's intense hatred of all things Latin as somehow cheating poor innocent Germans, and you are certain to see Germanic onslaughts to destroy as much of European civilization as is required for Germans to hold the One Ring to rule them all.

    Oh yes - and Yiddish is German, just a Judaized dialect of German, for a reason, the same one that meant Oliver Cromwell would immediately jump into bed with Jews: Germanic culture and Jews mix easily and naturally.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  70. Jeff77450 says:

    Mr. Brimelow, great article, many thanks. I look forward to seeing _Dunkirk_ but it wouldn’t appeal to *my* Texas wife so I probably won’t see it until it comes to pay-per-view.

    I heartily agree: A great many blatant traitors who have facilitated the mass invasion & rape of the West need to be strung-up like Mussolini. Let’s begin with Angela Merkel although she’s actually a Johnny-come-lately to this travesty.

    Sad that the West didn’t collectively heed John Enoch Powell’s timely & prescient warning in 1968 when it still wasn’t too late.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  71. Peter I think you will get your wish and live to see it. I doubt trump will survive but I think the rough beast is on its way and there is an inevitable reckoning. The left in its arrogance has summoned it believing themselves to be the arc of history but reality is the arc of history and they a mere 500 year blip. They have had ample time to avoid what will come Im so sure of this now i relish their every punch, My only regret is I may be too old to participate but it will be fun and terrible to behold. You should be proud, Im sure long ago you wondered if you were on a fools errand but your work was a necessary precondition whose utility has not yet reached its apex not even close, but we are close in time. Things collapse very very slowly then all at once,

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  72. Miro23 says:
    @Dr. X

    Regarding ‘ defend someone else’s borders’: I doubt very much Brits sent BEF to defend someone else’s border.
     
    They most certainly did. They had treaty obligations to Poland and France. They were members of the League of Nations, which required them to engage in collective defense to uphold the Treaty of Versailles.

    UK got itself involved in WW2 to prevent Nazi Germany from creating a Gross Germania in Europe, not because they gave a hoot about Poland.
     
    And how would a "Gross Germania" on the Continent have affected an island empire with largely Third World colonies? It wouldn't have. Dumb move on the part of the British to interpose themselves onto the Continent.

    Which would most certainly have taken place had Hitler not invaded USSR.
     
    This shows a gross misunderstanding of WWII in Europe on your part. The entire purpose of Hitler launching W0rld War II in 1939 was to defeat the Soviet Union and "Jewish Bolshevism." Jewish communists, inspired and trained by Moscow, had launched revolutions in Berlin, Bavaria, and Hungary in 1919. Trotsky trained Bela Kuhn (Cohn), the Jewish communist who established the Hungarian Soviet. The Jewess Rosa Luxembourg led a communist coup in Berlin, and Jew Eugen Levine created the Bavarian Soviet before being shot to death by the Freikorps.

    You need to study some real history, not merely repeat propaganda cliches.

    The entire purpose of Hitler launching W0rld War II in 1939 was to defeat the Soviet Union and “Jewish Bolshevism.” Jewish communists, inspired and trained by Moscow, had launched revolutions in Berlin, Bavaria, and Hungary in 1919. Trotsky trained Bela Kuhn (Cohn), the Jewish communist who established the Hungarian Soviet. The Jewess Rosa Luxembourg led a communist coup in Berlin, and Jew Eugen Levine created the Bavarian Soviet before being shot to death by the Freikorps.

    This is all true that Hitler had a long term plan to invade the East, but finishing with Jewish Bolshevism was secondary since by 1941 Stalin had mostly completed the job already, having morphed from an employee of the Jewish Bolshevik leadership, to collaborator, to dictator and then to executioner.

    Hitler’s main non-military topic of conversation while Barbarossa was underway was the post war organization of Germany’s Empire in the East (Urals in the East to the Black Sea in the South) involving the physical destruction of Moscow and St Petersburg, the wholesale removal of Slavs from the Ukraine to make way for German only zones (the whole Black Sea coast), construction of Germans only autobahns across Greater Germany (Russia) and the large scale construction of exclusive German towns for German settlers with Slavs banished to a distance of 20km and being kept in a state of essential slavery. The plan was for a European land empire to rival the British Empire (which he admired) but run on much harsher lines.

    Read More
    • Replies: @ANONymous

    Hitler’s main non-military topic of conversation while Barbarossa was underway was the post war organization of Germany’s Empire in the East . . . The plan was for a European land empire to rival the British Empire (which he admired) but run on much harsher lines.
     
    Source??
    , @KenH

    Hitler’s main non-military topic of conversation while Barbarossa was underway was the post war organization of Germany’s Empire in the East (
     
    People have been making these claims the last several weeks but never consider that the Soviet Union murdered and imprisoned more of its own people than any nation in history. Twenty million is a conservative estimate. They murdered or deported over 500K Volga Germans, who were invited into Russia in the 18th century, to slave labor camps in the fall of 1941.

    The Soviet gulag system resumed shortly after WWII as did retribution against anyone who opposed them, so it wasn't as if Eastern Europe and Soviet Russia returned to being a bucolic land of freedom, peace and plenty after the war. If Hitler or others within his inner circle were truly planning on a widespread colonization of the East then it wouldn't have been worse than what Lenin and Stalin had already inflicted on the hapless peoples of Eastern Europe, the Baltic states and Russia both before and after WWII.

    It seems it's only "worse" because Nazi ideology was objectionable (i.e., belief that Jews were congenitally evil and in Slavic inferiority). A cold blooded murderer and criminal like Stalin is accorded more respect presumably because he was not preoccupied with race and was an equal opportunity murderer.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  73. http://quillette.com/2017/07/18/neurodiversity-case-free-speech/

    Eccentricity used to be a real individual quality when society was sober, mature, and conformist. True eccentricity emerged despite social pressures. As such, it wasn’t enough to be merely eccentric. Eccentrics had to justify the worth of being ‘different’ in the arts, letters, or sciences. Old UK was like that. Proper and prim but full of talented eccentrics of wit… like Oscar Wilde and Aldous Huxley.

    Today, eccentricity is less individualistic and more institutionalized. As such, just being weird, perverse, or degenerate is enough for you to be hailed as special and wonderful. Your weirdness doesn’t have to be justified with talent, wit, or brilliance. It is hailed just for being weird or even demented. So, we end up with homomania and 50 genders and fatso body positivity and tattoos. In the past, homos felt compelled to justify their ‘difference’ with talent. These days, homos are culturally and intellectually lazy as they demand celebration as heroes and worship as gods merely for their perversion and deviance. They are now like pigs wallowing in mud.

    Worse, even people without eccentric qualities try to win ‘cool’ Weirdness pokemon points because ‘eccentricity’ has been institutionalized. After all, it’s the Schools and media that push tranny and homo and 50 genders thing. So, even squares, dullards, and ‘lamos’ get green/pink hair, get piercings, get tattoos, indulge in sexual deviancy like pegging & cucking, praise homos/trannies to high heaven, etc. Because people who are naturally conformist and square adopt institutionalized eccentricity, weirdness went from matter of individual liberty to an agenda of new conformism of trying to force everyone to embrace the New Normal.

    Btw, I can see how tattoos, piercings, green hair, and 50 genders stuff is useful to PC.
    PC is really about people being obedient followers, teachers’ pets, and servile dogs. The central command of big media and academia decide all the ‘answers’, and everyone else is supposed to agree and obey. People are not supposed to notice things or think on their own. The Power is supposed to serve as their eyes, ears, and brains.

    One problem: People don’t want to think of themselves as dumb servile dogs playing roll over and fetch. They want to think of themselves as ‘free-thinking’ and ‘creative.
    So, PC throws these PC-tards the bone of imaginary-identity whereby PC idiots can play around with ever increasing gender identities as ‘intellectualism’ and tattooes as ‘creativity’. It’s all nonsense and poses no threat to the Power, and it creates the illusion among PC drones that they are really free-thinking and creative since they get to ‘choose’ who they ‘really are’… among the useless 50 or 500 genders. And oh my, isn’t she soooooooooo creative since she got green hair and a steel thru her nose?

    This way, dogs on leash are made to see themselves as free coyotes. Also, the leash has been painted with homo ‘rainbow’ colors, so the dogs don’t see it as leash but sacred necklace.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  74. @Erik Sieven
    "My considered reaction to Dunkirk: People should be hung from lampposts—they should be burned alive—for what they’ve done to Britain."
    while I think allowing mass migration from muslim countries and from subsaharan African countries was a huge mistake I`d still rather live in any European country in its current state than in a society where political enemies get burned alive or hung from lampposts.

    I`d still rather live in any European country in its current state than in a society where political enemies get burned alive or hung from lampposts.

    You won’t be able to live long in any (western) European country in it’s current state – that’s the problem, Eric. The demographic and political situation is not static. If you and your family move there, 15 years later, you may wish people HAD been hanged from lampposts.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  75. I, as always when Hitler is the subject, see a lot of nonsense.
    Anyone who read detailed accounts on the attack on Poland, the occupation of Norway, the beating of France, and the attack on Russia, knows that Germany was not at all prepared for war.
    Hitler’s big mistake was to let himself be provoked to attack Poland, after making a deal with Stalin.
    Thereafter he was no longer in control.
    One thing lead to another.

    Read More
    • Agree: Beefcake the Mighty
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  76. @utu
    that America can be saved from this terrible fate

    It's more far gone than Britain. Always was. It all started with slavery.

    Russia had serfs.
    China had slaves.

    So, why don’t they have race problems like the US?

    Because Russian serfs were Russian and Chinese slaves were Chinese. So, when the system was eradicated, the once-serfs or once-slaves could be like everyone else.

    In contrast, the slaves were black in America. So, when black slaves were freed, they were no longer slaves but still black, and THAT was the problem. Slavery or no slavery, blacks remained stronger, more muscular, more aggressive, more psychopathic, louder, booty-shaking, and bigger-donged.
    In a way, end of slavery caused more problems for whites since stronger and more aggressive blacks could now run free and kick the white boy’s ass and get white girls.

    Blackness, not slavery, was the main problem. We see this in EU and Australia today. These blacks come as free men but they act much like crazy American blacks. Why? They are black.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simon_Mol

    Mol tried to turn Poland into Moland by sticking his dong into jungle-feverized Polish womenfolk. Polish women are known to be skanks.

    Suppose whites had enslaved other whites in America. Or the Chinese. Once freed, white ex-slaves would have melded in with other whites. Once freed, ex-slave Chinese would have looked up to bigger stronger whites and tried to fit in, like Mexican peasants used to saying ‘si, senor’.

    Even if 400,000 blacks had been brought over as free people, they would have caused the same problems in the US.
    Because blacks were slaves in the US, we have this fallacy that slavery caused all the problem. But if we hypothetically change the race of the slaves, and we see it isn’t so.

    No, the real problem was whites brought stronger, meaner, and more psychopathic black savages to the New World.

    Read More
    • Replies: @ThreeCranes
    Okay Priss, I'll take the bait and answer you.

    I've dated a number of women who had at one time in their lives, slept with brown bantu men. None of them stayed with them.

    Why?

    Because it doesn't take long for a white woman to realize that the brown man is full of bullsh*t.

    Whereas uncertainty is an essential part of the intelligent European man's makeup (a certain amount of doubt that leaves room for questioning is part of the process of learning from experience and the development of a knowledge-based culture) the brown bantu man suffers from no such hesitation. As you say, he is cocky, full of himself and because of this he is largely ignorant and therefore full of bullsh*t.

    Initially, white women--young ones especially--are susceptible to their charms but after seeing the magic brown bantu in action, with all his lies, evasions and baseless, inflated sense of self esteem they see the light and leave him. Give white gals some credit.

    You see, the brown man cannot ever admit that he is wrong about anything, ever. Well, one thing white women won't tolerate is being blamed by her man for something that he did wrong. They call bulls*t on that and he beats them. Then they leave. Sadder but wiser.

    To be sure, some white women do stay with bantus but those are women who suffer from low self esteem or who are taking revenge on their daddies. Bottom feeders. For the most part, only brown females will tolerate being beaten by their bantu beaus. It’s how he shows his love.

    And stop obsessing about long dongs. I went to integrated grade school and high school, played sports and showered with plenty of guys of both races. Not all bantus have long dongs. Some of us white guys do. We didn’t and don’t have any reason to envy bantus. Besides, a long dong is not what a woman looks for in a man. It may come as a pleasant surprise to her, but how could she have known how long the guy’s dong was before she agreed to sleep with him? Unless he made a habit of walking around with his dick out she wouldn’t have had a clue and if he had had that habit, she wouldn't have been interested in him.
    , @Alden
    Would you mind keeping your homo porn fantasies to yourself? You want to be raped by big, mean, aggressive black men with us usually large dongs. We get it. You post this several times a week.

    So get out your jar of lubricant and fantasize away.
    , @anarchyst
    You are correct. Part of the problem is that the slaves that were imported were not "the best and brightest", but were the conquests of the various tribal wars and the low IQ criminals and ne'er do-wells that the village chieftains wanted to get rid of (and be rid of) anyway.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  77. @Joe Wong
    I hope the author would mean Winston Churchill, Robert Vansittart, and a gang of ruthless colonial imperialist warmongers are the “People Should be Hung from Lampposts, They Should be Burned Alive, for What They've Done to Britain.”

    Mind you, the British troops were in the foreign land, it is not right for the invader to bear such bitter feeling and victimhood sentiment by being kicked out of their occupied land. On the other hand people said the British imitates the Roman, while the American is born out the British; the Roman called destroying Carthaginian and salted their land "creating peace," no wonder the American and the British go berserk when people kicks the American and British out of their homeland, and resort to bombing, killing and waterboarding on the fabricated phantom WMD allegation as humanitarian intervention to avenge their "humiliation."

    Between the Russians and Chinese commenters here, I can’t understand half of what people are saying. It may be somewhat annoying, but you all should think about turning grammar-check on. Just try to put up a comment that is not ALL underlined in wavy green, and we’d really appreciate it.

    (We have Daniel Cheih (sp?) on here as an example of how to write correctly – with great commentary, I might add – even while being Chinese. For Russian, there is a guy on Zerohedge named Boris Alotovkrap.)

    Read More
    • Replies: @jacques sheete

    Boris Alotovkrap
     
    Boris? I thought his first name was Fullova. ;)
    , @Joe Wong
    You should say "I can't understand half of what you are saying, not "people." You are talking to us, Russian and Chinese commenters, you are not talking to third party "people."

    You should say "Russian and Chinese commenters" not "Russians." Russian and Chinese are adjective in this case.

    You should also say "but you all should turn grammer-checking on" not "but you all should think about turning grammer-check on," because "think about" does not do anything to satisfy your bitching. Grammer-Checking is a compound name, you should not mix noun and verb to make a compound noun.

    There are more grammatical defects in you comment that is not desirable in proper English writing, but it becomes bothersome to point them out all.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  78. @nsa
    Your hero, Horrorvitz, is the actual virus in your germ theory analogy. Started his traitorous Izzy-firster career as a typical vile jooie Trotskyite in the 1960s......morphing into an even more vile jooie neocon traitor in the 1980s as the cultural currents reversed.

    He has black grandkids. How this degenerate can try and pass himself off as some kind of conservative trying to save the West is unreal.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  79. CanSpeccy says: • Website

    Concerning the hangings from lampposts, could we please start with Thereason May, who has just arranged to keep Britain’s borders open for another five years, which will allow sufficient new immigration and immigrant reproduction to ensure that a second referendum will reverse the Brexit vote and keep the border open for ever.

    After Thereason, David Camoron, who said immigration should be “gripped” but failed to grip it, should get his comeuppance together with Phony Bliar, who wanted to rub peoples noses in multiculturalism, and that turd Brown, who called an old women who opposed Britain’s self-genocide through repressed native reproduction and mass replacement immigration “bigoted”.

    The corpses could be suspended over the ferry terminal at Dover, together with those of a few of the immigrant murderers that EU law prevents Britain from deporting. A plus would be that hanging criminal illegals must be cheaper than deportng them.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    "Concerning the hangings from lampposts, could we please start with..."

    Always trying to have others do your dirty work. Typical.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  80. @Beckow
    Nazis were also planning to remove, or exterminate over time, the Czechs. They murdered 20% of Belorussians, and they did a fairly convincing genocide on Serbs. We can quibble where the mythical "West" starts and where it ends, but I would say that Prague is probably in it, and so is Beograd. If you add up the European nations that Nazis wanted gone one way or another, you get about 40% of white European population. Almost all in the east.

    How is that consistent with 'Nazis not threatening European civilisation'?

    The problem is the same: Western Europeans seem to hate the white eastern Slavs. Not all by any means, but the general instinct is always there. Nazis were just an extreme case, and were more open about it. What we see today in US, German, French or British media with regard to Russia (and sometimes also Poland or Hungary) is something that would never - ever - be said about any other group. Try to substitute any other group, from Irish to Chinese, from Arabs to Africans, this level of public and media hysteria would never be allowed to flourish. But when it comes to Russia it is ok. At some point, if you "Westerners" cannot police your own, aren't you really passively supporting this hysteria? These politicians get voted in, the media is your media - they represent you.

    This seems a replay of Nazism, on that I agree with you. But where are the voices of reason? Why should a 'civilisation' capable of this level of hatred and hypocrisy be saved anyway? You are misty-eyed about Dunkirk. Good. But at the same time you muse openly about 'wiping Moscow off the face of earth' and how that would not be such a tragedy. Well, when next Dunkirk comes, I can see the despised white easterners not giving a damn. Those are the fruits of hundreds of years of quiet and not so quiet hatred.

    “Nazis were also planning to remove, or exterminate over time, the Czechs….
    How is that consistent with ‘Nazis not threatening European civilisation’?”

    If true, that is horrible. But, there is more to Western Civ than Czech freedom.
    After all, Brits sometimes treated the drunken Irish like savages. But it didn’t mean end of British Civ.
    The crazy Thirty Years War killed 1/3 of Germans. But it didn’t end German civilization.
    Swedes once invaded Poland and caused much havoc. But that didn’t end Western Civ.
    Moors once had Spain and Turks once had Greece and much of Balkans. That didn’t end Western Civ.

    Nazis would have set things back, but they would not have destroyed the core of Western Civ. Their main threat was to Slavs(with their own great civilization) and Jews(with their own great culture).

    Nazis had to be defeated for their great crimes against Slavs and Jews, but it’s wrong to say they were a threat to the Western Core. If anything, their pathological obsession with it made them arrogant and aggressive.
    Anyway, PC and globalism are far greater threats to the Western Core today.

    Some might argue that Nazis nullified Western Civilization by acting cruel and inhuman. So, even if Hitler wanted to save European peoples(except Slavs) and arts & culture, his brutality negated Western values.
    But using this logic, Western Civilization died long ago when Spanish did horrible things to natives of New World, Anglos wiped out Aborigines, Belgians killed millions of Congolese, and Chinese were forced to buy and get addicted on opium.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Beckow

    "Nazis nullified Western Civilization by acting cruel and inhuman"
     
    Let's just say that they changed it. The parochial and provincial nature of Nazism didn't help. All of it dramatically shifted attitudes. That Europe would collapse demographically was unthinkable in 1945 - there was after all the continent-wide Baby Boom to come. The gradual opening of borders was probably a function of three separate trends: new technology and ease of travel, colonial backlash, and a conscious attempts by elites to weaken working classes. It has hardened into a crazy ideology, and a lot of it is definitely a reaction (or an over-reaction) to WWII.

    My point is that Nazi Germany was acting out a hundreds of years old Western fantasy to take over or eliminate Europe's eastern half. When one looks at Europe's history this is rather obvious and extremely visible, maybe that's why Western teaching of this history is so selective and skewed. This atavistic hatred of the east - as we can see today in US or UK - is very harmful to the key cause of preserving Western civilization. And it could turn out to be a fatal weakness. Even today when even an average kindergardener can see what is going on and what really threatens the West, even today the key elites are obsessed with their hatred of the east (personified by Russia).

    The alliances have not changed: in 17th century France allied with Ottomans who massacred Balkan Christians. Fast forward and in WWII Nazis allied with Crimean Tatars (of the slave raiding fame). And recently UK, France and US allied with Saudis and the Islamic world to bomb and destroy Serb Christians in Kosovo and Bosnia. It never changes. And I think it has gotten to the point that it might literally destroy the West. Those are the fruits of inexplicable hatreds and a lack of rational self-interest.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  81. @mp
    People should be hung from lampposts—they should be burned alive—for what they’ve done to Britain.

    Um...what people are you talking about, Peter? Who needs to hang? I thought that problem was solved at Mezzegra, and the show trials at Nuremberg ? Are you telling us that the wrong people were executed? It's time to get serious. Name the Jew and their fellow travelers. Otherwise, remain a clown.

    John Derbyshire needs to be strung up first. He married a Chinese woman and has Chinese offspring. He is an avid philosemite.

    Read More
    • Replies: @mp
    @attila

    Derbyshire needs to be hanged first? First? So he's the worst of the offenders?
    , @Corvinus
    "John Derbyshire needs to be strung up first. He married a Chinese woman and has Chinese offspring. He is an avid philosemite."

    People make up their own minds to marry within or outside their race. That is their liberty. Why are you opposed to individual freedom?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  82. Mr. Brimelow, it’s “hanged,” not “hung.” “Hung” means something else.

    Please correct. Thank you.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  83. @iffen
    but with a little help in the end.

    Thanks for the shout-out; you're welcome.

    It was a whisper. Just a reminder of reality so that you won’t get carried away.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  84. @Charles Pewitt
    The British nation wreckers who opened up Britain to mass immigration from the former areas of the British Empire starting in 1948 were the evil rodents who started the demographic destruction of Britain.

    The American nation wreckers who passed the 1965 Immigration Act into law were the evil globalizers who started the demographic destruction of the United States.

    In 1990 the United States passed a law that dramatically increased legal immigration. This immigration increase was added to the massive increase of immigration caused by the 1965 Immigration Act. In 1997 Tony Blair opened up the mass immigration floodgates into Britain. This added to the mass immigration of Third Worlders that had started in the late 1940s.


    The baby boomers saw the destruction caused by the mass immigration and mass importation of Third Worlders into Britain and the United States, but they either did nothing or pushed for more nation-wrecking immigration.

    The baby boomers are not to blame for the nation-wrecking 1965 Immigration Act, that is true. The baby boomers were not the dumb bastards that got the American Empire bogged down in Vietnam either.

    It was the generations born before 1924 that got the disastrous 1965 Immigration Act passed into law. LBJ was born in 1908. All the way with LBJ — right off the mass immigration invasion cliff.

    Tom Brokaw’s “Greatest Generation” crap is just a smokescreen to cover up all the evil horseshit done by people like Brokaw and his ilk. “Greatest Generation” of nation wreckers is more like it.

    I don’t think it’s very helpful to try to break it down into “this generation did this.” and “this generation did that.” There are the same types who want to control people and/or ruin their way of life, call ‘em Commies, Globalists, progressives, the cntrl-left, or whatever, in each generation. I don’t think there’d be enough lampposts for the whole Baby Boomer generation, anyway. The millennials would build more, but they first would have to find a lamppost manufacturing and installation “APP” for that.

    Read More
    • Replies: @wrd9
    They'd just use 3D printers.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  85. @Dan Hayes
    "People should be hung from lampposts, they should be burned alive, for what they've done to Britain."

    I agree with the author, Peter Brimelow, except with Ireland being substituted for Britain.

    What Blair did to Britain, Allan Shatter has done to Ireland. And in Ireland the populace seems to be blissfully unaware of the transformation taking place.

    Interestingly, quite some time ago Brimelow expressed the same general thoughts to me regarding Ireland (although in a more moderate tone)!

    First of all: pictures are hung; people are hanged.

    But I am in complete agreement. In fact one day some years ago walking past Buckingham Palace I looked up and saw a lamppost looming over me. “That one will be for Blair” I said to myself.

    I still know exactly where it is.

    Read More
    • Agree: Dan Hayes
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  86. @KenH
    The Jewish MSM doesn't like any movies that contradict their false and misleading historical narrative that the West, in this case Britain, has always been heavily multiracial. Not only that but that Africans, Mexicans, Asians and Muslims are the very essence of who we are.

    The last thing they want is the younger generation learning that Britain was virtually 100% white and much more peaceful and cohesive than it is today with millions of third world barbarians. That is why there is carping and whining from the usual suspects about Dunkirk being "too white".

    My considered reaction to Dunkirk: People should be hung from lampposts—they should be burned alive—for what they’ve done to Britain.
     
    Ditto for America, France, Sweden and Germany. And that will just be for starters.

    My considered reaction to Dunkirk: People should be hung from lampposts . . . for what they’ve done to Britain.

    Churchill & FDR are already dead.
    Altho — Mussolini’s corpse was hung —

    My considered reaction to Dunkirk: People should be . . . burned alive— for what they’ve done to Britain.

    The people who sought to ally with Britain and save European civilization WERE burned alive, by the British and the successor to European Christianity, the USA.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  87. mp says:
    @attilathehen
    John Derbyshire needs to be strung up first. He married a Chinese woman and has Chinese offspring. He is an avid philosemite.

    @attila

    Derbyshire needs to be hanged first? First? So he’s the worst of the offenders?

    Read More
    • Replies: @attilathehen
    Yes. Did you not read what I wrote? Are you familiar with his writings? His book "We are Doomed" is a perfect example of his evil degeneracy. He is really writing about his poor choice of a wife and then deciding to reproduce. His wife and daughter are Obummer voters. Importing Democratic voters. Do you remember the Obama years?

    His writings for Vdare are another window into his insane mind. He "thinks" Jews are smarter than gentiles. He criticized overweight white woman. As long as a woman reproduces enough to maintain the race, no one cares what a woman looks like after the age of 45 (same with men).

    He worked on a Wall Street, yet holds out his tin cup for shekels. He is bright enough that he should have learned banking lessons and made a small fortune.

    He wrote an article about how white parents should give their kids a talk about blacks. This man with non-white children cannot give advice to white parents with white children.

    He likes to write about mathematics. Anytime some Chinese math students win prizes he likes to write about this and bring attention to the Chinaness. Recently, a woman named Maryam Mirzakhani won the most prestigious math award, the Fields Medal. She was the first woman to win it. She is a high-caste Iranian (you can see she looks very Aryan, unfortunately she was a Muslim, but she did not appear religious so maybe living in the West helped her to change her mind about her belief system). I wonder if Derbyshire will write about her, or is he consumed with jealousy that no Chinese/Jewish woman has been able to win this prize?

    He deserves to be hanged first.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  88. Avery says:
    @Hippopotamusdrome


    Hitler planned to raze Moscow and kill millions and enslave the rest.

     

    Given they were living under Communism, it would be a step up.

    {Given they were living under Communism, it would be a step up.}

    You consider living under whatever conditions a, quote, ‘a step down’ from being killed? Too bad the Red Army left any of you SS jackboots alive when they raised the Red Banner over the alleged “1,000 year Reich” and pissed on the ashes of the coward who had the notion that his alleged Master Race could exterminate the Slavic peoples and take their lands.

    Adolf got so Master F____ by those Untermenschen, that Germany was ruined forever. The psychologically damaged German people have voluntarily prostrated themselves against all sorts of invaders and are slowly being erased as a distinct ethnos.

    Heil Hitler!
    Sieg Heil!

    Read More
    • Replies: @German_reader

    Adolf got so Master F____ by those Untermenschen, that Germany was ruined forever. The psychologically damaged German people have voluntarily prostrated themselves against all sorts of invaders and are slowly being erased as a distinct ethnos.
     
    That's illogical as the former East Germany (which experienced the Red Army's advance in 1945 and was part of the Eastern bloc for 40 years) is much less psychologically damaged than the former West Germany.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  89. ANONymous says: • Disclaimer
    @Miro23

    The entire purpose of Hitler launching W0rld War II in 1939 was to defeat the Soviet Union and “Jewish Bolshevism.” Jewish communists, inspired and trained by Moscow, had launched revolutions in Berlin, Bavaria, and Hungary in 1919. Trotsky trained Bela Kuhn (Cohn), the Jewish communist who established the Hungarian Soviet. The Jewess Rosa Luxembourg led a communist coup in Berlin, and Jew Eugen Levine created the Bavarian Soviet before being shot to death by the Freikorps.
     
    This is all true that Hitler had a long term plan to invade the East, but finishing with Jewish Bolshevism was secondary since by 1941 Stalin had mostly completed the job already, having morphed from an employee of the Jewish Bolshevik leadership, to collaborator, to dictator and then to executioner.

    Hitler's main non-military topic of conversation while Barbarossa was underway was the post war organization of Germany's Empire in the East (Urals in the East to the Black Sea in the South) involving the physical destruction of Moscow and St Petersburg, the wholesale removal of Slavs from the Ukraine to make way for German only zones (the whole Black Sea coast), construction of Germans only autobahns across Greater Germany (Russia) and the large scale construction of exclusive German towns for German settlers with Slavs banished to a distance of 20km and being kept in a state of essential slavery. The plan was for a European land empire to rival the British Empire (which he admired) but run on much harsher lines.

    Hitler’s main non-military topic of conversation while Barbarossa was underway was the post war organization of Germany’s Empire in the East . . . The plan was for a European land empire to rival the British Empire (which he admired) but run on much harsher lines.

    Source??

    Read More
    • Replies: @Miro23

    Hitler’s main non-military topic of conversation while Barbarossa was underway was the post war organization of Germany’s Empire in the East . . . The plan was for a European land empire to rival the British Empire (which he admired) but run on much harsher lines.

    Source??
     
    Hitler's Table Talk 1941 - 1944 by H.R. Trevor-Roper (Editor), Gerhard L. Weinberg (Introduction) texts assembled from the stenographic record of Hitler’s informal conversations ordered by Martin Bormann. https://www.amazon.com/Hitlers-Table-Talk-1941-1944/dp/1929631669/ref=cm_cr-mr-title , A very interesting read.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  90. it has actually been well received by the Leftist cultural Establishment

    That’s because the narrative enforcers have a soft spot for Britain. They don’t have a soft spot for paeans to the America of 1940. I wonder if that’s because so many editors at U.S. papers and magazines are from Britain.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  91. eys says:

    According to history textbooks being taught in Singapore where I grew up, during colonial times the locals working in colonial offices would have to kneel and wait for all their colonial masters to leave the office before they could leave. There were photographs of these. Bet you weren’t taught that in your history classes in Britain so get off your high horse.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Che Guava
    That is a pure lie.

    I also had five years of upbringing in Singapore.

    Studied the history at school there, also in Malay, more, and reading many accounts later. It may have been the case during our (Japanese) occupation, I met older ethnic Chinese people and teachers, old people were still to making complaints about behaviour by soldiers from here at that time, but your stupid claim was not among them.

    Having recently read The Turner Diaries, as an earlier commenter said, Brimelow reflects it, but who cares?

    Come on, give us a link to your alleged instances of kneeling.

    Many interesting comments on this thread, yours is only of interest as a strange lie.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  92. @Art
    Scotland should go its own way - Northern Ireland should return to Ireland - The Welsh should have their own cutout.

    Then the English can live in servitude to their Jew overlords.

    It is obvious - the overarching Western nation state has been corrupted by the Jews.

    Seek peace in local control of everything.

    Peace --- Art

    Can you imagine a three-cornered fight over a penny between a Jew, a Dutchman, and a Scotsman? Must be how the fidget-spinner was invented.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  93. @Durruti
    Hate to Rain on your parade:

    The British Expeditionary Force of 250,000 heavily armed soldiers war poorly led. Its commanders did not intend to resist the German Army. They abandoned their positions in Belgium and opened the Belgian and French Armies to flanking moves by the advancing and more mobile German attackers.

    The British, who suffered few casualties from actual combat, were only able to effectively retreat, because of the dogged, and brave resistance of the almost completely surrounded Belgian and French armies.

    As the British Divisions waited for rescue at Dunkirk, (and abandoned 95% of their military equipment, the French troops held the perimeter (under orders from their superiors), so that the British, the BEF could escape.

    History According to Jewish Hollywood (The Official Fairy Tale - Repeated ad Nauseum)

    As a History Prof., I can testify that our texts continue to insist that it was the Belgian Army surrender that opened the flanks of the British Army and forced it to retreat - in the early days of World War II. The texts continue with a fallback criticism of the lack of military prowess of the French. A careful check shows they have their chronology wrong.

    The Movie is Shit:

    It is not until one reads the writings of Winston Churchill, that you encounter the admission that Britain could (and would) not reliably battle the Axis until General Montgomery had assumed Command in North Africa, and that was not until late 1942. By then, the British Ruling Elite, and the American Elite, and their Jewish Controllers, had decided, with the Jewish Marxist Lemonists, to crush the Casino Trumpies - er Nasties in the Center, and Rule all, in the Name of the Rothschilds, and the lovely boy who marries his Grandmother/teacher, and the Chocolate store owner, and the German lady who hates her flag, and the Londoner who is a Muslim, and the French Comedian who is banned..

    My dad was a Belgian: He served in the Belgian & American Armies. Taught me Patriotism. He is buried in the American cemetery in Farmingdale LI.

    The coffee is wearing off.

    My girlfriend wants sex.

    I'm not in the mood.

    Durruti

    For the Anarchist Collective

    wow this is new. thanks for sharing. and yes, you are 100% right that is exactly what I learned back in school.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  94. Wilkey says:
    @The True and Original David
    Plus, the film is a back-handed slap at Russia. Russia defeated Germany. (US and British forces merely mopped up in the west.) In the Current Year, the film doesn't exactly disturb the anti-Russian campaign of the Deep State.

    From the standpoint of white interests, portraying and celebrating the Dunkirk losers as valiant little fighters 4 Democracy who are resisting Undemocratic Deplorableness is more than a bit reminiscent of Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign (which is still going, by the way). It's like Hillary voters - Harry Potter grokkers and Maury Povich Show guests - vs. Putin/Trump.

    Sure, there is a lot of white skin on the screen, to put the show over. (Most blacks couldn't be bothered to see this movie even if Denzel played Patton.) And sure, even Deep State mouthpieces can't help going off-message a little and interlarding their critical raves with reflexive grumbles about "lack of POC." But is this a pop culture victory for the white man, then? You tell me. I don't think so.

    “Plus, the film is a back-handed slap at Russia. Russia defeated Germany.”

    Russia, eh? Russia was not a sovereign nation in 1940. It was part of the USSR. At that time it was allied with the Third Reich, and would continue to be allied with the Third Reich for another year, until Hitler launched Operation Barbarossa. If Stalin hadn’t foolishly decapitated his military and allowed Mannerheim to utterly embarrass him in Finland then the Soviets might have remained Hitler’s ally throughout the war.

    In short, the USSR got zero mention in “Dunkirk.” So far as the Russians are concerned that was all for the better, because nothing that could have been said about them in a movie set entirely in a one week period in 1940 would have been nice.

    Read More
    • Replies: @EugeneGur

    it was allied with the Third Reich
     
    The USSR was never allied with the Third Reich unless you count every country with a non-aggression pact with Germany as allied with it. That would then include every country in Europe including Britain - remember, the USSR was the last to sign such pact after exhausting all other options.

    the Soviets might have remained Hitler’s ally throughout the war

     

    Putin once said in response to a similar remark that if a grandmother had balls (literally) and other appropriate equipment, she then would be a grandfather. This is a standard Russian expression illustrating the futility of all those "would've, could've, should've".

    Ever considered the possibility that if Britain and France had concluded a pact with the USSR, as Stalin tried hard to convince them to do, and together defended Czechoslovakia instead of surrendering to Hitler in Munich, there might not have been WWII and no Dunkirk?
    , @The True and Original David
    Russians comprised 66% of Soviet military casualties 1941-1945 per Krivosheev. The runner-up was Ukraine at about 15%. The rest of the nations in the "Union" put in roughly 1% each.

    I understand that Russia was ruled by a Georgian tyrant in this period, and so Russians were conscripted to fight for a polity that wasn't theirs and against their will (at least until the invasion). But no one can deny that the Russian people did more than their share of the fighting, the suffering, and the dying. Thus "Russia defeated Germany."
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  95. @Avery
    {...who had gone from their secure island to the continent to defend someone else’s borders, not their own.}

    Didn't British BIF* leave their secure island a couple of centuries prior to create an empire over which the sun never set? It's not like it was the first time they had left the island....... And their imperial presence was rarely to defend someone else.

    Regarding ' defend someone else’s borders': I doubt very much Brits sent BEF to defend someone else's border. It was the case of "We fight them there, so we don't have to fight them here". Brits, for a couple centuries or so, got themselves involved in the European continental affairs because they always feared European continental powers being united. Brits, being on a resource poor island, always feared a united continental Europe could starve them. So were always creating conflict between the great powers of the continent.

    UK got itself involved in WW2 to prevent Nazi Germany from creating a Gross Germania in Europe, not because they gave a hoot about Poland. Which would most certainly have taken place had Hitler not invaded USSR.

    Notwithstanding the 'heroic' myth of Dunkirk, where Brits and French ran like chickens in front of the Panzers, and Hitler pretty much _let_ them escape at Dunkirk.
    _________
    * British Imperial Forces

    Brits, being on a resource poor island, always feared a united continental Europe could starve them

    Resource-poor relative to which other European nations?

    This island is made mainly of coal and surrounded by fish.
    Only an organizing genius could produce a shortage of coal and fish at the same time.
    - Aneurin Bevan

    The rest is made of iron, copper and tin. The place fairly seethes with dairying, wool and malting barley, and the winters and summers are so pathetic and vague your cabbages will stand all year round.
    The only thing we’re short of is timber. Have been since the Bronze Age or thereabouts. Extra food is imported via shipping, at which we have historically excelled. It’s the Continental Powers with tiny coastlines that fear the blockade [Kiel Canal cough cough].

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  96. Corvinus says:
    @Priss Factor
    Diversity is like Venereal Disease.

    It might as well be called Diversyphilis or Globorrhea.

    Now, diversity per se is not the problem. All nations are diverse to some extent. Even in homogeneous nations, there is diversity if dialects and regions. And there can be good things arising from some diversity.

    The problem of what goes by 'diversity is our strength' or DIOS is that is a cancerous or viral process that NEVER STOPS. Enough is never enough.

    So, SOME Africans, Asians, and Muslims in London isn't enough. There must be more and more and more and more. Also, these minorities don't respect the host culture but make demands. Now, BBC is making history shows with blacks in white roles. Diversity even goes 'time machine' and alters past history like Stalin used to alter photos. Also, many whites get a virtue high from beating their chest about how they are infected with Diversyphilis.

    PC acts like HIV. It attacks the immune system.

    In any national order, patriots are most valuable for they are the guardians of what constitutes the nation in terms of identity/core ethnicity, territory, narrative, history, and culture. Patriots are the warriors, storytellers, guardians, and preservers. So, patriots must be highly regarded. Without them, the national order no longer has defenders.

    Likewise, an organism depends on immune system to survive. Immune system defends and sustains the organism. All around there are germs and stuff. Immune system must constantly resist and filter the hostile germs. Without such force, the organism will succumb to germs and toxins.

    What does HIV do? It attacks the immune system so that the organism cannot resist hostile germs and toxins, and gradually, the body succumbs to all sorts of infection. Indeed, even what were mild seeming infections keep festering and getting out of control.

    PC works the same way on nations. It attacks patriotism and patriotic forces, the very people most essential to protect and preserve the territory, ethnicity, history, and spirituality of the order. PC re-programs the organism so that it regards patriots as germs and toxins and tries to kill them off. And that weakens the national immune system and then tons of foreigners invade without resistance.

    The West has the money and technology to defend itself but it doesn't because PC has reprogrammed the Western mind to see patriots as germs/toxins while welcoming germs/toxins as the New Patriots. So, Africans, Muslims, and etc are to be welcomed as New Britons, New Irish, New Swedes, and New Germans while true European patriots are seen as 'far right toxic odious noxious rabid and virulent evil nazis'.

    David Horowitz used to run a alternative mag called Heterodoxy in the early 90s before internet became a big thing. It had a small audience but it could have done so much more if the net was big back then.

    Horowitz is a problematic figure, but he understood the dangers missed by most Cons because he'd been at the center of the New Left in the 60s. He knew them from inside out. He understood the radical mind like the back of his hand. And he warned National Review that nice guy Conservatism Inc is defenseless against this virulent form of ideology(that under Clinton would forge an alliance with Big Money).

    And all the things he warned about 'culture war' back then has come to be.

    http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/viewSubCategory.asp?id=337

    There was one satirical piece about how Hollywood is going to release old movies with blacks computerized over whites. It sounded outlandish then but now, we have BBC and Hollywood filling white roles with blacks in all these movies about european past.

    Coal-staining, not whitewashing, is the great crime of Hollywood.

    Peter and Priss…

    “But the real reason that Dunkirk’s inconveniently honest portrayal of Britain and its army in 1940 is so stunning: successive British governments have, in the twinkling of an eye (to quote Handel’s Messiah) utterly destroyed that world through immigration policy.”

    While of course Brian Truit should be taken to task for not realizing Dunkirk is a period piece, in a similar vein both of you are also forgetting that eras also change. That is the result of human interactions. Great Britain was the direct result of diversity–the Britons, Celts, Romans, Picts, and others fighting, intermingling, and intermarrying.

    Speaking of diversity being a strength…

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3146070/Mixed-race-relationships-making-taller-smarter-Children-born-genetically-diverse-parents-intelligent-ancestors.html

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  97. Corvinus says:
    @attilathehen
    John Derbyshire needs to be strung up first. He married a Chinese woman and has Chinese offspring. He is an avid philosemite.

    “John Derbyshire needs to be strung up first. He married a Chinese woman and has Chinese offspring. He is an avid philosemite.”

    People make up their own minds to marry within or outside their race. That is their liberty. Why are you opposed to individual freedom?

    Read More
    • Agree: Jeff77450
    • Replies: @mp
    Some people, like the poster in question, are easily confused. There is a difference between a private act, and public policy. If someone wants to marry a foreigner, that is their choice. On the other hand, if the government tells you that you have to marry a foreigner, as a matter of policy, then it's something else altogether. Bringing in a foreigner as a spouse, and taking care of her, is not the same thing as the government mandating that tens of thousands of foreigners be allowed entry.

    As far as hanging goes? I'd say that those promoting indigenous dispossession as policy should be banished to the countries they like so much. They could work as domestic servants for the people they love, and care about. Helping them in their daily chores, etc. No need to hang anyone, really.
    , @attilathehen
    Please see my comment no. 143.

    If "individual freedom" is detrimental to the West, the person must be removed. Derbyshire to China.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  98. @Avery
    {...who had gone from their secure island to the continent to defend someone else’s borders, not their own.}

    Didn't British BIF* leave their secure island a couple of centuries prior to create an empire over which the sun never set? It's not like it was the first time they had left the island....... And their imperial presence was rarely to defend someone else.

    Regarding ' defend someone else’s borders': I doubt very much Brits sent BEF to defend someone else's border. It was the case of "We fight them there, so we don't have to fight them here". Brits, for a couple centuries or so, got themselves involved in the European continental affairs because they always feared European continental powers being united. Brits, being on a resource poor island, always feared a united continental Europe could starve them. So were always creating conflict between the great powers of the continent.

    UK got itself involved in WW2 to prevent Nazi Germany from creating a Gross Germania in Europe, not because they gave a hoot about Poland. Which would most certainly have taken place had Hitler not invaded USSR.

    Notwithstanding the 'heroic' myth of Dunkirk, where Brits and French ran like chickens in front of the Panzers, and Hitler pretty much _let_ them escape at Dunkirk.
    _________
    * British Imperial Forces

    Tanks held up because they outpaced their fuel bowsers. And then they started to break down, being highly precise and superb pieces of engineering which weren’t easily ghetto-rigged. The most crucial factor was the lack of infantry support.
    Normandy bocage and hollow-ways isn’t the Steppes. It’s basically a narrow green tunnel, and heading over the tiny fields is like crossing a giant cattle grid. One Gitane-dragging beret-bonce could block a column with an IED or a bazooka and they’d never know he was there till it was too late, due to the infernal racket their beautiful heavy Panzers made. No infantry, no flank cover. No fuel, you’re just a fancy pillbox. Which is why the generals “diplomatically” ignored Adolf’s explicit orders to advance, for a bit, until those deficiencies were made good. Unlike him, they weren’t stupid.
    Later statements suggesting it was for ethical considerations are simply a meme, and retconning by Hortler just before he sucked the Luger.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Philip Owen
    And although it is not quotes as a consideration at the time, all 300 German tanks could have been destroyed by the 30 British warships miles from the beach. Tanks don't withstand artillery fire well. My father in law, an Army Captain there at the time was confident that this would have happened.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  99. Corvinus says:
    @CanSpeccy
    Concerning the hangings from lampposts, could we please start with Thereason May, who has just arranged to keep Britain's borders open for another five years, which will allow sufficient new immigration and immigrant reproduction to ensure that a second referendum will reverse the Brexit vote and keep the border open for ever.

    After Thereason, David Camoron, who said immigration should be "gripped" but failed to grip it, should get his comeuppance together with Phony Bliar, who wanted to rub peoples noses in multiculturalism, and that turd Brown, who called an old women who opposed Britain's self-genocide through repressed native reproduction and mass replacement immigration "bigoted".

    The corpses could be suspended over the ferry terminal at Dover, together with those of a few of the immigrant murderers that EU law prevents Britain from deporting. A plus would be that hanging criminal illegals must be cheaper than deportng them.

    “Concerning the hangings from lampposts, could we please start with…”

    Always trying to have others do your dirty work. Typical.

    Read More
    • Replies: @CanSpeccy

    Always trying to have others do your dirty work. Typical.
     
    Corvinus, being stupid, as usual.

    What's dirty about hanging traitors intent on destroying your nation?

    And where's the basis for pretending I want someone else to do the hanging.

    It's true, though, the job would be best left to a professional.

    And to adhere to constitutional forms, The House of Commons should exercise its sovereignty and pass a bill of attainder.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  100. Corvinus says:
    @the alt white comics
    it would have been better for everyone white if hitler had won

    “it would have been better for everyone white if hitler had won…”

    Actually, it worked out for the best for white people when Hitler and Germany lost.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  101. mp says:

    : during colonial times the locals working in colonial offices would have to kneel and wait for all their colonial masters to leave…

    In traditional cultures, this is pretty much the norm. One always showed respect for those above, including one’s family elders. Of course, in the case you cite, this rite was imposed from the outside, by the colonialists, and thus quite artificial and inorganic to the indigenous culture.

    Read More
    • Replies: @PiltdownMan
    In a meeting with senior executives at a major financial institution in Thailand in the early 2000s, my New York colleagues and I we were served coffee by a young assistant. She shuffled into the room on her knees, set out the cups and coffee pot and shuffled out again, never standing up. No one seemed to think this was unusual.

    It was all very "The King and I". And it was a local custom. I expect the British were simply continuing a local custom in Singapore.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  102. @Parsifal
    I recommend "Go and see" and "Only old men go to battle". Among others...

    I think you mean Come And See, which is only slightly more entertaining than watching paint dry.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  103. carlos453 says:

    ITS THE ECCONMOY STUPID!

    Eccomic activity is measured in GDP, performance in GDP growth.

    If GDP grows more this year than year before this is called % growth, if it shrinks its called recession.

    THE WEST INC UK ALLOWED ITS INDUSTRIES TO GO EAST TO ASIA!.

    The only way the western ecconomies can make money now is via home grown economic activity. How do they do that & ensure it grows every year?

    Immigration, increasing the population of course!

    More people in the country – your local Walmart sells more tins of soup than the year before, more cars are sold than year before etc etc…

    So immigration just allows politicians to cheat by claiming economic growth is a result of their economic management.

    This is called demographic Ponzi as it eventually has to collapse as a small country like the UK cannot continue like this.

    Like anabolic steroids in sport sooner or later it starts to kill the hoast

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  104. @Joe Wong
    I hope the author would mean Winston Churchill, Robert Vansittart, and a gang of ruthless colonial imperialist warmongers are the “People Should be Hung from Lampposts, They Should be Burned Alive, for What They've Done to Britain.”

    Mind you, the British troops were in the foreign land, it is not right for the invader to bear such bitter feeling and victimhood sentiment by being kicked out of their occupied land. On the other hand people said the British imitates the Roman, while the American is born out the British; the Roman called destroying Carthaginian and salted their land "creating peace," no wonder the American and the British go berserk when people kicks the American and British out of their homeland, and resort to bombing, killing and waterboarding on the fabricated phantom WMD allegation as humanitarian intervention to avenge their "humiliation."

    Mind you, the British troops were in the foreign land, it is not right for the invader to bear such bitter feeling and victimhood sentiment by being kicked out of their occupied land.

    My sides! AngloSaxon horde invades and occupies Normandy. Loyal German allies rally to the defence of the violated Dukedom of Normandy and the Kingdom of the Franks. Heathen Khaki Army repulsed with great loss and driven into the sea.
    Can I get a premiere ticket for that movie when it comes out please? Please don’t just be another troll, I want you to really believe your assertions. Priceless.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Joe Wong
    Are you saying the AngloSaxon's words must be taken as given truth? This is very authoritarian. You should know the AngloSaxon is notorious for manufacturing consent and fabricating fake news, anyone with an ounce of critical thinking capability should view anything spitted out by the AngloSaxon with a bucket of salt.

    You may believe the AngloSaxon fought WWII for liberty and anti fascism, but their actions during the war and after the war tell otherwise. Impartial analysis indicated that it was pure power struggle between the greedy evil colonial imperialists. AngloSaxon's post war historical narrative is glossing over their ugly nature and behavior.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  105. @TheJester
    If I can follow the above narrative, the British won the battle for WWII ... but then quickly lost the war for survival. The British held off an invasion by the Germans (close relatives in language, religion, history, and culture) only to be swallowed whole a few years later by an invasion from a basket of Third World peoples with alien languages, religions, cultures, and a significantly lower average IQ.

    At Dunkirk and throughout WWII, the British stood united as a people with purpose as they fought for their survival as a free people. However, they were never consulted about the follow-on invasion. The second invasion was quietly implemented by the Foreign Office and other government apparatchiks. It was undemocratic and, in practical terms, forthrightly treasonous.

    The new reality: London has a Muslim mayor. The country is filled with mosques and "no-g0" areas policed by Muslim religious police enforcing Islamic-sanctioned social behaviors. Sharia Law has official status in British civil cases. Gangs of Muslim youth roam the streets beating up whites because they are white. Other Muslims traffick white teenage girls into drugs and prostitution. London is experiencing a brash of random acid attacks on innocent people. Female circumcision and honor killings are quietly tolerated.

    A short stint of occupation by the Wehrmacht in WWII might have been preferable to this reality. It is doubtful that Chancellor Hitler would have tolerated open borders and a massive invasion by alien peoples and cultures. Indeed, Hitler admired his British cousins and their empire. He, in fact, sought a peace treaty with Britain that would have given Britain a free hand in their overseas empire in return for the Germans having a free hand in Europe. He wanted a partnership, not conquest.

    The open question is, Why did the British fight WWII against enormous odds ... only to quickly fold as gelded "cucks" to an invasion that is marking the end of Britain as a country and the British as a people? Losing their army at Dunkirk, suing Germany for peace, or suffering a short occupation would not have had such a disastrous outcome.

    So, in the final analysis, Dunkirk was a Pyrrhic victory. An uplifting story or fortitude and heroism that, in the final analysis, did little to protect the survival of Britain as a country and the British as a people.

    “The open question is, Why did the British fight WWII against enormous odds … only to quickly fold as gelded “cucks” to an invasion that is marking the end of Britain as a country and the British as a people?”

    Because during the war the propaganda ginned up by the Bernays inspired British Ministry of Information focused the people’s attention on one single demonic enemy whereas today, the same ministry of disinformation uses its powers to diffuse and distract our awareness of our danger.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  106. @jim jones
    David Aaronovitch of the Times says his history graduate daughters had never heard of Dunkirk:

    https://www.mercatornet.com/features/articles/20142/

    David Aaronovitch is a vile piece of shit from a family of Jewish communists, his being part of Britain’s media establishment is a perfect illustration how sick and rotten the modern UK has become.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  107. @Beckow
    Nazis were also planning to remove, or exterminate over time, the Czechs. They murdered 20% of Belorussians, and they did a fairly convincing genocide on Serbs. We can quibble where the mythical "West" starts and where it ends, but I would say that Prague is probably in it, and so is Beograd. If you add up the European nations that Nazis wanted gone one way or another, you get about 40% of white European population. Almost all in the east.

    How is that consistent with 'Nazis not threatening European civilisation'?

    The problem is the same: Western Europeans seem to hate the white eastern Slavs. Not all by any means, but the general instinct is always there. Nazis were just an extreme case, and were more open about it. What we see today in US, German, French or British media with regard to Russia (and sometimes also Poland or Hungary) is something that would never - ever - be said about any other group. Try to substitute any other group, from Irish to Chinese, from Arabs to Africans, this level of public and media hysteria would never be allowed to flourish. But when it comes to Russia it is ok. At some point, if you "Westerners" cannot police your own, aren't you really passively supporting this hysteria? These politicians get voted in, the media is your media - they represent you.

    This seems a replay of Nazism, on that I agree with you. But where are the voices of reason? Why should a 'civilisation' capable of this level of hatred and hypocrisy be saved anyway? You are misty-eyed about Dunkirk. Good. But at the same time you muse openly about 'wiping Moscow off the face of earth' and how that would not be such a tragedy. Well, when next Dunkirk comes, I can see the despised white easterners not giving a damn. Those are the fruits of hundreds of years of quiet and not so quiet hatred.

    and they did a fairly convincing genocide on Serbs.

    They got a lot of help with that from Croatians though (and to a lesser extent from Bosniaks and Albanians).
    I agree with your main point though, given German intentions towards the Slavic peoples it’s absurd to claim Nazi Germany was defending European civilization.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  108. Johnnydub says:
    @Priss Factor
    It's said that Nazi victory threatened the death to Western Civilization.

    Where do they get this? Sure, fvictorious Nazi Empire would have been evil, but the Nazis never threatened the core of Western Civilization except in Poland.

    Nazi's main threat were to Russian Slavs and Jews. Jews did play a key role in European Culture esp with Emancipation, but most of Western Civilization would be intact even without Jewish input.

    But Nazis did pose a real threat to Polish and then Russian civilization. Less to Poles because Nazis were half-convinced that Poles were fellow 'Aryans'. But it was hell for Russia. Hitler planned to raze Moscow and kill millions and enslave the rest. But then, going by today's hysteria about Russia, Russia, Russia, why should globalists be bothered by this? Globalists raped Russia real good in the 90s and then sought to destroy its culture with Homomania. Today, globalists say Putin is evil, Russia is the greatest threat to the world, etc. Those who call Putin 'new hitler' sound as crazed as hitler.

    Anyway, as evil as the Nazis were, they posed no threat to Core of Western Civilization. Nazis saw Scandies as fellow 'Aryans'. Even if Germans had invaded UK, most people would have been treated well and fairly. And Germans were pretty decent to the French(except Jews), much more so than the French were with their imperial subjects. And even though Hitler thought Italians weren't as good as northern Europeans, he admired Mussolini and wanted good relations with Italy. And Germany was for good relations with most Eastern European nations. With most European nations, Germans wanted dominance but didn't seek to tyrannize or exploit them.

    So, the only nations that were threatened by Germany in a big way were Poland and esp Russia.
    It would have been a great great crime if Nazis had destroyed Russia, but Russia was not part of 'Western Civilization'.

    When it came to the arts, letters, and music of most of Western history, the Nazis were admiring and reverent. Their contempt was for Jews and Russian Slavs. If anything, Hitler and Nazis had more respect for Western arts and culture than the modernists did who would embark on one radical attack after another on everything European in race, history, narrative, arts, expression, etc.

    Nazis can be blamed for lots of evil, but they were not a threat to Western Civilization unless one defines the West as Want of Diversity and Minority Priority.

    At any rate, a civilization doesn't vanish because an evil prevails over it. Romans had some evil emperors. China and Persia had some nutty tyrants. Russia was under evil Stalin, but Russia didn't vanish as civilization.

    Nazis were not like Germanic barbarian looters who had no use for arts and culture. If anything, Hitler's evil was he preferred arts & culture over human lives. A little humanism would have done him some good.

    Anyway, this stuff about how Nazis threatened Western Civilization is all the funnier coming from PC globalists whose plan for Europe is Diversity Cancer, mass invasion, race-mixing into Brazil-North-Africa, rap music as main music, Hollywood trash as main culture, homomaia as religion, and pornification of mainstream culture and even children's culture(just check out some Ariana Grande videos meant for young girls).

    Nazis would have been horrible for Russia, but a Nazi-conquered Britain would have been better than today's Britain and its dire future. Germans would have crushed British liberty, but they never would have threatened British race, culture, and history. And with a friendly government in place, the Germans might have left and restored sovereignty.

    Nazis were not uniform everywhere. If communists treated all peoples the same -- prole cattle though wrong class elements could be in big trouble --, the Nazis treated some people very well and treated others brutally depending on their ethnicity.
    So, Nazis posed little threat to Western Civilization but posed a real great threat to Russia.

    Nazis would have crushed democracy, but who says Europe needs democracy to be European or Western? After all, for most of Western history, there was NO democracy. And Polish experiment with democracy made it weak, and it was torn apart by stronger powers of Russia and Prussia.

    Nazis were evil and had to be defeated, but let's do away with the fiction that they posed a threat to Western Civilization. In their demented way, they were trying to save it from degeneracy. Alas, Germans were blind to the fact that their fuhrer himself was a pathological, a rabid dog barking against rabies.

    You touch on what’s going on but never nail it.

    The Jews will never forgive or forget the Holocaust. And it’s not just Nazis, it’s white western civilisation they blame. Which is why the globalist agenda is dominated by Jews – The banks, Hollywood, George Soros.

    They are going to genocide any potential threat (ie the West) to them going forward. It’s their interpretation of “never again”

    Read More
    • Replies: @Delinquent Snail
    The Zionists of proto isreal were on good terms with nazi germany. Both groups saw the other's desire for an ethnically pure homeland.

    The zionists of proto isreal ignored and buried cries of help from eastern European jews, including several very prominent rabis from eastern europe.
    , @Priss Factor
    The Jews will never forgive or forget the Holocaust. And it’s not just Nazis, it’s white western civilisation they blame.

    This is too much of a stretch. After all, Russians defeated the Nazis. But today, Neocons and even Liberal Zionists are working hand-in-hand with Ukrainian Neo-Nazis against Russia.

    Also, the Arabs and Muslims had nothing to do with the Holocaust. So, why have Jewish globalists concocted strategies that turned MENA into WWII-level war zones?

    It's more about power. When a people have too much of it and become addicted, it goes bad.

    It's like Nazis got too much power and totally destroyed a promising thing by going from national renewal to imperialist over-reach.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  109. @Avery
    {Given they were living under Communism, it would be a step up.}

    You consider living under whatever conditions a, quote, 'a step down' from being killed? Too bad the Red Army left any of you SS jackboots alive when they raised the Red Banner over the alleged "1,000 year Reich" and pissed on the ashes of the coward who had the notion that his alleged Master Race could exterminate the Slavic peoples and take their lands.

    Adolf got so Master F____ by those Untermenschen, that Germany was ruined forever. The psychologically damaged German people have voluntarily prostrated themselves against all sorts of invaders and are slowly being erased as a distinct ethnos.

    Heil Hitler!
    Sieg Heil!

    Adolf got so Master F____ by those Untermenschen, that Germany was ruined forever. The psychologically damaged German people have voluntarily prostrated themselves against all sorts of invaders and are slowly being erased as a distinct ethnos.

    That’s illogical as the former East Germany (which experienced the Red Army’s advance in 1945 and was part of the Eastern bloc for 40 years) is much less psychologically damaged than the former West Germany.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Avery
    {... the former East Germany (which experienced the Red Army’s advance in 1945 and was part of the Eastern bloc for 40 years)}

    You are correct.

    My regrets if you got the impression my post was anti-German.
    In reality I have great admiration for German people and German civilization, save for a brief descent into barbarism during WW2. The fact that by and large Germans have realized what their Nazi forebears did and have sincerely atoned for it shows what civilized people they are.

    My strong words were directed at a presumed neo-Nazi/neo-Hitlerite who thinks10s of millions of Slavs would be better off dead under Nazi jackboots rather than being under Communist rule.

    And considering what Hitler had in mind for Slavic peoples, and what Nazi invaders actually did in the East, Red Army's war crimes - as they were - when they entered Germany in WW2 pale in comparison.

    {...is much less psychologically damaged than the former West Germany.}

    Quite true.

    I saw a map which I cannot find just now which showed there are hardly any Mosques in former East German section of Germany compared to former West German section. No doubt an indication of having kept their 'Germanness' largely intact, compared to former Western Germany which had the 'benefit' of being occupied by US Neocons and being systematically brainwashed and de-Germanized for 4o years.

    Best Regards.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  110. EugeneGur says:
    @Wilkey
    "Plus, the film is a back-handed slap at Russia. Russia defeated Germany."

    Russia, eh? Russia was not a sovereign nation in 1940. It was part of the USSR. At that time it was allied with the Third Reich, and would continue to be allied with the Third Reich for another year, until Hitler launched Operation Barbarossa. If Stalin hadn't foolishly decapitated his military and allowed Mannerheim to utterly embarrass him in Finland then the Soviets might have remained Hitler's ally throughout the war.

    In short, the USSR got zero mention in "Dunkirk." So far as the Russians are concerned that was all for the better, because nothing that could have been said about them in a movie set entirely in a one week period in 1940 would have been nice.

    it was allied with the Third Reich

    The USSR was never allied with the Third Reich unless you count every country with a non-aggression pact with Germany as allied with it. That would then include every country in Europe including Britain – remember, the USSR was the last to sign such pact after exhausting all other options.

    the Soviets might have remained Hitler’s ally throughout the war

    Putin once said in response to a similar remark that if a grandmother had balls (literally) and other appropriate equipment, she then would be a grandfather. This is a standard Russian expression illustrating the futility of all those “would’ve, could’ve, should’ve”.

    Ever considered the possibility that if Britain and France had concluded a pact with the USSR, as Stalin tried hard to convince them to do, and together defended Czechoslovakia instead of surrendering to Hitler in Munich, there might not have been WWII and no Dunkirk?

    Read More
    • Replies: @iffen
    Let's see, in her non-aggression pact Russia got part of Poland, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, and Romania, oh and Finland. Great Britain and France got, they got, hmmm, surely they got some countries. What would a non-aggression pact that came without countries be? Or should I ask what a non-aggression pact loaded with countries should be called?
    , @Wilkey
    LOL. You're a genuinely funny guy.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  111. Beckow says:
    @Priss Factor
    "Nazis were also planning to remove, or exterminate over time, the Czechs....
    How is that consistent with ‘Nazis not threatening European civilisation’?"

    If true, that is horrible. But, there is more to Western Civ than Czech freedom.
    After all, Brits sometimes treated the drunken Irish like savages. But it didn't mean end of British Civ.
    The crazy Thirty Years War killed 1/3 of Germans. But it didn't end German civilization.
    Swedes once invaded Poland and caused much havoc. But that didn't end Western Civ.
    Moors once had Spain and Turks once had Greece and much of Balkans. That didn't end Western Civ.

    Nazis would have set things back, but they would not have destroyed the core of Western Civ. Their main threat was to Slavs(with their own great civilization) and Jews(with their own great culture).

    Nazis had to be defeated for their great crimes against Slavs and Jews, but it's wrong to say they were a threat to the Western Core. If anything, their pathological obsession with it made them arrogant and aggressive.
    Anyway, PC and globalism are far greater threats to the Western Core today.

    Some might argue that Nazis nullified Western Civilization by acting cruel and inhuman. So, even if Hitler wanted to save European peoples(except Slavs) and arts & culture, his brutality negated Western values.
    But using this logic, Western Civilization died long ago when Spanish did horrible things to natives of New World, Anglos wiped out Aborigines, Belgians killed millions of Congolese, and Chinese were forced to buy and get addicted on opium.

    “Nazis nullified Western Civilization by acting cruel and inhuman”

    Let’s just say that they changed it. The parochial and provincial nature of Nazism didn’t help. All of it dramatically shifted attitudes. That Europe would collapse demographically was unthinkable in 1945 – there was after all the continent-wide Baby Boom to come. The gradual opening of borders was probably a function of three separate trends: new technology and ease of travel, colonial backlash, and a conscious attempts by elites to weaken working classes. It has hardened into a crazy ideology, and a lot of it is definitely a reaction (or an over-reaction) to WWII.

    My point is that Nazi Germany was acting out a hundreds of years old Western fantasy to take over or eliminate Europe’s eastern half. When one looks at Europe’s history this is rather obvious and extremely visible, maybe that’s why Western teaching of this history is so selective and skewed. This atavistic hatred of the east – as we can see today in US or UK – is very harmful to the key cause of preserving Western civilization. And it could turn out to be a fatal weakness. Even today when even an average kindergardener can see what is going on and what really threatens the West, even today the key elites are obsessed with their hatred of the east (personified by Russia).

    The alliances have not changed: in 17th century France allied with Ottomans who massacred Balkan Christians. Fast forward and in WWII Nazis allied with Crimean Tatars (of the slave raiding fame). And recently UK, France and US allied with Saudis and the Islamic world to bomb and destroy Serb Christians in Kosovo and Bosnia. It never changes. And I think it has gotten to the point that it might literally destroy the West. Those are the fruits of inexplicable hatreds and a lack of rational self-interest.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  112. syonredux says:
    @utu
    that America can be saved from this terrible fate

    It's more far gone than Britain. Always was. It all started with slavery.

    Eh. In terms of numbers, the Latinx are Anglo-America’s real enemy:

    The share of the population that is Hispanic has been steadily increasing over the past half century. In 2014, Hispanics made up 17.3% of the total U.S. population, up from 3.5% in 1960. According to the latest projections from the U.S. Census Bureau (2014), the Hispanic share of the U.S. population is expected to reach 28.6% by 2060.

    http://www.pewhispanic.org/2016/04/19/statistical-portrait-of-hispanics-in-the-united-states-key-charts/

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  113. @Priss Factor
    Russia had serfs.
    China had slaves.

    So, why don't they have race problems like the US?

    Because Russian serfs were Russian and Chinese slaves were Chinese. So, when the system was eradicated, the once-serfs or once-slaves could be like everyone else.

    In contrast, the slaves were black in America. So, when black slaves were freed, they were no longer slaves but still black, and THAT was the problem. Slavery or no slavery, blacks remained stronger, more muscular, more aggressive, more psychopathic, louder, booty-shaking, and bigger-donged.
    In a way, end of slavery caused more problems for whites since stronger and more aggressive blacks could now run free and kick the white boy's ass and get white girls.

    Blackness, not slavery, was the main problem. We see this in EU and Australia today. These blacks come as free men but they act much like crazy American blacks. Why? They are black.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simon_Mol

    Mol tried to turn Poland into Moland by sticking his dong into jungle-feverized Polish womenfolk. Polish women are known to be skanks.

    Suppose whites had enslaved other whites in America. Or the Chinese. Once freed, white ex-slaves would have melded in with other whites. Once freed, ex-slave Chinese would have looked up to bigger stronger whites and tried to fit in, like Mexican peasants used to saying 'si, senor'.

    Even if 400,000 blacks had been brought over as free people, they would have caused the same problems in the US.
    Because blacks were slaves in the US, we have this fallacy that slavery caused all the problem. But if we hypothetically change the race of the slaves, and we see it isn't so.

    No, the real problem was whites brought stronger, meaner, and more psychopathic black savages to the New World.

    Okay Priss, I’ll take the bait and answer you.

    I’ve dated a number of women who had at one time in their lives, slept with brown bantu men. None of them stayed with them.

    Why?

    Because it doesn’t take long for a white woman to realize that the brown man is full of bullsh*t.

    Whereas uncertainty is an essential part of the intelligent European man’s makeup (a certain amount of doubt that leaves room for questioning is part of the process of learning from experience and the development of a knowledge-based culture) the brown bantu man suffers from no such hesitation. As you say, he is cocky, full of himself and because of this he is largely ignorant and therefore full of bullsh*t.

    Initially, white women–young ones especially–are susceptible to their charms but after seeing the magic brown bantu in action, with all his lies, evasions and baseless, inflated sense of self esteem they see the light and leave him. Give white gals some credit.

    You see, the brown man cannot ever admit that he is wrong about anything, ever. Well, one thing white women won’t tolerate is being blamed by her man for something that he did wrong. They call bulls*t on that and he beats them. Then they leave. Sadder but wiser.

    To be sure, some white women do stay with bantus but those are women who suffer from low self esteem or who are taking revenge on their daddies. Bottom feeders. For the most part, only brown females will tolerate being beaten by their bantu beaus. It’s how he shows his love.

    And stop obsessing about long dongs. I went to integrated grade school and high school, played sports and showered with plenty of guys of both races. Not all bantus have long dongs. Some of us white guys do. We didn’t and don’t have any reason to envy bantus. Besides, a long dong is not what a woman looks for in a man. It may come as a pleasant surprise to her, but how could she have known how long the guy’s dong was before she agreed to sleep with him? Unless he made a habit of walking around with his dick out she wouldn’t have had a clue and if he had had that habit, she wouldn’t have been interested in him.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Druid
    They only realize after a couple of mixed kids that then suffer lack of financial support and care! A lot of blacks just impregnate. It's a sort of subconscious revenge!
    , @Erik Sieven
    of course most Black male White female relationships don´t last, but neither do most White male White female relationships today. But the average women today has 1-3 children. So when a white female has her 1-3 children with a black male and than leaves him that doesn't change anything anymore.
    , @Priss Factor
    You're saying you feed on leftovers of black men.

    They are like lions who eat the prime meat. Once they had their fill and fun with white women and look for fresh ones, you enter like hyena or vulture and feed on the scraps. This is what makes you happy?

    Imagine a restaurant. You order something, but the Negro takes the plate and eats the best meat. After he's finished, you feed on leftover scraps. It's like dogs feeding on scrapes from a doggy bag.

    It's just another kind of cuck-behavior.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OJgNgj-scH8

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wa0lf3BLepw
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  114. People should be hung from lampposts—they should be burned alive—for what they’ve done to Britain.

    And a similar fate should’ve happened to those who were Hell bent on destroying Germany and Japan and pre-USSR Russia.

    And Iraq, and Libya, and now Syria to name just a fraction of those meant for destruction.

    Revisionism as applied to World War II and its origins (as also for previous wars) has the general function of bringing historical truth to an American and a world public that had been drugged by wartime lies and propaganda. This, in itself, is a virtue. But some truths of history, of course, may be largely of antiquarian interest, with little relevance to present-day concerns. This is not true of World War II revisionism, which has much critical significance for today’s world.

    The least of the lessons that revisionism can teach has already been thoroughly learned: that Germany and Japan are not uniquely “aggressor nations,” doomed from birth to menace the peace of the world. The larger lessons have, unfortunately, yet to be learned.

    Murray N. Rothbard, Revisionism for Our Time

    https://mises.org/library/revisionism-our-time

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  115. @Jay Igaboo
    A splendid and well-reasoned analogy, Priss Factor.
    Regrettably, it misses to mention The Tribe who did the most to inflict this pox upon us, The Tribe who secured their survival at the expense of the Allies sons, The Tribe who STILL use or sons (and a tiny few of our daughters) to fight their enemies.
    My father served in the RAF during WW2,(he got a 30-day deferment to his call up to build a one-room shack for my then 18 months old oldest brother and my pregnant mother after they were blitzed out of Clydebank, a town of 40.000 souls that had only SIX houses undamaged by the two-night blitz.
    Two uncles died in service.
    Was it worth it?
    Was it hell.
    They wished no harm to anyone of any race, like most Britons they were appalled by the way Blacks were treated in the US, but by the 80s,when Britain was beginning to be swamped by ever-more demanding, more criminal and ungrateful minorities, that was beginning to turn thin.
    They would be revolted and utterly amazed at what the Left and greedy business has done to destroy Britain.
    As it Talleyrand who wrote that "Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel"?
    That is true in some cases, but anti-patriotism (and active support of, or passive virtue -signalling of PC is the immediate refuge of the most malicious of many a modern scoundrel.

    It was supposedly Samuel Johnson, not Talleyrand, who said “Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel.”

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jay Igaboo
    Hence my asking--thanks.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  116. CanSpeccy says: • Website
    @Corvinus
    "Concerning the hangings from lampposts, could we please start with..."

    Always trying to have others do your dirty work. Typical.

    Always trying to have others do your dirty work. Typical.

    Corvinus, being stupid, as usual.

    What’s dirty about hanging traitors intent on destroying your nation?

    And where’s the basis for pretending I want someone else to do the hanging.

    It’s true, though, the job would be best left to a professional.

    And to adhere to constitutional forms, The House of Commons should exercise its sovereignty and pass a bill of attainder.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    "What’s dirty about hanging traitors intent on destroying your nation?"

    Nothing at all, except you are assuming that your countrymen who exercise their own freedom to enable non-English to enter the the country are traitors, and that these immigrants are hell bent on destroying everything in its path.

    "And where’s the basis for pretending I want someone else to do the hanging."

    If merry ol' England is being overrun by "invaders", and all you do is lament that nothing is being done about the situation, then you directly contributing to the demise of your nation. You demand others get involved to stop this trend cold in it tracks, but do not take the proper steps yourself to be on the front lines.

    "Now the common man of England sees his posterity destroyed, his job taken by an Asian or African or Middle-Easter coolie with no roots, no concept of rights, and long experience of, and submission to, a corrupt and tyrannical ruling class."

    Some common men.

    "All the while, the process of genocide is pushed forward by government and educational bureaucracies, and by the police, whileit is cheered on by cucks, ruling class traitors, the media and people like Corvinus."

    You are hyperventilating again. There is no "genocide" taking place. Again, if you feel so strongly about your nation being "invaded", why are you not physically doing something about it?

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  117. @Dan Hayes
    "People should be hung from lampposts, they should be burned alive, for what they've done to Britain."

    I agree with the author, Peter Brimelow, except with Ireland being substituted for Britain.

    What Blair did to Britain, Allan Shatter has done to Ireland. And in Ireland the populace seems to be blissfully unaware of the transformation taking place.

    Interestingly, quite some time ago Brimelow expressed the same general thoughts to me regarding Ireland (although in a more moderate tone)!

    Canada too. Toronto has been destroyed. ITs 50% non-White and hell.

    Meanwhile, Trudeau celebrates ‘new Canadians’ as the most real Canadians.

    Mulroney, Chretien, T1, Harper, T2 and all the government elite and bureaucracy are complicit in this invasion and crime. They all must answer.

    There is ONE problem: Africa for Africans, Asia for Asians, White countries for everyone IS White Genocide.
    ITs a crime, not a policy option.
    Canadians Speak: The Prime Minister’s 150th anniversary ‘dialogue’ on Canada’s future.

    https://ddswaterloo.wordpress.com/2017/02/09/a-dialogue-on-canadas-150th-anniversary/

    Read More
    • Agree: Dan Hayes
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  118. Dr. X says:
    @TheJester
    If I can follow the above narrative, the British won the battle for WWII ... but then quickly lost the war for survival. The British held off an invasion by the Germans (close relatives in language, religion, history, and culture) only to be swallowed whole a few years later by an invasion from a basket of Third World peoples with alien languages, religions, cultures, and a significantly lower average IQ.

    At Dunkirk and throughout WWII, the British stood united as a people with purpose as they fought for their survival as a free people. However, they were never consulted about the follow-on invasion. The second invasion was quietly implemented by the Foreign Office and other government apparatchiks. It was undemocratic and, in practical terms, forthrightly treasonous.

    The new reality: London has a Muslim mayor. The country is filled with mosques and "no-g0" areas policed by Muslim religious police enforcing Islamic-sanctioned social behaviors. Sharia Law has official status in British civil cases. Gangs of Muslim youth roam the streets beating up whites because they are white. Other Muslims traffick white teenage girls into drugs and prostitution. London is experiencing a brash of random acid attacks on innocent people. Female circumcision and honor killings are quietly tolerated.

    A short stint of occupation by the Wehrmacht in WWII might have been preferable to this reality. It is doubtful that Chancellor Hitler would have tolerated open borders and a massive invasion by alien peoples and cultures. Indeed, Hitler admired his British cousins and their empire. He, in fact, sought a peace treaty with Britain that would have given Britain a free hand in their overseas empire in return for the Germans having a free hand in Europe. He wanted a partnership, not conquest.

    The open question is, Why did the British fight WWII against enormous odds ... only to quickly fold as gelded "cucks" to an invasion that is marking the end of Britain as a country and the British as a people? Losing their army at Dunkirk, suing Germany for peace, or suffering a short occupation would not have had such a disastrous outcome.

    So, in the final analysis, Dunkirk was a Pyrrhic victory. An uplifting story or fortitude and heroism that, in the final analysis, did little to protect the survival of Britain as a country and the British as a people.

    The British held off an invasion by the Germans (close relatives in language, religion, history, and culture) only to be swallowed whole a few years later by an invasion from a basket of Third World peoples… A short stint of occupation by the Wehrmacht in WWII might have been preferable to this reality.

    The Germans were never going to invade Britain. Sure, they had plans drawn up — Operation Sea Lion. But militaries draw up all sorts of contingency plans that have no practical chance of seeing the light of day.

    Practically speaking, Germany as a land power had no tactical ability to actually accomplish such an invasion. Strategically, it was unnecessary. The grand German strategy was to conquer Eastern Europe and the USSR. Their only concern in the West was keeping France and Britain off their backs so that they didn’t have to fight a two-front war when they launched Barbarossa, and this was largely accomplished between Dunkirk and D-Day.

    Indeed, Hitler wanted peace with the British once they were off the Continent… Rudolf Hess went on his secret flight to Britain to attempt to negotiate peace.

    Finally, I think you’re presenting a false choice between “a short stint” of German occupation vs. being overrun by Third Worlders. France experienced a short German occupation, but today they’re allowing themselves to be inundated by Third World Arabs, Muslims, and blacks.

    Read More
    • Replies: @ThreeCranes
    Good comment. And why was Hess imprisoned for so long? I've never understood that. Any clues?
    , @David Davenport
    Their only concern in the West was keeping France and Britain off their backs so that they didn’t have to fight a two-front war when they launched Barbarossa, and this was largely accomplished between Dunkirk and D-Day.

    Indeed, Hitler wanted peace with the British once they were off the Continent… Rudolf Hess went on his secret flight to Britain to attempt to negotiate peace.


    Their only concern? Then why did "they" declare war on the USA ?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  119. @anon
    A Stalin may be the only way to save Britain, but he'd want to show up soon.

    A Stalin may be the only way to save Britain, but he’d want to show up soon.

    All it takes is some money bags and, “Presto!,” done deal. (Those cats can flip-flop on a dime.)

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  120. @anonymous

    Social rot in Britain started from the top.
     
    The 'elites', or whatever one prefers to call them, are the culprits in all this. They're the true believers and purveyors of the religion of PC-cult-think mind-rot. It's something that's been imposed on everyone else and has been mandated throughout the educational system to brainwash the younger people growing up in it, creating new generations of true believers. This was never due to any grassroots demand but has been a top-down imposition. It's a problem throughout the world where the leadership class despise the average person and consider them to be merely fungible protoplasm. Is it too late for Britainistan or other countries such as the US or Germany? Perhaps, but lets not count someone out until the count of ten has been reached. It's going to be close; bad times loom ahead. I'm not optimistic, however.

    It’s a problem throughout the world where the leadership class despise the average person and consider them to be merely fungible protoplasm.

    Yup.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  121. @Achmed E. Newman
    Between the Russians and Chinese commenters here, I can't understand half of what people are saying. It may be somewhat annoying, but you all should think about turning grammar-check on. Just try to put up a comment that is not ALL underlined in wavy green, and we'd really appreciate it.

    (We have Daniel Cheih (sp?) on here as an example of how to write correctly - with great commentary, I might add - even while being Chinese. For Russian, there is a guy on Zerohedge named Boris Alotovkrap.)

    Boris Alotovkrap

    Boris? I thought his first name was Fullova. ;)

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  122. @Dr. X

    The British held off an invasion by the Germans (close relatives in language, religion, history, and culture) only to be swallowed whole a few years later by an invasion from a basket of Third World peoples... A short stint of occupation by the Wehrmacht in WWII might have been preferable to this reality.
     
    The Germans were never going to invade Britain. Sure, they had plans drawn up -- Operation Sea Lion. But militaries draw up all sorts of contingency plans that have no practical chance of seeing the light of day.

    Practically speaking, Germany as a land power had no tactical ability to actually accomplish such an invasion. Strategically, it was unnecessary. The grand German strategy was to conquer Eastern Europe and the USSR. Their only concern in the West was keeping France and Britain off their backs so that they didn't have to fight a two-front war when they launched Barbarossa, and this was largely accomplished between Dunkirk and D-Day.

    Indeed, Hitler wanted peace with the British once they were off the Continent... Rudolf Hess went on his secret flight to Britain to attempt to negotiate peace.

    Finally, I think you're presenting a false choice between "a short stint" of German occupation vs. being overrun by Third Worlders. France experienced a short German occupation, but today they're allowing themselves to be inundated by Third World Arabs, Muslims, and blacks.

    Good comment. And why was Hess imprisoned for so long? I’ve never understood that. Any clues?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Dr. X

    Good comment. And why was Hess imprisoned for so long? I’ve never understood that. Any clues?
     
    Guilt by association.

    After 1945, Nazis became stand-ins for Satan in a secularized, Judaized world. Anyone remotely associated with Nazism was going to be hunted down forever. They're still arresting 87-year olds who were junior officers in 1945 and accusing them of war crimes -- someone as close to Hitler as the Deputy Fuhrer was never going to see the light of day.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  123. Alden says:
    @Priss Factor
    Russia had serfs.
    China had slaves.

    So, why don't they have race problems like the US?

    Because Russian serfs were Russian and Chinese slaves were Chinese. So, when the system was eradicated, the once-serfs or once-slaves could be like everyone else.

    In contrast, the slaves were black in America. So, when black slaves were freed, they were no longer slaves but still black, and THAT was the problem. Slavery or no slavery, blacks remained stronger, more muscular, more aggressive, more psychopathic, louder, booty-shaking, and bigger-donged.
    In a way, end of slavery caused more problems for whites since stronger and more aggressive blacks could now run free and kick the white boy's ass and get white girls.

    Blackness, not slavery, was the main problem. We see this in EU and Australia today. These blacks come as free men but they act much like crazy American blacks. Why? They are black.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simon_Mol

    Mol tried to turn Poland into Moland by sticking his dong into jungle-feverized Polish womenfolk. Polish women are known to be skanks.

    Suppose whites had enslaved other whites in America. Or the Chinese. Once freed, white ex-slaves would have melded in with other whites. Once freed, ex-slave Chinese would have looked up to bigger stronger whites and tried to fit in, like Mexican peasants used to saying 'si, senor'.

    Even if 400,000 blacks had been brought over as free people, they would have caused the same problems in the US.
    Because blacks were slaves in the US, we have this fallacy that slavery caused all the problem. But if we hypothetically change the race of the slaves, and we see it isn't so.

    No, the real problem was whites brought stronger, meaner, and more psychopathic black savages to the New World.

    Would you mind keeping your homo porn fantasies to yourself? You want to be raped by big, mean, aggressive black men with us usually large dongs. We get it. You post this several times a week.

    So get out your jar of lubricant and fantasize away.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Priss Factor
    You're living in denial.

    It's not just happening in schools and nightclubs.

    https://www.amren.com/features/2016/12/blacks-changed-school/

    they typically date white girls. Today’s young people are fully open to interracial dating, and our school does nothing to discourage it. How can we? Any teacher or administrator who has voiced any sort of contempt for such behavior has been accused of racism. We have caught many interracial couples having sex in the school building, sometimes during school hours. To my knowledge, no white couple has ever been caught doing this.

    It is being PROPAGATED BY THE STATE as the right thing.

    And what do Andrew Sullivan and Milo, two 'conservative' homo men', have in common? Addiction to Negroes. As with homo men, it will spread among white women.. especially as EU now seems defenseless against the arrival of millions and millions of black African men.
    Also, remember Simon Mol in Poland? A single Negro man can hump a 100 white women.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  124. SMK says: • Website
    @TheJester
    If I can follow the above narrative, the British won the battle for WWII ... but then quickly lost the war for survival. The British held off an invasion by the Germans (close relatives in language, religion, history, and culture) only to be swallowed whole a few years later by an invasion from a basket of Third World peoples with alien languages, religions, cultures, and a significantly lower average IQ.

    At Dunkirk and throughout WWII, the British stood united as a people with purpose as they fought for their survival as a free people. However, they were never consulted about the follow-on invasion. The second invasion was quietly implemented by the Foreign Office and other government apparatchiks. It was undemocratic and, in practical terms, forthrightly treasonous.

    The new reality: London has a Muslim mayor. The country is filled with mosques and "no-g0" areas policed by Muslim religious police enforcing Islamic-sanctioned social behaviors. Sharia Law has official status in British civil cases. Gangs of Muslim youth roam the streets beating up whites because they are white. Other Muslims traffick white teenage girls into drugs and prostitution. London is experiencing a brash of random acid attacks on innocent people. Female circumcision and honor killings are quietly tolerated.

    A short stint of occupation by the Wehrmacht in WWII might have been preferable to this reality. It is doubtful that Chancellor Hitler would have tolerated open borders and a massive invasion by alien peoples and cultures. Indeed, Hitler admired his British cousins and their empire. He, in fact, sought a peace treaty with Britain that would have given Britain a free hand in their overseas empire in return for the Germans having a free hand in Europe. He wanted a partnership, not conquest.

    The open question is, Why did the British fight WWII against enormous odds ... only to quickly fold as gelded "cucks" to an invasion that is marking the end of Britain as a country and the British as a people? Losing their army at Dunkirk, suing Germany for peace, or suffering a short occupation would not have had such a disastrous outcome.

    So, in the final analysis, Dunkirk was a Pyrrhic victory. An uplifting story or fortitude and heroism that, in the final analysis, did little to protect the survival of Britain as a country and the British as a people.

    Only an end to Muslim and African immigration, immediately, and mass deportations/expulsions, will save the UK and Western Europe. But that will never happen, of course. Even Douglas Murray, author of “The Strange Death of Europe,” opposes a ban on Muslim and African immigration, and mass expulsions, and is contemptuous of the people and groups who’d enact such laws and policies and thus save the UK and Western Europe.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  125. mobi says:
    @Sergey Krieger
    No idea what this fuss is about. Brits were able to evacuate because Hitler still hoped to get along with them. Germans could get them all if an order were given. But it shows nicely how this machine works. Make some dramatic movies about even this shameful event in Britain history, ignore completely true great battles that turned the tide of war because those were fought by USSR and do it consistently over decades. And here we have what we have. Completely distorted history of WW2 in the West and ignorant public.

    Make some dramatic movies about even this shameful event in Britain history, ignore completely true great battles that turned the tide of war because those were fought by USSR and do it consistently over decades. And here we have what we have. Completely distorted history of WW2 in the West and ignorant public.

    Please,

    Has any people in history ever got their asses so thoroughly kicked, lost so much territory so quickly, or collapsed so incompetently on the battlefield, as Russians in the first 6 months of invasion? (6 months, mind you, not 6 weeks).

    Russia defeated Germany, not Russians.

    Cling firmly, though, because, as always, it’s all you have to cling to.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Sergey Krieger
    Ah, General Winter? Heard this nonsense many times. Germans at the time was the best military in the world and while losing territory and battles Soviet army was indeed doing one thing. It was fighting and French, Polish, Brits collapsed within a week or two unable to offer much resistance at all . And what was the outcome? At the end Soviet army prevailed all on her own. Regarding never in history, I would disagree. Remember Second Punic war? Hannibal crashed Roman armies in 4 major battles in a row. All that matter is outcome and Germans were not defeated by distances but by Soviet Union political system, Soviet people, army, generals and Soviet leadership. Do some reading before making these sweaping generalizations.
    , @Avery
    {Has any people in history ever got their asses so thoroughly kicked, lost so much territory so quickly, or collapsed so incompetently on the battlefield, as Russians in the first 6 months of invasion? (6 months, mind you, not 6 weeks).}

    Yes: France.
    They lost their entire country.

    Wehrmacht vanquished all of France in 46 days.
    France in fact had about 1,000 more and newer tanks than Germany in 1940.
    (Germany ~2,400. France ~3,400)
    More guns. (Germany ~7,400. France ~14,000).
    Same number of divisions/troops.
    France folded in 46 days.

    The BEF and the French ran – ran - to Dunkirk to escape the advancing panzers.
    Pretty much most of Europe, save for neutrals and Nazi allies, was under Nazi occupation by the end of 1939, after the occupation of Poland in Oct 6,1939.
    Compare the size of Nazi occupied Europe vs size of Nazi occupied USSR*: which is larger?

    Please indeed.

    *
    Germans reached roughly the line from Leningrad to Moscow to Stalingrad.
    http://germanhistorydocs.ghi-dc.org/map.cfm?map_id=2888
    , @Avery
    {Russia defeated Germany, not Russians.}

    West can’t accept that Russians (e.g. Napoleon invasion) and Soviets (WW2, overwhelmingly Slavic peoples) are as good as them and maybe even better when it comes to fighting, so constantly denigrate their achievements and valor.

    The red herring of General Winter has been trotted out ever since Napoleon’s Grand Armee of ~700,00 was reduced to… [When the remnants of Napoleon's army crossed the Berezina River in November, only 27,000 effective soldiers remained](Wiki).
    Yeah, sure, Soviet generals and Soviet soldiers did not win the Battle of Moscow, the Battle of Stalingrad, the Battle of Kursk*,…..: it was all General Winter.
    Lucky Soviets/Russians.

    Did Soviet troops somehow manage to fight in balmy 70F degree weather while the Nazi invaders and their hangers on were freezing to death in -30C degree in Stalingrad? Soviet troops were fighting in the same ungodly weather conditions as the invaders.

    Soviets were smart enough to equip their troops with loose fitting felt boots, Telogreika overcoats, warm hats – while stupid Nazis equipped their troops with tight fitting leather jackboots that caused frostbite and gangrene.
    Steel helmets that froze to the stupid Nazi heads.
    Crisp tight-fitting Nazi uniforms that lost body heat.

    Soviet tank designers were smart enough to design the T-34 with wide tracks so it would not sink in mud or snow like the Panzers.

    Soviet sniper rifle designers were smart enough to design their rifles with a large adjustment knob to zero their sniper rifles, which could be done with gloves in freezing weather, while German ‘superior engineering’ required a tool to adjust/zero their sniper rifles: very hard to do in freezing weather.

    War is not a contest between gentlemen.
    When someone invades your home, your land, you kill them any way you can, using every natural advantage you have. Nobody gives out medals or accolades for ‘honorably’ losing your land and your people to invaders .


    {Cling firmly, though, because, as always, it’s all you have to cling to.}

    Likewise, cling firmly to your fantasies of Russian inferiority.
    Except next time when West decides to cling to their amnesiac view of Russia and invades again, what will rise over Reichstag/Bundestag will not be a Russian flag: it will be the payload of a Sarmat.

    Good night.
    ___________
    *
    The Battle of Kursk: 5 July 1943 – 16 July 1943: where was General Winter when Soviets needed him.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  126. Avery says:
    @German_reader

    Adolf got so Master F____ by those Untermenschen, that Germany was ruined forever. The psychologically damaged German people have voluntarily prostrated themselves against all sorts of invaders and are slowly being erased as a distinct ethnos.
     
    That's illogical as the former East Germany (which experienced the Red Army's advance in 1945 and was part of the Eastern bloc for 40 years) is much less psychologically damaged than the former West Germany.

    {… the former East Germany (which experienced the Red Army’s advance in 1945 and was part of the Eastern bloc for 40 years)}

    You are correct.

    My regrets if you got the impression my post was anti-German.
    In reality I have great admiration for German people and German civilization, save for a brief descent into barbarism during WW2. The fact that by and large Germans have realized what their Nazi forebears did and have sincerely atoned for it shows what civilized people they are.

    My strong words were directed at a presumed neo-Nazi/neo-Hitlerite who thinks10s of millions of Slavs would be better off dead under Nazi jackboots rather than being under Communist rule.

    And considering what Hitler had in mind for Slavic peoples, and what Nazi invaders actually did in the East, Red Army’s war crimes – as they were – when they entered Germany in WW2 pale in comparison.

    {…is much less psychologically damaged than the former West Germany.}

    Quite true.

    I saw a map which I cannot find just now which showed there are hardly any Mosques in former East German section of Germany compared to former West German section. No doubt an indication of having kept their ‘Germanness’ largely intact, compared to former Western Germany which had the ‘benefit’ of being occupied by US Neocons and being systematically brainwashed and de-Germanized for 4o years.

    Best Regards.

    Read More
    • Agree: German_reader
    • Replies: @iffen
    brief descent into barbarism during WW2

    Well, there was that Roman Empire thing, but that was a long time ago.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  127. Anonym says:

    The media have a very large, perhaps even the largest part to play in preventing a national conversation from taking place. I agree with you – the media barons, the editors, and their lapdog journalists should be hung from the lamp-posts, or worse. They are the ones who have decided where the boundaries are with our national conversation for the last half century, the boundaries of which totally excluded doing something about committing national suicide.

    The politicians are equally to blame. Blair and his compatriots, but the rot goes back further than Blair. I would be tempted to include whatever children they have had, so that whatever it was in their DNA to sell out their country gets extinguished from the gene pool. I am not sure if it is necessary to go that far though. At least Breivik let the leftist leaders of the national suicide know that their children are not safe from their own treason. Their children would not be able to cling to each other, insulated by their wealth in their gated communities.

    While we apportion blame it also includes the business leaders who have paid lobbyists and politicians to push this national suicide. The NGOs such as Amnesty International. And the opinion leaders such as Geldof and Bono who have turned “virtue” signalling into an art form and a marketing tool.

    The entertainment industry and the education industry – those who decided which books were appropriate and the publishers and authors who created the new anti-white curricula.

    Traitors, all of them, and deserving of the gallows. How many to include as good policy? I am not sure.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  128. PC favors Parasites over Patriots.

    It would even have us believe that Parasites are patriots, and vice versa.

    But these invaders and ‘migrants’ come like animals with primal drives. All this stuff about ‘principles’ is a fantasy held only by whites who read and cling to creed than breed. Sure, non-whites learn to speak the PC lingo quickly to hoodwink ‘whitey’ and also because it sanctifies their animal hunger and greed for what the West got. But they went to the West purely for animal reasons: Material Lust.

    Black predatory parasitic mentality thinks, “If they got that and if I don’t have it, and if I want it but they don’t gibs me dat, I will take it and it be rightfully mine cuz….. ‘racism’ and shi*.”

    With each year, predatory and parasitic non-whites can smell the blood. They are like hyenas sensing a sick or wounded hippo, rhino, or elephant. They sense they can bring it down.

    And then, as Africans rape Europe and as Muslims take over communities, more will arrive like vultures and pick off what’s remaining.

    But whites are too addicted to ‘vibrant’ thrills, distracted & dissipated with homomania, cucked with jungle fever, infected with ‘white guilt’, and addicted to self-righteous supremacism of PC meth-crack that they won’t realize the full measure of their stupidity.

    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/rashan-charles-protest-latest-fireworks-riot-metropolitan-police-dalston-hackney-chase-fire-a7866066.html

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  129. Miro23 says:
    @ANONymous

    Hitler’s main non-military topic of conversation while Barbarossa was underway was the post war organization of Germany’s Empire in the East . . . The plan was for a European land empire to rival the British Empire (which he admired) but run on much harsher lines.
     
    Source??

    Hitler’s main non-military topic of conversation while Barbarossa was underway was the post war organization of Germany’s Empire in the East . . . The plan was for a European land empire to rival the British Empire (which he admired) but run on much harsher lines.

    Source??

    Hitler’s Table Talk 1941 – 1944 by H.R. Trevor-Roper (Editor), Gerhard L. Weinberg (Introduction) texts assembled from the stenographic record of Hitler’s informal conversations ordered by Martin Bormann. https://www.amazon.com/Hitlers-Table-Talk-1941-1944/dp/1929631669/ref=cm_cr-mr-title , A very interesting read.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  130. KenH says:
    @Miro23

    The entire purpose of Hitler launching W0rld War II in 1939 was to defeat the Soviet Union and “Jewish Bolshevism.” Jewish communists, inspired and trained by Moscow, had launched revolutions in Berlin, Bavaria, and Hungary in 1919. Trotsky trained Bela Kuhn (Cohn), the Jewish communist who established the Hungarian Soviet. The Jewess Rosa Luxembourg led a communist coup in Berlin, and Jew Eugen Levine created the Bavarian Soviet before being shot to death by the Freikorps.
     
    This is all true that Hitler had a long term plan to invade the East, but finishing with Jewish Bolshevism was secondary since by 1941 Stalin had mostly completed the job already, having morphed from an employee of the Jewish Bolshevik leadership, to collaborator, to dictator and then to executioner.

    Hitler's main non-military topic of conversation while Barbarossa was underway was the post war organization of Germany's Empire in the East (Urals in the East to the Black Sea in the South) involving the physical destruction of Moscow and St Petersburg, the wholesale removal of Slavs from the Ukraine to make way for German only zones (the whole Black Sea coast), construction of Germans only autobahns across Greater Germany (Russia) and the large scale construction of exclusive German towns for German settlers with Slavs banished to a distance of 20km and being kept in a state of essential slavery. The plan was for a European land empire to rival the British Empire (which he admired) but run on much harsher lines.

    Hitler’s main non-military topic of conversation while Barbarossa was underway was the post war organization of Germany’s Empire in the East (

    People have been making these claims the last several weeks but never consider that the Soviet Union murdered and imprisoned more of its own people than any nation in history. Twenty million is a conservative estimate. They murdered or deported over 500K Volga Germans, who were invited into Russia in the 18th century, to slave labor camps in the fall of 1941.

    The Soviet gulag system resumed shortly after WWII as did retribution against anyone who opposed them, so it wasn’t as if Eastern Europe and Soviet Russia returned to being a bucolic land of freedom, peace and plenty after the war. If Hitler or others within his inner circle were truly planning on a widespread colonization of the East then it wouldn’t have been worse than what Lenin and Stalin had already inflicted on the hapless peoples of Eastern Europe, the Baltic states and Russia both before and after WWII.

    It seems it’s only “worse” because Nazi ideology was objectionable (i.e., belief that Jews were congenitally evil and in Slavic inferiority). A cold blooded murderer and criminal like Stalin is accorded more respect presumably because he was not preoccupied with race and was an equal opportunity murderer.

    Read More
    • Agree: jacques sheete
    • Replies: @iffen
    The Soviet gulag system

    That's just a lot of Western propaganda aided by hacks and falsifiers such as Solzhenitsyn and other Vlasovyte “dissidents” and other types.
    , @German_reader

    Twenty million is a conservative estimate.
     
    That's almost certainly much too high an estimate. The communists committed monstrous crimes, and if you add together deaths in the famines during the Russian civil war, the famines in Ukraine and other areas (Central Asia etc.) in 1932/33, the Great Terror and deaths in the camp system you might get to ten million deaths or even somewhat more over a 30-year period. But 20 million isn't really credible anymore...if you use such numbers, what's the detailed source for them?
    Also the Nazis had fairly radical plans which they didn't get to fully implement, like deliberately starving to death millions in the Soviet Union to make room for German settlers...that would have been significantly worse than post-war Soviet rule, despite all the Stalinist repression.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  131. mp says:
    @Corvinus
    "John Derbyshire needs to be strung up first. He married a Chinese woman and has Chinese offspring. He is an avid philosemite."

    People make up their own minds to marry within or outside their race. That is their liberty. Why are you opposed to individual freedom?

    Some people, like the poster in question, are easily confused. There is a difference between a private act, and public policy. If someone wants to marry a foreigner, that is their choice. On the other hand, if the government tells you that you have to marry a foreigner, as a matter of policy, then it’s something else altogether. Bringing in a foreigner as a spouse, and taking care of her, is not the same thing as the government mandating that tens of thousands of foreigners be allowed entry.

    As far as hanging goes? I’d say that those promoting indigenous dispossession as policy should be banished to the countries they like so much. They could work as domestic servants for the people they love, and care about. Helping them in their daily chores, etc. No need to hang anyone, really.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    "On the other hand, if the government tells you that you have to marry a foreigner, as a matter of policy, then it’s something else altogether."

    What pieces of legislation "tells" Americans they must marry foreigners?

    "As far as hanging goes? I’d say that those promoting indigenous dispossession as policy should be banished to the countries they like so much."

    First, immigration does not necessarily "promote indigenous dispossession". Second, how does your proposal meet constitutional scrutiny?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  132. iffen says:
    @EugeneGur

    it was allied with the Third Reich
     
    The USSR was never allied with the Third Reich unless you count every country with a non-aggression pact with Germany as allied with it. That would then include every country in Europe including Britain - remember, the USSR was the last to sign such pact after exhausting all other options.

    the Soviets might have remained Hitler’s ally throughout the war

     

    Putin once said in response to a similar remark that if a grandmother had balls (literally) and other appropriate equipment, she then would be a grandfather. This is a standard Russian expression illustrating the futility of all those "would've, could've, should've".

    Ever considered the possibility that if Britain and France had concluded a pact with the USSR, as Stalin tried hard to convince them to do, and together defended Czechoslovakia instead of surrendering to Hitler in Munich, there might not have been WWII and no Dunkirk?

    Let’s see, in her non-aggression pact Russia got part of Poland, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, and Romania, oh and Finland. Great Britain and France got, they got, hmmm, surely they got some countries. What would a non-aggression pact that came without countries be? Or should I ask what a non-aggression pact loaded with countries should be called?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  133. wrd9 says:
    @Achmed E. Newman
    I don't think it's very helpful to try to break it down into "this generation did this." and "this generation did that." There are the same types who want to control people and/or ruin their way of life, call 'em Commies, Globalists, progressives, the cntrl-left, or whatever, in each generation. I don't think there'd be enough lampposts for the whole Baby Boomer generation, anyway. The millennials would build more, but they first would have to find a lamppost manufacturing and installation "APP" for that.

    They’d just use 3D printers.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  134. iffen says:
    @Avery
    {... the former East Germany (which experienced the Red Army’s advance in 1945 and was part of the Eastern bloc for 40 years)}

    You are correct.

    My regrets if you got the impression my post was anti-German.
    In reality I have great admiration for German people and German civilization, save for a brief descent into barbarism during WW2. The fact that by and large Germans have realized what their Nazi forebears did and have sincerely atoned for it shows what civilized people they are.

    My strong words were directed at a presumed neo-Nazi/neo-Hitlerite who thinks10s of millions of Slavs would be better off dead under Nazi jackboots rather than being under Communist rule.

    And considering what Hitler had in mind for Slavic peoples, and what Nazi invaders actually did in the East, Red Army's war crimes - as they were - when they entered Germany in WW2 pale in comparison.

    {...is much less psychologically damaged than the former West Germany.}

    Quite true.

    I saw a map which I cannot find just now which showed there are hardly any Mosques in former East German section of Germany compared to former West German section. No doubt an indication of having kept their 'Germanness' largely intact, compared to former Western Germany which had the 'benefit' of being occupied by US Neocons and being systematically brainwashed and de-Germanized for 4o years.

    Best Regards.

    brief descent into barbarism during WW2

    Well, there was that Roman Empire thing, but that was a long time ago.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Avery
    Yeah, 2,000 years ago.

    Germanic tribes were considered barbarian by the Romans and by and larger they were.
    But over a period of ~2,000 years Germanic tribes coalesced into a German people and German civilization that gave the civilized world the likes of Ludwig van Beethoven, Johann Sebastian Bach,.....

    I don't know too many other formerly barbaric and/or nomadic peoples, if any, who have had such a remarkable transformation and ascent.
    , @TomSchmidt
    You might read the book Barbarians, by Terry Jones, for a picture of the Romans. Civilised we might not call them when we see how their empire was built.

    Counter to that is the recent Fall of the Roman Empire and the End of Civilization, which makes the point that, after the Romans left Britain, living standards declined to lower than they had been before the conquest of Britain by Rome.
    https://www.amazon.com/Fall-Rome-End-Civilization/dp/0192807285

    Best: Mohammed and Charlemagne, Revisited. Roman Empire collapsing in the third century, rising into the seventh century, even in the West. Then, Islam, cutting off trade with the East; coins disappear from the west, as does papyrus, leading to an inability to record business transactions cheaply, leading to a true dark age.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  135. Z-man says:

    But the British army in Nolan’s Dunkirk is totally, completely and stunningly white.

    No, there was one black soldier. He might have been a French colonial but the odds are he was Jamaican! LOL!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  136. Ace says:
    @utu
    that America can be saved from this terrible fate

    It's more far gone than Britain. Always was. It all started with slavery.

    There has hardly been one minute of our national existence where we have not had to deal with the pathologies of the black presence. Damn those who brought black slaves to this land.

    Read More
    • Replies: @utu
    Damn those who brought black slaves to this land.

    It was greed. Initially get rich quick scheme practiced by British gentlemen (also by French) to grow sugar cane, tobacco, coffee and cotton in the New World. Later it went on industrials scale.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  137. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @Sergey Krieger
    We did. But in Russian and for mostly internal use. Also, considering Russian character even in those movies that were shown in the West it was not about great battles but rather people like Ballad about soldier and few others. Anglo Saxon like to boast but in reality are not that good as history shows in military matters.

    That’s because Anglos specialize in divide and conquer, just like the jews. And don’t like to get their hands dirty unless they have guns and they are fighting against people who have spears.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  138. iffen says:
    @KenH

    Hitler’s main non-military topic of conversation while Barbarossa was underway was the post war organization of Germany’s Empire in the East (
     
    People have been making these claims the last several weeks but never consider that the Soviet Union murdered and imprisoned more of its own people than any nation in history. Twenty million is a conservative estimate. They murdered or deported over 500K Volga Germans, who were invited into Russia in the 18th century, to slave labor camps in the fall of 1941.

    The Soviet gulag system resumed shortly after WWII as did retribution against anyone who opposed them, so it wasn't as if Eastern Europe and Soviet Russia returned to being a bucolic land of freedom, peace and plenty after the war. If Hitler or others within his inner circle were truly planning on a widespread colonization of the East then it wouldn't have been worse than what Lenin and Stalin had already inflicted on the hapless peoples of Eastern Europe, the Baltic states and Russia both before and after WWII.

    It seems it's only "worse" because Nazi ideology was objectionable (i.e., belief that Jews were congenitally evil and in Slavic inferiority). A cold blooded murderer and criminal like Stalin is accorded more respect presumably because he was not preoccupied with race and was an equal opportunity murderer.

    The Soviet gulag system

    That’s just a lot of Western propaganda aided by hacks and falsifiers such as Solzhenitsyn and other Vlasovyte “dissidents” and other types.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Achmed E. Newman
    What do you call the places the millions of dissidents or just "enemies of the state" like Solzhenitsyn stayed in then, half-way houses?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  139. Avery says:
    @iffen
    brief descent into barbarism during WW2

    Well, there was that Roman Empire thing, but that was a long time ago.

    Yeah, 2,000 years ago.

    Germanic tribes were considered barbarian by the Romans and by and larger they were.
    But over a period of ~2,000 years Germanic tribes coalesced into a German people and German civilization that gave the civilized world the likes of Ludwig van Beethoven, Johann Sebastian Bach,…..

    I don’t know too many other formerly barbaric and/or nomadic peoples, if any, who have had such a remarkable transformation and ascent.

    Read More
    • Replies: @iffen
    Armenians have that diaspora thing going on, don't they?
    , @Jake
    That happened for only 1 reason: Germans eventually became Catholic.

    When the Goths sacked the city of Rome in 410, perhaps a majority of the tribe was Arian heretic. Most Germans who left paganism in Late Antiquity became heretics, not Catholic. And for all those centuries, Germans left nothing of cultural importance, save for some innovations that helped kill and steal more efficiently.

    But after becoming Catholic, linguistic Germans eventually began to produce high culture.

    The farther cultural/linguistic Germans move from being part of Catholic heritage, the more they reveal that they are suicidal. They are happy to oversee the death of the West.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  140. @KenH

    Hitler’s main non-military topic of conversation while Barbarossa was underway was the post war organization of Germany’s Empire in the East (
     
    People have been making these claims the last several weeks but never consider that the Soviet Union murdered and imprisoned more of its own people than any nation in history. Twenty million is a conservative estimate. They murdered or deported over 500K Volga Germans, who were invited into Russia in the 18th century, to slave labor camps in the fall of 1941.

    The Soviet gulag system resumed shortly after WWII as did retribution against anyone who opposed them, so it wasn't as if Eastern Europe and Soviet Russia returned to being a bucolic land of freedom, peace and plenty after the war. If Hitler or others within his inner circle were truly planning on a widespread colonization of the East then it wouldn't have been worse than what Lenin and Stalin had already inflicted on the hapless peoples of Eastern Europe, the Baltic states and Russia both before and after WWII.

    It seems it's only "worse" because Nazi ideology was objectionable (i.e., belief that Jews were congenitally evil and in Slavic inferiority). A cold blooded murderer and criminal like Stalin is accorded more respect presumably because he was not preoccupied with race and was an equal opportunity murderer.

    Twenty million is a conservative estimate.

    That’s almost certainly much too high an estimate. The communists committed monstrous crimes, and if you add together deaths in the famines during the Russian civil war, the famines in Ukraine and other areas (Central Asia etc.) in 1932/33, the Great Terror and deaths in the camp system you might get to ten million deaths or even somewhat more over a 30-year period. But 20 million isn’t really credible anymore…if you use such numbers, what’s the detailed source for them?
    Also the Nazis had fairly radical plans which they didn’t get to fully implement, like deliberately starving to death millions in the Soviet Union to make room for German settlers…that would have been significantly worse than post-war Soviet rule, despite all the Stalinist repression.

    Read More
    • Replies: @attilathehen
    Why do you disagree with me about Derbyshire?
    , @Beefcake the Mighty
    You are indeed a contemptible cuck.
    , @fnn
    Robert Conquest was the one who was a semi-pariah for many years for allegedly inflating the death tolls under Soviet Communism. Let's see what the lefties at Wikipedia have to say about that:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Great_Terror

    After the collapse of the Soviet Union and the opening up of the Soviet archives, many of Conquest's claims were validated as having been accurate. However, Conquest's estimates of the death toll and other aspects of his research were challenged by many historians, such as Arch Getty,[6][7][8] Trotskyist historian Vadim Rogovin,[9] and German historian Gábor T. Rittersporn.[10]

    Other historians agree with Conquest and maintain their original, higher estimates, among them Stalin biographer Simon Sebag Montefiore, Perestroika architect and former head of the "Presidential Committee for the Rehabilitation of Victims of Political Repression" Alexander Nikolaevich Yakovlev, and the director of Yale's "Annals of Communism" series Jonathan Brent, putting the death toll at about 20 million.[11] Russian historian Dmitri Volkogonov (who was special adviser for defence issues to the Russian President Boris Yeltsin until 1994), is also broadly in agreement with Conquest.[12]

    In 1997, Robert Conquest stated: "We are all inclined to accept the Zemskov totals (even if not as complete) with their 14 million intake to Gulag 'camps' alone, to which must be added 4–5 million going to Gulag 'colonies', to say nothing of the 3.5 million already in, or sent to, 'labour settlements'. However taken, these are surely 'high' figures.".[13] However, in the preface to the 40th anniversary edition of The Great Terror (2007), Conquest said that "Exact numbers may never be known with complete certainty, but the total of deaths caused by the whole range of Soviet regime's terrors can hardly be lower than some fifteen million."[14]
     

    , @KenH

    That’s almost certainly much too high an estimate.
     
    No, that's a close approximation and understated by 5-10 million according to some sources.

    But 20 million isn’t really credible anymore....
     
    According to whom?

    if you use such numbers, what’s the detailed source for them?
     
    Yes, and they aren't difficult to find.
    http://www.thecommentator.com/article/4230/so_how_many_did_communism_kill

    The Black Book of Communism pegs the death toll in the Soviet Union at 25 million:
    https://www.amazon.com/Black-Book-Communism-Crimes-Repression/dp/0674076087


    Also the Nazis had fairly radical plans which they didn’t get to fully implement, like deliberately starving to death millions in the Soviet Union to make room for German settlers....
     
    Were the Nazis going to starve more than the 7-10 million who perished in the holodomor at the hands of the communists? If yes, please provide sources that specifically address the numbers they were planning to murder via starvation.

    It seems the only thing that exists is circumstantial evidence based on the so called "generalplan ost" which entails resettling certain groups of people deemed hostile to Germany further east towards and in Western Siberia following a German victory, but the Germans lost. I don't think the actual plan has ever been produced and there's been lots of creative interpretations and versions going around.

    In 1941, Jew Theodore Kaufman self published Germany must Perish wherein he called for mass extermination of Germans via forced sterilization and the dismemberment of its territory. This was before any Generalplan Ost existed . That's pretty serious. And you can find actual evidence in the form of the book on Amazon and used booksellers.

    So if I understand you correctly you are a German who believes Germany is guilty of absolutely everything they've been accused of and probably more, but the communist Soviet Union is not? In fact, communist Russia is hardly guilty of anything they've been accused of.

    , @John Gruskos
    The Black Book of Communism estimated 20 million victims in the Soviet Union, and another 1 million in the other nations of Eastern Europe.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  141. BBC pushes for ACOWW or Afro-Colonization of White Wombs.

    https://www.infowars.com/bbc-depicts-black-people-as-typical-family-in-roman-britain/

    BBC wants all of UK to be Othelloed.

    Black men are beautiful tragic souls even when acting murderous. White men are a bunch of Iagos.
    It’s like OJ is still portrayed as tragic figure than demented thug.

    Whether it’s ancient Rome or Medieval Europe or today’s Europe, white wombs exist to be offered to Negro demigods by the logic of globalism. It’s like Polish women all gave themselves to Simon Mol. Glob says to Poland and Hungary, OPEN UP AND LET IN TONS OF AFRICANS AND MUSLIMS.

    In our hedonistic celebrity-drenched culture, generations of whites have grown up worshiping black athletes, singers, and studs as the superior race.

    Even elites at BBC are into ACOWW. Its white women are a bunch of jungle-fever whores and its diversity hires love the fact that white British men are a bunch of wussy cucks who sweat and apologize profusely if they say anything even mildly ‘racist’.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Rurik

    British men are a bunch of wussy cucks who sweat and apologize profusely if they say anything even mildly ‘racist’.
     
    British, but not Russian

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9IlDmcbDltw
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  142. iffen says:
    @Avery
    Yeah, 2,000 years ago.

    Germanic tribes were considered barbarian by the Romans and by and larger they were.
    But over a period of ~2,000 years Germanic tribes coalesced into a German people and German civilization that gave the civilized world the likes of Ludwig van Beethoven, Johann Sebastian Bach,.....

    I don't know too many other formerly barbaric and/or nomadic peoples, if any, who have had such a remarkable transformation and ascent.

    Armenians have that diaspora thing going on, don’t they?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Avery
    Yes, but what does that have to do with what I wrote in my post re Germans?
    Explain.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  143. @mp
    @attila

    Derbyshire needs to be hanged first? First? So he's the worst of the offenders?

    Yes. Did you not read what I wrote? Are you familiar with his writings? His book “We are Doomed” is a perfect example of his evil degeneracy. He is really writing about his poor choice of a wife and then deciding to reproduce. His wife and daughter are Obummer voters. Importing Democratic voters. Do you remember the Obama years?

    His writings for Vdare are another window into his insane mind. He “thinks” Jews are smarter than gentiles. He criticized overweight white woman. As long as a woman reproduces enough to maintain the race, no one cares what a woman looks like after the age of 45 (same with men).

    He worked on a Wall Street, yet holds out his tin cup for shekels. He is bright enough that he should have learned banking lessons and made a small fortune.

    He wrote an article about how white parents should give their kids a talk about blacks. This man with non-white children cannot give advice to white parents with white children.

    He likes to write about mathematics. Anytime some Chinese math students win prizes he likes to write about this and bring attention to the Chinaness. Recently, a woman named Maryam Mirzakhani won the most prestigious math award, the Fields Medal. She was the first woman to win it. She is a high-caste Iranian (you can see she looks very Aryan, unfortunately she was a Muslim, but she did not appear religious so maybe living in the West helped her to change her mind about her belief system). I wonder if Derbyshire will write about her, or is he consumed with jealousy that no Chinese/Jewish woman has been able to win this prize?

    He deserves to be hanged first.

    Read More
    • Disagree: German_reader
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    Are you Iranian?
    , @Avery
    Sadly, Maryam Mirzakhani passed away a couple of week ago from cancer.

    Great loss.
    , @mp
    Did you not read what I wrote?

    Umm...you didn't write all of that stuff until I called you on it. But I just read what you wrote now.

    Who is smarter than whom? I don't know...smart is as smart does, I guess.

    Next, until middle aged Chinese women start strapping on dynamite and blowing things up, I'm not worrying about them, too much. I do, however, think that mixed race kids have it more difficult at times. It depends on how adaptable the race is, the extended family structure, and social views on the matter. The latter can change more easily than the former two. Not a hanging offense. Have you been reading much Turner Diaries, lately, by any chance?

    I generally believe that an ethnostate (re: Wilmot Robertson) is the way to go. There should be no naturalized citizens. At least for several generations--maybe five or six. This would preclude immigrant voting, etc. And anyone married to a foreigner would not be allowed to conduct public policy, or vote. Dual citizenship would never be allowed. Foreigners should not be allowed to own property. Plato's outline in Laws seems just, to me.

    One other thing. It takes real alpha male courage to come on a blog and claim, anonymously, that another person, by name, should be killed. Brimelow uses his own name when he calls for someone, not named, to be hanged. That's bad enough. Who is he talking about? He doesn't say. And now you want to hang Derbyshire. Both statements smack of the rodent. Brimelow for being squirrelly, and you for being weaselly.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  144. People should be hung from lampposts—they should be burned alive—for what they’ve done to Britain.

    Yes, this is true. It is also true of the USA, France, Germany, Sweden, and several other nations. The people who’ve gleefully and self-righteously led us all to brink of the most dire catastrophe, richly deserve a swift, public, and arguably even somewhat brutal execution. It is my fervent wish they receive it.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  145. @iffen
    brief descent into barbarism during WW2

    Well, there was that Roman Empire thing, but that was a long time ago.

    You might read the book Barbarians, by Terry Jones, for a picture of the Romans. Civilised we might not call them when we see how their empire was built.

    Counter to that is the recent Fall of the Roman Empire and the End of Civilization, which makes the point that, after the Romans left Britain, living standards declined to lower than they had been before the conquest of Britain by Rome.

    https://www.amazon.com/Fall-Rome-End-Civilization/dp/0192807285

    Best: Mohammed and Charlemagne, Revisited. Roman Empire collapsing in the third century, rising into the seventh century, even in the West. Then, Islam, cutting off trade with the East; coins disappear from the west, as does papyrus, leading to an inability to record business transactions cheaply, leading to a true dark age.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  146. @the alt white comics
    it would have been better for everyone white if hitler had won

    Leave aside the Jews. If Slavs are white, you’re wrong.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  147. Also the Nazis had fairly radical plans which they didn’t get to fully implement, like deliberately starving to death millions in the Soviet Union to make room for German settlers…

    Any detailed, credible sources for that?

    I believe certain Jews declared war on Germany in an attempt to blockade the nation during already tough times, and there were some who apparently wanted to exterminate Germany.

    Most people think Hitler was crazy, but that sounds to me like both projection and propaganda. Read what one obvious crackpot had to say about exterminating Germans.:

    “…I advocate the sterilization of all Germans.”

    As quoted in The Canadian Jewish Journal, Sep 26, 1941, pg 5, in the article, Hitler Will Be Nothing But A Rosebud, Says the author of “Germany Must Perish.”

    https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=rPJOAAAAIBAJ&sjid=gkwDAAAAIBAJ&dq=theodore-kaufman%20germany%20must%20perish&pg=2325%2C5306

    Read More
    • Replies: @German_reader

    Read what one obvious crackpot had to say about exterminating Germans.
     
    Unless I'm mistaken, that Kaufman guy didn't have any real influence though and held no official position, he just wrote a bizarre book.
    Anyway, I probably shouldn't get any deeper into this discussion since it will probably be unproductive. It's also not about Dunkirk or about modern Britain.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  148. Avery says:
    @iffen
    Armenians have that diaspora thing going on, don't they?

    Yes, but what does that have to do with what I wrote in my post re Germans?
    Explain.

    Read More
    • Replies: @iffen
    Yes, but what does that have to do with what I wrote in my post re Germans?
    Explain.


    The usual: ethnicities, dissolution of empires, survival of residual ethnicity of empires, religious homogeneity (essential?), victim of major genocide (essential?), germans created many states and empires, Germany was late to the nation-state game (did it ever have a “real” empire), German barbarians, Germans, german nation-states, WWII( war bands coalescing?), dissolution of nation-states, dissolution of Pax Americana, dissolution of the US, we have no “ethnicity” that will survive, do any of the german states have an ethnicity that will survive?, the US only has the political founding, liberal democracy fails=America fails (has failed), can germans do ethnicity?, the Franks did, for a while, the Anglo-Saxons did, for a while, war bands coming together?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  149. utu says:
    @Ace
    There has hardly been one minute of our national existence where we have not had to deal with the pathologies of the black presence. Damn those who brought black slaves to this land.

    Damn those who brought black slaves to this land.

    It was greed. Initially get rich quick scheme practiced by British gentlemen (also by French) to grow sugar cane, tobacco, coffee and cotton in the New World. Later it went on industrials scale.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Druid
    And largely, Jews!
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  150. @Expletive Deleted
    Tanks held up because they outpaced their fuel bowsers. And then they started to break down, being highly precise and superb pieces of engineering which weren't easily ghetto-rigged. The most crucial factor was the lack of infantry support.
    http://www.strijdbewijs.nl/breakout/bocage.jpg
    Normandy bocage and hollow-ways isn't the Steppes. It's basically a narrow green tunnel, and heading over the tiny fields is like crossing a giant cattle grid. One Gitane-dragging beret-bonce could block a column with an IED or a bazooka and they'd never know he was there till it was too late, due to the infernal racket their beautiful heavy Panzers made. No infantry, no flank cover. No fuel, you're just a fancy pillbox. Which is why the generals "diplomatically" ignored Adolf's explicit orders to advance, for a bit, until those deficiencies were made good. Unlike him, they weren't stupid.
    Later statements suggesting it was for ethical considerations are simply a meme, and retconning by Hortler just before he sucked the Luger.

    And although it is not quotes as a consideration at the time, all 300 German tanks could have been destroyed by the 30 British warships miles from the beach. Tanks don’t withstand artillery fire well. My father in law, an Army Captain there at the time was confident that this would have happened.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  151. @jacques sheete

    Also the Nazis had fairly radical plans which they didn’t get to fully implement, like deliberately starving to death millions in the Soviet Union to make room for German settlers…
     
    Any detailed, credible sources for that?

    I believe certain Jews declared war on Germany in an attempt to blockade the nation during already tough times, and there were some who apparently wanted to exterminate Germany.

    Most people think Hitler was crazy, but that sounds to me like both projection and propaganda. Read what one obvious crackpot had to say about exterminating Germans.:

    “…I advocate the sterilization of all Germans.”

    As quoted in The Canadian Jewish Journal, Sep 26, 1941, pg 5, in the article, Hitler Will Be Nothing But A Rosebud, Says the author of “Germany Must Perish.”

    https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=rPJOAAAAIBAJ&sjid=gkwDAAAAIBAJ&dq=theodore-kaufman%20germany%20must%20perish&pg=2325%2C5306
     

    Read what one obvious crackpot had to say about exterminating Germans.

    Unless I’m mistaken, that Kaufman guy didn’t have any real influence though and held no official position, he just wrote a bizarre book.
    Anyway, I probably shouldn’t get any deeper into this discussion since it will probably be unproductive. It’s also not about Dunkirk or about modern Britain.

    Read More
    • Replies: @jacques sheete

    Unless I’m mistaken, that Kaufman guy didn’t have any real influence though and held no official position, he just wrote a bizarre book.
     
    Well, he wasn't the only one. Ever hear of Ilya Ehrengerg?

    Ehrenburg incited Soviet soldiers to treat Germans as sub-human. Writing:

    “The Germans are not human beings. From now on the word German means to use the most terrible oath. From now on the word German strikes us to the quick. We shall not speak any more. We shall not get excited. We shall kill. If you have not killed at least one German a day, you have wasted that day ... If you cannot kill your German with a bullet, kill him with your bayonet. If there is calm on your part of the front, or if you are waiting for the fighting, kill a German in the meantime. If you leave a German alive, the German will hang a Russian and rape a Russian woman. If you kill one German, kill another -- there is nothing more amusing for us than a heap of German corpses. Do not count days, do not count kilometers. Count only the number of Germans killed by you. Kill the German -- that is your grandmother's request. Kill the German -- that is your child's prayer. Kill the German -- that is your motherland's loud request. Do not miss. Do not let through. Kill.”
     
    Forget lampposts; dudes like them, (and there were apparently many),ought to be stuck in Abu Ghraib for life.
    , @Anonymous
    There was a prominent American anthropologist who advocated exterminating Germans during WWII:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ernest_Hooten#The_.22Hooton_Plan.22

    During World War II, Hooton proposed to eradicate the German people by infiltrating them slowly with masses of non-European male immigrants, thereby breed "war strains" out of them.[10]
     
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  152. Wally says: • Website
    @Beckow
    Nazis were also planning to remove, or exterminate over time, the Czechs. They murdered 20% of Belorussians, and they did a fairly convincing genocide on Serbs. We can quibble where the mythical "West" starts and where it ends, but I would say that Prague is probably in it, and so is Beograd. If you add up the European nations that Nazis wanted gone one way or another, you get about 40% of white European population. Almost all in the east.

    How is that consistent with 'Nazis not threatening European civilisation'?

    The problem is the same: Western Europeans seem to hate the white eastern Slavs. Not all by any means, but the general instinct is always there. Nazis were just an extreme case, and were more open about it. What we see today in US, German, French or British media with regard to Russia (and sometimes also Poland or Hungary) is something that would never - ever - be said about any other group. Try to substitute any other group, from Irish to Chinese, from Arabs to Africans, this level of public and media hysteria would never be allowed to flourish. But when it comes to Russia it is ok. At some point, if you "Westerners" cannot police your own, aren't you really passively supporting this hysteria? These politicians get voted in, the media is your media - they represent you.

    This seems a replay of Nazism, on that I agree with you. But where are the voices of reason? Why should a 'civilisation' capable of this level of hatred and hypocrisy be saved anyway? You are misty-eyed about Dunkirk. Good. But at the same time you muse openly about 'wiping Moscow off the face of earth' and how that would not be such a tragedy. Well, when next Dunkirk comes, I can see the despised white easterners not giving a damn. Those are the fruits of hundreds of years of quiet and not so quiet hatred.

    What a load of baseless Zionist propaganda recited like a parrot, or more than likely by another lying Zionist.
    Reads like something from the creepy supremacist Jew, Martin Gilbert.

    Of course you can’t back up any of it, History Channel for you all the way.

    “Some stories are true that never happened.”
    - Elie Wiesel

    There were the ‘Nazis’ with the mythological ’6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers’ and there were the ‘Nazis’ without the mythological ’6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers’.

    The ’6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers’ are scientifically impossible frauds.
    see the ‘holocaust’ scam debunked here:

    http://codoh.com

    No name calling, level playing field debate here:

    http://forum.codoh.com

    “One should not ask, how this mass murder was made possible. It was technically possible, because it happened. This has to be the obligatory starting-point for any historical research regarding this topic. We would just like to remind you: There is no debate regarding the existence of the gas chambers, and there can never be one.”
    - endorsed by 34 “reputable historians” and published in the French daily Le Monde on February 21, 1979

    “Ach,” he said, “we’ve often fantasized about drawing up an indictment against Adolf Hitler himself. And to put into that indictment the major charge: the Final Solution of the Jewish question in Europe, the physical annihilation of Jewry. And then it dawned upon us, what would we do? We didn’t have the evidence.”
    - “holocaust historian” Raul Hilberg, from https://youtu.be/2q51wqEE1fM

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    His post had nothing to do with Jews and instead concerned Nazi plans for the Slavic population of Europe.
    , @peterAUS

    What a load of baseless Zionist propaganda recited like a parrot, or more than likely by another lying Zionist.
     
    Oh man....you really do NOT know how to read people here.

    Whatever the man has said in this thread is either correct or, at least, calls for a decent conversation about.

    For example, trying to explore further his claim that there has been hatred towards Slavic peoples, throughout modern history, could be beneficial for common future.

    There is something......dark and deep....at work here when watching all this "Russia this" and "Russia that".
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  153. @iffen
    The Soviet gulag system

    That's just a lot of Western propaganda aided by hacks and falsifiers such as Solzhenitsyn and other Vlasovyte “dissidents” and other types.

    What do you call the places the millions of dissidents or just “enemies of the state” like Solzhenitsyn stayed in then, half-way houses?

    Read More
    • Replies: @jacques sheete

    What do you call the places the millions of dissidents or just “enemies of the state” like Solzhenitsyn stayed in then, half-way houses?
     
    Ignore those who think they're modern day Walter Durantys. Huge wastes of time. The lying hyenas can even have their Poolitzer Pwizes too.
    , @iffen
    What do you call the places the millions of dissidents or just “enemies of the state” like Solzhenitsyn stayed in then, half-way houses?

    I don’t know, maybe half-way house or houses. I guess it depends on whether you think all of the victims could fit inside one house or not.

    That was partial quote of Andrei Martyanov in a comment here:

    http://www.unz.com/akarlin/open-thread-19/#comment-1947924

    … US view of WW II was shaped by Wehrmacht’s generals, while Soviet history was shaped by hacks and falsifiers such as Solzhenitsyn and other Vlasovyte “dissidents” and other types of “nationalists” etc

    I guess he's not saying there was no Gulag, just that the one Solzhenitsyn described didn't exist.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  154. Rurik says: • Website
    @Priss Factor
    BBC pushes for ACOWW or Afro-Colonization of White Wombs.

    https://www.infowars.com/bbc-depicts-black-people-as-typical-family-in-roman-britain/

    BBC wants all of UK to be Othelloed.

    Black men are beautiful tragic souls even when acting murderous. White men are a bunch of Iagos.
    It's like OJ is still portrayed as tragic figure than demented thug.

    Whether it's ancient Rome or Medieval Europe or today's Europe, white wombs exist to be offered to Negro demigods by the logic of globalism. It's like Polish women all gave themselves to Simon Mol. Glob says to Poland and Hungary, OPEN UP AND LET IN TONS OF AFRICANS AND MUSLIMS.

    In our hedonistic celebrity-drenched culture, generations of whites have grown up worshiping black athletes, singers, and studs as the superior race.

    Even elites at BBC are into ACOWW. Its white women are a bunch of jungle-fever whores and its diversity hires love the fact that white British men are a bunch of wussy cucks who sweat and apologize profusely if they say anything even mildly 'racist'.

    British men are a bunch of wussy cucks who sweat and apologize profusely if they say anything even mildly ‘racist’.

    British, but not Russian

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jake
    It is a SIN against PC for whites to use force to resist black criminals.

    Thank you for that, WASP Abolitionists and WASP Radical Republican Reconstructionists.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  155. Wally says: • Website
    @utu
    that America can be saved from this terrible fate

    It's more far gone than Britain. Always was. It all started with slavery.

    Black researcher, Dr. Tony Martin, let’s us know who the prime sellers & owners of slaves really were, Jews.
    Dr. Tony Martin – The Jewish Role in the African Slave Trade

    fact:
    blacks also owned slaves in the US south
    fact:
    Africans had massive slavery, it was black Africans who sold black African slaves to the slave traders
    fact:
    slavery of black Africans would have never happened without black Africans selling black African slaves

    JEWS AND THE SLAVE TRADE

    http://wethoughttheywerewhite.weebly.com/jews–the-slave-trade.html

    http://wethoughttheywerewhite.weebly.com/uploads/5/3/4/9/53499197/6585841.jpg?296

    http://wethoughttheywerewhite.weebly.com/uploads/5/3/4/9/53499197/8785931.jpg?277

    http://wethoughttheywerewhite.weebly.com/uploads/5/3/4/9/53499197/1507471.jpg?717

    “Prof. Martin was indeed correct when he said “75% of Jewish households owned slaves” or “more than twice as many Jews owned slaves as compared to whites (36%),” as these statistics were drawn from Ira Rosenwaike’s analysis that attempted to do an apples-to-apples comparison with Lee Soltow’s study, which focused on the 14 Southern slave states. It should be noted that it was these two Jewish scholars that decided to base their comparisons on the 14 Southern slave states and not Prof. Martin, who was merely relaying the results of these two studies.?”

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  156. Druid says:
    @ThreeCranes
    Okay Priss, I'll take the bait and answer you.

    I've dated a number of women who had at one time in their lives, slept with brown bantu men. None of them stayed with them.

    Why?

    Because it doesn't take long for a white woman to realize that the brown man is full of bullsh*t.

    Whereas uncertainty is an essential part of the intelligent European man's makeup (a certain amount of doubt that leaves room for questioning is part of the process of learning from experience and the development of a knowledge-based culture) the brown bantu man suffers from no such hesitation. As you say, he is cocky, full of himself and because of this he is largely ignorant and therefore full of bullsh*t.

    Initially, white women--young ones especially--are susceptible to their charms but after seeing the magic brown bantu in action, with all his lies, evasions and baseless, inflated sense of self esteem they see the light and leave him. Give white gals some credit.

    You see, the brown man cannot ever admit that he is wrong about anything, ever. Well, one thing white women won't tolerate is being blamed by her man for something that he did wrong. They call bulls*t on that and he beats them. Then they leave. Sadder but wiser.

    To be sure, some white women do stay with bantus but those are women who suffer from low self esteem or who are taking revenge on their daddies. Bottom feeders. For the most part, only brown females will tolerate being beaten by their bantu beaus. It’s how he shows his love.

    And stop obsessing about long dongs. I went to integrated grade school and high school, played sports and showered with plenty of guys of both races. Not all bantus have long dongs. Some of us white guys do. We didn’t and don’t have any reason to envy bantus. Besides, a long dong is not what a woman looks for in a man. It may come as a pleasant surprise to her, but how could she have known how long the guy’s dong was before she agreed to sleep with him? Unless he made a habit of walking around with his dick out she wouldn’t have had a clue and if he had had that habit, she wouldn't have been interested in him.

    They only realize after a couple of mixed kids that then suffer lack of financial support and care! A lot of blacks just impregnate. It’s a sort of subconscious revenge!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  157. @German_reader

    Twenty million is a conservative estimate.
     
    That's almost certainly much too high an estimate. The communists committed monstrous crimes, and if you add together deaths in the famines during the Russian civil war, the famines in Ukraine and other areas (Central Asia etc.) in 1932/33, the Great Terror and deaths in the camp system you might get to ten million deaths or even somewhat more over a 30-year period. But 20 million isn't really credible anymore...if you use such numbers, what's the detailed source for them?
    Also the Nazis had fairly radical plans which they didn't get to fully implement, like deliberately starving to death millions in the Soviet Union to make room for German settlers...that would have been significantly worse than post-war Soviet rule, despite all the Stalinist repression.

    Why do you disagree with me about Derbyshire?

    Read More
    • Replies: @German_reader
    Because you didn't give a single serious reason why Derbyshire should be hanged, just totally silly stuff,
    e.g. this:

    He criticized overweight white woman
     
    Is fat-shaming now a capital offense or what?
    Seems also excessive to blame him for how his wife and daughter are voting (his daughter seems to be a disturbed individual though...a few years ago he mentioned she had a pet snake...that's not normal).
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  158. @Corvinus
    "John Derbyshire needs to be strung up first. He married a Chinese woman and has Chinese offspring. He is an avid philosemite."

    People make up their own minds to marry within or outside their race. That is their liberty. Why are you opposed to individual freedom?

    Please see my comment no. 143.

    If “individual freedom” is detrimental to the West, the person must be removed. Derbyshire to China.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    "If “individual freedom” is detrimental to the West, the person must be removed."

    In a word, no, since YOU are making the unilateral decision based on loosey goosey standards that a person's acts are "detrimental" to the point of being removed. Your thought process is in the extreme minority.

    Now, if you are so directly threatened by his presence, why don't you personally do something about it? Or are you just another impotent arm chair warrior?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  159. Druid says:
    @utu
    Damn those who brought black slaves to this land.

    It was greed. Initially get rich quick scheme practiced by British gentlemen (also by French) to grow sugar cane, tobacco, coffee and cotton in the New World. Later it went on industrials scale.

    And largely, Jews!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  160. @German_reader

    Read what one obvious crackpot had to say about exterminating Germans.
     
    Unless I'm mistaken, that Kaufman guy didn't have any real influence though and held no official position, he just wrote a bizarre book.
    Anyway, I probably shouldn't get any deeper into this discussion since it will probably be unproductive. It's also not about Dunkirk or about modern Britain.

    Unless I’m mistaken, that Kaufman guy didn’t have any real influence though and held no official position, he just wrote a bizarre book.

    Well, he wasn’t the only one. Ever hear of Ilya Ehrengerg?

    Ehrenburg incited Soviet soldiers to treat Germans as sub-human. Writing:

    “The Germans are not human beings. From now on the word German means to use the most terrible oath. From now on the word German strikes us to the quick. We shall not speak any more. We shall not get excited. We shall kill. If you have not killed at least one German a day, you have wasted that day … If you cannot kill your German with a bullet, kill him with your bayonet. If there is calm on your part of the front, or if you are waiting for the fighting, kill a German in the meantime. If you leave a German alive, the German will hang a Russian and rape a Russian woman. If you kill one German, kill another — there is nothing more amusing for us than a heap of German corpses. Do not count days, do not count kilometers. Count only the number of Germans killed by you. Kill the German — that is your grandmother’s request. Kill the German — that is your child’s prayer. Kill the German — that is your motherland’s loud request. Do not miss. Do not let through. Kill.”

    Forget lampposts; dudes like them, (and there were apparently many),ought to be stuck in Abu Ghraib for life.

    Read More
    • Replies: @German_reader
    Well, if I understand correctly Ehrenburg was writing about killing German soldiers, in the context of the times after the German invasion of the Soviet Union that sentiment was understandable...and killing enemy soldiers is pretty much you'd expect your own troops to do in war anyway (the far more serious allegations that Ehrenburg exhorted Red army soldiers to rape German women seem to be a post-war myth).
    But I'd really rather not discuss this any further, it gets tiresome.
    , @Beefcake the Mighty
    Yes. The point being, whether or not Kaufman or Eherenburg are simply extreme or demented individuals, they evinced attitudes towards non-Jews that many Jews hold, even if only in milder form. The closer a particular Jew is to power, it seems the more their hostility towards non-Jews is. Witness the current hostile elite of the former West.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  161. @attilathehen
    Why do you disagree with me about Derbyshire?

    Because you didn’t give a single serious reason why Derbyshire should be hanged, just totally silly stuff,
    e.g. this:

    He criticized overweight white woman

    Is fat-shaming now a capital offense or what?
    Seems also excessive to blame him for how his wife and daughter are voting (his daughter seems to be a disturbed individual though…a few years ago he mentioned she had a pet snake…that’s not normal).

    Read More
    • Replies: @Delinquent Snail
    Whats wrong with having a pet snake? It better then a pet bird or fish.
    , @attilathehen
    WOW!!! I write about Derbyshire's degeneracy, illustrated by his book, his wife, offspring (I didn't know that about the daughter so she is worse than even I suspected) and all you come up with is fat shaming???!!!

    His wife and daughter vote against the interests of the USA.

    Are you a German reader living in Germany? If so, are you a Merkel supporter?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  162. @Achmed E. Newman
    What do you call the places the millions of dissidents or just "enemies of the state" like Solzhenitsyn stayed in then, half-way houses?

    What do you call the places the millions of dissidents or just “enemies of the state” like Solzhenitsyn stayed in then, half-way houses?

    Ignore those who think they’re modern day Walter Durantys. Huge wastes of time. The lying hyenas can even have their Poolitzer Pwizes too.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  163. @animalogic
    "Enough is never enough."
    Without getting into the whole "germ" analogy, there is something to what you say. Enough seems never enough. A culture has a right to retain its substance & form. However, we live in times in which substance/form are relative, if not innately nebulous.
    At the conclusion of WW II the British people voted for a Labour government that delivered, as best it could, a social safety net. People wanted "something" for their sacrifice...because what WWII did do, was demonstrate that government, business & citizens, working for a COMMON good could SUCCEED. It's THAT which has been drowned slowly in a bathtub over the last 40 odd years. We are back to the same class riven days of the 1890's.
    Regardless of the deep state politics, average people believed their sacrifice meant something....what it meant was an intermission in business-as-usual....

    Enough seems never enough. A culture has a right to retain its substance & form.

    It is not a matter of ‘right’. It is a matter of passion. Such passion would be there if people were stilled and hardened with sense of history, identity, territory, and unity, or HITU.
    A people instilled with such passion will feel a ‘natural’ drive to defend their land and culture when they sense the threat.
    Lacking such passion, a people might still defend their people and culture out of a sense of duty and obligation. Even if they don’t feel the passion, they might feel the weight of history and heritage, a sense of burden. It’s like George Bailey wants to leave Bedford Falls. He has no passion for it. But he feels a sense of duty to his father and the community.

    But what if a people aren’t instilled with HITU? What if they lack patriotic passion and fervor because the system doesn’t imbue them with deep emotions about ethnos and narrative?
    Worse, what if they weren’t even instilled with a sense of duty and obligation?

    Also, what if family culture is dead in a nation where sex before/outside marriage is high, where divorce is common, where single mothers are all over the place, where old people are sent to nursing homes to just die without anyone caring? Thus, a sense of continuity and roots have been lost. What if the main culture is dumb movies, trashy TV, mindless pop music, and sports dominated by ghastly Negroes?

    Then, they might not feel any passion about defending the order, the culture, the heritage.
    They might be ignorant of most of it. Or just regard it as museum piece, dead history that has no relevance to today. They might see the pursuit of momentary pleasure as the highest value. And in such vain-and-hedonistic society, homos will naturally gain cultural dominance since they are obsessed with egotism.

    But there is worse. What if the System, taken over by globo elites, instill or infect people with Diversyphilis and teach people that their nation was always a nation that ‘welcomed’ immigrants(or invaders). What if the System rewrites history so that white Britons of the past are portrayed as blacks or Hindus or Arabs? Indeed, to make a movie where all whites in the past were white is considered a thought-crime and culture-crime. What if the System says European migrants who made Britain in the distant past were just like African, Hindu, Muslim invaders of today. They are all the same.

    Then, the problem will not be the lack of patriotic passion but the virulence of anti-patriotic passion that rabidly favors alien parasitism. And that is what has happened to generations of Brits raised by radicals and ‘progressives’.

    Worse, even among Britons who don’t buy into PC and simply cannot muster any anti-patriotic passion, there is a totally misplaced sense of duty to the Other. Even though they dread diversyphilis and see all the dangers, they’ve been made to feel that it is the DUTY of white Britons to welcome the world to either atone for the past, to be compassionate to darkies, or celebrate diversity as an unconditional good.

    Consider Douglas Murray. He has no passion for PC. He feels some patriotic urges. But his sense of DUTY compels him to welcome Diversyphilis even as he knows it will destroy Europe and UK. Also, PC infected his mind to the extent that he wants a patriotism without ‘racism’. But patriotism without sense of ethnos is ludicrous. Imagine Japan or Israel without a sense of ethnos.

    https://www.amren.com/features/2017/07/the-strange-death-of-europe-migrant-crisis-islam-terrorism/

    Of the economic migrants who are pushing into Europe, Mr. Murray writes, “Most of us do not want to eject most or many of them . . . .” He is aware of “send-them-back rhetoric” but calls it “ugly.” Is Mr. Murray content to be a passive chronicler of decline, or does he care enough to try to save Europe?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  164. @Hippopotamusdrome


    Hitler planned to raze Moscow and kill millions and enslave the rest.

     

    Given they were living under Communism, it would be a step up.

    Given they were living under Communism, it would be a step up.

    LOL.

    Right, given Japanese were living under brutal military rule, good thing people of Hiroshima were liberated with the bomb.

    A step up … to heaven.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  165. @Jay Igaboo
    Your first point is absolutely correct, and it was not really acknowledged enough for many years. The Western Desert also had many Indian (i.e. what was then India, Pakistan, Ceylon, etc.)
    Many fought well, and they undoubtedly helped defeat Rommel.
    It may surprise many that the British media and political Establishment have been ever more wacist to another ethic group who played a very large part not only with The Eighth Army in North Africa, but in The Battle of Britain. They have been completely airbrushed out of the modern historical recollection.
    I knew, because my Dad, and two uncles were in various theatres of war in WW2, plus I grew up and later worked surrounded by WW2 veterans.
    I really only noticed how shamefully this ethic group had been treated when I recently read Stephen Bungay’s excellent account “Alemein”and discovered how many had answered the call to arms.
    It wasn’t those who came from what was then India.
    It wasn’t those who came from Africa.
    It wasn’t those who came from The Caribbean.

    It was those who came from South Africa and Rhodesia.
    White South Africans and Rhodesians, of course, and therefore modern day untouchables.
    Most Indian troops had joined The army pre-war for the usual reasons—three squares a day, a career, maybe, to travel or to stay out of jail to, or joined because the sought adventure, etc.but the three squares alone was a huge incentive in India then. Comparatively few joined during the war, save when the Japs were knocking on the door at Imphal.
    Like almost all soldiers, because they were already in the Army pre-war, they went where they were ordered to go, although a fair few Indians became Jhats—they fought for the invading Japanese, and most Indian politicians were ambivalent about which side to jump.
    Quite rightly, they wanted what was best, in their opinion, for Indians, and independence was the quid pro pro they demanded and no doubt the examples of Japanese behaviour in Manchuria, Indonesia , Hong Kong or Malaya, etc helped make up their minds.

    This paen is dedicated to the blood, sweat and tears of sacrifices made by the Whites; who asked you to bring up the half naked fakirs of the Indian Subcontinent here and now, regardless of their contributions? Are you a fair minded simpleton or something?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jay Igaboo
    I don't know about being a "fair-minded simpleton" but I'd certainly be some kind of simpleton if I took seriously a comment from someone who wrote this:
    "Methinks, it’s an excellent idea… if it was left to women to run the world, humanity would be in much better shape than what the patriarchy has delivered."
    I looked at a few of your posts to see what your angle was--from your "If only women ruled the world" tripe I concluded that you are either a sadly common typical university-"educated" eunuch/ mummy's boy or a disengenous mischeif-maker.
    And if you read my post, it should be clear that it was also about the sacrices of ethnically White British Africans and how these were air-brushed away whilst the non-White contribution has, with every passing year, exaggerated and excessively promoted by the meeja-political traitors.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  166. @jacques sheete

    Unless I’m mistaken, that Kaufman guy didn’t have any real influence though and held no official position, he just wrote a bizarre book.
     
    Well, he wasn't the only one. Ever hear of Ilya Ehrengerg?

    Ehrenburg incited Soviet soldiers to treat Germans as sub-human. Writing:

    “The Germans are not human beings. From now on the word German means to use the most terrible oath. From now on the word German strikes us to the quick. We shall not speak any more. We shall not get excited. We shall kill. If you have not killed at least one German a day, you have wasted that day ... If you cannot kill your German with a bullet, kill him with your bayonet. If there is calm on your part of the front, or if you are waiting for the fighting, kill a German in the meantime. If you leave a German alive, the German will hang a Russian and rape a Russian woman. If you kill one German, kill another -- there is nothing more amusing for us than a heap of German corpses. Do not count days, do not count kilometers. Count only the number of Germans killed by you. Kill the German -- that is your grandmother's request. Kill the German -- that is your child's prayer. Kill the German -- that is your motherland's loud request. Do not miss. Do not let through. Kill.”
     
    Forget lampposts; dudes like them, (and there were apparently many),ought to be stuck in Abu Ghraib for life.

    Well, if I understand correctly Ehrenburg was writing about killing German soldiers, in the context of the times after the German invasion of the Soviet Union that sentiment was understandable…and killing enemy soldiers is pretty much you’d expect your own troops to do in war anyway (the far more serious allegations that Ehrenburg exhorted Red army soldiers to rape German women seem to be a post-war myth).
    But I’d really rather not discuss this any further, it gets tiresome.

    Read More
    • Replies: @jacques sheete

    But I’d really rather not discuss this any further, it gets tiresome.
     
    Defending the indefensible is almost guaranteed to get tiresome. Remember that.

    PS: It was typical for prominent Bolshiesas to express vile hatred for others. Then ask yourself who them there prominent Bolshies were. Kaufman's and Ehrenberg's spoutings were pretty much common knowledge back then and many people apparently felt as they did.

    Adios!

    , @Rurik

    ...that Ehrenburg exhorted Red army soldiers to rape German women seem to be a post-war myth).
    But I’d really rather not discuss this any further, it gets tiresome.

     

    I bet

    I remember when I first read accounts like this, and what bothered me about it was how 'white knight' anyone must be for having misplaced sympathy for these girls.

    I mean come on! When you think of how many Jews these girls gassed, and how many lampshades they no doubt made, they certainly got what they deserved, huh German_reader

    http://rense.com/general39/allied.htm

    waaa, waaa, waaa

    so some German women and girls were raped by the Red Army Rapists. So fucking what!

    they should have thought of that before they decided on their 'final solution' and decided to invade Poland; Nazi sluts!

    (actually, it was events like this, and Katyn, and the Holodomor that proved that we Yankees fought on the wrong side of that war, and instead we should have gone over there and slaughtered these sub-human butchers, and then reined in Hitler).
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  167. @anony-mouse
    1/ A bit of a complication. There may have been no non-Whites at Dunkirk, but there were lots of them in Burma, Singapore and Hong Kong, and there had been many in the trenches in the previous go-round.

    2/ Wasn't it the Dunkirk generation who began the opening of the doors. Between 1945 and Powell's speech who was doing the voting?

    Between 1945 and Powell’s speech who was doing the voting?

    I’m not sure anyone voted for non-white immigration. It began in 1948 because, with so many British cities bombed by the Luftwaffe, there was huge amount of reconstruction to be done, and there was a labour shortage. At least, that is what we were told. If this had been the whole truth, then mass immigration would have ended after, say, 15 years. Instead it has accelerated.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  168. Dr. X says:
    @ThreeCranes
    Good comment. And why was Hess imprisoned for so long? I've never understood that. Any clues?

    Good comment. And why was Hess imprisoned for so long? I’ve never understood that. Any clues?

    Guilt by association.

    After 1945, Nazis became stand-ins for Satan in a secularized, Judaized world. Anyone remotely associated with Nazism was going to be hunted down forever. They’re still arresting 87-year olds who were junior officers in 1945 and accusing them of war crimes — someone as close to Hitler as the Deputy Fuhrer was never going to see the light of day.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Beefcake the Mighty
    Yes, but the recent hysteria whereby anyone who may have even looked at a concentration camp while in German uniform is hunted down is just that, recent, and parallels the rise of the holocaust from a "detail of history" (as it was in all of the Allied leaders memoirs) to a cosmic, religious event for which non-Jews must all atone.

    Hess obviously knew something the Americans and British wanted kept quiet. I suspose they could've killed him, as they likely killed Himmler, but presumably they felt they had to maintain some kind of appearances in this case.
    , @David In TN
    The Soviets insisted Hess stay in prison. Why? They had the idea Hess's motive for his flight to Britain was to broker an alliance between Hitler and Britain against the Soviet Union.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  169. @German_reader

    Twenty million is a conservative estimate.
     
    That's almost certainly much too high an estimate. The communists committed monstrous crimes, and if you add together deaths in the famines during the Russian civil war, the famines in Ukraine and other areas (Central Asia etc.) in 1932/33, the Great Terror and deaths in the camp system you might get to ten million deaths or even somewhat more over a 30-year period. But 20 million isn't really credible anymore...if you use such numbers, what's the detailed source for them?
    Also the Nazis had fairly radical plans which they didn't get to fully implement, like deliberately starving to death millions in the Soviet Union to make room for German settlers...that would have been significantly worse than post-war Soviet rule, despite all the Stalinist repression.

    You are indeed a contemptible cuck.

    Read More
    • Disagree: German_reader
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  170. @nsa
    Your hero, Horrorvitz, is the actual virus in your germ theory analogy. Started his traitorous Izzy-firster career as a typical vile jooie Trotskyite in the 1960s......morphing into an even more vile jooie neocon traitor in the 1980s as the cultural currents reversed.

    Your hero, Horrorvitz, is the actual virus in your germ theory analogy.

    You nutzi freak, I didn’t say Horowitz is my hero. I said he understood something about the newly mutating ‘left’ that the Right failed to grasp. He understood how this ‘culture war’ would be fought in guerrilla and then institutional manner like the commies in China and Vietnam first used harassment and infiltration and then all-out assault and then the institutions.
    And he understood how demented and pathological it would become. And he understood how the ‘left’ didn’t make a distinction between political/ideological and personal/cultural. Today, even comic books are used to promote tranny stuff. He knew because he’d been among the 60s radicals from the inside.

    Also, he understood how 60s radicalism would grow neo-stalinist.

    Though radicals in the 60s were nutty, there was naturalness about them. They were young, and young tend to be idealistic and passionate. Also, the rise of youth culture and rock culture and drugs and sex meant great changes regardless of radical politics. So, there was at least vitality and exuberance about 60s radicalism. Some of it was crazy and insane, but we could say they were young, passionate, and naive. Eventually, the fire would burn out.

    But then, the radicals didn’t just learn their lessons but entered the very centers of power. So, even the saving grace of 60s radicalism — excitement, energy, passion, and idealism — were gone. Instead, it just became a grinding humorless neo-stalinist institutional game of power and as such, these radicals would make accommodations with Big Money as the neo-clergy. The rich would fund them, and the they would offer indulgences to the rich. They would also shape the minds of the rich in elite institutions. Like in Saudi Arabia where the rich monarchy cut a deal with the Wahabis.

    Horowitz saw the dangers, and in this regard, he was very different from company men like William Kristol and John Podhead.

    Now, the problem isn’t Horowitz’s Zionism. As a rightist, he feels nationalism about Jewishness. That was never the problem. The problem was ‘nationalism for us, but not for you’. This is what David Brooks and William Kristol peddle.

    Horowitz wasn’t part of that gang.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  171. @Joe Wong
    I hope the author would mean Winston Churchill, Robert Vansittart, and a gang of ruthless colonial imperialist warmongers are the “People Should be Hung from Lampposts, They Should be Burned Alive, for What They've Done to Britain.”

    Mind you, the British troops were in the foreign land, it is not right for the invader to bear such bitter feeling and victimhood sentiment by being kicked out of their occupied land. On the other hand people said the British imitates the Roman, while the American is born out the British; the Roman called destroying Carthaginian and salted their land "creating peace," no wonder the American and the British go berserk when people kicks the American and British out of their homeland, and resort to bombing, killing and waterboarding on the fabricated phantom WMD allegation as humanitarian intervention to avenge their "humiliation."

    Mind you, the British troops were in the foreign land, it is not right for the invader to bear such bitter feeling and victimhood sentiment by being kicked out of their occupied land.

    Brits could be brutal, and this dark side has to be remembered. But no people did as much to transform the whole world in the past 300 yr, mostly for the good.

    So, on balance, the Brits owe the world nothing. They took but also gave.

    If not for European invasion of China, your mother would still have bound feet and you would be kissing Manchu butt.

    Also, who killed more Chinese than Mao?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    The deaths during Mao's rule weren't that high as a percentage of the population. They were much lower, for example, than the deaths the Irish suffered under British rule during the potato famine.
    , @Joe Wong
    Sorry, you are upset, but you took my comments in the wrong way, I merely point out the facts that the British and their offshoots have been hiding those facts by manufacturing consent and fake news. Hiding crimes against humanity, crimes against peace and war crimes committed by the British and their offshoots in the last 300 years under democracy, human rights, and other moral high ground is simply hypocrisy that everybody should have the duty to expose it for the human sanity's sake.

    Dynasties got created and overthrown on the regular basis in Chinese history. Manchu was on their dying leg, without the European help to crash the Taipin revolution, Manchu would have been overthrown 60 years earlier, this is another fact the British is claiming credit where credit is not due.

    Mao did not kill a single person himself, but you want to blame all the Chinese killed on him because he was the leader, then the British should not complain the others blaming all the people killed due to British actions on the British and their offshoots, that number will be in the hundreds of millions, which will make Mao look like an amateur.

    BTW the number of people killed in the Great Leap Forward was based on Judith Banister's “massive death toll” hypothesis at the US Bureau of the Census, the number increases by the year, it was 30 million Judith proposed, nowadays it was between 80 to 100 million, what is the number you believe it should be?
    , @jacques sheete

    But no people did as much to transform the whole world in the past 300 yr, mostly for the good.
     
    Now that's pretty funny. You just proved Flynn wrong...

    “History at the cartoon level isolates only the unpleasant features and events and then exaggerates them to gain its effect.”

    John T. Flynn, As We Go Marching, 1944, pg 150 Law school graduate, journalist, historian, initially supported FDR, a founder of the America First Committee.
    http://mises.org/books/aswegomarching.pdf

     

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  172. @jacques sheete

    Unless I’m mistaken, that Kaufman guy didn’t have any real influence though and held no official position, he just wrote a bizarre book.
     
    Well, he wasn't the only one. Ever hear of Ilya Ehrengerg?

    Ehrenburg incited Soviet soldiers to treat Germans as sub-human. Writing:

    “The Germans are not human beings. From now on the word German means to use the most terrible oath. From now on the word German strikes us to the quick. We shall not speak any more. We shall not get excited. We shall kill. If you have not killed at least one German a day, you have wasted that day ... If you cannot kill your German with a bullet, kill him with your bayonet. If there is calm on your part of the front, or if you are waiting for the fighting, kill a German in the meantime. If you leave a German alive, the German will hang a Russian and rape a Russian woman. If you kill one German, kill another -- there is nothing more amusing for us than a heap of German corpses. Do not count days, do not count kilometers. Count only the number of Germans killed by you. Kill the German -- that is your grandmother's request. Kill the German -- that is your child's prayer. Kill the German -- that is your motherland's loud request. Do not miss. Do not let through. Kill.”
     
    Forget lampposts; dudes like them, (and there were apparently many),ought to be stuck in Abu Ghraib for life.

    Yes. The point being, whether or not Kaufman or Eherenburg are simply extreme or demented individuals, they evinced attitudes towards non-Jews that many Jews hold, even if only in milder form. The closer a particular Jew is to power, it seems the more their hostility towards non-Jews is. Witness the current hostile elite of the former West.

    Read More
    • Replies: @jacques sheete

    The point being...
     
    As I would have expected, you, an honest person, can easily get the drift.

    However, in marked contradistinction, the clown contingent here willfully ignores the obvious. No wonder they find truths "tiresome."
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  173. @Alden
    Would you mind keeping your homo porn fantasies to yourself? You want to be raped by big, mean, aggressive black men with us usually large dongs. We get it. You post this several times a week.

    So get out your jar of lubricant and fantasize away.

    You’re living in denial.

    It’s not just happening in schools and nightclubs.

    https://www.amren.com/features/2016/12/blacks-changed-school/

    they typically date white girls. Today’s young people are fully open to interracial dating, and our school does nothing to discourage it. How can we? Any teacher or administrator who has voiced any sort of contempt for such behavior has been accused of racism. We have caught many interracial couples having sex in the school building, sometimes during school hours. To my knowledge, no white couple has ever been caught doing this.

    It is being PROPAGATED BY THE STATE as the right thing.

    And what do Andrew Sullivan and Milo, two ‘conservative’ homo men’, have in common? Addiction to Negroes. As with homo men, it will spread among white women.. especially as EU now seems defenseless against the arrival of millions and millions of black African men.
    Also, remember Simon Mol in Poland? A single Negro man can hump a 100 white women.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  174. @Johnnydub
    You touch on what's going on but never nail it.

    The Jews will never forgive or forget the Holocaust. And it's not just Nazis, it's white western civilisation they blame. Which is why the globalist agenda is dominated by Jews - The banks, Hollywood, George Soros.

    They are going to genocide any potential threat (ie the West) to them going forward. It's their interpretation of "never again"

    The Zionists of proto isreal were on good terms with nazi germany. Both groups saw the other’s desire for an ethnically pure homeland.

    The zionists of proto isreal ignored and buried cries of help from eastern European jews, including several very prominent rabis from eastern europe.

    Read More
    • Agree: jacques sheete
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  175. @Johnnydub
    You touch on what's going on but never nail it.

    The Jews will never forgive or forget the Holocaust. And it's not just Nazis, it's white western civilisation they blame. Which is why the globalist agenda is dominated by Jews - The banks, Hollywood, George Soros.

    They are going to genocide any potential threat (ie the West) to them going forward. It's their interpretation of "never again"

    The Jews will never forgive or forget the Holocaust. And it’s not just Nazis, it’s white western civilisation they blame.

    This is too much of a stretch. After all, Russians defeated the Nazis. But today, Neocons and even Liberal Zionists are working hand-in-hand with Ukrainian Neo-Nazis against Russia.

    Also, the Arabs and Muslims had nothing to do with the Holocaust. So, why have Jewish globalists concocted strategies that turned MENA into WWII-level war zones?

    It’s more about power. When a people have too much of it and become addicted, it goes bad.

    It’s like Nazis got too much power and totally destroyed a promising thing by going from national renewal to imperialist over-reach.

    Read More
    • Replies: @jacques sheete

    It’s like Nazis got too much power and totally destroyed a promising thing by going from national renewal to imperialist over-reach.
     
    Nah. They were destroyed in order to prevent even a hint of such. The imperialist banksters were not about to tolerate so much as a whisper of competition. Same is true regarding Japan, and it's plain that they're still up to the same antics today.

    I say these things because WW1 was about crushing the competition and WW2 was an extension of its predecessor.

    Why, my fellow citizens, is there any man here or any woman, let me say is there any child here, who does not know that the seed of war in the modern world is industrial and commercial rivalry…and the reason why some nations went into the war against Germany was that they thought Germany would get the commercial advantage of them. The seed of the jealousy, the seed of the deep-seated hatred was hot, successful commercial and industrial rivalry…

    This war, in its inception was a commercial and industrial war. It was not a political war.

    -Woodrow Wilson, Address at the Coliseum in St. Louis, Missouri, September 5, 1919
     
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  176. @Sergey Krieger
    No idea what this fuss is about. Brits were able to evacuate because Hitler still hoped to get along with them. Germans could get them all if an order were given. But it shows nicely how this machine works. Make some dramatic movies about even this shameful event in Britain history, ignore completely true great battles that turned the tide of war because those were fought by USSR and do it consistently over decades. And here we have what we have. Completely distorted history of WW2 in the West and ignorant public.

    The Germans did bomb the beaches in Dunkirk where British troops were assembled, but the ground was soft sand which absorbed much of the explosive power of the bombs. By this stroke of good luck, most of the British Expeditionary Force escaped, though about a quarter were captured along with French soldiers who were defending the retreat.

    This was good luck for the USSR as well as the British – if the escape had not occurred, Germany would have been unopposed in the West, which would have meant an even greater onslaught on the Eastern Front, and no British contribution to the Arctic convoys. At Dunkirk Britain narrowly escaped a humiliating defeat and an armistice with Germany or even an invasion.

    The decisive battles against Nazi Germany were of course fought by the USSR, with help from the UK and USA with supplies delivered by the Arctic convoys.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Beefcake the Mighty
    Yeah, those Arctic convoys sure helped alleviate the butcher's bill on the eastern front. Why are Americans and British such tools?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  177. Joe Wong says:
    @Expletive Deleted

    Mind you, the British troops were in the foreign land, it is not right for the invader to bear such bitter feeling and victimhood sentiment by being kicked out of their occupied land.
     
    My sides! AngloSaxon horde invades and occupies Normandy. Loyal German allies rally to the defence of the violated Dukedom of Normandy and the Kingdom of the Franks. Heathen Khaki Army repulsed with great loss and driven into the sea.
    Can I get a premiere ticket for that movie when it comes out please? Please don't just be another troll, I want you to really believe your assertions. Priceless.

    Are you saying the AngloSaxon’s words must be taken as given truth? This is very authoritarian. You should know the AngloSaxon is notorious for manufacturing consent and fabricating fake news, anyone with an ounce of critical thinking capability should view anything spitted out by the AngloSaxon with a bucket of salt.

    You may believe the AngloSaxon fought WWII for liberty and anti fascism, but their actions during the war and after the war tell otherwise. Impartial analysis indicated that it was pure power struggle between the greedy evil colonial imperialists. AngloSaxon’s post war historical narrative is glossing over their ugly nature and behavior.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Expletive Deleted
    So ... you don't seem to know anything about this little local intra-European dispute whatsoever. Just that the Eternal Anglo is always wong.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  178. CanSpeccy says: • Website
    @anonymous

    Social rot in Britain started from the top.
     
    The 'elites', or whatever one prefers to call them, are the culprits in all this. They're the true believers and purveyors of the religion of PC-cult-think mind-rot. It's something that's been imposed on everyone else and has been mandated throughout the educational system to brainwash the younger people growing up in it, creating new generations of true believers. This was never due to any grassroots demand but has been a top-down imposition. It's a problem throughout the world where the leadership class despise the average person and consider them to be merely fungible protoplasm. Is it too late for Britainistan or other countries such as the US or Germany? Perhaps, but lets not count someone out until the count of ten has been reached. It's going to be close; bad times loom ahead. I'm not optimistic, however.

    The ‘elites’, or whatever one prefers to call them, are the culprits in all this. They’re the true believers and purveyors of the religion of PC-cult-think mind-rot.

    The British elite and their European counterparts have hated the common people for at least 200 years. Hence as a character in Disreali’s novel, Sybil, stated, there are:

    Two nations; between whom there is no intercourse and no sympathy; who are as ignorant of each other’s habits, thoughts, and feelings, as if they were dwellers in different zones, or inhabitants of different planets; who are formed by a different breeding, are fed by a different food, are ordered by different manners, and are not governed by the same laws . . . . THE RICH AND THE POOR.

    The thing was, during the 19th and most of the 20th century the working classes were needed to operate the industrial machine and die for their country in wars among national elites. Yet even then, the elites debated how to cull the masses. Fabian socialists such as H.G. Wells and George Bernard Shaw, as well as Charles Darwin’s son Francis, and many others talked about lethal chambers as a means to dispose of the unproductive. Trouble was, the Nazis gave gas chambers a bad name.

    But now, with manufacturing offshored and an increasing proportion of the remaining jobs being automated, the common people have become largely superfluous, and in any case they can be replaced by cheaper more subservient immigrant labor. At the same time, a practical mode of genocide has emerged: sex “education” which teaches every kind of sexual perversion while branding only reproduction as a vice, this combined with mass replacement immigration, which will make the Brits a minority in their own homeland by 2060.

    Now the common man of England sees his posterity destroyed, his job taken by an Asian or African or Middle-Easter coolie with no roots, no concept of rights, and long experience of, and submission to, a corrupt and tyrannical ruling class. All the while, the process of genocide is pushed forward by government and educational bureaucracies, and by the police, whileit is cheered on by cucks, ruling class traitors, the media and people like Corvinus.

    The powers of persuasion are overwhelming and unstoppable. It’s game over for Britain, short of a nationalist dictator.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Expletive Deleted

    It’s game over for Britain, short of a nationalist dictator.
     
    UK is hideously overpopulated, more than the Netherlands (I'm pretty much talking about England here, the Celtic bits are basically temperate tundra and fit only for trees or deer). Unlike the Low Countries, there's no possibility of adequate expansion even if we filled in the Wash, Morecambe Bay and the Severn.
    At the moment it's all just about ticking along on a tidal wave of funny money. But the minute Quantitative Easing and the gibs stop flowing, it's full on civil war to the last man standing. After that, fragmentation into mutually hostile regions populated by the indigenes. All foreigners with half a brain will have already fled abroad, or been Sarajevoed in the larger cities with no prospect of any Blue Helmet rescue. It'll resemble the situation in the 4th century AD, Empire pulls out the legions, bloody chaos and opportunistic foreign predation ensues. Supranational dictator not really feasible, given the fissile character and basically prehistoric hatreds of the various native tribes within the island, unless a few quick campaigns of genocide are envisaged, Hanoverian-style.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  179. @Dr. X

    Good comment. And why was Hess imprisoned for so long? I’ve never understood that. Any clues?
     
    Guilt by association.

    After 1945, Nazis became stand-ins for Satan in a secularized, Judaized world. Anyone remotely associated with Nazism was going to be hunted down forever. They're still arresting 87-year olds who were junior officers in 1945 and accusing them of war crimes -- someone as close to Hitler as the Deputy Fuhrer was never going to see the light of day.

    Yes, but the recent hysteria whereby anyone who may have even looked at a concentration camp while in German uniform is hunted down is just that, recent, and parallels the rise of the holocaust from a “detail of history” (as it was in all of the Allied leaders memoirs) to a cosmic, religious event for which non-Jews must all atone.

    Hess obviously knew something the Americans and British wanted kept quiet. I suspose they could’ve killed him, as they likely killed Himmler, but presumably they felt they had to maintain some kind of appearances in this case.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  180. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @Priss Factor
    Mind you, the British troops were in the foreign land, it is not right for the invader to bear such bitter feeling and victimhood sentiment by being kicked out of their occupied land.

    Brits could be brutal, and this dark side has to be remembered. But no people did as much to transform the whole world in the past 300 yr, mostly for the good.

    So, on balance, the Brits owe the world nothing. They took but also gave.

    If not for European invasion of China, your mother would still have bound feet and you would be kissing Manchu butt.

    Also, who killed more Chinese than Mao?

    The deaths during Mao’s rule weren’t that high as a percentage of the population. They were much lower, for example, than the deaths the Irish suffered under British rule during the potato famine.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  181. @TheJester
    If I can follow the above narrative, the British won the battle for WWII ... but then quickly lost the war for survival. The British held off an invasion by the Germans (close relatives in language, religion, history, and culture) only to be swallowed whole a few years later by an invasion from a basket of Third World peoples with alien languages, religions, cultures, and a significantly lower average IQ.

    At Dunkirk and throughout WWII, the British stood united as a people with purpose as they fought for their survival as a free people. However, they were never consulted about the follow-on invasion. The second invasion was quietly implemented by the Foreign Office and other government apparatchiks. It was undemocratic and, in practical terms, forthrightly treasonous.

    The new reality: London has a Muslim mayor. The country is filled with mosques and "no-g0" areas policed by Muslim religious police enforcing Islamic-sanctioned social behaviors. Sharia Law has official status in British civil cases. Gangs of Muslim youth roam the streets beating up whites because they are white. Other Muslims traffick white teenage girls into drugs and prostitution. London is experiencing a brash of random acid attacks on innocent people. Female circumcision and honor killings are quietly tolerated.

    A short stint of occupation by the Wehrmacht in WWII might have been preferable to this reality. It is doubtful that Chancellor Hitler would have tolerated open borders and a massive invasion by alien peoples and cultures. Indeed, Hitler admired his British cousins and their empire. He, in fact, sought a peace treaty with Britain that would have given Britain a free hand in their overseas empire in return for the Germans having a free hand in Europe. He wanted a partnership, not conquest.

    The open question is, Why did the British fight WWII against enormous odds ... only to quickly fold as gelded "cucks" to an invasion that is marking the end of Britain as a country and the British as a people? Losing their army at Dunkirk, suing Germany for peace, or suffering a short occupation would not have had such a disastrous outcome.

    So, in the final analysis, Dunkirk was a Pyrrhic victory. An uplifting story or fortitude and heroism that, in the final analysis, did little to protect the survival of Britain as a country and the British as a people.

    The open question is, Why did the British fight WWII against enormous odds … only to quickly fold as gelded “cucks” to an invasion that is marking the end of Britain as a country and the British as a people?

    So, in the final analysis, Dunkirk was a Pyrrhic victory.

    I’m not convinced that one follows from the other.

    Germany has overcompensated for its crimes in WWII, to the point that Germans have become ethno-masochistic. This was not inevitable: Japan committed grave atrocities of its own in the Pacific Theatre, but has managed to renounce militarism without abolishing the idea of Japan itself.

    The reaction of other European countries has been similar to that of Germany, though less intense. We follow the argument that the lessons of the Nazi era are not something that are unique to Germans (as criminals) and Jews (as victims), but rather are a hideous aspect of the human condition that can emerge anywhere given the right conditions … but then we apply this lesson only to ourselves, and then only as possible perpetrators, not as possible victims.

    We try to renounce racism, but we keep just enough of it to believe that other races are untouched by the same Original Sin as ourselves.

    The Left welcomes Arab and African immigrants to Europe, while lecturing us about colonialism, imperialism, and slavery. It ignores the history of the immigrant cultures themselves, whose historic vices are not dissimilar to our own, and which continue in the form of brutal ethnic and tribal civil wars right up to the present day.

    This boneheaded narrative is the norm among the intellectual classes. If you ask, for example, why Pakistan is a poor country, the fact that it is a tribal, inbred, corrupt, and low-trust society is the wrong answer – and in fact an answer that makes you a racist. The only answer acceptable to the left-leaning intellectual is that the British colonised Pakistan and stole their wealth.

    I don’t understand how we have fallen so low in only 70 years.

    Read More
    • Agree: German_reader
    • Replies: @SolontoCroesus

    Germany has overcompensated for its crimes in WWII, to the point that Germans have become ethno-masochistic. This was not inevitable: Japan committed grave atrocities of its own in the Pacific Theatre, but has managed to renounce militarism without abolishing the idea of Japan itself.
     
    The difference between Germany & Japan is that Jews were not involved in Japan.

    Jews were among the primary agitators for a war to destroy Germany; Jews played major roles in extracting from taxpayers the financial means- and creating the military means- by which Germany would be reduced to rubble; Jews in large numbers spied upon and functioned as saboteurs in Germany during the war; Jews dominated the interrogation and prosecution of Germans after the war; and Jews took leading roles in carrying out the brainwashing -- psychological warfare -- against (west) Germans in the post-war period.

    No, it was not "inevitable" in the ordinary course of war - to - end of war that "Germans would become ethno-masochistic": It was, however, the deliberately planned and executed outcome, managed by Jews at every level.

    Flip through "Capturing the German Eye," by Cora Sol Goldstein.

    As you do, ask yourself whether the American people are not subjected to similar forms of psychological warfare, by Jews, for similar purposes. (As to those "purposes," read Norman Finkelstein again: https://www.unz.com/nfinkelstein/to-live-or-to-perish/

    "[Jew want] To play their part in the Jewish people’s revenge on the goyim. . .
    Remember, the Israelis don’t just hate Arabs. They’re in an eternal war with all the goyim."
    )

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  182. @James N. Kennett
    The Germans did bomb the beaches in Dunkirk where British troops were assembled, but the ground was soft sand which absorbed much of the explosive power of the bombs. By this stroke of good luck, most of the British Expeditionary Force escaped, though about a quarter were captured along with French soldiers who were defending the retreat.

    This was good luck for the USSR as well as the British - if the escape had not occurred, Germany would have been unopposed in the West, which would have meant an even greater onslaught on the Eastern Front, and no British contribution to the Arctic convoys. At Dunkirk Britain narrowly escaped a humiliating defeat and an armistice with Germany or even an invasion.

    The decisive battles against Nazi Germany were of course fought by the USSR, with help from the UK and USA with supplies delivered by the Arctic convoys.

    Yeah, those Arctic convoys sure helped alleviate the butcher’s bill on the eastern front. Why are Americans and British such tools?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  183. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @German_reader

    Read what one obvious crackpot had to say about exterminating Germans.
     
    Unless I'm mistaken, that Kaufman guy didn't have any real influence though and held no official position, he just wrote a bizarre book.
    Anyway, I probably shouldn't get any deeper into this discussion since it will probably be unproductive. It's also not about Dunkirk or about modern Britain.

    There was a prominent American anthropologist who advocated exterminating Germans during WWII:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ernest_Hooten#The_.22Hooton_Plan.22

    During World War II, Hooton proposed to eradicate the German people by infiltrating them slowly with masses of non-European male immigrants, thereby breed “war strains” out of them.[10]

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  184. Albrecht says:

    The necktie party is at least a century overdue. National leaders who will inflict on their own people monstrosities like the Somme deserve death. Everlasting shame on the bankers, politicians and other evil perverts who, in their pride, could imagine no better fate for the precious patrimony of Europe than as so many conscripted sponges for soaking up machine gun bullets in the vain defense of “his majesty’s empire.” (Foremost among these monsters was a drunken bastard named Winston Churchill.) That was the death of Europe.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  185. Joe Wong says:
    @Priss Factor
    Mind you, the British troops were in the foreign land, it is not right for the invader to bear such bitter feeling and victimhood sentiment by being kicked out of their occupied land.

    Brits could be brutal, and this dark side has to be remembered. But no people did as much to transform the whole world in the past 300 yr, mostly for the good.

    So, on balance, the Brits owe the world nothing. They took but also gave.

    If not for European invasion of China, your mother would still have bound feet and you would be kissing Manchu butt.

    Also, who killed more Chinese than Mao?

    Sorry, you are upset, but you took my comments in the wrong way, I merely point out the facts that the British and their offshoots have been hiding those facts by manufacturing consent and fake news. Hiding crimes against humanity, crimes against peace and war crimes committed by the British and their offshoots in the last 300 years under democracy, human rights, and other moral high ground is simply hypocrisy that everybody should have the duty to expose it for the human sanity’s sake.

    Dynasties got created and overthrown on the regular basis in Chinese history. Manchu was on their dying leg, without the European help to crash the Taipin revolution, Manchu would have been overthrown 60 years earlier, this is another fact the British is claiming credit where credit is not due.

    Mao did not kill a single person himself, but you want to blame all the Chinese killed on him because he was the leader, then the British should not complain the others blaming all the people killed due to British actions on the British and their offshoots, that number will be in the hundreds of millions, which will make Mao look like an amateur.

    BTW the number of people killed in the Great Leap Forward was based on Judith Banister’s “massive death toll” hypothesis at the US Bureau of the Census, the number increases by the year, it was 30 million Judith proposed, nowadays it was between 80 to 100 million, what is the number you believe it should be?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Achmed E. Newman
    Besides the long run-on sentence that comprises your 4th paragraph, you're tightening up on the grammar. Good on ya your American friend. Now it's the content that has gone all to hell.

    Did you write that Chairman Mao was not responsible for the 30 million Chinamen who starved in 1960-61? I guess they should have just defied him and not melted down their farm implements to increase the steel output numbers or not made their communal steel mills per Mao's orders. Nobody would have lasted long defying the guy, and what are you gonna do without guns?

    Any dictator with absolute power like that, Mao, Stalin, Hitler, and all the Kings and Queens of old is indeed responsible for the deaths and misery caused by his stupid ideas. That's why you NEVER LET ANYONE GET TO A POSITION OF ABSOLUTE POWER. The British and Americans have a longer history of knowing this than any other peoples on Earth, BY FAR! I have very much respect for the British throughout history, as opposed to your BS, Mr. Wong. It is only in the last 1/2 century that the populace in both of these countries has dropped the ball and let all the work of their ancestors be ruined.

    BTW, here is Peak Stupidity's take on Chinese philosophy. (more on their modern-day nefarious plans HERE. See if you don't agree a little bit.
    , @mikey
    I don't know what the real numbers were, but I know a physician who came out of one of the prison camps who survived only because he ate tomatoes (the only food) for months on end. While he did not like to discuss the particulars, he did say that in his camp alone there were 300 people dying every day due to starvation and untreated disease. There were many more camps nearby so the numbers that died just in his locality must have been very high.

    Now the question would be why was he interred. It was very simple, he came from a well off family, and he had received his education in America. That was all it took.

    Why was he still there when the communists took over? Well it was very simple, he believed their lies, that they would create a better China. He thought they were for the common man... and he wanted to help. His sister, who was trained as a dentist, did not believe in the Communists and so escaped to Hong Kong and later came to Canada.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  186. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @attilathehen
    Yes. Did you not read what I wrote? Are you familiar with his writings? His book "We are Doomed" is a perfect example of his evil degeneracy. He is really writing about his poor choice of a wife and then deciding to reproduce. His wife and daughter are Obummer voters. Importing Democratic voters. Do you remember the Obama years?

    His writings for Vdare are another window into his insane mind. He "thinks" Jews are smarter than gentiles. He criticized overweight white woman. As long as a woman reproduces enough to maintain the race, no one cares what a woman looks like after the age of 45 (same with men).

    He worked on a Wall Street, yet holds out his tin cup for shekels. He is bright enough that he should have learned banking lessons and made a small fortune.

    He wrote an article about how white parents should give their kids a talk about blacks. This man with non-white children cannot give advice to white parents with white children.

    He likes to write about mathematics. Anytime some Chinese math students win prizes he likes to write about this and bring attention to the Chinaness. Recently, a woman named Maryam Mirzakhani won the most prestigious math award, the Fields Medal. She was the first woman to win it. She is a high-caste Iranian (you can see she looks very Aryan, unfortunately she was a Muslim, but she did not appear religious so maybe living in the West helped her to change her mind about her belief system). I wonder if Derbyshire will write about her, or is he consumed with jealousy that no Chinese/Jewish woman has been able to win this prize?

    He deserves to be hanged first.

    Are you Iranian?

    Read More
    • Replies: @attilathehen
    No.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  187. @Dr. X

    Good comment. And why was Hess imprisoned for so long? I’ve never understood that. Any clues?
     
    Guilt by association.

    After 1945, Nazis became stand-ins for Satan in a secularized, Judaized world. Anyone remotely associated with Nazism was going to be hunted down forever. They're still arresting 87-year olds who were junior officers in 1945 and accusing them of war crimes -- someone as close to Hitler as the Deputy Fuhrer was never going to see the light of day.

    The Soviets insisted Hess stay in prison. Why? They had the idea Hess’s motive for his flight to Britain was to broker an alliance between Hitler and Britain against the Soviet Union.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  188. Jake says:
    @Beckow
    Nazis were also planning to remove, or exterminate over time, the Czechs. They murdered 20% of Belorussians, and they did a fairly convincing genocide on Serbs. We can quibble where the mythical "West" starts and where it ends, but I would say that Prague is probably in it, and so is Beograd. If you add up the European nations that Nazis wanted gone one way or another, you get about 40% of white European population. Almost all in the east.

    How is that consistent with 'Nazis not threatening European civilisation'?

    The problem is the same: Western Europeans seem to hate the white eastern Slavs. Not all by any means, but the general instinct is always there. Nazis were just an extreme case, and were more open about it. What we see today in US, German, French or British media with regard to Russia (and sometimes also Poland or Hungary) is something that would never - ever - be said about any other group. Try to substitute any other group, from Irish to Chinese, from Arabs to Africans, this level of public and media hysteria would never be allowed to flourish. But when it comes to Russia it is ok. At some point, if you "Westerners" cannot police your own, aren't you really passively supporting this hysteria? These politicians get voted in, the media is your media - they represent you.

    This seems a replay of Nazism, on that I agree with you. But where are the voices of reason? Why should a 'civilisation' capable of this level of hatred and hypocrisy be saved anyway? You are misty-eyed about Dunkirk. Good. But at the same time you muse openly about 'wiping Moscow off the face of earth' and how that would not be such a tragedy. Well, when next Dunkirk comes, I can see the despised white easterners not giving a damn. Those are the fruits of hundreds of years of quiet and not so quiet hatred.

    “The problem is the same: Western Europeans seem to hate the white eastern Slavs.”

    That is not quite it. The Spanish and French, for example, have no history of labeling slaves sub-human or even inherently inferior and thus in need of superior Romance people’s conquering, so the Slavs allowed to survive can be serfs.

    Germans are the source. Germanic culture is the problem. Germans on the Continent want to force Slavs to be their permanent serf class. Anglo-Saxons (Angles and Saxons were German tribes) want the same for Celts. Cultural and linguistic Germans have destroyed far more European cultures and languages than the rest of the world combined.

    Add ‘faith only’ and ‘once saved always saved’ and Luther’s intense hatred of all things Latin as somehow cheating poor innocent Germans, and you are certain to see Germanic onslaughts to destroy as much of European civilization as is required for Germans to hold the One Ring to rule them all.

    Oh yes – and Yiddish is German, just a Judaized dialect of German, for a reason, the same one that meant Oliver Cromwell would immediately jump into bed with Jews: Germanic culture and Jews mix easily and naturally.

    Read More
    • Replies: @SolontoCroesus
    It was the Germans what dun it.

    Right.

    How do you explain Anglo-Irishman Bram Stoker's "Dracula," a flagrantly anti-Jewish screed at a time when Eastern European Jews were migrating to Britain, creating problems similar to those Derbyshire complains of?
    , @Beckow
    There are certainly variances in the level of dislike or hatred, I agree that Italians or Spaniards are a lot less virulent. But the French with Macron "I have been hacked" are among the worst, there is something odd about the French, as if they had a form of mental VD, cocky and subservient, weak and aggressive. I can't figure them out. But they always obediently mimic anglo, German, or even Scandinavian attitudes.

    We will not save the "West" like this. You can't have a huge internal split, you need to choose. This is a bit like WWII. And I don't see the current multi-cultural West dominated by aggressive uber-liberalism, and still displaying the old atavistic anti-east attitudes, I don't see that changing. So it will be over for them in this century. They will disappear as a recognizable civilization. This is who-whom moment, although the moment will last a few decades. Whether the east follows and collapses too, I don't know. They might, their internal confusion is quite bad. They might keep on taking the candy from the West and willingly go down with it.

    , @Corvinus
    "That is not quite it. The Spanish and French, for example, have no history of labeling slaves sub-human or even inherently inferior and thus in need of superior Romance people’s conquering, so the Slavs allowed to survive can be serfs."

    Clearly you failed at world history. Spanish theologians Juan Ginés de Sepúlveda and Francisco López de Gómara each argued that Indians were brutes who were made to serve civilized peoples. The French during the colonial period tracked people’s racial heritage into 128 parts (which is six generations) based on a racial superiority model. Even someone who had 125–127 European parts was referred to as “mixed blood”.

    "Cultural and linguistic Germans have destroyed far more European cultures and languages than the rest of the world combined."

    Thank you very much for your opinion on this matter.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  189. Jake says:
    @Rurik

    British men are a bunch of wussy cucks who sweat and apologize profusely if they say anything even mildly ‘racist’.
     
    British, but not Russian

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9IlDmcbDltw

    It is a SIN against PC for whites to use force to resist black criminals.

    Thank you for that, WASP Abolitionists and WASP Radical Republican Reconstructionists.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  190. @German_reader
    Because you didn't give a single serious reason why Derbyshire should be hanged, just totally silly stuff,
    e.g. this:

    He criticized overweight white woman
     
    Is fat-shaming now a capital offense or what?
    Seems also excessive to blame him for how his wife and daughter are voting (his daughter seems to be a disturbed individual though...a few years ago he mentioned she had a pet snake...that's not normal).

    Whats wrong with having a pet snake? It better then a pet bird or fish.

    Read More
    • Replies: @German_reader
    I disagree, people who have pet snakes are just creepy, young women who like those monstrosities all the more so.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  191. @German_reader
    Because you didn't give a single serious reason why Derbyshire should be hanged, just totally silly stuff,
    e.g. this:

    He criticized overweight white woman
     
    Is fat-shaming now a capital offense or what?
    Seems also excessive to blame him for how his wife and daughter are voting (his daughter seems to be a disturbed individual though...a few years ago he mentioned she had a pet snake...that's not normal).

    WOW!!! I write about Derbyshire’s degeneracy, illustrated by his book, his wife, offspring (I didn’t know that about the daughter so she is worse than even I suspected) and all you come up with is fat shaming???!!!

    His wife and daughter vote against the interests of the USA.

    Are you a German reader living in Germany? If so, are you a Merkel supporter?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Achmed E. Newman

    His wife and daughter vote against the interests of the USA.
     
    That is a woman thing, not a China thing, Attila. The century-long experiment in the vote for women has been a major part of this country's downfall.

    Also, why don't you worry about your own family and not Mr. Derbyshire's? This is not a gossip column, and you are not a 14-y/o schoolgirl. Or, are you ??
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  192. Joe Wong says:
    @Achmed E. Newman
    Between the Russians and Chinese commenters here, I can't understand half of what people are saying. It may be somewhat annoying, but you all should think about turning grammar-check on. Just try to put up a comment that is not ALL underlined in wavy green, and we'd really appreciate it.

    (We have Daniel Cheih (sp?) on here as an example of how to write correctly - with great commentary, I might add - even while being Chinese. For Russian, there is a guy on Zerohedge named Boris Alotovkrap.)

    You should say “I can’t understand half of what you are saying, not “people.” You are talking to us, Russian and Chinese commenters, you are not talking to third party “people.”

    You should say “Russian and Chinese commenters” not “Russians.” Russian and Chinese are adjective in this case.

    You should also say “but you all should turn grammer-checking on” not “but you all should think about turning grammer-check on,” because “think about” does not do anything to satisfy your bitching. Grammer-Checking is a compound name, you should not mix noun and verb to make a compound noun.

    There are more grammatical defects in you comment that is not desirable in proper English writing, but it becomes bothersome to point them out all.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Achmed E. Newman
    That stuff is all writing style, Chinaman; those aren't grammar mistakes. Your original comment, and a number of ones from the Russians on here, were all but unreadable due to either no skills or just laziness with the grammar.

    I can read your comment above very well, so nice job getting your American friend to write it for you. You should do that each time, so you could get your point across. Speaking of the point though, see my next reply to you.
    , @Achmed E. Newman

    There are more grammatical defects in you [sic] comment that is [sic] not desirable in proper English writing, but it becomes bothersome to point them out all.
     
    Same here, bro, same here. It looks like unz review only allows so many [sic]'s.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  193. Jake says:
    @Avery
    Yeah, 2,000 years ago.

    Germanic tribes were considered barbarian by the Romans and by and larger they were.
    But over a period of ~2,000 years Germanic tribes coalesced into a German people and German civilization that gave the civilized world the likes of Ludwig van Beethoven, Johann Sebastian Bach,.....

    I don't know too many other formerly barbaric and/or nomadic peoples, if any, who have had such a remarkable transformation and ascent.

    That happened for only 1 reason: Germans eventually became Catholic.

    When the Goths sacked the city of Rome in 410, perhaps a majority of the tribe was Arian heretic. Most Germans who left paganism in Late Antiquity became heretics, not Catholic. And for all those centuries, Germans left nothing of cultural importance, save for some innovations that helped kill and steal more efficiently.

    But after becoming Catholic, linguistic Germans eventually began to produce high culture.

    The farther cultural/linguistic Germans move from being part of Catholic heritage, the more they reveal that they are suicidal. They are happy to oversee the death of the West.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  194. @Z-man
    What's the age difference between you and your young Texan wife?

    She graduated in 2006, he claims to have beed raised in the 1950s, so 25-35 years. Some might say he was robbing the craddle, i like to think shes robbing the grave.

    Read More
    • LOL: Z-man
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  195. fnn says:
    @German_reader

    Twenty million is a conservative estimate.
     
    That's almost certainly much too high an estimate. The communists committed monstrous crimes, and if you add together deaths in the famines during the Russian civil war, the famines in Ukraine and other areas (Central Asia etc.) in 1932/33, the Great Terror and deaths in the camp system you might get to ten million deaths or even somewhat more over a 30-year period. But 20 million isn't really credible anymore...if you use such numbers, what's the detailed source for them?
    Also the Nazis had fairly radical plans which they didn't get to fully implement, like deliberately starving to death millions in the Soviet Union to make room for German settlers...that would have been significantly worse than post-war Soviet rule, despite all the Stalinist repression.

    Robert Conquest was the one who was a semi-pariah for many years for allegedly inflating the death tolls under Soviet Communism. Let’s see what the lefties at Wikipedia have to say about that:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Great_Terror

    After the collapse of the Soviet Union and the opening up of the Soviet archives, many of Conquest’s claims were validated as having been accurate. However, Conquest’s estimates of the death toll and other aspects of his research were challenged by many historians, such as Arch Getty,[6][7][8] Trotskyist historian Vadim Rogovin,[9] and German historian Gábor T. Rittersporn.[10]

    Other historians agree with Conquest and maintain their original, higher estimates, among them Stalin biographer Simon Sebag Montefiore, Perestroika architect and former head of the “Presidential Committee for the Rehabilitation of Victims of Political Repression” Alexander Nikolaevich Yakovlev, and the director of Yale’s “Annals of Communism” series Jonathan Brent, putting the death toll at about 20 million.[11] Russian historian Dmitri Volkogonov (who was special adviser for defence issues to the Russian President Boris Yeltsin until 1994), is also broadly in agreement with Conquest.[12]

    In 1997, Robert Conquest stated: “We are all inclined to accept the Zemskov totals (even if not as complete) with their 14 million intake to Gulag ‘camps’ alone, to which must be added 4–5 million going to Gulag ‘colonies’, to say nothing of the 3.5 million already in, or sent to, ‘labour settlements’. However taken, these are surely ‘high’ figures.”.[13] However, in the preface to the 40th anniversary edition of The Great Terror (2007), Conquest said that “Exact numbers may never be known with complete certainty, but the total of deaths caused by the whole range of Soviet regime’s terrors can hardly be lower than some fifteen million.”[14]

    Read More
    • Replies: @German_reader
    Hmm, okay, I'm not really convinced by that, but would have to look more closely into the matter, and don't have time for that right now. In any case both Soviet communism and Nazism were horrible systems.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  196. Avery says:
    @attilathehen
    Yes. Did you not read what I wrote? Are you familiar with his writings? His book "We are Doomed" is a perfect example of his evil degeneracy. He is really writing about his poor choice of a wife and then deciding to reproduce. His wife and daughter are Obummer voters. Importing Democratic voters. Do you remember the Obama years?

    His writings for Vdare are another window into his insane mind. He "thinks" Jews are smarter than gentiles. He criticized overweight white woman. As long as a woman reproduces enough to maintain the race, no one cares what a woman looks like after the age of 45 (same with men).

    He worked on a Wall Street, yet holds out his tin cup for shekels. He is bright enough that he should have learned banking lessons and made a small fortune.

    He wrote an article about how white parents should give their kids a talk about blacks. This man with non-white children cannot give advice to white parents with white children.

    He likes to write about mathematics. Anytime some Chinese math students win prizes he likes to write about this and bring attention to the Chinaness. Recently, a woman named Maryam Mirzakhani won the most prestigious math award, the Fields Medal. She was the first woman to win it. She is a high-caste Iranian (you can see she looks very Aryan, unfortunately she was a Muslim, but she did not appear religious so maybe living in the West helped her to change her mind about her belief system). I wonder if Derbyshire will write about her, or is he consumed with jealousy that no Chinese/Jewish woman has been able to win this prize?

    He deserves to be hanged first.

    Sadly, Maryam Mirzakhani passed away a couple of week ago from cancer.

    Great loss.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  197. Wilkey says:
    @Sergey Krieger
    We did. But in Russian and for mostly internal use. Also, considering Russian character even in those movies that were shown in the West it was not about great battles but rather people like Ballad about soldier and few others. Anglo Saxon like to boast but in reality are not that good as history shows in military matters.

    “Anglo Saxon like to boast but in reality are not that good as history shows in military matters.”

    Well there was that part about conquering North America. And Australia. And South Africa. And New Zealand. And winning Word War II. And World War I. And the Napoleonic Wars. And holding onto Wales and Scotland and Ireland for all so very long.

    How many European countries, for all their wars, can truly be said to have come out ahead in teritorrially terms? Even if its former colonies are no longer under its political control they are genuine extensions of its culture and, most importantly, its DNA. Militarily Britain’s disadvantage is the same as its advantage – it is an island, and has to send forth its armies across an ocean – or at least a channel – to place them in battle.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Sergey Krieger
    You are delusional. Neither UK or USA ever was able to win against peer nation be it Napoleonic France or Germany alone. Mostly coming to finish already defeated by someone else aka Russia/ USSR enemy. All those conquests you mention are nothing to be proud in military terms. Modern military attacking basically Savage people barely out of stone age. Before Bonaparte got annihilated in Russia, things were not going well for Anglo Saxon. Were as usually fighting using someone else. The only thing that prevented UK from being overan all the time was geography. Russia on the other hand has incomparable long term track record of beating who is who in military universe. Note, Russia conquered the whole territory from Ural to Pacific barely with few hundred people starting with ermak in the most inhospitable location. Defeated Napoleon and Nazi Germany without any military assistance from allies.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  198. Wilkey says:
    @EugeneGur

    it was allied with the Third Reich
     
    The USSR was never allied with the Third Reich unless you count every country with a non-aggression pact with Germany as allied with it. That would then include every country in Europe including Britain - remember, the USSR was the last to sign such pact after exhausting all other options.

    the Soviets might have remained Hitler’s ally throughout the war

     

    Putin once said in response to a similar remark that if a grandmother had balls (literally) and other appropriate equipment, she then would be a grandfather. This is a standard Russian expression illustrating the futility of all those "would've, could've, should've".

    Ever considered the possibility that if Britain and France had concluded a pact with the USSR, as Stalin tried hard to convince them to do, and together defended Czechoslovakia instead of surrendering to Hitler in Munich, there might not have been WWII and no Dunkirk?

    LOL. You’re a genuinely funny guy.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  199. Anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Wally
    What a load of baseless Zionist propaganda recited like a parrot, or more than likely by another lying Zionist.
    Reads like something from the creepy supremacist Jew, Martin Gilbert.

    Of course you can't back up any of it, History Channel for you all the way.

    "Some stories are true that never happened."
    - Elie Wiesel

    There were the ‘Nazis’ with the mythological '6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers' and there were the ‘Nazis’ without the mythological ’6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers’.

    The '6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers' are scientifically impossible frauds.
    see the 'holocaust' scam debunked here:
    http://codoh.com
    No name calling, level playing field debate here:
    http://forum.codoh.com


    "One should not ask, how this mass murder was made possible. It was technically possible, because it happened. This has to be the obligatory starting-point for any historical research regarding this topic. We would just like to remind you: There is no debate regarding the existence of the gas chambers, and there can never be one."
    - endorsed by 34 "reputable historians" and published in the French daily Le Monde on February 21, 1979

    “Ach,” he said, “we’ve often fantasized about drawing up an indictment against Adolf Hitler himself. And to put into that indictment the major charge: the Final Solution of the Jewish question in Europe, the physical annihilation of Jewry. And then it dawned upon us, what would we do? We didn’t have the evidence.”
    - "holocaust historian" Raul Hilberg, from https://youtu.be/2q51wqEE1fM
     

    His post had nothing to do with Jews and instead concerned Nazi plans for the Slavic population of Europe.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  200. @Priss Factor
    It's said that Nazi victory threatened the death to Western Civilization.

    Where do they get this? Sure, fvictorious Nazi Empire would have been evil, but the Nazis never threatened the core of Western Civilization except in Poland.

    Nazi's main threat were to Russian Slavs and Jews. Jews did play a key role in European Culture esp with Emancipation, but most of Western Civilization would be intact even without Jewish input.

    But Nazis did pose a real threat to Polish and then Russian civilization. Less to Poles because Nazis were half-convinced that Poles were fellow 'Aryans'. But it was hell for Russia. Hitler planned to raze Moscow and kill millions and enslave the rest. But then, going by today's hysteria about Russia, Russia, Russia, why should globalists be bothered by this? Globalists raped Russia real good in the 90s and then sought to destroy its culture with Homomania. Today, globalists say Putin is evil, Russia is the greatest threat to the world, etc. Those who call Putin 'new hitler' sound as crazed as hitler.

    Anyway, as evil as the Nazis were, they posed no threat to Core of Western Civilization. Nazis saw Scandies as fellow 'Aryans'. Even if Germans had invaded UK, most people would have been treated well and fairly. And Germans were pretty decent to the French(except Jews), much more so than the French were with their imperial subjects. And even though Hitler thought Italians weren't as good as northern Europeans, he admired Mussolini and wanted good relations with Italy. And Germany was for good relations with most Eastern European nations. With most European nations, Germans wanted dominance but didn't seek to tyrannize or exploit them.

    So, the only nations that were threatened by Germany in a big way were Poland and esp Russia.
    It would have been a great great crime if Nazis had destroyed Russia, but Russia was not part of 'Western Civilization'.

    When it came to the arts, letters, and music of most of Western history, the Nazis were admiring and reverent. Their contempt was for Jews and Russian Slavs. If anything, Hitler and Nazis had more respect for Western arts and culture than the modernists did who would embark on one radical attack after another on everything European in race, history, narrative, arts, expression, etc.

    Nazis can be blamed for lots of evil, but they were not a threat to Western Civilization unless one defines the West as Want of Diversity and Minority Priority.

    At any rate, a civilization doesn't vanish because an evil prevails over it. Romans had some evil emperors. China and Persia had some nutty tyrants. Russia was under evil Stalin, but Russia didn't vanish as civilization.

    Nazis were not like Germanic barbarian looters who had no use for arts and culture. If anything, Hitler's evil was he preferred arts & culture over human lives. A little humanism would have done him some good.

    Anyway, this stuff about how Nazis threatened Western Civilization is all the funnier coming from PC globalists whose plan for Europe is Diversity Cancer, mass invasion, race-mixing into Brazil-North-Africa, rap music as main music, Hollywood trash as main culture, homomaia as religion, and pornification of mainstream culture and even children's culture(just check out some Ariana Grande videos meant for young girls).

    Nazis would have been horrible for Russia, but a Nazi-conquered Britain would have been better than today's Britain and its dire future. Germans would have crushed British liberty, but they never would have threatened British race, culture, and history. And with a friendly government in place, the Germans might have left and restored sovereignty.

    Nazis were not uniform everywhere. If communists treated all peoples the same -- prole cattle though wrong class elements could be in big trouble --, the Nazis treated some people very well and treated others brutally depending on their ethnicity.
    So, Nazis posed little threat to Western Civilization but posed a real great threat to Russia.

    Nazis would have crushed democracy, but who says Europe needs democracy to be European or Western? After all, for most of Western history, there was NO democracy. And Polish experiment with democracy made it weak, and it was torn apart by stronger powers of Russia and Prussia.

    Nazis were evil and had to be defeated, but let's do away with the fiction that they posed a threat to Western Civilization. In their demented way, they were trying to save it from degeneracy. Alas, Germans were blind to the fact that their fuhrer himself was a pathological, a rabid dog barking against rabies.

    I have no problem with NAZIS in Germany but when they crossed borders, all bets were off.
    The Nazis should have stayed in Germany.
    They supposedly were National Socialists and not Internationalist Socialists.
    The Internationalist Socialists were the Communists.
    The Germans (nazis) had big street battles with the Communists and came out on top.
    Anyway itz fun speculating what would have happened if the stupid Nazis had stayed at home.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  201. @Joe Wong
    You should say "I can't understand half of what you are saying, not "people." You are talking to us, Russian and Chinese commenters, you are not talking to third party "people."

    You should say "Russian and Chinese commenters" not "Russians." Russian and Chinese are adjective in this case.

    You should also say "but you all should turn grammer-checking on" not "but you all should think about turning grammer-check on," because "think about" does not do anything to satisfy your bitching. Grammer-Checking is a compound name, you should not mix noun and verb to make a compound noun.

    There are more grammatical defects in you comment that is not desirable in proper English writing, but it becomes bothersome to point them out all.

    That stuff is all writing style, Chinaman; those aren’t grammar mistakes. Your original comment, and a number of ones from the Russians on here, were all but unreadable due to either no skills or just laziness with the grammar.

    I can read your comment above very well, so nice job getting your American friend to write it for you. You should do that each time, so you could get your point across. Speaking of the point though, see my next reply to you.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Joe Wong
    Yes, it is the entitlement of the American exceptionalsim, American do not make mistakes, even their bombing, killing and waterboarding on the fabricated phantom WMD allegation is humanitarian intervention.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  202. @Joe Wong
    Sorry, you are upset, but you took my comments in the wrong way, I merely point out the facts that the British and their offshoots have been hiding those facts by manufacturing consent and fake news. Hiding crimes against humanity, crimes against peace and war crimes committed by the British and their offshoots in the last 300 years under democracy, human rights, and other moral high ground is simply hypocrisy that everybody should have the duty to expose it for the human sanity's sake.

    Dynasties got created and overthrown on the regular basis in Chinese history. Manchu was on their dying leg, without the European help to crash the Taipin revolution, Manchu would have been overthrown 60 years earlier, this is another fact the British is claiming credit where credit is not due.

    Mao did not kill a single person himself, but you want to blame all the Chinese killed on him because he was the leader, then the British should not complain the others blaming all the people killed due to British actions on the British and their offshoots, that number will be in the hundreds of millions, which will make Mao look like an amateur.

    BTW the number of people killed in the Great Leap Forward was based on Judith Banister's “massive death toll” hypothesis at the US Bureau of the Census, the number increases by the year, it was 30 million Judith proposed, nowadays it was between 80 to 100 million, what is the number you believe it should be?

    Besides the long run-on sentence that comprises your 4th paragraph, you’re tightening up on the grammar. Good on ya your American friend. Now it’s the content that has gone all to hell.

    Did you write that Chairman Mao was not responsible for the 30 million Chinamen who starved in 1960-61? I guess they should have just defied him and not melted down their farm implements to increase the steel output numbers or not made their communal steel mills per Mao’s orders. Nobody would have lasted long defying the guy, and what are you gonna do without guns?

    Any dictator with absolute power like that, Mao, Stalin, Hitler, and all the Kings and Queens of old is indeed responsible for the deaths and misery caused by his stupid ideas. That’s why you NEVER LET ANYONE GET TO A POSITION OF ABSOLUTE POWER. The British and Americans have a longer history of knowing this than any other peoples on Earth, BY FAR! I have very much respect for the British throughout history, as opposed to your BS, Mr. Wong. It is only in the last 1/2 century that the populace in both of these countries has dropped the ball and let all the work of their ancestors be ruined.

    BTW, here is Peak Stupidity’s take on Chinese philosophy. (more on their modern-day nefarious plans HERE. See if you don’t agree a little bit.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Joe Wong
    In 1981 (25 years after the event) Judith Banister at the US Bureau of the Census proposed 30 millions killed in the Great Leap Forward (GLF) based on her “massive death toll” hypothesis, this figure is the mother of all subsequent numbers when the westerns write about the GLF; Frank Dikotter quoted 45 millions murdered in the GLF to win the Samuel Johnson prize for non-fiction; recently Jung Chang and Jon Halliday said 70 millions killed in the GLF in their book “Mao: the Unknown Story.” All of them claimed their number based on secret sources in china. The latest number is 100 millions murdered in the GLF in some western current affairs analysis sites.

    Achmed, how many do you believe deaths (or percentage) would attribute to polices of the Great Leap Forward or Mao himself personally?

    Peak Stupidity is indeed the peak bigotry of the White, it is written by the half educated bigots who has a mindset belonging to the past, stalled in the old days of colonialism and constrained by the zero-sum Cold War mentality. It tries to rewrite Chinese history for the Chinese based on second handed English sources and their small nation bagger-thy-neighbour culture .

    There are tens of different philosophies in China, Confucianism is just one of them. Confucianism is about the well-being of the people, it is not about harmony as the Peak Stupidity insisted. Harmony is one of the symptoms after the people are well being looked after.

    Here is the elementary of Confucianism for your food of thoughts.
    https://28utscprojects.wordpress.com/2011/03/01/%E8%8B%B1%E8%AD%AF-%E5%AD%94%E5%AD%90-%E5%A4%A7%E5%AD%B8%E4%B9%8B%E9%81%93/

    Mind you if you want to be able to think independently, don't take those toxins fed you by the 'God-fearing' morally defunct evil 'puritan' thru the education system from cradle to grave reinforced by the excessive flag saluting seriously.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  203. @Joe Wong
    You should say "I can't understand half of what you are saying, not "people." You are talking to us, Russian and Chinese commenters, you are not talking to third party "people."

    You should say "Russian and Chinese commenters" not "Russians." Russian and Chinese are adjective in this case.

    You should also say "but you all should turn grammer-checking on" not "but you all should think about turning grammer-check on," because "think about" does not do anything to satisfy your bitching. Grammer-Checking is a compound name, you should not mix noun and verb to make a compound noun.

    There are more grammatical defects in you comment that is not desirable in proper English writing, but it becomes bothersome to point them out all.

    There are more grammatical defects in you [sic] comment that is [sic] not desirable in proper English writing, but it becomes bothersome to point them out all.

    Same here, bro, same here. It looks like unz review only allows so many [sic]‘s.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Joe Wong
    I did not use proficiency of English to suppress freedom of speech, did I?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  204. @attilathehen
    WOW!!! I write about Derbyshire's degeneracy, illustrated by his book, his wife, offspring (I didn't know that about the daughter so she is worse than even I suspected) and all you come up with is fat shaming???!!!

    His wife and daughter vote against the interests of the USA.

    Are you a German reader living in Germany? If so, are you a Merkel supporter?

    His wife and daughter vote against the interests of the USA.

    That is a woman thing, not a China thing, Attila. The century-long experiment in the vote for women has been a major part of this country’s downfall.

    Also, why don’t you worry about your own family and not Mr. Derbyshire’s? This is not a gossip column, and you are not a 14-y/o schoolgirl. Or, are you ??

    Read More
    • Replies: @attilathehen
    "Achmed E. Newman" - are you a Muslim/Jew? Are you involved with Asians? Are you a Catholic?

    I can comment on Derbyshire because he is part of the problem - he married this woman. I listed facts and again I get nonsense.

    My family is kosher. Derbyshire's family is not.

    When you say women caused these problems, you have to look at the different types of women. White, black, Asian, Jewish, Christian. Most of the women in the USA who vote for welfare are black women. Most white married women vote for the GOP.

    The only century long experiment (1917-2017) that bothers me is the push for "universal brotherhood" and "universal church." I am interested in IQ which is related to race. From this we can separate those who don't belong in the West. Then we can begin to make the changes we need to regenerate Western countries. We know that IQ is the most important factor for the success of a nation.

    Your misogyny makes me believe there is something not kosher about you. (((Stefan Molyneux))) babbles about how women are to blame for the social welfare state. Japan does not have problems like these because they are a homogeneous nation that does not allow immigrants into their country. Welfare can only work in a country like Japan.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  205. G. Mayre says:

    Sorry Anglotards, credit for Dunkirk goes to Hitler only. Anything else is Anglo propaganda.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jake
    Correct.

    Whether Hitler held back his troops for one of his stupid reasons, or because he felt that he could persuade the English to go neutral rather than oppose fellow Germanics (not only were Angles, Saxons, Frisians, Jutes, and Danes Germanic, but Martin Luther was a Saxon), the fact is that Hitler's decision was THE reason the Brit Army could escape from Dunkirk.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  206. Now, this is surreal

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  207. Rod1963 says:
    @Barnard
    Did these places have any way to stop it? Were there candidates they could have voted for that were running to repeal laws that opened up immigration? I think in large part, the elites pushed it through over their objections.

    Quite so. Your average white American in 1965 would not have supported the 1964 Immigration Act had many known about it.

    They didn’t support forced busing either. They abandoned the cities to avoid having their children suffer at the hands of those black savages. Forced busing was the result of the elites using the courts to enforce social engineering on society

    Most of what constitutes race replacement was slipped under our collective noses since the elites had total control of the news in the U.S. up until the Internet matured enough to support alternative news sites. IOW we were kept in the dark.

    A lot was done via the courts.

    Politically we never had a say in immigration at the national level. Both sides worked for the elites and broke every promise they made to us once they got in. Some openly supported race replacement like McCain, Graham and Jeb Bush.

    The people who promote this s**t need to be fed to pit bulls.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  208. El Dato says:
    @Anon
    Evacution from Dunkirk as well as 'strange war' (broken Western promise to defend Poland) before are clear examples of match-fixing in WW2. Hitler was all the way playing with the rest of the West, that's why not too much resistance was observed, and too much waffen-SS from France, Belgium etc. volunteered. Hitler's empire was in fact a prototype of European Union, and Nazi ideology was only a concentrated, ultimate ideology of the West. Hopefully, the Russian bayonet destroyed the nefarious dreams. The D-day was, in fact, an attempt of the West to save chunks of Europe from USSR - obvious winner already, and to steal some spoils (e.g. nuclear and rocket techs). Western mythology still tries to save inexistent private Ryan. Besides this, Dunkirk as a massive loss of obsolete weaponry and vehicles was beneficial to British and American manufacturers.

    Nazi ideology was only a concentrated, ultimate ideology of the West. Hopefully, the Russian bayonet destroyed the nefarious dreams.

    Just what.

    The SOVIET bayonet and the NAZI bayonet were equal except that one was intensely internationalist and one was intensely nationalist. Deal with it.

    Russian? Well they have their own agenda. Post-WWI would have needed more Russians, less Soviets.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  209. @ThreeCranes
    Okay Priss, I'll take the bait and answer you.

    I've dated a number of women who had at one time in their lives, slept with brown bantu men. None of them stayed with them.

    Why?

    Because it doesn't take long for a white woman to realize that the brown man is full of bullsh*t.

    Whereas uncertainty is an essential part of the intelligent European man's makeup (a certain amount of doubt that leaves room for questioning is part of the process of learning from experience and the development of a knowledge-based culture) the brown bantu man suffers from no such hesitation. As you say, he is cocky, full of himself and because of this he is largely ignorant and therefore full of bullsh*t.

    Initially, white women--young ones especially--are susceptible to their charms but after seeing the magic brown bantu in action, with all his lies, evasions and baseless, inflated sense of self esteem they see the light and leave him. Give white gals some credit.

    You see, the brown man cannot ever admit that he is wrong about anything, ever. Well, one thing white women won't tolerate is being blamed by her man for something that he did wrong. They call bulls*t on that and he beats them. Then they leave. Sadder but wiser.

    To be sure, some white women do stay with bantus but those are women who suffer from low self esteem or who are taking revenge on their daddies. Bottom feeders. For the most part, only brown females will tolerate being beaten by their bantu beaus. It’s how he shows his love.

    And stop obsessing about long dongs. I went to integrated grade school and high school, played sports and showered with plenty of guys of both races. Not all bantus have long dongs. Some of us white guys do. We didn’t and don’t have any reason to envy bantus. Besides, a long dong is not what a woman looks for in a man. It may come as a pleasant surprise to her, but how could she have known how long the guy’s dong was before she agreed to sleep with him? Unless he made a habit of walking around with his dick out she wouldn’t have had a clue and if he had had that habit, she wouldn't have been interested in him.

    of course most Black male White female relationships don´t last, but neither do most White male White female relationships today. But the average women today has 1-3 children. So when a white female has her 1-3 children with a black male and than leaves him that doesn’t change anything anymore.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Rurik

    So when a white female has her 1-3 children with a black male and than leaves him
     
    I wonder...

    I would (and have) slept with women who no doubt have a sundry assortment of liaisons, but what if they had a black kid, would that stop you fellas from dating them or even marrying them?

    would that bother you in the least? Would you be perfectly happy to take such a woman and her brood to meet your mother and hang out at the family reunion, perhaps as a feather in your cap that you're so open-minded?

    I see these guys who get married to women with brown children and just sort of wonder if it ever bothers these guys, (knowing that the sniggers behind their backs- especially from black men- will follow them their entire lives)

    https://heartiste.files.wordpress.com/2017/07/eu.jpeg?w=500&h=281
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  210. @mobi

    Make some dramatic movies about even this shameful event in Britain history, ignore completely true great battles that turned the tide of war because those were fought by USSR and do it consistently over decades. And here we have what we have. Completely distorted history of WW2 in the West and ignorant public.
     
    Please,

    Has any people in history ever got their asses so thoroughly kicked, lost so much territory so quickly, or collapsed so incompetently on the battlefield, as Russians in the first 6 months of invasion? (6 months, mind you, not 6 weeks).

    Russia defeated Germany, not Russians.

    Cling firmly, though, because, as always, it's all you have to cling to.

    Ah, General Winter? Heard this nonsense many times. Germans at the time was the best military in the world and while losing territory and battles Soviet army was indeed doing one thing. It was fighting and French, Polish, Brits collapsed within a week or two unable to offer much resistance at all . And what was the outcome? At the end Soviet army prevailed all on her own. Regarding never in history, I would disagree. Remember Second Punic war? Hannibal crashed Roman armies in 4 major battles in a row. All that matter is outcome and Germans were not defeated by distances but by Soviet Union political system, Soviet people, army, generals and Soviet leadership. Do some reading before making these sweaping generalizations.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  211. @Priss Factor
    Diversity is like Venereal Disease.

    It might as well be called Diversyphilis or Globorrhea.

    Now, diversity per se is not the problem. All nations are diverse to some extent. Even in homogeneous nations, there is diversity if dialects and regions. And there can be good things arising from some diversity.

    The problem of what goes by 'diversity is our strength' or DIOS is that is a cancerous or viral process that NEVER STOPS. Enough is never enough.

    So, SOME Africans, Asians, and Muslims in London isn't enough. There must be more and more and more and more. Also, these minorities don't respect the host culture but make demands. Now, BBC is making history shows with blacks in white roles. Diversity even goes 'time machine' and alters past history like Stalin used to alter photos. Also, many whites get a virtue high from beating their chest about how they are infected with Diversyphilis.

    PC acts like HIV. It attacks the immune system.

    In any national order, patriots are most valuable for they are the guardians of what constitutes the nation in terms of identity/core ethnicity, territory, narrative, history, and culture. Patriots are the warriors, storytellers, guardians, and preservers. So, patriots must be highly regarded. Without them, the national order no longer has defenders.

    Likewise, an organism depends on immune system to survive. Immune system defends and sustains the organism. All around there are germs and stuff. Immune system must constantly resist and filter the hostile germs. Without such force, the organism will succumb to germs and toxins.

    What does HIV do? It attacks the immune system so that the organism cannot resist hostile germs and toxins, and gradually, the body succumbs to all sorts of infection. Indeed, even what were mild seeming infections keep festering and getting out of control.

    PC works the same way on nations. It attacks patriotism and patriotic forces, the very people most essential to protect and preserve the territory, ethnicity, history, and spirituality of the order. PC re-programs the organism so that it regards patriots as germs and toxins and tries to kill them off. And that weakens the national immune system and then tons of foreigners invade without resistance.

    The West has the money and technology to defend itself but it doesn't because PC has reprogrammed the Western mind to see patriots as germs/toxins while welcoming germs/toxins as the New Patriots. So, Africans, Muslims, and etc are to be welcomed as New Britons, New Irish, New Swedes, and New Germans while true European patriots are seen as 'far right toxic odious noxious rabid and virulent evil nazis'.

    David Horowitz used to run a alternative mag called Heterodoxy in the early 90s before internet became a big thing. It had a small audience but it could have done so much more if the net was big back then.

    Horowitz is a problematic figure, but he understood the dangers missed by most Cons because he'd been at the center of the New Left in the 60s. He knew them from inside out. He understood the radical mind like the back of his hand. And he warned National Review that nice guy Conservatism Inc is defenseless against this virulent form of ideology(that under Clinton would forge an alliance with Big Money).

    And all the things he warned about 'culture war' back then has come to be.

    http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/viewSubCategory.asp?id=337

    There was one satirical piece about how Hollywood is going to release old movies with blacks computerized over whites. It sounded outlandish then but now, we have BBC and Hollywood filling white roles with blacks in all these movies about european past.

    Coal-staining, not whitewashing, is the great crime of Hollywood.

    antiracist have no idea what to do when their final goal is achieved: let´s say Sweden has 50 million inhabitants with 5 million of them half white, the rest African. What´s then? After all the work they would discover that history does not stop with their glorious victory. Suddenly they would have to do the mentally hard work of finding a sense of life. They would have to find new final goals. Everybody fears this situation, so they just continue with mass migration, they have no idea what else to do.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Priss Factor
    We have this nonsense called gender studies but what we really need is sex studies. Sex is biological, gender is socially constructed. It's reality vs fantasy. Maybe, the elites promote genderology to distract us from the crucial facts of sexology.

    All white people are the products of white men planting seeds in white women. White women are like European soil. If you lose the land, you lose the place where you can build homes and plant food. It means death. Likewise, if white men lose access to white wombs, they lose the chance to make white life. For example, if any white man's mother had been womb-colonized by a Negro, he would been Afroborted and replaced by mulatto who will be seen as black. So, control of land and wombs are vital for racial survival. Blacks control all black wombs, and now, white wombs are coming under Afro-Colonization.

    Why? Because blacks are more muscular and more aggressive. They also have bigger dongs, a common trope in Pop Culture, even prime-time TV shows. Also, sports and music are related to sex. Female instinct wants to mate with top warriors, even if of another race that defeats her own race. Female instinct despises the loser, even of her own race. When whites integrate with blacks, blacks routinely kick white butt in schools, streets, and playing fields. Blacks command the ball, white girls play cheerleader for them. Look at Sports Illustrated. Top athletes are black, top bikini models are white.
    Also, music and sex affect same parts of the brain. As blacks have louder voices and more rhythm, they make more lustful music, and this turns white women into jungle women.

    Now, manhood is vital for male psychology, health, and survival. The fact is white manhood wilts and fades in the presence of blacks. White Manhood needs safe space from Black Thughood. White Manhood and Black Manhood cannot co-exist. When two come together, blacks are cocks, whites are cucks. It's like in prisons where black inmates routinely rape white boys as their 'bitches'.
    Milo, Andrew Sullivan, and other 'gay conservatives' are bitches to black homo dongs.

    So, why should white males welcome than resist the massive invasion of Europe by blacks. If a bunch of Vietnamese come to France, French manhood can lord over Viet manhood as Viet men are short and geeky. But when Sub-Saharan Africans arrive, French manhood goes down the toilet. Same in UK. What kind of man wants to lose his manhood in his own homeland and lose his women to Africans who conquer and colonize white wombs like Spanish conquered and colonized New World indigenous wombs and created the servile mestizo race that still lives under Hispanic rule?

    According to PC, Ideal White Fatherhood is welcoming black Africa invasion so that stronger blacks will beat up his sons and impregnate his daughters. Yes, white fathers should cheer the impregnation of his daughters' wombs by the same thugs who beat up his sons and destroyed their white manhood.

    What white man would want tougher blacks to beat up his son and impregnate his daughter? But PC says that is the IDEAL white parenting.

    We need sex studies about the real power and real survival. We don't need gender studies that distract us with fantasies and encourage white boys to seek 50 alternate genders of wussidom.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  212. @Joe Wong
    Are you saying the AngloSaxon's words must be taken as given truth? This is very authoritarian. You should know the AngloSaxon is notorious for manufacturing consent and fabricating fake news, anyone with an ounce of critical thinking capability should view anything spitted out by the AngloSaxon with a bucket of salt.

    You may believe the AngloSaxon fought WWII for liberty and anti fascism, but their actions during the war and after the war tell otherwise. Impartial analysis indicated that it was pure power struggle between the greedy evil colonial imperialists. AngloSaxon's post war historical narrative is glossing over their ugly nature and behavior.

    So … you don’t seem to know anything about this little local intra-European dispute whatsoever. Just that the Eternal Anglo is always wong.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  213. @CanSpeccy

    The ‘elites’, or whatever one prefers to call them, are the culprits in all this. They’re the true believers and purveyors of the religion of PC-cult-think mind-rot.
     
    The British elite and their European counterparts have hated the common people for at least 200 years. Hence as a character in Disreali's novel, Sybil, stated, there are:

    Two nations; between whom there is no intercourse and no sympathy; who are as ignorant of each other's habits, thoughts, and feelings, as if they were dwellers in different zones, or inhabitants of different planets; who are formed by a different breeding, are fed by a different food, are ordered by different manners, and are not governed by the same laws . . . . THE RICH AND THE POOR.
     
    The thing was, during the 19th and most of the 20th century the working classes were needed to operate the industrial machine and die for their country in wars among national elites. Yet even then, the elites debated how to cull the masses. Fabian socialists such as H.G. Wells and George Bernard Shaw, as well as Charles Darwin's son Francis, and many others talked about lethal chambers as a means to dispose of the unproductive. Trouble was, the Nazis gave gas chambers a bad name.

    But now, with manufacturing offshored and an increasing proportion of the remaining jobs being automated, the common people have become largely superfluous, and in any case they can be replaced by cheaper more subservient immigrant labor. At the same time, a practical mode of genocide has emerged: sex "education" which teaches every kind of sexual perversion while branding only reproduction as a vice, this combined with mass replacement immigration, which will make the Brits a minority in their own homeland by 2060.

    Now the common man of England sees his posterity destroyed, his job taken by an Asian or African or Middle-Easter coolie with no roots, no concept of rights, and long experience of, and submission to, a corrupt and tyrannical ruling class. All the while, the process of genocide is pushed forward by government and educational bureaucracies, and by the police, whileit is cheered on by cucks, ruling class traitors, the media and people like Corvinus.

    The powers of persuasion are overwhelming and unstoppable. It's game over for Britain, short of a nationalist dictator.

    It’s game over for Britain, short of a nationalist dictator.

    UK is hideously overpopulated, more than the Netherlands (I’m pretty much talking about England here, the Celtic bits are basically temperate tundra and fit only for trees or deer). Unlike the Low Countries, there’s no possibility of adequate expansion even if we filled in the Wash, Morecambe Bay and the Severn.
    At the moment it’s all just about ticking along on a tidal wave of funny money. But the minute Quantitative Easing and the gibs stop flowing, it’s full on civil war to the last man standing. After that, fragmentation into mutually hostile regions populated by the indigenes. All foreigners with half a brain will have already fled abroad, or been Sarajevoed in the larger cities with no prospect of any Blue Helmet rescue. It’ll resemble the situation in the 4th century AD, Empire pulls out the legions, bloody chaos and opportunistic foreign predation ensues. Supranational dictator not really feasible, given the fissile character and basically prehistoric hatreds of the various native tribes within the island, unless a few quick campaigns of genocide are envisaged, Hanoverian-style.

    Read More
    • Agree: CanSpeccy
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  214. iffen says:
    @Avery
    Yes, but what does that have to do with what I wrote in my post re Germans?
    Explain.

    Yes, but what does that have to do with what I wrote in my post re Germans?
    Explain.

    The usual: ethnicities, dissolution of empires, survival of residual ethnicity of empires, religious homogeneity (essential?), victim of major genocide (essential?), germans created many states and empires, Germany was late to the nation-state game (did it ever have a “real” empire), German barbarians, Germans, german nation-states, WWII( war bands coalescing?), dissolution of nation-states, dissolution of Pax Americana, dissolution of the US, we have no “ethnicity” that will survive, do any of the german states have an ethnicity that will survive?, the US only has the political founding, liberal democracy fails=America fails (has failed), can germans do ethnicity?, the Franks did, for a while, the Anglo-Saxons did, for a while, war bands coming together?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  215. @Pachyderm Pachyderma
    This paen is dedicated to the blood, sweat and tears of sacrifices made by the Whites; who asked you to bring up the half naked fakirs of the Indian Subcontinent here and now, regardless of their contributions? Are you a fair minded simpleton or something?

    I don’t know about being a “fair-minded simpleton” but I’d certainly be some kind of simpleton if I took seriously a comment from someone who wrote this:
    “Methinks, it’s an excellent idea… if it was left to women to run the world, humanity would be in much better shape than what the patriarchy has delivered.”
    I looked at a few of your posts to see what your angle was–from your “If only women ruled the world” tripe I concluded that you are either a sadly common typical university-”educated” eunuch/ mummy’s boy or a disengenous mischeif-maker.
    And if you read my post, it should be clear that it was also about the sacrices of ethnically White British Africans and how these were air-brushed away whilst the non-White contribution has, with every passing year, exaggerated and excessively promoted by the meeja-political traitors.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  216. RobRich says: • Website

    400,000 Brits on the beaches, Dunkirk chaos, Hitler rejoices.

    400,000 Americans on the beaches, Normandy, Hitler is Toast.

    Bless the Brits for their stubbornness. But US grit wins when our leaders let it win. As Churchill acknowledged in the same speech.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wilkey
    400,000 Brits on the beaches, Dunkirk chaos, Hitler rejoices. 400,000 Americans on the beaches, Normandy, Hitler is Toast. Bless the Brits for their stubbornness. But US grit wins when our leaders let it win.

    The soldiers who landed on D-Day were maybe 60/40 American vs. British. If you include the Canadians, who landed a division, a brigade, and a few other battalions on June 6, and the French, who landed a division and change, the initial landing force at Normandy was probably only about 50% American. That's not even counting all the Royal Navy and RAF men who participated, who may have outnumbered their American counterparts.

    Gee, it's almost as if you have more men and more time to prepare against what was probably the world's most effective fighting force (drastically diminished since 1940) you have a better chance of coming out victorious.

    As for the "Russians" other people here keep talking about? They were shits who allied themselves with Hitler. They split Eastern Europe with Germany at the beginning of the war then raped their way across it at the end, then refused to let go of it for over 40 years.

    Let me be clear that while no country deserved to lose 20 million people during the war - individuals who died as the result of stupid and even evil acts of their supposed leaders - if it had to have been any country it's better that it was the USSR than anyone else. Stalin was their shitty leader, not ours.

    , @Beefcake the Mighty
    Tool.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  217. Corvinus says:
    @mp
    Some people, like the poster in question, are easily confused. There is a difference between a private act, and public policy. If someone wants to marry a foreigner, that is their choice. On the other hand, if the government tells you that you have to marry a foreigner, as a matter of policy, then it's something else altogether. Bringing in a foreigner as a spouse, and taking care of her, is not the same thing as the government mandating that tens of thousands of foreigners be allowed entry.

    As far as hanging goes? I'd say that those promoting indigenous dispossession as policy should be banished to the countries they like so much. They could work as domestic servants for the people they love, and care about. Helping them in their daily chores, etc. No need to hang anyone, really.

    “On the other hand, if the government tells you that you have to marry a foreigner, as a matter of policy, then it’s something else altogether.”

    What pieces of legislation “tells” Americans they must marry foreigners?

    “As far as hanging goes? I’d say that those promoting indigenous dispossession as policy should be banished to the countries they like so much.”

    First, immigration does not necessarily “promote indigenous dispossession”. Second, how does your proposal meet constitutional scrutiny?

    Read More
    • Replies: @mp
    What pieces of legislation “tells” Americans they must marry foreigners?

    None, of course. I was offering an hypothetical as an example of the difference between a private choice and public policy. I thought it was clear--sorry if it was not.

    ... immigration does not necessarily “promote indigenous dispossession”. Second, how does your proposal meet constitutional scrutiny?

    All immigration without strict limits on immigrant's behavior promotes a degree of indigenous dispossession. If immigrants are allowed to vote, hold property, etc., it proportionally dispossesses citizens. I have no problem with immigrants of the proper sort. But their ought to be strict limits on what they can and can't do, in my view. No immigrant should be granted full citizenship. Maybe after several generations their progeny could apply. I don't know. An ethnostate where citizens are tied to the land by clan, religion, and family is the best situation. Not practical for the US, which is essentially a global Special Economic Zone. Whoever can bring enough cash to the table is allowed free rein. America will have to fail before meaningful change can take place, I suspect.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  218. Corvinus says:
    @attilathehen
    Please see my comment no. 143.

    If "individual freedom" is detrimental to the West, the person must be removed. Derbyshire to China.

    “If “individual freedom” is detrimental to the West, the person must be removed.”

    In a word, no, since YOU are making the unilateral decision based on loosey goosey standards that a person’s acts are “detrimental” to the point of being removed. Your thought process is in the extreme minority.

    Now, if you are so directly threatened by his presence, why don’t you personally do something about it? Or are you just another impotent arm chair warrior?

    Read More
    • Replies: @attilathehen
    This will happen as immigration laws are changed. A problem like Derbyshire did not just pop up. It's been simmering for a while, but now that Trump won, there will be changes.

    The good thing is Derbyshire's spawn is useless so he can see his mistakes fail before his eyes.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  219. Corvinus says:
    @CanSpeccy

    Always trying to have others do your dirty work. Typical.
     
    Corvinus, being stupid, as usual.

    What's dirty about hanging traitors intent on destroying your nation?

    And where's the basis for pretending I want someone else to do the hanging.

    It's true, though, the job would be best left to a professional.

    And to adhere to constitutional forms, The House of Commons should exercise its sovereignty and pass a bill of attainder.

    “What’s dirty about hanging traitors intent on destroying your nation?”

    Nothing at all, except you are assuming that your countrymen who exercise their own freedom to enable non-English to enter the the country are traitors, and that these immigrants are hell bent on destroying everything in its path.

    “And where’s the basis for pretending I want someone else to do the hanging.”

    If merry ol’ England is being overrun by “invaders”, and all you do is lament that nothing is being done about the situation, then you directly contributing to the demise of your nation. You demand others get involved to stop this trend cold in it tracks, but do not take the proper steps yourself to be on the front lines.

    “Now the common man of England sees his posterity destroyed, his job taken by an Asian or African or Middle-Easter coolie with no roots, no concept of rights, and long experience of, and submission to, a corrupt and tyrannical ruling class.”

    Some common men.

    “All the while, the process of genocide is pushed forward by government and educational bureaucracies, and by the police, whileit is cheered on by cucks, ruling class traitors, the media and people like Corvinus.”

    You are hyperventilating again. There is no “genocide” taking place. Again, if you feel so strongly about your nation being “invaded”, why are you not physically doing something about it?

    Read More
    • Replies: @CanSpeccy

    If merry ol’ England is being overrun by “invaders”, and all you do is lament that nothing is being done about the situation, then you directly contributing to the demise of your nation.
     
    Listen Corvinus, you want me to do something? Here's what I'll do. If I ever come across you in person, I knock you down as a reminder to other cucks, traitors, saboteurs, and agitators for European genocide just how most Europeans feel about such scum. OK?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  220. @German_reader
    Well, if I understand correctly Ehrenburg was writing about killing German soldiers, in the context of the times after the German invasion of the Soviet Union that sentiment was understandable...and killing enemy soldiers is pretty much you'd expect your own troops to do in war anyway (the far more serious allegations that Ehrenburg exhorted Red army soldiers to rape German women seem to be a post-war myth).
    But I'd really rather not discuss this any further, it gets tiresome.

    But I’d really rather not discuss this any further, it gets tiresome.

    Defending the indefensible is almost guaranteed to get tiresome. Remember that.

    PS: It was typical for prominent Bolshiesas to express vile hatred for others. Then ask yourself who them there prominent Bolshies were. Kaufman’s and Ehrenberg’s spoutings were pretty much common knowledge back then and many people apparently felt as they did.

    Adios!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  221. mp says:
    @attilathehen
    Yes. Did you not read what I wrote? Are you familiar with his writings? His book "We are Doomed" is a perfect example of his evil degeneracy. He is really writing about his poor choice of a wife and then deciding to reproduce. His wife and daughter are Obummer voters. Importing Democratic voters. Do you remember the Obama years?

    His writings for Vdare are another window into his insane mind. He "thinks" Jews are smarter than gentiles. He criticized overweight white woman. As long as a woman reproduces enough to maintain the race, no one cares what a woman looks like after the age of 45 (same with men).

    He worked on a Wall Street, yet holds out his tin cup for shekels. He is bright enough that he should have learned banking lessons and made a small fortune.

    He wrote an article about how white parents should give their kids a talk about blacks. This man with non-white children cannot give advice to white parents with white children.

    He likes to write about mathematics. Anytime some Chinese math students win prizes he likes to write about this and bring attention to the Chinaness. Recently, a woman named Maryam Mirzakhani won the most prestigious math award, the Fields Medal. She was the first woman to win it. She is a high-caste Iranian (you can see she looks very Aryan, unfortunately she was a Muslim, but she did not appear religious so maybe living in the West helped her to change her mind about her belief system). I wonder if Derbyshire will write about her, or is he consumed with jealousy that no Chinese/Jewish woman has been able to win this prize?

    He deserves to be hanged first.

    Did you not read what I wrote?

    Umm…you didn’t write all of that stuff until I called you on it. But I just read what you wrote now.

    Who is smarter than whom? I don’t know…smart is as smart does, I guess.

    Next, until middle aged Chinese women start strapping on dynamite and blowing things up, I’m not worrying about them, too much. I do, however, think that mixed race kids have it more difficult at times. It depends on how adaptable the race is, the extended family structure, and social views on the matter. The latter can change more easily than the former two. Not a hanging offense. Have you been reading much Turner Diaries, lately, by any chance?

    I generally believe that an ethnostate (re: Wilmot Robertson) is the way to go. There should be no naturalized citizens. At least for several generations–maybe five or six. This would preclude immigrant voting, etc. And anyone married to a foreigner would not be allowed to conduct public policy, or vote. Dual citizenship would never be allowed. Foreigners should not be allowed to own property. Plato’s outline in Laws seems just, to me.

    One other thing. It takes real alpha male courage to come on a blog and claim, anonymously, that another person, by name, should be killed. Brimelow uses his own name when he calls for someone, not named, to be hanged. That’s bad enough. Who is he talking about? He doesn’t say. And now you want to hang Derbyshire. Both statements smack of the rodent. Brimelow for being squirrelly, and you for being weaselly.

    Read More
    • Replies: @attilathehen
    Brimelow is just writing his usual cuck nonsense. It is easy to "answer" Brimelow as to who should be hanged, i.e., Derbyshire, because Brimelow refuses to accept that troublemakers like Derbyshire and the Jews have played a role in the destruction of England.

    Brimelow will always give in to the Jews. He's just babbling.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  222. @Priss Factor
    Mind you, the British troops were in the foreign land, it is not right for the invader to bear such bitter feeling and victimhood sentiment by being kicked out of their occupied land.

    Brits could be brutal, and this dark side has to be remembered. But no people did as much to transform the whole world in the past 300 yr, mostly for the good.

    So, on balance, the Brits owe the world nothing. They took but also gave.

    If not for European invasion of China, your mother would still have bound feet and you would be kissing Manchu butt.

    Also, who killed more Chinese than Mao?

    But no people did as much to transform the whole world in the past 300 yr, mostly for the good.

    Now that’s pretty funny. You just proved Flynn wrong…

    “History at the cartoon level isolates only the unpleasant features and events and then exaggerates them to gain its effect.”

    John T. Flynn, As We Go Marching, 1944, pg 150 Law school graduate, journalist, historian, initially supported FDR, a founder of the America First Committee.

    http://mises.org/books/aswegomarching.pdf

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  223. @Beefcake the Mighty
    Yes. The point being, whether or not Kaufman or Eherenburg are simply extreme or demented individuals, they evinced attitudes towards non-Jews that many Jews hold, even if only in milder form. The closer a particular Jew is to power, it seems the more their hostility towards non-Jews is. Witness the current hostile elite of the former West.

    The point being…

    As I would have expected, you, an honest person, can easily get the drift.

    However, in marked contradistinction, the clown contingent here willfully ignores the obvious. No wonder they find truths “tiresome.”

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  224. @Priss Factor
    The Jews will never forgive or forget the Holocaust. And it’s not just Nazis, it’s white western civilisation they blame.

    This is too much of a stretch. After all, Russians defeated the Nazis. But today, Neocons and even Liberal Zionists are working hand-in-hand with Ukrainian Neo-Nazis against Russia.

    Also, the Arabs and Muslims had nothing to do with the Holocaust. So, why have Jewish globalists concocted strategies that turned MENA into WWII-level war zones?

    It's more about power. When a people have too much of it and become addicted, it goes bad.

    It's like Nazis got too much power and totally destro