The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Peter Brimelow Archive
DUNKIRK: “People Should be Hung from Lampposts, They Should be Burned Alive, for What They've Done to Britain”
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>
dunkirk-672x281

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

So I went to see this movie DUNKIRK at the urging of James Kirkpatrick, VDARE.com’s lead tweetmeister and our ambassador to popular culture. In the process, I made the interesting discovery that my young Texan wife had never heard of Dunkirk. For me, it brought flocking back a host of memories and emotions sternly repressed since I left Britain for U.S. in 1970. Chief among them now: lethal rage.

If you grew up in Britain in the 1950s, as John Derbyshire and I did, the myth of the Dunkirk evacuation—using “myth” in its affirming and sustaining sense—was everywhere. I remember reading illustrated stories about it in children’s comics when I was about Felicity’s age (now 6).

Of course, the British were wrong to believe this was the decisive turning point in World War II—there were, as we are incessantly reminded, far bigger battles on the Eastern Front. But it was pretty decisive for Britain: the loss (or, politically even more awkward, capture) of the 200,000-plus U.K. troops retrieved from the beaches after being cut off by the German panzers would have been devastating, perhaps fatal, for a country that could field only ten infantry divisions in 1939. As it was, casualties were very heavy—one of many arresting points made by Dunkirk is how terrifyingly quickly combat-damaged ships can sink.

Moreover, Dunkirk was in a real sense a people’s battle. Some 700 civilian craft were recruited to get the men off the beaches and (as the movie recounts) their owners sometimes went with them. When my father took charge of the municipal-socialist public transport operation in Birkenhead in the 1960s, he had Mersey ferrymen who had gone. It was an intense popular effort and it struck deep personal roots.

Although aimed at a mass audience, Dunkirk is a very sophisticated movie and a remarkable technical achievement by writer-producer director Christopher Nolan. It’s also a political achievement. Nolan’s subject is one of the Anglosphere’s great patriotic epics and thus ripe for anti-West snark, but it has actually been well received by the Leftist cultural Establishment e.g.

Nolan seems to have flown under the radar, partly by eliminating virtually all dialog and hence minimizing the chance of jarring Politically Correct sensibilities.

Even Churchill’s sacralized “We shall fight on the beaches” June 4 oration announcing the evacuation to the House of Commons, hearing which was so much an inescapable part of growing up in England in the 1950s, like listening to Kathleen Ferrier, that I could recite it from memory and never without a thrill, appears here only as haltingly read, from a newspaper, by an exhausted, wondering survivor as his train finally reaches London.

But Nolan’s achievement goes far beyond avoiding trouble. Quietly, possibly inadvertently, he has made a movie that celebrates national identity.

He does this simply by showing a real nation in action. USA Today’s reviewer Brian Truit has been beaten up for observing that “the fact that there are only a couple of women and no lead actors of color may rub some the wrong way”. [Review: Christopher Nolan’s ‘Dunkirk’ examines WWII heroism up close, July 17, 2017] This is a little unfair: as Steve Sailer recently pointed out, director Tim Burton was indeed attacked for not including people of color in a movie set on a Welsh island in World War II, although as late as 1951 the proportion of “visible minorities” in Britain was just 0.19% (!). And the 2007 movie Atonement did prominently insert a wholly fictitious black soldier i nto its famous five-minute continuous tracking shot of the scene at Dunkirk. [Presenting the Black Past—How History Must Change The Media, by Miranda Kaufman, MirandaKaufman.com, November 14, 2013]

But the British army in Nolan’s Dunkirk is totally, completely and stunningly white.

(One of the “couple of women,” a nurse, is unsparingly shown, in a horrible below-decks underwater shot, dying an Equal Opportunity death by drowning after her hospital ship is torpedoed. Is this an implicit criticism of putting women in the front line?)

The result of this homogeneity, as the Chicago Tribune’s John Kass wrote in a brilliant column:

The star of “Dunkirk” is the character of the British people at that time, in the worst days of the war, long before America joined in, when the British Expeditionary Force was humiliated in Europe and almost destroyed.

And so it is a movie about a people of a certain time, a people who knew who they were, a people who firmly understood their culture and their obligations to it, and to their nation, and to each other.

‘Dunkirk’: Decency on a murderous beach, July 21, 2017

I am old enough to remember that Britain. And it looks like Christopher Nolan, born in 1970 in London to a British father and an American mother, caught some sense of it too.

One small sign: Nolan has the British troops standing in orderly, quiet queues (= lines in American), waiting to be taken off. This is apparently what happened at Dunkirk. The British of that era were very good at queuing. Significantly, the working class was best at it. It used to irritate my father that everyone would queue for his buses except in affluent areas, where people would just stand around and block the pavement (=sidewalk in American). “They think they’re too good to queue,” he said. Social rot in Britain started from the top.

(Nolan also has his troops being handed slices of bread and jam by rescue workers. Known in the North of England as “jam butties,” these were also omnipresent when I was a child. Reportedly, they’ve died out, along with so much else).

So is it inadvertent? Does Nolan realize what he’s done? It’s very hard to believe that anyone with deviant political views could hide them well enough to survive in Hollywood. Nolan does seem generally to avoid political statements, not typical of Leftists, but he reportedly donated to Obama in 2012 [The Religious And Political Views of Christopher Nolan, by Caitlin Frye, Hollowverse.com, November 25, 2012]. Still, it is a curious fact that his The Dark Knight Rises, last in a Batman trilogy, was seen as “fascist” by Left [“The Dark Knight Rises”: Christopher Nolan’s evil masterpiece, by Andrew O’Hehir, Salon, July 18, 2012] and Right [The Dark Right Rises:Christopher Nolan as Fascist Filmmaker?, by Gregory Hood and Luke Gordon, Counter-Currents, December 7, 2012] alike. The villain Bane has emerged as a sort of Alt-Right antihero—and Donald Trump (known to be a fan of The Dark Knight Rises) is widely believed to have offered him an homage [Donald Trump’s Inauguration Speech Borrows Line from Batman Villain Bane, by Aaron Couch , Hollywood Reporter, January 20, 2017 ).

But the real reason that Dunkirk’s inconveniently honest portrayal of Britain and its army in 1940 is so stunning: successive British governments have, in the twinkling of an eye (to quote Handel’s Messiah) utterly destroyed that world through immigration policy. Incredibly, whites—that is to say, the British—are projected to go into a minority, in a land they have exclusively occupied for millennia, not long after the same event is estimated to occur in the U.S. [RIP this Britain: With academic objectivity, Oxford Professor and population expert DAVID COLEMAN says white Britons could be in the minority by the 2060s – or sooner, by David Coleman, Daily Mail, May 28, 2016].

In 2009, Nicholas Pringle published The Unknown Warriors, a book of interviews with 150 of what in America is called the “Greatest Generation”—those who fought and lived through World War II:

Sarah Robinson was just a teenager when World War II broke out.

She endured the Blitz, watching for fires during Luftwaffe air raids armed with a bucket of sand.

Often she would walk ten miles home from work in the blackout, with bombs falling around her.

As soon as she turned 18, she joined the Royal Navy to do her bit for the war effort.

Hers was a small part in a huge, history-making enterprise, and her contribution epitomises her generation’s sense of service and sacrifice.

Nearly 400,000 Britons died. Millions more were scarred by the experience, physically and mentally.

But was it worth it? Her answer—and the answer of many of her contemporaries, now in their 80s and 90s—is a resounding No.

Immigration tops the list of complaints…Many writers are bewildered and overwhelmed by a multicultural Britain that, they say bitterly, they were never consulted about nor feel comfortable with.

`This isn`t the Britain we fought for,` say the `unknown warriors` of WWII, by Tony Rennell, London Daily Mail, November 21, 2009. Link added.

In 1940, my father, already in the British Army in which he was to spend 6½ years, was stationed on the English Channel at Folkstone, looking right at Dunkirk. Years later, reading about the German plans for Operation Sea Lion, the invasion of England, I realized he was right where paratroopers were to land and asked him what kind of resistance his unit would have been able to mount.

He said: “They would have had to give us rifles.”

The Germans never came—but Britain was invaded anyway. By 1990, when my father died, he was bitterly in agreement with Pringle’s interviewees: it wasn’t worth it.

My considered reaction to Dunkirk: People should be hung from lampposts—they should be burned alive—for what they’ve done to Britain.

God send, if only for the sake of my three little daughters, born almost exactly 100 years after my father, that America can be saved from this terrible fate.

Peter Brimelow [Email him | Tweet him]is the editor of VDARE.com. His best-selling book, Alien Nation: Common Sense About America’s Immigration Disaster , is now available in Kindle format.

(Republished from VDare by permission of author or representative)
 
Hide 377 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Diversity is like Venereal Disease.

    It might as well be called Diversyphilis or Globorrhea.

    Now, diversity per se is not the problem. All nations are diverse to some extent. Even in homogeneous nations, there is diversity if dialects and regions. And there can be good things arising from some diversity.

    The problem of what goes by ‘diversity is our strength’ or DIOS is that is a cancerous or viral process that NEVER STOPS. Enough is never enough.

    So, SOME Africans, Asians, and Muslims in London isn’t enough. There must be more and more and more and more. Also, these minorities don’t respect the host culture but make demands. Now, BBC is making history shows with blacks in white roles. Diversity even goes ‘time machine’ and alters past history like Stalin used to alter photos. Also, many whites get a virtue high from beating their chest about how they are infected with Diversyphilis.

    PC acts like HIV. It attacks the immune system.

    In any national order, patriots are most valuable for they are the guardians of what constitutes the nation in terms of identity/core ethnicity, territory, narrative, history, and culture. Patriots are the warriors, storytellers, guardians, and preservers. So, patriots must be highly regarded. Without them, the national order no longer has defenders.

    Likewise, an organism depends on immune system to survive. Immune system defends and sustains the organism. All around there are germs and stuff. Immune system must constantly resist and filter the hostile germs. Without such force, the organism will succumb to germs and toxins.

    What does HIV do? It attacks the immune system so that the organism cannot resist hostile germs and toxins, and gradually, the body succumbs to all sorts of infection. Indeed, even what were mild seeming infections keep festering and getting out of control.

    PC works the same way on nations. It attacks patriotism and patriotic forces, the very people most essential to protect and preserve the territory, ethnicity, history, and spirituality of the order. PC re-programs the organism so that it regards patriots as germs and toxins and tries to kill them off. And that weakens the national immune system and then tons of foreigners invade without resistance.

    The West has the money and technology to defend itself but it doesn’t because PC has reprogrammed the Western mind to see patriots as germs/toxins while welcoming germs/toxins as the New Patriots. So, Africans, Muslims, and etc are to be welcomed as New Britons, New Irish, New Swedes, and New Germans while true European patriots are seen as ‘far right toxic odious noxious rabid and virulent evil nazis’.

    David Horowitz used to run a alternative mag called Heterodoxy in the early 90s before internet became a big thing. It had a small audience but it could have done so much more if the net was big back then.

    Horowitz is a problematic figure, but he understood the dangers missed by most Cons because he’d been at the center of the New Left in the 60s. He knew them from inside out. He understood the radical mind like the back of his hand. And he warned National Review that nice guy Conservatism Inc is defenseless against this virulent form of ideology(that under Clinton would forge an alliance with Big Money).

    And all the things he warned about ‘culture war’ back then has come to be.

    http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/viewSubCategory.asp?id=337

    There was one satirical piece about how Hollywood is going to release old movies with blacks computerized over whites. It sounded outlandish then but now, we have BBC and Hollywood filling white roles with blacks in all these movies about european past.

    Coal-staining, not whitewashing, is the great crime of Hollywood.

  2. 1/ A bit of a complication. There may have been no non-Whites at Dunkirk, but there were lots of them in Burma, Singapore and Hong Kong, and there had been many in the trenches in the previous go-round.

    2/ Wasn’t it the Dunkirk generation who began the opening of the doors. Between 1945 and Powell’s speech who was doing the voting?

  3. utu says:

    that America can be saved from this terrible fate

    It’s more far gone than Britain. Always was. It all started with slavery.

  4. Dan Hayes says:

    “People should be hung from lampposts, they should be burned alive, for what they’ve done to Britain.”

    I agree with the author, Peter Brimelow, except with Ireland being substituted for Britain.

    What Blair did to Britain, Allan Shatter has done to Ireland. And in Ireland the populace seems to be blissfully unaware of the transformation taking place.

    Interestingly, quite some time ago Brimelow expressed the same general thoughts to me regarding Ireland (although in a more moderate tone)!

  5. jim jones says:

    David Aaronovitch of the Times says his history graduate daughters had never heard of Dunkirk:

    https://www.mercatornet.com/features/articles/20142/

    • Replies: @German_reader
  6. I think that it is ironic that some of the people who now say World War II was fought for nothing, were the very people who either made, or acquiesced in public policy decisions, in the 1960s through the 1980s (approximately the time that the “Greatest Generation” matured) that are at least partially reponsible for the population replacement we see today in Western Europe. “It all seemed like a good idea at the time!”

    The two world wars of the first half of the 20th Century altered the mindset of Europeans (including North American transplants) in ways that we are only now beginning to understand.

    • Replies: @Barnard
  7. How can anyone can look at what has happened to every White country in the West, against the will of the populations, and not see that these were truly genocidal policies.

    It is far too late for most countries like the UK.

    If members of the “Greatest Generation” had spoken out in the 50s and the 60s, this could have been avoided.

    • Agree: TomSchmidt
    • Replies: @Newsel
  8. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    Yes, you are a Mack Daddy. Respect.

  9. Dan Hayes says:
    @Dan Hayes

    For those interested in the continuing Irish autogenocide engineered in no small part by Allan Shatter, feel free to consult the “Irish Savant” website for many of the gory details.

  10. It’s said that Nazi victory threatened the death to Western Civilization.

    Where do they get this? Sure, fvictorious Nazi Empire would have been evil, but the Nazis never threatened the core of Western Civilization except in Poland.

    Nazi’s main threat were to Russian Slavs and Jews. Jews did play a key role in European Culture esp with Emancipation, but most of Western Civilization would be intact even without Jewish input.

    But Nazis did pose a real threat to Polish and then Russian civilization. Less to Poles because Nazis were half-convinced that Poles were fellow ‘Aryans’. But it was hell for Russia. Hitler planned to raze Moscow and kill millions and enslave the rest. But then, going by today’s hysteria about Russia, Russia, Russia, why should globalists be bothered by this? Globalists raped Russia real good in the 90s and then sought to destroy its culture with Homomania. Today, globalists say Putin is evil, Russia is the greatest threat to the world, etc. Those who call Putin ‘new hitler’ sound as crazed as hitler.

    Anyway, as evil as the Nazis were, they posed no threat to Core of Western Civilization. Nazis saw Scandies as fellow ‘Aryans’. Even if Germans had invaded UK, most people would have been treated well and fairly. And Germans were pretty decent to the French(except Jews), much more so than the French were with their imperial subjects. And even though Hitler thought Italians weren’t as good as northern Europeans, he admired Mussolini and wanted good relations with Italy. And Germany was for good relations with most Eastern European nations. With most European nations, Germans wanted dominance but didn’t seek to tyrannize or exploit them.

    So, the only nations that were threatened by Germany in a big way were Poland and esp Russia.
    It would have been a great great crime if Nazis had destroyed Russia, but Russia was not part of ‘Western Civilization’.

    When it came to the arts, letters, and music of most of Western history, the Nazis were admiring and reverent. Their contempt was for Jews and Russian Slavs. If anything, Hitler and Nazis had more respect for Western arts and culture than the modernists did who would embark on one radical attack after another on everything European in race, history, narrative, arts, expression, etc.

    Nazis can be blamed for lots of evil, but they were not a threat to Western Civilization unless one defines the West as Want of Diversity and Minority Priority.

    At any rate, a civilization doesn’t vanish because an evil prevails over it. Romans had some evil emperors. China and Persia had some nutty tyrants. Russia was under evil Stalin, but Russia didn’t vanish as civilization.

    Nazis were not like Germanic barbarian looters who had no use for arts and culture. If anything, Hitler’s evil was he preferred arts & culture over human lives. A little humanism would have done him some good.

    Anyway, this stuff about how Nazis threatened Western Civilization is all the funnier coming from PC globalists whose plan for Europe is Diversity Cancer, mass invasion, race-mixing into Brazil-North-Africa, rap music as main music, Hollywood trash as main culture, homomaia as religion, and pornification of mainstream culture and even children’s culture(just check out some Ariana Grande videos meant for young girls).

    Nazis would have been horrible for Russia, but a Nazi-conquered Britain would have been better than today’s Britain and its dire future. Germans would have crushed British liberty, but they never would have threatened British race, culture, and history. And with a friendly government in place, the Germans might have left and restored sovereignty.

    Nazis were not uniform everywhere. If communists treated all peoples the same — prole cattle though wrong class elements could be in big trouble –, the Nazis treated some people very well and treated others brutally depending on their ethnicity.
    So, Nazis posed little threat to Western Civilization but posed a real great threat to Russia.

    Nazis would have crushed democracy, but who says Europe needs democracy to be European or Western? After all, for most of Western history, there was NO democracy. And Polish experiment with democracy made it weak, and it was torn apart by stronger powers of Russia and Prussia.

    Nazis were evil and had to be defeated, but let’s do away with the fiction that they posed a threat to Western Civilization. In their demented way, they were trying to save it from degeneracy. Alas, Germans were blind to the fact that their fuhrer himself was a pathological, a rabid dog barking against rabies.

  11. whoever says: • Website

    I made the interesting discovery that my young Texan wife had never heard of Dunkirk.

    I know of it from reading Walter Lord’s The Miracle of Dunkirk when I was a kid. Otherwise, I probably never would have heard of it.
    My grandfather was apparently a fan of Lord’s and had a bunch of his books, which I read, so I learned about the Titanic, coast watchers, the Alamo and all sorts of interesting history, including Dunkirk.
    To defend your wife, I wonder how many Britishers have heard of Corregidor.
    As far as war movies showing women nurses in combat zones, So Proudly We Hail did it in 1943 in a film well worth watching even today.

  12. Art says:

    Scotland should go its own way – Northern Ireland should return to Ireland – The Welsh should have their own cutout.

    Then the English can live in servitude to their Jew overlords.

    It is obvious – the overarching Western nation state has been corrupted by the Jews.

    Seek peace in local control of everything.

    Peace — Art

    • Agree: Druid
    • Replies: @Expletive Deleted
  13. I have the same feeling about the Netherlands, my country no longer exists.
    We now need riot police when shortly before Deember 5 Sinterklaas arrives on a steam boat from Spain, on his white horse, Black Pete’s accompanying him.
    Black Pete nowadays is a symbol of slavery, so colored Dutch demonstrate against him.

    In Austria a politicologist is writing his book Der Letzte Europäer, The Last European.
    Predictions based on current immigrants and the number of children they get is that in 25 years from now 40% of the European population will be Muslim.
    Long before that the present social state will be gone, even after ten years here some 90% of immigrants live of welfare.
    75% of those in the city of Utrecht who live on welfare have a migration background.

    Maybe a connection is that in Sept in Germany the second book about journalism will appear.
    The first one was by Udo Ulfkotte, Gekaufte Journalismus, hope I got the title right, translated Bought Journalism.
    The second one is Lügenpresse, Press of Lies.

    • Replies: @Alden
  14. No idea what this fuss is about. Brits were able to evacuate because Hitler still hoped to get along with them. Germans could get them all if an order were given. But it shows nicely how this machine works. Make some dramatic movies about even this shameful event in Britain history, ignore completely true great battles that turned the tide of war because those were fought by USSR and do it consistently over decades. And here we have what we have. Completely distorted history of WW2 in the West and ignorant public.

  15. Parsifal says:

    Fun piece of historical trivia: Titanic’s Second Officer Charles Lightholler participated with his yacht in the Dunkirk evacuation. When one of the troops heard Lightholler was on the Titanic he wanted to jump overboard but another trooper said that if Lightholler survived the Titanic, he’ll survive anything so it’s all the more reason to stay. They made it safe back to England.

  16. anon • Disclaimer says:

    A Stalin may be the only way to save Britain, but he’d want to show up soon.

    • Replies: @jacques sheete
  17. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    Zero Sympathy towards the British.

    They are getting what they deserve. The elite pushed globalism and multiculturalism and the average bloke was either too dumb to notice what was going on or was too busy trying to figure out how he could profit from it.

    Meanwhile the British took part in wrecking many many other cultures who just wanted to be left alone.

    Well guess what British people, you were a rotten people, and now you are reaping what you sowed.

  18. delmas says:

    I think the main thrust of Christopher Nolan’s film comes across as the idea that when it gets down to the nut-cutting, all the fashionable diversity, virility bashing fads and shilly-shally relativism will prove their shallowness and worthlessness in combatting evil, and if there are ten good men left, they will have their finest hour.

  19. Looks like the text in the article has been posted twice.

    There were four companies of the Indian Army Service Corps who were at Dunkirk, of whom three servicemen were awarded the Indian Distinguished Service medal.

    http://dunkirk1940.org/index.php?&p=1_412

    “The Indian Distinguished Service Medal was the third-highest medal awarded to Indian forces after the Victoria Cross and the Indian Order of Merit. Three awards were made for services with the British Expeditionary Force in 1940. One was to junior officer Jemadar Maula Dad Khan for courage displayed in France; the citation reads:

    On 24 May 1940 when approaching Dunkerque, Jemadar Maula Dad Khan showed magnificent courage, coolness and decision. When his troop was shelled from the ground and bombed from the air by the enemy he promptly reorganised his men and animals, got them off the road and under cover under extremely difficult conditions. It was due to this initiative and the confidence he inspired that it was possible to extricate his troop without loss in men or animals.’”

  20. If you run around the right circles, you will meet many immigrant Britons who you’d think were quintessential English if you were deprived of your sight. They are all over the Beeb day and night. The reflect well on the country, for the most part, and they would hardly engender any doubt about the country’s future if they weren’t so significantly outnumbered by teeming hordes who are the antithesis of Western Culture and assimilation to it.

    These latter are the folks Mr. Pringle’s interviewees ran into on the streets of Britain, not the polished types paraded by the Beeb and the elites as paragons of virtue, and it is easy to understand the resentment Peter voices here.

  21. @Priss Factor

    “Enough is never enough.”
    Without getting into the whole “germ” analogy, there is something to what you say. Enough seems never enough. A culture has a right to retain its substance & form. However, we live in times in which substance/form are relative, if not innately nebulous.
    At the conclusion of WW II the British people voted for a Labour government that delivered, as best it could, a social safety net. People wanted “something” for their sacrifice…because what WWII did do, was demonstrate that government, business & citizens, working for a COMMON good could SUCCEED. It’s THAT which has been drowned slowly in a bathtub over the last 40 odd years. We are back to the same class riven days of the 1890′s.
    Regardless of the deep state politics, average people believed their sacrifice meant something….what it meant was an intermission in business-as-usual….

    • Replies: @Priss Factor
  22. mp says:

    People should be hung from lampposts—they should be burned alive—for what they’ve done to Britain.

    Um…what people are you talking about, Peter? Who needs to hang? I thought that problem was solved at Mezzegra, and the show trials at Nuremberg ? Are you telling us that the wrong people were executed? It’s time to get serious. Name the Jew and their fellow travelers. Otherwise, remain a clown.

    • Replies: @attilathehen
  23. Old fogey says:

    Excellent post. Please note that the first two paragraphs are repeated midway within the document – a simple editing problem.

  24. KenH says:

    The Jewish MSM doesn’t like any movies that contradict their false and misleading historical narrative that the West, in this case Britain, has always been heavily multiracial. Not only that but that Africans, Mexicans, Asians and Muslims are the very essence of who we are.

    The last thing they want is the younger generation learning that Britain was virtually 100% white and much more peaceful and cohesive than it is today with millions of third world barbarians. That is why there is carping and whining from the usual suspects about Dunkirk being “too white”.

    My considered reaction to Dunkirk: People should be hung from lampposts—they should be burned alive—for what they’ve done to Britain.

    Ditto for America, France, Sweden and Germany. And that will just be for starters.

    • Replies: @SolontoCroesus
  25. Arclight says:

    The West has allowed an elite to take hold of academia, politics, and culture that believe that the penance for the perceived sins of the past must be the destruction of our civilization and the people who helped form it. There has been little pushback against this notion and so here we are.

    Although I had been hopeful when Trump was elected that we had a president that was committed to arresting our decline, so far his political instincts have been confused and ineffective, and I fear that in 2020 the left will be back in power with a renewed assault on America’s institutions.

  26. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    Incredibly, whites—that is to say, the British—are projected to go into a minority, in a land they have exclusively occupied for millennia

    Yes, they won’t be white. They won’t be Christian. They will traffic little English girls in sex slavery. They will create Sharia patrols and eventually a Sharia legal system. But hey, at least they’re not German-speaking, high-IQed blonds! A horrific thought and a reality which all those Englishmen died fighting against.

    Now the remnant of whites in the West have their sights on the last bastion of non-cuck, independent white Christians. Russia.

  27. To my mind the great betrayers of Post-war Britain, were the politicians (Attlee, McMillan, Churchill & Co.) who so readily hitched the British trailer to the US Bandwagon and followed it slavishly into the Cold War. Those and the media moguls who were a big part of that.

  28. iffen says:

    and no lead actors of color may rub some the wrong

    Well, it did have prominent roles for the French soldiers.

    And as for the PC narrative, most of the common soldiers were downright hurtful toward the Frogs, but of course not the upper class officer who stayed behind to aid in their evacuation.

  29. Dr. X says:

    People should be hung from lampposts

    A scene straight out of the Turner Diaries.

    What’s fascinating about the plot in the Turner Diaries, in which civilian disarmament and government-forced race mixing is central, is that it has largely come to fruition in the UK before it has in the U.S.

    But there will be no civil war or “Day of the Rope.” What Brimelow fails to recognize is that the elite consensus regarding racial egalitarianism and anti-nationalism was formed as a result of the very event he sees as Britain’s finest hour. World War II, in which whites committed racial fratricide and butchered each other by the tens of millions, betrayed the 19th century belief that whites were superior and more civilized than naked jungle savages.

    The evacuation at Dunkirk may have been a moment of national pride before 1970, but we oughtn’t forget that it was other whites trying to kill the BEF, who had gone from their secure island to the continent to defend someone else’s borders, not their own.

    • Replies: @Avery
  30. anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    Social rot in Britain started from the top.

    The ‘elites’, or whatever one prefers to call them, are the culprits in all this. They’re the true believers and purveyors of the religion of PC-cult-think mind-rot. It’s something that’s been imposed on everyone else and has been mandated throughout the educational system to brainwash the younger people growing up in it, creating new generations of true believers. This was never due to any grassroots demand but has been a top-down imposition. It’s a problem throughout the world where the leadership class despise the average person and consider them to be merely fungible protoplasm. Is it too late for Britainistan or other countries such as the US or Germany? Perhaps, but lets not count someone out until the count of ten has been reached. It’s going to be close; bad times loom ahead. I’m not optimistic, however.

    • Replies: @jacques sheete
    , @CanSpeccy
  31. iffen says:
    @Sergey Krieger

    Completely distorted history of WW2 in the West and ignorant public.

    Ignorant publican here.

    I guess this means that the people who won the Great Patriotic War all by their lonesome can’t make good movies.

  32. @Priss Factor

    Hitler planned to raze Moscow and kill millions and enslave the rest.

    Given they were living under Communism, it would be a step up.

    • Replies: @Avery
    , @Priss Factor
  33. it would have been better for everyone white if hitler had won

    • Replies: @Corvinus
    , @TomSchmidt
  34. Avery says:
    @Dr. X

    {…who had gone from their secure island to the continent to defend someone else’s borders, not their own.}

    Didn’t British BIF* leave their secure island a couple of centuries prior to create an empire over which the sun never set? It’s not like it was the first time they had left the island……. And their imperial presence was rarely to defend someone else.

    Regarding ‘ defend someone else’s borders’: I doubt very much Brits sent BEF to defend someone else’s border. It was the case of “We fight them there, so we don’t have to fight them here”. Brits, for a couple centuries or so, got themselves involved in the European continental affairs because they always feared European continental powers being united. Brits, being on a resource poor island, always feared a united continental Europe could starve them. So were always creating conflict between the great powers of the continent.

    UK got itself involved in WW2 to prevent Nazi Germany from creating a Gross Germania in Europe, not because they gave a hoot about Poland. Which would most certainly have taken place had Hitler not invaded USSR.

    Notwithstanding the ‘heroic’ myth of Dunkirk, where Brits and French ran like chickens in front of the Panzers, and Hitler pretty much _let_ them escape at Dunkirk.
    _________
    * British Imperial Forces

  35. nsa says:
    @Priss Factor

    Your hero, Horrorvitz, is the actual virus in your germ theory analogy. Started his traitorous Izzy-firster career as a typical vile jooie Trotskyite in the 1960s……morphing into an even more vile jooie neocon traitor in the 1980s as the cultural currents reversed.

    • Agree: Z-man, Alden
  36. Parsifal says:
    @iffen

    I recommend “Go and see” and “Only old men go to battle”. Among others…

  37. Avery says:
    @iffen

    {…won the Great Patriotic War all by their lonesome can’t make good movies.}

    No they didn’t win the GPW all by their lonesome: they won it by 80%some: that’s the percentage of Wehrmacht they destroyed on the Eastern Front: a pretty healthy percentage.

    USSR/Russia made very good WW2 movies.
    Very realistic. Very brutal.
    Always showing massive KIA of Soviet troops, and Nazis as very capable.
    Authentic.
    Not like in American or British movies where a couple guys kill 1,000s of incompetent Germans, without nary a scratch on themselves.
    But the movies are in Russian, so…..

    In all fairness, movies are made here to make money, ROI.
    American movie going audiences would not be interested in what happened on the Eastern Front. They want to see Anglo-American guys doing heroic deeds.
    Very normal and natural.
    ‘Enemy at the Gates’ did so-so (Budget $68 million. Box office $97 million), even after the Stalingrad story was distorted to appeal to American audiences.

    • Replies: @Sergey Krieger
    , @Jeff77450
  38. Z-man says:

    What’s the age difference between you and your young Texan wife?

    • Replies: @Delinquent Snail
  39. @iffen

    We did. But in Russian and for mostly internal use. Also, considering Russian character even in those movies that were shown in the West it was not about great battles but rather people like Ballad about soldier and few others. Anglo Saxon like to boast but in reality are not that good as history shows in military matters.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    , @Wilkey
  40. “My considered reaction to Dunkirk: People should be hung from lampposts—they should be burned alive—for what they’ve done to Britain.”
    while I think allowing mass migration from muslim countries and from subsaharan African countries was a huge mistake I`d still rather live in any European country in its current state than in a society where political enemies get burned alive or hung from lampposts.

    • Replies: @Achmed E. Newman
  41. @Parsifal

    I would recommend Red snow, They fought for motherland, Dawn’s are quiet here too.

  42. Alden says:
    @jilles dykstra

    Every December we in America read about the disturbances caused by Sinterklaas and his servant black Pete.

  43. @Avery

    USSR did won lonesome. Those 80% were the best of the best and when it mattered. After 1944 it did not matter how many Germans would Allies KIA. The matter was settled before they landed. Germany lost in the East and then it was just agony. USSR would finish this business regardless of western allies entering the war or not. Hence lonesome but with a little help in the end.

    • Replies: @iffen
    , @Thomas O. Meehan
  44. Joe Wong says:
    @Priss Factor

    I hope the author would mean Winston Churchill, Robert Vansittart, and a gang of ruthless colonial imperialist warmongers are the “People Should be Hung from Lampposts, They Should be Burned Alive, for What They’ve Done to Britain.”

    Mind you, the British troops were in the foreign land, it is not right for the invader to bear such bitter feeling and victimhood sentiment by being kicked out of their occupied land. On the other hand people said the British imitates the Roman, while the American is born out the British; the Roman called destroying Carthaginian and salted their land “creating peace,” no wonder the American and the British go berserk when people kicks the American and British out of their homeland, and resort to bombing, killing and waterboarding on the fabricated phantom WMD allegation as humanitarian intervention to avenge their “humiliation.”

  45. Dr. X says:
    @Avery

    Regarding ‘ defend someone else’s borders’: I doubt very much Brits sent BEF to defend someone else’s border.

    They most certainly did. They had treaty obligations to Poland and France. They were members of the League of Nations, which required them to engage in collective defense to uphold the Treaty of Versailles.

    UK got itself involved in WW2 to prevent Nazi Germany from creating a Gross Germania in Europe, not because they gave a hoot about Poland.

    And how would a “Gross Germania” on the Continent have affected an island empire with largely Third World colonies? It wouldn’t have. Dumb move on the part of the British to interpose themselves onto the Continent.

    Which would most certainly have taken place had Hitler not invaded USSR.

    This shows a gross misunderstanding of WWII in Europe on your part. The entire purpose of Hitler launching W0rld War II in 1939 was to defeat the Soviet Union and “Jewish Bolshevism.” Jewish communists, inspired and trained by Moscow, had launched revolutions in Berlin, Bavaria, and Hungary in 1919. Trotsky trained Bela Kuhn (Cohn), the Jewish communist who established the Hungarian Soviet. The Jewess Rosa Luxembourg led a communist coup in Berlin, and Jew Eugen Levine created the Bavarian Soviet before being shot to death by the Freikorps.

    You need to study some real history, not merely repeat propaganda cliches.

    • Replies: @Miro23
  46. TheJester says:

    If I can follow the above narrative, the British won the battle for WWII … but then quickly lost the war for survival. The British held off an invasion by the Germans (close relatives in language, religion, history, and culture) only to be swallowed whole a few years later by an invasion from a basket of Third World peoples with alien languages, religions, cultures, and a significantly lower average IQ.

    At Dunkirk and throughout WWII, the British stood united as a people with purpose as they fought for their survival as a free people. However, they were never consulted about the follow-on invasion. The second invasion was quietly implemented by the Foreign Office and other government apparatchiks. It was undemocratic and, in practical terms, forthrightly treasonous.

    The new reality: London has a Muslim mayor. The country is filled with mosques and “no-g0″ areas policed by Muslim religious police enforcing Islamic-sanctioned social behaviors. Sharia Law has official status in British civil cases. Gangs of Muslim youth roam the streets beating up whites because they are white. Other Muslims traffick white teenage girls into drugs and prostitution. London is experiencing a brash of random acid attacks on innocent people. Female circumcision and honor killings are quietly tolerated.

    A short stint of occupation by the Wehrmacht in WWII might have been preferable to this reality. It is doubtful that Chancellor Hitler would have tolerated open borders and a massive invasion by alien peoples and cultures. Indeed, Hitler admired his British cousins and their empire. He, in fact, sought a peace treaty with Britain that would have given Britain a free hand in their overseas empire in return for the Germans having a free hand in Europe. He wanted a partnership, not conquest.

    The open question is, Why did the British fight WWII against enormous odds … only to quickly fold as gelded “cucks” to an invasion that is marking the end of Britain as a country and the British as a people? Losing their army at Dunkirk, suing Germany for peace, or suffering a short occupation would not have had such a disastrous outcome.

    So, in the final analysis, Dunkirk was a Pyrrhic victory. An uplifting story or fortitude and heroism that, in the final analysis, did little to protect the survival of Britain as a country and the British as a people.

    • Agree: SMK
  47. @Priss Factor

    A splendid and well-reasoned analogy, Priss Factor.
    Regrettably, it misses to mention The Tribe who did the most to inflict this pox upon us, The Tribe who secured their survival at the expense of the Allies sons, The Tribe who STILL use or sons (and a tiny few of our daughters) to fight their enemies.
    My father served in the RAF during WW2,(he got a 30-day deferment to his call up to build a one-room shack for my then 18 months old oldest brother and my pregnant mother after they were blitzed out of Clydebank, a town of 40.000 souls that had only SIX houses undamaged by the two-night blitz.
    Two uncles died in service.
    Was it worth it?
    Was it hell.
    They wished no harm to anyone of any race, like most Britons they were appalled by the way Blacks were treated in the US, but by the 80s,when Britain was beginning to be swamped by ever-more demanding, more criminal and ungrateful minorities, that was beginning to turn thin.
    They would be revolted and utterly amazed at what the Left and greedy business has done to destroy Britain.
    As it Talleyrand who wrote that “Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel”?
    That is true in some cases, but anti-patriotism (and active support of, or passive virtue -signalling of PC is the immediate refuge of the most malicious of many a modern scoundrel.

    • Replies: @David In TN
  48. @Anonymous

    It’s said that official British enmity toward Germany’s industrial ascendancy in the last half of the 19th century was instrumental in fomenting WWI, which led inevitably to WW2.

    In any case, the West might well have been saved had Hitler defeated Britain.

    The “inglourious basterds” at Dunkirk were not fighting on the side of Western man; quite the opposite. But Hitler was merciful to them. Proving, once again, that good deeds are always punished.

    That we are invited to celebrate Dunkirk -is- the PC political agenda of this movie. People really think that anything coming out of Hollywood could be any different?

  49. Barnard says:
    @Diversity Heretic

    Did these places have any way to stop it? Were there candidates they could have voted for that were running to repeal laws that opened up immigration? I think in large part, the elites pushed it through over their objections.

    • Replies: @Rod1963
  50. The British nation wreckers who opened up Britain to mass immigration from the former areas of the British Empire starting in 1948 were the evil rodents who started the demographic destruction of Britain.

    The American nation wreckers who passed the 1965 Immigration Act into law were the evil globalizers who started the demographic destruction of the United States.

    In 1990 the United States passed a law that dramatically increased legal immigration. This immigration increase was added to the massive increase of immigration caused by the 1965 Immigration Act. In 1997 Tony Blair opened up the mass immigration floodgates into Britain. This added to the mass immigration of Third Worlders that had started in the late 1940s.

    The baby boomers saw the destruction caused by the mass immigration and mass importation of Third Worlders into Britain and the United States, but they either did nothing or pushed for more nation-wrecking immigration.

    The baby boomers are not to blame for the nation-wrecking 1965 Immigration Act, that is true. The baby boomers were not the dumb bastards that got the American Empire bogged down in Vietnam either.

    It was the generations born before 1924 that got the disastrous 1965 Immigration Act passed into law. LBJ was born in 1908. All the way with LBJ — right off the mass immigration invasion cliff.

    Tom Brokaw’s “Greatest Generation” crap is just a smokescreen to cover up all the evil horseshit done by people like Brokaw and his ilk. “Greatest Generation” of nation wreckers is more like it.

  51. Wade says:
    @anony-mouse

    Yes, but as Brimelow states:

    Nearly 400,000 Britons died. Millions more were scarred by the experience, physically and mentally.

    I often wonder whether all the crazy far left political assaults on the home team in the west are due precisely to the fact that WWII took the lives of so many of the brave leaving us with proportionately more people predisposed to cowardice.

    I’m sure among those 400,000 would have arisen many civic leaders and perhaps some top notch political leaders who unfortunately died to protect Britain from invaders.

  52. Durruti says:

    Hate to Rain on your parade:

    The British Expeditionary Force of 250,000 heavily armed soldiers war poorly led. Its commanders did not intend to resist the German Army. They abandoned their positions in Belgium and opened the Belgian and French Armies to flanking moves by the advancing and more mobile German attackers.

    The British, who suffered few casualties from actual combat, were only able to effectively retreat, because of the dogged, and brave resistance of the almost completely surrounded Belgian and French armies.

    As the British Divisions waited for rescue at Dunkirk, (and abandoned 95% of their military equipment, the French troops held the perimeter (under orders from their superiors), so that the British, the BEF could escape.

    History According to Jewish Hollywood (The Official Fairy Tale – Repeated ad Nauseum)

    As a History Prof., I can testify that our texts continue to insist that it was the Belgian Army surrender that opened the flanks of the British Army and forced it to retreat – in the early days of World War II. The texts continue with a fallback criticism of the lack of military prowess of the French. A careful check shows they have their chronology wrong.

    The Movie is Shit:

    It is not until one reads the writings of Winston Churchill, that you encounter the admission that Britain could (and would) not reliably battle the Axis until General Montgomery had assumed Command in North Africa, and that was not until late 1942. By then, the British Ruling Elite, and the American Elite, and their Jewish Controllers, had decided, with the Jewish Marxist Lemonists, to crush the Casino Trumpies – er Nasties in the Center, and Rule all, in the Name of the Rothschilds, and the lovely boy who marries his Grandmother/teacher, and the Chocolate store owner, and the German lady who hates her flag, and the Londoner who is a Muslim, and the French Comedian who is banned..

    My dad was a Belgian: He served in the Belgian & American Armies. Taught me Patriotism. He is buried in the American cemetery in Farmingdale LI.

    The coffee is wearing off.

    My girlfriend wants sex.

    I’m not in the mood.

    Durruti

    For the Anarchist Collective

    • Replies: @Astuteobservor II
  53. iffen says:
    @Sergey Krieger

    but with a little help in the end.

    Thanks for the shout-out; you’re welcome.

    • Replies: @Sergey Krieger
  54. @Priss Factor

    My idea of Diversity is dating a Canadian.

  55. Durruti says:

    For those of you still counting.

    The withdrawal – cowardly retreat of the 250,000 BEF Eliminated a front of Half a Million+ armed troops that were – in place – facing the German Army. [Belgian 400,000 British 250,000, French 150,000+ Dutch 100,000-had just surrendered]

    This absence of 1/2 a million armed troops, with their equipment abandoned, allowed the unsullied, fresh German armies, to sweep, directly, almost undisturbed, into Paris.

    But don’t let the FACTS interfere with your preconceptions! or Jewish Hollywood brainwashing mis education!

    The most surprised by the ease of their victory were, in order, Hitler, Stalin, and the entire German Higher Army command, who were prepared for a serious slogging match comparable to WWI. Specially, as the Maginol Line (not present in WWI) and Alsace Lorraine (not in French possession in WWI), were in place. Hitler and his advisers were almost catatonic (positively), and at odds at what to do with their victory. Does anyone recall Hess’ visit to England? His visit was an END-Run around the Rothschilds.

    Where is my Vikidin?

  56. EugeneGur says:
    @iffen

    the people who won the Great Patriotic War all by their lonesome

    Largely, yes – not 100%, perhaps, but about 80% would be acurate. Even your Churchill once said that you don’t win wars by evacuations. Rushing through Europe when there are spoils to be collected and bombing cities into rubble is a nice military endeavors, but it is not what wins wars, either.

    • Replies: @iffen
  57. iffen says:
    @EugeneGur

    Rushing through Europe

    Yes, that was part of our only one front strategy. Never mind that it stretched from Europe thru Africa and into the Pacific. And thanks to the Red Army sweeping through the Imperial Army culls in Manchuria at the early date of August 1945, the Japanese Empire was brought to its knees, no thanks to Midway, Iwo, Guadalcanal, Philippines, etc., etc., etc.

  58. @anony-mouse

    Your first point is absolutely correct, and it was not really acknowledged enough for many years. The Western Desert also had many Indian (i.e. what was then India, Pakistan, Ceylon, etc.)
    Many fought well, and they undoubtedly helped defeat Rommel.
    It may surprise many that the British media and political Establishment have been ever more wacist to another ethic group who played a very large part not only with The Eighth Army in North Africa, but in The Battle of Britain. They have been completely airbrushed out of the modern historical recollection.
    I knew, because my Dad, and two uncles were in various theatres of war in WW2, plus I grew up and later worked surrounded by WW2 veterans.
    I really only noticed how shamefully this ethic group had been treated when I recently read Stephen Bungay’s excellent account “Alemein”and discovered how many had answered the call to arms.
    It wasn’t those who came from what was then India.
    It wasn’t those who came from Africa.
    It wasn’t those who came from The Caribbean.

    It was those who came from South Africa and Rhodesia.
    White South Africans and Rhodesians, of course, and therefore modern day untouchables.
    Most Indian troops had joined The army pre-war for the usual reasons—three squares a day, a career, maybe, to travel or to stay out of jail to, or joined because the sought adventure, etc.but the three squares alone was a huge incentive in India then. Comparatively few joined during the war, save when the Japs were knocking on the door at Imphal.
    Like almost all soldiers, because they were already in the Army pre-war, they went where they were ordered to go, although a fair few Indians became Jhats—they fought for the invading Japanese, and most Indian politicians were ambivalent about which side to jump.
    Quite rightly, they wanted what was best, in their opinion, for Indians, and independence was the quid pro pro they demanded and no doubt the examples of Japanese behaviour in Manchuria, Indonesia , Hong Kong or Malaya, etc helped make up their minds.

    • Replies: @Pachyderm Pachyderma
  59. @The True and Original David

    Plus, the film is a back-handed slap at Russia. Russia defeated Germany. (US and British forces merely mopped up in the west.) In the Current Year, the film doesn’t exactly disturb the anti-Russian campaign of the Deep State.

    From the standpoint of white interests, portraying and celebrating the Dunkirk losers as valiant little fighters 4 Democracy who are resisting Undemocratic Deplorableness is more than a bit reminiscent of Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign (which is still going, by the way). It’s like Hillary voters – Harry Potter grokkers and Maury Povich Show guests – vs. Putin/Trump.

    Sure, there is a lot of white skin on the screen, to put the show over. (Most blacks couldn’t be bothered to see this movie even if Denzel played Patton.) And sure, even Deep State mouthpieces can’t help going off-message a little and interlarding their critical raves with reflexive grumbles about “lack of POC.” But is this a pop culture victory for the white man, then? You tell me. I don’t think so.

  60. The main reason that I comment anonymously under a username is the same reason that Mr. Brimelow would be wise not to return( even on an uncheduled stop-over) to Britain:
    What we have witten, however reasoned and logical they might be, however truthful they might be, is regarded by the British State as “hate speech” and thus likely to result in incarceration.
    Treasure your Ist and Second Amendments, Americans.
    Use the First in Preference to the Second, but use’em or lose ‘em, the Left want to rob you of them.

  61. Jake says:
    @utu

    WRONG!

    Slavery does not cause PC.

    ‘It’ began with the Judaizing heresy that was Anglo-Saxon Puritanism. That heresy first and foremost meant that Elite WASPs would promote philoSemitism. Judaizing heresy leads inevitably to a culture that facilitates Jews, who, being Jews, will eventually come to be the managing partner.

    America’s problem was not slavery; it was the WASP culture of the northeastern Elites.

    The WASPs who forged Modern England and the UK and the British Empire were not merely philoSemitic products of a Judaizing heresy. They also despised the vast majority natives of the British Isles.

    The start was Anglo-Saxon Puritianism.

  62. geokat62 says:
    @Charles Pewitt

    The American nation wreckers who passed the 1965 Immigration Act into law were the evil globalizers who started the demographic destruction of the United States.

    A little evidence to support your assertion:

    Jewish Involvement in Shaping American Immigration Policy, 1881-1965: A Historical Review

    Kevin MacDonald

    California State University-Long Beach

    This paper discusses Jewish involvement in shaping United States immigration policy. In addition to a periodic interest in fostering the immigration of co-religionists as a result of anti-Semitic movements, Jews have an interest in opposing the establishment of ethnically and culturally homogeneous societies in which they resideas minorities. Jews have been at the forefront in supporting movements aimed at altering the ethnic status quo in the United States in favor of immigration of non-European peoples. These activities have involved leadership in Congress, organizing and funding anti-restrictionist groups composed of Jews and gentiles, and originating intellectual movements opposed to evolutionary and biological perspectives in the social sciences.

    An excerpt from p. 300:

    A congruent opinion is expressed by prominent Jewish social scientist and political activist Earl Raab’ who remarks very positively on the success of revised American immigration policy in altering the ethnic composition of the United States since 1965. Raab notes that the Jewish community has taken a leadership role in changing the Northwestern European bias of American immigration policy (1993a, p. 17), and he has also maintained that one factor inhibiting anti-Semitism in the contemporary United States is that “(a)n increasing ethnic heterogeneity, as a result of immigration, has made it even more difficult for a political party or mass movement of bigotry to develop” (1995, p. 91). Or more colorfully:

    The Census Bureau has just reported that about half of the American population will soon be non-white or non-European. And they will all be American citizens. We have tipped beyond the point where a Nazi-Aryan party will be able to prevail in this country. We [i.e., Jews] have been nourishing the American climate of opposition to bigotry for about half a century. That climate has not yet been perfected, but the heterogeneous na- ture of our population tends to make it irreversible—and makes our constitutional constraints against bigotry more practical than ever (Raab, 1993b, p. 23).

    Indeed, the “primary objective” of Jewish political activity after 1945 “was … to prevent the emergence of an anti-Semitic reactionary mass movement in the United States” (Svonkin 1997,1998).

  63. @The True and Original David

    In short, the movie is a Deep State stinker with the usual diversity wisely stripped out to impress the goobers. Just another enlistment movie.

    I’m surprised there aren’t Army recruiting tables set up in the theater lobbies. (Perhaps there are, somewhere.) It would be timely thing to do….

  64. iffen says:

    RE: The PC Narrative

    Don’t lock your doors (borders) to keep out dangerous people because you will only traumatize them further and they should not be held responsible (PTSD) for responding to your provocations by committing manslaughter (not even an unkind word about that).

  65. Anon • Disclaimer says:
    @Sergey Krieger

    Evacution from Dunkirk as well as ‘strange war’ (broken Western promise to defend Poland) before are clear examples of match-fixing in WW2. Hitler was all the way playing with the rest of the West, that’s why not too much resistance was observed, and too much waffen-SS from France, Belgium etc. volunteered. Hitler’s empire was in fact a prototype of European Union, and Nazi ideology was only a concentrated, ultimate ideology of the West. Hopefully, the Russian bayonet destroyed the nefarious dreams. The D-day was, in fact, an attempt of the West to save chunks of Europe from USSR – obvious winner already, and to steal some spoils (e.g. nuclear and rocket techs). Western mythology still tries to save inexistent private Ryan. Besides this, Dunkirk as a massive loss of obsolete weaponry and vehicles was beneficial to British and American manufacturers.

    • Replies: @El Dato
  66. Will you consent to be governed by the Hindu-Jamaican POTUS Kamala Harris?

  67. Jeff77450 says:
    @Avery

    I’m not disagreeing with you but in what way was the Stalingrad story distorted to appeal to American audiences? I’ve read _Stalingrad_ by Antony Beevor, which I thought was excellent, and so I know the basics. I liked _Enemy at the Gates_ but I learned many years ago the makers of historical films take liberties with the facts.

  68. @utu

    No many nation s have survived slavery, it started with making slaves niggers slaves at that citizens and then giving women the vote

  69. Beckow says:
    @Priss Factor

    Nazis were also planning to remove, or exterminate over time, the Czechs. They murdered 20% of Belorussians, and they did a fairly convincing genocide on Serbs. We can quibble where the mythical “West” starts and where it ends, but I would say that Prague is probably in it, and so is Beograd. If you add up the European nations that Nazis wanted gone one way or another, you get about 40% of white European population. Almost all in the east.

    How is that consistent with ‘Nazis not threatening European civilisation’?

    The problem is the same: Western Europeans seem to hate the white eastern Slavs. Not all by any means, but the general instinct is always there. Nazis were just an extreme case, and were more open about it. What we see today in US, German, French or British media with regard to Russia (and sometimes also Poland or Hungary) is something that would never – ever – be said about any other group. Try to substitute any other group, from Irish to Chinese, from Arabs to Africans, this level of public and media hysteria would never be allowed to flourish. But when it comes to Russia it is ok. At some point, if you “Westerners” cannot police your own, aren’t you really passively supporting this hysteria? These politicians get voted in, the media is your media – they represent you.

    This seems a replay of Nazism, on that I agree with you. But where are the voices of reason? Why should a ‘civilisation’ capable of this level of hatred and hypocrisy be saved anyway? You are misty-eyed about Dunkirk. Good. But at the same time you muse openly about ‘wiping Moscow off the face of earth’ and how that would not be such a tragedy. Well, when next Dunkirk comes, I can see the despised white easterners not giving a damn. Those are the fruits of hundreds of years of quiet and not so quiet hatred.

  70. Jeff77450 says:

    Mr. Brimelow, great article, many thanks. I look forward to seeing _Dunkirk_ but it wouldn’t appeal to *my* Texas wife so I probably won’t see it until it comes to pay-per-view.

    I heartily agree: A great many blatant traitors who have facilitated the mass invasion & rape of the West need to be strung-up like Mussolini. Let’s begin with Angela Merkel although she’s actually a Johnny-come-lately to this travesty.

    Sad that the West didn’t collectively heed John Enoch Powell’s timely & prescient warning in 1968 when it still wasn’t too late.

  71. Peter I think you will get your wish and live to see it. I doubt trump will survive but I think the rough beast is on its way and there is an inevitable reckoning. The left in its arrogance has summoned it believing themselves to be the arc of history but reality is the arc of history and they a mere 500 year blip. They have had ample time to avoid what will come Im so sure of this now i relish their every punch, My only regret is I may be too old to participate but it will be fun and terrible to behold. You should be proud, Im sure long ago you wondered if you were on a fools errand but your work was a necessary precondition whose utility has not yet reached its apex not even close, but we are close in time. Things collapse very very slowly then all at once,

  72. Miro23 says:
    @Dr. X

    The entire purpose of Hitler launching W0rld War II in 1939 was to defeat the Soviet Union and “Jewish Bolshevism.” Jewish communists, inspired and trained by Moscow, had launched revolutions in Berlin, Bavaria, and Hungary in 1919. Trotsky trained Bela Kuhn (Cohn), the Jewish communist who established the Hungarian Soviet. The Jewess Rosa Luxembourg led a communist coup in Berlin, and Jew Eugen Levine created the Bavarian Soviet before being shot to death by the Freikorps.

    This is all true that Hitler had a long term plan to invade the East, but finishing with Jewish Bolshevism was secondary since by 1941 Stalin had mostly completed the job already, having morphed from an employee of the Jewish Bolshevik leadership, to collaborator, to dictator and then to executioner.

    Hitler’s main non-military topic of conversation while Barbarossa was underway was the post war organization of Germany’s Empire in the East (Urals in the East to the Black Sea in the South) involving the physical destruction of Moscow and St Petersburg, the wholesale removal of Slavs from the Ukraine to make way for German only zones (the whole Black Sea coast), construction of Germans only autobahns across Greater Germany (Russia) and the large scale construction of exclusive German towns for German settlers with Slavs banished to a distance of 20km and being kept in a state of essential slavery. The plan was for a European land empire to rival the British Empire (which he admired) but run on much harsher lines.

    • Replies: @ANONymous
    , @KenH
  73. http://quillette.com/2017/07/18/neurodiversity-case-free-speech/

    Eccentricity used to be a real individual quality when society was sober, mature, and conformist. True eccentricity emerged despite social pressures. As such, it wasn’t enough to be merely eccentric. Eccentrics had to justify the worth of being ‘different’ in the arts, letters, or sciences. Old UK was like that. Proper and prim but full of talented eccentrics of wit… like Oscar Wilde and Aldous Huxley.

    Today, eccentricity is less individualistic and more institutionalized. As such, just being weird, perverse, or degenerate is enough for you to be hailed as special and wonderful. Your weirdness doesn’t have to be justified with talent, wit, or brilliance. It is hailed just for being weird or even demented. So, we end up with homomania and 50 genders and fatso body positivity and tattoos. In the past, homos felt compelled to justify their ‘difference’ with talent. These days, homos are culturally and intellectually lazy as they demand celebration as heroes and worship as gods merely for their perversion and deviance. They are now like pigs wallowing in mud.

    Worse, even people without eccentric qualities try to win ‘cool’ Weirdness pokemon points because ‘eccentricity’ has been institutionalized. After all, it’s the Schools and media that push tranny and homo and 50 genders thing. So, even squares, dullards, and ‘lamos’ get green/pink hair, get piercings, get tattoos, indulge in sexual deviancy like pegging & cucking, praise homos/trannies to high heaven, etc. Because people who are naturally conformist and square adopt institutionalized eccentricity, weirdness went from matter of individual liberty to an agenda of new conformism of trying to force everyone to embrace the New Normal.

    Btw, I can see how tattoos, piercings, green hair, and 50 genders stuff is useful to PC.
    PC is really about people being obedient followers, teachers’ pets, and servile dogs. The central command of big media and academia decide all the ‘answers’, and everyone else is supposed to agree and obey. People are not supposed to notice things or think on their own. The Power is supposed to serve as their eyes, ears, and brains.

    One problem: People don’t want to think of themselves as dumb servile dogs playing roll over and fetch. They want to think of themselves as ‘free-thinking’ and ‘creative.
    So, PC throws these PC-tards the bone of imaginary-identity whereby PC idiots can play around with ever increasing gender identities as ‘intellectualism’ and tattooes as ‘creativity’. It’s all nonsense and poses no threat to the Power, and it creates the illusion among PC drones that they are really free-thinking and creative since they get to ‘choose’ who they ‘really are’… among the useless 50 or 500 genders. And oh my, isn’t she soooooooooo creative since she got green hair and a steel thru her nose?

    This way, dogs on leash are made to see themselves as free coyotes. Also, the leash has been painted with homo ‘rainbow’ colors, so the dogs don’t see it as leash but sacred necklace.

  74. @Erik Sieven

    I`d still rather live in any European country in its current state than in a society where political enemies get burned alive or hung from lampposts.

    You won’t be able to live long in any (western) European country in it’s current state – that’s the problem, Eric. The demographic and political situation is not static. If you and your family move there, 15 years later, you may wish people HAD been hanged from lampposts.

  75. I, as always when Hitler is the subject, see a lot of nonsense.
    Anyone who read detailed accounts on the attack on Poland, the occupation of Norway, the beating of France, and the attack on Russia, knows that Germany was not at all prepared for war.
    Hitler’s big mistake was to let himself be provoked to attack Poland, after making a deal with Stalin.
    Thereafter he was no longer in control.
    One thing lead to another.

    • Agree: Beefcake the Mighty
  76. @utu

    Russia had serfs.
    China had slaves.

    So, why don’t they have race problems like the US?

    Because Russian serfs were Russian and Chinese slaves were Chinese. So, when the system was eradicated, the once-serfs or once-slaves could be like everyone else.

    In contrast, the slaves were black in America. So, when black slaves were freed, they were no longer slaves but still black, and THAT was the problem. Slavery or no slavery, blacks remained stronger, more muscular, more aggressive, more psychopathic, louder, booty-shaking, and bigger-donged.
    In a way, end of slavery caused more problems for whites since stronger and more aggressive blacks could now run free and kick the white boy’s ass and get white girls.

    Blackness, not slavery, was the main problem. We see this in EU and Australia today. These blacks come as free men but they act much like crazy American blacks. Why? They are black.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simon_Mol

    Mol tried to turn Poland into Moland by sticking his dong into jungle-feverized Polish womenfolk. Polish women are known to be skanks.

    Suppose whites had enslaved other whites in America. Or the Chinese. Once freed, white ex-slaves would have melded in with other whites. Once freed, ex-slave Chinese would have looked up to bigger stronger whites and tried to fit in, like Mexican peasants used to saying ‘si, senor’.

    Even if 400,000 blacks had been brought over as free people, they would have caused the same problems in the US.
    Because blacks were slaves in the US, we have this fallacy that slavery caused all the problem. But if we hypothetically change the race of the slaves, and we see it isn’t so.

    No, the real problem was whites brought stronger, meaner, and more psychopathic black savages to the New World.

    • Replies: @ThreeCranes
    , @Alden
    , @anarchyst
  77. @Joe Wong

    Between the Russians and Chinese commenters here, I can’t understand half of what people are saying. It may be somewhat annoying, but you all should think about turning grammar-check on. Just try to put up a comment that is not ALL underlined in wavy green, and we’d really appreciate it.

    (We have Daniel Cheih (sp?) on here as an example of how to write correctly – with great commentary, I might add – even while being Chinese. For Russian, there is a guy on Zerohedge named Boris Alotovkrap.)

    • Replies: @jacques sheete
    , @Joe Wong
  78. @nsa

    He has black grandkids. How this degenerate can try and pass himself off as some kind of conservative trying to save the West is unreal.

  79. CanSpeccy says: • Website

    Concerning the hangings from lampposts, could we please start with Thereason May, who has just arranged to keep Britain’s borders open for another five years, which will allow sufficient new immigration and immigrant reproduction to ensure that a second referendum will reverse the Brexit vote and keep the border open for ever.

    After Thereason, David Camoron, who said immigration should be “gripped” but failed to grip it, should get his comeuppance together with Phony Bliar, who wanted to rub peoples noses in multiculturalism, and that turd Brown, who called an old women who opposed Britain’s self-genocide through repressed native reproduction and mass replacement immigration “bigoted”.

    The corpses could be suspended over the ferry terminal at Dover, together with those of a few of the immigrant murderers that EU law prevents Britain from deporting. A plus would be that hanging criminal illegals must be cheaper than deportng them.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  80. @Beckow

    “Nazis were also planning to remove, or exterminate over time, the Czechs….
    How is that consistent with ‘Nazis not threatening European civilisation’?”

    If true, that is horrible. But, there is more to Western Civ than Czech freedom.
    After all, Brits sometimes treated the drunken Irish like savages. But it didn’t mean end of British Civ.
    The crazy Thirty Years War killed 1/3 of Germans. But it didn’t end German civilization.
    Swedes once invaded Poland and caused much havoc. But that didn’t end Western Civ.
    Moors once had Spain and Turks once had Greece and much of Balkans. That didn’t end Western Civ.

    Nazis would have set things back, but they would not have destroyed the core of Western Civ. Their main threat was to Slavs(with their own great civilization) and Jews(with their own great culture).

    Nazis had to be defeated for their great crimes against Slavs and Jews, but it’s wrong to say they were a threat to the Western Core. If anything, their pathological obsession with it made them arrogant and aggressive.
    Anyway, PC and globalism are far greater threats to the Western Core today.

    Some might argue that Nazis nullified Western Civilization by acting cruel and inhuman. So, even if Hitler wanted to save European peoples(except Slavs) and arts & culture, his brutality negated Western values.
    But using this logic, Western Civilization died long ago when Spanish did horrible things to natives of New World, Anglos wiped out Aborigines, Belgians killed millions of Congolese, and Chinese were forced to buy and get addicted on opium.

    • Replies: @Beckow
  81. @mp

    John Derbyshire needs to be strung up first. He married a Chinese woman and has Chinese offspring. He is an avid philosemite.

    • Replies: @mp
    , @Corvinus
  82. Mr. Brimelow, it’s “hanged,” not “hung.” “Hung” means something else.

    Please correct. Thank you.

  83. @iffen

    It was a whisper. Just a reminder of reality so that you won’t get carried away.

  84. @Charles Pewitt

    I don’t think it’s very helpful to try to break it down into “this generation did this.” and “this generation did that.” There are the same types who want to control people and/or ruin their way of life, call ‘em Commies, Globalists, progressives, the cntrl-left, or whatever, in each generation. I don’t think there’d be enough lampposts for the whole Baby Boomer generation, anyway. The millennials would build more, but they first would have to find a lamppost manufacturing and installation “APP” for that.

    • Replies: @wrd9
  85. @Dan Hayes

    First of all: pictures are hung; people are hanged.

    But I am in complete agreement. In fact one day some years ago walking past Buckingham Palace I looked up and saw a lamppost looming over me. “That one will be for Blair” I said to myself.

    I still know exactly where it is.

    • Agree: Dan Hayes
  86. @KenH

    My considered reaction to Dunkirk: People should be hung from lampposts . . . for what they’ve done to Britain.

    Churchill & FDR are already dead.
    Altho — Mussolini’s corpse was hung —

    My considered reaction to Dunkirk: People should be . . . burned alive— for what they’ve done to Britain.

    The people who sought to ally with Britain and save European civilization WERE burned alive, by the British and the successor to European Christianity, the USA.

  87. mp says:
    @attilathehen

    @attila

    Derbyshire needs to be hanged first? First? So he’s the worst of the offenders?

    • Replies: @attilathehen
  88. Avery says:
    @Hippopotamusdrome

    {Given they were living under Communism, it would be a step up.}

    You consider living under whatever conditions a, quote, ‘a step down’ from being killed? Too bad the Red Army left any of you SS jackboots alive when they raised the Red Banner over the alleged “1,000 year Reich” and pissed on the ashes of the coward who had the notion that his alleged Master Race could exterminate the Slavic peoples and take their lands.

    Adolf got so Master F____ by those Untermenschen, that Germany was ruined forever. The psychologically damaged German people have voluntarily prostrated themselves against all sorts of invaders and are slowly being erased as a distinct ethnos.

    Heil Hitler!
    Sieg Heil!

    • Replies: @German_reader
  89. ANONymous • Disclaimer says:
    @Miro23

    Hitler’s main non-military topic of conversation while Barbarossa was underway was the post war organization of Germany’s Empire in the East . . . The plan was for a European land empire to rival the British Empire (which he admired) but run on much harsher lines.

    Source??

    • Replies: @Miro23
  90. it has actually been well received by the Leftist cultural Establishment

    That’s because the narrative enforcers have a soft spot for Britain. They don’t have a soft spot for paeans to the America of 1940. I wonder if that’s because so many editors at U.S. papers and magazines are from Britain.

  91. eys says:

    According to history textbooks being taught in Singapore where I grew up, during colonial times the locals working in colonial offices would have to kneel and wait for all their colonial masters to leave the office before they could leave. There were photographs of these. Bet you weren’t taught that in your history classes in Britain so get off your high horse.

    • Replies: @Che Guava
  92. @Art

    Can you imagine a three-cornered fight over a penny between a Jew, a Dutchman, and a Scotsman? Must be how the fidget-spinner was invented.

  93. @Durruti

    wow this is new. thanks for sharing. and yes, you are 100% right that is exactly what I learned back in school.

  94. Wilkey says:
    @The True and Original David

    “Plus, the film is a back-handed slap at Russia. Russia defeated Germany.”

    Russia, eh? Russia was not a sovereign nation in 1940. It was part of the USSR. At that time it was allied with the Third Reich, and would continue to be allied with the Third Reich for another year, until Hitler launched Operation Barbarossa. If Stalin hadn’t foolishly decapitated his military and allowed Mannerheim to utterly embarrass him in Finland then the Soviets might have remained Hitler’s ally throughout the war.

    In short, the USSR got zero mention in “Dunkirk.” So far as the Russians are concerned that was all for the better, because nothing that could have been said about them in a movie set entirely in a one week period in 1940 would have been nice.

  95. @Avery

    Brits, being on a resource poor island, always feared a united continental Europe could starve them

    Resource-poor relative to which other European nations?

    This island is made mainly of coal and surrounded by fish.
    Only an organizing genius could produce a shortage of coal and fish at the same time.
    - Aneurin Bevan

    The rest is made of iron, copper and tin. The place fairly seethes with dairying, wool and malting barley, and the winters and summers are so pathetic and vague your cabbages will stand all year round.
    The only thing we’re short of is timber. Have been since the Bronze Age or thereabouts. Extra food is imported via shipping, at which we have historically excelled. It’s the Continental Powers with tiny coastlines that fear the blockade [Kiel Canal cough cough].

  96. Corvinus says:
    @Priss Factor

    Peter and Priss…

    “But the real reason that Dunkirk’s inconveniently honest portrayal of Britain and its army in 1940 is so stunning: successive British governments have, in the twinkling of an eye (to quote Handel’s Messiah) utterly destroyed that world through immigration policy.”

    While of course Brian Truit should be taken to task for not realizing Dunkirk is a period piece, in a similar vein both of you are also forgetting that eras also change. That is the result of human interactions. Great Britain was the direct result of diversity–the Britons, Celts, Romans, Picts, and others fighting, intermingling, and intermarrying.

    Speaking of diversity being a strength…

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3146070/Mixed-race-relationships-making-taller-smarter-Children-born-genetically-diverse-parents-intelligent-ancestors.html

  97. Corvinus says:
    @attilathehen

    “John Derbyshire needs to be strung up first. He married a Chinese woman and has Chinese offspring. He is an avid philosemite.”

    People make up their own minds to marry within or outside their race. That is their liberty. Why are you opposed to individual freedom?

    • Agree: Jeff77450
    • Replies: @mp
    , @attilathehen
  98. @Avery

    Tanks held up because they outpaced their fuel bowsers. And then they started to break down, being highly precise and superb pieces of engineering which weren’t easily ghetto-rigged. The most crucial factor was the lack of infantry support.
    Normandy bocage and hollow-ways isn’t the Steppes. It’s basically a narrow green tunnel, and heading over the tiny fields is like crossing a giant cattle grid. One Gitane-dragging beret-bonce could block a column with an IED or a bazooka and they’d never know he was there till it was too late, due to the infernal racket their beautiful heavy Panzers made. No infantry, no flank cover. No fuel, you’re just a fancy pillbox. Which is why the generals “diplomatically” ignored Adolf’s explicit orders to advance, for a bit, until those deficiencies were made good. Unlike him, they weren’t stupid.
    Later statements suggesting it was for ethical considerations are simply a meme, and retconning by Hortler just before he sucked the Luger.

    • Replies: @Philip Owen
  99. Corvinus says:
    @CanSpeccy

    “Concerning the hangings from lampposts, could we please start with…”

    Always trying to have others do your dirty work. Typical.

    • Replies: @CanSpeccy
  100. Corvinus says:
    @the alt white comics

    “it would have been better for everyone white if hitler had won…”

    Actually, it worked out for the best for white people when Hitler and Germany lost.

  101. mp says:

    @eys: during colonial times the locals working in colonial offices would have to kneel and wait for all their colonial masters to leave…

    In traditional cultures, this is pretty much the norm. One always showed respect for those above, including one’s family elders. Of course, in the case you cite, this rite was imposed from the outside, by the colonialists, and thus quite artificial and inorganic to the indigenous culture.

    • Replies: @PiltdownMan
  102. @Parsifal

    I think you mean Come And See, which is only slightly more entertaining than watching paint dry.

  103. carlos453 says:

    ITS THE ECCONMOY STUPID!

    Eccomic activity is measured in GDP, performance in GDP growth.

    If GDP grows more this year than year before this is called % growth, if it shrinks its called recession.

    THE WEST INC UK ALLOWED ITS INDUSTRIES TO GO EAST TO ASIA!.

    The only way the western ecconomies can make money now is via home grown economic activity. How do they do that & ensure it grows every year?

    Immigration, increasing the population of course!

    More people in the country – your local Walmart sells more tins of soup than the year before, more cars are sold than year before etc etc…

    So immigration just allows politicians to cheat by claiming economic growth is a result of their economic management.

    This is called demographic Ponzi as it eventually has to collapse as a small country like the UK cannot continue like this.

    Like anabolic steroids in sport sooner or later it starts to kill the hoast

  104. @Joe Wong

    Mind you, the British troops were in the foreign land, it is not right for the invader to bear such bitter feeling and victimhood sentiment by being kicked out of their occupied land.

    My sides! AngloSaxon horde invades and occupies Normandy. Loyal German allies rally to the defence of the violated Dukedom of Normandy and the Kingdom of the Franks. Heathen Khaki Army repulsed with great loss and driven into the sea.
    Can I get a premiere ticket for that movie when it comes out please? Please don’t just be another troll, I want you to really believe your assertions. Priceless.

    • Replies: @Joe Wong
  105. @TheJester

    “The open question is, Why did the British fight WWII against enormous odds … only to quickly fold as gelded “cucks” to an invasion that is marking the end of Britain as a country and the British as a people?”

    Because during the war the propaganda ginned up by the Bernays inspired British Ministry of Information focused the people’s attention on one single demonic enemy whereas today, the same ministry of disinformation uses its powers to diffuse and distract our awareness of our danger.

  106. @jim jones

    David Aaronovitch is a vile piece of shit from a family of Jewish communists, his being part of Britain’s media establishment is a perfect illustration how sick and rotten the modern UK has become.

  107. @Beckow

    and they did a fairly convincing genocide on Serbs.

    They got a lot of help with that from Croatians though (and to a lesser extent from Bosniaks and Albanians).
    I agree with your main point though, given German intentions towards the Slavic peoples it’s absurd to claim Nazi Germany was defending European civilization.

  108. Johnnydub says:
    @Priss Factor

    You touch on what’s going on but never nail it.

    The Jews will never forgive or forget the Holocaust. And it’s not just Nazis, it’s white western civilisation they blame. Which is why the globalist agenda is dominated by Jews – The banks, Hollywood, George Soros.

    They are going to genocide any potential threat (ie the West) to them going forward. It’s their interpretation of “never again”

  109. @Avery

    Adolf got so Master F____ by those Untermenschen, that Germany was ruined forever. The psychologically damaged German people have voluntarily prostrated themselves against all sorts of invaders and are slowly being erased as a distinct ethnos.

    That’s illogical as the former East Germany (which experienced the Red Army’s advance in 1945 and was part of the Eastern bloc for 40 years) is much less psychologically damaged than the former West Germany.

    • Replies: @Avery
  110. EugeneGur says:
    @Wilkey

    it was allied with the Third Reich

    The USSR was never allied with the Third Reich unless you count every country with a non-aggression pact with Germany as allied with it. That would then include every country in Europe including Britain – remember, the USSR was the last to sign such pact after exhausting all other options.

    the Soviets might have remained Hitler’s ally throughout the war

    Putin once said in response to a similar remark that if a grandmother had balls (literally) and other appropriate equipment, she then would be a grandfather. This is a standard Russian expression illustrating the futility of all those “would’ve, could’ve, should’ve”.

    Ever considered the possibility that if Britain and France had concluded a pact with the USSR, as Stalin tried hard to convince them to do, and together defended Czechoslovakia instead of surrendering to Hitler in Munich, there might not have been WWII and no Dunkirk?

    • Replies: @iffen
    , @Wilkey
  111. Beckow says:
    @Priss Factor

    “Nazis nullified Western Civilization by acting cruel and inhuman”

    Let’s just say that they changed it. The parochial and provincial nature of Nazism didn’t help. All of it dramatically shifted attitudes. That Europe would collapse demographically was unthinkable in 1945 – there was after all the continent-wide Baby Boom to come. The gradual opening of borders was probably a function of three separate trends: new technology and ease of travel, colonial backlash, and a conscious attempts by elites to weaken working classes. It has hardened into a crazy ideology, and a lot of it is definitely a reaction (or an over-reaction) to WWII.

    My point is that Nazi Germany was acting out a hundreds of years old Western fantasy to take over or eliminate Europe’s eastern half. When one looks at Europe’s history this is rather obvious and extremely visible, maybe that’s why Western teaching of this history is so selective and skewed. This atavistic hatred of the east – as we can see today in US or UK – is very harmful to the key cause of preserving Western civilization. And it could turn out to be a fatal weakness. Even today when even an average kindergardener can see what is going on and what really threatens the West, even today the key elites are obsessed with their hatred of the east (personified by Russia).

    The alliances have not changed: in 17th century France allied with Ottomans who massacred Balkan Christians. Fast forward and in WWII Nazis allied with Crimean Tatars (of the slave raiding fame). And recently UK, France and US allied with Saudis and the Islamic world to bomb and destroy Serb Christians in Kosovo and Bosnia. It never changes. And I think it has gotten to the point that it might literally destroy the West. Those are the fruits of inexplicable hatreds and a lack of rational self-interest.

  112. syonredux says:
    @utu

    Eh. In terms of numbers, the Latinx are Anglo-America’s real enemy:

    The share of the population that is Hispanic has been steadily increasing over the past half century. In 2014, Hispanics made up 17.3% of the total U.S. population, up from 3.5% in 1960. According to the latest projections from the U.S. Census Bureau (2014), the Hispanic share of the U.S. population is expected to reach 28.6% by 2060.

    http://www.pewhispanic.org/2016/04/19/statistical-portrait-of-hispanics-in-the-united-states-key-charts/

  113. @Priss Factor

    Okay Priss, I’ll take the bait and answer you.

    I’ve dated a number of women who had at one time in their lives, slept with brown bantu men. None of them stayed with them.

    Why?

    Because it doesn’t take long for a white woman to realize that the brown man is full of bullsh*t.

    Whereas uncertainty is an essential part of the intelligent European man’s makeup (a certain amount of doubt that leaves room for questioning is part of the process of learning from experience and the development of a knowledge-based culture) the brown bantu man suffers from no such hesitation. As you say, he is cocky, full of himself and because of this he is largely ignorant and therefore full of bullsh*t.

    Initially, white women–young ones especially–are susceptible to their charms but after seeing the magic brown bantu in action, with all his lies, evasions and baseless, inflated sense of self esteem they see the light and leave him. Give white gals some credit.

    You see, the brown man cannot ever admit that he is wrong about anything, ever. Well, one thing white women won’t tolerate is being blamed by her man for something that he did wrong. They call bulls*t on that and he beats them. Then they leave. Sadder but wiser.

    To be sure, some white women do stay with bantus but those are women who suffer from low self esteem or who are taking revenge on their daddies. Bottom feeders. For the most part, only brown females will tolerate being beaten by their bantu beaus. It’s how he shows his love.

    And stop obsessing about long dongs. I went to integrated grade school and high school, played sports and showered with plenty of guys of both races. Not all bantus have long dongs. Some of us white guys do. We didn’t and don’t have any reason to envy bantus. Besides, a long dong is not what a woman looks for in a man. It may come as a pleasant surprise to her, but how could she have known how long the guy’s dong was before she agreed to sleep with him? Unless he made a habit of walking around with his dick out she wouldn’t have had a clue and if he had had that habit, she wouldn’t have been interested in him.

  114. People should be hung from lampposts—they should be burned alive—for what they’ve done to Britain.

    And a similar fate should’ve happened to those who were Hell bent on destroying Germany and Japan and pre-USSR Russia.

    And Iraq, and Libya, and now Syria to name just a fraction of those meant for destruction.

    Revisionism as applied to World War II and its origins (as also for previous wars) has the general function of bringing historical truth to an American and a world public that had been drugged by wartime lies and propaganda. This, in itself, is a virtue. But some truths of history, of course, may be largely of antiquarian interest, with little relevance to present-day concerns. This is not true of World War II revisionism, which has much critical significance for today’s world.

    The least of the lessons that revisionism can teach has already been thoroughly learned: that Germany and Japan are not uniquely “aggressor nations,” doomed from birth to menace the peace of the world. The larger lessons have, unfortunately, yet to be learned.

    Murray N. Rothbard, Revisionism for Our Time

    https://mises.org/library/revisionism-our-time

  115. @Jay Igaboo

    It was supposedly Samuel Johnson, not Talleyrand, who said “Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel.”

    • Replies: @Jay Igaboo
  116. CanSpeccy says: • Website
    @Corvinus

    Always trying to have others do your dirty work. Typical.

    Corvinus, being stupid, as usual.

    What’s dirty about hanging traitors intent on destroying your nation?

    And where’s the basis for pretending I want someone else to do the hanging.

    It’s true, though, the job would be best left to a professional.

    And to adhere to constitutional forms, The House of Commons should exercise its sovereignty and pass a bill of attainder.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  117. @Dan Hayes

    Canada too. Toronto has been destroyed. ITs 50% non-White and hell.

    Meanwhile, Trudeau celebrates ‘new Canadians’ as the most real Canadians.

    Mulroney, Chretien, T1, Harper, T2 and all the government elite and bureaucracy are complicit in this invasion and crime. They all must answer.

    There is ONE problem: Africa for Africans, Asia for Asians, White countries for everyone IS White Genocide.
    ITs a crime, not a policy option.
    Canadians Speak: The Prime Minister’s 150th anniversary ‘dialogue’ on Canada’s future.

    https://ddswaterloo.wordpress.com/2017/02/09/a-dialogue-on-canadas-150th-anniversary/

    • Agree: Dan Hayes
  118. Dr. X says:
    @TheJester

    The British held off an invasion by the Germans (close relatives in language, religion, history, and culture) only to be swallowed whole a few years later by an invasion from a basket of Third World peoples… A short stint of occupation by the Wehrmacht in WWII might have been preferable to this reality.

    The Germans were never going to invade Britain. Sure, they had plans drawn up — Operation Sea Lion. But militaries draw up all sorts of contingency plans that have no practical chance of seeing the light of day.

    Practically speaking, Germany as a land power had no tactical ability to actually accomplish such an invasion. Strategically, it was unnecessary. The grand German strategy was to conquer Eastern Europe and the USSR. Their only concern in the West was keeping France and Britain off their backs so that they didn’t have to fight a two-front war when they launched Barbarossa, and this was largely accomplished between Dunkirk and D-Day.

    Indeed, Hitler wanted peace with the British once they were off the Continent… Rudolf Hess went on his secret flight to Britain to attempt to negotiate peace.

    Finally, I think you’re presenting a false choice between “a short stint” of German occupation vs. being overrun by Third Worlders. France experienced a short German occupation, but today they’re allowing themselves to be inundated by Third World Arabs, Muslims, and blacks.

  119. @anon

    A Stalin may be the only way to save Britain, but he’d want to show up soon.

    All it takes is some money bags and, “Presto!,” done deal. (Those cats can flip-flop on a dime.)

  120. @anonymous

    It’s a problem throughout the world where the leadership class despise the average person and consider them to be merely fungible protoplasm.

    Yup.

  121. @Achmed E. Newman

    Boris Alotovkrap

    Boris? I thought his first name was Fullova. ;)

  122. @Dr. X

    Good comment. And why was Hess imprisoned for so long? I’ve never understood that. Any clues?

    • Replies: @Dr. X
  123. Alden says:
    @Priss Factor

    Would you mind keeping your homo porn fantasies to yourself? You want to be raped by big, mean, aggressive black men with us usually large dongs. We get it. You post this several times a week.

    So get out your jar of lubricant and fantasize away.

    • Replies: @Priss Factor
  124. SMK says: • Website
    @TheJester

    Only an end to Muslim and African immigration, immediately, and mass deportations/expulsions, will save the UK and Western Europe. But that will never happen, of course. Even Douglas Murray, author of “The Strange Death of Europe,” opposes a ban on Muslim and African immigration, and mass expulsions, and is contemptuous of the people and groups who’d enact such laws and policies and thus save the UK and Western Europe.

  125. mobi says:
    @Sergey Krieger

    Make some dramatic movies about even this shameful event in Britain history, ignore completely true great battles that turned the tide of war because those were fought by USSR and do it consistently over decades. And here we have what we have. Completely distorted history of WW2 in the West and ignorant public.

    Please,

    Has any people in history ever got their asses so thoroughly kicked, lost so much territory so quickly, or collapsed so incompetently on the battlefield, as Russians in the first 6 months of invasion? (6 months, mind you, not 6 weeks).

    Russia defeated Germany, not Russians.

    Cling firmly, though, because, as always, it’s all you have to cling to.

    • Replies: @Sergey Krieger
    , @Avery
    , @Avery
  126. Avery says:
    @German_reader

    {… the former East Germany (which experienced the Red Army’s advance in 1945 and was part of the Eastern bloc for 40 years)}

    You are correct.

    My regrets if you got the impression my post was anti-German.
    In reality I have great admiration for German people and German civilization, save for a brief descent into barbarism during WW2. The fact that by and large Germans have realized what their Nazi forebears did and have sincerely atoned for it shows what civilized people they are.

    My strong words were directed at a presumed neo-Nazi/neo-Hitlerite who thinks10s of millions of Slavs would be better off dead under Nazi jackboots rather than being under Communist rule.

    And considering what Hitler had in mind for Slavic peoples, and what Nazi invaders actually did in the East, Red Army’s war crimes – as they were – when they entered Germany in WW2 pale in comparison.

    {…is much less psychologically damaged than the former West Germany.}

    Quite true.

    I saw a map which I cannot find just now which showed there are hardly any Mosques in former East German section of Germany compared to former West German section. No doubt an indication of having kept their ‘Germanness’ largely intact, compared to former Western Germany which had the ‘benefit’ of being occupied by US Neocons and being systematically brainwashed and de-Germanized for 4o years.

    Best Regards.

    • Agree: German_reader
    • Replies: @iffen
  127. Anonym says:

    The media have a very large, perhaps even the largest part to play in preventing a national conversation from taking place. I agree with you – the media barons, the editors, and their lapdog journalists should be hung from the lamp-posts, or worse. They are the ones who have decided where the boundaries are with our national conversation for the last half century, the boundaries of which totally excluded doing something about committing national suicide.

    The politicians are equally to blame. Blair and his compatriots, but the rot goes back further than Blair. I would be tempted to include whatever children they have had, so that whatever it was in their DNA to sell out their country gets extinguished from the gene pool. I am not sure if it is necessary to go that far though. At least Breivik let the leftist leaders of the national suicide know that their children are not safe from their own treason. Their children would not be able to cling to each other, insulated by their wealth in their gated communities.

    While we apportion blame it also includes the business leaders who have paid lobbyists and politicians to push this national suicide. The NGOs such as Amnesty International. And the opinion leaders such as Geldof and Bono who have turned “virtue” signalling into an art form and a marketing tool.

    The entertainment industry and the education industry – those who decided which books were appropriate and the publishers and authors who created the new anti-white curricula.

    Traitors, all of them, and deserving of the gallows. How many to include as good policy? I am not sure.

  128. PC favors Parasites over Patriots.

    It would even have us believe that Parasites are patriots, and vice versa.

    But these invaders and ‘migrants’ come like animals with primal drives. All this stuff about ‘principles’ is a fantasy held only by whites who read and cling to creed than breed. Sure, non-whites learn to speak the PC lingo quickly to hoodwink ‘whitey’ and also because it sanctifies their animal hunger and greed for what the West got. But they went to the West purely for animal reasons: Material Lust.

    Black predatory parasitic mentality thinks, “If they got that and if I don’t have it, and if I want it but they don’t gibs me dat, I will take it and it be rightfully mine cuz….. ‘racism’ and shi*.”

    With each year, predatory and parasitic non-whites can smell the blood. They are like hyenas sensing a sick or wounded hippo, rhino, or elephant. They sense they can bring it down.

    And then, as Africans rape Europe and as Muslims take over communities, more will arrive like vultures and pick off what’s remaining.

    But whites are too addicted to ‘vibrant’ thrills, distracted & dissipated with homomania, cucked with jungle fever, infected with ‘white guilt’, and addicted to self-righteous supremacism of PC meth-crack that they won’t realize the full measure of their stupidity.

    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/rashan-charles-protest-latest-fireworks-riot-metropolitan-police-dalston-hackney-chase-fire-a7866066.html

  129. Miro23 says:
    @ANONymous

    Hitler’s main non-military topic of conversation while Barbarossa was underway was the post war organization of Germany’s Empire in the East . . . The plan was for a European land empire to rival the British Empire (which he admired) but run on much harsher lines.

    Source??

    Hitler’s Table Talk 1941 – 1944 by H.R. Trevor-Roper (Editor), Gerhard L. Weinberg (Introduction) texts assembled from the stenographic record of Hitler’s informal conversations ordered by Martin Bormann. https://www.amazon.com/Hitlers-Table-Talk-1941-1944/dp/1929631669/ref=cm_cr-mr-title , A very interesting read.

  130. KenH says:
    @Miro23

    Hitler’s main non-military topic of conversation while Barbarossa was underway was the post war organization of Germany’s Empire in the East (

    People have been making these claims the last several weeks but never consider that the Soviet Union murdered and imprisoned more of its own people than any nation in history. Twenty million is a conservative estimate. They murdered or deported over 500K Volga Germans, who were invited into Russia in the 18th century, to slave labor camps in the fall of 1941.

    The Soviet gulag system resumed shortly after WWII as did retribution against anyone who opposed them, so it wasn’t as if Eastern Europe and Soviet Russia returned to being a bucolic land of freedom, peace and plenty after the war. If Hitler or others within his inner circle were truly planning on a widespread colonization of the East then it wouldn’t have been worse than what Lenin and Stalin had already inflicted on the hapless peoples of Eastern Europe, the Baltic states and Russia both before and after WWII.

    It seems it’s only “worse” because Nazi ideology was objectionable (i.e., belief that Jews were congenitally evil and in Slavic inferiority). A cold blooded murderer and criminal like Stalin is accorded more respect presumably because he was not preoccupied with race and was an equal opportunity murderer.

    • Agree: jacques sheete
    • Replies: @iffen
    , @German_reader
  131. mp says:
    @Corvinus

    Some people, like the poster in question, are easily confused. There is a difference between a private act, and public policy. If someone wants to marry a foreigner, that is their choice. On the other hand, if the government tells you that you have to marry a foreigner, as a matter of policy, then it’s something else altogether. Bringing in a foreigner as a spouse, and taking care of her, is not the same thing as the government mandating that tens of thousands of foreigners be allowed entry.

    As far as hanging goes? I’d say that those promoting indigenous dispossession as policy should be banished to the countries they like so much. They could work as domestic servants for the people they love, and care about. Helping them in their daily chores, etc. No need to hang anyone, really.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  132. iffen says:
    @EugeneGur

    Let’s see, in her non-aggression pact Russia got part of Poland, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, and Romania, oh and Finland. Great Britain and France got, they got, hmmm, surely they got some countries. What would a non-aggression pact that came without countries be? Or should I ask what a non-aggression pact loaded with countries should be called?

  133. wrd9 says:
    @Achmed E. Newman

    They’d just use 3D printers.

  134. iffen says:
    @Avery

    brief descent into barbarism during WW2

    Well, there was that Roman Empire thing, but that was a long time ago.

    • Replies: @Avery
    , @TomSchmidt
  135. Z-man says:

    But the British army in Nolan’s Dunkirk is totally, completely and stunningly white.

    No, there was one black soldier. He might have been a French colonial but the odds are he was Jamaican! LOL!

  136. Ace says:
    @utu

    There has hardly been one minute of our national existence where we have not had to deal with the pathologies of the black presence. Damn those who brought black slaves to this land.

    • Replies: @utu
  137. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @Sergey Krieger

    That’s because Anglos specialize in divide and conquer, just like the jews. And don’t like to get their hands dirty unless they have guns and they are fighting against people who have spears.

  138. iffen says:
    @KenH

    The Soviet gulag system

    That’s just a lot of Western propaganda aided by hacks and falsifiers such as Solzhenitsyn and other Vlasovyte “dissidents” and other types.

    • Replies: @Achmed E. Newman
  139. Avery says:
    @iffen

    Yeah, 2,000 years ago.

    Germanic tribes were considered barbarian by the Romans and by and larger they were.
    But over a period of ~2,000 years Germanic tribes coalesced into a German people and German civilization that gave the civilized world the likes of Ludwig van Beethoven, Johann Sebastian Bach,…..

    I don’t know too many other formerly barbaric and/or nomadic peoples, if any, who have had such a remarkable transformation and ascent.

    • Replies: @iffen
    , @Jake
  140. @KenH

    Twenty million is a conservative estimate.

    That’s almost certainly much too high an estimate. The communists committed monstrous crimes, and if you add together deaths in the famines during the Russian civil war, the famines in Ukraine and other areas (Central Asia etc.) in 1932/33, the Great Terror and deaths in the camp system you might get to ten million deaths or even somewhat more over a 30-year period. But 20 million isn’t really credible anymore…if you use such numbers, what’s the detailed source for them?
    Also the Nazis had fairly radical plans which they didn’t get to fully implement, like deliberately starving to death millions in the Soviet Union to make room for German settlers…that would have been significantly worse than post-war Soviet rule, despite all the Stalinist repression.

  141. BBC pushes for ACOWW or Afro-Colonization of White Wombs.

    https://www.infowars.com/bbc-depicts-black-people-as-typical-family-in-roman-britain/

    BBC wants all of UK to be Othelloed.

    Black men are beautiful tragic souls even when acting murderous. White men are a bunch of Iagos.
    It’s like OJ is still portrayed as tragic figure than demented thug.

    Whether it’s ancient Rome or Medieval Europe or today’s Europe, white wombs exist to be offered to Negro demigods by the logic of globalism. It’s like Polish women all gave themselves to Simon Mol. Glob says to Poland and Hungary, OPEN UP AND LET IN TONS OF AFRICANS AND MUSLIMS.

    In our hedonistic celebrity-drenched culture, generations of whites have grown up worshiping black athletes, singers, and studs as the superior race.

    Even elites at BBC are into ACOWW. Its white women are a bunch of jungle-fever whores and its diversity hires love the fact that white British men are a bunch of wussy cucks who sweat and apologize profusely if they say anything even mildly ‘racist’.

    • Replies: @Rurik
  142. iffen says:
    @Avery

    Armenians have that diaspora thing going on, don’t they?

    • Replies: @Avery
  143. @mp

    Yes. Did you not read what I wrote? Are you familiar with his writings? His book “We are Doomed” is a perfect example of his evil degeneracy. He is really writing about his poor choice of a wife and then deciding to reproduce. His wife and daughter are Obummer voters. Importing Democratic voters. Do you remember the Obama years?

    His writings for Vdare are another window into his insane mind. He “thinks” Jews are smarter than gentiles. He criticized overweight white woman. As long as a woman reproduces enough to maintain the race, no one cares what a woman looks like after the age of 45 (same with men).

    He worked on a Wall Street, yet holds out his tin cup for shekels. He is bright enough that he should have learned banking lessons and made a small fortune.

    He wrote an article about how white parents should give their kids a talk about blacks. This man with non-white children cannot give advice to white parents with white children.

    He likes to write about mathematics. Anytime some Chinese math students win prizes he likes to write about this and bring attention to the Chinaness. Recently, a woman named Maryam Mirzakhani won the most prestigious math award, the Fields Medal. She was the first woman to win it. She is a high-caste Iranian (you can see she looks very Aryan, unfortunately she was a Muslim, but she did not appear religious so maybe living in the West helped her to change her mind about her belief system). I wonder if Derbyshire will write about her, or is he consumed with jealousy that no Chinese/Jewish woman has been able to win this prize?

    He deserves to be hanged first.

    • Disagree: German_reader
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    , @Avery
    , @mp
  144. People should be hung from lampposts—they should be burned alive—for what they’ve done to Britain.

    Yes, this is true. It is also true of the USA, France, Germany, Sweden, and several other nations. The people who’ve gleefully and self-righteously led us all to brink of the most dire catastrophe, richly deserve a swift, public, and arguably even somewhat brutal execution. It is my fervent wish they receive it.

  145. @iffen

    You might read the book Barbarians, by Terry Jones, for a picture of the Romans. Civilised we might not call them when we see how their empire was built.

    Counter to that is the recent Fall of the Roman Empire and the End of Civilization, which makes the point that, after the Romans left Britain, living standards declined to lower than they had been before the conquest of Britain by Rome.

    https://www.amazon.com/Fall-Rome-End-Civilization/dp/0192807285

    Best: Mohammed and Charlemagne, Revisited. Roman Empire collapsing in the third century, rising into the seventh century, even in the West. Then, Islam, cutting off trade with the East; coins disappear from the west, as does papyrus, leading to an inability to record business transactions cheaply, leading to a true dark age.

  146. @the alt white comics

    Leave aside the Jews. If Slavs are white, you’re wrong.

  147. Also the Nazis had fairly radical plans which they didn’t get to fully implement, like deliberately starving to death millions in the Soviet Union to make room for German settlers…

    Any detailed, credible sources for that?

    I believe certain Jews declared war on Germany in an attempt to blockade the nation during already tough times, and there were some who apparently wanted to exterminate Germany.

    Most people think Hitler was crazy, but that sounds to me like both projection and propaganda. Read what one obvious crackpot had to say about exterminating Germans.:

    “…I advocate the sterilization of all Germans.”

    As quoted in The Canadian Jewish Journal, Sep 26, 1941, pg 5, in the article, Hitler Will Be Nothing But A Rosebud, Says the author of “Germany Must Perish.”

    https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=rPJOAAAAIBAJ&sjid=gkwDAAAAIBAJ&dq=theodore-kaufman%20germany%20must%20perish&pg=2325%2C5306

    • Replies: @German_reader
  148. Avery says:
    @iffen

    Yes, but what does that have to do with what I wrote in my post re Germans?
    Explain.

    • Replies: @iffen
  149. utu says:
    @Ace

    Damn those who brought black slaves to this land.

    It was greed. Initially get rich quick scheme practiced by British gentlemen (also by French) to grow sugar cane, tobacco, coffee and cotton in the New World. Later it went on industrials scale.

    • Replies: @Druid
  150. @Expletive Deleted

    And although it is not quotes as a consideration at the time, all 300 German tanks could have been destroyed by the 30 British warships miles from the beach. Tanks don’t withstand artillery fire well. My father in law, an Army Captain there at the time was confident that this would have happened.

  151. @jacques sheete

    Read what one obvious crackpot had to say about exterminating Germans.

    Unless I’m mistaken, that Kaufman guy didn’t have any real influence though and held no official position, he just wrote a bizarre book.
    Anyway, I probably shouldn’t get any deeper into this discussion since it will probably be unproductive. It’s also not about Dunkirk or about modern Britain.

    • Replies: @jacques sheete
    , @Anonymous
  152. Wally says: • Website
    @Beckow

    What a load of baseless Zionist propaganda recited like a parrot, or more than likely by another lying Zionist.
    Reads like something from the creepy supremacist Jew, Martin Gilbert.

    Of course you can’t back up any of it, History Channel for you all the way.

    “Some stories are true that never happened.”
    - Elie Wiesel

    There were the ‘Nazis’ with the mythological ’6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers’ and there were the ‘Nazis’ without the mythological ’6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers’.

    The ’6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers’ are scientifically impossible frauds.
    see the ‘holocaust’ scam debunked here:

    http://codoh.com

    No name calling, level playing field debate here:

    http://forum.codoh.com

    “One should not ask, how this mass murder was made possible. It was technically possible, because it happened. This has to be the obligatory starting-point for any historical research regarding this topic. We would just like to remind you: There is no debate regarding the existence of the gas chambers, and there can never be one.”
    - endorsed by 34 “reputable historians” and published in the French daily Le Monde on February 21, 1979

    “Ach,” he said, “we’ve often fantasized about drawing up an indictment against Adolf Hitler himself. And to put into that indictment the major charge: the Final Solution of the Jewish question in Europe, the physical annihilation of Jewry. And then it dawned upon us, what would we do? We didn’t have the evidence.”
    - “holocaust historian” Raul Hilberg, from https://youtu.be/2q51wqEE1fM

    • Replies: @Anon
    , @peterAUS
  153. @iffen

    What do you call the places the millions of dissidents or just “enemies of the state” like Solzhenitsyn stayed in then, half-way houses?

    • Replies: @jacques sheete
    , @iffen
  154. Rurik says: • Website
    @Priss Factor

    British men are a bunch of wussy cucks who sweat and apologize profusely if they say anything even mildly ‘racist’.

    British, but not Russian

    • Replies: @Jake
  155. Wally says: • Website
    @utu

    Black researcher, Dr. Tony Martin, let’s us know who the prime sellers & owners of slaves really were, Jews.
    Dr. Tony Martin – The Jewish Role in the African Slave Trade

    fact:
    blacks also owned slaves in the US south
    fact:
    Africans had massive slavery, it was black Africans who sold black African slaves to the slave traders
    fact:
    slavery of black Africans would have never happened without black Africans selling black African slaves

    JEWS AND THE SLAVE TRADE

    http://wethoughttheywerewhite.weebly.com/jews–the-slave-trade.html

    “Prof. Martin was indeed correct when he said “75% of Jewish households owned slaves” or “more than twice as many Jews owned slaves as compared to whites (36%),” as these statistics were drawn from Ira Rosenwaike’s analysis that attempted to do an apples-to-apples comparison with Lee Soltow’s study, which focused on the 14 Southern slave states. It should be noted that it was these two Jewish scholars that decided to base their comparisons on the 14 Southern slave states and not Prof. Martin, who was merely relaying the results of these two studies.?”

  156. Druid says:
    @ThreeCranes

    They only realize after a couple of mixed kids that then suffer lack of financial support and care! A lot of blacks just impregnate. It’s a sort of subconscious revenge!

  157. @German_reader

    Why do you disagree with me about Derbyshire?

    • Replies: @German_reader
  158. @Corvinus

    Please see my comment no. 143.

    If “individual freedom” is detrimental to the West, the person must be removed. Derbyshire to China.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  159. Druid says:
    @utu

    And largely, Jews!

  160. @German_reader

    Unless I’m mistaken, that Kaufman guy didn’t have any real influence though and held no official position, he just wrote a bizarre book.

    Well, he wasn’t the only one. Ever hear of Ilya Ehrengerg?

    Ehrenburg incited Soviet soldiers to treat Germans as sub-human. Writing:

    “The Germans are not human beings. From now on the word German means to use the most terrible oath. From now on the word German strikes us to the quick. We shall not speak any more. We shall not get excited. We shall kill. If you have not killed at least one German a day, you have wasted that day … If you cannot kill your German with a bullet, kill him with your bayonet. If there is calm on your part of the front, or if you are waiting for the fighting, kill a German in the meantime. If you leave a German alive, the German will hang a Russian and rape a Russian woman. If you kill one German, kill another — there is nothing more amusing for us than a heap of German corpses. Do not count days, do not count kilometers. Count only the number of Germans killed by you. Kill the German — that is your grandmother’s request. Kill the German — that is your child’s prayer. Kill the German — that is your motherland’s loud request. Do not miss. Do not let through. Kill.”

    Forget lampposts; dudes like them, (and there were apparently many),ought to be stuck in Abu Ghraib for life.

  161. @attilathehen

    Because you didn’t give a single serious reason why Derbyshire should be hanged, just totally silly stuff,
    e.g. this:

    He criticized overweight white woman

    Is fat-shaming now a capital offense or what?
    Seems also excessive to blame him for how his wife and daughter are voting (his daughter seems to be a disturbed individual though…a few years ago he mentioned she had a pet snake…that’s not normal).

  162. @Achmed E. Newman

    What do you call the places the millions of dissidents or just “enemies of the state” like Solzhenitsyn stayed in then, half-way houses?

    Ignore those who think they’re modern day Walter Durantys. Huge wastes of time. The lying hyenas can even have their Poolitzer Pwizes too.

  163. @animalogic

    Enough seems never enough. A culture has a right to retain its substance & form.

    It is not a matter of ‘right’. It is a matter of passion. Such passion would be there if people were stilled and hardened with sense of history, identity, territory, and unity, or HITU.
    A people instilled with such passion will feel a ‘natural’ drive to defend their land and culture when they sense the threat.
    Lacking such passion, a people might still defend their people and culture out of a sense of duty and obligation. Even if they don’t feel the passion, they might feel the weight of history and heritage, a sense of burden. It’s like George Bailey wants to leave Bedford Falls. He has no passion for it. But he feels a sense of duty to his father and the community.

    But what if a people aren’t instilled with HITU? What if they lack patriotic passion and fervor because the system doesn’t imbue them with deep emotions about ethnos and narrative?
    Worse, what if they weren’t even instilled with a sense of duty and obligation?

    Also, what if family culture is dead in a nation where sex before/outside marriage is high, where divorce is common, where single mothers are all over the place, where old people are sent to nursing homes to just die without anyone caring? Thus, a sense of continuity and roots have been lost. What if the main culture is dumb movies, trashy TV, mindless pop music, and sports dominated by ghastly Negroes?

    Then, they might not feel any passion about defending the order, the culture, the heritage.
    They might be ignorant of most of it. Or just regard it as museum piece, dead history that has no relevance to today. They might see the pursuit of momentary pleasure as the highest value. And in such vain-and-hedonistic society, homos will naturally gain cultural dominance since they are obsessed with egotism.

    But there is worse. What if the System, taken over by globo elites, instill or infect people with Diversyphilis and teach people that their nation was always a nation that ‘welcomed’ immigrants(or invaders). What if the System rewrites history so that white Britons of the past are portrayed as blacks or Hindus or Arabs? Indeed, to make a movie where all whites in the past were white is considered a thought-crime and culture-crime. What if the System says European migrants who made Britain in the distant past were just like African, Hindu, Muslim invaders of today. They are all the same.

    Then, the problem will not be the lack of patriotic passion but the virulence of anti-patriotic passion that rabidly favors alien parasitism. And that is what has happened to generations of Brits raised by radicals and ‘progressives’.

    Worse, even among Britons who don’t buy into PC and simply cannot muster any anti-patriotic passion, there is a totally misplaced sense of duty to the Other. Even though they dread diversyphilis and see all the dangers, they’ve been made to feel that it is the DUTY of white Britons to welcome the world to either atone for the past, to be compassionate to darkies, or celebrate diversity as an unconditional good.

    Consider Douglas Murray. He has no passion for PC. He feels some patriotic urges. But his sense of DUTY compels him to welcome Diversyphilis even as he knows it will destroy Europe and UK. Also, PC infected his mind to the extent that he wants a patriotism without ‘racism’. But patriotism without sense of ethnos is ludicrous. Imagine Japan or Israel without a sense of ethnos.

    https://www.amren.com/features/2017/07/the-strange-death-of-europe-migrant-crisis-islam-terrorism/

    Of the economic migrants who are pushing into Europe, Mr. Murray writes, “Most of us do not want to eject most or many of them . . . .” He is aware of “send-them-back rhetoric” but calls it “ugly.” Is Mr. Murray content to be a passive chronicler of decline, or does he care enough to try to save Europe?

  164. @Hippopotamusdrome

    Given they were living under Communism, it would be a step up.

    LOL.

    Right, given Japanese were living under brutal military rule, good thing people of Hiroshima were liberated with the bomb.

    A step up … to heaven.

  165. @Jay Igaboo

    This paen is dedicated to the blood, sweat and tears of sacrifices made by the Whites; who asked you to bring up the half naked fakirs of the Indian Subcontinent here and now, regardless of their contributions? Are you a fair minded simpleton or something?

    • Replies: @Jay Igaboo
  166. @jacques sheete

    Well, if I understand correctly Ehrenburg was writing about killing German soldiers, in the context of the times after the German invasion of the Soviet Union that sentiment was understandable…and killing enemy soldiers is pretty much you’d expect your own troops to do in war anyway (the far more serious allegations that Ehrenburg exhorted Red army soldiers to rape German women seem to be a post-war myth).
    But I’d really rather not discuss this any further, it gets tiresome.

    • Replies: @jacques sheete
    , @Rurik
  167. @anony-mouse

    Between 1945 and Powell’s speech who was doing the voting?

    I’m not sure anyone voted for non-white immigration. It began in 1948 because, with so many British cities bombed by the Luftwaffe, there was huge amount of reconstruction to be done, and there was a labour shortage. At least, that is what we were told. If this had been the whole truth, then mass immigration would have ended after, say, 15 years. Instead it has accelerated.

  168. Dr. X says:
    @ThreeCranes

    Good comment. And why was Hess imprisoned for so long? I’ve never understood that. Any clues?

    Guilt by association.

    After 1945, Nazis became stand-ins for Satan in a secularized, Judaized world. Anyone remotely associated with Nazism was going to be hunted down forever. They’re still arresting 87-year olds who were junior officers in 1945 and accusing them of war crimes — someone as close to Hitler as the Deputy Fuhrer was never going to see the light of day.

  169. @German_reader

    You are indeed a contemptible cuck.

    • Disagree: German_reader
  170. @nsa

    Your hero, Horrorvitz, is the actual virus in your germ theory analogy.

    You nutzi freak, I didn’t say Horowitz is my hero. I said he understood something about the newly mutating ‘left’ that the Right failed to grasp. He understood how this ‘culture war’ would be fought in guerrilla and then institutional manner like the commies in China and Vietnam first used harassment and infiltration and then all-out assault and then the institutions.
    And he understood how demented and pathological it would become. And he understood how the ‘left’ didn’t make a distinction between political/ideological and personal/cultural. Today, even comic books are used to promote tranny stuff. He knew because he’d been among the 60s radicals from the inside.

    Also, he understood how 60s radicalism would grow neo-stalinist.

    Though radicals in the 60s were nutty, there was naturalness about them. They were young, and young tend to be idealistic and passionate. Also, the rise of youth culture and rock culture and drugs and sex meant great changes regardless of radical politics. So, there was at least vitality and exuberance about 60s radicalism. Some of it was crazy and insane, but we could say they were young, passionate, and naive. Eventually, the fire would burn out.

    But then, the radicals didn’t just learn their lessons but entered the very centers of power. So, even the saving grace of 60s radicalism — excitement, energy, passion, and idealism — were gone. Instead, it just became a grinding humorless neo-stalinist institutional game of power and as such, these radicals would make accommodations with Big Money as the neo-clergy. The rich would fund them, and the they would offer indulgences to the rich. They would also shape the minds of the rich in elite institutions. Like in Saudi Arabia where the rich monarchy cut a deal with the Wahabis.

    Horowitz saw the dangers, and in this regard, he was very different from company men like William Kristol and John Podhead.

    Now, the problem isn’t Horowitz’s Zionism. As a rightist, he feels nationalism about Jewishness. That was never the problem. The problem was ‘nationalism for us, but not for you’. This is what David Brooks and William Kristol peddle.

    Horowitz wasn’t part of that gang.

  171. @Joe Wong

    Mind you, the British troops were in the foreign land, it is not right for the invader to bear such bitter feeling and victimhood sentiment by being kicked out of their occupied land.

    Brits could be brutal, and this dark side has to be remembered. But no people did as much to transform the whole world in the past 300 yr, mostly for the good.

    So, on balance, the Brits owe the world nothing. They took but also gave.

    If not for European invasion of China, your mother would still have bound feet and you would be kissing Manchu butt.

    Also, who killed more Chinese than Mao?

  172. @jacques sheete

    Yes. The point being, whether or not Kaufman or Eherenburg are simply extreme or demented individuals, they evinced attitudes towards non-Jews that many Jews hold, even if only in milder form. The closer a particular Jew is to power, it seems the more their hostility towards non-Jews is. Witness the current hostile elite of the former West.

    • Replies: @jacques sheete
  173. @Alden

    You’re living in denial.

    It’s not just happening in schools and nightclubs.

    https://www.amren.com/features/2016/12/blacks-changed-school/

    they typically date white girls. Today’s young people are fully open to interracial dating, and our school does nothing to discourage it. How can we? Any teacher or administrator who has voiced any sort of contempt for such behavior has been accused of racism. We have caught many interracial couples having sex in the school building, sometimes during school hours. To my knowledge, no white couple has ever been caught doing this.

    It is being PROPAGATED BY THE STATE as the right thing.

    And what do Andrew Sullivan and Milo, two ‘conservative’ homo men’, have in common? Addiction to Negroes. As with homo men, it will spread among white women.. especially as EU now seems defenseless against the arrival of millions and millions of black African men.
    Also, remember Simon Mol in Poland? A single Negro man can hump a 100 white women.

  174. @Johnnydub

    The Zionists of proto isreal were on good terms with nazi germany. Both groups saw the other’s desire for an ethnically pure homeland.

    The zionists of proto isreal ignored and buried cries of help from eastern European jews, including several very prominent rabis from eastern europe.

    • Agree: jacques sheete
  175. @Johnnydub

    The Jews will never forgive or forget the Holocaust. And it’s not just Nazis, it’s white western civilisation they blame.

    This is too much of a stretch. After all, Russians defeated the Nazis. But today, Neocons and even Liberal Zionists are working hand-in-hand with Ukrainian Neo-Nazis against Russia.

    Also, the Arabs and Muslims had nothing to do with the Holocaust. So, why have Jewish globalists concocted strategies that turned MENA into WWII-level war zones?

    It’s more about power. When a people have too much of it and become addicted, it goes bad.

    It’s like Nazis got too much power and totally destroyed a promising thing by going from national renewal to imperialist over-reach.

    • Replies: @jacques sheete
  176. @Sergey Krieger

    The Germans did bomb the beaches in Dunkirk where British troops were assembled, but the ground was soft sand which absorbed much of the explosive power of the bombs. By this stroke of good luck, most of the British Expeditionary Force escaped, though about a quarter were captured along with French soldiers who were defending the retreat.

    This was good luck for the USSR as well as the British – if the escape had not occurred, Germany would have been unopposed in the West, which would have meant an even greater onslaught on the Eastern Front, and no British contribution to the Arctic convoys. At Dunkirk Britain narrowly escaped a humiliating defeat and an armistice with Germany or even an invasion.

    The decisive battles against Nazi Germany were of course fought by the USSR, with help from the UK and USA with supplies delivered by the Arctic convoys.

    • Replies: @Beefcake the Mighty
  177. Joe Wong says:
    @Expletive Deleted

    Are you saying the AngloSaxon’s words must be taken as given truth? This is very authoritarian. You should know the AngloSaxon is notorious for manufacturing consent and fabricating fake news, anyone with an ounce of critical thinking capability should view anything spitted out by the AngloSaxon with a bucket of salt.

    You may believe the AngloSaxon fought WWII for liberty and anti fascism, but their actions during the war and after the war tell otherwise. Impartial analysis indicated that it was pure power struggle between the greedy evil colonial imperialists. AngloSaxon’s post war historical narrative is glossing over their ugly nature and behavior.

    • Replies: @Expletive Deleted
  178. CanSpeccy says: • Website
    @anonymous

    The ‘elites’, or whatever one prefers to call them, are the culprits in all this. They’re the true believers and purveyors of the religion of PC-cult-think mind-rot.

    The British elite and their European counterparts have hated the common people for at least 200 years. Hence as a character in Disreali’s novel, Sybil, stated, there are:

    Two nations; between whom there is no intercourse and no sympathy; who are as ignorant of each other’s habits, thoughts, and feelings, as if they were dwellers in different zones, or inhabitants of different planets; who are formed by a different breeding, are fed by a different food, are ordered by different manners, and are not governed by the same laws . . . . THE RICH AND THE POOR.

    The thing was, during the 19th and most of the 20th century the working classes were needed to operate the industrial machine and die for their country in wars among national elites. Yet even then, the elites debated how to cull the masses. Fabian socialists such as H.G. Wells and George Bernard Shaw, as well as Charles Darwin’s son Francis, and many others talked about lethal chambers as a means to dispose of the unproductive. Trouble was, the Nazis gave gas chambers a bad name.

    But now, with manufacturing offshored and an increasing proportion of the remaining jobs being automated, the common people have become largely superfluous, and in any case they can be replaced by cheaper more subservient immigrant labor. At the same time, a practical mode of genocide has emerged: sex “education” which teaches every kind of sexual perversion while branding only reproduction as a vice, this combined with mass replacement immigration, which will make the Brits a minority in their own homeland by 2060.

    Now the common man of England sees his posterity destroyed, his job taken by an Asian or African or Middle-Easter coolie with no roots, no concept of rights, and long experience of, and submission to, a corrupt and tyrannical ruling class. All the while, the process of genocide is pushed forward by government and educational bureaucracies, and by the police, whileit is cheered on by cucks, ruling class traitors, the media and people like Corvinus.

    The powers of persuasion are overwhelming and unstoppable. It’s game over for Britain, short of a nationalist dictator.

    • Replies: @Expletive Deleted
  179. @Dr. X

    Yes, but the recent hysteria whereby anyone who may have even looked at a concentration camp while in German uniform is hunted down is just that, recent, and parallels the rise of the holocaust from a “detail of history” (as it was in all of the Allied leaders memoirs) to a cosmic, religious event for which non-Jews must all atone.

    Hess obviously knew something the Americans and British wanted kept quiet. I suspose they could’ve killed him, as they likely killed Himmler, but presumably they felt they had to maintain some kind of appearances in this case.

  180. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @Priss Factor

    The deaths during Mao’s rule weren’t that high as a percentage of the population. They were much lower, for example, than the deaths the Irish suffered under British rule during the potato famine.

  181. @TheJester

    The open question is, Why did the British fight WWII against enormous odds … only to quickly fold as gelded “cucks” to an invasion that is marking the end of Britain as a country and the British as a people?

    So, in the final analysis, Dunkirk was a Pyrrhic victory.

    I’m not convinced that one follows from the other.

    Germany has overcompensated for its crimes in WWII, to the point that Germans have become ethno-masochistic. This was not inevitable: Japan committed grave atrocities of its own in the Pacific Theatre, but has managed to renounce militarism without abolishing the idea of Japan itself.

    The reaction of other European countries has been similar to that of Germany, though less intense. We follow the argument that the lessons of the Nazi era are not something that are unique to Germans (as criminals) and Jews (as victims), but rather are a hideous aspect of the human condition that can emerge anywhere given the right conditions … but then we apply this lesson only to ourselves, and then only as possible perpetrators, not as possible victims.

    We try to renounce racism, but we keep just enough of it to believe that other races are untouched by the same Original Sin as ourselves.

    The Left welcomes Arab and African immigrants to Europe, while lecturing us about colonialism, imperialism, and slavery. It ignores the history of the immigrant cultures themselves, whose historic vices are not dissimilar to our own, and which continue in the form of brutal ethnic and tribal civil wars right up to the present day.

    This boneheaded narrative is the norm among the intellectual classes. If you ask, for example, why Pakistan is a poor country, the fact that it is a tribal, inbred, corrupt, and low-trust society is the wrong answer – and in fact an answer that makes you a racist. The only answer acceptable to the left-leaning intellectual is that the British colonised Pakistan and stole their wealth.

    I don’t understand how we have fallen so low in only 70 years.

    • Agree: German_reader
    • Replies: @SolontoCroesus
  182. @James N. Kennett

    Yeah, those Arctic convoys sure helped alleviate the butcher’s bill on the eastern front. Why are Americans and British such tools?

  183. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @German_reader

    There was a prominent American anthropologist who advocated exterminating Germans during WWII:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ernest_Hooten#The_.22Hooton_Plan.22

    During World War II, Hooton proposed to eradicate the German people by infiltrating them slowly with masses of non-European male immigrants, thereby breed “war strains” out of them.[10]

  184. Albrecht says:

    The necktie party is at least a century overdue. National leaders who will inflict on their own people monstrosities like the Somme deserve death. Everlasting shame on the bankers, politicians and other evil perverts who, in their pride, could imagine no better fate for the precious patrimony of Europe than as so many conscripted sponges for soaking up machine gun bullets in the vain defense of “his majesty’s empire.” (Foremost among these monsters was a drunken bastard named Winston Churchill.) That was the death of Europe.

  185. Joe Wong says:
    @Priss Factor

    Sorry, you are upset, but you took my comments in the wrong way, I merely point out the facts that the British and their offshoots have been hiding those facts by manufacturing consent and fake news. Hiding crimes against humanity, crimes against peace and war crimes committed by the British and their offshoots in the last 300 years under democracy, human rights, and other moral high ground is simply hypocrisy that everybody should have the duty to expose it for the human sanity’s sake.

    Dynasties got created and overthrown on the regular basis in Chinese history. Manchu was on their dying leg, without the European help to crash the Taipin revolution, Manchu would have been overthrown 60 years earlier, this is another fact the British is claiming credit where credit is not due.

    Mao did not kill a single person himself, but you want to blame all the Chinese killed on him because he was the leader, then the British should not complain the others blaming all the people killed due to British actions on the British and their offshoots, that number will be in the hundreds of millions, which will make Mao look like an amateur.

    BTW the number of people killed in the Great Leap Forward was based on Judith Banister’s “massive death toll” hypothesis at the US Bureau of the Census, the number increases by the year, it was 30 million Judith proposed, nowadays it was between 80 to 100 million, what is the number you believe it should be?

    • Replies: @Achmed E. Newman
    , @mikey
  186. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @attilathehen

    Are you Iranian?

    • Replies: @attilathehen
  187. @Dr. X

    The Soviets insisted Hess stay in prison. Why? They had the idea Hess’s motive for his flight to Britain was to broker an alliance between Hitler and Britain against the Soviet Union.

  188. Jake says:
    @Beckow

    “The problem is the same: Western Europeans seem to hate the white eastern Slavs.”

    That is not quite it. The Spanish and French, for example, have no history of labeling slaves sub-human or even inherently inferior and thus in need of superior Romance people’s conquering, so the Slavs allowed to survive can be serfs.

    Germans are the source. Germanic culture is the problem. Germans on the Continent want to force Slavs to be their permanent serf class. Anglo-Saxons (Angles and Saxons were German tribes) want the same for Celts. Cultural and linguistic Germans have destroyed far more European cultures and languages than the rest of the world combined.

    Add ‘faith only’ and ‘once saved always saved’ and Luther’s intense hatred of all things Latin as somehow cheating poor innocent Germans, and you are certain to see Germanic onslaughts to destroy as much of European civilization as is required for Germans to hold the One Ring to rule them all.

    Oh yes – and Yiddish is German, just a Judaized dialect of German, for a reason, the same one that meant Oliver Cromwell would immediately jump into bed with Jews: Germanic culture and Jews mix easily and naturally.

  189. Jake says:
    @Rurik

    It is a SIN against PC for whites to use force to resist black criminals.

    Thank you for that, WASP Abolitionists and WASP Radical Republican Reconstructionists.

  190. @German_reader

    Whats wrong with having a pet snake? It better then a pet bird or fish.

    • Replies: @German_reader
  191. @German_reader

    WOW!!! I write about Derbyshire’s degeneracy, illustrated by his book, his wife, offspring (I didn’t know that about the daughter so she is worse than even I suspected) and all you come up with is fat shaming???!!!

    His wife and daughter vote against the interests of the USA.

    Are you a German reader living in Germany? If so, are you a Merkel supporter?

    • Replies: @Achmed E. Newman
  192. Joe Wong says:
    @Achmed E. Newman

    You should say “I can’t understand half of what you are saying, not “people.” You are talking to us, Russian and Chinese commenters, you are not talking to third party “people.”

    You should say “Russian and Chinese commenters” not “Russians.” Russian and Chinese are adjective in this case.

    You should also say “but you all should turn grammer-checking on” not “but you all should think about turning grammer-check on,” because “think about” does not do anything to satisfy your bitching. Grammer-Checking is a compound name, you should not mix noun and verb to make a compound noun.

    There are more grammatical defects in you comment that is not desirable in proper English writing, but it becomes bothersome to point them out all.

  193. Jake says:
    @Avery

    That happened for only 1 reason: Germans eventually became Catholic.

    When the Goths sacked the city of Rome in 410, perhaps a majority of the tribe was Arian heretic. Most Germans who left paganism in Late Antiquity became heretics, not Catholic. And for all those centuries, Germans left nothing of cultural importance, save for some innovations that helped kill and steal more efficiently.

    But after becoming Catholic, linguistic Germans eventually began to produce high culture.

    The farther cultural/linguistic Germans move from being part of Catholic heritage, the more they reveal that they are suicidal. They are happy to oversee the death of the West.

  194. @Z-man

    She graduated in 2006, he claims to have beed raised in the 1950s, so 25-35 years. Some might say he was robbing the craddle, i like to think shes robbing the grave.

    • LOL: Z-man
  195. fnn says:
    @German_reader

    Robert Conquest was the one who was a semi-pariah for many years for allegedly inflating the death tolls under Soviet Communism. Let’s see what the lefties at Wikipedia have to say about that:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Great_Terror

    After the collapse of the Soviet Union and the opening up of the Soviet archives, many of Conquest’s claims were validated as having been accurate. However, Conquest’s estimates of the death toll and other aspects of his research were challenged by many historians, such as Arch Getty,[6][7][8] Trotskyist historian Vadim Rogovin,[9] and German historian Gábor T. Rittersporn.[10]

    Other historians agree with Conquest and maintain their original, higher estimates, among them Stalin biographer Simon Sebag Montefiore, Perestroika architect and former head of the “Presidential Committee for the Rehabilitation of Victims of Political Repression” Alexander Nikolaevich Yakovlev, and the director of Yale’s “Annals of Communism” series Jonathan Brent, putting the death toll at about 20 million.[11] Russian historian Dmitri Volkogonov (who was special adviser for defence issues to the Russian President Boris Yeltsin until 1994), is also broadly in agreement with Conquest.[12]

    In 1997, Robert Conquest stated: “We are all inclined to accept the Zemskov totals (even if not as complete) with their 14 million intake to Gulag ‘camps’ alone, to which must be added 4–5 million going to Gulag ‘colonies’, to say nothing of the 3.5 million already in, or sent to, ‘labour settlements’. However taken, these are surely ‘high’ figures.”.[13] However, in the preface to the 40th anniversary edition of The Great Terror (2007), Conquest said that “Exact numbers may never be known with complete certainty, but the total of deaths caused by the whole range of Soviet regime’s terrors can hardly be lower than some fifteen million.”[14]

    • Replies: @German_reader
  196. Avery says:
    @attilathehen

    Sadly, Maryam Mirzakhani passed away a couple of week ago from cancer.

    Great loss.

  197. Wilkey says:
    @Sergey Krieger

    “Anglo Saxon like to boast but in reality are not that good as history shows in military matters.”

    Well there was that part about conquering North America. And Australia. And South Africa. And New Zealand. And winning Word War II. And World War I. And the Napoleonic Wars. And holding onto Wales and Scotland and Ireland for all so very long.

    How many European countries, for all their wars, can truly be said to have come out ahead in teritorrially terms? Even if its former colonies are no longer under its political control they are genuine extensions of its culture and, most importantly, its DNA. Militarily Britain’s disadvantage is the same as its advantage – it is an island, and has to send forth its armies across an ocean – or at least a channel – to place them in battle.

    • Replies: @Sergey Krieger
  198. Wilkey says:
    @EugeneGur

    LOL. You’re a genuinely funny guy.

  199. Anon • Disclaimer says:
    @Wally

    His post had nothing to do with Jews and instead concerned Nazi plans for the Slavic population of Europe.

  200. @Priss Factor

    I have no problem with NAZIS in Germany but when they crossed borders, all bets were off.
    The Nazis should have stayed in Germany.
    They supposedly were National Socialists and not Internationalist Socialists.
    The Internationalist Socialists were the Communists.
    The Germans (nazis) had big street battles with the Communists and came out on top.
    Anyway itz fun speculating what would have happened if the stupid Nazis had stayed at home.

  201. @Joe Wong

    That stuff is all writing style, Chinaman; those aren’t grammar mistakes. Your original comment, and a number of ones from the Russians on here, were all but unreadable due to either no skills or just laziness with the grammar.

    I can read your comment above very well, so nice job getting your American friend to write it for you. You should do that each time, so you could get your point across. Speaking of the point though, see my next reply to you.

    • Replies: @Joe Wong
  202. @Joe Wong

    Besides the long run-on sentence that comprises your 4th paragraph, you’re tightening up on the grammar. Good on ya your American friend. Now it’s the content that has gone all to hell.

    Did you write that Chairman Mao was not responsible for the 30 million Chinamen who starved in 1960-61? I guess they should have just defied him and not melted down their farm implements to increase the steel output numbers or not made their communal steel mills per Mao’s orders. Nobody would have lasted long defying the guy, and what are you gonna do without guns?

    Any dictator with absolute power like that, Mao, Stalin, Hitler, and all the Kings and Queens of old is indeed responsible for the deaths and misery caused by his stupid ideas. That’s why you NEVER LET ANYONE GET TO A POSITION OF ABSOLUTE POWER. The British and Americans have a longer history of knowing this than any other peoples on Earth, BY FAR! I have very much respect for the British throughout history, as opposed to your BS, Mr. Wong. It is only in the last 1/2 century that the populace in both of these countries has dropped the ball and let all the work of their ancestors be ruined.

    BTW, here is Peak Stupidity’s take on Chinese philosophy. (more on their modern-day nefarious plans HERE. See if you don’t agree a little bit.

    • Replies: @Joe Wong
  203. @Joe Wong

    There are more grammatical defects in you [sic] comment that is [sic] not desirable in proper English writing, but it becomes bothersome to point them out all.

    Same here, bro, same here. It looks like unz review only allows so many [sic]‘s.

    • Replies: @Joe Wong
  204. @attilathehen

    His wife and daughter vote against the interests of the USA.

    That is a woman thing, not a China thing, Attila. The century-long experiment in the vote for women has been a major part of this country’s downfall.

    Also, why don’t you worry about your own family and not Mr. Derbyshire’s? This is not a gossip column, and you are not a 14-y/o schoolgirl. Or, are you ??

    • Replies: @attilathehen
  205. G. Mayre says:

    Sorry Anglotards, credit for Dunkirk goes to Hitler only. Anything else is Anglo propaganda.

    • Replies: @Jake
  206. Now, this is surreal

  207. Rod1963 says:
    @Barnard

    Quite so. Your average white American in 1965 would not have supported the 1964 Immigration Act had many known about it.

    They didn’t support forced busing either. They abandoned the cities to avoid having their children suffer at the hands of those black savages. Forced busing was the result of the elites using the courts to enforce social engineering on society

    Most of what constitutes race replacement was slipped under our collective noses since the elites had total control of the news in the U.S. up until the Internet matured enough to support alternative news sites. IOW we were kept in the dark.

    A lot was done via the courts.

    Politically we never had a say in immigration at the national level. Both sides worked for the elites and broke every promise they made to us once they got in. Some openly supported race replacement like McCain, Graham and Jeb Bush.

    The people who promote this s**t need to be fed to pit bulls.

  208. El Dato says:
    @Anon

    Nazi ideology was only a concentrated, ultimate ideology of the West. Hopefully, the Russian bayonet destroyed the nefarious dreams.

    Just what.

    The SOVIET bayonet and the NAZI bayonet were equal except that one was intensely internationalist and one was intensely nationalist. Deal with it.

    Russian? Well they have their own agenda. Post-WWI would have needed more Russians, less Soviets.

  209. @ThreeCranes

    of course most Black male White female relationships don´t last, but neither do most White male White female relationships today. But the average women today has 1-3 children. So when a white female has her 1-3 children with a black male and than leaves him that doesn’t change anything anymore.

    • Replies: @Rurik
  210. @mobi

    Ah, General Winter? Heard this nonsense many times. Germans at the time was the best military in the world and while losing territory and battles Soviet army was indeed doing one thing. It was fighting and French, Polish, Brits collapsed within a week or two unable to offer much resistance at all . And what was the outcome? At the end Soviet army prevailed all on her own. Regarding never in history, I would disagree. Remember Second Punic war? Hannibal crashed Roman armies in 4 major battles in a row. All that matter is outcome and Germans were not defeated by distances but by Soviet Union political system, Soviet people, army, generals and Soviet leadership. Do some reading before making these sweaping generalizations.

  211. @Priss Factor

    antiracist have no idea what to do when their final goal is achieved: let´s say Sweden has 50 million inhabitants with 5 million of them half white, the rest African. What´s then? After all the work they would discover that history does not stop with their glorious victory. Suddenly they would have to do the mentally hard work of finding a sense of life. They would have to find new final goals. Everybody fears this situation, so they just continue with mass migration, they have no idea what else to do.

    • Replies: @Priss Factor
  212. @Joe Wong

    So … you don’t seem to know anything about this little local intra-European dispute whatsoever. Just that the Eternal Anglo is always wong.

  213. @CanSpeccy

    It’s game over for Britain, short of a nationalist dictator.

    UK is hideously overpopulated, more than the Netherlands (I’m pretty much talking about England here, the Celtic bits are basically temperate tundra and fit only for trees or deer). Unlike the Low Countries, there’s no possibility of adequate expansion even if we filled in the Wash, Morecambe Bay and the Severn.
    At the moment it’s all just about ticking along on a tidal wave of funny money. But the minute Quantitative Easing and the gibs stop flowing, it’s full on civil war to the last man standing. After that, fragmentation into mutually hostile regions populated by the indigenes. All foreigners with half a brain will have already fled abroad, or been Sarajevoed in the larger cities with no prospect of any Blue Helmet rescue. It’ll resemble the situation in the 4th century AD, Empire pulls out the legions, bloody chaos and opportunistic foreign predation ensues. Supranational dictator not really feasible, given the fissile character and basically prehistoric hatreds of the various native tribes within the island, unless a few quick campaigns of genocide are envisaged, Hanoverian-style.

    • Agree: CanSpeccy
  214. iffen says:
    @Avery

    Yes, but what does that have to do with what I wrote in my post re Germans?
    Explain.

    The usual: ethnicities, dissolution of empires, survival of residual ethnicity of empires, religious homogeneity (essential?), victim of major genocide (essential?), germans created many states and empires, Germany was late to the nation-state game (did it ever have a “real” empire), German barbarians, Germans, german nation-states, WWII( war bands coalescing?), dissolution of nation-states, dissolution of Pax Americana, dissolution of the US, we have no “ethnicity” that will survive, do any of the german states have an ethnicity that will survive?, the US only has the political founding, liberal democracy fails=America fails (has failed), can germans do ethnicity?, the Franks did, for a while, the Anglo-Saxons did, for a while, war bands coming together?

  215. @Pachyderm Pachyderma

    I don’t know about being a “fair-minded simpleton” but I’d certainly be some kind of simpleton if I took seriously a comment from someone who wrote this:
    “Methinks, it’s an excellent idea… if it was left to women to run the world, humanity would be in much better shape than what the patriarchy has delivered.”
    I looked at a few of your posts to see what your angle was–from your “If only women ruled the world” tripe I concluded that you are either a sadly common typical university-”educated” eunuch/ mummy’s boy or a disengenous mischeif-maker.
    And if you read my post, it should be clear that it was also about the sacrices of ethnically White British Africans and how these were air-brushed away whilst the non-White contribution has, with every passing year, exaggerated and excessively promoted by the meeja-political traitors.

  216. RobRich says: • Website

    400,000 Brits on the beaches, Dunkirk chaos, Hitler rejoices.

    400,000 Americans on the beaches, Normandy, Hitler is Toast.

    Bless the Brits for their stubbornness. But US grit wins when our leaders let it win. As Churchill acknowledged in the same speech.

  217. Corvinus says:
    @mp

    “On the other hand, if the government tells you that you have to marry a foreigner, as a matter of policy, then it’s something else altogether.”

    What pieces of legislation “tells” Americans they must marry foreigners?

    “As far as hanging goes? I’d say that those promoting indigenous dispossession as policy should be banished to the countries they like so much.”

    First, immigration does not necessarily “promote indigenous dispossession”. Second, how does your proposal meet constitutional scrutiny?

    • Replies: @mp
  218. Corvinus says:
    @attilathehen

    “If “individual freedom” is detrimental to the West, the person must be removed.”

    In a word, no, since YOU are making the unilateral decision based on loosey goosey standards that a person’s acts are “detrimental” to the point of being removed. Your thought process is in the extreme minority.

    Now, if you are so directly threatened by his presence, why don’t you personally do something about it? Or are you just another impotent arm chair warrior?

    • Replies: @attilathehen
  219. Corvinus says:
    @CanSpeccy

    “What’s dirty about hanging traitors intent on destroying your nation?”

    Nothing at all, except you are assuming that your countrymen who exercise their own freedom to enable non-English to enter the the country are traitors, and that these immigrants are hell bent on destroying everything in its path.

    “And where’s the basis for pretending I want someone else to do the hanging.”

    If merry ol’ England is being overrun by “invaders”, and all you do is lament that nothing is being done about the situation, then you directly contributing to the demise of your nation. You demand others get involved to stop this trend cold in it tracks, but do not take the proper steps yourself to be on the front lines.

    “Now the common man of England sees his posterity destroyed, his job taken by an Asian or African or Middle-Easter coolie with no roots, no concept of rights, and long experience of, and submission to, a corrupt and tyrannical ruling class.”

    Some common men.

    “All the while, the process of genocide is pushed forward by government and educational bureaucracies, and by the police, whileit is cheered on by cucks, ruling class traitors, the media and people like Corvinus.”

    You are hyperventilating again. There is no “genocide” taking place. Again, if you feel so strongly about your nation being “invaded”, why are you not physically doing something about it?

    • Replies: @CanSpeccy
  220. @German_reader

    But I’d really rather not discuss this any further, it gets tiresome.

    Defending the indefensible is almost guaranteed to get tiresome. Remember that.

    PS: It was typical for prominent Bolshiesas to express vile hatred for others. Then ask yourself who them there prominent Bolshies were. Kaufman’s and Ehrenberg’s spoutings were pretty much common knowledge back then and many people apparently felt as they did.

    Adios!

  221. mp says:
    @attilathehen

    Did you not read what I wrote?

    Umm…you didn’t write all of that stuff until I called you on it. But I just read what you wrote now.

    Who is smarter than whom? I don’t know…smart is as smart does, I guess.

    Next, until middle aged Chinese women start strapping on dynamite and blowing things up, I’m not worrying about them, too much. I do, however, think that mixed race kids have it more difficult at times. It depends on how adaptable the race is, the extended family structure, and social views on the matter. The latter can change more easily than the former two. Not a hanging offense. Have you been reading much Turner Diaries, lately, by any chance?

    I generally believe that an ethnostate (re: Wilmot Robertson) is the way to go. There should be no naturalized citizens. At least for several generations–maybe five or six. This would preclude immigrant voting, etc. And anyone married to a foreigner would not be allowed to conduct public policy, or vote. Dual citizenship would never be allowed. Foreigners should not be allowed to own property. Plato’s outline in Laws seems just, to me.

    One other thing. It takes real alpha male courage to come on a blog and claim, anonymously, that another person, by name, should be killed. Brimelow uses his own name when he calls for someone, not named, to be hanged. That’s bad enough. Who is he talking about? He doesn’t say. And now you want to hang Derbyshire. Both statements smack of the rodent. Brimelow for being squirrelly, and you for being weaselly.

    • Replies: @attilathehen
  222. @Priss Factor

    But no people did as much to transform the whole world in the past 300 yr, mostly for the good.

    Now that’s pretty funny. You just proved Flynn wrong…

    “History at the cartoon level isolates only the unpleasant features and events and then exaggerates them to gain its effect.”

    John T. Flynn, As We Go Marching, 1944, pg 150 Law school graduate, journalist, historian, initially supported FDR, a founder of the America First Committee.

    http://mises.org/books/aswegomarching.pdf

  223. @Beefcake the Mighty

    The point being…

    As I would have expected, you, an honest person, can easily get the drift.

    However, in marked contradistinction, the clown contingent here willfully ignores the obvious. No wonder they find truths “tiresome.”

  224. @Priss Factor

    It’s like Nazis got too much power and totally destroyed a promising thing by going from national renewal to imperialist over-reach.

    Nah. They were destroyed in order to prevent even a hint of such. The imperialist banksters were not about to tolerate so much as a whisper of competition. Same is true regarding Japan, and it’s plain that they’re still up to the same antics today.

    I say these things because WW1 was about crushing the competition and WW2 was an extension of its predecessor.

    Why, my fellow citizens, is there any man here or any woman, let me say is there any child here, who does not know that the seed of war in the modern world is industrial and commercial rivalry…and the reason why some nations went into the war against Germany was that they thought Germany would get the commercial advantage of them. The seed of the jealousy, the seed of the deep-seated hatred was hot, successful commercial and industrial rivalry…

    This war, in its inception was a commercial and industrial war. It was not a political war.

    -Woodrow Wilson, Address at the Coliseum in St. Louis, Missouri, September 5, 1919

  225. @James N. Kennett

    Germany has overcompensated for its crimes in WWII, to the point that Germans have become ethno-masochistic. This was not inevitable: Japan committed grave atrocities of its own in the Pacific Theatre, but has managed to renounce militarism without abolishing the idea of Japan itself.

    The difference between Germany & Japan is that Jews were not involved in Japan.

    Jews were among the primary agitators for a war to destroy Germany; Jews played major roles in extracting from taxpayers the financial means- and creating the military means- by which Germany would be reduced to rubble; Jews in large numbers spied upon and functioned as saboteurs in Germany during the war; Jews dominated the interrogation and prosecution of Germans after the war; and Jews took leading roles in carrying out the brainwashing — psychological warfare — against (west) Germans in the post-war period.

    No, it was not “inevitable” in the ordinary course of war – to – end of war that “Germans would become ethno-masochistic”: It was, however, the deliberately planned and executed outcome, managed by Jews at every level.

    Flip through “Capturing the German Eye,” by Cora Sol Goldstein.

    As you do, ask yourself whether the American people are not subjected to similar forms of psychological warfare, by Jews, for similar purposes. (As to those “purposes,” read Norman Finkelstein again: https://www.unz.com/nfinkelstein/to-live-or-to-perish/

    “[Jew want] To play their part in the Jewish people’s revenge on the goyim. . .
    Remember, the Israelis don’t just hate Arabs. They’re in an eternal war with all the goyim.”
    )

  226. Avery says:
    @mobi

    {Has any people in history ever got their asses so thoroughly kicked, lost so much territory so quickly, or collapsed so incompetently on the battlefield, as Russians in the first 6 months of invasion? (6 months, mind you, not 6 weeks).}

    Yes: France.
    They lost their entire country.

    Wehrmacht vanquished all of France in 46 days.
    France in fact had about 1,000 more and newer tanks than Germany in 1940.
    (Germany ~2,400. France ~3,400)
    More guns. (Germany ~7,400. France ~14,000).
    Same number of divisions/troops.
    France folded in 46 days.

    The BEF and the French ran – ran – to Dunkirk to escape the advancing panzers.
    Pretty much most of Europe, save for neutrals and Nazi allies, was under Nazi occupation by the end of 1939, after the occupation of Poland in Oct 6,1939.
    Compare the size of Nazi occupied Europe vs size of Nazi occupied USSR*: which is larger?

    Please indeed.

    *
    Germans reached roughly the line from Leningrad to Moscow to Stalingrad.

    http://germanhistorydocs.ghi-dc.org/map.cfm?map_id=2888

    • Replies: @Miro23
  227. Avery says:
    @mobi

    {Russia defeated Germany, not Russians.}

    West can’t accept that Russians (e.g. Napoleon invasion) and Soviets (WW2, overwhelmingly Slavic peoples) are as good as them and maybe even better when it comes to fighting, so constantly denigrate their achievements and valor.

    The red herring of General Winter has been trotted out ever since Napoleon’s Grand Armee of ~700,00 was reduced to… [When the remnants of Napoleon's army crossed the Berezina River in November, only 27,000 effective soldiers remained](Wiki).
    Yeah, sure, Soviet generals and Soviet soldiers did not win the Battle of Moscow, the Battle of Stalingrad, the Battle of Kursk*,…..: it was all General Winter.
    Lucky Soviets/Russians.

    Did Soviet troops somehow manage to fight in balmy 70F degree weather while the Nazi invaders and their hangers on were freezing to death in -30C degree in Stalingrad? Soviet troops were fighting in the same ungodly weather conditions as the invaders.

    Soviets were smart enough to equip their troops with loose fitting felt boots, Telogreika overcoats, warm hats – while stupid Nazis equipped their troops with tight fitting leather jackboots that caused frostbite and gangrene.
    Steel helmets that froze to the stupid Nazi heads.
    Crisp tight-fitting Nazi uniforms that lost body heat.

    Soviet tank designers were smart enough to design the T-34 with wide tracks so it would not sink in mud or snow like the Panzers.

    Soviet sniper rifle designers were smart enough to design their rifles with a large adjustment knob to zero their sniper rifles, which could be done with gloves in freezing weather, while German ‘superior engineering’ required a tool to adjust/zero their sniper rifles: very hard to do in freezing weather.

    War is not a contest between gentlemen.
    When someone invades your home, your land, you kill them any way you can, using every natural advantage you have. Nobody gives out medals or accolades for ‘honorably’ losing your land and your people to invaders .

    {Cling firmly, though, because, as always, it’s all you have to cling to.}

    Likewise, cling firmly to your fantasies of Russian inferiority.
    Except next time when West decides to cling to their amnesiac view of Russia and invades again, what will rise over Reichstag/Bundestag will not be a Russian flag: it will be the payload of a Sarmat.

    Good night.
    ___________
    *
    The Battle of Kursk: 5 July 1943 – 16 July 1943: where was General Winter when Soviets needed him.

  228. Joe Wong says:
    @Achmed E. Newman

    Yes, it is the entitlement of the American exceptionalsim, American do not make mistakes, even their bombing, killing and waterboarding on the fabricated phantom WMD allegation is humanitarian intervention.

    • Replies: @Achmed E. Newman
  229. @Jake

    It was the Germans what dun it.

    Right.

    How do you explain Anglo-Irishman Bram Stoker’s “Dracula,” a flagrantly anti-Jewish screed at a time when Eastern European Jews were migrating to Britain, creating problems similar to those Derbyshire complains of?

    • Replies: @Jake
  230. Joe Wong says:
    @Achmed E. Newman

    I did not use proficiency of English to suppress freedom of speech, did I?

    • Replies: @Achmed E. Newman
  231. Watching China become a great power yet again while the British get continually humiliated is one of the best pleasures of the 21st century. The Suez Crisis? Hilarious!

    • Replies: @attilathehen
  232. Maybe England shouldn’t have declared war on Germany. Hitler’s rage at Poland due to the treatment of German nationals now forced to live in Poland after the map of Europe was redrawn after WWI as well as Poland’s refusal to cede back Danzig and Polish corridor to Germany had nothing to do with England. However, that last thing Hitler wanted was war with England whom he considered fellow kinsmen. Nevertheless there was England in attack mode sending hundreds of thousands of forces right up to Germany’s border (along with French forces) to intimidate Hitler (big mistake) into withdrawing from Poland. By the time Hitler launched his blitzreig Poland was already defeated and occupied. However those that deny Hitler halted his attack to ALLOW the evacuation of British forces are hard pressed to come up with any other reason. Hence, films like this that ignore all these facts.

    • Replies: @Rurik
  233. Jake says:
    @G. Mayre

    Correct.

    Whether Hitler held back his troops for one of his stupid reasons, or because he felt that he could persuade the English to go neutral rather than oppose fellow Germanics (not only were Angles, Saxons, Frisians, Jutes, and Danes Germanic, but Martin Luther was a Saxon), the fact is that Hitler’s decision was THE reason the Brit Army could escape from Dunkirk.

    • Replies: @Wilkey
  234. @Joe Wong

    I did not use proficiency of English to suppress freedom of speech, did I?

    You’re not using it at all. What are you trying to say?

  235. @Delinquent Snail

    I disagree, people who have pet snakes are just creepy, young women who like those monstrosities all the more so.

  236. Rurik says: • Website
    @German_reader

    …that Ehrenburg exhorted Red army soldiers to rape German women seem to be a post-war myth).
    But I’d really rather not discuss this any further, it gets tiresome.

    I bet

    I remember when I first read accounts like this, and what bothered me about it was how ‘white knight’ anyone must be for having misplaced sympathy for these girls.

    I mean come on! When you think of how many Jews these girls gassed, and how many lampshades they no doubt made, they certainly got what they deserved, huh German_reader

    http://rense.com/general39/allied.htm

    waaa, waaa, waaa

    so some German women and girls were raped by the Red Army Rapists. So fucking what!

    they should have thought of that before they decided on their ‘final solution’ and decided to invade Poland; Nazi sluts!

    (actually, it was events like this, and Katyn, and the Holodomor that proved that we Yankees fought on the wrong side of that war, and instead we should have gone over there and slaughtered these sub-human butchers, and then reined in Hitler).

    • Replies: @German_reader
  237. @fnn

    Hmm, okay, I’m not really convinced by that, but would have to look more closely into the matter, and don’t have time for that right now. In any case both Soviet communism and Nazism were horrible systems.

  238. @Joe Wong

    Yes it’s like Chinese exceptionalism in being able to communicate with 3000-5000 complicated characters to just be literate, while we have 26. It is exceptionally STUPID, and requires tons of memorization, wasting brain power that could by used to think about concepts like “why do we need an all-powerful leader to tell us what to do?”

    BTW, I would probably be in agreement with you on War on an emotion Terror stuff, I imagine, were you to write comments about that. However, that doesn’t let Chairman Mao off the hook (where he’s hanging in Hell), and additionally I’ll add that China NEVER had any history of people that understand freedom – NEVER. It’s beyond them, it seems (too busy memorizing and making large-character posters to rag on their parents).

    • Replies: @Joe Wong
  239. Jake says:
    @SolontoCroesus

    Your questions marks you as a prime example of ‘can’t see the forest because of the few trees you prefer to focus on.’

    The fact that there were many individual Puritans during Cromwell’s reign who fiercely opposed his bedding with Jews, resulting in Jews returning to England, with more rights and privileges than the majority of white natives of the British Isles, does not alter the presiding fact that Anglo-Saxon Puritanism was a Judaizing heresy and would necessarily produce a philoSemtiic culture.

    Before Stoker, there was Charles Dickens, whose original magazine version of Oliver Twist made it clear that Fagin was a Jew and that London was filled with Jews just like him. Even Dickens bowed to the demands of Elite WASPs to tone it down, way down, for book publication.

    You see the tree of Dickens originally telling the truth in fiction. I see the forest of WASP culture siding with Jews even against the most beloved novelist in English history. That was early in the Victorian era.

    As for Stoker – he was a provincial. Just as at the same time Yankee WASP Elites from Philadelphia to Boston tended to smile and gently chide when a wealthy and/or acclaimed Southerner (who did NOT proclaim that the South was right) told the truth about blacks, the philoSemtiic English Elites tolerated Stoker because he was a man of the theatre who was greatly liked and respected in his sphere. And because he was not an Irish nationalist.

    And then there is the matter of SciFi/Fantasy. Stoker’s horror is outside the ream of realism. Clearly, it is about the vampiric nature of at least the ‘new Jews,’ but it is ‘fantasy.’ So, it can be seen as about nothing in the real world.

    Now, even if in fantasy horror fiction, Stoker had indicated that thee was something wrong in WASP culture that made its Elites eager to ally with Jews against the majority of British Isles natives, and that therefore Irish culture somehow must be central to saving the British isles from a future of being overrun with Jews and Moslems, then Stoker would have been destroyed.

  240. Wilkey says:
    @RobRich

    400,000 Brits on the beaches, Dunkirk chaos, Hitler rejoices. 400,000 Americans on the beaches, Normandy, Hitler is Toast. Bless the Brits for their stubbornness. But US grit wins when our leaders let it win.

    The soldiers who landed on D-Day were maybe 60/40 American vs. British. If you include the Canadians, who landed a division, a brigade, and a few other battalions on June 6, and the French, who landed a division and change, the initial landing force at Normandy was probably only about 50% American. That’s not even counting all the Royal Navy and RAF men who participated, who may have outnumbered their American counterparts.

    Gee, it’s almost as if you have more men and more time to prepare against what was probably the world’s most effective fighting force (drastically diminished since 1940) you have a better chance of coming out victorious.

    As for the “Russians” other people here keep talking about? They were shits who allied themselves with Hitler. They split Eastern Europe with Germany at the beginning of the war then raped their way across it at the end, then refused to let go of it for over 40 years.

    Let me be clear that while no country deserved to lose 20 million people during the war – individuals who died as the result of stupid and even evil acts of their supposed leaders – if it had to have been any country it’s better that it was the USSR than anyone else. Stalin was their shitty leader, not ours.

    • Agree: Johann Ricke
  241. Rurik says: • Website
    @Robert Dunn

    to intimidate Hitler (big mistake) into withdrawing from Poland.

    nope, England never gave a fuck about Poland. If she did, she’d have declared war on Stalin’s Russia at the same moment she declared war on Germany. But she didn’t. The truth is that England was as much under the thrall of the Fiend back then as she is today. And declared war on Hitler because he was telling the Juden Raus!

    duh

    (how is it after all these years people still get this wrong)

    those that deny Hitler halted his attack to ALLOW the evacuation of British forces are hard pressed to come up with any other reason. Hence, films like this that ignore all these facts.

    of course that’s why he let them go.

    any historian with a shred of integrity will tell you Hitler didn’t want war with the West. He LOVED the West. He was fighting for its very survival. And he lost, and look at it today.

    England is a mire pit of sewage and strife and the British people are doomed. Thanks directly to Churchill and the other stooges of Zion / The Fiend.

    The exact same fiend that is trying to ‘rope a dope’ Putin into war in Ukraine exactly like they rope-a-doped Hitler into Poland. If you raise your hand to the Fiend, expect the Whores of Zion (England, France, US, et al) to come running to put you in your place.

  242. Che Guava says:
    @eys

    That is a pure lie.

    I also had five years of upbringing in Singapore.

    Studied the history at school there, also in Malay, more, and reading many accounts later. It may have been the case during our (Japanese) occupation, I met older ethnic Chinese people and teachers, old people were still to making complaints about behaviour by soldiers from here at that time, but your stupid claim was not among them.

    Having recently read The Turner Diaries, as an earlier commenter said, Brimelow reflects it, but who cares?

    Come on, give us a link to your alleged instances of kneeling.

    Many interesting comments on this thread, yours is only of interest as a strange lie.

  243. Wilkey says:
    @Jake

    the fact is that Hitler’s decision was THE reason the Brit Army could escape from Dunkirk

    It was the decision of his generals, not him. Who knows why they held back? The most common reason cited is that they felt the Luftwaffe could finish them off.

    Everyone makes mistakes in war. Change a few key decisions and Lee may have won at Gettysburg. So? It was still a great Union victory. Some of Germany’s early victories were due to the stupidity of its opponents. They were still victories. Dunkirk was a “victory” made possible, in part, by the stupidity of German generals. It was still an impressive operation.

    • Replies: @Jake
  244. iffen says:
    @Achmed E. Newman

    What do you call the places the millions of dissidents or just “enemies of the state” like Solzhenitsyn stayed in then, half-way houses?

    I don’t know, maybe half-way house or houses. I guess it depends on whether you think all of the victims could fit inside one house or not.

    That was partial quote of Andrei Martyanov in a comment here:

    http://www.unz.com/akarlin/open-thread-19/#comment-1947924

    … US view of WW II was shaped by Wehrmacht’s generals, while Soviet history was shaped by hacks and falsifiers such as Solzhenitsyn and other Vlasovyte “dissidents” and other types of “nationalists” etc

    I guess he’s not saying there was no Gulag, just that the one Solzhenitsyn described didn’t exist.

    • Replies: @Achmed E. Newman
  245. @Rurik

    so some German women and girls were raped by the Red Army Rapists. So fucking what!

    That’s not what I wrote…but those events happened 70 years ago, can’t be changed, and I’m more concerned with present-day issues (like possibly getting stabbed to death by Islamists in a supermarket as happened yesterday in Hamburg).
    You guys get so overly emotional about all this WW2 stuff, that’s not healthy.

    • Replies: @Rurik
    , @jacques sheete
  246. @Avery

    “a large adjustment knob to zero their sniper rifles, which could be done with gloves in freezing weather, while German ‘superior engineering’ required a tool to adjust…”

    Good points. This brings to mind a theory I’ve developed after having worked on American, Japanese and German automobiles, especially 1960-1970 models which were more like their 1940′s progenitors than their 2010 descendants.

    It just seems to me that American stuff was easier to field service. Simple, rugged or, if you want to speak plainly, crude and overbuilt. But when something breaks down during an advance, you can’t return it to a spanking-clean shop for repair so simple becomes a real virtue. The advance advances.

    For example, every mechanic knows that it was a bear to replace a clutch in a 1970′s- 1980′s Japanese vehicle. That’s because the car was assembled with the transmission already attached to the engine (as it still is today and as is virtually every other car now). The bolts to separate them were inaccessible without an overhead lift. Actually, the repair manuals recommend that you pull the whole engine/transmission assembly to do the job!

    By way of contrast, the transmission on a Ford truck was held on with 6 bolts, all accessible from underneath the truck while it sat on the ground (as I can attest, having removed one while lying on my back with the truck parked on the side of a busy road).

    • Replies: @Miro23
  247. @Charles Pewitt

    Rubbish, tosh, racist crap. The American Landmass is usurped from the natives. The only way to justify it is to say “Might is right”. You cannot justify it any other way. Once you agree to this, then you agree to the law of the jungle.
    The Europeans, after plundering the world and losing their colonies, discovered “Ethics”. They loved their own rhetoric. After setting up the UN, they drafted laws that showed them as Noble and Enlightened people.
    But an Empire, any empire, has to be brutally honest.
    These hollow European claims are being challenged today by the reality of the refugee influx.
    The flood of refugees and the dissatisfaction of the populace
    The European politician still clings ‘European values; while the general public is being dumbed down.
    The migrant population in France, UK, Holland etc., were initially imported to do jobs that the whites were unwilling to do. These people, along with a small minority like doctors, nurses and then IT coolies were all beneficial to the local economies.
    20 years went by without any mass migration with a steady and manageable immigrant stream.
    So what changed?
    Let me list the reasons. FUCKING AROUND IN PLACES YOU DON’T NEED TO.

    • Replies: @anon
    , @Saxon
  248. @Wilkey

    You are delusional. Neither UK or USA ever was able to win against peer nation be it Napoleonic France or Germany alone. Mostly coming to finish already defeated by someone else aka Russia/ USSR enemy. All those conquests you mention are nothing to be proud in military terms. Modern military attacking basically Savage people barely out of stone age. Before Bonaparte got annihilated in Russia, things were not going well for Anglo Saxon. Were as usually fighting using someone else. The only thing that prevented UK from being overan all the time was geography. Russia on the other hand has incomparable long term track record of beating who is who in military universe. Note, Russia conquered the whole territory from Ural to Pacific barely with few hundred people starting with ermak in the most inhospitable location. Defeated Napoleon and Nazi Germany without any military assistance from allies.

  249. Rurik says: • Website
    @Erik Sieven

    So when a white female has her 1-3 children with a black male and than leaves him

    I wonder…

    I would (and have) slept with women who no doubt have a sundry assortment of liaisons, but what if they had a black kid, would that stop you fellas from dating them or even marrying them?

    would that bother you in the least? Would you be perfectly happy to take such a woman and her brood to meet your mother and hang out at the family reunion, perhaps as a feather in your cap that you’re so open-minded?

    I see these guys who get married to women with brown children and just sort of wonder if it ever bothers these guys, (knowing that the sniggers behind their backs- especially from black men- will follow them their entire lives)

    • Replies: @Erik Sieven
  250. Jake says:
    @Wilkey

    Yes, von Runstedt and von Kluge issued the order for the halt. Now, do you really think they did so with any doubt that is what Hitler wanted? Hitler naturally went public with his support, even though von Brauchitsch opposed the order and tried to over turn it immediately.

    If Hitler did not back the order, it would not have been given. If somehow it had been given without Hitler’s support, then those who gave it would have been removed ASAP, perhaps severely reprimanded.

    It was Hitler’s decision.

  251. Rurik says: • Website
    @German_reader

    …but those events happened 70 years ago, can’t be changed, and I’m more concerned with present-day issues (like possibly getting stabbed to death by Islamists in a supermarket as happened yesterday in Hamburg).
    You guys get so overly emotional about all this WW2 stuff, that’s not healthy.

    and you see no cause and effect between the WWII narrative (Germans are all evil Nazis at heart and are all guilty for the crimes of Hitler and the Nazis and must have it rubbed in their faces 24/7, 365 or they will absolutely, certainly try to do it again!!!, unless or until their congenital evil is bread out of them with Africans and Muslims as the final solution, once and for all!

    “Never Again!”

    you really don’t see a connection?

    it could not be more blatant and in-your-[Nazi]-face. Perhaps it’s because its so ubiquitous that you don’t see it. Like a fish hardly notices water.

    • Replies: @German_reader
  252. @Avery

    All good points. I would like to add that kursk battle took place in summer. Still no luck.if one really concentrates on track record of European nations Russia obviously has the best one but narrative is being written by someone else. Russia has been consistent destoyer of the best Western militaries. So, they tried to invent various excuses to explain their losses to supposedly inferior Slavs. Here come weather and distances but both work both ways. Russians have to fight in same terrible conditions and then Russians had to destroy and persue enemies over same huge distances from Moscow to Berlin and Paris. Nothing stopped them somehow.

    • Replies: @SolontoCroesus
  253. Joe Wong says:
    @Achmed E. Newman

    In 1981 (25 years after the event) Judith Banister at the US Bureau of the Census proposed 30 millions killed in the Great Leap Forward (GLF) based on her “massive death toll” hypothesis, this figure is the mother of all subsequent numbers when the westerns write about the GLF; Frank Dikotter quoted 45 millions murdered in the GLF to win the Samuel Johnson prize for non-fiction; recently Jung Chang and Jon Halliday said 70 millions killed in the GLF in their book “Mao: the Unknown Story.” All of them claimed their number based on secret sources in china. The latest number is 100 millions murdered in the GLF in some western current affairs analysis sites.

    Achmed, how many do you believe deaths (or percentage) would attribute to polices of the Great Leap Forward or Mao himself personally?

    Peak Stupidity is indeed the peak bigotry of the White, it is written by the half educated bigots who has a mindset belonging to the past, stalled in the old days of colonialism and constrained by the zero-sum Cold War mentality. It tries to rewrite Chinese history for the Chinese based on second handed English sources and their small nation bagger-thy-neighbour culture .

    There are tens of different philosophies in China, Confucianism is just one of them. Confucianism is about the well-being of the people, it is not about harmony as the Peak Stupidity insisted. Harmony is one of the symptoms after the people are well being looked after.

    Here is the elementary of Confucianism for your food of thoughts.

    https://28utscprojects.wordpress.com/2011/03/01/%E8%8B%B1%E8%AD%AF-%E5%AD%94%E5%AD%90-%E5%A4%A7%E5%AD%B8%E4%B9%8B%E9%81%93/

    Mind you if you want to be able to think independently, don’t take those toxins fed you by the ‘God-fearing’ morally defunct evil ‘puritan’ thru the education system from cradle to grave reinforced by the excessive flag saluting seriously.

  254. Joe Wong says:
    @Achmed E. Newman

    You are equating complexity to stupidity, this is an innovation of the American exceptionalism. Have ever come across your mind that small number of characters the White has because it was designed for the majority of the simple minded people of the White? So they can be hoodwinked into becoming debt serfs easily with obfuscation like free market capitalism, trickling down effect, etc.

  255. @Rurik

    you really don’t see a connection?

    Of course there’s a connection (though not a logical one imo, there’s a perceptive comment about this by James N. Kennett above), I’m definitely sick to death of the perpetual national self-flagellation that Germany’s political and media class is forcing on us. But is the solution to that endless obsessing about WW2, just with a focus on misdeeds of Soviets or the western allies instead? I doubt it.
    Besides, the whole “the white man is the source of all evil and has to disappear” complex isn’t based just on WW2 and the Nazis, you see pretty much the same thing in the US, France, UK etc., just with slavery, colonialism or whatever evil white men supposedly once did.

    • Replies: @SolontoCroesus
    , @Rurik
  256. @Sergey Krieger

    … attacking basically Savage people barely out of stone age …
    … Russia conquered the whole territory from Ural to Pacific barely with few hundred people …

    • Replies: @Sergey Krieger
  257. Peak Stupidity is indeed the peak bigotry of the White, it is written by the half educated bigots who has a mindset belonging to the past, stalled in the old days of colonialism and constrained by the zero-sum Cold War mentality. It tries to rewrite Chinese history for the Chinese based on second handed English sources and their small nation bagger-thy-neighbour culture .

    “Half-educated” – not hardly! “Bigots” – sure, why not?

    The rest of that paragraph is made up of a bunch of standard phrases stuck together (and it’s not “baggar”, so you don’t even understand that phrase). I really wonder if you are a computer, Joe. Do you have a MAC address or a street address? That is one way we both could tell if you are computer or not. If you are not, could you read more posts on Peak Stupidity before you tar, uhh, them, with a big brush like that?

    Achmed, how many do you believe deaths (or percentage) would attribute to polices of the Great Leap Forward or Mao himself personally?

    Chairman Mao may have not personally killed anyone, just as Adolph Hitler never did, as far as I’ve read (I could see where maybe he clonked someone over the head with one of those big beer steins they drink from though). You missed my point. The 30-40 million souls lost during Great Leap Forward 1.0 were all due to one man with control of the entire economy. I explained this to you already.

    The Confucianism post on Peak Stupidity was humorous, and you missed that. Computers … no damn sense of humor.

  258. @iffen

    I guess he’s not saying there was no Gulag, just that the one Solzhenitsyn described didn’t exist.

    I see, Iffen. I don’t believe Martyanov on this, but I’m no Russian.

    • Replies: @Sergey Krieger
  259. @Sergey Krieger

    apropos of not that much:

    How did Russia go from Tolstoy to Trotsky?

    And why is it US leaders allied with Stalin (Trotsky) when Russia was virulently Communist and anti-Christian, but hate Putin, who is attempting to re-invigorate classic Russian culture and Orthodox Christianity?

    What was/is the catalyzing agent in both scenarios?

  260. @Joe Wong

    Dude, English has an order of magnitude more words than Chinese, but you can just learn the words as you need them. You don’t need to memorize anything to know how to write most words. (I mean, the generic “you”, as Joe Wong obviously’s got a problem)

    The problem with the characters is that one must spend an inordinate amount of time just to be literate. In most languages, a bright 4 year-old can read and learn words on his own. I’ve seen it. The Chinese have got great memorization skills due to this hard work of learning 3,000 or more characters, each with 10 – 25 squiggles. I think this has probably become genetic, not just cultural, by this point. That’s where the brainpower goes, and the ingenuity suffers.

    free market capitalism Yes hoodwinked by a natural law, right. You do know that China has more of a free market in most areas – health care is a great example – at this point in history than almost anywhere, and that’s why they are doing so well, don’t you? The Chinese leaders are apt to “financially plan” the place into a debt bomb of their own (no it doesn’t matter that “we owe ourselves the money, so no problem” – what kind of stupid shit is that? If lots of people are going to get stiffed, there will be trouble)

    Ever read a book called “The man who loved China”? I’m curious what you would think of it.

  261. @Expletive Deleted

    Just pointed. Do not forget Karl XII, Bonaparte, Hitler and many in between.

  262. @Erik Sieven

    We have this nonsense called gender studies but what we really need is sex studies. Sex is biological, gender is socially constructed. It’s reality vs fantasy. Maybe, the elites promote genderology to distract us from the crucial facts of sexology.

    All white people are the products of white men planting seeds in white women. White women are like European soil. If you lose the land, you lose the place where you can build homes and plant food. It means death. Likewise, if white men lose access to white wombs, they lose the chance to make white life. For example, if any white man’s mother had been womb-colonized by a Negro, he would been Afroborted and replaced by mulatto who will be seen as black. So, control of land and wombs are vital for racial survival. Blacks control all black wombs, and now, white wombs are coming under Afro-Colonization.

    Why? Because blacks are more muscular and more aggressive. They also have bigger dongs, a common trope in Pop Culture, even prime-time TV shows. Also, sports and music are related to sex. Female instinct wants to mate with top warriors, even if of another race that defeats her own race. Female instinct despises the loser, even of her own race. When whites integrate with blacks, blacks routinely kick white butt in schools, streets, and playing fields. Blacks command the ball, white girls play cheerleader for them. Look at Sports Illustrated. Top athletes are black, top bikini models are white.
    Also, music and sex affect same parts of the brain. As blacks have louder voices and more rhythm, they make more lustful music, and this turns white women into jungle women.

    Now, manhood is vital for male psychology, health, and survival. The fact is white manhood wilts and fades in the presence of blacks. White Manhood needs safe space from Black Thughood. White Manhood and Black Manhood cannot co-exist. When two come together, blacks are cocks, whites are cucks. It’s like in prisons where black inmates routinely rape white boys as their ‘bitches’.
    Milo, Andrew Sullivan, and other ‘gay conservatives’ are bitches to black homo dongs.

    So, why should white males welcome than resist the massive invasion of Europe by blacks. If a bunch of Vietnamese come to France, French manhood can lord over Viet manhood as Viet men are short and geeky. But when Sub-Saharan Africans arrive, French manhood goes down the toilet. Same in UK. What kind of man wants to lose his manhood in his own homeland and lose his women to Africans who conquer and colonize white wombs like Spanish conquered and colonized New World indigenous wombs and created the servile mestizo race that still lives under Hispanic rule?

    According to PC, Ideal White Fatherhood is welcoming black Africa invasion so that stronger blacks will beat up his sons and impregnate his daughters. Yes, white fathers should cheer the impregnation of his daughters’ wombs by the same thugs who beat up his sons and destroyed their white manhood.

    What white man would want tougher blacks to beat up his son and impregnate his daughter? But PC says that is the IDEAL white parenting.

    We need sex studies about the real power and real survival. We don’t need gender studies that distract us with fantasies and encourage white boys to seek 50 alternate genders of wussidom.

    • Replies: @Erik Sieven
    , @ThreeCranes
  263. @Joe Wong

    BTW, what I do like about Chinese ( the language ) is that they make medical and scientific terms from small words, as opposed to long ones derived from latin or greek, like in English.

    “Artery” for instance, is something like “blood pipe”, using those 2 words. Phone (instead of being a new word) is “electric talk”, but man, translating is not so simple.

  264. Today, no revolution can succeed without the use of shoulder fired missiles or rocket propelled grenades. For a first-world subject people to successfully shrug off the yoke of an occupying, alien class it would have to attack at the most vulnerable point and that is helicopter and limousine commutes into the cities that are home to its nerve center, the great banks and corporate headquarters.

    In Afghanistan, the shoulder fired missile was the game changer against the Russkies.

    Such an assault would force the alien Elite to retaliate by bombing pockets of resistance. This would provoke the general population to such a pitch of fury that they would rally behind a charismatic leader who would organize the people into a militia and they would drive out the invader/occupier. This has been the blueprint for all successful revolutions.

    • Replies: @NoseytheDuke
    , @peterAUS
  265. @German_reader

    Besides, the whole “the white man is the source of all evil and has to disappear” complex isn’t based just on WW2 and the Nazis, you see pretty much the same thing in the US, France, UK etc., just with slavery, colonialism or whatever evil white men supposedly once did.

    What ideology or group is behind both/all of those scenarios? Do you see any patterns? Can you identify any commonalities?

    • Replies: @Rurik
  266. KenH says:
    @German_reader

    That’s almost certainly much too high an estimate.

    No, that’s a close approximation and understated by 5-10 million according to some sources.

    But 20 million isn’t really credible anymore….

    According to whom?

    if you use such numbers, what’s the detailed source for them?

    Yes, and they aren’t difficult to find.

    http://www.thecommentator.com/article/4230/so_how_many_did_communism_kill

    The Black Book of Communism pegs the death toll in the Soviet Union at 25 million:

    https://www.amazon.com/Black-Book-Communism-Crimes-Repression/dp/0674076087

    Also the Nazis had fairly radical plans which they didn’t get to fully implement, like deliberately starving to death millions in the Soviet Union to make room for German settlers….

    Were the Nazis going to starve more than the 7-10 million who perished in the holodomor at the hands of the communists? If yes, please provide sources that specifically address the numbers they were planning to murder via starvation.

    It seems the only thing that exists is circumstantial evidence based on the so called “generalplan ost” which entails resettling certain groups of people deemed hostile to Germany further east towards and in Western Siberia following a German victory, but the Germans lost. I don’t think the actual plan has ever been produced and there’s been lots of creative interpretations and versions going around.

    In 1941, Jew Theodore Kaufman self published Germany must Perish wherein he called for mass extermination of Germans via forced sterilization and the dismemberment of its territory. This was before any Generalplan Ost existed . That’s pretty serious. And you can find actual evidence in the form of the book on Amazon and used booksellers.

    So if I understand you correctly you are a German who believes Germany is guilty of absolutely everything they’ve been accused of and probably more, but the communist Soviet Union is not? In fact, communist Russia is hardly guilty of anything they’ve been accused of.

  267. mp says:
    @Corvinus

    What pieces of legislation “tells” Americans they must marry foreigners?

    None, of course. I was offering an hypothetical as an example of the difference between a private choice and public policy. I thought it was clear–sorry if it was not.

    … immigration does not necessarily “promote indigenous dispossession”. Second, how does your proposal meet constitutional scrutiny?

    All immigration without strict limits on immigrant’s behavior promotes a degree of indigenous dispossession. If immigrants are allowed to vote, hold property, etc., it proportionally dispossesses citizens. I have no problem with immigrants of the proper sort. But their ought to be strict limits on what they can and can’t do, in my view. No immigrant should be granted full citizenship. Maybe after several generations their progeny could apply. I don’t know. An ethnostate where citizens are tied to the land by clan, religion, and family is the best situation. Not practical for the US, which is essentially a global Special Economic Zone. Whoever can bring enough cash to the table is allowed free rein. America will have to fail before meaningful change can take place, I suspect.

    • Replies: @Miro23
  268. Natural diversity – that diversity that takes place by osmosis over time – it fine with me. The perfect example is the sci fi events I attend. The minority of blacks and Hispanics who come there are nerds like the rest of us and fit in fine. The white progressives who run these are always wringing their hands over diversity, but that’s silly. The folks who are interested will come, and those who aren’t, fine. It’s when they start fretting about some kind of hypothetical racism and trying to correct the racial balance — as if that mattered — that people get stupid.

  269. Rurik says: • Website
    @German_reader

    is the solution to that endless obsessing about WW2

    the German people have a deep and reflective soul. More than anything else, they want to be ‘good’ people. To think highly of themselves as ‘good’ people and to aspire to better things.

    So when you (the adult/state/school system/government/ubiquitous media..) tell a little German child that they are congenitally evil (for what they did during WWII) then that is going to have a direct and consequential effect on that child’s self-esteem and view of themselves. They want to be good, but now since they’ve been told that they are uniquely evil people, they feel that the only way for them to be good is by a proper amount of self-loathing and by doing all they can to repudiate the evil of their ancestors and the persistent evil of the German people, many of whom *even today!* are anti-immigrant = Nazis.

    So this narrative of WWII with Germans as evil people- pushing Jews (and others who don’t really matter) into ovens and trying to kill everyone who didn’t have blue eyes and blond hair, has had a direct and deliberate effect on the German psyche, with observable results.

    the same thing in the US, France, UK etc., just with slavery, colonialism or whatever evil white men supposedly once did.

    you’re absolutely right about that.

    I’ve been raised to believe that the white American man is congenitally evil. And we have a collective guilt for which no amount of permanent cultural emasculation and vituperation for our evil will ever purge the racism/evil from our souls.. We don’t just need Affirmative Action for black Americans, but for all the world’s blacks, and for all the world’s browns and yell0ws and everyone else that can get to these shores to stomp the evil white man under an army of ‘good’ people (non-whites and feminists, homos, etc..) who have suffered and suffered and suffered the evil of the white man since the beginning of time. With the most persistent of these SJW being properly “educated” whites themselves.

    Sure, I get all that. And you’re right, it does go beyond Germany to include all white men and all white nations everywhere who are under the domination of the Fiend.

    I just read a post by SC who ruminates thus:

    How did Russia go from Tolstoy to Trotsky?

    And why is it US leaders allied with Stalin (Trotsky) when Russia was virulently Communist and anti-Christian, but hate Putin, who is attempting to re-invigorate classic Russian culture and Orthodox Christianity?

    What was/is the catalyzing agent in both scenarios?

    indeed

    and what is the catalyzing agent in every case of Germans and white Americans and the French and Swedes and Brits and everyone else who is considered evil by the narratives of their home cultures and media representations?

    what is this all-pervasive fiend (politically correct, viscerally anti-white narrative) that has our children hating themselves for things they had nothing to do with?

    where does all this otherworldly hatred for our phenotype originate from? To the point that they have us telling our children that they are ‘bad’ people, and that the only way for them to redeem the evil in their genes is by always acting in ways that marginalize Germans (and white Americans and French and Swedes, etc…) and put non-whites first.

    is there a force in this world that is responsible for all of this, or is it just providence?

    I say there is indeed a recognizable force, and I call it the Fiend.

    It has many tentacles, but its power emanates out of the international banker’s privately owned Federal Reserve BankⓊ. The same Federal Reserve BankⓊ that was the force behind America going to war against Germany during WWI, and has set in motion all the other things that are being discussed on this article and elsewhere.

    (and for what it’s worth, the key to undoing the Fiend is by exposing ((who)) was behind 9/11)

  270. @ThreeCranes

    You’re saying you feed on leftovers of black men.

    They are like lions who eat the prime meat. Once they had their fill and fun with white women and look for fresh ones, you enter like hyena or vulture and feed on the scraps. This is what makes you happy?

    Imagine a restaurant. You order something, but the Negro takes the plate and eats the best meat. After he’s finished, you feed on leftover scraps. It’s like dogs feeding on scrapes from a doggy bag.

    It’s just another kind of cuck-behavior.

    • Replies: @ThreeCranes
  271. Rurik says: • Website
    @SolontoCroesus

    Do you see any patterns? Can you identify any commonalities?

    and not just for the hatred and scorn hurled at evil (especially German) white men, but behind all the demands for mass-immigration and for all the wars and assorted domestic treasons and cultural and spiritual sewage being shot out of our media like the sewage cannons they use in Palestine

    itz all hate, all day long with the Fiend

    • Replies: @Priss Factor
  272. @Rurik

    Wow, I didn’t know such existed.

    Very useful metaphor of how the Globo-Media works.

    It sprays certain groups and individuals with sewage cannon and then accuses them of being foul.

    It’s like a skunk spraying other animals and then accusing them of smelling ‘like a skunk’.

    Globalist Media are all about skunking the world.

  273. I weep for England, because I am English and a nationalist and a patriot. I am completely disgusted by what has happened to Britain since WWII. It seems to have been calmly accepted and to be inevitable that the British should become a minority in Britain. Those that have come to Britain since 1945 are not British and never will be, they have taken their own cultures with them unaltered. For politicians to continue to talk as if integration was possible and to use vast sums of money on futile projects is an insult to the British and treachery. Mass-immigration has to be countered by mass-deportation otherwise these islands will be British in name alone, and in reality become a territory dis-united by ethnic conflict.

    • Agree: MBlanc46
  274. “Nolan also has his troops being handed slices of bread and jam by rescue workers. Known in the North of England as “jam butties,” these were also omnipresent when I was a child. Reportedly, they’ve died out, along with so much else.”

    We still eat jam sandwiches, in fact there fewer greater joys in life than strawberry jam on buttered slices of the whitest bread you can find, my personal preference being Robertsons Strawberry Jam on slices of Mothers Pride served with a cup of tea and yes we still drink tea. We don’t eat “peanut butter an jelly sandwiches” because the very thought of eating that is making me slightly nauseous, peanuts are animal feed at worst and a bar-snack at best.

  275. @German_reader

    The Black Book of Communism estimated 20 million victims in the Soviet Union, and another 1 million in the other nations of Eastern Europe.

  276. @Achmed E. Newman

    There was Gulag, but Solzhenicin numbers and stories existed in his mind only. Archives were opened long time ago. Since 1921 till 1953 there were some 3 millions plus repressed with some 700 thousand plus executed. Far cry from Solzhenicin lies and frankly necessary measures considering times and situation.

  277. @Priss Factor

    “You’re saying you feed on leftovers of black men.”

    Hahaha….

    Funny, but I never said that. You’re putting words in my mouth.

    A woman isn’t a bar of soap. Just because one man has moved his schlong back and forth in her doesn’t mean that she was worn down by that. She won’t erode away.

    I’ll let you in on a secret. I never asked for a complete run down of a woman’s escapades before I’d consider boffing her. If she was boffable and willing then I was game. As Zorba the Greek said, the worst sin a man can commit is not to give love to a woman who stands in need of it.

    And for all you and I know, the black guy himself was “feed[ing] on leftovers” as you put it. I doubt they were first to plow that field.

    But to give you a serious response to the issue you raise; some women I was with did reveal that at some time in their past they had been with a Negro! Well, what of it? They didn’t have children (by the way) so I wasn’t inheriting some other guy’s spawn. I was just playing around with a woman, one of many attractive women I consorted with. It’s not like I married them. I ain’t no cuck.

    As one of them* (the lovely daughter of a SeaFair Queen) used to say, “Everyone has a history”.

    *not one of the Negro boffers

  278. Wilkey says:
    @Sergey Krieger

    Napoleonic France had twice the population of Great Britain, and Britain had to cross the Channel to supply its men. The Russian conquest of ‘the Urals to the Pacific’ was essentially the conquest of a whole lot of nothing and, unlike Britain conquering America, Australia, etc, they didn’t have to cross an ocean to do it.

  279. mikey says:
    @Joe Wong

    I don’t know what the real numbers were, but I know a physician who came out of one of the prison camps who survived only because he ate tomatoes (the only food) for months on end. While he did not like to discuss the particulars, he did say that in his camp alone there were 300 people dying every day due to starvation and untreated disease. There were many more camps nearby so the numbers that died just in his locality must have been very high.

    Now the question would be why was he interred. It was very simple, he came from a well off family, and he had received his education in America. That was all it took.

    Why was he still there when the communists took over? Well it was very simple, he believed their lies, that they would create a better China. He thought they were for the common man… and he wanted to help. His sister, who was trained as a dentist, did not believe in the Communists and so escaped to Hong Kong and later came to Canada.

  280. iffen says:
    @Sergey Krieger

    Russia on the other hand has incomparable long term track record of beating who is who in military universe.

    Yeah, that severe ass-whuppin they put on the Japanese in 1904-1905 stands out as one for the record books.

    • Replies: @Sergey Krieger
  281. MBlanc46 says:

    It’s probably a bit too early to think about hanging them from lamp posts. But when the time comes, it will be a good way for many of us to relieve our righteous anger. There will doubtless be many who will say that when that time comes, we should be magnanimous, that we should let the better angels of our nature govern us. But if they ultimately triumph, they will show us no mercy. They have nothing but disdain, even contempt for us. To them our lives have value only if we’re making money for them. If we’re not, they’ll eliminate us like vermin. We need to do unto them what they would do unto us. But do it first.

  282. @German_reader

    You guys get so overly emotional about all this WW2 stuff, that’s not healthy.

    Stick to the facts and drop the free, online psychologizing and health advice. None of us is here for that even if you were qualified to offer it.

    FYI, it’s an absolute necessity to debunk the lies told back then because it helps people to understand what’s being done today.

    In fact, every well informed, intelligent person knows that ancient history has lessons for today.

    There is no excuse for any literate person if he is less than three thousand years old in mind.

    – B.H. Liddell Hart (Thoughts on War, 143)

  283. Cortes says:

    No doubt the author will be in Parliament Square on Monday at the head of a band of torch- and pitchfork-wielding geriatric Brexiteers.

    Ah, yes. The easy words of the tosspot “exile.”

    Cmon, break out your hordes.

    Yap, yap and thrice yap.

    • Replies: @iffen
  284. iffen says:
    @Cortes

    Some people are idea people and can’t be bothered with the details of carrying out the ideas.

  285. @Avery

    Yes, Hitler let them escape at Dunkirk. At least that’s the German point of view. They admit that it was a great blunder. http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/dunkirk-75th-anniversary-real-reason-hitler-let-british-troops-go-1503201

  286. @Achmed E. Newman

    “Achmed E. Newman” – are you a Muslim/Jew? Are you involved with Asians? Are you a Catholic?

    I can comment on Derbyshire because he is part of the problem – he married this woman. I listed facts and again I get nonsense.

    My family is kosher. Derbyshire’s family is not.

    When you say women caused these problems, you have to look at the different types of women. White, black, Asian, Jewish, Christian. Most of the women in the USA who vote for welfare are black women. Most white married women vote for the GOP.

    The only century long experiment (1917-2017) that bothers me is the push for “universal brotherhood” and “universal church.” I am interested in IQ which is related to race. From this we can separate those who don’t belong in the West. Then we can begin to make the changes we need to regenerate Western countries. We know that IQ is the most important factor for the success of a nation.

    Your misogyny makes me believe there is something not kosher about you. (((Stefan Molyneux))) babbles about how women are to blame for the social welfare state. Japan does not have problems like these because they are a homogeneous nation that does not allow immigrants into their country. Welfare can only work in a country like Japan.

  287. @mp

    Brimelow is just writing his usual cuck nonsense. It is easy to “answer” Brimelow as to who should be hanged, i.e., Derbyshire, because Brimelow refuses to accept that troublemakers like Derbyshire and the Jews have played a role in the destruction of England.

    Brimelow will always give in to the Jews. He’s just babbling.

    • Agree: Beefcake the Mighty
  288. @Corvinus

    This will happen as immigration laws are changed. A problem like Derbyshire did not just pop up. It’s been simmering for a while, but now that Trump won, there will be changes.

    The good thing is Derbyshire’s spawn is useless so he can see his mistakes fail before his eyes.

  289. @George Orwell

    China will never be a great power. Since the start of their one child policy they have performed over 400 million abortions.

    In the 1980s, Japan was supposed to takeover the world and we were all going to turn Japanese. That didn’t happen.

    China’s collapse is coming.

  290. @ThreeCranes

    In Iraq the game-changer was the IED.

    I’m currently reading Vietnam: The Australian War. I had no idea previously that mines planted by Australians and deftly recovered by VC and NVA accounted for so many US and ANZAC casualties.

  291. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @attilathehen

    What is your ethnic background?

  292. anon • Disclaimer says:

    The British fought two wholly needless wars with the Germans only to turn around and give away their country through an unopposed invasion of black and brown aliens. I just do not get it.

    My own country, Canada, 98% white as recently as 1970, committed the same insanity….

    • Agree: CanSpeccy
    • Replies: @NoseytheDuke
    , @CanSpeccy
  293. anon • Disclaimer says:
    @anony-mouse

    Your mischaracterizing the situation. NOBODY ever voted for non-white immigration. Had it EVER been put to a vote in ANY white country it would have been annihilated at the voting booth.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  294. anon • Disclaimer says:
    @Joe Wong

    If only their was a logical point to anything you said sport.

  295. anon • Disclaimer says:
    @TheJester

    Have to agree 100% with what you say. If the goal was to preserve the racial and cultural integrity of Britain then the two German wars were completely pointless and the real rape of Britain (non-whites arriving) should have been prevented at any cost.

  296. @Sergey Krieger

    Without western allied material help, the USSR would have lost and lost badly. Soviet troops rode to battle on Studebaker trucks, running on American gas, while stuffing themselves with Spam and breat made from American wheat. The Soviets couldn’t even supply themselves with telephone wire. Soviet fighters flew on high octain aviation gas. The Soviet airforce was suplemented with fighters, bombers and transports from the West.

    Bear in mind that the Brits and the US fought both Germany/Italy etc. and the empire of Japan. The soviets only joined the fight when Japan was collapsing. Before that they were happy to have a nonaggression pact with the Japanese.

    The people of the Soviet Union were fighting for their lives against a regime every bit as evil as their own. But without our help they would have been destroyed. Keepm that in mind before you brag about the great Russian people.

  297. @iffen

    Do you know what track record is ? Know of 1939 Halkin Gol and Manchurian operations? What wars against and peers uk and USA ever won on their own?

    • Replies: @David In TN
    , @iffen
  298. anon • Disclaimer says:

    Very Strange. The destruction of Great Britain. The very first white country to allow its ‘voluntary’ racial disintegration. And after being on the “winning” side of WW2. Very, very , very strange indeed. I have often wondered about this. Who EXACTLY passed the 1948 Commonwealth citizenship act? WHY didn’t they realize what would happen?

    OR DID THEY…..???

    • Replies: @Priss Factor
    , @Philip Owen
  299. Miro23 says:
    @Avery

    Wehrmacht vanquished all of France in 46 days.
    France in fact had about 1,000 more and newer tanks than Germany in 1940.
    (Germany ~2,400. France ~3,400)
    More guns. (Germany ~7,400. France ~14,000).
    Same number of divisions/troops.
    France folded in 46 days.

    That’s a good point and often missed. The Germany invasion of France didn’t have anything like the probability of success awarded to it by hindsight. Adam Tooze came to the same conclusion in his excellent book on the German war economy; https://www.amazon.com/Wages-Destruction-Making-Breaking-Economy/dp/0143113208/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1501397926&sr=8-1&keywords=adam+tooze+wages+of+destruction

  300. Miro23 says:
    @ThreeCranes

    It just seems to me that American stuff was easier to field service. Simple, rugged or, if you want to speak plainly, crude and overbuilt. But when something breaks down during an advance, you can’t return it to a spanking-clean shop for repair so simple becomes a real virtue. The advance advances.

    And if you really want to stretch an analogy, Democracy needs to work the same way – being simple, well designed and easy to maintain locally and with no complex parts. No need for the expensive and useless Washington “repair shop”.

  301. Miro23 says:
    @mp

    I have no problem with immigrants of the proper sort. But their ought to be strict limits on what they can and can’t do, in my view. No immigrant should be granted full citizenship. Maybe after several generations their progeny could apply. I don’t know. An ethno state where citizens are tied to the land by clan, religion, and family is the best situation.

    The interesting point here is that immigration always seems to start as an economic story. Immigrants come because the US and Europe offer low paying jobs that the locals don’t want to do. So the problem comes later when they get English, German, Swedish or American passports while they’re not integrated in any real way.

    Some countries have a much better way of getting round this problem.

    For example, Spain is a moderately rich European country with a large agro industry and Spaniards are no longer willing to do the hard low paid work in the fields. Their solution is to offer temporary “foreign resident” status to immigrants, coupled to an obligation to make contributions to the national health insurance system. There’s no question of voting rights or gaining citizenship although they are protected by Spanish law in the same way as as Spanish citizens.

    Further along the scale, a very rich country like Switzerland has many more types of lower level jobs that the Swiss are unwilling to do, so they have a correspondingly larger immigrant population. They give out time specific work contracts with the job already identified prior to the worker (not immigrant) arriving in the country. There’s no question of the North African road repair men becoming Swiss nationals. And it works quite well with everyone knowing who they are and why they’re there.

    • Replies: @James N. Kennett
  302. Beckow says:
    @Jake

    There are certainly variances in the level of dislike or hatred, I agree that Italians or Spaniards are a lot less virulent. But the French with Macron “I have been hacked” are among the worst, there is something odd about the French, as if they had a form of mental VD, cocky and subservient, weak and aggressive. I can’t figure them out. But they always obediently mimic anglo, German, or even Scandinavian attitudes.

    We will not save the “West” like this. You can’t have a huge internal split, you need to choose. This is a bit like WWII. And I don’t see the current multi-cultural West dominated by aggressive uber-liberalism, and still displaying the old atavistic anti-east attitudes, I don’t see that changing. So it will be over for them in this century. They will disappear as a recognizable civilization. This is who-whom moment, although the moment will last a few decades. Whether the east follows and collapses too, I don’t know. They might, their internal confusion is quite bad. They might keep on taking the candy from the West and willingly go down with it.

  303. @Miro23

    For example, Spain is a moderately rich European country with a large agro industry and Spaniards are no longer willing to do the hard low paid work in the fields.

    The key words here are “low paid”. Spain has high youth unemployment. Businesses prefer to bring in foreign workers than to increase wages to the point that unemployed people are willing to do the work.

    The same pattern is repeated throughout the Western world. It is impossible to live a decent life in London on minimum wage, because rents are so high. The problem is solved by bringing in foreign workers who are willing to live in overcrowded shared accommodation.

    Well-meaning people used to tell us that the poor were “left behind”, and needed help to catch up with mainstream society. You don’t hear that kind of talk so much now. When people succeed in escaping poverty, wealthy countries import poor people from other countries to take their place.

    • Replies: @Miro23
  304. @Rurik

    strangely many men seem to accept such a situation, probably because the only other option is having no woman at all. I don´t even understand why many white men accept marriage with women who already have other white children.

  305. Corvinus says:
    @Jake

    “That is not quite it. The Spanish and French, for example, have no history of labeling slaves sub-human or even inherently inferior and thus in need of superior Romance people’s conquering, so the Slavs allowed to survive can be serfs.”

    Clearly you failed at world history. Spanish theologians Juan Ginés de Sepúlveda and Francisco López de Gómara each argued that Indians were brutes who were made to serve civilized peoples. The French during the colonial period tracked people’s racial heritage into 128 parts (which is six generations) based on a racial superiority model. Even someone who had 125–127 European parts was referred to as “mixed blood”.

    “Cultural and linguistic Germans have destroyed far more European cultures and languages than the rest of the world combined.”

    Thank you very much for your opinion on this matter.

    • Replies: @Jake
  306. Corvinus says:
    @anon

    “Your mischaracterizing the situation. NOBODY ever voted for non-white immigration. Had it EVER been put to a vote in ANY white country it would have been annihilated at the voting booth.”

    Actually, immigration has been put up to a vote…repeatedly. Not by citizens directly, of course, but by representatives in a legislature who were elected by citizens. Think next time, ok?

    • Replies: @James N. Kennett
  307. @Thomas O. Meehan

    No. USSR would not lose without so called lend lease. Firstly the whole help constituted mere 4% of what Soviet Union produced and invested in resources terms. Second, lend lease started arriving in any significant numbers at the end of 1943 when outcome of the war was no longer in question.soviet army broke Wermacht back by then all alone. What you are saying is just a feel good matra by the West to feel better. Without USSR involvement Britain would have been eventually overan. Without Western help and landing it would take a bit longer but the outcome would have been Soviet army at meditteranian beaches. Moscow, Stalingrad and Kursk three major battles that decided outcome of the WW2 in Europe too place before western help started arriving in large enough numbers and we’ll before Normandy landing. Looks like “partners” wanted to be sure investment would not be in vain and joined in person when it was sure Germany lost the war and was weak enough to be easy picking. The goal was to prevent USSR sole gegemony over Europe which was deserved.

  308. @Priss Factor

    That´s right. But one has to keep in mind that all the problems described are also true for the East Asian / Subsaharan relationship and also for Caucasian / East Asian relationship. I even have the impression that the “manlihood difference” between Subsaharan Africans and Caucasians is smaller than the difference between Caucasians and East Asians.
    The really unfair thing about all that is that East Asians and to a lesser degree Caucasians are not less manly without reason. Evolutionary mother nature traded one kind of manhood against for another. The latter could be briefly described as the foundation of civilization. So there are two ways of being manly: in terms of being a good boxer, having high bone density, high muscle tone, deep voices and a high image of yourself which leads to overall “swag” and sexual attractivity, the other way in terms of being self-restricted, being able to built up a home and wealth and feed a family. Both kinds of men have their way to make war: one by fighting physically with bare hands, the other by cooperation and the use of technology. Antiracism encourages one kind of violence (blacks beating up everybody else) but forbids the other kind of violence (which means cooperating to secure your home, family, borders), with the latter being called “racism”.

  309. Miro23 says:
    @James N. Kennett

    The key words here are “low paid”. Spain has high youth unemployment. Businesses prefer to bring in foreign workers than to increase wages to the point that unemployed people are willing to do the work.

    In the 1950′s Spaniards were willing to do the work since almost everyone was poor, but it’s difficult to be poor when a lot of people in the large cities and along the coast are earning reasonable wages. There’s a move out of rural areas that has been going on for years with bad unemployment, but even this is not quite what it seems, with a big undercover economy and the standing joke about the unemployed living with their mothers (there’s some truth in it).

    Also agro wages are determined by very low wholesale produce prices. When oranges retail for 80c a kilo in Spanish supermarkets it’s near a point where the fruit is left to rot under the trees.

  310. @Sergey Krieger

    The Russo-Japanese war is part of “the track record.” And why wasn’t the Soviet army able to install Otto Kuusinen as head of a puppet government in Finland in December 1939?

    Speaking of WW II, the Soviet Union was the only major belligerent with only one front to fight on. The largest front to be sure, but advantageous compared to having major battle zones on air, land, and sea thousands of miles apart.

    • Replies: @iffen
    , @Sergey Krieger
  311. @Dr. X

    Their only concern in the West was keeping France and Britain off their backs so that they didn’t have to fight a two-front war when they launched Barbarossa, and this was largely accomplished between Dunkirk and D-Day.

    Indeed, Hitler wanted peace with the British once they were off the Continent… Rudolf Hess went on his secret flight to Britain to attempt to negotiate peace.

    Their only concern? Then why did “they” declare war on the USA ?

    • Replies: @Steve Naidamast
  312. @Priss Factor

    Priss says;

    “White women are like European soil. If you lose the land, you lose the place where you can build homes and plant food. It means death. Likewise, if white men lose access to white wombs, they lose the chance to make white life. For example, if any white man’s mother had been womb-colonized by a Negro, he would been Afroborted and replaced by mulatto who will be seen as black. So, control of land and wombs are vital for racial survival. Blacks control all black wombs, and now, white wombs are coming under Afro-Colonization.”

    Righto.

    People say things like the following: “Because a male (cat, dog, Homo sapiens) can impregnate 100 (or 1000, whatever) females, it is imperative to castrate males rather than females. Besides, the operation of cutting off a male’s testicles is much less intrusive–and therefore less risky–than spaying the female. Therefore, CASTRATE MALES!”

    But they have it exactly bass ackwards. Precisely BECAUSE one male can impregnate 1000 females, it is relatively fruitless to castrate males if one intends to control population. What’s important, as Priss point out, is to regulate the number of wombs since their power to reproduce is so much lower.

    Say we castrate 999 males out of 1000. That one male can still impregnate 1000 females so to control population we need to focus on the womb and this means killing off females. Game wardens know this and that’s why states like Wisconsin, when they really need to thin down the deer, open the season to hunting does.

    This notion of murdering or rendering sterile the wombs of women runs deeply counter to European values. Women and children are protected under the general rules of civilized warfare. If you want to be instantly socially marginalized, just suggest that black welfare mothers should have to undergo mandatory sterilization after having had two children; that or give up their benefits. Almost all peoples, conservatives and liberals alike, will recoil in horror at this suggestion. They hold the right of a woman to determine the number of children she will have sacred. And yet common sense, science and math argue the opposite.

  313. @anon

    The British fought two wholly needless wars with the Germans only to turn around and give away their country through an unopposed invasion of black and brown aliens. I just do not get it.

    They beat the Germans in military struggle.

    They lost to the Glob in financial and ideological struggle.

    UK and Canada, like the US, became occupied by the Left and then the Glob.

    Also, if the ‘finest hour’ of UK was defeating race-supremacist Nazis, then the UK had to purge everything ‘racist’ about it to live up the worthy title of victors over Germans.

    Also, there was Negro pop culture that Brits became addicted to. They grew tired of their own culture as repressive and boring. They felt liberated by black funk.

  314. @Sergey Krieger

    To repeat my comments on another thread, 30 destroyers and 3 battleships with guns of 20 mile range would have destroyed panzers in column before they reached the cover of the town. Germans had about 300 tanks, maybe 200 operational. They could have lost them all to naval gunfire. The BEF was too weak to attack the Germans and the Germans were too weak to attack the BEF on the ground. The British heavy tanks were not bad but there were hardly any of them.

    Now I’ve seen the film I can understand why it is not a vehicle for Brexiteer triumphalism. The main Army character is a deserter who teams up with a French deserter. He could have reported to the beach HQ and returned to his regiment, as my father-in-law’s company did. Instead he tries to queue jump and board a hospital ship. Actual medical orderlies would have stayed with their regiments.

    Most of the army hid in the dunes where the bombing was ineffective. They stayed in regimental order until called. They expected the evacuation to succeed.

    • Agree: iffen
    • Replies: @Thomas O. Meehan
  315. @Sergey Krieger

    Forget Americans, there were British tanks defending Moscow by December 1941. The USSR received 3000 Hurricanes too. Not popular with Soviet pilots but very effective. This was not Lend Lease.

  316. @anon

    Large numbers of Commonwealth Citizens volunteered to fight with Britain including millions of Indians and many skilled West Indians in the RAF. The Commonwealth Citizenship act was a symbolic acknowledgement of that debt. And a continuous nation of the UK’s open Borders/ free trade/gold standard policy from before the 1929 crash. We are going that way again. Brexit means Brexit.

  317. @Sergey Krieger

    Britain also was quite deceitful as to how they handled the Dunkirk evacuation. While evacuation proceeded they were telling the French that they were re-positioning their troops leaving the French completely on their own to defend the retreating British. French soldiers who fought alongside the retreating British and landed up on the beaches with them were nevertheless refused rescue until all British troops were rescued.

    Britain and Poland were primarily responsible for WWII with a lot of help from their friend, FDR who was illegally partaking in the war efforts by helping to supply Britain’s armaments programs.

    If you read the diplomatic histories of the inter-war period you get a completely different view of who was responsible for this atrocity but Western psychology will never allow that to presented in a rational and honest format to population or to students in school. You have to dig to find this information…

  318. @David Davenport

    If I remember correctly, Germany declared war on the US because the US was hunting down their ships though Hitler had ordered all German ships to not confront the US Navy…

    • Replies: @Thomas O. Meehan
  319. Jake says:
    @Corvinus

    The subject of mine that you quote is about Germanics damning non-Germanic whites as inferior, The subject is NOT about slavery. The auto-correct must have ‘corrected’ my word Slavs (probably not capitalized: slavs), and made it into ‘slaves.’

    Again, the subject is not slavery, including how any group of Europeans saw slavery in terms of non-whites. The subject that is essential to grasping how we came to be in this mess is that cultural/linguistic Germans (which group includes Anglo-Saxons) have a very long and violent history of hating non-Germanic whites.

    Everything, for example, that the NAZIs said about Jews they also said about Slavs. And the NAZIs took that ‘Slavs as subhuman’ talk from earlier Germans.

  320. J1234 says:

    We often look for signs of recognition of (and reverence for) western cultural continuity from Hollywood, but it’s my opinion that it just isn’t there, not in any meaningful way. Over the last several years, I’ve seen columnists from the dissident right lift up the occasional movie like Dunkirk or movie makers like Nolan or Blomkamp or Clint Eastwood in an attempt to find a glimmer of hope from the entertainment industry, but I believe they are seeing what they want to see. It’s an illusion.

    Mel Gibson may be the one exception, but even he sometimes goes back and forth on positions that put him outside “polite” society in Hollywood. Sure, there may be conservative actors like Eastwood, Gary Sinise and Vince Vaughn, but their opinions don’t amount to much with regards to the output of the movie industry.

  321. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    What do diversitards celebrate? There is no such thing as “Xenophobia”. Phobias are unfounded fears. Fearing invasions by aliens is a rational reaction to the Whole of Human History. But say that you want a border wall like Israel and the ADL will call for your arrest. Its easy to want to kill them isn’t it? Its not just the blatant hypocrisy, its the endless denial that there is even any hypocrisy.
    They see hate everywhere. Probably because they hate everything not them. Hard not to see hate in a World they hate huh? Diversitards and their fake caring parade that leads to more misery and ruin.
    Everything they say they care about. Clean water, clean air, low pollution, low population density, safe food, animal rights, womens’ equality, and even freedom. Sacrificed like a dumb animal to the moon gods of vibrant stupidity. The brown savages are so happy and joyful they always proclaim. No kidding. Ignorance is bliss. Its hard to worry when you are too dumb to plan for Tomorrow.
    China has enough pollution to blot out the sun during noon. Mexico is a magical land of narcoterrorist gangs, permanent income inequality and hardly any clean potable water at all. In Islam, women are practically livestock owned by men. But America and the West is what they want destroyed. See what tolerance brings? Locking up lunatics and jailing perverts doesn’t seem so bad now does it? These are the voters who bring rapists to rape your women.

    • Agree: anarchyst
  322. iffen says:
    @David In TN

    The largest front to be sure

    Compared to one that originated in the Atlantic, then across Europe and the Mediterranean, down thru Africa, and spanning the entire Pacific Ocean?

  323. iffen says:
    @Sergey Krieger

    Do you know what track record is ?

    Apparently not.

    I would, for example, include that ass-kicking you gave to the mujahedeen in Afghanistan in the 70′s and 80′s.

    • Replies: @Sergey Krieger
  324. @Steve Naidamast

    Not true. Hitler was attempting to avoid war with the US until Japan declared war on the US. There is this curious thing about Hitler. For all the lies and deceit, he had this trait of supporting his allies, even silly ones like Italy. It sounds crazy, but Hitler felt obliged to declare war on the US out of his commitment to the Axis pact with Japan. Cost him the war.

    • Replies: @Beefcake the Mighty
  325. The truly ironic thing about this is that both UK and Germany, victor and vanquished, are now meeting the same fate under globalism.

    So, even though UK beat Germany, UK came under US control. And as US came under Glob Control, UK and Germany also came under Glob Control.

    And Glob infected all three with Diversyphilis.
    So, it doesn’t matter if UK beat Germany. Both are now ideological, financial, and demographic colonies of the Glob that pushes Homomania, Jungle Fever, Cuckery, and Diversinoma as cancer.

    It’s like what does it matter which dog is top dog in the house when all dogs must obey the master?

    If UK were truly independent and sovereign, it could take pride in defeating Germany. As both UK and Germany are both dogs of the GLOB, it doesn’t matter.
    If anything, neither would be servants of the Glob if the Germans had won. German victory would have been horrible and evil in many ways, but it would have avoided certain other evils that now destroy Europe.

    This is too bad. After WWII, Europe had a second chance. It rebuilt fast, homogeneous nations were created and served as basis for peace. Also, the fact that all Europeans lost — French lost to Germany and even Brits were soon to lose empire — made them sympathize with one another and bury the hatchet.
    And even without empire, European conditions improved and people never had it so good.

    In the end, it wasn’t WWII and its horrors that did Europe in. It was the good times. Too much La Dolce Vita. After all, we see the same results in Sweden and Germany. (Same with Japan. It survived horrible WWII and made great strides afterwards. But it is now faced with gloom because Japanese are hedonistic and lost their way as shown in Kurosawa films.)

    Former-communist nations are less into this madness because they underwent much hardship under Soviets.

    Europeans still confuse nationalism with imperialism because Brits and French(and Nazis) associated nationalism with chauvinism and then imperialism. But for Poles, nationalism always meant recovery of their lost homeland under Russian and German imperialism. And for many Europeans, nationalism meant restoration of national independence from the Soviets. Estonians and Lithuanians only dreamed of national freedom. So, it is wrong to associate nationalism only with imperialism that trampled on other nationalisms(but also ironically ignited nationalism all over the world by spreading the Western political model to the non-West; after all, Indian and Indonesian nationalism are the products of Europeanism. Also, even in homogeneous Japan, an organic civilization, nationalism was a recent development as it requires the unity of elites and masses. In Old Japan, the people were just servants or slaves of the elites who regarded the masses as chattel.)

    Anyway, DUNKIRK is irrelevant because UK victory over Germans didn’t ensure any more pride or freedom for the Brits than for the Germans in the long run. If anything, both nations came under power of US finance, Afromania, homomania, and anti-white PC.

    In the end, the people of both UK and Germany were little more than gladiatorial warriors. No matter which side won, they were to fall under the the thumb of the glob emperor that was to own all.

  326. iffen says:
    @Sergey Krieger

    Completely distorted history of WW2 in the West and ignorant public.

    Why is this a problem for you?

    Are you worried that the loons will bomb Moscow?

    You ain’t skeered are you?

  327. @Sergey Krieger

    You are making an excellent case for those who counseled against British alliance with the USSR. It would have been far wiser and moral to let the two retrograde powers bleed themselves into exhaustion. Germany strongly tends toward Western values and would have eventually returned to the fold. Russia as you demonstrate, is just too Asiatic to be a trustworthy partner in anything serious.

  328. @Philip Owen

    Agreed. The German army was almost exhausted. Tanks broken down and fuel supply tenuous.

    Also, consider the outcome if Luftwaffe level bomber pilots had any real training bombing moving targets ie. shipping. A lot of footage exists of not-so-near misses on slow moving freighters. Stukas were another matter but they could not defend themselves against British fighters.

  329. @iffen

    Really? While Russo Japanese war was obvious defeat this is not so in case of the war in Afghanistan:

    “3. The USSR suffered a massive military defeat in Afghanistan at the hands of the mujahideen

    This is one of the most persistent myths of Afghan history. It has been trumpeted by every former mujahideen leader, from Osama bin Laden and Taliban commanders to the warlords in the current Afghan government. It is also accepted unthinkingly as part of the western narrative of the war. Some western politicians go so far as to say that the alleged Soviet defeat in Afghanistan helped to cause the collapse of the Soviet Union itself. On this they agree with Bin Laden and al-Qaida’s other leaders, who claim they destroyed one superpower and are on their way to destroying another.

    The reality is the Afghan mujahideen did not defeat the Soviets on the battlefield. They won some important encounters, notably in the Panjshir valley, but lost others. In sum, neither side defeated the other. The Soviets could have remained in Afghanistan for several more years but they decided to leave when Gorbachev calculated that the war had become a stalemate and was no longer worth the high price in men, money and international prestige. In private, US officials came to the same conclusion about Soviet strength, although they only admitted it publicly later. Morton Abramowitz, who directed the State Department’s Bureau of Intelligence and Research at the time, said in 1997: “In 1985, there was a real concern that the [mujahideen] were losing, that they were sort of being diminished, falling apart. Losses were high and their impact on the Soviets was not great.””

    On the other hand we are witnessing yet another defeat of Anglo Saxons against same enemy with mujaheddin this time doing this without any assistance from anyone. Pathetic.

    Among recent Russian victories you fail to notice Georgia, Syria and yes Ukraine… Russia has been achieving her goals while Anglo Saxons side have not. Track record for your information is overall collection of results over long term hence one loss is not everything unless it is Germans circa WW2 loss which ends the whole track record for good. Russia has never suffered such a defeat.

    • Replies: @Beefcake the Mighty
  330. @David In TN

    Russo Japanese war is a part of track record and I am not even going to argue.
    But WW2 Eastern Front is like 90% of all WW2 efforts. The rest did not matter. Regarding having to fight only Germans was thanks to Zhukov destroying Japanese in 1939 in the most decisive manner which led to signing non aggression pact with Japan… 1939 defeat of Japanese erased shame of Russo Japanese war defeat and Manchurian operation was something that US military was never capable of.
    You can watch it here:

    • Replies: @ThreeCranes
  331. @Corvinus

    Actually, immigration has been put up to a vote…repeatedly. Not by citizens directly, of course, but by representatives in a legislature who were elected by citizens.

    Neither political party opposes immigration. The Conservatives want it because it provides cheap labour for business. Labour wants it because they think the newcomers will vote for them, and because they want to be seen as anti-racist. In the UK, voting against the party line is a career-limiting move for an MP.

    It is hard to break this stranglehold on politics, especially when people tend to vote for the party that they think will deliver greater economic growth. Nigel Farage did so by making the Conservatives fear losing votes to UKIP – so they offered a referendum on EU membership to neutralise the threat.

    Opinion polls show a large majority of the public are against mass immigration; but it would take somebody as skilful as Farage to redirect government policy against it.

  332. @Sergey Krieger

    You do remember that the United States not only soundly defeated the Japanese in the greatest sea war ever but put an exclamation point on that victory by dropping two nuclear bombs upon their cities?

    Had we wanted to we could have dropped six more on the Soviet Union and crushed you. Likely, you would not have been born. We could, had we wanted to, left the Soviet Union a smoking ruin.

    But we didn’t.

    Why not?

    Because we’re nice guys.

    To this day, we’re too nice.

    If I were ruler of America, I would send troops and transports to the Bahamas and load up the locals and ship them to Africa. Why? Because its a nice place and I want U.S. citizens to live there. Same with Baja Mexico. All you locals, get out. We want your territory. Adios. Back to the mainland.

    And what could the Bahamas or Mexico do? Nothing.

    Once the United States decided to intervene in countries on the far side of the globe instead of expanding locally, they lost their initiative, their Spirit. We should have left the Koreans and Vietnamese alone and annexed desirable territory for our population to expand into. Anyone doesn’t like it? Tough beans. We’re bigger and tougher than you and I don’t care about Might making Right, I just like the climate.

  333. @Thomas O. Meehan

    You do know of course that the material support was deliberately withheld for as long as possible in order to “bleed” the USSR?

    • Replies: @David In TN
  334. @NoseytheDuke

    FDR’s top aide, Harry Hopkins, went to Moscow and met with Stalin July 30-31, 1941. Hopkins promised almost unlimited aid. This was months before Pearl Harbor.

    By the way, how much assistance did Soviet Russia give Britain when they were standing alone against Hitler and being bombed day and night?

  335. @Thomas O. Meehan

    His pact with Japan only required him to declare war on the US if the US initiated hostilities, which, regardless of the clear American provocations against Japan (and against Germany), was not the case with Pearl Harbor. Hitler’s declaration of war on the US remains baffling me.

    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
  336. @Sergey Krieger

    Your obnoxious chest-thumping here is really no different from Americans crowing about they weren’t “really” defeated in Vietnam.

  337. Russian chauvinism over WW2 is rather amusing, given that the Soviet leader was Georgian and the Red Army was comprised of about 25% from the central Asians republics. (And course there were many Ukrainians as well.)

    • Replies: @Sergey Krieger
  338. Small brained Basque britian needs superior genes of dark peoples otherwise u are going extinct because of your horrible immune system.

  339. Saw it, and the film is an artwork far more than chronicle or myth. There is no unifying ethos. If
    you did not know the history, this could have a disaster movie of any culture. There is absolutely no aristocratic or Churchillian-bullddog flavor. The musical score is a prolonged cliche and embarrassment. Good for the acting portrayals of Kenneth Branagh, Cillian Murphy, Anthony Roylance, and the myriads who played Tommies and navees. Very good for shipboard and aerial action scenes. For myths I’ll stick to Olivier.

  340. anarchyst says:
    @Priss Factor

    You are correct. Part of the problem is that the slaves that were imported were not “the best and brightest”, but were the conquests of the various tribal wars and the low IQ criminals and ne’er do-wells that the village chieftains wanted to get rid of (and be rid of) anyway.

  341. peterAUS says:
    @Wally

    What a load of baseless Zionist propaganda recited like a parrot, or more than likely by another lying Zionist.

    Oh man….you really do NOT know how to read people here.

    Whatever the man has said in this thread is either correct or, at least, calls for a decent conversation about.

    For example, trying to explore further his claim that there has been hatred towards Slavic peoples, throughout modern history, could be beneficial for common future.

    There is something……dark and deep….at work here when watching all this “Russia this” and “Russia that”.

  342. peterAUS says:
    @ThreeCranes

    Whoah……………………

    Now, this is a dangerous comment.
    I am actually curious how it passed “the control”.

    Simplified to the bones, but, man………

    First paragraph, what to say?
    Second paragraph/sentence, well….up to a point really.
    Now, the third paragraph, well………that could be something to debate.
    But…haha…I am quite sure we can’t do it here.

    Actually, Mr ThreeCranes I am rather positive that you just got in The Database.

    Or….hehe…perhaps…you are part of the crew managing The Database.

    • Replies: @mobi
  343. mobi says:
    @peterAUS

    The history of revolutions is inherently fascinating.

  344. @Beefcake the Mighty

    25% from Central Asia? Could you provide your sources because Central Asians constituted tiny fraction at the time both in the army and in overall USSR population. They became more pronounced later probably because of terrible conditions all minorities suffered under Soviet power. At the time there was no difference between Russia, Belorussian and Ukrainian. Still, Russian contribution was a lion share which cannot be denied and is in causalities suffered…USSR by the way was just another name for Russia. As you might notice Ukrainians are not doing very well on their own and neither do others…

  345. @ThreeCranes

    Firstly you did not have those 6… But you were planning and getting ready, alas we made our own just in time. Regarding nice guys. IMHO you are as***s holes always were and always are. I never liked you and anything that USA represented.

    • Replies: @ThreeCranes
  346. @ThreeCranes

    Defeating Japanese was a small pickle by comparison to what was going on in the West. You can keep it all for yourself, just do not try to rewrite history in Europe. The destiny of the WW2 was decided on the eastern front.

    • Replies: @ThreeCranes
  347. Typical hollywood garbage and FAKE HISTORY. Facts are that Hitler ordered a Halt and to allow the evacuation in hopes that Churchill would see it as a gesture of good faith and stop hostilities. If hitler was out to take over the world why didnt he capture the lot and leave England defenseless. Cant have the truth exposed since it would ruin the Germans are bad lies built up over years. FAKE NEWS FAKE HISTORY FAKE REALITY brought to you by the usual suspects.

  348. Anon • Disclaimer says:
    @ThreeCranes

    We’re nice guys? I thought we were sociopaths protesting our innocence.

  349. Avery says:
    @Sergey Krieger

    {25% from Central Asia?}

    According to Karlin’s blog*, Central Asian death toll was 3.62%.
    Slavic peoples, Russian+Ukrainian+Belorussians, 85.3%.
    Those percentages would be roughly equivalent to participation percentages.

    Aside from foot soldiers, the marshals, generals, officer corps were probably pretty much all ethnic Slavs. Certainly the most famous ones were, with a few from other republics.

    I know that aside from famous Marshal Bagramyan, there were other high ranking ethnic Armenian officers in WW2 Red Army.
    [Bagramyan was the first non-Slavic military officer to become a commander of a Front. He was among several Armenians in the Soviet Army who held the highest proportion of high-ranking officers in the Soviet military during the war.] (Wiki)

    _______
    *

    http://www.unz.com/akarlin/soviet-victory-was-russian/#comments

    • Replies: @Beefcake the Mighty
  350. @Sergey Krieger

    I believe in Colossus Reborn Glantz claims 8M of the 34M mobilized were non-Slavic national minorities.

    Sure, Russians were the majority in the Red Army, so what? USSR was not Russia, that’s just jingoistic nonsense. And BTW, Khalkhin Gol does not negate the Japanese victory in the Russo-Japanese war.

  351. @Avery

    Kind of amazing the Armenians couldn’t fight off the Turks, no?

    • Replies: @Avery
  352. And I’ll note there’s no dispute that Stalin was not Russian?

  353. Avery says:
    @Beefcake the Mighty

    You haven’t learned, have you?
    Do you enjoy being humiliated?
    Let me know if you want more, Dr. Bovine, M.D.

    • Replies: @Beefcake the Mighty
  354. @Wilkey

    Russians comprised 66% of Soviet military casualties 1941-1945 per Krivosheev. The runner-up was Ukraine at about 15%. The rest of the nations in the “Union” put in roughly 1% each.

    I understand that Russia was ruled by a Georgian tyrant in this period, and so Russians were conscripted to fight for a polity that wasn’t theirs and against their will (at least until the invasion). But no one can deny that the Russian people did more than their share of the fighting, the suffering, and the dying. Thus “Russia defeated Germany.”

    • Replies: @Beefcake the Mighty
  355. @Sergey Krieger

    “IMHO you are as***s holes always were and always are. I never liked you and anything that USA represented.”

    But that’s not the point of my post really.

    What I implied was that the United States, with the power of a weapon the likes of which the world had never seen, could have gone on a rapacious acquisition spree by simply annexing any territory and exterminating any peoples it pleased. But it didn’t.

    I won’t argue that we’re really not “nice guys”. I’m was being a bit disingenuous. I know that we twist peoples arms and bomb them if they don’t comply.

    Nevertheless, it is a mystery why we with unlimited power at our fingertips exercised some restraint in expanding our empire. I believe that this is the key to understanding our current cuckdom. Two or three generations of American men have grown up in the knowledge that when push comes to shove they hold four Aces. The problem is that they have lost their aggressive instinct and grown complacent. They won’t for the life of them see the alien invasion of their own country as what it is. They still believe that they are untouchable. They can’t imagine that a threat from a minor country can harm them.

    And finally, you will never find me belittling the sacrifices made and losses suffered by the Russian people in WW2 nor would I ever gainsay their courage. The carnage on the Eastern European Front was terrible and the Soviet Union bore the brunt of and repulsed the Nazi attack.

  356. @Sergey Krieger

    “Defeating Japanese was a small pickle by comparison to what was going on in the West.”

    Horsefeathers.

    It was only a “small pickle” because we so ingeniously island hopped over their fortified bases and isolated them, thereby minimizing the number of human lives we lost. If that is your metric, then sorry we used a “tuning fork” (Nietzsche) when you would have used a sledge hammer.

    • Replies: @Avery
  357. @The True and Original David

    I’m not disputing Soviet sacrifices and bravery during the war, and I have nothing but contempt for Americans and British who try to minimize or overlook the Soviet war effort. What I object to is Russian chauvinism that tries to co-opt the Soviet war effort as a Russian national achievement.

    Poles and Balts are absolute fools for allowing the Zio-American empire to use them as pawns to provoke Russia, but their distrust of Russia is understandable.

  358. @Avery

    Sure, why not. I notice you are quite proud of Armenian military might (you even showed a video of artillery pieces being moved down a city street, without horses even (the Armenians having eaten them, I suppose)). I just found it interesting that you had no example of this prowess against the Turks, only in the service of the SU. So sure, enlighten me further.

    • Replies: @Avery
  359. Simply making the point that the SU was a multiethnic/multinational empire, it’s quite a stretch for Russians to claim it as their own (esp. given the disproportionate number of Jews in the original Bolshevik leadership).

  360. Avery says:
    @ThreeCranes

    Agree.

    Imperial Japan was not Nazi Germany*, but was a formidable adversary.
    People forget that they had conquered much of Asia and subjugated 10s and 10s of millions of people. Even Brits who happened to be in their way were routed (e.g. in Singapore)

    They had an excellent navy, and brave fighting men, bordering on fanatical.
    Their Zero was a very good fighter and Japanese pilots were highly skilled.
    Imperial Japanese put up a hell of a fight and fought to the bitter end.
    They were no pushovers.

    But Americans fought smarter and gradually bled them and destroyed their ability to resist.
    Japanese navy never recovered from the loss of their carriers at Midway, a brilliant, carefully planned and executed US Navy operation.

    Give credit where credit is due.

    _______
    *
    e.g. they did not have the industrial capacity and access to resources like Germany.

  361. Avery says:
    @Beefcake the Mighty

    {… without horses even (the Armenians having eaten them, I suppose)).}

    I already addressed your misdiagnosis in an another thread*, Dr. Bovine, M.D.
    But apparently there is too much cud between your horns, so you have difficulty remembering things. I will reproduce my analysis of your misdiagnosis here – for the benefit of unz.com readers:

    140. [{…I guess the Armenians ate them.}
    Nope, Dr. Bovine M.D.: your diagnosis is wrong. Again.
    Armenians don’t eat horses.
    We eat sheeps, beefs, chickens, turkeys, and sometimes pigs.
    It’s youse barn dwelling cannibalistic Schweinhunden who eat each other.]

    When you stop hurling insults and behave, I might _try_ to enlighten youse, although it would be quite a challenge given the bovine nature of the target of the would be effort.

    _____
    *
    #140

    http://www.unz.com/pgiraldi/americas-militarized-police/#new_comments

    • Replies: @Beefcake the Mighty
  362. @mp

    In a meeting with senior executives at a major financial institution in Thailand in the early 2000s, my New York colleagues and I we were served coffee by a young assistant. She shuffled into the room on her knees, set out the cups and coffee pot and shuffled out again, never standing up. No one seemed to think this was unusual.

    It was all very “The King and I”. And it was a local custom. I expect the British were simply continuing a local custom in Singapore.

  363. On the score-keeping front, let’s not forget, Russia was defeated in WW1.

  364. CanSpeccy says: • Website
    @Corvinus

    If merry ol’ England is being overrun by “invaders”, and all you do is lament that nothing is being done about the situation, then you directly contributing to the demise of your nation.

    Listen Corvinus, you want me to do something? Here’s what I’ll do. If I ever come across you in person, I knock you down as a reminder to other cucks, traitors, saboteurs, and agitators for European genocide just how most Europeans feel about such scum. OK?

    • Agree: Beefcake the Mighty
  365. CanSpeccy says: • Website
    @anon

    You can thank Pierre Trudeau for the decline of the European settlers of Canada. Before Trudeau, Canada had a fertility rate well above replacement, and a young dynamic population. Trudeau’s government voided the anti-abortion law and introduced no-fault divorce, with the result that, when Trudeau left office in 1984, Canada’s fertility rate was below replacement. Today, Canadians, with more room than citizens of any other country in the world have a fertility rate barely two-thirds the replacement rate.

    And to confirm the contempt of the Trudeau’s for Canadians, Trudeau the Second, recently informed the New York Times that Canada is a post-National state, without a core identity.

    And most recently, Trudeau II dissed Canadians again by telling immigrants they were more worthy of Canada than those born in Canada, immigrants having deliberately chosen to live in this wonderful land of the Trudeau’s, a land with no culture, no core, no loyalty of the ruling elite to the people, many of whose ancestors have worked and paid taxes in Canada and fought wars for Canada for generations.

  366. Newsel says:
    @RobertTaylor

    Some (Enoch) did and were castigated and fired.

    A decade later (5 decades later wrt to Powell) what did we learn? This is where the PC political crowd has taken its citizens. Ditto the EU and ditto the US. Where to now given that there is nowhere for the PC crowd to hide?

    https://www.spectator.co.uk/2007/11/nigel-hastilows-real-crime-was-to-dare-to-mention-enoch-powell-at-all/#

    http://conservativehome.blogs.com/goldlist/2007/11/candidate-who-s.html

  367. Today’s leftists are proving Hitler to have been right. As Hitler warned, they DID want to destroy Western Civ. They’re doing it in the open now.

  368. anon • Disclaimer says:
    @Rev. Spooner

    if your theory is correct, why don’t we see Mongolia invaded by swarms of refugees? After all, the Mongols had the greatest empire in world history. If it is were some natural consequences of ‘messing around’ in other cultures, they should be first on the invasion list.

  369. Saxon says:
    @Rev. Spooner

    Oh yes it was all going swimmingly of course without any issues except for things like the rape gangs which the state covered up for the better part of nearly half a century.

    You don’t know anything about economies. Individuals and corporations reaping huge profits by pocketing the difference with the outsource/offshore/import scab labour model is not the same as a healthy economy. The native majority have suffered greatly economically.

  370. Hitler never intended to invade GB.
    Dunkirk, for three whole days Hitler forbade the German tanks to advance on Dunkirk, he hoped for peace with GB, he therefore let the BEF escape.
    Heinz Guderian, ‘Panzer Leader’, London 2000, 1952
    Churchill had other ideas.

  371. @Beefcake the Mighty

    Hiler simply wanted to spare the German people fom yet another declaration of war, he therefore declared war on the USA himself.
    FDR’s war on Germany had been going on in the Atlantic since early 1940

  372. Johann says:
    @Sergey Krieger

    In May of 2015 Vladimir Putin invited a petulant Barack Obama to attend the victory parade of the 70th anniversary of the defeat of the German Reich in Moscow. Obama and his deep state butt boys refused to attend because they were busy preparing wars in Syria and Ukraine . The Americans and their Hollywood Sodomites keep churning out propoganda pieces about how the brave Americans and Brits ended the war with their Normandy landings . Hitler and his Wehrmacht were actually defeated in 1942 at Stalingrad. The history of WWII as written by American historians is just one big fairy tale altered each decade by what is politically correct at the time. Several years ago the American deep state Hollywood axis brought out a film depicting the liberation of an alleged Nazi concentration camp by an all negro US Army unit, a completely fictious event. It is always profitable to keep in mind that the winners write the history books.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS
PastClassics
Are elite university admissions based on meritocracy and diversity as claimed?
The sources of America’s immigration problems—and a possible solution
The evidence is clear — but often ignored
What Was John McCain's True Wartime Record in Vietnam?
Hundreds of POWs may have been left to die in Vietnam, abandoned by their government—and our media.