The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Andrew Joyce Archive
“Do Jews Think Differently?”: Aspects of Jewish Self-Glorification
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

“What hollow, offensive self-glorification! Here it is ‘proved’ that the nation of Kant was really educated to humanity by the Jews only, that the language of Lessing and Goethe became sensitive to beauty, spirit, and wit only through Boerne and Heine!”
Heinrich von Treitschke, A Word About Our Jewry, 1879.

As indicated by the above quote from the nineteenth-century German historian and politician Heinrich von Treitschke, self-glorification has long been a noted feature of Jewish ethnocentrism and has frequently contributed to anti-Jewish feeling in host populations. It is almost entirely absent, however, from existing studies of anti-Semitism. Primarily, this absence can be explained by way of the fact anti-Semitism is, in the received wisdom, something that Jews are subjected to by hostile host populations for irrational reasons, rather than something that Jews have a role in causing or provoking. Jewish behavior, especially the kind of behavior involving traits that are negative or antagonistic to outgroups, is therefore remarkably neglected in Jewish historiography and social science studies concerning Jews. A secondary explanation for the neglect of Jewish self-glorification in the development of anti-Semitism, or even simply as an aspect of the Jewish identity or personality, is the scarcity of serious studies of Jewish ethnocentrism. The following essay attempts to address this gap by exploring aspects and examples of Jewish self-glorification, and puts forward the hypothesis that Jewish self-glorification should be regarded as an example of both positive and negative ethnocentrism — that it reinforces in-group loyalties and self-esteem while weakening the loyalties and self-esteem of outgroups.

Jews have a joke among themselves that goes something like this: A class of schoolchildren is asked to produce an essay about giraffes; little Tom Smith hands in a piece on the neck; little John Baker writes about its diet; others write about the tail, the environment, and so on. Then little Benny Cohen hands in his paper, and it is titled “The Giraffe and the Jews.”

The joke, little-known among non-Jews, conveys an important truism — that, for Jews, everything, no matter how distant or abstract, often comes back to the idea and feeling of being Jewish. In other words, it is a joke about Jewish ethnocentrism. That non-Jews aren’t very familiar with the joke speaks to the fact that Jewish ethnocentrism is something that is very frequently discussed and celebrated by Jews, but also something that is frequently downplayed, obscured, or even denied when queried by outgroups. As such, it shouldn’t be surprising that there is very little objective scholarly literature that explicitly deals with the way in which Jews see and regard one another, and how they regard themselves as Jews. More generally, it has been noted that Jews are averse to being objectively studied at all, and are notoriously unresponsive to census questions, resulting in a persistent inability to accurately determine their population size in almost every Diaspora country.[1]Saxe, L. et al. “Measuring the Size and Characteristics of American Jewry: A New Paradigm to Understand an Ancient People,” in Rehbun, U (ed) The Social Scientific Study of Jewry. Sources, Approaches, Debates (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014), 37-8. This aversion to censuses has been explained as a cultural relic of reactive past responses to persecution, although there is a case to be made that it developed over time for more proactive, deliberate and strategic reasons, such as assisting in the avoidance of military service in the Russian Empire, and the evasion of quantitative population restrictions in Jewish residence charters issued in early modern Europe.[2]See, for example, the Charter Decreed for the Jews of Prussia (April 17, 1750) by Frederick II, which outlined the number of Jews, by occupation, permitted to reside in Berlin.

Jewish Ethnocentrism

In addition to census avoidance, it is notable that there is a general air of hostility towards other forms of gathering data about Jews and their behavior. It is especially interesting that, while studies of Jewish ethnocentrism carried out in the last fifty years are rare, objective studies of Jews have frequently been regarded as controversial or even as examples of prejudice. The quintessential case in this regard is of course that of Kevin MacDonald, but as Sander Gilman has demonstrated in Smart Jews: The Construction of the Image of Jewish Superior Intelligence (1996), there have also been very negative responses to work carried out on Jewish intelligence and behaviors by Gregory Cochran, Jason Hardy, Henry Harpending, Charles Murrary, and Richard Lynn. One could speculate that Jews are averse to objective studies of their aptitudes and behaviors because they are aware that at least some of these findings would reflect negatively on their group and provide some cause for revising the prevailing understanding of anti-Semitism and contemporary Jewish politics. Jews, it could be argued, are averse to studies of Jewish ethnocentrism because they are probably aware that such studies would reveal them to be highly ethnocentric, a fact that could prove extremely problematic if it became widespread cultural knowledge in a host population.

The small number of studies that have explicitly and directly examined Jewish ethnocentrism have unanimously concluded that Jews are a highly ethnocentric group that scores very highly in both positive (ingroup self-esteem) and negative (hostility to outgroups) ethnocentrism. Jewish children identify themselves as Jews as early as five years of age.[3]Hartley, E. L., Rosenbaum, M., & Schwartz, S. (1948). Children’s Perceptions of Ethnic Group Membership. The Journal of Psychology, 26(2), 387—397. Smooha’s 1987 study of Jewish ethnocentrism in Israel, published in the Routledge journal Ethnic and Racial Studies, found it to “contain an excessive or unjustified element of superiority,” and “an unwarranted expectation of Jews to be treated preferentially.” Smooha’s findings “clearly expose ethnocentric excesses among the Jews,” and indicated that by certain metrics “virtually all Israeli Jews are racist.” It was found that while Arab ethnocentrism in Israel was “mainly reactive and transformable,” “Jewish ethnocentrism looks both genuine and intractable.”[4]Smooha, S. (1987). Jewish and Arab ethnocentrism in Israel. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 10(1), 1—26. In a more recent study (2003), Brown et al. examined ingroup romantic preferences among American Jewish and non-Jewish White undergraduates and found that Jews had a “significantly greater” preference for their own group, and that the stronger a respondent identified as a Jew, the stronger was the respondent’s preference for a Jewish romantic partner.[5]Brown, L. M., McNatt, P. S., & Cooper, G. D. (2003). Ingroup romantic preferences among Jewish and non-Jewish White undergraduates. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 27(3), 335—354. These respondents were also more likely to more favorably evaluate the Jewish people as a whole “on every target rating.” In short, Jewish identity is very strongly linked to positive ethnocentrism and endogamy (marrying within one’s group).

A particularly interesting aspect of the study by Brown et al. is the response to increasing rates of intermarriage among American Jews. Jewish intermarriage has been raised as evidence by some scholars objecting to analyses of Jewish ethnocentrism, most notably and recently by Nathan Cofnas.[6]Cofnas, N. (2018). Judaism as a Group Evolutionary Strategy. Human Nature, 29(2), 134—156, (153). However, as Brown et al. note, given more than a century of intense assimilation and acceptance by the host population and a population size of only around 3%, “an endogamy rate [among Jews] of 50% is surprisingly high.” They add that intermarriage rates are highest in those areas where the number of eligible in-group partners is very low, and point out that their study of college students indicates that ethnocentric preferences remain very strong in Jews, even the young. Cofnas has also posited that intermarriage and subsequent gene dilution should be regarded as evidence against Kevin MacDonald’s theory that Jews have acted to facilitate the continued genetic distinctiveness of the Jewish gene pool in the United States. Here it is worth considering the Judaic scholar Simon Rawidowicz who coined the term “the ever-dying people” to describe the Jews. In every generation, he noted, there are concerns (real or imagined) about Jewish survival. Yet this very concern about survivability was what helped to ensure that the community would continue to live, and even thrive. In plain terms, Jews, still enjoying a “surprisingly high” rate of endogamy, can afford the collateral damage of moderate levels of intermarriage, and in some respects the panic it causes can even be beneficial in facilitating the continued genetic distinctiveness of the Jewish gene pool among the strongly-identified and highly ethnocentric core of the population.

Jewish Self-Glorification

As a highly ethnocentric population, Jews would be expected to exhibit high levels of self-esteem at group level. Individual self-esteem has been linked to both sense of ethnic identity, and to ethnic self-esteem,[7]Rosenberg, M. (1989) Society and the adolescent self-image (Rev. ed), Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. and although direct studies of the extent and nature of Jewish self-esteem are almost non-existent one study of Jewish adolescents has indicated a strong correlation between feeling Jewish and feeling good about oneself and one’s group.[8]Markstrom, C. A., Berman, R. C., & Brusch, G. (1998). An Exploratory Examination of Identity Formation among Jewish Adolescents According to Context. Journal of Adolescent Research, 13(2), 202—222. In fact, one 1968 study found that Jewish individuals with low personal self-esteem could boost their overall self-esteem by adopting a stronger group identity and, in a sense, drawing on the self-esteem of simply being Jewish.[9]Rutchik, A. (1968). Self‐Esteem and Jewish Identification. Jewish Education, 38(2), 40—46. Similarly, a 1981 study found that Jews, as a group, had higher self-esteem than both Protestants and Catholics, who were roughly equal in self-esteem.[10]Rovner, R. A. (1981). Ethno-Cultural Identity and Self-Esteem: A Reapplication of Self-Attitude Formation Theories. Human Relations, 34(5), 427—434. A more anecdotal indicator of Jewish self-esteem at the group level is the very strong group reaction towards those Jews who are even slightly critical of Jewish identity and “being Jewish,” most obviously in the form of the obviously excessive “self-hating Jew” accusation that is often made against Jewish defectors from the self-esteem norm. It is especially interesting that scholars who oppose work on Jewish ethnocentrism are also prominent in making Jewish “self-hatred” accusations, and Sander Gilman is again notable in this regard with his Jewish Self-Hatred (1986). This policing of positive perspectives of Jews among the in-group and outgroup is an excellent example of the dual function of Jewish self-glorification, which is arguably the most flamboyant and contentious aspect of Jewish positive ethnocentrism and high Jewish self-esteem.

Self-glorification is commonly defined as the exaltation of oneself and one’s abilities, though one could add that it entails excessive or unjustified elements of superiority. Individually, high levels of self-glorification are correlated strongly with psychopathy.[11]Hofer, P. (1989). The Role of Manipulation in the Antisocial Personality. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 33(2), 91—101. A small number of studies have found that groups demonstrating feelings of exaggerated self-love and superiority were more prone to desires or attempts to dominate other groups.[12]De Keersmaecker, J., Onraet, E., Lepouttre, N., & Roets, A. (2017). The opposite effects of actual and self-perceived intelligence on racial prejudice. Personality and Individual Differences, 112, 136—138. It is interesting in this respect that Patai (1996) quotes Menahem Nahum, an eighteenth century rabbi as follows: “All nations, with the exception of Israel, lack understanding [intelligence], and because they lack understanding no country can forgo Jewish leadership.”[13]Patai, R. (1996) The Jewish Mind Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 324. Jews have exhibited excessive or unjustified elements of superiority for many centuries, most evidently in the foundational texts of their religion which posit Jews as favored by a sole universal deity, destined to dominate other groups, and establish moral hierarchies in which outgroups can be treated badly. Even in the New Testament of Christians, one finds the statement that “Salvation is from the Jews (John 4:22), and Jesus is mentioned as comparing a non-Jew to a dog (Matthew 15:26).

Later, in their interactions with Western culture, Jews frequently had recourse to the exaltation of themselves and their real or imagined abilities. Patai argues that by the twentieth century such forthright confessions of supremacist thinking had evolved into a more guarded “environmentalist explanation of Jewish superiority.” These explanations follow a formulation that asserts Jewish superiority from a less aggressive stance, often accompanied by claims that Jews simply don’t have the cultural baggage of their hosts. As an example, Patai cites French Jews of the nineteenth century who claimed superiority over Frenchmen because they didn’t have the religious and cultural baggage of a Catholic upbringing. This compares remarkably well with a writer in the Times of Israel who, commenting on the activities of the Jewish politician Alan Shatter in promoting divorce and contraception in Ireland, has argued that Shatter’s Jewishness “appeared to put him at an advantage, freeing him from the baggage that weighed on his Catholic counterparts.” Similarly, David Dresser and Lester Friedman, Jewish scholars of the media, maintain the position that Jewish filmmakers have a unique, untainted objectivity because of their Jewishness. They write that “Jewish artists’ marginality allows them a vantage point denied other, more culturally absorbed, creative thinkers.”[14]Dresser, D and Friedman, L. (2004) American Jewish Filmmakers University of Illinois, 7.

Environmentalist explanations of Jewish superiority, and therefore examples of Jewish self-glorification, are certainly alive and well in the present. On October 5th, Norman Lebrecht, the Jewish British commentator on music and cultural affairs, published a piece at The Spectator titled “Do Jews Think Differently?,” in which he argues that Jews possess “a common ancestral way of thinking” that has allowed them to “change the world as we know it.” He insists that there exists “a way of thinking that has allowed Jews to see the world from an oblique angle,” and continues “Do Jews think differently? The moment I asked that question, there could be only one answer. … Some dissenting Jew, somewhere, right now, is about to change the way the world revolves.” Lebrecht refers at length to his recently published Genius & Anxiety: How Jews Changed the World, 1847–1947 (Simon & Schuster, 2019), in the course of which he profiles 36 Jews who he claims are responsible (in a positive sense) for modernity. Lebrecht is a strongly identified Jew who clearly has a high level of self-esteem at the group level. He also has a history of producing texts that have advanced Jewish self-glorification. For example, in a 2011 Occidental Observer review essay (of Lebrecht’s Why Mahler? How One Man and Ten Symphonies Changed the World), Brenton Sanderson argues that

The focus here is on alerting us to fact of Mahler’s towering genius, and how this genius was inextricably bound up with his identity as a Jew. Overlaying this, as ever, is the lachrymose vision of Mahler the saintly Jewish victim of gentile injustice. Lebrecht’s new book is another reminder of how Jewish intellectuals have used their privileged status as self-appointed gatekeepers of Western culture to advance their group interests through the way they conceptualize the respective artistic achievements of Jews and Europeans. … This betokens an acknowledgement of the importance of ethnic role models in the promotion of ethnic pride and group cohesion, and how ethnocentric Jews, like Lebrecht, have hyped the former to promote the latter. This form of Jewish intellectual activity is clearly directed at influencing ‘social categorization processes in a manner that benefits Jews.’

The unique aspect of Jewish self-glorification is not just the production of books like Lebrecht’s, but the scale and uniformity of such production, and the resulting broader cultural impact. Other groups have at times produced self-glorifying texts, for example, Thomas Cahill’s How the Irish Saved Civilization (1995), and Arthur Herman’s How the Scots Invented the Modern World (2001), but these are extreme rarities, these authors have also written about unrelated subjects, and these texts do not appear to be accompanied by particularly high levels of ethnic self-esteem or associated factors of ethnocentrism in their respective ethnic groups. By contrast, Lebrecht’s book is simply part of a steady production of texts in which Jews celebrate themselves, often with extremely tendentious claims and outlandish and misplaced self-congratulation. Lebrecht’s latest text, for example, is almost a reprint of Jacques Picard’s Makers of Jewish Modernity: Thinkers, Artists, Leaders, and the World They Made (Princeton, 1998), and this in turn is part of a tradition that includes Heinrich Graetz’s 11-volume Geschichte der Juden (1853-1870), Cecil Roth’s The Jewish Contribution to Civilization (1938), Fredric Bedoire’s The Jewish Contribution to Modern Architecture (2004), and Rebecca Goldstein’s Betraying Spinoza: The Renegade Jew Who Gave Us Modernity (2006) ( see here for an examination of how Spinoza has been a particular focus for Jewish self-glorification).

A fundamental problem with many of these texts, and a contributing factor to anti-Semitism, is that they very frequently involve Jews taking exclusive credit for accomplishments in which their role has been disputed, minor, or even entirely absent. Heinrich von Treitschke’s 1879 complaint at the opening of this essay concerned the efforts of the Jewish historian Heinrich Graetz to promote the idea that Jews were due credit for the work of Kant and the literature of Lessing and Goethe. It is noteworthy that the effort to claim credit for the work of Goethe is ongoing among Jews today, most prominently in two works, Klaus Berghahn’s Goethe in German-Jewish Culture (2001) and Karin Schutjer’s Goethe and Judaism (2015). Efforts have also been made, on the flimsiest of evidence, to suggest that Miguel de Cervantes, author of Don Quixote (1605), was Jewish, and as Sanderson has noted, there have been claims that Shakespeare’s works were actually written by a Jewish woman named Amelia Bassano Lanier. Jews have also attempted to demonstrate the Plato’s “dependence on Moses” (see, for a modern example, Carlos Fraenkel’s Philosophical Religions from Plato to Spinoza).

Richard Popkin (1923–2005), a Manhattan-born Jewish academic working in the history of philosophy, was particularly notable for his efforts in Jewish self-glorification. While working on raising the profile of Spinoza via dubious methodologies, Popkin employed equally questionable methods and arguments to raise the profile of another Enlightenment-era Jew, Isaac La Peyrere. Popkin wrote: “I have tried for over a decade to make him one of the central figures in modern thought, but have not yet succeeded in completely rescuing him from obscurity.”[15]Popkin, R.H. (1978) ‘Spinoza and La Peyrere’ in R. Shahan and J. Biro, Spinoza: New Perspectives Norman, Oklahoma. Even though La Peyrere’s accomplishments are regarded as marginal by almost every non-Jewish academic in the field, Popkin was at the forefront of efforts in the 1970s to displace Thomas Hobbes with La Peyrere as the most influential and significant critic of the idea of Mosaic authorship of the Old Testament, an attempt which ultimately failed because of a resolute scholarly consensus on the “archetypal originality” of Hobbes’ critique of religion. Popkin later turned his attention to linking La Peyrere to Spinoza, even though he admitted “no document attesting to this has been found,” and that in relation to Spinoza’s supposed use of La Peyrere’s works “one can only speculate.” Elsewhere, Popkin devoted himself to “proving” the “Jewish inheritance” of Isaac Newton, whom he wished to present as a “follower of Maimonides.”[16]Popkin, R.H. (1990) Essays on the Context, Nature, and Influence of Isaac Newton’s Theology Boston: Kluwer.

The Zionist thinker Walter Goldstein wrote in 1942, in relation to figures like Goethe, Mozart, Bach, Schiller, Lessing and Kant, that the meaning of the Diaspora was to “absorb the alien and learn from it — but to learn from it for us, for our own purpose”[17]Quoted in Biemann, A (2012) Dreaming of Michelangelo: Jewish Variations on a Modern Theme Stanford, California. [emphasis in original]. Trends in modern Jewish academia and culture suggest that a quite literal absorption is taking place, whereby almost every major figure of Western culture is being reinterpreted by Jews as owing much of their accomplishment to Jewish sources. Other major European figures and events that have been subjected to revisionist interpretations for Jewish self-glorification include John Milton (Jeffrey Shoulson’s 2012 Milton and the Rabbis: Hebraism, Hellenism, and Christianity), Leonardo Da Vinci (Leonardo Da Vinci’s Musical Gifts and Jewish Connections, 2010), and the scientific revolution (André Neher’s 1986 Jewish Thought and the Scientific Revolution of the Sixteenth Century). Dante Alighieri is now said to have been influenced by Kabbalah (Mark Mirsky’s 2003 Dante, Eros, and Kabbalah), while Louis Pasteur’s revolutionary research on immunization is now said to have been based on the Talmud. Other figures claimed as Jews, or to have been heavily influenced by Jews and Judaism, include Pythagoras (Louis Feldman’s 1996 Jewish and Gentile in the Ancient World), Christopher Columbus, Rembrandt (Steven Nadler’s 2003 Rembrandt’s Jews), and John Locke (Yechiel Leiter’s 2018 John Locke’s Political Philosophy and the Hebrew Bible).

Another aspect of Jewish self-glorification is implicit in claims that certain aspects of modern society would not exist without Jews, and even that outgroups need Jews in order to survive. A good example in this regard is the blurb for Norman Lebrecht’s latest book, Genius & Anxiety: How Jews Changed the World, in which it is argued: “Without Karl Landsteiner, for instance, there would be no blood transfusions or major surgery. Without Paul Ehrlich no chemotherapy. Without Siegfried Marcus no motor car. Without Rosalind Franklin genetic science would look very different. Without Fritz Haber there would not be enough food to sustain life on earth.” These incredibly hyperbolic claims are demonstrably false from a factual point of view. The case of Siegfried Marcus is worth discussing. The earliest form of the automobile was pioneered by François de Rivaz around 1808, and the four-stroke petrol internal combustion engine that still constitutes the most prevalent form of modern automotive propulsion was in fact patented by Nikolaus Otto in the 1860s. While some have claimed that Siegfried Marcus had developed a fully functioning motor car by the 1870s, there is remarkably little evidence for this. By contrast, in 1885, Karl Benz developed a petrol or gasoline powered automobile, and this is also considered to be the first “production” vehicle as Benz made several other identical copies. In either event, it is clear that Benz was operating independently of anything Marcus was building, and that Marcus himself was dependent on technological innovations developed by non-Jews in order to pursue his project. In short, without Siegfried Marcus we would indeed have the motor car, and since the chain of modern production goes back through the Benz technological genealogy, it can be confidently asserted that we did in fact have the motor car without Siegfried Marcus.

The same pattern can be ascertained in every example given in the blurb for Lebrecht’s book, and it is particularly ironic that Lebrecht should include Landsteiner who was an excellent example of a defector from the Jewish norm of high ethnic self-esteem. Landsteiner, a convert to Catholicism, took legal action in 1937 against an American publisher who had included him in the book Who’s Who in American Jewry and was highly ambivalent about his Jewish origins. One assumes that, had he been alive today, he would have taken legal action against Lebrecht also. The inclusion of Landsteiner in Lebrecht’s book is, however, indicative of another aspect of Jewish self-glorification — a tendency to exaggerate the Jewishness of the subject so that his ‘world-changing’ achievement is held to be the natural expression of his Jewish origins and identity.

This pattern is observed even in circumstances where there is ample evidence that the subject distanced themselves from Jews and Judaism, and even held hostile attitudes towards them. The best example in this regard is Spinoza, who was exiled from the Amsterdam Jewish community and later survived an assassination attempt arranged by the same Jews. Spinoza also wrote very disparagingly of Judaism and Jews in his 1670 Tractatus Theologico-Politicus in which he expressed his thoughts on Judaism. According to Spinoza, Judaism “commands the hatred of the enemy,” and is “carnal and particularistic.”[18]Strauss, L. (1965) Spinoza’s Critique of Religion New York, 18. Spinoza argued that Mosaic Law was “merely national,” and was “a particularistic and tribal law that serves no other end than the earthly or political felicity of the Jewish nation.” Claims that Judaism was a universal religion were seen as nonsense by Spinoza, who saw in the God of Israel only “a tribal God who is not the God of all mankind.” He stated that, in relation to the Jews “it is the hatred of the Nations that above all keeps them in existence as a people.”[19]Donagan, A. (1988) Spinoza New York, 9. Such statements and contexts haven’t prevented Spinoza from being adopted by an extraordinary Jewish academic cottage industry as the quintessential Jewish genius who saved outgroups and ushered in modernity with his putative Jewish brilliance.[20]See, for example, Harry Wolfson’s two-volume The Philosophy of Spinoza, Joseph Dunner’s Baruch Spinoza and Western Democracy, Lewis Feuer’s Spinoza and the Rise of Liberalism, Leon Roth’s Spinoza, Descartes, and Maimonides, the many works of Richard Popkin, Margaret Jacob’s The Radical Enlightenment, Marjorie Glicksman Grene’s Spinoza and the Sciences, Steven Nadler’s Spinoza: A Life and his Spinoza’s Heresy: Immortality and the Jewish Mind, Jonathan Israel’s Radical Enlightenment: Philosophy and the Making of Modernity, 1650—1750, Michael Mack’s Spinoza and the Specters of Modernity: The Hidden Enlightenment of Diversity from Spinoza to Freud, Steven Nadler’s A Book Forged in Hell: Spinoza’s Scandalous Treatise and the Birth of the Secular Age, and Rebecca Goldstein’s Betraying Spinoza: The Renegade Jew Who Gave Us Modernity.

A further aspect of Jewish self-glorification is the promotion or exaggeration of Jewish figures whose accomplishments would ordinarily (without Jewish self-glorification efforts) be regarded as moderate to mediocre. Lebrecht’s book is again a useful example because he cites figures like Franz Kafka and Marcel Proust as world-changing. While these authors produced works that are unquestionably unique and, if nothing else, interesting, their status as world-changing is hyperbolic by any objective standards. The works of both authors, which equally orbit the same themes of neuroticism and paranoia, did not resonate in the mass cultural consciousness in the same way that some of their non-Jewish literary contemporaries did (Joyce, Woolf, Beckett, Eliot, and Yeats to name just a few). And, in any event, there are questions as to why novelists (especially those of long-winded niche texts like Proust’s In Search of Lost Time) should be considered world-changing at all, especially in a century that saw multiple major wars, massive innovations against disease, and the development of the television and aircraft. Lebrecht’s focus on Jews is instead highly revealing of a certain type of Jewish perspective prominent in strongly identified Jews exhibiting high levels of ethnocentrism and ethnic self-esteem. From the perspective of these extraordinarily ethnocentric individuals, only Jews matter — regardless of the meaning or meaninglessness of their work or achievement. Perhaps the quintessential example in this regard is the reception by Jews of the Jewish Abstract Expressionist painter Mark Rothko. Sanderson (2011) comments:

For critics like [Klaus] Ottmann, Rothko’s genius is indisputable and he possessed an “extraordinary talent” that enabled him to transfer his metaphysical “impulses to the canvas with a power and magnetism that stuns viewers of his work. … In fact Rothko’s skill in achieving this result — whether intentional or not — perhaps explains why he was once called “the melancholic rabbi.” For prominent Jewish art historian Simon Schama, Rothko’s “big vertical canvasses of contrasting bars of colour, panels of colour stacked up on top of each other” qualify Rothko as “a maker of paintings as powerful and complicated as anything by his two gods — Rembrandt and Turner.” For the ethnocentric Schama “these [Rothko’s] paintings are equivalent of these old masters … Can art ever be more complete, more powerful? I don’t think so.”

A Rothko Masterpiece
A Rothko Masterpiece

In trying to explain these aspects of Jewish self-glorification, one can’t escape the possibility that the most ethnocentric strata of Jews have indeed retained the same perspective of Menahem Nahum, the eighteenth-century rabbi who insisted that all nations, with the exception of Jews, lack “understanding” and that no country can forgo Jewish leadership. It is likely that the level of ethnic self-esteem in such individuals is so high that they, in some sense, simply find it inconceivable that outgroups could succeed, let alone outperform Jews. Such a perspective would certainly go some way to explaining what appears to be an obsessive search for the often-imagined Jewish origins of leading Western figures and their accomplishments, and an equally obsessive search for Jewish figures who can be successfully boosted in the popular consciousness of outgroups, and positioned as lightning rods for Jewish ethnic pride.

Adaptive Qualities of Contemporary Jewish Self-Glorification

There are a number of features of Jewish self-glorification that could be regarded as highly adaptive in the contemporary social and cultural environment. Most obviously, by creating and sustaining an environment in which the in-group is seen as uniquely gifted and tasked with a world-historical mission, Jews promote high levels of ethnic cohesion and discourage defection. The most remarkable example of this dynamic at play can be found during the Middle Ages when some Jews opted for suicide over conversion to Christianity. The argument could be made that, for those choosing suicide, it was psychologically easier to die as a member of a gifted chosen people than to defect to a status that, in elements of Jewish theology, was less than human.

High self-esteem is also very strongly correlated with the General Factor of Personality (GFP), which in turn is associated with high degrees of social success and effectiveness.[21]Erdle, S., Irwing, P., Rushton, J. P., & Park, J. (2010). The General Factor of Personality and its relation to Self-Esteem in 628,640 Internet respondents. Personality and Individual Differences, 48(3), 343—346. In essence, by promoting high levels of in-group self-esteem, Jews make themselves more effective as individuals in acquiring, and helping to expand, positions of social, economic, and political influence for the broader group. In short, high self-esteem produces better and more effective activists. The generally higher level of self-esteem found among Jews, when compared to Catholics and Protestants[22]Rovner, R. A. (1981). Ethno-Cultural Identity and Self-Esteem: A Reapplication of Self-Attitude Formation Theories. Human Relations, 34(5), 427—434, would indeed suggest an elevated GFP and social effectiveness in general. It could also be reasonably posited that feelings of high ethnic self-esteem would provide encouragement and justification for psychological aggression and various forms of activism against outgroups, assumed to be intellectually or morally wrong in issues of inter-ethnic dispute, and this aggression could extend to attempts at cultural and political domination. An interesting case study in this respect is the Jewish New Left of the 1960s and their self-concept as engaging in “heroic action” against outgroup norms. Both Abbie Hoffman and Jerry Rubin quite literally used superhero allegories to describe themselves and their activities, with Rubin comparing himself to the Lone Ranger and Hoffman claiming “I’m just the guy who flies around in a cape and has the hots for Lois Lane.”[23]Jezer, M. (1993) Abbie Hoffman: American Rebel Rutgers University Press. In such cases, highly narcissistic Jews act aggressively in the cultures of outgroups at least partly, or ostensibly, in the belief that Jewish heroic “assistance” is required for the outgroup’s own good — with the outgroup patronizingly seen as incapable or unready to even understand what that “good” is. Some degree of self-deception among Jews would be required in such cases, and this is discussed further by the present writer elsewhere.

A further adaptive quality of contemporary Jewish self-glorification is that there is always a possibility that outgroups, in whole or in part, might be convinced by the cultural atmosphere of Jewish self-glorification, accept it as truth, and willingly submit themselves to Jewish leadership. This can occur on an individual level, in which outgroup members are so accustomed to believing that Jews are uniquely talented or gifted that they are more prone to following certain Jewish ‘guru’ figures, or it can occur on a more broad ethnic basis in which Jews in general are regarded as a special people by outgroups. In the former case, there are certainly no shortage of examples of Jews of moderate significance gaining very widespread followings and acclaim from outgroup members, with all the allusions to “Jewish genius” one might expect from such a scenario. In the latter case, Jews have long held a privileged status as victims and gurus on the Left (though this is now waning), and Jews and Israel continue to hold Christian Zionists and aspects of the European Right in thrall, and are indeed regarded by many as “the apple of God’s eye.” Examples of non-religious ethnic Europeans producing texts glorifying Jews include Paul Johnson’s 1987 A History of the Jews and Thomas Cahill’s 1998 panegyric The Gifts of the Jews.

Yet another adaptive quality of Jewish self-glorification, and related to the one above, is that it can act to simultaneously reduce ethnic pride among outgroups and elevate Jewish prestige. If highly ethnocentric Jews can successfully disseminate the falsehood that the outgroup’s accomplishments are in fact Jewish accomplishments, then there will be a clear diminishment in the level of ethnic self-esteem in the outgroup. A similar effect can be accomplished by culturally “spamming” the outgroup with discussions of Jewish genius and exceptionalism, and these can be exacerbated further by combining such efforts with cultural “spamming” depicting Jews as the blameless victims of irrational violence perpetrated by the same outgroup. In this case, the Jews become intellectual and moral heroes, boosting in-group self-esteem, while the outgroup is paralyzed by a twin sense of inferiority and guilt.

The converse, of course, is that Jews have been prominent in promoting White guilt—in effect glorifying their own past while vilifying the people and culture of the West. Mainstream media messages promoting White guilt are ubiquitous, and Jewish involvement with the media and projects such as “Whiteness Studies” is notorious.

Maladaptive Qualities of Jewish Self-Glorification

The most obvious maladaptive quality of Jewish self-glorification is its potential to provoke anti-Semitism, as seen in the quote opening this essay. It is especially interesting that the rise of modern forms of anti-Semitism coincided with the rise of European nationalisms, which could in some sense be regarded as a form of political activity designed to raise ethnic self-esteem. Jewish attempts to assert cultural superiority over the highly-accomplished and pride-filled Germans of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries appear to have been an especially volatile source of ethnic friction.

Jewish self-glorification is also something that needs to be carefully expressed, and even highly ethnocentric Jews appear to be aware of safe limits to the expression of their ethnic pride. For example, Cecil Roth in his The Jewish Contribution to Civilisation wrote:

The Jew is distinguished, perhaps, by a slightly greater degree of intellectualisation, possibly by a freshness of outlook, natural in one whose approach tends to be external; and, in consequence, by a faculty for synthesis and for introducing new ideas. He is apt to show, in fact, certain characteristics inevitable in persons who belong, through the circumstances of their history, to a single sociological group. To say more is hazardous. [emphasis added]

Not only is Roth’s comment an excellent example of an environmentalist explanation of Jewish superiority, but his caution is also extremely noteworthy. Jewish self-glorification can be hazardous because the very point of contending for credit for a particular invention/accomplishment is a potential point of ethnic conflict. Additionally, Jewish self-glorification takes the risk of publicly posturing Jews as a group, a position that is normally avoided and downplayed by Jews in almost every other cultural scenario. Jews must also exercise caution in what exactly the claim credit for. Claiming Karl Marx, for example, despite his baptism and some anti-Semitic remarks, is an endeavor not without risk, and the same can be said for texts like Neal Gabler’s 1998 An Empire of Their Own: How the Jews Invented Hollywood. Jewish claims of responsibility for creating “modernity” and the “modern world” also assume a level of cultural consensus that these are in fact good things worth taking the credit for. One imagines that if a cultural consensus was reached that “modernity” was bad, or negative for Europeans, texts like Norman Lebrecht’s latest book would quietly disappear.

Most catastrophically, Jewish self-glorification efforts can potentially be identified for what they truly are, with these efforts failing and then in fact coming to reflect badly on Jews. Writing in the 1970s, Dutch Spinoza expert, Hubertus G. Hubbeling, expressed awareness of the fundamental and longstanding difference between Jews and non-Jews in interpretations of Spinoza’s importance. Hubbeling, with barely concealed irritation at the specifically Jewish character of the effort to exaggerate Spinoza’s significance, wrote towards the end of his Spinoza’s Methodology that:

there are some Jewish writers who emphasize very strongly the importance of Spinoza’s contribution to the development of democratic ideas. Joseph Dunner, for example, places him above Locke in this respect. L. Feuer makes of Spinoza the first democratic political philosopher: ‘The political philosophy of Spinoza is the first statement in history of the standpoint of democratic liberalism’ … According to the opinion of the present writer Spinoza’s importance is exaggerated here.[24]Hubbeling, H.G. (1964) Spinoza’s Methodology Royal Van Gorcum, Netherlands. [emphasis added]

If the full implications and impact of Jewish self-glorification became common knowledge, fuelling anti-Semitism, it would clearly have a deleterious effect on the Jewish position in Western culture and society.

Conclusion

Although Jewish self-glorification is almost entirely absent from existing studies of anti-Semitism, it has played an important role in generating inter-ethnic friction over historical time. Jewish self-glorification, which continues to thrive both in Israel and the Diaspora, should be regarded as an extreme example of both positive and negative ethnocentrism — that it reinforces Jewish in-group loyalties and self-esteem while weakening the loyalties and self-esteem of outgroups. At time of this writing, Jewish self-glorification is highly adaptive for Jews who occupy a position of cultural prestige in almost all sections of Western culture and society, and who use self-glorification to secure this prestige and expand it further. Jewish self-glorification has been highly successful in boosting Jewish activism against outgroups, and together with victimhood narratives, which are themselves a form of historical glorification, have succeeded in paralyzing European outgroups with a twin sense of inferiority and guilt. Attempts to further lower European ethnic pride, through accusations of putative historical evils or by co-opting, relativizing, or universalizing their ethnic achievements will continue to be a key point of inter-ethnic conflict between Europeans and Jews. A crucial task for those interested in improving the prospects of the European peoples will therefore rest to some extent in finding ways to elevate group pride and creating a cultural consensus to diminish that of the Jews.

Notes

[1] Saxe, L. et al. “Measuring the Size and Characteristics of American Jewry: A New Paradigm to Understand an Ancient People,” in Rehbun, U (ed) The Social Scientific Study of Jewry. Sources, Approaches, Debates (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014), 37-8.

[2] See, for example, the Charter Decreed for the Jews of Prussia (April 17, 1750) by Frederick II, which outlined the number of Jews, by occupation, permitted to reside in Berlin.

[3] Hartley, E. L., Rosenbaum, M., & Schwartz, S. (1948). Children’s Perceptions of Ethnic Group Membership. The Journal of Psychology, 26(2), 387—397.

[4] Smooha, S. (1987). Jewish and Arab ethnocentrism in Israel. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 10(1), 1—26.

[5] Brown, L. M., McNatt, P. S., & Cooper, G. D. (2003). Ingroup romantic preferences among Jewish and non-Jewish White undergraduates. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 27(3), 335—354.

[6] Cofnas, N. (2018). Judaism as a Group Evolutionary Strategy. Human Nature, 29(2), 134—156, (153).

[7] Rosenberg, M. (1989) Society and the adolescent self-image (Rev. ed), Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

[8] Markstrom, C. A., Berman, R. C., & Brusch, G. (1998). An Exploratory Examination of Identity Formation among Jewish Adolescents According to Context. Journal of Adolescent Research, 13(2), 202—222.

[9] Rutchik, A. (1968). Self‐Esteem and Jewish Identification. Jewish Education, 38(2), 40—46.

[10] Rovner, R. A. (1981). Ethno-Cultural Identity and Self-Esteem: A Reapplication of Self-Attitude Formation Theories. Human Relations, 34(5), 427—434.

[11] Hofer, P. (1989). The Role of Manipulation in the Antisocial Personality. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 33(2), 91—101.

[12] De Keersmaecker, J., Onraet, E., Lepouttre, N., & Roets, A. (2017). The opposite effects of actual and self-perceived intelligence on racial prejudice. Personality and Individual Differences, 112, 136—138.

[13] Patai, R. (1996) The Jewish Mind Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 324.

[14] Dresser, D and Friedman, L. (2004) American Jewish Filmmakers University of Illinois, 7.

[15] Popkin, R.H. (1978) ‘Spinoza and La Peyrere’ in R. Shahan and J. Biro, Spinoza: New Perspectives Norman, Oklahoma.

[16] Popkin, R.H. (1990) Essays on the Context, Nature, and Influence of Isaac Newton’s Theology Boston: Kluwer.

[17] Quoted in Biemann, A (2012) Dreaming of Michelangelo: Jewish Variations on a Modern Theme Stanford, California.

[18] Strauss, L. (1965) Spinoza’s Critique of Religion New York, 18.

[19] Donagan, A. (1988) Spinoza New York, 9.

[20] See, for example, Harry Wolfson’s two-volume The Philosophy of Spinoza, Joseph Dunner’s Baruch Spinoza and Western Democracy, Lewis Feuer’s Spinoza and the Rise of Liberalism, Leon Roth’s Spinoza, Descartes, and Maimonides, the many works of Richard Popkin, Margaret Jacob’s The Radical Enlightenment, Marjorie Glicksman Grene’s Spinoza and the Sciences, Steven Nadler’s Spinoza: A Life and his Spinoza’s Heresy: Immortality and the Jewish Mind, Jonathan Israel’s Radical Enlightenment: Philosophy and the Making of Modernity, 1650—1750, Michael Mack’s Spinoza and the Specters of Modernity: The Hidden Enlightenment of Diversity from Spinoza to Freud, Steven Nadler’s A Book Forged in Hell: Spinoza’s Scandalous Treatise and the Birth of the Secular Age, and Rebecca Goldstein’s Betraying Spinoza: The Renegade Jew Who Gave Us Modernity.

[21] Erdle, S., Irwing, P., Rushton, J. P., & Park, J. (2010). The General Factor of Personality and its relation to Self-Esteem in 628,640 Internet respondents. Personality and Individual Differences, 48(3), 343—346.

[22] Rovner, R. A. (1981). Ethno-Cultural Identity and Self-Esteem: A Reapplication of Self-Attitude Formation Theories. Human Relations, 34(5), 427—434

[23] Jezer, M. (1993) Abbie Hoffman: American Rebel Rutgers University Press.

[24] Hubbeling, H.G. (1964) Spinoza’s Methodology Royal Van Gorcum, Netherlands.

(Republished from The Occidental Observer by permission of author or representative)
 
• Category: History, Ideology • Tags: American Media, Anti-Semitism, Jews 
Hide 279 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Other major European figures and events that have been subjected to revisionist interpretations for Jewish self-glorification include John Milton (Jeffrey Shoulson’s 2012 Milton and the Rabbis: Hebraism, Hellenism, and Christianity), Leonardo Da Vinci (Leonardo Da Vinci’s Musical Gifts and Jewish Connections, 2010), and the scientific revolution (André Neher’s 1986 Jewish Thought and the Scientific Revolution of the Sixteenth Century). Dante Alighieri is now said to have been influenced by Kabbalah (Mark Mirsky’s 2003 Dante, Eros, and Kabbalah), while Louis Pasteur’s revolutionary research on immunization is now said to have been based on the Talmud. Other figures claimed as Jews, or to have been heavily influenced by Jews and Judaism, include Pythagoras (Louis Feldman’s 1996 Jewish and Gentile in the Ancient World), Christopher Columbus, Rembrandt (Steven Nadler’s 2003 Rembrandt’s Jews), and John Locke (Yechiel Leiter’s 2018 John Locke’s Political Philosophy and the Hebrew Bible).

    • Replies: @M_Young
  2. Rational says:

    SELF-ADULATION IS A SIGN OF SECRET SELF-DISGUST.

    Thanks for the excellent article, Sir. Well researched, and well written, and exposes one more Jewish pathology—self adulation.

    Self adulation is a pathological disorder, a type of shamelessness and a denial of self-hatred. Judaists are repulsed by their gutter barbaric religion based on the most barbaric text, the OT and sick practices like male genital mutilation by mohels (b’peh) and rampant incest. This makes them feel depressed and leads to self-disgust and self-revulsion and a desire to get away from this barbaric cult.

    So the rabbis and their “leaders” invent all sorts of lies to whitewash Judaism and Judaists and resort to extreme self-adulation, to brainwash themselves and other sheeple to remain in the fold.

  3. “…sick practices like male genital mutilation by mohels…”

    This likely source, among others, of depression and self-revulsion has been generally suppressed and therefore deserves some illumination.

    [MORE]

    Sigmund Freud’s article in 1908, “On the Sexual Theories of Children“, in which he conjectured about “penis envy” in the context of his constructed female Oedipus complex, may very well have been merely a subliminal projection of his own unstated feeling of relative penile inadequacy, derived from the sacrificial Jewish mutilation ritual at infancy, upon which this prized male possession must necessarily develop to be somewhat smaller than it otherwise would have become, due to the missing circulatory support for the involuntarily amputated foreskin, as well as resulting in partial dysfunction due to unnatural dryness.

    Surely many Jewish males must suffer from such feelings of inadequacy – a different type of penis envy than that allegedly perceived by women – at an emotional level, though they would be reluctant to admit this, so indulging in collective self-glorification would be one compensatory mechanism to cope with such a deficiency to their own non-aesthetic centerpiece. Even if it were substantially elongated, a woman might then refer to it derisively as a shlong, which is nothing other than Viennese dialect for the word “snake”, also used in Yiddish, but nonetheless a snake has distinctively negative connotations, probably more so in the minds of females. Individuals like Philip Ross, Harvey Weinstein, and Jeffrey Epstein, for instance, have externalized such personal physical inadequacies in perverse ways.

    It is noteworthy that just a few years earlier, in 1903 and 1906, Richard Ungewitter, the pioneer of the modern nudist movement, had published two books on social nudity, People naked again and Nudity from the point of view of historical development, health, morality and art, respectively. His third book, Nudity, appeared in 1908, the same year Freud concocted female “penis envy”.

    Ungewitter’s books were very popular. at the time He encouraged outdoor nude bathing and hiking. Essentially, he advocated physical fitness and aesthetics as a form of positive eugenics. In 1910 he wrote explicitly (as translated from German at Wikipedia) in Nudity and Culture what would have already been implicitly understood by many connoisseurs of nudism long before:

    If every German woman saw a naked Germanic man more often, so many would not run after exotic alien races … for the sake of healthy reproductive selection I therefore demand nudism, so that the strong and healthy will mate, but weaklings will not succeed in reproducing.

    Since the Viennese intellectual and artist society was in tune with such concurrent developments through the exchange of ideas within the coffee house culture there, it is not unlikely that Freud and others would have been well aware of this emerging trend , along with the implications for themselves. Jewish men would have been conspicuously recognizable in the milieu of outdoor nudity, which was a frequent visual theme of such Expressionist artists as Ernst Ludwig Kirchner, who formed the group “The Bridge” with other architecture students at the university in Dresden in 1905, and additional artists, such as Hermann Max Pechstein, Emil Nolde, and Otto Mueller, who joined later.

    Fine arts museums are filled with sculptures and paintings of naked men and boys, none of which are mutilated in the middle. Appearing so unnaturally different at the very center, regardless whether one participates in social nudity or not, would thus be an understandable source of frustration that will surely provoke an urge at redirection.

    Nowadays some guys who had to endure the trauma of mutilation early on in their lives are determined to rectify their condition; this is trending even in Israel:

    Wikipedia article in Hebrew on foreskin restoration
    https://he.wikipedia.org/wiki/שחזור_עורלה

    Painting by Max Pechstein – 1910 – Bathers in Moritzburg – Oil on Canvas

    • Agree: MikeatMikedotMike
  4. If they put half the effort they do in purloining the culture and ideas of other people they might be able to lay claim to a culture of their own that exceeds the compilation of kosher cookbooks and vaudeville based cinematography. Nobody said they weren’t able, they just aren’t very original as a group. This is a natural consequence in a group of people policed for centuries under the iron grip of the Rabinnate.

  5. Dear Mr Joyce,
    I would like to name that I am not Jewish and my background is that I
    as an historian have found the influences from Jewish patrons and entrepreneurs in 18th and early 19 Cent. so evident that I spent almost ten years to follow the item in Europe and the US after I have noticed the subject on a more modest level in the Swedish cities of Stockholm and Gothenburgh. I have had no intension to glorify the Jews but objectively write about their rôle in mainly urban history.
    My family came as huguenots to Stockholm in 1670 (see Le Monde des huguenots. De la France des guerres de Religion au Stockholm de la noblesse marchande. Honoré Champion, Paris).

    Yours sincerely,
    Fredric Bedoire
    professor em. in architectural history
    Stockholm

  6. @Fredric Bedoire

    No mentally sane person would deny influence of various Jewish individuals (or groups) in numerous periods of European history. Also, there had been highly creative Jews & men of Jewish extraction (not necessarily identifying with Judaism) who strongly & positively contributed to European & world culture, especially in past 150-200 years.

    Just, there is a tendency among some (many?) modern, highly ethnocentic Jews to vastly exaggerate their role in the birth of the modern world. Despite author’s clear & all-too-visible misojudaism, the articles he addresses (by certain Lebrecht & a few others) are examples of absurdly comical self- delusional fantasies anyone conversant with history, science, culture, philosophy …. would find as extravagant & nebulous as a David Lynch movie.

    • Agree: TKK
  7. Wow, great article! I’ve been studying “Jewish politics” intensively for some time, and your article really fills in some blanks.

    In fact, I’m working on a book tentatively titled Jews 101. It’s essentially a reference book focusing on the political arena. It will focus on some of the more common questions about Jews…

    What is a Jew?
    What are Ashkenazi Jews?
    What is the relationship between Judaism and Christianity?
    What are the various theories about the Holocaust?
    Do Jews really control the economy? The media? The U.S. government?
    What’s the truth about various conspiracy theories involving Jews, including the infamous Protocols?

    I wanted to research the competition and was amazed to discover that there is none (to my knowledge). There are countless books about Jewish history, Jewish culture, the Holocaust, etc., etc. But I haven’t yet found a single comprehensive book that might be described as a Jewish/Judaic political primer. I haven’t found such a book written by Jews or by truthers, or even by NeoNazi types.

    And so I’d like to ask if you’re aware of such a book?

    Thank you.

    • Replies: @Wolfgang Otto
    , @Wally
  8. Good piece. Up to the usual Joyce standard. Demonstrates the well-known principle that the social construct of so-called “anti-semitism” is merely projection of jewish hyperethnocentrism and hatred of the Other… onto the targets of that hatred.

    As indicated by the above quote from the nineteenth-century German historian and politician Heinrich von Treitschke, self-glorification has long been a noted feature of Jewish ethnocentrism and has frequently contributed to anti-Jewish feeling in host populations

    Ethnonarcissism.

    As such, it shouldn’t be surprising that there is very little objective scholarly literature that explicitly deals with the way in which Jews see and regard one another, and how they regard themselves as Jews. More generally, it has been noted that Jews are averse to being objectively studied at all, and are notoriously unresponsive to census questions, resulting in a persistent inability to accurately determine their population size in almost every Diaspora country

    ….

    while studies of Jewish ethnocentrism carried out in the last fifty years are rare, objective studies of Jews have frequently been regarded as controversial or even as examples of prejudice.

    Narrative control is an obsession with the Tribe — even more so when it’s their own narrative. It’s much easier to construct — and promote — a narrative based on:

    – Purely abstract theoretical constructs
    – Individual, difficult-to-falsify anecdotes
    – Emotionally-based “moral” appeals to vaguely-reified neologisms/ redefined terms

    than to constrain it by tying it tightly to objectively-verifiable facts about the physical world — and hinder any desired narrative shifts.

    In plain terms, Jews, still enjoying a “surprisingly high” rate of endogamy, can afford the collateral damage of moderate levels of intermarriage, and in some respects the panic it causes can even be beneficial in facilitating the continued genetic distinctiveness of the Jewish gene pool among the strongly-identified and highly ethnocentric core of the population.

    As long as the rate of “loss” is sustainable, they’re losing less tribally-centered individuals into the general population — thus maintaining/ enhancing the hyperethnocentrism of the remaining group. Sharpening the knife, as it were. Doesn’t really matter the extent to which the characteristic is culturally vs. genetically determined — the effect is largely the same.

    …the very strong group reaction towards those Jews who are even slightly critical of Jewish identity and “being Jewish,” most obviously in the form of the obviously excessive “self-hating Jew” accusation that is often made against Jewish defectors from the self-esteem norm.

    The worst thing that a member of the Tribe can be called is a “self-hating jew” — someone who has too little group identity/ in-group preference.

    The worst thing that a white can be is a so-called “racist” — someone who exhibits too much group identity/ in-group preference. Or in the current year, a person of European ancestry who fails to exhibit active out-group preference.

    Hmmm… which group benefits from this situation?

    A fundamental problem with many of these texts, and a contributing factor to anti-Semitism, is that they very frequently involve Jews taking exclusive credit for accomplishments in which their role has been disputed, minor, or even entirely absent.

    The inverse of the well-known phenomenon that all jewish criminals are “white.”

    Perhaps the quintessential example in this regard is the reception by Jews of the Jewish Abstract Expressionist painter Mark Rothko.

    Tom Wolfe’s The Painted Word also comes to mind — the putative art object is nearly irrelevant; it’s the marketing/ pilpul to promote it that’s the real art…

  9. ‘… Lebrecht’s book is simply part of a steady production of texts in which Jews celebrate themselves…’

    One example of this you miss, probably because of the misleading title, is The Invention of the Middle Ages.

    Having an interest in history in general, and the Middle Ages in particular, I picked this one up. ‘Oh, this could be good: how the concept of the ‘Middle Ages’ appeared in the first place, has developed and evolved, and so on. Let’s check it out.’

    Ha ha ha. There was nothing along these lines that I can recall at all. It was simply a series of laudatory thumbnail biographies of various medievalists, starting in the late nineteenth century and moving forward.

    After a while I noticed something: they were all Jewish medievalists — and the author was Jewish as well. It wasn’t exactly subtle.

  10. I have learned to ignore laudatory book reviews in the Jewish press; the principle criterion for praise seems to be that the author is Jewish, and the book will be praised even if it’s emphatically mediocre.

    I encountered this with Sebag-Montefiore’s Dunkirk: to the Last Man. It was extravagantly lauded in Haaretz, so I picked it up.

    It was useful enough; but apparently written for a quick buck. It’s basically a compilation of excerpts from British regimental war diaries, with some connecting commentary by the author. Not bad for what it is — but not a landmark in the field of history.

  11. ‘… The inclusion of Landsteiner in Lebrecht’s book is, however, indicative of another aspect of Jewish self-glorification — a tendency to exaggerate the Jewishness of the subject so that his ‘world-changing’ achievement is held to be the natural expression of his Jewish origins and identity…’

    To be fair here, just about everyone seems to do this. The Irish seem to make considerably more of the influence of Irish monks in the Dark Ages than any serious historian of the period does. The ethnically ambiguous Copernicus becomes emphatically Polish. Every mulatto, quadroon, or octoroon who accomplished anything at all becomes ‘black.’

    I recall a visit I made to ‘Walhalla,’ a spectacular temple to Germanic greatness built around 1900 on a hillside overlooking the Danube near Regensburg. It has busts of just about every great German you can think of — including quite a few that are only very arguably German.

    About all that seems necessary to fall victim to the fault you describe is a certain degree of national insecurity.

  12. @Thus Spake

    ‘If they put half the effort they do in purloining the culture and ideas of other people they might be able to lay claim to a culture of their own that exceeds the compilation of kosher cookbooks and vaudeville based cinematography. Nobody said they weren’t able, they just aren’t very original as a group. This is a natural consequence in a group of people policed for centuries under the iron grip of the Rabinnate.’

    I think there’s a lot to this. I think the notion of ‘Jews’ as a single group is a canard to begin with, but it is true that certain groups of Jews — German Jews in particular — have posted achievements completely out of proportion to their numbers.

    However, they have done this, not while busy among themselves behind the ghetto walls, but out in the wider world, among that great sea of gentiles.

    The ‘great Jew’ does not become great as a member of the tribe, but as a leading light in some gentile community. Didn’t Einstein finish up at the Princeton Institute for Advanced Studies? It certainly wasn’t at some yeshiva in Israel or even Brandeis.

    Speaking of which, that’s rather telling. There have been many Jews who have excelled, and there are many Jewish institutions of learning. However, the former have rarely been at the latter.

    • Agree: Charon
    • Replies: @Wally
  13. @David Blomstrom

    Andrew Joyce wrote an article about such a hypothetical book which had been fictionally called “The Necessity of Anti-Semitism”, he then goes on to describe in detail what the actual contents of that book might be. It’s a fairly comprehensive look given the short length, and given that it’s purely concerned with the anti-semitic perspective it may be limited in scope, but it really is a novel idea. Highly recommend reading the article regardless, well actually all of Joyce’s work, he is pretty much unmatched.

    https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2019/09/27/the-necessity-of-anti-semitism/

    and another, that I consider one of his best and most original writings, you will always learn at least something when reading his work:

    https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2018/09/23/modify-the-standards-of-the-in-group-on-jews-and-mass-communications-part-one-of-two/

    • Replies: @David Blomstrom
  14. @Wolfgang Otto

    Wow, thanks for the tips – those articles are some of the best I’ve read yet.

    I worked as a teacher for the Seattle School District for sixteen years until I got laid off (after I became a whistle-blower). I loved the kids – which is precisely why I came to hate the unbelievably corrupt bureaucracy. I even began running for public office. Yet it was more than fifteen years after I got laid off that I discovered the Jewish mob – most of the media whores, corrupt school officials and even teachers union officials who had stabbed me in the back were Jews.

    A few years ago, I ran for state offie – Washington State Governor – becoming the first candidate in state history to take on the Jews as part of my campaign. Check out my website http://www.jewarchy.com

    I’m thinking of running for office again next year. Things are looking more interesting by the day. 😉

    Thanks again for the tips.

  15. The ancient Jews invented nothing.

    One only needs to familiarize him/herself with their Tanakh/Torah to see how they plagiarized the stories, concepts and beliefs of others to make up for their absolute insignificance.

    Let’s consider what Thomas Payne had to say …

    The Jews, on the contrary, were ignorant of astronomy, and of science in general, and if a religion founded upon astronomy fell into their hands, it is almost certain it would be corrupted. We do not read in the history of the Jews, whether in the Bible or elsewhere, that they were the inventors or the improvers of any one art or science. Even in the building of this temple, the Jews did not know how to square and frame the timber for beginning and carrying on the work, and Solomon was obliged to send to Hiram, King of Tyre (Zidon) to procure workmen; “for thou knowest, (says Solomon to Hiram, i Kings v. 6.) that there is not among us any that can skill to hew timber like unto the Zidonians.” This temple was more properly Hiram’s Temple than Solomon’s, and if the Masons derive any thing from the building of it, they owe it to the Zidonians and not to the Jews.

    Thomas Paine’s Origin of Free-Masonry
    http://freemasonry.bcy.ca/history/paine_t.html

    Modern Jews are not any different. Their emergence as a “superior race” is nothing but poppycock propaganda aimed at supporting the Anglo-Saxon-American colonial project known as Israel.

    • Replies: @Miggle
  16. anon[957] • Disclaimer says:

    every new ruling class need to justify their dominium the same as the medieval nobility tracing their ancestors to the Trojan Wars and they as the representative of the unbroken linage that gave birth to all the acomplishment of europe filling the gaps with half truths and outrageous lies like jews are doing now, the difference with jews is that they have pushed their narrative to a new level of apropiation and self deception that even nazis would be shamed off sign of their culprit counciousness.

    but dont despair the empire of lies will fall and the legitimate king of the west will raise to throw the impostors to hell where they belong , its a matter of time.

  17. Anon[337] • Disclaimer says:

    Self-adulation is a characteristic of most intellectual minds, not just Jewish ones. I’ve known a lot of scientists in my day, and nearly all of them were/are smug about their brains. Much of the problem is that being a smart kid isn’t useful when you’re being pushed around by the jocks and bullies. Smart kids tend to respond to physical humiliation by becoming more egoistical than before as a psychological defense mechanism. There’s also rationalization. If you play a game and lose, it’s hard to deny the fact that you lost. But when you lose an argument, the intellect constructs all sorts of excuses, such as ‘I didn’t really lose, and I am simply not wrong,’ that leave the ego intact.

    This is why it’s so hard to persuade a liberal to see reality as it is. The psychological defense mechanisms are too strong, long-standing, and too deeply implanted.

    • Replies: @Mj
  18. Jews have a joke among themselves that goes something like this: A class of schoolchildren is asked to produce an essay about giraffes; little Tom Smith hands in a piece on the neck; little John Baker writes about its diet; others write about the tail, the environment, and so on. Then little Benny Cohen hands in his paper, and it is titled “The Giraffe and the Jews.”

    A similar one I read — can’t recall if it was in a Jewish or non-Jewish publication, but probably the former:

    Mrs. Applebaum’s neighbor bangs on the door and rushes in breathlessly. “Oy vey!” she says. “Have you heard?”

    Mrs. Applebaum: “Heard what?”

    Neighbor: “A lion has escaped from the zoo!”

    Mrs. Applebaum, after a pause: “Is that good for the Jews or bad for the Jews?”

  19. anon19 says:

    Jews have done a great deal of harm throughout history, particularly to western nations. This is just a fact. A Jew-less western world would be very different today and would have developed along much different lines.

  20. Trends in modern Jewish academia and culture suggest that a quite literal absorption is taking place, whereby almost every major figure of Western culture is being reinterpreted by Jews as owing much of their accomplishment to Jewish sources.

    While such Jewish claims are more superficially believable, they still resemble those of the black lunatics who maintain that the pyramids and wall paintings of ancient Egypt are evidence of the greatness of sub-Saharan Africans. Or that the Greek thinkers of classical times were really Africans.

  21. utu says:

    Nothing new. Nothing has changed since antiquity. Plagiarization and appropriation of Western cultural achievements goes back to antiquity. This was Jewish coping mechanism when confronted with superior civilization:

    Antisemitism: Its History and Causes. Bernard Lazare 1894
    https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/lazare-bernard/1894/antisemitism/ch02.htm

    Not less than the Stoics did the Sophists detest the Jews. But the causes of their hatred were not religious, but, I should say, rather literary. From Ptolemy Philadelphus, until the middle of the third century, the Alexandrian Jews, with the intent of sustaining and strengthening their propaganda, gave themselves to forging all texts which were capable of lending support to their cause. The verses of Aeschylus, of Sophocles, of Euripides, the pretended oracles of Orpheus, preserved in Aristobulus and the Stromata of Clement of Alexandria were thus made to glorify the one God and the Sabbath. Historians were falsified or credited with the authorship of books they had never written. It is thus that a History of the Jews was published under the name of Hecataeus of Abdera. The most important of these inventions was the Sibylline oracles, a fabrication of the Alexandrian Jews, which prophesied the future advent of the reign of the one God. They found imitators, however, for since the Sibyl had begun to speak, in the second century before Christ, the first Christians also made her speak. The Jews would appropriate to themselves even the Greek literature and philosophy. In a commentary on the Pentateuch, which has been preserved for us by Eusebius,l7 Aristobulus attempted to show that Plato and Aristotle had found their metaphysical and ethical ideas in an old Greek translation of the Pentateuch. The Greeks were greatly incensed at such treatment of their literature and philosophy, and out of revenge they circulated the slanderous stories of Manetho, adapting them to those of the Bible, to the great fury of the Jews; thus the confusion of languages was identified with the myth of Zeus robbing the animals of their common language. The Sophists, wounded by the conduct of the Jews, would speak against them in their teaching.

    Perhaps we should rather concentrate on lack of Jewish achievements in arts, literature, mathematics, science and philosophy. Take for example mathematics. It is interesting that Jews who were preoccupied with banking (numbers) and real estate (geometry) had done nothing in mathematics. They were absolutely not interested in abstraction of mathematics and generalization of ideas that naturally should come from dealing with numbers and geometric measurements. I saw one hilarious “proof” by circa 17/18 century rabbi from eastern Poland of first five digits of pi. It was numerology and Kabbalah “proof”. This is pure obscurantism.

    Or look later at 19/20 century Yiddish literature. It was all imitation with hefty dose of Jewish schlock and schmaltz. They love schmaltz. They still do though in the mainstream now, in literature and movies. People lost ability to detect it because it became a mainstream now. We got too Judaised to see it.

    • Agree: Pheasant
    • Replies: @ivan
    , @Republic
  22. Matt. 21
    42 Jesus saith unto them, Did ye never read in the scriptures, The stone which the builders rejected, the same is become the head of the corner: this is the Lord’s doing, and it is marvellous in our eyes?

    43 Therefore say I unto you, The kingdom of God shall be taken from you, and given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof.

    it’s incredible the writer quotes the gospel to make his point. the fate of euro nationalism will become reversion to pre Christian, paganism if you mislead the youth thus.

    give the devil his due. modernity is all about elevating money over religion and jews are very good at making money. when the only measure of man becomes his bank book, the only worth of a country its GDP, no use blaming those who have “made it” if they think they are superior.

  23. sally says:
    @Bardon Kaldian

    No mentally sane person would deny influence of various Jewish individuals (or groups) in numerous periods of European history. Also, there had been highly creative Jews & men of Jewish extraction (not necessarily identifying with Judaism) who strongly & positively contributed to European & world culture, especially in past 150-200 years. re Bardon Kaldian @6..

    The crux of financial wealth universally shared based on need that has allowed Jewish influence peddling to flourish throughout modern economic history explains it all. The Jewish bankers (sometimes called organized criminals) used their wealth to exploit Jewish geno-typed groups and to use persons within those groups to promote the propaganda of Jewish influence throughout the entire world. Its a propaganda designed to make a few persons wealthy.. introduced into every society that has ever hosted Jews. The entry of Jewish financial power is accomplished though local Jewish genetically similar groups. Jewish financial power remotely invades and locally promotes the Jewish influence into the nations that host these genetically similar Jewish identity groups. <=sometimes the GSJIGs are very small indeed, but with sufficient external financial backing they can behave as giants.

    Financial power is used to remotely strengthen and power the infiltration of ethnocentric Jewish self glorification and Jewish opportunity preference. Its a infectious vector used to invade every society that has ever played host to the geno-type called Jew. Jewish self glorification is like a cancer, after initial differentiation into the bettered self, the aberrant cell begins to build a wall about itself to separate itself from the host elements that surround it, to detach itself from the norms of that host. This tumor, a product of but a single cell, or multi tumors, each products of single mutant cells, propagate through, and differentiate over and over again, during each subsequent production of progeny. Self Glorification powered by external and in time self sustaining developed internal Jewish power grows and grows and eventually becomes a noticeable burden to its host society. Self-glorification is merely the weakness that is to gain entry the real object of promoting self glorification as a function of group loyalty is to deny access to external sometimes massive in size groups resident within the host society that need to be weakened and denied.

    The icons of prestige (universities, books, school histories and news articles) must be controlled.. for that propaganda is developed.

    • Replies: @Amerimutt Golems
  24. This is an amazing piece that I will have to read more thoroughly but suffice it to say, the Jews’ entire religion is a bunch of fantasy stories about themselves. This is no different. Their religion has no substance outside of themselves. How did they ever get to be so incredibly and destructively TRIBAL? Tribalism is rightly viewed as the antithesis of civilization, and thus Jews have become the destroyers of civilization while believing themselves to be the creators of it.

    • Replies: @Raindrop
  25. ivan says:

    Like many I’ve learnt to take Jewish accounts of the their tribe’s greatness with a large dollop of salt. From mystification over how anyone can read a tedious book like the one by Marcel Proust, to the absurdity of Schiama’s account of Jewish greatness in art. In truth medieval Jewish art is so tacky as to be largely worthless. Compare the contemporaneous art produced by those who built the cathedrals and artists like Giotto, to the flea-market affairs produced by Jewish artists of that time. Once one gets beyond the self-referential nature of their later artistic productions in modern art and literature, their mutual back stroking, as in the nonsense by Rothko, one is awed by the vastness of the con game that has been played on the modern mind. I mean who wasn’t told that one simply had to read Derrida before reading anything, or Walter Benjamin who apparently dissected European literature to the point one doesn’t need to read it anymore?

    It got to a point that whenever I see a blurb praise by say someone like Cyntia Ozick, I just thank these Jewish savants silently and put the book back in its shelf.

  26. They name that ethnocentrism «Chutzpah»

  27. gotmituns says:

    It’s not a question of Jews “thinking differently.” Jews are just amoral and whatever they desire, they do whatever is necessary to obtain it. Jew just have the human countenance, but not human concepts. In a way, they’re further down the scale than negroes.

    • Replies: @Republic
  28. We got here perhaps 5-7 regular Jews, usually- from what I’ve read- fine & reasonable people (with one-two nutjobs); then, we have misojudaist lunatics galore (I guess there are at least 40-50 of them), even crazier than all the crazies in the world combined, loonier than Jolo, West Virginia snake handlers.

    So, this interesting topic (Jewish self-glorification & its delusions) cannot be rationally discussed.

  29. DanFromCT says:
    @Rational

    It isn’t just the rabbis who fabricate fairytales about Jewish superiority and greatness. George Gilder’s fawning book, The Israel Test, could be added to Paul Johnson’s History of the Jews, but would make even Johnson blush. Along with the preposterous nonsense of Einsteinian physics, Jewish genius can take credit for Eretz Israel, Freud, Marx, and the ongoing proxy genocide against whites as some of the most pernicious evils ever perpetrated on mankind.

    Aside from religion, Jewishness is inimical to Western Civilization and has triumphed by virtually eliminating the latter from the public stage. He who controls the media controls the public forum and so the formation of men’s attitudes and the outcome of elections. Does anyone doubt Jews have a monopoly on the public forum and with it the power to script the narrative and grant or withhold public existence?

    The Republican establishment and Conservatism Inc, bought and paid for controlled opposition, are so overplaying their parts lately that even Gilder must be blushing with embarrassment for them. Their servility is now so obviously disgraceful that the decision’s been made to trot them out before the cameras as little as possible.

  30. Jewish Superiority – For the Bible (that the Jews wrote) Tells Us So!

    Here are some good Bible sources for Jewish superiority. When some anti-Semitic Nazi nut (which virtually anyone who is critical of Israel is eventually labeled) tells you we should question US support for the Jewish state of Israel, and that Israel is not worth the lives and limbs of thousands of Americans or trillions of American tax dollars (as of 2013 the Iraq War, which US politicians from both parties started for Israel’s security, has cost American tax payers over $2 trillion), here are some Bible verses you can use to set them straight! After all, if we start to question the Bible-based Jewish state of Israel, the next thing will be questioning “God’s Word”, which came to us from the ancient Jews, and we can’t have that! Especially when “God’s Word” says the Jews are better than everyone else and that Israel will be “above all nations of the Earth”!


    http://deism.com/jewishsuperiority.htm

    • Replies: @Johnny Walker Read
  31. @Johnny Walker Read

    Leviticus
    25:44-46 Both thy bondmen, and thy bondmaids, which thou shalt have, shall be of the heathen that are round about you; of them shall ye buy bondmen and bondmaids. Moreover of the children of the strangers that do sojourn among you, of them shall ye buy, and of their families that are with you, which they begat in your land: and they shall be your possession. And ye shall take them as an inheritance for your children after you, to inherit them for a possession; they shall be your bondmen for ever: but over your brethren the children of Israel, ye shall not rule one over another with rigour.

  32. ivan says:
    @utu

    The funny thing about ancient Jewish history, is that whenever the archaeologists rely on Greek or pagan records, they find that their digs correspond to the records, but with Jewish records, Mt Sinai could be in Arabia or the Sinai Peninsula and the chronology could be off by 300 to 500. Great bunch of storytellers the Patriarchs and Prophets were.

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
    , @Alden
  33. “All parts of knowledge,” De Quincey said, “have their origin in metaphysics.” The religion in question is a Dualism. In non-Dualism God is, so to speak, “all good.” In Dualism He is either both Good and Evil in one package, or, two antithetical gods, as in Communism and Manichaeism. Either way there is absolute contradiction through every level of Being. The person who has been trapped in this metaphysical delusion is a plaything of the deadly sin of “superbia,” or demonic self-exaltation. The inevitable consequence is narcissism, circular reasoning, and, finally, solipsism, or madness. The subject is incapable of conceiving of “truth.” In the place of truth there is only what is expedient, what he thinks is “good for him.” An Austrian 19th century orientalist, Joseph von Hammer-Purgstall who studied this in the Sect of the Assassins was horrified and characterized the Dualist doctrine as “Nothing is true, everything is permitted.”

    • Replies: @Kolya Krassotkin
  34. bjondo says:

    When I see Jew,
    I think,
    “but for the Grace of God…”.

    5ds

  35. Zionists rule the ZUS and ZBritain and ZEurope via their privately owned central banks, the FED here in the ZUS and the Bank of England and on and on and they own the central bank of central banks the BIS in Switzerland, we are all slaves in a zionist owned matrix!

    Nathan Rothschild infamously said, I care not what puppet is place on the throne of England, for the man who controls the money supply controls the British Empire , and I am that man. It is the same here in the ZUS!

    Zionism is the greatest enemy of America, free America, abolish their FED and IRS!

    • Replies: @sally
  36. anon[837] • Disclaimer says:

    The biggest fundamental cognitive dissonance and hypocrisy at the heart of modern American society needs to be addressed. All this PC anti-racism culture is basically only reserved for blacks and jews. These faggots have no qualms about mocking and promoting racism towards anybody who is not a nigger or a kike. They use universalist language, but in reality, if you’re not a nigger or a kike, you are fair game for racial mockery, insults, and divide and conquer tactics. On the other hand, niggers and kikes are apparently gods who are above all criticism.

  37. Know who else has high self-esteem? Sociopaths.

    – Sociopaths believe they’re better than others and have been chosen by fate/history/God.

    – They believe others are less than them and that others exist primarily for their benefit.

    – The needs, rights and dignity of others are less important than their own.

    – When caught in their crimes and misbehavior, they work mightily to blame the victim. (I first noticed that observing the efforts of certain writers to excuse the crimes of Ivan Boesky as simply the consequence of a poor boy from Queens, whose family owned a strip club, feeling slighted by the goyim.)

  38. onebornfree says: • Website

    Andrew Joyce says: “The following essay attempts to address this gap by exploring aspects and examples of Jewish self-glorification, and puts forward the hypothesis that Jewish self-glorification should be regarded as an example of both positive and negative ethnocentrism — that it reinforces in-group loyalties and self-esteem while weakening the loyalties and self-esteem of outgroups.”

    So the basic assumption here is : “all jews think alike”, right?

    This is nothing more than yet another fine example of the idiocy usually labelled “racial polylogism” : https://wiki.mises.org/wiki/Polylogism

    This, [i.e.”racial polylogism”] is total BS , of course 🙂 , but lets go with it and assume that the assumption is correct and ask : so what is the author Andrew Joyce implying to be the “solution” to the “problem” that “all jews think alike” ?

    Let me guess, his “solution” involves, wait for it, more government ! Maybe a”final solution”?

    Lets hear the “solution”, Mr Joyce- I can’t wait !

    No regards, onebornfree

  39. @ploni almoni

    “Nothing is true, everything is permitted.”

    And then only might makes right; all contracts, oaths, laws, morals and agreements made null and void; and all social relationships reduced to master and slave.

    Hell on earth.

  40. So the basic assumption here is : “all jews think alike”, right?

    This is what is known as the “ALL generalizations are UNFAIR — except those that apply to Evil Whitey, of course” trope — a long-debunked semitic canard.

    It’s typically accompanied by the odd belief that a tunnel vision focus on exceptions, and a dogged refusal to acknowledge general rules, is somehow “right;” while noticing patterns is “immoral” — rather than a basic function of human intelligence.

    Also commonly referred to as “pattern recognition denialism.”

    Sad!

    Note also his odd delusion that Dr. Joyce is somehow “morally obligated” to solve the Tribe’s problems for them…

    • Replies: @Skeptikal
  41. @Bardon Kaldian

    You’re not one of those self-hating whites, are you?

    Sad!

    misojudaist

    Uh — no one ever claimed that Japanese soup was part of any secret Judaic rituals. On this forum… or anywhere else that I’m aware of.

    You know that, right?

    But since — unlike you — I’m a very open-minded, tolerant person, I’m perfectly willing to reconsider this point if you’re able to provide a credible citation to support your seemingly-ludicrous claim.

  42. anarchyst says:

    It’s not “smarts” or “IQ” that gives jews an advantage over gentile whites, but is their rabid insistence on cultural and social cohesiveness, insularity and nepotism (but only for themselves) that gives them an “advantage”.

    This same cultural and social cohesiveness that is prized so highly by jewish interests is denied to gentile whites. Jews, to a man will fight to deny this same cultural and social cohesiveness to gentile whites that they themselves enjoy as it is a major part of the jewish purpose–the destruction of gentile white culture, which IS superior to any jewish cultural or social society. If jews did not possess this power, they would most likely be rag merchants, liquor merchants, or furniture merchants–nothing more.

    [MORE]

    As I have previously stated, jewish success is based on cultural and social cohesiveness and insularity–NOT “smarts” or “IQ”. Once enough jews get into a position of power in the work world or education systems, they will hire and promote their own, even bypassing more qualified gentile white candidates.
    Jews have latched on to cultural cohesiveness and nepotism, as it serves their purpose exceedingly well.

    At the same time, jews pushed the concept of racial “equality”, (but only for gentile whites), backing it up with “civil-rights” and “equal accommodation” laws which are enforced by governments–but only against whites. These “civil-rights” laws are used as a “battering ram” against gentile whites to diffuse and fragment any semblance of gentile white solidarity and cohesiveness that may arise.

    Jews are the only group that lacks a moral component. Jews are very amoral, think nothing of screwing a “goy” out of money, possessions, or even reputation or life. You see, the jewish talmud elevates the jew above all others, “goyim” being “livestock with souls, created only to serve the jew”.

    This amorality is a critical component in jewish life and is partially responsible for jewish successes. When one does not possess a moral compass that defines and separates “right from wrong” THAT in itself gives the jew greater latitude to “get what he wants” as there are “no limits” on what a jew may do to gain the advantage in just about any situation. The lack of a moral component within jewish life is a major reason for jewish supremacy in civilized societies.

    A good example is outright jewish flouting of “civil-rights” laws in the jewish community of Kiryas Joel, New York, among others. If you are not jewish, you cannot buy property there, nor can you send your non-jewish children to the (jews-only) “public” schools, despite so-called “civil-rights” laws enacted to prohibit discrimination in housing and education.

    Not only that, but most of the jews who occupy Kiryas Joel and other “jews only” communities also take advantage of “social services” and “welfare” programs out of proportion to their numbers. Almost every jew in these “jews-only” communities is running some kind of “scam” on the American “social welfare system”.

    You see, “multiculturalism and diversity for thee, but not for me” is the jewish mantra and is the primary way that they destroy cultures and civilizations. Their lack of morality figures heavily into their success. Jews think nothing of screwing over a “goy”; it is just “normal business” for them…

    A great reckoning dealing with the jews is coming. As gentile whites become more marginalized, the accusation of being tagged as “racist” or a “holocaust denier” is rapidly losing its “sting”.

    Increasingly, jews are more wary of being “called out” and recognized as “jews”. One can call a jew a shyster, shylock, bankster, criminal or ne-er-do-well, and it will roll off his back like water off a duck, BUT call a jew a “jew”, and he will recoil in horror, having been “found out”.

    • Replies: @Kolya Krassotkin
  43. Alfred says:

    Does anyone know the proportion of US soldiers who are Jewish – compared to their proportion of the US population?

    I am just wondering about how smart they are at staying out the military.

  44. netyahu says:

    “Do Jews Think Differently?”

    or, has Satan got hold of ’em: “Absent a catastrophic and catalyzing event..”

    • Replies: @DESERT FOX
  45. onebornfree says: • Website

    James Forrrestal says: “Also commonly referred to as “pattern recognition denialism.””

    OK, so based on your conclusion that there is a [general ], recognizable, racial pattern, and that [presumably] then “something needs to be done” concerning this “general” pattern, what’s your proposed solution, if any ?

    Or do I assume too much by assuming that you believe that “something needs to be done” concerning this racial pattern that you see?

    “Regards” onebornfree

  46. @netyahu

    The zionists worship satan and hate Christians!

  47. @ivan

    ‘The funny thing about ancient Jewish history, is that whenever the archaeologists rely on Greek or pagan records, they find that their digs correspond to the records, but with Jewish records, Mt Sinai could be in Arabia or the Sinai Peninsula and the chronology could be off by 300 to 500. Great bunch of storytellers the Patriarchs and Prophets were.’

    This is because ‘ancient Jewish history’ was largely synthesized from various mythologies starting about 500 BC and ending perhaps around 200 BC. It has no more reality than do the medieval texts that claim the kings of England are ‘descended from Brutus.’

    From what I can gather, in reality Judaism was an urban cult that appeared in the wake of the Persian conquests, more or less simultaneously in Mesopotamia, Palestine, and Egypt. For some reason, Palestine and Jerusalem were accorded cultic significance — but Judaism was no more an organic outgrowth of Palestinian culture than California viniculture looks back to the practices of the Miwok Indians.

    So of course the Old Testament bears no meaningful relationship to the actual archeological record of pre-Persian Palestine. You might as well plumb modern Mexico’s constitution to come to an understanding of the Aztec state.

  48. Wally says:
    @Bardon Kaldian

    Here you go again.

    Damage control & spin.

    Credibility, zero.

    Bardon Kaldian. a True Believer in the impossible “holocaust” & laughable “gas chambers”.

  49. @Alfred

    ‘Does anyone know the proportion of US soldiers who are Jewish – compared to their proportion of the US population?

    I am just wondering about how smart they are at staying out the military.’

    I’ve casually looked into that. Through World War Two, they weren’t especially smart.

    Since World War Two, they’ve become very smart. As I recall, Jewish casualties in Viet Nam and Iraq were something like half what they should have been, going by their proportion of the population.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  50. Pheasant says:
    @Fredric Bedoire

    Hugenots are famously philo-semitic as a result of them being an endogamous group (for most of thier history) that started when Jews (ashkenazi and sephardic) married into noble and aristocratic families in north-eastern Spain and southern France.

    As late as world war two Jews knew they could find refuge in Hugenot villages in France from the Germans. It is put down to Hugenots having sympathy for Jews being as they are themselves a minority in catholic France but the reality is they are cousins.

    What Hugenots have to say about Jews I would not trust.

  51. @Bardon Kaldian

    ‘We got here perhaps 5-7 regular Jews, usually- from what I’ve read- fine & reasonable people (with one-two nutjobs); then, we have misojudaist lunatics galore (I guess there are at least 40-50 of them), even crazier than all the crazies in the world combined, loonier than Jolo, West Virginia snake handlers…’

    No on one, yes on two. The anti-semitic dogmatists are certainly here, but the Jews I notice are the morally stunted defenders of Israel: Lyin’ Zion, AaronB, Fran Taubman, MCohen… (I suspect that A123 creature is actually gentile).

    I have to keep reminding myself that I knew a whole lot of Jews back in my puppy years, and they were perfectly fine people: morally as good as any, and intellectually, inarguably above average.

    However, that doesn’t describe the Jews I run into here.

    • Replies: @Achilles Wannabe
  52. Well written, with a plethora of food for thought. Reading this put me in mind of a story that Alan Dershowitz once told about when he was a kid watching the Brooklyn Dodgers playing at old Ebbets Field. Even as a kid, Dershowitz had already been imbued with a sense of what may be categorized as “social justice”, so when he returned home late that afternoon he remarked to his mother about how great it was to see Jackie Robinson, the first man to break the color barrier in major league baseball and that baseball would benefit with the presence of more players like him.

    His mother’s response was “That’s nice Alan, but is it good for the Jews?”

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  53. Pheasant says:
    @Bardon Kaldian

    40-50?

    I would hope way more.

    By the way are there two people posting under your name? Because one or two of your comments are sane and the rest are trolling/irrational screeds.

  54. @anarchyst

    We “bad” whites value cohesiveness. “Good” whites don’t.

    We “bad” whites will survive.

    • Agree: anarchyst
    • Replies: @anonymous
  55. bjondo says:

    I have to keep reminding myself that I knew a whole lot of Jews back in my puppy years, and they were perfectly fine people: morally as good as any, and intellectually, inarguably above average.

    Did you ever discuss Tales from WW2 or Occupied Palestine
    with these fine folk or with yourself?

    5ds

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
  56. Alright, so much for nonsense. Let’s see the original article of this Lebrecht fellow.

    https://www.spectator.co.uk/2019/10/do-jews-think-differently/

    It’s a simple proposition: between the middle of the 19th and 20th centuries some three dozen men and women changed the way we see the world. For no obvious reason, half of them were Jews. Why is that?

    Unverifiable statement, the author’s opinion.

    Some of these remakers of our minds are so famous they are known by surnames alone — Marx, Freud, Einstein, Kafka, Trotsky, Disraeli, Gershwin.

    Except for Trotsky, who happened to be at the right place in the right time, most are German Jews. So, it’s about being German, more than Jewish. Disraeli, as influential statesman as he had been, did not change anything any other British statesman would have done (for instance, Palmerston or Pitt were more important); Gershwin- no comment…

    Then he goes about Landsteiner, who dismissed Judaism. So, what’s his point?

    And if so, could a common ancestral way of thinking have freed Karl Marx or Benjamin Disraeli or Sarah Bernhardt or Magnus Hirschfeld (we’ll come to him) to change the world as we know it?

    This is dumb beyond belief. Those people had not any knowledge of the Talmud (and, I’m not even sure that Bernhard was Jewish). What the heck has Talmud to do with all this?

    Einstein, who had a boyhood phase of observing Sabbath and eating kosher, saw the universe through a prism of Davidic psalms, which he quoted at the slightest impulse. He said he had a moral duty to complete God’s work of creation, ‘to draw His lines after Him’. Being Jewish, and Zionist, was central to his science. To blur these convictions (as many do) is to falsify the origins of modern physics.

    The only truth here was that Einstein passed through early religious phase which was an aberration- and forgot, even if he knew anything- about Judaism as religious culture.
    True, he was a cultural Zionist- but also clueless about Jewish culture.
    https://forward.com/news/325189/what-was-einsteins-relationship-to-judaism-and-zionism/

    Basically, Einstein did not understand that Judaism was repudiation of what Eliade & other called “cosmic religion”. Hebrew God is a God of history, covenant & revelation- not a God of nature. And this Einstein not only dismissed, but, I’d say, did not quite comprehend (at least completely). He could not get God’s transcendence, which is central to Judaism.

    Freud himself applied Talmudic reasoning in psychoanalysis. Six of the 13 statutory methods of Talmudic exegesis can be found in Freud’s analytic thinking. While Freud, an atheist, falsely claimed ignorance of Judaism, an awareness of Talmud was lodged in his unconscious.

    This is so wrong that even a superficial knowledge of psychoanalysis is more than enough…

    Beneath each genius of this fertile century lay an undercurrent of anxiety. Franz Kafka, in The Trial, foresaw the workings of Stalin’s great terror. Trotsky, as early as 1923, railed against Soviet anti-Semitism. Gershwin composed in what he called a freygish mode, a Yiddish term for questioning, self-doubt. The founders of Hollywood were Jews in flight from Tsarist pogroms. Casablanca, their most enduring movie, is a parable of Jewish anxiety in a Californian desert; the director, Michael Curtiz, was a Budapest emigré. In the Mojave desert other Budapest Jews tried to blow up the world.

    Absurd. For instance, paranoid style of writing can be attributed to Kafka’s great precursor Robert Walser (not Jewish). Then, here we have Gershwin, again….

    This article is so stupid it does not merit any serious analysis.

  57. Robjil says:
    @onebornfree

    Freedom of press would be the solution.

    Jewish culture fears the free flow of ideas. Thus, the Top Jews have taken over the press all over the world.

    Free flow of ideas is the way humans advanced.

    Jewish culture has to get over this fear of criticism.

    It is not that all Jews think alike.

    It is the Top Jews who think all alike, control the press, stop all discuss of what Top Jews are doing.

    These Top Jews are destroying themselves and this planet by stopping the free flow of ideas to uplift humanity.

    Humanity is stuck in a rut with Top Jews, with their control of press, stopping a free flow of discussions on this planet.

    • Agree: DESERT FOX, renfro
    • Replies: @onebornfree
  58. Pheasant says:
    @onebornfree

    The Jews are the groupiest group that ever grouped. If they were not they would not have outlived the ancient Egyptians, ancient Greeks, ancient Romans and many other formally great groups of people.

    Cry me a river.

  59. Wally says: • Website
    @David Blomstrom

    “What are the various theories about the Holocaust?”

    – No “theories”, fact. The claimed ‘6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers’ are impossible frauds.

    “I haven’t found such a book written by Jews or by truthers, or even by NeoNazi types.”

    – What are “NeoNazi” types?

  60. Mj says:
    @Anon

    About the jocks, you’re correct. But it’s much more about the paucity of female attention they experience throughout life. Attractive females, that is.

  61. Anon[114] • Disclaimer says:

    The one thing that strikes me about Jewish culture is how bad it is. The musicians, painters, and fiction writers that I’ve enjoyed throughout life are always gentiles. What do Jews produce in the arts? After hundreds of years of fine Western classical music, Jews finally cough up an unlistenable Gustav Mahler. After hundreds of years of brilliant Western painting, Jews produce a doltish dripper like Jackson Pollock. After hundreds of years of excellent literature, Jews can only provide a droning bore like Isaac Bashevis Singer. What Jews produce is always a flop, just a pathetic, flailing attempt to join the gargantuan canon of Western arts. Then the Jews trumpet these yo-yos and scream all over the planet about how brilliant these sub-par people are.

    • Replies: @Alden
  62. Jews earn antisemitism.

  63. SafeNow says:

    Among Philip Roth’s catalog of Jewish traits is “self-satire.” This would be at odds with self-glorification. Both exist in Roth. I observe plenty of self-satire in Jews. Perhaps that is because they are clever comics and cannot resist demonstrating their satirical cleverness. Roth also lists “clowning.”

    • Replies: @Pheasant
    , @Skeptikal
  64. >“Without Karl Landsteiner, for instance, there would be no blood transfusions or major surgery. Without Paul Ehrlich no chemotherapy. Without Siegfried Marcus no motor car. Without Rosalind Franklin genetic science would look very different. Without Fritz Haber there would not be enough food to sustain life on earth.” These incredibly hyperbolic claims are demonstrably false from a factual point of view.

    Exclude Siegfried Marcus, and the claims are demonstrably true from a factual point of view. Aside consideration of many other individuals, just on the basis of that sample alone, jews would be justified in being proud of jewish contributions to the welfare of humankind. The author’s thesis is false.

  65. @Bardon Kaldian

    to Kafka’s great precursor Robert Walser (not Jewish).

    There was this Russian dude called Nikolai Gogol who was at it way before Kafka. Walser, a precursor? I guess getting facts and dates straight is important. It also goes without saying that Dostoevsky also had a lot to do with Kafka. While I generally agree with your message, you shouldn’t be making your argument weaker by using our almost contemporary Walser instead of Kleist (no, not the Panzer commander).

  66. @onebornfree

    OK, so based on your conclusion that there is a [general ], recognizable, racial pattern, and that [presumably] then “something needs to be done” concerning this “general” pattern, what’s your proposed solution, if any ?

    This is a clear illustration of yet another common logical fallacy. It’s usually expressed as: “The goyim are NOT ALLOWED to notice certain aspects of reality unless and until they develop a PLAN to deal with that aspect of reality, SUBMIT it to the sanhedrin, and get it approved. Until then, they are ‘morally obligated’ to pretend that aspect of reality DOES NOT EXIST.”

    lol

  67. The Jew ‘Holy’ book is a lie, written by Mesopotamians. This was standard Imperial practice at the time: move half the group away, condition them to the Imperial, monotheistic cult and send them back. Throughout the Torah, you will see constant ranting against polytheism and assorted practices as the ‘new’ group of high Persianized priests bully the the old group. A fake religion for a fake people.

    Where would the world be without these semi-Semites and Khazars?
    We will find out shortly as the System they are part of crashes down. That’s what happens to deranged Luciferians; their system engenders contempt and virulent hatred.

    Cato, often portrayed by modern historians (most of which are Jewish slaves) as a fanatic, ended every speech, no matter the topic, with ‘Carthage must be destroyed’. Why? Because the Carthaginians, like the Canaanites, practised child murder: an abomination to healthy Roman values. In fact, Rome had to destroy a cult that began to spread that practised these Evil rites: 5, 000 were put to the sword, many were elites.
    America is in the process of doing the exact same thing right now: destroying an Ancient Babylonian cult that has spread over time, first among Jews and then among the Christian Black Nobility and now across the World over the last few centuries.

    Who will win? We decide. Whoever gathers the most spiritual power will win this current battle. Choose your side wisely.
    Generally, with Jew you lose.

    • Replies: @Mj
  68. @Bardon Kaldian

    You seem to have mastered basic grammar and spelling — surely you could make your failed attempts to:
    – conflate the concepts of “Judaism” and “the jewish nation/ people”
    – divert the thread onto an entirely different subject than the OP
    a little less rambling and incoherent?

    Thanks.

    • Replies: @Anon
  69. Bruno says:

    1% of whites (10 M ashkenazim out of 1 billion non Jewish whites) getting 25% of whites field medal, Nobel prize in economy (bank of Sweden) and Physics Nobel prize is an objective performance.

    If Industriousness and creativity was the same among goyim and jews and only IQ would diverge and average IQ of laureate were 148 (1 in 1000) Jewish to be 25 over-represented should have an average IQ of 118. If the average were 155 (1 in 10 000), jews should have an average IQ of 107.

    Probably, as there should be also differences in creativity and industriousness, the average IQ of laureates is 148 and the average IQ of Jews is 107, but it’s enough to get this huge contribution without deviousness

    The success of sefardim is only 5 times more than goyim

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
  70. onebornfree says: • Website
    @Robjil

    Robjil says: “Humanity is stuck in a rut with Top Jews, with their control of press, stopping a free flow of discussions on this planet.”

    So if “we” got rid of the jews- there’d be freedom of the press?

    Is that what you are claiming, or am I missing something?

    Regards, onebornfree

    • Replies: @Robjil
  71. @Wally

    “…What are “NeoNazi” types..?”

    For starters, look in the mirror.

    • Replies: @Wally
  72. Mj says:
    @steinbergfeldwitzcohen

    But unlike Carthage, America gives her denizens the constitutional right to practice child murder. Er,
    reproductive choice, I mean.

    • Replies: @ploni almoni
  73. @bjondo

    ‘Did you ever discuss Tales from WW2 or Occupied Palestine
    with these fine folk or with yourself?’

    Well, I see the Holocaust as roughly about as likely as Australia, so that never came up.

    As to occupied Palestine, in my experience, decent Jews get a pained look and fall silent. The one Jew I seriously pressed on the matter said that what he wanted was a single, secular, genuinely confession-blind democracy — which is of course the only solution that is both ethical and permits a continued large-scale Jewish presence in Palestine.

    It’s a laudable goal, and I’m happy to support its implementation — but it’s a bit late for that now.

    …but go ahead. Prove me wrong. It won’t bother me if Palestine becomes another Switzerland.

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
  74. Alden says:

    Thinking of jews; I’m perusing a catalog of Holiday junk. One of the dolls is Ruth Bader Ginsburg. Black dress hose and shoes, hideous shoes and dyed black hair. All she needs is a hat and broom stick and she’d be a perfect Halloween witch decoration.

    There’s a reason little girls prefer pretty girl dolls in pretty colorful dresses.

    I only buy Christmas things if they’re labeled Christmas not Holiday.

    This is my usual thought this time of year. Don’t buy anything from stores that substitute the Jewish word holiday for Christmas.

    • Agree: Republic
  75. Wally says:
    @Colin Wright

    said:
    “German Jews in particular — have posted achievements completely out of proportion to their numbers.”

    – Really? So what were their numbers? Counted by who? How?
    Given their avoidance of being counted I’d say you don’t know their “numbers”

    – False ‘genuis’ Jew icon Einstein was a fraud. That fits right in with the article above.

    Exposing the Real Albert Einstein: https://principia-scientific.org/exposing-the-real-albert-einstein
    The Great Einstein Hoax: https://www.amazon.com/Great-Einstein-Hoax-Herb-Rose/dp/1478748095
    Albert Einstein was a Fraud
    http://coconutrevival.com/?p=5656
    Einstein, plagiarist of the century: https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/esp_einstein.htm
    and:



    Jew icon Einstein was rabidly racist, xenophobic: https://www.theguardian.com/books/2018/jun/12/einsteins-travel-diaries-reveal-shocking-xenophobia

    • Replies: @Amerimutt Golems
  76. @onebornfree

    Only a Boomer could be this dumb. And sign one’s name to such stupidity.

  77. @Bruno

    ‘…Probably, as there should be also differences in creativity and industriousness, the average IQ of laureates is 148 and the average IQ of Jews is 107, but it’s enough to get this huge contribution without deviousness…’

    Agree — or to be precise, I don’t see the ‘deviousness’ as any worse than that practiced by any other ethnic group. If white gentiles of Northwestern European extraction want to feel guilty about more readily extending a helping hand to those like them and attempt to refrain, they can have at it — but they shouldn’t let their feelings get hurt if they look around and discover no one’s copying them.

    For what it’s worth, my impression is that Jewish networking has a greater impact in ‘soft’ fields such as the liberal arts and journalism and business and so on than it does in science and mathematics.

    …Interesting about the Sefardim. Really, it’s a canard to discuss all Jews as if they were one group. Usually, when people say ‘Jews,’ they mean Ashkenazim, and generally one particular flavor of Ashkenazim at that. Depending, they can be talking about German Ashkenazim, or Galician Ashkenazim, or Ukrainian Ashkanazim. It’s as if I went on about ‘Africans’ without bothering to specify whether I was thinking of Algerians or Nigerians or Tanzanians or even Boer farmers in South Africa.

    • Replies: @Rabbi Zaius
    , @Bruno
  78. Wally says:
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    LOL A racist Zionist emerges.

    After being crushed in the comments here , http://www.unz.com/article/evidence-for-the-german-euthanasia-program-compared-to-the-holocaust/ , by just about everyone you poke your little Zionist head up again just like a weasel.

    Of course there were the ‘Nazis’ with the impossible ‘6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers’ and there were the ‘Nazis’ without the impossible ’6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers’.

    Still owning you.

  79. ricpic says:

    Wow, not a single word about the actual book being “reviewed.”

    • Replies: @Been_there_done_that
  80. @onebornfree

    What do you base your epistemology on? Just curious. Boomer Libertarianism isn’t worth responding to whatsoever, but I’m curious in your fundamentals personally.
    Thanks.

  81. @Wally

    Given all the propaganda that has been churned out over the years, it’s impossible to know the precise truth about the Holocaust. Thus, we have no choice but embrace at least some theory.

    If six million Jews didn’t die, what was the actual number – 4 million? 100,000? And did they all die in Allied bombing raids?

    NeoNazi types are white supremacists. They have their own agenda.

    I prefer the 9/11 truthers as a role model. In the end, truth is all we have.

    • Replies: @Saggy
    , @Alden
    , @anon
    , @ploni almoni
  82. “Differently”? Is there a tribe in the world not prone to self-glorification?

    [MORE]


  83. @Colin Wright

    The Russell Gmirkin hypothesis might be of interest to you.
    His books are academic and quite expensive but he’s done a few podcast appearances.

  84. @sally

    The heavily Jewish fund management business thrives off institutional investors or in other words goyim money (pension contributions, insurance premiums, endowments, sovereign wealth etc).

  85. @Colin Wright

    a single, secular, genuinely confession-blind democracy

    In other words, a fantasy that has never worked anywhere.

  86. @Alfred

    just ask Ben Shapiro, chickenhawk, warmonger…who has been of the age to “serve” the last 20 years, but yet never has—even while calling for other men to go fight and die.

  87. Robjil says:
    @onebornfree

    No, I do not say that.

    Freedom of press doesn’t imply getting rid of anyone.

    It implies only freedom of the press.

    Six corporations own 9o percent of the world’s press. All six, notice the number, are own by Top Jews.

    Jewish culture has to grow up and get of a 500 BC Zion fantasy world.

    We are in the 21st century and not in 500 BC Zion.

    Freedom of press implies criticizing Top Jewish culture behavior.

    When one is criticized, one can learn and reform oneself.

    Without any mirror showing their wrong doing, they continue with the mantra – Whatever is good for the Jews ( a fantasy concept of Zion 500 BC).

    Whatever is good for the Js- can be anything, it has no set parameters.

    Mad Albright – 500000 Iraqi children dying of ZUS sanctions is OK

    WWII- firebombing 131 German cities, Japanese cities, French and Italian towns too is OK. Civilians were the main target in all these firebombings.

    Nuke bombing of Japan

    Balfour Declaration – WWI needed to get it. Top Jews worked in Britain and US to get it done.

    Israel- WWII needed to happen to get Jews to immigrant to Israel. Top Jews in Britain, Soviet Union and US worked on this project.

    Eretz Yisrael- Nine Eleven project used to spring this in action. Seven Nations to Destroy from Deut. 7.1-2

    Iraq 1991 attack ended on Purim. Iraq attack 2003 started on Purim

    Libya 2011 attack started on Purim.

    1st Revolution in Russia in 1917 started on Purim

    Stalin was poisoned on Purim in 1953.

    Nuremberg Trials was a Jewish Passion Play. Purim themes was used throughout. Ten big National Socialists were hung like the ten sons of Haman of Purim fame.

    • Replies: @Alden
  88. @Wally

    He is clearly overrated.

    Goyim had similar ideas as regards relativity – FitzGerald, Lorentz, Poincaré and his own mentor Minkowski.

    Light bending as it passes near a massive object was first proposed in the 1700s by polymath John Michell who also predicted ‘dark stars’ (black holes) – a fact that even Charles Murray omitted in the book Human Accomplishment.

    Einstein also didn’t understand Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle and its bizarre consequences like quantum ‘creationism’ as in virtual particles.

    Einstein’s original publicist was goy astronomer Arthur Eddington who wanted to reconcile German and British scientists after WWI. Eddington went to Africa during a solar eclipse to validate the General Theory of Relativity and light bending due to gravity.

  89. anonymous[348] • Disclaimer says:
    @Kolya Krassotkin

    Survive? You “bad” whitrash are aiming for immortality?

    Your kind of hateful pagan godless souls are headed for Hell anyway. So, relax. You will be on the Hell train sooner or later.

    The whole pathetic idea of a whitrash-only euRape or AmeriKKKa or…, will all seem rather insignificant on that one-way journey.

    • LOL: Kolya Krassotkin
    • Replies: @Pheasant
  90. @Colin Wright

    Canards eh? Is it a canard that only jews use the term canard? A la Abe foxman?

  91. Alden says:
    @Anon

    I don’t believe Pollock was a Jew. He was an Art School grad and could and did excellent representative paintings

    But he was a falling down passing out drunk. His agent arranged a marriage with a caretaker, chaperone to keen him semi controlled and alive. She was well compensated for her arduous unpleasant job.

    Pollock drank so much he could neither sit nor stand at a canvas. He couldn’t hold a brush very well either. So the agent figured putting the canvas in the floor with open pots of paint in different colors and sticks for dripping the paint.
    Pollock could crawl could crawl around and drip the paint till he passed out.

    I suspect the wife and agent did a lot of the dripping.

    People will buy anything if it’s well publicized and fashionable. I wonder what the prices on Picasso’s uglier works will be in 2150.

    • Replies: @Andrei Martyanov
  92. Alden says:
    @Robjil

    Gorla massacre Milan.

    WW 2 Americans bombing Italians. 2 waves of American bombers flew to Milan to bomb factories during the work day of course when the workers were there.

    First wave bombed the factories. Second wave over flew the factories and turned around to fly back to base. They dropped the bombs to lose the extra weight. Bombs fell on Francisco Crispi
    grade school in the Gorla neighborhood and killed 187 children many injured and disabled.

    • Replies: @SolontoCroesus
    , @Robjil
  93. Saggy says: • Website
    @David Blomstrom

    But I haven’t yet found a single comprehensive book that might be described as a Jewish/Judaic political primer.

    Two must reads, made to order …. Douglas Reed, ‘The Controversy of Zion’, and EM Jones, ‘The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit’. Both start in the Roman era and extend up to today.

    Given all the propaganda that has been churned out over the years, it’s impossible to know the precise truth about the Holocaust.

    Complete idiocy coming from someone who has never studied the matter. Read ‘The Hoax of the Twentieth Century’ by Arthur Butz, written in 1976 btw, and you will KNOW all you need to know.

    • Replies: @Alden
    , @David Blomstrom
  94. @Alden

    People will buy anything if it’s well publicized and fashionable. I wonder what the prices on Picasso’s uglier works will be in 2150.

    Ahh, what an excellent question.

  95. Bruno says:
    @Colin Wright

    Yes in math, physics, economy, chemistry and medicine, you’ve got 90 ashkenazim (10 M) for 5 sefardim (2,5M) meaning they ashkenazim are 4,5 times more successful than sefardim.

    The ashkenazim are to the sefardi what the sefardim are too the goyim in terms of most format scholastic activities (math, physics and economy). It would be even more for analytical philosophy.

    • Replies: @Pheasant
    , @Anon
  96. Joyce (not James, not Cary) writes:

    In a more recent study (2003), Brown et al. examined ingroup romantic preferences among American Jewish and non-Jewish White undergraduates and found that Jews had a “significantly greater” preference for their own group, and that the stronger a respondent identified as a Jew, the stronger was the respondent’s preference for a Jewish romantic partner.

    Sure, that’s because of religion/culture. How many exogamous Muslims, percentage-wise, are there is the US, by the way?

    However, as Brown et al. note, given more than a century of intense assimilation and acceptance by the host population and a population size of only around 3%, “an endogamy rate [among Jews] of 50% is surprisingly high.”

    Muslims, Hindus, Zoroastrians, Buddhists, …?

    Here it is worth considering the Judaic scholar Simon Rawidowicz who coined the term “the ever-dying people” to describe the Jews. In every generation, he noted, there are concerns (real or imagined) about Jewish survival. Yet this very concern about survivability was what helped to ensure that the community would continue to live, and even thrive. In plain terms, Jews, still enjoying a “surprisingly high” rate of endogamy, can afford the collateral damage of moderate levels of intermarriage, and in some respects the panic it causes can even be beneficial in facilitating the continued genetic distinctiveness of the Jewish gene pool among the strongly-identified and highly ethnocentric core of the population.

    One of the dumbest ideas so far. Some people from some ethnic-cultural group marry others, some do not. No one re these matters thinks of “gene pool” or “survival strategy”. Sometimes, a group of people gets swallowed by assimilation; sometimes, they survive as a distinct entity. There is no some grand plan for that, be it for the Sioux, Jews, Zoroastrians or the Tatars.

    Self-glorification is commonly defined as the exaltation of oneself and one’s abilities, though one could add that it entails excessive or unjustified elements of superiority. Individually, high levels of self-glorification are correlated strongly with psychopathy.[11] A small number of studies have found that groups demonstrating feelings of exaggerated self-love and superiority were more prone to desires or attempts to dominate other groups.[12] It is interesting in this respect that Patai (1996) quotes Menahem Nahum, an eighteenth century rabbi as follows: “All nations, with the exception of Israel, lack understanding [intelligence], and because they lack understanding no country can forgo Jewish leadership.

    Sure, this guy was nuts, so?

    Environmentalist explanations of Jewish superiority, and therefore examples of Jewish self-glorification, are certainly alive and well in the present. On October 5th, Norman Lebrecht, the Jewish British commentator on music and cultural affairs, published a piece at The Spectator titled “Do Jews Think Differently?,” in which he argues that Jews possess “a common ancestral way of thinking” that has allowed them to “change the world as we know it.” He insists that there exists “a way of thinking that has allowed Jews to see the world from an oblique angle,” and continues “Do Jews think differently? The moment I asked that question, there could be only one answer. … Some dissenting Jew, somewhere, right now, is about to change the way the world revolves.” Lebrecht refers at length to his recently published Genius & Anxiety: How Jews Changed the World, 1847–1947 (Simon & Schuster, 2019), in the course of which he profiles 36 Jews who he claims are responsible (in a positive sense) for modernity.

    What does it mean to “think differently”? Sure, there are national stereotypes: for instance, English intellectual culture is soaked in empiricism; German philosophy/way of thinking is characterized by a typical weakness: they tend to construct huge super-structures on small or shaky ground, without bothering themselves to check whether their constructions can pass reality-testing.

    If there is “Jewish way of thinking”, it can be found in their literature or mental culture, especially the Talmud. As I wrote before: Babylonian Talmud was composed from ca. 200-600 AD; it has 6,500 big folio pages & its English translation runs over 15,000 pages. Talmud is a mixture of wisdom literature (similar to Confucian “Analects”), various superstitions on magic & astrology, exegeses on murky passages of Hebrew Bible (frequently fantastic & hilarious), and mostly a codification of Jewish law, similar to Islamic shariah (agriculture, marriage, various taboos & ceremonies, crimes & misdemeanors, food etc.) So, the Talmud is mostly a imaginative exegesis on the Hebrew Bible, and especially their law (Jewish Shariah). There is no modern critical thinking in Talmud; there is an abundance of logical mistakes; most of it is derivative speculation on the Bible & intricacies of Jewish law.

    Maybe later…

    • Replies: @ploni almoni
  97. Alden says:
    @David Blomstrom

    Latest figures are less than 2 million.

    Cremation has been disproved by the fact that there wasn’t enough fuel to reach the temperature and keep it for the time needed to reduce a human body to less than a pound of ashes.

    Only mass grave found was Katyn forest grace of 5,000 Christian Polish soldiers massacred by heavily Jewish soviet communists

    No bodies, no proof. That Baba Yar canyon mass grave doesn’t exist either.

    Don’t forget that a few years after the war more holofraud survivors applied for German reparations than the Jews claimed as the number of survivors.

    I personally know 4 survivors. I’ll post their stories sometime. I’m very suspicious of one.

    Either she was born late 40’s early 50’s or she has the most superb state of the art face and neck lift. She also has the straight back, posture, walks sits down and gets up like early mid 60’s not mid 80’s

    Skin on her hands arms legs is also more like mid 60’s than mid late 80’s.

    She gets reparations from 3 different countries.

    • Replies: @Pheasant
    , @Skeptikal
  98. Alden says:
    @Saggy

    Every one should buy the Arthur Butz book. He was head of the chemical engineering department at top 20 Northwestern University bear Chicago. So he knows about chemicals and gases.

    He took the standard tour and realized it just never happened and could not possibly have happened. Buy it. Put it in PDF if you can. Give it as gifts. Spread the word

    • Replies: @Anon
  99. @Alden

    https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2019/10/20/milan-seeks-us-apology-wwii-bomb-hit-elementary-school-italy/4045367002/
    Milan seeks apology from US for WWII bomb that killed 184 elementary school children

    More Italian civilians were killed by Allies than by Germans.
    More French civilians were killed by Allies than by Germans.
    Allies bombed beautiful Sofia, in Bulgaria.

    • Replies: @Alden
  100. Pheasant says:
    @SafeNow

    To be real satire it has to have an element of admiration for what it is satirising otherwise it is just inverted parody. Sure Jews satirise themselves but it is about thier self love more than thier self criticism.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  101. Pheasant says:
    @anonymous

    Oh no the parasite fears an independent healthy host.

    Burn in hell you scumbag.

  102. Pheasant says:
    @Bruno

    You really are an idiot.

    How many nobel prizes have Israelis won again?

  103. Pheasant says:
    @Alden

    Listen pal they give reparations to people who were one year olds in 1939.

    The whole thing is a scam.

    Read Norman Finklestien on how Israel scammed the survivors out of payments (not that I give a shit anyway).

    • Replies: @Alden
  104. Robjil says:
    @Alden

    Amalek – blot out the memory of anyone who against Jewish interests

    It is for all generations this clause.

    In WWII it was the Axis powers

    These days it is Seven Nations to destroy in the Middle East. Iran being the main target, since it wasn’t destroyed yet.

    https://www.theatlantic.com/daily-dish/archive/2009/05/the-specter-of-amalek/201298/

    I recently asked one of his advisers to gauge for me the depth of Mr. Netanyahu’s anxiety about Iran. His answer: “Think Amalek.” “Amalek,” in essence, is Hebrew for “existential threat.” Tradition holds that the Amalekites are the undying enemy of the Jews. They appear in Deuteronomy, attacking the rear columns of the Israelites on their escape from Egypt. The rabbis teach that successive generations of Jews have been forced to confront the Amalekites: Nebuchadnezzar, the Crusaders, Torquemada, Hitler and Stalin are all manifestations of Amalek’s malevolent spirit. If Iran’s nuclear program is, metaphorically, Amalek’s arsenal, then an Israeli prime minister is bound by Jewish history to seek its destruction, regardless of what his allies think.

  105. WHY : JEWS never built an Empire like Rome, Greece, Persia, China??. ..Dismiss appropriate, steal others NON jewish brilliance: Edison, Shakesperae, Ford, Disney, Rap/Country/Rock Music an dother ofmrs of Art. A common non jews steal $5 a goes to jail for years, Jews steal trillions$$ and are called “financial gurus”??. .Jews often times ridiculed Jesus, and other Christian+NOn Christian “miracles” BUT jews readily accept jews often irrational, insane, biblical/Talmudic myths as unquestionable TURTHS.?? Their ideas,books,miracles, myths are for jews eternal truths…even when history,science,geography, archeology, DNA refutes their claims..I once attended a class presentation given by a Rabbi, he came to our classroom/religious seminar with an air the WISEST man on earth, he said that “Christians had not (historically) often not been kind to Jews…I asked him the opposite question ..How about JEWS non being very kind to NONjews in the context of Slavery, Palestinians, Bolsheviks..I cited Roman, Greek, and even jewish historians….He seemed pissed..he said wel that’s ANTIsemetic propaganda…so lets research it, wich he said that is also antisemetic!!!…IF you ask a jews the time of day and he gives you an answer opposite the clock,,then the clock is wrong, …jews believe that even GOD can be wrong unless he favors agrees with jewish INhumanities, evil doings..

  106. Alden says:
    @SolontoCroesus

    Don’t forget thousands of French women in north east France raped by black American support service troops who followed the White fighters. I wonder how many women got raped on the wrong day of the month, That’s what abortion is for, legal or illegal. Must have been a lot of D&Cs summer of 45.

  107. Dannyboy says:

    Yeah Jews do “think differently”…lol

    Look at the mostly fucking garbage they produce and have the nerve to label as art.

    Niggers are more accomplished artists than Jews.

  108. Jews often times ridiculed whites hillbilly Christian for their ignorant cults like snake dancing…I saw the jewish festival of Kasporot (chickens) and I was horrified. I saw the jews dancing like mad zombies their call for Mossichia Now it is disturbing. Jews ridicule other NON jewish religious “miracles” BUT jews believed their own books, myths, miracles to be ultimate truths..!!! no matter how irrational, illogical, even when SCIENCES, history, archeology, genetics disputes their claims. A Rabbi came to my class and he opened his discourse with an air of being the latest edition of the wisest man on earth. He told us that …”Christians had not been (historically) kind to jews..(progroms/victimology)..” I asked him the opposite question: Have jews not been kind to nonjews like for example jewish control of Slavery, usury, diamond trade wars, Bolshevik gulags, etc…the rabbi dismiss all of them as ANTIsemitic propaganda..!!! Statistical DATA proves that JEWS that make up about 30% of the admitting class to Harvard Law are overrepresented and many Unqualified to be admitted. And jews refuse to admit it, that there is an institutional CUOTA for jews, at the expense of better qualify gentiles, Asians, Indians, etc. A common goy steals $20 an dgoe to jail for years, jews steal trillions and are called financial gurus??? If you ask a jew the time they don’t need to look at the clock…they already know everything…

  109. @Colin Wright

    That percentage would reflect not just Macnamara’s 10,000 (have I got that right on the fly) but also the eligibility for academic deferrals – plus remnant lefty- commo sentiments and their hyper urban general avant garde nature….

  110. Alden says:
    @Pheasant

    And any Jew born before January 1, 1946. Now they’re going after Poland which had no Polish government during the war. It’s all Poland’s fault because they built Auschwitz in Poland.

    Then there’s children grandchildren and great grandchildren of Holofraud survivors. Even if the ancestors lived in Spain Egypt SAfrica India or Sweden during the war.

  111. @ricpic

    …not a single word about the actual book being “reviewed.”

    According to Amazon the depicted book is not even available yet in the US and just appeared a few days ago in the UK book market. Neither sites have the LOOK INSIDE feature, so the table of contents are unknown. At least it is possible to deduce from the title that this is yet another book about Jewish self-glorification, the actual theme of the essay, which does not purport to be a book review.

  112. Republic says:
    @gotmituns

    On a technical note, is there an advertisement between comments 29 and 30?

    • Replies: @bjondo
    , @Achilles Wannabe
  113. Alden says:
    @ivan

    There’s more real physical evidence of King Arthur than the Bible fairy stories.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  114. @Prester John

    That is a big plus for Dershowitz even after you have cynically discounted for its deliberate effect. (Amusing to divide his Jewish audience hypothetically into those who would have said “OMG Alan:you mustn’t say that” and the sophisticates who would have given a smile or chuckle).

    And here Ron is a question. Do you want to stop me, by a three Comment an hour limit, from tossing in an appreciative comment consisting say, of the first sentence? (I’ll post this on the Announcement I think).

  115. I wish other races had the same propensity to self aggrandization as Jews.

    If we all just started competing on our victimhoods and accomplishments the world would be a better place.

  116. AaronB says:

    Actually, Western Europeans in modern times think differently. The WEIRD countries.

    Jews think in ways that used to be traditional everywhere. There is respect for logic and fact, but also a greater belief in willpower and what might be called a kind of magic. That’s the source of their power.

    Western Europeans are easily discouraged by rational considerations, while Jews are more likely to think anything is possible. It’s a kind of magic thinking. It isn’t too untethered from fact and logic, but it isn’t the Europeans naive belief in the primacy of logic either.

    Logical, reasonable Europeans never would have created Israel, for instance, against all odds.

    But then the reasonableness of Europeans is the source of their weakness today.

    • LOL: geokat62
    • Replies: @Colin Wright
    , @Dannyboy
  117. Anon[115] • Disclaimer says:
    @James Forrrestal

    Didn’t James Forrestal kill himself? Overdue perhaps?

    • Replies: @DESERT FOX
  118. @Pheasant

    I disagree. I think satire is traditionally an attack – at least in form – by mockery so, to make your case you need to show that a line can be roughly drawn between Jewish and non-Jewish satire. Right yes, Jewish satire about things Jewish and etc.

  119. @Alden

    No, Moses was indeed a very nasty genocidal psychopath just as portrayed.

  120. Anon[170] • Disclaimer says:

    Logical, reasonable Europeans never would have created Israel, for instance, against all odds.

    Against all odds?? You’ve got to be joking. Did you come here to prove the point of the article? It seems so.

    You’ve bought your country’s own transparent propaganda that no one with any sense of history believes. “The scrappy little country and people-that-could, that happens to have the Chinese mandate of heaven according to us”. You come off like a propagandist and a moron for stating it here. In reality, you people are Nazi LARPers who can’t begin to match the Germans in any capacities except for deceit, oppression, and murder and so you are instead trying to give the impression that you are similarly fit through your obviously false self promotions.

    Jews were literally handed Israel, which is protected by the largest unified military system that the world has ever known. Your statements read like someone who won the lottery congratulating themselves for all their hard work. What a jackass, as usual.

  121. Anon[394] • Disclaimer says:
    @Alden

    Every one should buy the Arthur Butz book. He was head of the chemical engineering department at top 20 Northwestern University bear Chicago. So he knows about chemicals and gases.

    He took the standard tour and realized it just never happened and could not possibly have happened. Buy it. Put it in PDF if you can. Give it as gifts. Spread the word

    Don’t be naive. If you disprove the gas beyond a doubt, then it can be accounted for entirely by the death rollercoasters.

    • Replies: @Skeptikal
  122. @Anon

    Forrestal was a patriot and was assassinated by the deep state!

  123. Anon[776] • Disclaimer says:
    @Bruno

    The ashkenazim are to the sefardi what the sefardim are too the goyim in terms of most format scholastic activities (math, physics and economy). It would be even more for analytical philosophy.

    I went to an elite private school with significant numbers of every group mentioned and none of that is true whatsoever.

    What is likely is that you are a prole Jew with the typical instilled personality disorder that is the cause of the issue discussed in the article.

  124. anon[389] • Disclaimer says:
    @Alfred

    According to Hellstorm[on this site], jews weren’t in the front lines of the infantry invading Germany in 1944/45, but they were heavily over represented in the next wave, where there were only women and old men left in the villages.
    It was the same in the Red Army on the Eastern Front.
    Harrowing reading.

    • Replies: @SolontoCroesus
  125. anon[389] • Disclaimer says:
    @David Blomstrom

    I was told this by someone who lived there at the time:
    The Commissars in Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia, Poland, were all jews. When the Germans threw the Soviets out, the people wanted revenge on the jews. Partisans were mostly jews too.

  126. bjondo says:
    @Republic

    Ads throughout.
    Large block ads.
    1st noticed yesterday.

  127. Whether Jewish self-regard is “excessive” is in the eye of the beholder, I suppose. But can anyone doubt that the Jews have vastly “punched above their weight” in almost every field of achievement?

    Maybe Jews are entitled to an extra helping of group self-esteem. And maybe the lesson isn’t that Jews are wrong, but that Europeans should likewise be entitled to the group self-esteem that they are due, rather than the pathological self-loathing mandated by Current Year ideology.

    • Replies: @joe862
  128. @Saggy

    Complete idiocy is putting all your trust in one source.

    I’ve read a number of “alternative” histories of WWII/Holocaust, and they’ve been very enlightening. Yet the authors still disagree on certain things, and no one has all the details.

    Alexander Solzhenitzyn’s book 200 Years Together might shed some more light on the subject – if it was available in English.

    • Replies: @blake121666
  129. @Bardon Kaldian

    9/11 is “thinking differently.”

  130. Skeptikal says:
    @James Forrrestal

    “Note also his odd delusion that Dr. Joyce is somehow “morally obligated” to solve the Tribe’s problems for them…”

    Yes.
    Or, if you don’t have a solution to a problem you have no right to discuss or even raise it.
    That type of argument is quite common, actually.

  131. joe862 says:
    @Hypnotoad666

    The reason they “punch above their weight” is that they are supremacists and don’t have a working class. In order to have a functioning society you need people of varying abilities and temperaments. They are always looking to get rich as an exploitive minority. Other people do the work and they reap the rewards. Nobody is obligated to admire this. It causes more problems than it solves.

  132. Skeptikal says:
    @SafeNow

    There is a theory that the Jews of Eastern Europe developed the “joke”—what contemporary culture understands as a “joke.”

    I contend that Jewish humor, regardless of what one thinks of its quality, has had a huge influence on American humor in general and, even more, on American language and conversation. The latter is loaded with one \-liners. Very hard to get a person to listen to and respond to what one is actually saying. They are too busy coming up with some kind of putdown one-liner that they think is humorous. Like a standup comic.

    • Replies: @joe862
  133. Skeptikal says:
    @Alden

    “Cremation has been disproved by the fact that there wasn’t enough fuel t”

    Bollocks.

    Temperature was “maintained” by the bodies already burning.

    Just as you need the “fuel” of newspaper to get a fire going in your fireplace, but once it is going, you don’t need to add newspaper, just add more wood.

    Same with bodies in the crematorium. Once you get the fire going you just add more bodies to keep it going.

    See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Topf_and_Sons

    • LOL: Alden
    • Troll: anarchyst
  134. mikesmith says:

    In ancient Rome, Greek influence became so pervasive that even those who openly opposed it could not avoid expressing their opposition in literary genres invented by and borrowed from the Greeks. And it is interesting that in contemporary America, even critics of the Jews sometimes express their opposition in terms that sound suspiciously Freudian. Yes, the Jews are full of themselves, now more than ever, but sometimes a cigar is just a cigar.

    • Replies: @Pheasant
  135. sally says:
    @DESERT FOX

    The history of the formation of the constitution has been reported! But what is rarely discussed is how it was that 39 guys designated “ratification (Article VII)” as sufficient to impose on the entire country the new government the conventioneers invented.

    [MORE]

    These state (states are entities controlled by lobbyist of corporate economic interest and foreign sourced land grant wealth) appointees to the convention were suppose to meet and return solutions to certain elements in the Articles of Confederation, not eliminate the Articles of Confederation? Instead the conventioneers designated ratification by the states (instead of holding a general election), wrote their own constitution, ignored the masses, and appointed those who appointed the conventioneers to the convention, as the authority to approve the conventioneers constitution. Moreover, even today the Article II persons ( President and Vice President ) are appointed by essentially the same process .. the states each appoint electors to the electoral college and the electoral college elects the president and the vice president, (no matter what the outcome of the popular vote).

    Has anyone traced the backgrounds of the 39 persons who destroyed Democracy in America to Jewish ancestry? Could it be there were no Jews among the founders? There were landed Gentry, members of the British elite..yet not one a Jew from the land of the bankers ?

    Please note both the federal reserve and income tax were installed in the run up to world war I (which was a war imposed on humanity by the bankers and corporations in British and France. WWI was designed to remove Germany’s competition to the British and French economy and to take the oil rich Ottoman Empire from the Ottomans. Both the income tax and federal reserve were installed in 1913 within a few days of each other, but the ratification of the 16th amendment is still being debated in places.

    Desert Fox, I think you make a good point.

  136. anon[837] • Disclaimer says:

    There is something fundamentally degenerate about Anglo culture and mentality that allows jews to so easily take over English-speaking societies and develop a symbiosis with Anglo elites. British Empire or JewSA its all the same shit. World would be much better off had the Axis powers not been completely defeated and pummeled, or had the USSR not collapsed in 1991. Post-1991, we have complete Anglo-Zionist hegemony, which is just now starting to crack.

  137. Very good article. The idea of Jewish superiority and Jewish exclusivity is culturally inbred. It permeates everything. I found your mention of the New Testament interesting:

    Even in the New Testament of Christians, one finds the statement that “Salvation is from the Jews (John 4:22), and Jesus is mentioned as comparing a non-Jew to a dog (Matthew 15:26).

    From a religious perspective the first statement is a truism – the route to salvation was through covenant promises that focused on the Davidic dynasty. The second statement seems harsh and promotes Jewish exclusivity suggesting that Jesus was a product of his environment until one factors in the gentile response and Jesus’ admiring acceptance of “gentile faith”. After all, Jesus declared that he had “other sheep” and they would be “one flock” (John 10:15). Therefore the Fourth Gospel demonstrates a change of attitude in Jesus’ thought processes. Jesus had come to “glorify” the Father (John 12:28) but the Jews were only interested (and still are) in self-glorification.

    In the measure that she glorified herself and lived luxuriously, in the same measure give her torment and sorrow; for she says in her heart, “I sit as queen, and am no widow, and will not see sorrow.” Therefore her plagues will come in one day—death and mourning and famine. And she will be utterly burned with fire, for strong is the Lord God who judges her. (Rev 18:7-8)

    Finally, Judaism and particularly the Rabbi’s have a special place reserved for their fellow Rabbi Paul the apostle to the gentiles. They certainly see him as a self-hating Jew because he extended the “hope of Israel” to the gentiles and destroyed the notion of Jewish superiority and exclusivity. However, it was touch and go there for a while because Judaists in the early church were appalled at the idea of sharing their status. This lies at the root of the argument between Paul and Mark and the writing of a pro-gentile gospel. See the following PDF:
    http://www.biblaridion.info/Anthology/food_for_thought.pdf

    • Replies: @Alden
    , @mikesmith
  138. Zamboni says:

    Jews are averse to being objectively studied at all, and are notoriously unresponsive to census questions, resulting in a persistent inability to accurately determine their population size in almost every Diaspora country

    That makes sense. I have long sensed that Jews are vastly undercounted in the US. I think they are far higher than the reported 2% in the country. Also, even if they outmarry, their children still continue to identify as Jews.

    I live in the Northwest, everywhere I turn, I see and hear Jews. They are great at hiding behind non-Jewish names these days, like Bret Stephens or David French, but their behavior doesn’t change, still predictably libtard or Ziocon. I now basically count all liberals, LGBTQ and/or Israel supporters as Jews, this includes Bill Gates, Warren Buffett, Jeff Bezos, Koch brothers, any and all self-identified Democrats, all the cucks and Israel firsters in the GOP. If they are not Jews, they might as well be, no difference.

    • Replies: @Zamboni
  139. Johan says:

    The Jew runs the Western world by means of owning the financial systems, as noted already by many, but a small part of people seem to become aware that the Jew runs the Western world because he owns and guides also something more important, which is the imagination of Westerners.
    Imagination is most important in life, what you become, you have first imagined, what you imagine, you become, if you don’t imagine anything, you become nothing, both on the individual level, and on the group level. Imagination is vision, vision is future.

    The Jew runs the Goy’s imagination by means of being present everywhere in the Western world where imagination is key, the entertainment sectors, high brow culture sectors (classical music, literature, philosophy, etc), the media sector, technology sectors, politics, etc, etc. The Jew owns and controls the imagination of the Western Goy in main areas, the imagination of his nation (forbidding the Goy’s nationalism), he owns the narrative of the past of the Goy (history), and he owns the narrative of the future of the Goy (big-tech, etc.). Meanwhile, while aiding the degradation and destruction of all what is of the Goy himself, and what is of imaginative value to the Goy, the Jew upgrades and aggrandizes himself scandalously brutally by means of imposing his own imagination onto the Goy.

    We Goy, we have ourself subjugated by a very small fanatic minority, they mold and guide us like we are infantile and incompetent. How shameful, what degenerated fools and slaves we are, and how incompetent, clueless and corrupt are our leaders!

    Without vision, the future will perish they say, one could also state that by accepting the vision of an alien group of people, you are leading a second hand life, imagined for you by someone else.

    • Replies: @joe862
  140. Zamboni says:
    @Zamboni

    Also, anyone who is unscrupulous, greedy, shameless, arrogant, narcissistic, neurotic, intellectual, pushy, rude, argumentative, insulting, gluttonous, loves “diversity”, obsessed with sex/money/gender/race/identity/victimhood — JEW.

  141. joe862 says:
    @Skeptikal

    I think jews were funny for maybe 15 minutes but it was before I became aware of comedians. Are there any really funny jewish comedians recently? There are a lot of jewish comedians but they range from bad to mediocre. Chelsea Handler and sarah silverman, for example, aren’t funny at all. I can think of examples of incredibly unfunny jewish comics but nothing else notable. seinfeld was popular but very banal. He found the sweet spot in the sitcom watching demographic. Impressive from a money-making perspective but not great comedy by any stretch. There’s a youtube video showing a long list of jokes amy schumer has ripped off. All the comedians I find funny are black or white. No jews, no asians, no latinos.

  142. Zamboni says:

    Jews are great at promoting one another. “Expert” is an endearing term bestowed on Jews in academia/politics by Jews in the media. Only a Jew can be an expert of anything, with an occasional Kool Aid drinking goyim thrown in so as not to be too obvious. I’m convinced the reason Jews seem like such a successful bunch is because they form an exclusive clannish club that actively hire and promote only Jews. This is how they came to dominate all institutions of import in this country, from Wall Street to Hollywood, DC to SV, and everywhere in between: media, academia, judiciary, the arts. Hire only Jews, promote only Jews. The so-called white privilege is basically just Jew privilege.

    The entire deep state is run by Jews, with their HQ at CIA, which reports to Mossad.

  143. renfro says:
    @Fredric Bedoire

    I as an historian have found the influences from Jewish patrons and entrepreneurs in 18th and early 19 Cent. so evident that I spent almost ten years to follow the item in Europe and the US after

    Elaborate on that please.

  144. bjondo says:

    Even in the New Testament of Christians, one finds the statement that “Salvation is from the Jews (John 4:22

    Early Scofield.
    Best do as Marcion –
    excise and burn.
    Remove Judaizers
    from Christian Testament.

    …and Jesus is mentioned as comparing a non-Jew to a dog (Matthew 15:26).

    Can’t find.
    Made up?

    https://biblehub.com/matthew/15-26.htm

    Ugliness that Jew would say, then and now.
    Jesus not Jew.
    Came against Jew, then, now, forever.

    5ds

  145. joe862 says:
    @Johan

    The difficulty is not wanting to resort to being as disgusting as they are. Westerners aspire to something more. Something beyond selfish tribalism is far harder to achieve. Selfish tribalism has been done to death.

    • Replies: @mikesmith
  146. ivan says:
    @Colin Wright

    Agreed. The biblical stories have been editorialised – sometimes a few times over – to give some coherence to the emerging national consciousness of what became the Jews.

  147. Seraphim says:

    The root of Jewish self-glorification and self-adulation was laid bare by the Christ:

    “THEN spake Jesus to the multitude, and to his disciples, 2 Saying: The scribes and the Pharisees sit in Moses’ seat: 3 All therefore whatsoever they bid you observe, that observe and do; but do not ye after their works: for they say, and do not. 4 For they bind heavy burdens and grievous to be borne, and lay them on men’s shoulders; but they themselves will not move them with one of their fingers. 5 But all their works they do for to be seen of men: they make broad their phylacteries, and enlarge the borders of their garments, 6 And love the uppermost rooms at feasts, and the chief seats in the synagogues, 7 And greetings in the markets, and to be called of men, Rabbi, Rabbi. 8 But be not ye called Rabbi: for one is your Master, even Christ; and all ye are brethren. 9 And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven. 10 Neither be ye called masters: for one is your Master, even Christ. 11 But he that is greatest among you shall be your servant. 12 And whosoever shall exalt himself shall be abased; and he that shall humble himself shall be exalted. 13 But woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye shut up the kingdom of heaven against men: for ye neither go in yourselves, neither suffer ye them that are entering to go in”.

    They are right that they ‘created’ the ‘modern world’. But it was by a long and persistent action of subverting the Church and its ‘Weltanschauung’. Christianity was their greatest enemy because it proclaimed that with the Incarnation their role of ‘chosen’ people came to an end. They know that, but they cannot suffer not to sit in the chief seats in the synagogues and be called Rabbi, Rabbi. They cannot humble themselves.

  148. Harbinger says:
    @Bardon Kaldian

    “No mentally sane person would deny influence of various Jewish individuals (or groups) in numerous periods of European history. Also, there had been highly creative Jews & men of Jewish extraction (not necessarily identifying with Judaism) who strongly & positively contributed to European & world culture, especially in past 150-200 years.”

    Well then, it would appear that the overwhelming majority of truth seekers, who have studied Judaism and its influences on this earth, are insane, according to you.
    The Jews do not do for the benefit of others. They do for the benefit of the Jew. I think of here in the UK and the Rothschilds. What good have they done, compared to the bad? Just how many lives have been destroyed by them, directly and indirectly, since they were vomited onto the European scene in the latter 18th century?
    Interesting to note, that of late, the ‘late’ (hooray) Anthony Bourdain was a much celebrated Jewish, celebrity chef who, of course, was plastered all over the msm and given TV shows. America mourned his death and yet the msm remain 100% silent on the fact that he not only called openly for the genocide of Europeans but also wouldn’t allow whites into some of his shows. And what, would have happened to any European who had done likewise to Jews? Instantly removed from their position on TV, character assassination would follow by the Jew media and that’s the last you’d hear of them. But nope, they even aired Anthony Bourdain, on a trip to Israel speaking of “ending whiteness” and not a peep, from the press, about blatant racism on his part (and Jews) as well as promoting genocide.

    Again, Jews DO for Jews. If non Jews happen to benefit (only on the exceptionally rare occasion) you can guarantee that it’s a double edged sword and something bad, will befall them in the future as a result of it.

    Compassion and kindness are two traits lacking in Jews, amongst many.

  149. Johan says:

    Regarding the ‘Jew self-deception’ theme as referred to in the article. I’d posit here the following meta theory:

    The Westerners are objectivist materialists, which is the reason why science was born and has been developed in the Western world (spreading to the rest of the world), and why the Western world is so materialistic (especially the US). These are the dominant qualities and orientation of the Western mind.

    The Easterners are subjectivist spiritualists at large. The Jews though are a special breed, they are subjectivist materialists (again, ‘at large’, meaning dominant qualities).

    Now, subjectivists are strong in imagination, they are not like objectivists targeted at determining of what is objectively true, what is most probably true. What is a lie for an objectivist, is a necessary functional narrative for a subjectivist. Every group of people, also objectivists, engage to some extent in the creation of functional imaginative lies, of imaginative group narratives, but the Jew has a very strong tendency towards this, and a strong historical practice which goes way back. What we call deception, self-deception, lies, etc., for them, these are functional imaginations.

    In the Western world, we are trying to come to terms with some of our objective past (colonization, slavery), while our guests, the imaginative Jews are not intent to embark on honest objective self-reflection, they lie, they exaggerate, they aggrandize, they fantasize, they are full of imaginative nonsense from the Western point of view, at least those Westerners whom are awake to it. A Westerner, when confronted with the ‘imaginative narratives…’ of the horrors of the holocaust, he would never suspect that a group of people would just plainly imagine these horrors, for a Westerner it is unimaginable to make up such things, you do not lie about such things, that is our mentality, but this is not at all the mentality of the Jew. It is about time that the West comes to understand this, and that the Jew in these respects is taken for what he is, a fantast in the negative sense, imaginative in the positive sense. Fantasts are a burden, they manipulate and use their imagination for themselves, imagination itself though can be used in a good way, and a very minor part of them have been using it to be of aid also to other people. We should reject the Jew as far as he engages in the maintenance of selfish Jew group-binding narratives, he should be made to not feel comfortable trying to sell his fantasies.

  150. Seraphim says:

    A few notes on Isaac La Peyrère to see why he might be considered more important than Hobbes and Spinoza.
    He is famous for formulating the theory of the ‘Prae-Adamitae’ (Men Before Adam) which became the basis for 19th century theories of polygenism (of American variety -Charles Caldwell, Josiah Nott, Samuel Morton) and ‘white-ism’ (only Whites are descendants of Adam – in fact La Peyrere says explicitly that Adam is the father of the Jewish race).

    His biography is no less interesting:
    “LA PEYRÈRE, ISAAC (1594 or 1596–1676), French theologian, Bible critic, and anthropologist, apparently of Marrano background. He was born in Bordeaux and raised a Calvinist. In 1640 he became the Prince of Condé’s secretary. In 1642–43 he wrote Praeadamitae and Du Rappel des Juifs, which constitute one continuous theory of Bible criticism and Messianism. The Rappel des Juifs was published anonymously in 1643, while the more revolutionary Praeadamitae (“Men Before Adam”) was banned and circulated privately in manuscript in France, Holland, and Denmark…
    La Peyrère has been interpreted as a heretic, atheist, deist, Socinian, father of Bible criticism, and father of Zionism. His overall theory is a Marrano Messianist view. La Peyrère argued that the Jews are about to be recalled, that the Messiah is coming for them, that they should join the Christians, and with the king of France rebuild Zion. Then the Jews will rule the world from Jerusalem. La Peyrère was a combination of hard-headed scientist and kabbalistic messianist in developing his case…
    His analysis of the Bible played a great role in the development of Higher Criticism, influencing Spinoza and Richard Simon [the ‘Father of Higher Criticism’ of the Bible] [and the deists].
    @https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/la-peyr-x00e8-re-isaac

    “he lived for one month in 1654 in a house in the Southern Netherlands adjoining that of the recently abdicated Queen Christina of Sweden. Christina is said to have financed the anonymous publication of Prae-Adamitae.[2] During this time both Christina and La Peyrère met with Menasseh Ben Israel, who was later invited by Oliver Cromwell’s government to England to negotiate the readmission of Jews to that country. Menasseh became a convert to La Peyrère’s belief that the coming of the Jewish Messiah was imminent. La Peyrère also argued that the Messiah would join with the king of France (that is, the Prince of Condé, not Louis XIV of France) to liberate the Holy Land, rebuild the Temple and set up a world government of the Messiah with the king of France acting as regent”.
    It has since emerged that, in fact: “Condé, Cromwell and Christina were negotiating to create a theological-political world state, involving overthrowing the Catholic king of France, among other things”. (Wikipedia quoting “Garber & Ayers, Cambridge History of Seventeenth-Century Philosophy, p. 407).

  151. Norman Lebrecht: Truly a vile, self-promoting, pseudo-intellectual who thrives off the genius of others, parasitically using them as vulgar props in order to turn the spotlight onto himself. His writings on classical music—filled with innuendo, half-truths, and blatant lies—are among the grimiest stains upon the already fetid toilet that is British journalism. The veritable poster child of smug, self-satisfied, and utterly mediocre Jewish supremacy.

    • Replies: @Johan
  152. @Thus Spake

    They tried that already. It’s called Zionism, and it’s attempt to make the Jews “normal” just like other nations is a clear failure.

    It wasn’t for lack of trying. The old stereotypes that Jews could never be farmers or soldiers or even athletic was targeted by the kibbutz movement in Israel to show they really could excel at these physically demanding endeavors.

    After a promising start, the atavistic tendency to shystering and kvetching reasserted itself, and now the Jewish state is filled to overflowing with shuling and davening yiddles who expect and get the goyim to do their dirty work and bloody wars for them.

  153. What sort of people were the 19th century Anglo Americans that they thought they could accommodate in their country a people who were spoken of thusly?

    EXODUS
    34:10 And he said, Behold, I make a covenant: before all thy people I will do marvels, such as have not been done in all the earth, nor in any nation: and all the people among which thou art shall see the work of the LORD: for it is a terrible thing that I will do with thee.

    34:12 Take heed to thyself, lest thou make a covenant with the inhabitants of the land whither thou goest, lest it be for a snare in the midst of thee:

    34:13 But ye shall destroy their altars, break their images, and cut down their groves:

    • Replies: @anon
  154. @Sick of Orcs

    If Jews aren’t complaining about past genocides that never happened, they’re complaining about future ones that never seem to arrive.

    • Replies: @Sick of Orcs
  155. @Skeptikal

    The human body is 2/3rds water. Do you really think you could keep a fire going with corpses?

  156. @Colin Wright

    Yes I too knew a lot of Jews in my puppy years – graduate student colleagues, friends. girlfriends.
    But my puppy years were a long time ago. The country has changed and perhaps those Jews have changed with it. People do change as they get older and this country has grown much more philosemetic(not a good thing). Sometimes I wonder if the Jews I see on this sight are the Jews
    I used to know

    • Replies: @Angharad
  157. @Republic

    Yes, there are ads. I find myself wondering if there isn’t something Jewish about that Somehow organized Jewry has to disrupt Unz

  158. SafeNow says:

    Today (Oct. 21) is “Babbling Day.” I am not making this up. Check your calendar of daily minor holidays if you do not believe me. Babbling Day celebrates those with a glib tongue; those who would turn a simple statement into a dissertation.

  159. @Skeptikal

    The comment you replied to is bollocks – it can’t be shown that “there wasn’t enough fuel …”. But it does require more fuel to burn a corpse than supplied by that corpse. That is because of the water content of the corpse. The cremation process consists of evaporating the water from a corpse (which of course results in evaporative cooling) and igniting the combustibles of that corpse (which suppplies heat). The heat from the corpse’s combustibles is not enough to offset the heat needed for the evaporation.

    It is odd that your wiki link to Topf mentioned one of their patents – but not the one that most closely aligns with the case you wish to make. Their patent DRP 861731 was for a cremation oven that only required external fuel to bring it up to temperature and thereafter only the fuel of the coffins to continuously operate. But that coffin fuel was of course necessary. You couldn’t cremate corpses solely from the fuel of those corpses – as in your wood example.

    I discuss this Topf patent here:

    https://rodoh.info/forum/viewtopic.php?f=13&t=3141&p=123329#p123329

    You can go directly to the very ending of that particular post of mine for a short synopsis of what the patent claims. Topf did indeed make a few of these particular cremation ovens which worked as claimed.

  160. Alden says:
    @Skeptikal

    Writing a Wikipedia entry doesn’t mean it’s true.

    First, the human body is full of water, 60 percent. Human bodies don’t burn with just a bit of kindling. I don’t think you can burn watery things like watermelon spinach strawberries and grapes with just a bit of kindling.

    Second firewood burns because it’s stiff enough to build triangles and criss cross piles with lots of empty space for oxygen. The oxygen is the food of fire. When the wood is stacked closely it won’t burn. You can squirt lighter fluid on it but the fluid just burns itself out in a few minutes.

    Who ever write the wiki article should have taken basic anatomy and grown up with a fireplace and barbecue so he’d know how fire works

    To burn a pile of bodies: the Germans would have to erect like stacks of grills? shelves? With at least 8 inches between layers. Then they could douse the bodies with gasoline or kerosine. But laws of physics thermodynamics mean when the skin was burnt off the fire wouldn’t be able to consume the 60 percent water body.

    Third the Jews have always always claimed both in their historical propaganda and fiction like Exodus that the bodies were burnt in crematory ovens and reduced to ashes and bits of bone which was used as under pavement in paving roads.

    So it’s changed from crematoria to stacks of bodies; in cold foggy rainy N Europe.

    My main interest is affirmative action, not Jewish lies about 1939-1946.

  161. @AaronB

    ‘Logical, reasonable Europeans never would have created Israel, for instance, against all odds.’

    How is a colonial enterprise begun in the late nineteenth century either (a) something that Europeans never would have done, and (b) ‘against all odds’?

  162. sed -i ‘s/Jew/American/g’

    Reads the same, if you can get used to the neologism “Americanish” and ignore anything that refers to a period before the start of the 18th century.

  163. @Skeptikal

    just add more wood

    Yeah, your system might have a few difficulties if your wood contains as much water as the average fresh human corpse, and you’re trying to cremate a couple of hundred bodies a day in each retort, non-stop for year after year. Engineering says “Nope”.

    And then there’s all those bits of bone left over… where did they go? From memory, cremation of a human being leaves about 5.5lb of bone shards and ash. 33 million lb of remains generated in ~3 years, and not a trace anywhere. Seems legit.

  164. anon[837] • Disclaimer says:
    @Achilles Wannabe

    They were and still are fools. I have no sympathy for Anglo-Americans, they made their bed and they have to sleep in it, selling their soul to the devil. I feel bad for Russians, Germans, and Japanese, who all had their national dreams and ambitions crushed or severely derailed by the filthy jew.

    • Replies: @Achilles Wannabe
  165. Republic says:

    re:#166

    Ron actually approved those new ads, see the current announcements section where he explains that those type of ads (adsence) by google help pay for hosting this site.

    It is possible to block those ad by installing adblock.

    • Replies: @renfro
  166. Johan says:
    @Nicolás Palacios Navarro

    ” His writings on classical music—filled with innuendo, half-truths, and blatant lies—are among the grimiest stains upon the already fetid toilet that is British journalism.”

    Talking about toilet journalism, journalism being politics.
    In a more broader sense the classical music world in Europe is owned by progressive liberals at large. They attacked the conductor Valerie Gergiev about his view on the Russian law which forbids propaganda of homosexuality among minors. Then from the snakepit of progressives many sounds were heard making pleas to forbid him to conduct European (British, Dutch) orchestras, there were even pleas to do away with the Gergiev festival in The Netherlands. In many other respects, quite some classical radio stations spit out progressive propaganda continuously (recently and enormous amount related to the climate change hoax).

  167. Hbm says:

    There’s a whole lot of things I’d like to post under this fine article, but I’ll just do my usual shtick: Jewish behavior is what Freud would call a compulsive repetition– in this case, a repetition of the processes of how Judaism itself came into being. What the dear departed Harold Bloom would call metaleptic transumption is the master trope of Judaism, and it infects the Abrahamisms and their derivatives. It is a revision of origins, a rhetorical superceding by way of a retrojection whose aim is psychological primacy in the here and now. There’s plenty of examples in Professor Joyce’s article. Thousands of years ago Hellenized Jews did it when luminaries like Philo claimed Plato learned philosophy from Moses, or that Spartans were Jewish in origin, having been a lost tribe of Israel. Jews also told their Ptolemaic rulers that they were once the secret power behind the throne of Egypt and suggested that Jews had built the pyramids. They did this and do this because Judaism was given birth to by Persian Zoroastrian colonizers who had lied to Levantine yokels as a matter of policy about who they were, and lied that their new alien rulers were really a returning old elite. Some scholars argue that the notion of Jewish Chosen-ness is really just the Shah’s claim over his subjects, which was revised into something much more grand when presented as Jewish History to the Greeks. So much of Jewish psychology is illuminated when Ezra and Nehemiah are rightly regarded as Judaism’s primal scene.

  168. jsigur says:
    @Bardon Kaldian

    Jews would say and have said I am an anti-Semite.
    Nevertheless, Jews have been primarily responsible for modernity if for no other reason it has been their money for the most part that backed and financed products and areas, that have led to its creation.
    The first central banks and the establishment of corporations not to mention the immediate use of the printing press as a Jewish subversion tool to mind control in their favor are major tools that accomplished that
    All these white inventions without Jewish approval would have been thrown on a junk heap if you get my drift (rather than rise up in fact in the public consciousness).
    The rise of modernity coincides with what one could claim was the beginning of the NWO (1492) that was a Jewish concept from the start and a major reason for the diaspora (which in reality is an effort to colonize areas previously free of Jewish influence)
    Colonialism, Protestantism and communist like Revolutions, soon after, led to things like Jewish full control of money, the industrial revolution, the need for railroads to help finish off the Indians in America, etc.
    It was accomplished because it is only Jews that have been able to keep primary a secret plan of subversion to undermine all cultures not owned by them till they are owned by them while finishing off the prophecies laid forth in the various Abrahamic books whose origin is traced to Jewish ancestry, everyone

  169. Johan says:

    As of the arrogance of Jewish self aggrandizement, and related to the Jew takeover of the classical world, there was Leonard Bernstein with his ‘Jeremiah’ symphony and other works which were based on Jew narratives and religious culture. These works were a propaganda of Jewish narratives from a B composer who has been promoted as a composer of universal signature…
    Universal, when your inspirational narratives are partly a promotion of age old tribal barbarism, tribal self aggrandizement, and the usual martyrology (obsessive self pity)? A ‘universal’ composer who specially for the occasion conducted an orchestra in Israel, in celebration of Israel, while they were at the same time, so to speak while they were playing, slaughtering Palestinians. Of course these Jewish based works were not popular at the time, what idiot tries to use Jewish narratives, the tribal narratives of some minority, and the psychological obsessions of the tribe on the global Western stage, what arrogance.

  170. Johan says:
    @Bardon Kaldian

    “Just, there is a tendency among some (many?) modern, highly ethnocentic Jews to vastly exaggerate their role in the birth of the modern world.”

    Some or many.
    We should include not only ‘ ethnocentic Jews’, but also those non Jews who actively and fervently do the propaganda for them, there are vast quantities of them.

    In Christianity in various modern countries in Europe you are taught in the church since the twentieth century that Israel is the land of the people of god, and that Christians need to support Israel and the Jews. This is inculcated into the congregations continuously. This is also taught to and inculcated massively in the minds of Christians in the US. This is the religious variant of the secular contribution to ”European & world culture’. The alleged religious superiority.

    A very popular non Jew pro Zionist right wing politician in The Netherlands dared to claim that the barbarian tribe (barbarian tribe, my words of course) stood at the basis of Western civilization… Also, politicians, propagandists of all sorts speak about the Western world as a ‘Judeo-Christian society’…

    Israel is promoted as an enlightened country in the midsts of alleged Muslim barbarism, while the country is actually a hotbed of nationalism, ultra-nationalism, religious orthodoxy and ultra orthodox fanaticism. While the country is dependent on Western support, vast amounts of Western money, Western technology(also stolen technology), and merely imitates Western political systems.

    This widely distributed image of Israel is another form of promoting the image of its place in world culture.
    Al these together represent a gigantic campaign, presenting the Jews and Israel as superior, in terms of culture, religion, and overall civilizational level. While the truth aside of exceptions is quite the opposite..

    “Also, there had been highly creative Jews & men of Jewish extraction (not necessarily identifying with Judaism) who strongly & positively contributed to European & world culture, especially in past 150-200 years.”

    True, these are exceptions though, but these are also exceptions among Goys, all these people, whether Jew or Goy are at first persecuted, prosecuted, ridiculed, or at best ignored. Because al nations are roughly mainly semi-barbarian nations. No nation can claim superiority, they all have treated their best people in hostile ways.

  171. @Johan

    They attacked the conductor Valerie Gergiev about his view on the Russian law which forbids propaganda of homosexuality among minors.

    Many also said that he is not a good conductor, which he, of course, proved them wrong while conducting London Symphony Orchestra playing Ravel’s Bolero with the tooth-pick. Western “journalism”, for the most part, is a collection of uneducated hacks and sociopaths who would prostitute anything and anyone for a 15 minute of fame. Most of them are utterly dumb.

  172. @Andrei Martyanov

    He is a superb conductor, but like most conductors—even the greats—he is also uneven. Not sure why, but his LSO recordings seem to glide by on auto-pilot; even the Russian repertoire he recorded with them (e.g. Prokofiev, Rachmaninoff, Scriabin). His recordings with the Munich Philharmonic and the Mariinsky Orchestra are much better, but are still occasionally beset by fatigue.

    To be fair, Gergiev is a fine musician, but does not even begin to approximate the greatness of Soviet era conductors such as Mravinsky, Kondrashin, Svetlanov, Rozhdestvensky, Melik-Peshayev, Samosud, and most of all Nikolai Golovanov. Even among contemporary Russian conductors I mostly prefer Yuri Temirkanov, Alexander Lazarev, and Vladimir Fedoseyev.

    • Replies: @Andrei Martyanov
  173. @Johan

    In a more broader sense the classical music world in Europe is owned by progressive liberals at large.

    Correct, as has occurred with all the arts. Today one is regularly treated to biographies of musicians long dead that contrive to show that they were somehow forerunners of today’s liberals, for example.

    Recently I read a new biography of Dmitri Shostakovich that was written by a female musicologist whom I otherwise respect highly. But she could not resist the urge to paint the man as a proto-fourth wave feminist, drawing especial attention to the “open” marriage he had with his first wife. That he had agreed to such a foolish arrangement was certainly true enough, but she also carefully omitted how he repeatedly bemoaned to his friends the misery it brought him. Nor did she seem to notice or care how telling it was that Shostakovich would never again repeat this “progressive” feat in his subsequent marriages.

    Returning to Lebrecht, I have not read him in nearly a decade. But as I recall, he was not a liberal, but rather a neocon Zionist.

    • Replies: @Johan
  174. ” Perhaps the quintessential example in this regard is the reception by Jews of the Jewish Abstract Expressionist painter Mark Rothko”

    Art is where Jewish ethnocentrism shines through most clearly. Why are there so many heavily hyped abstract painters of Jewish origin?

    After all, it takes zero intelligence to be an abstract painter. Tom Wolfe’s book on the NY art scene is a good indication of that fact. No grappling with proofs and theorems for 20 years, no learning four languages and studying ancient texts.

    In fact, IQ research suggests that Jews score lower in spatial intelligence, so Jews would seem to have no advantage in fine art at all.

    So why then do they dominate?

    The obvious answer is that the Jews dominate the business of art and promote their own. They even gloat about the art critic industry being run by a ‘mafia’.

    • Replies: @Skeptikal
    , @Colin Wright
  175. @Nicolás Palacios Navarro

    Svetlanov

    That’s for sure. Interestingly, Gergiev and Temirkanov have a lingering feud, including a famous spat over Tenirkanov’s (who is a Circassian nationalist) statement that Tchaikovsky’s music is a derivative pop (something to this effect), to which Gergiev responded with the offer to Temirkanov to write anything comparable to Tchaikovsky’s best. Gergiev is Russia’s patriot and is open on that. But in general, they are all good and tiny differences noticeable only by very sophisticated music connoisseurs do not really matter, most people just enjoy music. And yes, conducting with a tooth-pick was a damn funny and astute response.

  176. The Holocaust™ is total B.S.

    The “6 million” is demographically and logistically impossible.

    They also tried to claim soap and lampshades were made from Jews.

    It’s all B.S. War is deception and the Victors rewrite history.

    The state of the west and scum in control today have by their own actions proven Hitler right.

    The only solution is Nationalism. It’s the best model for everyone.

  177. Alden says:

    I thought Cristina went to Rome, never mind.

  178. @Andrei Martyanov

    Interestingly, Gergiev and Temirkanov have a lingering feud, including a famous spat over Tenirkanov’s (who is a Circassian nationalist) statement that Tchaikovsky’s music is a derivative pop (something to this effect), to which Gergiev responded with the offer to Temirkanov to write anything comparable to Tchaikovsky’s best.

    I am sure you know of his other longstanding conductorial feud with Semyon Bychkov. The latter was originally Yevgeny Mravinsky’s designated choice to succeed him at the Leningrad Philharmonic. However, Temirkanov was deemed more politically reliable (or so the story goes) and was appointed to the position instead.

    The Tchaikovsky-themed feud between him and Gergiev was unknown to me. A truly bizarre statement from Temirkanov, especially because he has recorded so much Tchaikovsky. Amazing that even 126 years after his death you still have snobs turning up their nose at Tchaikovsky!

  179. Johan says:
    @Nicolás Palacios Navarro

    Regarding the mentioned biography, it reminds me of how Oscar Wilde has been put forward as an icon of defence and alleged martyr of homosexuality. If you read his works and transcriptions of the trial though, he does not plea for nor against it, other than a few words, he completely ignores the issue, his philosophy was all about defence of art from moralism, and all about the necessity of art and beauty in our lives, whether low or highbrow art.
    Even more, those who have made of him an icon of sexual liberation are doing the exact opposite of what he stood for, the so called ‘progressives’ are the ones who are most actively and fanatically engaged in the censorship of art these days, they are the moralist puritans of our times. Such ideological highly politicized people do not read, what they see and read is what their minds project on it, they merely recruit people under the banner of their ideology.

  180. Miggle says:
    @Hiram of Tyre

    The ancient Jews invented nothing.

    One only needs to familiarize him/herself with their Tanakh/Torah to see how they plagiarized the stories, concepts and beliefs of others to make up for their absolute insignificance.

    But the Canaanites invented the alphabet.

    And a particularly nasty tribe of Canaanites whose god was a “jealous god” (each tribe had its own god) plagiarized the writings of the time. I’m vague on this, but I think Shlomo Sand was one of the historians who pointed out that that particularly nasty people were really Canaanites, though in denial. On some site concerned with language and writing I read that the Canaanites invented the alphabet, inspired by Egyptian hieroglyphics. On another, I think it was the site of a raving Jew in furious denial that at many points of the Bible a new or better understanding of it is reached after studying ancient Canaanite writings (or fragments or something) relating to other gods.

    So the OT is based on earlier Canaanite writings, perhaps mostly lost because of the nastiness of that tribe. It was polytheistic, though often having only one god of its own, but during the Babylonian exile, after the Persian conquest, they learnt of monotheism from the Persians, and came back with the new notion that their god was not only a jealous god but the only god. And apparently much throughout the OT was written or re-written after their return from the exile. By “scribes”, no doubt.

    It must have been then that that god told them that Moses had spent spent a 10,000 hour day after leaving Mount Sinai talking a lot, laying down 10,000 hours of law verbally, too much to write down, breaking his jaw at the speed he spoke, which they would need to re-harvest out of thin air.

    • Replies: @mikesmith
  181. Dannyboy says:
    @AaronB

    Shitty Little Israel would not exist without Europe and the US, you stoopid fukin kike kunt.

    • Agree: Poco
  182. Pheasant says:
    @Skeptikal

    Human corpses are mostly water. Even when they were burned years after being buried the human body would not have had sufficient flammable effect to do what you are describing.

  183. Pheasant says:
    @mikesmith

    Freud took his best stuff from the ancient greeks.

    • Replies: @mikesmith
  184. Skeptikal says:
    @jbwilson24

    Jews seem to excel at playing the violin.

    It seems like the greatest solo and other violinists of the 20th C were Russian or Eastern European Jews or their descendants.

    • Replies: @utu
    , @Wally
  185. @anon

    Yes but what about the white immigrants who struggled to assimilate to Anglo American culture
    while the Jews were just accepted as they were providing they shaved and got a hair cut? This seems like a betrayal of the assimilation contract

    • Replies: @mikesmith
  186. mikesmith says:
    @secondElijah

    This brings to mind the thought that the one thing the Jews do not seem to be writing books to congratulate themselves for inspiring is, ironically, something they really were responsible for: Christianity! “Isn’t it wonderful how we Jews brought the Christian gospel to the world!” Nope, I don’t hear much of that from them.

  187. Seraphim says:

    It is because the WASP were inoculated with ‘Christian Zionism’ from the moment when they set foot in the ‘New Israel’. And then started to think of themselves as the Lost Tribes of Israel.

  188. mikesmith says:
    @Achilles Wannabe

    Until FDR, there was a tendency to keep the Jews at a distance. It was difficult for a while for them to get into the best universities or to get high level jobs in the best firms, and Jews received few appointments to the White House cabinet, were rarely found in Congress, and did not sit on the Supreme Court. This all changed very rapidly with the election of FDR in 1932. One factor that helped the Jews was that, while in Europe Jews were suspect if they openly practiced their religion, in America they were respected for practicing their religion, even if it was the wrong one. This was partly due to the influence of Deism and Freemasonry, and partly to the influence of living under the first amendment.

    • Replies: @Achilles Wannabe
  189. mikesmith says:
    @Miggle

    The alphabet was invented by the Phoenicians, just to the north of Canaan/Philistia. (Philistia, land of the Philistines, was an alternative name because the Philistines–Mycenaean Greeks–had invaded by sea and settled there during the general chaos and collapse at the end of the Bronze Age, the same general time period during which the Hebrews also appear there. Philistia was later mangled by the Romans into Palestina, and was known by that name from the Roman conquest in the first century BC until 1948.)

    • Replies: @geokat62
    , @Miggle
  190. renfro says:
    @Republic

    I don’t object to the ads.,. neither would I object to the site asking for donations from we commenters….its certainly worth paying something for.

  191. geokat62 says:
    @mikesmith

    The alphabet was invented by the Phoenicians…

    The Phoenicians came close, but their writing system fell short of qualifying as an alphabet:

    The alphabet is a form of writing whose elements represent the actual sounds of the spoken word. The alphabetic signs, which represent single phonemes, when combined, “translate the aural, invisible elements of human speech into graphic, visible signs.” The first alphabetic script in Greece developed in the late ninth or early eighth century BC, forming the Hellenic alphabet. The great majority of the signs of this alphabet were adopted from the Phoenician script, a West Semitic consonantal syllabary, which was probably developed in ca. 1000 BC. However, the revolutionary character of the Hellenic alphabet was achieved through some phonetic alterations of the existing signs and the addition of new signs. Whereas the Semitic syllabary was exclusively consonantal, the Hellenic script evolved into a phonetic writing with the alteration of five Phoenician consonants into vowels. In addition to that, four signs were added-phi, psi, chi, and omega-to cover all the range of sounds in the Hellenic language. These alterations and additions formed the first alphabet, which managed to create a visual representation of all the phonetic elements of speech.

    https://phoenicia.org/alphabetcontrov.html

    • Replies: @mikesmith
  192. mikesmith says:

    @Seraphim,

    Some corrections. “Christian Zionism,” if by that you mean the teachings of such people as John Hagee and Pat Robertson, among many others, was not invented until circa 1829 by John Nelson Darby in Britain.

    To “think of themselves as the Lost Tribes of Israel” is known as Anglo-Israelism or British Israelism and was also invented in Britain during the Victorian Age.

    The “New Israel” is a term that since the 2nd century AD has consistently referred to the New Testament Church, which the Church Fathers taught had replaced Israel according to the flesh. The Jewish translation of the OT into Greek also identified Israel as the ekklesia or Church. The debate was over which group constituted the rightful heirs to the OT promises.

    It was the followers of Darby (the inventor of Dispensationalism or “Christian Zionism,” who tried to reconcile this disagreement by compartmentalizing the Bible into different parts, some relevant to the NT Church and others relevant to OT Israel, but during different periods or “dispensations” of history), who propagated the teaching that they were two separate peoples of God rather than that one had replaced the other.

    After the War of Northern Aggression (known by some as the “Civil War”), Samuel Untermeyer, Bernard Baruch, and Jacob Schiff financed an unscrupulous religious entrepreneur to travel to Britain, study his doctrines, and to publish them in America as the Scofield Reference Bible, and the rest is history:
    https://historicist.info/untermeyer/sheep.htm

    QUOTE: Untermeyer introduced Scofield to numerous Zionist and socialist leaders, including Samuel Gompers, Fiorello LaGuardia, Abraham Straus, Bernard Baruch and Jacob Schiff. Scofield had a shady past, a criminal record, had just gotten out of jail and had never been to seminary. But this was no problem. With their control of the press, some public relations work and their international network he was quickly transformed into one of America’s leading theologians.

    PS–The Jacob Schiff referred to above was a Rothschild agent and was not the same Jacob Schiff who was the (great?) grandfather of popular financial analyst Peter Schiff, even though both Jacob Schiff’s were New York Jews.

  193. mikesmith says:
    @geokat62

    The Semitic tongues, such as Phoenician, are unique in that they can be written without vowel symbols and still be understood , although occasionally a word will be subject to debate. The first scripts were syllabaries. Phoenician merchants, who needed a way to keep records without relying on expensive, highly educated scribes, apparently realized that they could create a simplified”syllabary” without indicating which consonant sound went with which vowel sound because of the unique structure of the Semitic tongues. However, the absence of any symbols for the vowels does not make the Phoenician script any less of an alphabet. Indeed, the general, maybe universal, view among linguists is that the Phoenicians were the only people to invent a true alphabet from scratch, and that all other alphabets ultimately derive from theirs, directly or indirectly.

    • Replies: @geokat62
    , @Miggle
  194. mikesmith says:
    @Pheasant

    Freud borrowed some imagery from Greek mythology, or at least the story of Oedipus, but the way he used it was uniquely his own brand of pseudo-science. Psychoanalysis is to psychiatry what astrology is to astronomy.

    • Replies: @anon
  195. Nothing ticks them off more than being indifferent to Pissrael and their precious Lolocaust. As for Freud, he can suck a dick.

  196. @Hamlet's Ghost

    Bad news, goyim, reparations must continue with our traumatized children.

    Horrific memories of non-existent gas chambers are being passed down.

    https://www.thedailybeast.com/children-of-holocaust-survivors-could-inherit-brain-trauma-new-study-suggests

    • Agree: Kiel
  197. geokat62 says:
    @mikesmith

    Indeed, the general, maybe universal, view among linguists is that the Phoenicians were the only people to invent a true alphabet…

    Funny you should use the expression true alphabet:

    The first fully phonemic script, the Proto-Canaanite script, later known as the Phoenician alphabet, is considered to be the first alphabet, and is the ancestor of most modern alphabets, including Arabic, Greek, Latin, Cyrillic, Hebrew, and possibly Brahmic. Peter T. Daniels, however, distinguishes an abugida or alphasyllabary, a set of graphemes that represent consonantal base letters which diacritics modify to represent vowels (as in Devanagari and other South Asian scripts), an abjad, in which letters predominantly or exclusively represent consonants (as in the original Phoenician, Hebrew or Arabic), and an “alphabet“, a set of graphemes that represent both vowels and consonants. In this narrow sense of the word the first “true” alphabet was the Greek alphabet, which was developed on the basis of the earlier Phoenician alphabet.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alphabet

  198. @jbwilson24


    In fact, IQ research suggests that Jews score lower in spatial intelligence, so Jews would seem to have no advantage in fine art at all.

    So why then do they dominate?’

    They didn’t dominate back in the day. For example, there was only one Jewish Impressionist — Pissaro — and he was distinctly second-tier.

    They only came to the forefront once art stopped requiring artistic ability. This isn’t to say they’re actually deficient — just not as inherently likely to disproportionately achieve as they are in, say, physics.

  199. Raindrop says:
    @Jayne Says

    You need to remember that the Jews you speak of who are obsessed with Tribalism, bloodline, Usury World Domination etc. are not the true ethhnic Jews that formed the 12 tribes of Jacob.
    The current small ethnic group calling themselves ‘Jews’ are masquerading as the true Jews or Isralites who’s circumstances we dont know much about today.

    The Jews you speak of in your comment are the Ashkenzi Jews who are descendents of the Khazar Khagnate ruled by King Bulan. The suddenly converted to Judaism around the 8th century and prior to this their religion/culture was based on a variant of Shamanism.
    This was most probably spurred by the ambitious Islamic and Christian empires and so their conversion was more about keeping up appearances. This Khazar tribe was descended from the Huns, Alans, Gokturks etc.
    They were a a war like people basically who loved to conquer and this same trait seems to have stayed with them. So thsi is reason why they have been so destructive ever since their first re-emergence in the 16th century and instigation of Protestantism; by which means they formed the Judeo-Christian alliance and waged their covert tactics very successfully to which we’re all witnesses to this day.

    Their are quite a few good videos out there (as well as many links on this site) documenting the evidence which shows their forced encouragement of migration to the west and preventing this by force to Israle.
    Despite all their destructiveness I still wouldn’t really speak up much about this because Europeans and Americans are not exactly the bastion of peacekeepers although they do like to try their hand at this at present. Far-rights groups and parties are popping up every where and are an equally destructive force as “the Jews” are.

    So there is no point is really demonizing “the jews” in an extreme sense otherwise you just play into the hands of the far-right and also “the jews” who use this as an excuse to get more paranoid and more militant, even though “the jews” do help to fuel the rise, in part, of the far right as it helps their cause. Most of the militant far-rights groups (alt-right) actually know about what The Jews are up to but its the majority anglo-saxon descendents in Europe and America who are still far-right; and its this lot that are being brainwashed to believe its muslims and other minorities (but mostly muslims) who are the cause of their problems.

    Just show the evidence of what they The Jews have been up to with evidence but dont bother to demonize them or you infact harm yourself and play into their plan to give support to far-rights governments to launch wars of aggression in Africa/Mideast which causes migration to EU mostly. Then there is also the added factor of you’re indirectly contributing to race-wars in the west between majority white and African/Asians who are mostly muslims.

    I am observing how Africans and Asians are being demonized in Europe by seeing how the far-right use Islam to negatively affect this group and victimize them when some members of these groups commit crimes which is then used to tarnish them all.

    Uncontrolled migration is contributing this far-right problem but at the end of the day your basically stuck between a rock and a hard place, do you start propagating the trueth about “the jews” on masse and risk allowing far-rights groups to rise because they will if you do. Or do you just bring the evidence and hope a more focussed approach is taken to keep jews out poweralthough this will be very very difficult because they have the financial power and their germ is firmly entrenched in the USA/EU who see them as essentially brothers LOL.

    • Replies: @Flint Clint
  200. @mikesmith

    Yes,that is rather ironic. Salvation has come through the Jews just not in the way that they envisaged. Truly, God works in mysterious ways. From the very beginning Jacob was a deceiver and wrestled God (metaphorically) until he “overcame”. He did not “beat the angel” as some think – he overcame his old nature which was one of trickery and deceit. When Jacob received his first revelation at Bethel he “made a deal” with God (remember the Kate Bush song?). The deal was…..if you bring me back safely, feed me and look after me etc…..then you will be my God (Gen 28:19-21). God does not work like that. You cannot give him ultimatums or set conditions. It is only when Jacob was in terror of losing his life that he was renamed Israel which means…..GOD RULES (God is Prince). It does not mean Prince with God (as many Jews and Christians will tell you). The apostle Paul said that the Jews were beloved for the fathers sake (Patriarchs) but enemies for the gospels sake. Jacob is about to learn a terrible lesson before he earns the name Israel.

    • Replies: @Miggle
    , @Kiel
  201. Kiel says:

    And to think their actual contribution only got started when Cyrus was kind enough to build them their 1st Temple in honor of Ahura Mazda. Before that, it was just lifting the mythology & gods of the heathen in the ghettos of Babylon. Thankfully, the elders preserved their original Canaanite, so that the stories might be written in their original tongue.

  202. @Raindrop

    Africans and Muslims are destroying Europe, and their presence is due to Jews.

    It’s pretty simple – all of the above.

    Asians, if they are a minority only forced to assimilate, and subject to the same rules on property ownership and franchise as applie to non-Chinese in China, are fine.

    • Replies: @Raindrop
  203. It’s already started.

    This Jewish man was arrested because he defended himself against a Black man.

    Jews are so smart, they’ve created a dominant Left that regards them as merely white people wearing funny hats.

    The non-Zionist Jews and non international banking clique Jews better start supporting white people.

    Otherwise I expect, unfortunately, there is going to be a lot more of this. Welcome to the reality of white people every day. If you defend yourself from a Nog raping your wife and burning your house down, you go to jail for racism.

    And an NYPD full of nogs and Mexicas will make sure you suffer for daring to defend yourself.

    • Replies: @joe862
  204. @mikesmith

    Yeah, it was around Roosevelt’s second administration that Jews began to swarm around gov in a way in which we are now accustomed to and this swarming helps account for our entry into WW2. But I think Brandies, and Untermeyer were schmoozing Wilson which may account for our entry into WW1 as a quid quo pro for England’s recognition of Zionist claims to Palestine. However I think their is an Judaized quality to Anglo Protestantism which makes them very open to the Chosen and their values,. I want to know more about why and how Angloes admitted so many Askenazi in the 1880’s and 90’s. That admission eventually sealed our fate vs immigration law

    • Replies: @Alden
  205. @mikesmith

    Don’t forget Americas entry into WW2. They aren’t laying claim to that though they certainly deserve it

    • Agree: Kiel
  206. @mikesmith

    Oh I heard Hagee has actually admitted the Jews as Judaics to salvation. Know anything about that ?

  207. Seraphim says:
    @mikesmith

    A little correction. The origins of ‘British Israelism are far older than the Victorian era.

    “According to Brackney (2012) and Fine (2015), the French Hugenot magistrate M. le Loyer’s The Ten Lost Tribes, published in 1590, provided the first expression that “Anglo-Saxon, Celtic, Scandinavian, Germanic, and associated cultures”were direct descendants of the ancient Israelites. Anglo-Israelism has also been attributed to Francis Drake and James VI and I, who believed he was the King of Israel. Adriaan van Schrieck (1560-1621), who influenced Henry Spelman (1562-1641) and John Sadler (1615-1674), wrote in the early 17th century about his ideas on the origins of the Celtic and Saxon peoples. In 1649, Sadler published The Rights of the Kingdom, “which argues for an ‘Israelite genealogy for the British people’”.
    Aspects of British Israelism and its influences have also been traced to Richard Brothers’ A Revealed Knowledge of the Prophecies and Times in 1794, John Wilson’s Our Israelitish Origin (1840s), and John Pym Yeatman’s The Shemetic Origin of the Nations of Western Europe (1879)”.

    The Puritans who settled in America viewed themselves in that light. They were the ‘New Israel’ conquering the ‘New Canaan’, fighting the ‘Amalekites’ and Philistines. They prepared the soil where the ‘Christian Zionism’, ‘Christian Identity’, ‘City on the hill’, American exceptionalism and narcissism, ‘Manifest Destiny’, willingness to serve all Jewish causes, flourished.

    Actually for the Fathers of the Church the Church was the ‘True Israel’, Verus Israel. “For they are not all Israel, which are of Israel, Neither, because they are the seed of Abraham, are they all children[of Abraham]”.
    The promise of the OT was the spiritual Kingdom of Heaven, not the eternal possession of the conquered Canaan, nor belief in the ‘Jewish Messiah’ who would re-conquer the lost land (and the Gentile lands as a bonus), but faith in the Son of God Incarnated, Crucified, Resurrected and Ascended to the right hand of the Father.

    • Replies: @mikesmith
  208. Miggle says:
    @secondElijah

    He did not “beat the angel” as some think – he overcame his old nature which was one of trickery and deceit.

    Total rubbish. Israel did not overcome his old nature, his trickery and deceit. One of the most prominent marks of the Jews today is trickery and deceit.

  209. Miggle says:
    @mikesmith

    The English alphabet today does not have vowels, only letters that signify, don’t identify, vowels. Sunday, Monday, different letters, same vowel. Number, numerous, same letter, different vowels.

    That the inventors of the first alphabet didn’t include vowels is no surprise, given that the task is virtually impossible. They were smart enough to realize that. Who else was?

    • Replies: @mikesmith
  210. Miggle says:
    @mikesmith

    Okay, I stand corrected. The Canaanites adopted their alphabet(s) after seeing the writings of their near neighbors to the north. That changes nothing much. A nasty Canaanite tribe based its own writings on earlier Canaanite writings. It required exile to half-civilize it. It went away polytheistic, learnt monotheism from the Persians, and returned to Canaan as monotheists.

    • Replies: @mikesmith
  211. Kiel says:
    @secondElijah

    “Salvation has come through the Jews just not in the way that they envisaged. Truly, God works in mysterious ways.”

    Wait, what?

    Salvation’s coming through that demon in the Old Testament?

    The same demon that just wuv wuv wuv David the Philistine Mercenary, Whore-monger & Murder?

    That guy?

  212. @Rational

    You’re right to call Judaism a cult. I would add that “Jewishness” is the same cult. Jews are not a people, a nation, or an ethnicity. They’re barely a religion. But they are a collection of communities, and those communities are essentially a group of like-minded cults, the Ashkenazis being the largest general cult grouping. (Because the Ashkenazis are various different peoples as well, as opposed to a single ethnicity, although they break down into two major supersets. This is why they all look so different from each other.)

    • Replies: @Miggle
  213. Miggle says:
    @Stochastic Determinist

    They’re barely a religion. But they are a collection of communities, and those communities are essentially a group of like-minded cults, …

    Barely? They are not a religion. David Ben-Gurion was an atheist, yet a Jew. Most Jews today are atheists.

    There are some among them who look like religious cultists, but it’s all about deceivers inventing monstrous, absurd religions. Hence the Blood “Libels”, so-called, a “religion” that sacrificed the blood of Christian babies. Judaism.

    That within Judaism idiotic religions are invented does not make Judaism a religion. Not barely: absolutely not at all.

    They are nothing but a criminal gang from which there is no escape. So the children of gang members are gang members. All ruled by the chief gangsters. Shahak and others have written of the totalitarianism of the chief gangsters. Babies taught to hate non-Jews, believing Jews are always persecuted by non-Jews. Victimhood, solely a device to foment hatred. That hatred of non-Jews is critical to the survival of Judaism.

    • Replies: @mikesmith
  214. mikesmith says:
    @joe862

    There are many people in Western societies–not always but very often Jews–who have worked hard to persuade us that “tribalism” is bad or evil for whites but okay for everyone else. There are problems with this. First, “tribalism” is just another word for teamwork and team spirit, for the capacity for group cohesion and mutual affection.

    Second, altruism does not evolve except in groupish species. If you cannot love the ingroup members, you will also lose the capacity to love outgroup members.

    Third, if you are an individualist/cosmopolitan competing against teams, the teams will win and your descendants will lose out in what Darwin called “the struggle for life.” In computer models that feature four types of “agents”–“humanitarians” (universalists/cosmopolitans), ethnocentrists, libertarians, and defectors (who use a betrayal strategy by switching sides)–libertarian and defector strategists lose in every personal scenario against both humanitarians and ethnocentrists, although neither dies out completely. Roughly a third of the time, ethnocentrists dominate from the beginning and all the way through the runs. Roughly another third of the runs, ethnocentrists and humanitarians compete neck and neck until carrying capacity is approached, straining resource availability, and then ethnocentrists pull permanently ahead. And roughly a third of the runs, we see a scenario similar to what we are experiencing today: humanitarians dominate early on, but as carrying capacity is approached (life gets harder) ethnocentrists again pull decisively ahead. I for one am not going to bet the future on a doomed strategy just to make myself feel morally superior to my fellow man.

  215. mikesmith says:
    @Miggle

    Having a separate symbol for each vowel is not only possible but easy. In the case of English, two things happened. One, we adopted the Latin alphabet, which does not have enough unique symbols for every vowel sound we use, so some letters must represent more than one sound. Second, the pronunciation of some words has changed over time, or in different regions or social casses, but we have not changed the spelling with the pronunciation. We need vowel symbols in English and other Aryan tongues, but Semitic tongues, although they eventually developed some vowel symbols, can be understood without writing them because of the nature of their word structure.

  216. mikesmith says:
    @Miggle

    I see some problems with your hypothesis/assertion that the Jews learned monotheism from the Persians/Parsis. First, you have presented no actual evidence. Second, best evidence is that Zarathrustra (Zoroaster) lived in the 6th century BC, not the earlier dates that some early scholars conjectured, and in southeastern Iran, so it was unlikely that the Jewish exiles in Babylon knew about it before they returned to Canaan under Ezra and Nehemiah. It takes time for a new religion to spread, especially in those days with slower communication and movement. Third, in early Zoroastrianism, Ahura Mazda was the supreme God, but not the only deity. In later centuries, Zoroastrians were influenced by Christianity, probably due to Nestorian missionary activity, so that modern Zoroastrianism is different in significant ways from the ancient version.

    • Replies: @anonymous
    , @Alden
    , @hbm
  217. geokat62 says:
    @mikesmith

    I for one am not going to bet the future on a doomed strategy just to make myself feel morally superior to my fellow man.

    Very well put… agree, completely!

  218. @onebornfree

    Comments that perfectly make Joyce’s points.

  219. Great article! It is satisfying to see others recognize and publish their observations and research of this pathological self-aggrandizement by the jew.

  220. You can’t accuse them of laziness. Every academic library in the U.S. is brimming with their books.

  221. mikesmith says:
    @mikesmith

    “libertarian and defector strategists lose in every personal scenario against both humanitarians and ethnocentrists”—SHOULD have read “in every POSSIBLE scenario;” sorry if my inexplicable mistake caused any confusion.

  222. Kikl says:

    I remember speaking with the mother of a Jewish friend. They had left Germany for Sweden but came back after the 2. WW. I praised a socialist politician – Gregor Gysi – for his wit, although I didn’t agree with him. Her response was: That’s because he’s a jew. I didn’t even know that he was Jewish.

    I was truly astonishing.

    Something similar happened to me in New York. I sat in a cab with a Jewish friend. We drove home from some classical concert. Out of the blue she told me that we Germans had STOLEN the composer Mendelsson-Bartholdy from the Jews. This was not meant to be a joke, she was really angry.

    Again, I didn’t know what to say, it was so absurd.

    I could add a few more of these stories about Jews. I haven’t known too many Jews in my life. But, I have never experienced anything similar with Russians, Poles, French, English,…

  223. mikesmith says:
    @Seraphim

    Thanks for the documentation on the precursors to Victorian Anglo-Israelism. Although these ideas are older than I knew, they are still a phenomenon of the Modern Age and more particularly of Protestantism which stimulated the development of a lot of religious novelty. However, it is based on bad philology and erroneous history.

    You are of course correct that the Puritans in America, and especially the Pilgrims in Plymouth Bay, drew analogies between themselves and the OT story of the Israelites dispossessing the Canaanites. Nevertheless, they still supported missionary outreach to the indigenous Americans. The “city on the hill” metaphor remained for them what it was originated as, an attempt to be an exemplary religious model. But with the creation of the United States at a later date, the concept became semi-secularized and transferred from a distinctively Christian context to the context of American “civil religion.”

    Americans did not invent the idea of “American exceptionalism.” American exceptionalism was the verdict of foreign observers of Americans, such as Toqueville. It had largely faded by the 20th century, and Americans who have suddenly started prattling on about it in the early 21st century are historical illiterates who don’t understand what it referred to.

    “willingness to serve Jewish causes” is overwhelmingly a 20th century development, mostly since the election of FDR who had many Jewish supporters and advisers. Jews also coined the expression “Judeo-Christian” in the 1930’s in opposition to the anti-interventionist America First movement, whose most visible public spokesman was Charles Lindbergh.

    And you are entirely correct about the early Christian view of the Church as the New Israel. It is often ridiculed by Dispensationalists (Darby-Scofieldians) as “replacement” ecclesiology, which is really not a bad description, although “succession” might better describe the early Christian view of this relationship. No Christian held any other view until the 19th century. However, Protestants can rationalize their innovations, even innovations as radical as Mormonism, by claiming there was a sudden falling away after AD 100 (although some would claim 312 or 325), with the “true” teaching of the apostles having been forgotten or changed while the gates of hell prevailed against the Church until 1517 when Martin Luther initiated the first phase in a long and gradual recovery of lost Christian truth which is not necessarily complete even now. This Protestant tendency to denigrate and ignore or gloss over the vast majority of the Christian era was reinforced by Enlightenment humanists who prefer to do the same thing for different reasons. The result is that most people are too historically illiterate to realize how profoundly unserious this theory of a sudden loss of the “true” apostolic faith at a very early date really is. For Protestants it is almost as though we transitioned from John the beloved apostle to Martin Luther the rebellious Augustinian monk with nothing in between, or at least nothing that either Protestants or Enlightenment humanists view as worth learning.

    • Replies: @Seraphim
  224. mikesmith says:
    @Miggle

    “Barely? They are not a religion. David Ben-Gurion was an atheist, yet a Jew. Most Jews today are atheists.”

    That is the strange thing about Jews. They tend to be either extremely secular–everything from convictionless cultural Judaism to militant atheism–or to be cult-like in their religious intensity, without a lot in between. “In between” would be the badly named “Modern Orthodoxy” whose offspring often tend to diverge in one extreme or the other. I also notice that even Jewish secular political or intellectual movements are often very cult-like, with authoritarian leaders, a devoted band of personal disciples, and intolerance of deviation. Think of Boasian social anthropology, Freudian psychoanalysis, dedicated Communist Party cells, or the contemporary Neoconservative movement, as well as more obscure groups one may read about from time to time.

    As for Jewish religious sectarianism, that is typical of religions that are not modeled, like pre-Protestant Christianity, on the organizational structure of the Roman Empire, with parishes that are components of territorial dioceses presided over by bishops with a strict rule of apostolic succession, which gives the four surviving versions of Roman-era Christianity a surprising degree of uniformity and cohesion. Less structured religions, such as post-Temple Judaism, Islam, Protestantism, Hinduism, and Buddhism, are a maze of sects. Even within Protestantism one can observe that groups which, by plan or accident, have developed organizational structures similar to the RCC are less prone to spin off sects than other Protestant denominations with more decentralized structures.

    • Replies: @Miggle
  225. @anon

    Fran Taubman says:
    “My father was an arial photographer during the war, he mapped out Europe and France in an airplane for the Normandy invasion.”

    {one of the frequently unmentioned outcomes of WWII was the annexation of France to Europe. 🤯 }

    “My father mapped out Germany for the Allied invasion. I am happy about all those bombs.”

    In addition to the annexation of France to Europe, a bit more background on the Normandy invasion:
    –> June 6 – mid-July 1944

    –> I’ve long been intrigued by this comment in a conversation between Ron Rosenbaum and Martin Amis at Museum of Jewish Heritage in NYC:

    “The [Germans] already knew they were going to lose the war. . . . It is a great mystery and you write about it, too, that the war is lost in December of ’41.”

    https://www.c-span.org/video/?322861-1/explaining-hitler-the-zone-interest

    In another talk, at the US Army War College, award-winning historian Robert Citino said,

    “1943 marked the end for the German Army’s advance in World War II. The German forces, known as the Wehrmacht, lost the initiative on all fronts.”

    In January of 1943, at Casablanca, FDR declared the policy of Unconditional Surrender, much to Churchill’s chagrin. http://www.thehistoryreader.com/modern-history/unconditional-surrender-questioning-fdrs-prerequisite-peace/

    By that time, the project that Erich Mendelsohn, “the Jewish architect,” and others of his circle had consulted on — the design and rehearsal of methods of creating firestorms that would incinerate German civilians in their homes and beds — had been perfected.

    (https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2003/may/12/architecture.artsfeatures
    “German Village . . .a test site created by the Allied military during the second world war to develop weapons of mass destruction for use against civilian targets in Germany and Japan.
    All that survives of German Village is a single block of high-gabled, prewar Berlin working-class housing. It is accurate in every respect. And it should be: commissioned by the chemical warfare corps of the US army, it was designed by Erich Mendelsohn (1887-1953), the German architect who settled in the US in 1941 after a spell in England.
    . . .
    How can this Erich Mendelsohn be the architect of the dark and deathly German Village in the Utah desert? Mendelsohn left no correspondence or notebooks relating to the Dugway Proving Ground project, where napalm and poison gases were developed and tested. He had been under gas attack in the trenches, yet it is hard not to think that his primary motivation in the desert of Utah was revenge on the Nazis. If this seems fair enough, what remains disturbing is the fact that this work was expressly designed to destroy working-class districts of Berlin, including Wedding and Pankow. These had been communist strongholds, virulently anti-Hitler, before the Gestapo and SS all but destroyed opposition to the Nazi regime.

    A concerted Allied attack, by the British and US air force on working-class districts of German and Japanese cities had, however, become more or less official policy by 1943. Churchill wanted to gas them. Killed and mutilated in sufficient numbers, the German working class would, he argued, rise up against Hitler and bring a quick end to the war. ** “It is absurd to consider morality on this topic,” he told RAF planners when the first German V1 rockets fell on London. “I want the matter studied in cold blood by sensible people, and not by psalm-singing uniformed defeatists.””]

    ** Fran Taubman declaimed passionately that this is what should have happened, and that it was all Hitler’s fault that Germany was destroyed by the use of “weapons of mass destruction for use against civilian targets in Germany” — actions that Fran Taubman roundly endorses and celebrates:

    https://www.unz.com/gatzmon/iran-israel-and-destiny/
    The bombings of German civilians and the bombing of Japan were the results of the relentless desire to go all or nothing of the German and Japanese leaders, WITH LITTLE REGARD TO THEIR POPULATIONS.
    Both Germany and Japan could have surrendered and saved their populations. . . .
    You want to blame the loss of precious German life at the Allie bombing of German cities. Look at what Hitler did to his country, population, and cities. He humiliated his country for no reason other than his insanity which in the end was so antithetical to surviving that it is the very definition of insanity.
    . . .
    If destroying the populations of German cities however horrible and ill conceived. It paled in comparison to what the Third Reich inflicted upon the German population.
    A suicide mission for the leaders where the people had no vote.

    Taubman carefully ignores the numerous offers of peace made by German leaders, including the “insane” Hitler, which would, of course, have fallen on the deaf ears of Franklin Roosevelt: FDR heard only the voice of Ulysses S. Grant:

    “Roosevelt, about to make an announcement, introduced it with a characteristically jaunty story about the American Civil War general U. S. Grant. For a time, he said, the general had been known as “Unconditional Surrender Grant,” and it had occurred to him that this formula might be just the thing—the proper way to end the war. In his view, this would placate the absent Stalin.” http://www.thehistoryreader.com/modern-history/unconditional-surrender-questioning-fdrs-prerequisite-peace/

    Besides, by the time of the Casablanca conference, as noted above, FDR had the means to incinerate an army and a nation that had already been defeated.

    By the time Fran Taubman’s father, Gershon Taubman, took aerial photos of Germany in preparation for the Normandy invasion, at least 100 German cities had been reduced to rubble — perhaps he observed their smoldering ruins?
    Perhaps Gershon Taubman was able to observe and celebrate the handiwork of his fellow Jew, Erich Mendelsohn; perhaps he observed some of the 7 million German civilians who were rendered homeless.

    This is the adversary Gershon Taubman prepared to finally force to unconditional surrender — a destroyed, incinerated, homeless and defeated nation. So brave!

    It’s hard for me to wrap my mind around the thinking processes of someone like Fran Taubman who boasts of the acts of cowards who kill women and children from the air, while labeling as “insane” people who resist those criminal acts.

    “Hitler should have surrendered and lived to fight another day,” Taubman blared.

    But the terms were Unconditional Surrender, Fran; death, one way or the other.

    Over a decade ago, Norman Finkelstein told a Lebanese journalist that “people have a right to defend their country from those who are destroying their country . . .” He said he “has more respect for those who choose to die on their feet rather than live on their knees.”

  226. Raindrop says:
    @Flint Clint

    You will learn to embrace Asians and Blacks. The scourge that ails your kind (Franko-Anglo-Saxon’s) in the form of the descendants of the Khazar “Jews” is because you have not learned to transcend your foolish white pride. Just as those fake jews have an obsession with Tribalism, linage and Usury You have obsessions with your white skin, blue eyes and all manner of so called Aryan features.

    It’s good that you’re being put in your place because your attitude stinks and the only way you can become free of your evil ways is by mixing with other ways to pacify this Aryan genetic trait that will eventually be your downfall.
    I used to be just like ya’ll a far-right nutcase but I have since learned to transcend my white colour, something I wasn’t even in control of since the day I was born. Yet you low class sons of Franko-Anglo-Saxons seem to believe your the Master race. You criticise the ones masquarading as jews but your no better just look at your long bloody history.
    Those fake jews as evil as they are, have done well to put you in your place and hopefully their plan to have us all interbreeding with each other will manage to pacify the bloodlust within us and then we can get along and take care of business.

    • Replies: @Anon
  227. anonymous[299] • Disclaimer says:
    @mikesmith

    Looked up The Cyrus Cylinder which I though made reference to Ahura, the god of Zoroaster.

    Wouldn’t you know it.
    The translations are all propaganda, dreamed up by the Pahlavi dynasty to elevate Persian culture over Islamic cultural influences in Pahlavi’s Iran.
    Statements in opposition to slavery? Mistranslations.
    The bit about the Cylinder being the first declaration of international rights? All propaganda.

    A correct translation has been composed by Irving Finkel, a philologist at British Museum, where the Cylinder is kept.
    “Finkel was raised as an Orthodox Jew but became an atheist as a teenager. He lives in southeast London”

  228. Anon[371] • Disclaimer says:
    @Raindrop

    Well what do you know.

    Max security prisoners now have internet access.

    Welcome newbie.
    How long ya in for?

    • LOL: Bardon Kaldian
    • Replies: @Anon372
  229. @Kikl

    Yeah, we have to get over not knowing people are Jewish. Not knowing people are Jewish or knowing and not caring enabled me to spend a very long time failing to notice certain patterns that appear among intellectuals and ideologies – the patterns of Semitism. Semitism is of course not good for we whites considered as a people. It is stripping us of our country

  230. Seraphim says:
    @mikesmith

    It is true that”“willingness to serve Jewish causes” is overwhelmingly a 20th century development”, but it did come after a long preparation, starting with the Damascus Affair (1840):

    “In a new and groundbreaking effort, the American Jewish community of 15,000 protested in six American cities on behalf of their Syrian brethren. “For the first time in American Jewish life, Jews… organized themselves politically to help Diaspora Jewry in distress.” Among the new ethnic immigrant populations to the United States, the Jews were the first to attempt to sway the government to act on behalf of their kin and co-religionists abroad; with this incident, they became involved in the politics of foreign policy, persuading but not pressuring President Van Buren to protest officially*. The United States consul in Egypt expressed the protest…
    “For the Jews, the Damascus affair launched modern Jewish politics on an international scale, and for American Jews it represented their first effort at creating a distinctive political agenda. Just as the United States had used this affair to proclaim its presence on the global scale, so too did American Jews, in their newspapers and at mass meetings, announce to their coreligionists in France and England that they too ought to be thought of players in global Jewish diplomacy.”

    *Van Buren ordered American diplomats in Constantinople and Alexandria to tell the Ottoman rulers of Syria of the “horror” felt by all Americans at the “extravagant charges strikingly similar to those which, in less enlightened ages, were made pretexts for the persecution and spoliation of these unfortunate people.” Van Buren cited America’s liberal institutions, which “place upon the same footing, the worshipers of God, of every faith and form” as his basis for intervening “in behalf of an oppressed and persecuted race, among whose kindred are found some of the most worthy and patriotic of [American] citizens.”@ https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/americans-react-to-the-damascus-blood-libel

    A subject that deserves a special treatment is the support of the ‘American public opinion’, ‘shocked by the barbaric treatment of Jews’ in Russia (and Romania) for pressures on their Governments to stop the ‘medieval persecutions’ of Jews. The ‘public opinion’ swallowed line, sinker and hook the Jewish propaganda and sunk their money in the ‘relief agencies’ and eventually forced the American Government to apply the first economic sanctions against Russia (Jacob Schiff played a central and crucial role). ‘Public opinion’ expressed by street orators and in public forums blamed the Tsar for the misery of the Russian Jews. A catch word was: The “humane” Tsar, was no better than “a humane murderer or a humane dynamiter.”‘

    • Replies: @Alden
  231. @Kikl

    Rabbinic Judaism is a cult. Recognize that and many things become clear.

  232. joe862 says:
    @Flint Clint

    yes, and they’re so fond of urban living. The choice will be get thumped in the city or move out to the suburbs with the hated white people. Smart people would’ve seen this coming a long time ago.

  233. joe862 says:
    @mikesmith

    I agree. The western way required keeping ethnocentric groups out. Since we were too childish to do that, the only solution is to retreat back to tribalism. It’s a bummer. I really dislike it but when you’re surrounded by various groups acting as members of a tribe that’s what you’re stuck with.

  234. Alden says:
    @Achilles Wannabe

    There were no restrictions on immigration in the 1880’s. Anyone who arrived could stay and become a citizen.
    The immigrants were very welcome as cheap labor and settlers. Increase population meant more workers, more consumers, more taxpayers.

    Only 2 ports, New York and San Francisco has any restrictions on immigrants. Chinese but not other Asians had to be processed in the small Angel Island in SF Bay. No restrictions forChinese disembarking in the nearby Port of Oakland.

    New York had Ellis Island which did not admit immigrants with Tuberculosis, diphtheria scarlet fever etc. Other than that, no restrictions.

    They didn’t wave the Red Flag and sing the Internationale as they left the ships.

    • Replies: @Achilles Wannabe
  235. Alden says:
    @mikesmith

    You’re correct. Your explanation is excellent.

  236. Ilya says:

    A comparatively recent example is Grigori Perelman and his proof of the Poincaré conjecture. Masha Gessen wrote a book about him as another towering Jewish Genius™®, and yet, amazingly, Perelman refused the Fields Medal on the basis that Richard Hamilton had actually done most of the work previously.

    David Reich uses Nick Patterson’s statistical methods and Svante Pääbo’s physical protocols.

    In fact, whole fields of inquiry consist of specious Jewish confection (all of psychology outside of psychometrics, Wallerstein’s “world-system theory”, etc.) that receive the support of a complicit publishing industry and press, receive lavish funding, and then nominate themselves for awards that they then grant.

  237. Alden says:
    @Seraphim

    Thanks for the information. As early as 1840.

  238. renfro says:

    I am sort of bored with the Jewish thing except as it relates to US government policy corruption and the ME Palestine issues.

    But I will leave this unfinished work I started when all the talk was about Jewish brilliance.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

    JEWISH NOBEL PRIZE WINNERS
    JINFO.ORG
    At least 204 Jews and people of half- or three-quarters-Jewish ancestry have been awarded the Nobel Prize,1 accounting for 22% of all individual recipients worldwide between 1901 and 2019
    http://www.jinfo.org/Nobel_Prizes.html

    ALL Nobel Prize Winners since 1901
    https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/lists/all-nobel-prizes/
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>.>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

    I cant remember the exacts but it appeared that Jewish Nobels didn’t take off in most categories…(particularly in Economics believe it or not)…. until the late 50’s and peaked in the 80’s and 90’s and has declined lately. It appears to have been dominated in early 90’s by the French, the Netherlands and non Jewish Germans. Then if you take into account the ‘split prizes’ of Jew-non Jew partners in the awards…and then also take into account the ‘partly Jewish’ prize winners…you get a different % of ‘Jewish Nobels then claimed.

    If someone wants to do this more thoroughly than my amateur math it would be interesting.

  239. hbm says:
    @mikesmith

    An answer is that the Hebrew Scriptures were not composed by Moses, or in Solomon’s Court c. 1000BC or discovered in the Temple in c. 800BC– but not until after Alexander’s conquest, and that Persians brought Zoroastrianism directly to the Levantine Semite pagans who had never gone anywhere and who had never been enslaved anywhere and who had never come from anywhere, and who under this outside pressure syncretized a new religion. So, perhaps, the “Second Temple” so graciously provided by Cyrus and Darius for the Jews to pay their taxes into is actually the first one. While Semite pagan temples surely existed, probably to the god Sin, from where we get Sinai, and other Canaanite deities like the ones in the Baal Cycle, the stuff about Solomon is clearly fantasy. The Patriarchs and like particulars of Jewish History before the Persian conquest are fictions written under the shadow of Greek Romances and Herodotus and Thucydides, and with the textual resources and records of the Library to draw on to give it historical verisimilitude. (If one believes that the Haibiru we learn about from Egyptian records were the Hebrews, then that old Rabbi scribblers’ con was successful. They had the same records to peruse, too.) Yahweh anthropomorphized and capricious, and mucking around with humans like Zeus is clearly Greek in inspiration; as is the Neoplatonic God-as-word; while the earlier Zoroastrian influence remains with the Creator invisible or as pillars of fire and burning bushes. David and his empire and conquest is clearly modeled on Alexander; The Northern Kingdom vs the Southern is Athens vs. Sparta– & etc. The idea that these aren’t just myths but History with a capital H is clearly something post-Greek, unless Jews, whom Herodotus had never heard of, invented History, too. Transportation of Elites was common practice for ancient empires in that part of the world, so it’s not that much of a stretch to suppose that the Returners may not have been “Jews” to begin with; they could have been any group of ruling elites the Persians had conquered during their expansion and pressed into service. Portions of Deuteronomy are clearly instructions given directly to these colonizer overseers. It’s all a heavily interpolated, edited, redacted, cut-and-pasted affair of dubious Divine historicity, exactly like the texts of its offspring, Christianity and Islam– and Mormonism, and any Abrahamic-derived creature one might care to name. Similarities shared by Christianity and Zoroastrianism come inherently by way of Judaism; and later, by Christianity and its re-connection with Zoroastrianism via the Mithraic cult popular in Rome that it arrogated to itself to aid in its expansion.

    • Agree: Kiel
  240. Anon372 says:
    @Anon

    Embrace White Guilt and cast aside White Power. Immigrants are good people, may The God allow more immigrants into Europe and America. If you dont like it then you go and become the new president of your nation state and stop it but you can’t and you never will. Good day buddy.

  241. Vojkan says:

    There was Hendrik Lorentz and there was Henri Poincaré. Then came a Jew with a gift of gab by the name of Albert Einstein who presented a theory as his own without any reference to their works. That’s the Jewish genius, plagiarism, mythomania and herd instinct. And mentioning the insipidity of Mahler or the vacuity of Rothko as quintessentials examples of Jewish genius prove only one thing, that “le ridicule ne tue pas”.

    • Agree: Kolya Krassotkin
  242. @Alden

    They didn’t wave the Red Flag and sing the Internationale as they left the ships.

    I was talking abut jewish immigrants, not just immigrants. Jews had a rather long history of not fitting in anywhere except at cost to ordinary gentiles. Anglo elites knew this

    • Replies: @Alden
  243. @hbm

    Hebrew Scriptures were not composed by Moses, or in Solomon’s Court c. 1000BC or discovered in the Temple in c. 800BC– but not until after Alexander’s conquest, and that Persians brought Zoroastrianism directly to the Levantine Semite pagans who had never gone anywhere and who had never been enslaved anywhere and who had never come from anywhere, and who under this outside pressure syncretized a new religion. So, perhaps, the “Second Temple” so graciously provided by Cyrus and Darius for the Jews to pay their taxes into is actually the first one.

    So the whole ancient Hebrew story line was cooked up around …. when? 200BC? The idea was to give a pedigree to a new regime in Palestine? Seems very possible

    • Replies: @mikesmith
  244. ΑΖ says:

    AUTOTHEISIS (self-deification): The ultimaye blasphemy!!! That is what Satan did and fell from the celestial zion…….

  245. anon[207] • Disclaimer says:
    @mikesmith

    Plato’s description of three types of souls or three types of human beings – it on ,silver,and gold
    captures the essence of Frued’s division of developmental processes of mind – I’d,ego,and superego.

    Gold was the perfect ruler who has risen above the instinctual demands .

    His idea about communal life can be seen as having influenced Marx views of society . Luddite idea of common space common usase common ownership is also pre Marxian ‘ Marxisim ‘

    • Replies: @mikesmith
  246. Angharad says:
    @Achilles Wannabe

    The country is swirling down the toilet, and it’s DUE to the Jewing,

    • Replies: @Achilles Wannabe
  247. Alden says:
    @Achilles Wannabe

    Sorry, I meant they just came in quietly with the other immigrants.

    • Replies: @Achilles Wannabe
  248. @Alden

    No problem

    Yeah, they did come in quietly. Then they took over

  249. @Angharad

    Yeah but the Jews could not have done it without the cooperation. if not encouragement, of the Angloe ruling class. HIgher class Anglo Americans seem to love Jews much more than their own people, nevermind the rest of us whites

  250. Miggle says:
    @mikesmith

    very cult-like, with authoritarian leaders, a devoted band of personal disciples, and intolerance of deviation.

    You are spot on. Shahak used the world “totalitarian”, but “authoritarian” will do. Intolerance of variation, well, every allowed variation specified exactly in the Talmud. Again, Shahak goes into the absurdities, like the trick of milking cows on the Sabbath.

    I think “gang” is a better choice than “band”, though.

  251. anon[228] • Disclaimer says:

    its old news they have been rewriting history for centuries ,let me put here a couple of page of how one of the leading filologist that was also jewish tried everything he could to deny the not semite roots of sumeria against all the academical stablishment

    [MORE]

    It is difficult to imagine that the same Paris where, today, every school child knows that history begins at Sumer, was once the center of a movement that denied the very existence of the Sumerians and the Sumerian language.2 The originator and chief spokesman of this anti-Sumerist movement was Joseph Halévy, for half a century a prominent and prolific figure in the world of French philology. He was one of a number of Jews who were instrumental in the development of scientific philology in France, but unlike many of the others, he was neither German-born nor German-trained; rather, he was an Oriental Jew, and an autodidact.3 Joseph Halévy, was born in 1827 in Adrianople (Edirne).4 He taught in Jewish schools there and in Bucharest, and was active in promoting the Hebrew enlightenment (haskalah). In his free time he taught himself oriental languages, even mastering Amharic because he was taken by the notion of making contact with the Jews of Ethiopia, who, having been cut off for a millennium from the rest of Jewry, were being intensively proselytized by Protestant missionaries. Halévy arrived in Paris in 1866, and the next year was sent to Ethiopia by the Alliance Israélite Universelle. His successful fulfillment of that assignment — he returned with important manuscripts and much information on the community — led to his being sent in 1869 by the Académie des inscriptions et belles-lettres to the Yemen to collect inscriptions for the planned Corpus Inscripiionum Semiticarum. The Yemen was closed to European travellers, so Halévy disguised himself as an alms-collecting rabbi from Jerusalem and circulated among the Yemenite Jewish communities, surreptitiously copying South Arabian inscriptions along the way. He returned to Paris with 686 texts, by far the largest corpus of such inscriptions hitherto known, and published them in 1872-73. He was widely recognized for both the feat itself and his scientific achievement. In 1879 he was named professor of Ethiopian languages at the Ecole Pratique des Hautes Etudes.5 Halévy was known to Assyriologists for his discredited theory that Sumerian, the language of the inventors of cuneiform writing, was not really a language at all, but simply a more primitive way of writing the Akkadian language of the Semites who, according to orthodox theory, borrowed and adapted Sumerian cuneiform to write their own language. In Halévy’s own words, “le Sumérien n’a jamais exprimé une langue réelle parlée par un peuple quelconque.”6 Despite the many thousands of pages devoted to the Sumerian question between 1874 and 1914 both by Halévy and his opponents, including two long monographic rebuttals of Halévy’s thesis written in 1898 and 1904,7 Halévy and his theories are all but forgotten by modern Assyriologists. The most recent history of Assyriology devotes a bit of space to the controversy, attributing, in a dismissive way, Halévy’s position to the sin of racial pride: “Perhaps it was on account of racial prejudice that he denied that Babylonia, from where his ancestors, the Hebrew patriarchs, came, had been occupied by a non-Semitic people before the Semites, a people who were even said to have invented the writing which was the Semitic Babylonian’s own ingenious invention.”8 Recent attention that has been called to the “Orientalist” aspect of early ancient Near Eastern studies9 suggests that this judgement is only partly right: it was “racial prejudice”, but not, or not only, his own, that motivated Halévy in his forty year struggle against “Sumerism.”

    here you have the entire review https://www.persee.fr/docAsPDF/rhr_0035-1423_1993_num_210_2_1437.pdf

    not surprisingly sumeria as the founder of the semitic civilization is still a thorn nailed in the ego of jews so incapable of denying any longer the foreign status of sumerians they try to claim that the influences of sumerians in the middle east were insignificant and even they deny sumerians as the first civilization . this time is from the new york times only 29 years ago

    https://www.nytimes.com/1990/10/24/opinion/l-history-didn-t-begin-in-mesopotamia-468190.html

    not only that the only sample of the ubaid culture(proto sumerians) in the united states in the hands of a jewish patrocined museum and they have denied all the request to extract dna ,is not dificult to understand why ,the museum is filled with all kind of sumerian antiquities and presiding them all jewish symbols everywhere tacitly apropiating their achieviments and certainly deceiving a lot of people ,a simple dna text would broke the enchantment of their self deception .

  252. mikesmith says:
    @hbm

    Even the most secular minded among serious scholarly specialists of Middle Eastern antiquity would scoff at this revisionist history you have embraced. Judaism was incontrovertibly not a post-Alexandrian invention, among other problems with your thesis. I think there have been some people since the rise of Enlightenment deism who hate the whole Abrahamic tradition, or sometimes just Christianity, so much that they will grasp at straws to discredit it, hoping to take advantage of the historical illiteracy of vast majority of people. It is not different than the growing popularity of Flat Earth “theory,” or the way many people have been suckered into believing the moon landing was a hoax.

  253. mikesmith says:
    @Achilles Wannabe

    “So the whole ancient Hebrew story line was cooked up around …. when? 200BC? The idea was to give a pedigree to a new regime in Palestine? Seems very possible”

    So according to you the Pentateuch, circa 250 BC in Alexandria, was translated from Hebrew into Greek before the Hebrew text from which it was translated was even composed! Perhaps they did this with the help of a time machine. No, not “very possible.” You have clearly done no serious historical research before concocting this story. Unfortunately, many gullible people will not be sufficiently read in history or archaeological research to see through it, just like the new Flat Earthers do not know enough about astronomy see through that untenable hypothesis.

  254. mikesmith says:
    @anon

    Superego, ego, and id are not three types of human but three levels of consciousness (if you believe this hypothesis) in every person.

    Luddite ideas of the commons drew on actual English customs that had rather recently been terminated.

    Plato may have influenced Marx, but by Marx’s time there was already an established tradition in western Europe of published blueprints or fantasies of Utopian societies, of which Thomas Moore’s “Utopia” is the most famous, but certainly not sui generis. Marx could have been influenced by any or all of them.

  255. Anonymous[339] • Disclaimer says:

    self-glorification has long been a noted feature of Jewish ethnocentrism

    What purpose does self-glorification serve?

    • Replies: @Seraphim
    , @joe862
  256. Seraphim says:
    @Anonymous

    Self glorification/ vainglory(vanity) is the “the immediate offspring of pride, the beginning of every sin.”
    Pride is excessive belief in one’s own abilities, that interferes with the individual’s recognition of the grace of God: “…it is characteristic of pride to be unwilling to be subject to any superior, and especially to God; the result being that a man is unduly lifted up….” (St Thomas Aquinas).

    “The beginning of pride is when one departeth from God, and his heart is turned away from his Maker. 13For pride is the beginning of sin, and he that hath it shall pour out abomination: and therefore the Lord brought upon them strange calamities, and overthrew them utterly. 14The Lord hath cast down the thrones of proud princes, and set up the meek in their stead. 15The Lord hath plucked up the roots of the proud nations, and planted the lowly in their place. 16The Lord overthrew countries of the heathen, and destroyed them to the foundations of the earth” (Ecclesiasticus 12-16).
    Pride is “the father and foundation for all other sins”- St Gregory the Great.

    There are a number of activities that are associated with vainglory: “…the vices which by their very nature are such as to be directed to the end of a certain capital vice, are called its daughters….”: boastfulness, obstinacy, discord, contention, and disobedience. Each is a manifestation of an individual’s desire “to make known his excellence by showing that he is not inferior to another.”

    “It was Pride that changed angels into devils; it is humility that makes men as angels”. – St. Augustine.

    Is it not what the Jews do? What the ‘Western European’ civilization does?
    “The scribes and the Pharisees have sat down on Moses’ seat; 3therefore keep and observe all things whatsoever they might tell you. But do not do according to their works, for they preach and do not act. 4And they tie up burdens heavy and hard to beara and lay them on the shoulders of men; but they themselves are not willing to move them with their finger. 5And they do all their deeds in order to be seen by men. For they broaden their phylacteries and enlarge their tassels, 6and they love the chief place at the banquets, and the first seats in the synagogues, 7and the greetings in the marketplaces, and to be called ‘Rabbi’ by men. 8But you shall not be called ‘Rabbi,’ for your Teacher is One, and you are all brothers. 9And call no one your father on the earth; for One is your Father, who is in heaven. 10Neither be called instructors; since One is your instructor, the Christ. 11But the greatest among you will be your servant. 12And whoever shall exalt himself will be humbled, and whoever shall humble himself will be exalted” (Matthew 23:2-12).

  257. joe862 says:
    @Anonymous

    when people are full of themselves or their group the natural reaction is to respond with criticism and ridicule. They can then claim everyone hates them for no reason, etc.

  258. @mikesmith

    No, I think you are a little overwrought mike. I was not “concocting” anything but simply responding to hbm’s thesis. All this is quite outside my scholarly competences. However, years back I did read an argument that was similar to hbm’s in a book called In Search of Ancient Israel by Philip R Davies. He had a chair at the university of Sheffield in Biblical studies. Is he a flat earther?

  259. Emi says:

    Sadly, this jewish ethnocentrism has also made it’s way
    to christians when it comes to how they view Jesus as prophet
    of all prophets. Of course, cause Jesus was jewish and this unconscious enthocentrism puts their Jesus above all others from
    Krishna to Buddha,Mohammed, and all others

  260. Seraphim says:
    @Emi

    Now, Christians put Jesus above Moses and Abraham too. BTW, neither Abraham nor Moses were ‘Jews’.

  261. @Emi

    Actually Jesus is held in less repute by American Protestant Christians these days. He didn’t like rich people, money changers or “the Jews”. This will not do in the Jewish neo liberal United States.

  262. @mikesmith

    I think there have been some people since the rise of Enlightenment deism who hate the whole Abrahamic tradition, or sometimes just Christianity, so much that they will grasp at straws to discredit it,

    It occurs to me that YOU may have a particular attachment to the Abrahamic tradition. Is that right Mike? Do you come here to deliver your erudite lectures on history to the flat earth goyim?

  263. Rosie says:
    @mikesmith

    I for one am not going to bet the future on a doomed strategy just to make myself feel morally superior to my fellow man.

    And those who demand that we do so must be recognized as hostile and nefarious.

  264. Wally says:
    @Skeptikal

    said:
    “It seems like the greatest solo and other violinists of the 20th C were Russian or Eastern European Jews or their descendants.”

    Maybe.
    No doubt there are some excellent ones, but at minimum they get the Zio media / PR machine proclaiming them “the greatest” … at the exclusion of others of course.

    Recall frauds Einstein, Freud & Salk lauded by the Usual Enemies of Free Speech as the epitome of “genius”.

    However:

    “Alone the fact that one may not question the Jewish “holocaust” and that Jewish pressure has inflicted laws on democratic societies to prevent questions—while incessant promotion and indoctrination of the same averredly incontestable ‘holocaust’ occur—gives the game away. It proves that it must be a lie. Why else would one not be allowed to question it? Because it might offend the “survivors”? Because it “dishonors the dead”? Hardly sufficient reason to outlaw discussion. No, because the exposure of this leading lie might precipitate questions about so many other lies and cause the whole ramshackle fabrication to crumble.”

    – Gerard Menuhin / righteous Revisionist Jew, son of famous violinist

  265. notanon says:

    living as an assimilated minority for so many generations must be selective for traits conducive to that

  266. Nothing in this world will be really solved until Jews admit openly that they are the world’s ethnic supremacists par excellence.

    And that can’t happen until everyone openly admits that ethnic supremacy is (at least in moderation) actually ok. Everyone roots for the home team, and that’s just fine.

    But it’s another case of golem-torpedoes circling around. In order to get one over on Whitey, Jews hacked Whitey’s proclivity to use adherence to abstract ideals (and the policing thereof) as “social glue,” and “made him live up to his own ideals.” So Whitey is now terrified to admit to any sense of thumos. But the same construct makes it impossible for Jews to openly glorify themselves, to glory in their achievements.

    It would be much better if everyone just laid their cards on the table and we all dealt with each other in the basis of friendlier kind of rivalry. Higher-level co-operation leading to rule-limited competition is always the best way. But that would be too “sporty” for Jews – no, for them, their sense of ethnic supremacy was given to them by God, a terrible burden to carry, you understand, a serious burden …

    Talk about painting yourself into a corner.

    • Replies: @joe862
  267. joe862 says:
    @gurugeorge

    aren’t they supposed to be living in Israel and being supreme there? I agree with your description of their behavior but not that it is what their God gave them.

    Whitey is capable of creating and maintaining big, functional countries and societies far better than the jews are. This requires discouragement of greed, exploitation, extreme selfishness and megalomania. This isn’t necessary for a supremacist minority. I think they just need to all live with each other and only each other for a thousand years or so. They’d either learn to moderate their antisocial tendencies or kill each other off. Either way, the rest of the world is better off.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Andrew Joyce Comments via RSS