The Unz Review - Mobile

The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection

A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Philip Giraldi Archive
Bribing Bibi and His Proxies to Behave
They won't anyway and it will cost us much more

Email This Page to Someone


 Remember My Information



=>
Stack of money

There are a lot of expressions about standing up to bullies being the best policy. Unfortunately the White House has difficulty in following that sound advice when it comes to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his governing coalition of racists and thugs. And one might also add that the reticence also applies to dealing with Israel’s many friends in Congress, some of whom have apparently extorted their pound of flesh in exchange for their votes on the Iran deal.

Israel is already the military colossus in the Middle East, with formidable high tech ground, sea and air forces backed up by a semi-secret nuclear arsenal with modern delivery systems and several defensive missile system referred to as Iron Dome, Arrow 4 and David Sling. The defense systems were developed and deployed using $3 billion of U.S. Treasury special “grants” while roughly 20% of Israel’s annual total defense budget comes directly from the American taxpayer. This is all justified on the basis of sustaining Israel’s “Qualitative Military Edge,” an expression that has its own acronym QME and that is much loved by America’s national legislators, the White House and the media. In reality, Israel possesses an enormous military superiority relative to all its neighbors combined and has benefited from that capability for many years, all thanks to the United States of America.

But for some, too much is never enough. President Barack Obama is struggling to line up sufficient Democratic votes to block any congressional veto of his Iran agreement. At this point it looks like he will succeed, but the effort has brought with it the type of backstage politicking that most Americans have come to despise. Both Netanyahu and select Congressmen are being treated to a package of bribes for Israel that defies all reason, particularly given the fact that even the Israeli defense and intelligence establishments have split with Bibi’s government and sensibly declared the agreement with Iran to be better than any alternative. So even though defanging Iran is good for Israel, Washington nevertheless feels compelled to sweeten the pot, with actual American interests as usual ignored or not even considered.

How it all works has been revealed by Walter Pincus of the Washington Post, who apparently has seen a copy of a personal letter from President Obama that was sent to Democratic Congressman Jerrold Nadler, a representative from New York who was hesitating over how to cast his vote regarding Iran. Nadler’s district is reported to be heavily Jewish and the congressman, himself Jewish, has long been an outspoken advocate for Israel. The letter he received may have been similar or even identical to letters presumably sent to other Congressmen who have also been sitting on the fence over the Iran deal.

Obama, to give him his due, cleverly focuses on “our enhanced support for Israel” as the way to get to Nadler’s vote, thereby enabling the Congressman to cite what Israel will be getting out of it as he explains to his angry constituents why he is defying the call by Netanyahu to vote down the deal.

President Obama, boasting in the letter that “no administration has done for Israel’s security than mine,” adds that he is “prepared to further strengthen the relationship.” Indeed he does. He commits the United States to extend the U.S. commitment to provide Israel with $3.5 billion per year for purchasing military equipment for an additional decade after the current George W. Bush era program expires in 2018. The letter notes a “unique element” in the purchase agreement which allows Tel Aviv to spend up to 26.3% of the money on Israeli manufactured equipment.

Beyond the $3 billion plus per annum, Obama also pledged to continue extra funding for “collaborative research and development for tunnel detection and mapping technologies,” a program that only benefits Israel. Israel will also be the only country in the Middle East to receive the new advanced F-35 fighter when it finally become operational next year, all paid for by the American taxpayer.

Apart from the fact that the United States is inexplicably giving billions to an Israel that has a thriving economy with Western European levels of income, there are a number of problems with this Obama deal and the nature of the “special relationship” that it represents. For Washington, Israel is the squeaking wheel that is constantly requiring applications of grease to keep quiet. The grease is liberally applied, but the wheel keeps squeaking, the noise generally emanating from the office of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who has been directly interfering in U.S. politics since 2012.

One problem is that the United States is allowing Israel to use the money to be armed and equipped in a fashion which is directly contrary to American interests. A May offering of $1.88 billion in new equipment to Israel included 50 BLU-113 5,000 pound bombs with special penetrating nose cones that can be used against underground targets. Those targets would include Iran’s nuclear facilities, most notably its Fodrow underground uranium enrichment plant. Israel’s friends have also been agitating for the much larger 30,000 pound version of the bomb together with the heavy bombers needed to drop it on target. If past history is anything to go by it is merely a matter of time before they are granted their wish.

Bombing Iran is not exactly a U.S. interest at the moment – quite the contrary. Is it far-fetched to imagine Netanyahu staging such an attack to upset the apple cart and destroy any chance of Iranian rapprochement with Washington? A month ago I would have said no, but last week former Israeli Prime Minister and Defense Minister Ehud Barak revealed that both he and Netanyahu did indeed want to bomb Iran in 2010-2012 but backed down because of technical issues and also due to the refusal of key cabinet members and military officers to support the decision.

A second problem is the authorization for Israel to spend American taxpayer money on equipment produced locally. Israel is a major weapons supplier worldwide, sometimes both selling and providing training to regimes that many consider unsavory. Its own military industrial complex was built up using the largesse coming from the United States and it now competes with American companies. It also has a well-established record of stealing United States developed military technology and then re-exporting it under its own label, a win-win for Israel but a lose-lose for American companies.

While I am far from a fan of America’s military industrial congressional complex, using American tax dollars to subsidize a foreign competitor is the height of insanity. It will cut into exports and cost American jobs. Combining that reality with the fact that no amount of bribery will make Netanyahu shut up and that Israel will likely use some of the gifted weapons in ways that will cause difficulties for Washington the constant introduction of more money and more arms for Israel is just not a good idea. Kudos to Obama for having proceeded as far as he has with the Iran agreement but if a Congressman from New York cannot for once perceive that a deal is good for America he should resign his seat and go home. Constantly playing the Israel card has not been good for politics in the United States and it has also not been good for Israel itself as well as for the Middle East region. It is time to cut the tie that binds.

 

222 Comments to "Bribing Bibi and His Proxies to Behave"

Commenters to Ignore
Agrees/Disagrees Only
[Filtered by Reply Thread]
  1. what if this has been the strategy all along, or at least the point in the future where all plans converge? we sign the deal with Iran, arm Israel, then they, or we create a case of an Iranian violation, and poof, we’re at war!
    considering the sophisticated detection methods, introducing a radioactive substance, should be a cinch! (See Syrian gas attack)
    The race for approval of the deal was the warm up act to get us all conditioned to acquiesce to another damned war in the ME.
    It may not convince anyone else in the world but who cares,

    • Replies: , ,
    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  2. Would Israel’s military officers support the decision to bomb Iran if Netanyahu is given the toys required to effectively bomb Iran? Is it the feasibility that they protested or was it the stupidity of it all? There is nothing sadder than a whipped Empire. The Iran deal is a great accomplishment and what will the rest of the world do if Israel starts a war with Iran over false pretenses? Will they come to the aid of a state that is becoming more fascist as time goes on?

    Reply More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  3. no amount of bribery will make Netanyahu shut up

    Cutoff all foreign and diplomatic and military aid to Israel, for real.

    It is time to cut the tie that binds.

    To cut the ties with Israel would require eliminating or breaking the Jewish national victim cult scheme that dominates United States politics.

    • Replies:
    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  4. Is $3.5 billion, mostly spent in the US and much of it adding to America’s scientific and technical knowledge base, such a bad, or even a big investment? It pales into insignificance compared with invading Afghanistan or Iraq. It pales into insignificance compared to the waste in America’s health care systems just in case your imagination needed a prompt. All those defensive systems like Iron Dome sound like a cheap investment and it is hard to see why the US, within its policy constraints, shouldn’t regard support for technological advances like improved tunnel detection as a relatively good use of money. (Indeed tunnel detection might be very useful on the border with Mexico).

    So, that part isn’t shocking. Of course Netanyahu is not to be trusted any more than the Iranians – or Pakistan or Russia for that matter. The trouble is getting Germany, China, Russia, the UK and France to maintain sanctions would be impossible so the idea of rejecting the deal is probably ridiculous. I say “probably” because I have just read that inspections under Obama’s deal will only take place after 24 days notice. If so that is ridiculous. The only mitigation lies in the inspectorate’s ability to counterattack if subjected to long waiting periods with evidence at the end of incriminating material having been moved. Two much evident cleaning up and the retaliation could be (perhaps… I assume the treaty would allow it) multiple notices of inspection which would require much Iranian R&D to be aborted.

    On my one visit to Israel, three months ago, I saw little sign of its prosperous economy being easily able to afford all the outlays it makes. The Bedouin and the Ethiopian Jews constitute huge deadweights on the economy, as do the Ultra Orthodox in their various hues (the latter make a disproportionate contribution of retarded children thanks to their inbreeding habits; indeed it is hard to think of anything economically positive about them: the Amish they are not). Even the creation of the 8th or 9th research university at Ariel in “Samaria” was a subject of angst because it is requiring other universities to lose funding. And the two years nearly all young Israelis spend in the IDF is a big negative as is the size of the defence budget. The hotels I stayed in, despite plenty of stars, were pretty shoddy, as were the city streets, not least in Tel Aviv, though not so much Jerusalem.

    Maybe someone would care to do the figures thoroughly but I’m tentatively saying that I agree with you except that I guess Obama’s getting out of political trouble pretty lightly at a few billion dollars to get the votes in Congress. The more articles like yours saying it’s outrageous the better the White House will like it.

    Let’s not forget that Israel as military superpower is good for the US once you consider the cost of Israel being seen as weak enough to tempt neighbours to attack and America not being able to wash its hands of possible Iranian or Arab military victory.

    • Replies: , , , , , ,
    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  5. support the Boycott, Divest, and Sanction campaign against Zion-in-Palestine @ http://www.endtheoccupation.com …it’s the only way that the bloody albatross that is Israel will ever be gotten off America’s back

    • Replies: ,
    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  6. Wouldn’t it be better (and cheaper) to see the deal rejected? Stripping a rogue nation of its most important allies would be a major plus for the planet.

    • Agree: SolontoCroesus
    • Disagree: Sam Shama
    • Replies:
    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  7. Is $3.5 billion, … such a bad, or even a big investment? It pales into insignificance compared with invading Afghanistan or Iraq.

    Nice try. The trillions spent on wars in the ME are for Israel’s benefit, as well… all in an effort to make the jungle a little safer for the villa. You should give Mearsheimer and Walt a read, should you have any doubts.

    • Replies:
    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  8. “…as he explains to his angry constituents why he is defying the call by Netanyahu to vote down the deal.”

    I thought polls indicated that most american jews supported the deal?

    Reply More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  9. Don’t forget the village idiot Christian Zionist Republican base!

    • Replies: ,
    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  10. How effective can the BDS campaign be?

    The Israelis of course make much of the accurately stated stats about the employment of Palestinians in the West Bank businesses and, apart from being most likely ineffective and avoidable, Palestinians are not going to be grateful. It occurs to me also that BDS will give a push to the huge efforts at development the Israelis are making in the Negev which is much larger than the West Bank. If Palestinians can’t be allowed to commute there to work there will be plenty of even cheaper labour available from India and the Phillipines.

    • Agree: Sam Shama
    • Replies:
    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  11. That’s a point but in no way a point which answers what I suggested about $3.5 billion, not least that Obama might reasonably think it a cheap way of tying up the votes he needs.

    • Replies:
    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  12. You appear to be saying that Obama is consciously aiming for a war in the Middle East. If so I need a lot of persuasion to believe that even remotely plausible.

    • Replies:
    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  13. Given the eloquence of Nadler’s statement defending the deal, the right wing Zionist vitriol against him, I’m not really against Obama giving him as many talking points as possible to defend his position. I really fear the guy (a friend of good friends, and I’ve seen him around Columbia University for forever) might be an assassination target.
    Plus, I doubt Obama has given his good friend Bibi any assurances about US UN vetoes, or the 30,000 bomb. I like your piece a lot, but politics is the art of the possible.

    Reply More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  14. That 3.5 billion is money taken from Americans and our children. Defending Israel is not the responsibility of the US government or the American taxpayer. Who cares where they spend the money? I would spend all of it in the United States, but you don’t see the Feds shipping me 3.5 billion in American tax money.

    Israel could disappear tomorrow and it would be a net positive for the American people.

    You also need to add in the money spent bribing Egypt not to attack Israel as more of Israel’s welfare. That promise of bribe money was the worst thing Carter did as president.

    • Agree: geokat62
    • Replies:
    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  15. 3.5 billion is a radio active waste ,not a regular recycle able waste or safe non hazardous waste

    It makes Israel powerful enough that it can threaten US allies in the region- Iraq in 80s,Egypt in 2000,attack Lebanon,kill Arafat,push America around ,derails peace ,decries and denounces Oslo,builds wall builds settlement,and grabs lands.
    ( Israel using its media then reminds America that Israel is its only ally WHENEVER ARAB CITIZEN COMMITS TERRORISM AGAINST AMERICA IN RESPONSE TO US SUPPORT TO ISRAELI CRIMES . ISrael reminds America that Israel is doing Americas war against terrorism when ARAB COUNTRIES TRY TO RESIST ECONOMICALLY OR POLITICALLY BY JOINING WITH SOVIET OR CHINA IN TREATEIS AGAINST AMERICA AFYER THEIR REPEATED FAILURES TO MAKE US LISTEN TO THEIR GRIEVANCES AGAINST ISRARL

    THOSE NEEDS to seek Israeli support of abstract nature WOULDN’T HAVE ARISEN IF US NEVER SUPPORTED THE ACTIVELY ENGAGED ENEMY OF ARAB which has been Israel .
    To the contrary Israel never supported America during 1949 , neither in Lebanon in 1980 or during Hostage Crisis in Iran or during 2003 wars against Iraq or during Oslo peace process in 1991 or during 2002 unrest in Palestine . By taking advantage of chaos from post WW2 to post 911 and post 2003 , Israel has harmed and endangered America

    The money and the technology stolen from west have made Israel so powerful that its interlocutors in US and its military strategists or historian can even threaten West with Nuclear winter ( some communication professor in Louisiana State University and one famous Von Credel from Israel articulated these threats in no uncertain terms )

    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  16. support the Boycott, Divest, and Sanction campaign against Zion-in-Palestine @ http://www.endtheoccupation.com …it’s the only way that the bloody albatross that is Israel will ever be gotten off America’s back

    We should change sides, yay! Why not just bomb Israel, yay!

    Idiot.

    How could it possibly be in America’s interest to take the Arab side? You think they will reward you? Haha.

    How about a simple formula? No aid and no interference with either side?

    The world might then see the US as a poor potential ally who doesn’t remain true, but I think the world already sees the US that way.

    • Replies: , ,
    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  17. Is America doing same stuff against Netanyahu or his administration or his regime that US is doing against Iran,against Pakistan,against Russia?

    Problems of Bedouin or Ethiopian Jews are the problem of Haredim run Israel not of US. It has no place in discussion other than stating that America isn’t to subsidize Torah reading or flying Ethiopian Jews or grabbing lands from Bedouin.
    By subsiding Torah readings, America is helping in more religious inspired violence ,contributing to more religiously inspired right wing political shifts ,and promoting more religiously infused violence against Christian and Muslim.

    • Replies:
    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  18. Israel could disappear tomorrow and it would be a net positive for the American people.

    I don’t think it would make much of a difference. You’d save a bit of money. But there’d be one less rock on which the Muslim demographic tsunami can break.

    Reply More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  19. No you don’t need to add the money promised by Carter to Egypt whether or not it is a good or bad investment by the US judged by its own interests and what it has achieved. Why? Because the argument you are purporting to answer only has to do whether Obama can reasonably regard the $3.5 billion (or the lesser amount which is added to what would be paid anyway) as a good investment in getting the votes for his deal. It is equally irrelevant that 26 per cent will be spent outside the US or in on assets which will belong to Israel because it is not possible to say what the alternative would have been in the context of America running giant deficits financed by the Chinese and Japanese at almost no interest.

    That said I could easily make a case for wishing that the Balfour Declaration could be nullified ab initio. I would like the somewhat fanciful but actual proposal for Jews to be given a national home in Australia’s Kimberley Region to have become a reality. The local Aborigines could stand in for today’s troublesome Bedouin and the southern hemisphere Israel could be suffering from the Dutch disease because of the iron ore….

    It remains true that the US couldn’t wash its hands of Israel if it was attacked and likely to be defeated by anyone. So making sure it is well armed can be regarded as an insurance premium against the US having to go to war for Israel directly.

    • Replies: ,
    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  20. Bribing Bibi and His Proxies to Behave | MasterAdrian's Weblog
    says:
    • Website     Show CommentNext New Comment

    […] By Philip Giraldi • Unz Review • September 1, 2015 […]

    Reply More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  21. I don’t know what you think that has to do with what I wrote any more than I understand what you mean by “Haredim run Israel”. That suggests to me that you don’t know what you are talking about. The ultra orthodox in Israel use their swinging votes in the Knesset to win privileges which have nothing to do with foreign policy or defence – except to get themselves out of defending the country in the IDF.

    • Replies: ,
    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  22. ” American Jews are disillusioned and disenchanted with Obama on his stand on the Egyptian revolution ( not supporting Mubarek and then not supporting Sisi ) ” from Chicago Tribune

    say everything Americans need to know who is the enemy in the garb of an American ally in Middle East and what that ally does to the region hitting American interest .
    Israel is the one who tells the world – hey look you can’t trust America ,it is forsaking Mubatek and Sisi.

    • Replies:
    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  23. The nature of the true feelings of the European – German. French,British and rest to Isarel have always been
    -http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4695440,00.html
    depicted in the pictures of the doves shitting on Isreali regime.
    Years ago French envoy called it a little shitty country.
    Years ago a true Zionist and a criminal same time Sarkozy correctly described another colleague in crime Netanyahu as a liar . He had had enough. Mafia wa turning on each other.

    This sanction was never in the interest of Europe . So the moment they saw the opportunities ,they ran with it instead of drowning themselves to rescue some liar in both houses of US.

    So your observation of this breakout day or that 24 are the same BS that colored WMD arguent against Iraq. The promise and the conduct of the argument were abd are illegal and are framed by Israel. Israel says – hey this should be the red line – knowing fully no country would allow a red line on the sand of its sovereignty . So when that fictitious Zionist driven and drawn red line is erased , Israel says- hey ,red line is crossed – lets kill some Muslims .
    So take your worry about Iran not following or complying to Israel.

    • Replies:
    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  24. Israel designates to America who should be it ally or who is.
    Wolfowitz in 2003 wanted military in Turkey to be the vassal state’s ruler
    In 2013 Israel , American Jews wanted Mubarek and after Mubatek, Sisi to be the designated ally .Ahmed Chalabi was one truly desired .
    Shah in Iran in tow with SAVAK and Abbas in Palestine are the Israeli embodiments of what an Ally would be .
    Israel created a true ally by name Idi Amin also out of whole cloth of military training in Israel .

    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  25. Here they are now.

    http://www.ifcj.org/site/PageNavigator/eng/USENG_homenew

    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  26. You should revise or get an editor. I haven’t a clue what you are talking about. But that maybe is because it was just something you wanted to utter and only nominated as a Reply to me by some slip.

    • Replies:
    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  27. My theory of many years has been everytime we give a $ to an Israeli we give a $ to a Palestinian, it
    would take time lapse photography to catch the Zionists rushing for the Peace Table.

    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  28. Gee Wiz,

    Hmm – for a supposed Gentile you sure know everything about Israel – how does this happen?

    Could you really be a deceitful Little Jew?

    Isn’t deceit a major part of the Jew character – isn’t that how David became king – isn’t his deceiving his father by “pooling the wool over his eyes” proudly celebrated by Jew religious culture?

    Isn’t “by deceit we make war” the proud motto of the murderous Mossad mob.

    Tell us — Art

    • Replies: ,
    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  29. If you’re anti-Israel, giving them F-35s should make you happy.

    Peace, love, truth,

    The Grate Deign

    Reply More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  30. Israel is the one who tells the world – hey look you can’t trust America ,it is forsaking Mubatek and Sisi.

    If Israel is saying that, then Israel is right.

    Compare and contrast with how loyal Iran and Russia have been to Assad in Syria.

    Those two countries seem like they will stick with you through thick and thin.

    • Replies: ,
    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  31. Is $3.5 billion, mostly spent in the US and much of it adding to America’s scientific and technical knowledge base, such a bad, or even a big investment?

    A waste of our money. A bad investment. Nothing scientific about it. A bad idea.

    • Replies:
    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  32. Your comments do not appear when I read the Comments because I have included you in the list of Commenters to Ignore but the fact of your commenting in reply to me is communicated to me by email. Please refrain from replying to my comments. I will not be replying to you so it is a waste of your and my time for you to attempt to engage in dispute or discussion with me.

    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  33. Uncritically boosting Israel’s offensive capacity removes any remaining incentive for it to engage in diplomacy and likely makes further military adventurism a virtual certainty.

    • Agree: SolontoCroesus
    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  34. America has plenty of its irons in the warfires currently raging in the Middle East. That was Obama’s boast, that it proved how tough he is on Iran. Syria is the latest objective.

    • Replies:
    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  35. Nuclear weapons in the mid-east give a new meaning to mutually assured destruction. Most of the countries adjoining Israel are much too small and close packed –at least the urban areas- to use such weapons. Israel wasn’t thinking when it introduced such weapons to the area. As with India and Pakistan, if your bellicose neighbor has such weapons it’s necessary to match their status.

    It was a major and obvious mistake for Israel to pioneer such weapons. The better course would be for them to engage with an offer purge the nukes in return for an enforceable pledge from others in the region to do likewise.

    Milking Uncle Sap by stoking the threat is getting old and more dangerous.

    • Disagree: Wizard of Oz
    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  36. Do you *know* that there is no addition to Americans’ useful scientific or technical knowledge which is what I take you to mean when you say “nothing scientific about it”?

    And is it a bad investment as
    (1) Obama’s way of ensuring there are enough votes to sustain the deal with Iran;
    (2) An insurance premium to keep Israel strong enough for America not to have to get caught up in another Middle Eastern war (which would happen I am sure you would agree
    if Israel was attacked by a force which might defeat it)?

    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  37. Would you care to elaborate? I am not sure what this is intended to tell me or whst point or points of mine it may be answering

    • Replies:
    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  38. “Your comments do not appear when I read the Comments because I have included you in the list of Commenters to Ignore”

    Gee Wiz,

    How you work this site is your business (what a weenie).

    You make your comments to the general public – so you will get comments back – that is how freedom works.

    I will continue to point out the disconnect between your claim to be a Gentile and your vast knowledge of all things Jewish/Israel/Zionist.

    You cannot pull the wool over peoples eyes forever.

    Buck up Wiz — Art the Honest (smile)

    Reply More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  39. KA is basically trying to say that whole sanction business was dangerously defective American product made in Israel for Israel.
    Argument in favor of sanctions was never bought by anybody in Europe or Asia. EU went along with the American efforts so that it could avoid being sanctioned by the US (at the urgings of Israel).

    The true feelings to Right wing/ Likud party have been communicated by EU at different times over last 15 years or so.

    • Replies:
    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  40. What is your position on Adam Lanza’s mother giving him guns and taking him to shooting range to boost his confidence?

    How about Dylan Roof — his father gave him a gun for his birthday. Good idea or bad idea?

    • Replies: ,
    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  41. “Bribing Bibi and His Proxies to Behave”

    This misses the more crucial point, i.e. Bibi is himself the proxy of globalist Jewish power. It is wrong to see this in terms of sane Jews + Obama vs Bibi + insane Jews(aka Neocons). Rather, so-called sane Jews of J-Street are using both Obama and Bibi to get what they want. They see the deal with Iran as workable and even beneficial(at least for the next decade or so), but they also see Bibi as valuable in creating a ruckus to have more ‘aid’ and goodies be sent to Israel. J-Street Jews really love what Bibi is doing. They pretend to be angry and stand by Obama, but they know that without Bibi’s antics, Israel won’t get the extra goodies out of it. Suppose Bibi were silent and went along. Iran Deal would pass, and that’d be that. There would be no cause for special packages for Israel. But if Bibi throws tantrums and GOP cuckservatives follow suit, then the Democratic Party will have to play ‘super-friend of Israel’ and offers tons of goodies in supplication.

    So, we have to see Bibi as a bit player in the overall drama of Jewish power.
    Look, as powerful as the Neocons are, far more powerful are the Lib Jews. If Lib Jews who control government, Hollywood, Harvard and Ivies, Silicon Valley, law firms, Wall Street, and etc. really wanna put Bibi in his place and kick his ass, they can do so in a heartbeat. But why do they allow Bibi to get away with so much? Because his antics pressure the Democrats to offer more to Israel, indeed more than what Iran will get out of the deal.

    Also, there is no real difference between J-Street Jews and Neocons. Outwardly, they pretend to bicker, but they are both for Jewish tribal power. Jewish Liberal Conscience is always about beating on wasp privilege, ‘white guilt’, Russian evil, German evil, Spanish evil, Polish evil, French evil, and etc. but it’s never ever about Jewish evils. If Jewish Liberals were truly liberal, they would be self-critical. Except for odd Jews like the MondoWeiss guy, it’s not the case. As far as I can remember, the New Republic Jews were just as fiercely Zionist as National Review Jews.

    Also, just as Liberal Jews are not really liberal(when it comes to self-criticism of tribal interests), Neocon Jews are not really conservative. Sheldon Adelson, the biggest donor to the GOP, isn’t conservative on any issue. His only ‘conservative’ issue is Zionism, but it’s entirely about Jewish tribalism, not about what is good for all Americans. On every social and political issue — immigration, ‘gay’ agenda, diversity, and etc. — Adelson is no different from George Soros and Elena Kagan. American Conservatives, having been cuckized, suck up to him because he’s a rich Las Vegas mogul(degenerate new conservatism is all about money, money, money) and because the only permissible tribalism in the GOP is pro-Zionism(despite the fact that most Jews, neocons included, hate white people and are waging a war on conservative white America that is no less vicious than the war on Russia).

    Remember GOODFELLAS? Tommy(Joe Pesci) was acting bad, but the gang bosses let him run wild as long as he was bringing in the dough and paying tribute. He was useful. They finally got rid of him cuz he killed a ‘made guy’. Anyway, Bibi gets to do his Tommy act because the truly powerful Jews in the US, the Lib Jews, find him useful as the bulldog of Jewish interests. These Lib Jews are too ‘classy’ to act so vulgar for Jewish interests, so they leave the badboy act to someone like Bibi.
    Bibi raises the ruckus, and the nice Lib Jews(acting like Paulie played by Sorvino) promise to do something about it. But in the end, it’s all about raking it in all for the mob.

    “Obama, to give him his due, cleverly focuses on ‘our enhanced support for Israel’ as the way to get to Nadler’s vote, thereby enabling the Congressman to cite what Israel will be getting out of it as he explains to his angry constituents why he is defying the call by Netanyahu to vote down the deal.”

    Obama isn’t being clever at all. He’s fallen into the trap. J-Street Jews advised him on the deal. Now, he’s being attacked by Bibi and Neocons(something that J-Street Jews saw coming and secretly love), and so Obama has to cave to Israel even more to maintain Jewish support. To do this, he has to grovel before Jews and offer superduper packages to Israel.

    Obama is just a grocery clerk. The idea that he’s some grand strategist working all sides to get the deal is so ridiculous. The grand strategy is handled by J-Street Jews who want the deal but also want to squeeze maximum packages for Israel, and in this, they are secretly coordinating with Neocons and Bibi. I’m not necessarily saying that J-Street Jews, Neocons, and Bibi all got together in some secret smoke-filled room. But Jews telepathically can pick up on each other’s signals. It’s wink-wink.
    If you grew up with Jews, you know how this works. You know there is a general understanding among Jews, and I mean all Jews, whether ‘left’ or ‘right’.

    It’s the Marx Brothers pretend to be at each other’s throats all the time but are actually working together.

    • Replies: , , , ,
    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  42. This is the Jewish way.

    Partners-in-Crime.

    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  43. But let’s not forget our own turncoat fellow travelers in Congress. Senator Tom Cotton was in Israel yesterday meeting with Netanyahu and pledging to work with him against our own president. This is something very close to treason at least as the dictionary would define it though our constitution requires that treason involve collusion with a country with which we are actually at war.

    http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/cotton-will-stand-foreign-leader-against-us-foreign-policy

    • Agree: Orville H. Larson
    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  44. The money paid as a bribe to Egypt must be added to the cost of Israel to the American people.

    We could very easily wash our hands of that alien culture on the other side of the world, if they did not control our government. Going to war for Israel is something we should never do.

    • Replies:
    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  45. But Jews telepathically can pick up on each other’s signals. It’s wink-wink.
    If you grew up with Jews, you know how this works.

    Priss,
    I am in the clutches of a left-hemisphere headache. Abe Foxman transmits messages, nodding and winking, “lay off all the criticism of Bibi, Israel and Zionism!” he says.

    What should I do?

    • Replies: ,
    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  46. Now with the mass immigration’s into the EU of “refugees” due to US, Saudi, and Israeli wars the NWO and Zionists can even further erode nationalist tendencies which would thwart their control of countries. Sovereign countries and nationalism are a major threat to the NWO and the Zionists.

    They can also bolster their domestic forces against the original populace by saying they are policing the new immigrants. Then many of these cash economy immigrants use social services paid by true taxpayers who then get short changed via austerity because there is not enough money to pay for it all. It does assure that those in power stay in power.

    What do they care. They live in rich gated communities, make money globally, and have homes all over the place. Then there’s another effect kind of like Mao’s Cultural Revolution. They have goon squads to destroy age old traditions, customs, and cultures which cements their control over a nation.

    This same model is being used to great advantage by the ruling classes in a Balkanized America. People are too busy fighting each other to challenge power. The immigrants become useful idiots and a decoy from the populace turning to issues that really matter which would have stopped the massive uncontrolled immigrations in the first place.

    We hear lots and spend billions upon billions for Homeland Security and whatever the EU does but how is it safe to have open borders? One thing the NWO has in common is support for Israel and immigration as a weaponized destructive force. Yet Israel, a country that Congress and Washington support heavily has one of the most Draconian immigration policies in the world.

    Something is certainly not Kosher here!

    Reply More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  47. When S2C is in the clutches of a left-hemisphere headache S2C listens to some upbeat, motivating music.

    Here’e hoping your left- hemisphere comes to its SENSes

    • Replies:
    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  48. How top Clinton confidants talk about Israel when no one’s listening:

    http://www.vox.com/2015/9/1/9239943/israel-clinton-emails


    Israel lobby influenced (owned) Congress pushes to derail Iran deal for Iran war
    :

    http://america-hijacked.com/2015/03/10/netanyahu-us-congress-hawks-want-to-torpedo-iran-nuclear-talks/

    • Agree: Orville H. Larson
    • Replies:
    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  49. “Netanyahu, & US Congress hawks want to torpedo Iran nuclear talks”
    says:
    • Website     Show CommentNext New Comment

    […] http://www.unz.com/article/bribing-bibi-and-his-proxies-to-behave/ […]

    Reply More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  50. Gee Wiz,

    Here is what you have to defend.

    “The Israeli army should have shot a Palestinian family from the West Bank village of Nabi Saleh who saved an injured child from being arrested during the village’s weekly demonstration against the illegal confiscation of their land, a minister said.”

    https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/news/middle-east/20751-israeli-minister-palestinian-women-who-saved-injured-boy-from-israeli-soldier-should-have-been-shot

    The child was 11 – the woman who defended him was his mother. The Israeli minister who said that is a Zionist Jew woman. This is the trash our money goes too.

    Poor Little Jew Wiz –– I am so clad I am not YOU -=== Art

    • Replies:
    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  51. I would like the somewhat fanciful but actual proposal for Jews to be given a national home in Australia’s Kimberley Region to have become a reality. The local Aborigines could stand in for today’s troublesome Bedouin and the southern hemisphere Israel could be suffering from the Dutch disease because of the iron ore….

    I rather like the idea of a Jewish homeland in the Anglosphere. On the whole, I might have taken up raising sheep in the Kimberley, and enjoyed it a great deal more than suffering the current branding personally (not entirely undeserved, I might add, a share of the group blame….)

    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  52. Indeed, he’s an apartheid apologist using every cliche from the Hasbara Handbook.

    Seemingly endless Zionist organizations engaged in propaganda

    http://electronicintifada.net/blogs/asa-winstanley/israel-tech-site-paying-interns-covertly-plant-stories-social-media

    Israel tech site paying “interns” to covertly plant stories in social media

    http://electronicintifada.net/blogs/ali-abunimah/israeli-students-get-2000-spread-state-propaganda-facebook

    Israeli students to get $2,000 to spread state propaganda on Facebook

    http://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=6175

    Jewish Internet Defense Force

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_Internet_Defense_Force

    Zionist Wikipedia Editing Course http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/139189

    Who runs the Federal Reserve?
    Who runs Wall Street?
    Who owns the US Congress
    Who owns the White House?
    Who forces acceptance of the fictitious & impossible ’6M & gas chambers’?
    Who runs the media / entertainment?
    Who dominates ‘academia’?
    Why is AIPAC the most powerful, dominant lobby, which regularly writes the text of Congressional bills and resolutions.
    Who is it that wants to censor free speech via the “hate speech” canard.
    Who is it that demands we shed the blood of US troops for their interests?
    Who are the biggest racists on the planet?

    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  53. ART!!

    There you go again, slandering peace-loving Israelis.

    How dare you slander the poor IDF soldier who was only protecting himself from those “Pallywood” Palestinians!

    Thank goodness CAMERA has the real scoop and can straighten you out —

    http://www.camera.org/index.asp?x_context=2&x_outlet=284&x_article=3095

    Nabi Saleh, near the Jewish community of Neveh Tzuf, is “where photographers gather every Friday to document repetitious scenes of Palestinian residents and international activists clashing with Israeli soldiers” and where activists often place their children in danger to score propaganda points.
    Nabi Saleh’s most popular Pallywood child star, known as “Shirley Temper” (aka Ahed. or A’hd, Tamimi), revived her recurring role as the symbol of Palestinian “resistance” on Friday, when she was seen attacking an Israeli soldier who had detained a rock-thrower during protests.

    Ahed is the daughter of Narimen and Bassem Tamimi, prominent activists in the Popular Resistance who evidently determine the girl’s protest “strategy.” As Sternthal noted, “rather than keeping their children at a safe distance from the often-violent clashes, the parents encourage their children to play highly visible roles in the confrontation with the army.” . . .

    (The term “Pallywood” refers to the staging of scenes by Palestinian journalists in order to present the Palestinians as hapless victims of Israeli aggression.) . . .

    What arguably stands out most about this video is the restraint shown by the Israeli soldier. He was shoved, hit and bitten and yet maintained his discipline throughout the incident until a commander called off the detention, citing the escalating violence. [CAMERA fails to mention that after his commander rescued him from the children, the brave IDF soldier threw a tear gas grenade at the Palestinian group.* The soldier did his share of shoving, elbowing, grasping, smacking, as shown in the video. We have Cameras too, CAMERA.]

    *youtube has removed the video that shows the soldier initially chasing and manhandling the boy; pressing him face-down on rocks, and, at the ending, pulling the pin from a tear-gas grenade and throwing it at the feet of the group of Palestinians.
    A version posted on Huffington Post does not show those scenes.

    • Replies: , ,
    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  54. Haredim’s habit of free ride on rest of the Israelis is subsidized by the US .

    • Replies:
    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  55. Now you scratch your head ,may be then you figure out why Egyptians don’t like US administration . They see the obvious – America will not listen to Egyptians and even will hurt its own national interests to placate Israelis .

    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  56. Pallyywood was the word Nazi was almost about to use for the train to Auswitchz hurtling down to Hollywood for more effective propaganda .

    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  57. “I am in the clutches of a left-hemisphere headache. Abe Foxman transmits messages, nodding and winking, ‘lay off all the criticism of Bibi, Israel and Zionism!’ he says.
    What should I do?”

    LOL.

    Interesting that you mention Abe Foxman because he’s been the Bibi-Joe-McCarthy of Jewish Power in the USA as the head of ADL.

    Foxman is like which character in SEINKEFELD? Newman of course.

    I think most Jews see right through Foxman. Deep down inside, they agree with Norman Finkelstein that Bibi is a loutish bully and scam-artist, a ‘hystericist’, and demagogue.
    Most Jews don’t want to act like Foxman. Too vulgar, too lacking in dignity, too pushy, too stereotypically Jewish, and etc.

    But SOMEONE has to do it. Someone had to do the ‘dirty’ work. Someone has to play the henchman, the bounty hunter, and brass-knuckle thug(albeit wrapped in the moral fabric of a velvet glove).

    So, Jews contribute a huge amount to ADL that dredges up endless instances of ‘antisemitism’ like Bibi sees nukes all over Iran(just like the homo-negro Flanagan aka ‘Bryce Williams’ saw watermelons watermelons everywhere, not a slice to eat).

    Deep down inside, Jews must know that Bibi and Foxman belong to a certain types of Jews with especially nasty and hostile personalities. If Foxman didn’t have the mantle of ‘holocaust survivor’ around his shoulders and if Bibi didn’t wrap himself with ‘never again’(this time Iran being New Nazi Germany) flag, people would have dropped them long ago like hot potatoes.
    Be that as it may, the fact is Jews are nervous about their power and the future of Israel, so they need to morally bully and badger the goyim and constantly sound the alarm about the ‘existential’ threat against Jews and Israel.
    So, Bibi keeps saying nukes in Iran are just around the corner. And ‘Jewish translation’ turns Iranian statement such as ‘Zionist regime will one day fall’ to ‘we will wipe Israel off the map’.

    Look at this video clip:

    Isn’t it so much like Bibi holding up the bomb chart?

    According to the video, there are so many cases of ‘antisemitism’ all over America on a daily basis and unless they are nipped in the bud, they will lead to the new holocaust.
    Now, most Jews must be cracking up at this. Only dumb goyim fall for this shit. But Jews know their history, especially the Holocaust, and wonder if they should preempt bad shit before it happens… because you never know.
    But then, ironically, such zealously mindless hunt for ‘antisemitism’ may actually lead to real anti-Jewish hatred in the future. Why? Because great power needs to be checked and countered in order to remain healthy and decent. All power, regardless of who has it, will grow more corrupt if left unchecked. As Jews are the ruling elites of the US, their power need to be scrutinize and countered. Jews do good things, Jews do bad things. And bad things need to be called out. But with ADL and the like screaming ‘antisemitism’ all the time — and the label is now more injurious to careers than being called a commie during the so-called McCarthy Era — , there is total silence about Jewish power. So, what happens? In the absence of criticism, Jewish power grows more corrupt and worse and worse… and eventually people might not be able to hold back anymore and then anti-Jewish sentiments may explode.

    I think some Jews see the dangers and are beginning to criticize Jewish power because they understand this. If Neocons, Wall Street gangsters, Hollywood degenerates, and etc. keep doing what they’re doing and if social decay and economic problems lead to a real mess, some people may start calling out on the Jews regardless of PC controls.

    Anyway, for the time being, I think most Jews see Foxman for what he is but also value him as a bulldog for silencing gentiles who might say anything that smacks of ‘antisemitism’. Most Jews don’t wanna be like Foxman. Woody Allen makes fun of Jewish hysteria and paranoia, and most Jews wanna come across as hip and funny and not over-the-top like Foxman. But they rely on Foxmans to control the Narrative. Let Foxman do the dirty work. Let ADL act shrill while the more dignified ACLU pretends to be about ‘civil liberties’ and higher principles.

    It’s sort of like CRIMES AND MISDEMEANORS by Woody Allen. When push comes to shove, the respectable doctor, the ‘good Jew’ of the community, hires his thug brother to get rid of the troublesome woman. Someone has to do the dirty work. And it’s people like that who win. And to maintain respectability, you always need others to do the dirty work.

    It’s like the French novel FEAR AND TREMLBING by Amelie Nothomb. The Japanese corporation is run by stern and mean-spirited task-masters, but it is because they do the dirty work that the top boss of the company can act so gentle and above-it-all.

    • Replies: ,
    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  58. We need a TV show.

    Leave it to Bibi.

    Or maybe Bibi can get his message across as music.

    Justin Bibi.

    Reply More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  59. Thanks for turning what KA said into coherent English (and confirming that he wasn’t contradicting anything I had said, contrary to what his tone indicated). At least I suppose you translated accurately. Is he your patient

    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  60. “Haredim’s habit of free ride on the rest of Israelis is subsidized by the US”.

    Are you asserting the prima facie ordinary English meaning of this that there are earmarked US government transfers of US taxpayers’ funds to Israel conditioned on the Haredim’s parasitical ways being maintained? If so I would make a big bet that you are wrong.

    Or are you just making an empty statement that lacks all differentiating significance because every transfer of money by anyone to anyone which lowers the net outlays of the Israeli government to any cause or purpose is a subsidy to the Haredim, to the IDF, to Israeli universities and just about everything touched by government?

    If not a vacuous statement, how so?

    • Replies:
    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  61. Deep down inside, they agree with Norman Finkelstein that Bibi is a loutish bully and scam-artist, a ‘hystericist’, and demagogue.

    I reckon it isn’t deep down anymore, bubbling up to the surface in fact, the dislike for Bibi’s antics. One has to be halfwitted to even spend energy with the pretense that ADL pushes around. I think ADL employees are also sort of engaged in justifying their existence and collecting donations from the community. Most of the ADL desk gals are probably your typical yentas, delighting in collecting gossip, jotting down “complaints” etc., in other words, a “good day’s work”.

    Bibi sees nukes all over Iran(just like the homo-negro Flanagan aka ‘Bryce Williams’ saw watermelons watermelons everywhere, not a slice to eat).

    hahahahaa. Its really true. BTW in Israel the electorate, composed of at least the following groups: the hard liberal left with the gays, the center, the center right, the right, the crazy “religious” right winger zionists, are all engaged in an elaborate charade, to see which one among the politicians can get the most out of the USA. Its actually comical. They talk pretty openly and are actually pragmatic about it when you ask them, knowing fully well that all it takes is one determined POTUS to say NO firmly. I really wish that would happen. Truth of the matter is, (and when I spent some time on it after RTW pointed it out to me), the most insidious part of the US/Israel relationship is due to Israel acting as a broker-dealer for US manufactured arms to the world and collecting a commission in the middle. That I think is awfully difficult if not impossible to dislodge. I mean $3.5b is small change compared to the numbers we are talking about.

    Be that as it may, the fact is Jews are nervous about their power and the future of Israel, so they need to morally bully and badger the goyim and constantly sound the alarm about the ‘existential’ threat against Jews and Israel.

    Living in New York, I never gave any thought to the stereotypical jewish existential nervousness, nor really considered “jewish power” to be supreme or anything. Most folks I know are similarly disposed. They also believe that the Israel related charade has to end, and that need does not require any other compunction, other than its intrinsically distortionary nature.

    great power needs to be checked and countered in order to remain healthy and decent. All power, regardless of who has it, will grow more corrupt if left unchecked. As Jews are the ruling elites of the US, their power need to be scrutinize and countered. Jews do good things, Jews do bad things. And bad things need to be called out.

    Certainly true. There is jewish power no doubt, but aren’t the “five eyes” power even greater? (I always thought that the Wasps were the elites)

    FEAR AND TREMBLING, has been on my list to watch.

    • Replies:
    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  62. Thanks for that fascinating link to the Indyk and Berger emails. (I wonder if they were consulted before Mrs Clinton released them).

    What they say about Bibi is the long version of what one of the smartest leaders of Australia’s Jewish community said to me nearly 18 years ago. And Bibi goes on winning the keys to the House of Cards!

    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  63. CZ’s are a tiny minority, and are a minor political base for conservative Jews in the US.

    Israel is first and foremost a national victim cult, and it is dominated by both secular and conservative Jewish people.

    Unsurprisingly, the national victim cult in the US is dominated by the ideology of Democrat party secular Jewish, and Republican party conservative Jewish.

    Christian Zionists are aligned with conservative Judaism.

    Many if not most CZ idiots are also victim cultists.

    The American-Israeli victim cult scheme includes all these classes of people:

    women
    queers
    Jewish
    disabled
    Latino
    Arabs
    Asian
    afro-blacks
    military veterans
    native Americans

    In particular, many women and afro-blacks and Latinos and Arabs and military veterans and disabled are both victim cultists and Christian Zionists.

    Christian Zionist are not true Christians.

    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  64. I’ve said much the same thing as your second par myself though oil and countering Russia/USSR used to be enough reason for the US to involve itself in the ME. After all Eisenhower was not under the control of the Israel lobby. Now it doesn’t seem to be too much of an exaggeration to speak of “control” of quite a lot of Congressmen. No doubt that’s why Obama feels he has to treat $3.5 billion as marginal chickenfeed in the competition for votes in a good (or better than nothing) cause.

    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  65. Lousy idea to give them the guns, though maybe not to take AL to a shooting range. But your analogy fails. They were children and not already armed to the teeth.

    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  66. YouTube killed the video of the 11 year old Palestinian child and the masked IDF solder who was taking him down – that is the problem with Jews – they are an aggressive dishonest cultural gang.

    When it comes to tribal maters there is not one iota of difference between the lowlife scumbag Zionist Jew solder and scumbag Zionist Jew owners of google.

    Fascist Zionist Jewry is a plague on humanity.

    • Replies:
    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  67. And you told everyone your parents told you to respect Jews….

    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  68. Mr. Shapiro, a longtime benefactor of the New York senator and other Democrats.. said he spoke with Mr. Schumer about his meeting with Egypt’s president, Abdel Fattah el-Sisi, including the leader’s warning that the agreement would increase regional terrorism. – See more at: http://mondoweiss.net/2015/09/obama-and-zionists#sthash.YJ7iTqbe.dpuf

    Sisi is returning the favor . All along during the time of Morsi he was in touch with Israelis. Now Israelis are in touch with him .

    While Forward editor Eisner was suggesting to Obama how to repair relation with Israel -

    ” won’t it be much more difficult — won’t Iran be more formidable to attack 10 or 15 years from now when it’s stronger than the way it’s been the last few years, so isolated and so weak? – See more at: http://mondoweiss.net/2015/09/obama-and-zionists#sthash.9HAG9hyp.dpuf

    • Replies:
    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  69. The fact is Jews do have a lot of power and money and influence.

    You, on the other hand, are a powerless maggot whose only recourse is to post hate-filled rants on the Internet.

    It sucks, doesn’t it?

    • Replies: ,
    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  70. There is no good parasite in Israel.

    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  71. … knowing fully well that all it takes is one determined POTUS to say NO firmly. I really wish that would happen.

    As long as presidential election campaigns cost over $1B and the Lobby underwrites the bulk of those costs, there is little chance a POTUS will just say NO, firmly or otherwise.

    Surprised someone with a +7σ IQ wouldn’t know this, Sam. You wouldn’t be trying to play us dumb goy for fools, again, would you? It’s probably something that is difficult for you to resist… but really, you need to try harder.

    • Replies:
    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  72. And you told everyone your parents told you to respect Jews….

    Indeed they did.

    They also counseled not to suffer fools gladly.

    I would welcome a critique of substantive points, if you care to make one, Sherman.

    Same goes to Sam Shama, who makes no substantive critique, just an offer to use everything in my power to have you exposed: your identity, lies and intentions, not much different from one of those ADL desk gals . . . probably your typical yentas, delighting in collecting gossip, jotting down “complaints” etc., snooping on commenters in an effort to expose their identity — in other words, a “good day’s work”

    By the way — I think I have found a response to one of the questions posed by Robert Cohen here:

    Holocaust denial will remain a fringe issue. The documentation is secure in its veracity and overwhelming in its volume. If anything, today’s school children are in danger of thinking that Churchill, Roosevelt and Stalin went to war against Hitler because of what was happening to the Jews. – http://mondoweiss.net/2015/01/auschwitz-revisited#sthash.qN1PhvnP.dpuf

    that is, since by implication Churchill, Roosevelt and Stalin did not go to war against Hitler because of what was happening to the Jews, why did Churchill, Roosevelt and Stalin go to war against Hitler?

    Historians Niall Ferguson and Hew Strachan seem to agree: Churchill went to war against Hitler because in his mind, Germany was contending for hegemony and the British could not permit their empire to be eclipsed or resisted. The British set out to destroy Germany because they were afraid they could not compete with the Germans and maintain their empire. As we know, the British may have destroyed Germany, but they also destroyed their empire. USA are you paying attention?

    It’s the same reason US maintains a war-like footing vis a vis Iran, and if you heard the John Hay Stepford Wives deliver foreign policy addresses in South Carolina, you hear precisely the same arguments launched against both Iran and China. Churchill had neither the manpower nor the finances to engage war with Germany so FDR needed to be drawn in. FDR was a willing co-conspirator, but there being no honor among thieves, FDR used the occasion to join Churchill in destroying Germany but then plucked the British empire out from under Winston. Stalin provided muscle and brutality, and also ran his own agenda, besting both Churchill and FDR by enriching Russia at the expense of the USA and of Germany.

    • Replies: , ,
    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  73. Bribing Bibi and His Proxies to Behave | Piotr Bein's blog = blog Piotra Beina
    says:
    • Website     Show CommentNext New Comment

    […] http://www.unz.com/article/bribing-bibi-and-his-proxies-to-behave/ […]

    Reply More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  74. The Jewish founders of Google are worth billions of dollars.

    You, on the other hand, are a lowlife loser who can’t even spell correctly.

    I mean, “maters” and “solders”.

    It’s no wonder you can’t hold a job!

    • Replies: ,
    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  75. “It sucks, doesn’t it?”

    Sure does. But it must suck even more to rant about a powerless maggot.

    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  76. Sherman, why don’t you change the handle to Schwarzmann?

    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  77. these points are all valid. However, I base my judgement of BDS potential on 2 things:

    1) the prime mover, Anna Baltzer: smart, indefatigable, and EZ on the eyes. If she ever gets in front of a Congressional Committee, Israel is in deep trouble…

    2) the escalating attacks on BDS on the Zio/neo-con sites, and in Zionist print media as well; the current issue of Haddassah magazine, for example, headlines a lengthy, slanderous, hit piece. The “apartheid Israel” meme in particular appears to be snowballing, esp. younger US Jews

    • Replies:
    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  78. The British set out to destroy Germany because they were afraid they could not compete with the Germans and maintain their empire. As we know, the British may have destroyed Germany, but they also destroyed their empire. USA are you paying attention

    You’re saying that the position of the USA relative to Iran is similar to the position of Britain relative to Germany pre-WWII?

    I know middle easterners are prone to bombast, but even by middle eastern standards, your chest beating is nuts.

    No-one, absolutely no-one, except insane Shia apocalyptics, argue that Iran is an existential threat to the USA as Germany clearly was to Britain.

    Sane people might argue that Iran is a threat to US interests but only middle eastern maniacs would claim that Iran could somehow dismantle the apparatatae of American power.

    As I’ve been saying, you need context and a sense of scale. In this case, you need to remember that Iran is a regional power in a highly contested region and with zero global influence.

    There are many, many countries in Iran’s league. America is the global superpower and still in a league of its own.

    • Replies:
    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  79. “Israel and its close allies — including Schumer — fought back by trying to implicate Syria in one of the most emotionally loaded issues of the day: drug trafficking. As one American official observed at the time, “It is in the Israelis’ interest to spin the drugs claim in order to keep Syria on the U.S. State Department list of countries involved in drug trafficking.”

    https://consortiumnews.com/2015/08/31/schumers-troubling-mideast-record/

    They are powerful. Money runs the machine.
    Faces change. Tomorrow it would be someone else .They betray the country . They betray the leader. Tomorrow it will be Wasserman Shultz unless she is already there -http://mondoweiss.net/2015/08/wasserman-schultz-bucking

    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  80. I’m not sure that this is a response to a point you are seeking to make as your own but I think the obvious probability of Iran being much stronger in 10 to 15 years time is just one factor of modest size that needed (needs) to be weighed in the balance. it is worth considering too the growth in wealth and power of higher birthrate Sunni countries like Pakistan and Turkey. If Pakistan weren’t still fixated on India (and Kashmir and Afghanistan) it could be a worry for Iran and Turkey, apart from a common interest in keeping the Kurds down certainly would be. But the point about Iran suddenly producing a nuclear weapon is that it won’t need war on the ground against it but swift strikes from the air. Iran wouldn’t launch direct attacks on Israel (though it might continue to stir Hamas and Jezbollah into action) because it would be totally destroyed. Of course much could happen over 10-15 years in Egypt or Saudi Arabia that might make the US glad it didn’t have Iran as top danger for a while….m

    Reply More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  81. I have just read an article from the Catholic Herald by Kevin Myers premised on the view (contested in the Comments) that Hitler didn’t want to invade Britain and couldn’t have when the glorious Battle of Britain, now about to have its 75th amnnivesary celebrated, was supposed to have saved Britain. The hypothetical was that Britain had made a deal with Germany (laughably like Denmark which was invaded and said to have saved most of its Jews because the SS leader there allowed it) but perhaps had come in to the war again when Hitler attacked the USSR…

    A commenter said that Churchill was just doing the bidding of the Jews! I suppose that kind of thinking finds something sinister in Churchill’s major biographer, Martin Gilbert being Jewish. I am aware that in those looser times Churchill received financial support in a way not now acceptable and that some money csme from a South African mining magnate, presumably Jewish. That Churchill was more than slightly influenced by anyone is clearly fantasy.

    • Replies: , ,
    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  82. My reply to your #68 is at #80

    • Replies:
    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  83. Thanks for an informative reply. You obviously know a lot more about BDS than I do.

    Ideally all Israelis and Palestinians would join the same branch of modern civilisation and form one nation perhaps doing a number of radical things of which making English the common public language would not perhaps be the most remarkable. The fact that Palestinians on average aren’t as smart or productive as Ashkenazi Jews would only be a minor problem given those that Israel already drals with. But this rejection and reworking of the Zionist project is obviously impossible until convergence is well under way – above all in reduction of Palestinian fertility. Still your mention of the response of young Jews to the apartheid tag being applied to Israel prompted the thought that almost unimaginable changes in society can occur within a single generation, and easily in two.

    • Agree: Sam Shama
    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  84. Thank you for your responses, WoO. You raise several critical points that I will list and discuss tomorrow — today requires travel & a conference.

    I scanned the Catholic Herald article; it’s depressing, especially the comments. Catholics are even dumber than Christian zionists. One quick refutation — a commenter dismisses Myers because Myers is a journalist not an historian, whereas the commenter’s uncle, cousin and nephew fought in the war — which, presumably, qualifies the commenter as an historian.

    William Shirer wrote the book that sold millions and from which most people derive their “popular” history of WWII. He was a journalist, not an historian. Shirer left Europe in 1940. And when Shirer wrote “Rise and Fall of Third Reich,” it was because he had recently been fired, was deeply in debt and desperate for income. He wrote what would sell, which was a good bet on his part, but it may not have been an accurate history and it has clouded the minds of many many people, to the world’s dismay.

    One other fact to toss into the stew that will dramatically change the flavor:

    In 1940 several European statesmen, businessmen, the Vatican as well as German diplomats presented peace offers to the British. Lord Vansittart dismissed them all. He was intent to destroy Germany, as stated below —

    It’s fair to say Vansittart hated Germany, not just Hitler and not even just the German people, he hated the idea of Germany.

    ” In Black Record: Germans Past and Present (1941), Vansittart portrayed German history from the time of ancient Rome as a continuous record of aggression. Nazism was just the latest manifestation. Therefore, after Germany was defeated, it must be stripped of all military capacity, including its heavy industries. The German people enthusiastically supported Hitler’s wars of aggression, just as they supported the Franco-Prussian War in 1870 and the First World War in 1914. So they must be thoroughly re-educated under strict Allied supervision for at least a generation.
    De-Nazification was not enough. The German military elite was the real cause of war, especially the “Prussianist” officer corps and the General Staff: both must be destroyed. In 1943 he wrote:

    In the opinion of the author, it is an illusion to differentiate between the German right, centre, or left, or the German Catholics or Protestants, or the German workers or capitalists. They are all alike, and the only hope for a peaceful Europe is a crushing and violent military defeat followed by a couple of generations of re-education controlled by the United Nations.

    Elsewhere Vansittart wrote:

    “We didn’t go to war in 1939 to save Germany from Hitler…or the continent from fascism. Like in 1914 we went to war for the not lesser noble cause that we couldn’t accept a German hegemony over Europe.”

    Vansittart was not an anonymous blogger, he was a senior British diplomat in the WWI and WWII era. His views prevailed.

    • Replies:
    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  85. You are witnessing a ( USA) Good cop vs( Israel) Bad cop routine.
    Another scam to fool the general public. Iran is a pawn and a sucker to believe America has any intent to become friendly . Recall Hitler(1920′s) Saddam Kaduffy–all promised goodies and destroyed.
    Another set up– Fund Israel to the hilt and Americans wouldn’t know the difference as a scam.
    Iran better stay put and keep a distance from any deals with evil American’s in control.
    Iran is been used as cheap w*ore. Sanctions will be lift temperately and assault will begin.
    Question to all? Why are politicians signing up for the Iran deal when most are Zionists?

    • Agree: SolontoCroesus
    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  86. Just a reminder–England France declared war on Germany 1938 for invading Poland 1937.
    In 1938 Germany cities were aerial bombed. Now put that in prospective and do some research why Germany went into Poland.

    • Replies:
    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  87. I can’t really help what you think. I simply meant that we need a POTUS of stature, and I do believe that is in short supply. America tends to produce them in times of real crisis. Perhaps we are really NOT in one. The basic standard of living in this country is quite acceptable really, despite wide inequality. Pause before you deny this, by comparing it to the majority of countries. Most of middle America is basically your “Joe 6-pack”, comfortable and not particularly driven to do much. You get what you strive for.

    Do you know what it is costing Donald Trump to run his campaign thus far? Almost nothing compared to the rest of them. Clearly it is going to cost more as videos are produced, ground campaigns are financed, etc., all essentially a cost related to penetrate the slothful mind of J6P, to drag him off the couch in front of the TV, and go and push a lever for the horse which the delegates and super-delegates picked for the meaningless race.

    • Replies:
    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  88. Stick to the topic the writer is presenting, which, it might disappoint you – as everything flutters in front of your eyes as the new edition of Mein Kamp – is “Bribing Bibi and his proxies to behave…..”

    If you were depositing this tripe in Razib Khan’s posts, you would have been banned a while ago. Dr. Giraldi is far more lenient I suppose.

    • Replies:
    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  89. Many thing can happen over 15 years. Israel can attack again America,Egypt,or UK . It can try to kill a sitting president or bribe again a sitting president . Israel can camouflage its identity to make the requests look like as if coming from another country to get certain countries to vote in favor of Israel. Israel can start working on original Zionist plan of Eretz Israel by taking over part of S Arabia and Iraq.
    May be the world should force a negotiation on Israel for next 15 yrs to prevent Israel from buying or selling certain stuff and from engaging in certain staff .

    Only a psychopathic moron like Eisner or Schumer could argue for bombing Iran to stop Iran becoming powerful in distant future . They could largely due to the money but partly also from the knowledge that there are quite a lot of people out there who can obfuscate and confuse issue by rambling about Kurd or India or for the sky being blue . Eisner knows ,so does Schumer that no one would accuse them in public of being an anti American Israeli agent .
    Instead of fixation on Pakistan,may be you should consider this possibility of Israel grabbing more lands from neighboring countries and expelling Arabs from WB,Gaza,S Lebanon and Sinai while the bombing campaigns go on against Iran.

    • Replies:
    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  90. Your mention of Vansittart (the importance of whose influence I think you may be inclined to overrate) reminded me of s small (100 page) book published in 1942 with praise from Vansittart which I must finish reading. It is “German With Tears” by Peter F. Wiener a German teacher in the UK – and refugee. It consists of letters to a former student, by then a young intelligence officer dealing with German POWs. He had written to say how appalled he was at his inability to understand the mental, moral and educational formation (I paraphrase) of young Germans. Wiener gives chapter and verse to show that the vices of German education (mostly under Prussian influence I think) went back a long way – indeed Catholic Hitler was Luther’s heir….

    I am also reminded of a topical obsrvation in a review of a biography of Max Weber in, I think, the TLS. He complained bitterly about the ethnic and cultural changes being brought about by greedy land owning Junkers bringing in cheap Polish labour!!

    • Replies:
    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  91. See my reply to your elaboration on BDS at #83

    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  92. Quote A:

    I simply meant that we need a POTUS of stature, and I do believe that is in short supply. America tends to produce them in times of real crisis.

    name one, not including the founders.

    Quote B:

    go and push a lever for the horse which the delegates and super-delegates picked for the meaningless race.

    Doesn’t B. contradict A?

    POTUS has gotten out of hand in terms of perceived “stature.” It’s become Hollywoodized and imperial-sized. Time to trim back the “stature” of POTUS.

    Niall Ferguson argues that the real power in any nation is in the hands of bankers.
    If that’s the case, then in a Constitutional republic the people should have far more input and control over the activities of the people and offices that administer their financial affairs.

    • Replies: ,
    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  93. You are so profoundly ignorant of what anyone with half an education knows that you ought to be wary of exposing yourself in these columns if you don’t want to find some responder making my remrks seem grovellingly flattering in comparison. To wit….

    The UK declared war on Germany on 3rd September 1939 on account of the invasion of Poland which took place a few days earlier. Churchill does seem to have successfully provoked Hitler in August 1940 into diverting his attacks on Britain from the military priorities if he was to invade, namely destroying the RAF and its airfields, into attacking cities. Of course the Nazis had long since lost any claim to be more than tactically sparing of cuvilian targets starting with the destruction of Guernica in Spain.

    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  94. Sam – Our policy is to let people write what they want as long as they are not completely obscene or abusive about it. In no way does my silence on many of the comments means that either I or Ron Unz necessarily endorses the viewpoint. We are, however, willing to air as many alternative viewpoints as possible without censorship.

    • Agree: Deduction
    • Replies: , , , ,
    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  95. Schummer,Scultz and Sherman are honest. They are taking the position that can be understood as an expression of the love,fear,worries and concerns that relate to Israel. They have made that clear in the past on a number of occasions . Their anti American activities are not new also. It is in their resume and known to American.

    But Mark, Cotton or Menendez are fish of a darker kettle from a bygone era . They have the same dependency ,weakness,misplaced righteousness false bravado ,and readiness to compromise loyalties and ethics that Balfour,Lloyd George,Churchill,Truman and Dewey had.

    Reply More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  96. Not for the first time: you should try doing people the courtesy of reading what people actually say. Nowhere do I say anything that justifies your suggestion that I have a “fixation on Pakistan”.

    • Replies:
    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  97. Thanks for the reply Dr. Giraldi, I thought as much. I don’t subscribe to censorship either, but simply wanted to convey the idea that repetitious posting of essentially the same material (independent of its offensiveness to some) really tends to get in the way of forming a cogent trend of discussion.

    (I don’t mind it THAT much really, and in fact it might be a device to train patience and concentration :-) )

    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  98. Good to know that your still with us:)

    It must be tempting sometimes….

    As you may have noticed I am with you on this thread apart from my interpretation of the latest handout to Israel.

    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  99. I would agree that the presidential system, ie. with president as head of government not just head of state, has got out of hand. The US would be better off with an adaptation of the Westminster system though not with a single chamber elected by nationwide proportional representation as in Israel.

    But surely, whatever else you would say of him, Lincoln was a president of stature. And Teddy Roosevelt though you might dispute the “crisis”. The Rockefellers wouldn’t have however.

    And what about pre Iran Contra Reagan after the stagflation of the 70s and humiliation by Iran? Even if he was a Hollywood B movie actor.

    • Replies:
    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  100. “A partition with a smaller state was favored by Weizmann.

    On Jun 1937,Weizman presented his reasoning at a private dinner given by Sir Archibald Sinclair at which Churchill was present ,as well as James de Rothschild and several parliamentary supporters of Zionism: Leo Amery,Clement Attlee,Colonel Josiah Wedgwood and Captain Victor Cazalet . “” You know you are our masters,”” Churchill told Weizmann,and he added. Pointing to those present,”” If you ask us to fight,we shall fight like tigers””
    Churchill mounted attack on British government for being coward,not trustworthy,and for letting Jewish down. Churchill disagreed on partition because Churchill felt that small land of Weizmann would not be able to survive and Britain would not come to military rescue .
    Churchill and the Jews by Martin Gilbert page 121
    Churchill promised on 8 th June 1937 to the Jews ” England will wake up and defeat Mussolinin and Hitler ,and then your time will come too” arguing against the partition with smaller land much less than what was intended in Mandate.

    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  101. Sure,you are correct. I limited myself to your fixation to one country’s future course of direction when you were enlightening us with more than just one countries’s

    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  102. Crapulous- Your comment is a non sequitur. Latin for you.

    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  103. True, but our “leaders” would have to grow a pair to do that…

    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  104. That’s a very fair policy but your logic is obscured by your Israel as fount of all evil ideology. Obama’s Iran “treaty” looks like it will sail though. You as a putative conservative should rejoice but instead you heap more calumny on…….. Israel because Israel is your lifeline/ on political discourse. A one note Johnny. You only hate Zionism but not Jews. Right!!! This really shines though via your commentators. They are your students so rejoice once again even though you would never allow 80% of them in your house, your secure abode from which you pontificate. You have chosen failed third world Islam and will fail.

    • Replies: , ,
    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  105. name one, not including the founders.

    Abe Lincoln

    Woodrow Wilson

    Herbert Hoover

    Teddy Roosevelt

    FDR

    Ronald Reagan

    B does not contradict A. It may be that diversity of the American economy, its population, renders it difficult to elicit a response from the population, however it might happen.

    POTUS is indeed somewhat imperial, and should be. I don’t believe in pure proportional representation. (Its a bloody mess in Israel, where devious creatures like Bibi are able to sway the public mind through fear-mongering).

    To Niall Ferguson, a historian turned poseur economist, everything looks like a bank. The man is a shameless self-promoter and could not give a twit for the betterment of the nation.

    That being established, the notion that bankers and industrialists are all powerful, is an idea I don’t subscribe to. Once again, it is in the province of a powerful POTUS to do the needful. In this regard, I find it quite useful to quote John Maynard Keynes, who in responding to FDR, pointed out the sheeplike nature of business leaders. (One might disagree with Keynes’ to varying degrees, but he was a brilliant man, with unparalleled insight into the workings of a capitalist system. He is so mistakenly labelled a socialist by the latter-day GoP idiots).

    Keynes wrote in a letter to FDR:

    Business men have a different set of delusions from
    politicians; and need, therefore, different handling. They
    are, however, much milder than politicians, at the same
    time allured and terrified by the glare of publicity, easily
    persuaded to be ‘patriots’, perplexed, bemused, indeed
    terrified, yet only too anxious to take a cheerful view,
    vain perhaps but very unsure of themselves, pathetically
    responsive to a kind word. You could do anything you liked
    with them, if you would treat them (even the big ones), not
    as wolves and tigers, but as domestic animals by nature, even
    though they have been badly brought up and not trained as
    you would wish. It is a mistake to think that they are more
    immoral than politicians. If you work them into the surly,
    obstinate, terrified mood, of which domestic animals, wrongly
    handled, are so capable, the nation’s burdens will not
    get carried to market;

    http://www.fdrlibrary.marist.edu/aboutfdr/pdfs/smFDR-Keynes_1938.pdf

    Are bankers in possession of all the levers of the nation? I should doubt it. They have power over credit, but that power is contingent on the laws and executors of those laws, with the POTUS at the helm.

    • Replies: ,
    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  106. Truer words were never spoken. Well said (posted).

    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  107. Grammar Nazis like you always crop-up when indisputable statements critical of the Tribe are made by people who do not necessarily use spell-check before publishing their comments. It happens so regularly until I am beginning to assume it constitutes an important element of Hasbara schooling.

    • Replies:
    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  108. You allowed a certain deranged reader to post a video of Nazis performing a violently anti-Semitic song.

    I guess according to you this is not “obscene or abusive”.

    • Replies:
    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  109. “You’re saying that the position of the USA relative to Iran is similar to the position of Britain relative to Germany pre-WWII?”

    As the above sentence indicates, your first mistake is thinking that the current problems with Iran has anything to do with Iran being a threat to the US. When, in fact, the current stand-off with Iran has everything to do with Iran emerging as a genuine threat to Israel’s economic and military domination of the Middle East. Which makes Solonto’s comparison concerning the rivalry between England and Germany an entirely valid point.

    • Replies:
    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  110. “Lincoln was a president of stature.”

    In four short years, Lincoln destroyed virtually everything the Founding Fathers of this country considered important. Which explains why the Establishment worships him today as a deity who breathed the breath of life into their nostrils.

    • Agree: Orville H. Larson
    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  111. You’re 100% correct. When I studied at Hasbara University they taught me how to spell check.

    • Replies:
    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  112. We are not bribing Netanyahu.

    We are bribing those who are owned by AIPAC. We give them money to use as excuses, cover for not doing things as spelled out by AIPAC.

    The offer of money for Israel was made to Rep. Nadler, to influence him, not Netanyahu.

    • Replies:
    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  113. “You’re 100% correct. When I studied at Hasbara University they taught me how to spell check.”

    But you misspelled your name. It should be Schwarzmann.

    • Replies:
    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  114. ‘but instead you heap more calumny on…….. Israel because Israel is your lifeline/ on political discourse”

    So lets figure out who as individual or group has obsession that center around Isreal –

    “Berger wrote to Clinton about the Middle East in summer 2010, and he speaks a lot about the power of the Israel lobby. Berger advises sucking up to Netanyahu to pacify the lobby. All emphases are mine:

    -””At a political level, the past year has clearly demonstrated the degree to which the U.S. has been hamstrung by its low ratings in Israel and among important segments of
    the domestic Jewish constituency. This is a critical dimension not for electoral reasons, but because the U.S.’s best chance of influencing Bibi is to build support for
    a deal in Israel and at home among those who care most. That capacity has been improved to some extent as a result of the successful July visit by Netanyahu and the
    string of military/security deals between our two countries. But we must be honest: there sill is a long way to go. If anything, the recent Obama/Bibi illustrated a new,
    potentially perverse dynamic: the U.S. president at this juncture needs the Israeli prime minister to validate his pro-Israeli credentials more than the Israeli prime minister needs the U.S. president to vouch for his pro-peace ones…”””
    http://www.mondoweiss.net 9/2/15

    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  115. “by then a young intelligence officer dealing with German POWs. He had written to say how appalled he was at his inability to understand the mental, moral and educational formation (I paraphrase) of young Germans.”

    Gee Wiz —- You mean like Israeli children today – right!

    p.s. Sorry Wiz – you can never escape the evil of Zionist Israel. You can never be half Zionist. Fascism is fascism.

    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  116. Zionist claptrap.

    My favorite:

    “Let’s not forget that Israel as military superpower is good for the US once you consider the cost of Israel being seen as weak enough to tempt neighbours to attack and America not being able to wash its hands of possible Iranian or Arab military victory.”

    What the hell would be wrong with an Iranian or Arab (or better joint) military victory over Israel? What good American would want to “wash their hands” of any such thing—as long as the US stayed out of such a conflict entirely?

    • Agree: Orville H. Larson
    • Replies:
    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  117. ‘Are bankers in possession of all the levers of the nation? I should doubt it. They have power over credit, but that power is contingent on the laws and executors of those laws, with the POTUS at the helm.’

    Attention Sam Shama,
    One of your conniving kin folk didn’t think so:

    “Give me control of a nations money supply, and I care not who makes it’s laws.” Amschel Rothschild, founder of the Rothschild banking dynasty.

    • Replies:
    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  118. Actually, Scharzmann is more of a German spelling.

    Schwarzman is more Jewish.

    Names ending “nn” tend to be German, not Jewish.

    You’re so stupid you can’t even get your anti-Semitic insults correct!

    :)

    • Replies: , ,
    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  119. New conglomeration THE MILITARY-INDUSTRIAL-ISRAELI COMPLEX

    An old term updated. It’s no longer called Blitzkreig. It’s now SHOCK AND AWE.

    Reply More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  120. Start calling them what they are

    SQUATTERS………not………SETTLERS.

    A big danged difference.

    Reply More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  121. Carroll you are trying admirably to make some interesting points. Yet you might wish to read economic history closely. It might also help to stop using vituperations such as ‘conniving’ incessantly, as it clearly draws on limited resources.

    It was FDR who spearheaded and signed the Glass Steagall Act and the Banking Act, in 1932-33, and separated investment banking and brokerage from deposit banking and credit, to break the back of Rothschild ambitions .

    So again, a POTUS of stature has the power and the ability. We need one. Congress is useless.

    • Replies: ,
    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  122. Phil any link between the Hilary email scandal and the whole Libya thing? I just get the impression the leaks to the Washington Times and the opening up of an investigation into the email scandal isn’t payback by the deep state?

    I noticed the head of MI6 faced down the Prime Minster over Britain toppling Gadaffi.

    In a showdown over Libya at a meeting of the National Security Council, headed by the PM, Sir David and MI6 chief Sawers challenge him head on.

    Told bluntly by Cameron that his call for military action to depose Gaddafi is ‘in the British national interest, speak now or hold your peace’, they take up the gauntlet. Using the most direct language, Sawers delivers an astonishing personal rebuke to the Prime Minister, telling him it has nothing to do with ‘the national interest’ and saying Cameron is acting for ‘humanitarian reasons,’ pointedly drawing attention to the gulf between the two political motives.

    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3215566/Ex-Army-head-PM-blame-rise-ISIS-Damning-accusation-Chief-Staff-explosive-new-Cameron-biography.html#ixzz3kcEcNVLR

    Reply More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  123. “Names ending “nn” tend to be German, not Jewish.
    You’re so stupid you can’t even get your anti-Semitic insults correct!”

    You’re such a pathetic dammy. Stanley Kauffmann with two n’s was Jewish.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanley_Kauffmann

    There are tons of Jews with two ‘n’s in the last name.

    Btw, you’re such a hissy bitch that I suggest SchwarzWOMANN instead.

    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  124. Someone should have told Chaim Weizmann

    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  125. It was FDR who spearheaded and signed the Glass Steagall Act and the Banking Act…

    True, but didn’t the banksters lobby Clinton to repeal this act?

    • Agree: geokat62
    • Replies:
    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  126. If I were Dr. Giraldi I would prefer that commenters like S2C just disappear, go away, not post provocative material on my articles. I understand that.
    And I appreciate his forbearance and apologize in advance if his situation is in any way harmed by S2C’s comments. The last thing I wish to occur is for Dr. Giraldi’s voice to be silenced.

    The nature of the times are such that inconvenient facts are met with threats of censorship backed up with threats to one’s employment, career, associations.

    [MORE]

    Precisely that behavior was displayed here:

    “I will also use everything in my power to have you exposed: your identity, lies and intentions” http://www.unz.com/tsaker/europe-in-free-fall/#comment-1095647

    Statements — and behavior– like that are meant to intimidate and to silence.

    There is nothing antisemitic — or anti-Jewish, which is what I suspect you really mean — about the NSDAP national anthem, i.e. the Horst Wessel song.

    All things involving Germany in the 20th century have been so thoroughly demonized and bastardized that way too many people are incapable of assessing the bare facts — like the lyrics of the song as well as the circumstances of Horst Wessel.
    Get a grip people.

    The topic of this article is Benjamin Netanyahu’s hysterical antics and what he intends to achieve through them. We have seen what Netnayahu’s forebears have achieved through similar behavior — lying, demonizing, propagandizing, blackmailing, sanctioning to starvation, and the like. It did not end well for millions of German people who were the target of those lies, etc. in the 1930s, and if Netanyahu gets his way, the 21st century repeat of the same behaviors will not end well for the Iranian people.

    Posting a video of the NSDAP anthem is one small step toward de-conditioning a populace that is seriously brainwashed to the point of hysteria. Hysteria, like demonization, destroys the ability to think critically; they make accurate assessment of history impossible, which leads logically to the inability to make sound foreign policy decisions.

    The Horst Wessel Song

    Flag high, ranks closed,
    The S.A. marches with silent solid steps.
    Comrades shot by the red front and reactionaries
    march in spirit with us in our ranks.

    The street free by the brown battalions,
    The street free by the Storm Troopers.
    Millions, full of hope, look up at the Hackenkreuz
    The day breaks for freedom and for bread.

    For the last time the call will now be sounded,
    For the struggle now we all stand ready.
    Soon will fly Hitler-flags over every street;
    Slavery will last only a short time longer.

    Flag high, ranks closed,
    The S.A. marches with silent solid steps.
    Comrades shot by the red front and reactionaries
    march in spirit with us in our ranks.

    • Replies:
    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  127. That may be your policy, but Khan runs a much tighter ship. I don’t know if he’s actually banned anyone, but he certainly threatens — for not having read his article carefully, or just general stupidity.

    • Replies:
    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  128. Geokat you are correct. The repeal of Glass-Steagall was a HUGE error, and much of the instability in the financial system felt in 2008 was due precisely to that. Dodd-Frank Act since then, and the Volcker Rule attempt to remedy some of it, but fall short in many respects. My personal belief is that Dodd-Frank ought to be replaced with a higher capital ratio requirement for banks and disallowance to engage in speculative trading in derivatives.

    • Replies:
    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  129. “Khan runs a much tighter ship”

    He’s the most tight-assed anal-retentive prick in the world.

    He won’t let anyone comment unless he or she smooches his arse.

    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  130. “There is nothing antisemitic — or anti-Jewish, which is what I suspect you really mean — about the NSDAP national anthem, i.e. the Horst Wessel song.”

    The song itself says nothing about Jews, but to the extent that it honors a Nazi ‘martyr’, it is an anti-Jewish Nazi song.

    Look, if Maoists have a song that glorifies a Maoist soldier, it may be a direct attack on capitalism. But to the extent that the soldier was devoted to fighting capitalism, of course the song would have to be seen as ‘anti-capitalist’.

    Now, the Horst Wessel song is pretty good, and I like much of Nazi stuff as propaganda aesthetics. But I like a lot of communist stuff on the surface too, especially Soviet songs.

    But as they meant to be used as cultural weaponry for certain movements and ideology, they cannot be seen apart from politics.

    At any rate, Horse Whistle is too political for me.

    I prefer this:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fc-DgRO1SrQ

    Soviet songs are enjoyable too.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=myg8Q0r8JnQ

    • Replies:
    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  131. Sam, given that GS has been repealed, do you agree that rather than breaking the back of Rothschild ambitions, the introduction of this legislation temporarily dislocated it?

    • Replies:
    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  132. We are not bribing Israeli PM unless we include the periodic deliveries of military gadgets often free of cost every few years ,unless we inlcude our perpetual consistent predictable vetoes in UN in favor of Israel unless we include our promises not to rock the apple carts over the settlement and barrier issues and our silence on the humiliation murder,and harassment at the checkpoints,unless we include our passing of information to Israeli intelligence on the very neighbors to which we are trying to carve out new directions ,unless we include our readiness to agree to Israeli concerns on the unfolding social and political issues in the Middle East .

    Taking a step back. I would like to know why Obama has been treated by Israel the way he has been ? What did he do? He hasn’t attacked Iran,he has disagreed with settlement activities and he has not attacked Syria the way AIPAC wanted.
    But are these actions illegal ,anti Amerucan,or anti general sentiment across the whole world?
    Same question could be hurled against American Jewish power both money and the votes . Why the Jewish agencies in US have continued to ratchet up this noxious reckless innuendo against Obama for last 7 yrs?

    The bribes to Israel come as gift as veto,as winking,as condoning,as saving from censures in international institutes ,and tolerance of relentless insults by Israelis against Obama administraion in hope that Israel will stop or curtail or freeze it’s thuggish illegal actions .
    When the American frustrations starts bursting at the seams, we hear the canard of antisemitism we hear the stabbing at the back of Israel,we hear the charges. of undermining of special relationship,we hear the criticism and suggestion and advice from the Israeli firsters from AIPAC ,ADL,and JINSA,FDD, and numerous other organizations and figures about what America needs to do to make Israel safe ,mollified,and strong enough to make correct decisions .

    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  133. Bribing Bibi and His Proxies to Behave | Counter Information
    says:
    • Website     Show CommentNext New Comment

    […] 02, 2015 “Information Clearing House” – “Unz Review” – There are a lot of expressions about standing up to bullies being the best policy. […]

    Reply More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  134. You mean to tell me that German Jews don’t consider themselves German? What a surprise to the German people and people of other nations where Jews adopted Gentile names for the purpose of blending into the background as they looted the nation’s assets.

    • Replies:
    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  135. Thanks for coaching me on the proper use of words etc. As to the economic thing, it doesn’t require an economics professor to figure out that conniving Jewish bankers instigated every war this country has fought for the past 100 years or more. It’s no mere coincidence that the United States found itself embroiled in WW 1, only two years after the Federal Reserve Act was signed into law at the insistence of Jewish bankers.

    • Replies: ,
    Reply More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments