The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Tobias Langdon Archive
Borders for Us, Not for You
Higher Status in the Leftist Grievance Hierarchy Means You Can Invade Others’ Borders
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Sex and race are, to the left, mere social constructs, abstract systems of delusion and injustice that can be overturned by human will and social engineering. It follows, then, that leftists will support and celebrate men who reject the social construct of sex and claim to be women. And leftists do support and celebrate such men.

Triumph of the Trannies

It also follows that leftists will support and celebrate Whites who reject the social construct of race and claim to be Blacks. But leftists don’t support and celebrate such Whites. Quite the contrary. While Bruce Jenner, a man claiming to be a woman, is worshipped and rewarded, Rachel Dolezal, a White claiming to be a Black, is ridiculed and punished. Steve Sailer and others have drawn attention to this contradiction, but I don’t think they’ve properly explained it. Why do leftists cheer when men cross the border between the sexes, but jeer when Whites try to cross the border between the races?

I pose those questions deliberately in that form to draw out the links between the left’s love of transgenderism and the left’s love of open borders. The Jewish libertarian Murray Rothbard (1926–95) described this aspect of leftist ideology very well in this passage of an otherwise long-winded and boring essay:

The egalitarian revolt against biological reality, as significant as it is, is only a subset of a deeper revolt: against the ontological structure of reality itself, against the “very organization of nature”; against the universe as such. At the heart of the egalitarian left is the pathological belief that there is no structure of reality; that all the world is a tabula rasa that can be changed at any moment in any desired direction by the mere exercise of human will — in short, that reality can be instantly transformed by the mere wish or whim of human beings. (Egalitarianism as a Revolt Against Nature, Modern Age, Fall 1973)

Rothbard was right in general about leftism, but failed to explain that highly significant exception: why does the “exercise of human will” allow Bruce Jenner and others to become women, but not allow Rachel Dolezal and others to become Blacks? Sex and race are both aspects of reality, but the left believes that only one of those aspects “can be instantly transformed by the mere wish or whim of human beings.” Why so? I would explain it by supplementing Rothbard’s explanation. Yes, he’s right when he says the left have a magical belief in the reality-transforming power of “human will,” but he doesn’t discuss what happens when there is a clash of wills.

The high and the low

Let’s look at transgenderism first. Men like Bruce Jenner and Jonathan Yaniv have “willed” that men can become women and must enjoy unrestricted access to all female spaces. At the same time, some women — the so-called Trans-Exclusionary Radical Feminists or TERFs — have “willed” that men can’t become women and must keep out of female spaces. There is a clash of wills that is settled, for the Left, by the status of the opposing sides. In leftist eyes, the men have higher status than the women, which is why the men’s will prevails and the women’s will is rejected. But hold on, you might be thinking: How can the men have higher status than the women in leftist eyes? It’s easy: the transgender men have cleverly aligned themselves not with men in general, who are indeed of lower status than women, but with homosexual men, who are of higher status than women.

Trangendered men are part of the “LBGTQ+ community,” which lifts them above women in the leftist hierarchy. Take Jonathan Yaniv, the perverted and probably Jewish male who claims to be a woman and has been suing female cosmeticians in Canada for refusing to wax his fully intact male genitals. If Yaniv spoke the truth, he would admit that he is a heterosexual male who seeks perverted sexual pleasure by passing himself off as a woman and receiving Brazilian waxes or entering female toilets to share tampon tips with under-age girls, etc. Obviously, then, Yaniv can’t admit the truth. Heterosexual men are wicked in leftist eyes and are well below women in the leftist hierarchy. Heterosexual men definitely cannot pass themselves off as women in pursuit of perverted sexual thrills.

Actual authentic lesbians

Yaniv and other “trans-women” must therefore align themselves with homosexuals to pass leftist purity-tests. As trans-women they claim to be members of a sexual minority, which triggers the leftist love of minority-worship. Indeed, Yaniv and some others go further than simply claiming to be women: they claim to be actual authentic lesbians. A pinned tweet at Yaniv’s Twitter account states that he is “One proud lesbian. I’ll never give up fighting for human rights equality. #LGBTQoftwitter.” Yaniv isn’t a lesbian, of course. Real lesbians — that is, real women who are sexually attracted to other real women — quite rightly reject fake lesbians like him, so the fake lesbians exploit leftist ideology again and accuse real lesbians of bigotry and hate.

Feminism has the concept of the “glass ceiling,” whereby women are unjustly prevented by sexist men from reaching the highest positions in politics, business and academia. Inspired by this, the fake lesbians have invented the concept of the “cotton ceiling,” whereby men like Yaniv are unjustly prevented by real lesbians from removing the underwear of said lesbians and having sex with them. Here is a trans-lesbian activist lecturing a sceptical TERF (i.e., Trans-Exclusionary Radical Feminist for those not up on the latest jargon) on the injustices of the cotton ceiling:

Trans women are female. When our female-ness and womanhood is denied, as you keep doing repeatedly, that is transphobic and transmisogynist. As I said earlier, all people’s desires are influenced by an intersection of cultural messages that determine those desires. Cultural messages that code trans women’s bodies as male are transphobic, and those messages influence people’s desires. So cis queer women who are attracted to other queer women may not view trans women as viable sexual partners because they have internalized the message that trans women are somehow male.

The comparison to what cis males say also makes no sense. What trans women are saying is that we are women, and thus should be considered women sexually, and thus be considered viable partners for women who are attracted to women. What cis males are saying is that queer women shouldn’t be exclusively attracted to women, which is completely different. (The Cotton Ceiling? Really?, Femonade blog, 13th March 2012)

It’s not “completely different,” of course. In both cases, people with penises are “saying” (and willing) that real lesbians should have sex with them. In both cases, real lesbians would be encountering the male genitals of real men. But the trans-activist believes in an act of verbal transubstantiation whereby a trans-lesbian possesses a “female penis” that, despite all appearances, is “completely different” to the nasty and objectionable penis of a “cis male.”

Aspects of religious psychology

I use the term “transubstantiation” deliberately. It’s a term from Catholic theology that refers to the supernatural process whereby wafers and wine transform into the flesh and blood of Christ during the celebration of Holy Eucharist by a priest. No physical or scientific test can detect this transformation and to all appearances the wafers and wine remain unchanged. But traditionalist Catholics will insist that the wafers and wine are now truly Christ’s flesh and blood. If you disagree, you’re probably safe nowadays but you wouldn’t have been in the past. It was very unwise to openly deny, let alone ridicule, transubstantiation in Catholic nations during the Middle Ages. And disagreements over the concept were central to the murderous hatreds of the Reformation. Those who believed in transubstantiation got very angry when it was denied.

This anger, which is part of the odium theologicum, is an important aspect of religious psychology, whether overt or covert — leftism can in fact be explained as a mutation of Christianity and Judaism. Overt and covert religions gain power by demanding belief in things that defy everyday reality, because such belief is difficult and requires a greater emotional investment. When we invest more in a belief, we have more incentive to protect it more strongly. And it is precisely because concepts like transubstantiation and the “female penis” are absurd that they are powerful. When we have an emotional investment in something we can’t prove, we react strongly when it is denied or ridiculed. That applies even more when we ourselves are subconsciously aware or afraid that our beliefs are baseless or false. Crushing external heresies can be a way of stilling internal doubts.

The “female penis” vs the “unisex brain”

And so religion and other forms of ideology can gain power by their contradictions and absurdities. However, in the clash between transgenderism and feminism, both sides believe in absurdities: the trannies insist on the concept of the female penis, just as the feminists insist on the concept of the “unisex brain,” namely, that there is no genuine difference between male and female brains. These two concepts are both biologically absurd: there is no such thing as a female penis, but there is such a thing as a female brain. However, if transgenderism and feminism are both powered by absurdities, why have trannies been winning the battle over the TERFs? Well, it’s partly because the trannies have the bigger, and therefore better, absurdities. For example, the “female penis” is an obvious absurdity, the “unisex brain” is much less so. Penises are out in the open, after all, whereas brains are hidden behind the skull.

And there is a continuum between a typically male brain and a typically female brain that doesn’t exist between male genitals and female genitals in the vast majority of cases. The psychological differences between men and women are a question of averages and tendencies, but the physical differences are generally stark and obvious (inter-sex individuals are rare). A certain group of trannies also have the stronger male will-to-power and love of battle, which is another reason they are winning the battle with lesbians. All this explains why the left supports and celebrates trannies as they cross the border between male and female. As a sexual minority, they have higher status than ordinary women. As a novel and exhibitionist sexual minority, they also have higher status than lesbians, who also have less will-to-power.

Better than Black

Indeed, as I pointed out in “Power to the Perverts!,” transgenderism has allowed some White heterosexual men to leap above the Black-Jewish lesbian feminist Linda Bellos in the leftist hierarchy. The White men are “transgender” and Bellos, although Black, is a TERF. In current leftism, transgender trumps TERF. Leftists therefore support the border-abolishing White men and not the border-erecting Black woman.

However, leftists would instantly support Bellos if those White men were claiming to be Black rather than female. Leftists want the border between male and female abolished, but not the border between Black and White. Why so? Again I would argue that higher and lower status settle the clash of wills. Rachel Dolezal “willed” that she was Black, while Blacks “willed” that she wasn’t. Dolezal was trying to abolish a border, Blacks were trying to maintain one, so a naïve reading of leftism would say that leftists should support “trans-racialists” like Dolezal just as they support transgenderists like Bruce Jenner. But leftists didn’t support Dolezal, and Blacks easily won the battle of wills. The border between Black and White stayed up, and Dolezal was ridiculed and punished, despite being more convincing as a Black than most transgenderists ever are as women.

High and low again

Why did this happen? Because Dolezal, as a White, had lower status than the Blacks whose territory she wanted to enter. When you have higher status, leftists allow you to control your borders. Their cry of “No borders, no nations!” only applies to those of low status. The Black nation is allowed to have borders against non-Black infiltrators, just as Israel is allowed to have borders against non-Jewish infiltrators. There was no way for Dolezal to align herself with a minority with higher status than the Blacks whose territory she wanted to enter. She had to pretend to be truly Black in a way that Bruce Jenner and Jonathan Yaniv don’t have to pretend to be truly women. And so Dolezal could be exposed as a fraud in a way that Jenner and Yaniv can’t.

Hey, haters: Karen White is a woman!
Hey, haters: Karen White is a woman!

For example, a review of a film about Dolezal in the Guardian says that Dolezal “has become a pariah in Spokane, Washington” after she was exposed as having “appropriated blackness and then lied about it.” The film-reviewer, the stereotypically leftist non-White Arwa Mahdawi, says that this deception “seems like peak white privilege.” And that’s exactly what it is, in Mahdawi’s eyes: she thinks that the film “prioritizes a white woman’s feelings over the damage she has caused.” But what “damage” has Dolezal actually caused? None whatsoever by comparison with what transgender men have caused. In 2018 the heterosexual male David Thompson (born Stephen Terence Wood) already had “convictions for indecent assault, indecent exposure and gross indecency involving children, violence and dishonesty.” He was on remand for rape in a male jail, but claimed to be a woman called Karen White and was transferred to a female jail. He then sexually assaulted two real women. But Mahdawi would not say that White had “appropriated femaleness” and would not condemn his behaviour as “peak male privilege.” That would be transphobic!

Similarly, the Guardian has ignored the damage done by Jonathan Yaniv as he tries to destroy the livelihoods of real women by dragging them before a Human Rights Tribunal in British Colombia. And those real women are non-White. Why have Mahdawi and her anti-racist feminist sisters not leapt to their defence against the “male privilege” and “white privilege” of a White male predator? I think I’ve explained this above: it’s because transgender men like Yaniv, by aligning themselves with homosexuals, have won higher status than all ordinary women, even non-White ones. The men can therefore cross the border between male and female, while TERFs who try to defend the border are accused of hate and bigotry.

Parallels with mass immigration

This analysis obviously also applies to mass immigration by non-Whites into Western nations. To leftists, Whites have low status and therefore cannot maintain physical borders against non-Whites, who have high status. Nor can Whites maintain abstract borders of political identity. In leftist eyes, a Somali, Iraqi or Chinese who emigrates to Britain, America or France thereby becomes just as British, American or French as native Whites whose ancestors have lived there for centuries or millennia and who created the institutions, culture and history of those nations. Non-Whites can enter and occupy all White spaces, which is why we now have absurdities like Sir Lancelot, “The Most Gallant Knight,” being played by a Black actor:

A Black Sir Lancelot, courtesy of two Jews
A Black Sir Lancelot, courtesy of two Jews

Gallantry is not a Black concept — or a Jewish one. As the image above reveals, the Black Lancelot has been created and imposed on White audiences by the Jews Edward Kitsis and Adam Horowitz. This behaviour represents the later stages not simply of the culture of critique but also of a campaign of dissolution. Jews want to destroy all the borders and boundaries, physical, cultural and ideological, whereby Whites maintain their distinct identity and defend their own interests. That’s why Jews have long promoted the idea that America is a “nation of immigrants” and a “proposition nation” defined by ideas and ideology, not by the racial identity of its inhabitants.

In a way, characters like the Black Lancelot are a jeer of triumph over Whites, who are being told that they now no longer have the status or the power to maintain the borders of their own identity and culture. All White roles are now open to non-Whites, but non-White roles are closed to Whites. It would now be absolutely “unacceptable,” in leftist parlance, for a Black character like Othello to be played by a White. The Jewish role in this “appropriation” of White culture is obvious and was condemned by the late Larry Auster, himself a Jew, in his remarkably honest and clear-sighted article “Jews — The Archetypal Multiculturalists”:

Eastern European Jews, with their discontented, irrepressible temperament, were admitted as equals into a culture that had been formed by Anglo-Saxons and other northern European-origin people, with their pacific, self-controlled temperament. The former outsiders then proceeded to make their own sensibility the center of the culture, while diminishing and demonizing the Anglo-Saxon. … To seek to transform America into a Messianic project, to identify with the Other (whoever the Other may be) at the expense of the native majority, to deny to the native majority its ethnic identity while indulging in one’s own ethnic identity — this is not just a bad agenda, it is a Jewish agenda, and it is entirely moral for citizens of a free country to criticize it as such. (See Lawrence Auster on the Role of Jews in Disestablishing White, Christian America, The Occidental Observer, 13th March 2013)

Auster also condemns the “all-consuming narcissism” and “unmitigated, brazen arrogance” of Jews like the “attorney and law professor Alan Dershowitz.” Such Jews have conducted both the culture of critique and the campaign of dissolution, striving to throw down all borders and barriers with which Whites have defended their own interests and maintained their own identity. And that “all-consuming [Jewish] narcissism” and “arrogance” identified by Auster have never gone away. It has recently been on display in Open Borders: The Science and Ethics of Mass Immigration (2019), created by the Jewish economist Bryan Caplan and the Jewish illustrator Zach Weinersmith, who “make a bold case for unrestricted immigration in this fact-filled graphic non-fiction.”

Punims as propaganda: the cover of Open Borders by Jews Bryan Caplan and Zach Weinersmith
Punims as propaganda: the cover of Open Borders by Jews Bryan Caplan and Zach Weinersmith

You could call the cover of the book “Peculiar Punims as Pro-Migration Propaganda” (punim is Yiddish for “face”). Drawn by Zach Weinersmith, the cover effectively presents migrants of all races as large-nosed Jews overseen by a similarly large-nosed Statue of Liberty. And Lady Liberty is displaying the “glory-hole gape” or “nümale grimace,” that is, the submissive open-mouthed grin identified by hate-thinkers like Men of the West as characteristic of low-testosterone leftist males (or soy-boys). I find the cover oddly disturbing and unpleasant. The peculiar punims are androgynous and abhuman, like those of robots or people drugged into compliance.

But although the diverse migrants to submissive America are presented as Jewish, that isn’t really how Jews regard non-Jewish migrants. Rabbi Laura Klausner-Janner, “Senior Rabbi” in British Reform Judaism and daughter of the alleged paederast Greville Janner, has claimed that “When Jewish people look at Calais migrants, we see ourselves.” But Rabbi Laura lived in Jerusalem for 15 years and knows perfectly well that Israel does not have open borders for “vulnerable and oppressed” non-Jews. Instead, it has firmly sealed borders equipped with very sturdy fences and very effective surveillance equipment.

It’s a question of high and low status again. As God’s Chosen People, Jews have the highest possible status and are therefore entitled to the best possible borders while being free to invade the spaces of all others. This accounts for phenomena like Jewish anti-White activist Tim Wise titling his book White Like Me and the common Twitter meme in which Jews claiming to be White loudly preach open borders and other liberal pieties that conform to Jewish interests and oppose the interests of Whites.

Likud celebrates the creation of Fortress Israel
Likud celebrates the creation of Fortress Israel

And the borders maintained by Jews in Israel aren’t just physical. The poster above is read from right-to-left because it’s in Hebrew, the artificially revived language of the new Jewish nation. As I described in “Words as Weapons,” Hebrew and its script are barriers to entry by non-Jews and to penetration by foreign intelligence services. But Israeli intelligence finds no difficulty recruiting Jewish speakers of any important gentile language. The Jewish message to Whites is very simple: Borders for us, not for you. Leftists have the same message. And that’s why Bruce Jenner can become a woman, but Rachel Dolezal can’t become a Black.

(Republished from The Occidental Observer by permission of author or representative)
 
Hide 76 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. I don’t know about anyone else, but I’m sick of hearing about the freaks in the society. They’ve always been there and always will be there, but in previous times they had the courtesy of not sticking their perversions in my face. Now I’m supposed to support their mental illness. No thank you.

    By advertising their delusions through articles, they get more bold and demand more ‘rights’ to lunacy. Stop it.

    • Agree: Moi
    • Replies: @Anon
    , @niteranger
  2. Anon[361] • Disclaimer says:
    @RoatanBill

    This is, as it were, the grade of opposition The Society Engineers have faced so far, and will keep facing.
    Any wonder they are exhilarated, and don’t even doubt each of their plans will come to effect?

  3. Anon[361] • Disclaimer says:

    Those who believed in transubstantiation got very angry when it was denied.

    That because, quite obviously:

    1) Their belief was, at best, shaky; therefore doubt seen outside aroused their own subconscious doubt: to repress their own doubt successfully, they needed not to see it expressed by anyone else.
    This is a key element of human psychology and culture: no-one who really firmly holds their belief will get disturbed by “denial”…

    2) For the cleverest, it was, as it has always been with such matters, only power plays… and ploys.

    • Replies: @Candy
  4. @RoatanBill

    I agree but the lunacy of the Jews will get worse and it will either explode or destroy all of society. Ashkenazi Jews have mental disorders of about 30 to 40 percent above the general average of any population they inhabit. This is most likely due to massive endogamy and assortative mating according to their own studies. This also appears to cause mutations related to a number of genetic disorders including Tay- Sachs.

    Since the Jews control all media, social sites, universities, and economic pathways this will be the “new norm.” There is a reason the Jews were thrown out of over 100 countries and nations over time. I see little hope and it gets more absurd everyday. Recently the off spring of Killary Clinton and some ungulate which produced Chelsea Clinton has gone even further down the black hole of idiocy. Chelsea is declaring if you are male with a penis and beard you can still be a women.

    There is no limit to their madness and society just cowers to their attacks rather than going after them and calling them exactly what they are: Fucking Nutbags!

    • Agree: the grand wazoo
    • Replies: @Richard B
    , @Wally
  5. Bill H says: • Website

    But the left does support the crossing of racial barriers. The white person who claimed to be Native American is the leading contender for the Democratic presidential nomination.

  6. I’m a “live and let live” person, but the Jewish nation wreckers are no such thing. They show us, day after day in an increasing frenzy, their determination to push every kind of loathsome sexual degradation on the rest of us. It isn’t for the benefit of the freaks they champion — it’s to rub our noses in the end of the Western civilization they hate, to show us how powerless we are to set any limits on anti-bourgeois triumphalism.

    The Jewish mafia and its running dogs are confident that decent people will grumble but kneel in the dirt before them. So far their confidence has been justified.

    So far.

    • Agree: mark green
    • Replies: @Richard B
  7. Webster says:

    Borders, schmorders waders fuck it.
    What I want to talk about is how Chavez and a handful of other progressive leaders all fell to cancer. Way beyond the possibility that they would have all fallen at the same time.
    And how Jack Layton on the NDP party in Canada also fell to cancer when he was just about to be elected as the prime minister in Canada.
    This was no accident, it was how the filthy rich stay on top in fake democracies. Nobody said much up here, but there are a lot of us who thought how strange it was that progressive leaders often die an early death when they actually stand up and say they want democratic change. Hope it doesn’t happen in your country.

    • Replies: @Sic Semper
    , @Archangel
  8. Vojkan says:

    In short, perverts thrive on ‘woke-ism’. Who’d have seen that coming?

  9. “For the cleverest, it was, as it has always been with such matters, only power plays… and ploys.”
    Absolutely.
    Great article by Langdon. His concept of the leftist hierarchy is both interesting & plausible.
    His comparison between the PC left & the fanaticism of the middle ages church is profitable. The greater the absurdity of a public belief, the greater it’s adherents will engage in a bloody-minded/handed defence of it.
    Reading his material ABOUT the PC Left, though is quite nauseating. Their complete disdain for material reality is vomit inducing.
    It quite tempting to just say they are all psychotic, complete fruit-loops….. And no doubt many ARE….
    However, “power plays & ploys” are also at the heart of this.
    The PC are narcissists, & ego maniacs — they are quintessential masturbators.
    Like Nero, they have fiddled with each others’ erogenous zones while the world fell to bits around them.
    Never have they (to mix metaphors) tried to steer the Titanic from hitting the iceberg, but have spent their entire energy rearranging the deck chairs.
    Indeed, they have been completely complicit with the rise of the oligarchy & the destruction of democracy.
    They have existed because they shop.
    I curse them.

  10. J says: • Website

    Hebrew and its script are barriers to entry by non-Jews and to penetration by foreign intelligence services.

    Nonsense. Hebrew is no more difficult to learn than Arabic or Japanese or Greek. In fact, it is much easier to read than Chinese or Japanese. Foreign intelligence services – unlike the author of the quote above – are intelligent enough to learn the lingo and spy on us. Even google-translate, a lowly machine, finds it easy to write grammatically correct Hebrew.

    • Replies: @Norbertus Nasutus
  11. Anonymous[648] • Disclaimer says:

    The question I have is why the Republican establishment rolls over in the face of this evil. Gay kompromat was almost assuredly the reason Hastert and others have been chosen to lead the legislature over the years, yet that leverage seems too weak to explain the total capitulation of, say, Ryan, who in the latter case is completing the leftward transformation of Fox News with his recent appointment to the board.

    One explanation that comes to mind is the parallel with what’s going on within the Catholic Church, where sodomites have infiltrated the seminaries for some decades for the cover story, true, but also to destroy from within the organization that until yesterday had defined their signature behaviors as an abomination in the eyes of God. Regarding the Republicans, the candidates on all but the most local level pop up out of nowhere—no one knows who the heck these people are—, having been pre-screened as ringers like Susan Collins behind closed doors, and as the Epstein affair makes clear, for their susceptibility to sexual kompromat. The only possible attribute that, for example, Charlie Crist had for being selected behind closed doors was, apparently, his being an habitue of the gay bar scene in Tampa and working for the very gay-looking Morgan.

    If Republicans do anything when they’re called before the Sanhedrin’s cameras, it’s to encourage more of the same by their abject, groveling cowardice, to the point there should be public outcry from the deplorables, who instead sit like zombies buying into the Israel-first meme on Fox encapsulated within that flag-waving jingoism and phony C&W shtick blown in their face from midtown NYC. Oy vey.

    Any thoughts about Rush Limbaugh? I never listen, but I’d guess that, because his chances of getting a show without being a Jewish flunky like Sean Hannity were zero, he was chosen as a Judas goat both with regard to Israel first and to hide the takeover of America’s corporate boardrooms by the left under the banner of free-market capitalism.

  12. White men should continue to convert to Islam (including wearing modest clothing, thobes, kufi, etc to work). White people in general, should always claim “Hispanic” if they even have 1 percent Iberian DNA (make the other side litigate it). There is no means testing for Hispanic and it can be anyone of any Spanish culture or origin, by the federal standard (including Spain, alone).

    Also, if there actually were any white trolls within Hollywood or the media, they would continually be calling for Jewish/Hebrew characters in all movies (Moses, Abraham, all of them) be played by black actors.

    Lastly, again, if there were any legitimate trolls anywhere in the media or internet (youtube), a new narrative of “Anti-Irish” would begin any time anyone criticizes any one that even remotely is Irish (or appears Irish), which should then be conflated to ‘Anti-Celtic’, which covers an even more broad group of “disenfranchised people groups”.

    • Replies: @Montefrío
  13. Washedup says:

    The reason trannies gain status by converting and not Rachel Dolezal is simple. They are men who castrate themselves. By ablating their penises they become sacrificial victims to the Cause and as such are entitled to exalted status. The mechanism is unconscious. Deep down it’s just a snake cult.

    • Agree: fish
  14. Candy says:
    @Anon

    Wow. That’s an interesting angle, to which I think I agree

  15. Sean says:

    Comparing anti racism to the Catholic faith. Is that the best you can do?

    https://www.psychologytoday.com/gb/blog/the-imprinted-brain/201901/are-our-leaders-using-only-half-their-brains

    Neural activity in TPN tends to inhibit activity in the DMN, and vice versa. The TPN is important for problem solving, focusing of attention, making decisions, and control of action. The DMN plays a central role in emotional self-awareness, social cognition, and ethical decision making. It is also strongly linked to creativity and openness to new ideas. Because activation of the TPN tends to suppress activity in the DMN, an over-emphasis on task-oriented leadership may prove deleterious to social and emotional aspects of leadership. Similarly, an overemphasis on the DMN would result in difficulty focusing attention, making decisions, and solving known problems. […] The objective universe is fatalistic in this respect, but the mental one allows freedom, opportunity, and multiple outcomes. In the world of the mind we are literally fancy-free, with infinite powers, possibilities, and potential. But in the world of tangible reality we are prisoners of fate, where physical causality rules and conservation laws dictate that we cannot have it both ways at once.

    Women incline to the bolded mental style.

    https://www.psychologytoday.com/intl/blog/the-imprinted-brain/201909/diametric-diagnosis-the-new-british-disease
    … As one of the world’s most famous autistics, Temple Grandin, has pointed out (see reference), Western societies of the recent past may have made life easier for high-functioning autistics than do present-day ones. The explanation may simply be that in the past it was much more of a man’s world than is the case today, and given that autism has been associated since Asperger with male mentality, past Western societies were, therefore, more mechanistic—and certainly more typically male—in their cognitive configuration.

    But since the World Wars, and especially World War 2, Western societies have seen the full emancipation of women, …. Indeed, today, this trend has reached its apogee, with women coming to occupy a prominent place in many occupations and professions: notably medicine (especially general practice); law; psychotherapy; journalism, editing, and public relations; and increasingly in politics, public administration, and government. The result has been that the cognitive configuration of Western civilization as a whole has shifted from being centered on the male point of balance illustrated above to being based on the female one. But as the diagram also reveals, the migration towards the female side is also inevitably one towards hyper-mentalism and even psychosis.

    • Replies: @Catiline
  16. El Dato says:

    YOU CAN’T BECOME HOLY BY PRETENDING TO BE HOLY!

    However, you CAN become holey by pretending to be holey.

    That’s all.

  17. Richard B says:
    @niteranger

    Ashkenazi Jews have mental disorders of about 30 to 40 percent above the general average of any population they inhabit.

    There is no limit to their madness and society just cowers…

    Unfortunately, cowering is also a mental illness.

    What sane person would want to adapt to an insane society?

    We’re definitely living a very real Invasion Of The Body Snatchers.

    Pretty much the only refuge for those of us who don’t claim to be perfect (the bedrock of mental illness and the foundation of Jewish Supremacy Inc.), but are committed to living in reality, is in the comment sections of sites like TUR.

    We’re kind of like the people in those videos of the 2004 tsunami who escaped the water by rushing to the top of buildings, until the buildings themselves washed away.

    The only sensible, the only real solution, is to find a strong building filled with like-minded people, ie; people who accept reality, reject utopias*, know they’re not perfect and just want to be healthy.

    Good luck with that.

    I’ve found that many people complaining about these nutjobs are nutjobs themselves.

    Then there’s the lucky few who have escaped to some quiet place far, far away and have found the two things that make life worth living, love and work.

    *The Right has their share of these crazies. That’s why nothing – absolutely nothing – good will ever come from the Right.

    Because, as is implied in its very name, it’s simply the other side of crazy.

    The Right is like someone who refuses to separate from a crazy sibling because they hate change themselves. So, they prefer to stay attached and just complain. Until, of course, they become crazy themselves and are just as lacking in self-awareness as their crazy sibling.

  18. El Dato says:

    Likud celebrates the creation of Fortress Israel

    Whenever someone says “Walls don’t Work”, post this!

    The nümale grimace

    Even worse when it’s a fedora-adorned guy.
    Even worse when it’s a black guy.

    So fake.

  19. @Webster

    When (((they))) say “Democratic Change” (((they))) mean DEMOGRAPHIC change

    • Replies: @FLgeezer
  20. Richard B says:
    @Cat Hierophant

    Good comment.

    So far their confidence has been justified.

    True. But it’s the confidence of crazy people.

    It’s easy to call someone crazy.

    But it’s much better to give at least a working definition.

    And I would describe crazy as a person or group who thinks they’re perfect and rejects reality. They obviously go together.

    I’d say that’s an accurate definition of Jewish Supremacy Inc (JSI).

    It’s real enemy has always been reality itself. JSI rejects reality body and soul.

    That’s why what we’re really witnessing is The Pyrrhic Victory of JSI.

    Why?

    Because the rise of JSI power has been in direct proportion to the collapse of the very civilization that power controls.

    Too many people, and I mean sensible, intelligent people, insist on looking at JSI as some superior, unstoppable force of nature. It’s as if even the complainers want to submit and maybe they do.

    But JSI is not a superior, insuperable force. It’s a parasite. A terminal disease? Yes. But an unstoppable force that will reign supreme forever? No way.

    And, though parasites are good at infiltration, subversion, disintegration, destruction and death, they’re no good at social-management.

    Just look around. Everything JSI controls is in free fall.

    The reason for this is devoid of any complexity. It’s right there staring us all in the face.

    Power entirely dependent on force is destablizing.

    When power imposes its demand for blind obedience to its authority by force it destablizes the social-institutions that power controls.

    It’s not going to all of a sudden work because Whites are going to be replaced.

    It’s not going to work at all.

    Believing that it will is part of the magical thinking so characteristic of JSI.

    No. What we’re witnessing is The Pyrrhic Victory of JSI.

    JSI has destroyed the West and is now conducting a Fire Sale.

    And the only buyer, obviously, is China.

  21. Rahan says:

    Now THIS is how you write an article about this madness.

    Just like the East Asians learned to master the technology of the whites, today white goyim are learning how to turn the culture of critique back on (((fellow white people))).

    How to deconstruct the deconstructers.

    Where they hide behind an octopus ink cloud of long sentences in hazy paragraphs, the new white deconstructor values clarity and simplicity. Hence the rightwing meme as the culmination of this.

    Because? Because those who value truth and reality strive for clarity. Those who try to outlaw truth and reality–they use needlessly complex gibberish as a WMD.

    • Replies: @Ambrose Kane
  22. @OscarWildeLoveChild

    My three grandchildren have a Hispanic mother who even has some indigenous blood (Guaraní), although they’re very European in appearance. When once upon a time I thought it would be a good idea to send them to a US university (an idea since discarded), my son and I had every intention of playing the Hispanic card for them. My son tried it for himself because we live in Argentina, but that was a no-go. We’re Irish, mostly, but not Celts; we’re Norman Irish, but I’d be glad to throw in with the Celts. Wasn’t there once a “black Moses”? Personally, I’d love to see a biopic of Golda Meir with Whoopi Goldberg playing Golda.

    I’m so sick of all this nonsense that it’s begun to stir up prejudices I didn’t previously have. At some point, a hard stop must be put to all this lunacy.

  23. Wally says:
    @niteranger

    said: “Ashkenazi Jews have mental disorders of about 30 to 40 percent above the general average of any population they inhabit. ”

    Here you go:

    Scientists Discover Gene That Predisposes Ashkenazi Jews to Schizophrenia
    Variations of the DNST3 gene make Ashkenazi Jews 40 percent more likely to develop schizophrenia and similar diseases.’
    : https://www.haaretz.com/.premium-ashkenazi-gene-increases-schizophrenia-1.5294333

    Does the strong Jew tendency towards mental illness assist in their ‘holocaust’ fantasies?:https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=12239

  24. If Yaniv spoke the truth, he would admit that he is a heterosexual male who seeks perverted sexual pleasure by passing himself off as a woman and receiving Brazilian waxes or entering female toilets to share tampon tips with under-age girls, etc.

    Langdon’s overthinking it.

    Let’s say there are 10,000 trannies in the U.S. and Canada … how many have sued to get a Brazilian wax? Exactly one. And how many headlines have there been in the past five years about all of these trannies, each of whom use the bathroom four or five times a day, accosting minor girls? Count them on your fingers with room to spare.

    For trannies it’s about the autogynephilia, not child molestation. Most people complete the yin/yang symbol through a partnership with the opposite sex. Trannies internalize it.

    And Jonathan Yaniv is a special case. First, never trust a tranny less than three or four years post-transition. They’re all ebulliently psycho, like a 14-year-old girl. Hormones are whack. And second, Yaniv sues because (s)he’s Jewish. That’s what they fuckin’ do, whether it’s crosses on hilltops or pubic hair on the jonk.

    The entire premise of 21st-century Judaism in America is the destruction of the white Christian nuclear family. They’re so close they can taste it. Yaniv furthers that goal, while Dolezal impedes it. What good is it when whites can flash a Get Out Of Jail Free card by claiming Nubian heritage?

    • Replies: @Bill
  25. @Rahan

    “Because those who value truth and reality strive for clarity. Those who try to outlaw truth and reality–they use needlessly complex gibberish as a WMD” – Yep, isn’t that the truth? And the Chosen Tribe are the best at obfuscation, convoluted sentences and unnecessarily complex forms of reasoning in order to cloak their nonsense and thereby fool the goyim.

    It’s often hard to decipher it because we wrongly imagine that deeper or profound truths must be communicated in sophisticated verbiage, but it’s not true.

    It has got to the point now that when I read an article, especially one written by one of our Jewish subversives, I can immediately discern the bullshit because of its style and pretentious manner.

    After all, it’s who they are. It’s what they do.

  26. Agent76 says:

    August 27, 2019 The Power to Oversee the Education System, A Historical Timeline from the Prussian Empire to the Rockefeller Dynasty

    Throughout history, the idea of those in power to oversee the education system started in the 16th Century. The history is complex and is rarely mentioned. The formation of the American public education system began in the Kingdom of Prussia around 1525, a former Kingdom in north-central Germany with an extension of lands that crossed between the Baltic and Northern seas.

    http://silentcrownews.com/wordpress/?p=6202

    Jun 6, 2019 If You have A Problem With The #STRAIGHTPRIDE Parade, You’re Not Seeing The BIGGER PICTURE!

    This summer the city of Boston may become the first city ever to host a straight pride parade if a group known as “Super Happy Fun America” gets their way.

  27. What about Shaun King?

    Childhood pictures show him to be a red haired, freckle faced lad with two definitely White parents yet somehow, with the help of strategic grooming, he’s managed to pass himself off as black and is adored as a black grievance advocate.

    • Replies: @fytei
  28. Race is merely a social construct. Unless you are white. The white race is real and it is deplorable and irredeemable. We all know the drill. It’s not identity politics. It’s anti white politics. And it’s not the POC. It’s the alphabet people who are the new Jacobin/Maoist left. And they are mostly whites and *sigh* Jews.

  29. FLgeezer says:
    @Sic Semper

    >(((they))) mean DEMOGRAPHIC CHANGE

    Assertion confirmed. From the North Palm Beach Jewish Journal page 3:
    ———————————
    Jewish Groups decry major U.S. cut in refugee admissions

    The Reform movement and HIAS the leading Jewish immigration advocacy group have decried
    the Trump administration new restrictions on refugees as a moral abdication.
    The Trump administration slashed the ceiling on refugee admissions to 18,000 next fiscal year
    from 30,000 this year. The ceiling was 45,000 in the previous year.
    An executive order also allowed states and local authorities to deny entry to refugees.
    “This order is in effect a state-by-state, city-by-city refugee ban, and it’s un-American and wrong,”
    HIAS President Mark Hetfield said in a statement. “Is this the kind of America we want to live in?
    Where local towns and cities can put up signs the say ‘No Refugees Allowed’ and the Federal Government will back that?”
    Trump administration officials have said the backlog in asylum and refugee applications have forced them to slash the number of eligible refugees.
    ————————————

    Let we goy all recite in unison “The (((j**s))) will not replace us”.

    • Replies: @Wally
  30. Who is the most badass fabulous football skillser?

    You might think an in-shape adult man likee Messi or Rinaldo!

    But ARSEs no better!!!

    It’s the most unlikely person. I could name 6 million reasons the Nose is wrong…

    1) obesity
    2) female……..!!!!!

  31. At the heart of the egalitarian left is the pathological belief that there is no structure of reality; that all the world is a tabula rasa that can be changed at any moment in any desired direction by the mere exercise of human will — in short, that reality can be instantly transformed by the mere wish or whim of human beings.

    This also explains why these dullards like those craptastic Harry Potter books so bad.

  32. Good article.
    Clearly show the absurdity of the Jews who promote homosexuality, transgenderism, and anything destructive to a healthy European Christian society. They will use anything to destroy. It’s what they do.

  33. ricpic says:

    Why must lefty insanity rule?!

  34. jhan says:

    You probably love this one: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-46425774

    (man tries to lower his registered age)

  35. Agent76 says:

    This is rather common sense step in the world of chaos. October 15th, 2019 We should be investing in education, not incarceration

    Rather than being supported, she was handcuffed, arrested, and taken to a juvenile detention center where she was charged with battery.

    https://www.childrensdefense.org/blog/we-should-be-investing-in-education-not-incarceration/

  36. “Gallantry is not a Black concept — or a Jewish one.”

    Gallantry is not a European concept. The term “gallantry” is European, but what is referred to as “gallant” behavior is a concept understood and practiced across societies around the globe.

    Bravery, honor in the face of adversity, self sacrifice, risk taking . . . hardly a European trait alone. The objection to a black as Sir Lancelot would be rooted in the historicst rendering of the character, which was Spain and most spaniards were light in color so as to be white.

    The only bridge is that even the English acknowledged black english soldiers, hence the standout,
    Othello.

    What bars a black James Bond — is the historical record, not that there weren’t and aren’t black spies. But they would not have the lineage historically of the Bond Character.

    • Replies: @baythoven
  37. There are truths here, some of them profound, such as Mr. Langdon’s analysis of enforcement and belief mechanisms surrounding the dogma of transubstantiation, although since the author is sometimes given to imprecise generalizations, he detracts somewhat from his thesis with this statement:

    … leftism can in fact be explained as a mutation of Christianity and Judaism.

    Actually, Leftism originates in the idea of utopia, which was weaponized in the Renaissance by the Catholic cleric Rabelais.

    Some of the intolerance in the Left-wing ideology is found in types of Churchianity. For example, “the error has no rights” papalolatry of the Jesuits who taught many of the future French revolutionaries in their youth. These Jacobins forged an agnostic Jesuitism in 1789. Christianity in its Biblical essence is not totalitarian and cannot be indicted as a precursor of Leftist fanaticism. Quakers, Amish, Mennonites, Salvationists, Dorothy Day Catholic Workers, 20th century Russian Baptists and many more Christians are not guilty. This is not a quibble. Truth demands that what has been done in the name of Jesus needs to be separated from what Jesus taught and His true followers practiced, which is liberty under Law.

    Unfortunately, the article descends into the familiar Jew-bashing. I wish I had a dollar for every time someone pursued that category they are pleased to call “The Jews” for some catastrophic evil. I’d be a millionaire.

    Langdon posits the notion that “the Jews” without qualification (save Mr. Auster), are the main agents behind open borders and mass immigration. All the guilty goyim involved are a distant second in perfidy. This is a disservice to the author’s presumed educational objective. The monolith (“The Jews”) which he has fashioned, like all caricatures, is unsuited to the drawing of analytical distinctions, even though in poring over the follies both lexicographical and biological of the transgender psychosis, he manages to make important distinctions. But not when it comes to “the Jews.”

    What “Jews” is he referring to? Secular Judaics disaffected by the Israeli state? Secular Judaic supporters of the Israeli state? Modern Orthodox Zionists? Israeli settler Zionists? Hasidic Zionists? Anti-Zionist Hasidics? Believe it or not, all of those groups have differing views and agendas. One demarcation line focuses on the Right-wing Judaic conviction, rooted in Kabbalah, that western man, and more specifically the American white man and woman, functions as a type of golem whose continuing existence and national integrity are essential to the primacy of the Israeli state over its regional enemies. Hence, numerous “conservative” Judaics sincerely wish to preserve the white race in America as a guarantor of Israeli security. Why is this overlooked? Is there that much of a passionate attachment to the 1930s type of anti-Semitism that Hitler and Henry Ford peddled that we are blind to contemporary facts?

    On the other side of the line are Left-wing Zionists who believe that golem can be found anywhere, recruited from among disparate peoples of any color, and that the numerous Talmudic injunctions to take revenge against the Christian West are best achieved by doing as Mr. Langdon has sketched and immersing white Americans in the “melting pot,” to the point of dissolution.

    There are also other Judaics who have no dog in this fight and little interest in controversies over who immigrates where. These three positions do not exclude others.

    Langdon’s otherwise insightful column is seriously marred by his Jew-bashing and sweeping generalizations.

    Many Right-wingers cannot process a radical truth about the Cryptocracy’s frontmen: whether in New York or occupied Palestine, those who front for the diabolic do not much resemble the demonic masterminds at the very pinnacle of world power. Through a revival of the slogans of Hitler and Henry Ford, and now various 21st century would-be opinion molders, these Overlords are successfully reviving an ancient charade, whereby their supreme evil is camouflaged by an all-encompassing focus on the doings of “The Jews.”

    This has been true of the Right wing investigation of usury banking in the West, with agents of the the Cryptocracy managing to place the spotlight almost exclusively on “Jewish bankers,” while the actual Italian and German “Catholic” architects of the early usury system, which is the foundation of what we have today, escaped scrutiny, and through this misdirection was born an empire of money nearly impossible to eradicate now. Centuries before the Rothschilds there were the Fuggers and the Medici. This is mostly unknown to the generalizers who continue to act a part in a shadow play that thrives on the denials of its existence by those who perform in it.

    Michael Hoffman is the author of The Occult Renaissance Church of Rome; Usury in Christendom, Judaism Discovered, and most recently, Adolf Hitler: Enemy of the German People.

    Copyright ©2019
    http://www.RevisionistHistory.org

    • Replies: @mark green
    , @geokat62
  38. Republic says:

    Jews and perversion go together like a duck to water

  39. Catiline says:
    @Sean

    Comparing anti racism to the Catholic faith. Is that the best you can do?

    Toby is English. Anti-racism thrives in Protestant lands more so than in Catholic ones. Toby can’t wrap his English head around that. Neither can the assholes who make up 7/8ths of the commentators on this site. Have a nice day.

  40. Bill says:

    Yaniv isn’t a lesbian, of course. Real lesbians — that is, real women who are sexually attracted to other real women — quite rightly reject fake lesbians like him, so the fake lesbians exploit leftist ideology again and accuse real lesbians of bigotry and hate.

    Tobias Langdon: bravely fighting for “real lesbians.”

    Hey, Tobias, remind me again, are the Democrats the real racists?

  41. Bill says:
    @Nancy Pelosi'a Latina Maid

    First, never trust a tranny less than three or four years post-transition.

    But, once they get to year five (like Bruce Jenner is about to), you can trust them with your life.

  42. Haha says:

    I used to think the loony left would explode but it looks that instead we all are to be marched off to the lunatic asylum believing there is no such thing as race, gender, and reality. Tobias Langdon has espoused a brilliant theory about the pecking order governing our lunatic age. I now understand why a black tranny is higher up over a mere white tranny; why a transgender transsexual will score higher than a mere transgender; and why a back-and-forth gender reassignment case (man to woman, then back to man) will be almost a king of loonies. And if this double gender reassignment case would proclaim himself/herself bisexual, take up exhibitionism, and perhaps gets his brain surgically filled with shit, he/she/it is sure to be anointed Caesar. I used to guffaw hearing about these things but am now fearful about what further is to come. BTW, our kids are soon to enjoy a blockbuster movie featuring a black tranny as Cinderella’s godmother.

  43. Dumbo says:

    for a Black character like Othello to be played by a White.

    Othello was not Black. He was a Moor, not a Subsaharan African. Well, who knows how Shakespeare imagined him, I’m not sure if he ever saw a real Moor, but historically Moors were not black Africans (except for their slaves), so it’s more likely that he would have been a light-skinned Arab (which would still be darker than an European, in any case).

  44. geokat62 says:

    Higher Status in the Leftist Grievance Hierarchy Means You Can Invade Others’ Borders

    How can the Left have an hierarchy when liberal democratic societies are supposedly egalitarian?

    • Replies: @Franklin Ryckaert
  45. The Jews have been at this for 3000 years. However, with the internet their game is being exposed for what it is: a concerted effort to rule the world from Jerusalem. Divide and conquer is their modus operandi. They divide nations, they divide races, and now they divide the sexes. But, more people are awake than ever before.
    Read Laurent Guyenot’s fine book: From Yahweh To Zion.

  46. fytei says:
    @Johnny Smoggins

    Great point! What about Shaun King, aka Talcum X? If we follow Langdon’s logic maybe he’s been more or less accepted by the left’s grievance hierarchy because he never “fessed up” like Dolezal did. She freely admitted (as far as I can ascertain, perhaps after being caught “red-handed”) she identified as black, but in fact wasn’t black at all. Shaun King still insists he’s black. After being outed he even incredibly claimed that his mother was a prostitute and his father was black. Though family members have contradicted him, though his own history indicts him, he still clings to the lie.

    Accepting transgenders and their ludicrous sexual philosophies demands that we suspend belief in objective reality and accept something that is incongruous and blatantly false. In other words: accepting and championing a lie in furtherance of the Narrative. Perhaps King gets a pass because he does this same act…

    re Elizabeth Warren’s free pass on trying to pass herself off as Indian. Maybe she’s got a pass because defeating Trump is more important. Or maybe she gets points because she’s a woman candidate for president, or because American Indian issues are simply not important enough to the Narrative (because there are so few of them)… or maybe she’s gotten a free pass because she dared to live the lie like King for as long as she did… and got away with it for years…

  47. ogunsiron says:

    relevant tweet:

  48. S. Handle says:

    So if Rachel Dolezal wanted to be accepted as black she should have claimed to be a black male, then her trans-ness would have trumped “normal” blackness.

    Do I have this correct? I admit that I read about half the article and skimmed the rest.

    • Replies: @awry
  49. Wally says:
    @FLgeezer

    Yep.

    All the while Jews support strict Israeli immigration laws which specify JEWS ONLY.

  50. @geokat62

    “…How can the Left have an hierarchy when liberal democratic societies are supposedly egalitarian..?”

    Some pigs are “more equal” than others. This happens all the time in any Marxist situation.

    • Agree: geokat62
  51. baythoven says:
    @EliteCommInc.

    Othello governs the island of Cyprus, part of the Venetian empire. He’s a Moor, exotic compared to his fellow Italians, but he’s not plausibly a sub-Saharan African. But the main point — He’s not English. (If you want people to ponder “acknowledged black english solders”, you need a better “standout”.)

    As for “gallantry,” it is indeed a peculiarly European concept, more specifically of medieval Europe. The French noun “galant” means lover or suitor. Hence, gallantry ties in with the concepts of chivalry and romance which arose in medieval times. Bravery and sacrifice are universal virtues. Courtesy and deference to the Lady? That’s European.

  52. @Michael Hoffman

    Michael- I respect you and the work you’ve done. However, Tobias Langdon has penned an imaginative, intelligent, and incisive critique. It’s even comical (perhaps inadvertently.) Why tear it down over “the Jews”?

    The theme of Landon’s article is not airtight, but it’s original and insightful all the same. The victim status hierarchy he constructs is very clever. It also rings true. And at the center of this modern mess are–you guessed it–“the Jews”.

    Sure, this noisy, narcissistic clique is not alone, but they do constitute an essential component of this envy-and-resentment-driven movement.

    Langdon is also right about the clashes brewing within this new unholy alliance. Aggrieved racial, religious, and sexual categories are competing against one another for victim status.

    So who are the supreme victims?

    Langdon suggests that it is “the Jews”. And he is right. Most Jews would probably agree. They just can’t help themselves; those poor, downtrodden darlings!

    Indeed, when one measures the amount of cinema, television, ‘news’, literature and academic study devoted to undeserved and tragic Jewish suffering, “the (blameless) Jews” have surely accorded themselves top status as the world’s Most Important Victims. Black Americans however do come in a respectable second place. But the faux partnership is all about shaming the white man. This alliance however does give “the Jews” additional cred and power since they have awarded themselves most of the starring roles. Meanwhile, Jewish power cannot be effectively challenged or even identified. It’s taboo.

    I blame “the Jews” for this. I detect a pattern.

    Highly-positioned Zionist Jews, for example, who have orchestrated outright wars (often fought by US soldiers) never get hit by laws or penalties invoking religious or racial bigotry. It’s just politics. “The Jews” cruise right through it. They suffer no penalty. The Arab world has learned this lesson the hard way. So has Russia and Germany. Jewish bigotry often gets a pass.

    In Israel for instance, ‘Black Jews’ get little respect and have received almost no victim status for their unsought roles as POC pariahs who aren’t accepted as genuine Jews. Gradually, they are being driven out of Israeli society. Their marginalization however earns them no points. They are invisible.

    Sometimes Langdon (and others here at UNZ) does use the term “the Jews” in a generalized fashion. This is out of necessity. Communication requires some generalization.

    Keep in mind that the use of this hot-button term (“the Jews”) is similar to the way that most people (and especially Jews) use the term “the Nazis” when describing not only the attitudes and actions that emerged in Germany from 1933 – 1945, but in describing contemporary movements or even just the political sympathies of individuals whose views are anathema to the Jewish establishment.

    Polling data, for instance, indicates that most native-born, white US citizens (we are classified as ‘non-Hispanic whites’ now) want vigorous enforcement of US immigration laws. Yet this popular sentiment earns us the moniker of ‘racist’, even ‘Nazi’.

    Wall-loving Jews in Israel don’t get tarred this way.

    For these entrenched double-standards, I blame “the Jews”.

    Don’t you?

  53. awry says:
    @S. Handle

    So if Rachel Dolezal wanted to be accepted as black she should have claimed to be a black male, then her trans-ness would have trumped “normal” blackness.

    Do I have this correct? I admit that I read about half the article and skimmed the rest.

    IMHO “blackness” trumps anything “whitey”.

  54. melpol says:

    Border and all kinds of protection is needed for helpless Jews. Most others need much less protection and have little use for border walls. Pogroms and other extermination methods have been used against Jews, they cannot be blamed for demanding special protection against outsiders and strangers.

  55. Archangel says:
    @Webster

    Thank you. Your post was a revelation. It is so easy to induce cancer. All you need is a tube emitting strong directional electromagnetic radiation in the microwave part of the spectrum. Expose the person for a few hours and there is enough DNA damage to start it. And it is terribly hard to detect because it leaves no traces, only a vague sensation of warmth.

    My limited imagination has come up with this in a matter of minutes. But some smart engineers could devise much better ways given time and means.

    Hence assassinations like those of Pim Fortuyn and Jorg Haider are of the past. Way too obvious even though the MSM kept the lies going.

    Thank you for opening my eyes.

  56. geokat62 says:
    @Michael Hoffman

    What “Jews” is he referring to?

    To those Supremacist Jews who belong to the manifold organizations that work round the clock to implement their nefarious objectives.

    Surely you’ve heard of AIPAC, CofP, JINSA, PNAC, ADL, SPLC, HIAS, AJCongress, AJCommittee, OSF, IsraAid, etc., etc., etc., etc., etc., etc., etc., etc., etc., etc., etc., etc., etc., etc., etc., etc., etc., etc., etc., etc., etc., etc., etc., etc., etc., etc., etc., etc., etc., etc., etc., etc., …. ad infinitum?

    Do you think the people who work at these organizations are doing God’s work?

    Even a truth telling True-Torah rabbi admitted that these organizations are responsible for the destruction of Western societies by placing them on “the chopping block,” by promoting the twin poisons of mass immigration and mass miscegenation.

    Just look at what is taking place in major Western cities like London and Paris to see how well their multicultural experiment is panning out. They are quickly becoming veritable unlivable shitholes and the future is looking very grim, indeed, for European and European-derived peoples.

    What we need more of are brave people like Mr. Langdon who are courageous enough to speak of these truths. The last thing we need are more Shabbos goys who are prepared to subvert the interests of their own people.

    • Agree: Patrikios Stetsonis
  57. Hi Geo. Tbanx for your comments. This is a worthy article by Tobias Langdon. Assigning and accruing ‘victim status’ has become a formidable weapon.

    My guess is that M. Hoffman has gotten a bit weary of this battle. (Not that I completely blame him.) He has certainly paid a price for his efforts. The other side is fanatically dedicated, unified, and ruthless–with funds to match. They also occupy the moral high ground (at this time.)

    But the evidence and fingerprints denoting critical Jewish involvement in a range of subversive cultural/intellectual movements are clearly there. Sure, the kosher cabal is not alone in this war by any means. But they are it’s chief ideological progenitors (and gatekeepers).

    The chosen ones have constructed a resent-driven coalition of LGBTQ, radical fems, and unhappy POC to bring down America’s white (Christian) patriarchy. I’m sure that they consider this a worthy goal. ‘Equality’, and all that. But the Jews–as the world’s Most Important Victims–are largely exempt from their wrath. They’ve made themselves untouchable due to their supreme victim status.

    The ongoing cultural wars go to prove that ‘diversity’ might be their strength, but it’s certainly not ours. Power and influence remain a zero-sum game.

    • Replies: @geokat62
    , @Michael Hoffman
  58. geokat62 says:
    @mark green

    Tbanx for your comments.

    No, thanks go to you mark for your stellar comments. It’s a pleasure reinforcing the rock solid arguments you made in your previous comment.

    My guess is that M. Hoffman has gotten a bit weary of this battle.

    I have no issue with older warriors who’ve grown weary of the battle. While we owe them a debt of gratitude for fighting the good fight, they need to graciously bow out when the time comes.

    The other side is fanatically dedicated, unified, and ruthless–with funds to match. They also occupy the moral high ground (at this time.)

    While the other side is indeed as committed as you’ve described them, it’s my humble opinion that they do not occupy the moral high ground.

    How could they when they know they a propagating an ideology, Egalitarianism, that is based on a lie. If they truly believed that all people are the same, they would be advocating that Israel bring down their walls and welcome all the sub-saharan africans into the Holy Land. Ain’t gonna happen!

    Telling the truth should always have the higher moral ground than telling lies. Period!

    But the evidence and fingerprints denoting critical Jewish involvement in a range of subversive cultural/intellectual movements are clearly there. Sure, the kosher cabal is not alone in this war by any means. But they are it’s chief ideological progenitors (and gatekeepers).

    The evidence assembled by Prof. Kevin MacDonald is irrefutable. If that isn’t enough, the links provided by Langdon to the writings of Lawrence Auster are jaw-dropping! [I provide excerpts of the most pertinent evidence below the more button]

    I highly recommend reading Auster’s Jews–The Archetypal Multiculturalists. I do so not just because of the evidence it presents as to the culpability of Organized Jewry, it is striking for some of the recommendations he makes for addressing this crisis.

    Here are a few excerpts:

    Another prospect emerging from the wilderness of peoples will be an upsurge of anti-Semitism among marginalized whites, many of whom will blame the Jews (not without cause) for the ruin of white civilization. Having acted all along on the ludicrous and hostile assumption that the white American majority is a potential neo-Nazi force that must be dispossessed, Jews will hardly be in a position to complain about real anti-Semitism when it appears among whites who have actually been dispossessed.

    How to oppose the Jewish agenda without anti-Semitism?

    Even though Jews will ultimately benefit from a politics of white self-defense, such a politics necessarily means opposing the current Jewish agenda and power structure, and therefore will inevitably provoke false charges of anti-Semitism. However, it also involves the possibility of sparking real anti-Semitism. To prevent that from happening, we must provide a moral framework in which to place this issue, a framework that applies not just to Jews but to all groups and all human beings

    If America is to be restored as a nation, we must put to an end the pious fraud we have practiced since the 1960s, of simultaneously granting ethnic minorities the right to assert their distinct identity, and the right to speak for America as a whole, in which capacity they have stripped America of its identity

    What else can explain the fact that Jews demand homogeneity and group survival for themselves, and deny the same to others?

    This pervasive double standard is the heart of the “Jewish problem,” and there is nothing anti-Semitic—i.e. there is nothing immoral—about pointing it out.

    The ongoing cultural wars go to prove that ‘diversity’ might be their strength, but it’s certainly not ours.

    Everyone needs to understand that it was the diabolical ADL that was responsible for first coining that slogan. If they truly believed in its veracity, they would be pushing for diversity for the Jewish state.

    P.S. mark green for President!

    [MORE]

    Extensive quotes from Lawrence Auster, Jews–The Archetypal Multiculturalists that support Prof. MacDonald’s thesis in Culture of Critique:

    In terms of national identity, Jews were instrumental in the reformulation of America as a universalist society based strictly on ideology rather than on peoplehood, a change that set the stage for mass Third-World immigration and the much more profound redefinition of America as a multicultural society. In terms of morality, many Jewish intellectuals, writers, and entertainers deliberately undermined the older Anglo-American Victorian ethos, a program of moral/cultural subversion that climaxed in the Sixties counterculture and the dominant nihilist culture of the 1980s and 1990s. In terms of politics, Jews were instrumental in replacing the old American order of Constitutional self-restraint with the statist politics of unrestrained compassion…

    Goodman’s apparent lack of fear that his remarks may provoke anti-Semitism… is a signal that the long march of ethnic minorities and the cultural left through America’s institutions has triumphed. Now that their enemies have been scattered and silenced, the left and the minorities can admit that their real agenda all along was not simply inclusion, equality, justice, or tolerance toward Jews and other minorities, but the destruction of the Christian culture…

    The Jewish role in open borders
    The majority culture is deprived of its spiritual being through cultural transformation, and of its physical being through demographic diversification. The latter was the ultimate aim of the American Jewish Committee’s 40-year-long campaign to repeal the 1924 National Quota Act and open America’s borders to the world. Significantly, Jewish immigration reformers of the 1950s and 1960s were no longer concerned with augmenting the number of Jews coming into the U.S., but with increasing all immigrants from non-traditional sources. Their purpose was not to help any particular group; their purpose was to eliminate any sort of preferences for immigrants whom the restrictionists thought would be more assimilable to America’s existing culture. To do this, it was necessary to create a sense of resentment among the America ethnic groups whose fellow ethnics in their home countries were being excluded under the National Quota…

    The key to immigration reform, [Handlin] argued, was to wake up the mass of contented white ethnics to the real injustice of the existing restrictive laws:

    The laws are bad because they rest on the racist assumption that mankind is divided into fixed breeds, biologically and culturally separated from each other, and because, within that framework, they assume that Americans are Anglo-Saxons by origin and ought to remain so. To all other peoples, the laws say that the United States ranks them in terms of their racial proximity to our own “superior” stock; and upon the many, many million of Americans not descended from the Anglo-Saxons, the laws cast a distinct imputation of inferiority…

    The 1965 Immigration Act, the culmination of a forty-year, largely Jewish-led campaign, was not simply a piece of “liberal” legislation (i.e., an act aimed at formal equality) which later turned out to have unforeseen, radical consequences. As early as 1952, the liberal idea of equality before the law was already linked in the minds of Jewish immigrationists with the radical project of dispossessing America’s white, Anglo-Saxon, Christian majority…

    For many Jews, white gentile society, in and of itself, is a threat. Earl Raab, of Brandeis University’s Institute for Jewish Advocacy and a columnist for the Jewish Bulletin, welcomes the prospect of whites becoming a minority in the U.S., because it means that “[w]e have tipped beyond the point where a Nazi-Aryan party will be able to prevail in this country.” [Earl Raab, Jewish Bulletin, February 19, 1993, 23, quoted by Peter Brimelow, Alien Nation, p. 120.]

    We should not ignore the implications of this appalling comment. In Raab’s mind, a white majority, by its very existence, poses a never-ending threat of Nazism. White gentiles, left to themselves, are all potential Nazis…

    All of the above should make it clear that the Jewish double standard as embodied by Dershowitz is no mere ethnocentric bias. It is a blind, unreasonable, unappeasable force…

    The Jewish laws regarding fair and humane behavior only apply to dealings with other Jews, not to dealings with gentiles, or “goyim.” A Jew, for example, is required to desecrate the Sabbath in order to save the life of a Jew. But a Jew is forbidden to desecrate the Sabbath to save the life of a gentile, unless there is a likelihood of the event become known by the gentles and thus endangering the Jews themselves. The key point is that the gentile’s life has no value in itself, but only in relation to the welfare of the Jews. [Tractate Yoma, p. 47.]

    This deeply tribalistic mode of thought runs through the Talmud. If a Jew finds an item belonging to a gentile, he may keep it. If a gentile accidentally gives a Jew extra change, the Jew is not required to tell him. If a Jew has been near a dead body, he is contaminated and must be ritually cleansed. But he is not contaminated if the dead person is a goy, because the Torah commandment in this instance refers to “adam,” man, and a goy is not “adam.” As shocking as it may be to realize this, the Orthodox Jews, like many ancient or primitive peoples, only regard members of their own tribe as “man.”

    Further, I would suggest that what makes this tribalism so enduring—and so effective in subverting other tribes—is that it sees itself as universal. Ancient Israel was never simply a tribe like others, but a tribe that had been chosen by the Creator of the Universe to bring his truth to mankind. In the same way, modern Jews employ “universalist” ideals to justify what is often a tribal agenda. What else can explain the fact that so many secular Jews, who see themselves as the champions of the “Other,” have no regard for the subjectivity of the Other if the Other is a white Christian? What else can explain the fact that Jews demand homogeneity and group survival for themselves, and deny the same to others?

    This pervasive double standard is the heart of the “Jewish problem,” and there is nothing anti-Semitic—i.e. there is nothing immoral—about pointing it out. Just as it is not racist to say that a significant part of the black community has wrong and harmful attitudes which blacks need to amend and which whites should no longer accept, it is not anti-Semitic to say that a significant part of the Jewish community has wrong and harmful attitudes that Jews need to amend and that others should no longer accept.

    Why Jews fear America
    These insights into the tribalism and the (often unconscious) double standard that lie at the core of the Jewish psyche, including their (unconscious) disregard for the subjectivity of the white gentile, help us understand other Jewish attitudes. In advancing their anti-majoritarian and countercultural agendas, Jews of various political stripes have been driven, not just by peculiarly Jewish ideals, but by peculiarly Jewish fears. Their main fear is that if America defines itself as a nation, and not just as a democratic or capitalist ideology, then the Jews will be excluded from that nation, or at least be forced into second-class status within it. While the fear is understandable given the Jews’ history of persecution and exclusion in the Old World, it is totally unjustified in America…

    The answer is that the Jews played a leading role in stripping the altars of American nationhood. Just as nonwhites have forced racial diversity on formerly all-white, mainstream institutions while maintaining their own, ethnically exclusive organizations, Jews have stripped the public schools of their Christian customs and American national traditions, while maintaining exclusive Jewish schools with Jewish traditions.

    Subversion through popular culture
    In addition to transforming American ideology and national identity, Jews have also, through their extraordinary influence in entertainment and media, changed the style and soul of American popular culture and manners. This is a vast and complicated subject, and all I can do here is try to suggest a few aspects of it…

    The above discussion, brief and unsatisfactory as it has been, illustrates once again our theme of inclusion leading to destruction. Eastern European Jews, with their discontented, irrepressible temperament, were admitted as equals into a culture that had been formed by Anglo-Saxons and other northern European-origin people, with their pacific, self-controlled temperament. The former outsiders then proceeded to make their own sensibility the center of the culture, while diminishing and demonizing the Anglo-Saxon.

    Hoist by their own petard
    As they work to dismantle America’s majority culture through mass immigration, diversity, the subversion of mainstream values, and the mainstreaming of countercultural values, those Jews who are waging the Kulturkampt have failed to realize that they are cutting off the civilization they are sitting on…

    Blinded by his anti-majority passion, Lerner cannot understand that in contemporary America, where Jews (for their numbers) are the most wealthy and powerful group, nonwhites are hardly likely to see the Jews as an “oppressed” minority like themselves. [“Six Days Shalt Thou Work,” Michael Lerner, Tikkun, Nov/Dec 1993, p. 35.]…

    Since Germans have been taught to see the West as hegemonic, warlike, and racist, isn’t it only natural that they would also view one of primary sources of the West—the Hebrew Bible—in exactly the same terms?

    While the absence of self-awareness among Jewish leftists is only laughable, the blindness of the mainstream Jewish community is a serious matter. In their tireless campaign for mass immigration and cultural diversity—motivated by conscious or unconscious hostility to the white Christian majority—Jews are helping destroy the very way of life that made a happy Jewish existence in this country possible. Despite some anti-Jewish prejudice and social exclusions in the early twentieth century, Jews found in America a stable environment where they were protected, where they prospered, and where they felt fully comfortable for the first time in two thousand years. That environment was a white society with a Christian religion and an Anglo-Saxon code of conduct. As America becomes nonwhite and non-Western, will that code, and those protections, endure?

    Alan Mittleman argues,
    The breakdown of a common culture and the drift toward multiculturalism, which Jews support, pose real hazards for American Jews, because they weaken the citizenship on which Jewish participation in modern society is based…. If people revert to more primordial forms of belonging, civil society will dissolve and American Jews might find themselves in what the prophet Ezekiel called a midbar hammim, a wilderness of the peoples. This would be a nightmarish denouement. [Alan L. Mittleman, “Jews in Multicultural America,” First Things, December 1996, p. 17.]

    One notable feature of this coming “wilderness of peoples,” in which Jews will lose all security, is the black racialism that is rising as the dominant white culture declines. In the lawless Third-World America of the coming century, do Jews think they will be able to count on Dominicans and Chinese and Arabs and Mexicans to protect them from black anti-Semites?

    Another prospect emerging from the wilderness of peoples will be an upsurge of anti-Semitism among marginalized whites, many of whom will blame the Jews (not without cause) for the ruin of white civilization. Having acted all along on the ludicrous and hostile assumption that the white American majority is a potential neo-Nazi force that must be dispossessed, Jews will hardly be in a position to complain about real anti-Semitism when it appears among whites who have actually been dispossessed…

    The classical philosophers taught the virtue of sophrosyne, or temperance, by which the respective parts of man’s being or of society restrain themselves to their proper tasks and function harmoniously within the whole. In terms of minority-majority relations, this was the situation that obtained in America in the pre-Sixties period, when minorities happily accepted the fact that they were minorities and deferred to the majority culture. … Thus a tiny minority began to act as though it were the majority, subject to no law outside itself. In this manner, a polity governed by sophrosyne was replaced by a polity governed by chutzpah…

    To seek to transform America into a Messianic project, to identify with the Other (whoever the Other may be) at the expense of the native majority, to deny to the native majority its ethnic identity while indulging in one’s own ethnic identity—this is not just a bad agenda, it is a Jewish agenda, and it is entirely moral for citizens of a free country to criticize it as such. Just as it is not racist to oppose a Hispanic or black or Asian agenda that weakens America, so it is not anti-Semitic to oppose a Jewish agenda that weakens America.

    The moral and civilized solution to the Jewish problem is the same as it is for all minority and immigrant groups. Minorities must realize that they are minorities. Immigrants must realize they are not running things. There used to be a majoritarian force of resistance against immigrants, telling them they had to defer to the rules of the majority culture if they wanted to be accepted as full members in it. But with the advent of mass nonwhite immigration and other cultural upheavals, that opposing force has been taken away…

    If America is to be restored as a nation, we must put to an end the pious fraud we have practiced since the 1960s, of simultaneously granting ethnic minorities the right to assert their distinct identity, and the right to speak for America as a whole, in which capacity they have stripped America of its identity.

  59. anon[153] • Disclaimer says:

    when we are going to start building our own history and narrative of our people?

    its time already

  60. @mark green

    Mark Green wrote:

    My guess is that M. Hoffman has gotten a bit weary of this battle. (Not that I completely blame him.)

    Battle fatigue goes with the territory but it doesn’t afflict this writer. By way of evidence I submit the latest (September) issue of our RevisionistHistory® newsletter. The cover story is titled, “The Talmudic Attack on America’s Founders: The Zionist Media’s ‘1619 Project.” https://truthfulhistory.blogspot.com

    Mr. Langdon’s Jew-bashing, black-hating jargon

    Gallantry is not a Black concept

    and ideology, appeals only to a sub-cult. If it were the truth, then fine, who cares how small the support or the audience. In fact, it’s a Talmudic mindset and it fails to convince, or even establish the credentials of the author, except as preachment to the choir. It reflects Orthodox rabbinic mentality; it’s a mirror image of the hatred and bigotry of the Talmudists. Our people are weary of hate and the revival of ancient blood feuds and misunderstandings.

    For myself I am indeed fatigued—by the colossal misdirection I witness. The widespread ignorance of the schemes of a Cryptocracy which consists of the “Aryan” blue bloods and banker dynasties who get away with far more than murder while they misdirect you away from their iniquity and focus it almost exclusively on the “Jews.” They slyly exploit bigots’ psychological disposition to hate Judaic people.

    The textbook example of this misdirection is the study of the origins of usury in the early modern period. Ask any “anti-Zionist” right-winger and, parroting Ezra Pound and Hilaire Belloc, they’ll squawk : “Usury started with ‘The Jews’ and the ‘Judaizing Protestants.”

    No, it did not, as I demonstrate in Usury in Christendom and The Occult Renaissance Church of Rome. While the Rothschilds were peddling rags in the shetl and the Banks of London and Amsterdam were merely gleams in the eyes of the grandfathers’ of their future founders— under the auspices of the Church of Rome and Renaissance pontiffs, merciless, fabulously wealthy German and Italian papal money-lenders,with names like Fugger and Medici, were laying the foundation of the usury-banking empire we still have with us today. The Judaic money businesses extant in that period were minuscule operations in comparison.

    The vast history of the origins of usury banking in Renaissance Europe has been obscured and shipped down the memory hole by the “Aryan” Cryptocracy, not “The Jews.” All the Right wing knows is “Jew bankers” and “Protestant misers.” Don’t bother them with the facts. Can a victorious movement ever be predicated on a foundation of lies?

    In order to acquire new knowledge about historical realities, one has to read deeply and outside one’s zone of comfort, while struggling against one’s confirmation bias. For haters that struggle is of no interest. They’re too lazy and too accustomed to their dogma of hate to engage in it. These are “superior” people? These are the gallant Lancelots and Galileos? I think not.

    I am as energized as ever I have been, attempting to lead our people out of the neo-Nazi cul-de-sac into which they are being led by another generation of mesmerists.

    Michael Hoffman is the author of ten books of history and literature; the most recent being Adolf Hitler: Enemy of the German People.
    https://truthfulhistory.blogspot.com/2016/02/special-offers.html

    • Replies: @geokat62
  61. geokat62 says:
    @Michael Hoffman

    The textbook example of this misdirection is the study of the origins of usury in the early modern period.

    Speaking of misdirection, you keep harkening back to the peripheral issue of the origins of usury, but avoid mentioning the 800lb gorilla in the room, the JQ.

    Allow me to once again illustrate how a real truth teller tackles that issue head on:

    “What else can explain the fact that Jews demand homogeneity and group survival for themselves, and deny the same to others? This pervasive double standard is the heart of the “Jewish problem,” and there is nothing anti-Semitic—i.e. there is nothing immoral—about pointing it out.” – Lawrence Auster

    • Agree: mark green
  62. …you keep harkening back to the peripheral issue of the origins of usury…

    The study of the inception of the Money Power’s tyranny over the West is a “peripheral issue?”

    This tyranny is the source of all of our woes.

    • Replies: @geokat62
  63. @J

    Nonsense. Hebrew is no more difficult to learn than Arabic or Japanese or Greek.

    You skillfully attack your own argument. Arabic and Japanese are also barriers to outside intelligence services. Greek isn’t as difficult as the others. If Israel used English or German, it would be easier for the outside world to spy on it.

    In fact, it is much easier to read than Chinese or Japanese.

    Feminist-level logic. Coz there are more difficult languages, Hebrew isn’t difficult for outsiders.

    Foreign intelligence services – unlike the author of the quote above – are intelligent enough to learn the lingo and spy on us.

    “Learning the lingo” is a cost that Israel doesn’t have to pay to the same extent or sometimes at all.

    Even google-translate, a lowly machine, finds it easy to write grammatically correct Hebrew.

    Feminist-level logic again. When Hebrew was adopted by Israel, machine-translation didn’t exist. And machine-translation has still not removed the Israeli advantage.

    In short: thanks to Hebrew, Israel finds it easier to spy on goyim and discourage incomers than vice versa.

    But don’t worry: no-one expects you to betray your ethnic heritage and millennia of tradition by being honest and admitting the truth.

  64. geokat62 says:
    @Michael Hoffman

    This tyranny is the source of all of our woes.

    I beg to differ. The source of Western societies’ woes is precisely what this Truth-Torah rabbi openly admitted on his YouTube channel, not long ago:

    Organized Jewry have placed Western societies “on the chopping block” through their pursuit of the twin policies of mass immigration and mass miscegenation.

    • Replies: @Michael Hoffman
  65. Hi Geo. You and the rabbi are quite correct. MacDonald, Joyce, and others have amassed overwhelming evidence of key Jewish involvement in the ‘immigration reform’ movement that continues to target historically white countries.

    ‘Immigration reform’ is a euphemism for the unwelcome process of injecting large numbers of non-white populations into countries founded and settled by European-descended peoples. Its universal unpopularity (among the white majority) demonstrates its anti-democratic nature.

    The impact of this unsought race-mixing is telling. It has undermined white political cohesion, white influence, and white continuity. These destabilizing ‘reforms’ stretch from N. America to Europe to Australia. The cultural, and eventually, racial, transformations that their Jewish-lead efforts have set in motion are profound. And irreversible.

    Curiously, it is an undeniable fact that the vast majority of Diaspora Jews take pride in the pivotal role played by ‘liberal’ Jews in advancing America’s much-ballyhooed ‘civil rights’ movement–even though the end results are, to say the least, mixed.

    In America, ‘affirmative action’ (anti-white discrimination) remains the law of the land. Subsequently, the white underclass has grown, along with white homelessness. Yet ‘racism’ persists (among all self-identified racial groups). On the other hand, Jewish influence has risen steadily in America, along with, I suspect, Jewish wealth and Jewish pride. Black-white relations however remain strained.

    Meanwhile, the number of black men in American prisons has reached an all-time high. Black academic achievement remains stubbornly low. Yet Hollywood continues to glamorize black/white miscegenation.

    At the same time, world Jewry remains united it maintaining ironclad borders for Israel as well as furthering Jewish security and Jewish continuity by virtually any means necessary. The sad plight of Arabs in and around Israel demonstrates the fanatical level of Jewish devotion towards achieving Jewish-Arab separation (‘hafrada’ in Hebrew).

    Not only are interfaith marriages (involving Jews and gentiles) prohibited in Israel, but on Israeli TV programs you will find no entertainment programs–not one–which glamorize Arab-Jewish romance or miscegenation. Contrast this with the reckless interracial propaganda that ((Hollywood)) is imposing on white children throughout the world.

    Meanwhile, back in the glorious ‘democratic’ Jewish state, not only are Israel’s native Arab communities still being systematically marginalized, but even Israel’s black Jewish population is being eviscerated.

    https://forward.com/opinion/408769/black-jews-are-being-chased-out-of-the-jewish-community-by-racism-here-are/

    In summary: Jewish cultural subversion in the West continues. Jewish hypocrisy is soaring to new highs.

    • Replies: @geokat62
  66. geokat62 says:
    @mark green

    Like I said, mark, when it comes to your comments… the longer… the better!

  67. @geokat62

    Organized Jewry have placed Western societies “on the chopping block” through their pursuit of the twin policies of mass immigration and mass miscegenation.

    1. How is it that Western societies became so vulnerable and decrepit as to succumb to so-called “organized Jewry” which, according to you has sufficient mighty power and potency to allegedly impose this all-encompassing calamity on its feminized Western bitch?

    2. It is hardly the case that what you are pleased to call “Jewry” (signifying Judaic people collectively which is a grotesque injustice), are mainly responsible for our demise, while the “Aryan” contingent of the Cryptocracy plays only a bit part in this tragedy. It’s quite the reverse. Our tribal brothers at the top of the pyramid have worked assiduously for our decline and fall.

    But we’re going in circles here. You continue to repeat the 1930s “Jewry” tropes that are self-defeating dead ends. The blaming-the-Jews stuff is a pathetic surrender of our responsibility for the self-extinction we have willed for ourselves. We can’t face our failures so we scapegoat Judaics. At the subconscious level this instills a despairing thanatos mentality within us. It implants a suicidal despair in our psyche. The alt.Right and cognate movements are death cults possessed of no spark of life and little chance of success. They deign to act parts in someone else’s script, then they blame the script-writers for their disastrous choice.

    By granting Judaics the power to “place us on the chopping block” you nullify the potency we possess. By narrating the chronicle of our decline and fall from what is actually the latter part of its history, you omit any possibility of understanding the origin: the central role of the Money Power in making possible the “chopping block” against which you inveigh.

    Without that understanding we are doomed to play-act in a psychodrama whose exceedingly dark last act is being written by Michel Houellebecq.

    Michael Hoffman is the author of ten books, including Judaism Discovered (2008), and Adolf Hitler: Enemy of the German People (2019)

    • Replies: @geokat62
    , @JP
    , @Flint Clint
  68. geokat62 says:
    @Michael Hoffman

    1. How is it that Western societies became so vulnerable and decrepit as to succumb to so-called “organized Jewry” which, according to you has sufficient mighty power and potency to allegedly impose this all-encompassing calamity on its feminized Western bitch?

    Have you not read Prof. Kevin MacDonald’s magnum opus, Culture of Critique? Although he does a superlative job identifying the political movements and ideologies that enabled the subversion of Western societies, especially the US, I can furnish you a quick synopsis.

    Along with the damage done by pseudo anthropologist Franz Boas who perpetrated the Big Lie that there is no such thing as Race (it was merely a social construct), the leading members of the Frankfurt School stumbled across a very potent poison first developed by Georgy Lukacs and Antonio Gramsci, that the true battlefield for hegemony is the cultural one and not the economic, otherwise known as Cultural Marxism. And as the saying goes, the rest is history!

    2. It is hardly the case that what you are pleased to call “Jewry” (signifying Judaic people collectively which is a grotesque injustice),

    Grotesque injustice? Moi? Why did you decide to omit the adjective “Organized” that I intentionally inserted before the word “Jewry”? I’ll leave it there.

    [Organized Jewry] are mainly responsible for our demise, while the “Aryan” contingent of the Cryptocracy plays only a bit part in this tragedy. It’s quite the reverse. Our tribal brothers at the top of the pyramid have worked assiduously for our decline and fall.

    If our tribal brothers, as you put it, were truly ruling the roost, why would they implement policies that would result in the demise of their tribal brothers and their tribal homelands? Makes no sense, especially when we consider that Organized Jewry have been diligently working to ensure the integrity of their tribal brothers and tribal homeland.

    The blaming-the-Jews stuff is a pathetic surrender of our responsibility for the self-extinction we have willed for ourselves.

    The ordinary people of the West have willed their self-extinction? I don’t think so. This policy was a top-down one, not a bottom-up. One that was engineered by Organized Jewry and their Traitorous Shabbos Goys.

    At the subconscious level this instills a despairing thanatos mentality within us.

    No, at the conscious level this installs an invigorating Eros mentality within us to fight for our and our progeny’s survival.

    Without that understanding we are doomed to play-act in a psychodrama whose exceedingly dark last act is being written by Michel Houellebecq.

    Not sure who Michel Houellebecq is, but without an understanding among our “tribal brothers” that worshipping at the feet of the False God of “multi-culti” is an unmitigated disaster, we are doomed.

    Michael Hoffman is the author of ten books, including Judaism Discovered (2008), and Adolf Hitler: Enemy of the German People (2019)

    geokat62 is the author of no books, but he has a strong desire to write one before he expires

  69. If our tribal brothers, as you put it, were truly ruling the roost, why would they implement policies that would result in the demise of their tribal brothers and their tribal homelands? Makes no sense

    Why did Cain kill Abel?
    _________________

    Treason doth ever prosper.

    There’s much more to it, but it entails an exposition of the Neoplatonic-Hermetic conspiracy arising in Florence in the 15th century. Tracking it from there to the end of the early modern period and the dawn of the masonic imperium took me 700 pages to even begin to explicate (cf. The Occult Renaissance Church of Rome).
    __________________

    I am well familiar with Kevin MacDonald’s scholarship.

    Thank you for this exchange. I appreciate the civil tenor of your response and rejoinder.

    • Replies: @geokat62
  70. geokat62 says:
    @Michael Hoffman

    Why did Cain kill Abel?

    Well, I don’t consider myself to be an expert on the OT so I had to supplement my limited knowledge with a little in-depth research. This is the response my google search returned:

    Answer: When Cain realized that God was not pleased with his sacrifice but accepted Abel’s, his heart became more wicked. He was angry and jealous of his brother and killed him out of envy.

    https://answersingenesis.org/kids/bible-questions/why-cain-kill-abel/

    Thank you for this exchange. I appreciate the civil tenor of your response and rejoinder.

    Likewise, Michael. The pleasure was all mine.

  71. JP says:
    @Michael Hoffman

    The blaming-the-Jews stuff is a pathetic surrender of our responsibility for the self-extinction we have willed for ourselves. We can’t face our failures so we scapegoat Judaics.

    I certainly never willed myself into extinction. Immigration has never been popular, certainly not when it was foisted onto the American public in 1965. They passed that law under the explicit promise not to change the demographic makeup of the country, then proceeded to do exactly that. That’s not suicide, that’s murder.

    If you want to get to the root of white failing, it’s not money per se, it’s civilization domesticating us, of which money is only a subset. In 1912 the still slightly free men of Georgia hung the pedophile Leo Frank after the corrupt governor pardoned him. But they were negligent in their duties; they should’ve lynched the corrupt governor and every lying newspaperman they could get their hands on, then systematically taken out the network that supported him. Money didn’t stop them, social convention did.

    Money is a social construct, maintained only by herd dynamics. Yet these herd dynamics are powerful enough to cause people to kill for it, sell their bodies for it, sell their souls for it. If one person rejects it, they change nothing and hurt themselves. If everyone rejects it, they set themselves free. But who’s willing to throw themselves on the fire, especially when no one else seems ready to follow? This in a nutshell is the source of all our woes.

  72. geokat62 says:

    For an encore presentation, I’d like to share this article posted by Christians for Truth, Why Is The Jewish Mayor Of Portland, Maine Flooding The City With More African Migrants?

    Here is an excerpt of the concluding paragraphs:

    And what’s his answer for this housing crisis he’s created by welcoming these homeless migrants?  He has the taxpayers float a bond to pay for low-income, government-subsidized public housing for them, in typical Bolshevik fashion.  He’s willing to bankrupt the city, create a crime-ridden ghetto, and raise taxes in order to bring about his “Final Solution” to the problem that Maine is the “Whitest state” in America.

    As Bari Weiss, the jewish writer for the New York Times has assured us, it is not a ‘conspiracy theory’ that Jews are behind the flooding of America (and Europe) with Third World migrants, and Mayor Strimling is the living embodiment of that  jewish “canard”.

    https://christiansfortruth.com/why-is-the-jewish-mayor-of-portland-maine-flooding-the-city-with-more-african-migrants/

    As a special bonus, they appended this video… which most objective observers would consider eye-popping.

    Enjoy!

    JEWS ARE BEHIND MASS IMMIGRATION:

    https://www.bitchute.com/video/NaqOe6EQ7CJJ/

  73. @Michael Hoffman

    Why not both?

    And you are quite wrong about the ‘alt-right’ that phrase has been poisoned successfully. However you are going to see it’s expression in every polity,

    You want to know how it happened? Lets have a look at how it was happening well over one hundred years ago.

    The First Anti-Jewish Conference in Dresden in 1882:
    http://web.archive.org/web/20121207081515/http://spingola.com/Manifesto1882.pdf

    I won’t go through it in detail.

    But it is absolutely unreal that every single protestation that was made in 1882 not only applies to today, but in a much more egregious form.

    “They dominate Financial Markets” and give credit to their own and deny it to others. How true. I just found out that Jews in Australia are given interest free loans by their fellow Jews. So check. Now add the media and every other institution as an outgrowth. Check.

    National debt burdens turn entire nations into Jewish collection agencies – check.

    [MORE]

    The Rothschilds are still prominent and promote war – check

    “…the Jews have become absolute masters, fabricators of public opinion. Any complaint raised against them, however justified it may be, is suppressed. Any article that addresses the subject of Jewish dominance to the slightest extent is done away with”.

    Yip, that’ll do it won’t it.

    “The professional advancement of men active in public life and the recognition and rewarding of their achievements is dependent upon the favorable position of the Jewish press. Consequently, anyone wishing to reach his goals through some kind of public career is forced to curry the favor of the Jewish press and thus that of the Jewish clan.”

    Yip – to make it in government or entertainment to get to the highest levels you literally apparently have to suck Jewish penis, and do much, much worse as well, on video even! They didn’t have videos in the 1880’s. Jeffrey Epstein was running a rape Shikses blackmail operation.

    “In many countries, the Jews have adulterated the system of [freemason] lodges, stripped it of its essence, and degraded it into one of the most dangerous and effective instruments of Jewish power.”

    Yes – absolutely. Freemasonry now is just an outgrowth of Judaism and it’s tenets, preferences and philosophies.

    “Mainly by means of the press, Jewry increasingly undermines the Christian religion, which, after all, has become a racially specific religion of the Aryan European peoples” – yes absolutely. The pedophile crisis in the Catholic Church was fomented by Jewish media – who ignore of course their own pederasty and facts like Israel being a sex-trafficking capital of the world, with the highest proportion of degenerate LGBTQ’s, and of course the fact almost all the culprits within the Church were freemasonic plants and communist infiltrators – per Bella Dodd in School of Darkness.

    “Because the Jewish people has essentially retained its age-old nomadic nature, it is unfamiliar with the idea of the fatherland. As a cosmopolitan, the Jew adheres to the principle: ubi bene, ibi patria (“where it’s best, there is the fatherland”).”

    Absolutely. Now this is expressed in terms of double loyalty with Israel. Israel is just used to assist the Cosmopolitanism. So Israel is substituted for ‘Jews’ at the Jews pleasure.

    The Christian’s observed that Jews were responsible also for the first wave of immigration to America as follows:

    “the farmer today is under an unconditional obligation to the Jewish usurer and innkeeper, who is in a position, by virtue of the acquired right to auctioning, to drive the farmer out of his house and home at any time and thus make him and his family homeless.

    This is one of the major causes of the massive – and increasingly mounting – emigration to America, as a result of which the soil is being deprived, through Jewish usury and Jewish slavery, of its industrious and diligent native inhabitants. Unproductive, haggling Jews now take their place’ – yes, that’s certainly true in the case of the Irish struggling under the Anglo-Jewish English.

    Then we get this:

    “Because the Talmud allows the Jews to commit any kind of injustice or crime against non-Jews, the Jews threaten to overthrow the legal order and thus the social order. Criminal statistics prove that Jews constitute a remarkably higher percentage of convicted criminals than nonJews, and it is even higher among accused criminals. As a result of the close solidarity among Jews, however, a large number of the Jewish accused manage to evade punishment – partly with the help of false, mostly Jewish witnesses, but partly through bribing the judicial powers.”

    How prevalent and prescient this is and was. What Jew involved in the frauds of the 2008 financial crisis has suffered any kind of penalty? What was involved in the formation of the anti-defamation league? This is absolutely true. Weinstein was just a symbolic sacrifice, and he probably is on a beach somewhere.

    “a non-Jew is often not able to enforce his most incontestable rights vis-à-vis a Jew before a court of law; on the contrary, he runs the risk that the bribed officials, in cahoots with the Jews, will make him the target of life-long harassment and persecution” – Absolutely.

    Jews were the original de-platformers. Unz himself, has to bear this Calumny

    “Sticking together as closely as it does, the international Jewish pack has an internationally directed executive organ in the form of the “Alliance israélite universelle,” which was founded in Paris in 1860 and operates branches across the entire planet. Supposedly a mere charitable association, it has now assumed the character of a political association that virtually maintains diplomatic contacts with individual national governments. It even had its own delegates represent it at the 1878 Berlin Congress.”

    Jews today still operate in international conspiracy – and decry random kids posting memes on the internet from different countries as some kind of competitor to their international fraternity – a ludicrous inversion. Now the proliferation of Jewish NGO’s is even larger.

    “This universal political Jewish association enables Jewry to focus all its international weight and power against any attack – or, really, any self-defense action – launched by non-Jews in any corner of the world; it enables Jewry to punish any rebelliousness emerging against Jewish power as an example to others so that it may further tighten the shackles with which it has enslaved the European Christian peoples, mainly in Central and Eastern Europe.”

    “Hopefully our appeal will not remain a cry in the wilderness, but will awaken Europe’s Christian society to the danger facing it, so that it will proceed at once to take the legal means of justified self-defense. If this happens, then, within a short time, the nineteenth century will be able to rid itself of the disgrace that an anti-cultural race of 7-8 million souls, namely the Semitic race of Jews, is tyrannizing the Aryan (or, through Christianity, Aryanized) race of 350 million souls on intellectual, moral, and financial levels – the very race that, by virtue of its intellectual and physical superiority, has been given the mission of spreading its seed, including its perfected civilization, to all parts of the world by means of victorious arms and works of peace”

    Indeed.

    These aren’t 1930’s tropes. These are 19th century tropes – because they are observedly true.

    If it is true that there are many useful idiots and non-Jews who are now in alliance with Jewish aims, such as the Kalergi plan etc that makes it even more incumbent on the Jews to fight the Cabal.

    When you read anything about the Jews in any time in history – it’s always the same.

    Yes, there are gentiles like the House of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha and many others who married into Jewish lines – but we live in a Jewish world – just ask any Jew.

    So take responsibility.

    Your entreaties sound errily familiar to the ‘my fellow white people’ trope.

    The alt right are not a death cult – they are a very viable resistance. You protest too much, methinks.

    The alt right is just Christian Nationalism, seeking survival.

    • Replies: @mark green
  74. @Flint Clint

    Thank you for your comments and the link to the historic, 1882 Dresden manifesto. Very interesting.

    • Replies: @geokat62
  75. geokat62 says:
    @mark green

    … and the link to the historic, 1882 Dresden manifesto. Very interesting.

    Your comment piqued my curiosity, mark, so I downloaded the manifesto.

    This is my favourite quote:

    The victorious ideals of the French Revolution – liberty, equality, and fraternity – have torn down the barriers against the Jewish race that had been erected for the protection of the Christian peoples.

    The principle of liberty was also applied to a race whose first and foremost thoughts and energies are everywhere aimed at putting other nations in the moral and material shackles of slaves by all kinds of cunning behavior. According to the Jews’ religious and national traditions, all of these peoples were created merely to serve them.

    The principle of equality was also applied to a race that does not wish to be equal with us, that considers itself a people privileged by God and [regards] the rest of mankind as lower beings, impure animals.

    The principle of fraternity was also applied to a race that does not even acknowledge non-Jews as neighbors and fellow human beings and according to whose Talmud non-Jews are enemies destined for eradication. Moreover, cheating, stealing from them, bleeding them dry, bringing ruin upon them, perjuring against them, dishonoring, and even killing them constitutes an activity pleasing to their God.

    Small wonder, therefore, if modern liberalism, identifying more and more with the ascendant Jews, has taken the shape of pseudo-liberalism. In the Jews’ hands, it has turned into a convenient tool for realizing their plans for world domination and putting irons on the European peoples.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Tobias Langdon Comments via RSS