The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 NOI Research Group Archive
Blackface History Is Jewish History
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

The recent spate of blackface outings seems to have started with the Megyn Kelly debacle a few months ago. She didn’t actually wear blackface—she just wasn’t sufficiently disgusted by it, and though she apologized for the gaff the harsh reaction quickly unemployed her. Now, Virginia’s Governor Ralph Northam and Attorney General Mark Herring have been caught up in blackface scandals—many years ago Herring blacked up to mock rapper Kurtis Blow, and Northam tarred up for his yearbook page, teaming with a classmate who donned the hood-&-robe regalia of American terrorism—a photo that school authorities apparently thought appropriate.

Whether or not one accepts the rounds of sorrowful apologies , it is essential to note that the Christian offenders—Kelly, Northam and Herring —are apologizing for a Jewish crime.

Blackface, as a form of American “entertainment,” started out in the early 1800s, most notably through a highly popular minstrel show performer by the name of Thomas “Daddy” Rice, a white entertainer who blackened his face with burnt cork to ridicule Blacks and their culture. White minstrel shows lampooned Black people, presenting them as dim-witted, lazy, buffoonish, superstitious, criminal, but nonetheless prodigiously musical. Rice’s popular blackface character was named Jim Crow—a name that came to describe the racially repressive era after the Civil War in which white society was determined to violently force Blacks back into plantation slavery. Blackface died a well-earned death, but was revived when Jews became perversely connected with this racist “art form” as performers and as fans, filling auditoriums to watch blackface stage shows in Jewish neighborhoods all over America.

Jewish History of Blackface Hate

Dr. Irving Howe
Dr. Irving Howe

From the time of the earliest American colonies Jews had always been a formidable presence in the slave-based economy, where they became important slave traders and international marketers of slavery’s products, especially sugar, cotton, and tobacco. But after the Civil War Jewish immigration to America increased dramatically. Their history in Europe with Gentiles over many centuries was one of conflict and violence, and so in America they saw distinct advantages in helping to create a society that made but one distinction based entirely on skin color. Brandeis’s Irving Howe, author of the most popular book on American Jewish history, World of Our Fathers, is one of many Jewish scholars that admitted that Blacks were scapegoats for Jews:

“For decades American blacks had served…as a kind of buffer for American Jews. So long as native hatreds were taken out primarily on blacks, they were less likely to be taken out on Jews.”

So, for Jews, anti-Black racism was a benefit and a valuable asset to their own goals of gaining power and influence. Jews saw blackface minstrelsy as a vehicle to claim their whiteness and to ensure that racism—and not religious ethnicism—would become the American way. It was this conscious Jewish need to use Blacks as scapegoats that drove their involvement in that atrocious “art form” known as blackface minstrelsy. Jewish film scholar Lester D. Friedman is even more direct in his book Hollywood’s Image of the Jew:

“In actuality, many Jewish performers gained early and continued success using [blackface]….Indeed, it is too easy to ignore the derogatory aspects of such activities, the unconscious racism accepted and nourished by such cruel parodies, by citing historical contexts. The undisguised elements of ridicule in such blackface portrayals by Jews mimicking the outlandish stereotypes of blacks now looks suspiciously like one group’s desperate need to assert its own superiority by mimicking another.”

University of California religious studies professor Dr. Michael Alexander received a National Jewish Book Award for his book in which he asserts that minstrelsy—the public ridicule and mockery of the Black race—became identified with Jewish entertainers: “Jews performed this kind of minstrelsy in the 1910s and 1920s better and more often than any other group in America. Jewish faces covered in cork were ubiquitous.”

In fact, blackface and a singing style pioneered by Jews known as “coon shouting” were mainstays of Jewish entertainment, with their most popular performers, like Eddie Cantor, Sophie Tucker, Al Jolson, Irving Berlin, George Burns, and Florenz Ziegfeld, using Black-race mockery as a dominant theme. Jewish historian Dr. Jeffrey Melnick says that Jews played “a major role in the manufacture of the racial stereotypes on which American popular culture depended.”

Al Jolson Sings “Mammy” in blackface

But blackface Jews had an even more devious design. According to Melnick,

“Both Cantor and Jolson cultivated what Cantor called ‘the cultured, pansy-like negro’; Cantor also made an early blackface appearance in drag. The production of effeminacy—which is, in this context, another way of saying homosexuality—as a major modality for these Jewish men in blackface was also tied up with their display as children…”

Dr. Jeffrey Melnick
Dr. Jeffrey Melnick

What blackface represents, then, is not simply Jewish ridicule of Blacks, but a purposefully malicious destruction and redefinition of the Black character fronting as entertainment. And it is a formula that has permeated the film output of Jewish Hollywood for generations. This treachery was not limited to the Jewish actors on stage and screen. B’nai B’rith is seen as the most prestigious of Jewish organizations, and it is the parent of the notorious den of spies and racists, the Anti-Defamation League. In the 1920s their monthly magazine printed meticulously crafted examples of what they considered “jokes.” Here is a B’nai B’rith “joke” the Jewish editors titled DARKTOWN:

Rastus: Whuffo’ yo’ ‘jeculate yoself to me in dat onery manner?

Cicero: Whoffo’? Nigguh, who do yo’ calkerate yo’ is?

Rastus: Yo’ nigguh! mah family am quality folks an’ ahm a pusson of rank.

Cicero: Huh! ah’ll have yo’ triflin’, Rastus, to know that ah’m ranker than you is.

And this B’nai B’rith Magazine “joke” is titled “Good Enough”:

Mose: Dat’s a purty shirt you has on, Rastus, How many yards does it take for one ob dem shirts?

Rastus: What you all talking about, Nigger? I done got three like them in one yard last night.

In the age of Black leaders and thinkers of such intelligence and prestige as W.E.B. Du Bois, Marcus Garvey, Booker T. Washington, Nannie Burroughs, William Monroe Trotter, Ida B. Wells-Barnett, and Nobel Drew Ali, among many, many others, the Jewish leadership preferred to invent “nigguhs” they named “Rastus,” “Cicero,” and “Mose.”

B’nai B’rith’s blackface depictions occurred in the 1920s, more than a decade after that same organization set up the Anti-Defamation League to counter what it saw as the prevalent public ridicule of Jews! According to the ADL’s 1913 charter:

“For a number of years a tendency has manifested itself in American life toward the caricaturing and defaming of Jews on the stage, in moving pictures. The effect of this on the unthinking public has been to create an untrue and injurious impression of an entire people and to expose the Jew to undeserved contempt, and ridicule. The caricatures center around some idiosyncrasy of the few which, by the thoughtless public, is often taken as a pivotal characteristic of the entire people…”

So the highest levels of the American Jewish leadership were keenly aware of the negative power of these blackface images, and even forced their own Hollywood brethren to cleanse the Jewish image, while these same Jews ran the image and reputation of Blacks into the gutter. Jews smeared black shoe polish on their faces and assaulted the consciousness of the entire world with anti-Black racism in its purest and most concentrated form.

It gets worse.

At the same moment the ADL began, a number of Jewish businessmen from the Boston area were plotting to finance the most degrading and hateful blackface movie ever made—The Birth of a Nation. The silent movie epic released in 1915 was the first movie blockbuster, smashing all box office records. It rewrote the history of the Civil War to make the Ku Klux Klan terrorists the heroes and saviors of a grateful white nation. It depicted all Blacks as notorious criminals, uncontrollable rapists of white women, and intellectual, social, and spiritual inferiors who had no useful or rightful function in America except as slaves. So racially hateful were its blackface portrayals of the Black man that the Ku Klux Klan used this Jewish production as its recruitment film! How many of the thousands of American lynchings this Jewish-financed film was responsible for may never be known. For the many white immigrants pouring in to America by the millions at the time, it was the first “black” image they would see and it depicted an American racial system they could believe in.

The NAACP condemned The Birth of a Nation in the harshest words, whilst Jewish reviewers trumpeted the virtues of the film, Jewish-owned movie theaters premiered it, and Jewish distributors spread the debased Black stereotypes to theaters around the world. Louis B. Mayer made so much money distributing this blackface hatefest that he started Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer (MGM), the “greatest” of the Jewish movie studios, where he continued to make movies that trafficked in the ugliest stereotypes of Native Americans, Asians, Blacks, Latinos, and Arabs.

Jewish music publisher Isidore Witmark created and distributed disgraceful “coon” images of Blacks for world consumption. Witmark, along with his Hollywood brethren, were leaders in institutionalizing anti-Black racism.

The Jewish-dominated media takes a hard line with whites who have been blackface-outed, but they are careful to conceal the Jewish role in the history of this truly American hate phenomenon. Kelly, Herring, and Northam were certainly racially naïve, but the treacherous blackface Jews had something far more diabolical in mind.


(Republished from NOI Research Group by permission of author or representative)
 
Hide 212 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Corvinus says:

    “Whether or not one accepts the rounds of sorrowful apologies , it is essential to note that the Christian offenders—Kelly, Northam and Herring —are apologizing for a Jewish crime.”

    No, it is a “crime” committed by several ethnic groups, including Christians.

    “Rice’s popular blackface character was named Jim Crow—a name that came to describe the racially repressive era after the Civil War in which white society was determined to violently force Blacks back into plantation slavery.”

    Was Rice Jewish? The article carefully avoids labeling him. Rather, they lead the audience to assume he was Jewish. We know that Thomas Dartmouth “Daddy” Rice (1808-1860) was an aspiring white actor from New York.

    Furthermore, terms such as “racially repressive era” and “violently force blacks back into plantation slavery” are associated with SJW language. Perhaps the authors ought to reconsider employing such leftist tripe.

    “So, for Jews, anti-Black racism was a benefit and a valuable asset to their own goals of gaining power and influence.”

    No, it was those whites who believed that anti-black racism was a benefit to moving humanity forward rather than designate one group (blacks) as being inherently inferior.

    “asserts that minstrelsy—the public ridicule and mockery of the Black race—became identified with Jewish entertainers”

    It was identified with entertainers, some of whom were Jewish. Here is the historical context–Jews played an important role in the development of Vaudeville and film, so naturally they would be involved in minstrelsy.

  2. buckwheat says:

    Both blacks and jews are hated the world over. Coincidence or racism and anti semitism? More than likely they both earned their reputations by the content of their character. Firing someone for wearing blackface is the insanity of the PC crowd and the liberal fools that abound today.

  3. joef says:

    Not too much revelation here. Ethnic groups frequently seek their own self interest at the expense of others. America, Christianity, Military service, is suppose to create a melting pot that transcends this with unity of a common purpose. However this is frequently unsuccessful in our current narcissistic based society; that is mostly outer directed, easily manipulated by clever self motivated leaders.

    My issue is despite sins of a collective group, a person must be evaluated as an individual first and foremost. This collective guilt crap is an instrument of the Communist, and is used too much by people who just want to scapegoat for the convenience of their own lazy thinking. As much as I criticize the malevolence, and destruction, of contemporary afro americans, I still rather be neighbors with a upright Black man, than a duplicitous White man. Ethnic preferences has its practical limits.

    Not every individual in the group is responsible for their collective group behavior, in part, or as a whole. Yet we lazily scapegoat all Jews, all Hispanics, all cops, all Catholics, all Asians, all Moslems (if every one of the billion were Jihadist, then we will really be in trouble) etc etc etc.

    Yet their is one group we never would even dare to criticize their collective individual actions, no matter how heinous their individual acts, no matter how hostile to the culture that provides them unearned material support, no matter how dangerous to our collective survival. Instead we are inculcated with worship of whatever they do, unceasingly providing unworthy praise. No matter how many examples of their failures, and destructions, that is thoroughly exhibited in areas they control, like Camden, Detroit, Bmore, we provide illogical excuse making for their highly negative outcomes.

    And that is because we lack the resolve to address the issue that will eventually make everything look like Detroit. And because we have this lack of resolve we safely scapegoat everyone else instead. We refuse to have the courage to even recognize the most detrimental problem in America today, how can we ever hope to even have the resolve to correct it then. So we distract ourselves by scapegoating other groups instead.

    And as we fail to impose normal standards of civilized behavior, and dismantle group identity politics, eventually we won’t just look like Greece (without the bailout), and Venezuela; but eventually the Balkans (because while you conveniently scapegoat others, the afro is aggressively scapegoating you!), and may even regionally resemble Somalia, and Zimbabwe (don’t say you were not warned). IF trend lines are not altered, they eventually reach certain destinations.

  4. Rich says:

    Who cares if someone puts on make-up to look darker? Have people gone insane? I wouldn’t do it because I stopped playing dress-up in 2nd grade after the halloween parade, but if this is what keeps some people entertained, who cares? Why are people making a big deal out of nothing?

    • Agree: TKK
  5. For decades American blacks had served…as a kind of buffer for American Jews. So long as native hatreds were taken out primarily on blacks, they were less likely to be taken out on Jews.

    That says it all huh? Divide and rule. Same game the capitalist elite play today.

    I agree that all the outrage over face painting is a little ridiculous. But this is typical of todays corrupt and divisive media. They know what they’re doing. There are lots more important things we could be talking about like poverty, low wages, homelessness, health care, war, suicides, CIA/Big Pharma drug epidemic, but the medias job is to sow hate and division, never forget that.

    The whole thing stinks of fake news or psy-op to me, how were these pictures not discovered years ago, before these guys were elected? Maybe pictures like these are an example of how “deep state” blackmails pols into staying in line?

    Thanks to NOI for exposing the hypocrites, thanks to Mr. Unz for posting NOI.

    • Replies: @jbwilson24
  6. @joef

    This collective guilt crap is an instrument of the Communist

    RED SCARE! Sorry but this (USA) is a rabidly capitalist country. You really think Breitbart, Fox News, Glenn Beck, NBC, CNN, etc. etc.. are communists?
    They’re some of the worst offenders at pushing “collective guilt”

    No matter how many examples of their failures, and destructions, that is thoroughly exhibited in areas they control, like Camden, Detroit, Bmore, we provide illogical excuse making for their highly negative outcomes.

    You don’t think Detroit going under had something to do with them losing all the jobs to capitalist greed? This happened to all of the rust belt.
    You think maybe that greed had a lot to do with Appalachian towns falling the same way?
    My town in rural Ga. had lots of sewing/textile plants not that long ago that were lost to greed. My mother worked in one.

    This is the capitalist system, outsourcing to cheaper labor countries because shareholders and executives profit more. Profit is the driving force of capitalism. Profit is all that matters, they DO NOT give a shit about our country, our communities, our culture, or our families, only MONEY! If they can’t extract more profit by outsourcing, then they will import cheaper labor in the form of H1B’s and illegals. This really isn’t hard to understand.

    Make all the excuses you want, this is reality.

  7. @Rich

    Of course. The root of all humour is the surprise factor. Whites in blackface are funny to whites. Blacks in whiteface are funny to blacks. Men dreessed up as women has been a staple of the annual church follies for decades.

    Jews are very good humorists … when they’re not doing blue.

  8. Wally says:
    @redmudhooch

    said:
    “RED SCARE! Sorry but this (USA) is a rabidly capitalist country,”

    Except that the truly scary Reds are alive and flourishing in the USA.

    Green New Deal Is a Revamped Communist Manifesto
    https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/02/08/green-new-deal-says-vote-trump-2020/

    • Replies: @Franz
    , @Commentator Mike
  9. RobRich says: • Website
    @redmudhooch

    So your complaint is that capitalists did not satisfy YOUR commie greed and provide you with services at a loss created by zany regulations and taxes you don’t condemn.

    BTW, the major reasons companies move abroad has little to do with wages but a) high inventory and property taxes, and b) US policy, which encourages US companies to elevate the economies of its allies.

    • Replies: @Biff
    , @Thales the Milesian
  10. @Corvinus

    Ah yes, an apologist who can’t grasp the concept of per capita involvement in such shenanigans.

    Sure, there were probably some Christians who engaged in this sort of thing. The article claims that Jews were the dominant group.

    You might try to excuse it by saying ‘well, Jews ran the entertainment companies’. Sure, go read about how Edison ran around trying to shut down Jewish entertainment companies from producing smut with his inventions.

    Jews used their tribal nepotism to lock down the entertainment industry and prevent competition by outsiders. They had ample opportunity to stop stereotyping other groups, but they didn’t.

    Of course, there’s always some useful shabbesgoy who comes along and says ‘whitey made them do it’.

    • Replies: @Heros
    , @Corvinus
    , @anonymous
  11. @redmudhooch

    ” There are lots more important things we could be talking about like poverty, low wages, homelessness, health care, war, suicides, CIA/Big Pharma drug epidemic”

    Yep, true. Oddly enough, Jews have a leading hand in a few of those as well (cough cough, Sacklers, cough cough Project for a New American Century).

    I’ve seen some of these photos before. About a decade ago there was a flap about blackface skits being put on at a major Jewish organization’s conference. It still goes on, but Jewish PR is good at stifling it. Helps when you control most of the major papers.

    The Nation of Islam is perhaps the only North American organization that can call out Jewish power and get away with it. More props to them.

  12. Franz says:
    @Wally

    Except that the truly scary Reds are alive and flourishing in the USA.

    The most dangerous form of Communism is just a disguise for the subterranean activity of finance capital.

    “Outsourcing” millions of working class jobs to Asia & Mexico was just the Reaganomic version of Stalinism’s “internal exile.” Don’t for a minute think the same boardroom didn’t design both.

    I’m lucky. There’s Russian truckers where I work and they know the score. In one of the last working factories in my Rustbelt town, they’ve come right out and told me that their Grandpa’s version of the same form of terror was actually easier because there was no squid ink mass media to delude everyone about what was going on.

    The old saw is true. The USA has communism for the rich and capitalism for the poor.

    That people still think there’s “left” and “right” amaze me.

  13. @Rich

    “Why are people making a big deal out of nothing?”

    Because it it “racist” and “racism” is what fuels the “diversity” industry and leverages the extortion that the left is engaged in 24×7.

    See: http://fosterspeak.blogspot.com/2019/02/racism-its-time-to-repudiate-guilt.html

  14. Heros says:

    A very worthwhile read, I learned a several interesting details, such as “coon shouting”. The article is completely full of factual holes though, and is so heavily slanted towards black snow-flake “sensitivities” that it can be construed as anti-white black propaganda. This is what one would expect from NOI.

    It is important to note that Birth of a Nation, rather than being some racist black hate movie, was released the same year as the Lusitania sinking and was created on the eve of WWI. The jews making the movie certainly wanted to foment race tensions, but the real issue was whether the Southerners would fight and die in a fake world war for Israel. The jews had seen how the Confederates had kept whooping the Northern armies with a fraction of the resources and manpower, that is why they sent Sherman and Sheridan to practice new scorched earth and starvation tactics. But most importantly, the jews knew that it was only the Southerners who could win wars for them.

    After the civil war, during reconstruction, carpet bagger jews and yankee bottom feeders were deliberately provoking a race war, turning the freed blacks to prey on the “white trash” population. This is why the KKK came into being, it was a reaction to jews provoking blacks, just as the Nazi party was a reaction to jews agitating Poles and Communists.

    “How many of the thousands of American lynchings this Jewish-financed film was responsible for may never be known. For the many white immigrants pouring in to America by the millions at the time, it was the first “black” image they would see and it depicted an American racial system they could believe in.”

    Fortunately, Paul Kersey of SBPDL, from the unz front page, has some articles on this typical black lie. In one, he compares the total number of lynching over 86 years to Baltimore for 6 years:

    http://www.unz.com/sbpdl/lynchings-in-usa-over-86-year-time-span-3/

    “Between 1882 and 1968, there were 4,743 lynchings in America; of those, 3,466 were black and 1,297 were white.

    Between 2007 and 2013 in Baltimore, there were 1,629 murders in the city, of which 1,492 (or 91.5 percent) were black – almost all murdered by other blacks.”

    Please note that Kersey is using statistics for ALL lynchings, not just KKK lynchings. Compared to the amount of rampant anti-white black crime occurring on a daily basis across the US, the KKK are pikers.

    Also important to note that 1297/4743 lynchings were of white people, or ~25%, a statistic that is actually higher than the historic rates of black crime across the US today. We can therefore safely assume that the rate that whites were falsely lynched when historic black criminality is taken into account exceeds that of the false black lynchings. This implies a complete lack of race as motivation, and points completely to the guilt of the “victims”.

    This tiny number of lynchings in all US history in comparison to the rampant anti-white black crime destroying the country proves that anyone who mentions “lynching” is just covering up for black lawlessness and barbarism. SBPDL documents literally thousands instances of black violence against whites over 10 years, take a look. They simply are not the same race as us.

    Below the !more are some recent clips of anti-white black racist violence. It is despicable, and I spit on any mother who sends their white (or asian) child into a school with this species.

    [MORE]

  15. wayfarer says:

    “Three of the Blackest Pills of All”

  16. @Wally

    That article states the Green New Deal proposes to:

    ‘Build trains across oceans and end all air travel”

    Surely it means ocean to ocean, i.e. coast to coast, in the US, and not a bad idea if ultra high speed trains and Maglevs. And perhaps to partly replace, not “end”, air travel.

    I doubt anyone seriously thinks we’ll be taking the train from London to New York.

    How truthful is all this ideologically driven reporting?

  17. wayfarer says:

    “Then they came for the memes!”

    • Replies: @Heros
  18. onebornfree says: • Website

    “At the same moment the ADL began, a number of Jewish businessmen from the Boston area were plotting to finance the most degrading and hateful blackface movie ever made—The Birth of a Nation. The silent movie epic released in 1915 was the first movie blockbuster, smashing all box office records.”

    In other words, blackface was a facet of a POPULAR entertainment form[ a movie], freely chosen by audiences of the day in sufficient numbers to make it a “hit” with the general public. Nobody forced them to pay money to see the movie

    The persons who invested in, and funded the movie presumably got rich [or richer] . So what?

    This just in: The system that allows people to freely earn and spend their money as they, and only they, see fit, is called “capitalism”

    Regards, onebornfree

  19. A prelude to Virginia’s current blackface/rape political scandals:

    In 1961, Jackie Wilson released a tribute album dedicated to Al Jolson. In his liner notes, Wilson said, “the greatest entertainer of this or any other era is the late Al Jolson”. Later, Wilson reportedly converted to Judaism.

    Singer Patti LaBelle has accused Jackie Wilson of trying to rape her.

    “I believe he was tipsy the night they pulled me into this room,” says LaBelle. “It was like my schoolteacher or somebody, someone you look up to is trying to take advantage of you. I was saying, I can’t believe this is Jackie Wilson’ . . . {He and his assistant} pulled my stuff up and I screamed. It scared people off. He . . . had my dress off.” It didn’t go any further than that, she says — “thank God.”

    There is a disturbed woman on YouTube who says that Jackie Wilson raped her mother and she is a product of that rape. She bears a strong resemblance to Wilson. She recently changed her last name to Wilson.

  20. ariadna says:
    @Corvinus

    “It was identified with entertainers, some of whom were Jewish.”

    Well put. This is what I say to those who claim that the organized world jewry owns the finances of the Western world (and more). I say, “The Fed Reserve, IMF, WB, Bak of International Settlements, and all large banks are owned/controlled by bankers, some of whom are Jews.”
    Obstinate nitpickers want to know if “some” means 90% or more but I ignore those.

    Your posts are cogent and fair, based on impeccable logic. You don’t speak from a pro-Israel/philosemitic perspective because, as you said before, you are “Goy. Pure Goy.”
    It is how any Christian/non-Jew would normally self-identify. Just as a Jew would normally say “I am a kike. Pure kike.”

    • Replies: @ariadna
  21. ariadna says:
    @ariadna

    I also like your nick. Corvinus = raven. Is that smart or is it?
    Quoth Corvinus: Never Again.

    • LOL: Stan d Mute
    • Replies: @Seraphim
  22. Heros says:
    @wayfarer

    Sometimes Watson hits one out the park as he did on that clip, I love memes and use them as often as I can to make short and powerful messages to family and friends.

    But as much as he whines about the left and snow flakes, Watson would be offended by and likely try to get memes from Dailystormer banned as “offensive”, such as ones depicting black anti-white hatred, jew usury, or the fake holocaust.

    Here is last weeks meme page from the dailystormer:

    https://dailystormer.name/memetic-monday-tuesday-edition/

    • Replies: @wayfarer
    , @anonymous
  23. Heros says:
    @jbwilson24

    But wasn’t the jews alone, they had willing bullets. With a few sweet lies, jews know precisely how to turn a couple of youfs into and angry white hating mob. It also doesn’t hurt that most of that smut was of white girls because black girls and mulatos are rarely close to being a thing of beauty. Thus jews were always feeding the primordial drive of black predators with an endless string of craven sex images of beautiful young white girls. Jews pouring gasoline on the fire.

    “Since the dawn of history the negro has owned the continent of Africa – rich beyond the dream of poet’s fancy, crunching acres of diamonds beneath his bare black feet. Yet he never picked one up from the dust until a white man showed to him its glittering light. His land swarmed with powerful and docile animals, yet he never dreamed a harness, cart, or sled. A hunter by necessity, he never made an axe, spear, or arrowhead worth preserving beyond the moment of its use. He lived as an ox, content to graze for an hour. In a land of stone and timber he never sawed a foot of lumber, carved a block, or built a house save of broken sticks and mud. With league on league of ocean strand and miles of inland seas, for four thousand years he watched their surface ripple under the wind, heard the thunder of the surf on his beach, the howl of the storm over his head, gazed on the dim blue horizon calling him to worlds that lie beyond, and yet he never dreamed a sail.”

    — Charles Darwin

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
    , @Cassandra
  24. Agent76 says:

    Sep 3, 2012 Malcolm X: Black Democrats are “Traitors”

    The second from the Malcolm X series. Although I do not agree with his early philosophy, he sets the record straight and reveals the Truth about the Democratic Party!!

    AUG 14, 2018 How ‘The Birth of a Nation’ Revived the Klan

    On the evening of March 21, 1915 President Woodrow Wilson attended a special screening at the White House of THE BIRTH OF A NATION, a film directed by D.W. Griffith and based on THE CLANSMAN, a novel written by Wilson’s good friend Thomas Dixon.

    https://www.history.com/news/kkk-birth-of-a-nation-film

  25. I live in a minority majority area and observe the different ethnic groups and religions, we talk diversity in this country. We do not practice it. Where I live is segregated. Without the government forcing people together, no interaction would take place.
    It makes me very happy to see the country is viting itself apart along racial lines. More and more people are clueing into the fact minority majority America is a lie.
    I’m a giant racist. It grew out of my living near black America. What a horror! Georgia is going to have a black governor soon, so bye bye Georgia.
    Ha ha ha. I say, burn baby burn.

  26. George says:

    “Blackface History Is Jewish History” … but not recent Jewish history.

    • Replies: @anonymous
  27. macilrae says:

    As commenter Redmudhooch has already picked up:

    “For decades American blacks had served…as a kind of buffer for American Jews. So long as native hatreds were taken out primarily on blacks, they were less likely to be taken out on Jews.”

    And, yes, quite obviously, this strategy hasn’t changed – just become more subtle as popular culture upholds the extreme antisocial antics of many blacks: tolerating, condoning and even celebrating such behaviour as being all part of ‘inclusion’ and ‘cultural diversity’ – which the rest of us must accept or be branded ‘racist’. And of course, being a ‘racist’ has been conjured into just about the most diabolical slur imaginable.

    Whomever controls the corporate media, the entertainment industry and, in my opinion most importantly, the pop industry, also has the direction of ‘our’ popular culture firmly in their grasp.

    And the outcome, of course, is a gathering, suppressed hatred directed against blacks which, so far, has been almost completely smothered. I believe there is more truly racist sentiment smoldering in the hearts of the non-black community today than there ever was in the 1940s.

    In this sense, blacks are indeed victims.

    • Replies: @Counterinsurgency
  28. TKK says:
    @Corvinus

    It’s not a crime. It’s a joke. It’s entertainment. It’s silly. It signifies nothing but… goofing off.

    It has the same moral weight as wearing a Freddie Krueger or Porky Pig mask.

    For Unz to even publish an article about the alleged horrors of “blackface” only emboldens the Global Retards (Blacks) to sink deeper into perpetual snarling victimhood.

    • Replies: @OilcanFloyd
  29. Priss Factor [AKA "Asagirian"] says: • Website

    Blackface may be offensive but blackface acts were mild compared real black behavior in rap and thuggery.

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
  30. wayfarer says:
    @Heros

    Nothing is sacred, in the meme universe.

  31. @TKK

    For Unz to even publish an article about the alleged horrors of “blackface” only emboldens the Global Retards (Blacks) to sink deeper into perpetual snarling victimhood.

    This article is very relevant. What it does is show the very real issue of the tribal, destructive, and hypocritical nature of Jewish politics and social life.

    Why should Jews get a pass on their slave holding/slave trading past, their cynical role in the civil rights movement, their obvious role in stirring up racial animosity today, extreme tribalism to the detriment of everyone else…..when they are busy destroying the nation accusing others, often falsely, of doing the same? That’s the issue!

    Jewish power is a very real problem that has to be solved.

  32. @Heros

    That didn’t sound like Darwin to me and, of course, it was not, as any educated person should at least suspect before risking the giving of an unsourced false quote. It was from The Clansman: a Historical Romance of the Ku Klux Klan by Thomas Dixon (1905). Did you purposely seek to mislead or was it just rank ignorance.

    • Replies: @Heros
    , @Heros
  33. Heros says:

    Jews use blacks to gaslight whites

  34. wayfarer says:

    America’s Political Freak Show: Starring Elizabeth Warren in Wearing Red Face!

    “Elizabeth Warren Is In: Trump Immediately Delivers Linguistic Killshot”

  35. Heros says:
    @Wizard of Oz

    Found it on another comment on an SBPDL thread. It fits, although I first thought it was Mark Twain.

    Even if Darwin didn’t say it, and you certainly haven’t brought evidence to show that he didn’t, then, as your side loves to say when it brushes off their misinformation campaigns:

    Fake but True.

    You know, like the 6 million. “I saw it in my mind”.

  36. Heros says:
    @Wizard of Oz

    As Darwin said, how many thousand years with all that wealth under their feet.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  37. Priss Factor [AKA "Asagirian"] says: • Website

    At the same moment the ADL began, a number of Jewish businessmen from the Boston area were plotting to finance the most degrading and hateful blackface movie ever made—The Birth of a Nation. The silent movie epic released in 1915 was the first movie blockbuster, smashing all box office records.

    I can understand why black people would be offended by Griffith’s movie, but it’s one of the most prophetic movies ever. It is less a historical summary than a future warning. And its warnings have come true. Indeed, the reason why that movie is so suppressed is not because it was so false but because it now rings truer than ever. But PC neo-victorianism represses those all-too-obvious truths.

    So, what does the movie tell us?

    1. Naive white do-gooders have no idea what’s in store for them. Complacent with power and privilege(that was really won by war and conflict) and imbued with Christian notion that all souls are alike around the world, they believe that black is white and white is black, and all will get along together if whites only try harder. In truth, blacks have different temperaments & souls and regard white good-will as weakness to manipulate. The woman’s father in the movie is a do-gooder white guy who trusts the mulatto… who later tries to rape the man’s daughter.

    2. Rise of mulatto as conduit between whites and blacks. As even well-meaning whites find total blackness a bit intimidating, they rely on the mulatto as bridge. Back in the days, most mulattoes were products of white men and black women: symbols of white sexual advantage. Today, most are products of black men and white women with jungle fever: symbols of black sexual advantage. These mulattoes are Loki-like characters who have black aggression but white calculation. They use their white intellect to serve the black soul. We saw this with Obama and other mulattoes taking over the Democratic Party. Notice the Dems prefer mulattoes to outright blacks: Kamala Harris and Cory Booker. Mulatto serves as the butter on the white bread before it is eaten by the Negro. Whites fall for mulattoes. Blacks rely on mulattoes as cross-over figures… though mulattoes also cheat blacks. And mulattoes manipulate both sides, white and black, to accrue more advantage for themselves.

    3. Black political corruption. While corruption is universal, black corruption really takes the cake(and the cornbread, grits, chitlins, blackeyed peas, fried chicken, an entire bucketful). Just look what black politicians have done to Detroit, Baltimore, black parts of St. Louis-Milwaukee-Chicago-Oakland. Because blacks tend to be more impulsive, more egocentric, more uninhibited, and more psychopathic, they are more shameless and unrestrained in their corruption. Furthermore, because they can get off the hook so easily by screaming ‘it be racist!’, they are allowed to get away with so much. Even though the depiction of corrupt black politicians in BOAN is cartoonish and over-the-top, the state of black politics in the US(and other black run places like South Africa) isn’t much different from the movie.

    4. Blacks are naturally wild and savage, and if unrestrained, will revert to the jungle nature. The anti-‘racists’ have been attacking such stereotype forever… but even they have been at odds with their own narrative. On the one hand, the Libs say it’s wrong to say blacks are wilder and more prone to ugabuga. But then, they praise blacks for having natural rhythm, dancing better, singing louder, coming up with sexual music and dance, and spreading trends like bumping-and-grinding and ‘twerking’. Libs get triggered when someone says blacks are more into ‘let the good times roll’, but they say blacks be cool and funky and indeed liberated lame white people from ice-cold repression with all that jungle heat and funky jive.
    BOAN says blacks are naturally wilder, and it has been condemned for racial stereotyping. But how do the Jewish-Liberal-controlled media depict blackness? As thug athletes, thug rappers, sex-crazed studs whose only idea is ‘muh dic*’, black ‘biatches’ who be ‘twerking’ and yapping about her booty(and even be named Bootisha or Assnique). Also, since blacks got more freedom to express their true nature, their culture has turned more savage and crazy. If anything, depiction of black savagery in BOAN is mild compared to what rappers and other black thugs do in culture.

    5. Black men despise white males as wussy and want to hump white women. This was one of the core message of BOAN. If left unchecked, black male lust will stalk white females. We’ve been told that this is just racial paranoia and fears. But in SOUL ON ICE, Eldridge Cleaver wrote his own Portnegro’s Complaint. Just like Philip Roth the Jew said he had endless ‘boings’ thinking of Aryan-blonde Shikses(and Norman Mailer wrote a book on Marilyn Monroe as his sex goddess… who married Jewish Arthur Miller btw), Cleaver said he not only fantasized raping white women but really did it(though he didn’t serve many yrs in prison even in those days). And much of Rap culture is about black guys and white girls with jungle fever dumping on dorky white guys. Also, Jews control pornography and promoted interracial black-man-and-white-woman as the thing. From pop culture to porn culture(though two have merged considerably), the message is black guys are the real men and want white women, and white women should go with superior Negroes. So, BOAN was proved right on that account.
    Where it was wrong(hopefully naive) perhaps was that white women in the movie rebuff the advances by black men. But Griffith should have known better because Jack Johnson became champion before the movie came out. He destroyed and humiliated so many white men, but what did a lot of white women do? Stick with their fallen men? No, just like French women who ran into arms of Nazis and Japanese women who ran into arms of US GI’s, white women ran into arms of Jack Johnson. Since then, the sports culture is one of black guys dominating the field, white cuck athletes serving as bench-warmers, and countless white women getting knocked up by Negro athletes and thugs. The biggest name in movie of the 90s and 2000s, Quentin Tarantino, was raised by such a woman. And in the 90s, madonna’s second act was that she was passed around as a sex doll by blacks in the NBA.
    So, if anything, BOAN was mostly right about the sexual dynamics of black and white but didn’t go far enough. If white men lose power, not only will blacks come after white women but white women will go with Negroes. It’s like Poland is turning into Simon Moland. One African goes to Poland and gets to hump over 300 jungle-feverish women.

  38. @redmudhooch

    Your detractors will not admit that that the founding fathers saw as commerce, was not capitalism as it exists today, but understood, exactly, the problem .

    Merchants have no country. The mere spot they stand on does not constitute so strong an attachment as that from which they draw their gains.

    Thomas Jefferson

    As for the narrative about Birth of a Nation it is false, whether Jews produced the movie or not. The original KKK lynched people known to have committed violent crimes, like rape, or those, where there was strong evidence, of having committed violent crime. Race was not a factor. Both Blacks and Whites were lynched at about a 3:1 ratio, and yes, there were thousands, (about 5) over a hundred years. The number of “innocents” would have been few, if any. The KKK was formed to combat the lawlessness of the time.
    It may well have been KKK supporters who lynched B’nai B’rith President Leo Frank, who tried to blame a Negro, Newt Lee, for Mary Phagan’s rape and murder. Funny the all White jury didn’t buy it.

    • Replies: @Craig Nelsen
  39. @Corvinus

    Gee Whiz, Corvinus! I disagree with you, but I must say: you’ve got to improve your game.
    This “you’ve understood basic facts, here they are, accept them on my authority and in the spirit of fair play” game worked for quite some time.
    The old English theory wrt treating newcomers was something like:
    Given them a little more authority than perhaps they deserve, trust them a bit more than perhaps they should be trusted, and they will grow into it
    So: look at England today. After about AD 1905, practicing above policy in England was found to produce results comparable to letting the advance woman of a home invasion gang into your house at 3:00AM because “her car broke down”.
    Something similar has happened in the US to anybody who wanted to play your game. They’ve caught on!!!
    If you want different results, try a different game?

    Counterinsurgency

    Counerinsurgency

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  40. @joef

    My issue is despite sins of a collective group, a person must be evaluated as an individual first and foremost.

    Yeah, I used to do that before the losses became prohibitive. Not any more. You have to remember that the Left has gone counter-Enlightenment [1]. Among other things, this means that members of ethnic groups are not permitted to act as individuals. Remember all the black conservatives who were told they weren’t actually black during sustained and vicious attacks [2]? That’s enforcement. Ethnic group members who don’t conform are treated a lot like snitches [3].
    Last place I worked, all the Koreans I knew (who had been reasonable company before) suddenly (like within a month) became strongly left wing SJW and somewhat hostile. And that’s just one example.

    If you want to take chances like that, go ahead. I certainly won’t stop you – I’m just text on a screen. I’ve lost enough, myself, and I have responsibilities to other people.

    Counterinsurgency

    1] Hicks.
    _Explaining Postmodernism_.
    Also, search Youtube for “Hicks Postmodernism 2018” Long, but worth it.l

    2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ken_Hamblin
    The wikipedia article didn’t mention it, but Hamblin went into hiding after his radio series ended. “now spends much of his time traveling with his wife Sue” as of 2010, last time he was heard from. You bet he spent “much of his time traveling”.

    3] of “stitches” and “ditches” fame.

    • Replies: @joef
  41. @macilrae

    Oh, hell, yes. Con-man’s dream, having everybody in some group with a mean IQ of 85 and a highly emotional nature _color coded_! Right up there with the old “There are pickpockets present” dodge that gets everybody to show where their wallets are.
    Same thing with the home invader’s dream in coastal California: The people most likely to have large amounts of cash at home are color coded!!
    The bad guys must think they’ve died and (through some ghastly mistake) gone to Heaven! And that doesn’t even include the bad guys who took governmental legitimacy and trust in leadership (also color coded) as gullibility.

    Counterinsurgency

  42. Agent76 says:

    Billie Holiday – Strange Fruit

  43. Maybe, maybe, maybe … but I like it when people making strong arguments acknowledge facts that might be seen as going against their case. Such as, that the Jolson character in The Jazz Singer wants to be a jazz singer, that is, he wants to sing the music of African-Americans. Usually imitation is seen as a form of flattery, no?

  44. @Corvinus

    Whether Rice was a Jew or not is not the topic, and my impression from reading this is he was not a Jew, but Jews copied or stole his successful act and took it to another level. Something Jews are very good at. Read the book Master Switch, an history of the communications industry, to get good idea of what I’m saying.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  45. @Franz

    Thank you for your comment. I have said, for years, that capitalism and communism are two sides of the same coin. Both seek to concentrate wealth in the hands of a few, and the few are overwhelmingly from the same tribe.
    One of the problems is that the US population has been fed a steady diet of bullshit, which equates communism with socialism, while at the same time failing to understand the concept of commonwealth, which several US States contain in their title. For example, rivers are the commonwealth of a state, they cannot be privately owned.
    While overseas studying in the early 70s, I met Soviets, East Germans, and Czechoslovakians, along with students from virtually every other “western” European country. The “commies” were more than happy to explain what they saw as the superiority of their system, which included no unemployment and no taxes. I didn’t criticize, only asked more questions. I’m not promoting the system, only reporting. There is no free ride in communism you work where you are told to work. Slackers are social pariah, and can have government support removed.
    What is being promoted as socialism in the US, isn’t. In order to be successful, socialism needs a high trust cohesive society. Multiculturalism (globalism) is the antithesis of a socialist country. That is why the former socialist countries of Scandinavia are failing. The goal is full employment, with support when unemployed. Millions of 3rd world parasites unwilling to assimilate has destroyed what made them successful societies. Capitalism cannot tolerate full employment, because it increases wages and living conditions for all, not just the elite.

    • Replies: @Ivan
  46. HiHo says:

    That’s Jews for you! They do something similar everywhere you find them.

    Talking of slaves…all the slaving ships that sailed under the British flag were owned by Jews. The conditions were so awful that just as many crew died as did slaves.

    Why do you think the Jews have encouraged immigration through unnecessary wars, famine and excessive usurious loans to Africa and the Middle East?

    Just like blacks in America, Jews need immigrants to take the heat off them.

  47. Jake says:

    “From the time of the earliest American colonies Jews had always been a formidable presence in the slave-based economy, ”

    Many people get caught on assertions like this one and never get any farther. The reason – in addition to our having been trained to not crimethink regarding Jews – is that we know that Jews were a less than teeny minority of the US population until long after the end of slavery.

    So how is this statement true? The answer is: Globalist economy combined with the heritage of the Judaizing heresy Anglo-Saxon Puritanism.

    When Jews were expelled from Spain, most fled to the Spanish ruled Netherlands. There, they immediately became big in investment banking and publishing. Those Sephardic Jews, even more than the German-speaking Jews (Yiddish is a German with a few Semitisms and written in Hebrew script), were the Jews who were the necessary publishers of Protestant tracts and books.

    By the time that Oliver Cromwell had made his deal with the Netherlands Jews, in effect taking their loans at good rates and inviting them into England, Jews were permanently entangled in global English economics.

    Conversos (Iberian Jews who had entered the Catholic Church in order to remain in Spain) were the major leaders of the Spanish slave trade. And they, naturally, allied with their blood kin – Jews in the Netherlands and England – in financing the cross Atlantic slave trade.

    Per capita, ethnic Jews would have made more money on the cross-Atlantic slave trade than any ethnic group. The Nation of Islam knows that, and knows that is how and why Jews were a huge part – money part – of the American cross-Atlantic slave trading.

    Of course, the Black Moslems rather steadfastly refuse to see that Moriscos (Mohammedans who entered the Catholic Church in order to stay in Spain) also played a huge role in the Spanish slave trade.

    Essential fact: virtually 100% of the Spanish and Portuguese Protestant leaders were at least 50% Semitic (Converso and/or Morisco) in genetics.

    Of cour

  48. @Corvinus

    I am with TKK.. Christianity was also a victim.. consider
    For Jews, anti-Black racism was a benefit and a valuable asset to their own goals of gaining power and influence.
    scapegoats at the cruel expense of another .expresses the historical quoted and stereotyped in outlandish art forms.
    But where did these racist 1910 Jews come from? How, why, and from where when did the Jews come to America.. where in America did they settle… At the time stage shows cost big $s to produce.. yet we see well financed able and language capable immigrants engaged in cultural coon shouting economics. HUMMM!

    Melnick: observes coon, pansy sterotyped modalities were modalities “engineered and manufactured” (for a Jewish racial cultural purpose).. as infrigements invading into the American social and cultural media (American popular culture on stage, and Darktown in Print ). Zionism, which is system of economics that takes no prisoners, a system that decimates, devours, and eliminates any and all competition by any means necessary. Any andd all economic, political and cultural competition must be eliminated when it threatens Jewish Immigrants settled to America The stage was used to redirect unfavorable Jews culture by setting working Jews on another race. Technique of Zionism = redirect..

    But back then there were hundrends of foreign and international Jewish organizations, charities, transferring knowledge, money and political thoughts and power into and out of America. These networks could raise millions in a few minutes, and move the money, and when necessary highly visible persons, armed mercenaries, and groups of technicans, and even immigrants by the thousands… from one nation to another..

    Defense: The Anti-Defamation League.. B’nai B’rith <=who set these Jewish powers up? Were are the ADL predessor organizations ? Interesting the ADL's 1913 Charter= same time the Supreme court over ruled
    1. 47 prior consecutive court refusals to deny the protection from an Income tax guaranteed to Americans (until then Article I, Sec 9, Para 4 US Consitution protected Americans from paying all of the taxes and the Zionist from paying none of the taxes: "No tax of any kind, not in proportion to the Census shall be laid), and
    2. On almost the same day in Jan 1913 the court allowed the constitutional monopoly on banking (belonged to all Americans) to be transferred from US Government to a private banking system (THE FEDERAL RESERVE), a first instance of privitization? ) This separated Banking in American from the American constitutional Political System. Imagine all of the nations wealth and powe to lend congress just transferred to a private Zionist owned bank) and no one asks why? This made the USA itself a debtor borrower to the Zionist banking Syndicates, it had to raise the taxes to pay the interest on the loans.

    Let us not forget in 1906-1908 several wars, the Ottoman's burned the homes and businesses of the corrupt Zionist and the Jewish populations that Zionism Controlled in Salonika and chased them out because Zionism got caught trying to oveer-throw the Ottoman; hence invasion of the Salonika dispersed Jews to NYC and ST. Petersburg Russia.. How was the Russian media confiscated by Zionist for use of the Jews in Russia. <This article does not address that similarity? Everywhere you look the everyday Jew has been made a weapon and a victum of Zionism. In short the Jewish race has been the engine that has driven Zionism, but like in a car the Driver (Zionism) decides where it will go. The banksters were using the naive and uninformed members of the Jewish race everywhere to achieve the objective 1896 initiated goal: to take the oil from the Arabs. Remember, Zionism eliminates all competition by whatever means necessary, in order to have and to hold a monopoly n everthing.

    Thanks for the article it adds one more bit to the history of take everything Zionism
    http://www.unz.com/article/blackface-history-is-jewish-history/

  49. A silly article concerning a silly non-topic, predictably lacking any sense of proportion or awareness.
    Whatever horror caused by the genocidal wearing of blackface by Jews in the 19th and early 20th centuries, has certainly been made up for by Jewish run Hollywood’s complete and comprehensive elevation of the American negro toward divinity through cinema, music, and television over the last 50 years.

    Conversely, there has not been a group of people in the United States, in that same last 50 years, that have been as thoroughly degraded, denigrated, mocked, miscategorized, scapegoated, and vilified as the rural white southern male by that same (((Hollywood))) racket.

    Indeed, Hollywood has made billions of dollars presenting scores and scores of supposed serious and realistic films focusing on the presumed degenerate nature of rural southern whites. On the other hand, I can think of just one film, ONE, that attempts to cast a serious eye on by far THE most chaotic, feral, parasitic, dysfunctional, and inhumane subculture within these United States, and that of course is the culture of the inner city negro. (Precious is the movie)

    But NOI, in keeping with the time held tradition of absolute zero self responsibility and accountability of the negro race in general but the US negro specifically, will continue to cast blame for the perpetual plight of the African in these foreign lands known as “the civilized world,” upon any and every other human form of life, without ever addressing the biggest problem negro’s face, and that is the nature of the negro itself.

    Blackface is not keeping blacks down, NOI, blacks are. This is problem, but it’s nowhere near as of a problem as it will be when the welfare checks stop coming.

  50. Wearing black face today is not an insult. It is a privilege! So those who were wearing black face knew instinctively what is coming. They are prophets.

  51. I’m going to send this article on over to Mr. Farrakhan. Might give him an idea for a sermon. Of course he’s the very few with the guts to talk about this.
    And BTW; Again, thank you Mr. Unz for the most refreshing, courageous and important website I’ve ever run across.

  52. renfro says:

    Explain to me the difference between Governor Northam or anyone appearing in Blackface and the Broadway ‘rap’ play ‘Hamilton’ about Alexander Hamilton in which George Washington was cast as a black man and played by a black actor .

    A black can turn a white American founder into a black but a white can’t turn himself into a black, is that it?

  53. Anon[233] • Disclaimer says:
    @Heros

    “your side” ??? What does that make *your* side? Credulous stupidity and no standards for intelligent discourse?

  54. @Heros

    I’m not one to doubt that Darwin’s cousin Francis Galton was right about the Africans (You do know the *genuine* letter he wrote to The Times in June 1864 don’t you?). But your way of expressing our probably overlapping prejudices is just silly. Australians today are rich well beyond deserving because a few people used modern technology completely unavailable to 99.99999% of everyone who has lived to find, develop and transport the exportable minerals to newly prosperous Asia from small parts of our vast continent. Your maps say nothing different.

    • Replies: @anonymous
    , @Heros
  55. joef says:
    @redmudhooch

    The contemporary corporatist crony capitalism caused severe employment problems is not directly related to the afro caused destruction of once great cities. Further, because of corporate greed, the ignorant now believe in unsustainable free lunch Commie answers.

    But Commie answers have a track record far far worse, especially in eventual economic decline, and murderous purges of their fellow human beings (and please no excuses that this historical fact is not true, that is somehow debunked thru special clairvoyant osmosis).

    The only reason you have some (and I mean “some”) former Warsaw Pact Europeans missing it is because they were deeply inculcated with the entitlement attitude; while most others definitely do not miss the scarcity, or the Stasi.

    As for the MSM they are leftist leaning in affinity, and news presentation; and their preferred corporate model wishes to resemble China, more than any other corporate model.

    I know that leftist are desperate to push the false narrative that contemporary afro americans are not responsible for their own self created plight. However, it is not because they are not responsible, as much as collectively irresponsible.

    There are other cities that suffered the same economic hardships from globalism but are not a bankrupted violent mess as say Detroit. Than what is the other major difference? Answer (obviously) is Detroit is a majority afro controlled city.

    I know commie thinking prefers to manufacture its own reality, but the denial of reality is a very poor survival mechanism; and the only reason that leftist, and limo libs, are thriving is because of our current system of modern protections. Prior to that they died off from natural selection (and will die off again once they bankrupt our system, which will remove those same protections).

    • Replies: @Jim Bob Lassiter
  56. Until the Black and White problem is solved in America, the Jewish and homosexual problem won’t be solved… I doubt that the goyim and heterosexuals pay any attention to the elephant in the room!

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  57. Anonymous[846] • Disclaimer says:
    @Reuben Kaspate

    Wrong. The jews are at the root of the clusterfuck and the cure is clear to everyone who’s clued-in.

    This will get very ugly for the tribe. It’s inevitable at this point.

  58. anon[228] • Disclaimer says:
    @joef

    This collective guilt crap is an instrument of the Communist,”

    The sanctions imposed on Iran Iraq Syria and Somalia Libya are nothing but collective punishment

    • Replies: @joef
  59. TKK says:
    @OilcanFloyd

    In the South, it is not Jews who are groveling and boot licking blacks, gays and other disordered freaks who demand special privileges.

    It is the chinless, obese spineless sons of the South.

    There is a Grand Canyon sized gulf between Israeli Jews (actual Jews) and repellent American leftist morons who, I agree- are pot stirrers in academia and their cocoons of privilege in Miami, NYC and LA.

    But who gives them this power? Evangelical Christians. The White Western male, the main engine of genius in recorded history, could work with Israel.

    Israel just wants to survive. I don’t see them laying off GM workers and stripping the South of the textile mills that allowed a man to support his family with dignity. It is white Republicans and Democrats (one in the same) selling out American job opportunities. Even diagnostic tests (CAT scans, X rays, MRIs) are emailed to India to be read for $15 a hour.

    American Jews, and the deranged SJW(s) should be ignored.

    NO MORE APOLOGIES. The response to any more pearl clutching outrage should be: Yeah. I did it. I said it. So?

    If America drastically cuts aid to Israel, they will still survive. They are ingenious, ruthless and take no guff. American politicians could learn much from them. They want the vital intelligence Mossoud shares and the amazing covert operations they pull off.

    This is a bait and switch. A frothing hatred of the Jews is NOT a very real problem to be solved.

    If they are no jobs for the working white american, we can all sit around in an empty warehouse and smash menorahs and eat cold beans from a can. Would that be a victory?

    • Replies: @Wally
    , @OilcanFloyd
    , @Jake
  60. “White minstrel shows lampooned Black people, presenting them as dim-witted, lazy, buffoonish, superstitious, criminal, but nonetheless prodigiously musical.”

    Well, refute that or wear the superbly fitting shoe.

  61. joef says:
    @Counterinsurgency

    In my opinion, the main reason other ethnic groups have started to act as collective extortionist, hostile to White America is because:
    A) Narcissistic identity politics has reduced the conforming to something bigger than oneself, in which American/Christian ideals supersedes ethnocentric origins.
    B) Ethnic hostility is encouraged by leftist politicians, MSM, and academics;
    C) They see the successfully extorted unearned entitlements, and unearned praise, produced by never ending afro american demands.
    And since this demanding afro animosity seems to have worked (ignoring any foresight regarding its long term viability), every other ethnic group wants to jump on the pseudo victimized bandwagon, and get their benefits.

    Your situation sounds like it was bad; but given a choice, I still would rather travel thru Koreantown at night, than Bed Stuy. Afros, unlike most others, enjoy victimizing others for its own sake as personal enjoyment.

    • Replies: @Counterinsurgency
  62. @joef

    Indeed. When Detroit finally turned south big time with the 1967 summer riots, GMC was cranking out Chevelles and Impalas by the jillions, ditto for Ford with Mustangs and Fairlanes, almost ditto for Chrysler with Valiants and Furys. The only foreign auto of any discernible numbers on the highway was Hitler’s VW Beetle. Nobody had even heard of Globalism or The New World Order and Blackie was unconditionally embraced by the UAW with plenty of high pay, low skill union jobs that were almost impossible to get fired from at the time. It all was good until their clergy noticed declining collection plates and increasing activity at the Sunday backyard barbeque and shot (of liquor and leg) shacks and complained to the PoPo. The rest is history. Ernesto “Che” Guevara was on the money with his take on Blacks.

    Blacks are their own worst enemies.

    • Agree: joef
  63. Ivan says:
    @Curmudgeon

    Old joke:

    “Comrade, what is Capitalism? ”

    “The exploitation of man by man”

    “And what is Communism? ”

    “The reverse.”

  64. @MikeatMikedotMike

    I fail to see any part of that elevation. of black folk,.. I see propped up, as in this is my child,.. see how wonder my black child is? Some day when my child grows up and learns enough; full citizenship and social standing will be their waiting until him or her!

    The horrors you cite, was not about blackface Jews, instead the horror was in “denying justice and opportunity to a competitive race, it was about denying equal opportunity to American citizens (the blacks emerging from Slavery were a major threat to dominate happy Zionism).. The blackface was about making sure the blacks, in America could not compete for a respectful place in USA politics, high flying Wall Street funded industry and creditable society; modern Hollywood has done nothing to change that.

    Nothing could be further from the truth that your statement “Whatever horror caused by the genocidal wearing of blackface by Jews in the 19th and early 20th centuries, has certainly been made up for by Jewish run Hollywood’s complete and comprehensive elevation of the American negro toward divinity through cinema, music, and television over the last 50 years.”

    But you are right about the Hollywood change in propaganda, its focus has changed from blocking black progress to using blacks to protect the Zionist from the balance of America.. Zionism is a system of economics, it does not rest unless and until it has complete and total monopoly power.

    • Replies: @anonymous
    , @Wizard of Oz
  65. Wally says:
    @TKK

    asked:
    “But who gives them this power?”

    That’s an easy one.
    The fake & impossible “holocaust” narrative, that’s “who”.
    The absurd ‘holocaust’ fiction has been the tool that is used to silence all debate. I know it, everyone knows it.
    Only lies require censorship, suppression of free speech.
    http://www.codoh.com

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  66. joef says:
    @anon

    The sanctions imposed on Iran Iraq Syria and Somalia Libya are nothing but collective punishment

    I generally agree. It is very difficult to discern our national interests within our foreign entanglements. I generally grew wary of endless war that our neocon & neoliberal political leaders keep promoting. President Eisenhower warned us of the inordinate influence of our military (congressional) industrial complex. And while we continue to fight out there, we deteriorate in here (which may be by political design to cause us distraction from our real domestic problems). Then we pay for the troublesome F35 program, while we short change Veteran’s Affairs for returning combatants.

  67. Corvinus says:
    @jbwilson24

    “Ah yes, an apologist who can’t grasp the concept of per capita involvement in such shenanigans.”

    White people hold the monopoly, specifically Europeans, from 1492 with their colonization and imperialism.

    “Sure, there were probably some Christians who engaged in this sort of thing. The article claims that Jews were the dominant group.”

    Claims being the operative word here.

    “You might try to excuse it by saying ‘well, Jews ran the entertainment companies’. Sure, go read about how Edison ran around trying to shut down Jewish entertainment companies from producing smut with his inventions.”

    Let us provide context here. A recent article by Thaddeus Russell, “7 Ways the Mafia Made the U.S. a Better Place: ‘Renegade History’”, contains further fascinating background on this episode:

    Soon after he invented the motion picture camera and projector, Thomas Edison formed his own movie production and distribution company. In 1908, Edison joined with nine other film companies to form the Motion Picture Patents Company, a monopoly that attempted to control the making, distribution, and showing of all movies in the United States. Edison and “The Trust” pledged to make only movies that promoted wholesome, Christian, and “American” values. But on the Lower East Side, a group of entrepreneurial Jewish immigrants used Edison’s inventions to produce and screen their own films, which were shown in thousands of nickelodeons – five-cent movie theaters – in working-class neighborhoods all over the country. These “outlaw” filmmakers started out as vaudeville and burlesque promoters, and many of their movies were sexier, more violent, and far more entertaining than the bland fare put out by the Edison monopoly.

    The great inventor was furious that “Jewish profiteers” were stealing his patent, getting rich from it, and using it to spread “smut” across America. So too were law enforcement officials. In 1907 a judge in Chicago wrote that the nickelodeons “caused, indirectly or directly, more juvenile crime coming into my court than all other causes combined.” Shortly thereafter the Chicago city council passed an ordinance granting power to the chief of police to censor motion pictures played in the city. In New York in 1907, soon after the police commissioner recommended that nickel shows be wiped out entirely, Mayor George McClellan was so moved by the evidence of immoral motion pictures polluting the minds of his citizens that on Christmas Day he ordered that all of the illicit motion picture houses be shut down.

    Moral condemnations and court injunctions didn’t stop the proliferation of nickelodeons that showed unseemly fare and violated Edison’s patent, so the inventor and his colleagues hired squads of thugs to shut them down. They seized film, beat up directors and actors, forced audiences out of theaters, smashed the nickelodeon arcades and set fire to entire city blocks where they were concentrated. But fortunately for the Jewish renegades, they lived and operated in neighborhoods where hundreds of soldiers stood ready and able to protect them – men like “Big” Jack Zelig, “Lefty Louie” Rosenberg, “Gyp the Blood” Horowitz, Joe “The Greaser” Rosenzweig, and the leaders of the notorious Yiddish Black Hand, Jacob “Johnny” Levinsky and “Charley the Cripple” Vitoffsky. There were even women ready for the fight – fierce, well-armed “gun-mols” like Bessie London, Tillie Finkelstein, Birdie Pomerantz, and Jennie “The Factory” Morris.

    Cameras, projectors, film, and sound equipment disappeared from the storerooms of Edison companies and showed up on makeshift movie lots on the Lower East Side. Bullets rained down on the Trust’s enforcers from the rooftops of nickelodeons. And massive fires destroyed the Edison distributors’ warehouses in the Bronx, Philadelphia, and Chicago. By 1915 the Trust had disbanded and the outlaw filmmakers moved west, where they could make bigger and better movies. Who were the men who, with the help of their nicknamed friends, fought Thomas Edison and the law and won? They were Marcus Loew of Loews Theatres and Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Carl Laemmle of Universal Pictures, Adolph Zukor of Paramount Pictures, William Fox of Twentieth-Century Fox, and the brothers Harry, Albert, Sam, and Jack Warner.

    “Jews used their tribal nepotism to lock down the entertainment industry and prevent competition by outsiders.”

    Not quite. See above content. It was a battle royale between two groups essentially over the First Amendment.

  68. Here is a video by a talented guy that goes by Blackpilled on YouTube.
    He tackles the black face issue by delving into the film the Jazz Singer by the Jewish Al Jolson.

  69. Corvinus says:
    @Counterinsurgency

    “This “you’ve understood basic facts, here they are, accept them on my authority and in the spirit of fair play” game worked for quite some time.”

    And it still works today.

    • Replies: @Counterinsurgency
  70. Corvinus says:
    @the grand wazoo

    “Whether Rice was a Jew or not is not the topic…”

    It’s part of the narrative, and the author neglects to inform the audience of his ethnicity. That is a cogent point to bring up.

    “and my impression from reading this is he was not a Jew, but Jews copied or stole his successful act and took it to another level.”

    Some Jews, assuredly, just like some whites.

    “Something Jews are very good at. Read the book Master Switch, an history of the communications industry, to get good idea of what I’m saying.”

    Actually, that would be simply human beings regardless of race or ethnicity.

  71. Biff says:
    @RobRich

    US policy, which encourages US companies to elevate the economies of its allies.

    Pull that one out of your ass did ya?

  72. Corvinus says:
    @Priss Factor

    “I can understand why black people would be offended by Griffith’s movie, but it’s one of the most prophetic movies ever. It is less a historical summary than a future warning.”

    No, it was based on Southron propaganda and confirmation bias.

    “1. Naive white do-gooders have no idea what’s in store for them.”

    Actually, they do have a clear picture. God is colorblind.

    “In truth, blacks have different temperaments & souls and regard white good-will as weakness to manipulate.”

    That would be a wild generalization on your part.

    “As even well-meaning whites find total blackness a bit intimidating, they rely on the mulatto as bridge. Back in the days, most mulattoes were products of white men and black women: symbols of white sexual advantage.”

    You mean white men taking advantage of their situation. It, of course, is hypocritical. They (white men) say race mixing is treasonous…yet engage in their dark carnal pleasures. On top of it all, they (white men) tended to disown their own flesh and blood. That is the work of the Devil.

    “Today, most are products of black men and white women with jungle fever: symbols of black sexual advantage.”

    No, that would be the products of liberty.

    “Black political corruption. While corruption is universal, black corruption really takes the cake.”

    Nope. Consider that white people have been in power longer, and have displayed more impulsive, more egocentric, more uninhibited, and more psychopathic conduct compared to their black brethren. It’s inborn.

    “Blacks are naturally wild and savage, and if unrestrained, will revert to the jungle nature.”

    Actually, that would be white European stock. Look at how they violently conquered the world, all for gimmedats and frees stuff.

    “Black men despise white males as wussy and want to hump white women.”

    Whiskey, is that you?

    • Replies: @anonymous
  73. Gene Su says:

    I know I am a little late. However, I have a big question. I would like someone who is NOT a flamer to give me a straight, intelligent answer.

    A lot of black people today complain about the “unique animus” that was supposedly directed to them in entertainment forms such a blackface that were popular a century ago. However, I don’t think that racial animus was unique or confined to blacks. According to Wikipedia, the Three Stooges were once called, “Ted Healy and His Southern Gentlemen”. Southern Gentleman? As in rednecks? How many vaudeville acts at the time also mocked whites from the Deep South or the rural Mid-West? Today, I note that there are some very offensive TV shows that mock whites like “Here comes Honey Boo Boo”, which shows a white single mother on welfare and her convict boyfriend. I have a funny feeling that black were not singled out for racial animus (or as much as they claim).

    • Replies: @OilcanFloyd
    , @anonymous
  74. @TKK

    In the South, it is not Jews who are groveling and boot licking blacks, gays and other disordered freaks who demand special privileges.

    It is the chinless, obese spineless sons of the South.

    Not true. It’s mostly the state level politicians who all want to go national who are doing the boot licking and selling out. The tens of millions of transplants are pretty good at doing the same.

    The leader of the state senate from my state told a group of locals who complained to him about the removal of Southern monuments that between the millions of transplants living in the metro area, around the capitol city, and the national and international business interests, he really couldn’t serve our interests, even if he agreed. He now lives in Italy and works for the U.N.

    As for Evangelicals, they aren’t really the ones who are soft on race. The polite denominations like Episcopalians, certain Methodists, Lutherans, and maybe Presbyterians are far more likely to have social justice leanings. It’s not Baptists or Fundamentalist Christians who pander to political correctness, at least the flock doesn’t. What they do is pander to neocons and the cult of Israel. Their pastors might as well be rabbis. Somehow they forgot that their religion is supposed to serve it’s followers.

    Israel has never had to fight on its own, face a real enemy, or stand on its own feet economically. America and the South have done all of the above, together and apart. America is the Super Power, and the South would do fine if left alone.

    The role of Jews in the ongoing destruction of America is plain to see by now. I guess an Israeli would say it’s something to ignore, but he depends on those same Jews who are looting America to butter his bread. I stand by everything I stated in the previous post that you replied to.

  75. T. Weed says:

    When I was growing up in the ’40’s, a popular weekly radio program was Amos ‘n Andy, just pure stereotypical “blackface” comedy. It was funny, we laughed at their language and bumbling misadventures, and characters such as Kingfish and Lightnin’, a lazy slowpoke. I wonder who the writers and producers of this show were.

  76. wayfarer says:

    Who Keeps Lighting the Fuse in the “Culture War?”

  77. Jake says:
    @TKK

    “In the South, it is not Jews who are groveling and boot licking blacks, gays and other disordered freaks who demand special privileges.”

    That is dead wrong.

    Unless you mean that Jews are not bootlicking blacks because those who pay blacks cannot be bootlickers of blacks.

    Jews are maybe 2 % of Caucasians in the south. At least a quarter of the Caucasians in the south who fiercely back radical blacks and the gay lobby are Jews. Jews, as everywhere, are wildly, almost unbelievably overrepresented in the promotion of all things Leftist.

    The only way your assertion could be less true is if you had added that in the south it is not Jews who lead atheist groups and demand an end to school prayer.

    I bet the Jewish SPLC loves your post.

  78. anonymous[350] • Disclaimer says:
    @Corvinus

    I heard the Irish (through their association and rivalry for jobs with blacks) were heavily involved in blackface. Is there any truth to this?

  79. anonymous[350] • Disclaimer says:
    @jbwilson24

    ‘The article claims that Jews were the dominant group’

    It clains they were the instigators which may or may not be true.

  80. anonymous[350] • Disclaimer says:
    @Heros

    ‘black snow-flake “sensitivities” ‘

    unfortunate choice of words.

  81. anonymous[350] • Disclaimer says:
    @Heros

    waston is a rather obvious alt light crypto jew

  82. anonymous[350] • Disclaimer says:
    @George

    What about Rham emanuel?

  83. anonymous[350] • Disclaimer says:
    @Wizard of Oz

    ‘Australians today are rich well beyond deserving because a few people used modern technology completely unavailable to 99.99999% of everyone who has lived to find, develop and transport the exportable minerals to newly prosperous Asia from small parts of our vast continent. Your maps say nothing different.’

    Eh?

    Africans never invented the wheel.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  84. @Curmudgeon

    The black/white ratio in lynching victims mirrors the black/white ratio on today’s death rows.

  85. anonymous[350] • Disclaimer says:
    @sally_at_the_place

    ‘The blackface was about making sure the blacks, in America could not compete for a respectful place in USA politics, high flying Wall Street funded industry and creditable society;’

    Blacks have never been able to compete either in the old world or the new, hence why they moan so much.

  86. @Gene Su

    Blacks are treated very gingerly in all forms of media. Whites from the South are not, and it’s been that way forever.

    When I still watched television and went to movies, it was very common for the words “redneck” and “white trash” to be used with real intent behind them, and it was okay, almost like the slurs are deserved payback. We’ve gone so far that we actually replace the word “nigger” with the “the n-word,” which is practically a word itself by now. I’d give even odds that I could start a fight or small riot by saying “the n-word” in public.

    My point isn’t that I think that it should be okay to use racial slurs, but let’s be honest about the hypocrisy involved in who can and can’t be slurred, and where the real hatred and violence are directed.

    • Replies: @joef
  87. anonymous[350] • Disclaimer says:
    @Corvinus

    The reason the American film industry is located in Hollywood is because patent laws where not as vigorously enforced and the time delay in travel meant enforcing royalties could be gotten around. As for Jews using nepotism virtually all studio heads have been Jewish except for the odd token Armenian and even then some of those have been Jewish.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  88. anonymous[350] • Disclaimer says:
    @Corvinus

    ‘“In truth, blacks have different temperaments & souls and regard white good-will as weakness to manipulate.”

    That would be a wild generalization on your part.’

    Why? And if it is a generalisation according to you is it at least part correct?

    ‘On top of it all, they (white men) tended to disown their own flesh and blood’

    No actually the used to free them and set them up in business. In most states the majority free black population were mulattoes and were significantly more advances because of the patronage of the fathers. They also used to consider themselves better than free blacks who had earned thier freedom.

    ‘That is the work of the Devil.’

    You mispelled debil.

    ‘Black political corruption. While corruption is universal, black corruption really takes the cake.”

    Nope. Consider that white people have been in power longer, and have displayed more impulsive, more egocentric, more uninhibited, and more psychopathic conduct compared to their black brethren. It’s inborn.’

    Have a look at the global corruption index preferably in map form. See which contient has the most corrupt countries. Do report back to us. The rest of your comment is projection.

    ‘Actually, that would be white European stock. Look at how they violently conquered the world, all for gimmedats and frees stuff’

    Whites create welath blacks consume it. Would you really be happy to live without the products of europeans? (ie the entire modern world) Bearing in mind black Africans never invented the wheel.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  89. Anonymous[361] • Disclaimer says:

    ” It depicted all Blacks as notorious criminals, uncontrollable rapists of white women, and intellectual, social, and spiritual inferiors who had no useful or rightful function in America except as slaves. ”

    And how is this caricature false, exactly? It is borne out by all FBI crime statistics.
    Blacks hate this form of mockery because it is true, and it is a sore point with them.
    They are a drag on the peace and prosperity of America, and should have all been repatriated after the Civil War. What to do with them now is anyone’s guess.

    • Replies: @anonymous
  90. anonymous[350] • Disclaimer says:
    @Gene Su

    ‘I have a funny feeling that black were not singled out for racial animus (or as much as they claim).’

    The problem that they have is criticism is too close to the bone. White hillbillies are outliers black thugs are not. Other groups have shown propensities to change and improve blacks have always been crud.

  91. anonymous[350] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anonymous

    ‘Blacks hate this form of mockery because it is true, and it is a sore point with them’

    Yup

    ‘They are a drag on the peace and prosperity of America, and should have all been repatriated after the Civil War’

    Yes even Abraham Lincoln said so. The first and only time he ever invited blacks to the white house was to ask them to leave via colonisation. Then again look what happened to Liberia.

  92. Anonymous[427] • Disclaimer says:
    @Corvinus

    Cameras, projectors, film, and sound equipment disappeared from the storerooms of Edison companies and showed up on makeshift movie lots on the Lower East Side.

    Movies had no sound until at least ten years later.

    And Edison was within his legal and moral rights to control his invention until the patents ran out, though he would have made more simply licensing camera and projector makers, as he was not a very good filmmaker.

    Edison and Henry Ford were good friends and I suspect Jewish behavior in the motion picture industry had something to do with his anti-Jewish animus.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  93. @anonymous

    So what is your argument if you think it through? That non invention of the wheel (for some specified purposes) tells us what? I think it may have been Fred Reed who has just drawn our attention to the Maya having, contrary to “didn’t invent the wheel stories”, invented wheels for toys.

    A quick internet search suggests that, after the potter’s wheel the wheel for chariots and maybe other vehicles was invented in and adjacent to the Middle East about 5000 years ago. Of course axles were equally vital. Others copied. Why would Africans not copy it if there was economic reason to? It wouldn’t have helped much with fishing, or the produce of palms and other trees. What crops would it have helped grow and harvest? What plains in the Congo could chariots sweep across in the hope of defeating and enslaving whole armies? BTW have you reflected on the use of sedan chairs which didn’t have wheels by Europeans only a few centuries ago? Why?

    • Replies: @anonymous
  94. @sally_at_the_place

    Where do you get your unusual idea about Zionism being a system of economics whether or not aiming for complete and total monopoly in all or some (unidentified) countries? It is an idea which would surely have puzzled the founders of Zionism like Theodor Herzl. Was there a big internal revolution some time? When? Sources please.

    • Replies: @sally_at_the_place
  95. Heros says:
    @Wizard of Oz

    “(You do know the *genuine* letter he wrote to The Times in June 1864 don’t you?)”

    No, I don’t. Enlighten me, please.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  96. Whitewolf says:
    @joef

    You can consider yourself lucky if you end up like the Balkans. The area is recovering well from past wars and the demographics there are a lot better than America’s. Whatever problems they have can be sorted. The same can’t really be said of any area that resembles Somalia or Zimbabwe. It might be PC to argue otherwise but reality doesn’t care about being PC.

    • Agree: joef
  97. Anonymous [AKA "Margret Sanger"] says:

    Anyone that uses any method of darkening their skin, tanning lotions, tanning booths, natural sunlight, or genetic manipulation is a racist.

  98. @Heros

    Thanks for asking. It has taken me only about 10 seconds to find and copy the link from the Galton Archive but it has served the useful function of causing me to add to the list of errors which should keep me a little modest about my pretty good memory.

    The date was in June 1873, not 1864.

    http://galton.org/letters/africa-for-chinese/AfricaForTheChinese.htm

    • Replies: @Heros
  99. Anonymous [AKA "Andrew Simon"] says:

    First, Greece was not bailed out. Greece is repaying LOANS, and took on that added debt because of being shackled to the euro and Germany’s wrongheaded austerity policies.

    Rather than offering a small amount of debt forgiveness at the onset of the crisis, Germany insisted on piling more debt on Greece. Meanwhile, Germany was forgiven more debt than any country in the history of the world after WWII, and Spain and Greece directly helped Germany build a trade surplus. Still, Germany remained intransigent when it came to Greece.

    Furthermore, Greece is not only repaying those loans, but through incredible sacrifice and grit has doubled its tourism, increased shipping capacity, and running a budget surplus while returning to markets.

    The laziness is yours, with cognitive dissonance in top. What does Venezuela have to do with your Lou Dobbsy screed? Have you contributed anything back to society that might prevent us from slipping into Somalia status. I highly doubt it.

    The issue is primarily wealth ineqality (caused by a tiny group that advocates for themselves relentlessly) and lack of investment that creates ghettos of concentrated poor. Poverty reflects culture and investment, as do incarceration rates. Blacks smoke pot at lower percentages than whites but minorities comprise 80% of prisoners with marijuana charges. How do you expect those people to come out of jail, with a record, and build a thriving society? Would YOU hire from that pool?

    How many Jews are in jail for smoking pot? There is no racism against Jews in this country. Quite the contrary, they are heralded and applauded constantly, and their country in the Middle East is festooned with great largesse, the largest aid package in American history is signed over to Israel every. single. year.

    What we did to Africa is another matter entirely, from stealing its natural resources to enslaving its youth over hundreds of years. No race has endured such repugnant maltreatment. Do you have any idea what King Leopold of Belgium did to the Congo? Check out that slow holocaust, no one even bothers mentioning it. And that sick puppy is still heralded in Belgium.

    We have a direct hand in what happened to blacks throughout history. They have barely had time as a “culture” to catch their breath and shake off the vestiges of Jim Crow, slavery, and systematic theft.

    Scapegoating like yours is ugly and ignorant.

  100. macilrae says:
    @Priss Factor

    But how do the Jewish-Liberal-controlled media depict blackness? As thug athletes, thug rappers, sex-crazed studs

    Exactly. And isn’t that at the core of this discussion? “Black face” reincarnated in these media-created stereotypes.

    What’s not to hate? Particularly if you are a middle-aged white male. Tell me who, that has not been brainwashed or works for the BBC, has anything positive to say about rappists? They are a hate-focus: like Bolton’s mustache!

  101. Cassandra says:
    @Heros

    Read Guns, Germs and Steel. Civilization sprung up where resources were abundant and easily sourced. Most of Africa is not hospitable to building permanent structures.

  102. @Corvinus

    Corvinus

    And it still works today.

    Good point. We obviously differ on this, and it’s a crucial difference.

    My counter: Note the replies to your posting. If it still works today, it’s drawing opposition. That didn’t happen back in the 1990s. Postings such as yours back then would ordinarily draw concurrence, apologies, or dead silence. To me, that looks like the on-going failure of a technique.
    To see this in another venue (that is, happening to somebody other than yourself), consider the broadcast media is running into a very similar problem of diminishing returns. I remember that, even back around AD 2008, people were still wishing that the media could be as reliable as it was during WW II. I think they meant “reliable cheerleaders for the US”, but the concept also included “reliable”in the sense that reports would withstand comparison with reality. Nobody is wishing that now: the media has managed to discredit itself retroactively.
    Much the same thing is happening with the “reasonable man, benefit of the doubt” approach. Supposedly, one of the early PR flacks said: “I could sell tuberculosis to every person in America, but only once each.” The “reasonable man, benefit of the doubt” approach is a lot like robo-calls: too much risk, not enough reward, so don’t listen.
    Frankly, the “reasonable man, benefit of the doubt” approach is being replaced by simple animosity, the old “politics is religion, absolute good vs. absolute bad, so destroy the evil enemy” bit:
    * Ignorance is Strength (don’t listen to evil oppressors)
    * Freedom is Slavery (Freedom lets the evil oppressors win)
    * War is Peace (Constant fighting is the price of ending oppression, and there is no Neutral Ground in reason).
    I don’t think that open animosity would suit you.

    Counterinsurgency

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  103. joef says:
    @OilcanFloyd

    The use of the N word is just a symptom of the problem. Leftist true believers are using this newspeak to crush dissenting opposition, in order to bring in their commie paradise. But like all commie paradises they are starting to eat their own.

    Whereas the cowardly hypocritical limousine liberal just wants to drink their Starbucks in peaceful gentrified areas, and are willing to throw the rest of us to the dark wolves (afro americans) to facilitate this.

    What both limo libs, and leftist, are missing is they have created this Frankenstein Monster with the afro, and that Monster will refuse to be controlled, and eventually turn on its master.

    Mostly all liberals somehow believe that they are somehow exempt from this;
    That in their leftist inspired race war (it’s a cold war now), they will be recognized as the good white people, and will be exempt from afro hostilities.
    What they do not understand is that afros animosity does not make such distinctions among Whites, and they don’t even make such distinctions among other Non Blacks (Asians, & Hispanics).

    We lack resolve to impose civilization among the ungrateful afro hoard. And if civilization cannot be retained, the outcome is eventual collapse in failed state like conditions (at least regionally). We are getting previews of this with Detroit, and Camden, but we refuse to believe it can happen any further. The longterm trend line of reality will eventually harshly disabuse us of this make believe.

  104. Heros says:
    @Wizard of Oz

    Interesting, but I don’t understand its relevance. Why are you pointing it out? Is Galton a jew?

    I believe a lot of indians and chinamen were brought into east africa. This is also the same period where the chinese were building many railroads and digging the canals and the levees in the Sacramento delta. Someone brought them over, and I’ll bet it was a ***,

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  105. @joef

    a) Narcissistic identity politics. Check.
    b) Ethnic hostility is encouraged. Check.
    c) They see the successfully extorted unearned entitlements, and unearned praise. Check.

    But this leaves unanswered the question of why the (a,b,c) types aren’t simply told that they are doing something bad and illegal, a simple shakedown. This is where Hicks [1] does a really good job of explaining why the left’s arguments aren’t simply shut down as an obvious low level insurrection.

    As for the Koreans, I wasn’t hurt – just a bit surprised. One of the Koreans ran a local drycleaners business; the other was an employee of a large organization. This was during the runup to Trump’s election, and they both flipped, just like that. This suggests that they do not value their independent identity, but rather their group identity: they aren’t individuals, they are emergent properties. That’s why I can’t rely on individual behavior rather than group behavior. In fact, looking back on it all, I should have dropped reliance on individual behavior decades back. In all cases, group behavior (‘stereotype”) was by far the better predictor.

    As far as bad areas go, “absence of body beats presence of mind.”

    Counterinsurgency

    1] Hicks.
    _Explaining postmodernism_.
    Book, also see Youtube.com

    • Replies: @joef
  106. anarchyst says:
    @Wally

    Ursula Haverbeck, Monika Schaefer, Sylvia Stolz–are but three “victims” imprisoned by those who are attempting to keep “the big lie”–the holohoax alive…

  107. @Wizard of Oz

    Hertzl’s Zionism was racism.. the bankers and oil lust that supported and provided for the Zionist (Racist) meetings were Zionism as economics. It was Bankers economics that copted the racial politics Hertzl intended..
    NOthing unusual about that.. in those times. The brains of Zionism was not those of Hertzl.. he was a victim of identity politics in Germany, intending to fight back.. The bankers, and powerful corporations and their operatives after 1865 realized that whale oil was dying out and that people were beginning to replace whale oil lamps with petrol, that Slavery and slave produced trade goods were getting more expensive and difficult to find.

    The whalers and the bankers got together in New Orleans,, and realized they needed to forget whale oil and move to Petrol. At the time the only known sources of oil were in Pennsylvania and Baghdad Ottoman Empire..Germany had the Baghdad Railroad, that was a problem for the Zionist bankers (Britain and France and the USA, secret agreement 1897 to quash Germany, another agreement between Russia and France 1896, all intending at some point to gang up on Germany because Germany was too powerful they could not share with someone they could not control) so the 1st attempt to overthrow the Ottoman Empire by infiltrating the Army, it failed, discovered by the Ottomans, burned the International TRADING Jews out (can’t remember 1904 or 1906 ( but really they were mostly the bankers traders and looters gang (Zionist) in Salonika (same bunch kicked out of Portugal and Spain 1492 and 1501 out 1/2 went to NYC (changed Wilsonian politics, 1st term NYC was Iris, 2nd term Jewish), other half to St. Peters burg Russia. (<1917 overthrow of the Czar), Germany (Austria, Itlay) 3A was a major problem for Zionist England (city of London) and France because Germany was well entrenched in the Ottoman empire, and because the Germany economy was powerful, strong and getting stronger Read Pan Germanism by Professor Roland Greene Usher and before you read My Memoirs by Ex Kaiser Wilhelm, III himself (1922), explains how surprised he was the whole secret plan.. The entire of every day Jews (especially the Eastern Jews) were made into unwitting weapons of mass destruction in Europe and in America..Zionism operated many charities and had a massive well functioning global network capable to solve local problems in more a less crowd funding fashion. The overall problem was that the Zionist in England and France did not have at their disposal an armed rule making nation state capable to defeat Germany or to take over the Oil Rich Ottoman Empire.. so they had to bring the USA into the battles, the transition began in Germany in 1876 or so, where it became clear to the Triple Entrant (3E) that the Triple Alliance had them beat with the USA. That began the separation of the USA from the American people.

    Read it.. and see if you don't agree, the entire blame cast against the Jewish people is and has been because of Zionism(where slaves, E. and W. Indies, and sugar and spices were the norm and guerrilla domestic politics ), not the ordinary Jews. Its guilt by association but that has worked very well for Zionism as it has, because it provide for needs, makes capital available when a Jew needs it for opportunity, but also can punish the Jew that refuses to conform in all sorts of ways) been able to keep the undying allegiance of the Jew, to the so called Jewish causes (none of which benefited the everyday Jew). Jewish are giving administrative privilege in education, government and jobs, because a Jewish embellished team is controllable by Zionism; explains why exclusive access to certain higher jobs and deep technical training is reserved to Jews. explains elected Article I and Article II jobs at the USA, suspect same in both France and England.. just don't have that data.

    There is so much more to this,, but that will give you a start to discover that Zionism is enterprise of banksters Oligarchs and monopoly powered enterprises that have only one goal: to own and control everything and everyone. Abuse of human rights is nothing if it interferes with achieving or maintaining a Zionism goal. The foundation for Zionism has clearly embedded in clauses within the US Constitution ( that constitution created an armed rule making nation state, and divided America into 527 elected, salaried puppets of Zionism who are charged to protect the constitution (not the American people) and 350,000,000 non voting highly controlled Americas.

  108. Anonymous [AKA "WhiteIQ"] says: • Website

    If you start plowing through the videos of Jews in Blackface, you’ll quickly notice that Jewish commenters are trying to either place the blame on Whites. OR, they try to create their own fictitious falsehoods. That’s scarier than anything.
    I wouldn’t blame them if they said that various stereotyping was normal back then. and you can’t blame someone. But for them to unload all the blame onto us is ….. it’s typical of their people.

  109. Corvinus says:
    @anonymous

    “No actually the used to free them and set them up in business. In most states the majority free black population were mulattoes and were significantly more advances because of the patronage of the fathers. They also used to consider themselves better than free blacks who had earned thier freedom.”

    Most mixed up types while free did not benefit from their white fathers.

    “Have a look at the global corruption index preferably in map form. See which contient has the most corrupt countries. Do report back to us. The rest of your comment is projection.”

    It’s white nations. Latin America. Eastern Europe. Russia. The Middle East. Of course Africa is part of the mix, in large part due to the instability that resulted when they became free post-World War II from their colonial masters.

    “Whites create welath blacks consume it.”

    You mean whites took wealth from blacks and yellows. See colonization and imperialism.

    • Replies: @anonymous
  110. Corvinus says:
    @anonymous

    “The reason the American film industry is located in Hollywood is because…”

    After hearing about this wonderful place, in 1913 many movie-makers headed west to avoid the fees imposed by Thomas Edison, who owned patents on the movie-making process. [In other words, he had created a monopoly]. In Los Angeles, California, the studios and Hollywood grew. Before World War I, movies were made in several U.S. cities, but filmmakers gravitated to southern California as the industry developed. They were attracted by the mild climate and reliable sunlight, which made it possible to film movies outdoors year-round, and by the varied scenery that was available. The first feature film made in Hollywood, in 1914, was called ‘The Squaw Man’. All the films made in Los Angeles from 1908 to 1913 had been short subjects. ‘The Squaw Man’, marked the beginning of the modern Hollywood movie industry. Through the First World War it went on to become the movie capital of the world.

    https://reelrundown.com/film-industry/Hollywood_-_The_History_of_a_Movie_Capital

    • Replies: @anonymous
    , @Heros
  111. Corvinus says:
    @Anonymous

    “And Edison was within his legal and moral rights to control his invention until the patents ran out, though he would have made more simply licensing camera and projector makers, as he was not a very good filmmaker.”

    You mean extralegal and immoral rights.

    “Edison and Henry Ford were good friends and I suspect Jewish behavior in the motion picture industry had something to do with his anti-Jewish animus.”

    You mean jealousy.

  112. Mulegino1 says:
    @Corvinus

    Not quite. See above content. It was a battle royale between two groups essentially over the First Amendment.

    Leave it to a Jew or a Judeophile to claim that the First Amendment protects thievery and the corruption of culture.

    Antisemitism is merely the immunological response of a healthy society and culture to a parasitical bacillus.

  113. anonymous[422] • Disclaimer says:
    @Wizard of Oz

    Its hardly the most egregious example. There is clear genetic evidence of a caucisoid reversion back into Africa and some people think they might have brought fire with them. There wete plenty of tribes all over Africa that did not have fire.

    Just so stories indeed

  114. anonymous[422] • Disclaimer says:
    @Corvinus

    ‘Thomas Edison, who owned patents on the movie-making process. [In other words, he had created a monopoly]’

    A gentile invented somthing and demanded payment for his intellectual property! He created a monopoly for somthing *he* invented?

    The anti-semitism!

    Its annudah shoah!

  115. anonymous[422] • Disclaimer says:
    @Corvinus

    ‘You mean jealousy.’

    No *you* mean envy

    tsk

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  116. anonymous[422] • Disclaimer says:
    @Corvinus

    ‘You mean whites took wealth from blacks and yellows. See colonization and imperialism.’

    Why were they in a position to do this in the first place? Could it be they created a civilisation (‘wealth’) which allowed them to conquer others-as all human groups have done. Or are you one of these people who believe Africans had advanced civilisations?

    Europe is more corrupt than Africa?

    Lol

    listen to yourself

    blacks cant even run a city council without looting it.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  117. Mulegino1 says:
    @Corvinus

    Jealousy of what, precisely? Anyone with even a cursory familiarity with Christian European culture will acknowledge its total superiority to the low lumpen-culture which Jewry brings to a society. It is as if one should celebrate pimping, prostitution, loan sharking, and the rackets as somehow being culturally enriching. What has Jewry ever brought to our peoples that has enriched us? I daresay nothing. We would be infinitely better off had Hymiewood and the entertainment industry never existed at all. Our children would be imbibing authentic folk and classical culture instead of the sea of liquid manure that is poured out on a daily basis by the ancestral progenitors of filth and swine slop.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  118. Corvinus says:
    @anonymous

    “No *you* mean envy”

    No, it was jealousy, especially Ford, who built an entire worldview around “dangerous Jews”, especially those whom he believed were ought to steal his invention. Hence, his publications helped popularize the idea of a “Jewish World Conspiracy”. Of course, Ford would have never dreamed of a day where a Jew would be the head of his motor company.

  119. Corvinus says:
    @Mulegino1

    “Anyone with even a cursory familiarity with Christian European culture will acknowledge its total superiority”

    That would be the ceremonial wine talking. The reality is that God would not condone such an attitude.

    Galatians 6:1, From the Phillip’s translation–Even if a man should be detected in some sin, my brothers, the spiritual ones among you should quietly set him back on the right path, not with any feeling of superiority but being yourself on guard against temptation.

    “We would be infinitely better off had Hymiewood and the entertainment industry never existed at all.”

    YOU, not we. And you could be right. Then again, probably not.

    “Leave it to a Jew or a Judeophile to claim that the First Amendment protects thievery and the corruption of culture.”

    First, I am Goy. All Goy. Second, reread Comment 69.

    • Replies: @Mulegino1
  120. Corvinus says:
    @Counterinsurgency

    “That didn’t happen back in the 1990s. Postings such as yours back then would ordinarily draw concurrence, apologies, or dead silence.”

    Um, no. Postings back then, like now, would generate similar responses. There was opposition back then as there is now.

    “I remember that, even back around AD 2008, people were still wishing that the media could be as reliable as it was during WW II.”

    Actually, the media is not as bad as some people make it out to be. The problem is some on the Left and the Right are becoming ignorant, perhaps even willfully. It is much easier to say “Fake News” and “The media lies” rather than than delve long and hard about what is said in their stories and commentaries. Instead, confirmation bias and the fundamental attribution error runs rampant. In this way, people who believe in “Fake News” and “The media lies” no longer have to think. In other words, they are becoming intellectually sterile.

    “Nobody is wishing that now: the media has managed to discredit itself retroactively.”

    No, the discrediting comes from those who no longer want to take time and energy into truly understanding an issue from multiple perspectives. Rather, they say “Fake News” and “The media lies”. It truly is unhealthy for a representative democracy and the exchange of ideas.

    “The “reasonable man, benefit of the doubt” approach is a lot like robo-calls: too much risk, not enough reward, so don’t listen.”

    That is not entirely accurate.

    • Replies: @Counterinsurgency
  121. @anonymous

    I like our Darwinian Just So Stories. I would have liked to be Darwin’s house guest for the weekend and proffered, to remind or tell him, of the tribal people’s of southern Africa and Amazonia who don’t have counting numbers beyond 1, 2, lots. I would suggest that the prevailing innumeracy of voters and politicians is the result of numeracy as a cognitive ability only evolving very late. It also suggests explanations for resentment of smart Greeks, Armenians and Jews who could keep track of debts and of a farmer’s credit in stored grain….

  122. Corvinus says:
    @anonymous

    “Why were they in a position to do this in the first place? Could it be they created a civilisation (‘wealth’) which allowed them to conquer others-as all human groups have done.”

    Europeans borrowed heavily from other civilizations to put them in a position to jackboot anyone who got in their way. It is in their DNA.

    “Or are you one of these people who believe Africans had advanced civilisations?”

    Of course Africans had advanced civilizations. Would you like to know more, citizen?

    “Europe is more corrupt than Africa?”

    Just as corrupt. Again, Europeans put that continent in that position. Or are you one of those people who whitewash the impact of colonization and imperialism?

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  123. @anonymous

    Without fire? It occurs to me that there are two kinds of “without fire”. One is totally without – not even utilising fire started by lightening. The other is inability to start a fire. Which are you referring to? It is easy enough to imagine Equatorial Africans not having the use of fire until it was introduced from elsewhere as I doubt that there would have been many persistent fires started by lightening.

    As to the early Caucasoid returns to Africa the only (superficial) reason for not saying “of course, what would you expect?” is the solid blackness of most Nilotic black Africans. As against that superficial view I pose my own observation that East Africans tend to be good looking by Caucasoid (no doubt totally culturally determined) standards in a way those they happily call “Bantu” are not. Being male I notice the females most and it is interesting that even East Africans who class themselves as Bantu may be finer featured than thecWest Africans – successful Hutu acquiring Tutsi wives maybe? No doubt there are portraits of Gannibal….

    Maybe a few quick searches would enlighten me but I would be interested in what DNA evidence says about returns to Africa and also what objective measures comparable to long distance running and sprinting might separate East and West Africans on cognitive abilities. (Equally of course within different West African tribes and castes as for Yoruba, Igbo etc.)

  124. Mulegino1 says:
    @Corvinus

    You might be a goy, but most likely the kind that turn light switches on for the beards on Saturday- so they will not run afoul of their ridiculous Talmudic interpretation of the Old Testament prohibition of building a fire on the sabbath.

    “Anyone with even a cursory familiarity with Christian European culture will acknowledge its total superiority”

    I notice you did not use the full quotation with respect to our Christian European culture being superior to anything produced in the lousy cacophonous shtetl rats nests. Every refined Jew was a product of assimilation into the superior European Christian culture; the Hollywood Jews, being mostly of Russian or Polish origin, lacked refinement, and simply emerged like rats from ships out of the Pale of Settlement.

    Contemporary Judaism and Jewry have about as much to do with the religion of the Patriarchs and Prophets who anticipated Christ as King Kamehameha or Shaka Zulu.

  125. @Corvinus

    Advanced African civilisations? Tell us more including how they rose and fell. Did they have writing and mathematics like the Maya?

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  126. @Heros

    I was simply emphasising my good standing as one who could detect a fake Darwin quote without in any way being tarred with any of the usual UR thread pejoratives. No Galton was not Jewish fwiw.

  127. Corvinus says:
    @Mulegino1

    “You might be a goy…”

    LOL. It never ceases to amaze me how some of the fine posters here have a Joo affliction–anyone and everyone who dares to question their thought process is a Joo or carries their water.

    Again, I am goy. Pure goy.

    “I notice you did not use the full quotation with respect to our Christian European culture being superior…”

    Because it is not, as I provided the requisite Biblical citation. Perhaps you ought to read your holy book before you spout off anymore nonsense. God is watching you.

    “Contemporary Judaism and Jewry have about as much to do with the religion of the Patriarchs and Prophets who anticipated Christ as King Kamehameha or Shaka Zulu.”

    All your lies are belong to us.

    • Replies: @Seraphim
  128. Seraphim says:
    @ariadna

    It is rather Crow, the scavenging carrion crow, whose irritating ‘crowing’ is the ominous omen of death. Crow usually raise fear and repugnance, as it is linked with sorcery and death. And stealing, even from their own kind.

  129. Seraphim says:
    @Corvinus

    Shabbos goys are pure goy also.

    • Agree: Mulegino1
    • Replies: @Corvinus
  130. Thim says:

    I did not know about all these jew blackface entertainers. Now I am beginning to remember why I used to like jews so much. As to the author of this article, he is a liar and an historical dimwit. Birth Of A Nation, for one, was not set in the Civil War, and neither were the heroic freedom fighters of the KKK, which was comprised of the very best Americans of that generation, and were admired worldwide. The context of that movie was the reconstruction period. And oh yes, keep telling us how ” intelligent” blacks are. Only liars talk that way. Everyone knows better.

  131. joef says:
    @Counterinsurgency

    But this leaves unanswered the question of why the (a,b,c) types aren’t simply told that they are doing something bad and illegal, a simple shakedown.

    Thats because then they would have to admit the leftist encouragement of afro american misbehavior was a bad idea. And since it was a leftist idea, supported by the cowardly hypocritical limo liberals, they will never admit their own culpability in this.

    You have a point that many, in this age of group identity politics, act in a more stereotypical manner than as individuals. They seem to always be following a leftist script, in the hopes of gaining unearned benefits. However judging individuals is not just about independent identity. Its about only being guilty for ones own actions, and not accountable for the actions of others (despite being in the same group).

    Leftist love group guilt because they have used this concept so successfully against the average White male, imposing guilt for things 400 years before he was born. I don’t like it when they do it to us, thus I have a hard time hypocritically doing it to others. A persons guilt or innocence ends with themselves, no one else. I am solely responsible for my own actions alone, no one else’s (including actions of the group that I belong to).

    [For full disclosure of my own hypocrisy in this matter; my paleocon racial realist tendencies does describe afro americans in the same collective guilt manner that I dislike. I do acknowledge that there are many Black outliers, that behave with decency, in comparison to observed afro group behavior that is ruinous to this nation.

    However, no other group expresses the antipathy that most afro americans have towards others, nor the destructiveness towards civilized society that they cause. Afros consistently behave badly, and it can be readily observed in almost any urban afro ghetto.

    I do not believe that they are intrinsically bad, but that that they collectively commit themselves to doing bad; thus they have the ability to reform themselves, but choose not to. And our failure to confront this problem can only lead to further decline in the future.

    By allowing the afro to act in antisocial ways, we open the door for other groups (including Whites) to act in the same way].

  132. Truth says:

    I’m glad this subject was touched upon. When I watch this clip here, I am totally shocked, angered and offended by the stereotypical and wanton deception it depicts! How many are with me?

  133. @Corvinus

    Nice try. And quite interesting. But they all fail the tests you set up for yourself of them being “advanced” (even the Mayans invented or inherited a writing system) and of Europeans borrowing heavily from them. The link, btw, is a bit imprecise as when it treats the Kongo “civilisation” as a big rubber exporter. That happened under the brutal rule of King Leopold after about 1890.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  134. Heros says:
    @Corvinus

    The jews moved to California because Edison would not allow them to use his patent to produce pornography.

    • Agree: Mulegino1
    • Replies: @Corvinus
  135. @joef

    By allowing the afro to act in antisocial ways, we open the door for other groups (including Whites) to act in the same way].

    That’s one of my main points, although I don’t put it that way. The allowing is a very dangerous thing to do, since other groups can be a _lot_ more destructive that Blacks when they decide to be destructive.

    If you want a book about why certain groups act in certain ways, take a look at Clarke, _A Farewell to Alms: A Brief Economic History of the World (The Princeton Economic History of the Western World)_, 2019/01/19. Seriously.

    The Left believes that individuals are emergent properties of groups for more reasons that convenience, see Hicks op cit.

    As far as good and evil goes, right now I’m trying to continue breathing, eating, water, clothing, and living inside. I look for threats and means of neutralizing them, while trying very hard to avoid making new threats. That’s it. With no base religion, the West is reduced to my policy on a good day. On a bad day, the West wants to sacrifice itself to non-Western groups in partial expiation of its sins. Strangely enough, the bad day advocates never seem to specify themselves as the sacrificial victims.

    • Replies: @joef
  136. @Corvinus

    Corvinus:

    1. Your observations directly contradict my experience.
    2. You aren’t looking for common ground, you’re trying to win a communication contest.
    3. And you’re continuing he “reasonable man” approach, with the addition of rather harsh statements about “people”, e.g.
    No, the discrediting comes from those who no longer want to take time and energy into truly understanding an issue from multiple perspectives. Rather, they say “Fake News” and “The media lies”. It truly is unhealthy for a representative democracy and the exchange of ideas.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  137. @Corvinus

    patents are part of economic Zionism.. here is some more https://www.presstv.com/Detail/2019/02/12/588370/Iran-oil-Europe-OPEC-Russia-gas-market-sanctions
    The rule of law produces monopoly power from thin air.. and the government uses rule of law to grant monopoly powers to private for profit corporate and private interests. These are called patents and copyrights Ben Franklin and international propagandist, put them into to the USA constitution from his experience in London as a USA lobbyist. But the British courts were threatened to be hanged by the masses of people in a hearing about whether or copyrights or patents had a perpetual lifetime and could be transferred from Generation to generation in Aristocratic Coffee House England.

    The court saved itself from being hanged on the spot by the crowd by saying no the corporations and Aristocrats cannot have a monopoly for life, cannot gift those monopolies to their heirs, and the longest time a patent or a copyright can survive will be 7 years. this happened in England just before the USA constitution was drafted,, so Ben (I think he was Jewish) Franklin put it in the USA constitution. Article I, Sec 8. [8] The Congress shall have the Power To:..promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive right to their respective Writings and Discoveries. <= this clause in the USA constitution accounts for the massive difference in income and wealth between our richest and our poor, and it accounts for why monopoly powers run America instead of competitive powers.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  138. @joef

    “By allowing the afro to act in antisocial ways, we open the door for other groups (including Whites) to act in the same way].”

    Laughing.

    Pretty soon the whites would be tossing tea into the bay . . . tar and feathering people, brawling in the streets over taxes on beer, and inciting revolution . . .

    Better make sure to keep those blacks in line or we’ll have a civil war . . . and then

    “Fire and brimstone coming down from the skies! Rivers and seas boiling!”
    “Forty years of darkness! Earthquakes! Volcanoes!”
    “The dead rising from the grave!”

    And then,

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JmzuRXLzqKk

  139. Corvinus says:
    @Wizard of Oz

    “But they all fail the tests you set up for yourself of them being “advanced” (even the Mayans invented or inherited a writing system).”

    Of course they were advanced, from their system of government to their economy to their architecture. The link I provided offered glimpses into their civilization. You simply do not want to admit it.

    https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2016/mar/18/story-of-cities-5-benin-city-edo-nigeria-mighty-medieval-capital-lost-without-trace

    https://www.jstor.org/stable/20853124?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

    https://www.history.com/news/who-was-the-richest-man-in-history-mansa-musa

    “and of Europeans borrowing heavily from them.”

    You mean how much they borrowed from Mesopotamia and the Chinese.

  140. Corvinus says:
    @Seraphim

    “Shabbos goys are pure goy also.”

    Do you check under your bed AND in your closet for Joos? Do you always label anyone who you even remotely think is a Joo or is a “shabbos goy”? Are you truly that frightened? Man, your parents really did a number on you.

    • Replies: @Mulegino1
  141. Corvinus says:
    @Counterinsurgency

    “1. Your observations directly contradict my experience.”

    Which means we’ve had different encounters in our life.

    “2. You aren’t looking for common ground, you’re trying to win a communication contest.”

    I am looking to communicate and find common ground in the process.

    “3. And you’re continuing he “reasonable man” approach, with the addition of rather harsh statements about “people”, e.g.”

    A person can be reasonable when they are critiquing their world around them, which may include “harsh” statements about people.

  142. Corvinus says:
    @sally_at_the_place

    “patents are part of economic Zionism.. here is some more”

    So the Founding Fathers were economic Zionists when they put forth the federal government as the purveyors of copyrights and patents? LOL!

    “The rule of law produces monopoly power from thin air.. and the government uses rule of law to grant monopoly powers to private for profit corporate and private interests. These are called patents and copyrights Ben Franklin and international propagandist, put them into to the USA constitution from his experience in London as a USA lobbyist.”

    The purpose of patents was to offer legal protection for people who created an original idea and give them the opportunity to profit from their own individual and intellectual work. It is a “monopoly” only in the sense they exclusively may earn money from their invention or concept. It is also viewed as a property issue. The general purpose of patents is to reward scientific innovation.

    From Wikipedia–In 1474, in Venice, the first known patent law that granted inventors exclusive rights to their inventions was passed as a result of an economic policy. Thereafter, patents were a formal means of granting and restricting monopolies in Europe. The Venice statute had all the basic elements of a modern patent system—a requirement of novelty, proof of usefulness, and a requirement that the patentee describe and explain the invention. In 1624, in England, the Statute of Monopolies was passed primarily to restrict the power of the sovereign in granting monopolies. The Statute of Monopolies, for the first time in history, defined the following: that inventions had to be “new” to attain a monopoly, and that a monopoly would be granted only for a limited period of time (in this case 14 years.) These aspects have carried forward and helped shape the United States Patent Law.

    “so Ben (I think he was Jewish) Franklin put it in the USA constitution…”

    In your world, EVERYONE is Jewish! LOL. Franklin was freaking English. His ancestors were Puritan.

    • Replies: @Father Coughlin
    , @Seraphim
  143. Corvinus says:
    @Heros

    You mean Jews and non-Jews moved to California, as well as other places, to make porn. Interesting how high IQ, high time-preference whites cannot get enough of the stuff. Just goes to show that white people are prurient by their very nature. So, how do you propose to minimize this natural curiosity among white people?

    • Replies: @Mulegino1
  144. Mulegino1 says:
    @Corvinus

    Like any other type of vermin, Jewry is ubiquitous in most unclean and subterranean venues of the host societies. It is enough to peruse the flat screens of filthy and subversive spectacle, which are Kosher redoubts. The Jews as a collective excel at entertainment and cultural corruption because of their age old adeptness at piggy backing to influence and enrichment upon the vices of the goyim.

    There is no need to look under beds and inside closets; it is more a question of looking under rocks and inside sewers.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  145. joef says:
    @Counterinsurgency

    As far as good and evil goes, right now I’m trying to continue breathing, eating, water, clothing, and living inside. I look for threats and means of neutralizing them, while trying very hard to avoid making new threats. That’s it.

    Some insight into this from my own experiences with growing up with it, and living with it (mostly from the Bronx, with friends/relatives experiences from areas of Brooklyn/Newark/Philly/Yonkers mixed in); growing up in a urban blue collar working class Catholic ghetto (Irish/Italian/Polish/Portuguese/Porto Rican), that adjoined urban afro american ghetto areas.

    Our neighborhoods first started to deteriorate in the 70s when they desegregated our schools. In middle school, you had high school aged afros (from their lack of academic promotion at the time), who introduced unprecedented levels of unprovoked violence, and crime, that severely inhibited academic learning in the school. Threats of being menaced with a knife was fairly common, to which stabbings were becoming a more & more frequent occurrence.

    The school administration pretended nothing untoward was going on, with incessant coverups and excuse making. By the time I entered High School, my first acquaintance was stabbed to death after school , at a local pizzeria. And it only got much much worse from there. Eventually visiting people in the hospital (and occasionally a funeral home) from violent attacks was not unusual at all.

    Learning that afros are aggressive, but not brave, and prefer to target the weak, you learned to make yourself a hard target. Many in my neighborhood became ruthless street fighters (thats street fighting that usually sends someone off to the hospital, not the school yard kind of suburbia). Many of us lifted weights, carried knives, and baseball bats in the car. Many of us took up boxing/wrestling/judo/karate (full contact, not esoteric) to provide an edge in sending the other guy to the hospital instead of oneself.

    But there was an unintended consequence of all this focus on violence with the afro. Some of the people I knew from the streets became more violent than the afro themselves, with a much more cunning attitude towards criminality than the unsophisticated afro was capable of. Afros were basically walking IDs, using criminality as a means of satisfying their immediate gratification. Whereas the White criminals were much more brutally ambitious.

    In repelling the afro hoard, some lost their own souls in fighting it, with some becoming worse then very thing they were fighting against. Its a shame that most millennial children of urban white flight refugees have no clue what their parents escaped from.

    • Replies: @Counterinsurgency
  146. Mulegino1 says:
    @Corvinus

    You mean Jews and non-Jews moved to California, as well as other places, to make porn. Interesting how high IQ, high time-preference whites cannot get enough of the stuff. Just goes to show that white people are prurient by their very nature. So, how do you propose to minimize this natural curiosity among white people?

    I am not aware of non-Jews in any great numbers moving to California to make porn. It would appear that your fragile claim of “I am not a Jew” is running on empty. If you are not a Jew, then you are a fit representative of that most abject and beaten down class of human beings imaginable- the shabbos goy- whose sole object is to become a kosher subject to his Jewish handlers. If that is the case, you are nothing more than a kosher cog in a Jewish production, or better yet, a monkey for your organ grinder patrons.

    If you are not, then please make an explicit statement of Christian belief, wherein you renounce your allegiance to the people that crucified the Lord of history, who had absolutely zero affinity with the contemporary Central Asian tribalists who haunt Brooklyn and make the lives of Palestinian Christians and Muslims intolerable. Do this now, or slink away.

  147. Corvinus says:
    @Mulegino1

    “Like any other type of vermin, Jewry is ubiquitous in most unclean and subterranean venues of the host societies.”

    It is other than surprising that you point the finger at others rather than yourself All you are doing here is making a clear misrepresentation about another group of people, which clearly violates the will of God. Proverbs 6:16-19–There are six things that the Lord hates, seven that are an abomination to him: haughty eyes, a lying tongue, and hands that shed innocent blood, a heart that devises wicked plans, feet that make haste to run to evil, a false witness who breathes out lies, and one who sows discord among brother.

    “There is no need to look under beds and inside closets; it is more a question of looking under rocks and inside sewers.”

    Which you find men and women of each race, ethnicity, and religion who have pushed porn onto the masses. Yet, you find it, wrongly, to be under the exclusive domain of one group. That is patently false.

    I thought white people have the internal resolve to withstand alleged Jewish machinations. Why are you outright refusing to acknowledge their propensity to succumb lustful behaviors on their accord? I thought they have the moral compass to not be invited to partake in sin. Perhaps it is an internal flaw that you are conveniently glossing over.

    “I am not aware of non-Jews in any great numbers moving to California to make porn.”

    So now you are feigning ignorance. Will you continue to reveal your ugly character?

    “It would appear that your fragile claim of “I am not a Jew” is running on empty. If you are not a Jew, then you are a fit representative of that most abject and beaten down class of human beings imaginable- the shabbos goy- whose sole object is to become a kosher subject to his Jewish handlers.”

    It would appear that, again, anyone who dares to question your take on matters is a Joo or a shabbos goy. Is this your default button by design?

    “If you are not, then please make an explicit statement of Christian belief, wherein you renounce your allegiance to the people that crucified the Lord of history, who had absolutely zero affinity with the contemporary Central Asian tribalists who haunt Brooklyn and make the lives of Palestinian Christians and Muslims intolerable.”

    It is abundantly clear which side I am. All you are doing here is making a clear misrepresentation about another group of people, which clearly violates the will of God. Why must you continue to make Him your object of mockery?

    • Replies: @Mulegino1
  148. Mulegino1 says:

    All you are doing here is making a clear misrepresentation about another group of people, which clearly violates the will of God. Why must you continue to make Him your object of mockery?

    You could not be more wrong. Christ Himself called the leaders of the Jews children of the Devil for a reason, and they are also called the Synagogue of Satan in the Apocalypse. This, of course, does not refer to all of those born as Jews, but to those who consciously accept the Talmudic/ Jewish identity which is characterized by both the rejection of Christ and the concomitant Deicide committed by the Sanhedrin. The Pharisees were the founders of the religion we know as “Judaism” and that religion’s chief characteristic is Christ denial and the blasphemous rejection of the Divine Logos. Judaism is a husk, a drying empty chrysalis. Christianity is the fulfillment, the emergent butterfly. Christ and Christianity represent the life of the world; Talmudic Judaism represents nothing but a dead end.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  149. Mulegino1 says:
    @Corvinus

    Which you find men and women of each race, ethnicity, and religion who have pushed porn onto the masses. Yet, you find it, wrongly, to be under the exclusive domain of one group. That is patently false.

    Wrong. Not exclusive, but overwhelmingly preponderant with respect to the porn industry. Not all producers of porn are Jews, just as not all of the major Bolsheviks were Jews, or all of the international usurers are Jews, but their presence in all of these rotten endeavors is overwhelmingly disproportionate when demographics are taken into consideration.

    This is not surprising for a group which venerates such a fecund heap of nastiness as the Christ and goy hating Talmud.

  150. Corvinus says:
    @Mulegino1

    Christ Himself called the leaders of the Jews children of the Devil for a reason.

    No. Uses of that passage we find in the New Testament that give evidence of tensions between religious communities, well, “Christians” like yourself take them out of that historical context and pervert them to serve their own ends. Those who cite John, saying that “Jews are children of the devil” ignore statements in John, like ‘Salvation comes from the Jews.’” Your blasphemy is duly noted.

    “Wrong. Not exclusive, but overwhelmingly preponderant with respect to the porn industry.”

    Now you are backtracking. Perhaps you are confronted by your own guilt. That is a start.

    “but their presence in all of these rotten endeavors is overwhelmingly disproportionate when demographics are taken into consideration.”

    Then again, you press your default button. Again, when are you going to substantially address the culpability of the white audience who relishes in such filth, which is the labor by Jew and non-Jew filmmaker alike?

  151. @Corvinus

    “Jews are children of the devil” and ‘Salvation comes from the Jews.’” are not mutually exclusive.
    Nice try.

    “when are you going to substantially address the culpability of the white audience who relishes in such filth”

    I get why you are saying that. We obviously have a different definition of “who is my brother?” than you do.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  152. @Corvinus

    I agree with Corvinus here. There is nothing wrong with patents. Think of it as a grain subsidy. Instead of government paying you to plant, it gives you a monopoly to reap … if you can.

  153. Mulegino1 says:
    @Corvinus

    No. Uses of that passage we find in the New Testament that give evidence of tensions between religious communities, well, “Christians” like yourself take them out of that historical context and pervert them to serve their own ends. Those who cite John, saying that “Jews are children of the devil” ignore statements in John, like ‘Salvation comes from the Jews.’” Your blasphemy is duly noted.

    Sorry, but it is you that are wrong, because you ignore the fact that there was always a distinction between the general population of Judeans/Iudeos who happened to populate Palestine and who considered the Temple at Jerusalem to be the authentic center of the religion built upon the foundation of the Old Testament Patriarchs and Prophets- in anticipating of Christ- and the leadership of the Judeans (Pharisees, Saducees, etc.) whom Christ called the children of the Devil. The Pharisees were the founders of the rejectionist cult of Talmudism/Rabbinism/Judaism which post dated the founding of Christianity, and which forms the basis of contemporary Judaism and Jewish identity. Judaism is not founded upon Sacred Scripture in any appreciable sense, but upon the Babylonian Talmud.

    Now you are backtracking. Perhaps you are confronted by your own guilt. That is a start.

    I’m not backtracking at all. There simply are not enough Jews in the world to fill all the vacancies in Jewry’s criminal network, so naturally there will always be enough of the worst elements of the goyim to serve as their associates, however subordinate the latter may be.

    For not being a Jew, you sure spend a lot of time carrying water for the tribe. Nothing is more pitiful or contemptible than the slavish shabbos goy.

    • Replies: @Seraphim
    , @Corvinus
  154. Seraphim says:
    @Corvinus

    “PURITANS WERE MORE JEWISH THAN PROTESTANTS”, by Hugh Fogelman
    @http://www.christianity-revealed.com/cr/files/puritansweremorejewishthanprotestants.html

    “The Puritans felt that Parliament, and not the King, should have the final say and that the moral guidance for all legal decision should come from the Jewish Bible which they considered to be the highest authority in all matters.
    The Puritans were obsessed with the Bible and came to identify their political struggle against England with that of the ancient Hebrews against Pharaoh or the King of Babylon. Because they identified so strongly with ancient Israel, they chose to identify with the Old Testament (Hebrew Bible). (World Book Encyclopedia & Encyclopaedia Judaica) In 1620, the “Separatists” sailed for America on the Mayflower. The Separatists/Puritans who settled at Plymouth Colony called themselves “Pilgrims” because of their wanderings in search of religious freedom. The Puritan culture of New England was marked from the outset by a deep association with Jewish themes. No Christian community in history identified more with the Israelites of the Bible than did the first generations of settlers of the Massachusetts Bay Colony, who believed their own lives to be a literal reenactment of the biblical drama of the chosen people―they were the children of Israel and the ordinances of God’s Holy covenant by which they lived were His divine law. Since they viewed themselves as the persecuted victims of the sinful Christian establishment of the Old World (England), the Puritans also had a natural sympathy for the Jews of their own time. The Protestant Puritan leader Cotton Mather repeatedly referred to the Jews in his prayer for their conversion as God’s “Beloved People.” The New Israel―The influence of the Hebrew Bible marks every step of the Puritan exodus to their Zion in the wilderness of the New World. The Jewish Bible formed their minds and dominated their characters; its conceptions were their conceptions…
    The Puritans wholeheartedly believed that it was their special mission to establish in America a society precisely modeled on the precepts of Sacred Jewish Scriptures. The Massachusetts Bay Colony was at the very least a state inspired by and thoroughly devoted to the Jewish Bible. “If we keep this covenant,” Governor John Winthrop assured his people, “we shall find that the God of Israel is among us, but if we deal falsely with our God… we be consumed out of the good land whither we are going.” The Jewish covenant concept was thus the bedrock of all Puritan religious communities…
    the first settlers in New England called themselves “Christian Israel.” Comparison of the Puritan leaders with the great leaders of ancient Israel—especially Moses and Joshua—were common. So the names of Daniel, Jonathan, Esther, Enoch, Ezra, Rachel and a host of others were in constant use among the Puritans. Interestingly enough, there was a conspicuous absence of the names of Christian saints. Names of cities, towns and settlements likewise derived from Hebraic sources. This widespread use of biblical names, however, was not confined to the naming of offspring, cities and towns – names of many biblical heights were eventually bestowed upon the great mountains of America. Mount Carmel and Mount Horeb, home of the Prophets, were popular names, as was Mount Nebo, the final resting place of Moses. Names like Mount Ephraim, Mount Gilead, Mount Hermon, Mount Moriah, Mount Pisgah, were all popular as well. Some mountains in the New World were even called Mt. Sinai, Mount Zion and Mount Olive….

    Ben Franklin was raised in a devout Puritan home. He went a bit further by rejecting even the tenuous link that Puritans still maintained with Christianity: “God, in his divine mercy, however, chose to offer salvation to humankind through the death and resurrection of his only son, Jesus Christ”. Practically he became a Shabbos goy.

  155. Seraphim says:
    @Mulegino1

    One of the usual tricks by which the Shabbos goys try to justify their submission and perhaps alleviate their guilty conscience, is to point out to the ‘contradictions’ between different pronouncements of the Christ, taken out of their context and perverting them to serve their own ends.
    ‘Salvation comes FROM the Jews’ not BY the Jews. Jesus is the Salvation and he came out from the Jews, nobody doubted that.
    John’s passage is clear:
    “21 Jesus saith unto her, Woman, believe me, the hour cometh, when ye shall neither in this mountain, nor yet at Jerusalem, worship the Father. 22 Ye worship ye know not what: we know what we worship: for salvation is from the Jews. But the hour cometh, and now is, when the true worshippers shall worship the Father in spirit and in truth: for the Father seeketh such to worship him. 24 God is a Spirit: and they that worship him must worship him in spirit and in truth. 25 The woman saith unto him, I know that Messias cometh, which is called Christ: when he is come, he will tell us all things. 26 Jesus saith unto her, I that speak unto thee AM HE”… 40 So when the Samaritans were come unto him, they besought him that he would tarry with them: and he abode there two days. 41 And many more believed because of his own word; 42 And said unto the woman, Now we believe, not because of thy saying: for we have heard him ourselves, and know that this is indeed the Christ, the Saviour of the world”.

    • Agree: Mulegino1
    • Replies: @Corvinus
  156. Heros says:

    @Seraphim, @Mulegin1, @Joef, @Father Coughlin,

    Great job taking down Corvinus, thank you all. He is a typical shyster who with every sentence he writes makes clear why his people make such great paid liars (lawyers). Every time you read a Corvinus comment, imagine the face of Michael Cohen, that slimy rat faced lawyer Trump used.

    • Agree: Mulegino1
  157. @jbwilson24

    jbwilson24 wrote:

    The Nation of Islam is perhaps the only North American organization that can call out Jewish power and get away with it. More props to them.

    True because Jews hate whites, have for over a century been inciting blacks against whites, but know they have no ability to silence blacks via guilt-tripping as they do the Euros (http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2011/06/guilt-tripping-the-europeans/).

    So Jews fear blacks as not easily intimidated by political correctness (which is really Jew-imposed speech code) like whites. Because Jews have glorified blacks to diminish whites, a free thinking black like Farrakhan who calls them out frightens them as uncontrollable like no white man can since they’ve succeeded at stigmatizing white voices so Jews see grave danger that the citizenry they’ve trained to heed black voices spewing the Jew line will now heed this black voice who does not bow to Jew pressure.

    Thus the NOIRG’s work is right now on the critical path in humanity’s struggle to survive this final push currently being undertaken by these enemies of humanity.

    The clock’s running out and you have the ball, guys. The rest of humanity is counting on you to bring the light of this truth to the masses before we’re all either genocided or enslaved by those Christ Jesus revealed to be children of their father the devil. We cherish with great appreciation Minister Farrakhan’s fortitude as spokesman and hope NOIRG continues to provide him with maximum effort and support in the scholarship of research and info gathering.

  158. @Corvinus

    So, to continue my comment:
    After some thought, I’ve decided that you’re actually performing a public service. Somebody has to continue demonstrating that _claiming_ to be a disinterested person who sees both sides is not the same as _being_ a disinterested person. If you were what you claimed, you would have reached some sort of common ground with those who disagree with you. As it is, that doesn’t happen. This is obvious to anybody who follows this forum. By demonstrating the method (simple contradiction masquerading as false disinterestedness), you keep it in the public mind, and thus provide a public service. I was wrong from the start!!

    So: continue with your glorious work!

    Now, you get the last word, as I really have no more to contribute on this subject.

    Counterinsurgency

  159. @Corvinus

    So, to continue my comment:
    After some thought, I’ve decided that you’re actually performing a public service. Somebody has to continue demonstrating that _claiming_ to be a disinterested person who sees both sides is not the same as _being_ a disinterested person. If you were what you claimed, you would have reached some sort of common ground with those who disagree with you. As it is, that doesn’t happen. This is obvious to anybody who follows this forum. By demonstrating the method (simple contradiction masquerading as false disinterestedness), you keep it in the public mind, and thus provide a public service. I was wrong from the start!!

    So: continue with your glorious work!

    Now, you get the last word, as I really have no more to contribute on this subject.

    Counterinsurgency

  160. @Franz

    …Russian truckers where I work…(i)n one of the last working factories in my Rustbelt town… told me that their Grandpa’s version of the same form of terror…

    Deep how the truth always fits together.

    Solzhenitsyn has said/written that what we’ve been taught to call “The Russian Revolution” was actually called by the Russians (who were overwhelmingly Christian and obviously white) “The Jewish Terror”. Bolshevik leadership was overwhelmingly Jews and they slaughtered over 65 million Russians and Ukrainians according to Solzhenitsyn.

    Economic systems are only tools used by some in ethnic warfare. Marxist communism is obviously a Jew tool to dominate other groups to the point of enslavement or genocide.

    The terms “Right” and “Left” can be insightful and very useful if applied like this:

    The “Right” are those of a specific nation (ethnicity) who seek to 1) obey the time-tested rules of their society; and 2) punish those who violate those rules to keep order so that society may continue to benefit from those time-tested rules;

    The “Left” are outsiders to the specific nation (ethnicity) along with members of the nation who are deviants who seek to destroy the rules-based cultural habitat of the nation so as to genocide the normal members of the society.

    The “Right” is “reactoinary” because when the Left attempts to destroy their society/habitat they react in defense to exclude the “Left” so that they can resume living in peace under their own time-tested standards.

  161. @Heros

    Thank you for this invaluable response accurately challenging certain parts of the main article.

    Truth can only enhance discussion here in the marketplace of ideas.

    It is irrefutable that in the real time experience of those alive today black-on-white violence is hideously disproportionately high in contrast to white-on-black violence. Arguing to the contrary requires citing of television, movies and books to challenge this obvious reality of what occurs daily on the ground in our nation.

    Your feedback though not positively reinforcing benefits the article’s author(s) in the long run by refining future writings away from use/reliance on any of the countless Jew fictions by which all of us in the US have been subjected to relentless brainwashing.

    Both the statistical analysis you share as well as the anecdotal observations of others you pass along show the realities.

    There’s plenty of common ground here without compromising truth.

  162. @Mulegino1

    “Anyone with even a cursory familiarity with Christian European culture will acknowledge its total superiority”

    This is, unfortunately, not quite the case. The entire “abolish Whiteness” crusade is just a racial rephrase of “Hey, Hey, Ho, Ho, Western Civ has got to go” from the 1960s.

    A surprising number of groups are unable to live in Western civilization. Their reasons vary:
    a) Crude IQ. A substantial portion of their group [1] is at or below IQ 83 and cannot do anything of economic value. They usually do not understand much of the Enlightenment beliefs that are necessary for industrial society, and do not like the parts they understand.
    b) Religious identity. Group members cannot function without their religion, and their religion rejects individualism, rationality as a means of settling disputes (e.g. Corvinus, who tries to use it to continue disputes), the importance of physical reality, the unimportance of revelation, etc. The most obvious case this in the US was the role of Yankees in embroiling the US in various “crusades” to do various things (promote equality of outcomes by using force to free slaves, for example) that somehow never got done, but sounded good before they were tried. The Jews are another example, although in there case they appear to be following short term objectives fed by fear of having to flee the country and a general rejection of the Enlightenment _in addition to_ a desire to preserve internal structure.
    c) Conquest, Glory, and Loot of Empire (CG&LoE). In a word, “barbarians”. This group wants to be American, but only because they’ve heard that there is money in it. They are simple barbarians, who destroy the structure they come to live off of. Groups of type (c) can become type (a) and (b) groups in the second or third generation, but they very seldom become productive participants in industrial society.
    In fact, comparing the great migrations to the US during the interval AD 1845 – AD 1924 with the period of liberal rule post-AD 1970 to present, the descendants of the great migration immigrants were _less_ productive (by several measures) during the later interval.

    Note also that not one of the three groups is essentially motivated by evil, nor does even one of them care about long term consequences. They are not bad people, only people, but you can say that about anybody on the planet, and for that matter any of the higher mammals (e.g. lions, water buffalo, Grizzly bears, etc.). The question is not “bad”, it is “can you live with them”?

    Even liberals apply the “can you live with them” test. Note Sailor’s recent article about bears on California, and that the highly liberal Californians have no intention of re-introducing Grizzly bears to their state. Also, note that liberals cannot live with Americans (see comments to the root article of this comment).

    Counterinsurgency

    1] somewhere around 40% assuming mean IQ of 85 and SD of 12. It’s a pretty daunting fraction: 2 out of every 5 children won’t ever have jobs or start a business!

    • Replies: @Seraphim
  163. @Jimbeamplease

    Jimbeamplease wrote:

    I’m a giant racist. It grew out of my living near black America. What a horror!

    Among non-Leftists whites (NOT Jews) those who are doing the most damage to all of us in America now are those who “virtue signal” about how wonderful they see blacks as being FROM A SAFE DISTANCE.

    There are more and more mature, compassionate, thoughtful black men today who acknowledge and respect the views of whites who are race realists. Only the mindless advocates deny the reality of contemporary black behavior’s destructiveness AND that the responsibility for it DOES NOT LIE OUTSIDE THE BLACK COMMUNITY.

  164. @OilcanFloyd

    Thank you, OilcanFloyd, for this existentially necessary truth worth repeating relentlessly:

    Why should Jews get a pass on their slave holding/slave trading past, their cynical role in the civil rights movement, their obvious role in stirring up racial animosity today, extreme tribalism to the detriment of everyone else…..when they are busy destroying the nation accusing others, often falsely, of doing the same? That’s the issue!

    Jewish power is a very real problem that has to be solved.

  165. @Priss Factor

    Today, most are products of black men and white women…

    Based on personal observation my guess is that this is empirically very accurate; sadly the overwhelming pattern is that these children seem to be “symbols of” a very temporary sexual relationship as opposed to the lifetime monogamy foundational to the stability, prosperity and general quality of life historically in Christian Western Civilization.

    Others of your points strike as compelling or at least meritorious of consideration as we seek the betterment of humankind, although not error free.

  166. Corvinus says:
    @Father Coughlin

    ““Jews are children of the devil” and ‘Salvation comes from the Jews.’” are not mutually exclusive.”

    Says who? Offer an explanation.

    “We obviously have a different definition of “who is my brother?” than you do.”

    You do realize that this “we” includes your “own kind” who makes and watches porn, even people (like Christians) whom you believe would refrain from such activity. Again, when are you going to substantially address the culpability of the white audience who relishes in such filth, especially among your own ranks?

  167. Corvinus says:
    @OilcanFloyd

    “Why should Jews get a pass on their slave holding/slave trading past”

    Some engaged in the slave trade. That past has been overstated.

    “their cynical role in the civil rights movement”

    By whom? Why?

    “their obvious role in stirring up racial animosity today”

    Obvious to you, but not normies, who have a much better pulse on things, given your own recency and confirmation biases.

    “extreme tribalism to the detriment of everyone else”

    Of course, you do realize that you are engaging in this “extreme tribalism” yourself, right? Or are you being your typical oblivious self?

    • Replies: @ariadna
    , @OilcanFloyd
  168. @Jake

    Reinforcing your point, Jake:

    Jews were able to purchase an astounding 78% of all Trans-Atlantic slave trading vessels. Over 75% of Jewish families in Charleston, South Carolina; Richmond, Virginia; and Savannah, Georgia, owned slaves. Approximately 40% of all Jewish households in the United States owned at least one slave.

    https://republicstandard.com/everything-you-were-taught-about-slavery-lie/

    It seems to be commonly recognized that the percentage of white NON JEW homes in the US owning slaves pre 1863 was never higher than .35% meaning less that ONE PER CENT.

  169. @MikeatMikedotMike

    Whatever horror caused by the genocidal wearing of blackface by Jews in the 19th and early 20th centuries, has certainly been made up for by Jewish run Hollywood’s complete and comprehensive elevation of the American negro toward divinity through cinema, music, and television over the last 50 years.

    Both have been disservices to blacks, the later because it’s created an unfounded arrogance of grandeur and a hydroplaning over the realities of responsibility, all part of the Jews’ use of blacks as foot soldiers / cannon fodder to blacks’ harm in the Jew war on whites.

    Conversely, there has not been a group of people in the United States, in that same last 50 years, that have been as thoroughly degraded, denigrated, mocked, miscategorized, scapegoated, and vilified as the rural white southern male by that same (((Hollywood))) racket.

    Absolutely true. Constant deception by Jews (they make every month “Jew-lie”) has been harmful to every segment of traditional America, all to Jew benefit.

    The tribal enemy of humanity has harmed all with their extreme out-group hostility and I for one am glad to see blacks like NOI “naming the Jew” instead of doing what the Jews want blacks doing – unceasingly and mindlessly faulting whitey.

  170. @2stateshmustate

    2stateshmustate wrote:

    Mr. Farrakhan…(one of)… the very few with the guts to talk about this.

    So true. He and Dr. Duke, another rare truth-teller, should hold a summit on the topic of the constant Jew lie. (They could even hold it in Ju-ly. 😉

  171. Corvinus says:
    @Mulegino1

    “Sorry, but it is you that are wrong, because you ignore the fact that there was always a distinction…”

    Now you are trying to state one group of Jews are “genuine” and another group of Jews shanghai’ed the faith. Have you no shame in how you continue to denigrate a group through your own warped sense of historical accuracy?

    “Judaism is not founded upon Sacred Scripture in any appreciable sense, but upon the Babylonian Talmud.”

    You are completely off base here.

    http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/pcb_documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_20020212_popolo-ebraico_en.html

    “‘For not being a Jew, you sure spend a lot of time carrying water for the tribe. Nothing is more pitiful or contemptible than the slavish shabbos goy.”

    What is pitiful and contemptible is representing yourself as a Christian but acting contrary to its fundamental tenets. All you have left is designating anyone who questions your alleged authority on the nature of Jews as being their defenders. It is markedly easier to take this approach because then you are able to erect strawman. The jig is up. Obviously, you will neglect to take this advice into account, and continue to bastardize His message.

    • Replies: @Rogue
    , @Mulegino1
  172. Corvinus says:
    @Seraphim

    “One of the usual tricks by which the Shabbos goys try to justify their submission and perhaps alleviate their guilty conscience, is to point out to the ‘contradictions’ between different pronouncements of the Christ, taken out of their context and perverting them to serve their own ends.”

    LOL, speak from experience? Thanks for revealing your soul. It is extremely enlightening.

  173. Corvinus says:
    @Seraphim

    “Ben Franklin was raised in a devout Puritan home. He went a bit further by rejecting even the tenuous link that Puritans still maintained with Christianity: “God, in his divine mercy, however, chose to offer salvation to humankind through the death and resurrection of his only son, Jesus Christ”. **Practically he became a Shabbos goy.”**

    So you make this comment, do not provide any background or context, and somehow we are to believe you, that Franklin, a Founding Father, was a “Shabbos goy”? LOL.

  174. ariadna says:
    @Corvinus

    “Some [Jews] engaged in the slave trade.”
    True. Also:
    Some Jews own the global banking system.
    Very much like:
    Some Chinese have narrow eyes.

  175. Rogue says:
    @Corvinus

    Sorry, but people far more expert than yourself (Michael Hoffman for example) are quite clear that the modern Jewish religion is based far more on the Talmud (the Pharisees) than on the Tanakh (the Old Testament in Christian terminology).

    Some religious Jews adhere to the latter, but not the Jewish religious mainstream.

  176. Mulegino1 says:
    @Corvinus

    You cite a Vatican document which speaks about the Old Testament and the New Testament. Contemporary Judaism is, for the most part, based upon the Babylonian Talmud and not the Old Testament. As a matter of fact, the oldest extant edition of the Old Testament is the Greek Septuagint, published centuries before the birth of Christ, and based, so far as we can tell, upon the Paleo-Hebrew version of the Scriptures. Most of the recent finds such as the Dead Sea Scrolls and the documents at Qmran, dating from the first century A.D., for the most part, vindicate the accuracy of the Septuagint.

    The Masoretic text of the Jews, which dates from the Medieval period, is written, not in the Paleo-Hebrew of the original Hebrew texts of the Old Testament, but in the Babylonian Hebrew script of the Talmud, and falsifies many of the original passages of Scripture relating to the prophecies regarding Christ. This is just one more example of how Talmudism/Rabbinism/Judaism’s primary identity lies in the rejection of Christ as the Word Incarnate and Son of God. Therefore, contemporary Judaism is a rejectionist cult, not based in any appreciable sense upon the Old Testament Scriptures but upon the pointless contention and drivel of dueling rabbis.

    It is therefore not difficult to see the Jewish identity as a pathological and anti-social one, and nowhere does this manifest itself any more clearly than in Jewry’s relentless subversion and destruction of its host cultures.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  177. @joef

    some lost their own souls in fighting it
    I’ve been reading about the Fall of Rome for quite some time. Once, decades ago, I read a volume from (I think) the 1930s. It contained a quote in support of something that was considered common wisdom at the time: that during Late Antiquity (AD 250- AD 750) there was no written acknowledgement that Rome either was falling or had fallen, although Rome (the city itself) had fallen and its aqueducts destroyed c.a. AD 538, about half way through Late Antiquity.
    The quote, heavily paraphrased, ran something like this:
    “It is said by some that Rome is no more, that we lack training in rhetoric and law and engineering that the ancients had. This is true. Our time is spent fighting barbarians and training for war, and we have not the time to learn the fine points of rhetoric we cannot use, or the law of a peace we do not have, or the engineering that we do not have the men to practice. But we are Romans for all of that, as civilized and more for we have Christianity and we are loyal servants of the Empire and the Emperor.”
    Eventually, they hadn’t the leisure to even write quotes (heavy paraphrases) like the one above.

    People never know when they’ve lost everything. That’s left to later historians.

    OTOH, when something dies, usually something is born. It’s just that you never know quite what that something is.

    People who actually have to fight are quite often changed by it, quite often but not always for the worse (accumulated injuries, psychological dysfunction). Quite often they pretend that nothing has happened. Since the changes you outline haven’t by any means led to a defeat of the threat that caused the problems, it seems likely that changes will continue. We can see that today, see that even in the short term of the border wall disputes. Quite likely the damage will continue or intensify.

    As for kids, they tend to believe their peer group over their parents. Propagandizing the youth tends to produce a uniform set of enunciated beliefs. Unfortunately for the propagandists, these beliefs can reverse very quickly, as it did in the US during the late 1960s and the USSR during the late 1980s, and as it seems to be doing now again in the US. Part of the process of something dying and something being born to replace it, I guess.

    Counterinsurgency

    • Replies: @joef
  178. Corvinus says:
    @Mulegino1

    “You cite a Vatican document which speaks about the Old Testament and the New Testament.”

    That demonstrates Judaism was indeed founded in Sacred Scripture of an appreciable sense.

    “Contemporary Judaism is, for the most part, based upon the Babylonian Talmud…”

    Is that entirely accurate or is it something that you THINK to be accurate. Here is the proper context of “Contemporary Judaism”. There are competing lines of thought, just like in Christianity and in Islam.

    http://bhoffert.faculty.noctrl.edu/rel100/05.judaism.branches.html

    “The Masoretic text of the Jews, which dates from the Medieval period, is written, not in the Paleo-Hebrew of the original Hebrew texts of the Old Testament, but in the Babylonian Hebrew script of the Talmud, and falsifies many of the original passages of Scripture relating to the prophecies regarding Christ.”

    Falsifies? No.

    https://www.britannica.com/topic/Masoretic-text

    “Therefore, contemporary Judaism is a rejectionist cult, not based in any appreciable sense upon the Old Testament Scriptures but upon the pointless contention and drivel of dueling rabbis.”

    Your religious fly is open.

    “It is therefore not difficult to see the Jewish identity as a pathological and anti-social one…”

    What is pathological and anti-social are your repeated efforts to associate a particular religion as being subversive and destructive.

  179. @RobRich

    Are you telling us China is a US ally?

  180. @Seraphim

    Seraphim

    Best explanation I’ve seen of why Protestant groups can be compared to Judaism, and a reason I hadn’t thought of why New York and New England [1] would be able to cooperate so well in attempts to dominate the rest of the United States.

    As I see it, the New Englanders would have been able to cooperate with New Amsterdam’s initial settlers because these settlers were Protestant, and with subsequent immigrants to the extent that they were near Protestants. Judaism apparently qualifies as near Protestant.
    This collaboration gave us the industrialization of the USA, with Yankees handling the academic / engineering part and New Netherlands handling the finance / sales / shipping part. Yankee sense of stewardship kept things from being too exploitative, and New Netherlands interest in money and trade provided the markets.
    This collaboration also gave us the Civil War, which was perhaps not so much a success. The Yankeedom Whigs handled the propaganda and sense of moral outrage, while New York handled the finances. Note that the Transcontinental Railroad was actually authorized during the Civil War (AD 1862) [2], definitely after the Confederacy attacked Ft. Sumter (AD 1861) [3], with full scale railroad construction started AD 1862/09. You’d think that winning the Civil War would have taken all time and money, but apparently there was some long term thinking going on here, and it’s the type of long term thinking favored by New Amsterdam — the return on investment kind. I think it extremely probable that to some in New Amsterdam (NYC, remember) regarded the Civil War as a sideshow to the main effort — providing transportation needed to settle the Midwest and the Great American Desert (GAD, which is just about the right acronym). The Southern states had been blocking construciton of a Transcontinental Railroad for since perhaps AD 1865, apparently to maintain free States / Slave State balance in the Senate, and perhaps New Amsterdam business people thought that enough was enough. Business thinking doesn’t go far beyond getting money, as overthinking tends to spoil profits.

    And the Yankee/New Netherlands collaboration continues to this day (although the original Yankees and Dutch have long since been crowded out by newcomers). Yankees are the quiet source of moral outrage in academia, corporations, and government (talk to a Unitarian Universalist sometime on race relations and Trump if you want _real_ outrage, not just SJW fakery), and New York being the quiet source of money to support immigration, plus a large importer of immigrants itself.

    Just a little bit of US history. Maybe a bit of US present as well.

    Counterinsurgency

    1] Colin Woodward.
    _American Nations: A History of the Eleven Rival Regional Cultures of North America_
    Analyzes US regional patterns of culture based on group that originally settled various areas, and the subsequent expansion (or not) of the group. New England becomes “Yankeedom”, New York City becomes “New Netherlands”, as it was settled by Dutch traders who were interested in money fist, and other things in about tenth place and descending.

    2] https://historyplex.com/transcontinental-railroad Simple history, but also very clear.

    3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Fort_Sumter

    • Replies: @Seraphim
  181. Seraphim says:
    @Counterinsurgency

    What is disquieting in the ‘West vs the Rest’ discourse, is the failure to understand that the darkness called ‘Enlightenment’ and its cult of ‘progress’ (which actually created the ‘West’) is the sub-product of the messianic Judaized mentality of Protestantism embraced by the so-called ‘Whites’ (actually ‘Anglo-Saxons’) in their fight against the Church and the Christian Empire(s).
    What is noticeable in all vocal defenses of ‘Western civilization’, ‘White Christianity’ and Anglo-Saxon Social Darwinist obsession with ‘races’ (and their ‘scientific-rational’ hierarchical classification of their IQ’s), is actually an undisguised animus against traditional Christianity, i.e. the Church and its world-vision, expressed either in the most vulgar language of the Nietzschean ‘pagans’ (“the monster of Judaeo-Christianity” which ‘infected our blood and our intelligence’) or in the elevated Spenglero-Evolan jargon of academia (the ‘Faustian will to power and morality’ of the ‘aristocratic culture of the Indo-Europeans’ – read ‘White’ – which ‘shaped’ the Christianity in Europe (putting the cart before the horse). Do they realize that they are actually doing the bidding of the Jews?

    • Replies: @Counterinsurgency
  182. @Corvinus

    The role of Jews in the slave trade has been ignored and vastly understated. When Is the last time you saw it mentioned in the MSN. Try NEVER. At the same time pretty much all whites are tarred with being responsible for slavery and the slave trade, when the vast majority were harmed by their forced competition with slave labor. Merchant Jews often owned household slaves, and at a far higher rate than whites in general, but you never hear about that. Instead whites have an obligatory historical guilt for slavery that Jews somehow get a pass on, despite the Jewish role in slavery and their higher percentage of ownership of slaves. Jews also owned quite a few of those segregated lunch counters and department stores that we hear about endlessly.

    If you wish to claim that the Jewish role in radical and racial politics has been anything more than self-serving and cynical, go ahead. That’s obviously not the case, but I don’t care what you think. Do you have any critique of organized Jewry or Jewish power?

    Unlike you, I’m honest about my views. I don’t like Jews as a group, or Jewish institutions and power. And I’d be stupid to have any other view! You don’t have to have special insight or even the ability to read between the lines to see the hostility projected onto whites from the Jewish community. It’s all out in the open, and it has been that way for a very long time.

    You aren’t normal, at least you aren’t healthy. FWIW, I’m not really tribal. What I am is someone who has been forced into reactionary politics by nuts like you.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  183. Margaret says:

    People, chill. Consider historic performances of Othello, the Moor played by a white actor often in blackface. More recently, actors with natural darker skin can play these roles in the operas and plays. Old classic ballets often have blackface roles which are preserved in some restorations. I don’t like the way the makeup looks–it’s excessive and distracting. Today we don’t need to create ethnic roles with dark make-up but some producers may prefer to.

    Meanwhile, I see little criticism of males dressing as women and acting stupid at their expense–for a laugh or dollars. These acts insult females and are beneath the dignity of the males who perform in these drag shows; But as long as there is money to be made, in what I consider a repulsive form of entertainment, they won’t die out any time soon.

    Some sensitivity and tolerance is needed; banning these theatrical expressions is not the way to phase unattractive displays and roles out. Slinging the “hate” word around shows a lack of knowledge regarding global cultural arts history. To get rid of vulgarity, some maturity and better taste would be welcome.

    • Replies: @Truth
  184. Seraphim says:
    @Counterinsurgency

    You certainly are not unaware that Jews showed up in New Amsterdam shortly after the founding of the colony.
    A few details gleaned from the Wikipedia:

    “The first recorded Jewish settler in New York was Jacob Barsimson, who arrived in August 1654 on a passport from the Dutch West India Company. A month later, a group of Jews to come to New York, then the colony New Amsterdam, as refugees from Recife, Brazil. Portugal had just re-conquered what is now known of the Brazilian State of Pernambuco from the Netherlands, and the Sephardi Jews there promptly fled. Most went to Amsterdam, but 23 headed for New Amsterdam instead. Governor Peter Stuyvesant was at first unwilling to accept them but succumbed to pressure from the Dutch West India Company — itself pressed by Jewish stockholders — to let them remain. Nevertheless, he imposed numerous restrictions and taxes on his Jewish subjects. Eventually, many of these Jews left.
    When the British took the colony from the Dutch in 1664, the only Jewish name on the requisite oath of loyalty given to residents was Asser Levy. This is the only record of a Jewish presence at the time, until 1680 when some of Levy’s relatives arrived from Amsterdam shortly before he died.
    The first synagogue, the Sephardi Congregation Shearith Israel, was established in 1682, but it did not get its own building until 1730. Over time, the synagogue became dominant in Jewish life, organizing social services and mandating affiliation for all New York Jews. Even though by 1720 the Ashkenazim outnumbered Sephardim, the Sephardi customs were retained.
    An influx of German and Polish Jews followed the Napoleonic Wars in Europe. The increasing number of Ashkenazim led to the founding of the city’s second synagogue, B’nai Jeshurun, in 1825…
    Following the assassination of Alexander II of Russia, for which many blamed “the Jews,” there was a vast increase in anti-Jewish pogroms there – possibly with the support of the government – and numerous anti-Jewish laws were passed. The result was that over 2 million Jews immigrated to America, more than a million of them to New York…” [where they entertained a constant ‘anti-Tsarist and anti-Russian agitation].

    • Replies: @Counterinsurgency
  185. @Priss Factor

    ‘Blackface may be offensive but blackface acts were mild compared real black behavior in rap and thuggery.’

    Is anyone actually offended by blackface in the first place?

    If they are, should we care? Am I offended by an image of Marlene Dietrich wearing a man’s suit? Should old men find it offensive if a kid puts on a white beard for Holloween? If I saw a black man wearing ‘white face’ I’d be a bit taken aback but I wouldn’t be ‘offended.’

    But to repeat, is anyone actually offended by blackface in the first place? I think not.

  186. @Seraphim

    Yes, like that. It’s clear that you oppose the Enlightenment for religious reasons and would be quite willing to shut it down. You are far from the only one who does that.

    As far as who is serving who, that’s a bit tangled. Again, for another view see Hicks [1]. Postmodernism’s first ancestor was apparently Kant, who was trying to modify the Western Enlightenment to make a place for faith. Instead, he founded both modern sensor systems (which have the exact problems Kant mentions) and the Eastern/Middle European Counter-Enlightenment. It is not clear that Kant was associated with Judaism, or that it influenced his thinking.

    As for contemporary Christianity, I’m not suicidal. Its base doctrines appear to be “Shut Up and Sit Down” for the Protestants, and, so the media says, “Shut Up and Bend Over” for the Catholics. I’ve no opinion about the Orthodox branch. Christianity was a great religion in the past, and may well be again in the future, but, as I said above, right now I’m not suicidal.

    Counterinsurgency

    1] Hicks.
    _Understanding Postmodernism_
    Search Amazon.com.

    • Replies: @Seraphim
  187. Truth says:
    @Margaret

    Meanwhile, I see little criticism of males dressing as women and acting stupid at their expense–for a laugh or dollars. These acts insult females and are beneath the dignity of the males who perform in these drag shows;

    Believe me when I say, you don’t know the half…

  188. vickpm says:

    Yes Jews made $$$$ out of black face. So What? But not all Jews were in the movie business. And the movie patrons who paid….a majority of whom were white christians…..were sympathizers and collaborators? So What? A good business model for Hollywood moguls. Are you jealous you didn’t think of tjis yourself? You don’t seem to get it. Jews are great entertainers and capture imaginations and followers and fans. Just think at how many followers Jesus on the cross has. That movie never gets old!

    • Replies: @Mulegino1
  189. Mulegino1 says:
    @vickpm

    Yes Jews made $$$$ out of black face. So What? But not all Jews were in the movie business. And the movie patrons who paid….a majority of whom were white christians…..were sympathizers and collaborators? So What? A good business model for Hollywood moguls. Are you jealous you didn’t think of tjis yourself? You don’t seem to get it. Jews are great entertainers and capture imaginations and followers and fans. Just think at how many followers Jesus on the cross has. That movie never gets old!

    The Jews are also adept at large scale dope trafficking, white slavery, pornography, all types of organized crime, fraud and all around general criminality. These must also be great business models. In any case, Jewry, excels at low brow entertainment because of its subterranean world view, which appraises nature not in terms of order or beauty, but in the barren metallic terms of profit and exploitation; the quintessential Jew lacks any sense of nobility, decency or real self-respect and is perfectly content to degrade himself as he degrades others. Just think how many followers the Holohoax legend had. Auschwitz is a movie that is getting very world, as people are now waking up to the fact that Jewry dreads the “Arbeit Macht Frei” sign primarily because of the “Arbeit” part.

  190. Benjy says:

    Mᴜʜᴀᴍᴍᴀᴅ Aʟɪ ᴏɴ ʀᴀᴄᴇ

  191. Reisen says:

    I’m glad the Nation of Islam is getting involved in the Unz Review. What better way for them to cover up black crime than to lambast the few Jews who actually did acknowledge that race exists?

    Daily Reminder that NOI still thinks the Egyptians were black.

  192. Corvinus says:
    @OilcanFloyd

    “The role of Jews in the slave trade has been ignored and vastly understated.”

    You mean the role of the Jews in slavery perhaps has been vastly overstated. Indeed, Jews like other groups owned plantations and slaves. But let us dig deeper.

    Willie F. Page, professor of African American Studies at Brooklyn College, noted that in Dutch Brazil, the Jews operated less than 6% of the plantations.

    Seymour Drescher remarked in Immigrants And Minorities (July 1993) that Jews’ investment share in the Dutch West India Company “amounted to only 0.5 percent of the company’s capital”. Dutch historians Pieter Emmer and Johanes Postma have argued that “Jews had a very limited and subordinate roles even at the height of the Dutch slave trade in the 17th century.”

    From 1709-1807, there are 934 recorded voyages in which Rhode Island merchants were responsible for procuring 106,000 slaves. Now, Jews arrived in Newport as early as 1758. On the eve of the Revolution, they were estimated to be around thirty families. According to records historian Eli Faber used (e.g. naval office shipping lists, censuses, tax records) that identified merchants and planters as Jewish, there were 347 slave ships sent to Africa by Rhode Island slave traders from 1761-1774, with 21 being funded by Aaron Lopez, a Portuguese Jew. That means 326 voyages were underwritten by non-Jews during this time frame. Of course, Jews played a role in the peddling of human flesh. The extent in this particular case is nominal compared to other ethnic groups, according to Gaber.

    Junius Rodriguez (The Historical Encyclopedia of World Slavery, Volume 1, ABC-CLIO, 1997) referenced…

    “A few Jews even became prominent slave owning planters in the Old South…as successful as these Jewish Southerners were by Southern standards, they represent a very tiny percentage of the 20,000 Jews residing in the antebellum South who could, or would, ever aspire to own a slave. About 5,000 Jews owned one or more slaves – about 1.25 percent of all the slaveowners in the antebellum South…For those Jews who did own slaves, the records demonstrate that they were not significantly different from other masters in their treatments of their bondsmen.”

    Note that the antebellum period covers the period before the Civil War, 1820-1860.

    Regardless of factual accuracy, some would argue that these numbers are meaningless since they neglect to account for any other difference in demographics besides religion. For example, poorer families were less likely to own slaves than wealthier families.

    If we account for all other factors, it ends up there is no statistically significant difference between Jews and the overall population in terms of slave ownership, especially since levels of slave ownership varied in the southern states and in southern cities. For example, this source (forward.com/articles/205455/slaves-of-charleston/?p=all) notes that in 1830 the proportion of Jewish residents of Charleston who owned slaves was similar to that of the general white population (83% versus 87%).

    “Instead whites have an obligatory historical guilt for slavery that Jews somehow get a pass on, despite the Jewish role in slavery and their higher percentage of ownership of slaves.”

    Who/Whom?

    “Do you have any critique of organized Jewry or Jewish power?”

    They, like any group, whether it be the WASPs or the Irish or the Italians, all seek to dominate the political and social landscape.

    “I don’t like Jews as a group, or Jewish institutions and power. And I’d be stupid to have any other view!”

    Sounds like a personal problem.

    “You aren’t normal, at least you aren’t healthy. FWIW, I’m not really tribal.”

    Standard default button pressed. When someone who challenges your beliefs, press “those people who oppose my thought process are not normal”. I see that the button is about to come off your Alt-Right keyboard. I suggest gently pressing it rather than pounding on it repeatedly.

    “What I am is someone who has been forced into reactionary politics by nuts like you.”

    I thought claiming victimhood was a darkie and feminist thang.

  193. Seraphim says:
    @Counterinsurgency

    Kant is a flotsam in the same current of ‘criticism’ which started with the criticism of the Christian Scriptures and of the worldview of the Christian-Platonic philosophy of the Church, initiated by Protestantism influenced by Judaism, flowing through Newton, Locke, Hume, Hegel, Marx, Nietzsche and ending (so far) in the ‘deconstruction’ of all our certitudes, of all ‘persona’. Return to chaos.

    Orthodoxy is not a ‘branch’ of ‘Christianity’ (least of all of ‘Judeo-Christianity’) but the Church. Why would you consider an acquaintance with it ‘suicide’?

    • Replies: @Counterinsurgency
  194. Mulegino1 says:

    That demonstrates Judaism was indeed founded in Sacred Scripture of an appreciable sense.

    No it does not. To be founded upon Sacred Scripture (in this case the Old Testament) would imply heeding the words of said scripture. It is quite clear that in many cases the Talmud circumvents, contradicts or simply ignores clear and unambiguous precepts found in the Old Testament. The Talmud is not a gloss on Sacred Scripture, it is a rubbish heap of rabbinical opinion which contemporary Jews claim possesses greater authority than the Mosaic covenant and commandments and the rest of the Prophets, Psalms and writings of the Old Testament.

    Falsifies? No.

    Falsifies: Yes. Example: Original psalm: “They have pierced my hands and feet.” Masoretic falsification: “My hands and feet, like a lion.”

    Also, you can send a link that enumerates the different branches of something called “Judaism” a religion which post-dates Christianity by centuries.

    Orthodox and Conservative Jews accept the supreme authority of the Talmud.

    Karaites and Ethiopian Falashas, who are not really “Jews” as the term is now understood (Himmler gave the Karaites honorary membership in the S.S. to prevent the anti-Jewish measures being applied against them), only accept the Pentateuch or first five books of Moses. They categorically reject the Talmud.

    Messianic Jews are a mixed bag. It was probably a sect of Messianic Judeans that was instrumental in founding Islam- Muslims, you know, believe that Jesus (Isa)- while not divine- was the Messiah of Israel and have a very high esteem for the Mother of Jesus (Miriam) while Jewish belief denigrates
    and blasphemes both.

    Reform Jews are products of the German Jewish enlightenment of the late 18th century, which pretty
    much rejected the Talmud and rejected the obscurantist and rat ridden life of the shtetl and Talmudic despotism. They are little different than the Unitarians.

    Odd isn’t it, how the Falashas, the Karaites and the Samaritans (all of Old Testament heritage) are patrilineal while the Talmudic Jews are matrilineal, a very un-Biblical position, no?

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  195. Corvinus says:
    @Mulegino1

    “To be founded upon Sacred Scripture (in this case the Old Testament) would imply heeding the words of said scripture. It is quite clear that in many cases the Talmud circumvents, contradicts or simply ignores clear and unambiguous precepts found in the Old Testament.”

    All you are providing here is YOUR lay opinion on the matter. Which is other than surprising given your holier than thou attitude. You do realize that God is watching you closely, right?

    “Falsifies: Yes. Example: Original psalm: “They have pierced my hands and feet.” Masoretic falsification: “My hands and feet, like a lion.””

    Nice try.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/They_have_pierced_my_hands_and_my_feet

    “To explain how divergent translations from the biblical text came about, Gregory Vall, a Christian professor of Religious Studies at Trinity Western University, speculated that the Septuagint translators were faced with כארו; i.e. as in the Masoretic text, but ending with the longer letter vav (ו) rather than the shorter yod (י), giving כארו ka’aru. This is not a word in the Hebrew language, but without the aleph it becomes כרו, “dug”, “mined”, or “excavated”. Biblical and Hebrew scholars, such as Brent Strawn, support the Masoretic Text reading of כארי (“like a lion”), based on textual analysis (i.e. derivatives of the word “lion” appear numerous times in the psalm and are a common metaphor in the Hebrew Bible), as well as its appearance in virtually every ancient Hebrew manuscript. An exception to this is a Psalms fragment from Nahal Hever, where the word in question is written as כארו, karu, which becomes “dug” when omitting the aleph, as Vall had previously speculated. This finding is called into question by the Nahal Hever scribe’s other numerous misspellings, such as one in the very same sentence, where ידיה is written instead of the correct ידי, making the Hebrew word ידי yadai “my hands” into ידיה yadeha, “her hands”.”

    • Replies: @Mulegino1
  196. Mulegino1 says:
    @Corvinus

    The Septuagint was translated at least a thousand years before the Masoretic texts, and was approved by the High Priest in Jerusalem. The translators of the Septuagint had access to manuscripts far more ancient than those used for the Masoretic texts.

    The vast majority of Old Testament quotes in the New Testament were taken from the Septuagint. The truth is that the accuracy of the Septuagint- and such passages as the referenced passage from Psalm 22, were not an issue until around 135 A.D., i.e., once the Jewish Sanhedrin arose to counter the claims of the Christians.

    Therefore, the subsequent distortions and false translations were questions of a polemical and not a linguistic, nature.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
    , @Seraphim
  197. joef says:
    @Counterinsurgency

    As for kids, they tend to believe their peer group over their parents. Propagandizing the youth tends to produce a uniform set of enunciated beliefs. Unfortunately for the propagandists, these beliefs can reverse very quickly, as it did in the US during the late 1960s and the USSR during the late 1980s, and as it seems to be doing now again in the US. Part of the process of something dying and something being born to replace it, I guess.

    I hope so, but I remain skeptical of millennial critical thinking, even when it applies to their own rational self interest. They are currently consumed with the MSM afro american worship paradigm. They don’t defend against afro attacks, but blame themselves for it instead.

    Since the changes you outline haven’t by any means led to a defeat of the threat that caused the problems, it seems likely that changes will continue. We can see that today, see that even in the short term of the border wall disputes. Quite likely the damage will continue or intensify.

    Ergo the problem, we are on what Tolkien would say, a long retreat. At first, urban working class neighborhoods were able to withstand, and repel, the unprovoked ghetto afro criminal incursions. But District Attorney’s, being politicians at heart, always look for the opportunity to get their name exposure in the press, started prosecuting incidents of urban street justice. Yet it was street justice that kept these urban neighborhoods viable.

    After legitimate incidents of street justice were prosecuted, eg Bernie Goetz, Howard Beach, etc, it removed the ability of these same urban neighborhoods to defend themselves. Ghetto bred afros, always looking for targets that don’t fight back, became encouraged in their criminal invasions.

    The trend line is not good for our long term sustainability as a productive functioning country. The only diversion from this unfortunate trend line is that afros reform themselves (they don’t want to, especially since they have no incentive to do so); or Non Blacks (and the Black outliers who dislike the dominance of ghetto afro culture) don’t tolerate it anymore (which we collectively lack a resolve for, favoring the leftist fantasy narrative instead).

    We are Rome, which did not collapse suddenly in 476 AD, but was slowly declining for a hundred years prior to that. Afros are jonesing for race war now when they are getting everything; imagine when we become a bankrupted debt ridden mess that can’t afford the welfare checks anymore, while waiting on long lines for goods at supermarkets/gasoline stations. Then our relationship may devolve with the afro to the point of kill or be killed, where no one will benefit from the outcome (and we can thank our self serving political elite leadership for taking us there).

    • Replies: @Counterinsurgency
  198. Corvinus says:
    @Mulegino1

    “Therefore, the subsequent distortions and false translations were questions of a polemical and not a linguistic, nature.”

    It certainly may appear controversial to you and others who hold that viewpoint, but it remains linguistic. Consider the Greek Old Testament (Septuagint or LXX for short). It was a translation of the Hebrew Bible used at Alexandria (and elsewhere). In fact, there were several different versions of the Hebrew scriptures floating around. So you cannot take today’s Hebrew (which was done all the way back to Origen) and compare it to one of the Old Greek Testaments and say, well, this is incorrect. I believe the version used for the LXX has been found at the Dead Sea Scrolls.

    From what I gather, the septuagint was a special revelation in Greek, not a translation of Hebrew. Ultimately it is the language God selected for his second revelation to mankind. Remember, only scribes of the priestly tribe copied the sacred manuscripts and scrolls. Moreover, there is some indication that versions of the Septuagint were corrected by the Church to reflect then extant Hebrew versions. But these revisions were earlier than the Masoretic revision, with the purpose to standardize rabbinic Judaism as a faith with a uniform sacred text.

    Again, we get it. Your purpose is to denigrate.

    • Replies: @Beefcake the Mighty
  199. Seraphim says:
    @Mulegino1

    There are two accounts of the translation of the Torah in Greek.
    One is found in the main traditional Jewish sources that describe the incident: the Talmud treaties Megillah 9a* and Mesechta Sofrim 1:8-9**.

    *It is taught, an incident occurred with Ptolemy the king that he gathered seventy-two elders and put them into seventy-two houses and he did not reveal to them why he had gathered them. He went in to each one of them and told him, “Write for me the Torah of Moses your teacher.” The Holy One, blessed be He, gave counsel to the heart of every one of them and they all came to the same opinion and they wrote for him, “God created in the beginning”
    **An incident occurred with five elders who wrote the Torah in Greek for Ptolemy the king, and the day was as difficult for [the people of] Israel as the day that the [golden] calf was made, for the Torah could not be translated sufficiently.
    A further incident occurred with Ptolemy the king when he gathered seventy-two elders and placed them in seventy-two houses and did not reveal to them why he had gathered them. He went in to each one of them and said to them, “Write for me the Torah of Moshe your teacher.” God placed counsel into the heart of each one and their opinions all came to the same opinion and each one wrote for him his own Torah. They made thirteen changes in it, and these are: “God created in the beginning”…

    The second account is based on the ‘Letter of Aristeas’, purportedly written by an advisor of Ptolemy Philadelphus named Aristeas recounting the story of the translation of the Torah, and is relayed by Josephus Flavius and Philo. The Letter said:
    “Three days later Demetrius[Philadelphus’ librarian.] took the men and, passing along the sea-wall, seven stadia long, to the island, crossed the bridge and made for the northern districts of Pharos. There he assembled them in a house, which had been built upon the sea-shore, of great beauty and in a secluded situation, and invited them to carry out the work of translation, since everything that they needed for the purpose was placed at their disposal. So they set to work comparing their several results and making them agree, and whatever they agreed upon was suitably copied out under the direction of Demetrius. … They met together daily in the place which was delightful for its quiet and its brightness and applied themselves to their task. And it so chanced that the work of translation was completed in seventy-two days, just as if this had been arranged of set purpose”.

    So, it is clear that the translation was not a ‘miracle’ and not a ‘new revelation’. It was done in collaboration, the seventy consulting with each others, confronting different variants and agreeing on the correct translation, which would convey the true meaning of original, of course ‘inspired’. The legend of the ‘miracle’ was a justification of the canonization of the Septuagint, which was hold in veneration by the Jews and others until after the Christ. Philo relates that even in his days (1st century AD)”every year a solemn assembly was held and a festival celebrated in the island of Pharos, to which not only the Jews but a great number of persons of other nations sail across, reverencing the place in which the first light of interpretation shone forth, and thanking God for that ancient piece of beneficence which was always young and fresh”.

    But Jews were soon to change their attitude:
    “On the eighth of Teves the Torah was written in Greek in the days of Ptolemy the king[18] and darkness came to the world for three days.” (Talmud, Megillas Taanis).
    Why was that? The answer was given by the Christ himself in advance:
    Before the Resurrection:
    “39 Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me. 40 And ye will not come to me, that ye might have life. 41 I receive not honour from men. 42 But I know you, that ye have not the love of God in you. 43 I am come in my Father’s name, and ye receive me not: if another shall come in his own name, him ye will receive. 44 How can ye believe, which receive honour one of another, and seek not the honour that cometh from God only? 45 Do not think that I will accuse you to the Father: there is one that accuseth you, even Moses, in whom ye trust. 46 For had ye believed Moses, ye would have believed me; for he wrote of me. 47 But if ye believe not his writings, how shall ye believe my words? (John 5:39-47)

    After the Resurrection:
    “Then he said unto them, O fools, and slow of heart to believe all that the prophets have spoken: 26 Ought not Christ to have suffered these things, and to enter into his glory? 27 And beginning at Moses and all the prophets, he expounded unto them in all the scriptures the things concerning himself” (Luke 24: 25-27).

    The Masoretes expunged or twisted all possible references to Christ from the ‘Hebrew’ text.
    To their chagrin the oldest Hebrew texts of the Dead Sea Scrolls, match the Septuagint text!

    • Agree: Mulegino1
  200. @Seraphim

    Seraphim

    Apparently Protestant governments back c.a. AD 1600 had very little objection to Judaism and a great interest in material prosperity as a sign of election by God. The idea seems to have been that God had made Man a steward of the natural world, and those whose stewardship produced the most returns were the best stewards, hence favored by God.
    The Dutch, in particular, were a dominant trading group. As I recall, they dominated Northern European shipping for about two centuries (1500s through 1600s) [1]. Their shipping rates were roughly half those of competitors in the AD 1600s,, perhaps because Dutch ships by that time were highly automated [2]. They were highly important in international trade also.

    The consequence was that New Amsterdam was highly commercial, always looking for something to trade. Its interests were always monetary, and New York (as it was re-named by the British) had no serious objection to British occupation during the US Revolutionary War, taking (for example) no steps to save the lives of American POWs who were released in dead winter with no coats and expired (Dead Right There) on New York streets [4].

    Point: You can’t blame the Jews for everything. They have a “so smart and so stupid” way of making a bad situation worse, but they quite often didn’t create the situation in the first place, their role being more grabbing the steering wheel and stomping on the accelerator as long as they can.

    And, wrt your last paragraph, many have noted that the US Jews never really noticed that they aren’t living in AD 1900 Russia. They simply re-use slogans from that time.

    Counterinsurgency

    1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_history_of_the_Netherlands_(1500%E2%80%931815)
    2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fluyt
    4] American prisoners of the British during the Revolutionary War had about a 50% mortality rate. This seems to have been the result of British indifference and desire to have American prisoners volunteer for British military service rather than actual malice, but it caused a certain amount of resentment after the war, resentment that lasted until WW I, when it was overcome by a propaganda offensive by the US Governmetn.

  201. @Seraphim

    WRT Kant: you might want to look at Hicks [1], who presents a good case that Kant was strongly opposed to the Western European Enlightenment and was, in fact, the major founder of the Eastern European Counter Enlightenment. Hicks does a much better job than I do.

    I take it that you prefer Orthodox Christianity?

    Why would you consider an acquaintance with it ‘suicide’?

    (it being “Orthodox Christianity”) I wouldn’t. I don’t have enough acquaintance with Orthodox Christianity to have an opinion on it.

    Orthodoxy is not a ‘branch’ of ‘Christianity’ (least of all of ‘Judeo-Christianity’) but the Church.

    I wasn’t trying to be that precise. The “branch” metaphor is in fairly common use, so I used it. I have no objection to your terminology in this matter.

    Counterinsurgency

    1] Stephen Hicks.
    _Understanding Postmodernism_
    Source: Amazon.com, pub: 2013/12/19.
    Hicks’ book discusses Kant, his video does not.

    • Replies: @Seraphim
  202. @joef

    millennial critical thinking

    That’s a funny combination of words in itself.

    Yep, democracy doesn’t seem to fit industrialization as well as we thought it did. The fatal flaw is that it provides enough surplus value to let the politicians support a large non-productive population as a vote farm. The farm tends to expand, and eventually it soaks up everything — at which point one gets a singularity.

    I wrote a fairly long post on this subject earlier this evening, in S. Sailor’s “Is Trump being Baited and Switched” article. You might want to look it up. Search for would be “Creveld” or “_Parameters_”.

    I was living in the NYC area when the Goetz affair happened. For about 24 hours, the radio praised Goetz as a hero. Then, no transition, Goetz was a villain. Bing. It tend to think that he acted as any highly stressed person might act, continuing to fire until all threats were definitively neutralized.

    Note to casual readers: If you don’t want to end up dealing with a person acting as Goetz did, try not threatening his life while holding a deadly weapon (as are your several friends). Threatened people can act unpredictably.

    It was pretty obvious that (at least on the radio) the fix was in. Note that the Goetz incident happened when NYC had lost its small manufacturing base, was near bankruptcy, and was utterly dependent on political importance, banks, and corporate headquarters. The City middle class didn’t count anymore.

    Counterinsurgency

    • Agree: joef
  203. Seraphim says:
    @Counterinsurgency

    But you should try to be precise and use names in their proper sense.
    “Branch theory” is not a ‘metaphor’, but an ‘ecclesiological proposition’ within Protestantism according to which the ‘One, Holy, Universal, and Apostolic Church’ is actually divided into multiple branches growing from a common trunk that would be a generic ‘Christianity’, each one evolving its own ‘tradition’ according to the ‘necessities of the time’.
    ‘Christianity’ is the Orthodox Church, the only one that kept unaltered the criteria of Oneness, Holiness, Universality, Apostolicity of the Church founded on the ‘rock ‘ of the acknowledging the revelation of the Divinity of Christ and that he became man for ‘us men and our salvation’. The Christ did not found ‘Christianity’, some sort of school of ‘philosophy’, but a community (ecclesia) of worship, united in the faith in Christ and his commandments. A community you unite with through Baptism in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, becoming a member of the ‘Body of Christ’, or not. It is not a matter of believing in a ‘doctrine’, or ‘preference’ for a social and political organization of society, but of commitment to a way of life which will lead you to salvation. It is a gracious offer that you take or leave, or return it with a polite ‘thank you, I don’t need it’ or throw it in the face of the offeror and spit on it after.
    But there cannot be ‘Christianity’ outside the Church, least of all while denying the Church (‘organized religion’ in modern parlance, against which ‘Enlightenment or ‘Counter-Enlightenment’ generally march in lock-step).
    The ‘branches’ are not growing from the trunk of the Church, but separating from the trunk, not receiving anymore the sap of the Spirit and withering out. They are dead branches. They are ‘schools’ (that is the meaning of ‘heresy’) of thought, clubs resembling more Masonic Lodges (they retained ‘rituals’ devoid of the Spirit).

    • Replies: @Counterinsurgency
  204. @Seraphim

    ‘Christianity’ is the Orthodox Church

    Ah. So you do favor the Orthodox Church, and strongly.

    As I said, I know very little about the Orthodox Church.

    The ‘branches’ are not growing from the trunk of the Church, but separating from the trunk, not receiving anymore the sap of the Spirit and withering out. They are dead branches. They are ‘schools’ (that is the meaning of ‘heresy’) of thought, clubs resembling more Masonic Lodges (they retained ‘rituals’ devoid of the Spirit).

    The above block quote I do know something about. It is in the present tense, and to me it appears to be correct, no reservations on my part.

    Counterinsurgency

  205. @Heros

    like the 6 million. “I saw it in my mind”.

    Or indeed, the late Eli Wiesel’s priceless “Some things are true which never happened”.

  206. @redmudhooch

    Great post. Good to see a (white?) Georgia boy show some solidarity and awareness of how capitalism actually works. Isn’t it interesting how @joef criticizes scapegoating, then proceeds to scapegoat the most scapegoated group in American society?

    I see you’re being criticized by right-wing ideologues claiming that the devastation of the working class, and increasingly the middle and upper middle class professionals in trade-able service work like programming and radiology, had nothing to do with what Paul Craig Roberts calls wage arbitrage? As if OSHA, fair labor standards and the power of unions have nothing to do with labor costs versus countries whose dictators run death squads. As if imperially directed ISDS (Industry-state dispute settlement) required by capitalists in all “free trade” agreements has nothing to do with maintaining low or nonexistent labor standards and environmental controls in targeted countries. Do such ideologues have even a casual acquaintance with reality?

  207. Anonymous [AKA "The Rebelle"] says:

    The “blackface” canard now permeates every aspect of the designation of people of color. From whence cometh “African-Americans”? Why are AMERICAN people of color, who have the most diverse ancestry on this planet, disenfranchised by name from their NATIVE land, with every sociological reference! It is telling that people with DUAL citizenship are not classified as ISRAELI-Americans. Nor is any other group. Jews scream about wearing a Yellow Star in Nazi Germany. The term African-American is WORSE than a Black Star. There are actual African Americans, as there are people who have emigrated from Africa in recent memory, including so-called Whites, whose true mixed ancestry is another story. But phenotypes are telling.

    In fact, many Americans of Color actually received their pigmentation from INDIGENOUS populations of deeply melanated Native Americans. Not all black people came over on Slave Ships, another canard; nor were all people of color slaves. Many “black” Americans are as purely AMERICAN as they come, and people of color (including blue-eyed blond “blacks”) need to actively reclaim their rightful ancestry.

    The whole multi-gender thing is, I think, a strategy to take the focus away from the multi-raciality of Americans. The Bruce/Caitlyn Jenner story was sensationalized in exact opposition to the Rachel Dolezal extravaganza. Dolezal was relentlessly hounded for choosing “the other” race, while Jenner opened the door to a Heinz 57 number of ridiculous genders. And all this happened around the time that DNA testing was proving, not only the European ancestry of “blacks”, but the AFRICAN ancestry of many “whites”. Go figure.

    I always found the hullabaloo surrounding Barack Obama’s “multi-racial origins” laughable, as if he were somehow unique. Most Southerners of color have at least as mixed an ancestry as Barack Obama. But that was apparently part of the public plan.

    Additionally, people should study Jewish law on the question of late-term abortions. I once attended a lecture on Jewish views on abortion, and the mother’s life always takes precedence, until the very last moment. There is also an issue of when the soul actually enters the body. Once again, blissfully unaware, i.e., ignorant, Christians need to be as cognizant of Jewish law in all its deep aspects and permutations as Jews are studious of Christianity and its ramifications upon THEIR status and lives.

  208. @Corvinus

    And your purpose is to cuck. Well done!

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All NOI Research Group Comments via RSS