The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Boyd D. Cathey Archive
Black & White in Culturally Marxist America
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New Reply
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks
 Prof. Ekow N. Yankah, Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law, Yeshiva University
Prof. Ekow N. Yankah, Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law, Yeshiva University

The words race and racism have become “devil terms” in American politics and culture—ideologically weaponized concepts to advance a cultural Marxist agenda and basically repel and silence any opposition to that agenda. In a widely-reported op-ed published recently in The New York Times (November 11, 2017), black law professor Ekow N. Yankah wrote that when he instructs his children “on the ways of the world,” he teaches them that white people cannot be trusted and that blacks cannot befriend whites. In short, white folks are evil, supremacist oppressors, not just by their traditions and history, but by their very intrinsic nature.

Then, just the other day, several items came my way that relate how a writer for the student newspaper at Texas State University at San Marcos, one Rudy Martinez [a Latino], demanded that white people “die.” “Your DNA is an abomination,” he declared in the student newspaper, the University Star [“Whiteness: Your DNA is an Abomination,” November 29, 2017:

“You were not born white, you became white…You have been estranged from yourself and, in that absence, have been instilled with an allegiance to a country that was never great. One that has continuously attempted to push non-whites into non-existence through crusades that have been defended by the law.”

Martinez, who is a senior philosophy major(!), continued his garbled screed by accusing white Europeans of unjustly possessing privilege and having actively “built…an oppressive world.” “I see white people as an aberration,” he wrote, and promised “a constant, ideological struggle…to deconstruct whiteness.” Martinez declared that he and his allies would “win” that struggle, and that “goodhearted liberals, apathetic nihilists and right-wing extremists” should accept the “death of whiteness as liberation for all.”

There was push back, of course, from both the university administration and from the student body president, Connor Clegg, who condemned Martinez’s essay. But that only elicited demands from groups such as the Pan African Action Committee [PAAC] and other powerful on-campus organizations that Clegg resign as student body president because he was “openly biased and racist.” [“Texas State Student President Will Not Resign After Condemning Campus Newspaper Article Calling for ‘White Death’,” Free Beacon, Dec. 5, 2017.

It would be comforting to think that incidents such as this one were rare and uncharacteristic of American college campuses—and American education. But the fact is that what occurred at Texas State University is far more representative of the Marxist ideological veneer—or, more precisely, the Marxist straight jacket—that dominates and, in fact, throttles what passes for “higher education” these days. The examples that can be cited are literally countless and would fill volumes.

And what is a singular and salient characteristic of this situation is that it has as much to do with the professoriate and academic over class as it has to do with the students. The chilling fact is that since the late 1960s, most of the PhDs—the future professors, teachers and university administrators—turned out by our colleges and universities have been imbued with a Marxist outlook and philosophy that now pervades nearly all academic disciplines, but most especially history, sociology, philosophy, English, anthropology, and political science, in other words, the liberal arts.

As a Jefferson Fellow grad student at the University of Virginia in the 1970s, I observed this process metastasizing at a gallop. Virginia—UVa—was still a fairly conservative Southern school at that time. Indeed, when I was there we had a number of whom I would call “refugee” grad students who had transferred to the university from places like Columbia, Berkeley and Hunter College-City University of New York to escape from the early outbreaks of Marxist violence and revolution on those campuses. Some were outright “conservatives,” others just students who wished to avoid the upheavals. One lady friend recounted how she had been physically assaulted at Hunter; she called it quits after that.

Yet, many doctoral candidates at UVa had already imbibed a Marxist vision and narrative. The student body president, if I remember correctly, was a former seminarian, but had been “converted” through his reading of texts such as The Wretched of the Earth, and Black Skin, White Masks, by black French revolutionary and anti-colonialist writer Frantz Fanon, and works by Deconstructionist ideologue Jacques Derrida. Eventually, he made his way to Mao’s China, which he claimed was the ultimate “peoples’ paradise” on earth, something to be emulated here in the United States and in Europe.

What impressed me about these Marxist students was not just their fanatical zeal and seriousness, but that they were far more “radical” and revolutionary than any of those stodgy Soviet Communists who then ruled Russia and who exercised control over Eastern Europe. I had met some of those types as an exchange student in England a few years earlier—they parroted the Moscow Communist “line,” but would not have been caught dead advocating “sexual liberation” or same sex marriage, certainly not like those I encountered at UVa in the 1970s, or that we encounter today.

This variant of Marxism was and is a much more virulent strain, a zealously globalist brand that owes far more to Leon Trotsky than to Josef Stalin, and that understands the value of emphasizing “racial liberation” as well as “sexual liberation” in the struggle against the West. The Christian West is to be undermined, not just because of its “economic injustices” and its “oppressive Capitalist system,” but because of its “white supremacy and colonialist oppression” of minorities (mostly blacks) and its “sexual oppression and exploitation” of women.

Ironically, just as the Soviet Communist system finally fell (August 1991) after seven decades of totalitarian rule and Eastern Europe was being self-liberated from its forty-five years under Moscow’s boot, what Dr. Paul Gottfried has labeled quite correctly “cultural Marxism” was triumphing in Western Europe and in the United States. In fact, Marxism did not disappear with the exit of the octogenarian Soviet commissars, but resurfaced in a significantly more dangerous and infectious formulation, and largely domestic form here in America, soon dominating our campuses, our entertainment industry, our pulpits, our media and now our politics.

And its major ideological weapons of choice are: the imposition of a race-based narrative culturally and politically, and the demand for sexual liberation, specifically concerning the role of women in society.

A couple of weeks ago the local PBS station (WUNC-TV) featured a program they called “Focus,” featuring a discussion of historic monuments honoring Confederate veterans and “what should be done about them.” Of the approximately seventeen participants in this on-camera “dialogue,” only two represented what I would term the opposition to taking down those monuments. Of the supporters for removal, one young black woman gave away the whole narrative and plan: American history, she explained, was totally infected, based in and on, “racism” (as well as “sexism”). Thus, that history needed to be “cleansed” and purified, and that must be begun with the removal of those obviously “racist” reminders of the Southern Confederacy, since, as “we all know,” the “war was about slavery…and that was why the South was fighting.”

This was, now fully blown, the excited but jejune theorization I had first heard forty-five years ago in graduate seminars at the University of Virginia, then spouted by young doctoral students who would in a few decades’ time occupy the endowed chairs in history, philosophy, English, and other subjects at our major universities. This was the narrative that also had infected the thinking of university administrators and basically turned our academic institutions into Marxist “communes” dedicated to the indoctrination of those students sent off, at exorbitant tuition expense, by parents who believed the “myth” that all you had to do in life to succeed was get a college education.

It was and is a dogmatic standard, a new canon of faith, that indicts white (read=European) Christians, mostly (but not always) males, making them the culprits and responsible parties for the near entirety of the defined (by Marxist theory) “ills of the world.” Into our vocabulary have come such terms as “white supremacy,” “white racism” (there is no other kind), “white oppression,” “white privilege,” and the “need to deconstruct ‘whiteness’.” And as dogma it must be imposed, no questions asked…with so-called traditional “academic freedom” discarded by the wayside if it stands in the way.

The most prominent group responsible for the violent tearing down of the Confederate veterans’ monument in Durham, NC, three months ago (August 14) was a Marxist organization self-denominated the Workers World Party (www.workers.org) whose essential platform includes the following points: “Abolish Capitalism – Disarm the Police & ICE Agents – Fight for Socialist Revolution – Support Black Lives Matter.” And their overarching template is: “Smash White Supremacy.”

There have always been such fringe groups on the far Left, but what gives the Workers World Party and groups such as Black Lives Matter, Antifa, and others like them more cache’ and prominence in America in 2017 is that one of the nation’s two major political parties, the Democratic Party, basically buys into their narrative, at least politically, and the opposition Republican Party—most of its leadership—is deathly afraid of entering any type of negative discussion involving “race,” for fear of being accused of that dreadfully unforgivable and ineradicable “sin” of racism—by far the worst offense that any politician or public figure can be guilty of in our modern society (save perhaps for predatory male-on-female sexual abuse).

Creating a standard and unquestionable narrative on race has been undoubtedly the most successful strategy of cultural Marxist theory and its theoreticians. It first captured the academy, from which it was able to dictate the education of several generations of Americans. It has shaped and limited debate, and defined its parameters, which always continue to evolve, and always toward additional “deconstruction” and “liberation,” which, in fact, means the continued marginalization and destruction of our historic European and Christian civilization.

It should have been clear decades ago what was occurring—there were visible signs and markers. We had seen the disastrous experiences of “de-colonization” in Africa and revolution in Latin America (e.g., Cuba, Nicaragua, Venezuela, etc.), inspired largely by Marxist-dominated secular and religious thought.

In the United States a few farsighted conservative critics of the “civil rights movement” and the mad rush to embrace egalitarianism understood that the results could be just as severe and revolutionary. The idea of equality—what the late scholar Mel Bradford termed “the Heresy of Equality” [See his long essay, “The Heresy of Equality,” Modern Age, Winter 1976, vol. 20, no.1]—underlay the cultural Marxist template. That idea violated the very lineaments and laws of Nature, itself, not to mention an essential understanding of the American republic’s Founding and the vision of the Framers of the Constitution. [cf. Barry Alan Shain’s massive study, The Declaration of Independence in Historical Context: American State Papers, Petitions, Proclamations & Letters of the Delegates to the First National Congress, for ample documentation of Bradford’s exposition.]

But by the 1980s those cautionary voices were largely muted, as the self-denominated “Neoconservatives” forcibly gained control of the “conservative movement” and soon served as the intellectual brain trust for the GOP political class. As the Neocons shared the same philosophical origins—Trotskyite globalism—as the “farther Left” cultural Marxists, their intellectual parameters and ability to argue fundamentals were severely circumscribed. They were and are inherently incapable—and basically unwilling—to make the necessary case and usually end up as enablers of continued leftist revolution.

Until the fraudulent template of “equality” is acknowledged—Until the Marxist template of “race and racism” as the critical factor underlying all of American history and the necessary imperative to erase, correct and make reparations for racist “injustice”—“white guilt”—are overturned and rejected—Until our very language of communication on this topic is reformed, until then, we shall continue to be at the mercy of this authoritarian cultural “gestalt” that despoils our heritage, perverts our history, and infects and deforms our very existence as a people.

 
• Category: Ideology • Tags: Antiracism, Political Correctness 
Hide 221 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
    []
  1. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    “… what Dr. Paul Gottfried has labeled quite correctly “cultural Marxism”…”

    Dr Gottfried can label it what he wants, but it’s not Marxism of any kind, which is opposed to this kind of identity politics, as is easily demonstrated by the comment sections of socialist websites, the conflicts raging between old-school leftists and trans activists who are attempting to demonize/purge them. Funnily enough, the author admits himself that the East European communists he met did not share any wish for same-sex marriage, sexual liberation. There’s the clue, and our intrepid writer explains it away as ‘stodgy’.

    Read More
    • Agree: utu
    • Replies: @utu
    I agree but I do not on the 2nd thought. Th cultural part form marxism was dropped in USSR after Stalin got to power. But for several years after the Bolshevik revolution in terms of mores anything went like in Weimar Republic. Cultural revolution was part of Marxism. Go read The Communist Manifesto and you will find there a chapter on prostitution and marriage which was considered as institutionalized prostitution. So when Bolsheviks got to power marriage was relaxed and even abolished and promiscuity was promoted. Read something about Alexandra Kollontai. Why Stalin decided to go prude? Perhaps it was his personal taste. After all he studied to become a priest and was not like the cosmopolitan mostly Jewish Bolsheviks.
    , @Heros

    "it’s not Marxism of any kind, which is opposed to this kind of identity politics"
     
    Marxism and cultural Marxism are simply sanitized Protocols of Zion for stupid goy useful idiots. You cannot even scratch the surface of either without an in depth analysis of the Talmud and Ashkenazi hatred of Christians.
    , @Jake
    You are missing the point. Marxism,'classical Marxism,' was never just about the class struggle. It was about Marx formulating a theoretical framework from which to oppose every part of Christendom, which required unrelenting desire to replace the cultures of Christendom: white Christian cultures. Marx was creating a replacement for Christendom

    In classical Marxism, that replacement is to be effected by Marxist economics controlled by Marxist politicians and bureaucrats and the State warring against the Church.

    In Cultural Marxism, the war against Christendom and its peoples, whites, has been shifted to matters of race. And that form of war to exterminate any possible vestige of Christendom is extremely attractive not just to blacks, Jews, and Asians, but also to WASP Elites, because it not merely allows private wealth but encourages private wealth among the 'Politically Correct,' because then they can use the their fortunes for good: which means to exterminate all trace of Christendom and essentially make serfs of almost all white people who are not PC/Cultural Marxist in faith and militant advocacy.

    , @Reg Cæsar

    it’s not Marxism of any kind
     
    No, it's Leninism. Who, whom.

    Leftism of all kinds is about power and nothing else. That includes Wilson and FDR, whom Southerners loved so much.
    , @Joe Franklin

    Dr Gottfried can label it what he wants, but it’s not Marxism of any kind, which is opposed to this kind of identity politics

     

    So-called Cultural Marxism, something I label Victim Class Supremacy, is similar to Marxism in that both are totalitarian and both promote class supremacy.

    Both Victim Class Supremacy and Marxism are seditious with respect to the US constitution.

    All the incoherent nonsense spouting from academic negroes is a cover for their constant craving for government protected class group entitlements for negroes.

    Academic negroes can't admit that the state of Israel is a victim class supremacy paradise.

    To admit this fact would be to admit academic negroes also support fascism, something they claim to oppose.
    , @MBlanc46
    I think that the connection to Marxism is that in the 1950s and 1960s, these people would have been Marxists. Before 1956, many of them would have been Stalinists. Not Party members, of course. The Party was pretty choosy about who was allowed to join. But fellow travelers, “useful idiots”. In the 1960s, when the actual workers declined to join the revolution, and even cracked some revolutionary heads, the bloom went off the traditional Marxist rose, and the class struggle morphed into identity grievance. It’s the same sort of malcontent, with the same MO—chanting, shouting people down, rampaging through the streets—but with a different ideological venerr.
    , @RealAmericanValuesCirca1776Not1965
    That depends on the lens through which you view Marxism to begin with. That is, whether or not you believe that the stated goal of the doctrines are honest ones. Are they really trying to build a better world, a utopia, or are they just using that lie to recruit useful idiots to further their actual goals of redistributing power to themselves?

    If Marxism and its derivatives are indeed strategy masquerading as a legitimate ideology with the intention of weaponizing the masses for the ultimate benefit of a select few, then Marxism and all of it's derivatives are indeed related as they all share this core aspect in common with each other, and every other aspect to which one would point to say "see, they are different because of this!" is quite irrelevant as those differences are all completely superficial. Only the true, but (thinly) veiled goal of the transference of power from the existing structure to the invading one, by means of the manipulating and warping the masses into a weapon with which to take it, remains the same.
    , @yeah
    There is nothing "Marxist" about SJW's, their identity politics, or their gender agenda. Anyone who believes otherwise needs to read up at least a little bit what Marx wrote and what the policies were in USSR. 'Scholars' like Dr. Gottfried, like plenty of Ph.D.'s, alas, need to revisit their educational experience starting from kindergarten. As for the author: what can I say, I am a polite person.
    , @polaco
    There was a homosexual pride parade in St. Petersburg in 1917, most likely the first one in the world. Sexual promiscuity and all sorts of abnormal sexual behavior were heavily promoted in the early days of the USSR. But the communists quickly realized they had total control of the society, and all of that was just a waste of resources and unnecessary. There was no real need to undermine the social order since they already could do absolutely anything they wanted. The decided to save that for the West, about three quarters of the KGB's budget were appropriated for ideological warfare and social engineering in target countries. In the waning days of the Union, birth control equaled abortion. In 1990 the average Soviet woman had had 13 abortions in her lifetime. In Poland the communist government didn't really care about homosexuality, the press hardly ever touched the topic, and if it did it was described rather favorably. People viewed it with disgust for the most part, so the homosexuals knew to keep their personal affairs quiet. In the late eighties the police engaged in some personal data gathering on the gay community, I have no idea why, maybe it had to do with the communist fear of AIDS or maybe they were looking to legalize gay marriage. Abortion was totally legal for all practical purposes.
    , @Tinidril
    The term Cultural Marxism is a good descriptor because the same type of people (radical far-leftists) using a sleight of hand have co-opted the model of Oppressor/Oppressed that the economic Marxists used, only now substituting White/Black or Male/Female for Bourgeoisie/Proletariat. They kept the scaffold but updated with new "victims" and "oppressors" more with the times, now that Soviet communism has been thoroughly rejected after its sins exposed with Solzhenitsyn etc. It is the same con-game: radical egalitarianism under a new banner, where some people are (of course) more equal than others!
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
    AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
    These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
    Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
    Sharing Comment via Twitter
    /article/black-white-in-culturally-marxist-america/#comment-2109571
    More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  2. Thank you prof. Yankah.

    I was a department head at our state’s university and this is all true, but it is even worse.

    One thing I did regularly as a department head was distribute literature on grant programs, from foundations and think tanks, along with student internships and scholarships.

    I saw the whole global warming hoax rise, then bob and weave into climate change. The grantor told you what to write about, what to major in, and it was in conjunction with a whole spider web of other grantor machinations. The money powers can not only do endowed chairs but they are the big players in legislatures and governorships – hence state budgets to higher education.

    If you are a free market capitalist, it is a tough go. I was in a business program, and the dean had a bust of Lenin in his office.

    It’s a lot better in the private sector. That fixes it for me. But not for the rest of society. Since I left, the snowflake generation has arrived, screaming at the sky and wearing pussy hats.

    Read More
    • Replies: @JackOH
    BB, thanks for that insider's view. I've observed my local Podunk Tech for years, and it depresses me to think how much of academic discourse is bounded, even dictated, by money and ideology. Especially true in the humanities, but even STEM disciplines are not immune. Exasperated, I sometimes wonder if our academies differ from North Korea's only in degree and not in kind. Don't rock the boat, keep your mouth shut, go along-get along, toe the line, don't push your evidence, look the other way, stay on the right side of your department chair, your dean, your students, don't ruffle the trustees, all that.
    , @Spirit of the bayonette.
    Generation snowflake is such a fitting description. Generation clown doesn't roll off the tongue quiet as well.
    , @Fredtard
    You've outed yourself as a global warming denier. That's safe, even common, here at Unz, where our own groupthink bonds us on the right.

    As a laissez faire libertarian, I've had a real hard time accepting that our tech-enabled exploitation of resources is quickly and finally leading to global ecological collapse. Like any new convert, I may be a bit overzealous. My view: it's happening way faster than even Al Gore says. One goal of the powers-that-be has always been to pacify (lie to) )the public, until the truth can't be hidden any longer.

    The great unwashed third world masses didn't consume what we did. Yeah, China pollutes, but they're burning coal to manufacture our "stuff." If we can't overcome our own denial/rationalizations/cognitive dissonance, how can we denigrate others who have built their own bubbles of bullshit? If photosynthesis indeed ceases at 104F, the consequences of our willful blind spot will make cultural Marxism seem like a stubbed toe.
    , @Anonymous
    "Thank you prof. Yankah."

    Let's dig a bit deeper here. Yankah is the dolt who wrote the anti-white piece that the author Cathey uses as a stepping stone into his discussion on wider problems.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  3. utu says:
    @Anonymous
    "... what Dr. Paul Gottfried has labeled quite correctly “cultural Marxism”..."

    Dr Gottfried can label it what he wants, but it's not Marxism of any kind, which is opposed to this kind of identity politics, as is easily demonstrated by the comment sections of socialist websites, the conflicts raging between old-school leftists and trans activists who are attempting to demonize/purge them. Funnily enough, the author admits himself that the East European communists he met did not share any wish for same-sex marriage, sexual liberation. There's the clue, and our intrepid writer explains it away as 'stodgy'.

    I agree but I do not on the 2nd thought. Th cultural part form marxism was dropped in USSR after Stalin got to power. But for several years after the Bolshevik revolution in terms of mores anything went like in Weimar Republic. Cultural revolution was part of Marxism. Go read The Communist Manifesto and you will find there a chapter on prostitution and marriage which was considered as institutionalized prostitution. So when Bolsheviks got to power marriage was relaxed and even abolished and promiscuity was promoted. Read something about Alexandra Kollontai. Why Stalin decided to go prude? Perhaps it was his personal taste. After all he studied to become a priest and was not like the cosmopolitan mostly Jewish Bolsheviks.

    Read More
    • Replies: @animalogic
    There's much I agree with in this article. The RANK hypocracy of some black people actually calling for the elimination of white people, of saying that no white person can be trusted, can be a friend, is SICKENING. They should shrivel up with shame.
    This is all a part of Identity Politics, that intellectually poisonous ideology. They are useful idiots. The democratic party has been manipulating & exploiting these morons for years. Elites generally have supported it: simple divide & rule strategy. Sheep all, fleece them or flay them.
    However, these idiots have little or nothing to do with Marxism. "Culture" is a secondary, if not tertiary issue for genuine Marxists. Race & gender are NOT primary categories.
    Cultural Marxism is actually POST MODERNISM & PROGRESSIVISM. It helps no one to confuse these ideologies. (Of course "cultural Marxism" is "sexy": plays well to that whole American fear & loathing of communism)
    , @jilles dykstra
    Stalin's taste was making someone afraid, fearing his death, and then have him killed.
    , @Reg Cæsar

    So when Bolsheviks got to power marriage was relaxed and even abolished and promiscuity was promoted.
     
    Yeah, and that bombed, so they went back somewhat to the old ways.

    The Ruth Institute recently pointed out that Soviet Russia ended up with no-fault divorce from the opposite direction to ours. We got it through liberalization, they got it when cracking down.
    , @Seamus Padraig

    Why Stalin decided to go prude? Perhaps it was his personal taste. After all he studied to become a priest and was not like the cosmopolitan mostly Jewish Bolsheviks.
     
    It had little to do with Stalin's personal tastes. The reason why he had birth control and abortion restricted was to increase the size of the population (natalism). The reason why he banned homosexuality and promoted marriage is because that's the most efficient way to order society--always has been, always will be. Besides, that's what the vast majority of the Russians (and other ethnicities) wanted, which, of course, was the exact opposite of the what the Jew-Bolsheviks wanted.
    , @Anon
    In the USSR, the official turn towards traditional marriage was accompanied by draconian restrictions on abortion (brings to mind Mr. Hyde-the-Adulterer’ Amendment."
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  4. xkn says:

    Western Marxism is extremely dangerous, as it is direct strain of most virulent branch of Marxism-Stalinism. It belongs to the same branch as Maoism and whatever Pol Pot called his system. It leads invariably to pits full of human flesh. European Marxism changed after Stalin’s death, because communists understood that if same system continues nobody is safe including, most importantly, for them – themselves. This cleansing did not happen in the West. I do not agree that Marxism suddenly resurfaced in its most virulent form in the West, as author suggests. It was always there. Weather Underground & Co. have been openly discussing elimination (that is extermination) of 10% of US population in 1960′s, so there is hardly anything new under the sun in West as far as Marxism goes. Exterminating 10% of population (for openings) was essentially a Stalinist benchmark. Zealotry of Western Marxists, who essentially behave as cult, or at least orthodox religionists of their religion, can only be matched today with zealotry of Islamists. There cannot be reasoning with those people. Any attempt is doomed to failure.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Carroll Price
    Marxism is especially dangerous in the Western world because, for the most part, Westerners are too stupid and naïve to recognize it for what it is.
    , @Wizard of Oz
    You provide the stuff of satire. It may be true that there are still worshippers of Stalin amongst the small number of avowed Marxists in the "West" which somehow you confusingly distinguish from "Europeans" (how so?). But they are surely a small loony fringe with little influence on anyone of any importance. And how can you justify your hysterical "It invariably [sic] leads to pits of human flesh". I won't bother to ask for boring scholastic detail of the doctrines and beliefs of those most bloodthirsty Communist dictators you name** because what you are doing is to utter a warning based on an implied prophecy.

    Your prophecy means you think you see and belueve in a wideranging murderous outcome of this Marxism thinking and preaching in the "West"that you identify. Please attempt an elaboration of such a scenario to give some credibility to this idea.

    Of course I recognise the attraction of an exclusive minority cult lije yours which has nothing like the number of vulgar ignoramuses dancing on pinheads of the wrong size as e.g. Christian pro-lifers who appear to believe that everything [else]important to the USA should give way to putting embryo destroyers in gaol.

    **If you were so inclined I might ask for a comparison with the bloodthirstiest Crusaders who these days are seen as giving a bad name to Christianity, almost up with the barbarity of the Hebrew God in his early days....
    , @Anon
    "To overcome our enemies we must have our own socialist militarism. We must carry along with us 90 million out of the 100 million of Soviet Russia's population. As for the rest, we have nothing to say to them. They must be annihilated," Grigory Zinoviev (Gershon Apfelbaum) http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Grigory_Zinoviev
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  5. @utu
    I agree but I do not on the 2nd thought. Th cultural part form marxism was dropped in USSR after Stalin got to power. But for several years after the Bolshevik revolution in terms of mores anything went like in Weimar Republic. Cultural revolution was part of Marxism. Go read The Communist Manifesto and you will find there a chapter on prostitution and marriage which was considered as institutionalized prostitution. So when Bolsheviks got to power marriage was relaxed and even abolished and promiscuity was promoted. Read something about Alexandra Kollontai. Why Stalin decided to go prude? Perhaps it was his personal taste. After all he studied to become a priest and was not like the cosmopolitan mostly Jewish Bolsheviks.

    There’s much I agree with in this article. The RANK hypocracy of some black people actually calling for the elimination of white people, of saying that no white person can be trusted, can be a friend, is SICKENING. They should shrivel up with shame.
    This is all a part of Identity Politics, that intellectually poisonous ideology. They are useful idiots. The democratic party has been manipulating & exploiting these morons for years. Elites generally have supported it: simple divide & rule strategy. Sheep all, fleece them or flay them.
    However, these idiots have little or nothing to do with Marxism. “Culture” is a secondary, if not tertiary issue for genuine Marxists. Race & gender are NOT primary categories.
    Cultural Marxism is actually POST MODERNISM & PROGRESSIVISM. It helps no one to confuse these ideologies. (Of course “cultural Marxism” is “sexy”: plays well to that whole American fear & loathing of communism)

    Read More
    • Replies: @The Anti-Gnostic
    plays well to that whole American fear & loathing of communism

    Good for them. Americans would do communism at least as badly as they've done imperialism.
    , @Anon
    That's like saying Catholics are the only real Christians. It may or may not be true, but all those guys calling themselves Marxists and squabbling over which ones are the true Marxists are kind of hard to tell apart.
    , @Dutch Boy
    You are correct. It is also significant that CM is also dogma with corporations and corporate-funded NGOs. The CM emphasis on cultural rather than class warfare is right up the capitalists' alley. the consumerist zombies created by the CM state are also just the sort of "citizen" preferred by the capitalists.
    , @Seamus Padraig
    I'll agree with you this far: modern Cultural Marxism has basically shed any truly Marxist theory of political economy and made its peace with Neoliberalism. Tellingly, most modern Cultural Marxists actually try to deny that Cultural Marxism even exists! They like to claim that this is some 'conspiracy theory' spread by Breitbart, etc. However, the original Cultural Marxists, the Frankfurt School theorists, did still self-describe as Marxist and at least paid lip service to socialist ideals (even if they were anti-Soviet).
    , @MBlanc46
    Not much fear and loathing of communism in the US these days. Apparently, though, they still don’t like the Russians.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  6. The Dutch Leiden university professor Cliteur recently was at Berkeley university, used the toilet, and saw written with soap on the mirror something like ‘did you kill your fascist today’.
    If is was meant for Cliteur, he did not say so, in the eyes of leftists at Berkeley I suppose he, being a nationalist, automatically is a fascist.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  7. @utu
    I agree but I do not on the 2nd thought. Th cultural part form marxism was dropped in USSR after Stalin got to power. But for several years after the Bolshevik revolution in terms of mores anything went like in Weimar Republic. Cultural revolution was part of Marxism. Go read The Communist Manifesto and you will find there a chapter on prostitution and marriage which was considered as institutionalized prostitution. So when Bolsheviks got to power marriage was relaxed and even abolished and promiscuity was promoted. Read something about Alexandra Kollontai. Why Stalin decided to go prude? Perhaps it was his personal taste. After all he studied to become a priest and was not like the cosmopolitan mostly Jewish Bolsheviks.

    Stalin’s taste was making someone afraid, fearing his death, and then have him killed.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  8. Sam J. says:

    “…Marxist outlook…what gives the Workers World Party and groups such as Black Lives Matter, Antifa, and others like them more cache’ and prominence in America in 2017 is that one of the nation’s two major political parties, the Democratic Party, basically buys into their narrative, at least politically,..”

    What makes this possible is the Jewish tendency to attack the dominate group in any society and to turn as many minorities as they can against them. Without Jewish funding, support and propaganda in their Jewish owned media none of this would be happening. Oh sure there would still be people that think the same way but they would get no where with no cash and no support. They would be on the same level as George Lincoln Rockwell was in turning America Nazi.

    The only long term response I can see is to stop all immigration of anyone not White. Why should we import them only to have them be oppressed? Better they stay home. The ones that are here should be invited to leave. We may need to think about totally defunding public education. It would be a mess but college used to be affordable if you saved a little money and worked while going to school. It could be that way again.

    Read More
    • Agree: Carroll Price
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  9. Realist says:

    Consider the fate of this black professor at a Jewish university if he had written….that when he instructs his children “on the ways of the world,” he teaches them that Jewish people cannot be trusted and that blacks cannot befriend Jews.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  10. Mexican Radical, “America! You people are rotten racists! You practice exclusion. You “other” us! You want to wall us out! Well let me tell you, your “Leave It To Beaver”, white-privileged world of the 1950′s is going to disappear under an avalanche of Hispanic immigration!”

    Normal White American, “Why do you want to disappear the world of “Leave It To Beaver”? What was wrong with the life lived by those people? They lived in nice homes located in clean, orderly communities where they were friends with their neighbors, wore clean, un-patched clothes, attended modern schools that were unmarred by violence, drove nice cars, ate well in kitchens equipped with labor-saving appliances. Families were two parent with Fathers who held good jobs and earned enough to support the family in comfort while Mothers were able to stay home and tend to their broods. What exactly was wrong with all that?”

    Mexican Radical, “It’s all so white bread. Monotonous. It needs to be torn down. Livened up. You need the energy we Hispanics bring to life. You’re boring!”

    Normal White American, “Well, if you really believe that everything we hold dear needs to be torn down to make room for you, can you really blame us for wanting to build a wall and exclude–excuse me–”other” you?”

    Read More
    • Agree: RadicalCenter, MBlanc46
    • Replies: @Grandpa Charlie

    “Why do you want to disappear the world of “Leave It To Beaver”? What was wrong with the life lived by those people? They lived in nice homes ... wore clean, un-patched clothes ... " == ThreeCranes
     
    What is wrong with clean patched clothes? ThreeCranes' "Normal White American" must be a boomer, as must ThreeCranes also, whereas I was born before the War. during the Great Depression. Anyone who would automatically associate the standard for clean with unpatched -- and thus patched with dirty -- is obviously a spoiled boomer and a snobbish consumerist. Bah!
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  11. Bill Jones says: • Website

    Why are these fukrs still walking around? And paid by taxpayers?

    Read More
    • Replies: @SMK
    Philosopher Rudy Martinez, a deranged muddle-head, as laughable as he's terrifying, and obviously a Mestizo or pure Amerindian rather than a pure Spaniard like Jorge Ramos and Marco Rubio, calls for white genocide, the extermination of all whites. "Your DNA is an abomination," he fulminates. So whites are uniquely evil, innately and immutably. But he also writes that "you were not born white, you became white. So "race doesn't exist." Race is an "artificial social construct," whiteness is a an "artificial social construct," and thus can be "deconstructed." People of any race, which doesn't exist, can become "white." This philosophy major is so stupid and obtuse that he can't see the blatant and stupefying incoherence and contradiction of his "arguments."
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  12. Heros says:
    @Anonymous
    "... what Dr. Paul Gottfried has labeled quite correctly “cultural Marxism”..."

    Dr Gottfried can label it what he wants, but it's not Marxism of any kind, which is opposed to this kind of identity politics, as is easily demonstrated by the comment sections of socialist websites, the conflicts raging between old-school leftists and trans activists who are attempting to demonize/purge them. Funnily enough, the author admits himself that the East European communists he met did not share any wish for same-sex marriage, sexual liberation. There's the clue, and our intrepid writer explains it away as 'stodgy'.

    “it’s not Marxism of any kind, which is opposed to this kind of identity politics”

    Marxism and cultural Marxism are simply sanitized Protocols of Zion for stupid goy useful idiots. You cannot even scratch the surface of either without an in depth analysis of the Talmud and Ashkenazi hatred of Christians.

    Read More
    • Agree: Johnny Smoggins
    • Replies: @biz
    Since you have certainly done that in-depth analysis, tell me this: how many times are Christians or Christianity mentioned in the Talmud?
    , @Reg Cæsar

    Marxism and cultural Marxism are simply sanitized Protocols of Zion for stupid goy useful idiots.
     
    So socialism is the anti-Semitism of fools?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  13. The notion of Cultural Marxism keeps slipping out of my grasp. A glance at RatiinalWiki suggests that there is little of the Frankfurt School nowadays in anything potent that might be so called. Indeed “cultural Marxist” may have started as a sneering description by real Marxist class warriors.

    American problems with sex until close to 1960 and even beyond seems to have a lot to do with American usage.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Dube
    "Indeed 'cultural Marxist' may have started as a sneering description by real Marxist class warriors."

    Nah, rather, Frankfurt Marxist Herbert Marcuse conceded in his "One-Dimensional Man" that the workers had been co-opted, and that all of his contemporary culture had become "one-dimensional,"
    having lost the power to criticize, challenge, and transcend. That lead to the new strategy of attempting to overthrow the culture, rather than specifically the ownership class, which had turned its opposition laboring class into a pillar of support.

    That's as I understand it.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  14. Malla says:

    Corporate Capitalism and Communism are both allies. The enemies of these Marxists enemies are the decent, intelligent, civilized members of society mostly the middle classes whom they hate, not super rich bankers. Just look at what happened Venezuela and even up to a lesser extent in Brazil. Chavez looted the middle classes and channeled some of the money to buy out the underclasses and thugs but the vast majority of the wealth ended up with the elites, Chavez too was a member of the so called elites.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3640941/Super-rich-quaff-champagne-Venezuela-country-club-middle-classes-scavenge-food-rubbish-dumps-DOGS-starving.html

    The controlled whole world media projected Chavez as the man of the people fighting evil uncle Sam. Now the middle classes are destitute and the super elites enjoy their lives. Venezuela was just an experiment for the world.
    The elites use the bottom classes to terrorize the Middle classes. The whole race fiasco in South Africa was more Globalists using it’s Marxists branch using blacks Marxist leaders using the black masses to overturn the Apartheid Regime. They were supported by world media controlled by leftists who in turn are controlled by the globalist elites.
    Before WW2 they had hoped to use the White working classes of the west to get their revolution but since the White working class of the West had become to prosperous and were too independent in nature, they realised the White working class will not work as the vehicle for revolution. Hence the non Whites especially blacks and even LGBTs to be used as vehicles of revolution. Blacks on average have low IQ, have massive jealousy and hatred for Whites (naturally which is augmented by education, general black culture and the media), are impulsive, greedy for handouts, love playing the victim card, the vast majority of them will always remain an underclass etc… They could not have asked for a better tribe of people. LGBTs on average naturally love deviant things. Weapons for the leftist arm of the globalists. That is what they are.

    Read More
    • Agree: Alden
    • Replies: @patsy
    A fantastic book to read on the coming together of corporate capitalism and communism and it is a must read. The Milner Fabian Conspiracy. Author Ioan Ratiu.
    , @Anon
    Yup. It's a pity the 0.01 per cent and their smart servants and class-hoppers couldn't see their way to looking after the 30 per cent if they couldn't find a way as in Canada, Australia, Scandinavia etc to keep nearly everyone crawling up the material ladder with innovation and productivity.

    We could argue whether those of the Marxist or merely Christian left who have continued with the 200 year old theme of spreading growing wealth more equally by finding the happiness deficient of all kinds to share good things created by others can muster good factual arguments for their preferences. But I commend some diversion of their thoughts and feelings to the increasingly dysgenic breeding of whites for 150 years and to whether the great gene pool of "whites" has ever been worth celebrating as if it were more than a contingent and impermanent feature of man's history.

    I was particularly struck by the incongruity of what is said or apparently assumed about whites when watchinf some docis about the two world wars. The treatment of black servicemen during and after both, not least by other servicemen, served as a reminder that at least 70 per cent of the product of any human gene pool only escape being scum occasionally and temporarily. (Abhor excessive certainties. Where would one place one's Viking ancestors who gave their lives in valiant defence of the communities they had established after despoliating minasteries and killing the monks barbarously then raping all the local women? Was the Holocaust carried out by whites? )

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  15. JackOH says:
    @Backwoods Bob
    Thank you prof. Yankah.

    I was a department head at our state's university and this is all true, but it is even worse.

    One thing I did regularly as a department head was distribute literature on grant programs, from foundations and think tanks, along with student internships and scholarships.

    I saw the whole global warming hoax rise, then bob and weave into climate change. The grantor told you what to write about, what to major in, and it was in conjunction with a whole spider web of other grantor machinations. The money powers can not only do endowed chairs but they are the big players in legislatures and governorships - hence state budgets to higher education.

    If you are a free market capitalist, it is a tough go. I was in a business program, and the dean had a bust of Lenin in his office.

    It's a lot better in the private sector. That fixes it for me. But not for the rest of society. Since I left, the snowflake generation has arrived, screaming at the sky and wearing pussy hats.

    BB, thanks for that insider’s view. I’ve observed my local Podunk Tech for years, and it depresses me to think how much of academic discourse is bounded, even dictated, by money and ideology. Especially true in the humanities, but even STEM disciplines are not immune. Exasperated, I sometimes wonder if our academies differ from North Korea’s only in degree and not in kind. Don’t rock the boat, keep your mouth shut, go along-get along, toe the line, don’t push your evidence, look the other way, stay on the right side of your department chair, your dean, your students, don’t ruffle the trustees, all that.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Backwoods Bob
    Less in STEM maybe but I worked with engineers and scientists too that adopted all the right language, did all the right grant research, etc. Even one who rode his bike every day to school in extreme cold, and wanted everyone else in the world to be made to do it too.

    In doing so, they allowed Orwellian double-speak right into their labs. "Sustainable" had a concrete definition in my field, like maximum sustained yield in forestry and fishing. But it is being co-opted.

    "Sustainable" in Cultural Marxism is a label that means private property and markets are bad, while government is good.

    The field of Economics is so wrecked now that they teach the Tragedy of the Commons exactly backwards. The history is that common property is the best way to ensure resource collapse in systems beyond family units. Nobody has an incentive to conserve and husband the resource.

    So they teach that the government must manage production because when people are left to their own devices, all the fish are caught including the breeding stock, and forests are clear cut without replanting.

    Yet, that is the result of common property, not private property. A fish farm or private timber holding is managed for maximum sustained yield.

    I was brought up on sexual harassment charges for the following: I had a prof who sent out surveys asking people how much they claimed it was worth to them to stop logging and save the spotted owls. She had some absurd "psychic" value on the Spotted Owls.

    So I asked why she wasn't allowing the negative values - most everyone around there would love to pay a bounty on them. And historically that is far more accurate, with bounties on predators and so forth.

    She was so angry at being exposed for the bias that she filed sexual harassment charges because, being more than 20 years younger than me, I had called her "young lady" once exactly as the old profs had called me "young man" when I had arrived.

    That was the entire basis of the complaint but I had to prepare for a sanctioning meeting with the Dean, with the bust of Lenin, who gleefully sent it up in her favor, requiring a hearing with the Vice Chancellor.

    By that time I had gotten enough of the old-timers to write affadavits they had called me "young man" and the management prof was still teaching so they had a hard time with selective prosecution.

    Yet, they claimed sexual harassment is in the eye of the alleged victim, that if I hold a door for her or walk in front of, behind, or next to - whichever one she chooses is harassment, it is all up to her. I am not allowed to know beforehand. I find out in a sexual harassment action that could potentially have me fired.

    You don't have courts and juries in acadamia. There is theater of such, without the doctrine of common law or stare decisis. My best prof in game management was turned down for tenure because he wasn't "collegial" enough, despite his teaching and publishing record being superb.

    The quality of the classroom, the rigor, fell in direct proportion to the marxist infection. You step out of the world of science and reason - and into the world of doublespeak and arbitrary authority.

    Marxism is idiotic on the face of it. The first few paragraphs of Marx and Engel's Manifesto about all previous history is a religious statement, not even remotely resembling history.

    I made my freshman students read it, and what impressed me was how incapable of thinking they were. Okay kids, you say it sounds great in theory. Let's talk about abolishing the family. Your family.

    Oh, well maybe not that part. Alright kids, then what about you not being able to own property? Oh, well maybe not that part either. Alright kids, what about holding the women in common? How do you little feminists feel about being the common property of men? Oh, well maybe not that part either. Etc.

    How can they read this tripe and say that it "sounds good in theory"? It sounds incoherent, tyrannical, and stupid, at face value.

    The reason "Marxism" can drift from an alleged class struggle to a race struggle to a gender struggle or what have you is that Marxism is a divide-and-conquer strategy where people are merely objects to attain ends.

    You're a fool if you try to make sense out of the particulars with the Marxist in front of you. It's Saul Alinsky's Rules for Radicals which is an instruction manual for psychopaths to use and abuse people as objects. It is all about manipulation and control, and in the end they'll slit your throat to get what they want.

    , @Alden
    A biology teacher at Santa Monica City College often states that " blonde hair and blue eyes are a mutation and the sooner they are eliminated the better the world will be." She is actually a high school teacher who teaches 2 night classes a week at the college.

    She is a redhead from Minnesota with one of the most common Scandinavian last names. Her skin is pale as paper. I guess she doesn't realize she is among the whitest of the Whites.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  16. “but it’s not Marxism of any kind.” I disagree. Marxism apes revealed religion with an inspired Founder, a holy, infallible text and followers who immediately begin to splinter into competing, mutually denouncing sects when the founder kicks off. Recall Stalin denouncing the “Social Fascist” German Social Democrats, a betrayal of true Marxism. American Marxism is race-based because that’s where the deepest social tension lies, where you have the morally superior oppressed/exploited rising up against the benighted oppressor/exploiters — the classic Marxist paradigm.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  17. That picture is truly disgusting. Professor Yankah looks like an anthropomorphicized turd and I wouldn’t want to be his friend anyway. What a parasite this man is. It was White Western culture that created the sinecure he now occupies, where he is paid a handsome wage to produce nothing of any value and to hector us relentlessly about our supposed injustices. Why do we allow pathetic little pseudo-intellectual polyps like him to sprout in the colon of civilized discourse? Why did we allow one of his ilk, Barack Obama—another sneering, butt-ugly, inconsequential fart of man—to become president? This is definitely a White man’s disease. We could certainly show them some real disclusion if we ever decided to get serious about it. They have no power, no fuel, no means with which to peddle their crap other than the White man’s guilt and cuckery.

    How disheartening it is to see goofy White guys eagerly prostrating themselves before the cult of diversity and insisting (more to their own inner contemplative vision than to any outside observer in particular) on the plainly fallacious idea of racial equality. How absurd to see them heaping praise, riches, and largess upon these wayward sons of Africa, throwing away their lives and destroying their civilization in the process. All it takes is one moment’s abstraction from the situation, one step back from the sacred circle of negro worship, to see what is really going on here. The soft, easy-living, daydreaming White folks have adopted negroes to serve as the golden calves and sacred monkeys of their new, post-Christian, degenerate religion of cosmopolitanism.

    The complicated Leftist ideology that supports this degeneracy is really of little consequence. Even the refutation thereof would belong only to the annals of a dry intellectual history that motivates little in the day-to-day world. Meanwhile, the monkeys continue to make a mess of things, defecating in the temple, stealing food, and harassing the passers by. For whatever your ideology stipulates, it remains an objective fact that Black people do little except interfere with White society. They are a thoroughgoing nuisance-race, have been for 500 years, and will remain so for as long into the future as is of practical concern.

    It is therefore time to call openly for separation. Those who do so may feel themselves to be a small an ineffectual opposition, but the effects that such opposition can achieve are much greater than mere numbers would suggest, provided only that the effort is a real one. So beat the drum incessantly in order to bring about the change in dialogue that Dr. Cathey rightly insists is necessary. At the very least, we will finally have an alternative to the mandatory cucking out to cultural Trotskyism that masquerades as morality in the West.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Authenticjazzman
    Just the view of this pompous fool's stupid, arrogant visage, gives me the willies, and the knowledge that he is raking in a totally undeserved six-figure salary, pisses me off more than I can express in words.

    Authenticjazzman "Mensa" qualified since 1973, airborne trained US Army vet, and pro jazz artist.
    , @MBlanc46
    Many blacks also favor separation. Perhaps it’s an idea whose time has finally come.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  18. Jake says:
    @Anonymous
    "... what Dr. Paul Gottfried has labeled quite correctly “cultural Marxism”..."

    Dr Gottfried can label it what he wants, but it's not Marxism of any kind, which is opposed to this kind of identity politics, as is easily demonstrated by the comment sections of socialist websites, the conflicts raging between old-school leftists and trans activists who are attempting to demonize/purge them. Funnily enough, the author admits himself that the East European communists he met did not share any wish for same-sex marriage, sexual liberation. There's the clue, and our intrepid writer explains it away as 'stodgy'.

    You are missing the point. Marxism,’classical Marxism,’ was never just about the class struggle. It was about Marx formulating a theoretical framework from which to oppose every part of Christendom, which required unrelenting desire to replace the cultures of Christendom: white Christian cultures. Marx was creating a replacement for Christendom

    In classical Marxism, that replacement is to be effected by Marxist economics controlled by Marxist politicians and bureaucrats and the State warring against the Church.

    In Cultural Marxism, the war against Christendom and its peoples, whites, has been shifted to matters of race. And that form of war to exterminate any possible vestige of Christendom is extremely attractive not just to blacks, Jews, and Asians, but also to WASP Elites, because it not merely allows private wealth but encourages private wealth among the ‘Politically Correct,’ because then they can use the their fortunes for good: which means to exterminate all trace of Christendom and essentially make serfs of almost all white people who are not PC/Cultural Marxist in faith and militant advocacy.

    Read More
    • Replies: @woodNfish
    You do know the "P" in WASP stands for "Protestant", don't you? Protestants are Christians, so explain to me why they want to eliminate themselves.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  19. @Intelligent Dasein
    That picture is truly disgusting. Professor Yankah looks like an anthropomorphicized turd and I wouldn't want to be his friend anyway. What a parasite this man is. It was White Western culture that created the sinecure he now occupies, where he is paid a handsome wage to produce nothing of any value and to hector us relentlessly about our supposed injustices. Why do we allow pathetic little pseudo-intellectual polyps like him to sprout in the colon of civilized discourse? Why did we allow one of his ilk, Barack Obama---another sneering, butt-ugly, inconsequential fart of man---to become president? This is definitely a White man's disease. We could certainly show them some real disclusion if we ever decided to get serious about it. They have no power, no fuel, no means with which to peddle their crap other than the White man's guilt and cuckery.

    How disheartening it is to see goofy White guys eagerly prostrating themselves before the cult of diversity and insisting (more to their own inner contemplative vision than to any outside observer in particular) on the plainly fallacious idea of racial equality. How absurd to see them heaping praise, riches, and largess upon these wayward sons of Africa, throwing away their lives and destroying their civilization in the process. All it takes is one moment's abstraction from the situation, one step back from the sacred circle of negro worship, to see what is really going on here. The soft, easy-living, daydreaming White folks have adopted negroes to serve as the golden calves and sacred monkeys of their new, post-Christian, degenerate religion of cosmopolitanism.

    The complicated Leftist ideology that supports this degeneracy is really of little consequence. Even the refutation thereof would belong only to the annals of a dry intellectual history that motivates little in the day-to-day world. Meanwhile, the monkeys continue to make a mess of things, defecating in the temple, stealing food, and harassing the passers by. For whatever your ideology stipulates, it remains an objective fact that Black people do little except interfere with White society. They are a thoroughgoing nuisance-race, have been for 500 years, and will remain so for as long into the future as is of practical concern.

    It is therefore time to call openly for separation. Those who do so may feel themselves to be a small an ineffectual opposition, but the effects that such opposition can achieve are much greater than mere numbers would suggest, provided only that the effort is a real one. So beat the drum incessantly in order to bring about the change in dialogue that Dr. Cathey rightly insists is necessary. At the very least, we will finally have an alternative to the mandatory cucking out to cultural Trotskyism that masquerades as morality in the West.

    Just the view of this pompous fool’s stupid, arrogant visage, gives me the willies, and the knowledge that he is raking in a totally undeserved six-figure salary, pisses me off more than I can express in words.

    Authenticjazzman “Mensa” qualified since 1973, airborne trained US Army vet, and pro jazz artist.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  20. @animalogic
    There's much I agree with in this article. The RANK hypocracy of some black people actually calling for the elimination of white people, of saying that no white person can be trusted, can be a friend, is SICKENING. They should shrivel up with shame.
    This is all a part of Identity Politics, that intellectually poisonous ideology. They are useful idiots. The democratic party has been manipulating & exploiting these morons for years. Elites generally have supported it: simple divide & rule strategy. Sheep all, fleece them or flay them.
    However, these idiots have little or nothing to do with Marxism. "Culture" is a secondary, if not tertiary issue for genuine Marxists. Race & gender are NOT primary categories.
    Cultural Marxism is actually POST MODERNISM & PROGRESSIVISM. It helps no one to confuse these ideologies. (Of course "cultural Marxism" is "sexy": plays well to that whole American fear & loathing of communism)

    plays well to that whole American fear & loathing of communism

    Good for them. Americans would do communism at least as badly as they’ve done imperialism.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  21. anarchyst says:

    I have come to the conclusion that passing the so-called “civil-rights” acts were mistakes. The more “rights” these black bastards demand, the more they complain and make demands not available to whites. When whites become a “minority” in our own country, do you think the “civil-rights” acts will benefit us? I think not…

    When whites become a minority, this country is finished. All one has to do is look at Zimbabwe, South Africa, and other black-run “basket cases”. This is our future…

    That being said…

    The term “racism” was invented by communists, and is used to destroy cultures and defuse (and render impotent) those with differing points-of-view on “racial” issues.

    True “racism” is desirable as it merely cements cultural and social bonds that are necessary for a society to function and flourish.

    True “racism” merely denotes commonality of purpose and advancement within each respective racial group.

    Blacks have the NAACP and Congressional Black Caucus, Hispanics have La Raza and Mecha, Jews have the $PLC, ACLU and ADL. These are all “racist” organizations that serve to promote the interests (and political power) of their respective races.

    It is only whites who are castigated and threatened for attempting to show any signs of racial solidarity.

    Let’s look at what us “evil, privileged” whites have done for Western society and the world:

    1. “Civil-rights (for some)” laws (that effectively destroy “freedom of association” for whites, but not for other races) and do not apply to whites–only “people of color” are covered by these so-called “civil-rights (for some)” protections.

    2. “Affirmative action” policies (that push better qualified whites out of positions and jobs that they would ordinarily qualify for) in favor of lesser-qualified minorities. In fact, “affirmative action” policies actually damage those minorities who are quite capable of “making it on their own” because they get “lumped in” with the groups that cannot make it on their own without “help”,

    3. “Contract set-asides” (that are specifically targeted for minorities (that white people are prohibited from bidding on) and immigration policies (that specifically exclude whites, most of who have skills that would benefit the USA) in favor of those from the third-world (with no marketable skills).

    4. Scholarships that specify particular ethnic groups are looked upon favorably by most people, save one–scholarships that are intended for whites only are looked upon as being “racist”, and therefore impermissible and improper in today’s racially-charged climate of “political correctness”.

    NO OTHER RACE (BUT WHITES) HAS (EVER) BENT OVER BACKWARDS to assure that all non-white races receive a “fair shake” in being a part of American life, even to the detriment and social well-being of “our own kind” (whites).

    Whites possess an externalized altruism that no other races possesses. This externalized altruism that “looks out for the other guy” will be the demise of the white race. This altruism needs to be internalized and focused inward, just as other races have done. There is NO SHAME in looking out for one’s own kind.

    “Multiculturalism” and “diversity” are code-words for white genocide.

    I blame those of the “greatest generation” for selling out our birthright with the passage of the “Civil-Rights Acts” of 1957 and 1964, and the “Hart-Cellar immigration act of 1965″. To those of the “greatest generation” (who are still alive) thanks for NOTHING…

    As whites comprise only 6% of the world population, it is us whites who should be the most protected and cherished of minorities…

    Read More
    • Agree: Alden
    • Replies: @Malla

    NO OTHER RACE (BUT WHITES) HAS (EVER) BENT OVER BACKWARDS to assure that all non-white races receive a “fair shake” in being a part of American life, even to the detriment and social well-being of “our own kind” (whites).

     

    Whites of Europe (especially North Western Europe) have never experienced multi-racialism to the extent like peoples living in the Middle East, North Africa, South Asia or South East Asia until about 500 years ago. That is why White Europeans could not develop the kind of social defenses like the people of the Middle East for example. Northern Europeans especially tend to be individualistic and do not posses the clannish tendencies which people of the Middle East or South Asia posses, clannish tendencies developed to cope with multiracialism and multiculturalism which these populations have experienced for thousands of years. Blacks have innate survivalist instincts and do not fall for the propaganda of universalism that easily. North East Asians are not as clannish as South Asians or Middle Easterners but their civilizations never had tendencies towards global universalism as much as Western civilization. Southern Europeans have dealt with non European populations of the Middle East/North Africa for a long time and thus they do posses some social defenses developed from these experiences. Likewise Eastern Europeans had to deal with Mongols, Siberians and Central Asians for along period of time and they have developed such defences too but to a much smaller extent than Southern Europeans. Both these European populations had traditionally shielded North Western Europeans from the big bad European world.

    As long as uncivilized/explotive non Whites were a small minority in a Western White society, White societies could tolerate it and move on. But in those cases, such non Whites are a huge minority or a majority, the most effective social method White people had was segregation/apartheid. But clannish populations like Arabs or Pakistanis do not need apartheid, their social natures have prepared them for thousands of years for living in multicultural/ multiracial environments.

    For example,

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dPxv4Aff3IA

    Check out the Israeli woman's response to charges racism at about 1:10 minutes in the video.
    The charge of being called racist does not affect her one bit. She proclaims infront of a crowd of mainstream Israelis 'I am proud to be a racist, and it's our right to be racist' Imagine a White person saying that infront of a crowd in a major Western city.
    Also at 2:00 minutes see how the mainstream crowd treats a libtard Israeli who is on the side of the blacks.
    Mainstream Israeli society treats perceived Race traitors like how mainstream Western societies treat race nationalists/ race realists.
    , @joef

    NO OTHER RACE (BUT WHITES) HAS (EVER) BENT OVER BACKWARDS to assure that all non-white races receive a “fair shake” in being a part of American life, even to the detriment and social well-being of “our own kind” (whites).
     
    I generally given up a peaceful resolution with afro americans, because it is clear most do not want one. They will always push for more capitulations to further unreasonable demands. They show no signs of stopping. It will stop only when they bankrupt the country, but that will bring its own set of severe problems. The worst are the traitorous whites, who ignore the Non Black victims of afro american violent crime, and will enable afros to the end. This includes leftist, limo liberals, and anarcho capitalist. At least you can claim that most afros are just a bunch of ignorant people following their immediate gratifications. But these whites are surely much more culpable in pushing this radical destructive afro agenda (eg BLM).
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  22. “Cultural Marxism” (whatever that might be) triumphing in Western Europe? I wonder what the author means. He doesn’t say. I can’t think of any event in my already long European lifetime that could be so described. I’m always amused, by the way, that the very same people who preach “non-intervention” (when it suits Vladimir Putin), withdrawal from NATO (when it suits Vladimir Putin) and who keep saying “don’t invade other people’s countries” (when it suits Vladimir Putin) keep telling us white European Christians how to run our countries and even rewrite our history to suit their own domestic American political discourse. That “forked tongue” doesn’t exactly lend credibility to their arguments!

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    First of all, you are not a white European Christian but a Zionist; this has been proven by your many post parroting the Lobby. Even in this diatribe against Putin -- what the modern capitalist Russia has to do with the stupidity of affirmative actions in the US and the phenomenon of Professor Yankah? -- you are trying to cheerlead for Eretz Israel by "rationalizing" the wars in the Middle East.
    You need to make a decision whether you stand for "white European Christians" and European history or for the supremacist plans of the "chosen." These two choices are not interchangeable.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  23. @xkn
    Western Marxism is extremely dangerous, as it is direct strain of most virulent branch of Marxism-Stalinism. It belongs to the same branch as Maoism and whatever Pol Pot called his system. It leads invariably to pits full of human flesh. European Marxism changed after Stalin's death, because communists understood that if same system continues nobody is safe including, most importantly, for them - themselves. This cleansing did not happen in the West. I do not agree that Marxism suddenly resurfaced in its most virulent form in the West, as author suggests. It was always there. Weather Underground & Co. have been openly discussing elimination (that is extermination) of 10% of US population in 1960's, so there is hardly anything new under the sun in West as far as Marxism goes. Exterminating 10% of population (for openings) was essentially a Stalinist benchmark. Zealotry of Western Marxists, who essentially behave as cult, or at least orthodox religionists of their religion, can only be matched today with zealotry of Islamists. There cannot be reasoning with those people. Any attempt is doomed to failure.

    Marxism is especially dangerous in the Western world because, for the most part, Westerners are too stupid and naïve to recognize it for what it is.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
    What is it that you have recognised?

    If "Westerners" have not exercised intelligence and recognised the dangerous Marxism in their nations might it be because there is so little of it, so few people expressing an allegiance to Marxist ideas, and so much recognition of the failures of Marxists to run or govern anything effective?

    How much unity can you describe in eother the doctrines or organisation or policy aims of these Western Marxists?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  24. biz says:
    @Heros

    "it’s not Marxism of any kind, which is opposed to this kind of identity politics"
     
    Marxism and cultural Marxism are simply sanitized Protocols of Zion for stupid goy useful idiots. You cannot even scratch the surface of either without an in depth analysis of the Talmud and Ashkenazi hatred of Christians.

    Since you have certainly done that in-depth analysis, tell me this: how many times are Christians or Christianity mentioned in the Talmud?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Malla
    This could help

    http://www.talmudunmasked.com/chapter4.htm
    http://www.talmudunmasked.com/chapter5.htm
    http://www.talmudunmasked.com/chapter6.htm
    http://www.talmudunmasked.com/chapter7.htm
    ............................
    , @Wizard of Oz
    I like it even if his literate nephew Malla has tried party pooping to some effect :-)
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  25. @Backwoods Bob
    Thank you prof. Yankah.

    I was a department head at our state's university and this is all true, but it is even worse.

    One thing I did regularly as a department head was distribute literature on grant programs, from foundations and think tanks, along with student internships and scholarships.

    I saw the whole global warming hoax rise, then bob and weave into climate change. The grantor told you what to write about, what to major in, and it was in conjunction with a whole spider web of other grantor machinations. The money powers can not only do endowed chairs but they are the big players in legislatures and governorships - hence state budgets to higher education.

    If you are a free market capitalist, it is a tough go. I was in a business program, and the dean had a bust of Lenin in his office.

    It's a lot better in the private sector. That fixes it for me. But not for the rest of society. Since I left, the snowflake generation has arrived, screaming at the sky and wearing pussy hats.

    Generation snowflake is such a fitting description. Generation clown doesn’t roll off the tongue quiet as well.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  26. @Anonymous
    "... what Dr. Paul Gottfried has labeled quite correctly “cultural Marxism”..."

    Dr Gottfried can label it what he wants, but it's not Marxism of any kind, which is opposed to this kind of identity politics, as is easily demonstrated by the comment sections of socialist websites, the conflicts raging between old-school leftists and trans activists who are attempting to demonize/purge them. Funnily enough, the author admits himself that the East European communists he met did not share any wish for same-sex marriage, sexual liberation. There's the clue, and our intrepid writer explains it away as 'stodgy'.

    it’s not Marxism of any kind

    No, it’s Leninism. Who, whom.

    Leftism of all kinds is about power and nothing else. That includes Wilson and FDR, whom Southerners loved so much.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  27. If Prof Haknay Woke (it’s more pronounceable backwards!) had described his Jewish employers with the same words he uses for the rest of the white population, Yeshiva would show him the door.

    Read More
    • Replies: @lavoisier
    It was his Jewish employers who were thrilled to publish the hate whitey essay!!
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  28. @Heros

    "it’s not Marxism of any kind, which is opposed to this kind of identity politics"
     
    Marxism and cultural Marxism are simply sanitized Protocols of Zion for stupid goy useful idiots. You cannot even scratch the surface of either without an in depth analysis of the Talmud and Ashkenazi hatred of Christians.

    Marxism and cultural Marxism are simply sanitized Protocols of Zion for stupid goy useful idiots.

    So socialism is the anti-Semitism of fools?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wally
    Is your so called "anti-Semitism" bad?

    If so, why?


    www.codoh.ccom
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  29. @utu
    I agree but I do not on the 2nd thought. Th cultural part form marxism was dropped in USSR after Stalin got to power. But for several years after the Bolshevik revolution in terms of mores anything went like in Weimar Republic. Cultural revolution was part of Marxism. Go read The Communist Manifesto and you will find there a chapter on prostitution and marriage which was considered as institutionalized prostitution. So when Bolsheviks got to power marriage was relaxed and even abolished and promiscuity was promoted. Read something about Alexandra Kollontai. Why Stalin decided to go prude? Perhaps it was his personal taste. After all he studied to become a priest and was not like the cosmopolitan mostly Jewish Bolsheviks.

    So when Bolsheviks got to power marriage was relaxed and even abolished and promiscuity was promoted.

    Yeah, and that bombed, so they went back somewhat to the old ways.

    The Ruth Institute recently pointed out that Soviet Russia ended up with no-fault divorce from the opposite direction to ours. We got it through liberalization, they got it when cracking down.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  30. Malla says:

    This is worth a read

    http://www.whitenationalism.com/etext/ak-intro.htm

    Sir Arthur Keith

    “Universalism as an ideal is as old as – nay, is probably much more ancient than – the Christian ideal. Yet see how different they are in penetrating power. Christianity has a momentum of its own which has carried it over a large part of the earth’s surface; Universalism has no drive, no momentum; it is not contagious; it has behind it no missionary enthusiasm. And yet this strange fact remains: Universalism, not as an ideal but as a political practice, has been and is at work in all parts of the earth. Nowhere is Universalism welcomed and encouraged by a people; everywhere governments have forced and are forcing Universalism upon unwilling and resistant subjects. There is something in the Universalist ideal which runs against the grain of human nature. Force and fear are the driving power behind this regional kind of Universalism. Love and brotherhood have had no part in its spread.”

    also

    “Huxley condemned Universalism; it was an illusion. More than a century earlier J. J. Rousseau gave an equally unsparing verdict; ‘it was a veritable chimera.’ But the reasons they gave for their condemnation were not the same. Huxley’s judgment was founded on the belief that no sooner would Universalism be established than evolution would again raise her hoary head, pitting local group against local group, and that soon mankind would reassume its evil evolutionary ways. Rousseau’s reason was very different. For him nationalism was the source of all that is good: If people would be virtuous … let them love their own country … If it is a home for everyone … It is a home for no one.’ * * * A uniform Universalist system of schools could do much in the attaining of such ideals, but the old instincts would be merely suppressed, not eliminated. To eliminate them, and so secure stability for the Universalist State, breeding and marriage must be controlled everywhere so that individuals of a warlike spirit, individuals who are evolutionary – minded – that is, competitive, combative, strong-willed, ambitious. or jealous – are prevented from handing on their qualities to the coming generation. In this way mankind could be domesticated, tamed, and made suitable subjects for a Universal state. If we desire universal peace we must be prepared to surrender our evolutionary birthright. I for one would prefer to keep my birthright and use the gifts which Nature has given me for its maintenance, the chief of which is courage – courage and self-sacrifice.”

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  31. Malla says:
    @biz
    Since you have certainly done that in-depth analysis, tell me this: how many times are Christians or Christianity mentioned in the Talmud?
    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  32. anon • Disclaimer says:

    As a white person I suggested a government program be started to help resettle white people to Europe. I wrote posts Denmark or Bust. Now I’m a white supremacist. The idea really is about making whites non-white. No one wants whites to really leave and go live with other whites. They want subservient whites who fight their battles and raise they chill’n. I also suggested that we take down all those statues of whites and put statues of Obama, Hillary, Al Sharpton, because with those the cities make sense. For some reason whites are just to afraid to notice how much even their own spouse thinks they are shit and dislikes their color and other Europeans and wallows in any bad that may happen; things like well more people die in accidents when Muslims kill people. They want to kill Christians because of their thoughts on homosexuality but when Muslims kill, well it’s not that many, that’s not my country, we stand with the Muslims. The contrast is bewildering.
    At this point I like the white supremacists better, they would never force me to go colonize Africa or the Middle East.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  33. Anon • Disclaimer says:
    @animalogic
    There's much I agree with in this article. The RANK hypocracy of some black people actually calling for the elimination of white people, of saying that no white person can be trusted, can be a friend, is SICKENING. They should shrivel up with shame.
    This is all a part of Identity Politics, that intellectually poisonous ideology. They are useful idiots. The democratic party has been manipulating & exploiting these morons for years. Elites generally have supported it: simple divide & rule strategy. Sheep all, fleece them or flay them.
    However, these idiots have little or nothing to do with Marxism. "Culture" is a secondary, if not tertiary issue for genuine Marxists. Race & gender are NOT primary categories.
    Cultural Marxism is actually POST MODERNISM & PROGRESSIVISM. It helps no one to confuse these ideologies. (Of course "cultural Marxism" is "sexy": plays well to that whole American fear & loathing of communism)

    That’s like saying Catholics are the only real Christians. It may or may not be true, but all those guys calling themselves Marxists and squabbling over which ones are the true Marxists are kind of hard to tell apart.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  34. Malla says:
    @anarchyst
    I have come to the conclusion that passing the so-called "civil-rights" acts were mistakes. The more "rights" these black bastards demand, the more they complain and make demands not available to whites. When whites become a "minority" in our own country, do you think the "civil-rights" acts will benefit us? I think not...

    When whites become a minority, this country is finished. All one has to do is look at Zimbabwe, South Africa, and other black-run "basket cases". This is our future...

    That being said...

    The term "racism" was invented by communists, and is used to destroy cultures and defuse (and render impotent) those with differing points-of-view on "racial" issues.

    True "racism" is desirable as it merely cements cultural and social bonds that are necessary for a society to function and flourish.

    True "racism" merely denotes commonality of purpose and advancement within each respective racial group.

    Blacks have the NAACP and Congressional Black Caucus, Hispanics have La Raza and Mecha, Jews have the $PLC, ACLU and ADL. These are all "racist" organizations that serve to promote the interests (and political power) of their respective races.

    It is only whites who are castigated and threatened for attempting to show any signs of racial solidarity.

    Let's look at what us "evil, privileged" whites have done for Western society and the world:

    1. "Civil-rights (for some)" laws (that effectively destroy "freedom of association" for whites, but not for other races) and do not apply to whites--only "people of color" are covered by these so-called "civil-rights (for some)" protections.

    2. "Affirmative action" policies (that push better qualified whites out of positions and jobs that they would ordinarily qualify for) in favor of lesser-qualified minorities. In fact, "affirmative action" policies actually damage those minorities who are quite capable of "making it on their own" because they get "lumped in" with the groups that cannot make it on their own without "help",

    3. "Contract set-asides" (that are specifically targeted for minorities (that white people are prohibited from bidding on) and immigration policies (that specifically exclude whites, most of who have skills that would benefit the USA) in favor of those from the third-world (with no marketable skills).

    4. Scholarships that specify particular ethnic groups are looked upon favorably by most people, save one--scholarships that are intended for whites only are looked upon as being "racist", and therefore impermissible and improper in today's racially-charged climate of "political correctness".

    NO OTHER RACE (BUT WHITES) HAS (EVER) BENT OVER BACKWARDS to assure that all non-white races receive a "fair shake" in being a part of American life, even to the detriment and social well-being of "our own kind" (whites).

    Whites possess an externalized altruism that no other races possesses. This externalized altruism that "looks out for the other guy" will be the demise of the white race. This altruism needs to be internalized and focused inward, just as other races have done. There is NO SHAME in looking out for one's own kind.

    "Multiculturalism" and "diversity" are code-words for white genocide.

    I blame those of the "greatest generation" for selling out our birthright with the passage of the "Civil-Rights Acts" of 1957 and 1964, and the "Hart-Cellar immigration act of 1965". To those of the "greatest generation" (who are still alive) thanks for NOTHING...

    As whites comprise only 6% of the world population, it is us whites who should be the most protected and cherished of minorities...

    NO OTHER RACE (BUT WHITES) HAS (EVER) BENT OVER BACKWARDS to assure that all non-white races receive a “fair shake” in being a part of American life, even to the detriment and social well-being of “our own kind” (whites).

    Whites of Europe (especially North Western Europe) have never experienced multi-racialism to the extent like peoples living in the Middle East, North Africa, South Asia or South East Asia until about 500 years ago. That is why White Europeans could not develop the kind of social defenses like the people of the Middle East for example. Northern Europeans especially tend to be individualistic and do not posses the clannish tendencies which people of the Middle East or South Asia posses, clannish tendencies developed to cope with multiracialism and multiculturalism which these populations have experienced for thousands of years. Blacks have innate survivalist instincts and do not fall for the propaganda of universalism that easily. North East Asians are not as clannish as South Asians or Middle Easterners but their civilizations never had tendencies towards global universalism as much as Western civilization. Southern Europeans have dealt with non European populations of the Middle East/North Africa for a long time and thus they do posses some social defenses developed from these experiences. Likewise Eastern Europeans had to deal with Mongols, Siberians and Central Asians for along period of time and they have developed such defences too but to a much smaller extent than Southern Europeans. Both these European populations had traditionally shielded North Western Europeans from the big bad European world.

    As long as uncivilized/explotive non Whites were a small minority in a Western White society, White societies could tolerate it and move on. But in those cases, such non Whites are a huge minority or a majority, the most effective social method White people had was segregation/apartheid. But clannish populations like Arabs or Pakistanis do not need apartheid, their social natures have prepared them for thousands of years for living in multicultural/ multiracial environments.

    For example,

    Check out the Israeli woman’s response to charges racism at about 1:10 minutes in the video.
    The charge of being called racist does not affect her one bit. She proclaims infront of a crowd of mainstream Israelis ‘I am proud to be a racist, and it’s our right to be racist’ Imagine a White person saying that infront of a crowd in a major Western city.
    Also at 2:00 minutes see how the mainstream crowd treats a libtard Israeli who is on the side of the blacks.
    Mainstream Israeli society treats perceived Race traitors like how mainstream Western societies treat race nationalists/ race realists.

    Read More
    • Replies: @anarchyst
    Thank you, Malla. Good post!
    I, for one am PROUD to be considered "racist" and wear my "racism" as a badge of honor. When I am confronted by those who recognize my "racism", I (attempt to) shake their hands and "thank them for noticing". The confused, bewildered looks on their faces is priceless.
    Regards,
    , @Wally
    Notice that The Left demands massive immigration into the US & Europe while they support very strict Israeli immigration laws which allow JEWS ONLY.

    Israel to shut migrant centre and deport Africans
    http://www.unz.com/isteve/israel-to-shut-migrant-centre-and-deport-africans/

    Forget the 'slippery slope' — Israel already is an apartheid state: Neil Macdonald
    http://www.cbc.ca/news/opinion/israel-slippery-slope-1.4368018

    Israel police detain 15 over campaign to stop Jewish-Arab dating
    https://www.yahoo.com/news/israeli-police-arrest-15-over-campaign-stop-jew-083710375.html
    "Jerusalem (AFP) - Israeli police detained 15 suspected Jewish extremists following an undercover investigation into a group accused of tracking down and threatening Arab men dating Jewish women, authorities said Sunday
    Gopstein was also questioned by police in 2015 after he condoned torching churches in Israel, in accordance with a mediaeval Jewish commandment to destroy places of idol-worship."

    Female Israeli fights off primate, ultra religious Jews
    http://video.dailymail.co.uk/video/mol/2017/10/20/4993070019781505124/640x360_MP4_4993070019781505124.mp4
    The video shows the group of men spit and swear at Golan, calling a 'shiksa' (a non-Jewish woman) as well as whore
    , @Malla

    Both these European populations had traditionally shielded North Western Europeans from the big bad European world.
     
    Correction
    Both these European populations had traditionally shielded North Western Europeans from the big bad NON-European* world.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  35. Joe Hide says:

    First… This educational insanity is rapidly becoming a non-problem. Online education is replacing sit on your butt in a lecture hall with 200 bored students being talked at by a boring lecturer, who by the way, usually isn’t very good at communicating knowledge, which requires exponentially increasing tuition, fees, and hidden costs, financed through student loans that require no down payment, no collateral, and no likelihood of income upon graduation, made to the most vulnerable young people, which is one of the only forms of lending with impossibility of bankruptcy, which the psychopathic predatory lenders have bribed (lobbied) politicians to guarantee with taxpayer dollars.
    Second .. Cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin are providing funding to innovators, creators, and inventors which were hamstrung in financing their projects before by the dinosaur … Mainstream Banking System (MBS).
    Third … information through the internet is replacing mis-information, dis-information, and outright propaganda.
    Be patient, the future looks good for us productive, beneficial, hardworking truth seekers!

    Read More
    • Replies: @RadicalCenter
    Online education is NOT rapidly replacing sit-on-your-ass-and-be-indoctrinated-by-an-ass universities. Not yet. But I join you in welcoming the growth of online ed to the extent that it undermines the anti-white, anti-liberty, simply perverted physical universities that have been confusing and brainwashing our youth to hate their own people and culture and to turn away from normal sexuality and family life.
    , @Alden
    Those on line degrees require registration and payment of tuition. Check out the prices. they are very expensive and student loans are offered.

    I have known people who got through law school and nursing school without having to study after class. they just brought the test prep books to class. Instead of listening and discussing they just sat in the back and memorized the questions and answers in the test prep book.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  36. “Racism” is the contemporary version of the pre-modern term “witchcraft”, an invisible malevolent force that explains things that upset me, but which remains invisible.

    Social Justice Warriors are the Witchfinders of our age.

    Read More
    • Agree: Seamus Padraig
    • Replies: @Malla
    If you do some research on the Travistock institute and their mind control program/ social engineering program, they were already anticipating/ preparing for this SJW phenomenon many decades ago. SJWs do not realize that they are stupid programmed patsy drones for the sinister elites.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  37. anarchyst says:
    @Malla

    NO OTHER RACE (BUT WHITES) HAS (EVER) BENT OVER BACKWARDS to assure that all non-white races receive a “fair shake” in being a part of American life, even to the detriment and social well-being of “our own kind” (whites).

     

    Whites of Europe (especially North Western Europe) have never experienced multi-racialism to the extent like peoples living in the Middle East, North Africa, South Asia or South East Asia until about 500 years ago. That is why White Europeans could not develop the kind of social defenses like the people of the Middle East for example. Northern Europeans especially tend to be individualistic and do not posses the clannish tendencies which people of the Middle East or South Asia posses, clannish tendencies developed to cope with multiracialism and multiculturalism which these populations have experienced for thousands of years. Blacks have innate survivalist instincts and do not fall for the propaganda of universalism that easily. North East Asians are not as clannish as South Asians or Middle Easterners but their civilizations never had tendencies towards global universalism as much as Western civilization. Southern Europeans have dealt with non European populations of the Middle East/North Africa for a long time and thus they do posses some social defenses developed from these experiences. Likewise Eastern Europeans had to deal with Mongols, Siberians and Central Asians for along period of time and they have developed such defences too but to a much smaller extent than Southern Europeans. Both these European populations had traditionally shielded North Western Europeans from the big bad European world.

    As long as uncivilized/explotive non Whites were a small minority in a Western White society, White societies could tolerate it and move on. But in those cases, such non Whites are a huge minority or a majority, the most effective social method White people had was segregation/apartheid. But clannish populations like Arabs or Pakistanis do not need apartheid, their social natures have prepared them for thousands of years for living in multicultural/ multiracial environments.

    For example,

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dPxv4Aff3IA

    Check out the Israeli woman's response to charges racism at about 1:10 minutes in the video.
    The charge of being called racist does not affect her one bit. She proclaims infront of a crowd of mainstream Israelis 'I am proud to be a racist, and it's our right to be racist' Imagine a White person saying that infront of a crowd in a major Western city.
    Also at 2:00 minutes see how the mainstream crowd treats a libtard Israeli who is on the side of the blacks.
    Mainstream Israeli society treats perceived Race traitors like how mainstream Western societies treat race nationalists/ race realists.

    Thank you, Malla. Good post!
    I, for one am PROUD to be considered “racist” and wear my “racism” as a badge of honor. When I am confronted by those who recognize my “racism”, I (attempt to) shake their hands and “thank them for noticing”. The confused, bewildered looks on their faces is priceless.
    Regards,

    Read More
    • Replies: @Malla
    Being racist has always been, is and will always be a part of being human.
    , @Alden
    I do too. When accused of racism I always say right on, I'm a proud White racist.

    Gets them every time.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  38. @Anonymous
    "... what Dr. Paul Gottfried has labeled quite correctly “cultural Marxism”..."

    Dr Gottfried can label it what he wants, but it's not Marxism of any kind, which is opposed to this kind of identity politics, as is easily demonstrated by the comment sections of socialist websites, the conflicts raging between old-school leftists and trans activists who are attempting to demonize/purge them. Funnily enough, the author admits himself that the East European communists he met did not share any wish for same-sex marriage, sexual liberation. There's the clue, and our intrepid writer explains it away as 'stodgy'.

    Dr Gottfried can label it what he wants, but it’s not Marxism of any kind, which is opposed to this kind of identity politics

    So-called Cultural Marxism, something I label Victim Class Supremacy, is similar to Marxism in that both are totalitarian and both promote class supremacy.

    Both Victim Class Supremacy and Marxism are seditious with respect to the US constitution.

    All the incoherent nonsense spouting from academic negroes is a cover for their constant craving for government protected class group entitlements for negroes.

    Academic negroes can’t admit that the state of Israel is a victim class supremacy paradise.

    To admit this fact would be to admit academic negroes also support fascism, something they claim to oppose.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  39. anarchyst says:

    A major problem is that of feminism and liberalism, especially as it applies to women. Feminism actually exposes the weaknesses of the women’s movement and the shallow beliefs that it engenders.
    Blacks use this to their advantage, using phrases like “you won’t date me because I’m black”.
    Weak-minded women capitulate to the black-uttered guilt-ridden statement and DO date outside of their race, with disastrous effects. The proper, racially aware answer to blacks who use this guilt trip on gullible white women is “that’s right, I don’t date outside my race”.
    Multiculturalism and diversity is our present-day “Tower of Babel” which will only lead to our dispossession and destruction.

    Read More
    • Replies: @anon
    That statement would get a person fired, you have to find some other way and don't forget her work evaluations. I doubt it's possible to turn down gay advances either, look at the churches have to openly promote it and have gay pastors. The best whites could hope for is a return to Europe, and Europe could promote the US for it's for color populations. White people just won't know peace any other way that I can see. The Christians throw out Jesus for the Muslims, how many times will they rewrite their own Bible? The Universities should get rid of statues of Thomas Jefferson and put Mao and Fidel Castro, Mandela and Obama, then it all makes so much more sense because Jefferson or his thoughts and ideas just don't exist there.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  40. @utu
    I agree but I do not on the 2nd thought. Th cultural part form marxism was dropped in USSR after Stalin got to power. But for several years after the Bolshevik revolution in terms of mores anything went like in Weimar Republic. Cultural revolution was part of Marxism. Go read The Communist Manifesto and you will find there a chapter on prostitution and marriage which was considered as institutionalized prostitution. So when Bolsheviks got to power marriage was relaxed and even abolished and promiscuity was promoted. Read something about Alexandra Kollontai. Why Stalin decided to go prude? Perhaps it was his personal taste. After all he studied to become a priest and was not like the cosmopolitan mostly Jewish Bolsheviks.

    Why Stalin decided to go prude? Perhaps it was his personal taste. After all he studied to become a priest and was not like the cosmopolitan mostly Jewish Bolsheviks.

    It had little to do with Stalin’s personal tastes. The reason why he had birth control and abortion restricted was to increase the size of the population (natalism). The reason why he banned homosexuality and promoted marriage is because that’s the most efficient way to order society–always has been, always will be. Besides, that’s what the vast majority of the Russians (and other ethnicities) wanted, which, of course, was the exact opposite of the what the Jew-Bolsheviks wanted.

    Read More
    • Replies: @MBlanc46
    I’d like to see some good citations from the Marxian corpus that show that it wasn’t “all about” class struggle.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  41. Dutch Boy says:
    @animalogic
    There's much I agree with in this article. The RANK hypocracy of some black people actually calling for the elimination of white people, of saying that no white person can be trusted, can be a friend, is SICKENING. They should shrivel up with shame.
    This is all a part of Identity Politics, that intellectually poisonous ideology. They are useful idiots. The democratic party has been manipulating & exploiting these morons for years. Elites generally have supported it: simple divide & rule strategy. Sheep all, fleece them or flay them.
    However, these idiots have little or nothing to do with Marxism. "Culture" is a secondary, if not tertiary issue for genuine Marxists. Race & gender are NOT primary categories.
    Cultural Marxism is actually POST MODERNISM & PROGRESSIVISM. It helps no one to confuse these ideologies. (Of course "cultural Marxism" is "sexy": plays well to that whole American fear & loathing of communism)

    You are correct. It is also significant that CM is also dogma with corporations and corporate-funded NGOs. The CM emphasis on cultural rather than class warfare is right up the capitalists’ alley. the consumerist zombies created by the CM state are also just the sort of “citizen” preferred by the capitalists.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  42. chris m says:

    my oh my, how things have changed!!

    well remember the good old-bad old days
    and a favourite slogan of mine

    “workers of the world unite for ………a white south africa”
    (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rand_Rebellion)

    always thought that was very funny/ironic.

    you definitely couldn’t say that about the current crop of Marxists.
    ( a totally humourless bunch)

    Read More
    • Replies: @Alden
    Before John Reed helped found the American communist party and went to Russia to glorify the communists, he went to S. Africa to glorify the Boers fighting the evil imperialist British Empire.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  43. @animalogic
    There's much I agree with in this article. The RANK hypocracy of some black people actually calling for the elimination of white people, of saying that no white person can be trusted, can be a friend, is SICKENING. They should shrivel up with shame.
    This is all a part of Identity Politics, that intellectually poisonous ideology. They are useful idiots. The democratic party has been manipulating & exploiting these morons for years. Elites generally have supported it: simple divide & rule strategy. Sheep all, fleece them or flay them.
    However, these idiots have little or nothing to do with Marxism. "Culture" is a secondary, if not tertiary issue for genuine Marxists. Race & gender are NOT primary categories.
    Cultural Marxism is actually POST MODERNISM & PROGRESSIVISM. It helps no one to confuse these ideologies. (Of course "cultural Marxism" is "sexy": plays well to that whole American fear & loathing of communism)

    I’ll agree with you this far: modern Cultural Marxism has basically shed any truly Marxist theory of political economy and made its peace with Neoliberalism. Tellingly, most modern Cultural Marxists actually try to deny that Cultural Marxism even exists! They like to claim that this is some ‘conspiracy theory’ spread by Breitbart, etc. However, the original Cultural Marxists, the Frankfurt School theorists, did still self-describe as Marxist and at least paid lip service to socialist ideals (even if they were anti-Soviet).

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  44. Fredtard says:
    @Backwoods Bob
    Thank you prof. Yankah.

    I was a department head at our state's university and this is all true, but it is even worse.

    One thing I did regularly as a department head was distribute literature on grant programs, from foundations and think tanks, along with student internships and scholarships.

    I saw the whole global warming hoax rise, then bob and weave into climate change. The grantor told you what to write about, what to major in, and it was in conjunction with a whole spider web of other grantor machinations. The money powers can not only do endowed chairs but they are the big players in legislatures and governorships - hence state budgets to higher education.

    If you are a free market capitalist, it is a tough go. I was in a business program, and the dean had a bust of Lenin in his office.

    It's a lot better in the private sector. That fixes it for me. But not for the rest of society. Since I left, the snowflake generation has arrived, screaming at the sky and wearing pussy hats.

    You’ve outed yourself as a global warming denier. That’s safe, even common, here at Unz, where our own groupthink bonds us on the right.

    As a laissez faire libertarian, I’ve had a real hard time accepting that our tech-enabled exploitation of resources is quickly and finally leading to global ecological collapse. Like any new convert, I may be a bit overzealous. My view: it’s happening way faster than even Al Gore says. One goal of the powers-that-be has always been to pacify (lie to) )the public, until the truth can’t be hidden any longer.

    The great unwashed third world masses didn’t consume what we did. Yeah, China pollutes, but they’re burning coal to manufacture our “stuff.” If we can’t overcome our own denial/rationalizations/cognitive dissonance, how can we denigrate others who have built their own bubbles of bullshit? If photosynthesis indeed ceases at 104F, the consequences of our willful blind spot will make cultural Marxism seem like a stubbed toe.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Seamus Padraig
    I, too, believed in Global Warming (or whatever you want to call it) for a long time, about 25 years. But so many years on, I can't help but wonder why we still haven't lost a single Pacific atoll--never mind Holland or Bengladesh. I mean, if all this Arctic ice is really melting at once, then the newly liquified water would have to go somewhere, right?

    It's interesting that you mentioned China, which is now officially the world's largest carbon-polluter (though not, of course, per capita). If GW really were the danger they make it out to be, then getting the Chinese, not us, to scale back would be the GWers number one priority. Of course, they usually retort that it's fair to intentionally disadvantage the Western countries in GW treaties (such as the Paris Accord) because China is still developing and their per capita pollution is lower. But hey--icebergs don't really give a damn as to whether they're melting because of American pollution or Chinese pollution; icebergs melt because of total carbon emissions, not average of per capita emissions. Which raises the question: are these GW treaties really about the climate at all? Or about something else: perhaps accelerating our de-industrialization, or establishing a one-word state.

    I also used to find high finance's support for GW initiatives puzzling until they rolled out the 'cap and trade' plan. Then I saw a clear cui bono for the banksters right away. Cap and trade is yet another way for them to profit off of our misery.

    Now look, all of this may well be just a coincidence--what do I know? I am not a scientist, and am not even expert enough to evaluate the credentials of the pro-GW scientists relative to the anti-GW or GW-neutral scientists. In fact, I don't take a strong position on the issue at all, precisely for that reason. I don't know who or what to believe anymore. All I do know is that the system lies to us about everything else imaginable, so why should I advance them credit on an issue like this, with such profound and far-reaching consequences for our political economy?
    , @Wally
    Fredtard screams blasphemy !!

    Only the religious fanatic calls someone a 'denier".

    Real science doesn't hide it's data.
    Real science doesn't need to alter data.
    Real science produces 'models' which generate real, observable results.
    Real scientists don't get nailed in Climate Gate.
    Real science doesn't try to silence differences of opinion.
    Real scientists don't advocate the arrest of those that disagree with them.

    Now 400 Scientific Papers in 2017 Say ‘Global Warming’ Is a Myth
    http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/10/24/delingpole-now-400-scientific-papers-in-2017-say-global-warming-is-a-myth/

    Most Massive Scientific Fraud In Human History
    https://principia-scientific.org/most-massive-scientific-fraud-in-human-history/

    100% Of US 'Warming' Is Due To NOAA Data Tampering
    https://www.lewrockwell.com/2016/12/no_author/100-us-global-warming/

    , @backwoods Bob
    lol. A label. What a powerful argument.

    In statistics my favorite example was to run a regression of temperature against a basket of greenhouse gasses and demonstrate the statistical significance and large affect of greenhouse gasses.

    Then we put the output of the sun in the regression too, and watched the correletion between the gasses and temperature vanish.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  45. Anon • Disclaimer says:

    Superb article. Spot on! Thank you Sir!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  46. @Carroll Price
    Marxism is especially dangerous in the Western world because, for the most part, Westerners are too stupid and naïve to recognize it for what it is.

    What is it that you have recognised?

    If “Westerners” have not exercised intelligence and recognised the dangerous Marxism in their nations might it be because there is so little of it, so few people expressing an allegiance to Marxist ideas, and so much recognition of the failures of Marxists to run or govern anything effective?

    How much unity can you describe in eother the doctrines or organisation or policy aims of these Western Marxists?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wally
    "So little of it"?

    Where you been? Open your eyes.

    Try reading the piece under discussion here.

    and:
    Nearly 1 In 5 Millennials Consider Joseph Stalin And Kim Jong Un ‘Heroes’
    http://dailycaller.com/2017/11/02/nearly-1-in-5-millennials-consider-joseph-stalin-and-kim-jong-un-heroes/

    , @Carroll Price
    People like you who think "there is little of it" is the ignorant Westerners I'm talking about.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  47. Wally says: • Website
    @Malla

    NO OTHER RACE (BUT WHITES) HAS (EVER) BENT OVER BACKWARDS to assure that all non-white races receive a “fair shake” in being a part of American life, even to the detriment and social well-being of “our own kind” (whites).

     

    Whites of Europe (especially North Western Europe) have never experienced multi-racialism to the extent like peoples living in the Middle East, North Africa, South Asia or South East Asia until about 500 years ago. That is why White Europeans could not develop the kind of social defenses like the people of the Middle East for example. Northern Europeans especially tend to be individualistic and do not posses the clannish tendencies which people of the Middle East or South Asia posses, clannish tendencies developed to cope with multiracialism and multiculturalism which these populations have experienced for thousands of years. Blacks have innate survivalist instincts and do not fall for the propaganda of universalism that easily. North East Asians are not as clannish as South Asians or Middle Easterners but their civilizations never had tendencies towards global universalism as much as Western civilization. Southern Europeans have dealt with non European populations of the Middle East/North Africa for a long time and thus they do posses some social defenses developed from these experiences. Likewise Eastern Europeans had to deal with Mongols, Siberians and Central Asians for along period of time and they have developed such defences too but to a much smaller extent than Southern Europeans. Both these European populations had traditionally shielded North Western Europeans from the big bad European world.

    As long as uncivilized/explotive non Whites were a small minority in a Western White society, White societies could tolerate it and move on. But in those cases, such non Whites are a huge minority or a majority, the most effective social method White people had was segregation/apartheid. But clannish populations like Arabs or Pakistanis do not need apartheid, their social natures have prepared them for thousands of years for living in multicultural/ multiracial environments.

    For example,

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dPxv4Aff3IA

    Check out the Israeli woman's response to charges racism at about 1:10 minutes in the video.
    The charge of being called racist does not affect her one bit. She proclaims infront of a crowd of mainstream Israelis 'I am proud to be a racist, and it's our right to be racist' Imagine a White person saying that infront of a crowd in a major Western city.
    Also at 2:00 minutes see how the mainstream crowd treats a libtard Israeli who is on the side of the blacks.
    Mainstream Israeli society treats perceived Race traitors like how mainstream Western societies treat race nationalists/ race realists.

    Notice that The Left demands massive immigration into the US & Europe while they support very strict Israeli immigration laws which allow JEWS ONLY.

    Israel to shut migrant centre and deport Africans

    http://www.unz.com/isteve/israel-to-shut-migrant-centre-and-deport-africans/

    Forget the ‘slippery slope’ — Israel already is an apartheid state: Neil Macdonald

    http://www.cbc.ca/news/opinion/israel-slippery-slope-1.4368018

    Israel police detain 15 over campaign to stop Jewish-Arab dating

    https://www.yahoo.com/news/israeli-police-arrest-15-over-campaign-stop-jew-083710375.html

    “Jerusalem (AFP) – Israeli police detained 15 suspected Jewish extremists following an undercover investigation into a group accused of tracking down and threatening Arab men dating Jewish women, authorities said Sunday
    Gopstein was also questioned by police in 2015 after he condoned torching churches in Israel, in accordance with a mediaeval Jewish commandment to destroy places of idol-worship.”

    Female Israeli fights off primate, ultra religious Jews

    The video shows the group of men spit and swear at Golan, calling a ‘shiksa’ (a non-Jewish woman) as well as whore

    Read More
    • Replies: @Malla
    LOL, Funny Video. Israel is dropping it's fake western garbs to show it's true self, a typical Middle Eastern society. As the population of the ultra orthodox increases as a percentage of the population, the israelis will be quite indistinguishable from their Arab neighbours.

    Also what I have noticed is that they use the word 'infiltrator' to describe the Africans. While they would be called refugees, immigrants, visible minorities (Canada) in Western countries. All play of words, but the usage of words is of immense significance. The term 'Infiltrator' gives the image of a temporary intruder who has to be removed. Like someone who has like infiltrated the fence of the nation. The word 'immigrant' on the other hand gives the image of permanence of stay of the outsider.
    The left regularly invents words such as carbon footprint, visible minority etc... In 1984, George Orwell does talk about 'Newspeak' in which words and vocabulary are manipulated to control the population.

    I suggest Western nationalists start using the term 'infiltrator' instead of 'immigrant' for outsiders.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  48. sondjata says: • Website

    “reading of texts such as The Wretched of the Earth, and Black Skin, White Masks, by black French revolutionary and anti-colonialist writer Frantz Fanon”

    I’ve read both books yet I’m not a marxist. Indeed those two books did influence me but I realized those books are far more a critique of the so called “black revolutionary” than it is so called “white supremacy”.

    If anything the so called BLM and Antifa types would do well to read and re-read the chapters in Wretched on the pitfalls of violence and the ‘revolutionary” class that is incapable of running the systems they think they want to destroy.

    Even the late Kwame Ture who saw first hand what the “revolutionaries” in Africa wanted to do soon found himself “out of Africa”.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  49. @Fredtard
    You've outed yourself as a global warming denier. That's safe, even common, here at Unz, where our own groupthink bonds us on the right.

    As a laissez faire libertarian, I've had a real hard time accepting that our tech-enabled exploitation of resources is quickly and finally leading to global ecological collapse. Like any new convert, I may be a bit overzealous. My view: it's happening way faster than even Al Gore says. One goal of the powers-that-be has always been to pacify (lie to) )the public, until the truth can't be hidden any longer.

    The great unwashed third world masses didn't consume what we did. Yeah, China pollutes, but they're burning coal to manufacture our "stuff." If we can't overcome our own denial/rationalizations/cognitive dissonance, how can we denigrate others who have built their own bubbles of bullshit? If photosynthesis indeed ceases at 104F, the consequences of our willful blind spot will make cultural Marxism seem like a stubbed toe.

    I, too, believed in Global Warming (or whatever you want to call it) for a long time, about 25 years. But so many years on, I can’t help but wonder why we still haven’t lost a single Pacific atoll–never mind Holland or Bengladesh. I mean, if all this Arctic ice is really melting at once, then the newly liquified water would have to go somewhere, right?

    It’s interesting that you mentioned China, which is now officially the world’s largest carbon-polluter (though not, of course, per capita). If GW really were the danger they make it out to be, then getting the Chinese, not us, to scale back would be the GWers number one priority. Of course, they usually retort that it’s fair to intentionally disadvantage the Western countries in GW treaties (such as the Paris Accord) because China is still developing and their per capita pollution is lower. But hey–icebergs don’t really give a damn as to whether they’re melting because of American pollution or Chinese pollution; icebergs melt because of total carbon emissions, not average of per capita emissions. Which raises the question: are these GW treaties really about the climate at all? Or about something else: perhaps accelerating our de-industrialization, or establishing a one-word state.

    I also used to find high finance’s support for GW initiatives puzzling until they rolled out the ‘cap and trade’ plan. Then I saw a clear cui bono for the banksters right away. Cap and trade is yet another way for them to profit off of our misery.

    Now look, all of this may well be just a coincidence–what do I know? I am not a scientist, and am not even expert enough to evaluate the credentials of the pro-GW scientists relative to the anti-GW or GW-neutral scientists. In fact, I don’t take a strong position on the issue at all, precisely for that reason. I don’t know who or what to believe anymore. All I do know is that the system lies to us about everything else imaginable, so why should I advance them credit on an issue like this, with such profound and far-reaching consequences for our political economy?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Eagle Eye

    Which raises the question: are these GW treaties really about the climate at all? Or about something else: perhaps accelerating our de-industrialization, or establishing a one-word state.

     

    In Tom Clancy's "Rainbox Six," a narrow elite works to engineer a virus strain that is certain to kill anyone not previously inoculated while retaining its virulence.

    The aim of the "elite" perpetrators - many cynical eco-extremists - is to re-create a world of pristine natural beauty, far from the madding crowd who will have succumbed to the infection.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  50. anon • Disclaimer says:
    @anarchyst
    A major problem is that of feminism and liberalism, especially as it applies to women. Feminism actually exposes the weaknesses of the women's movement and the shallow beliefs that it engenders.
    Blacks use this to their advantage, using phrases like "you won't date me because I'm black".
    Weak-minded women capitulate to the black-uttered guilt-ridden statement and DO date outside of their race, with disastrous effects. The proper, racially aware answer to blacks who use this guilt trip on gullible white women is "that's right, I don't date outside my race".
    Multiculturalism and diversity is our present-day "Tower of Babel" which will only lead to our dispossession and destruction.

    That statement would get a person fired, you have to find some other way and don’t forget her work evaluations. I doubt it’s possible to turn down gay advances either, look at the churches have to openly promote it and have gay pastors. The best whites could hope for is a return to Europe, and Europe could promote the US for it’s for color populations. White people just won’t know peace any other way that I can see. The Christians throw out Jesus for the Muslims, how many times will they rewrite their own Bible? The Universities should get rid of statues of Thomas Jefferson and put Mao and Fidel Castro, Mandela and Obama, then it all makes so much more sense because Jefferson or his thoughts and ideas just don’t exist there.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  51. @xkn
    Western Marxism is extremely dangerous, as it is direct strain of most virulent branch of Marxism-Stalinism. It belongs to the same branch as Maoism and whatever Pol Pot called his system. It leads invariably to pits full of human flesh. European Marxism changed after Stalin's death, because communists understood that if same system continues nobody is safe including, most importantly, for them - themselves. This cleansing did not happen in the West. I do not agree that Marxism suddenly resurfaced in its most virulent form in the West, as author suggests. It was always there. Weather Underground & Co. have been openly discussing elimination (that is extermination) of 10% of US population in 1960's, so there is hardly anything new under the sun in West as far as Marxism goes. Exterminating 10% of population (for openings) was essentially a Stalinist benchmark. Zealotry of Western Marxists, who essentially behave as cult, or at least orthodox religionists of their religion, can only be matched today with zealotry of Islamists. There cannot be reasoning with those people. Any attempt is doomed to failure.

    You provide the stuff of satire. It may be true that there are still worshippers of Stalin amongst the small number of avowed Marxists in the “West” which somehow you confusingly distinguish from “Europeans” (how so?). But they are surely a small loony fringe with little influence on anyone of any importance. And how can you justify your hysterical “It invariably [sic] leads to pits of human flesh”. I won’t bother to ask for boring scholastic detail of the doctrines and beliefs of those most bloodthirsty Communist dictators you name** because what you are doing is to utter a warning based on an implied prophecy.

    Your prophecy means you think you see and belueve in a wideranging murderous outcome of this Marxism thinking and preaching in the “West”that you identify. Please attempt an elaboration of such a scenario to give some credibility to this idea.

    Of course I recognise the attraction of an exclusive minority cult lije yours which has nothing like the number of vulgar ignoramuses dancing on pinheads of the wrong size as e.g. Christian pro-lifers who appear to believe that everything [else]important to the USA should give way to putting embryo destroyers in gaol.

    **If you were so inclined I might ask for a comparison with the bloodthirstiest Crusaders who these days are seen as giving a bad name to Christianity, almost up with the barbarity of the Hebrew God in his early days….

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    The bloodthirstiest Crusaders were not especially bloodthirsty. That there was a bloody sack of Jerusalem does not change that all too much. Want to talk about Warsaw? Nanking? Berlin? Jews in'48? Arabs in '48? The Vendee? Any city ever sacked by the Mongols? Let's face it, Crusaders were pansies when it comes to democide.
    , @Wally
    said:
    "If you were so inclined I might ask for a comparison with the bloodthirstiest Crusaders who these days are seen as giving a bad name to Christianity, almost up with the barbarity of the Hebrew God in his early days…."

    Except The Crusades would not have occurred if the Muslims had not invaded the Christian Holy Land.
    Oops.

    The Crusaders were righteous in attacking the invaders of the Christian Holy Land.

    Cave men Muslims and The Left think that using the words 'crusaders / crusades' will score points.
    It does not. The Crusades were the right thing to do.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  52. Anon • Disclaimer says:
    @utu
    I agree but I do not on the 2nd thought. Th cultural part form marxism was dropped in USSR after Stalin got to power. But for several years after the Bolshevik revolution in terms of mores anything went like in Weimar Republic. Cultural revolution was part of Marxism. Go read The Communist Manifesto and you will find there a chapter on prostitution and marriage which was considered as institutionalized prostitution. So when Bolsheviks got to power marriage was relaxed and even abolished and promiscuity was promoted. Read something about Alexandra Kollontai. Why Stalin decided to go prude? Perhaps it was his personal taste. After all he studied to become a priest and was not like the cosmopolitan mostly Jewish Bolsheviks.

    In the USSR, the official turn towards traditional marriage was accompanied by draconian restrictions on abortion (brings to mind Mr. Hyde-the-Adulterer’ Amendment.”

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  53. Anon • Disclaimer says:
    @xkn
    Western Marxism is extremely dangerous, as it is direct strain of most virulent branch of Marxism-Stalinism. It belongs to the same branch as Maoism and whatever Pol Pot called his system. It leads invariably to pits full of human flesh. European Marxism changed after Stalin's death, because communists understood that if same system continues nobody is safe including, most importantly, for them - themselves. This cleansing did not happen in the West. I do not agree that Marxism suddenly resurfaced in its most virulent form in the West, as author suggests. It was always there. Weather Underground & Co. have been openly discussing elimination (that is extermination) of 10% of US population in 1960's, so there is hardly anything new under the sun in West as far as Marxism goes. Exterminating 10% of population (for openings) was essentially a Stalinist benchmark. Zealotry of Western Marxists, who essentially behave as cult, or at least orthodox religionists of their religion, can only be matched today with zealotry of Islamists. There cannot be reasoning with those people. Any attempt is doomed to failure.

    “To overcome our enemies we must have our own socialist militarism. We must carry along with us 90 million out of the 100 million of Soviet Russia’s population. As for the rest, we have nothing to say to them. They must be annihilated,” Grigory Zinoviev (Gershon Apfelbaum) http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Grigory_Zinoviev

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  54. Martinez should be expelled, then prosecuted for inciting violence. Throw in a sentencing enhancement for a “hate crime”, as would be done if he were a white person publicly calling for the death of other racial groups.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  55. Anon • Disclaimer says:
    @Michael Kenny
    “Cultural Marxism” (whatever that might be) triumphing in Western Europe? I wonder what the author means. He doesn't say. I can't think of any event in my already long European lifetime that could be so described. I'm always amused, by the way, that the very same people who preach "non-intervention" (when it suits Vladimir Putin), withdrawal from NATO (when it suits Vladimir Putin) and who keep saying "don't invade other people's countries" (when it suits Vladimir Putin) keep telling us white European Christians how to run our countries and even rewrite our history to suit their own domestic American political discourse. That "forked tongue" doesn't exactly lend credibility to their arguments!

    First of all, you are not a white European Christian but a Zionist; this has been proven by your many post parroting the Lobby. Even in this diatribe against Putin — what the modern capitalist Russia has to do with the stupidity of affirmative actions in the US and the phenomenon of Professor Yankah? — you are trying to cheerlead for Eretz Israel by “rationalizing” the wars in the Middle East.
    You need to make a decision whether you stand for “white European Christians” and European history or for the supremacist plans of the “chosen.” These two choices are not interchangeable.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  56. schrub says:

    Several commenters here seem to think that what is going on is the rise “cultural Marxism”.

    It isn’t. What is going on is the rise of of “cultural Trotskyism”. There is a profound difference between the two movements. Marxism, a least in Russia, was mostly a Jewish controlled movement up until the purges starting in 1936. On the other hand Trotskyism was (and is) an ENTIRELY Jewish controlled movement to this day with a much more ambitious, world wide agenda which continues.

    Everyone from William Kristol to Diane Feinstein and Michael Bloomberg could be labeled as “cultural Trotskites”. Trotskyism was in fact what the very influential Rabbi Stephen Wise was describing many years ago when he declared “Some call it communism, I call it Judaism”.

    English Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn might describe himself as a “mild” Marxist. He would definitely NOT describe himself as a any sort of Trotskyite and neither would have the late Hugo Chavez of Venezuela.

    This is because Marxism is mostly an economic philosophy. Trotskyism is much more of a cultural movement with an economic facade to fool the yokels and has far more profound and dangerous implications.

    Our war mongering Neocons were/are Trotskyites, not Marxists. They certainly knew the differences between the two philosophies. People here should also learn them too.

    And, by the way, what is the present day handmaiden of “cultural Trotskyism”? None other than Tikkun Olam.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tikkun_olam

    The cultural tide that has taken over universities has started to seep into high schools as well.

    Just recently, in very toney Marin County California, San Domenico School , a very expensive private school with Dominican Order Catholic roots, decided to remove almost all of the christian symbols from its campus.

    Who pushed for this change? Jewish parents who had allied themselves with naive, left wing shabbos goy gentile parents. These two groups simply took over the boards of director of the school and then decided to make it more “inclusive”. The gentile women board members of this ilk are easily identified by their hyphenated last names.

    The timid (or more possibly afraid) Catholic parents at San Domenico simply stood by and allowed them to do this.

    This is what happens when you allow Jews (along with their amazingly, ample sources of donations) to attend christian schools. They quickly work to undermine them and secularize them. The Jesuit University of San Francisco learned this lesson much to their dismay years ago, as did DePaul University in Illinois.

    No more “Merry Christmas” greetings at San Domenico. No more mangers. This would make certain people feel bad. Now just “seasons greetings” are allowed. Saying Happy Hanukkah would probably be tolerated in order to be more inclusive. . Read about this sad tale here:

    http://www.marinij.com/article/NO/20170824/NEWS/170829883

    Your local Catholic school is probably next in line for this “improvement”.

    Read More
    • Agree: Carroll Price
    • Replies: @Intelligent Dasein
    I completely agree, and you'll notice I used that exact phrase, "Cultural Trotskyism," in my comment at #17.
    , @Malla

    Your local Catholic school is probably next in line for this “improvement”.
     
    Check out Mr. E. Micheal Jones on Youtube on how this all began in the Catholic Church. Very interesting.

    One more sad (and crazy) tale

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jkfRkR1Pqag

    Lesbian bishop of a Swedish church removes crosses and marks the direction to Mecca to make surly racist Muslim infiltrators into Sweden feel welcome !!! You really can't make this stuff up.

    As far as the truth about Yule, Christmas, hanuka, kwanza, this video is a must watch. All of them are rip offs of Yule and Christmas.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VUDT1L2Iy9I

    , @Wally
    from a Trotsky letter to his wife, Natalia Sedova:

    "I shall die a proletarian revolutionist, a Marxist, a dialectical materialist, and, consequently, an irreconcilable atheist. My faith in the communist future of mankind is not less ardent, indeed it is firmer today, than it was in the days of my youth."
     
    , @Grandpa Charlie

    “Why do you want to disappear the world of “Leave It To Beaver”? What was wrong with the life lived by those people? They lived in nice homes ... wore clean, un-patched clothes ... " == ThreeCranes
     
    What is wrong with clean patched clothes? ThreeCranes' "Normal White American" must be a boomer, as must ThreeCranes also, whereas I was born before the War. during the Great Depression. Anyone who would automatically associate the standard for clean with unpatched -- and thus patched with dirty -- is obviously a spoiled boomer and a snobbish consumerist. Bah!
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  57. Anon • Disclaimer says:
    @Wizard of Oz
    You provide the stuff of satire. It may be true that there are still worshippers of Stalin amongst the small number of avowed Marxists in the "West" which somehow you confusingly distinguish from "Europeans" (how so?). But they are surely a small loony fringe with little influence on anyone of any importance. And how can you justify your hysterical "It invariably [sic] leads to pits of human flesh". I won't bother to ask for boring scholastic detail of the doctrines and beliefs of those most bloodthirsty Communist dictators you name** because what you are doing is to utter a warning based on an implied prophecy.

    Your prophecy means you think you see and belueve in a wideranging murderous outcome of this Marxism thinking and preaching in the "West"that you identify. Please attempt an elaboration of such a scenario to give some credibility to this idea.

    Of course I recognise the attraction of an exclusive minority cult lije yours which has nothing like the number of vulgar ignoramuses dancing on pinheads of the wrong size as e.g. Christian pro-lifers who appear to believe that everything [else]important to the USA should give way to putting embryo destroyers in gaol.

    **If you were so inclined I might ask for a comparison with the bloodthirstiest Crusaders who these days are seen as giving a bad name to Christianity, almost up with the barbarity of the Hebrew God in his early days....

    The bloodthirstiest Crusaders were not especially bloodthirsty. That there was a bloody sack of Jerusalem does not change that all too much. Want to talk about Warsaw? Nanking? Berlin? Jews in’48? Arabs in ’48? The Vendee? Any city ever sacked by the Mongols? Let’s face it, Crusaders were pansies when it comes to democide.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
    Thank you for improving om the exptession of my point. Mind you I think you could have considered the Crusaders' conquest of Constantinople as another count against the church of Rome....
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  58. “Abolish Capitalism – Disarm the Police & ICE Agents – Fight for Socialist Revolution – Support Black Lives Matter.” And their overarching template is: “Smash White Supremacy.”

    Right on, Morons.

    Then meet the new Boss, same as the old Boss.

    As long as you continue to deny human nature you will be fooled again, and again, and again…

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  59. Ragno says:

    I can’t tell you how often, sometimes in near-hysteria, I’ve near-shouted much of what Mr Cathey articulates in this essay. Try to tell the tepid conservatives (now rightfully called out as “cucks”) that the fall of Soviet Communism only helped to obscure its mutated form taking hold and metastasizing in America and Western Europe ten or twenty years ago – its spread as rapid as the cancer of my clumsy metaphor – and you’d’ve been patted on the head and escorted out to spare you the gales of laughter following.

    In any event, the International Communist Conspiracy wise men once laughed off as “neo-fascist alarmism”….well….only fools are still laughing today. One might note the speed of the resultant decline of meaningful Western freedom to be oddly concomitant with the rise of the neo-conservative….not for me to say. Other than it’s a damned strange state of affairs when both Left and Right counsel the public to move along – “show’s over, folks!; nothing t’see here!” – particularly as “the show” seems to have been only beginning. They’re still largely claiming that, even with the landmarks of our past being defaced and demolished before our eyes.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  60. Malla says:
    @Malla

    NO OTHER RACE (BUT WHITES) HAS (EVER) BENT OVER BACKWARDS to assure that all non-white races receive a “fair shake” in being a part of American life, even to the detriment and social well-being of “our own kind” (whites).

     

    Whites of Europe (especially North Western Europe) have never experienced multi-racialism to the extent like peoples living in the Middle East, North Africa, South Asia or South East Asia until about 500 years ago. That is why White Europeans could not develop the kind of social defenses like the people of the Middle East for example. Northern Europeans especially tend to be individualistic and do not posses the clannish tendencies which people of the Middle East or South Asia posses, clannish tendencies developed to cope with multiracialism and multiculturalism which these populations have experienced for thousands of years. Blacks have innate survivalist instincts and do not fall for the propaganda of universalism that easily. North East Asians are not as clannish as South Asians or Middle Easterners but their civilizations never had tendencies towards global universalism as much as Western civilization. Southern Europeans have dealt with non European populations of the Middle East/North Africa for a long time and thus they do posses some social defenses developed from these experiences. Likewise Eastern Europeans had to deal with Mongols, Siberians and Central Asians for along period of time and they have developed such defences too but to a much smaller extent than Southern Europeans. Both these European populations had traditionally shielded North Western Europeans from the big bad European world.

    As long as uncivilized/explotive non Whites were a small minority in a Western White society, White societies could tolerate it and move on. But in those cases, such non Whites are a huge minority or a majority, the most effective social method White people had was segregation/apartheid. But clannish populations like Arabs or Pakistanis do not need apartheid, their social natures have prepared them for thousands of years for living in multicultural/ multiracial environments.

    For example,

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dPxv4Aff3IA

    Check out the Israeli woman's response to charges racism at about 1:10 minutes in the video.
    The charge of being called racist does not affect her one bit. She proclaims infront of a crowd of mainstream Israelis 'I am proud to be a racist, and it's our right to be racist' Imagine a White person saying that infront of a crowd in a major Western city.
    Also at 2:00 minutes see how the mainstream crowd treats a libtard Israeli who is on the side of the blacks.
    Mainstream Israeli society treats perceived Race traitors like how mainstream Western societies treat race nationalists/ race realists.

    Both these European populations had traditionally shielded North Western Europeans from the big bad European world.

    Correction
    Both these European populations had traditionally shielded North Western Europeans from the big bad NON-European* world.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  61. Wally says: • Website
    @Reg Cæsar

    Marxism and cultural Marxism are simply sanitized Protocols of Zion for stupid goy useful idiots.
     
    So socialism is the anti-Semitism of fools?

    Is your so called “anti-Semitism” bad?

    If so, why?

    http://www.codoh.ccom

    Read More
    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
    You obviously didn't get the joke, a twist on an old familiar saw.

    My own "anti-Semitism" is focused on the great majority of Semites, who, strangely enough, have quite a fan club on this forum.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  62. MBlanc46 says:
    @Anonymous
    "... what Dr. Paul Gottfried has labeled quite correctly “cultural Marxism”..."

    Dr Gottfried can label it what he wants, but it's not Marxism of any kind, which is opposed to this kind of identity politics, as is easily demonstrated by the comment sections of socialist websites, the conflicts raging between old-school leftists and trans activists who are attempting to demonize/purge them. Funnily enough, the author admits himself that the East European communists he met did not share any wish for same-sex marriage, sexual liberation. There's the clue, and our intrepid writer explains it away as 'stodgy'.

    I think that the connection to Marxism is that in the 1950s and 1960s, these people would have been Marxists. Before 1956, many of them would have been Stalinists. Not Party members, of course. The Party was pretty choosy about who was allowed to join. But fellow travelers, “useful idiots”. In the 1960s, when the actual workers declined to join the revolution, and even cracked some revolutionary heads, the bloom went off the traditional Marxist rose, and the class struggle morphed into identity grievance. It’s the same sort of malcontent, with the same MO—chanting, shouting people down, rampaging through the streets—but with a different ideological venerr.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  63. MBlanc46 says:
    @animalogic
    There's much I agree with in this article. The RANK hypocracy of some black people actually calling for the elimination of white people, of saying that no white person can be trusted, can be a friend, is SICKENING. They should shrivel up with shame.
    This is all a part of Identity Politics, that intellectually poisonous ideology. They are useful idiots. The democratic party has been manipulating & exploiting these morons for years. Elites generally have supported it: simple divide & rule strategy. Sheep all, fleece them or flay them.
    However, these idiots have little or nothing to do with Marxism. "Culture" is a secondary, if not tertiary issue for genuine Marxists. Race & gender are NOT primary categories.
    Cultural Marxism is actually POST MODERNISM & PROGRESSIVISM. It helps no one to confuse these ideologies. (Of course "cultural Marxism" is "sexy": plays well to that whole American fear & loathing of communism)

    Not much fear and loathing of communism in the US these days. Apparently, though, they still don’t like the Russians.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  64. Wally says: • Website
    @Fredtard
    You've outed yourself as a global warming denier. That's safe, even common, here at Unz, where our own groupthink bonds us on the right.

    As a laissez faire libertarian, I've had a real hard time accepting that our tech-enabled exploitation of resources is quickly and finally leading to global ecological collapse. Like any new convert, I may be a bit overzealous. My view: it's happening way faster than even Al Gore says. One goal of the powers-that-be has always been to pacify (lie to) )the public, until the truth can't be hidden any longer.

    The great unwashed third world masses didn't consume what we did. Yeah, China pollutes, but they're burning coal to manufacture our "stuff." If we can't overcome our own denial/rationalizations/cognitive dissonance, how can we denigrate others who have built their own bubbles of bullshit? If photosynthesis indeed ceases at 104F, the consequences of our willful blind spot will make cultural Marxism seem like a stubbed toe.

    Fredtard screams blasphemy !!

    Only the religious fanatic calls someone a ‘denier”.

    Real science doesn’t hide it’s data.
    Real science doesn’t need to alter data.
    Real science produces ‘models’ which generate real, observable results.
    Real scientists don’t get nailed in Climate Gate.
    Real science doesn’t try to silence differences of opinion.
    Real scientists don’t advocate the arrest of those that disagree with them.

    Now 400 Scientific Papers in 2017 Say ‘Global Warming’ Is a Myth

    http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/10/24/delingpole-now-400-scientific-papers-in-2017-say-global-warming-is-a-myth/

    Most Massive Scientific Fraud In Human History

    https://principia-scientific.org/most-massive-scientific-fraud-in-human-history/

    100% Of US ‘Warming’ Is Due To NOAA Data Tampering

    https://www.lewrockwell.com/2016/12/no_author/100-us-global-warming/

    Read More
    • Replies: @woodNfish
    One point, while models should reflect reality they do not always do that because they fail for various reasons. Those models should not be used. In climate fraud, failed models are used to justify more fraud.

    Your statement should read that real scientists don't use models that don't work.
    , @Fredtard
    I read the links you provided. Like the back of my own hand, not more than four years ago. I've made most if not all of those arguments, face-to-face, and they usually seemed to work on my listeners.

    But all the quasi-scientific and us-vs- them sowing-of-doubt arguments seem infantile to me now. The empirical data is piling up; warming is going exponential. All the feedbacks are in one direction.
    I suspect even if/when industrial civilization collapses, the cat's out of the bag. It's too far tipped to meaningfully halt, let alone reverse. It hinges on the phase of the currently-frozen methane in the arctic.

    Please look over this one recent (12/4/17) article describing weather measurements in Barrow, AK. The bar graph of daily high and low temp records, by decade back to the 1920's, stuck out to me:

    https://www.wunderground.com/cat6/amazing-autumn-alaskas-north-slope-record-warmth-record-low-sea-ice-extent

    Now if we would have downsized and brought or military home in 1990, and taxed the crap out of fossil fuels at that time, and switched to all consumption-based instead of income-based taxation too, ...who knows? Of course, none of those radical, disruptive changes will ever happen pre-emptively. Only when the SHTF, at which time only the uber-wealthy will have the resources to absorb and adapt to the dire circumstances. I hope you're one of them.

    And, I hope I am wrong about the predicament (existential problem without a solution.) If I'm right, I'll take it as one giant lesson in humility that we had coming.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  65. Malla says:
    @Wally
    Notice that The Left demands massive immigration into the US & Europe while they support very strict Israeli immigration laws which allow JEWS ONLY.

    Israel to shut migrant centre and deport Africans
    http://www.unz.com/isteve/israel-to-shut-migrant-centre-and-deport-africans/

    Forget the 'slippery slope' — Israel already is an apartheid state: Neil Macdonald
    http://www.cbc.ca/news/opinion/israel-slippery-slope-1.4368018

    Israel police detain 15 over campaign to stop Jewish-Arab dating
    https://www.yahoo.com/news/israeli-police-arrest-15-over-campaign-stop-jew-083710375.html
    "Jerusalem (AFP) - Israeli police detained 15 suspected Jewish extremists following an undercover investigation into a group accused of tracking down and threatening Arab men dating Jewish women, authorities said Sunday
    Gopstein was also questioned by police in 2015 after he condoned torching churches in Israel, in accordance with a mediaeval Jewish commandment to destroy places of idol-worship."

    Female Israeli fights off primate, ultra religious Jews
    http://video.dailymail.co.uk/video/mol/2017/10/20/4993070019781505124/640x360_MP4_4993070019781505124.mp4
    The video shows the group of men spit and swear at Golan, calling a 'shiksa' (a non-Jewish woman) as well as whore

    LOL, Funny Video. Israel is dropping it’s fake western garbs to show it’s true self, a typical Middle Eastern society. As the population of the ultra orthodox increases as a percentage of the population, the israelis will be quite indistinguishable from their Arab neighbours.

    Also what I have noticed is that they use the word ‘infiltrator’ to describe the Africans. While they would be called refugees, immigrants, visible minorities (Canada) in Western countries. All play of words, but the usage of words is of immense significance. The term ‘Infiltrator’ gives the image of a temporary intruder who has to be removed. Like someone who has like infiltrated the fence of the nation. The word ‘immigrant’ on the other hand gives the image of permanence of stay of the outsider.
    The left regularly invents words such as carbon footprint, visible minority etc… In 1984, George Orwell does talk about ‘Newspeak’ in which words and vocabulary are manipulated to control the population.

    I suggest Western nationalists start using the term ‘infiltrator’ instead of ‘immigrant’ for outsiders.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  66. MBlanc46 says:
    @Intelligent Dasein
    That picture is truly disgusting. Professor Yankah looks like an anthropomorphicized turd and I wouldn't want to be his friend anyway. What a parasite this man is. It was White Western culture that created the sinecure he now occupies, where he is paid a handsome wage to produce nothing of any value and to hector us relentlessly about our supposed injustices. Why do we allow pathetic little pseudo-intellectual polyps like him to sprout in the colon of civilized discourse? Why did we allow one of his ilk, Barack Obama---another sneering, butt-ugly, inconsequential fart of man---to become president? This is definitely a White man's disease. We could certainly show them some real disclusion if we ever decided to get serious about it. They have no power, no fuel, no means with which to peddle their crap other than the White man's guilt and cuckery.

    How disheartening it is to see goofy White guys eagerly prostrating themselves before the cult of diversity and insisting (more to their own inner contemplative vision than to any outside observer in particular) on the plainly fallacious idea of racial equality. How absurd to see them heaping praise, riches, and largess upon these wayward sons of Africa, throwing away their lives and destroying their civilization in the process. All it takes is one moment's abstraction from the situation, one step back from the sacred circle of negro worship, to see what is really going on here. The soft, easy-living, daydreaming White folks have adopted negroes to serve as the golden calves and sacred monkeys of their new, post-Christian, degenerate religion of cosmopolitanism.

    The complicated Leftist ideology that supports this degeneracy is really of little consequence. Even the refutation thereof would belong only to the annals of a dry intellectual history that motivates little in the day-to-day world. Meanwhile, the monkeys continue to make a mess of things, defecating in the temple, stealing food, and harassing the passers by. For whatever your ideology stipulates, it remains an objective fact that Black people do little except interfere with White society. They are a thoroughgoing nuisance-race, have been for 500 years, and will remain so for as long into the future as is of practical concern.

    It is therefore time to call openly for separation. Those who do so may feel themselves to be a small an ineffectual opposition, but the effects that such opposition can achieve are much greater than mere numbers would suggest, provided only that the effort is a real one. So beat the drum incessantly in order to bring about the change in dialogue that Dr. Cathey rightly insists is necessary. At the very least, we will finally have an alternative to the mandatory cucking out to cultural Trotskyism that masquerades as morality in the West.

    Many blacks also favor separation. Perhaps it’s an idea whose time has finally come.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Carroll Price
    True, but white liberals would never allow it.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  67. Wally says:
    @Wizard of Oz
    What is it that you have recognised?

    If "Westerners" have not exercised intelligence and recognised the dangerous Marxism in their nations might it be because there is so little of it, so few people expressing an allegiance to Marxist ideas, and so much recognition of the failures of Marxists to run or govern anything effective?

    How much unity can you describe in eother the doctrines or organisation or policy aims of these Western Marxists?

    “So little of it”?

    Where you been? Open your eyes.

    Try reading the piece under discussion here.

    and:
    Nearly 1 In 5 Millennials Consider Joseph Stalin And Kim Jong Un ‘Heroes’

    http://dailycaller.com/2017/11/02/nearly-1-in-5-millennials-consider-joseph-stalin-and-kim-jong-un-heroes/

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
    Thank you for reminding me to read the article fully. However, you seem to have failed to notice that I was replying to a nominated commentator's particular broad generalisation. Perhaps you too exaggerate the importance of what is immediately before your eyes and ears from time to time. If you care to read my #94 account of school children's (to us) extraordinary ignorance you might place less weight on your linked material from which no reliable conclusion can be reached. (What was the question? What was the context?). I doubt if many American students know anything much about Stalin etc and anyway it is a far cry from many thinking the leader of the USSR in the world war was heroic to believing that more than 1 per cent of university educated Americans could even give you a coherent account of Marxist teachings, let alone Marx's teachings, on anything. I wonder if you know that much of "Capital" is satire. I learned that from Francis Wheen's highly readable biography of Marx in which he quotes the splendid satirical sally about criminals creating empkoyment for policemen and judges!
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  68. Malla says:
    @anarchyst
    Thank you, Malla. Good post!
    I, for one am PROUD to be considered "racist" and wear my "racism" as a badge of honor. When I am confronted by those who recognize my "racism", I (attempt to) shake their hands and "thank them for noticing". The confused, bewildered looks on their faces is priceless.
    Regards,

    Being racist has always been, is and will always be a part of being human.

    Read More
    • Replies: @woodNfish
    Yes, it is just as nationalism is an extension of tribalism. But these neoMarxists use racist to demonize their opponents. Obviously, there is no Mexican race, and no Central American or Latin American race.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  69. MBlanc46 says:
    @Seamus Padraig

    Why Stalin decided to go prude? Perhaps it was his personal taste. After all he studied to become a priest and was not like the cosmopolitan mostly Jewish Bolsheviks.
     
    It had little to do with Stalin's personal tastes. The reason why he had birth control and abortion restricted was to increase the size of the population (natalism). The reason why he banned homosexuality and promoted marriage is because that's the most efficient way to order society--always has been, always will be. Besides, that's what the vast majority of the Russians (and other ethnicities) wanted, which, of course, was the exact opposite of the what the Jew-Bolsheviks wanted.

    I’d like to see some good citations from the Marxian corpus that show that it wasn’t “all about” class struggle.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  70. Malla says:
    @EEvilWhiteMale
    "Racism" is the contemporary version of the pre-modern term "witchcraft", an invisible malevolent force that explains things that upset me, but which remains invisible.

    Social Justice Warriors are the Witchfinders of our age.

    If you do some research on the Travistock institute and their mind control program/ social engineering program, they were already anticipating/ preparing for this SJW phenomenon many decades ago. SJWs do not realize that they are stupid programmed patsy drones for the sinister elites.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  71. @schrub
    Several commenters here seem to think that what is going on is the rise "cultural Marxism".

    It isn't. What is going on is the rise of of "cultural Trotskyism". There is a profound difference between the two movements. Marxism, a least in Russia, was mostly a Jewish controlled movement up until the purges starting in 1936. On the other hand Trotskyism was (and is) an ENTIRELY Jewish controlled movement to this day with a much more ambitious, world wide agenda which continues.

    Everyone from William Kristol to Diane Feinstein and Michael Bloomberg could be labeled as "cultural Trotskites". Trotskyism was in fact what the very influential Rabbi Stephen Wise was describing many years ago when he declared "Some call it communism, I call it Judaism".

    English Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn might describe himself as a "mild" Marxist. He would definitely NOT describe himself as a any sort of Trotskyite and neither would have the late Hugo Chavez of Venezuela.

    This is because Marxism is mostly an economic philosophy. Trotskyism is much more of a cultural movement with an economic facade to fool the yokels and has far more profound and dangerous implications.

    Our war mongering Neocons were/are Trotskyites, not Marxists. They certainly knew the differences between the two philosophies. People here should also learn them too.

    And, by the way, what is the present day handmaiden of "cultural Trotskyism"? None other than Tikkun Olam.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tikkun_olam

    The cultural tide that has taken over universities has started to seep into high schools as well.

    Just recently, in very toney Marin County California, San Domenico School , a very expensive private school with Dominican Order Catholic roots, decided to remove almost all of the christian symbols from its campus.

    Who pushed for this change? Jewish parents who had allied themselves with naive, left wing shabbos goy gentile parents. These two groups simply took over the boards of director of the school and then decided to make it more "inclusive". The gentile women board members of this ilk are easily identified by their hyphenated last names.

    The timid (or more possibly afraid) Catholic parents at San Domenico simply stood by and allowed them to do this.

    This is what happens when you allow Jews (along with their amazingly, ample sources of donations) to attend christian schools. They quickly work to undermine them and secularize them. The Jesuit University of San Francisco learned this lesson much to their dismay years ago, as did DePaul University in Illinois.

    No more "Merry Christmas" greetings at San Domenico. No more mangers. This would make certain people feel bad. Now just "seasons greetings" are allowed. Saying Happy Hanukkah would probably be tolerated in order to be more inclusive. . Read about this sad tale here:

    http://www.marinij.com/article/NO/20170824/NEWS/170829883

    Your local Catholic school is probably next in line for this "improvement".

    I completely agree, and you’ll notice I used that exact phrase, “Cultural Trotskyism,” in my comment at #17.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  72. Malla says:
    @schrub
    Several commenters here seem to think that what is going on is the rise "cultural Marxism".

    It isn't. What is going on is the rise of of "cultural Trotskyism". There is a profound difference between the two movements. Marxism, a least in Russia, was mostly a Jewish controlled movement up until the purges starting in 1936. On the other hand Trotskyism was (and is) an ENTIRELY Jewish controlled movement to this day with a much more ambitious, world wide agenda which continues.

    Everyone from William Kristol to Diane Feinstein and Michael Bloomberg could be labeled as "cultural Trotskites". Trotskyism was in fact what the very influential Rabbi Stephen Wise was describing many years ago when he declared "Some call it communism, I call it Judaism".

    English Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn might describe himself as a "mild" Marxist. He would definitely NOT describe himself as a any sort of Trotskyite and neither would have the late Hugo Chavez of Venezuela.

    This is because Marxism is mostly an economic philosophy. Trotskyism is much more of a cultural movement with an economic facade to fool the yokels and has far more profound and dangerous implications.

    Our war mongering Neocons were/are Trotskyites, not Marxists. They certainly knew the differences between the two philosophies. People here should also learn them too.

    And, by the way, what is the present day handmaiden of "cultural Trotskyism"? None other than Tikkun Olam.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tikkun_olam

    The cultural tide that has taken over universities has started to seep into high schools as well.

    Just recently, in very toney Marin County California, San Domenico School , a very expensive private school with Dominican Order Catholic roots, decided to remove almost all of the christian symbols from its campus.

    Who pushed for this change? Jewish parents who had allied themselves with naive, left wing shabbos goy gentile parents. These two groups simply took over the boards of director of the school and then decided to make it more "inclusive". The gentile women board members of this ilk are easily identified by their hyphenated last names.

    The timid (or more possibly afraid) Catholic parents at San Domenico simply stood by and allowed them to do this.

    This is what happens when you allow Jews (along with their amazingly, ample sources of donations) to attend christian schools. They quickly work to undermine them and secularize them. The Jesuit University of San Francisco learned this lesson much to their dismay years ago, as did DePaul University in Illinois.

    No more "Merry Christmas" greetings at San Domenico. No more mangers. This would make certain people feel bad. Now just "seasons greetings" are allowed. Saying Happy Hanukkah would probably be tolerated in order to be more inclusive. . Read about this sad tale here:

    http://www.marinij.com/article/NO/20170824/NEWS/170829883

    Your local Catholic school is probably next in line for this "improvement".

    Your local Catholic school is probably next in line for this “improvement”.

    Check out Mr. E. Micheal Jones on Youtube on how this all began in the Catholic Church. Very interesting.

    One more sad (and crazy) tale

    Lesbian bishop of a Swedish church removes crosses and marks the direction to Mecca to make surly racist Muslim infiltrators into Sweden feel welcome !!! You really can’t make this stuff up.

    As far as the truth about Yule, Christmas, hanuka, kwanza, this video is a must watch. All of them are rip offs of Yule and Christmas.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Eagle Eye

    Lesbian bishop of a Swedish church removes crosses
     
    Her obvious addiction to virile and undiscerning Muslim men and hatred of native Swede men suggests she is lesbian only faute de mieux and would be only too happy to grant her favors to a few dozen "new Swedes."
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  73. woodNfish says:
    @Jake
    You are missing the point. Marxism,'classical Marxism,' was never just about the class struggle. It was about Marx formulating a theoretical framework from which to oppose every part of Christendom, which required unrelenting desire to replace the cultures of Christendom: white Christian cultures. Marx was creating a replacement for Christendom

    In classical Marxism, that replacement is to be effected by Marxist economics controlled by Marxist politicians and bureaucrats and the State warring against the Church.

    In Cultural Marxism, the war against Christendom and its peoples, whites, has been shifted to matters of race. And that form of war to exterminate any possible vestige of Christendom is extremely attractive not just to blacks, Jews, and Asians, but also to WASP Elites, because it not merely allows private wealth but encourages private wealth among the 'Politically Correct,' because then they can use the their fortunes for good: which means to exterminate all trace of Christendom and essentially make serfs of almost all white people who are not PC/Cultural Marxist in faith and militant advocacy.

    You do know the “P” in WASP stands for “Protestant”, don’t you? Protestants are Christians, so explain to me why they want to eliminate themselves.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Intelligent Dasein

    Protestants are Christians, so explain to me why they want to eliminate themselves.
     
    Protestants are not Christians. If the individual Protestants are invincibly ignorant of the true origins of their cult and are acting in good faith, then at best you can say that Protestants are pagan peoples who have heard rumors of Christ and His Church and wish to pay them homage. But Protestant theology is not correct, and the faith of Protestants is not the faith taught by Christ or believed by His Apostles, or that which is maintained by His true Church.

    The fact that Protestantism is incipient SJWism hardly needs remarking upon. The progress from Protestantism to Puritanism to Deism to Rationalism to Marxist-Darwinian dialectics to Post-Modernism is inevitable and historically very well established. For whatever reason, these people actually do want to eliminate themselves. Not at the conscious level, no doubt, but the effect of the policies they adopt under the inspiration of their ideology does lead necessarily in that direction. This is what James Burnham meant when he called Liberalism "the ideology of Western suicide."
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  74. woodNfish says:
    @Malla
    Being racist has always been, is and will always be a part of being human.

    Yes, it is just as nationalism is an extension of tribalism. But these neoMarxists use racist to demonize their opponents. Obviously, there is no Mexican race, and no Central American or Latin American race.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Grandpa Charlie

    "Obviously, there is no Mexican race, and no Central American or Latin American race." -- woodNfish
     
    Except that when Mexicans use the term "La Raza" they generally do not mean the human race, they mean the mestizo race or the Mexican race, founded by the union of Cortez and Montezuma's daughter.OTOH, I have never met a Mexican who objected when I said that I consider Mexicans to be white -- except for the black Mexicans around Vera Cruz.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  75. woodNfish says:

    Jews are already duplicates of the muslims. The only difference is the jews genocide against the West is much more insidious, more destructive, and has been more successful than terrorist bombs.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  76. @Fredtard
    You've outed yourself as a global warming denier. That's safe, even common, here at Unz, where our own groupthink bonds us on the right.

    As a laissez faire libertarian, I've had a real hard time accepting that our tech-enabled exploitation of resources is quickly and finally leading to global ecological collapse. Like any new convert, I may be a bit overzealous. My view: it's happening way faster than even Al Gore says. One goal of the powers-that-be has always been to pacify (lie to) )the public, until the truth can't be hidden any longer.

    The great unwashed third world masses didn't consume what we did. Yeah, China pollutes, but they're burning coal to manufacture our "stuff." If we can't overcome our own denial/rationalizations/cognitive dissonance, how can we denigrate others who have built their own bubbles of bullshit? If photosynthesis indeed ceases at 104F, the consequences of our willful blind spot will make cultural Marxism seem like a stubbed toe.

    lol. A label. What a powerful argument.

    In statistics my favorite example was to run a regression of temperature against a basket of greenhouse gasses and demonstrate the statistical significance and large affect of greenhouse gasses.

    Then we put the output of the sun in the regression too, and watched the correletion between the gasses and temperature vanish.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  77. woodNfish says:
    @Wally
    Fredtard screams blasphemy !!

    Only the religious fanatic calls someone a 'denier".

    Real science doesn't hide it's data.
    Real science doesn't need to alter data.
    Real science produces 'models' which generate real, observable results.
    Real scientists don't get nailed in Climate Gate.
    Real science doesn't try to silence differences of opinion.
    Real scientists don't advocate the arrest of those that disagree with them.

    Now 400 Scientific Papers in 2017 Say ‘Global Warming’ Is a Myth
    http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/10/24/delingpole-now-400-scientific-papers-in-2017-say-global-warming-is-a-myth/

    Most Massive Scientific Fraud In Human History
    https://principia-scientific.org/most-massive-scientific-fraud-in-human-history/

    100% Of US 'Warming' Is Due To NOAA Data Tampering
    https://www.lewrockwell.com/2016/12/no_author/100-us-global-warming/

    One point, while models should reflect reality they do not always do that because they fail for various reasons. Those models should not be used. In climate fraud, failed models are used to justify more fraud.

    Your statement should read that real scientists don’t use models that don’t work.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  78. KenH says:

    The left always used to claim that IQ, genetics and DNA was junk science and that we’re all born into this world as blank slates in keeping with Marxist dogma. This is because these fields often debunked their claims about race, the inherent equality of the races and their long time hobby horse of environmental determinism they used as a basis to forcibly redistribute wealth and property.

    But suddenly and hypocritically I’ve noticed their increasing use of genetics and DNA against whites to prove that we’re irredeemably evil based on the cherry picked and revisionist history they use to flog us with (e.g., Europeans deliberately killed XXX million Indians with the smallpox virus). And if our eternal wickedness is encoded in our DNA, well, you know what THAT means.

    So once again the (((loony left))) and their black and brown shock troops are all over the map and use whatever they think will serve their nefarious purpose at any given moment even if they opposed that very something just yesterday. Thus, they’ve now added genetic determinism to their repertoire if it can be used to bludgeon, defame and guilt trip whitey whereas before it was dismissed as “racist junk science”.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  79. Russ says:

    Of the supporters for removal, one young black woman gave away the whole narrative and plan: American history, she explained, was totally infected, based in and on, “racism” (as well as “sexism”). Thus, that history needed to be “cleansed” and purified

    When the hut-skyscraper equivalency has been refuted, what other gambit remains?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  80. Brilliant article written by brilliant mind.

    I can’t wait for the day when Constitution will be rejected because it was worked out and written by white racist Anglo Saxons-slave owners.

    Joke?

    Absolutely not. Cultural Marxists will make it reality.

    Read More
    • LOL: utu
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  81. @woodNfish
    You do know the "P" in WASP stands for "Protestant", don't you? Protestants are Christians, so explain to me why they want to eliminate themselves.

    Protestants are Christians, so explain to me why they want to eliminate themselves.

    Protestants are not Christians. If the individual Protestants are invincibly ignorant of the true origins of their cult and are acting in good faith, then at best you can say that Protestants are pagan peoples who have heard rumors of Christ and His Church and wish to pay them homage. But Protestant theology is not correct, and the faith of Protestants is not the faith taught by Christ or believed by His Apostles, or that which is maintained by His true Church.

    The fact that Protestantism is incipient SJWism hardly needs remarking upon. The progress from Protestantism to Puritanism to Deism to Rationalism to Marxist-Darwinian dialectics to Post-Modernism is inevitable and historically very well established. For whatever reason, these people actually do want to eliminate themselves. Not at the conscious level, no doubt, but the effect of the policies they adopt under the inspiration of their ideology does lead necessarily in that direction. This is what James Burnham meant when he called Liberalism “the ideology of Western suicide.”

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
    Your submission of a passage for inclusion in that eloquent flight of fancy "All Roads Lead to Rome" will be applauded by those of a certain ingenious cast of mind. For me "There is one God and Mahomet is His Prophet" will have superior claims.
    , @woodNfish
    Your ignorance of protestants and their Christian faith is truly amazing. You obviously know nothing about them, and I have no intention of enlightening you. Please continue digging your hole.
    , @Malla
    Why only Protestantism? Maybe all of Christianity have some suicidal tendencies.

    http://www.revilo-oliver.com/news/2010/09/what-is-‘liberalism’/

    “Liberals” babble bout “One World,” which is to be a “universal democracy” and is “inevitable,” and they thus describe it in the very terms in which the notion was formulated, two thousand years ago, by Philo Judaeus, when he cleverly gave a Stoic coloring to the old Jewish dream of a globe in which all the lower races would obey the masters whom Yahweh, by covenant, appointed to rule over them. And the “Liberal” cults, having rejected the Christian doctrine of “original sin,” which, although based on a silly myth about Adam and Eve, corresponded fairly well to the facts of human nature, have even reverted to the most pernicious aspect of Christianity, which common sense had held in check in Europe until the Eighteenth Century; and they openly exhibit the morbid Christian fascination with whatever is lowly, proletarian, inferior, irrational, debased, deformed, and degenerate. This maudlin preoccupation with biological refuse, usually sicklied over with such nonsense words as ‘underprivileged [!],’ would make sense, if it had been decreed by a god who perversely chose to become incarnate among the most pestiferous of human races and to select his disciples from among the illiterate dregs of even that peuplade, but since the “Liberals” claim to have rejected belief in such a divinity, their superstition is exposed as having no basis other than their own resentment of their betters and their professional interest in exploiting the gullibility of their compatriots.

    , @blank-misgivings
    Lol. Have you read St Paul recently? I would say the intellectual diseases you highlight start in 1 Romans. The obscurantist dialectics, the veiled utopian promises, the conceptual machinery of radical dissolution of boundaries but with the clever get out clause that it was all just 'spiritual'. Pauline religion and it's transcendental lower middle class narcissism is the eternal home of sjw's.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  82. @JackOH
    BB, thanks for that insider's view. I've observed my local Podunk Tech for years, and it depresses me to think how much of academic discourse is bounded, even dictated, by money and ideology. Especially true in the humanities, but even STEM disciplines are not immune. Exasperated, I sometimes wonder if our academies differ from North Korea's only in degree and not in kind. Don't rock the boat, keep your mouth shut, go along-get along, toe the line, don't push your evidence, look the other way, stay on the right side of your department chair, your dean, your students, don't ruffle the trustees, all that.

    Less in STEM maybe but I worked with engineers and scientists too that adopted all the right language, did all the right grant research, etc. Even one who rode his bike every day to school in extreme cold, and wanted everyone else in the world to be made to do it too.

    In doing so, they allowed Orwellian double-speak right into their labs. “Sustainable” had a concrete definition in my field, like maximum sustained yield in forestry and fishing. But it is being co-opted.

    “Sustainable” in Cultural Marxism is a label that means private property and markets are bad, while government is good.

    The field of Economics is so wrecked now that they teach the Tragedy of the Commons exactly backwards. The history is that common property is the best way to ensure resource collapse in systems beyond family units. Nobody has an incentive to conserve and husband the resource.

    So they teach that the government must manage production because when people are left to their own devices, all the fish are caught including the breeding stock, and forests are clear cut without replanting.

    Yet, that is the result of common property, not private property. A fish farm or private timber holding is managed for maximum sustained yield.

    I was brought up on sexual harassment charges for the following: I had a prof who sent out surveys asking people how much they claimed it was worth to them to stop logging and save the spotted owls. She had some absurd “psychic” value on the Spotted Owls.

    So I asked why she wasn’t allowing the negative values – most everyone around there would love to pay a bounty on them. And historically that is far more accurate, with bounties on predators and so forth.

    She was so angry at being exposed for the bias that she filed sexual harassment charges because, being more than 20 years younger than me, I had called her “young lady” once exactly as the old profs had called me “young man” when I had arrived.

    That was the entire basis of the complaint but I had to prepare for a sanctioning meeting with the Dean, with the bust of Lenin, who gleefully sent it up in her favor, requiring a hearing with the Vice Chancellor.

    By that time I had gotten enough of the old-timers to write affadavits they had called me “young man” and the management prof was still teaching so they had a hard time with selective prosecution.

    Yet, they claimed sexual harassment is in the eye of the alleged victim, that if I hold a door for her or walk in front of, behind, or next to – whichever one she chooses is harassment, it is all up to her. I am not allowed to know beforehand. I find out in a sexual harassment action that could potentially have me fired.

    You don’t have courts and juries in acadamia. There is theater of such, without the doctrine of common law or stare decisis. My best prof in game management was turned down for tenure because he wasn’t “collegial” enough, despite his teaching and publishing record being superb.

    The quality of the classroom, the rigor, fell in direct proportion to the marxist infection. You step out of the world of science and reason – and into the world of doublespeak and arbitrary authority.

    Marxism is idiotic on the face of it. The first few paragraphs of Marx and Engel’s Manifesto about all previous history is a religious statement, not even remotely resembling history.

    I made my freshman students read it, and what impressed me was how incapable of thinking they were. Okay kids, you say it sounds great in theory. Let’s talk about abolishing the family. Your family.

    Oh, well maybe not that part. Alright kids, then what about you not being able to own property? Oh, well maybe not that part either. Alright kids, what about holding the women in common? How do you little feminists feel about being the common property of men? Oh, well maybe not that part either. Etc.

    How can they read this tripe and say that it “sounds good in theory”? It sounds incoherent, tyrannical, and stupid, at face value.

    The reason “Marxism” can drift from an alleged class struggle to a race struggle to a gender struggle or what have you is that Marxism is a divide-and-conquer strategy where people are merely objects to attain ends.

    You’re a fool if you try to make sense out of the particulars with the Marxist in front of you. It’s Saul Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals which is an instruction manual for psychopaths to use and abuse people as objects. It is all about manipulation and control, and in the end they’ll slit your throat to get what they want.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
    I am sorry that you overstate the problems associated with thinking and theorising about the commons and discard part of the truth. Can you not concede that something desirable and accessible which is in limited supply is under threat of exhaustion if it has no strong defender, a defender who may be a private owner or private owners who have the will and strength to defend it by the direct or indirect use of force, or a centralised owner carrying out the will of the tribe or other community? (Even the individual owners are likely to be most effective as conservators if they benefot from the collective - or monarchy - establishing and maintaining an effective rule of law and law enforcement although private gangs of armed rangers could do the job especially if the judges belonged to the right group). Have you considered the surest answer to the tragedy of the commons in Africa which should be promoted by scientific conservationists and trophy hunters alike, namely the vigorous and extensive culling of Africans. I suggest a slogan "Africa for the 16th Century". Ask the Vice Chancellor** to be our inaugural Patron and in return we will apply heat to snowflakes and defend him from them.

    ** is that not a strikingly unAmerican title? What institutions have you been referring to?
    , @Eagle Eye

    The quality of the classroom, the rigor, fell in direct proportion to the marxist infection.
     
    That's a key feature beloved of pseudo-academic imposters, not a bug.

    In Maoist terminology, why bother becoming a real "expert" if all you really need is "red" attitude (aka "virtue signaling," better called "virtue sniveling")?

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  83. patsy says:
    @Malla
    Corporate Capitalism and Communism are both allies. The enemies of these Marxists enemies are the decent, intelligent, civilized members of society mostly the middle classes whom they hate, not super rich bankers. Just look at what happened Venezuela and even up to a lesser extent in Brazil. Chavez looted the middle classes and channeled some of the money to buy out the underclasses and thugs but the vast majority of the wealth ended up with the elites, Chavez too was a member of the so called elites.
    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3640941/Super-rich-quaff-champagne-Venezuela-country-club-middle-classes-scavenge-food-rubbish-dumps-DOGS-starving.html
    The controlled whole world media projected Chavez as the man of the people fighting evil uncle Sam. Now the middle classes are destitute and the super elites enjoy their lives. Venezuela was just an experiment for the world.
    The elites use the bottom classes to terrorize the Middle classes. The whole race fiasco in South Africa was more Globalists using it's Marxists branch using blacks Marxist leaders using the black masses to overturn the Apartheid Regime. They were supported by world media controlled by leftists who in turn are controlled by the globalist elites.
    Before WW2 they had hoped to use the White working classes of the west to get their revolution but since the White working class of the West had become to prosperous and were too independent in nature, they realised the White working class will not work as the vehicle for revolution. Hence the non Whites especially blacks and even LGBTs to be used as vehicles of revolution. Blacks on average have low IQ, have massive jealousy and hatred for Whites (naturally which is augmented by education, general black culture and the media), are impulsive, greedy for handouts, love playing the victim card, the vast majority of them will always remain an underclass etc... They could not have asked for a better tribe of people. LGBTs on average naturally love deviant things. Weapons for the leftist arm of the globalists. That is what they are.

    A fantastic book to read on the coming together of corporate capitalism and communism and it is a must read. The Milner Fabian Conspiracy. Author Ioan Ratiu.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  84. @Anon
    The bloodthirstiest Crusaders were not especially bloodthirsty. That there was a bloody sack of Jerusalem does not change that all too much. Want to talk about Warsaw? Nanking? Berlin? Jews in'48? Arabs in '48? The Vendee? Any city ever sacked by the Mongols? Let's face it, Crusaders were pansies when it comes to democide.

    Thank you for improving om the exptession of my point. Mind you I think you could have considered the Crusaders’ conquest of Constantinople as another count against the church of Rome….

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    No you couldn't though it would make an excellent count against the city of Venice.
    Possibly also against the more or less freelance system that set the crusading army looking for funds, and also against the Greek "system" of succession, if it can even be called a system, which regularly left princes with a deep grudge against their close relatives on the throne.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  85. @Intelligent Dasein

    Protestants are Christians, so explain to me why they want to eliminate themselves.
     
    Protestants are not Christians. If the individual Protestants are invincibly ignorant of the true origins of their cult and are acting in good faith, then at best you can say that Protestants are pagan peoples who have heard rumors of Christ and His Church and wish to pay them homage. But Protestant theology is not correct, and the faith of Protestants is not the faith taught by Christ or believed by His Apostles, or that which is maintained by His true Church.

    The fact that Protestantism is incipient SJWism hardly needs remarking upon. The progress from Protestantism to Puritanism to Deism to Rationalism to Marxist-Darwinian dialectics to Post-Modernism is inevitable and historically very well established. For whatever reason, these people actually do want to eliminate themselves. Not at the conscious level, no doubt, but the effect of the policies they adopt under the inspiration of their ideology does lead necessarily in that direction. This is what James Burnham meant when he called Liberalism "the ideology of Western suicide."

    Your submission of a passage for inclusion in that eloquent flight of fancy “All Roads Lead to Rome” will be applauded by those of a certain ingenious cast of mind. For me “There is one God and Mahomet is His Prophet” will have superior claims.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  86. SMK says: • Website
    @Bill Jones
    Why are these fukrs still walking around? And paid by taxpayers?

    Philosopher Rudy Martinez, a deranged muddle-head, as laughable as he’s terrifying, and obviously a Mestizo or pure Amerindian rather than a pure Spaniard like Jorge Ramos and Marco Rubio, calls for white genocide, the extermination of all whites. “Your DNA is an abomination,” he fulminates. So whites are uniquely evil, innately and immutably. But he also writes that “you were not born white, you became white. So “race doesn’t exist.” Race is an “artificial social construct,” whiteness is a an “artificial social construct,” and thus can be “deconstructed.” People of any race, which doesn’t exist, can become “white.” This philosophy major is so stupid and obtuse that he can’t see the blatant and stupefying incoherence and contradiction of his “arguments.”

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
    Shades of Alan Sokal's magnificent hoax?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  87. woodNfish says:
    @Intelligent Dasein

    Protestants are Christians, so explain to me why they want to eliminate themselves.
     
    Protestants are not Christians. If the individual Protestants are invincibly ignorant of the true origins of their cult and are acting in good faith, then at best you can say that Protestants are pagan peoples who have heard rumors of Christ and His Church and wish to pay them homage. But Protestant theology is not correct, and the faith of Protestants is not the faith taught by Christ or believed by His Apostles, or that which is maintained by His true Church.

    The fact that Protestantism is incipient SJWism hardly needs remarking upon. The progress from Protestantism to Puritanism to Deism to Rationalism to Marxist-Darwinian dialectics to Post-Modernism is inevitable and historically very well established. For whatever reason, these people actually do want to eliminate themselves. Not at the conscious level, no doubt, but the effect of the policies they adopt under the inspiration of their ideology does lead necessarily in that direction. This is what James Burnham meant when he called Liberalism "the ideology of Western suicide."

    Your ignorance of protestants and their Christian faith is truly amazing. You obviously know nothing about them, and I have no intention of enlightening you. Please continue digging your hole.

    Read More
    • Replies: @RealAmericanValuesCirca1776Not1965
    Translation: "You're wrong, but I can't be bothered to tell you why!"
    He's got a lot of digging to do before his proverbial hole is anywhere near as deep as yours already is.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  88. @Backwoods Bob
    Less in STEM maybe but I worked with engineers and scientists too that adopted all the right language, did all the right grant research, etc. Even one who rode his bike every day to school in extreme cold, and wanted everyone else in the world to be made to do it too.

    In doing so, they allowed Orwellian double-speak right into their labs. "Sustainable" had a concrete definition in my field, like maximum sustained yield in forestry and fishing. But it is being co-opted.

    "Sustainable" in Cultural Marxism is a label that means private property and markets are bad, while government is good.

    The field of Economics is so wrecked now that they teach the Tragedy of the Commons exactly backwards. The history is that common property is the best way to ensure resource collapse in systems beyond family units. Nobody has an incentive to conserve and husband the resource.

    So they teach that the government must manage production because when people are left to their own devices, all the fish are caught including the breeding stock, and forests are clear cut without replanting.

    Yet, that is the result of common property, not private property. A fish farm or private timber holding is managed for maximum sustained yield.

    I was brought up on sexual harassment charges for the following: I had a prof who sent out surveys asking people how much they claimed it was worth to them to stop logging and save the spotted owls. She had some absurd "psychic" value on the Spotted Owls.

    So I asked why she wasn't allowing the negative values - most everyone around there would love to pay a bounty on them. And historically that is far more accurate, with bounties on predators and so forth.

    She was so angry at being exposed for the bias that she filed sexual harassment charges because, being more than 20 years younger than me, I had called her "young lady" once exactly as the old profs had called me "young man" when I had arrived.

    That was the entire basis of the complaint but I had to prepare for a sanctioning meeting with the Dean, with the bust of Lenin, who gleefully sent it up in her favor, requiring a hearing with the Vice Chancellor.

    By that time I had gotten enough of the old-timers to write affadavits they had called me "young man" and the management prof was still teaching so they had a hard time with selective prosecution.

    Yet, they claimed sexual harassment is in the eye of the alleged victim, that if I hold a door for her or walk in front of, behind, or next to - whichever one she chooses is harassment, it is all up to her. I am not allowed to know beforehand. I find out in a sexual harassment action that could potentially have me fired.

    You don't have courts and juries in acadamia. There is theater of such, without the doctrine of common law or stare decisis. My best prof in game management was turned down for tenure because he wasn't "collegial" enough, despite his teaching and publishing record being superb.

    The quality of the classroom, the rigor, fell in direct proportion to the marxist infection. You step out of the world of science and reason - and into the world of doublespeak and arbitrary authority.

    Marxism is idiotic on the face of it. The first few paragraphs of Marx and Engel's Manifesto about all previous history is a religious statement, not even remotely resembling history.

    I made my freshman students read it, and what impressed me was how incapable of thinking they were. Okay kids, you say it sounds great in theory. Let's talk about abolishing the family. Your family.

    Oh, well maybe not that part. Alright kids, then what about you not being able to own property? Oh, well maybe not that part either. Alright kids, what about holding the women in common? How do you little feminists feel about being the common property of men? Oh, well maybe not that part either. Etc.

    How can they read this tripe and say that it "sounds good in theory"? It sounds incoherent, tyrannical, and stupid, at face value.

    The reason "Marxism" can drift from an alleged class struggle to a race struggle to a gender struggle or what have you is that Marxism is a divide-and-conquer strategy where people are merely objects to attain ends.

    You're a fool if you try to make sense out of the particulars with the Marxist in front of you. It's Saul Alinsky's Rules for Radicals which is an instruction manual for psychopaths to use and abuse people as objects. It is all about manipulation and control, and in the end they'll slit your throat to get what they want.

    I am sorry that you overstate the problems associated with thinking and theorising about the commons and discard part of the truth. Can you not concede that something desirable and accessible which is in limited supply is under threat of exhaustion if it has no strong defender, a defender who may be a private owner or private owners who have the will and strength to defend it by the direct or indirect use of force, or a centralised owner carrying out the will of the tribe or other community? (Even the individual owners are likely to be most effective as conservators if they benefot from the collective – or monarchy – establishing and maintaining an effective rule of law and law enforcement although private gangs of armed rangers could do the job especially if the judges belonged to the right group). Have you considered the surest answer to the tragedy of the commons in Africa which should be promoted by scientific conservationists and trophy hunters alike, namely the vigorous and extensive culling of Africans. I suggest a slogan “Africa for the 16th Century”. Ask the Vice Chancellor** to be our inaugural Patron and in return we will apply heat to snowflakes and defend him from them.

    ** is that not a strikingly unAmerican title? What institutions have you been referring to?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  89. @SMK
    Philosopher Rudy Martinez, a deranged muddle-head, as laughable as he's terrifying, and obviously a Mestizo or pure Amerindian rather than a pure Spaniard like Jorge Ramos and Marco Rubio, calls for white genocide, the extermination of all whites. "Your DNA is an abomination," he fulminates. So whites are uniquely evil, innately and immutably. But he also writes that "you were not born white, you became white. So "race doesn't exist." Race is an "artificial social construct," whiteness is a an "artificial social construct," and thus can be "deconstructed." People of any race, which doesn't exist, can become "white." This philosophy major is so stupid and obtuse that he can't see the blatant and stupefying incoherence and contradiction of his "arguments."

    Shades of Alan Sokal’s magnificent hoax?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  90. anon • Disclaimer says:

    Oh yeah, don’t forget the other ploy…play white people against each other, hold back their posts, rewrite them put up fake youtube or facebook accounts with photo-shopped pictures and fake content, to get them attacked . The racist should come to the conclusion of the kindness of people of color.
    Once all the whites that want to leave are safely back in Europe, the dismantling of homosexuals from pulpits can happen without fear of reprisal as a diversity heretic The church shouldn’t change to suit the others. If they choose to attend church they should live by the church and accept the churches doctrine. Most people get involved for “change” to occur. We can still dream can’t we.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  91. Anon • Disclaimer says:
    @Wizard of Oz
    Thank you for improving om the exptession of my point. Mind you I think you could have considered the Crusaders' conquest of Constantinople as another count against the church of Rome....

    No you couldn’t though it would make an excellent count against the city of Venice.
    Possibly also against the more or less freelance system that set the crusading army looking for funds, and also against the Greek “system” of succession, if it can even be called a system, which regularly left princes with a deep grudge against their close relatives on the throne.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
    I think I might generaluse that the Creator got bored while still fine tuning hominids and left them with not much more refinement than the use of language which was good for organising the massacre of mammoths but unfortunately soon adapted to the handling if intertribal relations.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  92. @ThreeCranes
    Mexican Radical, "America! You people are rotten racists! You practice exclusion. You "other" us! You want to wall us out! Well let me tell you, your "Leave It To Beaver", white-privileged world of the 1950's is going to disappear under an avalanche of Hispanic immigration!"

    Normal White American, "Why do you want to disappear the world of "Leave It To Beaver"? What was wrong with the life lived by those people? They lived in nice homes located in clean, orderly communities where they were friends with their neighbors, wore clean, un-patched clothes, attended modern schools that were unmarred by violence, drove nice cars, ate well in kitchens equipped with labor-saving appliances. Families were two parent with Fathers who held good jobs and earned enough to support the family in comfort while Mothers were able to stay home and tend to their broods. What exactly was wrong with all that?"

    Mexican Radical, "It's all so white bread. Monotonous. It needs to be torn down. Livened up. You need the energy we Hispanics bring to life. You're boring!"

    Normal White American, "Well, if you really believe that everything we hold dear needs to be torn down to make room for you, can you really blame us for wanting to build a wall and exclude--excuse me--"other" you?"

    “Why do you want to disappear the world of “Leave It To Beaver”? What was wrong with the life lived by those people? They lived in nice homes … wore clean, un-patched clothes … ” == ThreeCranes

    What is wrong with clean patched clothes? ThreeCranes’ “Normal White American” must be a boomer, as must ThreeCranes also, whereas I was born before the War. during the Great Depression. Anyone who would automatically associate the standard for clean with unpatched — and thus patched with dirty — is obviously a spoiled boomer and a snobbish consumerist. Bah!

    Read More
    • Replies: @ThreeCranes
    Sorry to disappoint you Gramps but I'm not who you think I am.

    I started every year in grade school with two new pair of pants. By the end of the year they had patches on the patches. I don't automatically associate patches with dirt or anything else except work clothes vs. going out to eat or going to a social function clothes.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  93. How can the innocents of post-post modern generations understand the unfairness and wickedness which has oppressed their kind and denied them the chance of being as rich as Bill Gates without statues to raise questions and provide reminders? Mind you a true story I heard recently should make anyone attributing influence to Marxists or Christians as they are conceived by the speaker/writer take pause. A group of upper middle clsss school children from South Africa were in Trafalgar Square. Looking up at Nelson’s column their guide/teacher asked them to say who it was on top. No answers. A bit of pressure…. Hitler?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  94. Wally says: • Website
    @schrub
    Several commenters here seem to think that what is going on is the rise "cultural Marxism".

    It isn't. What is going on is the rise of of "cultural Trotskyism". There is a profound difference between the two movements. Marxism, a least in Russia, was mostly a Jewish controlled movement up until the purges starting in 1936. On the other hand Trotskyism was (and is) an ENTIRELY Jewish controlled movement to this day with a much more ambitious, world wide agenda which continues.

    Everyone from William Kristol to Diane Feinstein and Michael Bloomberg could be labeled as "cultural Trotskites". Trotskyism was in fact what the very influential Rabbi Stephen Wise was describing many years ago when he declared "Some call it communism, I call it Judaism".

    English Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn might describe himself as a "mild" Marxist. He would definitely NOT describe himself as a any sort of Trotskyite and neither would have the late Hugo Chavez of Venezuela.

    This is because Marxism is mostly an economic philosophy. Trotskyism is much more of a cultural movement with an economic facade to fool the yokels and has far more profound and dangerous implications.

    Our war mongering Neocons were/are Trotskyites, not Marxists. They certainly knew the differences between the two philosophies. People here should also learn them too.

    And, by the way, what is the present day handmaiden of "cultural Trotskyism"? None other than Tikkun Olam.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tikkun_olam

    The cultural tide that has taken over universities has started to seep into high schools as well.

    Just recently, in very toney Marin County California, San Domenico School , a very expensive private school with Dominican Order Catholic roots, decided to remove almost all of the christian symbols from its campus.

    Who pushed for this change? Jewish parents who had allied themselves with naive, left wing shabbos goy gentile parents. These two groups simply took over the boards of director of the school and then decided to make it more "inclusive". The gentile women board members of this ilk are easily identified by their hyphenated last names.

    The timid (or more possibly afraid) Catholic parents at San Domenico simply stood by and allowed them to do this.

    This is what happens when you allow Jews (along with their amazingly, ample sources of donations) to attend christian schools. They quickly work to undermine them and secularize them. The Jesuit University of San Francisco learned this lesson much to their dismay years ago, as did DePaul University in Illinois.

    No more "Merry Christmas" greetings at San Domenico. No more mangers. This would make certain people feel bad. Now just "seasons greetings" are allowed. Saying Happy Hanukkah would probably be tolerated in order to be more inclusive. . Read about this sad tale here:

    http://www.marinij.com/article/NO/20170824/NEWS/170829883

    Your local Catholic school is probably next in line for this "improvement".

    from a Trotsky letter to his wife, Natalia Sedova:

    “I shall die a proletarian revolutionist, a Marxist, a dialectical materialist, and, consequently, an irreconcilable atheist. My faith in the communist future of mankind is not less ardent, indeed it is firmer today, than it was in the days of my youth.”

    Read More
    • Agree: Grandpa Charlie
    • Replies: @Anon
    "...a proletarian revolutionist" in a country with 2% of proletariat (tsarist Russia). A make-belief revolution. The Marxist movement then was an atheist replay of the Anabaptist et al movements that have sprang a few centuries before the "Manifesto" in reaction to the Roman Catholic Church' massive indecencies and overall predatory nature.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  95. @Anonymous
    "... what Dr. Paul Gottfried has labeled quite correctly “cultural Marxism”..."

    Dr Gottfried can label it what he wants, but it's not Marxism of any kind, which is opposed to this kind of identity politics, as is easily demonstrated by the comment sections of socialist websites, the conflicts raging between old-school leftists and trans activists who are attempting to demonize/purge them. Funnily enough, the author admits himself that the East European communists he met did not share any wish for same-sex marriage, sexual liberation. There's the clue, and our intrepid writer explains it away as 'stodgy'.

    That depends on the lens through which you view Marxism to begin with. That is, whether or not you believe that the stated goal of the doctrines are honest ones. Are they really trying to build a better world, a utopia, or are they just using that lie to recruit useful idiots to further their actual goals of redistributing power to themselves?

    If Marxism and its derivatives are indeed strategy masquerading as a legitimate ideology with the intention of weaponizing the masses for the ultimate benefit of a select few, then Marxism and all of it’s derivatives are indeed related as they all share this core aspect in common with each other, and every other aspect to which one would point to say “see, they are different because of this!” is quite irrelevant as those differences are all completely superficial. Only the true, but (thinly) veiled goal of the transference of power from the existing structure to the invading one, by means of the manipulating and warping the masses into a weapon with which to take it, remains the same.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    Early Marxism was designed as a secular RELIGION specifically to supplant Christianity.

    The wealth-"sharing" aspect is important in practice but secondary to the religious cult aspect of the movement.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  96. Wally says:
    @Wizard of Oz
    You provide the stuff of satire. It may be true that there are still worshippers of Stalin amongst the small number of avowed Marxists in the "West" which somehow you confusingly distinguish from "Europeans" (how so?). But they are surely a small loony fringe with little influence on anyone of any importance. And how can you justify your hysterical "It invariably [sic] leads to pits of human flesh". I won't bother to ask for boring scholastic detail of the doctrines and beliefs of those most bloodthirsty Communist dictators you name** because what you are doing is to utter a warning based on an implied prophecy.

    Your prophecy means you think you see and belueve in a wideranging murderous outcome of this Marxism thinking and preaching in the "West"that you identify. Please attempt an elaboration of such a scenario to give some credibility to this idea.

    Of course I recognise the attraction of an exclusive minority cult lije yours which has nothing like the number of vulgar ignoramuses dancing on pinheads of the wrong size as e.g. Christian pro-lifers who appear to believe that everything [else]important to the USA should give way to putting embryo destroyers in gaol.

    **If you were so inclined I might ask for a comparison with the bloodthirstiest Crusaders who these days are seen as giving a bad name to Christianity, almost up with the barbarity of the Hebrew God in his early days....

    said:
    “If you were so inclined I might ask for a comparison with the bloodthirstiest Crusaders who these days are seen as giving a bad name to Christianity, almost up with the barbarity of the Hebrew God in his early days….”

    Except The Crusades would not have occurred if the Muslims had not invaded the Christian Holy Land.
    Oops.

    The Crusaders were righteous in attacking the invaders of the Christian Holy Land.

    Cave men Muslims and The Left think that using the words ‘crusaders / crusades’ will score points.
    It does not. The Crusades were the right thing to do.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
    You are changing the subject which had nothing to do with the rightness of the cause.

    It could be an interesting subject to debate i.e. who - or what system of government - was the appropriate ruler of the Holy Places of Palestine at any given era. But the really interesting exercise would be achieving consensus on the criteria for judgment. If God cared he might have told Mahomet to fall into line as a Christian or Jew....
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  97. Martinez, who is a senior philosophy major(!),

    Is he taking his minor in McDonald’s or Starbucks?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  98. @woodNfish
    Your ignorance of protestants and their Christian faith is truly amazing. You obviously know nothing about them, and I have no intention of enlightening you. Please continue digging your hole.

    Translation: “You’re wrong, but I can’t be bothered to tell you why!”
    He’s got a lot of digging to do before his proverbial hole is anywhere near as deep as yours already is.

    Read More
    • Replies: @woodNfish
    Yeah, says you. Go fuck yourself.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  99. Anon • Disclaimer says:
    @Malla
    Corporate Capitalism and Communism are both allies. The enemies of these Marxists enemies are the decent, intelligent, civilized members of society mostly the middle classes whom they hate, not super rich bankers. Just look at what happened Venezuela and even up to a lesser extent in Brazil. Chavez looted the middle classes and channeled some of the money to buy out the underclasses and thugs but the vast majority of the wealth ended up with the elites, Chavez too was a member of the so called elites.
    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3640941/Super-rich-quaff-champagne-Venezuela-country-club-middle-classes-scavenge-food-rubbish-dumps-DOGS-starving.html
    The controlled whole world media projected Chavez as the man of the people fighting evil uncle Sam. Now the middle classes are destitute and the super elites enjoy their lives. Venezuela was just an experiment for the world.
    The elites use the bottom classes to terrorize the Middle classes. The whole race fiasco in South Africa was more Globalists using it's Marxists branch using blacks Marxist leaders using the black masses to overturn the Apartheid Regime. They were supported by world media controlled by leftists who in turn are controlled by the globalist elites.
    Before WW2 they had hoped to use the White working classes of the west to get their revolution but since the White working class of the West had become to prosperous and were too independent in nature, they realised the White working class will not work as the vehicle for revolution. Hence the non Whites especially blacks and even LGBTs to be used as vehicles of revolution. Blacks on average have low IQ, have massive jealousy and hatred for Whites (naturally which is augmented by education, general black culture and the media), are impulsive, greedy for handouts, love playing the victim card, the vast majority of them will always remain an underclass etc... They could not have asked for a better tribe of people. LGBTs on average naturally love deviant things. Weapons for the leftist arm of the globalists. That is what they are.

    Yup. It’s a pity the 0.01 per cent and their smart servants and class-hoppers couldn’t see their way to looking after the 30 per cent if they couldn’t find a way as in Canada, Australia, Scandinavia etc to keep nearly everyone crawling up the material ladder with innovation and productivity.

    We could argue whether those of the Marxist or merely Christian left who have continued with the 200 year old theme of spreading growing wealth more equally by finding the happiness deficient of all kinds to share good things created by others can muster good factual arguments for their preferences. But I commend some diversion of their thoughts and feelings to the increasingly dysgenic breeding of whites for 150 years and to whether the great gene pool of “whites” has ever been worth celebrating as if it were more than a contingent and impermanent feature of man’s history.

    I was particularly struck by the incongruity of what is said or apparently assumed about whites when watchinf some docis about the two world wars. The treatment of black servicemen during and after both, not least by other servicemen, served as a reminder that at least 70 per cent of the product of any human gene pool only escape being scum occasionally and temporarily. (Abhor excessive certainties. Where would one place one’s Viking ancestors who gave their lives in valiant defence of the communities they had established after despoliating minasteries and killing the monks barbarously then raping all the local women? Was the Holocaust carried out by whites? )

    Read More
    • Replies: @Malla
    There are standards of scum too. The White scum is in many ways better than the scum you get in the brown black world, I know, I live in the brown world and have seen White scum up close. The only reason in some ways the brown scum here is better than the White scum is because we have not gone through the level of cultural destruction/ social engineering that White societies have gone through in the last century. Traditional culture maintains social order among the scum, of course there are aspects of traditional culture which are crappy too and need to be hacked off. Such as Sati among us Hindus or stone pelting of couples under Islamic Sharia law. The collapse of traditional culture in the West has decimated the White as well as black scum of the West.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  100. @biz
    Since you have certainly done that in-depth analysis, tell me this: how many times are Christians or Christianity mentioned in the Talmud?

    I like it even if his literate nephew Malla has tried party pooping to some effect :-)

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  101. @Anon
    No you couldn't though it would make an excellent count against the city of Venice.
    Possibly also against the more or less freelance system that set the crusading army looking for funds, and also against the Greek "system" of succession, if it can even be called a system, which regularly left princes with a deep grudge against their close relatives on the throne.

    I think I might generaluse that the Creator got bored while still fine tuning hominids and left them with not much more refinement than the use of language which was good for organising the massacre of mammoths but unfortunately soon adapted to the handling if intertribal relations.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  102. yeah says:
    @Anonymous
    "... what Dr. Paul Gottfried has labeled quite correctly “cultural Marxism”..."

    Dr Gottfried can label it what he wants, but it's not Marxism of any kind, which is opposed to this kind of identity politics, as is easily demonstrated by the comment sections of socialist websites, the conflicts raging between old-school leftists and trans activists who are attempting to demonize/purge them. Funnily enough, the author admits himself that the East European communists he met did not share any wish for same-sex marriage, sexual liberation. There's the clue, and our intrepid writer explains it away as 'stodgy'.

    There is nothing “Marxist” about SJW’s, their identity politics, or their gender agenda. Anyone who believes otherwise needs to read up at least a little bit what Marx wrote and what the policies were in USSR. ‘Scholars’ like Dr. Gottfried, like plenty of Ph.D.’s, alas, need to revisit their educational experience starting from kindergarten. As for the author: what can I say, I am a polite person.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  103. Eagle Eye says:
    @Seamus Padraig
    I, too, believed in Global Warming (or whatever you want to call it) for a long time, about 25 years. But so many years on, I can't help but wonder why we still haven't lost a single Pacific atoll--never mind Holland or Bengladesh. I mean, if all this Arctic ice is really melting at once, then the newly liquified water would have to go somewhere, right?

    It's interesting that you mentioned China, which is now officially the world's largest carbon-polluter (though not, of course, per capita). If GW really were the danger they make it out to be, then getting the Chinese, not us, to scale back would be the GWers number one priority. Of course, they usually retort that it's fair to intentionally disadvantage the Western countries in GW treaties (such as the Paris Accord) because China is still developing and their per capita pollution is lower. But hey--icebergs don't really give a damn as to whether they're melting because of American pollution or Chinese pollution; icebergs melt because of total carbon emissions, not average of per capita emissions. Which raises the question: are these GW treaties really about the climate at all? Or about something else: perhaps accelerating our de-industrialization, or establishing a one-word state.

    I also used to find high finance's support for GW initiatives puzzling until they rolled out the 'cap and trade' plan. Then I saw a clear cui bono for the banksters right away. Cap and trade is yet another way for them to profit off of our misery.

    Now look, all of this may well be just a coincidence--what do I know? I am not a scientist, and am not even expert enough to evaluate the credentials of the pro-GW scientists relative to the anti-GW or GW-neutral scientists. In fact, I don't take a strong position on the issue at all, precisely for that reason. I don't know who or what to believe anymore. All I do know is that the system lies to us about everything else imaginable, so why should I advance them credit on an issue like this, with such profound and far-reaching consequences for our political economy?

    Which raises the question: are these GW treaties really about the climate at all? Or about something else: perhaps accelerating our de-industrialization, or establishing a one-word state.

    In Tom Clancy’s “Rainbox Six,” a narrow elite works to engineer a virus strain that is certain to kill anyone not previously inoculated while retaining its virulence.

    The aim of the “elite” perpetrators – many cynical eco-extremists – is to re-create a world of pristine natural beauty, far from the madding crowd who will have succumbed to the infection.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  104. Eagle Eye says:
    @Malla

    Your local Catholic school is probably next in line for this “improvement”.
     
    Check out Mr. E. Micheal Jones on Youtube on how this all began in the Catholic Church. Very interesting.

    One more sad (and crazy) tale

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jkfRkR1Pqag

    Lesbian bishop of a Swedish church removes crosses and marks the direction to Mecca to make surly racist Muslim infiltrators into Sweden feel welcome !!! You really can't make this stuff up.

    As far as the truth about Yule, Christmas, hanuka, kwanza, this video is a must watch. All of them are rip offs of Yule and Christmas.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VUDT1L2Iy9I

    Lesbian bishop of a Swedish church removes crosses

    Her obvious addiction to virile and undiscerning Muslim men and hatred of native Swede men suggests she is lesbian only faute de mieux and would be only too happy to grant her favors to a few dozen “new Swedes.”

    Read More
    • Replies: @Malla
    I do not think that the real Swedish men will mind that very much. She is not very high on the totem pole of physical attractiveness even in a place like Saudi Arabia, let alone Sweden, a nation known for the physical attractiveness of their people.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  105. @schrub
    Several commenters here seem to think that what is going on is the rise "cultural Marxism".

    It isn't. What is going on is the rise of of "cultural Trotskyism". There is a profound difference between the two movements. Marxism, a least in Russia, was mostly a Jewish controlled movement up until the purges starting in 1936. On the other hand Trotskyism was (and is) an ENTIRELY Jewish controlled movement to this day with a much more ambitious, world wide agenda which continues.

    Everyone from William Kristol to Diane Feinstein and Michael Bloomberg could be labeled as "cultural Trotskites". Trotskyism was in fact what the very influential Rabbi Stephen Wise was describing many years ago when he declared "Some call it communism, I call it Judaism".

    English Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn might describe himself as a "mild" Marxist. He would definitely NOT describe himself as a any sort of Trotskyite and neither would have the late Hugo Chavez of Venezuela.

    This is because Marxism is mostly an economic philosophy. Trotskyism is much more of a cultural movement with an economic facade to fool the yokels and has far more profound and dangerous implications.

    Our war mongering Neocons were/are Trotskyites, not Marxists. They certainly knew the differences between the two philosophies. People here should also learn them too.

    And, by the way, what is the present day handmaiden of "cultural Trotskyism"? None other than Tikkun Olam.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tikkun_olam

    The cultural tide that has taken over universities has started to seep into high schools as well.

    Just recently, in very toney Marin County California, San Domenico School , a very expensive private school with Dominican Order Catholic roots, decided to remove almost all of the christian symbols from its campus.

    Who pushed for this change? Jewish parents who had allied themselves with naive, left wing shabbos goy gentile parents. These two groups simply took over the boards of director of the school and then decided to make it more "inclusive". The gentile women board members of this ilk are easily identified by their hyphenated last names.

    The timid (or more possibly afraid) Catholic parents at San Domenico simply stood by and allowed them to do this.

    This is what happens when you allow Jews (along with their amazingly, ample sources of donations) to attend christian schools. They quickly work to undermine them and secularize them. The Jesuit University of San Francisco learned this lesson much to their dismay years ago, as did DePaul University in Illinois.

    No more "Merry Christmas" greetings at San Domenico. No more mangers. This would make certain people feel bad. Now just "seasons greetings" are allowed. Saying Happy Hanukkah would probably be tolerated in order to be more inclusive. . Read about this sad tale here:

    http://www.marinij.com/article/NO/20170824/NEWS/170829883

    Your local Catholic school is probably next in line for this "improvement".

    “Why do you want to disappear the world of “Leave It To Beaver”? What was wrong with the life lived by those people? They lived in nice homes … wore clean, un-patched clothes … ” == ThreeCranes

    What is wrong with clean patched clothes? ThreeCranes’ “Normal White American” must be a boomer, as must ThreeCranes also, whereas I was born before the War. during the Great Depression. Anyone who would automatically associate the standard for clean with unpatched — and thus patched with dirty — is obviously a spoiled boomer and a snobbish consumerist. Bah!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  106. @Wally
    said:
    "If you were so inclined I might ask for a comparison with the bloodthirstiest Crusaders who these days are seen as giving a bad name to Christianity, almost up with the barbarity of the Hebrew God in his early days…."

    Except The Crusades would not have occurred if the Muslims had not invaded the Christian Holy Land.
    Oops.

    The Crusaders were righteous in attacking the invaders of the Christian Holy Land.

    Cave men Muslims and The Left think that using the words 'crusaders / crusades' will score points.
    It does not. The Crusades were the right thing to do.

    You are changing the subject which had nothing to do with the rightness of the cause.

    It could be an interesting subject to debate i.e. who – or what system of government – was the appropriate ruler of the Holy Places of Palestine at any given era. But the really interesting exercise would be achieving consensus on the criteria for judgment. If God cared he might have told Mahomet to fall into line as a Christian or Jew….

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wally
    No, I didn't change the subject.

    You said "the bloodthirstiest Crusaders".
    Please review your post.

    I'm telling you that it was not a 'thirst for blood' which was the motive for the Crusaders.

    Regards.

    www.codoh.com
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  107. denise says:

    Whats wrong with unclean patched clothes. There are plenty of homeless, veterans included, with unclean clothes an no decent work to go to. Six hundred people for a McDonald’s job. My mom went to work in the jewelry factory during tough times in the 70′s, when those industries still existed and they hired white people. There is not much demand for workers in this type of global economy especially with all the off shoring of jobs that corps like the Millennium Challenge Corp, does.

    https://www.mcc.gov/about/org-unit/board-of-directors

    “The MCC Board of Directors is comprised of the Secretary of State, the Secretary of the Treasury, the U.S. Trade Representative, the Administrator of USAID, the CEO of MCC and four private sector members appointed by the President of the United States with the advice and consent of the U.S. Senate. (jane claire)
    The Secretary of State serves as the Chair of the Board and the Secretary of the Treasury serves as the Vice Chair.”
    Hillary once did this job and Timmy Geitner was in the Treasury while Obammi was el Presidente.
    The MCC was a joint US and United Nations agreement during the joint presidency of Bill and Hillary Rodham Clinton. She also headed up the task force to overhaul the nations healthcare that was shit on by too white many white people in America. Oh how they cried when climatologist Al Gore didn’t take Bills place and Bush promised a tax cut and delivered. Then they cried over who got the biggest break when Congress was controlled by the Democrats and made the decision.
    Ripped jeans, now we wear them as a fashion no patches needed.

    I don’t want to confuse the fact that Bush put it in place because the agreement was already done.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  108. Eagle Eye says:
    @Backwoods Bob
    Less in STEM maybe but I worked with engineers and scientists too that adopted all the right language, did all the right grant research, etc. Even one who rode his bike every day to school in extreme cold, and wanted everyone else in the world to be made to do it too.

    In doing so, they allowed Orwellian double-speak right into their labs. "Sustainable" had a concrete definition in my field, like maximum sustained yield in forestry and fishing. But it is being co-opted.

    "Sustainable" in Cultural Marxism is a label that means private property and markets are bad, while government is good.

    The field of Economics is so wrecked now that they teach the Tragedy of the Commons exactly backwards. The history is that common property is the best way to ensure resource collapse in systems beyond family units. Nobody has an incentive to conserve and husband the resource.

    So they teach that the government must manage production because when people are left to their own devices, all the fish are caught including the breeding stock, and forests are clear cut without replanting.

    Yet, that is the result of common property, not private property. A fish farm or private timber holding is managed for maximum sustained yield.

    I was brought up on sexual harassment charges for the following: I had a prof who sent out surveys asking people how much they claimed it was worth to them to stop logging and save the spotted owls. She had some absurd "psychic" value on the Spotted Owls.

    So I asked why she wasn't allowing the negative values - most everyone around there would love to pay a bounty on them. And historically that is far more accurate, with bounties on predators and so forth.

    She was so angry at being exposed for the bias that she filed sexual harassment charges because, being more than 20 years younger than me, I had called her "young lady" once exactly as the old profs had called me "young man" when I had arrived.

    That was the entire basis of the complaint but I had to prepare for a sanctioning meeting with the Dean, with the bust of Lenin, who gleefully sent it up in her favor, requiring a hearing with the Vice Chancellor.

    By that time I had gotten enough of the old-timers to write affadavits they had called me "young man" and the management prof was still teaching so they had a hard time with selective prosecution.

    Yet, they claimed sexual harassment is in the eye of the alleged victim, that if I hold a door for her or walk in front of, behind, or next to - whichever one she chooses is harassment, it is all up to her. I am not allowed to know beforehand. I find out in a sexual harassment action that could potentially have me fired.

    You don't have courts and juries in acadamia. There is theater of such, without the doctrine of common law or stare decisis. My best prof in game management was turned down for tenure because he wasn't "collegial" enough, despite his teaching and publishing record being superb.

    The quality of the classroom, the rigor, fell in direct proportion to the marxist infection. You step out of the world of science and reason - and into the world of doublespeak and arbitrary authority.

    Marxism is idiotic on the face of it. The first few paragraphs of Marx and Engel's Manifesto about all previous history is a religious statement, not even remotely resembling history.

    I made my freshman students read it, and what impressed me was how incapable of thinking they were. Okay kids, you say it sounds great in theory. Let's talk about abolishing the family. Your family.

    Oh, well maybe not that part. Alright kids, then what about you not being able to own property? Oh, well maybe not that part either. Alright kids, what about holding the women in common? How do you little feminists feel about being the common property of men? Oh, well maybe not that part either. Etc.

    How can they read this tripe and say that it "sounds good in theory"? It sounds incoherent, tyrannical, and stupid, at face value.

    The reason "Marxism" can drift from an alleged class struggle to a race struggle to a gender struggle or what have you is that Marxism is a divide-and-conquer strategy where people are merely objects to attain ends.

    You're a fool if you try to make sense out of the particulars with the Marxist in front of you. It's Saul Alinsky's Rules for Radicals which is an instruction manual for psychopaths to use and abuse people as objects. It is all about manipulation and control, and in the end they'll slit your throat to get what they want.

    The quality of the classroom, the rigor, fell in direct proportion to the marxist infection.

    That’s a key feature beloved of pseudo-academic imposters, not a bug.

    In Maoist terminology, why bother becoming a real “expert” if all you really need is “red” attitude (aka “virtue signaling,” better called “virtue sniveling”)?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  109. @Wally
    "So little of it"?

    Where you been? Open your eyes.

    Try reading the piece under discussion here.

    and:
    Nearly 1 In 5 Millennials Consider Joseph Stalin And Kim Jong Un ‘Heroes’
    http://dailycaller.com/2017/11/02/nearly-1-in-5-millennials-consider-joseph-stalin-and-kim-jong-un-heroes/

    Thank you for reminding me to read the article fully. However, you seem to have failed to notice that I was replying to a nominated commentator’s particular broad generalisation. Perhaps you too exaggerate the importance of what is immediately before your eyes and ears from time to time. If you care to read my #94 account of school children’s (to us) extraordinary ignorance you might place less weight on your linked material from which no reliable conclusion can be reached. (What was the question? What was the context?). I doubt if many American students know anything much about Stalin etc and anyway it is a far cry from many thinking the leader of the USSR in the world war was heroic to believing that more than 1 per cent of university educated Americans could even give you a coherent account of Marxist teachings, let alone Marx’s teachings, on anything. I wonder if you know that much of “Capital” is satire. I learned that from Francis Wheen’s highly readable biography of Marx in which he quotes the splendid satirical sally about criminals creating empkoyment for policemen and judges!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  110. @Wizard of Oz
    What is it that you have recognised?

    If "Westerners" have not exercised intelligence and recognised the dangerous Marxism in their nations might it be because there is so little of it, so few people expressing an allegiance to Marxist ideas, and so much recognition of the failures of Marxists to run or govern anything effective?

    How much unity can you describe in eother the doctrines or organisation or policy aims of these Western Marxists?

    People like you who think “there is little of it” is the ignorant Westerners I’m talking about.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  111. @MBlanc46
    Many blacks also favor separation. Perhaps it’s an idea whose time has finally come.

    True, but white liberals would never allow it.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  112. joef says:
    @anarchyst
    I have come to the conclusion that passing the so-called "civil-rights" acts were mistakes. The more "rights" these black bastards demand, the more they complain and make demands not available to whites. When whites become a "minority" in our own country, do you think the "civil-rights" acts will benefit us? I think not...

    When whites become a minority, this country is finished. All one has to do is look at Zimbabwe, South Africa, and other black-run "basket cases". This is our future...

    That being said...

    The term "racism" was invented by communists, and is used to destroy cultures and defuse (and render impotent) those with differing points-of-view on "racial" issues.

    True "racism" is desirable as it merely cements cultural and social bonds that are necessary for a society to function and flourish.

    True "racism" merely denotes commonality of purpose and advancement within each respective racial group.

    Blacks have the NAACP and Congressional Black Caucus, Hispanics have La Raza and Mecha, Jews have the $PLC, ACLU and ADL. These are all "racist" organizations that serve to promote the interests (and political power) of their respective races.

    It is only whites who are castigated and threatened for attempting to show any signs of racial solidarity.

    Let's look at what us "evil, privileged" whites have done for Western society and the world:

    1. "Civil-rights (for some)" laws (that effectively destroy "freedom of association" for whites, but not for other races) and do not apply to whites--only "people of color" are covered by these so-called "civil-rights (for some)" protections.

    2. "Affirmative action" policies (that push better qualified whites out of positions and jobs that they would ordinarily qualify for) in favor of lesser-qualified minorities. In fact, "affirmative action" policies actually damage those minorities who are quite capable of "making it on their own" because they get "lumped in" with the groups that cannot make it on their own without "help",

    3. "Contract set-asides" (that are specifically targeted for minorities (that white people are prohibited from bidding on) and immigration policies (that specifically exclude whites, most of who have skills that would benefit the USA) in favor of those from the third-world (with no marketable skills).

    4. Scholarships that specify particular ethnic groups are looked upon favorably by most people, save one--scholarships that are intended for whites only are looked upon as being "racist", and therefore impermissible and improper in today's racially-charged climate of "political correctness".

    NO OTHER RACE (BUT WHITES) HAS (EVER) BENT OVER BACKWARDS to assure that all non-white races receive a "fair shake" in being a part of American life, even to the detriment and social well-being of "our own kind" (whites).

    Whites possess an externalized altruism that no other races possesses. This externalized altruism that "looks out for the other guy" will be the demise of the white race. This altruism needs to be internalized and focused inward, just as other races have done. There is NO SHAME in looking out for one's own kind.

    "Multiculturalism" and "diversity" are code-words for white genocide.

    I blame those of the "greatest generation" for selling out our birthright with the passage of the "Civil-Rights Acts" of 1957 and 1964, and the "Hart-Cellar immigration act of 1965". To those of the "greatest generation" (who are still alive) thanks for NOTHING...

    As whites comprise only 6% of the world population, it is us whites who should be the most protected and cherished of minorities...

    NO OTHER RACE (BUT WHITES) HAS (EVER) BENT OVER BACKWARDS to assure that all non-white races receive a “fair shake” in being a part of American life, even to the detriment and social well-being of “our own kind” (whites).

    I generally given up a peaceful resolution with afro americans, because it is clear most do not want one. They will always push for more capitulations to further unreasonable demands. They show no signs of stopping. It will stop only when they bankrupt the country, but that will bring its own set of severe problems. The worst are the traitorous whites, who ignore the Non Black victims of afro american violent crime, and will enable afros to the end. This includes leftist, limo liberals, and anarcho capitalist. At least you can claim that most afros are just a bunch of ignorant people following their immediate gratifications. But these whites are surely much more culpable in pushing this radical destructive afro agenda (eg BLM).

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  113. Malla says:
    @Intelligent Dasein

    Protestants are Christians, so explain to me why they want to eliminate themselves.
     
    Protestants are not Christians. If the individual Protestants are invincibly ignorant of the true origins of their cult and are acting in good faith, then at best you can say that Protestants are pagan peoples who have heard rumors of Christ and His Church and wish to pay them homage. But Protestant theology is not correct, and the faith of Protestants is not the faith taught by Christ or believed by His Apostles, or that which is maintained by His true Church.

    The fact that Protestantism is incipient SJWism hardly needs remarking upon. The progress from Protestantism to Puritanism to Deism to Rationalism to Marxist-Darwinian dialectics to Post-Modernism is inevitable and historically very well established. For whatever reason, these people actually do want to eliminate themselves. Not at the conscious level, no doubt, but the effect of the policies they adopt under the inspiration of their ideology does lead necessarily in that direction. This is what James Burnham meant when he called Liberalism "the ideology of Western suicide."

    Why only Protestantism? Maybe all of Christianity have some suicidal tendencies.

    http://www.revilo-oliver.com/news/2010/09/what-is-‘liberalism’/

    “Liberals” babble bout “One World,” which is to be a “universal democracy” and is “inevitable,” and they thus describe it in the very terms in which the notion was formulated, two thousand years ago, by Philo Judaeus, when he cleverly gave a Stoic coloring to the old Jewish dream of a globe in which all the lower races would obey the masters whom Yahweh, by covenant, appointed to rule over them. And the “Liberal” cults, having rejected the Christian doctrine of “original sin,” which, although based on a silly myth about Adam and Eve, corresponded fairly well to the facts of human nature, have even reverted to the most pernicious aspect of Christianity, which common sense had held in check in Europe until the Eighteenth Century; and they openly exhibit the morbid Christian fascination with whatever is lowly, proletarian, inferior, irrational, debased, deformed, and degenerate. This maudlin preoccupation with biological refuse, usually sicklied over with such nonsense words as ‘underprivileged [!],’ would make sense, if it had been decreed by a god who perversely chose to become incarnate among the most pestiferous of human races and to select his disciples from among the illiterate dregs of even that peuplade, but since the “Liberals” claim to have rejected belief in such a divinity, their superstition is exposed as having no basis other than their own resentment of their betters and their professional interest in exploiting the gullibility of their compatriots.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  114. anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    The genesis of all this took place in the 30s when so many European intellectuals fled to the United Staes, their heads filled with “The Big Three” (Nietzsche, Hegel and Schopenhauer) in addition to Marx, Sartre, Saussure etc. etc. Intellectually and emotionally scarred by the effects of The Great War, they would come to dominate the faculties of the Ivies and other elite universities and colleges. They and their immediate intellectual offspring would cast a spell over the Boomers who entered those schools in the early and mid-60s–a spell which has never been broken. And we’ve been paying for it ever since.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Alden
    You mean Jewish communist intellectuals.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  115. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @Backwoods Bob
    Thank you prof. Yankah.

    I was a department head at our state's university and this is all true, but it is even worse.

    One thing I did regularly as a department head was distribute literature on grant programs, from foundations and think tanks, along with student internships and scholarships.

    I saw the whole global warming hoax rise, then bob and weave into climate change. The grantor told you what to write about, what to major in, and it was in conjunction with a whole spider web of other grantor machinations. The money powers can not only do endowed chairs but they are the big players in legislatures and governorships - hence state budgets to higher education.

    If you are a free market capitalist, it is a tough go. I was in a business program, and the dean had a bust of Lenin in his office.

    It's a lot better in the private sector. That fixes it for me. But not for the rest of society. Since I left, the snowflake generation has arrived, screaming at the sky and wearing pussy hats.

    “Thank you prof. Yankah.”

    Let’s dig a bit deeper here. Yankah is the dolt who wrote the anti-white piece that the author Cathey uses as a stepping stone into his discussion on wider problems.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    Ekow Yankah is a Ghanaian born and raised in the U.S. who has found a comfortable niche impersonating the fantasies of Leftist white academics. His children's mother appears to be white.

    His given name Ekow is a "day name" (look it up) meaning "Thursday."

    You could say Ekow serves as his colleagues' ethnically "authentic" MAN THURSDAY.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  116. woodNfish says:
    @RealAmericanValuesCirca1776Not1965
    Translation: "You're wrong, but I can't be bothered to tell you why!"
    He's got a lot of digging to do before his proverbial hole is anywhere near as deep as yours already is.

    Yeah, says you. Go fuck yourself.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  117. @Wally
    Is your so called "anti-Semitism" bad?

    If so, why?


    www.codoh.ccom

    You obviously didn’t get the joke, a twist on an old familiar saw.

    My own “anti-Semitism” is focused on the great majority of Semites, who, strangely enough, have quite a fan club on this forum.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wally
    Yeah, I missed it. Sorry.
    Just had a tooth extracted, bad excuse, but true. Ouch.

    The semites here don't do so well, however. Free speech is their worst enemy.
    But then there is unz.com's Steve Sailer, who often does a shabbos goy routine.
    C'est la vie, you take what you can get.

    Cheers.

    www.codoh.com

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  118. @Grandpa Charlie

    “Why do you want to disappear the world of “Leave It To Beaver”? What was wrong with the life lived by those people? They lived in nice homes ... wore clean, un-patched clothes ... " == ThreeCranes
     
    What is wrong with clean patched clothes? ThreeCranes' "Normal White American" must be a boomer, as must ThreeCranes also, whereas I was born before the War. during the Great Depression. Anyone who would automatically associate the standard for clean with unpatched -- and thus patched with dirty -- is obviously a spoiled boomer and a snobbish consumerist. Bah!

    Sorry to disappoint you Gramps but I’m not who you think I am.

    I started every year in grade school with two new pair of pants. By the end of the year they had patches on the patches. I don’t automatically associate patches with dirt or anything else except work clothes vs. going out to eat or going to a social function clothes.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Grandpa Charlie

    " I don’t automatically associate patches with dirt or anything else except work clothes vs. going out to eat or going to a social function clothes."-- ThreeCranes
     
    Glad to hear that. I got the wrong idea from your comment that kids "in the world of “Leave It To Beaver” ... "wore clean, unpatched clothes." I forgot that the "Leave it to Beaver" show had a pretty big budget and could afford all the new clothes you could want. I'm pretty sure that the show was a fairly accurate if somewhat idealized portrayal of the world in which many boomers grew up in 1950s suburbs.

    Like you, ThreeCranes, I don't get why anyone would diss the world of "Leave it to Beaver" ... unless it would be out of envy. After all, if you didn't or don't like the show, you didn't have to watch it and you don't have to watch the reruns. Myself, I love reruns or arvhives of the Andy Griffith Show (Mayberry RFD). I'm not sure but it might be that Opie sometimes wore patched jeans. That's the kind of thing that Aunt Bee might do, seeing as Mayberry surely could not afford to pay the sheriff much at all.

    BTW: Jim Nabors recently passed away, 30 November 2017 at 87 years of age.

    Thanks for your response to my comment.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  119. Wally says:
    @Reg Cæsar
    You obviously didn't get the joke, a twist on an old familiar saw.

    My own "anti-Semitism" is focused on the great majority of Semites, who, strangely enough, have quite a fan club on this forum.

    Yeah, I missed it. Sorry.
    Just had a tooth extracted, bad excuse, but true. Ouch.

    The semites here don’t do so well, however. Free speech is their worst enemy.
    But then there is unz.com’s Steve Sailer, who often does a shabbos goy routine.
    C’est la vie, you take what you can get.

    Cheers.

    http://www.codoh.com

    Read More
    • Replies: @Grandpa Charlie
    Wally,

    Steve Sailor does a shabbos goy routine?
    , @Intelligent Dasein

    But then there is unz.com’s Steve Sailer, who often does a shabbos goy routine.
     
    Actually, Steve has been coming down pretty hard on the Jews lately. It even lost him one long-time commenter and contributer, Lot.
    , @Reg Cæsar

    Just had a tooth extracted, bad excuse, but true. Ouch.
     
    I just had three. Then I ate a Corn Nuts competitor. Triple ouch.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  120. Wally says:
    @Wizard of Oz
    You are changing the subject which had nothing to do with the rightness of the cause.

    It could be an interesting subject to debate i.e. who - or what system of government - was the appropriate ruler of the Holy Places of Palestine at any given era. But the really interesting exercise would be achieving consensus on the criteria for judgment. If God cared he might have told Mahomet to fall into line as a Christian or Jew....

    No, I didn’t change the subject.

    You said “the bloodthirstiest Crusaders”.
    Please review your post.

    I’m telling you that it was not a ‘thirst for blood’ which was the motive for the Crusaders.

    Regards.

    http://www.codoh.com

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  121. @woodNfish
    Yes, it is just as nationalism is an extension of tribalism. But these neoMarxists use racist to demonize their opponents. Obviously, there is no Mexican race, and no Central American or Latin American race.

    “Obviously, there is no Mexican race, and no Central American or Latin American race.” — woodNfish

    Except that when Mexicans use the term “La Raza” they generally do not mean the human race, they mean the mestizo race or the Mexican race, founded by the union of Cortez and Montezuma’s daughter.OTOH, I have never met a Mexican who objected when I said that I consider Mexicans to be white — except for the black Mexicans around Vera Cruz.

    Read More
    • Replies: @woodNfish
    Yes, but the leftists use it as a weapon and opportunity to label their enemies as racists even though it is nonsense, and the corrupt presstitute media goes along with it, and many americans are so stupid they think it is true.

    The only white Mexicans are of unmixed Spanish descent, and that makes up most of the ruling and upper class in Mexico which has a true class system. They are as white as anyone of European descent. This is true of all Central and South America whenever the European immigrants have mostly remained racially pure and it is the reason so many beautiful women come from places like Brazil and Argentina (94% white) like Gisele Bündchen and Luisana Lopilato.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  122. @Wally
    Yeah, I missed it. Sorry.
    Just had a tooth extracted, bad excuse, but true. Ouch.

    The semites here don't do so well, however. Free speech is their worst enemy.
    But then there is unz.com's Steve Sailer, who often does a shabbos goy routine.
    C'est la vie, you take what you can get.

    Cheers.

    www.codoh.com

    Wally,

    Steve Sailor does a shabbos goy routine?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  123. Malla says:
    @Eagle Eye

    Lesbian bishop of a Swedish church removes crosses
     
    Her obvious addiction to virile and undiscerning Muslim men and hatred of native Swede men suggests she is lesbian only faute de mieux and would be only too happy to grant her favors to a few dozen "new Swedes."

    I do not think that the real Swedish men will mind that very much. She is not very high on the totem pole of physical attractiveness even in a place like Saudi Arabia, let alone Sweden, a nation known for the physical attractiveness of their people.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  124. @Wally
    Yeah, I missed it. Sorry.
    Just had a tooth extracted, bad excuse, but true. Ouch.

    The semites here don't do so well, however. Free speech is their worst enemy.
    But then there is unz.com's Steve Sailer, who often does a shabbos goy routine.
    C'est la vie, you take what you can get.

    Cheers.

    www.codoh.com

    But then there is unz.com’s Steve Sailer, who often does a shabbos goy routine.

    Actually, Steve has been coming down pretty hard on the Jews lately. It even lost him one long-time commenter and contributer, Lot.

    Read More
    • Replies: @David
    Do you know that's why Lot stopped commenting?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  125. Dube says:
    @Wizard of Oz
    The notion of Cultural Marxism keeps slipping out of my grasp. A glance at RatiinalWiki suggests that there is little of the Frankfurt School nowadays in anything potent that might be so called. Indeed "cultural Marxist" may have started as a sneering description by real Marxist class warriors.

    American problems with sex until close to 1960 and even beyond seems to have a lot to do with American usage.

    “Indeed ‘cultural Marxist’ may have started as a sneering description by real Marxist class warriors.”

    Nah, rather, Frankfurt Marxist Herbert Marcuse conceded in his “One-Dimensional Man” that the workers had been co-opted, and that all of his contemporary culture had become “one-dimensional,”
    having lost the power to criticize, challenge, and transcend. That lead to the new strategy of attempting to overthrow the culture, rather than specifically the ownership class, which had turned its opposition laboring class into a pillar of support.

    That’s as I understand it.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
    Interesting and quite persuasive, except forthe "Nah":-)

    Oops! A whole lot more has disappeared. It was based on the motives chsnging from poverty and quasi feudal oppression to envy in a prosperous and quite educated society....

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  126. No, my use of “bloodthierst Crusaders” was actually making a distinction the commenter I criticised failed to make and one which you would agree with. Far from saying as you suggest that all Crusaders were bloodthirsty I allowed for a distinction which the commenter you have stepped in to support failed to when he extravagantly said of “Western Marxism” “it invariably leads to pits full of human flesh”. I didn’t make any such broad generalisation about Crusaders.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  127. @ThreeCranes
    Sorry to disappoint you Gramps but I'm not who you think I am.

    I started every year in grade school with two new pair of pants. By the end of the year they had patches on the patches. I don't automatically associate patches with dirt or anything else except work clothes vs. going out to eat or going to a social function clothes.

    ” I don’t automatically associate patches with dirt or anything else except work clothes vs. going out to eat or going to a social function clothes.”– ThreeCranes

    Glad to hear that. I got the wrong idea from your comment that kids “in the world of “Leave It To Beaver” … “wore clean, unpatched clothes.” I forgot that the “Leave it to Beaver” show had a pretty big budget and could afford all the new clothes you could want. I’m pretty sure that the show was a fairly accurate if somewhat idealized portrayal of the world in which many boomers grew up in 1950s suburbs.

    Like you, ThreeCranes, I don’t get why anyone would diss the world of “Leave it to Beaver” … unless it would be out of envy. After all, if you didn’t or don’t like the show, you didn’t have to watch it and you don’t have to watch the reruns. Myself, I love reruns or arvhives of the Andy Griffith Show (Mayberry RFD). I’m not sure but it might be that Opie sometimes wore patched jeans. That’s the kind of thing that Aunt Bee might do, seeing as Mayberry surely could not afford to pay the sheriff much at all.

    BTW: Jim Nabors recently passed away, 30 November 2017 at 87 years of age.

    Thanks for your response to my comment.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  128. @Joe Hide
    First... This educational insanity is rapidly becoming a non-problem. Online education is replacing sit on your butt in a lecture hall with 200 bored students being talked at by a boring lecturer, who by the way, usually isn't very good at communicating knowledge, which requires exponentially increasing tuition, fees, and hidden costs, financed through student loans that require no down payment, no collateral, and no likelihood of income upon graduation, made to the most vulnerable young people, which is one of the only forms of lending with impossibility of bankruptcy, which the psychopathic predatory lenders have bribed (lobbied) politicians to guarantee with taxpayer dollars.
    Second .. Cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin are providing funding to innovators, creators, and inventors which were hamstrung in financing their projects before by the dinosaur ... Mainstream Banking System (MBS).
    Third ... information through the internet is replacing mis-information, dis-information, and outright propaganda.
    Be patient, the future looks good for us productive, beneficial, hardworking truth seekers!

    Online education is NOT rapidly replacing sit-on-your-ass-and-be-indoctrinated-by-an-ass universities. Not yet. But I join you in welcoming the growth of online ed to the extent that it undermines the anti-white, anti-liberty, simply perverted physical universities that have been confusing and brainwashing our youth to hate their own people and culture and to turn away from normal sexuality and family life.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    "But I join you in welcoming the growth of online ed to the extent that it undermines the anti-white, anti-liberty, simply perverted physical universities that have been confusing and brainwashing our youth to hate their own people and culture and to turn away from normal sexuality and family life."

    Per usual, an overblown generalization regarding the nature and function of colleges today.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  129. Malla says:
    @Anon
    Yup. It's a pity the 0.01 per cent and their smart servants and class-hoppers couldn't see their way to looking after the 30 per cent if they couldn't find a way as in Canada, Australia, Scandinavia etc to keep nearly everyone crawling up the material ladder with innovation and productivity.

    We could argue whether those of the Marxist or merely Christian left who have continued with the 200 year old theme of spreading growing wealth more equally by finding the happiness deficient of all kinds to share good things created by others can muster good factual arguments for their preferences. But I commend some diversion of their thoughts and feelings to the increasingly dysgenic breeding of whites for 150 years and to whether the great gene pool of "whites" has ever been worth celebrating as if it were more than a contingent and impermanent feature of man's history.

    I was particularly struck by the incongruity of what is said or apparently assumed about whites when watchinf some docis about the two world wars. The treatment of black servicemen during and after both, not least by other servicemen, served as a reminder that at least 70 per cent of the product of any human gene pool only escape being scum occasionally and temporarily. (Abhor excessive certainties. Where would one place one's Viking ancestors who gave their lives in valiant defence of the communities they had established after despoliating minasteries and killing the monks barbarously then raping all the local women? Was the Holocaust carried out by whites? )

    There are standards of scum too. The White scum is in many ways better than the scum you get in the brown black world, I know, I live in the brown world and have seen White scum up close. The only reason in some ways the brown scum here is better than the White scum is because we have not gone through the level of cultural destruction/ social engineering that White societies have gone through in the last century. Traditional culture maintains social order among the scum, of course there are aspects of traditional culture which are crappy too and need to be hacked off. Such as Sati among us Hindus or stone pelting of couples under Islamic Sharia law. The collapse of traditional culture in the West has decimated the White as well as black scum of the West.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    See #143 for reply
    , @Alden
    Decimate means kill every tenth person in a specific group. I believe you mean destroyed.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  130. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @Anonymous
    "Thank you prof. Yankah."

    Let's dig a bit deeper here. Yankah is the dolt who wrote the anti-white piece that the author Cathey uses as a stepping stone into his discussion on wider problems.

    Ekow Yankah is a Ghanaian born and raised in the U.S. who has found a comfortable niche impersonating the fantasies of Leftist white academics. His children’s mother appears to be white.

    His given name Ekow is a “day name” (look it up) meaning “Thursday.”

    You could say Ekow serves as his colleagues’ ethnically “authentic” MAN THURSDAY.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  131. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @RealAmericanValuesCirca1776Not1965
    That depends on the lens through which you view Marxism to begin with. That is, whether or not you believe that the stated goal of the doctrines are honest ones. Are they really trying to build a better world, a utopia, or are they just using that lie to recruit useful idiots to further their actual goals of redistributing power to themselves?

    If Marxism and its derivatives are indeed strategy masquerading as a legitimate ideology with the intention of weaponizing the masses for the ultimate benefit of a select few, then Marxism and all of it's derivatives are indeed related as they all share this core aspect in common with each other, and every other aspect to which one would point to say "see, they are different because of this!" is quite irrelevant as those differences are all completely superficial. Only the true, but (thinly) veiled goal of the transference of power from the existing structure to the invading one, by means of the manipulating and warping the masses into a weapon with which to take it, remains the same.

    Early Marxism was designed as a secular RELIGION specifically to supplant Christianity.

    The wealth-”sharing” aspect is important in practice but secondary to the religious cult aspect of the movement.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  132. Anon • Disclaimer says:
    @Wally
    from a Trotsky letter to his wife, Natalia Sedova:

    "I shall die a proletarian revolutionist, a Marxist, a dialectical materialist, and, consequently, an irreconcilable atheist. My faith in the communist future of mankind is not less ardent, indeed it is firmer today, than it was in the days of my youth."
     

    “…a proletarian revolutionist” in a country with 2% of proletariat (tsarist Russia). A make-belief revolution. The Marxist movement then was an atheist replay of the Anabaptist et al movements that have sprang a few centuries before the “Manifesto” in reaction to the Roman Catholic Church’ massive indecencies and overall predatory nature.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Alden
    Russia was never, never RC. It converted to the Byzantine Greek Orthodox version of Christianity.

    The Munster Anabaptists were revolting against the official established Lutheran version of Christianity in Westphalia. not the Roman Catholics. The Puritans, Plymouth Brotherhood and the rest of the lunatic wanna be Jews revolted against the Church of England.

    Guess you never heard of Mr. google.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  133. @Intelligent Dasein

    Protestants are Christians, so explain to me why they want to eliminate themselves.
     
    Protestants are not Christians. If the individual Protestants are invincibly ignorant of the true origins of their cult and are acting in good faith, then at best you can say that Protestants are pagan peoples who have heard rumors of Christ and His Church and wish to pay them homage. But Protestant theology is not correct, and the faith of Protestants is not the faith taught by Christ or believed by His Apostles, or that which is maintained by His true Church.

    The fact that Protestantism is incipient SJWism hardly needs remarking upon. The progress from Protestantism to Puritanism to Deism to Rationalism to Marxist-Darwinian dialectics to Post-Modernism is inevitable and historically very well established. For whatever reason, these people actually do want to eliminate themselves. Not at the conscious level, no doubt, but the effect of the policies they adopt under the inspiration of their ideology does lead necessarily in that direction. This is what James Burnham meant when he called Liberalism "the ideology of Western suicide."

    Lol. Have you read St Paul recently? I would say the intellectual diseases you highlight start in 1 Romans. The obscurantist dialectics, the veiled utopian promises, the conceptual machinery of radical dissolution of boundaries but with the clever get out clause that it was all just ‘spiritual’. Pauline religion and it’s transcendental lower middle class narcissism is the eternal home of sjw’s.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  134. CCZ says:

    “Serious” time for a hate crime. Can whites safely befriend blacks?

    Woman In Facebook Torture Case Banned From Social Media For 4Years
    December 8, 2017

    (CBS) — A woman who live-streamed herself and a trio of friends abusing a mentally disabled man and taunting him with racial insults was sentenced to probation Friday after spending nearly a year behind bars.

    Brittany Covington, 19, had been held at the Cook County Jail without bond since January, when she and co-defendants Tesfaye Cooper, Jordan Hill and her 24-year-old sister Tanishia Covington were arrested on kidnapping and hate-crime charges.

    The plea deal prosecutors made with Brittany Covington makes her the first of the four to be released, though she will remain on probation for four years and is barred from contact with Cooper and Hill, the Chicago Sun-Times is reporting.

    Other terms of the plea agreement bars Covington from using social media for four years, the Cook County State’s Attorney’s Office tells CBS 2.

    Brittany Covington narrated Facebook Live video of the others tormenting an 18-year-old white man in the apartment she shared with her sister.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  135. woodNfish says:
    @Grandpa Charlie

    "Obviously, there is no Mexican race, and no Central American or Latin American race." -- woodNfish
     
    Except that when Mexicans use the term "La Raza" they generally do not mean the human race, they mean the mestizo race or the Mexican race, founded by the union of Cortez and Montezuma's daughter.OTOH, I have never met a Mexican who objected when I said that I consider Mexicans to be white -- except for the black Mexicans around Vera Cruz.

    Yes, but the leftists use it as a weapon and opportunity to label their enemies as racists even though it is nonsense, and the corrupt presstitute media goes along with it, and many americans are so stupid they think it is true.

    The only white Mexicans are of unmixed Spanish descent, and that makes up most of the ruling and upper class in Mexico which has a true class system. They are as white as anyone of European descent. This is true of all Central and South America whenever the European immigrants have mostly remained racially pure and it is the reason so many beautiful women come from places like Brazil and Argentina (94% white) like Gisele Bündchen and Luisana Lopilato.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  136. There is no debate…The Alt Right opposes importing Nonwhite LEGAL IMMIGRANTS…and that’s all there is to it….

    I really don’t care if Martinez is pissed that we want to keep his racial kind out-off of OUR LIVING AND BREEDING SPACE…

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
    When push comes to shove only the better members of any race or class are worth anything and that certainly has been true of whites even if you might persuade me of times when they were generally superior. BUT who is doing the breeding now? I don't just mean to point to Europeans including Italians with total fertiilty of 1.4 and African immigrants with fertlity of 5. I refer to the whites who are outbreeding other whites and doing it significantly earlier. Are those heroic whites who lynched or burned black veterans in 1919 reliably replicated today as the kind of whites who made America great and can keep it that way?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  137. Fredtard says:
    @Wally
    Fredtard screams blasphemy !!

    Only the religious fanatic calls someone a 'denier".

    Real science doesn't hide it's data.
    Real science doesn't need to alter data.
    Real science produces 'models' which generate real, observable results.
    Real scientists don't get nailed in Climate Gate.
    Real science doesn't try to silence differences of opinion.
    Real scientists don't advocate the arrest of those that disagree with them.

    Now 400 Scientific Papers in 2017 Say ‘Global Warming’ Is a Myth
    http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/10/24/delingpole-now-400-scientific-papers-in-2017-say-global-warming-is-a-myth/

    Most Massive Scientific Fraud In Human History
    https://principia-scientific.org/most-massive-scientific-fraud-in-human-history/

    100% Of US 'Warming' Is Due To NOAA Data Tampering
    https://www.lewrockwell.com/2016/12/no_author/100-us-global-warming/

    I read the links you provided. Like the back of my own hand, not more than four years ago. I’ve made most if not all of those arguments, face-to-face, and they usually seemed to work on my listeners.

    But all the quasi-scientific and us-vs- them sowing-of-doubt arguments seem infantile to me now. The empirical data is piling up; warming is going exponential. All the feedbacks are in one direction.
    I suspect even if/when industrial civilization collapses, the cat’s out of the bag. It’s too far tipped to meaningfully halt, let alone reverse. It hinges on the phase of the currently-frozen methane in the arctic.

    Please look over this one recent (12/4/17) article describing weather measurements in Barrow, AK. The bar graph of daily high and low temp records, by decade back to the 1920′s, stuck out to me:

    https://www.wunderground.com/cat6/amazing-autumn-alaskas-north-slope-record-warmth-record-low-sea-ice-extent

    Now if we would have downsized and brought or military home in 1990, and taxed the crap out of fossil fuels at that time, and switched to all consumption-based instead of income-based taxation too, …who knows? Of course, none of those radical, disruptive changes will ever happen pre-emptively. Only when the SHTF, at which time only the uber-wealthy will have the resources to absorb and adapt to the dire circumstances. I hope you’re one of them.

    And, I hope I am wrong about the predicament (existential problem without a solution.) If I’m right, I’ll take it as one giant lesson in humility that we had coming.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  138. polaco says:
    @Anonymous
    "... what Dr. Paul Gottfried has labeled quite correctly “cultural Marxism”..."

    Dr Gottfried can label it what he wants, but it's not Marxism of any kind, which is opposed to this kind of identity politics, as is easily demonstrated by the comment sections of socialist websites, the conflicts raging between old-school leftists and trans activists who are attempting to demonize/purge them. Funnily enough, the author admits himself that the East European communists he met did not share any wish for same-sex marriage, sexual liberation. There's the clue, and our intrepid writer explains it away as 'stodgy'.

    There was a homosexual pride parade in St. Petersburg in 1917, most likely the first one in the world. Sexual promiscuity and all sorts of abnormal sexual behavior were heavily promoted in the early days of the USSR. But the communists quickly realized they had total control of the society, and all of that was just a waste of resources and unnecessary. There was no real need to undermine the social order since they already could do absolutely anything they wanted. The decided to save that for the West, about three quarters of the KGB’s budget were appropriated for ideological warfare and social engineering in target countries. In the waning days of the Union, birth control equaled abortion. In 1990 the average Soviet woman had had 13 abortions in her lifetime. In Poland the communist government didn’t really care about homosexuality, the press hardly ever touched the topic, and if it did it was described rather favorably. People viewed it with disgust for the most part, so the homosexuals knew to keep their personal affairs quiet. In the late eighties the police engaged in some personal data gathering on the gay community, I have no idea why, maybe it had to do with the communist fear of AIDS or maybe they were looking to legalize gay marriage. Abortion was totally legal for all practical purposes.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth

    In the waning days of the Union, birth control equaled abortion. In 1990 the average Soviet woman had had 13 abortions in her lifetime.
     
    This is quite difficult to believe. Do you have some sort of supporting evidence.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  139. @Dube
    "Indeed 'cultural Marxist' may have started as a sneering description by real Marxist class warriors."

    Nah, rather, Frankfurt Marxist Herbert Marcuse conceded in his "One-Dimensional Man" that the workers had been co-opted, and that all of his contemporary culture had become "one-dimensional,"
    having lost the power to criticize, challenge, and transcend. That lead to the new strategy of attempting to overthrow the culture, rather than specifically the ownership class, which had turned its opposition laboring class into a pillar of support.

    That's as I understand it.

    Interesting and quite persuasive, except forthe “Nah”:-)

    Oops! A whole lot more has disappeared. It was based on the motives chsnging from poverty and quasi feudal oppression to envy in a prosperous and quite educated society….

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  140. @War for Blair Mountain
    There is no debate...The Alt Right opposes importing Nonwhite LEGAL IMMIGRANTS...and that’s all there is to it....

    I really don’t care if Martinez is pissed that we want to keep his racial kind out-off of OUR LIVING AND BREEDING SPACE...

    When push comes to shove only the better members of any race or class are worth anything and that certainly has been true of whites even if you might persuade me of times when they were generally superior. BUT who is doing the breeding now? I don’t just mean to point to Europeans including Italians with total fertiilty of 1.4 and African immigrants with fertlity of 5. I refer to the whites who are outbreeding other whites and doing it significantly earlier. Are those heroic whites who lynched or burned black veterans in 1919 reliably replicated today as the kind of whites who made America great and can keep it that way?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Bayan
    Fertility in Africa may be 5. I doubt African or other immigrants have fertility of 5 where they migrate. I is just not fun to have five children in wealthy parts of the world.
    , @Alden
    Are you babbling about the Brownsville TX thing in 1919? You are just another naive, credulous moron who is brainwashed by liberal propaganda. Your brain is an empty sink. Every once in a while liberal propaganda central opens the tap, drains out the current propaganda, closes the tap and turns on the faucet and fills your empty brain with the latest propaganda.

    here is the truth about the Brownsville TX 1919 thing.

    The black regiment in the local army base broke into the armory, killed and locked up the White officers and marched into Brownsville intent on killing raping and looting the townspeople.

    The townspeople used their own hunting rifles and other private guns to fight off and defeat the regiment of black soldiers who attacked them with military weapons.

    END OF STORY

    Anything else is a lie that was poured into your empty vessel brain. Copy and paste some dip sh*t wikipedia article about the thing if you want. It's all lies you empty vessel brained moron.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  141. Anon • Disclaimer says:

    Perhaps we could take this further over a G & T on the balcony of the Pune Polo Club ;-)

    Read More
    • Replies: @Malla
    Cool. How do I contact you? What you in the Indian Army? The Polo club is in the NDA right?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  142. Corvinus says:
    @RadicalCenter
    Online education is NOT rapidly replacing sit-on-your-ass-and-be-indoctrinated-by-an-ass universities. Not yet. But I join you in welcoming the growth of online ed to the extent that it undermines the anti-white, anti-liberty, simply perverted physical universities that have been confusing and brainwashing our youth to hate their own people and culture and to turn away from normal sexuality and family life.

    “But I join you in welcoming the growth of online ed to the extent that it undermines the anti-white, anti-liberty, simply perverted physical universities that have been confusing and brainwashing our youth to hate their own people and culture and to turn away from normal sexuality and family life.”

    Per usual, an overblown generalization regarding the nature and function of colleges today.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Alden
    Colleges have changed from when you graduated in 1950.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  143. Truth says:
    @polaco
    There was a homosexual pride parade in St. Petersburg in 1917, most likely the first one in the world. Sexual promiscuity and all sorts of abnormal sexual behavior were heavily promoted in the early days of the USSR. But the communists quickly realized they had total control of the society, and all of that was just a waste of resources and unnecessary. There was no real need to undermine the social order since they already could do absolutely anything they wanted. The decided to save that for the West, about three quarters of the KGB's budget were appropriated for ideological warfare and social engineering in target countries. In the waning days of the Union, birth control equaled abortion. In 1990 the average Soviet woman had had 13 abortions in her lifetime. In Poland the communist government didn't really care about homosexuality, the press hardly ever touched the topic, and if it did it was described rather favorably. People viewed it with disgust for the most part, so the homosexuals knew to keep their personal affairs quiet. In the late eighties the police engaged in some personal data gathering on the gay community, I have no idea why, maybe it had to do with the communist fear of AIDS or maybe they were looking to legalize gay marriage. Abortion was totally legal for all practical purposes.

    In the waning days of the Union, birth control equaled abortion. In 1990 the average Soviet woman had had 13 abortions in her lifetime.

    This is quite difficult to believe. Do you have some sort of supporting evidence.

    Read More
    • Replies: @polaco
    It's quite realistic, but may appear shocking. Marilyn Monroe had more than 10 abortions if I remember correctly. But considering what I heard from Russians about the Soviet medical care system, how before a surgery, all patients were shaved using the same safety razor, and they had to bribe the nurse to use a new, clean blade (the razor remained the same) and this went for women in maternity units as well, I'm not really that surprised. The number I gave is what I remember from Jim Rogers' book titled Investment Biker, he had gotten it from some female director of a Women's Health Clinic in the USSR.
    , @polaco
    It's quite realistic, but may appear shocking. Marilyn Monroe had more than 10 abortions if I remember correctly. But considering what I heard from Russians about the Soviet medical care system, how before a surgery, all patients were shaved using the same safety razor, and they had to bribe the nurse to use a new, clean blade (the razor remained the same) and this went for women in maternity units as well, I'm not really that surprised. The number I gave is what I remember from Jim Rogers' book titled Investment Biker, he had gotten it from some female director of a Women's Health Clinic in the USSR. I want to add that nearly all Polish communists who served Russia before 1989, became Social Democrats and now praise the EU and everything its bureaucracy does. The Polish United Workers' Party (the PZPR) was renamed to the Union of the Democratic Left (the SLD) and is indistinguishable from any Western leftist party in its agenda.
    , @Alden
    The massive abortion rate in the soviet union is common knowledge among historians. It's in most books about the old soviet union. Ask Mr. google. I'm sure the information is out there.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  144. My favorite line from the movie Ghostbusters: “I’ve worked in the private sector, they expect results.”

    The irony here is Marxists have no love for intellectuals. Mao’s Chinese Communist Party famously sent all the intellectuals to labor camp in the country side to make them understand what it’s like to get their hands dirty. Khmer Rouge the communists of Cambodia used to drive around the cities nabbing anyone who wears glasses and either shot them or sent them to agricultural camp.

    It’s easy to see why. Societies fall apart when those who’ve never done a day of real labor lord over those who do real work. It’s why the left have been doing such a horrible job running the country. Starting from JFK’s era the DNC has been known to staff all their agencies with Ivy League grads, in their minds the “best and brightest”. Obama sold himself as an “intellectual” and did the same. Over 75% of those in his cabinet were Ivy League grads, 25% from Harvard alone. That’s why the Obama administration was such a miserable failure. The left is completely overrun by academics and journalists, people who’ve never done any real labor, hence the terms champagne socialists, limousine liberals, country club commies.

    It’s time we refer to Academics as what they really stand for: Out of Touch Pseudo Intellectuals.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  145. Anon • Disclaimer says:
    @Malla
    There are standards of scum too. The White scum is in many ways better than the scum you get in the brown black world, I know, I live in the brown world and have seen White scum up close. The only reason in some ways the brown scum here is better than the White scum is because we have not gone through the level of cultural destruction/ social engineering that White societies have gone through in the last century. Traditional culture maintains social order among the scum, of course there are aspects of traditional culture which are crappy too and need to be hacked off. Such as Sati among us Hindus or stone pelting of couples under Islamic Sharia law. The collapse of traditional culture in the West has decimated the White as well as black scum of the West.

    See #143 for reply

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  146. Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  147. Bayan says:
    @Wizard of Oz
    When push comes to shove only the better members of any race or class are worth anything and that certainly has been true of whites even if you might persuade me of times when they were generally superior. BUT who is doing the breeding now? I don't just mean to point to Europeans including Italians with total fertiilty of 1.4 and African immigrants with fertlity of 5. I refer to the whites who are outbreeding other whites and doing it significantly earlier. Are those heroic whites who lynched or burned black veterans in 1919 reliably replicated today as the kind of whites who made America great and can keep it that way?

    Fertility in Africa may be 5. I doubt African or other immigrants have fertility of 5 where they migrate. I is just not fun to have five children in wealthy parts of the world.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
    True. Apparently living in a small apartment in a French city does tend to cut down the enthusiasm for adding to family members in the country through their personal reproductive efforts. And the welfare state quite quickly shows a way to survive without having a lot of children. But there is also the age at which they have children adding to the reproductive superiority. The trebling of the immigrant population within 40 years while the natives halve their numbers under 60 in that time is quite likely.
    , @Reg Cæsar

    It is just not fun to have five children in wealthy parts of the world.
     
    It is if you can afford it:

    http://thenewdaily.com.au/entertainment/celebrity/2016/12/09/mick-jagger-children/
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  148. @Bayan
    Fertility in Africa may be 5. I doubt African or other immigrants have fertility of 5 where they migrate. I is just not fun to have five children in wealthy parts of the world.

    True. Apparently living in a small apartment in a French city does tend to cut down the enthusiasm for adding to family members in the country through their personal reproductive efforts. And the welfare state quite quickly shows a way to survive without having a lot of children. But there is also the age at which they have children adding to the reproductive superiority. The trebling of the immigrant population within 40 years while the natives halve their numbers under 60 in that time is quite likely.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  149. @Wally
    Yeah, I missed it. Sorry.
    Just had a tooth extracted, bad excuse, but true. Ouch.

    The semites here don't do so well, however. Free speech is their worst enemy.
    But then there is unz.com's Steve Sailer, who often does a shabbos goy routine.
    C'est la vie, you take what you can get.

    Cheers.

    www.codoh.com

    Just had a tooth extracted, bad excuse, but true. Ouch.

    I just had three. Then I ate a Corn Nuts competitor. Triple ouch.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  150. @Bayan
    Fertility in Africa may be 5. I doubt African or other immigrants have fertility of 5 where they migrate. I is just not fun to have five children in wealthy parts of the world.

    It is just not fun to have five children in wealthy parts of the world.

    It is if you can afford it:

    http://thenewdaily.com.au/entertainment/celebrity/2016/12/09/mick-jagger-children/

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  151. Malla says:
    @Anon
    Perhaps we could take this further over a G & T on the balcony of the Pune Polo Club ;-)

    Cool. How do I contact you? What you in the Indian Army? The Polo club is in the NDA right?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    Pune was my little joke (note that I am with it enough to not call it Poona though I find it a bit odd that the educated international people of Karnataka state should want their pride as Kannada speakers displayed in Bengaluru and Mysuru!). I think history may look kindly on the bluff retired colonels, both British and Indian, that I can imagine taking dismissive swipes at BS and cant over their G & Ts. Actually I have only stayed at the Bowring Institute of all the many old once gentlemen only clubs in India. Its 1864 foundation makes it even older than the Bangalore Club and the attractive young woman in the smart new swimming pool made me very tolerant of the decayed old buldings which were about to be renovated.

    On my first visit to India in 1984 I said India should be tasted in 6 day bites so overwhelming were one's impressions (Bombay, Raj Thani express to Delhi with a hold up by riot in Gujurat meaning I saw a lot of Rajasthan in daylight, Agra, jaipur and back to Bombay). Later to Himachal Pradesh - so as not ti be kidnapped in Kashmir, and via India to trekking in Nepal. Other family members have added impressions in Tamil Nadu and the north but Bangalore and Mysore have been my latest destinations. I visit Sri Lanka annually and am happy now to have a direct flight to Colombo from my home city.

    Perhaps we can get Ron Unz to put us in touch.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  152. polaco says:
    @Truth

    In the waning days of the Union, birth control equaled abortion. In 1990 the average Soviet woman had had 13 abortions in her lifetime.
     
    This is quite difficult to believe. Do you have some sort of supporting evidence.

    It’s quite realistic, but may appear shocking. Marilyn Monroe had more than 10 abortions if I remember correctly. But considering what I heard from Russians about the Soviet medical care system, how before a surgery, all patients were shaved using the same safety razor, and they had to bribe the nurse to use a new, clean blade (the razor remained the same) and this went for women in maternity units as well, I’m not really that surprised. The number I gave is what I remember from Jim Rogers’ book titled Investment Biker, he had gotten it from some female director of a Women’s Health Clinic in the USSR.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth
    Marilyn Monroe had exactly NO abortions.

    Unless Freemason science is that far ahead, men don't get pregnant.

    And my friend, you have to understand, that would mean that for every woman in Russia who had no abortions, there would (statistically) be someone who had 26.
    , @Alden
    The reason soviet women had so many abortions was that their condoms and diaphrams, like everything else manufactured in the soviet union, were defective. Who knows what was in the birth control pills, probably baking soda and cornstarch.

    Abortions were the basic method of birth control.

    I have known a few women who had one abortion and after that seriously took care of their birth control. But I know one who had 4, and another 5 abortions.

    "Why don't you take the pill"? "Might cause high blood pressure, who knows what the effects will be 30 years from now".

    "Get your tubes cut, a day in the hospital and no more worries, no more nausea from the pill, no more bleeding from the IUD, no more checking the diagrapham for holes or whatever"

    "I don't believe in surgery"

    And these were White, "educated, sophisticated feminist progressive" women.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  153. polaco says:
    @Truth

    In the waning days of the Union, birth control equaled abortion. In 1990 the average Soviet woman had had 13 abortions in her lifetime.
     
    This is quite difficult to believe. Do you have some sort of supporting evidence.

    It’s quite realistic, but may appear shocking. Marilyn Monroe had more than 10 abortions if I remember correctly. But considering what I heard from Russians about the Soviet medical care system, how before a surgery, all patients were shaved using the same safety razor, and they had to bribe the nurse to use a new, clean blade (the razor remained the same) and this went for women in maternity units as well, I’m not really that surprised. The number I gave is what I remember from Jim Rogers’ book titled Investment Biker, he had gotten it from some female director of a Women’s Health Clinic in the USSR. I want to add that nearly all Polish communists who served Russia before 1989, became Social Democrats and now praise the EU and everything its bureaucracy does. The Polish United Workers’ Party (the PZPR) was renamed to the Union of the Democratic Left (the SLD) and is indistinguishable from any Western leftist party in its agenda.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  154. What matters most is not White Guilt per se. It is the power of the TEMPLATE.

    The power of the Template decides who can feel righteous and accuse OR who must feel ashamed and defensive.

    Once the Template is smashed, it doesn’t matter what people believe.

    Take communism in East Germany. As long as the System was in place, the Template was “Marxism-Leninism is the truth, and those who espouse it are noble and should attack and accuse those who are anti-communist.”
    Under the System, the pro-communists could accuse, denounce, and condemn anyone deemed anti-communist. They didn’t need to give reasons. The System ensured that they would be favored and protected. All they had to do was point fingers and accuse. And the accused had to either deny their anti-communism or try to defend/justify it against all odds. The System enforced the Marxist-Leninist Template.

    But once the System fell in East Germany, it didn’t matter if there were still hardline communists or Marxist-Leninist true believers. The System no longer existed to protect, promote, and prioritize them. Few or many, they were now all alone to make their case with the System propping up and enforcing the Template.

    Their accusations no longer had the power to destroy lives because the System was no longer to back them with the Template.
    And anti-communists no longer needed to cower before the accusers. They no longer needed to deny their anti-communism. They no longer needed to defend or justify their anti-Leninism. They could freely express their disdain for communism.

    Same goes with ‘white guilt’. It’s not the feeling itself that is worrisome. Same with Diversity and Homomania. Before Diversity and Homomania were promoted and enforced as Official Templates, it didn’t matter if one espoused nationalism or anti-homo-agenda sentiments. One could openly push back against those agendas prior to institutionalization of PC as New Stasi.
    It didn’t matter is some people were pro-homo-agenda or pro-massive-invasion. They didn’t have the power of the Officially Approved Template, and therefore they could be PUSHED back.

    But once Diversity was cast into an Iron Template, those who were for it had the backing of the System. And those who opposed it could be destroyed by the accusers favored by the System. Once elite institutions enforced PC, only certain kinds of views and positions were allowed, and this had a ripple effect on all of society. So, if all elites from left to right were compelled to say ‘Diversity is our strength’ in order to maintain their status and privilege, the message was loud and clear that Diversity was now a Template than a mere position.

    So, the issue isn’t White Guilt per se. It will always exist as any society(even non-white ones has its share of self-loathing types). What gave Self-Loathing Whites or SLW’s an advantage is that the Globalist elites gained the commanding heights of power in the West and push the Iron Template of Diversity and Homomania. So, SLW’s are favored in the way that communist zealots, communist toadies, and communist hacks were favored in Stasi-dominated East Germany. But notice how the commies in all walks of life lost their advantage overnight once the System came down.

    The problem isn’t so much the existence of SLW’s. It’s that they are protected by the System that calls for Open Season on White Patriots. Once the Template is smashed, the Patriots can fight back with full force, and then SLW’s will crumble. After all, those who hate their own kind will lose to those who love their own kind.

    Smash the Template.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Authenticjazzman
    Brilliant observations.

    "They didn't need to give reasons"

    In the current scenario it is the "racism" angle which is the SJW's almost invincible bludgeon, and I have been saying several years that we have to turn it around on them, we have to capture their "racism" catapult and turn it around on them, in the action of hitting them with : YOU ARE THE TRUE RACISTS", "24/7 .
    DT should begin every tweet with the phrase : To the racist Democrats, the founders of Jim Crow, KKK school segregation , etc and relentlessly rub all of this under their noses without respite.

    They have gained huge amounts of societal territory simply through the employment of the "racism" ball-bat, and the most effective counter is : TURN IT AROUND ON THEM.

    Apparently this tactic seems too simplistic to be consided as potent, however it would be the most effective of all methods

    Authenticjazzman "Mensa" qualified since 1973, airborne trained US Army Vet, and pro Jazz artist.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  155. Truth says:
    @polaco
    It's quite realistic, but may appear shocking. Marilyn Monroe had more than 10 abortions if I remember correctly. But considering what I heard from Russians about the Soviet medical care system, how before a surgery, all patients were shaved using the same safety razor, and they had to bribe the nurse to use a new, clean blade (the razor remained the same) and this went for women in maternity units as well, I'm not really that surprised. The number I gave is what I remember from Jim Rogers' book titled Investment Biker, he had gotten it from some female director of a Women's Health Clinic in the USSR.

    Marilyn Monroe had exactly NO abortions.

    Unless Freemason science is that far ahead, men don’t get pregnant.

    And my friend, you have to understand, that would mean that for every woman in Russia who had no abortions, there would (statistically) be someone who had 26.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    Only assuming a normal distribution.
    , @Alden
    How do you know Marilyn Monroe had no abortions?


    How could anyone know how many abortions Monroe had or did not have?
    , @polaco
    I wish I could point to the official data, I think it could be true. Assuming an average woman, in the course of 20 years, say from the time she is 20 to 40 it's not that far fetched. And what the distribution would be is also interesting. After a woman had decided to have no more kids, and planned to abort all unexpected babies in the future for the rest of her life, the Soviet medical care system would surely have been there for her- oh you think you're pregnant again, we'll take care of that, no worries. I'm very curious myself to know the facts about this, but I'm too lazy to look deeper. Communists have always favored abortion though, that was my whole point.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  156. David says:
    @Intelligent Dasein

    But then there is unz.com’s Steve Sailer, who often does a shabbos goy routine.
     
    Actually, Steve has been coming down pretty hard on the Jews lately. It even lost him one long-time commenter and contributer, Lot.

    Do you know that’s why Lot stopped commenting?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  157. Anon • Disclaimer says:
    @Truth
    Marilyn Monroe had exactly NO abortions.

    Unless Freemason science is that far ahead, men don't get pregnant.

    And my friend, you have to understand, that would mean that for every woman in Russia who had no abortions, there would (statistically) be someone who had 26.

    Only assuming a normal distribution.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth
    Oh of course. There could be 26 women who have had 14 each to balance her out, but you get the point. There had to be plenty of women in Soviet-era Russia that never had an abortion.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  158. Alden says:
    @JackOH
    BB, thanks for that insider's view. I've observed my local Podunk Tech for years, and it depresses me to think how much of academic discourse is bounded, even dictated, by money and ideology. Especially true in the humanities, but even STEM disciplines are not immune. Exasperated, I sometimes wonder if our academies differ from North Korea's only in degree and not in kind. Don't rock the boat, keep your mouth shut, go along-get along, toe the line, don't push your evidence, look the other way, stay on the right side of your department chair, your dean, your students, don't ruffle the trustees, all that.

    A biology teacher at Santa Monica City College often states that ” blonde hair and blue eyes are a mutation and the sooner they are eliminated the better the world will be.” She is actually a high school teacher who teaches 2 night classes a week at the college.

    She is a redhead from Minnesota with one of the most common Scandinavian last names. Her skin is pale as paper. I guess she doesn’t realize she is among the whitest of the Whites.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
    I guess she has a sly sense of humour laying traps for people like you who imagine your point about the mutations of blue eyed blondes and redheads isn't obvious to all reasonably well informed people.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  159. Alden says:
    @polaco
    It's quite realistic, but may appear shocking. Marilyn Monroe had more than 10 abortions if I remember correctly. But considering what I heard from Russians about the Soviet medical care system, how before a surgery, all patients were shaved using the same safety razor, and they had to bribe the nurse to use a new, clean blade (the razor remained the same) and this went for women in maternity units as well, I'm not really that surprised. The number I gave is what I remember from Jim Rogers' book titled Investment Biker, he had gotten it from some female director of a Women's Health Clinic in the USSR.

    The reason soviet women had so many abortions was that their condoms and diaphrams, like everything else manufactured in the soviet union, were defective. Who knows what was in the birth control pills, probably baking soda and cornstarch.

    Abortions were the basic method of birth control.

    I have known a few women who had one abortion and after that seriously took care of their birth control. But I know one who had 4, and another 5 abortions.

    “Why don’t you take the pill”? “Might cause high blood pressure, who knows what the effects will be 30 years from now”.

    “Get your tubes cut, a day in the hospital and no more worries, no more nausea from the pill, no more bleeding from the IUD, no more checking the diagrapham for holes or whatever”

    “I don’t believe in surgery”

    And these were White, “educated, sophisticated feminist progressive” women.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  160. Alden says:
    @anonymous
    The genesis of all this took place in the 30s when so many European intellectuals fled to the United Staes, their heads filled with "The Big Three" (Nietzsche, Hegel and Schopenhauer) in addition to Marx, Sartre, Saussure etc. etc. Intellectually and emotionally scarred by the effects of The Great War, they would come to dominate the faculties of the Ivies and other elite universities and colleges. They and their immediate intellectual offspring would cast a spell over the Boomers who entered those schools in the early and mid-60s--a spell which has never been broken. And we've been paying for it ever since.

    You mean Jewish communist intellectuals.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  161. Alden says:
    @Truth
    Marilyn Monroe had exactly NO abortions.

    Unless Freemason science is that far ahead, men don't get pregnant.

    And my friend, you have to understand, that would mean that for every woman in Russia who had no abortions, there would (statistically) be someone who had 26.

    How do you know Marilyn Monroe had no abortions?

    How could anyone know how many abortions Monroe had or did not have?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth
    If you want to take the red pill, Nea and be privy to incredible information, click below, than click again. If you want to take the blue pill Mrs. Anderson, please disregard...

    https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=marilyn+monroe+tranny
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  162. Alden says:
    @Truth

    In the waning days of the Union, birth control equaled abortion. In 1990 the average Soviet woman had had 13 abortions in her lifetime.
     
    This is quite difficult to believe. Do you have some sort of supporting evidence.

    The massive abortion rate in the soviet union is common knowledge among historians. It’s in most books about the old soviet union. Ask Mr. google. I’m sure the information is out there.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth
    An average of 13 betwixt EVERY woman in the USSR?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  163. Alden says:
    @Corvinus
    "But I join you in welcoming the growth of online ed to the extent that it undermines the anti-white, anti-liberty, simply perverted physical universities that have been confusing and brainwashing our youth to hate their own people and culture and to turn away from normal sexuality and family life."

    Per usual, an overblown generalization regarding the nature and function of colleges today.

    Colleges have changed from when you graduated in 1950.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  164. Anon • Disclaimer says:
    @Malla
    Cool. How do I contact you? What you in the Indian Army? The Polo club is in the NDA right?

    Pune was my little joke (note that I am with it enough to not call it Poona though I find it a bit odd that the educated international people of Karnataka state should want their pride as Kannada speakers displayed in Bengaluru and Mysuru!). I think history may look kindly on the bluff retired colonels, both British and Indian, that I can imagine taking dismissive swipes at BS and cant over their G & Ts. Actually I have only stayed at the Bowring Institute of all the many old once gentlemen only clubs in India. Its 1864 foundation makes it even older than the Bangalore Club and the attractive young woman in the smart new swimming pool made me very tolerant of the decayed old buldings which were about to be renovated.

    On my first visit to India in 1984 I said India should be tasted in 6 day bites so overwhelming were one’s impressions (Bombay, Raj Thani express to Delhi with a hold up by riot in Gujurat meaning I saw a lot of Rajasthan in daylight, Agra, jaipur and back to Bombay). Later to Himachal Pradesh – so as not ti be kidnapped in Kashmir, and via India to trekking in Nepal. Other family members have added impressions in Tamil Nadu and the north but Bangalore and Mysore have been my latest destinations. I visit Sri Lanka annually and am happy now to have a direct flight to Colombo from my home city.

    Perhaps we can get Ron Unz to put us in touch.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  165. Alden says:
    @Wizard of Oz
    When push comes to shove only the better members of any race or class are worth anything and that certainly has been true of whites even if you might persuade me of times when they were generally superior. BUT who is doing the breeding now? I don't just mean to point to Europeans including Italians with total fertiilty of 1.4 and African immigrants with fertlity of 5. I refer to the whites who are outbreeding other whites and doing it significantly earlier. Are those heroic whites who lynched or burned black veterans in 1919 reliably replicated today as the kind of whites who made America great and can keep it that way?

    Are you babbling about the Brownsville TX thing in 1919? You are just another naive, credulous moron who is brainwashed by liberal propaganda. Your brain is an empty sink. Every once in a while liberal propaganda central opens the tap, drains out the current propaganda, closes the tap and turns on the faucet and fills your empty brain with the latest propaganda.

    here is the truth about the Brownsville TX 1919 thing.

    The black regiment in the local army base broke into the armory, killed and locked up the White officers and marched into Brownsville intent on killing raping and looting the townspeople.

    The townspeople used their own hunting rifles and other private guns to fight off and defeat the regiment of black soldiers who attacked them with military weapons.

    END OF STORY

    Anything else is a lie that was poured into your empty vessel brain. Copy and paste some dip sh*t wikipedia article about the thing if you want. It’s all lies you empty vessel brained moron.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth
    History is a group of lies, agreed upon.
    -Napoleon Bonaparte.

    But please, Aldey, if you were there give us your eyewitness account.
    , @Wizard of Oz
    My my, where did you learn that language? Perhaps whete your cognitive faculties were distorted to imagine a 1906 event when I expressly referred to a 1919 event?

    I hadn't heard of your Brownsville affair so I Googled (as I know you do) with "Brownville affair 1919" as my search words and soon found that you had just been sounding off from a very imperfect memory mixed with prejudice. Even the affair you wrongly thought I was referring to you got wrong. Not just the date but the ultimate exoneration of the 137 discharged black soldiers.

    Of course I could have posed my question about the DNA of whites who massacred Indians and stole their land, of Germans who committed mass murder in WW2, etc. amd asked if it is the civilisation that they created which is what we need even the lowest classes of whites to preserve.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  166. @Alden
    A biology teacher at Santa Monica City College often states that " blonde hair and blue eyes are a mutation and the sooner they are eliminated the better the world will be." She is actually a high school teacher who teaches 2 night classes a week at the college.

    She is a redhead from Minnesota with one of the most common Scandinavian last names. Her skin is pale as paper. I guess she doesn't realize she is among the whitest of the Whites.

    I guess she has a sly sense of humour laying traps for people like you who imagine your point about the mutations of blue eyed blondes and redheads isn’t obvious to all reasonably well informed people.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Alden
    What are you talking about? Your comment makes no sense at all.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  167. Alden says:
    @Anon
    "...a proletarian revolutionist" in a country with 2% of proletariat (tsarist Russia). A make-belief revolution. The Marxist movement then was an atheist replay of the Anabaptist et al movements that have sprang a few centuries before the "Manifesto" in reaction to the Roman Catholic Church' massive indecencies and overall predatory nature.

    Russia was never, never RC. It converted to the Byzantine Greek Orthodox version of Christianity.

    The Munster Anabaptists were revolting against the official established Lutheran version of Christianity in Westphalia. not the Roman Catholics. The Puritans, Plymouth Brotherhood and the rest of the lunatic wanna be Jews revolted against the Church of England.

    Guess you never heard of Mr. google.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    "Russia was never, never RC. It converted to the Byzantine Greek Orthodox version of Christianity."

    How did you get into your mind that Russians were Catholics and/or Anabaptists? The post compared a strain of Marxism in Russia with the Anabaptist movement in Germany. There were though some Anabaptists refugees to the East (see Moravian brothers mentioned by Leo Tolstoy).
    Also, “Anabaptists were heavily persecuted during the 16th century and into the 17th century by both Magisterial Protestants and Roman Catholic Church." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anabaptism
    You may want to consult Will Durant's "Reformation: The Story of Civilization:" The Anabaptist ideas were the precursor for communist ideology of 19th - 20th century.
    By the way, there are direct descendant of Zwingly, who are living in the US.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  168. Alden says:
    @Malla
    There are standards of scum too. The White scum is in many ways better than the scum you get in the brown black world, I know, I live in the brown world and have seen White scum up close. The only reason in some ways the brown scum here is better than the White scum is because we have not gone through the level of cultural destruction/ social engineering that White societies have gone through in the last century. Traditional culture maintains social order among the scum, of course there are aspects of traditional culture which are crappy too and need to be hacked off. Such as Sati among us Hindus or stone pelting of couples under Islamic Sharia law. The collapse of traditional culture in the West has decimated the White as well as black scum of the West.

    Decimate means kill every tenth person in a specific group. I believe you mean destroyed.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth
    Now you see, Nea, that's good Information. In all of these years I've never correlated the word "decimate" with the root word of "10".

    I suppose you are the chosen one.
    , @David
    By that reasoning, December is the tenth month.

    The connotation you're thinking of has never been true in English.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  169. @Priss Factor
    What matters most is not White Guilt per se. It is the power of the TEMPLATE.

    The power of the Template decides who can feel righteous and accuse OR who must feel ashamed and defensive.

    Once the Template is smashed, it doesn't matter what people believe.

    Take communism in East Germany. As long as the System was in place, the Template was "Marxism-Leninism is the truth, and those who espouse it are noble and should attack and accuse those who are anti-communist."
    Under the System, the pro-communists could accuse, denounce, and condemn anyone deemed anti-communist. They didn't need to give reasons. The System ensured that they would be favored and protected. All they had to do was point fingers and accuse. And the accused had to either deny their anti-communism or try to defend/justify it against all odds. The System enforced the Marxist-Leninist Template.

    But once the System fell in East Germany, it didn't matter if there were still hardline communists or Marxist-Leninist true believers. The System no longer existed to protect, promote, and prioritize them. Few or many, they were now all alone to make their case with the System propping up and enforcing the Template.

    Their accusations no longer had the power to destroy lives because the System was no longer to back them with the Template.
    And anti-communists no longer needed to cower before the accusers. They no longer needed to deny their anti-communism. They no longer needed to defend or justify their anti-Leninism. They could freely express their disdain for communism.

    Same goes with 'white guilt'. It's not the feeling itself that is worrisome. Same with Diversity and Homomania. Before Diversity and Homomania were promoted and enforced as Official Templates, it didn't matter if one espoused nationalism or anti-homo-agenda sentiments. One could openly push back against those agendas prior to institutionalization of PC as New Stasi.
    It didn't matter is some people were pro-homo-agenda or pro-massive-invasion. They didn't have the power of the Officially Approved Template, and therefore they could be PUSHED back.

    But once Diversity was cast into an Iron Template, those who were for it had the backing of the System. And those who opposed it could be destroyed by the accusers favored by the System. Once elite institutions enforced PC, only certain kinds of views and positions were allowed, and this had a ripple effect on all of society. So, if all elites from left to right were compelled to say 'Diversity is our strength' in order to maintain their status and privilege, the message was loud and clear that Diversity was now a Template than a mere position.

    So, the issue isn't White Guilt per se. It will always exist as any society(even non-white ones has its share of self-loathing types). What gave Self-Loathing Whites or SLW's an advantage is that the Globalist elites gained the commanding heights of power in the West and push the Iron Template of Diversity and Homomania. So, SLW's are favored in the way that communist zealots, communist toadies, and communist hacks were favored in Stasi-dominated East Germany. But notice how the commies in all walks of life lost their advantage overnight once the System came down.

    The problem isn't so much the existence of SLW's. It's that they are protected by the System that calls for Open Season on White Patriots. Once the Template is smashed, the Patriots can fight back with full force, and then SLW's will crumble. After all, those who hate their own kind will lose to those who love their own kind.

    Smash the Template.

    Brilliant observations.

    “They didn’t need to give reasons”

    In the current scenario it is the “racism” angle which is the SJW’s almost invincible bludgeon, and I have been saying several years that we have to turn it around on them, we have to capture their “racism” catapult and turn it around on them, in the action of hitting them with : YOU ARE THE TRUE RACISTS”, “24/7 .
    DT should begin every tweet with the phrase : To the racist Democrats, the founders of Jim Crow, KKK school segregation , etc and relentlessly rub all of this under their noses without respite.

    They have gained huge amounts of societal territory simply through the employment of the “racism” ball-bat, and the most effective counter is : TURN IT AROUND ON THEM.

    Apparently this tactic seems too simplistic to be consided as potent, however it would be the most effective of all methods

    Authenticjazzman “Mensa” qualified since 1973, airborne trained US Army Vet, and pro Jazz artist.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  170. polaco says:
    @Truth
    Marilyn Monroe had exactly NO abortions.

    Unless Freemason science is that far ahead, men don't get pregnant.

    And my friend, you have to understand, that would mean that for every woman in Russia who had no abortions, there would (statistically) be someone who had 26.

    I wish I could point to the official data, I think it could be true. Assuming an average woman, in the course of 20 years, say from the time she is 20 to 40 it’s not that far fetched. And what the distribution would be is also interesting. After a woman had decided to have no more kids, and planned to abort all unexpected babies in the future for the rest of her life, the Soviet medical care system would surely have been there for her- oh you think you’re pregnant again, we’ll take care of that, no worries. I’m very curious myself to know the facts about this, but I’m too lazy to look deeper. Communists have always favored abortion though, that was my whole point.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  171. Alden says:
    @anarchyst
    Thank you, Malla. Good post!
    I, for one am PROUD to be considered "racist" and wear my "racism" as a badge of honor. When I am confronted by those who recognize my "racism", I (attempt to) shake their hands and "thank them for noticing". The confused, bewildered looks on their faces is priceless.
    Regards,

    I do too. When accused of racism I always say right on, I’m a proud White racist.

    Gets them every time.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  172. Alden says:
    @Joe Hide
    First... This educational insanity is rapidly becoming a non-problem. Online education is replacing sit on your butt in a lecture hall with 200 bored students being talked at by a boring lecturer, who by the way, usually isn't very good at communicating knowledge, which requires exponentially increasing tuition, fees, and hidden costs, financed through student loans that require no down payment, no collateral, and no likelihood of income upon graduation, made to the most vulnerable young people, which is one of the only forms of lending with impossibility of bankruptcy, which the psychopathic predatory lenders have bribed (lobbied) politicians to guarantee with taxpayer dollars.
    Second .. Cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin are providing funding to innovators, creators, and inventors which were hamstrung in financing their projects before by the dinosaur ... Mainstream Banking System (MBS).
    Third ... information through the internet is replacing mis-information, dis-information, and outright propaganda.
    Be patient, the future looks good for us productive, beneficial, hardworking truth seekers!

    Those on line degrees require registration and payment of tuition. Check out the prices. they are very expensive and student loans are offered.

    I have known people who got through law school and nursing school without having to study after class. they just brought the test prep books to class. Instead of listening and discussing they just sat in the back and memorized the questions and answers in the test prep book.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  173. Anon • Disclaimer says:
    @Alden
    Russia was never, never RC. It converted to the Byzantine Greek Orthodox version of Christianity.

    The Munster Anabaptists were revolting against the official established Lutheran version of Christianity in Westphalia. not the Roman Catholics. The Puritans, Plymouth Brotherhood and the rest of the lunatic wanna be Jews revolted against the Church of England.

    Guess you never heard of Mr. google.

    “Russia was never, never RC. It converted to the Byzantine Greek Orthodox version of Christianity.”

    How did you get into your mind that Russians were Catholics and/or Anabaptists? The post compared a strain of Marxism in Russia with the Anabaptist movement in Germany. There were though some Anabaptists refugees to the East (see Moravian brothers mentioned by Leo Tolstoy).
    Also, “Anabaptists were heavily persecuted during the 16th century and into the 17th century by both Magisterial Protestants and Roman Catholic Church.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anabaptism
    You may want to consult Will Durant’s “Reformation: The Story of Civilization:” The Anabaptist ideas were the precursor for communist ideology of 19th – 20th century.
    By the way, there are direct descendant of Zwingly, who are living in the US.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Alden
    "How did you get into your mind that Russians were Catholics and/or Anabaptists?"

    Read the post. i never wrote that Russians were catholics or anabaptists. I wrote that Russians were never Catholics. I wrote about the the takeover of Munster Germany by lunatic Anabaptists in the mid 1500s.

    No wonder the German Lutherans and everybody else persecuted the Anabaptists after that horror of massacre, looting and destruction.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  174. Truth says:
    @Anon
    Only assuming a normal distribution.

    Oh of course. There could be 26 women who have had 14 each to balance her out, but you get the point. There had to be plenty of women in Soviet-era Russia that never had an abortion.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  175. Truth says:
    @Alden
    How do you know Marilyn Monroe had no abortions?


    How could anyone know how many abortions Monroe had or did not have?

    If you want to take the red pill, Nea and be privy to incredible information, click below, than click again. If you want to take the blue pill Mrs. Anderson, please disregard…

    https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=marilyn+monroe+tranny

    Read More
    • Replies: @Alden
    I ask again, how do you if Marilyn Monroe ever had an abortion or not?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  176. Truth says:
    @Alden
    The massive abortion rate in the soviet union is common knowledge among historians. It's in most books about the old soviet union. Ask Mr. google. I'm sure the information is out there.

    An average of 13 betwixt EVERY woman in the USSR?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Alden
    Read my post. I never said an average of 13 abortions for every soviet woman. I just wrote that soviet birth control, like everything else manufactured in the soviet union was so useless women had a lot of abortions which is common knowledge.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  177. Truth says:
    @Alden
    Are you babbling about the Brownsville TX thing in 1919? You are just another naive, credulous moron who is brainwashed by liberal propaganda. Your brain is an empty sink. Every once in a while liberal propaganda central opens the tap, drains out the current propaganda, closes the tap and turns on the faucet and fills your empty brain with the latest propaganda.

    here is the truth about the Brownsville TX 1919 thing.

    The black regiment in the local army base broke into the armory, killed and locked up the White officers and marched into Brownsville intent on killing raping and looting the townspeople.

    The townspeople used their own hunting rifles and other private guns to fight off and defeat the regiment of black soldiers who attacked them with military weapons.

    END OF STORY

    Anything else is a lie that was poured into your empty vessel brain. Copy and paste some dip sh*t wikipedia article about the thing if you want. It's all lies you empty vessel brained moron.

    History is a group of lies, agreed upon.
    -Napoleon Bonaparte.

    But please, Aldey, if you were there give us your eyewitness account.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  178. Truth says:
    @Alden
    Decimate means kill every tenth person in a specific group. I believe you mean destroyed.

    Now you see, Nea, that’s good Information. In all of these years I’ve never correlated the word “decimate” with the root word of “10″.

    I suppose you are the chosen one.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Alden
    Ever heard of a dictionary? BTW the substitution of the word decimate for destroy is a recent liberal creation. They are morons but want to sound intellectual so they came up with decimate instead of destroy. Liberal is another language.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  179. David says:
    @Alden
    Decimate means kill every tenth person in a specific group. I believe you mean destroyed.

    By that reasoning, December is the tenth month.

    The connotation you’re thinking of has never been true in English.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Alden
    Moron, decimate is an English word. Check the dictionary
    , @David
    There's nothing wrong with you that couldn't have been prevented by a mother's love.

    For the benefit of others: Decimate enters English in about 1600 and is first used to mean tax by 10%, i.e. to tithe, as in "poor as a decimated cavalier." It does retain your meaning "to kill 10% by lot," but whenever it's used this way, as when Cromwell decimated some Irish troops, it needs to be specified somehow special, as in "renewing the Roman punishment." By 1850, decimate is used almost exclusively to mean destroy, at first as an analog to punish by decimation, as in "typhus periodically decimated the student body" and then just destroy, as in "the decimated land."

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  180. lavoisier says: • Website
    @Reg Cæsar
    If Prof Haknay Woke (it's more pronounceable backwards!) had described his Jewish employers with the same words he uses for the rest of the white population, Yeshiva would show him the door.

    It was his Jewish employers who were thrilled to publish the hate whitey essay!!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  181. Alden says:
    @David
    By that reasoning, December is the tenth month.

    The connotation you're thinking of has never been true in English.

    Moron, decimate is an English word. Check the dictionary

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  182. Alden says:
    @Truth
    Now you see, Nea, that's good Information. In all of these years I've never correlated the word "decimate" with the root word of "10".

    I suppose you are the chosen one.

    Ever heard of a dictionary? BTW the substitution of the word decimate for destroy is a recent liberal creation. They are morons but want to sound intellectual so they came up with decimate instead of destroy. Liberal is another language.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
    As you say. Try looking up dictionaries. My Macquarie Dictionary is a perfectly respectable dictionary of its size and happened to be first to hand so I find there that the No. 1 contemporary meaning is to destroy a large proportion of anything. But naturally I was worried about those American liberals (different meaning from liberal in Australia) worming their way into dictionaries that Australians might use. So I moved on to an old two volume Concise Oxford Dictionary which had the Roman military meaning tagged as "milit". However that degraded modern meaning that Macquarie puts first is noted as used in 1683. Whew! We don't really have to worry about those liberals and lefties corrupting this bit of the language after all. And all at the cost of just using a good dictionary. I really do recommend it. Try next time to walk the walk.

    For my part I shall not bother to search further for my full multi- volume Oxford English Dictionary. The petty pedantry which makes me write and say "obliterate", devastate" or "destroy" rather than "decimate" will survive as I am sure yours will too.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  183. Alden says:
    @Truth
    An average of 13 betwixt EVERY woman in the USSR?

    Read my post. I never said an average of 13 abortions for every soviet woman. I just wrote that soviet birth control, like everything else manufactured in the soviet union was so useless women had a lot of abortions which is common knowledge.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  184. Alden says:
    @Truth
    If you want to take the red pill, Nea and be privy to incredible information, click below, than click again. If you want to take the blue pill Mrs. Anderson, please disregard...

    https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=marilyn+monroe+tranny

    I ask again, how do you if Marilyn Monroe ever had an abortion or not?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth
    I don't, just as I don't KNOW that George W. Bush never had an abortion. But for the same REASON that I strongly assume GWB had an abortion, I STRONGLY ASSUME that MM never had an abortion.

    You see, Aldey, only roughly %51 percent of the world population has any need for an abortion. Both Monroe and Bush are part of the other %49.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  185. Alden says:
    @Anon
    "Russia was never, never RC. It converted to the Byzantine Greek Orthodox version of Christianity."

    How did you get into your mind that Russians were Catholics and/or Anabaptists? The post compared a strain of Marxism in Russia with the Anabaptist movement in Germany. There were though some Anabaptists refugees to the East (see Moravian brothers mentioned by Leo Tolstoy).
    Also, “Anabaptists were heavily persecuted during the 16th century and into the 17th century by both Magisterial Protestants and Roman Catholic Church." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anabaptism
    You may want to consult Will Durant's "Reformation: The Story of Civilization:" The Anabaptist ideas were the precursor for communist ideology of 19th - 20th century.
    By the way, there are direct descendant of Zwingly, who are living in the US.

    “How did you get into your mind that Russians were Catholics and/or Anabaptists?”

    Read the post. i never wrote that Russians were catholics or anabaptists. I wrote that Russians were never Catholics. I wrote about the the takeover of Munster Germany by lunatic Anabaptists in the mid 1500s.

    No wonder the German Lutherans and everybody else persecuted the Anabaptists after that horror of massacre, looting and destruction.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  186. @Alden
    Are you babbling about the Brownsville TX thing in 1919? You are just another naive, credulous moron who is brainwashed by liberal propaganda. Your brain is an empty sink. Every once in a while liberal propaganda central opens the tap, drains out the current propaganda, closes the tap and turns on the faucet and fills your empty brain with the latest propaganda.

    here is the truth about the Brownsville TX 1919 thing.

    The black regiment in the local army base broke into the armory, killed and locked up the White officers and marched into Brownsville intent on killing raping and looting the townspeople.

    The townspeople used their own hunting rifles and other private guns to fight off and defeat the regiment of black soldiers who attacked them with military weapons.

    END OF STORY

    Anything else is a lie that was poured into your empty vessel brain. Copy and paste some dip sh*t wikipedia article about the thing if you want. It's all lies you empty vessel brained moron.

    My my, where did you learn that language? Perhaps whete your cognitive faculties were distorted to imagine a 1906 event when I expressly referred to a 1919 event?

    I hadn’t heard of your Brownsville affair so I Googled (as I know you do) with “Brownville affair 1919″ as my search words and soon found that you had just been sounding off from a very imperfect memory mixed with prejudice. Even the affair you wrongly thought I was referring to you got wrong. Not just the date but the ultimate exoneration of the 137 discharged black soldiers.

    Of course I could have posed my question about the DNA of whites who massacred Indians and stole their land, of Germans who committed mass murder in WW2, etc. amd asked if it is the civilisation that they created which is what we need even the lowest classes of whites to preserve.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Alden
    So you believethe leftist, cultural Marxist, anti White version of the Brownsville Tx 1919 murderous attack on White towns people by black soldiers.

    Moron, who believes google except for practical things such as BMW repair near me.

    Like most leftist anti Whites, you’ve never heard of a university library with their pre 1960 history books.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  187. Truth says:
    @Alden
    I ask again, how do you if Marilyn Monroe ever had an abortion or not?

    I don’t, just as I don’t KNOW that George W. Bush never had an abortion. But for the same REASON that I strongly assume GWB had an abortion, I STRONGLY ASSUME that MM never had an abortion.

    You see, Aldey, only roughly %51 percent of the world population has any need for an abortion. Both Monroe and Bush are part of the other %49.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Alden
    Why bring assumptions about dead movie stars into this discussion. What’s your point and why did you bring up the non issue of Monroe and abortions?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  188. Here’s your overriding problem. You note that the takeover begins during the 1950′s. Perhaps I am mistaken but blacks are hardly in a position of influence in the 1950′as. 1960′s and barely making headway in the 1970′s. It is not until the 1970′s when black ethnic (really color) studies are introduced into the standard university. And then you don’t have black studies alone. Native American, feminists, chicano, mexican, asian, mideast etc. The level of influence by far is mighty shrift for african american studies and marxist philosophy. Marxist studies have been in US universities ever since Karl Marx wrote his treatise on collective revolution. The other major shift in was not so much in university study in the 1970′s but over hauling academia just the same — same sex relational dynamics.

    The national identity movement’s gravitation towards marxism has little to do with the politics in the classroom. An embrace of marx was as much as a response to the rejection by capitalists and western democracies, just entering their response to colonialism. The demarcation lines were drawn but politics in real as opposed to merely the ideals of marx.

    but in the US blacks were not a large quota of the marxist agenda. Even the black panthers focused on the best of what makes community. Self sustaining and self responsibility. Unfortunately during the 1950′s and 1960′s any black organization taking on the wrongs in the country got a communist label without that label reflecting either their motive or their goals. The black contention was for the american dream, not the dreams and aspirations of the Soviet Union, China, or Karl Marx.

    I am hard pressed to comprehend why marxism would even be associated with civil rights save that communists were quick to use the color disparities as a means of indictment. Note, even Paul Robeson who was not a communist was a served a pretty hefty dose of abuse by the black community in the US for his comments concerning the Vietnam War.

    Every single one of the transformative measures to a communist prone ethos did came from white men and women and benefited the same — including welfare. Which blacks did not get in mass until the 1960′s.

    The author’s own references: to deconstruction, post modern thought — are advanced by nonblack intellectuals. Inside the US b;lacks looked to the democratic capitalist system. And those blacks that did otherwise did so based on the argument that white men and women were heck bent on keeping democracy and capitalism out of the use of US black citizens.

    In short most blacks did not have the luxury to embrace communist or marxist theory in any practical form.

    It is common place to link blacks with the country’s decline — but that honor goes to whites.

    I am not a fan of the civil rights act, but anyone pointing to that correction in american policies stray from the constitution by naming it as culprit, needs a much a better tool than Marx to make their case.

    Expecting equal treatment under the Constitution is neither Marxian or communist ideology. And blacks did not post modern or deconstruction ethos to make the case for fairness – the record is pretty clear.

    Read More
    • Replies: @lavoisier
    Blacks have been used as pawns in the destruction of the American Republic.

    Any they are being destroyed as well.

    Just look today at the incredible levels of black dysfunction. Sure biology is playing a role, but the leftist culture orchestrated by the usual suspects has damaged the black community beyond comprehension.

    Seriously, when will the architects of this destruction be held responsible for their malfeasance?

    The hate whitey thing is destroying everyone. And it will eventually destroy the puppet masters as well.
    , @Ilyana_Rozumova
    I vehemently disagree! the honor for decline of America belongs to democratic party.
    I even would go so far that Democrats committed high treason on USA.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  189. lavoisier says: • Website
    @EliteCommInc.
    Here's your overriding problem. You note that the takeover begins during the 1950's. Perhaps I am mistaken but blacks are hardly in a position of influence in the 1950'as. 1960's and barely making headway in the 1970's. It is not until the 1970's when black ethnic (really color) studies are introduced into the standard university. And then you don't have black studies alone. Native American, feminists, chicano, mexican, asian, mideast etc. The level of influence by far is mighty shrift for african american studies and marxist philosophy. Marxist studies have been in US universities ever since Karl Marx wrote his treatise on collective revolution. The other major shift in was not so much in university study in the 1970's but over hauling academia just the same -- same sex relational dynamics.

    The national identity movement's gravitation towards marxism has little to do with the politics in the classroom. An embrace of marx was as much as a response to the rejection by capitalists and western democracies, just entering their response to colonialism. The demarcation lines were drawn but politics in real as opposed to merely the ideals of marx.

    but in the US blacks were not a large quota of the marxist agenda. Even the black panthers focused on the best of what makes community. Self sustaining and self responsibility. Unfortunately during the 1950's and 1960's any black organization taking on the wrongs in the country got a communist label without that label reflecting either their motive or their goals. The black contention was for the american dream, not the dreams and aspirations of the Soviet Union, China, or Karl Marx.

    I am hard pressed to comprehend why marxism would even be associated with civil rights save that communists were quick to use the color disparities as a means of indictment. Note, even Paul Robeson who was not a communist was a served a pretty hefty dose of abuse by the black community in the US for his comments concerning the Vietnam War.

    Every single one of the transformative measures to a communist prone ethos did came from white men and women and benefited the same -- including welfare. Which blacks did not get in mass until the 1960's.

    The author's own references: to deconstruction, post modern thought -- are advanced by nonblack intellectuals. Inside the US b;lacks looked to the democratic capitalist system. And those blacks that did otherwise did so based on the argument that white men and women were heck bent on keeping democracy and capitalism out of the use of US black citizens.

    In short most blacks did not have the luxury to embrace communist or marxist theory in any practical form.

    It is common place to link blacks with the country's decline -- but that honor goes to whites.

    I am not a fan of the civil rights act, but anyone pointing to that correction in american policies stray from the constitution by naming it as culprit, needs a much a better tool than Marx to make their case.

    Expecting equal treatment under the Constitution is neither Marxian or communist ideology. And blacks did not post modern or deconstruction ethos to make the case for fairness - the record is pretty clear.

    Blacks have been used as pawns in the destruction of the American Republic.

    Any they are being destroyed as well.

    Just look today at the incredible levels of black dysfunction. Sure biology is playing a role, but the leftist culture orchestrated by the usual suspects has damaged the black community beyond comprehension.

    Seriously, when will the architects of this destruction be held responsible for their malfeasance?

    The hate whitey thing is destroying everyone. And it will eventually destroy the puppet masters as well.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth
    but the culture orchestrated by the usual suspects has damaged the black community beyond comprehension.

    Yup, and the answer to the question so elegantly posed by Mr. Samuel Peter below is; You Necks!

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=liwDVF69Cis
    , @EliteCommInc.
    I doubt there are high a percentage of blacks actually hating whites than there are whites actual hating blacks.

    There's no evidence that skin tone - biology is a serious factor in behavior. Since the dysfunctions that afflict a small percentage of blacks visits every population that inhabits the worst of environments, it's unlikely that skin color has any bearing on the question.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  190. David says:
    @David
    By that reasoning, December is the tenth month.

    The connotation you're thinking of has never been true in English.

    There’s nothing wrong with you that couldn’t have been prevented by a mother’s love.

    For the benefit of others: Decimate enters English in about 1600 and is first used to mean tax by 10%, i.e. to tithe, as in “poor as a decimated cavalier.” It does retain your meaning “to kill 10% by lot,” but whenever it’s used this way, as when Cromwell decimated some Irish troops, it needs to be specified somehow special, as in “renewing the Roman punishment.” By 1850, decimate is used almost exclusively to mean destroy, at first as an analog to punish by decimation, as in “typhus periodically decimated the student body” and then just destroy, as in “the decimated land.”

    Read More
    • Replies: @Ilyana_Rozumova
    You are talking B.S.
    Decimate was used in the uprising by most of the European rulers.
    After the battle where where rebels lost, the captives were put in the straight line, and every tenth was killed by sword or bullet.
    It was a random punishment. Reason was that they did not want to kill all.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  191. Truth says:
    @lavoisier
    Blacks have been used as pawns in the destruction of the American Republic.

    Any they are being destroyed as well.

    Just look today at the incredible levels of black dysfunction. Sure biology is playing a role, but the leftist culture orchestrated by the usual suspects has damaged the black community beyond comprehension.

    Seriously, when will the architects of this destruction be held responsible for their malfeasance?

    The hate whitey thing is destroying everyone. And it will eventually destroy the puppet masters as well.

    but the culture orchestrated by the usual suspects has damaged the black community beyond comprehension.

    Yup, and the answer to the question so elegantly posed by Mr. Samuel Peter below is; You Necks!

    Read More
    • Replies: @lavoisier
    Good one!!
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  192. @David
    There's nothing wrong with you that couldn't have been prevented by a mother's love.

    For the benefit of others: Decimate enters English in about 1600 and is first used to mean tax by 10%, i.e. to tithe, as in "poor as a decimated cavalier." It does retain your meaning "to kill 10% by lot," but whenever it's used this way, as when Cromwell decimated some Irish troops, it needs to be specified somehow special, as in "renewing the Roman punishment." By 1850, decimate is used almost exclusively to mean destroy, at first as an analog to punish by decimation, as in "typhus periodically decimated the student body" and then just destroy, as in "the decimated land."

    You are talking B.S.
    Decimate was used in the uprising by most of the European rulers.
    After the battle where where rebels lost, the captives were put in the straight line, and every tenth was killed by sword or bullet.
    It was a random punishment. Reason was that they did not want to kill all.

    Read More
    • Replies: @David
    Citation?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  193. @EliteCommInc.
    Here's your overriding problem. You note that the takeover begins during the 1950's. Perhaps I am mistaken but blacks are hardly in a position of influence in the 1950'as. 1960's and barely making headway in the 1970's. It is not until the 1970's when black ethnic (really color) studies are introduced into the standard university. And then you don't have black studies alone. Native American, feminists, chicano, mexican, asian, mideast etc. The level of influence by far is mighty shrift for african american studies and marxist philosophy. Marxist studies have been in US universities ever since Karl Marx wrote his treatise on collective revolution. The other major shift in was not so much in university study in the 1970's but over hauling academia just the same -- same sex relational dynamics.

    The national identity movement's gravitation towards marxism has little to do with the politics in the classroom. An embrace of marx was as much as a response to the rejection by capitalists and western democracies, just entering their response to colonialism. The demarcation lines were drawn but politics in real as opposed to merely the ideals of marx.

    but in the US blacks were not a large quota of the marxist agenda. Even the black panthers focused on the best of what makes community. Self sustaining and self responsibility. Unfortunately during the 1950's and 1960's any black organization taking on the wrongs in the country got a communist label without that label reflecting either their motive or their goals. The black contention was for the american dream, not the dreams and aspirations of the Soviet Union, China, or Karl Marx.

    I am hard pressed to comprehend why marxism would even be associated with civil rights save that communists were quick to use the color disparities as a means of indictment. Note, even Paul Robeson who was not a communist was a served a pretty hefty dose of abuse by the black community in the US for his comments concerning the Vietnam War.

    Every single one of the transformative measures to a communist prone ethos did came from white men and women and benefited the same -- including welfare. Which blacks did not get in mass until the 1960's.

    The author's own references: to deconstruction, post modern thought -- are advanced by nonblack intellectuals. Inside the US b;lacks looked to the democratic capitalist system. And those blacks that did otherwise did so based on the argument that white men and women were heck bent on keeping democracy and capitalism out of the use of US black citizens.

    In short most blacks did not have the luxury to embrace communist or marxist theory in any practical form.

    It is common place to link blacks with the country's decline -- but that honor goes to whites.

    I am not a fan of the civil rights act, but anyone pointing to that correction in american policies stray from the constitution by naming it as culprit, needs a much a better tool than Marx to make their case.

    Expecting equal treatment under the Constitution is neither Marxian or communist ideology. And blacks did not post modern or deconstruction ethos to make the case for fairness - the record is pretty clear.

    I vehemently disagree! the honor for decline of America belongs to democratic party.
    I even would go so far that Democrats committed high treason on USA.

    Read More
    • Replies: @EliteCommInc.
    I am unclear where our disagreement rests. I think I would press heavy the fault of liberal and democratic thinkers, especially the radical brand of polity engaged since the late 1960's forward. Nearly all of which was under the direction and control of whites.

    Oddly enough whites have benefited more from civil rights legislation in real terms than blacks, in my view.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  194. David says:
    @Ilyana_Rozumova
    You are talking B.S.
    Decimate was used in the uprising by most of the European rulers.
    After the battle where where rebels lost, the captives were put in the straight line, and every tenth was killed by sword or bullet.
    It was a random punishment. Reason was that they did not want to kill all.

    Citation?

    Read More
    • Replies: @utu
    Here you have article about etymology and meaning in English
    https://blog.oxforddictionaries.com/2012/09/10/does-decimate-mean-destroy-one-tenth/

    If we look to the dictionaries of this time period the evidence suggests that this tithing sense of decimate was just as common, if not more so, as the sense of killing or punishing one of every ten. The first English dictionary to record the word was Thomas Blount’s magnificently titled Glossographia, published in 1656, which defines decimate as “to take the tenth, to gather the Tyth”, with no mention made of killing anyone, soldiers or otherwise. In Elisha Coles’ An English Dictionary, published some twenty years later, it is defined as both ‘to tythe or take the tent’ and ‘also punishing every tenth man’. These are the only two dictionaries of the 17th century to define decimate (which is not terribly surprising, as there were very few such reference works at the time).
     
    But English is not the center of the world. In most European languages equivalent of decimate means killing every tenth and has nothing to do with taxes:

    decimate ---> dezimieren, décimer, decimare, diezmar, decimovat,....

    However there is equivalent of tithe: decimal obtulerunt --->dime, Zehnten, decimal, desátek,...
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  195. Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  196. lavoisier says: • Website
    @Truth
    but the culture orchestrated by the usual suspects has damaged the black community beyond comprehension.

    Yup, and the answer to the question so elegantly posed by Mr. Samuel Peter below is; You Necks!

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=liwDVF69Cis

    Good one!!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  197. And the precursors to genocide proceed apace; just like their myriad historical antecedents.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  198. utu says:
    @David
    Citation?

    Here you have article about etymology and meaning in English

    https://blog.oxforddictionaries.com/2012/09/10/does-decimate-mean-destroy-one-tenth/

    If we look to the dictionaries of this time period the evidence suggests that this tithing sense of decimate was just as common, if not more so, as the sense of killing or punishing one of every ten. The first English dictionary to record the word was Thomas Blount’s magnificently titled Glossographia, published in 1656, which defines decimate as “to take the tenth, to gather the Tyth”, with no mention made of killing anyone, soldiers or otherwise. In Elisha Coles’ An English Dictionary, published some twenty years later, it is defined as both ‘to tythe or take the tent’ and ‘also punishing every tenth man’. These are the only two dictionaries of the 17th century to define decimate (which is not terribly surprising, as there were very few such reference works at the time).

    But English is not the center of the world. In most European languages equivalent of decimate means killing every tenth and has nothing to do with taxes:

    decimate —> dezimieren, décimer, decimare, diezmar, decimovat,….

    However there is equivalent of tithe: decimal obtulerunt —>dime, Zehnten, decimal, desátek,…

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  199. @lavoisier
    Blacks have been used as pawns in the destruction of the American Republic.

    Any they are being destroyed as well.

    Just look today at the incredible levels of black dysfunction. Sure biology is playing a role, but the leftist culture orchestrated by the usual suspects has damaged the black community beyond comprehension.

    Seriously, when will the architects of this destruction be held responsible for their malfeasance?

    The hate whitey thing is destroying everyone. And it will eventually destroy the puppet masters as well.

    I doubt there are high a percentage of blacks actually hating whites than there are whites actual hating blacks.

    There’s no evidence that skin tone – biology is a serious factor in behavior. Since the dysfunctions that afflict a small percentage of blacks visits every population that inhabits the worst of environments, it’s unlikely that skin color has any bearing on the question.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  200. @Ilyana_Rozumova
    I vehemently disagree! the honor for decline of America belongs to democratic party.
    I even would go so far that Democrats committed high treason on USA.

    I am unclear where our disagreement rests. I think I would press heavy the fault of liberal and democratic thinkers, especially the radical brand of polity engaged since the late 1960′s forward. Nearly all of which was under the direction and control of whites.

    Oddly enough whites have benefited more from civil rights legislation in real terms than blacks, in my view.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Ilyana_Rozumova
    Sorry for interruption.
    Maybe when we talk about decline we could speak a little bit in more specific terms. I was speaking in terms of economic decline. That is because economic decline influences other declines as spiritual artistic, philosophical, educational, cultural, moral, and others.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  201. @EliteCommInc.
    I am unclear where our disagreement rests. I think I would press heavy the fault of liberal and democratic thinkers, especially the radical brand of polity engaged since the late 1960's forward. Nearly all of which was under the direction and control of whites.

    Oddly enough whites have benefited more from civil rights legislation in real terms than blacks, in my view.

    Sorry for interruption.
    Maybe when we talk about decline we could speak a little bit in more specific terms. I was speaking in terms of economic decline. That is because economic decline influences other declines as spiritual artistic, philosophical, educational, cultural, moral, and others.

    Read More
    • Replies: @EliteCommInc.
    I am not inclined to blame black people for the decline in any area they have but a minority stake in creating.

    Whites still comprise most of the democratic party and more so the wheels, levers and cogs that control party politics.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  202. @Ilyana_Rozumova
    Sorry for interruption.
    Maybe when we talk about decline we could speak a little bit in more specific terms. I was speaking in terms of economic decline. That is because economic decline influences other declines as spiritual artistic, philosophical, educational, cultural, moral, and others.

    I am not inclined to blame black people for the decline in any area they have but a minority stake in creating.

    Whites still comprise most of the democratic party and more so the wheels, levers and cogs that control party politics.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  203. Tinidril says:
    @Anonymous
    "... what Dr. Paul Gottfried has labeled quite correctly “cultural Marxism”..."

    Dr Gottfried can label it what he wants, but it's not Marxism of any kind, which is opposed to this kind of identity politics, as is easily demonstrated by the comment sections of socialist websites, the conflicts raging between old-school leftists and trans activists who are attempting to demonize/purge them. Funnily enough, the author admits himself that the East European communists he met did not share any wish for same-sex marriage, sexual liberation. There's the clue, and our intrepid writer explains it away as 'stodgy'.

    The term Cultural Marxism is a good descriptor because the same type of people (radical far-leftists) using a sleight of hand have co-opted the model of Oppressor/Oppressed that the economic Marxists used, only now substituting White/Black or Male/Female for Bourgeoisie/Proletariat. They kept the scaffold but updated with new “victims” and “oppressors” more with the times, now that Soviet communism has been thoroughly rejected after its sins exposed with Solzhenitsyn etc. It is the same con-game: radical egalitarianism under a new banner, where some people are (of course) more equal than others!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  204. Corvinus says:

    “Then, just the other day, several items came my way that relate how a writer for the student newspaper at Texas State University at San Marcos, one Rudy Martinez [a Latino], demanded that white people “die.””

    Martinez is no different than anyone on the Alt Right. Regardless, he, along with the author of this piece, at members of the Coalition of the Fringes who are proudly rejected by normies.

    “The chilling fact is that since the late 1960s, most of the PhDs—the future professors, teachers and university administrators—turned out by our colleges and universities have been imbued with a Marxist outlook and philosophy that now pervades nearly all academic disciplines, but most especially history, sociology, philosophy, English, anthropology, and political science, in other words, the liberal arts.”

    Cultural Marxism is Fake News. Of course, if Cathey had his way, he would have professors, teachers, and university administrators insist that the 14 points be the standard curriculum, with little or no debate whatsoever.

    Read More
    • Replies: @geokat62

    Cultural Marxism is Fake News.
     
    Bullsh*t!


    Why don't you give Stanley Hornbeck's review of Prof. MacDonald's The Culture of Critique, a read Corvy, and provide us with your thoughts?

    Here's are a few excerpts:

    Earl Raab, former president of heavily Jewish Brandeis University makes the diversity argument in a slightly different way. Expressing his satisfaction with the prediction that by the middle of the next century whites will become a minority, he writes, “We have tipped beyond the point where a Nazi-Aryan party will be able to prevail in this country.” He is apparently prepared to displace the people and culture of the founding stock in order to prevent the theoretical rise of an anti-Jewish regime. Prof. Raab appears to see whites mainly as potential Nazis, and is willing to sacrifice their culture and national continuity in order to defuse an imagined threat to Jews. This passage takes for granted the continued future existence of Jews as a distinct community even as gentile whites decline in numbers and influence.

    In the same passage, Prof. Raab continues by noting that, “We [Jews] have been nourishing the American climate of opposition to bigotry for about half a century. That climate has not yet been perfected, but the heterogeneous nature of our population tends to make it irreversible...” – just as it tends to make the ultimate displacement of European culture also irreversible...

    Prof. MacDonald traces the development of this diversity strategy to several sources. It is widely recognized that the German-Jewish immigrant Franz Boas (1858-1942) almost single-handedly established the current contours of anthropology, ridding it of all biological explanations for differences in human culture or behavior. Prof. MacDonald reports that he and his followers – with the notable exceptions of Margaret Mead and Ruth Benedict – were all Jews with strong Jewish identities: “Jewish identification and the pursuit of perceived Jewish interests, particularly in advocating an ideology of cultural pluralism as a model for Western societies, has been the ‘invisible subject’ of American anthropology.”

    By 1915, Boas and his students controlled the American Anthropological Association and by 1926 they headed every major American university anthropology department. From this position of dominance they promoted the idea that race and biology are trivial matters, and that environment counts for everything. They completely recast anthropology so as to provide intellectual support for open immigration, integration, and miscegenation. They also laid the foundation for the idea that because all races have the same potential, the failures of non-whites must be blamed exclusively on white oppression. The ultimate conclusion of Boasian anthropology was that since environment accounts for all human differences, every inequality in achievement can be eliminated by changing the environment. This has been the justification for enormous and wasteful government intervention programs.

    http://heretical.com/miscellx/culturec.html
     
    P.S. This review is a must read for every dumb goyim.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  205. geokat62 says:
    @Corvinus
    "Then, just the other day, several items came my way that relate how a writer for the student newspaper at Texas State University at San Marcos, one Rudy Martinez [a Latino], demanded that white people “die.”"

    Martinez is no different than anyone on the Alt Right. Regardless, he, along with the author of this piece, at members of the Coalition of the Fringes who are proudly rejected by normies.

    "The chilling fact is that since the late 1960s, most of the PhDs—the future professors, teachers and university administrators—turned out by our colleges and universities have been imbued with a Marxist outlook and philosophy that now pervades nearly all academic disciplines, but most especially history, sociology, philosophy, English, anthropology, and political science, in other words, the liberal arts."

    Cultural Marxism is Fake News. Of course, if Cathey had his way, he would have professors, teachers, and university administrators insist that the 14 points be the standard curriculum, with little or no debate whatsoever.

    Cultural Marxism is Fake News.

    Bullsh*t!

    Why don’t you give Stanley Hornbeck’s review of Prof. MacDonald’s The Culture of Critique, a read Corvy, and provide us with your thoughts?

    Here’s are a few excerpts:

    Earl Raab, former president of heavily Jewish Brandeis University makes the diversity argument in a slightly different way. Expressing his satisfaction with the prediction that by the middle of the next century whites will become a minority, he writes, “We have tipped beyond the point where a Nazi-Aryan party will be able to prevail in this country.” He is apparently prepared to displace the people and culture of the founding stock in order to prevent the theoretical rise of an anti-Jewish regime. Prof. Raab appears to see whites mainly as potential Nazis, and is willing to sacrifice their culture and national continuity in order to defuse an imagined threat to Jews. This passage takes for granted the continued future existence of Jews as a distinct community even as gentile whites decline in numbers and influence.

    In the same passage, Prof. Raab continues by noting that, “We [Jews] have been nourishing the American climate of opposition to bigotry for about half a century. That climate has not yet been perfected, but the heterogeneous nature of our population tends to make it irreversible…” – just as it tends to make the ultimate displacement of European culture also irreversible…

    Prof. MacDonald traces the development of this diversity strategy to several sources. It is widely recognized that the German-Jewish immigrant Franz Boas (1858-1942) almost single-handedly established the current contours of anthropology, ridding it of all biological explanations for differences in human culture or behavior. Prof. MacDonald reports that he and his followers – with the notable exceptions of Margaret Mead and Ruth Benedict – were all Jews with strong Jewish identities: “Jewish identification and the pursuit of perceived Jewish interests, particularly in advocating an ideology of cultural pluralism as a model for Western societies, has been the ‘invisible subject’ of American anthropology.”

    By 1915, Boas and his students controlled the American Anthropological Association and by 1926 they headed every major American university anthropology department. From this position of dominance they promoted the idea that race and biology are trivial matters, and that environment counts for everything. They completely recast anthropology so as to provide intellectual support for open immigration, integration, and miscegenation. They also laid the foundation for the idea that because all races have the same potential, the failures of non-whites must be blamed exclusively on white oppression. The ultimate conclusion of Boasian anthropology was that since environment accounts for all human differences, every inequality in achievement can be eliminated by changing the environment. This has been the justification for enormous and wasteful government intervention programs.

    http://heretical.com/miscellx/culturec.html

    P.S. This review is a must read for every dumb goyim.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    Earl Raab, like Professor McDonald, are extremists beyond the pale. They are confirmation bias personified.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  206. Corvinus says:
    @geokat62

    Cultural Marxism is Fake News.
     
    Bullsh*t!


    Why don't you give Stanley Hornbeck's review of Prof. MacDonald's The Culture of Critique, a read Corvy, and provide us with your thoughts?

    Here's are a few excerpts:

    Earl Raab, former president of heavily Jewish Brandeis University makes the diversity argument in a slightly different way. Expressing his satisfaction with the prediction that by the middle of the next century whites will become a minority, he writes, “We have tipped beyond the point where a Nazi-Aryan party will be able to prevail in this country.” He is apparently prepared to displace the people and culture of the founding stock in order to prevent the theoretical rise of an anti-Jewish regime. Prof. Raab appears to see whites mainly as potential Nazis, and is willing to sacrifice their culture and national continuity in order to defuse an imagined threat to Jews. This passage takes for granted the continued future existence of Jews as a distinct community even as gentile whites decline in numbers and influence.

    In the same passage, Prof. Raab continues by noting that, “We [Jews] have been nourishing the American climate of opposition to bigotry for about half a century. That climate has not yet been perfected, but the heterogeneous nature of our population tends to make it irreversible...” – just as it tends to make the ultimate displacement of European culture also irreversible...

    Prof. MacDonald traces the development of this diversity strategy to several sources. It is widely recognized that the German-Jewish immigrant Franz Boas (1858-1942) almost single-handedly established the current contours of anthropology, ridding it of all biological explanations for differences in human culture or behavior. Prof. MacDonald reports that he and his followers – with the notable exceptions of Margaret Mead and Ruth Benedict – were all Jews with strong Jewish identities: “Jewish identification and the pursuit of perceived Jewish interests, particularly in advocating an ideology of cultural pluralism as a model for Western societies, has been the ‘invisible subject’ of American anthropology.”

    By 1915, Boas and his students controlled the American Anthropological Association and by 1926 they headed every major American university anthropology department. From this position of dominance they promoted the idea that race and biology are trivial matters, and that environment counts for everything. They completely recast anthropology so as to provide intellectual support for open immigration, integration, and miscegenation. They also laid the foundation for the idea that because all races have the same potential, the failures of non-whites must be blamed exclusively on white oppression. The ultimate conclusion of Boasian anthropology was that since environment accounts for all human differences, every inequality in achievement can be eliminated by changing the environment. This has been the justification for enormous and wasteful government intervention programs.

    http://heretical.com/miscellx/culturec.html
     
    P.S. This review is a must read for every dumb goyim.

    Earl Raab, like Professor McDonald, are extremists beyond the pale. They are confirmation bias personified.

    Read More
    • Replies: @geokat62

    They are confirmation bias personified.
     
    What about Lawrence Auster's The Path to National Suicide: An Essay on Immigration and Multiculturalism. Have you given it a read? He makes a very convincing argument that mass immigration will spell the end of European and Eurpean-derived countries.

    If you don't have the appetite to read the entire essay, here are some of the more pertinent excerpts:




    According to Webster’s, racism is “a belief that race is the pri­ mary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race.” It is thus not a belief in the existence of racial differences as such, but the belief that those differences produce an inherent racial superi­ ority, that constitutes racism...

    unless we conclude (1) that any statement that members of a particular racial group find offensive is, for that reason alone, racist, or (2) that the very idea that there are physically distinct races of mankind is itself racist. The first of these ideas was a theme of the Harvard conference mentioned above. Participants were told that professors teaching a class should “never introduce any sort of thing that might hurt a group”—a prescription for the massive repression of speech. As for the second idea, it’s simply absurd; if there were not these plainly discernible physical groupings of the human family, we would not even have a concept of race...

    Racism, then, is not a psychological or moral flaw, and thus an exception to the rule; it is the rule...

    Since, then, there is no “non-racist” norm, from which racism would be a deviation, is it not clear that “racism,” in its contemporary inflated sense, has no meaning at all? It has no more meaning than calling people with noses “nosists.”...

    Of course, no one actually believes in such a project. What we have rather is a rhetorical tendency toward an undefined racial utopia that governs all discourse. And it is not all the nations of the earth that are subject to this utopian standard, but only one: the United States. No one questions the right of Arabs to have an Arab nation; of China to be a Chinese nation; of the Africans to preserve their cultures. But the United States, which has never been limited to a single ethnic nationality but has instead—until 1965—drawn most of its people from the na­tions of Europe, is to be denied even this conglomerate, but still distinct, identity. We must absorb all the peoples of the world into our society and submerge our historic character as a predom­inantly Caucasian, Western society.

    When they [the founding fathers] spoke of equal treatment before the law, they meant it in terms of individuals, not in terms of mass migrations that would totally change the country. But today we have lost the ability to make that vital distinction. The idea of equality has been transferred, in effect, from individuals to entire peoples, and along with it, a moralism that brooks no opposition. Under this new dispensation we owe, as it were, an obligation to all the peoples in the world to let them migrate here en masse and recreate American society in their image. And no one can question this project for fear of being called a racist. Liberalism has thus overthrown its professed devotion to political pluralism by turning cultural pluralism into an absolute...

    Merely to make this common­sense observation does not mean we are repeating the race­-idolization of the 19th century racial theorists—or the romantic nationalism that elevates particularity into an absolute. But we also seek to avoid the potentially fatal error of classical liberalism, which, in emphasizing the abstract rights of all men, totally ignores their cultural and ethnic particularities...

    A Chinese person is not merely a locus of abstract legal and human rights identical and interchangeable with all other persons in the world. This ethnic and racial dimension of human identity is an obvious fact that everyone intuitively recognizes, yet which is censored by our equalitarian ideology. (Or rather, it is censored when whites are asserting their rights, but it is insisted on when people of color are asserting theirs.)

    Robert Kennedy said in 1965: “This is the central problem of immigration today; that the law . . . has not recognized that one people is not intrinsically superior or inferior to another people.” But Kennedy was wrong. The paramount moral issue the United States faces is not racial superiority but self­preservation. At the 1965 Senate hearings, Sam Ervin said:

    I do not think that belief in a national origin quota system indicates that one believes that one foreigner is better than another. As I see it, it really indicates that on the basis of our experience, we know that some foreigners are more readily assimilable than others and thus contribute to the requirements of the bedrock of our survival.

    During the Senate floor debate, Strom Thurmond used a common sense analogy to make the same point:

    The wish to preserve one’s own identity and the identity of one’s nation requires no justification and no belief in racial or national superiority any more than the wish to have one’s own children, and to continue one’s own family through them, need be justified or rationalized by a belief that they are superior to the children of others.
     
    This, finally, is the question on which all else depends. Does the United States, does any nation have the moral right to preserve its identity? If our answer is yes, then we have the right to open up this issue and re­evaluate our immigration law without fear of the crippling charge of racism. If our answer is no, then we shall simply continue on our present path to national suicide...

    This infantile belief that we can somehow save the world (or at least our own souls) by allowing the whole world to move here, this inflated idealism that sees America, much as the French revolutionists saw France, as the “Christ of Nations,” is bound up with a classic flaw in human nature: the unwillingness to accept rational limits. Irving Babbitt’s analysis of this age-­old moral failing has profound implication for us today:

    Man’s expansive conceit, as the Greeks saw, produces insolent excess (hybris) and this begets blindness (âte) which in turn brings on Nemesis. Expansive conceit tempered by Nemesis— this is a de nition of an essential aspect of human nature that nds considerable support in the facts of history. Man never rushes forward so con dently, it would sometimes seem, as when he is on the very brink of the abyss.
     
    ...

    It should be recognized that these proposals do not mean a return to the national and racial restrictions of the 1920s legislation; they do not mean exclusion of non-­Europeans; but they do mean a rejection of radical multiculturalism and the visionary idea that the U.S. should become the “Mirror of the World.”...

    It should be made clear that these reforms are not aimed at non­ European peoples as such, but at the huge numbers of immigrants that are altering the very composition—and destiny—of our nation.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  207. geokat62 says:
    @Corvinus
    Earl Raab, like Professor McDonald, are extremists beyond the pale. They are confirmation bias personified.

    They are confirmation bias personified.

    What about Lawrence Auster’s The Path to National Suicide: An Essay on Immigration and Multiculturalism. Have you given it a read? He makes a very convincing argument that mass immigration will spell the end of European and Eurpean-derived countries.

    If you don’t have the appetite to read the entire essay, here are some of the more pertinent excerpts:

    [MORE]

    According to Webster’s, racism is “a belief that race is the pri­ mary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race.” It is thus not a belief in the existence of racial differences as such, but the belief that those differences produce an inherent racial superi­ ority, that constitutes racism…

    unless we conclude (1) that any statement that members of a particular racial group find offensive is, for that reason alone, racist, or (2) that the very idea that there are physically distinct races of mankind is itself racist. The first of these ideas was a theme of the Harvard conference mentioned above. Participants were told that professors teaching a class should “never introduce any sort of thing that might hurt a group”—a prescription for the massive repression of speech. As for the second idea, it’s simply absurd; if there were not these plainly discernible physical groupings of the human family, we would not even have a concept of race…

    Racism, then, is not a psychological or moral flaw, and thus an exception to the rule; it is the rule…

    Since, then, there is no “non-racist” norm, from which racism would be a deviation, is it not clear that “racism,” in its contemporary inflated sense, has no meaning at all? It has no more meaning than calling people with noses “nosists.”…

    Of course, no one actually believes in such a project. What we have rather is a rhetorical tendency toward an undefined racial utopia that governs all discourse. And it is not all the nations of the earth that are subject to this utopian standard, but only one: the United States. No one questions the right of Arabs to have an Arab nation; of China to be a Chinese nation; of the Africans to preserve their cultures. But the United States, which has never been limited to a single ethnic nationality but has instead—until 1965—drawn most of its people from the na­tions of Europe, is to be denied even this conglomerate, but still distinct, identity. We must absorb all the peoples of the world into our society and submerge our historic character as a predom­inantly Caucasian, Western society.

    When they [the founding fathers] spoke of equal treatment before the law, they meant it in terms of individuals, not in terms of mass migrations that would totally change the country. But today we have lost the ability to make that vital distinction. The idea of equality has been transferred, in effect, from individuals to entire peoples, and along with it, a moralism that brooks no opposition. Under this new dispensation we owe, as it were, an obligation to all the peoples in the world to let them migrate here en masse and recreate American society in their image. And no one can question this project for fear of being called a racist. Liberalism has thus overthrown its professed devotion to political pluralism by turning cultural pluralism into an absolute…

    Merely to make this common­sense observation does not mean we are repeating the race­-idolization of the 19th century racial theorists—or the romantic nationalism that elevates particularity into an absolute. But we also seek to avoid the potentially fatal error of classical liberalism, which, in emphasizing the abstract rights of all men, totally ignores their cultural and ethnic particularities…

    A Chinese person is not merely a locus of abstract legal and human rights identical and interchangeable with all other persons in the world. This ethnic and racial dimension of human identity is an obvious fact that everyone intuitively recognizes, yet which is censored by our equalitarian ideology. (Or rather, it is censored when whites are asserting their rights, but it is insisted on when people of color are asserting theirs.)

    Robert Kennedy said in 1965: “This is the central problem of immigration today; that the law . . . has not recognized that one people is not intrinsically superior or inferior to another people.” But Kennedy was wrong. The paramount moral issue the United States faces is not racial superiority but self­preservation. At the 1965 Senate hearings, Sam Ervin said:

    I do not think that belief in a national origin quota system indicates that one believes that one foreigner is better than another. As I see it, it really indicates that on the basis of our experience, we know that some foreigners are more readily assimilable than others and thus contribute to the requirements of the bedrock of our survival.

    During the Senate floor debate, Strom Thurmond used a common sense analogy to make the same point:

    The wish to preserve one’s own identity and the identity of one’s nation requires no justification and no belief in racial or national superiority any more than the wish to have one’s own children, and to continue one’s own family through them, need be justified or rationalized by a belief that they are superior to the children of others.

    This, finally, is the question on which all else depends. Does the United States, does any nation have the moral right to preserve its identity? If our answer is yes, then we have the right to open up this issue and re­evaluate our immigration law without fear of the crippling charge of racism. If our answer is no, then we shall simply continue on our present path to national suicide…

    This infantile belief that we can somehow save the world (or at least our own souls) by allowing the whole world to move here, this inflated idealism that sees America, much as the French revolutionists saw France, as the “Christ of Nations,” is bound up with a classic flaw in human nature: the unwillingness to accept rational limits. Irving Babbitt’s analysis of this age-­old moral failing has profound implication for us today:

    Man’s expansive conceit, as the Greeks saw, produces insolent excess (hybris) and this begets blindness (âte) which in turn brings on Nemesis. Expansive conceit tempered by Nemesis— this is a de nition of an essential aspect of human nature that nds considerable support in the facts of history. Man never rushes forward so con dently, it would sometimes seem, as when he is on the very brink of the abyss.

    It should be recognized that these proposals do not mean a return to the national and racial restrictions of the 1920s legislation; they do not mean exclusion of non-­Europeans; but they do mean a rejection of radical multiculturalism and the visionary idea that the U.S. should become the “Mirror of the World.”…

    It should be made clear that these reforms are not aimed at non­ European peoples as such, but at the huge numbers of immigrants that are altering the very composition—and destiny—of our nation.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    "As I see it, it really indicates that on the basis of our experience, we know that some foreigners are more readily assimilable than others and thus contribute to the requirements of the bedrock of our survival."

    The ASSUMPTION is that some foreigners are more readily assimilable than others. Remember, the nativists believed that the Irish and Germans and Italians--white Europeans!--lacked the qualities to be "properly" absorbed.

    "But the United States, which has never been limited to a single ethnic nationality but has instead—until 1965—drawn most of its people from the na­tions of Europe, is to be denied even this conglomerate, but still distinct, identity."

    America's "distinct identity" is that we are a nation of mutts. We have had the intermingling of racial and ethnic groups that makes us quite remarkable. At FIRST, our character was generally from Europe. However, the Founding Fathers enabled the people through their representatives in Congress to decide the criteria for immigration. As a result, non-Europeans have been able to come into our nation. Now, while I do support limits on the number of foreigners coming here, I do NOT subscribe to the theory that "mestizos" or "Arabs" or "darkies" overall lack the qualities to be subsumed into the body and cultural politic of our country.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  208. Corvinus says:
    @geokat62

    They are confirmation bias personified.
     
    What about Lawrence Auster's The Path to National Suicide: An Essay on Immigration and Multiculturalism. Have you given it a read? He makes a very convincing argument that mass immigration will spell the end of European and Eurpean-derived countries.

    If you don't have the appetite to read the entire essay, here are some of the more pertinent excerpts:




    According to Webster’s, racism is “a belief that race is the pri­ mary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race.” It is thus not a belief in the existence of racial differences as such, but the belief that those differences produce an inherent racial superi­ ority, that constitutes racism...

    unless we conclude (1) that any statement that members of a particular racial group find offensive is, for that reason alone, racist, or (2) that the very idea that there are physically distinct races of mankind is itself racist. The first of these ideas was a theme of the Harvard conference mentioned above. Participants were told that professors teaching a class should “never introduce any sort of thing that might hurt a group”—a prescription for the massive repression of speech. As for the second idea, it’s simply absurd; if there were not these plainly discernible physical groupings of the human family, we would not even have a concept of race...

    Racism, then, is not a psychological or moral flaw, and thus an exception to the rule; it is the rule...

    Since, then, there is no “non-racist” norm, from which racism would be a deviation, is it not clear that “racism,” in its contemporary inflated sense, has no meaning at all? It has no more meaning than calling people with noses “nosists.”...

    Of course, no one actually believes in such a project. What we have rather is a rhetorical tendency toward an undefined racial utopia that governs all discourse. And it is not all the nations of the earth that are subject to this utopian standard, but only one: the United States. No one questions the right of Arabs to have an Arab nation; of China to be a Chinese nation; of the Africans to preserve their cultures. But the United States, which has never been limited to a single ethnic nationality but has instead—until 1965—drawn most of its people from the na­tions of Europe, is to be denied even this conglomerate, but still distinct, identity. We must absorb all the peoples of the world into our society and submerge our historic character as a predom­inantly Caucasian, Western society.

    When they [the founding fathers] spoke of equal treatment before the law, they meant it in terms of individuals, not in terms of mass migrations that would totally change the country. But today we have lost the ability to make that vital distinction. The idea of equality has been transferred, in effect, from individuals to entire peoples, and along with it, a moralism that brooks no opposition. Under this new dispensation we owe, as it were, an obligation to all the peoples in the world to let them migrate here en masse and recreate American society in their image. And no one can question this project for fear of being called a racist. Liberalism has thus overthrown its professed devotion to political pluralism by turning cultural pluralism into an absolute...

    Merely to make this common­sense observation does not mean we are repeating the race­-idolization of the 19th century racial theorists—or the romantic nationalism that elevates particularity into an absolute. But we also seek to avoid the potentially fatal error of classical liberalism, which, in emphasizing the abstract rights of all men, totally ignores their cultural and ethnic particularities...

    A Chinese person is not merely a locus of abstract legal and human rights identical and interchangeable with all other persons in the world. This ethnic and racial dimension of human identity is an obvious fact that everyone intuitively recognizes, yet which is censored by our equalitarian ideology. (Or rather, it is censored when whites are asserting their rights, but it is insisted on when people of color are asserting theirs.)

    Robert Kennedy said in 1965: “This is the central problem of immigration today; that the law . . . has not recognized that one people is not intrinsically superior or inferior to another people.” But Kennedy was wrong. The paramount moral issue the United States faces is not racial superiority but self­preservation. At the 1965 Senate hearings, Sam Ervin said:

    I do not think that belief in a national origin quota system indicates that one believes that one foreigner is better than another. As I see it, it really indicates that on the basis of our experience, we know that some foreigners are more readily assimilable than others and thus contribute to the requirements of the bedrock of our survival.

    During the Senate floor debate, Strom Thurmond used a common sense analogy to make the same point:

    The wish to preserve one’s own identity and the identity of one’s nation requires no justification and no belief in racial or national superiority any more than the wish to have one’s own children, and to continue one’s own family through them, need be justified or rationalized by a belief that they are superior to the children of others.
     
    This, finally, is the question on which all else depends. Does the United States, does any nation have the moral right to preserve its identity? If our answer is yes, then we have the right to open up this issue and re­evaluate our immigration law without fear of the crippling charge of racism. If our answer is no, then we shall simply continue on our present path to national suicide...

    This infantile belief that we can somehow save the world (or at least our own souls) by allowing the whole world to move here, this inflated idealism that sees America, much as the French revolutionists saw France, as the “Christ of Nations,” is bound up with a classic flaw in human nature: the unwillingness to accept rational limits. Irving Babbitt’s analysis of this age-­old moral failing has profound implication for us today:

    Man’s expansive conceit, as the Greeks saw, produces insolent excess (hybris) and this begets blindness (âte) which in turn brings on Nemesis. Expansive conceit tempered by Nemesis— this is a de nition of an essential aspect of human nature that nds considerable support in the facts of history. Man never rushes forward so con dently, it would sometimes seem, as when he is on the very brink of the abyss.
     
    ...

    It should be recognized that these proposals do not mean a return to the national and racial restrictions of the 1920s legislation; they do not mean exclusion of non-­Europeans; but they do mean a rejection of radical multiculturalism and the visionary idea that the U.S. should become the “Mirror of the World.”...

    It should be made clear that these reforms are not aimed at non­ European peoples as such, but at the huge numbers of immigrants that are altering the very composition—and destiny—of our nation.

    “As I see it, it really indicates that on the basis of our experience, we know that some foreigners are more readily assimilable than others and thus contribute to the requirements of the bedrock of our survival.”

    The ASSUMPTION is that some foreigners are more readily assimilable than others. Remember, the nativists believed that the Irish and Germans and Italians–white Europeans!–lacked the qualities to be “properly” absorbed.

    “But the United States, which has never been limited to a single ethnic nationality but has instead—until 1965—drawn most of its people from the na­tions of Europe, is to be denied even this conglomerate, but still distinct, identity.”

    America’s “distinct identity” is that we are a nation of mutts. We have had the intermingling of racial and ethnic groups that makes us quite remarkable. At FIRST, our character was generally from Europe. However, the Founding Fathers enabled the people through their representatives in Congress to decide the criteria for immigration. As a result, non-Europeans have been able to come into our nation. Now, while I do support limits on the number of foreigners coming here, I do NOT subscribe to the theory that “mestizos” or “Arabs” or “darkies” overall lack the qualities to be subsumed into the body and cultural politic of our country.

    Read More
    • Replies: @bomag

    Remember, the nativists believed that the Irish and Germans and Italians–white Europeans!–lacked the qualities to be “properly” absorbed.
     
    You keep saying this, but so what? You can find historical skepticism about any public policy; it doesn't mean we are obliged to accept a similar arrangement today.

    we are a nation of mutts
     
    Not really.

    while I do support limits on the number of foreigners coming here, I do NOT subscribe to the theory that “mestizos” or “Arabs” or “darkies” overall lack the qualities to be subsumed into the body and cultural politic of our country.
     
    Nice sentiment, but the "mestizos", "Arabs", and "darkies" consistently inform me that they are not here to be subsumed; they are here to do the subsuming, if not to take the thing over completely and install their people. They see anyone preaching Universalism as someone in the process of surrendering.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  209. bomag says:
    @Corvinus
    "As I see it, it really indicates that on the basis of our experience, we know that some foreigners are more readily assimilable than others and thus contribute to the requirements of the bedrock of our survival."

    The ASSUMPTION is that some foreigners are more readily assimilable than others. Remember, the nativists believed that the Irish and Germans and Italians--white Europeans!--lacked the qualities to be "properly" absorbed.

    "But the United States, which has never been limited to a single ethnic nationality but has instead—until 1965—drawn most of its people from the na­tions of Europe, is to be denied even this conglomerate, but still distinct, identity."

    America's "distinct identity" is that we are a nation of mutts. We have had the intermingling of racial and ethnic groups that makes us quite remarkable. At FIRST, our character was generally from Europe. However, the Founding Fathers enabled the people through their representatives in Congress to decide the criteria for immigration. As a result, non-Europeans have been able to come into our nation. Now, while I do support limits on the number of foreigners coming here, I do NOT subscribe to the theory that "mestizos" or "Arabs" or "darkies" overall lack the qualities to be subsumed into the body and cultural politic of our country.

    Remember, the nativists believed that the Irish and Germans and Italians–white Europeans!–lacked the qualities to be “properly” absorbed.

    You keep saying this, but so what? You can find historical skepticism about any public policy; it doesn’t mean we are obliged to accept a similar arrangement today.

    we are a nation of mutts

    Not really.

    while I do support limits on the number of foreigners coming here, I do NOT subscribe to the theory that “mestizos” or “Arabs” or “darkies” overall lack the qualities to be subsumed into the body and cultural politic of our country.

    Nice sentiment, but the “mestizos”, “Arabs”, and “darkies” consistently inform me that they are not here to be subsumed; they are here to do the subsuming, if not to take the thing over completely and install their people. They see anyone preaching Universalism as someone in the process of surrendering.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  210. Corvinus says:

    “Not really.”

    Yes, really, we are a nation of mutts. Immigrants came here, and after a couple of generations, began to marry outside of their ethnicity or of their race.

    “Nice sentiment, but the “mestizos”, “Arabs”, and “darkies” consistently inform me that they are not here to be subsumed; they are here to do the subsuming, if not to take the thing over completely and install their people.”

    So what were there exact words? I mean, you said they informed you, right? What did they specifically say to you?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  211. Alden says:
    @Wizard of Oz
    I guess she has a sly sense of humour laying traps for people like you who imagine your point about the mutations of blue eyed blondes and redheads isn't obvious to all reasonably well informed people.

    What are you talking about? Your comment makes no sense at all.

    Read More
    • Replies: @ANON
    Well I've just checked and I think it is a sly use of the word "sly" but I'm afraid it is really very clear. It is saying you are a pretty slow witted dim bulb who couldn't even entertain the possibility that people like you were being baited by this sharp young lady. You have just confirmed that she was right if she knew you.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  212. Alden says:
    @Truth
    I don't, just as I don't KNOW that George W. Bush never had an abortion. But for the same REASON that I strongly assume GWB had an abortion, I STRONGLY ASSUME that MM never had an abortion.

    You see, Aldey, only roughly %51 percent of the world population has any need for an abortion. Both Monroe and Bush are part of the other %49.

    Why bring assumptions about dead movie stars into this discussion. What’s your point and why did you bring up the non issue of Monroe and abortions?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  213. Alden says:
    @Wizard of Oz
    My my, where did you learn that language? Perhaps whete your cognitive faculties were distorted to imagine a 1906 event when I expressly referred to a 1919 event?

    I hadn't heard of your Brownsville affair so I Googled (as I know you do) with "Brownville affair 1919" as my search words and soon found that you had just been sounding off from a very imperfect memory mixed with prejudice. Even the affair you wrongly thought I was referring to you got wrong. Not just the date but the ultimate exoneration of the 137 discharged black soldiers.

    Of course I could have posed my question about the DNA of whites who massacred Indians and stole their land, of Germans who committed mass murder in WW2, etc. amd asked if it is the civilisation that they created which is what we need even the lowest classes of whites to preserve.

    So you believethe leftist, cultural Marxist, anti White version of the Brownsville Tx 1919 murderous attack on White towns people by black soldiers.

    Moron, who believes google except for practical things such as BMW repair near me.

    Like most leftist anti Whites, you’ve never heard of a university library with their pre 1960 history books.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    Excuse me intervening anonymously but I don't wish to have anything to do with what might most charitably be characterised as drunken buffoonery of a not very bright person who has pretensions to being regarded as better educated than he is. What I do want is some information that you claim to have.

    I have tried Googling for Brownsville Tx 1919 as you seem to recommend (though I note you imply rather inconsistent views of Google in different places) and I simply can't find anything about the event you purport to give some description of. So, please, where do you get your story from now that you have apparently corrected your focus from your erroneous 1906 story about black soldiers and whites at Brownsville. It appears to be you that brought up Brownsville in the first place so maybe you are best placed to clear up the confusion.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  214. ANON • Disclaimer says:
    @Alden
    What are you talking about? Your comment makes no sense at all.

    Well I’ve just checked and I think it is a sly use of the word “sly” but I’m afraid it is really very clear. It is saying you are a pretty slow witted dim bulb who couldn’t even entertain the possibility that people like you were being baited by this sharp young lady. You have just confirmed that she was right if she knew you.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  215. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @Alden
    So you believethe leftist, cultural Marxist, anti White version of the Brownsville Tx 1919 murderous attack on White towns people by black soldiers.

    Moron, who believes google except for practical things such as BMW repair near me.

    Like most leftist anti Whites, you’ve never heard of a university library with their pre 1960 history books.

    Excuse me intervening anonymously but I don’t wish to have anything to do with what might most charitably be characterised as drunken buffoonery of a not very bright person who has pretensions to being regarded as better educated than he is. What I do want is some information that you claim to have.

    I have tried Googling for Brownsville Tx 1919 as you seem to recommend (though I note you imply rather inconsistent views of Google in different places) and I simply can’t find anything about the event you purport to give some description of. So, please, where do you get your story from now that you have apparently corrected your focus from your erroneous 1906 story about black soldiers and whites at Brownsville. It appears to be you that brought up Brownsville in the first place so maybe you are best placed to clear up the confusion.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Alden
    Surely there must be at least a podunk community college library near you that has history books written before 1960.

    Your state university has a library. You can get a friend of the library card and you can get history books from there.

    I only use google for practical things, such as auto supply shops that I can call and ask if they have a #36 battery.

    Wikipedia probably has some lies that the civilians of Brownsville decided to attack the black soldiers for no reason but bigotry and hatred and attacked the black soldiers at night when they were asleep or something like that.

    The opposite is true. The black soldiers killed some other soldiers, seized the weapons and invaded the town planning to kill, rape, burn and loot.

    The civilian townspeople, both men and women defended themselves with their privately owned guns and defeated the black soldiers.
    I don’t know anything about what happened in 1906 in Brownsville. I doubt there was a regiment of black soldiers drafted to fight in WW1 there in 1906.

    If all else fails try Cecil Green library of Stanford university Palo alto ca that’s where I first read about it. Stanford may have destroyed the book as heresy by now.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  216. @Alden
    Ever heard of a dictionary? BTW the substitution of the word decimate for destroy is a recent liberal creation. They are morons but want to sound intellectual so they came up with decimate instead of destroy. Liberal is another language.

    As you say. Try looking up dictionaries. My Macquarie Dictionary is a perfectly respectable dictionary of its size and happened to be first to hand so I find there that the No. 1 contemporary meaning is to destroy a large proportion of anything. But naturally I was worried about those American liberals (different meaning from liberal in Australia) worming their way into dictionaries that Australians might use. So I moved on to an old two volume Concise Oxford Dictionary which had the Roman military meaning tagged as “milit”. However that degraded modern meaning that Macquarie puts first is noted as used in 1683. Whew! We don’t really have to worry about those liberals and lefties corrupting this bit of the language after all. And all at the cost of just using a good dictionary. I really do recommend it. Try next time to walk the walk.

    For my part I shall not bother to search further for my full multi- volume Oxford English Dictionary. The petty pedantry which makes me write and say “obliterate”, devastate” or “destroy” rather than “decimate” will survive as I am sure yours will too.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  217. Alden says:
    @chris m
    my oh my, how things have changed!!

    well remember the good old-bad old days
    and a favourite slogan of mine

    "workers of the world unite for .........a white south africa"
    (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rand_Rebellion)


    always thought that was very funny/ironic.

    you definitely couldn't say that about the current crop of Marxists.
    ( a totally humourless bunch)

    Before John Reed helped found the American communist party and went to Russia to glorify the communists, he went to S. Africa to glorify the Boers fighting the evil imperialist British Empire.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  218. Alden says:
    @Anonymous
    Excuse me intervening anonymously but I don't wish to have anything to do with what might most charitably be characterised as drunken buffoonery of a not very bright person who has pretensions to being regarded as better educated than he is. What I do want is some information that you claim to have.

    I have tried Googling for Brownsville Tx 1919 as you seem to recommend (though I note you imply rather inconsistent views of Google in different places) and I simply can't find anything about the event you purport to give some description of. So, please, where do you get your story from now that you have apparently corrected your focus from your erroneous 1906 story about black soldiers and whites at Brownsville. It appears to be you that brought up Brownsville in the first place so maybe you are best placed to clear up the confusion.

    Surely there must be at least a podunk community college library near you that has history books written before 1960.

    Your state university has a library. You can get a friend of the library card and you can get history books from there.

    I only use google for practical things, such as auto supply shops that I can call and ask if they have a #36 battery.

    Wikipedia probably has some lies that the civilians of Brownsville decided to attack the black soldiers for no reason but bigotry and hatred and attacked the black soldiers at night when they were asleep or something like that.

    The opposite is true. The black soldiers killed some other soldiers, seized the weapons and invaded the town planning to kill, rape, burn and loot.

    The civilian townspeople, both men and women defended themselves with their privately owned guns and defeated the black soldiers.
    I don’t know anything about what happened in 1906 in Brownsville. I doubt there was a regiment of black soldiers drafted to fight in WW1 there in 1906.

    If all else fails try Cecil Green library of Stanford university Palo alto ca that’s where I first read about it. Stanford may have destroyed the book as heresy by now.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    You really are a presumptuous poseur aren't you?

    Subject matter that YOU, ans only you, brought up: i.e. Brownsville violence between black soldiers and whites. The only such events that research brings up is for 1906, not 1919 and instead of just sneering about what Wikipedia might bring up, why don't you take 2 minutes to see if your supposition could be correct and show the courtesy of not wasting other people's time discovering and correcting your errors.

    The real subject doesn't appear to have anything to do with the 1919 events that you got confused about in your initial reply. Moreover you could have learned something relevant if you had bothered to consult anything beyond pre 1920 printed matter you think you read years ago in Palo Alto. You would have discovered the subsequent exoneration of the discharged (not convicted) soldiers, some unfortunately only posthumously.

    By the way. Why do you suppose I am one of Unz Review's maybe 60 per cent of commenters who are living in America near state university libraries? As it happens I have libraries accessible to me with hundreds of thousands of books, all between 1000 yards and two miles distant by foot.

    1There remain two points. One is to ask why I should take historical research to end at 1920 and consult only books which omit subsequent exonerations of the soldiers. The other is why you don't seem even now to have understood that your purported reply didn't have anything to do with what you claimed, in very offensive language, to be replying to.

    Your pre 1920 books mightn't be comprehensive so I suggest you use multiple search engines to inform yourself on the subject of "lynching of American black soldiers". I hope the perpetraters were no closer than 7th cousins of mine. By the sound of your diatribes you are probably much closer, and proud of it.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  219. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @Alden
    Surely there must be at least a podunk community college library near you that has history books written before 1960.

    Your state university has a library. You can get a friend of the library card and you can get history books from there.

    I only use google for practical things, such as auto supply shops that I can call and ask if they have a #36 battery.

    Wikipedia probably has some lies that the civilians of Brownsville decided to attack the black soldiers for no reason but bigotry and hatred and attacked the black soldiers at night when they were asleep or something like that.

    The opposite is true. The black soldiers killed some other soldiers, seized the weapons and invaded the town planning to kill, rape, burn and loot.

    The civilian townspeople, both men and women defended themselves with their privately owned guns and defeated the black soldiers.
    I don’t know anything about what happened in 1906 in Brownsville. I doubt there was a regiment of black soldiers drafted to fight in WW1 there in 1906.

    If all else fails try Cecil Green library of Stanford university Palo alto ca that’s where I first read about it. Stanford may have destroyed the book as heresy by now.

    You really are a presumptuous poseur aren’t you?

    Subject matter that YOU, ans only you, brought up: i.e. Brownsville violence between black soldiers and whites. The only such events that research brings up is for 1906, not 1919 and instead of just sneering about what Wikipedia might bring up, why don’t you take 2 minutes to see if your supposition could be correct and show the courtesy of not wasting other people’s time discovering and correcting your errors.

    The real subject doesn’t appear to have anything to do with the 1919 events that you got confused about in your initial reply. Moreover you could have learned something relevant if you had bothered to consult anything beyond pre 1920 printed matter you think you read years ago in Palo Alto. You would have discovered the subsequent exoneration of the discharged (not convicted) soldiers, some unfortunately only posthumously.

    By the way. Why do you suppose I am one of Unz Review’s maybe 60 per cent of commenters who are living in America near state university libraries? As it happens I have libraries accessible to me with hundreds of thousands of books, all between 1000 yards and two miles distant by foot.

    1There remain two points. One is to ask why I should take historical research to end at 1920 and consult only books which omit subsequent exonerations of the soldiers. The other is why you don’t seem even now to have understood that your purported reply didn’t have anything to do with what you claimed, in very offensive language, to be replying to.

    Your pre 1920 books mightn’t be comprehensive so I suggest you use multiple search engines to inform yourself on the subject of “lynching of American black soldiers”. I hope the perpetraters were no closer than 7th cousins of mine. By the sound of your diatribes you are probably much closer, and proud of it.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
Current Commenter says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS
PastClassics
The evidence is clear — but often ignored
The unspoken statistical reality of urban crime over the last quarter century.
The “war hero” candidate buried information about POWs left behind in Vietnam.
The major media overlooked Communist spies and Madoff’s fraud. What are they missing today?
What Was John McCain's True Wartime Record in Vietnam?