The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Boyd D. Cathey Archive
Baltimore and the Failure of the Egalitarian Experiment
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New Reply
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Back on Tuesday, May 5, Rush Limbaugh spent nearly a half hour of his syndicated radio program dissecting the actions of Maryland State’s Attorney Marilyn Mosby’s decision to indict six Baltimore policemen, whom she charged with the death of Freddie Gray. Many observers acknowledged the racial aspect of her indictment. One visible fact stood out. And Rush pounced on it immediately: three of the indicted policemen are black. He asked rhetorically: “How can she turn this case into a racial issue, of white policemen abusing blacks, when three of the indicted officers are black?” Rush went on to raise potential difficulties for hucksters like Al Sharpton and much of the civil rights establishment if they seek to frame this case in purely white-vs-black terms.

On one level, Limbaugh has a point. Strictly speaking, the potential culpability of the black officers doesn’t fit neatly into a narrowly-framed narrative of white police abusing blacks. But give Ms. Mosby credit: that was never the real meaning of her actions. Of course, by her statements and language, she has politicized this case, as Rush asserts; but even more, she has turned it into a broader attack on the entire judicial process. In that respect, it becomes a part of the neo-Marxist assault on the nation’s legal system and part of the effort to totally recast jurisprudence, deconstruct it, and turn it on its head as part of a larger campaign to remake this nation.

There are much deeper issues highlighted by this case which underlie Mosby’s indictment. To understand these, we must go back to the 1960s, when American blacks were promised complete “equality” and full empowerment by the liberal political establishment. Over the past 50 years, a benchmark template of egalitarianism has emerged as the standard mainstream narrative for judging race and racial relations in America. This template dominates today in our media, in our schools, in our politics, and in our culture. Both political parties pay obeisance to it. Hollywood inserts it into our films and evening television fare. All our networks and media, from MSNBC to Fox News, accept it. Our schools and universities inculcate it into the flabby brains of our children.

The long-range solution to historical and present inequality is a never-ending stream of radical changes and “reparations” — verbal, financial, electoral, educational, cultural — that must be imposed on the current (and future) white population, and, above all, the dismantling of the white power structure. Even more, white people and their future progeny must be “sensitized” and “re-educated” to comprehend their substantial historic racism. They have to understand that this “guilt” will never really go away. It’s like the stain on Lady Macbeth’s hand: there is nothing that whites can do to remove it. Affirmative action, race preferences in education and in job placement, and a transformation of the culture, itself, may perhaps ease just a bit the sense of guilt carried by whites, but the burden and stain are permanent.

This sin of racism only affects whites and white-created society. As Shelby Steele wrote in The Wall Street Journal back in 2003 (“Yo, Howard!” WSJ, November 13, 2003), blacks are in fact not really capable of racism. Only whites, with their historic guilt and their positions of power to oppress, can be true racists. And that is why in the present scheme of things, black-on-black crime (which is the great majority of crime among blacks) is much less important. It doesn’t represent the racism that is inherent in white (especially police) treatment of blacks. And thus the three black police officers indicted in Baltimore are, in so many words, “Uncle Toms” only serving an oppressive white system. Since white Americans and their power structures are responsible for that oppression, it makes no important difference whether three of the arrested policemen in Baltimore were black or not; they are a part of the establishment that has been keeping down black people for centuries. The presumption from the beginning in any event like that in Baltimore is: “It’s another sign of white racism and the oppression by the white power structure. By definition, the white man is guilty.”

As Steele wrote, under this template there is a radical disconnect between how the races are viewed in the United States: “It is quite acceptable for either party to explicitly go after the black, Hispanic, or even the Jewish vote … But it is absolutely verboten for either party, or any white candidate, to appeal to whites as a racial identity group. Racial identity is simply forbidden to whites in America and across the entire Western world. Black children today are hammered with the idea of racial identity and pride, yet racial pride in whites constitutes a grave evil. Say ‘I’m white and I’m proud,’ and you are a Nazi….White guilt—the need to win enough moral authority around race to prove that one is not a racist—is the price whites today pay for this history. [Italics added] Political correctness is the language that enables whites to show by wildly exaggerated courtesy that they are not racist; diversity does this for institutions.”

By and large the dominant American political class have bought into this narrative, to one degree or another. Even mainstream conservatism, in particular the Neoconservative “talking heads” and their epigones at the RNC and in Congress, accept its historical premises, although suggesting distinctly different remedies.

Since the late 1950s and 1960s, it has been a Leftist agenda and intellectual dynamic that have dominated discussion and debate. While the Left proposes increasingly more radical measures, conservatives, having swallowed the Leftist and neo-Marxist historical narrative, have dithered, most of their proposals only watering down the more aggressive or extreme programs. The message of the so-called “Civil Rights” bills of the 1960s, the Great Society, and all the subsequent legislation and government action, all the trillions of dollars spent, all the government destruction of settled rights and traditions—all of it—was that Big Brother in Washington DC, the all-seeing and all-knowing altruistic Federal government, would correct the injustices of the past and legislate equality, and by law and various social/welfare programs, simply make everyone equal. Schools and universities would play an integral role in the process; affirmative action programs would boost minorities into higher positions and roles (whether they could or could not handle the work or schooling); Hollywood and the media would play an equally important role—our entertainment industry would demonstrate over and over again how bad white folks had been, how oppressive they were, and how the structural foundations of the American republic were truly rotten.

The facts, however, have proved quite difficult to overcome. All the trillions and all the laws and programs have done very little, save create unfulfilled expectations that, in fact, could never be fulfilled or accomplished. And that, certainly, is one of the major reasons for the pent-up anger and frustration unleashed in Baltimore and in other major cities with a large black underclass.

It is not the police or law enforcement that are the problem in those cities. No; it is the neo-Marxist template that has been engrained in the black underclass over the past fifty years: the impossible promises, the assurances that with one more expensive (and wasteful) social program, things will get better.

Recall the lady at the Obama rally in 2008: “He’s gonna get me an Obama phone.” Or, “Obama’s gonna pay my mortgage!” It is the expectations game played by the Left since the days of Martin Luther King, and it is both fraudulent and extremely dangerous.

There is a Latin phrase that comes from Aristotelian philosophy: “Nemo dat quod non habet,” which means, simply, “you can’t give what you don’t have.” And in contemporary America we have both government and the increasingly dependent minorities denying that such a self-evident truth applies.

For the government, that means attempting to transfer immense wealth (much of it yet to be created in the distant future by our grandchildren) to the underclass minorities, not realizing that in more cases than not, it is wasting billions, pouring that wealth into leaky waste bins, and that all the money in the world cannot create a silk purse from a sow’s ear. And for the minority, the continuing failure of expectations has engendered anger and rage, but anger and rage directed at a system perceived to be the oppressor, when, in fact, it is the inadequacies and cognitive disparities of the group, itself, that in large part are responsible for the failure to achieve and accomplish.

The dream of across-the-board equality is in reality a ghoulish nightmare that will, most likely, destroy this nation, perhaps breaking it into separate sections. Yet, the more unsuccessful it apparently is and can be readily seen to be, the more zealously its proponents push it and impose it. Baltimore, a city dominated governmentally by a Left wing black establishment is a case in point, just as Detroit, Los Angeles, and other cities are.

Still, Nature will most likely have the final say in the matter, and whether blood will flow in the streets or states will rise up once again to reclaim their stolen sovereignty, the present lingering situation does not bode well for the future, unless many more citizens become willing to ask excruciatingly painful questions and offer answers that hardly anyone wants to hear.

Barring that, the American “experiment”–the “exceptional nation”–will not survive, at least not in its present state…nor, probably, should it.

 
• Category: Ideology, Race/Ethnicity • Tags: Baltimore Riots, Blacks 
Hide 105 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
    []
  1. The dream of across-the-board equality is in reality a ghoulish nightmare that will, most likely, destroy this nation, perhaps breaking it into separate sections.

    The Solution Left Untried.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Father O'Hara
    The Solution we need is the Final Solution
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
    AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
    These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
    Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
    Sharing Comment via Twitter
    /article/baltimore-and-the-failure-of-the-egalitarian-experiment/#comment-956464
    More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  2. For the government, that means attempting to transfer immense wealth (much of it yet to be created in the distant future by our grandchildren) to the underclass minorities, not realizing that in more cases than not, it is wasting billions, pouring that wealth into leaky waste bins, and that all the money in the world cannot create a silk purse from a sow’s ear

    Change just three words and you have:

    For the government, that means attempting to transfer immense wealth (much of it yet to be created in the distant future by our grandchildren) to our empire’s military, not realizing that in more cases than not, it is wasting billions, pouring that wealth into leaky waste bins, and that all the money in the world cannot create a silk purse from a sow’s ear

    Now, if all of those hundreds upon hundreds of billions of tax $ poured into social welfare jobs generated by and for White people (military contracting) had been equitably divided with the demographic Black share invested in job creation in disadvantaged neighborhoods, where would the argument shift to? (recalling Rush Limbaugh’s life as an Oxycontin junkie, not so different to a ‘crack ho’ excepting White privilege got him a slap on the wrist instead of doing time.)

    Read More
    • Replies: @The Anti-Gnostic

    Now, if all of those hundreds upon hundreds of billions of tax $ poured into social welfare jobs generated by and for White people (military contracting) had been equitably divided with the demographic Black share invested in job creation in disadvantaged neighborhoods...
     
    You are an old, self-loathing white fool and I am wasting my time, but here goes:

    Government spending does not "create jobs." Government spending only transfers existing wealth. Once the transfer payments end, the jobs "created" by them end. Any actual public goods being provided end up being serviced for much, much less (compare public and private school teacher salaries).

    American blacks are the recipients of loads of largesse. We have an entire US Postal Service where we pay them and give them a pension and medical coverage to deliver corporate marketing materials. We have delivered entire cities to them to be run by, for and with black people. Black entertainers, athletes and entrepeneurs earn millions of dollars.

    Government transfer payments seemingly work for white people (for a few generations, at which point high youth unemployment and taxes and inflation shut the Ponzi scheme down) because of their mean lower time-preference, lower aggression, and higher general intelligence. For blacks with higher time-preference, higher aggression and lower general intelligence, you end up with a dysgenic, dysfunctional Big Man culture. Again, the gravy train only lasts so long as the (mostly white) net tax-payors are willing to fund it.

    , @Lepanto
    Good point. Of course, not all whites work for military contractors. There are plenty working in service, fast food, retail, etc.
    , @Jus' Sayin'...
    I suggest that you take a look at a summary of the federal budget sometime. The military budget is much larger than it should be but consumes a far smaller proportion of the budget (20-25%) than so-called entitlement payments --Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and a variety of "welfare programs"-- and payments to service debt incurred for these entitlement payments. This is not even considering the costs of phony federal jobs, spread across the federal budget, that disproportionately employ otherwise unemployable Negroes and other basically useless members of society. The costs of entitlements, debt and debt-servicing, and redundant personnel are also consuming an ever-increasing portion of the federal budget, squeezing out everything else including military expenditures..

    But the federal budget is only about half of all government spending in this country. State and local governments account for the remainder. The budgets of non-federal governments have become increasingly shackled by so-called federal mandates that essentially cajole and/or force them into providing additional dysfunctional forms of welfare and other transfer payments. And state and local government jobs are an essential part of this welfare system. Check out who is badly serving you the next time you deal with a local government agency in a locality with a significant Negro population.

    The bottom line is that the military budget is being steadily encroached upon by other government spending. But even diverting it entirely to various forms of transfer payments cannot solve our problems now. And that's ignoring the fact that a large fraction of the military budget is in fact just another form of welfare transfer. (A main reason why it's become almost a political impossibility to close local military baes no matter how expensive and/or useless they are.)
    , @Vortex
    The argument would shift to why you are focusing on the molehill (US military spending: 4.5% of GDP) instead of the mountain (US social spending: 34% of GDP)
    , @Mark
    Blacks make up thirteen per cent of the population but only pay six per cent of income taxes. If money is being wasted by the military, it isn't coming from blacks and causing them to be poorer. It's just one group of whites (taxpayers) subsidizing another group of whites (highly paid DOD employees and contractors).
    , @Jeff77450
    Correct me if I'm wrong but I think that I've read that blacks & Hispanics are disproportionately represented in the armed forces. I've also read that 60% of blacks with college degrees work for government (vs. 20% of whites with degrees). In fact, I've worked for DoD in different capacities, both military & civilian, for almost forty years and I can attest that blacks are very well represented. My point being that large numbers of blacks have benefited directly from defense-spending.

    Those valid points aside, national defense is among the twenty-odd enumerated functions of the federal government listed in the Constitution and job-creation is not. Jobs are created by entrepreneurs & investors as a byproduct of pursuing profit and by consumers who create demand for products & services which in turn creates supply which requires labor (jobs).
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  3. Kyle a says:

    It’s not the “neo-Marxist” that are the problem. It’s just blacks.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Realist
    "It’s just blacks."

    No it's whites that allow it.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  4. TheJester says:

    Other blogs and commentators in the Unz Review point to an understanding of the failure of the egalitarian experiment in the United States. Human evolution impacts racial DNA and culture, with the first helping to form the second.

    Blacks are racially and culturally tuned for the Tropical Biosphere; Caucasians are racially and culturally tuned for the Temperate Biosphere, and Orientals are racially and culturally tuned for the Arctic Biosphere. Then, the Great Admixture (migration) of the modern era.

    In short, contemporary industrial civilization is a produce of the harsh climate of the Temperate Zone. The DNA and survival disposes a rule-based “law and order” society. (How can you have an industrial society without an almost universal disposition toward order and science?) The Tropical Biosphere disposes a “balance of terror” society — the more general condition of the human race. One clan or tribe respects another clan’ or tribes’ women, children, and property to avoid the inevitable vendettas and violence that comes from violations.

    When racial DNA and cultural dispositions mix via mass migrations, certain populations are handicapped by not being racially and culturally tuned to their new social environments. No matter how much one “howls at the moon” via affirmative action, government transfer programs, social sanctions, and “re-connning” history, nothing can be done about it. The recent focus on White “microaggression” and White privilege and other invisible causes of interracial and intercultural failure in the United States is perhaps best understood as expressing a sense of hopelessness over the inability of peoples from biospheres alien to industrial culture to integrate into industrial culture. Indeed, if one looks closely enough, one sees that the language, social relationships, and other cultural dispositions among long-standing African populations in the United States are traceable to their African origins.

    If there is to be change, the expression “time heals all wounds” perhaps best expresses the only solution. Physical and cultural evolution requires time as the Biospheres mix populations on a scale unheard of in human history. The mass migrations of the modern era cannot be undone. The end results of evolution also cannot be predicted. In the meantime, “it is … what it is.”

    Read More
    • Replies: @Realist
    You wrote all that just to say....'whatever'?
    , @Ace
    Where is it written that migrations can't be undone? Or that white homelands cannot be made inhospitable to immigrants? If whites stop being the eloi morons that they are they could save their culture and their homelands but they won't stop that, so a reversal of immigration will in fact not take place, even though it could. Thus, white European civilization will be extinguished.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  5. @Ronald Thomas West

    For the government, that means attempting to transfer immense wealth (much of it yet to be created in the distant future by our grandchildren) to the underclass minorities, not realizing that in more cases than not, it is wasting billions, pouring that wealth into leaky waste bins, and that all the money in the world cannot create a silk purse from a sow’s ear
     
    Change just three words and you have:

    For the government, that means attempting to transfer immense wealth (much of it yet to be created in the distant future by our grandchildren) to our empire's military, not realizing that in more cases than not, it is wasting billions, pouring that wealth into leaky waste bins, and that all the money in the world cannot create a silk purse from a sow’s ear
     
    Now, if all of those hundreds upon hundreds of billions of tax $ poured into social welfare jobs generated by and for White people (military contracting) had been equitably divided with the demographic Black share invested in job creation in disadvantaged neighborhoods, where would the argument shift to? (recalling Rush Limbaugh's life as an Oxycontin junkie, not so different to a 'crack ho' excepting White privilege got him a slap on the wrist instead of doing time.)

    Now, if all of those hundreds upon hundreds of billions of tax $ poured into social welfare jobs generated by and for White people (military contracting) had been equitably divided with the demographic Black share invested in job creation in disadvantaged neighborhoods…

    You are an old, self-loathing white fool and I am wasting my time, but here goes:

    Government spending does not “create jobs.” Government spending only transfers existing wealth. Once the transfer payments end, the jobs “created” by them end. Any actual public goods being provided end up being serviced for much, much less (compare public and private school teacher salaries).

    American blacks are the recipients of loads of largesse. We have an entire US Postal Service where we pay them and give them a pension and medical coverage to deliver corporate marketing materials. We have delivered entire cities to them to be run by, for and with black people. Black entertainers, athletes and entrepeneurs earn millions of dollars.

    Government transfer payments seemingly work for white people (for a few generations, at which point high youth unemployment and taxes and inflation shut the Ponzi scheme down) because of their mean lower time-preference, lower aggression, and higher general intelligence. For blacks with higher time-preference, higher aggression and lower general intelligence, you end up with a dysgenic, dysfunctional Big Man culture. Again, the gravy train only lasts so long as the (mostly white) net tax-payors are willing to fund it.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth

    We have an entire US Postal Service where we pay them and give them a pension and medical coverage to deliver corporate marketing materials.
     
    African-Americans make up a whopping 1/5 of all postal workers; so who's the old white fool?

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/20/us-post-office-job-cuts-black-middle-class_n_2514917.html
    , @Ronald Thomas West

    I am wasting my time
     
    Yep.
    , @Kat Grey
    And that train will only keep-a-runnin until the Hispanic population gets into the driver's seat. And remember they have no crushing guilt complex poked and prodded by the self-hating liberal media; despite Spain having had a hundred years lead on the Anglos in the slave trade.
    , @schmenz
    Please don't criticize our ubiquitous Ronald Thomas West. I enjoy reading his self-promoting, comical rubbish.
    , @Bill Jones
    You say
    "Government spending does not “create jobs.”

    It has created entire industries,
    Would a company like Lockheed martin exist without the the State?
    Booze-Allen?
    Acis?Kroll?

    You live in a fantasy world. It creates massive amounts of jobs in sectors that will support its crimes.

    The piece you are missing is the cost to the productive economy.
    , @Ace
    Excellent.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  6. Arclight says:

    I agree withe premise that across the board equality is a futile dream, but I do think that social equality is achievable but has been largely stymied by the welfare state. By this I mean that anyone who is doing the best they can with what they have and working and staying out of trouble with the law deserves society’s respect, whether they are a fast food worker, janitor, teacher, business owner or what have you.

    In general I do think Americans respect others who fit this description but the problem is that the social welfare system excuses people from society’s basic civil obligations and the recipients are not only looked down on by the rest of society, they know that they are and most at some level feel it is warranted. The result is not gratitude for the society that pays for their basic needs but seething resentment. The left has done its best to de-stygmatize participation in social welfare for blacks in the name of compassion and/or reparations but the end result is a population that is grossly overrepresented in the social welfare system and viewed as a burden to society when not so long ago black employment rates matched that of whites. The end result is that a huge percentage of black America has no experience with regular employment or being self-sustaining and is now dependent on Uncle Sam for meeting basic needs and can’t imagine life any other way.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  7. Lepanto says:
    @Ronald Thomas West

    For the government, that means attempting to transfer immense wealth (much of it yet to be created in the distant future by our grandchildren) to the underclass minorities, not realizing that in more cases than not, it is wasting billions, pouring that wealth into leaky waste bins, and that all the money in the world cannot create a silk purse from a sow’s ear
     
    Change just three words and you have:

    For the government, that means attempting to transfer immense wealth (much of it yet to be created in the distant future by our grandchildren) to our empire's military, not realizing that in more cases than not, it is wasting billions, pouring that wealth into leaky waste bins, and that all the money in the world cannot create a silk purse from a sow’s ear
     
    Now, if all of those hundreds upon hundreds of billions of tax $ poured into social welfare jobs generated by and for White people (military contracting) had been equitably divided with the demographic Black share invested in job creation in disadvantaged neighborhoods, where would the argument shift to? (recalling Rush Limbaugh's life as an Oxycontin junkie, not so different to a 'crack ho' excepting White privilege got him a slap on the wrist instead of doing time.)

    Good point. Of course, not all whites work for military contractors. There are plenty working in service, fast food, retail, etc.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  8. @Ronald Thomas West

    For the government, that means attempting to transfer immense wealth (much of it yet to be created in the distant future by our grandchildren) to the underclass minorities, not realizing that in more cases than not, it is wasting billions, pouring that wealth into leaky waste bins, and that all the money in the world cannot create a silk purse from a sow’s ear
     
    Change just three words and you have:

    For the government, that means attempting to transfer immense wealth (much of it yet to be created in the distant future by our grandchildren) to our empire's military, not realizing that in more cases than not, it is wasting billions, pouring that wealth into leaky waste bins, and that all the money in the world cannot create a silk purse from a sow’s ear
     
    Now, if all of those hundreds upon hundreds of billions of tax $ poured into social welfare jobs generated by and for White people (military contracting) had been equitably divided with the demographic Black share invested in job creation in disadvantaged neighborhoods, where would the argument shift to? (recalling Rush Limbaugh's life as an Oxycontin junkie, not so different to a 'crack ho' excepting White privilege got him a slap on the wrist instead of doing time.)

    I suggest that you take a look at a summary of the federal budget sometime. The military budget is much larger than it should be but consumes a far smaller proportion of the budget (20-25%) than so-called entitlement payments –Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and a variety of “welfare programs”– and payments to service debt incurred for these entitlement payments. This is not even considering the costs of phony federal jobs, spread across the federal budget, that disproportionately employ otherwise unemployable Negroes and other basically useless members of society. The costs of entitlements, debt and debt-servicing, and redundant personnel are also consuming an ever-increasing portion of the federal budget, squeezing out everything else including military expenditures..

    But the federal budget is only about half of all government spending in this country. State and local governments account for the remainder. The budgets of non-federal governments have become increasingly shackled by so-called federal mandates that essentially cajole and/or force them into providing additional dysfunctional forms of welfare and other transfer payments. And state and local government jobs are an essential part of this welfare system. Check out who is badly serving you the next time you deal with a local government agency in a locality with a significant Negro population.

    The bottom line is that the military budget is being steadily encroached upon by other government spending. But even diverting it entirely to various forms of transfer payments cannot solve our problems now. And that’s ignoring the fact that a large fraction of the military budget is in fact just another form of welfare transfer. (A main reason why it’s become almost a political impossibility to close local military baes no matter how expensive and/or useless they are.)

    Read More
    • Replies: @Ronald Thomas West

    The military budget is much larger than it should be but consumes a far smaller proportion of the budget (20-25%) than so-called entitlement payments –Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and a variety of “welfare programs”
     
    And we're talking about Black's, how much of that is White, Asian & Hispanic?

    I'd left this over at Peter Frost's screed, it works just as well here:

    Now, back to the failed policies of race in Europe and particularly America. When ‘White’ liberals (your ‘big-brained’ brothers and sisters) imagine up all sorts of ‘good things’ for disadvantaged groups, more often than not, they’ll get the solutions wrong. This rather reoccurring phenomena is due to the core historical issues are never addressed. For instance much of the Black American slums had been based on capitalism’s ‘leave your rural life for opportunity with factory jobs to improve your lot’ .. or that is, until the factories were no longer economically viable and the parent corporations pulled up stakes, abandoning the Black urban communities they created to become slums. They were capitalized upon and discarded at capitalism’s whim. No amount of consequent social welfare programs will repair inter-generational anger which comes of that abandoned in a trap with no capital to extricate oneself, short of forking over land to those who’d like to return to Plan A or ’40 acres and a mule’ with opportunity to become organic farmers in the modern incarnation, example given. Is capitalism too cheap to consider real remedies? Probably.

    Meanwhile, endless self-deceits play out to excuse the origin and real nature of the problems

     
    'White America' wouldn't have a Black welfare problem if it hadn't created it. And now they wish to take no responsible steps to correct it. Just kick the can down the road and point fingers at Blacks for the social problems capitalism not only created but will never take responsibility for in a ethical/moral sense of accountability
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  9. Vortex says:
    @Ronald Thomas West

    For the government, that means attempting to transfer immense wealth (much of it yet to be created in the distant future by our grandchildren) to the underclass minorities, not realizing that in more cases than not, it is wasting billions, pouring that wealth into leaky waste bins, and that all the money in the world cannot create a silk purse from a sow’s ear
     
    Change just three words and you have:

    For the government, that means attempting to transfer immense wealth (much of it yet to be created in the distant future by our grandchildren) to our empire's military, not realizing that in more cases than not, it is wasting billions, pouring that wealth into leaky waste bins, and that all the money in the world cannot create a silk purse from a sow’s ear
     
    Now, if all of those hundreds upon hundreds of billions of tax $ poured into social welfare jobs generated by and for White people (military contracting) had been equitably divided with the demographic Black share invested in job creation in disadvantaged neighborhoods, where would the argument shift to? (recalling Rush Limbaugh's life as an Oxycontin junkie, not so different to a 'crack ho' excepting White privilege got him a slap on the wrist instead of doing time.)

    The argument would shift to why you are focusing on the molehill (US military spending: 4.5% of GDP) instead of the mountain (US social spending: 34% of GDP)

    Read More
    • Replies: @Realist
    A lot of what you call social spending was prepaid for by the recipients.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  10. David says:

    Though I agree entirely with this piece I would add that the social rot engendered by the welfare state is well advanced in Vermont among rural whites. Hiding one’s income and claiming disabilities to qualify for free everything has become Vermont’s single largest industry. There are twice as many people between 16 and 64 on SSDI than working for the school system, for example.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  11. Truth says:
    @The Anti-Gnostic

    Now, if all of those hundreds upon hundreds of billions of tax $ poured into social welfare jobs generated by and for White people (military contracting) had been equitably divided with the demographic Black share invested in job creation in disadvantaged neighborhoods...
     
    You are an old, self-loathing white fool and I am wasting my time, but here goes:

    Government spending does not "create jobs." Government spending only transfers existing wealth. Once the transfer payments end, the jobs "created" by them end. Any actual public goods being provided end up being serviced for much, much less (compare public and private school teacher salaries).

    American blacks are the recipients of loads of largesse. We have an entire US Postal Service where we pay them and give them a pension and medical coverage to deliver corporate marketing materials. We have delivered entire cities to them to be run by, for and with black people. Black entertainers, athletes and entrepeneurs earn millions of dollars.

    Government transfer payments seemingly work for white people (for a few generations, at which point high youth unemployment and taxes and inflation shut the Ponzi scheme down) because of their mean lower time-preference, lower aggression, and higher general intelligence. For blacks with higher time-preference, higher aggression and lower general intelligence, you end up with a dysgenic, dysfunctional Big Man culture. Again, the gravy train only lasts so long as the (mostly white) net tax-payors are willing to fund it.

    We have an entire US Postal Service where we pay them and give them a pension and medical coverage to deliver corporate marketing materials.

    African-Americans make up a whopping 1/5 of all postal workers; so who’s the old white fool?

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/20/us-post-office-job-cuts-black-middle-class_n_2514917.html

    Read More
    • Replies: @Marty
    I know an Iranian small businessman who will only ship with DHL, never UPS or FedEx, because its workers are white. I guess he must have been brainwashed by Orval Faubus.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  12. @The Anti-Gnostic

    Now, if all of those hundreds upon hundreds of billions of tax $ poured into social welfare jobs generated by and for White people (military contracting) had been equitably divided with the demographic Black share invested in job creation in disadvantaged neighborhoods...
     
    You are an old, self-loathing white fool and I am wasting my time, but here goes:

    Government spending does not "create jobs." Government spending only transfers existing wealth. Once the transfer payments end, the jobs "created" by them end. Any actual public goods being provided end up being serviced for much, much less (compare public and private school teacher salaries).

    American blacks are the recipients of loads of largesse. We have an entire US Postal Service where we pay them and give them a pension and medical coverage to deliver corporate marketing materials. We have delivered entire cities to them to be run by, for and with black people. Black entertainers, athletes and entrepeneurs earn millions of dollars.

    Government transfer payments seemingly work for white people (for a few generations, at which point high youth unemployment and taxes and inflation shut the Ponzi scheme down) because of their mean lower time-preference, lower aggression, and higher general intelligence. For blacks with higher time-preference, higher aggression and lower general intelligence, you end up with a dysgenic, dysfunctional Big Man culture. Again, the gravy train only lasts so long as the (mostly white) net tax-payors are willing to fund it.

    I am wasting my time

    Yep.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  13. Kat Grey says:
    @The Anti-Gnostic

    Now, if all of those hundreds upon hundreds of billions of tax $ poured into social welfare jobs generated by and for White people (military contracting) had been equitably divided with the demographic Black share invested in job creation in disadvantaged neighborhoods...
     
    You are an old, self-loathing white fool and I am wasting my time, but here goes:

    Government spending does not "create jobs." Government spending only transfers existing wealth. Once the transfer payments end, the jobs "created" by them end. Any actual public goods being provided end up being serviced for much, much less (compare public and private school teacher salaries).

    American blacks are the recipients of loads of largesse. We have an entire US Postal Service where we pay them and give them a pension and medical coverage to deliver corporate marketing materials. We have delivered entire cities to them to be run by, for and with black people. Black entertainers, athletes and entrepeneurs earn millions of dollars.

    Government transfer payments seemingly work for white people (for a few generations, at which point high youth unemployment and taxes and inflation shut the Ponzi scheme down) because of their mean lower time-preference, lower aggression, and higher general intelligence. For blacks with higher time-preference, higher aggression and lower general intelligence, you end up with a dysgenic, dysfunctional Big Man culture. Again, the gravy train only lasts so long as the (mostly white) net tax-payors are willing to fund it.

    And that train will only keep-a-runnin until the Hispanic population gets into the driver’s seat. And remember they have no crushing guilt complex poked and prodded by the self-hating liberal media; despite Spain having had a hundred years lead on the Anglos in the slave trade.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  14. @Jus' Sayin'...
    I suggest that you take a look at a summary of the federal budget sometime. The military budget is much larger than it should be but consumes a far smaller proportion of the budget (20-25%) than so-called entitlement payments --Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and a variety of "welfare programs"-- and payments to service debt incurred for these entitlement payments. This is not even considering the costs of phony federal jobs, spread across the federal budget, that disproportionately employ otherwise unemployable Negroes and other basically useless members of society. The costs of entitlements, debt and debt-servicing, and redundant personnel are also consuming an ever-increasing portion of the federal budget, squeezing out everything else including military expenditures..

    But the federal budget is only about half of all government spending in this country. State and local governments account for the remainder. The budgets of non-federal governments have become increasingly shackled by so-called federal mandates that essentially cajole and/or force them into providing additional dysfunctional forms of welfare and other transfer payments. And state and local government jobs are an essential part of this welfare system. Check out who is badly serving you the next time you deal with a local government agency in a locality with a significant Negro population.

    The bottom line is that the military budget is being steadily encroached upon by other government spending. But even diverting it entirely to various forms of transfer payments cannot solve our problems now. And that's ignoring the fact that a large fraction of the military budget is in fact just another form of welfare transfer. (A main reason why it's become almost a political impossibility to close local military baes no matter how expensive and/or useless they are.)

    The military budget is much larger than it should be but consumes a far smaller proportion of the budget (20-25%) than so-called entitlement payments –Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and a variety of “welfare programs”

    And we’re talking about Black’s, how much of that is White, Asian & Hispanic?

    I’d left this over at Peter Frost’s screed, it works just as well here:

    Now, back to the failed policies of race in Europe and particularly America. When ‘White’ liberals (your ‘big-brained’ brothers and sisters) imagine up all sorts of ‘good things’ for disadvantaged groups, more often than not, they’ll get the solutions wrong. This rather reoccurring phenomena is due to the core historical issues are never addressed. For instance much of the Black American slums had been based on capitalism’s ‘leave your rural life for opportunity with factory jobs to improve your lot’ .. or that is, until the factories were no longer economically viable and the parent corporations pulled up stakes, abandoning the Black urban communities they created to become slums. They were capitalized upon and discarded at capitalism’s whim. No amount of consequent social welfare programs will repair inter-generational anger which comes of that abandoned in a trap with no capital to extricate oneself, short of forking over land to those who’d like to return to Plan A or ’40 acres and a mule’ with opportunity to become organic farmers in the modern incarnation, example given. Is capitalism too cheap to consider real remedies? Probably.

    Meanwhile, endless self-deceits play out to excuse the origin and real nature of the problems

    ‘White America’ wouldn’t have a Black welfare problem if it hadn’t created it. And now they wish to take no responsible steps to correct it. Just kick the can down the road and point fingers at Blacks for the social problems capitalism not only created but will never take responsibility for in a ethical/moral sense of accountability

    Read More
    • Replies: @Dave
    What's amazing is your insistence that black people are absolutely never responsible for the choices they made and make in response to those welfare programs and policies.
    You are cognitively incapable of holding them to the same standards as other civilized human beings. You implicitly accept the reality of white supremacy because you don't believe black people have agency and, in your terms, are only capable of reacting helplessly to programs created by whites for the benefit of the black community.
    Millions of individual black people consistently made a choice to accept welfare benefits and programs for decades on end, while seeing the negative consequences of those choices manifest all around them.
    It must feel wonderful to know you can always blame someone else for the consistently lousy choices you make every day for your entire adult life.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  15. Marty [AKA "wick"] says:
    @Truth

    We have an entire US Postal Service where we pay them and give them a pension and medical coverage to deliver corporate marketing materials.
     
    African-Americans make up a whopping 1/5 of all postal workers; so who's the old white fool?

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/20/us-post-office-job-cuts-black-middle-class_n_2514917.html

    I know an Iranian small businessman who will only ship with DHL, never UPS or FedEx, because its workers are white. I guess he must have been brainwashed by Orval Faubus.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth
    No, he's probably just a dumbshit who likes paying 50% more for an ideology based upon an observational theory he cant even verify the truth of.
    , @Truth
    Hey here you go, Homie; some info for your friend:

    According to Bloomberg Business, 13% of DHL employees are African Americans, and FIFTY-FOUR percent are "minorities" (whatever that means) so be sure to forward this like to him, and let he know, he's a complete sap, for me.

    http://www.businessweek.com/careers/bplc/2007/78.htm
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  16. “[T]the American “experiment”–the “exceptional nation”–will not survive, at least not in its present state…nor, probably, should it.”

    Indeed it should not, cannot, and will not. In its present state, it is an empire of lies built from lawless usurpations.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  17. O/T but somewhat related…..

    Can someone explain why Ebonics continues to the dominant dialect spoken among the majority of US blacks even though they have been part of an English-speaking nation and culture for hundreds of years?

    As a comparison, on international business TV channels, one can see many examples of minorities that reside in the UK speak in a perfect British accent. These can be South or East Asians, east Europeans, and in some cases, UK blacks (assumed to be the top 10%). I never sees anyone black from the UK (even from the lower classes) speak in gutteral, basic Ebonics that is common to the US black population. Why is this?

    BTW, those perfect British accents spoken by attractive minority females can be very sexy, no?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Sparkling Wiggle
    Blacks in [formerly-] Great Britain have a UK version of Ebonics. The French version is called Haitian Creole. This is just what blacks do to languages.

    If large groups of blacks were ever taught Chinese as their first language, they would lapse into sloppy, ghetto Chinese within a few generations at most.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  18. yes, multiculturalism is bad, affirmative action is bad, and yes, the overclass is shoving white guilt down our throats. Yes, I agree with everything you say.

    But you ignore the really important part–that multiculturalism and affirmative action and white race guilt all help the overclass grow the supply of labor and the supply of consumers.

    Multiculturalism is all about helping the rich get richer.

    And the Dissident Right sites won’t tell that truth. At least not too much.

    Read More
    • Replies: @War for Blair Mountain
    That's right. At rock bottom, it is no more complicated than importing highly racialized high fertility nonwhite scab labor. If vdare.com and American Renaissance had waged the battle against Native Born White American Race- Replacement through a Native Born White American Populist Labor Revolt Framework, things would be a whole lot different today...instead, we had two decades of a blizzard of PISA scores and IQ test score psychometrics. Without a doubt , a major opportunity has been blown....
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  19. Renoman says:

    Red Fox once said “I hate Niggas, Niggas is lazy shiftless and no good, that means there’s a whole lotta white Niggas out there too”. Assholes come in every color.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  20. schmenz says:
    @The Anti-Gnostic

    Now, if all of those hundreds upon hundreds of billions of tax $ poured into social welfare jobs generated by and for White people (military contracting) had been equitably divided with the demographic Black share invested in job creation in disadvantaged neighborhoods...
     
    You are an old, self-loathing white fool and I am wasting my time, but here goes:

    Government spending does not "create jobs." Government spending only transfers existing wealth. Once the transfer payments end, the jobs "created" by them end. Any actual public goods being provided end up being serviced for much, much less (compare public and private school teacher salaries).

    American blacks are the recipients of loads of largesse. We have an entire US Postal Service where we pay them and give them a pension and medical coverage to deliver corporate marketing materials. We have delivered entire cities to them to be run by, for and with black people. Black entertainers, athletes and entrepeneurs earn millions of dollars.

    Government transfer payments seemingly work for white people (for a few generations, at which point high youth unemployment and taxes and inflation shut the Ponzi scheme down) because of their mean lower time-preference, lower aggression, and higher general intelligence. For blacks with higher time-preference, higher aggression and lower general intelligence, you end up with a dysgenic, dysfunctional Big Man culture. Again, the gravy train only lasts so long as the (mostly white) net tax-payors are willing to fund it.

    Please don’t criticize our ubiquitous Ronald Thomas West. I enjoy reading his self-promoting, comical rubbish.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Ronald Thomas West

    Please don’t criticize our ubiquitous Ronald Thomas West. I enjoy reading his self-promoting, comical rubbish
     
    Good. This one's for you:

    http://ronaldthomaswest.com/2014/10/09/liberals/

    It's my 2nd most read satire (after 'Alfreda Bikowski')
    , @TWS
    Just block him. It's much easier to follow the comments when he's not trying to hijack the thread to his ridiculous site.

    PT Barnum would have applauded RTW's self promotion.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  21. War for Blair Mountain [AKA "Battle for Blair Mountain"] says:

    The open declaration of a race war against The Historic Native Born White American Majority at the most fundamental level is being waged by Greedy Cheating White Male MEGA-CEOs. At the most fundamental level:mass transfer of Native Born White American Working Class Wealth to the parasitic Greedy Cheating Class White Male MEGA-CEO…this requires the mass importation of the high fertility highly racialized nonwhite Democratic Party voters who have their own racial-nationalist agenda that requires voting Whitey enthusiastically into a racial minority on Nov 3 2016.

    Both blacks and Native Born White Americans are victims of this wealth theft-wage slave policy. But blacks are in a political coalition with post-1965 nonwhites…so blacks brought economic wage slavery upon themselves. Blacks will of course never accept this, and will blame Whitey…this means:home break-ins and brutal gang raping of White Women in front of their White husbands and White sons.

    The only viable way to wage this battle is through a highly racialized Nationalist Anarcho-Syndcalist-Bill Blizzard-Wat Tyler-Battle for Blair Mountain Working Class Native Born White American Peasant Revolt against the Greedy-Cheating White Male MEGA-CEO framework. Of course, if your Richard Spencer over a Radix Journal you will wage the battle through movie reviews and ski vacations on the ski slopes of Idaho.

    Secession=being surrounded by China, India and Mexico….

    Read More
    • Replies: @War for Blair Mountain
    It would be way more interesting if Ron Unz brought Noam Chomsky or Jeffrey Sinclair over here to debate us Native Born White Americans. Is this what you have in the da works Ron? Ron..you got da connections...right?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  22. Corvinus says:

    “There are much deeper issues highlighted by this case which underlie Mosby’s indictment. To understand these, we must go back to the 1960s, when American blacks were promised complete “equality” and full empowerment by the liberal political establishment.”

    Replace “liberal political establishment” with “a wide range of groups, including conservatives and liberals”.

    “Over the past 50 years, a benchmark template of egalitarianism has emerged as the standard mainstream narrative for judging race and racial relations in America. This template dominates today in our media, in our schools, in our politics, and in our culture. Both political parties pay obeisance to it. Hollywood inserts it into our films and evening television fare. All our networks and media, from MSNBC to Fox News, accept it. Our schools and universities inculcate it into the flabby brains of our children.”

    Considering that for 200 years prior, the benchmark template was Christian patriarchy.

    
“The long-range solution to historical and present inequality is a never-ending stream of radical changes and “reparations” — verbal, financial, electoral, educational, cultural — that must be imposed on the current (and future) white population, and, above all, the dismantling of the white power structure.”


    The white power structure is still in place. Always has been, always will be. And that’s fine. The historical issue was EXCLUSION of non-whites and women.

    
“Even more, white people and their future progeny must be “sensitized” and “re-educated” to comprehend their substantial historic racism.”

    Some liberals take this wrong-headed approach, certainly. Rather than focus on “guilt” by their forefathers, we ought to take lengths to enable people opportunities.

    “Affirmative action, race preferences in education and in job placement…”:

    
Which are problematic, I would agree.

    “and a transformation of the culture, itself.”

Culture ALWAYS transforms. America is the standard bearer of that phenomenon.

    “may perhaps ease just a bit the sense of guilt carried by whites, but the burden and stain are permanent.”

    Well, that burden and stain were the results of white males. After all, they created the world (at least that’s what I’ve been told).

    “As Shelby Steele wrote in The Wall Street Journal back in 2003 (“Yo, Howard!” WSJ, November 13, 2003), blacks are in fact not really capable of racism. Only whites, with their historic guilt and their positions of power to oppress, can be true racists.”

    Most people, liberal and conservative, find her assertion laughable.

    “Racial identity is simply forbidden to whites in America and across the entire Western world.”

    Well, when you have the fine folks at Stormfront calling out whites as traitors for failing to embrace anything and everything white, without being able to define what is white, one can see that the calls for white nationalism still sting from a historical point of view. Nothing wrong with being proud of one’s race, but the past five centuries had demonstrated that whites used their race as the means to dominate and subjugate “lesser races”. We should be focusing on our humanity, but this emphasis would ruin the narrative of our race baiters (white, black, Hispanic, Asian).

    “While the Left proposes increasingly more radical measures, conservatives, having swallowed the Leftist and neo-Marxist historical narrative, have dithered, most of their proposals only watering down the more aggressive or extreme programs.”

    The political pendulum swings, indeed. And remember, the historical narrative had been decidedly one-sided, written by white men.

    “all the government destruction of settled rights and traditions.”

    You mean legal segregation? no citizenship rights for women? no readdress of grievances for Native Americans? Are those traditions to be proud of?

    “All the trillions and all the laws and programs have done very little, save create unfulfilled expectations that, in fact, could never be fulfilled or accomplished.”

    “For the government, that means attempting to transfer immense wealth (much of it yet to be created in the distant future by our grandchildren) to the underclass minorities.”

    Great rhetorical statements. Care to elaborate?

    “states will rise up once again to reclaim their stolen sovereignty.”

    Still stinging from the southern defeat in the Civil War, eh?

    “For blacks with higher time-preference, higher aggression and lower general intelligence…”

    Replace blacks with people and you would be accurate.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  23. Realist says:
    @Vortex
    The argument would shift to why you are focusing on the molehill (US military spending: 4.5% of GDP) instead of the mountain (US social spending: 34% of GDP)

    A lot of what you call social spending was prepaid for by the recipients.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Ace
    That is true for the first years once payouts begin. I believe, however, that the total payout greatly exceeds the amount of the contribution, due in part, if not large part, to greater longevity. So the contributions do not cover payout. The taxpayer makes up the difference.

    I believe, however, that the annuitants in Social Security are in fact short changed because they would receive a great deal more had their forced contribution gone not to the "trust fund" but been invested privately.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  24. War for Blair Mountain [AKA "Battle for Blair Mountain"] says:
    @leftist conservative
    yes, multiculturalism is bad, affirmative action is bad, and yes, the overclass is shoving white guilt down our throats. Yes, I agree with everything you say.

    But you ignore the really important part--that multiculturalism and affirmative action and white race guilt all help the overclass grow the supply of labor and the supply of consumers.

    Multiculturalism is all about helping the rich get richer.

    And the Dissident Right sites won't tell that truth. At least not too much.

    That’s right. At rock bottom, it is no more complicated than importing highly racialized high fertility nonwhite scab labor. If vdare.com and American Renaissance had waged the battle against Native Born White American Race- Replacement through a Native Born White American Populist Labor Revolt Framework, things would be a whole lot different today…instead, we had two decades of a blizzard of PISA scores and IQ test score psychometrics. Without a doubt , a major opportunity has been blown….

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  25. Dave says:
    @Ronald Thomas West

    The military budget is much larger than it should be but consumes a far smaller proportion of the budget (20-25%) than so-called entitlement payments –Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and a variety of “welfare programs”
     
    And we're talking about Black's, how much of that is White, Asian & Hispanic?

    I'd left this over at Peter Frost's screed, it works just as well here:

    Now, back to the failed policies of race in Europe and particularly America. When ‘White’ liberals (your ‘big-brained’ brothers and sisters) imagine up all sorts of ‘good things’ for disadvantaged groups, more often than not, they’ll get the solutions wrong. This rather reoccurring phenomena is due to the core historical issues are never addressed. For instance much of the Black American slums had been based on capitalism’s ‘leave your rural life for opportunity with factory jobs to improve your lot’ .. or that is, until the factories were no longer economically viable and the parent corporations pulled up stakes, abandoning the Black urban communities they created to become slums. They were capitalized upon and discarded at capitalism’s whim. No amount of consequent social welfare programs will repair inter-generational anger which comes of that abandoned in a trap with no capital to extricate oneself, short of forking over land to those who’d like to return to Plan A or ’40 acres and a mule’ with opportunity to become organic farmers in the modern incarnation, example given. Is capitalism too cheap to consider real remedies? Probably.

    Meanwhile, endless self-deceits play out to excuse the origin and real nature of the problems

     
    'White America' wouldn't have a Black welfare problem if it hadn't created it. And now they wish to take no responsible steps to correct it. Just kick the can down the road and point fingers at Blacks for the social problems capitalism not only created but will never take responsibility for in a ethical/moral sense of accountability

    What’s amazing is your insistence that black people are absolutely never responsible for the choices they made and make in response to those welfare programs and policies.
    You are cognitively incapable of holding them to the same standards as other civilized human beings. You implicitly accept the reality of white supremacy because you don’t believe black people have agency and, in your terms, are only capable of reacting helplessly to programs created by whites for the benefit of the black community.
    Millions of individual black people consistently made a choice to accept welfare benefits and programs for decades on end, while seeing the negative consequences of those choices manifest all around them.
    It must feel wonderful to know you can always blame someone else for the consistently lousy choices you make every day for your entire adult life.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Ronald Thomas West

    What’s amazing is your insistence that black people are absolutely never responsible for the choices they made and make in response to those welfare programs and policies
     
    That's your assumption and it's an assumption and only that. As a matter of fact, I prefer to focus on the facts surrounding White denial of making immense contributions to the social problems we face. Example given, American empire is a White phenomena sustained by a White majority national legislature. Deny that and you could be accused of believing the Moon is made of green cheese. But that's too easy an example. White people in a White culture are as subject to ethnocentric bias as anyone. All ethnocentric bias means is you don't see/can't see the facts from a point of another culture's view. It's a real handicap, a kind of social retardation.
    , @War for Blair Mountain
    Blacks are being harmed by Democratic Party imported nonwhite scab labor policy. But they will never blame the Democratic Party and the Kenyan Dear Leader for this...instead, they will break into Native Born White American Family Homes and brutally gang rape White Women in front of their tied-up and pistol- whipped White Husbands and Sons.....there are irreconciliable differences between Native Born White Americans and blacks.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  26. War for Blair Mountain [AKA "Battle for Blair Mountain"] says:
    @War for Blair Mountain
    The open declaration of a race war against The Historic Native Born White American Majority at the most fundamental level is being waged by Greedy Cheating White Male MEGA-CEOs. At the most fundamental level:mass transfer of Native Born White American Working Class Wealth to the parasitic Greedy Cheating Class White Male MEGA-CEO...this requires the mass importation of the high fertility highly racialized nonwhite Democratic Party voters who have their own racial-nationalist agenda that requires voting Whitey enthusiastically into a racial minority on Nov 3 2016.

    Both blacks and Native Born White Americans are victims of this wealth theft-wage slave policy. But blacks are in a political coalition with post-1965 nonwhites...so blacks brought economic wage slavery upon themselves. Blacks will of course never accept this, and will blame Whitey...this means:home break-ins and brutal gang raping of White Women in front of their White husbands and White sons.

    The only viable way to wage this battle is through a highly racialized Nationalist Anarcho-Syndcalist-Bill Blizzard-Wat Tyler-Battle for Blair Mountain Working Class Native Born White American Peasant Revolt against the Greedy-Cheating White Male MEGA-CEO framework. Of course, if your Richard Spencer over a Radix Journal you will wage the battle through movie reviews and ski vacations on the ski slopes of Idaho.

    Secession=being surrounded by China, India and Mexico....

    It would be way more interesting if Ron Unz brought Noam Chomsky or Jeffrey Sinclair over here to debate us Native Born White Americans. Is this what you have in the da works Ron? Ron..you got da connections…right?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  27. @schmenz
    Please don't criticize our ubiquitous Ronald Thomas West. I enjoy reading his self-promoting, comical rubbish.

    Please don’t criticize our ubiquitous Ronald Thomas West. I enjoy reading his self-promoting, comical rubbish

    Good. This one’s for you:

    http://ronaldthomaswest.com/2014/10/09/liberals/

    It’s my 2nd most read satire (after ‘Alfreda Bikowski’)

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  28. @Dave
    What's amazing is your insistence that black people are absolutely never responsible for the choices they made and make in response to those welfare programs and policies.
    You are cognitively incapable of holding them to the same standards as other civilized human beings. You implicitly accept the reality of white supremacy because you don't believe black people have agency and, in your terms, are only capable of reacting helplessly to programs created by whites for the benefit of the black community.
    Millions of individual black people consistently made a choice to accept welfare benefits and programs for decades on end, while seeing the negative consequences of those choices manifest all around them.
    It must feel wonderful to know you can always blame someone else for the consistently lousy choices you make every day for your entire adult life.

    What’s amazing is your insistence that black people are absolutely never responsible for the choices they made and make in response to those welfare programs and policies

    That’s your assumption and it’s an assumption and only that. As a matter of fact, I prefer to focus on the facts surrounding White denial of making immense contributions to the social problems we face. Example given, American empire is a White phenomena sustained by a White majority national legislature. Deny that and you could be accused of believing the Moon is made of green cheese. But that’s too easy an example. White people in a White culture are as subject to ethnocentric bias as anyone. All ethnocentric bias means is you don’t see/can’t see the facts from a point of another culture’s view. It’s a real handicap, a kind of social retardation.

    Read More
    • Replies: @map
    And the "facts" you talk about just happen to be the "facts" that place all of the blame on white people and none on blacks.

    How convenient.

    Just which side of the razor wire are you confident on not ending up? Many have made a similar miscalculation to their peril.

    What leftism wants is White Slavery. That's it. Everything else is just a rationalization for such an outcome.

    No argument ever made would ever convince me to agree with this. I would sooner see America destroyed, the cities burned to the ground and the population wiped out than become a slave in my own country.

    I say stick the darkies in Wests' and Corvinus' neighborhood. Let them enlighten the savages.
    , @Stealth
    As a matter of fact, I prefer to focus on the facts surrounding White denial of making immense contributions to the social problems we face.

    Ho-hum. Since criticizing white people is permitted by the establishment, it's very common. You're not saying anything original, so why the smug tone? Everyone who bashes white people seems to think he or she is boldly breaking new ground.

    I don't think anyone will honestly deny that blacks have been held back by forced segregation and racism, but if you really believe that's all that's holding them back, then you haven't spent much time around black people. If I had to guess, I'd say you've spent your whole life in places that don't have substantial black populations.

    In other words, this is all academic to you, and you really don't know what you're talking about.

    , @The Anti-Gnostic
    That's what separate countries are for. But I get the idea you would be as unhappy with a white America returned to its parochial, Anglo-Celt roots.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  29. War for Blair Mountain [AKA "Battle for Blair Mountain"] says:
    @Dave
    What's amazing is your insistence that black people are absolutely never responsible for the choices they made and make in response to those welfare programs and policies.
    You are cognitively incapable of holding them to the same standards as other civilized human beings. You implicitly accept the reality of white supremacy because you don't believe black people have agency and, in your terms, are only capable of reacting helplessly to programs created by whites for the benefit of the black community.
    Millions of individual black people consistently made a choice to accept welfare benefits and programs for decades on end, while seeing the negative consequences of those choices manifest all around them.
    It must feel wonderful to know you can always blame someone else for the consistently lousy choices you make every day for your entire adult life.

    Blacks are being harmed by Democratic Party imported nonwhite scab labor policy. But they will never blame the Democratic Party and the Kenyan Dear Leader for this…instead, they will break into Native Born White American Family Homes and brutally gang rape White Women in front of their tied-up and pistol- whipped White Husbands and Sons…..there are irreconciliable differences between Native Born White Americans and blacks.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  30. @leper messiah
    O/T but somewhat related.....

    Can someone explain why Ebonics continues to the dominant dialect spoken among the majority of US blacks even though they have been part of an English-speaking nation and culture for hundreds of years?

    As a comparison, on international business TV channels, one can see many examples of minorities that reside in the UK speak in a perfect British accent. These can be South or East Asians, east Europeans, and in some cases, UK blacks (assumed to be the top 10%). I never sees anyone black from the UK (even from the lower classes) speak in gutteral, basic Ebonics that is common to the US black population. Why is this?

    BTW, those perfect British accents spoken by attractive minority females can be very sexy, no?

    Blacks in [formerly-] Great Britain have a UK version of Ebonics. The French version is called Haitian Creole. This is just what blacks do to languages.

    If large groups of blacks were ever taught Chinese as their first language, they would lapse into sloppy, ghetto Chinese within a few generations at most.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  31. Truth says:
    @Marty
    I know an Iranian small businessman who will only ship with DHL, never UPS or FedEx, because its workers are white. I guess he must have been brainwashed by Orval Faubus.

    No, he’s probably just a dumbshit who likes paying 50% more for an ideology based upon an observational theory he cant even verify the truth of.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  32. Truth says:
    @Marty
    I know an Iranian small businessman who will only ship with DHL, never UPS or FedEx, because its workers are white. I guess he must have been brainwashed by Orval Faubus.

    Hey here you go, Homie; some info for your friend:

    According to Bloomberg Business, 13% of DHL employees are African Americans, and FIFTY-FOUR percent are “minorities” (whatever that means) so be sure to forward this like to him, and let he know, he’s a complete sap, for me.

    http://www.businessweek.com/careers/bplc/2007/78.htm

    Read More
    • Replies: @Marty
    As long as you're in the mood for research, could you look up how much of that 13% is concentrated where the company has no choice, like D.C., Philly and Miami? I'm guessing that's not Berkeley, the town where even the middle-eastern cab drivers say of your folks, "there's something wrong with those people."
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  33. map says:
    @Ronald Thomas West

    What’s amazing is your insistence that black people are absolutely never responsible for the choices they made and make in response to those welfare programs and policies
     
    That's your assumption and it's an assumption and only that. As a matter of fact, I prefer to focus on the facts surrounding White denial of making immense contributions to the social problems we face. Example given, American empire is a White phenomena sustained by a White majority national legislature. Deny that and you could be accused of believing the Moon is made of green cheese. But that's too easy an example. White people in a White culture are as subject to ethnocentric bias as anyone. All ethnocentric bias means is you don't see/can't see the facts from a point of another culture's view. It's a real handicap, a kind of social retardation.

    And the “facts” you talk about just happen to be the “facts” that place all of the blame on white people and none on blacks.

    How convenient.

    Just which side of the razor wire are you confident on not ending up? Many have made a similar miscalculation to their peril.

    What leftism wants is White Slavery. That’s it. Everything else is just a rationalization for such an outcome.

    No argument ever made would ever convince me to agree with this. I would sooner see America destroyed, the cities burned to the ground and the population wiped out than become a slave in my own country.

    I say stick the darkies in Wests’ and Corvinus’ neighborhood. Let them enlighten the savages.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Ronald Thomas West
    "Angry" says about everything anyone would need to know. Anger is a main culprit involved with drops in social intelligence and precludes useful insights and perception. And as you thrive on anger, here's something to think about:

    http://ronaldthomaswest.com/2015/04/16/raphaels-paradox/

    ^ It's about a creepy bug climbed up White people's butts a long time ago, and one reason White civilization is angry per se (not that a truly 'White' anyone would want to look too closely)
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  34. Biff says:

    “black-on-black crime (which is the great majority of crime among blacks)”

    I keep hearing this all the time, but I have never heard about the simple fact that if a black is convicted of committing a crime on any other race(White, Asian, Jew) it is considered a hate crime and the judge gives the perp twice/three times the jail time.. Blacks know this.. Others seem oblivious..

    Read More
    • Replies: @Realist
    "I keep hearing this all the time, but I have never heard about the simple fact that if a black is convicted of committing a crime on any other race(White, Asian, Jew) it is considered a hate crime and the judge gives the perp twice/three times the jail time."

    Citation?

    But I do think you chose your pseudonym well.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  35. Anon says: • Disclaimer

    http://www.theguardian.com/global/live/2015/may/23/counting-underway-for-irelands-referendum-on-marriage-equality#comment-52712585

    Too much pop culture. Irish are hooked to US pop culture and have lost connection to their identity, roots, and culture.

    British used opium to make Chinese docile and obedient. Chinese hooked on pipe dreams wouldn’t have the pride to stand up to imperialism, so the British hoped.

    US Jewish-homo pop culture globalism is the new opium. It enters every nation, brainwashes the young, cuts them off from their ancestors, makes them identify with Hollywood and MTV, and it makes them surrender to the globalist agenda controlled by Jews and homos. Why do Jews and homos like each other? Both are hostile minority elites in nations that are overwhelmingly straight and gentile. So, they work together to undermine and subvert any majority value. Or, they try to make the majority favor the minority over the majority. Today, Irish care more about Jews and homos than about their own kind who are overwhelmingly gentile and straight.

    Just as most white gentiles have been turned into Jew-worshipers, they’ve now also been made into homo-worshipers. The oligarchic likes of Sheldon Adelson and David Geffen are laughing their ass off at stupid Irish drunk on pop culture garbage and PC. There are two PC’s controlled by Jews and homos: Pop Culture and Political Correctness.

    The homo flag is the symbol of Jewish-homo imperialism. Ireland is another nation to fall under its flag. Ireland is no longer free. It is under globalist Jewish-homo occupation.

    Globalist oligarchs love the homo agenda. It has been massively funded by Wall Street, Silicon Valley, the Koch Brothers, George Soros, Hollywood, Las Vegas, and etc. Why would rich people support the homo agenda?

    It is because the oligarchs are trying to change leftism and progressivism from a people movement to an elite movement. AS the 1% grows richer and richer, they fear class/economic issues. So, they’ve changed the core of leftism to promoting the ‘gay agenda’. Why do rich like homos? Because homos are narcissistic, elitist, snobby, and love to cater to the rich. Homos have been pandering to aristocratic class all through the ages. In our age of neo-aristocratism, homos are the best allies of the rich oligarchic class.

    That the Guardian endorses an agenda favored by Wall Street/Hollywood/Las Vegas/London Banking oligarchs should tell you what has happened to leftism.

    And it is not about ‘marriage equality’ because ONLY homos are allowed to change marriage laws. Not incest-sexuals and polygamists. No ‘equality marriage’ for them. Only homos are favored because there are many homos in entertainment, fashion, government, and position of power.
    As most people are addicted to junk pop culture of celebrity, narcissism, and hedonism, they’ve come to worship homos who are heavily represented in vice industries and vanity industries. Irish, like Americans and British, have come to worship men whose idea of ‘sex’ is fecal penetration. Irish used to resist British imperialism but now they follow in the footsteps of the agenda favored by London bankers and Wall Street financiers.

    Irish people may think they made this decision on their own, but they’ve been fed tons of pop culture opium. Also, the Irish intellectual class have become little more than collaborationist class of the globalists. They attend colleges in US and London and have soaked up all the PC that favors Jews and homos.
    They no longer stand for Ireland, Irish pride, Irish independence. Rather, they want Ireland to do whatever to win the approval of the globalist ruling class in places like London and NY. Dublin and the Irish people are now just mental and cultural slaves of the globalist oligarchs. You bet Sheldon Adelson, the Koch Brothers, and George Soros and Bill Gates were celebrating as Ireland fell under the power of the globo-imperialist homo agenda.

    Most Irish people are straight and Gaelic. They should stand for Irish power and identity. But now, the Irish have become brainwashed by Pop culture and Political Correctness. Irish want to serve Jewish globalists and homo imperialists. They want to fill up Ireland with massive immigration from Africa and Muslims nations because Oligarchs in NY and London say it will be good for Ireland. Irish are so afraid of being called ‘racist’ and ‘homophobic’, terms used by globalists to undermine the nationalist pride and power of gentile nations.

    Sure, there should be freedom for homos to be homo. There should be tolerance for homo behavior. But what sane person would say a man ejaculating inside a fecal hole is engaged in sexual behavior on par, biologically and morally, with a man and woman using complementary organs in a way intended by nature? Nature intended the fecal hole to excrete feces, not to take in sperm.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  36. @map
    And the "facts" you talk about just happen to be the "facts" that place all of the blame on white people and none on blacks.

    How convenient.

    Just which side of the razor wire are you confident on not ending up? Many have made a similar miscalculation to their peril.

    What leftism wants is White Slavery. That's it. Everything else is just a rationalization for such an outcome.

    No argument ever made would ever convince me to agree with this. I would sooner see America destroyed, the cities burned to the ground and the population wiped out than become a slave in my own country.

    I say stick the darkies in Wests' and Corvinus' neighborhood. Let them enlighten the savages.

    “Angry” says about everything anyone would need to know. Anger is a main culprit involved with drops in social intelligence and precludes useful insights and perception. And as you thrive on anger, here’s something to think about:

    http://ronaldthomaswest.com/2015/04/16/raphaels-paradox/

    ^ It’s about a creepy bug climbed up White people’s butts a long time ago, and one reason White civilization is angry per se (not that a truly ‘White’ anyone would want to look too closely)

    Read More
    • Replies: @map
    "Angry” says about everything anyone would need to know. Anger is a main culprit involved with drops in social intelligence and precludes useful insights and perception. And as you thrive on anger, here’s something to think about:"

    Your pithy psychoanalysis is both pedestrian and boring.

    Anger and hate is the fuel of civilization. It is what keeps the blood warm at night. If you never learn to hate your enemy as much as he hates you, then you will always be his victim.

    It is time once again that Whites acted out their rage upon the world.

    The World deserves it.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  37. “to prove that one is not a racist—is the price whites today pay for this history”

    when people of color say things like they have to have “the talk” with their kids and this is “the talk” that whites have to have with their kids.

    you’re entire career can be ended with just one “wrong” sentence and it doesn’t matter if it will be taken out of context or even re branded as racist

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  38. Priss Factor [AKA "The Priss Factory"] says:

    On the issue of ‘police brutality’, it will never go away.

    Yes, it exists. In some cases, the cops are morons or sadists.

    But in most cases, PB is the result of the fact that police are human too. And everyone has a breaking point.
    Try as you might, if you deal with the scum of the earth all day long all year round–and black community is full of louts and punks and thugs and crazies–, you’re gonna have a breaking point.

    Everyone has a breaking point. Over-stressed parents take it out on their kids and spouses.
    Angry kids take it out on their parents.
    Friends get into angry argument with friends.

    Sometimes, it’s not really about issues but about nerves. After someone has had a bad day, even the slightest thing can trigger and set off bad tempers.

    Look at politicians. Behind closed doors, Clinton and Obama lost it at times and screamed and foamed at the mouth. And Gingrich and others too.

    Also, Americans love the angry maverick. Americans love rappers who scream, taunt, and throw fits. Americans love punk rockers who call for mayhem. Americans love gangster movies. Americans love professional wrestlers who talk shit. Americans love blockbuster movies about revenge and violence. Americans love angry street protesters who break windows and throw rocks. Feminists lionize the angry bitch who talks shit.
    Certain kinds of rage are deemed as cool. American Conservatives support US troops who drop bombs on other countries and kill all those ‘muzzies’. Jews love chutzpah and aggression against goyim. Homos love being bitchy and nasty.
    Our culture encourages and promotes a culture of abrasiveness, aggressiveness, and in-your-face-ness. Look at Jerry Springer. Look at Howard Stern. Look at Maury Povich.

    So, why should it be any different with cops? Sure, as upholders of the law, cops are supposed to control their emotions and be cool at all times. But they are humans, not robots. As humans, they have breaking point like everyone else.
    And a cop’s nerves are tested most in the black community because blacks are naturally more aggressive, naturally more jiveass, and naturally more arrogant. A lot of blacks grow up thinking they are the toughest bunch of mofos in the world. White civilians don’t get in the way of blacks out of fear. And blacks take pride in pushing whites around. So, when white cops stand up to black violence, blacks feel as if their biological rights have been violated. Blacks think it’s their natural right to push other races around. They grew up that way. Also, rap culture encourages bad attitude, thug behavior, and social/emotional arrogance among blacks.

    When soldiers fight overseas, they too have a breaking point. Decent men find themselves committing horrible acts. At some point, they grow so bitter and angry after so much stress.

    Cops are the same way.

    If most Americans were decent and crime was limited, cops might get along with people at most times.
    But in some communities, especially black ones, cops have to deal with scum all day.
    Worse, due to the cult of ‘white racism’ and ‘white guilt’, white cops must take special care to deal with black scumbags. So, the stress piles on and on and on. And some cops just lose it and go crazy. Police Brutality is usually the reaction to black savagery than the other way around.

    There is no solution to this problem. Not because cops are inhuman but because they are human, all too human. Because they are human, they are emotional and get stressed out. Because they are human, their nerves get tattered and they grow bitter.
    Actually, if cops were emotionless sociopaths or robots, they would handle stress better.
    But cops are human like you and me. And once human emotions come under great stress, something happens.

    Of course, one can say that black savagery is also the product of what blacks experienced under white ‘racism’. If blacks were merely black-faced white folks, I might agree. But science and daily observation teach us that blacks are indeed of another race, are more aggressive by nature, are stronger and tougher, are more self-centered, and are more childish. By nature.
    Biology is the main reason for black savagery.
    And as long as we expect cops to control blacks, there will be some cops who will lose it.

    Everyone loses it sometimes. Who hasn’t lost their tempers and blown up at parents, kids, friends, co-workers, employees, and even strangers?
    We know we shouldn’t but we can’t control ourselves.

    Cops are the same way. But it’s more problematic with them because they must deal with physically abusive assailants or thugs who are dangerous.
    Also, once cops get into a melee, they must ‘finish it’ because their authority as officers of the law is dependent on demonstrating that they are tough and will use force to take down thugs. If thugs sense weakness in cops, they will become emboldened to act worse.

    Anyway, as long as we have black savagery, there will be problems of police brutality. Police, black or white, are only human and have breaking points with some of those feral crazy blacks.

    I’ve had extensive experience with all races in America. I like most and get along with most too. But blacks are the one exception. Of course, not all blacks. But a sizable number of them. And this is true in so many cities, so many communities.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Stealth
    I hold no illusions about the police. When you live in a small town and know everybody, one of the things you learn is that the police are often people you wouldn't want as neighbors. A slim majority of white cops are probably decent folks, but it's hard to deny that too many of them are bullies and sadists. I myself have had two encounters with cops who used their authority to push people around. One sheriff's deputy, after a bizarre and senseless tirade, dared me to call and complain about him. All this because I wasn't paying attention and put a sticker on the wrong side of my license plate. It was obvious that he was trying to bait me into giving him an excuse to beat and arrest me, and if I suffered from "black mouth," the encounter would have indeed turned violent. They're not stressed out, they're not down to the wire, and they're not on edge; they're violent, resentful and self-righteous. Local PD's and SO's tend to have a disproportionate share of bad cops. The highway patrol seems to be much better.

    That being said, most police shootings of black people can almost be called suicide by cop. Fighting with the cops is really, really stupid, and black people just don't seem to get that. If you fight a lone cop, there's a damn good chance you'll get shot. If you square off with a group of cops, they're going to beat you to a bloody pulp. In some cases, it's justified.

    Walter Scott would be alive today if he hadn't inexplicably gotten out of his car and taken off running. Instead of simply surrendering when Slager caught up with him, he chose to fight. Bad decision. Oscar Grant would still be alive if he hadn't resisted arrest. Eric Garner would have survived his own ordeal if he hadn't chosen to defy police instructions to move away from where he was.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  39. KenH says:

    The American negro simply doesn’t have the right genetic stuff to achieve collective success in the white, Western world. And when they fail they lash out, often violently, at everyone except themselves. It also doesn’t help that innumerable demagogues, whether white lefty, Jewish lefty or Obama/Sharpton/ Jackson/Farrakhan, remind them daily that their failures or character flaws are not their fault and the result of white racism and white privilege.

    Any “peace” always entails white people being forced to submit to terms laid down by the radical blacks (who harbor an atavistic hatred of “whitey”) and their many champions in the mainstream media. A normal, healthy race would have violently revolted a long time ago, but whites are so beaten down, brainwashed and fearful of the police state that I don’t think that will ever be possible.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  40. Realist says:

    Whites have been the majority in this country forever. Whites have allowed our current situation. Some whites have even encouraged our situation for money, votes or both. Why would this change? If anything it will get worse due to dysgenics. This country allows idiots to vote, how could it be any different?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  41. Realist says:
    @Kyle a
    It's not the "neo-Marxist" that are the problem. It's just blacks.

    “It’s just blacks.”

    No it’s whites that allow it.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  42. Realist says:
    @TheJester
    Other blogs and commentators in the Unz Review point to an understanding of the failure of the egalitarian experiment in the United States. Human evolution impacts racial DNA and culture, with the first helping to form the second.

    Blacks are racially and culturally tuned for the Tropical Biosphere; Caucasians are racially and culturally tuned for the Temperate Biosphere, and Orientals are racially and culturally tuned for the Arctic Biosphere. Then, the Great Admixture (migration) of the modern era.

    In short, contemporary industrial civilization is a produce of the harsh climate of the Temperate Zone. The DNA and survival disposes a rule-based "law and order" society. (How can you have an industrial society without an almost universal disposition toward order and science?) The Tropical Biosphere disposes a "balance of terror" society -- the more general condition of the human race. One clan or tribe respects another clan' or tribes' women, children, and property to avoid the inevitable vendettas and violence that comes from violations.

    When racial DNA and cultural dispositions mix via mass migrations, certain populations are handicapped by not being racially and culturally tuned to their new social environments. No matter how much one "howls at the moon" via affirmative action, government transfer programs, social sanctions, and "re-connning" history, nothing can be done about it. The recent focus on White "microaggression" and White privilege and other invisible causes of interracial and intercultural failure in the United States is perhaps best understood as expressing a sense of hopelessness over the inability of peoples from biospheres alien to industrial culture to integrate into industrial culture. Indeed, if one looks closely enough, one sees that the language, social relationships, and other cultural dispositions among long-standing African populations in the United States are traceable to their African origins.

    If there is to be change, the expression "time heals all wounds" perhaps best expresses the only solution. Physical and cultural evolution requires time as the Biospheres mix populations on a scale unheard of in human history. The mass migrations of the modern era cannot be undone. The end results of evolution also cannot be predicted. In the meantime, "it is ... what it is."

    You wrote all that just to say….’whatever’?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  43. Realist says:
    @Biff
    "black-on-black crime (which is the great majority of crime among blacks)”

    I keep hearing this all the time, but I have never heard about the simple fact that if a black is convicted of committing a crime on any other race(White, Asian, Jew) it is considered a hate crime and the judge gives the perp twice/three times the jail time.. Blacks know this.. Others seem oblivious..

    “I keep hearing this all the time, but I have never heard about the simple fact that if a black is convicted of committing a crime on any other race(White, Asian, Jew) it is considered a hate crime and the judge gives the perp twice/three times the jail time.”

    Citation?

    But I do think you chose your pseudonym well.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  44. robother says:

    The problem Boyd Cathey describes can be thought of as the cultural equivalent of a virus, specifically the HIV. The cultural virus, which I usually identify roughly as “cultural marxism,” like its biological analogue, is destroying the immune system of Western culture. As with HIV, we experience the opportunistic attacks of ever present threats (predatory blacks, Muslims, purveyors of pure hedonism) to our core cult as the disease.

    But these threats have always been present. What has changed is the social signaling: individuals or institutions that are the antibodies, the immune system of the culture if you will, are being isolated and destroyed. I think of the line from American Sniper about there being 3 kinds of humans: Sheep, wolves and sheep dogs. Starting somewhere in the early 20th Century (to speak only about US cultural history), the attack on the sheep dogs began and is now reaching climax. The born wolves (high and low) are increasingly supported and valorized; the rest of us must become more sheepish in their presence. The stubborn sheep dogs are the ones with a target on their backs.

    In every institution of our culture– educational, religious or commercial–it is close to social suicide to stand for any traditional values or even for the literal defense of European culture from invasion. Too often, conservatives are fighting the opportunistic infections. But the real enemy is this cultural HIV, this literal revulsion at the highest levels (media, education, commercial and political) for Western European culture and humans.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  45. Stealth says:
    @Priss Factor
    On the issue of 'police brutality', it will never go away.

    Yes, it exists. In some cases, the cops are morons or sadists.

    But in most cases, PB is the result of the fact that police are human too. And everyone has a breaking point.
    Try as you might, if you deal with the scum of the earth all day long all year round--and black community is full of louts and punks and thugs and crazies--, you're gonna have a breaking point.

    Everyone has a breaking point. Over-stressed parents take it out on their kids and spouses.
    Angry kids take it out on their parents.
    Friends get into angry argument with friends.

    Sometimes, it's not really about issues but about nerves. After someone has had a bad day, even the slightest thing can trigger and set off bad tempers.

    Look at politicians. Behind closed doors, Clinton and Obama lost it at times and screamed and foamed at the mouth. And Gingrich and others too.

    Also, Americans love the angry maverick. Americans love rappers who scream, taunt, and throw fits. Americans love punk rockers who call for mayhem. Americans love gangster movies. Americans love professional wrestlers who talk shit. Americans love blockbuster movies about revenge and violence. Americans love angry street protesters who break windows and throw rocks. Feminists lionize the angry bitch who talks shit.
    Certain kinds of rage are deemed as cool. American Conservatives support US troops who drop bombs on other countries and kill all those 'muzzies'. Jews love chutzpah and aggression against goyim. Homos love being bitchy and nasty.
    Our culture encourages and promotes a culture of abrasiveness, aggressiveness, and in-your-face-ness. Look at Jerry Springer. Look at Howard Stern. Look at Maury Povich.

    So, why should it be any different with cops? Sure, as upholders of the law, cops are supposed to control their emotions and be cool at all times. But they are humans, not robots. As humans, they have breaking point like everyone else.
    And a cop's nerves are tested most in the black community because blacks are naturally more aggressive, naturally more jiveass, and naturally more arrogant. A lot of blacks grow up thinking they are the toughest bunch of mofos in the world. White civilians don't get in the way of blacks out of fear. And blacks take pride in pushing whites around. So, when white cops stand up to black violence, blacks feel as if their biological rights have been violated. Blacks think it's their natural right to push other races around. They grew up that way. Also, rap culture encourages bad attitude, thug behavior, and social/emotional arrogance among blacks.

    When soldiers fight overseas, they too have a breaking point. Decent men find themselves committing horrible acts. At some point, they grow so bitter and angry after so much stress.

    Cops are the same way.

    If most Americans were decent and crime was limited, cops might get along with people at most times.
    But in some communities, especially black ones, cops have to deal with scum all day.
    Worse, due to the cult of 'white racism' and 'white guilt', white cops must take special care to deal with black scumbags. So, the stress piles on and on and on. And some cops just lose it and go crazy. Police Brutality is usually the reaction to black savagery than the other way around.

    There is no solution to this problem. Not because cops are inhuman but because they are human, all too human. Because they are human, they are emotional and get stressed out. Because they are human, their nerves get tattered and they grow bitter.
    Actually, if cops were emotionless sociopaths or robots, they would handle stress better.
    But cops are human like you and me. And once human emotions come under great stress, something happens.

    Of course, one can say that black savagery is also the product of what blacks experienced under white 'racism'. If blacks were merely black-faced white folks, I might agree. But science and daily observation teach us that blacks are indeed of another race, are more aggressive by nature, are stronger and tougher, are more self-centered, and are more childish. By nature.
    Biology is the main reason for black savagery.
    And as long as we expect cops to control blacks, there will be some cops who will lose it.

    Everyone loses it sometimes. Who hasn't lost their tempers and blown up at parents, kids, friends, co-workers, employees, and even strangers?
    We know we shouldn't but we can't control ourselves.

    Cops are the same way. But it's more problematic with them because they must deal with physically abusive assailants or thugs who are dangerous.
    Also, once cops get into a melee, they must 'finish it' because their authority as officers of the law is dependent on demonstrating that they are tough and will use force to take down thugs. If thugs sense weakness in cops, they will become emboldened to act worse.

    Anyway, as long as we have black savagery, there will be problems of police brutality. Police, black or white, are only human and have breaking points with some of those feral crazy blacks.

    I've had extensive experience with all races in America. I like most and get along with most too. But blacks are the one exception. Of course, not all blacks. But a sizable number of them. And this is true in so many cities, so many communities.

    I hold no illusions about the police. When you live in a small town and know everybody, one of the things you learn is that the police are often people you wouldn’t want as neighbors. A slim majority of white cops are probably decent folks, but it’s hard to deny that too many of them are bullies and sadists. I myself have had two encounters with cops who used their authority to push people around. One sheriff’s deputy, after a bizarre and senseless tirade, dared me to call and complain about him. All this because I wasn’t paying attention and put a sticker on the wrong side of my license plate. It was obvious that he was trying to bait me into giving him an excuse to beat and arrest me, and if I suffered from “black mouth,” the encounter would have indeed turned violent. They’re not stressed out, they’re not down to the wire, and they’re not on edge; they’re violent, resentful and self-righteous. Local PD’s and SO’s tend to have a disproportionate share of bad cops. The highway patrol seems to be much better.

    That being said, most police shootings of black people can almost be called suicide by cop. Fighting with the cops is really, really stupid, and black people just don’t seem to get that. If you fight a lone cop, there’s a damn good chance you’ll get shot. If you square off with a group of cops, they’re going to beat you to a bloody pulp. In some cases, it’s justified.

    Walter Scott would be alive today if he hadn’t inexplicably gotten out of his car and taken off running. Instead of simply surrendering when Slager caught up with him, he chose to fight. Bad decision. Oscar Grant would still be alive if he hadn’t resisted arrest. Eric Garner would have survived his own ordeal if he hadn’t chosen to defy police instructions to move away from where he was.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Priss Factor
    I guess it depends from locality to locality.

    It could be some towns have louts as cops.

    I never much liked cops but they never gave me any trouble.

    But then, I'm about as law-abiding as anyone can get.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  46. Marty [AKA "wick"] says:
    @Truth
    Hey here you go, Homie; some info for your friend:

    According to Bloomberg Business, 13% of DHL employees are African Americans, and FIFTY-FOUR percent are "minorities" (whatever that means) so be sure to forward this like to him, and let he know, he's a complete sap, for me.

    http://www.businessweek.com/careers/bplc/2007/78.htm

    As long as you’re in the mood for research, could you look up how much of that 13% is concentrated where the company has no choice, like D.C., Philly and Miami? I’m guessing that’s not Berkeley, the town where even the middle-eastern cab drivers say of your folks, “there’s something wrong with those people.”

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth
    You want research? Here it is, complete with charts, graphs, and statistics:

    Of every national / international company, African-American employees are overrepresented....where African-Americans live. Not in Sioux City, or yes, Marin County; where they don't.

    OK. where's my Zellner Thesis Award?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  47. Stealth says:
    @Ronald Thomas West

    What’s amazing is your insistence that black people are absolutely never responsible for the choices they made and make in response to those welfare programs and policies
     
    That's your assumption and it's an assumption and only that. As a matter of fact, I prefer to focus on the facts surrounding White denial of making immense contributions to the social problems we face. Example given, American empire is a White phenomena sustained by a White majority national legislature. Deny that and you could be accused of believing the Moon is made of green cheese. But that's too easy an example. White people in a White culture are as subject to ethnocentric bias as anyone. All ethnocentric bias means is you don't see/can't see the facts from a point of another culture's view. It's a real handicap, a kind of social retardation.

    As a matter of fact, I prefer to focus on the facts surrounding White denial of making immense contributions to the social problems we face.

    Ho-hum. Since criticizing white people is permitted by the establishment, it’s very common. You’re not saying anything original, so why the smug tone? Everyone who bashes white people seems to think he or she is boldly breaking new ground.

    I don’t think anyone will honestly deny that blacks have been held back by forced segregation and racism, but if you really believe that’s all that’s holding them back, then you haven’t spent much time around black people. If I had to guess, I’d say you’ve spent your whole life in places that don’t have substantial black populations.

    In other words, this is all academic to you, and you really don’t know what you’re talking about.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Ronald Thomas West

    If I had to guess, I’d say you’ve spent your whole life in places that don’t have substantial black populations.

    In other words, this is all academic to you, and you really don’t know what you’re talking about
     
    I lived with a Black family in a Black neighborhood for some months when I was younger. Nice people. So, no, not much experience there, it only for a few months. I served with Blacks in the military and found them to be more honorable and dependable than Whites in small things, like returning favors when we 'borrowed' cigarettes; Blacks remembered more often than not, Whites were the reverse. Admittedly that's no scientific expertise. But when it comes to knowing 'White' people's prejudices, my experience is quite extensive:

    http://ronaldthomaswest.com/2014/08/17/life-in-indian-country/

    ^
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  48. Truth says:
    @Marty
    As long as you're in the mood for research, could you look up how much of that 13% is concentrated where the company has no choice, like D.C., Philly and Miami? I'm guessing that's not Berkeley, the town where even the middle-eastern cab drivers say of your folks, "there's something wrong with those people."

    You want research? Here it is, complete with charts, graphs, and statistics:

    Of every national / international company, African-American employees are overrepresented….where African-Americans live. Not in Sioux City, or yes, Marin County; where they don’t.

    OK. where’s my Zellner Thesis Award?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  49. Corvinus says:

    “The open declaration of a race war against The Historic Native Born White American Majority at the most fundamental level is being waged by Greedy Cheating White Male MEGA-CEOs. At the most fundamental level:mass transfer of Native Born White American Working Class Wealth to the parasitic Greedy Cheating Class White Male MEGA-CEO…this requires the mass importation of the high fertility highly racialized nonwhite Democratic Party voters who have their own racial-nationalist agenda that requires voting Whitey enthusiastically into a racial minority on Nov 3 2016.”

    
There is no race war, only race baiters such as yourself pretending there is one to wage.

    “Both blacks and Native Born White Americans are victims of this wealth theft-wage slave policy. But blacks are in a political coalition with post-1965 nonwhites…so blacks brought economic wage slavery upon themselves. Blacks will of course never accept this, and will blame Whitey…this means:home break-ins and brutal gang raping of White Women in front of their White husbands and White sons.”

    Considering that most crime is black on black, and that home-break ins and gang rapes of white women in the suburbs are rarities, it would seem that you are overgeneralizing per usual.

    
“The only viable way to wage this battle is through a highly racialized Nationalist Anarcho-Syndcalist-Bill Blizzard-Wat Tyler-Battle for Blair Mountain Working Class Native Born White American Peasant Revolt against the Greedy-Cheating White Male MEGA-CEO framework.”



    How do you propose to wage this war?

    “US Jewish-homo pop culture globalism is the new opium”

    Corrected for accuracy—Pop culture globalism is the new opium.

    “Biology is the main reason for black savagery.”

    Corrected for accuracy—Biology and environment are the reasons for savagery among all races

    “I’ve had extensive experience with all races in America. I like most and get along with most too. But blacks are the one exception. Of course, not all blacks. But a sizable number of them.”

    How many are we talking about, Hoss?

    “The American negro simply doesn’t have the right genetic stuff to achieve collective success in the white, Western world.”

    Citations, please.

    “Whites have been the majority in this country forever”

    Actually, the red man, aka Native Americans, were in this country prior to Europeans brutally removing them. Because progress.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  50. Dutch Boy says:

    Republicans do use covert racial appeals to whites (the so-called dog whistles) but then work against their interests and in the interests of their megabucks donor class.

    Read More
    • Replies: @leftist conservative
    You wrote:
    "Republicans do use covert racial appeals to whites (the so-called dog whistles) but then work against their interests and in the interests of their megabucks donor class."
    =============


    This is obviously true. And many of the Dissident Right bloggers and commentators will even admit this is true--if they are pressed on the issue. They have to admit that or lose credibility.

    Most in truth, almost all Dissident Right bloggers, pundits etc will not FOCUS on this truth.

    And that really really hurts the Dissident Right's ability to become a force for change.

    But ya know what? Dissident Right bloggers and pundits etc don't really care about change. They care about getting readers. Because that is how to get money.

    The truth does not lead to money. People only want their biases confirmed --not confronted. And that goes for Dissident Right readers. They hate being demonized by the liberals and the media. They hate being legally discriminated against by the legal system.

    But they cannot let go of their pre-set biases and listen to and accept the truth: Multiculturalism is shoved down our throats because it increases corporate profits.

    The Dissident Right does not care about this truth.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  51. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  52. Priss Factor [AKA "The Priss Factory"] says:
    @Stealth
    I hold no illusions about the police. When you live in a small town and know everybody, one of the things you learn is that the police are often people you wouldn't want as neighbors. A slim majority of white cops are probably decent folks, but it's hard to deny that too many of them are bullies and sadists. I myself have had two encounters with cops who used their authority to push people around. One sheriff's deputy, after a bizarre and senseless tirade, dared me to call and complain about him. All this because I wasn't paying attention and put a sticker on the wrong side of my license plate. It was obvious that he was trying to bait me into giving him an excuse to beat and arrest me, and if I suffered from "black mouth," the encounter would have indeed turned violent. They're not stressed out, they're not down to the wire, and they're not on edge; they're violent, resentful and self-righteous. Local PD's and SO's tend to have a disproportionate share of bad cops. The highway patrol seems to be much better.

    That being said, most police shootings of black people can almost be called suicide by cop. Fighting with the cops is really, really stupid, and black people just don't seem to get that. If you fight a lone cop, there's a damn good chance you'll get shot. If you square off with a group of cops, they're going to beat you to a bloody pulp. In some cases, it's justified.

    Walter Scott would be alive today if he hadn't inexplicably gotten out of his car and taken off running. Instead of simply surrendering when Slager caught up with him, he chose to fight. Bad decision. Oscar Grant would still be alive if he hadn't resisted arrest. Eric Garner would have survived his own ordeal if he hadn't chosen to defy police instructions to move away from where he was.

    I guess it depends from locality to locality.

    It could be some towns have louts as cops.

    I never much liked cops but they never gave me any trouble.

    But then, I’m about as law-abiding as anyone can get.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  53. @Dutch Boy
    Republicans do use covert racial appeals to whites (the so-called dog whistles) but then work against their interests and in the interests of their megabucks donor class.

    You wrote:
    “Republicans do use covert racial appeals to whites (the so-called dog whistles) but then work against their interests and in the interests of their megabucks donor class.”
    =============

    This is obviously true. And many of the Dissident Right bloggers and commentators will even admit this is true–if they are pressed on the issue. They have to admit that or lose credibility.

    Most in truth, almost all Dissident Right bloggers, pundits etc will not FOCUS on this truth.

    And that really really hurts the Dissident Right’s ability to become a force for change.

    But ya know what? Dissident Right bloggers and pundits etc don’t really care about change. They care about getting readers. Because that is how to get money.

    The truth does not lead to money. People only want their biases confirmed –not confronted. And that goes for Dissident Right readers. They hate being demonized by the liberals and the media. They hate being legally discriminated against by the legal system.

    But they cannot let go of their pre-set biases and listen to and accept the truth: Multiculturalism is shoved down our throats because it increases corporate profits.

    The Dissident Right does not care about this truth.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    You've lost your mind friend

    You are telling me that 'dissident right' pundits are really just in it for the bucks?!?

    Have you noticed that there aren't a lot of advertisements on Unz.com? The only reason it can even exist is because Unz made a wack of money elsewhere, and has essentially volunteered to bankroll a charity operation. He probably hopes it will grow into something of monetary value, but there are far easier ways to turn a buck.

    I'm astounded you can possibly believe anybody in the 'dissident right' (for lack of a better word) is only in it for the money
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  54. Soundman says:

    Strange, everyone always seems to take a position that only one side or the other is to blame for all the problems. Seems to me that not only is there enough blame to go around, but that blame actually is not helpful in resolution of the problems. Now, since these are emotionally charged issues, they are the hardest to deal with, and hence need the most focus to look at dispassionately.

    Fact is, Blacks make up a very small percentage of the population. The amount of public resources expended on a certain (negatively useful) subset of the black population is disproportionate to their actual proportion of the population . By public resources, we must include not only the give away items like welfare or affirmative action, but public services like police, courts, penal systems. Their use of resources is completely out of even the most reasonable scale (as far as i can see from data reported in media, both MSM and alternate). A certain negatively useful subset of Whites, Hispanics and Asians also exist. I would like to see someone do the research on how much each negative subset is using public resources proportional to their percentage of the population (by geographic location). I think we would find that there would be large disparities even within negative subsets.

    We however are caught on a trap of our own making. We can not easily drop support and remove resource usage from these negative groups, without being willing to accept that there will be violent consequences (maybe not direct race wars, but certainly riots, looting, etc.) and at this time, we do not have the internal strength of mind or character to accept them. Nor would MSM and liberal organizations be willing to discuss the issues openly to allow a consensus on how to move forward to form. Without an agreed societal consensus, nothing can be done to correct the problem.

    Instead, we will probably keep going the way we are until the whole things blows to pieces because we cannot have open discussions, and negative black subset apologists(or any negative subset apologists, but blacks are the loudest) and supporters will not allow any acceptance of responsibility for the conditions that prevail or their solutions to accrue to the negative black subset (or any specific negative subset).

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth

    By public resources, we must include not only the give away items like welfare or affirmative action, but public services like police, courts, penal systems. Their use of resources is completely out of even the most reasonable scale (as far as i can see from data reported in media, both MSM and alternate).
     
    As with everything else, this depends upon how elastic your mind is. First of all, welfare and affirmative action are not "give away items." Welfare gives people who would (theoretically) not have any income, spending power, which in turn creates business and private sector jobs. People take their welfare checks to supermarkets, convenience stores, and Wal-Marts, which employ (mostly) white people. Without welfare, how many white people would lose their jobs? This is not my theory, it is the reason the programs were created.

    Affirmative action was created to combat "negative action" which is, a subset of the population was responsible for taxes but unable to reap the benefits of them. This is called "taxation without representation" which is the reason we started the war with England to begin with.

    Public services, such as the ones you mentioned above, are not give away items. They are a method of less-than-brilliant (mostly white ) people, achieving middle-class lifestyles. What do you think these $78,000 a year policemen, with high-school diplomas would be doing otherwise to support their families, splitting atoms?

    If you are a white man intelligent enough to run your own business, black people are a desired demographic because they consume heavily, and foolishly, and do not found competing businesses. This is why black people are overrepresented in advertising.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  55. @The Anti-Gnostic

    Now, if all of those hundreds upon hundreds of billions of tax $ poured into social welfare jobs generated by and for White people (military contracting) had been equitably divided with the demographic Black share invested in job creation in disadvantaged neighborhoods...
     
    You are an old, self-loathing white fool and I am wasting my time, but here goes:

    Government spending does not "create jobs." Government spending only transfers existing wealth. Once the transfer payments end, the jobs "created" by them end. Any actual public goods being provided end up being serviced for much, much less (compare public and private school teacher salaries).

    American blacks are the recipients of loads of largesse. We have an entire US Postal Service where we pay them and give them a pension and medical coverage to deliver corporate marketing materials. We have delivered entire cities to them to be run by, for and with black people. Black entertainers, athletes and entrepeneurs earn millions of dollars.

    Government transfer payments seemingly work for white people (for a few generations, at which point high youth unemployment and taxes and inflation shut the Ponzi scheme down) because of their mean lower time-preference, lower aggression, and higher general intelligence. For blacks with higher time-preference, higher aggression and lower general intelligence, you end up with a dysgenic, dysfunctional Big Man culture. Again, the gravy train only lasts so long as the (mostly white) net tax-payors are willing to fund it.

    You say
    “Government spending does not “create jobs.”

    It has created entire industries,
    Would a company like Lockheed martin exist without the the State?
    Booze-Allen?
    Acis?Kroll?

    You live in a fantasy world. It creates massive amounts of jobs in sectors that will support its crimes.

    The piece you are missing is the cost to the productive economy.

    Read More
    • Replies: @The Anti-Gnostic
    I don't think you read my comment very carefully, or beyond the first sentence.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  56. map says:
    @Ronald Thomas West
    "Angry" says about everything anyone would need to know. Anger is a main culprit involved with drops in social intelligence and precludes useful insights and perception. And as you thrive on anger, here's something to think about:

    http://ronaldthomaswest.com/2015/04/16/raphaels-paradox/

    ^ It's about a creepy bug climbed up White people's butts a long time ago, and one reason White civilization is angry per se (not that a truly 'White' anyone would want to look too closely)

    “Angry” says about everything anyone would need to know. Anger is a main culprit involved with drops in social intelligence and precludes useful insights and perception. And as you thrive on anger, here’s something to think about:”

    Your pithy psychoanalysis is both pedestrian and boring.

    Anger and hate is the fuel of civilization. It is what keeps the blood warm at night. If you never learn to hate your enemy as much as he hates you, then you will always be his victim.

    It is time once again that Whites acted out their rage upon the world.

    The World deserves it.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Priss Factor
    Damn Right!
    , @Ronald Thomas West

    Your pithy psychoanalysis is both pedestrian and boring

    Anger and hate is the fuel of civilization. It is what keeps the blood warm at night. If you never learn to hate your enemy as much as he hates you, then you will always be his victim.

    It is time once again that Whites acted out their rage upon the world
     
    Actually what I was saying with my 'boring, pedestrian pithy psycho analysis' of angry White people (admittedly yourself) is, y'all are queers too stupid to understand y'all are queers.

    Here's the link again, people have been reading:

    http://ronaldthomaswest.com/2015/04/16/raphaels-paradox/

    ^
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  57. Truth says:

    “Government spending does not “create jobs.”

    LOL, Dude please take your act on the road;

    http://security.blogs.cnn.com/2011/09/22/defense-cuts-the-jobs-numbers-game/

    Read More
    • Replies: @The Anti-Gnostic
    Again, government spending is simply a transfer of existing wealth. I can take money from you and use it to hire someone to sort my socks. I can justify my expropriation by saying, "Look: happily employed sock-sorters." I assume you're intelligent enough to figure out the missing part of my calculation. Or maybe you're not.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  58. Truth says:
    @Soundman
    Strange, everyone always seems to take a position that only one side or the other is to blame for all the problems. Seems to me that not only is there enough blame to go around, but that blame actually is not helpful in resolution of the problems. Now, since these are emotionally charged issues, they are the hardest to deal with, and hence need the most focus to look at dispassionately.

    Fact is, Blacks make up a very small percentage of the population. The amount of public resources expended on a certain (negatively useful) subset of the black population is disproportionate to their actual proportion of the population . By public resources, we must include not only the give away items like welfare or affirmative action, but public services like police, courts, penal systems. Their use of resources is completely out of even the most reasonable scale (as far as i can see from data reported in media, both MSM and alternate). A certain negatively useful subset of Whites, Hispanics and Asians also exist. I would like to see someone do the research on how much each negative subset is using public resources proportional to their percentage of the population (by geographic location). I think we would find that there would be large disparities even within negative subsets.

    We however are caught on a trap of our own making. We can not easily drop support and remove resource usage from these negative groups, without being willing to accept that there will be violent consequences (maybe not direct race wars, but certainly riots, looting, etc.) and at this time, we do not have the internal strength of mind or character to accept them. Nor would MSM and liberal organizations be willing to discuss the issues openly to allow a consensus on how to move forward to form. Without an agreed societal consensus, nothing can be done to correct the problem.

    Instead, we will probably keep going the way we are until the whole things blows to pieces because we cannot have open discussions, and negative black subset apologists(or any negative subset apologists, but blacks are the loudest) and supporters will not allow any acceptance of responsibility for the conditions that prevail or their solutions to accrue to the negative black subset (or any specific negative subset).

    By public resources, we must include not only the give away items like welfare or affirmative action, but public services like police, courts, penal systems. Their use of resources is completely out of even the most reasonable scale (as far as i can see from data reported in media, both MSM and alternate).

    As with everything else, this depends upon how elastic your mind is. First of all, welfare and affirmative action are not “give away items.” Welfare gives people who would (theoretically) not have any income, spending power, which in turn creates business and private sector jobs. People take their welfare checks to supermarkets, convenience stores, and Wal-Marts, which employ (mostly) white people. Without welfare, how many white people would lose their jobs? This is not my theory, it is the reason the programs were created.

    Affirmative action was created to combat “negative action” which is, a subset of the population was responsible for taxes but unable to reap the benefits of them. This is called “taxation without representation” which is the reason we started the war with England to begin with.

    Public services, such as the ones you mentioned above, are not give away items. They are a method of less-than-brilliant (mostly white ) people, achieving middle-class lifestyles. What do you think these $78,000 a year policemen, with high-school diplomas would be doing otherwise to support their families, splitting atoms?

    If you are a white man intelligent enough to run your own business, black people are a desired demographic because they consume heavily, and foolishly, and do not found competing businesses. This is why black people are overrepresented in advertising.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Soundman
    @Truth

    I will allow that using the term give away items was mental laziness on my part. And i can't disagree completely that welfare does give an income to people who MIGHT not otherwise have one. However, given that the majority of any negative use subset, be they black, white, hispanic or asian, are not physically handicapped, and most likely would not prefer to starve to death, there is an implicit assumption, and i may be incorrect, that they would be forced to do something useful in order to earn a living to at least feed themselves, if not their entire family..

    The question becomes not one of whether welfare is providing input into the economy, it certainly is, and you are correct on that, but does it maximize the input producible over welfare as a baseline. However, we have to ask, is welfare at the levels it is being given creating a situation where not working allows better living than working? Clearly if they can afford to sit at home and live comfortably, then the level is too high. And welfare was not created to be a sole source of support for multiple generations of any color. The initial idea was to create a temporary assistance package until a family could get back on its feet.

    It is also exactly not taxation without representation for the people on welfare, since they technically fall below the poverty line, their income is effectively not taxable. I do know this from experience as at least twice when i was a child my parents had to spend some time on welfare while dad was in between jobs. Of course that was a long time ago, but i do not see that the actual idea behind the system has changed, only our implementation of it.

    Public services, of any type, are exactly a give away from society to itself. In theory, it is for the public good and becomes a part of the public commons. But since public services are never (in general anyways) means tested, it becomes one group subsidizing another. In example, public mass transit is generally considered to be most useful to the poorest among us. We all subsidize the build, and only small part of the larger society makes use of it. You can argue that it is about personal choice, and that is quite true for some people, but still it is a subsidization of society to society.

    As for the $78,000 a year high school diploma cop, i don't think that is quite accurate. Most places that pay that much for a police officer a year require at least a minimum level of advanced education. I know small town cops in Wisconsin who maybe, maybe make somewhere in the neighborhood of $40,000 a year with overtime. Not exactly upper middle class is it?

    But as you say, it depends on the elasticity of your thinking. No matter whether you think a public good is a give away, a subsidy or a wealth transfer device, it is still something that a society must reach a consensus on delivering. My point was not so much whether there should or should not be such a subsidy, but that it has to be decided as a societal consensus. And that within that process, without being able to have an honest conversation about costs and results of such policies, we cannot reach such a consensus. And without consensus, we are doomed to keep repeating the same scenes over and over.
    , @Anonymous
    Now that post was truly the product of an 'elastic mind'

    Priceless!.... Keep em coming 'truth'!...
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  59. Truth says:

    It is time once again that Whites acted out their rage upon the world.

    Another comedian! When did they ever stop?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  60. Kat Grey says:

    Truth makes some good, valid points. Blacks are indeed big consumers and it could be one of the reasons why European Fat Cats are seeking to import them to the EU. And we all know they also feature heavily in sports and entertainment. The Chinese on the other hand set up rival businesses and spend their profits within their own community or send them back home.

    Another thing I noticed in American cities is the plethora of billboards in black districts advertising liquor!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  61. Priss Factor [AKA "The Priss Factory"] says:
    @map
    "Angry” says about everything anyone would need to know. Anger is a main culprit involved with drops in social intelligence and precludes useful insights and perception. And as you thrive on anger, here’s something to think about:"

    Your pithy psychoanalysis is both pedestrian and boring.

    Anger and hate is the fuel of civilization. It is what keeps the blood warm at night. If you never learn to hate your enemy as much as he hates you, then you will always be his victim.

    It is time once again that Whites acted out their rage upon the world.

    The World deserves it.

    Damn Right!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  62. @Truth

    “Government spending does not “create jobs.”
     
    LOL, Dude please take your act on the road;

    http://security.blogs.cnn.com/2011/09/22/defense-cuts-the-jobs-numbers-game/

    Again, government spending is simply a transfer of existing wealth. I can take money from you and use it to hire someone to sort my socks. I can justify my expropriation by saying, “Look: happily employed sock-sorters.” I assume you’re intelligent enough to figure out the missing part of my calculation. Or maybe you’re not.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  63. Truth says:

    Every thing in America is a wealth transfer from those who have a little to those who have a lot, or are you not old enough to have figured that out yet?

    Read More
    • Replies: @War for Blair Mountain
    That's not quite right. There is a level of analysis where you can say you are correct. A deeper level of analysis shows that you are wrong. Post-1965 immigration policy has resulted in a massive transfer of wealth to the very wealthy. The low-skill Blue collar class of workers have been annihilated by this. The economic life support system they survive on comes from taxing to death the Native Born White American blue-collar skilled class and White collar skilled middle class both also victims of the form of economic violence known as Foriegn nonwhite scab labor and their US born nonwhite geneline scab labor.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  64. @Ronald Thomas West

    What’s amazing is your insistence that black people are absolutely never responsible for the choices they made and make in response to those welfare programs and policies
     
    That's your assumption and it's an assumption and only that. As a matter of fact, I prefer to focus on the facts surrounding White denial of making immense contributions to the social problems we face. Example given, American empire is a White phenomena sustained by a White majority national legislature. Deny that and you could be accused of believing the Moon is made of green cheese. But that's too easy an example. White people in a White culture are as subject to ethnocentric bias as anyone. All ethnocentric bias means is you don't see/can't see the facts from a point of another culture's view. It's a real handicap, a kind of social retardation.

    That’s what separate countries are for. But I get the idea you would be as unhappy with a white America returned to its parochial, Anglo-Celt roots.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Ronald Thomas West

    That’s what separate countries are for. But I get the idea you would be as unhappy with a white America returned to its parochial, Anglo-Celt roots
     
    Actually I'd be happy with a nation the practices common sense which, in my view, has little to do with the color of someone's skin and everything to do with someone's practical intelligence; regardless of race. And the 'Whitey' race war types posting here is a good thing, Ron Unz has done the world a favor to allow these infantile/homicidal currents into the open .. if only for people to understand the USA is no impregnable monolith but rather a ceramic jar that could shatter in ways that would make the break-up of the former Yugoslavia look like a schoolyard spat. Thinking people of all colors should be looking at that and begin informed dialogue outside of the 'established' channels.

    When I see incredibly divisive screeds (like the article we are supposedly posting comments about) pumping out what amounts to juvenile accusations and finger pointing, from a perspective of 'we're smarter, better, more deserving and none of the fault is our own' tying Blacks to neo-marxism and overlooking (with a solid dose of ethnocentric blindness) neo-fascist forces that have not only a long history of impunity in policing America's Black communities (with the effect of propping up morons like Al Sharpton) but are increasingly militarized in what amounts to a dangerous level of potential escalation .. and that White people somehow believe they are under some sole assault .. what a cynical laugh.

    http://ronaldthomaswest.com/2014/12/09/metadata-panorama/

    People should be paying attention to this stuff, mob mentality is certainly not limited to 'people of color' and a militarized police could come down on any community .. diverse communities need alliances, not divisions

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  65. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @leftist conservative
    You wrote:
    "Republicans do use covert racial appeals to whites (the so-called dog whistles) but then work against their interests and in the interests of their megabucks donor class."
    =============


    This is obviously true. And many of the Dissident Right bloggers and commentators will even admit this is true--if they are pressed on the issue. They have to admit that or lose credibility.

    Most in truth, almost all Dissident Right bloggers, pundits etc will not FOCUS on this truth.

    And that really really hurts the Dissident Right's ability to become a force for change.

    But ya know what? Dissident Right bloggers and pundits etc don't really care about change. They care about getting readers. Because that is how to get money.

    The truth does not lead to money. People only want their biases confirmed --not confronted. And that goes for Dissident Right readers. They hate being demonized by the liberals and the media. They hate being legally discriminated against by the legal system.

    But they cannot let go of their pre-set biases and listen to and accept the truth: Multiculturalism is shoved down our throats because it increases corporate profits.

    The Dissident Right does not care about this truth.

    You’ve lost your mind friend

    You are telling me that ‘dissident right’ pundits are really just in it for the bucks?!?

    Have you noticed that there aren’t a lot of advertisements on Unz.com? The only reason it can even exist is because Unz made a wack of money elsewhere, and has essentially volunteered to bankroll a charity operation. He probably hopes it will grow into something of monetary value, but there are far easier ways to turn a buck.

    I’m astounded you can possibly believe anybody in the ‘dissident right’ (for lack of a better word) is only in it for the money

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  66. Soundman says:
    @Truth

    By public resources, we must include not only the give away items like welfare or affirmative action, but public services like police, courts, penal systems. Their use of resources is completely out of even the most reasonable scale (as far as i can see from data reported in media, both MSM and alternate).
     
    As with everything else, this depends upon how elastic your mind is. First of all, welfare and affirmative action are not "give away items." Welfare gives people who would (theoretically) not have any income, spending power, which in turn creates business and private sector jobs. People take their welfare checks to supermarkets, convenience stores, and Wal-Marts, which employ (mostly) white people. Without welfare, how many white people would lose their jobs? This is not my theory, it is the reason the programs were created.

    Affirmative action was created to combat "negative action" which is, a subset of the population was responsible for taxes but unable to reap the benefits of them. This is called "taxation without representation" which is the reason we started the war with England to begin with.

    Public services, such as the ones you mentioned above, are not give away items. They are a method of less-than-brilliant (mostly white ) people, achieving middle-class lifestyles. What do you think these $78,000 a year policemen, with high-school diplomas would be doing otherwise to support their families, splitting atoms?

    If you are a white man intelligent enough to run your own business, black people are a desired demographic because they consume heavily, and foolishly, and do not found competing businesses. This is why black people are overrepresented in advertising.

    I will allow that using the term give away items was mental laziness on my part. And i can’t disagree completely that welfare does give an income to people who MIGHT not otherwise have one. However, given that the majority of any negative use subset, be they black, white, hispanic or asian, are not physically handicapped, and most likely would not prefer to starve to death, there is an implicit assumption, and i may be incorrect, that they would be forced to do something useful in order to earn a living to at least feed themselves, if not their entire family..

    The question becomes not one of whether welfare is providing input into the economy, it certainly is, and you are correct on that, but does it maximize the input producible over welfare as a baseline. However, we have to ask, is welfare at the levels it is being given creating a situation where not working allows better living than working? Clearly if they can afford to sit at home and live comfortably, then the level is too high. And welfare was not created to be a sole source of support for multiple generations of any color. The initial idea was to create a temporary assistance package until a family could get back on its feet.

    It is also exactly not taxation without representation for the people on welfare, since they technically fall below the poverty line, their income is effectively not taxable. I do know this from experience as at least twice when i was a child my parents had to spend some time on welfare while dad was in between jobs. Of course that was a long time ago, but i do not see that the actual idea behind the system has changed, only our implementation of it.

    Public services, of any type, are exactly a give away from society to itself. In theory, it is for the public good and becomes a part of the public commons. But since public services are never (in general anyways) means tested, it becomes one group subsidizing another. In example, public mass transit is generally considered to be most useful to the poorest among us. We all subsidize the build, and only small part of the larger society makes use of it. You can argue that it is about personal choice, and that is quite true for some people, but still it is a subsidization of society to society.

    As for the $78,000 a year high school diploma cop, i don’t think that is quite accurate. Most places that pay that much for a police officer a year require at least a minimum level of advanced education. I know small town cops in Wisconsin who maybe, maybe make somewhere in the neighborhood of $40,000 a year with overtime. Not exactly upper middle class is it?

    But as you say, it depends on the elasticity of your thinking. No matter whether you think a public good is a give away, a subsidy or a wealth transfer device, it is still something that a society must reach a consensus on delivering. My point was not so much whether there should or should not be such a subsidy, but that it has to be decided as a societal consensus. And that within that process, without being able to have an honest conversation about costs and results of such policies, we cannot reach such a consensus. And without consensus, we are doomed to keep repeating the same scenes over and over.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  67. @map
    "Angry” says about everything anyone would need to know. Anger is a main culprit involved with drops in social intelligence and precludes useful insights and perception. And as you thrive on anger, here’s something to think about:"

    Your pithy psychoanalysis is both pedestrian and boring.

    Anger and hate is the fuel of civilization. It is what keeps the blood warm at night. If you never learn to hate your enemy as much as he hates you, then you will always be his victim.

    It is time once again that Whites acted out their rage upon the world.

    The World deserves it.

    Your pithy psychoanalysis is both pedestrian and boring

    Anger and hate is the fuel of civilization. It is what keeps the blood warm at night. If you never learn to hate your enemy as much as he hates you, then you will always be his victim.

    It is time once again that Whites acted out their rage upon the world

    Actually what I was saying with my ‘boring, pedestrian pithy psycho analysis’ of angry White people (admittedly yourself) is, y’all are queers too stupid to understand y’all are queers.

    Here’s the link again, people have been reading:

    http://ronaldthomaswest.com/2015/04/16/raphaels-paradox/

    ^

    Read More
    • Replies: @map
    "Actually what I was saying with my ‘boring, pedestrian pithy psycho analysis’ of angry White people (admittedly yourself) is, y’all are queers too stupid to understand y’all are queers."

    Yeah, I suppose you think the reservation, concentration camp and gas chamber are just one-offs that will never be repeated.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  68. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @Truth

    By public resources, we must include not only the give away items like welfare or affirmative action, but public services like police, courts, penal systems. Their use of resources is completely out of even the most reasonable scale (as far as i can see from data reported in media, both MSM and alternate).
     
    As with everything else, this depends upon how elastic your mind is. First of all, welfare and affirmative action are not "give away items." Welfare gives people who would (theoretically) not have any income, spending power, which in turn creates business and private sector jobs. People take their welfare checks to supermarkets, convenience stores, and Wal-Marts, which employ (mostly) white people. Without welfare, how many white people would lose their jobs? This is not my theory, it is the reason the programs were created.

    Affirmative action was created to combat "negative action" which is, a subset of the population was responsible for taxes but unable to reap the benefits of them. This is called "taxation without representation" which is the reason we started the war with England to begin with.

    Public services, such as the ones you mentioned above, are not give away items. They are a method of less-than-brilliant (mostly white ) people, achieving middle-class lifestyles. What do you think these $78,000 a year policemen, with high-school diplomas would be doing otherwise to support their families, splitting atoms?

    If you are a white man intelligent enough to run your own business, black people are a desired demographic because they consume heavily, and foolishly, and do not found competing businesses. This is why black people are overrepresented in advertising.

    Now that post was truly the product of an ‘elastic mind’

    Priceless!…. Keep em coming ‘truth’!…

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  69. @Stealth
    As a matter of fact, I prefer to focus on the facts surrounding White denial of making immense contributions to the social problems we face.

    Ho-hum. Since criticizing white people is permitted by the establishment, it's very common. You're not saying anything original, so why the smug tone? Everyone who bashes white people seems to think he or she is boldly breaking new ground.

    I don't think anyone will honestly deny that blacks have been held back by forced segregation and racism, but if you really believe that's all that's holding them back, then you haven't spent much time around black people. If I had to guess, I'd say you've spent your whole life in places that don't have substantial black populations.

    In other words, this is all academic to you, and you really don't know what you're talking about.

    If I had to guess, I’d say you’ve spent your whole life in places that don’t have substantial black populations.

    In other words, this is all academic to you, and you really don’t know what you’re talking about

    I lived with a Black family in a Black neighborhood for some months when I was younger. Nice people. So, no, not much experience there, it only for a few months. I served with Blacks in the military and found them to be more honorable and dependable than Whites in small things, like returning favors when we ‘borrowed’ cigarettes; Blacks remembered more often than not, Whites were the reverse. Admittedly that’s no scientific expertise. But when it comes to knowing ‘White’ people’s prejudices, my experience is quite extensive:

    http://ronaldthomaswest.com/2014/08/17/life-in-indian-country/

    ^

    Read More
    • Replies: @Stealth
    You're right, that's not very extensive. You need to live in a place where you're casually exposed to large numbers of them on a daily basis if you want to know the extent of that community's dysfunction. Stay a little longer and you'll realize that it's self-sustaining, not the result of on-going racism. You'll see that black people are people, like you, and not soulless automatons who only respond to what white people think and do. One recent victim of police murder, Walter Scott, had four children for whom he was obliged to pay child support. This is a lot more common than you think. A police officer unjustly took Scott's life, but he didn't force the man to sire four children. How many white men do you know with similar circumstances?

    Do a little time in the South, or in a heavily AA northern city, and then you'll understand why blacks themselves complain so much about having to live in black neighborhoods. Keep that in mind: oppressed blacks don't fight for the right to separate or leave; they fight to have their children sit side-by-side with white children in school. Millions of people every year state loud and clear with their feet that they would rather live in white countries than in their own. If so many non-whites want to be wherever we are, can we all be so bad? I hear liberals like Michael Moore trash white people all the time, but most of them don''t want to live in a town or neighborhood that's numerically dominated by black people.

    Cherry-picking negative experiences you've had with your fellow white people doesn't prove that whites as a whole are bad. We're not perfect, but why are we expected to be? White people are held to an impossible standard that no one can actually uphold. If any one white person does something ill, the whole is held responsible for it. As such, it's a rigged game in which no matter what white people do, we're always wrong and bad. Everyone else is considered oppressed and given a pass, no matter what they do.

    Yes, our leaders are evil, but, as the saying goes, evil people always float to the top. In what society is this not the case?
    , @dcite
    Extraordinary. Maybe it was the particular people. Virtually everywhere I've ever heard of, blacks are far more known for wanting to borrow and not pay back. Virtually everywhere, be it a school, a shopping mall, a city, any institution where they become more than a small minority, more crime and bad behavior occurs.
    Experienced that personally, and it is borne out in statistics. Blacks more "honorable?" Some certainly, but in general? In what universe? I've been the victim of crimes by blacks, as have most whites I know. I was at a riding stable, of all places, and there was a black couple with a kid who distinctly did not seem to belong there. There were a few blacks who rode, but they looked the type. This couple didn't. I had left my pocket book on the front seat of my car because nobody ever heard of crime in this area. I got back to my car, and my window was smashed, pocket book gone, and that couple gone. Within minutes they had charged on my cards. This kind of story happens constantly. That's one of the milder crimes--I was also robbed and nearly killed by blacks. The son of a couple I know, devoted to racial equality, was beaten into a coma by blacks for no reason (they don't need one) and took 3 years to recover. Whenever more blacks come into an environment, you get more crime. Maybe the military attracted a different type. But don't try and sell us the "blacks are more honorable" tripe, because that is so bizarro world, in almost every environment except maybe the one you were in, that it's just funny.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  70. @Bill Jones
    You say
    "Government spending does not “create jobs.”

    It has created entire industries,
    Would a company like Lockheed martin exist without the the State?
    Booze-Allen?
    Acis?Kroll?

    You live in a fantasy world. It creates massive amounts of jobs in sectors that will support its crimes.

    The piece you are missing is the cost to the productive economy.

    I don’t think you read my comment very carefully, or beyond the first sentence.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  71. War for Blair Mountain [AKA "Battle for Blair Mountain"] says:
    @Truth
    Every thing in America is a wealth transfer from those who have a little to those who have a lot, or are you not old enough to have figured that out yet?

    That’s not quite right. There is a level of analysis where you can say you are correct. A deeper level of analysis shows that you are wrong. Post-1965 immigration policy has resulted in a massive transfer of wealth to the very wealthy. The low-skill Blue collar class of workers have been annihilated by this. The economic life support system they survive on comes from taxing to death the Native Born White American blue-collar skilled class and White collar skilled middle class both also victims of the form of economic violence known as Foriegn nonwhite scab labor and their US born nonwhite geneline scab labor.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth
    Blair Mountain, and Soundman;

    One thing I hear about all of the time on this site, and similar ones is the mysterious "wealth transfer." It's very difficult to explain wealth transfer, without really knowing what wealth, or money, is. This is not an insult, I am sure that you are smart men, but practically no one in American society understands what money is, how it is created, or where it goes.

    Money is, for the most part an imaginary thing. A bank can lend it to you, and charge money on it, without having it. Then default, and no one goes to jail for it. It is taken from you in taxes, "re-distributed" and then finds its way back. What money truly is, is however the subject for a dissertation, not a post on a WN website. One of my favorite commentators here, gives a fair short version, just something to think about at around 7:20:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CSmgL43sSWY
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  72. @The Anti-Gnostic
    That's what separate countries are for. But I get the idea you would be as unhappy with a white America returned to its parochial, Anglo-Celt roots.

    That’s what separate countries are for. But I get the idea you would be as unhappy with a white America returned to its parochial, Anglo-Celt roots

    Actually I’d be happy with a nation the practices common sense which, in my view, has little to do with the color of someone’s skin and everything to do with someone’s practical intelligence; regardless of race. And the ‘Whitey’ race war types posting here is a good thing, Ron Unz has done the world a favor to allow these infantile/homicidal currents into the open .. if only for people to understand the USA is no impregnable monolith but rather a ceramic jar that could shatter in ways that would make the break-up of the former Yugoslavia look like a schoolyard spat. Thinking people of all colors should be looking at that and begin informed dialogue outside of the ‘established’ channels.

    When I see incredibly divisive screeds (like the article we are supposedly posting comments about) pumping out what amounts to juvenile accusations and finger pointing, from a perspective of ‘we’re smarter, better, more deserving and none of the fault is our own’ tying Blacks to neo-marxism and overlooking (with a solid dose of ethnocentric blindness) neo-fascist forces that have not only a long history of impunity in policing America’s Black communities (with the effect of propping up morons like Al Sharpton) but are increasingly militarized in what amounts to a dangerous level of potential escalation .. and that White people somehow believe they are under some sole assault .. what a cynical laugh.

    http://ronaldthomaswest.com/2014/12/09/metadata-panorama/

    People should be paying attention to this stuff, mob mentality is certainly not limited to ‘people of color’ and a militarized police could come down on any community .. diverse communities need alliances, not divisions

    Read More
    • Replies: @Stealth
    So you don't like divisive screeds? There are plenty of anti-white screeds published every day in mainstream publications. Ever say a word against those? I thought not. It's easier to just go along with the anti-white crowd and pretend you're saying something insightful and original. Why don't you just go there for a little while? I'm sure they'll love your word salad style blog entries.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  73. Stealth says:
    @Ronald Thomas West

    If I had to guess, I’d say you’ve spent your whole life in places that don’t have substantial black populations.

    In other words, this is all academic to you, and you really don’t know what you’re talking about
     
    I lived with a Black family in a Black neighborhood for some months when I was younger. Nice people. So, no, not much experience there, it only for a few months. I served with Blacks in the military and found them to be more honorable and dependable than Whites in small things, like returning favors when we 'borrowed' cigarettes; Blacks remembered more often than not, Whites were the reverse. Admittedly that's no scientific expertise. But when it comes to knowing 'White' people's prejudices, my experience is quite extensive:

    http://ronaldthomaswest.com/2014/08/17/life-in-indian-country/

    ^

    You’re right, that’s not very extensive. You need to live in a place where you’re casually exposed to large numbers of them on a daily basis if you want to know the extent of that community’s dysfunction. Stay a little longer and you’ll realize that it’s self-sustaining, not the result of on-going racism. You’ll see that black people are people, like you, and not soulless automatons who only respond to what white people think and do. One recent victim of police murder, Walter Scott, had four children for whom he was obliged to pay child support. This is a lot more common than you think. A police officer unjustly took Scott’s life, but he didn’t force the man to sire four children. How many white men do you know with similar circumstances?

    Do a little time in the South, or in a heavily AA northern city, and then you’ll understand why blacks themselves complain so much about having to live in black neighborhoods. Keep that in mind: oppressed blacks don’t fight for the right to separate or leave; they fight to have their children sit side-by-side with white children in school. Millions of people every year state loud and clear with their feet that they would rather live in white countries than in their own. If so many non-whites want to be wherever we are, can we all be so bad? I hear liberals like Michael Moore trash white people all the time, but most of them don”t want to live in a town or neighborhood that’s numerically dominated by black people.

    Cherry-picking negative experiences you’ve had with your fellow white people doesn’t prove that whites as a whole are bad. We’re not perfect, but why are we expected to be? White people are held to an impossible standard that no one can actually uphold. If any one white person does something ill, the whole is held responsible for it. As such, it’s a rigged game in which no matter what white people do, we’re always wrong and bad. Everyone else is considered oppressed and given a pass, no matter what they do.

    Yes, our leaders are evil, but, as the saying goes, evil people always float to the top. In what society is this not the case?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Ronald Thomas West

    If any one white person does something ill, the whole is held responsible for it. As such, it’s a rigged game in which no matter what white people do, we’re always wrong and bad
     
    I've met Mexicans would say the same in relation to their communities, often with good justification, no different to many Blacks see it that way and most certainly I have seen years of the phenomena you describe applied by White communities, as a general attitude, towards neighboring Native American communities or that is to say an attitude of 'they're all bad.'

    Nothing you're telling me I haven't seen, only what you haven't seen is your own prejudice.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  74. Stealth says:
    @Ronald Thomas West

    That’s what separate countries are for. But I get the idea you would be as unhappy with a white America returned to its parochial, Anglo-Celt roots
     
    Actually I'd be happy with a nation the practices common sense which, in my view, has little to do with the color of someone's skin and everything to do with someone's practical intelligence; regardless of race. And the 'Whitey' race war types posting here is a good thing, Ron Unz has done the world a favor to allow these infantile/homicidal currents into the open .. if only for people to understand the USA is no impregnable monolith but rather a ceramic jar that could shatter in ways that would make the break-up of the former Yugoslavia look like a schoolyard spat. Thinking people of all colors should be looking at that and begin informed dialogue outside of the 'established' channels.

    When I see incredibly divisive screeds (like the article we are supposedly posting comments about) pumping out what amounts to juvenile accusations and finger pointing, from a perspective of 'we're smarter, better, more deserving and none of the fault is our own' tying Blacks to neo-marxism and overlooking (with a solid dose of ethnocentric blindness) neo-fascist forces that have not only a long history of impunity in policing America's Black communities (with the effect of propping up morons like Al Sharpton) but are increasingly militarized in what amounts to a dangerous level of potential escalation .. and that White people somehow believe they are under some sole assault .. what a cynical laugh.

    http://ronaldthomaswest.com/2014/12/09/metadata-panorama/

    People should be paying attention to this stuff, mob mentality is certainly not limited to 'people of color' and a militarized police could come down on any community .. diverse communities need alliances, not divisions

    So you don’t like divisive screeds? There are plenty of anti-white screeds published every day in mainstream publications. Ever say a word against those? I thought not. It’s easier to just go along with the anti-white crowd and pretend you’re saying something insightful and original. Why don’t you just go there for a little while? I’m sure they’ll love your word salad style blog entries.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  75. @Stealth
    You're right, that's not very extensive. You need to live in a place where you're casually exposed to large numbers of them on a daily basis if you want to know the extent of that community's dysfunction. Stay a little longer and you'll realize that it's self-sustaining, not the result of on-going racism. You'll see that black people are people, like you, and not soulless automatons who only respond to what white people think and do. One recent victim of police murder, Walter Scott, had four children for whom he was obliged to pay child support. This is a lot more common than you think. A police officer unjustly took Scott's life, but he didn't force the man to sire four children. How many white men do you know with similar circumstances?

    Do a little time in the South, or in a heavily AA northern city, and then you'll understand why blacks themselves complain so much about having to live in black neighborhoods. Keep that in mind: oppressed blacks don't fight for the right to separate or leave; they fight to have their children sit side-by-side with white children in school. Millions of people every year state loud and clear with their feet that they would rather live in white countries than in their own. If so many non-whites want to be wherever we are, can we all be so bad? I hear liberals like Michael Moore trash white people all the time, but most of them don''t want to live in a town or neighborhood that's numerically dominated by black people.

    Cherry-picking negative experiences you've had with your fellow white people doesn't prove that whites as a whole are bad. We're not perfect, but why are we expected to be? White people are held to an impossible standard that no one can actually uphold. If any one white person does something ill, the whole is held responsible for it. As such, it's a rigged game in which no matter what white people do, we're always wrong and bad. Everyone else is considered oppressed and given a pass, no matter what they do.

    Yes, our leaders are evil, but, as the saying goes, evil people always float to the top. In what society is this not the case?

    If any one white person does something ill, the whole is held responsible for it. As such, it’s a rigged game in which no matter what white people do, we’re always wrong and bad

    I’ve met Mexicans would say the same in relation to their communities, often with good justification, no different to many Blacks see it that way and most certainly I have seen years of the phenomena you describe applied by White communities, as a general attitude, towards neighboring Native American communities or that is to say an attitude of ‘they’re all bad.’

    Nothing you’re telling me I haven’t seen, only what you haven’t seen is your own prejudice.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Stealth
    So you're changing the subject. Instead of addressing what I said, you bring up how bad white people are and how we've been so terrible to everyone who.... wants to move to wherever the white people are. Not all black people are the same. Neither are all whites or Mexicans. White liberals are, though. Funny how you all think your cookie-cutter views are original.

    As I said, white people aren't perfect. But, every university, every mainstream news outlet, and every public school criticizes white people - all day long. There are plenty of people who tell white people we're scum, and they get to do it openly, without fear of consequences. Anyone who disagrees with establishment positions on racial issues has to use a pseudonym. Well, you're not speaking truth to power. You're speaking safe establishment views to the powerless (at no risk to yourself), so please drop the righteous indignation.
    , @Stealth
    Nothing you’re telling me I haven’t seen,

    The essence of ninety percent of your replies is "you're a racist." Do you honestly believe there's anyone here who hasn't heard that one before? Again, you're not a unique snowflake.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  76. Stealth says:
    @Ronald Thomas West

    If any one white person does something ill, the whole is held responsible for it. As such, it’s a rigged game in which no matter what white people do, we’re always wrong and bad
     
    I've met Mexicans would say the same in relation to their communities, often with good justification, no different to many Blacks see it that way and most certainly I have seen years of the phenomena you describe applied by White communities, as a general attitude, towards neighboring Native American communities or that is to say an attitude of 'they're all bad.'

    Nothing you're telling me I haven't seen, only what you haven't seen is your own prejudice.

    So you’re changing the subject. Instead of addressing what I said, you bring up how bad white people are and how we’ve been so terrible to everyone who…. wants to move to wherever the white people are. Not all black people are the same. Neither are all whites or Mexicans. White liberals are, though. Funny how you all think your cookie-cutter views are original.

    As I said, white people aren’t perfect. But, every university, every mainstream news outlet, and every public school criticizes white people – all day long. There are plenty of people who tell white people we’re scum, and they get to do it openly, without fear of consequences. Anyone who disagrees with establishment positions on racial issues has to use a pseudonym. Well, you’re not speaking truth to power. You’re speaking safe establishment views to the powerless (at no risk to yourself), so please drop the righteous indignation.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  77. Stealth says:
    @Ronald Thomas West

    If any one white person does something ill, the whole is held responsible for it. As such, it’s a rigged game in which no matter what white people do, we’re always wrong and bad
     
    I've met Mexicans would say the same in relation to their communities, often with good justification, no different to many Blacks see it that way and most certainly I have seen years of the phenomena you describe applied by White communities, as a general attitude, towards neighboring Native American communities or that is to say an attitude of 'they're all bad.'

    Nothing you're telling me I haven't seen, only what you haven't seen is your own prejudice.

    Nothing you’re telling me I haven’t seen,

    The essence of ninety percent of your replies is “you’re a racist.” Do you honestly believe there’s anyone here who hasn’t heard that one before? Again, you’re not a unique snowflake.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Ronald Thomas West

    Again, you’re not a unique snowflake
     
    http://ronaldthomaswest.com/2013/08/12/native-americans-and-race/

    ^
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  78. @Stealth
    Nothing you’re telling me I haven’t seen,

    The essence of ninety percent of your replies is "you're a racist." Do you honestly believe there's anyone here who hasn't heard that one before? Again, you're not a unique snowflake.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Stealth
    How in the hell did Native American concepts of race, or lack thereof, leak into this exchange of ours?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  79. Stealth says:
    @Ronald Thomas West

    Again, you’re not a unique snowflake
     
    http://ronaldthomaswest.com/2013/08/12/native-americans-and-race/

    ^

    How in the hell did Native American concepts of race, or lack thereof, leak into this exchange of ours?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  80. Checking out of this conversation with a parting observation:

    “You can’t convince a chimpanzee to give you a banana with the promise it will get 20 more bananas in chimpanzee heaven. It won’t do it. But humans will” -Yuval Noah Harari, Hebrew University of Jerusalem

    I picked his quote because it covers two bases .. to insult the intelligence of anti-Semites while pointing out chimpanzees are smarter than many of the commenters at this article.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    That was a great quote... Not 100% sure what he was getting at, but it's poetic - I like it.

    ...it's got bananas ... Chimpanzees...

    It must be meaningful
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  81. map says:
    @Ronald Thomas West

    Your pithy psychoanalysis is both pedestrian and boring

    Anger and hate is the fuel of civilization. It is what keeps the blood warm at night. If you never learn to hate your enemy as much as he hates you, then you will always be his victim.

    It is time once again that Whites acted out their rage upon the world
     
    Actually what I was saying with my 'boring, pedestrian pithy psycho analysis' of angry White people (admittedly yourself) is, y'all are queers too stupid to understand y'all are queers.

    Here's the link again, people have been reading:

    http://ronaldthomaswest.com/2015/04/16/raphaels-paradox/

    ^

    “Actually what I was saying with my ‘boring, pedestrian pithy psycho analysis’ of angry White people (admittedly yourself) is, y’all are queers too stupid to understand y’all are queers.”

    Yeah, I suppose you think the reservation, concentration camp and gas chamber are just one-offs that will never be repeated.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  82. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @Ronald Thomas West
    Checking out of this conversation with a parting observation:

    "You can't convince a chimpanzee to give you a banana with the promise it will get 20 more bananas in chimpanzee heaven. It won't do it. But humans will" -Yuval Noah Harari, Hebrew University of Jerusalem
     
    I picked his quote because it covers two bases .. to insult the intelligence of anti-Semites while pointing out chimpanzees are smarter than many of the commenters at this article.

    That was a great quote… Not 100% sure what he was getting at, but it’s poetic – I like it.

    …it’s got bananas … Chimpanzees…

    It must be meaningful

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  83. joe webb says:

    good piece. I do like to see numbers when available. Like over half of murders in the US are done by blacks , usually to themselves. Black IQ is unchanged from decades ago: 85. We have spent 15 trillion dollars on them since 1964. There is no evidence that any program has done any good.

    There are always stories of good blacks, etc. I have some too. The issue is not whether the top 10 % of blacks can be relatively productive and decent folks, the issue is the vast bulk of them.

    I think 50 years ago there was a lot of hope…I marched with MLK in Washington DC in 1963. Today most whites don’t believe there is any hope and I guess that most blacks don’t believe it either, not that black youth don’t show up for free college in droves, and then drop out. I read that over 70% of them enroll in college, more so than whites.

    I suppose this documents the naivete of the young blacks. The parents encourage, but know not much is going to come of it, except disappointment. White youth are more realistic.

    Some folks predict a long hot summer of black revolt. That will be good for the counter-revolution, and where it all goes is dicey. If it was not for the huge state that we now live under, and its cops and soldiers, we would have a civil war starting right now on the streets.

    Blacks are only about 13% of the US, and in that we are lucky, compared to S. Africa for example where everything points to very bad times coming.

    These times require that whites not only stand their ground, but have the guts to tell their neighbors, especially the adolescents, the truth about black behavior, intelligence, and so on.
    My experience with the youngsters is that they start squirming…one of my sidebars is to tell them to read the Minnesota Twin Study on identicals. That lowers the temperature a bit, and is pretty much the same thing as telling the truth about race.

    Joe Webb

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  84. Truth says:
    @War for Blair Mountain
    That's not quite right. There is a level of analysis where you can say you are correct. A deeper level of analysis shows that you are wrong. Post-1965 immigration policy has resulted in a massive transfer of wealth to the very wealthy. The low-skill Blue collar class of workers have been annihilated by this. The economic life support system they survive on comes from taxing to death the Native Born White American blue-collar skilled class and White collar skilled middle class both also victims of the form of economic violence known as Foriegn nonwhite scab labor and their US born nonwhite geneline scab labor.

    Blair Mountain, and Soundman;

    One thing I hear about all of the time on this site, and similar ones is the mysterious “wealth transfer.” It’s very difficult to explain wealth transfer, without really knowing what wealth, or money, is. This is not an insult, I am sure that you are smart men, but practically no one in American society understands what money is, how it is created, or where it goes.

    Money is, for the most part an imaginary thing. A bank can lend it to you, and charge money on it, without having it. Then default, and no one goes to jail for it. It is taken from you in taxes, “re-distributed” and then finds its way back. What money truly is, is however the subject for a dissertation, not a post on a WN website. One of my favorite commentators here, gives a fair short version, just something to think about at around 7:20:

    Read More
    • Replies: @War for Blair Mountain
    That's probably true for all the fundamental concepts of neo-classical economics. There was big debate about whether "capital" was even a meaningfull concept for years among the Cambridge School Economists. And don't get me started on the field of econometrics.

    However....wealth theft is a very well understood concept by chattel slaves and the wage slaves of Carniege-Fricke...and the Rouge River wage slaves of Henry Ford.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  85. Priss Factor [AKA "The Priss Factory"] says:
    Read More
    • Replies: @War for Blair Mountain
    What would Black Husbands do if a White Teenager whistled at their attractive Black Wives every day as she walked down the street to work?

    Emmitt Till got what he deserved..and so did his rapist serial killer father Louis Till.

    Emmit Till and Louis Till rot in Hell!!!!
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  86. War for Blair Mountain [AKA "Battle for Blair Mountain"] says:
    @Truth
    Blair Mountain, and Soundman;

    One thing I hear about all of the time on this site, and similar ones is the mysterious "wealth transfer." It's very difficult to explain wealth transfer, without really knowing what wealth, or money, is. This is not an insult, I am sure that you are smart men, but practically no one in American society understands what money is, how it is created, or where it goes.

    Money is, for the most part an imaginary thing. A bank can lend it to you, and charge money on it, without having it. Then default, and no one goes to jail for it. It is taken from you in taxes, "re-distributed" and then finds its way back. What money truly is, is however the subject for a dissertation, not a post on a WN website. One of my favorite commentators here, gives a fair short version, just something to think about at around 7:20:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CSmgL43sSWY

    That’s probably true for all the fundamental concepts of neo-classical economics. There was big debate about whether “capital” was even a meaningfull concept for years among the Cambridge School Economists. And don’t get me started on the field of econometrics.

    However….wealth theft is a very well understood concept by chattel slaves and the wage slaves of Carniege-Fricke…and the Rouge River wage slaves of Henry Ford.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  87. War for Blair Mountain [AKA "Battle for Blair Mountain"] says:
    @Priss Factor
    Jews got more 'white guilt' crap in store for you.

    http://kulturekritic.com/2015/05/news/the-story-of-emmett-tills-brutal-murder-is-coming-to-the-big-screen/

    What would Black Husbands do if a White Teenager whistled at their attractive Black Wives every day as she walked down the street to work?

    Emmitt Till got what he deserved..and so did his rapist serial killer father Louis Till.

    Emmit Till and Louis Till rot in Hell!!!!

    Read More
    • Replies: @Priss Factor
    Every year, blacks kill and rape more whites than all the blacks killed and raped by whites since the end of the Civil War.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  88. Priss Factor [AKA "The Priss Factory"] says:
    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  89. Priss Factor [AKA "The Priss Factory"] says:
    @War for Blair Mountain
    What would Black Husbands do if a White Teenager whistled at their attractive Black Wives every day as she walked down the street to work?

    Emmitt Till got what he deserved..and so did his rapist serial killer father Louis Till.

    Emmit Till and Louis Till rot in Hell!!!!

    Every year, blacks kill and rape more whites than all the blacks killed and raped by whites since the end of the Civil War.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth
    You're a real mathematical genius aren't you? Do you mind sharing your sources, Blaise Pascal?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  90. Priss Factor [AKA "The Priss Factory"] says:

    https://www.facebook.com/spotboxlive/videos/754837984563350/

    The video above shows a new weapon for Negro crowd control. Cops should learn from the preacher on how to take the Negroes down. He done it without guns. Just the power of the lawd.

    Anyway, some people say the problems of blacks have nothing to do with race/biology and only to do with culture.

    But just look at the video above. Even when blacks are culturally turned into Christians, they worship it differently because their natural personalities are different. They like to holler, jump up and down, and act all wild and shit. It be part of their nature.

    So, culture alone doesn’t explain it. Christian culture practiced by whites, blacks, and Asians differ markedly depending on the different racial personalities.

    During slavery, white man did everything to discourage blacks from acting crazy, loud, insane, aggressive, and etc. White man did everything to make the black man kindly and docile.
    But black nature couldn’t be rubbed clean cuz it be written in the Negro DNA.

    So, even when blacks be given the same culture, they done act crazier than other folks.

    If blacks were made Buddhist, Confucian, Muslim, or whatever, they still acting wilder than others. It just be part of their natural makeup.

    Read More
    • Replies: @joe webb
    Priss...my travels in Europe, most recently in Norway back you up. African behavior is the same everywhere I have been. Another fact usually not noticed, is that native African clothing is very colorful. And Africans in Europe and the US dress the same way...very loud and colorful.

    This is probably because low reactors need a big charge of color, drama, cheap thrills, drugs, violence, etc just to feel like they are awake..and alive..

    High functioning people are high reactors, and need little stimulation to feel awake and good. Thus, softer colors in dress, softer music as in classical compared to apefunkrap, and quieter social intercourse and conversation go with high reaction capability.

    Low reactors are usually in prison...it takes pointing a gun at someone to feel alive, etc. When you see a crazy -lady they are usually dressed in crazy colors. Same for men, but less so.

    Joe Webb
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  91. dcite says:
    @Ronald Thomas West

    If I had to guess, I’d say you’ve spent your whole life in places that don’t have substantial black populations.

    In other words, this is all academic to you, and you really don’t know what you’re talking about
     
    I lived with a Black family in a Black neighborhood for some months when I was younger. Nice people. So, no, not much experience there, it only for a few months. I served with Blacks in the military and found them to be more honorable and dependable than Whites in small things, like returning favors when we 'borrowed' cigarettes; Blacks remembered more often than not, Whites were the reverse. Admittedly that's no scientific expertise. But when it comes to knowing 'White' people's prejudices, my experience is quite extensive:

    http://ronaldthomaswest.com/2014/08/17/life-in-indian-country/

    ^

    Extraordinary. Maybe it was the particular people. Virtually everywhere I’ve ever heard of, blacks are far more known for wanting to borrow and not pay back. Virtually everywhere, be it a school, a shopping mall, a city, any institution where they become more than a small minority, more crime and bad behavior occurs.
    Experienced that personally, and it is borne out in statistics. Blacks more “honorable?” Some certainly, but in general? In what universe? I’ve been the victim of crimes by blacks, as have most whites I know. I was at a riding stable, of all places, and there was a black couple with a kid who distinctly did not seem to belong there. There were a few blacks who rode, but they looked the type. This couple didn’t. I had left my pocket book on the front seat of my car because nobody ever heard of crime in this area. I got back to my car, and my window was smashed, pocket book gone, and that couple gone. Within minutes they had charged on my cards. This kind of story happens constantly. That’s one of the milder crimes–I was also robbed and nearly killed by blacks. The son of a couple I know, devoted to racial equality, was beaten into a coma by blacks for no reason (they don’t need one) and took 3 years to recover. Whenever more blacks come into an environment, you get more crime. Maybe the military attracted a different type. But don’t try and sell us the “blacks are more honorable” tripe, because that is so bizarro world, in almost every environment except maybe the one you were in, that it’s just funny.

    Read More
    • Replies: @TWS
    The military tests for IQ ruthlessly. They're not getting the talent tenth but they are getting a better than average AA.
    , @Ace
    I loaned $5 to a black guy in Army basic training as an experiment. A couple of pay days came and went but no repayment. After I "counseled" a white guy for taking my shaving brush from the latrine it was suddenly no longer a problem paying me back my $5. What a mystery it was.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  92. Truth says:
    @Priss Factor
    Every year, blacks kill and rape more whites than all the blacks killed and raped by whites since the end of the Civil War.

    You’re a real mathematical genius aren’t you? Do you mind sharing your sources, Blaise Pascal?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Priss Factor
    Negroes be wild.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  93. joe webb says:
    @Priss Factor
    https://www.facebook.com/spotboxlive/videos/754837984563350/

    The video above shows a new weapon for Negro crowd control. Cops should learn from the preacher on how to take the Negroes down. He done it without guns. Just the power of the lawd.

    Anyway, some people say the problems of blacks have nothing to do with race/biology and only to do with culture.

    But just look at the video above. Even when blacks are culturally turned into Christians, they worship it differently because their natural personalities are different. They like to holler, jump up and down, and act all wild and shit. It be part of their nature.

    So, culture alone doesn't explain it. Christian culture practiced by whites, blacks, and Asians differ markedly depending on the different racial personalities.

    During slavery, white man did everything to discourage blacks from acting crazy, loud, insane, aggressive, and etc. White man did everything to make the black man kindly and docile.
    But black nature couldn't be rubbed clean cuz it be written in the Negro DNA.

    So, even when blacks be given the same culture, they done act crazier than other folks.

    If blacks were made Buddhist, Confucian, Muslim, or whatever, they still acting wilder than others. It just be part of their natural makeup.

    Priss…my travels in Europe, most recently in Norway back you up. African behavior is the same everywhere I have been. Another fact usually not noticed, is that native African clothing is very colorful. And Africans in Europe and the US dress the same way…very loud and colorful.

    This is probably because low reactors need a big charge of color, drama, cheap thrills, drugs, violence, etc just to feel like they are awake..and alive..

    High functioning people are high reactors, and need little stimulation to feel awake and good. Thus, softer colors in dress, softer music as in classical compared to apefunkrap, and quieter social intercourse and conversation go with high reaction capability.

    Low reactors are usually in prison…it takes pointing a gun at someone to feel alive, etc. When you see a crazy -lady they are usually dressed in crazy colors. Same for men, but less so.

    Joe Webb

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  94. Priss Factor [AKA "The Priss Factory"] says:
    @Truth
    You're a real mathematical genius aren't you? Do you mind sharing your sources, Blaise Pascal?

    Negroes be wild.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  95. Priss Factor [AKA "The Priss Factory"] says:

    Is THE WOLF OF WALL STREET a neo-Jewish version of THE ETERNAL JEW?

    In notorious Nazi film THE ETERNAL JEW, it says that Jews remain Jewish inside and only pretend to be goy-ish-like to fool the gentile population. In other words, do NOT trust the Jew. He tries to look like you and act like you, but deep down inside, he is a Jew filled with contempt for the goy. He sees the goy as toy, as slave, as prostitute, as meat to exploit. Jews look upon goyim the way Jewish porn kings look at ‘shikse’ whores or like how Neocons see American soldiers — as cannon fodder to use in Wars for Israel that are sold as ‘war on terror’ or ‘spreading democracy’.

    Jews have denounced the film as evil and defaming.

    But consider Jordan Belfort’s THE WOLF OF WALL STREET. He says the same thing. He explains how he and other Jews pretended to be respectable wasps to fool Americans that they were solid, trustworthy, and mainstream. But they were out to fleece to goy.

    If THE ETERNAL JEW denounces Jewish way of deceit, THE WOLF OF WALL STREET celebrates the Jewish way of deceit in triumphal mode. It has the same message as THE ETERNAL JEW but as a point of pride than shame. One is antisemitic and the other far-our-semitic, but they are agreed that Jews are full of guile and out to fool the gullible goy. Guile beats gullibility every time.

    Just like the homo came out of the closet and now takes PRIDE in the debauchery of fecal penetration, the Jew has come out of the closet and now takes shameless joy in his pushy and vicious exploitation of the goy.

    But most Americans now just worship Jews and homos no matter how much they are made to bend over and get rammed in the ass by Jews and homos. Why? Because Jews and homos control media, academia, finance, government, and entertainment, most Americans are brainwashed sheep. Most Americans think that 25% of Americans are Jewish or homo. They are that ignorant. And infantile because they are hooked on junk culture peddled by Jews and homos.

    Jews are out of the closet as proud sharks &wolves fleecing us all, and homos are out of the closet with the ‘pride’ of degenerate ‘sex’. If anything, those who find homo ‘sex’ to be gross and deviant are now made to feel shame and make public apologies.

    Jews can brag, “I fooled those dumb goyim” with pride and feel no shame.

    But, if you notice what Jews are doing and say, ‘Jews are not to be trusted’, you will be shamed as an ‘evil anti-semite’.

    So, Jews can brag that they are bad, but we must only see them as good.

    Similarly, homos can loudly and lewdly indulge in all their perversions and openly admit that they are out to undermine moral values.

    But, if you notice what homos are doing and say ‘Homos are perverted’, you will be shamed as an ‘evil homophobe’.

    When someone is both Jewish and homo, the mix can be truly toxic. Is there anyone more vile and hideous than Masha Gessen?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  96. Mark says:
    @Ronald Thomas West

    For the government, that means attempting to transfer immense wealth (much of it yet to be created in the distant future by our grandchildren) to the underclass minorities, not realizing that in more cases than not, it is wasting billions, pouring that wealth into leaky waste bins, and that all the money in the world cannot create a silk purse from a sow’s ear
     
    Change just three words and you have:

    For the government, that means attempting to transfer immense wealth (much of it yet to be created in the distant future by our grandchildren) to our empire's military, not realizing that in more cases than not, it is wasting billions, pouring that wealth into leaky waste bins, and that all the money in the world cannot create a silk purse from a sow’s ear
     
    Now, if all of those hundreds upon hundreds of billions of tax $ poured into social welfare jobs generated by and for White people (military contracting) had been equitably divided with the demographic Black share invested in job creation in disadvantaged neighborhoods, where would the argument shift to? (recalling Rush Limbaugh's life as an Oxycontin junkie, not so different to a 'crack ho' excepting White privilege got him a slap on the wrist instead of doing time.)

    Blacks make up thirteen per cent of the population but only pay six per cent of income taxes. If money is being wasted by the military, it isn’t coming from blacks and causing them to be poorer. It’s just one group of whites (taxpayers) subsidizing another group of whites (highly paid DOD employees and contractors).

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  97. Priss Factor [AKA "The Priss Factory"] says:

    “Blacks make up thirteen per cent of the population but only pay six per cent of income taxes. ”

    6%?

    When you consider how much blacks soak up in taxes, it’s freaking negative territory.

    Blacks may pay 6% of the taxes but in social spending — welfare, medicine, police, and etc. — they take so much from the governments. And many blacks working in government pretty much have patronage jobs where they pick up a paycheck for doing almost nothing.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  98. TWS says:
    @schmenz
    Please don't criticize our ubiquitous Ronald Thomas West. I enjoy reading his self-promoting, comical rubbish.

    Just block him. It’s much easier to follow the comments when he’s not trying to hijack the thread to his ridiculous site.

    PT Barnum would have applauded RTW’s self promotion.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  99. TWS says:
    @dcite
    Extraordinary. Maybe it was the particular people. Virtually everywhere I've ever heard of, blacks are far more known for wanting to borrow and not pay back. Virtually everywhere, be it a school, a shopping mall, a city, any institution where they become more than a small minority, more crime and bad behavior occurs.
    Experienced that personally, and it is borne out in statistics. Blacks more "honorable?" Some certainly, but in general? In what universe? I've been the victim of crimes by blacks, as have most whites I know. I was at a riding stable, of all places, and there was a black couple with a kid who distinctly did not seem to belong there. There were a few blacks who rode, but they looked the type. This couple didn't. I had left my pocket book on the front seat of my car because nobody ever heard of crime in this area. I got back to my car, and my window was smashed, pocket book gone, and that couple gone. Within minutes they had charged on my cards. This kind of story happens constantly. That's one of the milder crimes--I was also robbed and nearly killed by blacks. The son of a couple I know, devoted to racial equality, was beaten into a coma by blacks for no reason (they don't need one) and took 3 years to recover. Whenever more blacks come into an environment, you get more crime. Maybe the military attracted a different type. But don't try and sell us the "blacks are more honorable" tripe, because that is so bizarro world, in almost every environment except maybe the one you were in, that it's just funny.

    The military tests for IQ ruthlessly. They’re not getting the talent tenth but they are getting a better than average AA.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  100. Jeff77450 says:
    @Ronald Thomas West

    For the government, that means attempting to transfer immense wealth (much of it yet to be created in the distant future by our grandchildren) to the underclass minorities, not realizing that in more cases than not, it is wasting billions, pouring that wealth into leaky waste bins, and that all the money in the world cannot create a silk purse from a sow’s ear
     
    Change just three words and you have:

    For the government, that means attempting to transfer immense wealth (much of it yet to be created in the distant future by our grandchildren) to our empire's military, not realizing that in more cases than not, it is wasting billions, pouring that wealth into leaky waste bins, and that all the money in the world cannot create a silk purse from a sow’s ear
     
    Now, if all of those hundreds upon hundreds of billions of tax $ poured into social welfare jobs generated by and for White people (military contracting) had been equitably divided with the demographic Black share invested in job creation in disadvantaged neighborhoods, where would the argument shift to? (recalling Rush Limbaugh's life as an Oxycontin junkie, not so different to a 'crack ho' excepting White privilege got him a slap on the wrist instead of doing time.)

    Correct me if I’m wrong but I think that I’ve read that blacks & Hispanics are disproportionately represented in the armed forces. I’ve also read that 60% of blacks with college degrees work for government (vs. 20% of whites with degrees). In fact, I’ve worked for DoD in different capacities, both military & civilian, for almost forty years and I can attest that blacks are very well represented. My point being that large numbers of blacks have benefited directly from defense-spending.

    Those valid points aside, national defense is among the twenty-odd enumerated functions of the federal government listed in the Constitution and job-creation is not. Jobs are created by entrepreneurs & investors as a byproduct of pursuing profit and by consumers who create demand for products & services which in turn creates supply which requires labor (jobs).

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  101. @Kyle McKenna

    The dream of across-the-board equality is in reality a ghoulish nightmare that will, most likely, destroy this nation, perhaps breaking it into separate sections.
     
    The Solution Left Untried.

    The Solution we need is the Final Solution

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  102. Ace says:
    @The Anti-Gnostic

    Now, if all of those hundreds upon hundreds of billions of tax $ poured into social welfare jobs generated by and for White people (military contracting) had been equitably divided with the demographic Black share invested in job creation in disadvantaged neighborhoods...
     
    You are an old, self-loathing white fool and I am wasting my time, but here goes:

    Government spending does not "create jobs." Government spending only transfers existing wealth. Once the transfer payments end, the jobs "created" by them end. Any actual public goods being provided end up being serviced for much, much less (compare public and private school teacher salaries).

    American blacks are the recipients of loads of largesse. We have an entire US Postal Service where we pay them and give them a pension and medical coverage to deliver corporate marketing materials. We have delivered entire cities to them to be run by, for and with black people. Black entertainers, athletes and entrepeneurs earn millions of dollars.

    Government transfer payments seemingly work for white people (for a few generations, at which point high youth unemployment and taxes and inflation shut the Ponzi scheme down) because of their mean lower time-preference, lower aggression, and higher general intelligence. For blacks with higher time-preference, higher aggression and lower general intelligence, you end up with a dysgenic, dysfunctional Big Man culture. Again, the gravy train only lasts so long as the (mostly white) net tax-payors are willing to fund it.

    Excellent.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  103. Ace says:
    @TheJester
    Other blogs and commentators in the Unz Review point to an understanding of the failure of the egalitarian experiment in the United States. Human evolution impacts racial DNA and culture, with the first helping to form the second.

    Blacks are racially and culturally tuned for the Tropical Biosphere; Caucasians are racially and culturally tuned for the Temperate Biosphere, and Orientals are racially and culturally tuned for the Arctic Biosphere. Then, the Great Admixture (migration) of the modern era.

    In short, contemporary industrial civilization is a produce of the harsh climate of the Temperate Zone. The DNA and survival disposes a rule-based "law and order" society. (How can you have an industrial society without an almost universal disposition toward order and science?) The Tropical Biosphere disposes a "balance of terror" society -- the more general condition of the human race. One clan or tribe respects another clan' or tribes' women, children, and property to avoid the inevitable vendettas and violence that comes from violations.

    When racial DNA and cultural dispositions mix via mass migrations, certain populations are handicapped by not being racially and culturally tuned to their new social environments. No matter how much one "howls at the moon" via affirmative action, government transfer programs, social sanctions, and "re-connning" history, nothing can be done about it. The recent focus on White "microaggression" and White privilege and other invisible causes of interracial and intercultural failure in the United States is perhaps best understood as expressing a sense of hopelessness over the inability of peoples from biospheres alien to industrial culture to integrate into industrial culture. Indeed, if one looks closely enough, one sees that the language, social relationships, and other cultural dispositions among long-standing African populations in the United States are traceable to their African origins.

    If there is to be change, the expression "time heals all wounds" perhaps best expresses the only solution. Physical and cultural evolution requires time as the Biospheres mix populations on a scale unheard of in human history. The mass migrations of the modern era cannot be undone. The end results of evolution also cannot be predicted. In the meantime, "it is ... what it is."

    Where is it written that migrations can’t be undone? Or that white homelands cannot be made inhospitable to immigrants? If whites stop being the eloi morons that they are they could save their culture and their homelands but they won’t stop that, so a reversal of immigration will in fact not take place, even though it could. Thus, white European civilization will be extinguished.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  104. Ace says:
    @Realist
    A lot of what you call social spending was prepaid for by the recipients.

    That is true for the first years once payouts begin. I believe, however, that the total payout greatly exceeds the amount of the contribution, due in part, if not large part, to greater longevity. So the contributions do not cover payout. The taxpayer makes up the difference.

    I believe, however, that the annuitants in Social Security are in fact short changed because they would receive a great deal more had their forced contribution gone not to the “trust fund” but been invested privately.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  105. Ace says:
    @dcite
    Extraordinary. Maybe it was the particular people. Virtually everywhere I've ever heard of, blacks are far more known for wanting to borrow and not pay back. Virtually everywhere, be it a school, a shopping mall, a city, any institution where they become more than a small minority, more crime and bad behavior occurs.
    Experienced that personally, and it is borne out in statistics. Blacks more "honorable?" Some certainly, but in general? In what universe? I've been the victim of crimes by blacks, as have most whites I know. I was at a riding stable, of all places, and there was a black couple with a kid who distinctly did not seem to belong there. There were a few blacks who rode, but they looked the type. This couple didn't. I had left my pocket book on the front seat of my car because nobody ever heard of crime in this area. I got back to my car, and my window was smashed, pocket book gone, and that couple gone. Within minutes they had charged on my cards. This kind of story happens constantly. That's one of the milder crimes--I was also robbed and nearly killed by blacks. The son of a couple I know, devoted to racial equality, was beaten into a coma by blacks for no reason (they don't need one) and took 3 years to recover. Whenever more blacks come into an environment, you get more crime. Maybe the military attracted a different type. But don't try and sell us the "blacks are more honorable" tripe, because that is so bizarro world, in almost every environment except maybe the one you were in, that it's just funny.

    I loaned $5 to a black guy in Army basic training as an experiment. A couple of pay days came and went but no repayment. After I “counseled” a white guy for taking my shaving brush from the latrine it was suddenly no longer a problem paying me back my $5. What a mystery it was.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
Current Commenter says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS
PastClassics
The unspoken statistical reality of urban crime over the last quarter century.
The “war hero” candidate buried information about POWs left behind in Vietnam.
The major media overlooked Communist spies and Madoff’s fraud. What are they missing today?
What Was John McCain's True Wartime Record in Vietnam?