The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 James Kirkpatrick Archive
America’s Lying Press Fails to Intimidate Trump—Now Targeting His Employees and Supporters

The usual suspects tried to break Donald Trump at the beginning of his campaign by destroying his business and ruining him personally. The Donald refused to play by the usual script and didn’t cave. For that reason alone, Americans rallied to him and Trump is now the champion of a voter revolt against the political class and, specifically, America’s Lying Press. But now, the Main Stream Media has switched to targeting Trump supporters and surrogates.

  • First, there’s a piece from Olivia Nuzzi [Tweet her] of the fanatically anti-Trump Daily Beast.

Nuzzi has a new profile of Hope Hicks in GQ which contains some subtle hints about how sticking with Trump would be a poor career move for her. Nuzzi smirks:

It was her job to facilitate Trump’s rebuke of the Pope after His Holiness questioned the Christianity of anybody who would build a border wall (kind of Trump’s thing). And it was she who helped malign a female reporter who’d been manhandled by Trump’s campaign manager, immediately claiming she was a lying attention hound.

[The Mystifying Triumph of Hope Hicks, Donald Trump’s Right Hand Woman, June 20, 2016]

This last is a reference to the Michelle Fields case. Fields was a reporter for Breitbart who had posed as a conservative and even wrote a book bashing the “Washington Elite.” However, she claimed to have been almost thrown to the ground by Trump’s former campaign manager Corey Lewandowski—a claim echoed by the MSM and most Conservative Inc. media outlets. They demanded Lewandowski’s head, but Trump refused, defying the Beltway Right’s most hallowed tradition of cowardly human sacrifices.

Fields’s “assault” proved to be laughably exaggerated, Fields was shown to be a “publicity hound” and charges against Lewandowski were dismissed after video evidence surfaced. But the entire debacle proved advantageous to Fields, who escaped the conservative ghetto to join the Huffington Post. Her “Why I Am No Longer A Conservative” article is only a matter of time.

In contrast, Nuzzi warns that Hicks will rue her involvement with the Trump campaign:

Outside the campaign, Hicks’s colleagues gossip about whether she’ll regret her heady first brush with politics. “She made a choice to work for the most fascist candidate in recent American history,” one political spokesperson told me. “Everyone who knows her tells her to stop doing this and putting her name on stuff.… She is going to regret everything she’s said and done. And I don’t think she knows it yet.”

Who is this “political spokesperson”—assuming he, she or it even exists?

Whatever the identity, we know for certain this anonymous “colleague” is more interested in protecting his or her racket than pursuing political victory. Indeed, this anonymous spokesthing is speaking for the entire political, academic and MSM Establishment when he or she is quoted as saying “she is going to regret everything she’s said and done.”

And, as always in the modern West, this warning of personal destruction is done in the name of anti-fascism.

Nuzzi argues Hicks isn’t sufficiently welcoming to the press, sneering “She’s seemingly unaware that they might just be vetting a potential United States president.”

Either that, or Hicks is all too aware that contemporary “reporters” are simply political activists. It’s not as if reporters will be “vetting” Hillary Clinton—any more than they ever “vetted” Barack Obama. Instead, they will be hunting down dissidents supporting Trump and seeking to punish them economically.

  • Second, look at the assault on Trump-supporting college students.

Having studiously ignored or championed violence, hate speech, political extremism, and blatant racism from Leftist college students around the country, the MSM is now turning its guns on those few brave young people who support the presumptive Republican nominee [Milo Mayhem: Activists Storm Stage, Threaten Milo At DePaul Event, Breitbart, May 24, 2016]

Thus at the inaugural meeting of Students for Trump at Portland State University, Leftists raided the meeting to berate the students, some displaying Mexican flags.

Many of the Leftist “protesters” seem hysterical and unstable, openly declaring their intention to shut down speech they don’t agree with.

Nonetheless, Students for Trump didn’t back down. It even built a replica of the “great wall of Trump” on their campus, despite attempts by Leftist “protesters to disrupt the event [Exclusive: Portland Campus Radicals Plan Shutdown of Students for Trump Event Today, by Lee Stranahan, Breitbart, April 16, 2016].

Where Leftists activism failed, the MSM hoped to step in. The Cultural Marxist outlet Raw Story dutifully produced a hit piece screaming for the group to be shut down.

The Narrative of the piece is confused, as writer Arun Gupta can’t decide whether Students for Trump is a cutting edge, Internet savvy AltRight group specializing in trolling, or a group that “could be out of 1950s Alabama” obsessed with “crude scientific racism.” (Can “racism” be both “scientific” and “crude?”)

Noting the group’s propensity for Milo Yiannopoulos-style politically incorrect humor, he whines:

On one level their provocations are trolling that’s crossed from the virtual into reality. But claiming it’s all in jest is dubious when the 2016 election is occurring in a crucible of domestic terrorism, gun culture, Islamophobia, mass deportations, and Black Lives Matter…

It’s hyperbole to say there would be a Kristallnacht around every corner under Trump, but he would unleash the sinister elements of America’s id that are now taking shape across the country.

[Meet the shock troops of Trump’s America, by Arun Gupta, June 17, 2016]

What Gupta is really saying is that students are “terrifying” if

Gupta’s was simply another attempt by a journalist/ activist to shut down debate because he didn’t like what people are saying.

And Gupta may not be in the best position to tell us what is and is not humorous. Responsible Leftist journalist that he is, believes it is respectable rhetoric to joke about Donald Trump’s assassination.

Also, one of the students he quoted gave his name as “Sam Hyde.”

Unless this is an astonishing coincidence, this suggests Gupta was successfully trolled–the name Sam Hyde is part of a popular internet prank/meme. [How 4chan tricked the Internet into believing this comedian is a mass shooter, by Fruzsina Eordogh, Fobes, June 2, 2016].

Perhaps Gupta simply doesn’t know what he’s talking about.

Trump is a Wrecking Ball not just for American politics, but for American culture. He’s shifted the Overton Window to the right and, more importantly, he is inspiring people actually to fight back against Cultural Marxism.

However, as one of the students profiled in Gupta’s piece accurately observes, Trump “is pretty much all that unites the Alternative Right.” If Trump can be defeated and destroyed, the purges will continue—not just within the conservative movement but throughout academia, the media, and corporate America.

As reporters are the commissars who spearhead this repressive effort, they have an active interest in seeing Trump annihilated in November.

For patriots, this is the strongest argument for Trump. It’s not just about his policies or even the danger posed by a President Hillary Clinton. It’s that he’s a vehicle which enables meaningful resistance to the cultural status quo.

And as the MSM aims its fire not just at the candidate but at his employees and supporters, patriots are facing the stark reality that there’s no way to get around the Lying Press.

The only way to defeat them is to go through them—and break their power once and for all.

James Kirkpatrick [Email him] is a Beltway veteran and a refugee from Conservatism Inc.

(Reprinted from VDare.com by permission of author or representative)
 
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
[]
  1. I am not a Trump supporter, but I would vote for him for the reasons of human survival. But even if I were neutral, observing the extremism of his opponents (who I would never call left-wing then just crazies), I would be very worried for the future of the country. This is at all levels, from students to MSM honchos. Just pure garbage is piling up against Trump and all his faults pale when faced with this garbage avalanche. It is his opponents now who are defining who and what Trump is – not them. Good luck Trump.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Positive Dennis
    I doubt I will vote this cycle, but I fully understand Kiza.
    , @Stephen R. Diamond

    I am not a Trump supporter, but I would vote for him for the reasons of human survival.
     
    Sounds rather like the Republican who said he would vote for Trump but not endorse him.

    Of course you're a "Trump supporter." I suppose you just mean that you refuse to deify him.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
    AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
    These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are only available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also only be used once per hour.
    Sharing Comment via Twitter
    http://www.unz.com/article/americas-lying-press-fails-to-intimidate-trump-now-targeting-his-employees-and-supporters/#comment-1464273
    More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  2. Priss Factor [AKA "Anonymny"] says:     Show CommentNext New Comment

    https://youtu.be/Bcz16TleLJc?t=23m52s

    People who say “We are at war with RADICAL ISLAM, not with ISLAM” are liars.

    No, the Zio-controlled US is at war with Secular Arab Modernizers. It’s not about Islam. Indeed, US has often used radical Muslims against secular Arab/Muslim modernizers.

    Consider the regimes destroyed or destabilized by the Zio-controlled US:

    Afghanistan ruled by secular Soviet-backed regime.

    Iraq ruled by secular modernizer Hussein.

    Libya ruled by secular modernizer Gaddafi.

    Syria ruled by secular western-educated Arab Assad.

    Also, PLO was a secular Arab outfit. If anything, Israel created the radical Islamic Hamas to counter it. Israel also had a hand in creating Hezbollah in Lebanon against secular Arabs.

    US has been working with theocratic Saudis, the main funders of radical Islam.
    US used radical Muslim warlords and terrorists to destroy Libya.
    US used radical Muslims to destroy Syria.
    US has been arming and funding Alqaeda in Syria.
    US has grown esp cozy with Turkey that is becoming less secular and more Islamic.

    So much for US being at war against radical Islam. US has been at war in cooperation with radical Muslims except on the occasion when it led to the blowback of 9/11.
    But notice how Bush II, the puppet of neocons, used that as pretext to wage war on SECULAR ARAB HUSSEIN who had been fighting the likes of Alqaeda and Osama forever.
    Americans are SO DUMB that they cannot tell the difference between secular Arabs and radical Muslims. They are all ‘muzzies’. Hussein was no Islamic fundie. If anything, US worked with Islamists to overthrow Hussein. And when Shia regime grew closer and closer to Iran, US turned a blind eye to Sunni radical Muslims to wreak havoc all over Iraq.

    So, US isn’t at war with Islam or radical Islam.
    US is at war with modern secular Arab nations hated by Israel.
    Jews prefer backward Muslims such as Saudis who cuck out to the US or Muslims such as ISIS that just create havoc & destroy the modern achievements of secular Arab nations.
    Just look at what radical Muslims did to Libya and Syria and parts of Iraq.
    Surely, Jews were secretly cackling with hideous glee.

    It was Russia that aided secular Syria against ISIS and Alqaeda, whereas US and/or its allies have been funding, arming, or aiding the radical Jihadis at war with Assad and the Christian Arab community.

    So, Islam, radical or moderate, is a secondary issue. It’s all smoke and mirrors. The real reason for the mess in the Middle East is that Jews fear and will not tolerated secular and modernizing Arab/Muslim nations.
    After all, the most effective and dogged challenge to Israel always came from secular Arab regimes.

    And in Pakistan, US backed right-wing Zia and radical Muslims against secular modernizers.

    Iran was an anomaly. Shah was a secular modernizer but protected by US and Israel. Why? Because he was such a total running dog of the US. He was such toady that a combination of Iranian Liberals and religious fundies united to overthrow him. But the fundies won cuz there were more of them and they were more impassioned & ruthless.

    Even so, Iranian regime didn’t reject science and technology. Much of secular society was left intact as long as it didn’t act too defiant of Muslim authority. Iran was a real case of Islam + Modernity in the Muslim world. And that is why Jews used US-led sanctions to utterly destroy its economy. This failed in the end because Iran had the backing of China and Russia. This makes Jews very angry with both great powers.

    The world is made up of so many peoples, but so much of International Crisis is the result of an extreme variation of “But, is it good for the Jews?” Jewish Power has turned psychotic.
    Look at Russia in the 90s. Look at Jewish War on Russia as the New Cold War. Look what Jews did to Ukraine. Look what Jews did to Iraq. Look at Libya and Syria. Look at the ‘refugee’ crisis triggered off by Jewish-led foreign policy in the Middle East.
    Look how the Iranian economy was hurt real bad by Jews even though Iran has no nukes(whereas Israel has 300 illegal nukes). And all this trouble over North Korea is also about Jews. Jews hate the fact that Norks did business with enemies with Israel. Jews don’t care about human rights. They are silent about Palestinians in West Bank and Saudi abuses. And US has become the biggest human rights abuser in its foreign policy, cooking up lies to destroy entire nations through war or sanctions.

    But then, Jews act the same way in the US. So much of US politics, economics, and laws are about “Is it good for the Jews?” Even the homo agenda was cooked up by Jews to serve Jews. Jews wanna end ‘hate speech’ to snuff all criticism of Jewish power. Jews want to take guns away so Jewish-run state will control all the firepower. Jews in Wall Street could rob us blind and not go to jail but be bailed out to rob some more.

    We need to ask, “Is Jewish Power good for humanity?”

    No, it’s been the single most disruptive and destructive force since the end of the Cold War.

    Lebovitzkrieg must end.

    Read More
    • Replies: @boogerbently
    Untrue.
    Over half the muslims living here are in favor of Sharia law HERE.
    , @TjM
    Great comment, I always appreciate when people take the time to write out their beliefs, especially when they fly in the face of the lying media (Zionist). Great post!
    , @joe webb
    "Surely, Jews were secretly cackling with hideous glee."

    When I was paying close attention to Israel, say abut 14 years ago, Israel was widely reported to be very surprised that Hamas , which it had helped create...the story goes...was getting out of hand. That they would have been better off with the old Fatah organization was and is the current view.

    This post by Anonymny says that that the rise of radical Islam was cooked up by the jews and the US. I doubt that and I doubt it because it denies the Arabs their own agency, and implies that they are too out of it to have come up with radical Islam by themselves.

    Whatever the Arabs and muzzies are, and they do have an average IQ of about 84, they do not lack elites who are smart enough to do various things, including develop a more militant Islam.

    We are all familiar with the putative Wahabi contribution to the Islamic stew. Are they just jewish stooges? etc, etc.

    Islam has been very contentious for a long time, internally.

    What I bank on is relative stupidity generally. This includes jews and the Black or Whitehouse.

    It is quite a breathtaking announcement to declare that the US and Israel masterminded the Islamic radical revolt, all the better to destroy Arabia. The Failed State model which I think probably informed the PNAC neocon strategy was a good strategy. A failed state model is perfect to realize Israeli hegemony over the middle east, with or without the US permanently in the jewish hip pocket.

    I would think that a neutral observer would comment that an Islamic Front, or Solid Islamic State religion would be more dangerous to Israel than a bunch of failed states. Thus, the apparent surprise of Israel about a dozen years with regard to having helped create a kind of frankenstein in Hamas would seem to ne a more compelling argument today for what radical Islam has become.

    Palestine militants are now more dangerous in Israel than they were. Individuals acting alone are killing Israelies, just as militant Islamic state warriors in the US are doing the same thing to us.
    This is all part of a plan by cackling jews and dumb goyim in Washington?

    Don't think so. Islam is quite capable of doing this stuff without jewish , and goyem help. Again, they have agency, and are not just useful idiots for jews or anybody else.

    To state the obvious, the jews started this whole mess, 1948, 1967 and many adventures in Arab killing in the 70s and 80s...think Lebanon, as the best example, and on to the beginning current wars against the Arabs, for Israel and certainly not for oil (inasmuch as we had cozy oil deals all along, or Kuiwait...who cares?) However, here we are , with as the cliche goes, an existential problem.

    We need to throw the Arabs and muzzies out of Europe, here, and wherever they show up in our neck of the woods. After that and various other problems with the third world migrants, we need to collar the jews and make them behave. But that will be the last thing on the immediate agenda.

    I am reminded of 9-11-01, the Arabs did it. O they are too stupid to do it, the CIA, etc. did it. Israel did it (that is possible...that they permitted the Arabs to continue their operation).

    Arabs do not lack agency. They can do things, like just about every other ethnic group except maybe Africans who have the lowest IQ in the world at 67.

    The jews suckered us into racial equality folly. They did this to get themselves into the country, and then to destroy White solidarity by setting the Negroes on their Liberation lunacies. They sucker us today, but seem to be losing their momentum. Whites are sick of the whole thing.

    We don't want to fight wars for Israel, or anybody else. We hate the pols. We know we are getting hammered by Globalism, we know the culture has been damaged by blacks and jews and cosmopolitans...whites, etc, Hollywood, JewTV, Negro Myth, mexer dirt, chinese rapacity....on and on...Trump may be our last chance.

    Joe Webb
    , @artichoke
    Those "secular Arab modernizers" were brilliant specially selected strongmen that our side had put in place to control the Muslim world. GWB was certainly playing on the side of radical Islam, or Islam generally in starting to knock out the pegs of our control in the Muslim world. His successor Obama plays for the same team, but he's so obvious about it he wears a Muslim ring on his finger.
  3. Anonymous says:     Show CommentNext New Comment

    Refugee from Conservatism Inc, exactly my sentiments. Before wading into anything any of them write, pull up a photo of these limp-wristed metrosexual fruitcakes and save yourself the time and exasperation. I used to work a few blocks from Natl Review’s office and part of my awakening hit me like having ice water thrown in my face when I stopped by their office only to find everyone I could see there swishy, effeminate preppies. It’s gotten worse since today they’re mostly swishy, effeminate leftists–junior versions of George Will–posing as conservatives.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Bill Jones
    The NR office is just one more piece of evidence that the "terrorism" meme is bullshit.

    That would be the number one target of genuine terrorists.
  4. It is indeed astonishing that any of the events reported on this article(?) are considered to be politics.

    Read More
  5. It seems the writer is either afraid of being called ‘antisemite’ or totally ignorant of the owners of his sources – The Daily Beast, and Jerusalem-based Breitbart, named after the “proud Jew” Andrew Breitbart.

    Both Olivia Nuzzi and Michelle Fields are Zionist Jews and known members of ‘Israel Hasbara Committee’.

    Here is the truth about the PROUD JEW you will never read in Zionist-controlled mainstream media.

    On March 1, 2012, the ‘Jewish Daily Forward’ in its editorial proclaimed Andrew Breitbart “A Proud Jew”.

    Andrew Breitbart, Republican Jewish media Moghul from Los Angeles, collapsed and died while walking near his Westwood home. He was 43. His family and his Jewish lawyer said that Andrew died of natural cause. However, according to the Daily Mail Reporter (March 3, 2012), many Zionist bloggers believe Andrew Breitbart was killed on president Obama’s orders.

    “Andrew Breitbart’s untimely death has sparked wild conspiracy theories that the publisher was murdered on the President’s orders,” says DMR…..

    https://rehmat1.com/2012/03/07/who-killed-the-proud-jew-andrew-breitbart/

    Read More
  6. What kind of “men’s magazine” is pro-Clinton and anti-Trump? Confirms what I have suspected all these years without ever opening an issue.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Marcus
    Anything marketed to men that wants to survive has to genuflect to PC dogma on a regular basis
  7. Here is an example of a much bigger fish, from my blog:

    Jan 19, 2016 – Objective Journalism

    I remember when newsmen would never attack or endorse politicians. It was considered unprofessional, unethical, and they’d get fired. Today I read:

    “CNN’s Fareed Zakaria on Sunday pilloried Republicans who have continued to dodge the question of whether they can back their party’s presumptive presidential nominee, Donald Trump, arguing that it’s past time to speak out against him…a 70-year-old megalomaniac, whose entire life has been devoted to ceaselessly promoting himself, and using any means to tear down others, would suddenly develop deep empathy for the party, though so far, he has used it solely as a vehicle for his own personal advancement,” Zakaria continued.”

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/donald-trump-republicans_us_5766a7e4e4b015db1bc9a3f8?section=

    ____________________________

    No matter what one thinks of Trump, this discredits CNN as a “news” organization. They never mention that Zakaria is a Muslim immigrant. There are hosts who offer political opinions like Bill O’Reilly, but he makes it clear that he’s a commentator and not a newsman.

    Read More
    • Agree: edNels
    • Replies: @Rehmat
    YES - Zakaria is an immigrant from India - so were Bill O’Reilly's ancestors from Europe. Though both are committed Zionists - Zakaria did have upper hand over Bill O’Reilly - his wife is Jewish.

    Bill O’Reilly became darling of CNN for hatred towards Muslims while Zakaria got the job at CNN to "modernize" Islam in the image of the Zionist-controlled West.

    Bill O’Reilly, in his 2013 book "Killing Jesus: A History", claims that Mel Gibson was right – Jews did kill Jesus Christ. Naturally, the America's "Guardian" of the Organized Jewry, Abraham Foxman asked O’Reilly to apologize for the antisemitic statement – but O’Reilly refused to go against his Bible as did Rev. Pat Robertson in 2002 for saying that the prophesized "Anti-Christ will be Jewish".

    https://rehmat1.com/2013/10/11/was-jesus-christ-invented/
    , @dahoit
    Zakaria is a quisling suck up to illiberal values.A demoncrat appartchik?.
  8. @elmer t. jones
    What kind of "men's magazine" is pro-Clinton and anti-Trump? Confirms what I have suspected all these years without ever opening an issue.

    Anything marketed to men that wants to survive has to genuflect to PC dogma on a regular basis

    Read More
  9. Priss Factor [AKA "Anonymny"] says: • Website     Show CommentNext New Comment

    Pope is a Poop.

    Christianity cannot even resist the homo lobby. A dead religion of mass suicide.

    http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/06/22/accompanied-migrants-pope-francis-says-christian-lets-everybody-come/

    Read More
    • Replies: @Kiza
    Well, the Pope is a demagogue: Vatican is surrounded by one of the highest walls I have ever seen.
  10. @Priss Factor
    Pope is a Poop.

    Christianity cannot even resist the homo lobby. A dead religion of mass suicide.

    http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/06/22/accompanied-migrants-pope-francis-says-christian-lets-everybody-come/

    Well, the Pope is a demagogue: Vatican is surrounded by one of the highest walls I have ever seen.

    Read More
  11. Given Hope Hicks’ background and good looks I would suggest work is purely optional for her, can’t blacklist her.

    Read More
  12. Priss Factor [AKA "Anonymny"] says: • Website     Show CommentNext New Comment

    J-WOW or Jewish-War-on-Whites continues.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_State_of_Jones_(film)

    Whites need to make a movie about good decent white Americans helping Palestinians against Jewish oppressors in retaliation.

    Read More
  13. We can now identify the domestic resistance to Imperial Washington/Police State America. They are Trump supporters. The back bone of resistance is white men who have not been lobotomized on American campuses. Thanks to Donald Trump it is now possible to choose which side you are on. Red team/blue team is finally exposed as a false choice. Your choice is patriot or quisling.

    Read More
  14. @Kiza
    I am not a Trump supporter, but I would vote for him for the reasons of human survival. But even if I were neutral, observing the extremism of his opponents (who I would never call left-wing then just crazies), I would be very worried for the future of the country. This is at all levels, from students to MSM honchos. Just pure garbage is piling up against Trump and all his faults pale when faced with this garbage avalanche. It is his opponents now who are defining who and what Trump is - not them. Good luck Trump.

    I doubt I will vote this cycle, but I fully understand Kiza.

    Read More
  15. @Carlton Meyer
    Here is an example of a much bigger fish, from my blog:

    Jan 19, 2016 - Objective Journalism

    I remember when newsmen would never attack or endorse politicians. It was considered unprofessional, unethical, and they'd get fired. Today I read:

    "CNN’s Fareed Zakaria on Sunday pilloried Republicans who have continued to dodge the question of whether they can back their party’s presumptive presidential nominee, Donald Trump, arguing that it’s past time to speak out against him...a 70-year-old megalomaniac, whose entire life has been devoted to ceaselessly promoting himself, and using any means to tear down others, would suddenly develop deep empathy for the party, though so far, he has used it solely as a vehicle for his own personal advancement,” Zakaria continued."

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/donald-trump-republicans_us_5766a7e4e4b015db1bc9a3f8?section=

    ____________________________

    No matter what one thinks of Trump, this discredits CNN as a "news" organization. They never mention that Zakaria is a Muslim immigrant. There are hosts who offer political opinions like Bill O'Reilly, but he makes it clear that he's a commentator and not a newsman.

    YES – Zakaria is an immigrant from India – so were Bill O’Reilly’s ancestors from Europe. Though both are committed Zionists – Zakaria did have upper hand over Bill O’Reilly – his wife is Jewish.

    Bill O’Reilly became darling of CNN for hatred towards Muslims while Zakaria got the job at CNN to “modernize” Islam in the image of the Zionist-controlled West.

    Bill O’Reilly, in his 2013 book “Killing Jesus: A History”, claims that Mel Gibson was right – Jews did kill Jesus Christ. Naturally, the America’s “Guardian” of the Organized Jewry, Abraham Foxman asked O’Reilly to apologize for the antisemitic statement – but O’Reilly refused to go against his Bible as did Rev. Pat Robertson in 2002 for saying that the prophesized “Anti-Christ will be Jewish”.

    https://rehmat1.com/2013/10/11/was-jesus-christ-invented/

    Read More
    • Replies: @Avery
    {... so were Bill O’Reilly’s ancestors from Europe.....}

    European Christians founded this country: not Muslims from Islamistan.
    See the difference?
    Bill O’Reilly's ancestors built this country. Not Zakaria' Muslim ancestors.
    Farid Zakaria is an ingrate parasite, enjoying the hospitality of European/American Christians, while working tirelessly to destroy the culture that he is benefiting from.

    This is a country based on Western, European, Christian culture, values, traditions, and Anglo-Saxon common laws.

    You don't like it here or in Canada, you want to enjoy the benefits of Islam, go back to your Muslim homeland. Lots of peaceful, prosperous, highly advanced, tolerant, Muslim countries for you to choose from. Go, don't wait.
    , @dahoit
    I don't think people historically blame Jews as killers of Christ,although they were the obvious instigators,the Romans carried out the execution.
    Otherwise it would be they and not Judas who be categorized as the bad guy(s)throughout history.
    I think its a false claim,as I believe the fact that Christ was a Jew did far more for their safety than the former accusation hurt them,by far.
    A feel good myth,as wo that connection they might have been wiped out millennia ago.They are people of the book to the Muslims,so it would have been Europeans who would have done the eliminating.
    The Muslims,who protected and helped Jews throughout history are now the fall guys for zion.What a twist.
  16. As an ex leftish kind of guy and always anti-communist, I know my own mind fairly well, and I know squishy liberals.

    When on the left, I never thought about bashing free speech, etc. for anybody. But even back then, I noticed that most lefties just saw the thing as a battle, with no holds barred.

    The left, all of it, does not understand the difference between Peacetime and Wartime. It is all wartime for them. They are functionally psychotic in their murderous emotions.

    So, they are pursuing War in Peacetime (where civilized debate is supposed to be the rule) and will discover that when civil war comes, as it probably will, that their ghost dance magic words will be useless against bullets, real bullets. And their War Words will come back at them transformed into lead.

    Joe Webb

    Read More
  17. @Rehmat
    YES - Zakaria is an immigrant from India - so were Bill O’Reilly's ancestors from Europe. Though both are committed Zionists - Zakaria did have upper hand over Bill O’Reilly - his wife is Jewish.

    Bill O’Reilly became darling of CNN for hatred towards Muslims while Zakaria got the job at CNN to "modernize" Islam in the image of the Zionist-controlled West.

    Bill O’Reilly, in his 2013 book "Killing Jesus: A History", claims that Mel Gibson was right – Jews did kill Jesus Christ. Naturally, the America's "Guardian" of the Organized Jewry, Abraham Foxman asked O’Reilly to apologize for the antisemitic statement – but O’Reilly refused to go against his Bible as did Rev. Pat Robertson in 2002 for saying that the prophesized "Anti-Christ will be Jewish".

    https://rehmat1.com/2013/10/11/was-jesus-christ-invented/

    {… so were Bill O’Reilly’s ancestors from Europe…..}

    European Christians founded this country: not Muslims from Islamistan.
    See the difference?
    Bill O’Reilly’s ancestors built this country. Not Zakaria’ Muslim ancestors.
    Farid Zakaria is an ingrate parasite, enjoying the hospitality of European/American Christians, while working tirelessly to destroy the culture that he is benefiting from.

    This is a country based on Western, European, Christian culture, values, traditions, and Anglo-Saxon common laws.

    You don’t like it here or in Canada, you want to enjoy the benefits of Islam, go back to your Muslim homeland. Lots of peaceful, prosperous, highly advanced, tolerant, Muslim countries for you to choose from. Go, don’t wait.

    Read More
    • Replies: @boogerbently
    Same goes for ingrate blacks.
    If this is such a terrible, discriminatory country, why is the WORLD beating a path to our door ?
    They can't WAIT to live under WHITE rule.
    , @MRW
    "The Founding Fathers and Islam” from the Library of Congress
    http://www.loc.gov/loc/lcib/0205/tolerance.html

    "Thomas Jefferson's Qur'an: Islam and the Founders," by Denise A. Spellberg
    http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/17/books/review/thomas-jeffersons-quran-by-denise-a-spellberg.html?_r=0
    From editorial reviews for the book:

    “Denise Spellberg has done a great thing here by recovering the spirit and the substance of Thomas Jefferson's vision of true religious liberty. For Jefferson and many of his Founding colleagues, the shift from ‘toleration’ to ‘liberty’ marked a profound change, extending protection and, yes, sanctuary to those of any faith whatsoever, including those of no faith. By focusing on the Jeffersonian understanding of Islam, Spellberg tells a fresh story in engaging fashion and shows us that the past, while surely not perfect, still has much to teach us all these years distant.” —Jon Meacham, winner of the Pulitzer prize and author of Thomas Jefferson: The Art of Power
     
    , @MRW
    The first country to acknowledge the United States as a new country was Morocco, a Muslim country.
    , @Jacques Sheete
    "European Christians founded this country: not Muslims from Islamistan."

    So what?
  18. @Priss Factor
    https://youtu.be/Bcz16TleLJc?t=23m52s

    People who say "We are at war with RADICAL ISLAM, not with ISLAM" are liars.

    No, the Zio-controlled US is at war with Secular Arab Modernizers. It's not about Islam. Indeed, US has often used radical Muslims against secular Arab/Muslim modernizers.

    Consider the regimes destroyed or destabilized by the Zio-controlled US:

    Afghanistan ruled by secular Soviet-backed regime.

    Iraq ruled by secular modernizer Hussein.

    Libya ruled by secular modernizer Gaddafi.

    Syria ruled by secular western-educated Arab Assad.

    Also, PLO was a secular Arab outfit. If anything, Israel created the radical Islamic Hamas to counter it. Israel also had a hand in creating Hezbollah in Lebanon against secular Arabs.

    US has been working with theocratic Saudis, the main funders of radical Islam.
    US used radical Muslim warlords and terrorists to destroy Libya.
    US used radical Muslims to destroy Syria.
    US has been arming and funding Alqaeda in Syria.
    US has grown esp cozy with Turkey that is becoming less secular and more Islamic.

    So much for US being at war against radical Islam. US has been at war in cooperation with radical Muslims except on the occasion when it led to the blowback of 9/11.
    But notice how Bush II, the puppet of neocons, used that as pretext to wage war on SECULAR ARAB HUSSEIN who had been fighting the likes of Alqaeda and Osama forever.
    Americans are SO DUMB that they cannot tell the difference between secular Arabs and radical Muslims. They are all 'muzzies'. Hussein was no Islamic fundie. If anything, US worked with Islamists to overthrow Hussein. And when Shia regime grew closer and closer to Iran, US turned a blind eye to Sunni radical Muslims to wreak havoc all over Iraq.

    So, US isn't at war with Islam or radical Islam.
    US is at war with modern secular Arab nations hated by Israel.
    Jews prefer backward Muslims such as Saudis who cuck out to the US or Muslims such as ISIS that just create havoc & destroy the modern achievements of secular Arab nations.
    Just look at what radical Muslims did to Libya and Syria and parts of Iraq.
    Surely, Jews were secretly cackling with hideous glee.

    It was Russia that aided secular Syria against ISIS and Alqaeda, whereas US and/or its allies have been funding, arming, or aiding the radical Jihadis at war with Assad and the Christian Arab community.

    So, Islam, radical or moderate, is a secondary issue. It's all smoke and mirrors. The real reason for the mess in the Middle East is that Jews fear and will not tolerated secular and modernizing Arab/Muslim nations.
    After all, the most effective and dogged challenge to Israel always came from secular Arab regimes.

    And in Pakistan, US backed right-wing Zia and radical Muslims against secular modernizers.

    Iran was an anomaly. Shah was a secular modernizer but protected by US and Israel. Why? Because he was such a total running dog of the US. He was such toady that a combination of Iranian Liberals and religious fundies united to overthrow him. But the fundies won cuz there were more of them and they were more impassioned & ruthless.

    Even so, Iranian regime didn't reject science and technology. Much of secular society was left intact as long as it didn't act too defiant of Muslim authority. Iran was a real case of Islam + Modernity in the Muslim world. And that is why Jews used US-led sanctions to utterly destroy its economy. This failed in the end because Iran had the backing of China and Russia. This makes Jews very angry with both great powers.

    The world is made up of so many peoples, but so much of International Crisis is the result of an extreme variation of "But, is it good for the Jews?" Jewish Power has turned psychotic.
    Look at Russia in the 90s. Look at Jewish War on Russia as the New Cold War. Look what Jews did to Ukraine. Look what Jews did to Iraq. Look at Libya and Syria. Look at the 'refugee' crisis triggered off by Jewish-led foreign policy in the Middle East.
    Look how the Iranian economy was hurt real bad by Jews even though Iran has no nukes(whereas Israel has 300 illegal nukes). And all this trouble over North Korea is also about Jews. Jews hate the fact that Norks did business with enemies with Israel. Jews don't care about human rights. They are silent about Palestinians in West Bank and Saudi abuses. And US has become the biggest human rights abuser in its foreign policy, cooking up lies to destroy entire nations through war or sanctions.

    But then, Jews act the same way in the US. So much of US politics, economics, and laws are about "Is it good for the Jews?" Even the homo agenda was cooked up by Jews to serve Jews. Jews wanna end 'hate speech' to snuff all criticism of Jewish power. Jews want to take guns away so Jewish-run state will control all the firepower. Jews in Wall Street could rob us blind and not go to jail but be bailed out to rob some more.

    We need to ask, "Is Jewish Power good for humanity?"

    No, it's been the single most disruptive and destructive force since the end of the Cold War.

    Lebovitzkrieg must end.

    Untrue.
    Over half the muslims living here are in favor of Sharia law HERE.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Priss Factor
    "Untrue. Over half the muslims living here are in favor of Sharia law HERE."

    I'm talking about US foreign policy. It has mostly targeted modern secular Arab/Muslim nations than 'radical Muslims'. If anything, US has allied with radical Muslims in Pakistan, Afghanistan, Saudi Arabia(the main funders of nuttery), Libya, and Syria to bring down pro-modern secular Arab and Muslim regimes.

    So, the rhetoric we often hear from Neocons and Westerners that Muslims have failed to modernize and secularize rings hollow.

    US had gone out of its way to destabilize secular/modern Arab-Muslim nations.

    In 67 and 73, Jews were up against modern-secular Arab nations. Jews won decisively but they still got jitters. They feared the Arabs modernizing even more.

    Jews considered it a great feat to turn secular military-ruled Egypt toward pro-US stance. As Sadat was a total puppet and tool of the US, it was doable.

    But most secular Arab/Muslim nations were staunchly anti-Zionist. There was Hussein of Iraq, Assad of Syria, and Gaddafi of Libya. They were no-good sons-a-bitches, but they were committed to modernization and made some real achievements. During the Cold War, those nations had USSR backing, so US couldn't just do as it pleased.
    In the 80s, Iraq and US made common cause against Iran, a strange case of Muslim nation committed to both Faith and Modernization.

    But with end of Cold War, US policy(especially as directed by Zionists) in the Middle East became far more aggressive. With Jews running things, the main objective has been to wreak as much havoc on the enemy-states-of-Israel. It's really that simple.
    After all, Syria doesn't have much oil, but it's been targeted because it's allied with Iran and Russia.
    , @MRW
    You’re either poorly read or poorly educated.

    Anti-Muslim crusaders make millions spreading fear By Bob Smietana, Religion Editor for The Tennessean. An investigative report into the financial ‘charity’ scams being pulled by people like Frank Gaffney, Stephen Emerson (these two in league with Pam Geller), Bill French, Robert Spencer, Brigitte Tudor, and Guy Rogers.
    http://www.tennessean.com/story/news/local/2010/10/24/antimuslim-crusaders-make-millions-spreading-fear/28936467/

    The message anti-Islam authors and groups disseminate isn't always accurate.

    Brannon Wheeler, history professor and director of the Center for Middle East and Islamic Studies at the United States Naval Academy, said critics of Islam mistakenly assume that Shariah law is a set of fixed principles that apply to every Muslim, everywhere.

    That's not the case, he said, making clear that he speaks as an expert and not for the Navy or the Naval Academy.

    While French, for example, has put together his Sharia Law for Non-Muslims, no similar book exists for Muslims.

    "There's no text that is entitled The Shariah," Wheeler said. "It's not a code of law. It's not like you could go to the library and get the 12 volumes of Shariah law."

    Instead, Shariah is flexible, and applies differently in different contexts. It comes from clerics' and scholars' interpretations of the Quran and other holy books.

    Wheeler also had harsh words for Gaffney's report, which claims Shariah is an imminent threat to America.

    "He makes the Shariah look absurd and insidious by trolling through and finding outrageous rulings and then making them universal for all time," Wheeler said. "It's ridiculous."
     
    Islam has no central authority, none, unlike Judaism and Christianity that has head-knockers and reigning poobahs telling their adherents what they have to believe. Islam is whatever a group of Muslims agree upon. That’s why Brannon Wheeler says above: "It [Shariah Law] comes from clerics' and scholars' interpretations of the Quran and other holy books.” That’s why there’s an IS (21stC Iraq War revenge creation), Wahhabism (a fundamentalist desert tribal 1800 AD creation), myriad Sunni sects, Shia, etc. The only authority a Muslim accepts is his own relationship with the Quran.

    The Shariah Law threat bullshit in this country is a bunch of snake-oil salesmen pulling the wool over American eyes, many of whom have fallen for it like cheap suits. It’s easy to bamboozle the ignorant.
    , @Bill Jones
    Do you really believe the myths of the statist opinion pollers?
    , @Priss Factor
    Buggergently, what do you think of Shoahriah or Shoariah?

    That law says the West pay for the Holocaust forever and worships Jews for all eternity.
    , @dahoit
    And all the haredim Jews here want Talmudic law(and I think they live by it in their exclusive enclaves.WTF?).So what?
    This whole shebang is about Israeli expansion and (in)security,since 1948.The Arabs didn't start this,we USzion did.
    Kirkpatrick?Jean?
    Hopefully this apple fell far from that tree.
    Ideologues suck btw.
  19. @Avery
    {... so were Bill O’Reilly’s ancestors from Europe.....}

    European Christians founded this country: not Muslims from Islamistan.
    See the difference?
    Bill O’Reilly's ancestors built this country. Not Zakaria' Muslim ancestors.
    Farid Zakaria is an ingrate parasite, enjoying the hospitality of European/American Christians, while working tirelessly to destroy the culture that he is benefiting from.

    This is a country based on Western, European, Christian culture, values, traditions, and Anglo-Saxon common laws.

    You don't like it here or in Canada, you want to enjoy the benefits of Islam, go back to your Muslim homeland. Lots of peaceful, prosperous, highly advanced, tolerant, Muslim countries for you to choose from. Go, don't wait.

    Same goes for ingrate blacks.
    If this is such a terrible, discriminatory country, why is the WORLD beating a path to our door ?
    They can’t WAIT to live under WHITE rule.

    Read More
  20. @Avery
    {... so were Bill O’Reilly’s ancestors from Europe.....}

    European Christians founded this country: not Muslims from Islamistan.
    See the difference?
    Bill O’Reilly's ancestors built this country. Not Zakaria' Muslim ancestors.
    Farid Zakaria is an ingrate parasite, enjoying the hospitality of European/American Christians, while working tirelessly to destroy the culture that he is benefiting from.

    This is a country based on Western, European, Christian culture, values, traditions, and Anglo-Saxon common laws.

    You don't like it here or in Canada, you want to enjoy the benefits of Islam, go back to your Muslim homeland. Lots of peaceful, prosperous, highly advanced, tolerant, Muslim countries for you to choose from. Go, don't wait.

    “The Founding Fathers and Islam” from the Library of Congress

    http://www.loc.gov/loc/lcib/0205/tolerance.html

    “Thomas Jefferson’s Qur’an: Islam and the Founders,” by Denise A. Spellberg

    http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/17/books/review/thomas-jeffersons-quran-by-denise-a-spellberg.html?_r=0

    From editorial reviews for the book:

    “Denise Spellberg has done a great thing here by recovering the spirit and the substance of Thomas Jefferson’s vision of true religious liberty. For Jefferson and many of his Founding colleagues, the shift from ‘toleration’ to ‘liberty’ marked a profound change, extending protection and, yes, sanctuary to those of any faith whatsoever, including those of no faith. By focusing on the Jeffersonian understanding of Islam, Spellberg tells a fresh story in engaging fashion and shows us that the past, while surely not perfect, still has much to teach us all these years distant.” —Jon Meacham, winner of the Pulitzer prize and author of Thomas Jefferson: The Art of Power

    Read More
    • Replies: @Discard
    Thomas Jefferson was a brilliant but ineffectual dreamer. He died in debt because he couldn't manage his affairs well. He was asked to write the Declaration of Independence because he was a good wordsmith, not because he had the soundest judgement. I pretty much dismiss him as a source of wisdom. After all, he would have been in favor of Moslem immigration. What does that tell you about his lack of good sense?
  21. @Avery
    {... so were Bill O’Reilly’s ancestors from Europe.....}

    European Christians founded this country: not Muslims from Islamistan.
    See the difference?
    Bill O’Reilly's ancestors built this country. Not Zakaria' Muslim ancestors.
    Farid Zakaria is an ingrate parasite, enjoying the hospitality of European/American Christians, while working tirelessly to destroy the culture that he is benefiting from.

    This is a country based on Western, European, Christian culture, values, traditions, and Anglo-Saxon common laws.

    You don't like it here or in Canada, you want to enjoy the benefits of Islam, go back to your Muslim homeland. Lots of peaceful, prosperous, highly advanced, tolerant, Muslim countries for you to choose from. Go, don't wait.

    The first country to acknowledge the United States as a new country was Morocco, a Muslim country.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Avery
    Yeah, OK.
    So Morocco recognizing United States means - what?
    Nothing.
    Natha.
    Butkus.
    Zilch.

    Whether any country recognized US or not is irrelevant.
    US declared Independence from the Superpower of the day, England.
    US did no need anybody's recognition.

    [ The Declaration of Independence: A Transcription

    IN CONGRESS, July 4, 1776.

    The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America,

    When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

    We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.--Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.]

    Some Islamist state sucking up to US, is worth less than pile of camel dung.
    , @Hibernian
    Please cite a source for this. In the early days of US History Islamic pirates did regard us as profitable victims of their extortion racket.
  22. Priss Factor [AKA "Anonymny"] says: • Website     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @boogerbently
    Untrue.
    Over half the muslims living here are in favor of Sharia law HERE.

    “Untrue. Over half the muslims living here are in favor of Sharia law HERE.”

    I’m talking about US foreign policy. It has mostly targeted modern secular Arab/Muslim nations than ‘radical Muslims’. If anything, US has allied with radical Muslims in Pakistan, Afghanistan, Saudi Arabia(the main funders of nuttery), Libya, and Syria to bring down pro-modern secular Arab and Muslim regimes.

    So, the rhetoric we often hear from Neocons and Westerners that Muslims have failed to modernize and secularize rings hollow.

    US had gone out of its way to destabilize secular/modern Arab-Muslim nations.

    In 67 and 73, Jews were up against modern-secular Arab nations. Jews won decisively but they still got jitters. They feared the Arabs modernizing even more.

    Jews considered it a great feat to turn secular military-ruled Egypt toward pro-US stance. As Sadat was a total puppet and tool of the US, it was doable.

    But most secular Arab/Muslim nations were staunchly anti-Zionist. There was Hussein of Iraq, Assad of Syria, and Gaddafi of Libya. They were no-good sons-a-bitches, but they were committed to modernization and made some real achievements. During the Cold War, those nations had USSR backing, so US couldn’t just do as it pleased.
    In the 80s, Iraq and US made common cause against Iran, a strange case of Muslim nation committed to both Faith and Modernization.

    But with end of Cold War, US policy(especially as directed by Zionists) in the Middle East became far more aggressive. With Jews running things, the main objective has been to wreak as much havoc on the enemy-states-of-Israel. It’s really that simple.
    After all, Syria doesn’t have much oil, but it’s been targeted because it’s allied with Iran and Russia.

    Read More
  23. @Another Dan: “I stopped by their office only to find everyone I could see there swishy, effeminate preppies. It’s gotten worse since today they’re mostly swishy, effeminate leftists–junior versions of George Will–posing as conservatives.”

    I’m not aware that “preppies” tend to come to work in tee-shirts and earrings; we DO NOT wish to look like Kevin Williamson!

    Read More
  24. @boogerbently
    Untrue.
    Over half the muslims living here are in favor of Sharia law HERE.

    You’re either poorly read or poorly educated.

    Anti-Muslim crusaders make millions spreading fear By Bob Smietana, Religion Editor for The Tennessean. An investigative report into the financial ‘charity’ scams being pulled by people like Frank Gaffney, Stephen Emerson (these two in league with Pam Geller), Bill French, Robert Spencer, Brigitte Tudor, and Guy Rogers.

    http://www.tennessean.com/story/news/local/2010/10/24/antimuslim-crusaders-make-millions-spreading-fear/28936467/

    The message anti-Islam authors and groups disseminate isn’t always accurate.

    Brannon Wheeler, history professor and director of the Center for Middle East and Islamic Studies at the United States Naval Academy, said critics of Islam mistakenly assume that Shariah law is a set of fixed principles that apply to every Muslim, everywhere.

    That’s not the case, he said, making clear that he speaks as an expert and not for the Navy or the Naval Academy.

    While French, for example, has put together his Sharia Law for Non-Muslims, no similar book exists for Muslims.

    “There’s no text that is entitled The Shariah,” Wheeler said. “It’s not a code of law. It’s not like you could go to the library and get the 12 volumes of Shariah law.”

    Instead, Shariah is flexible, and applies differently in different contexts. It comes from clerics’ and scholars’ interpretations of the Quran and other holy books.

    Wheeler also had harsh words for Gaffney’s report, which claims Shariah is an imminent threat to America.

    “He makes the Shariah look absurd and insidious by trolling through and finding outrageous rulings and then making them universal for all time,” Wheeler said. “It’s ridiculous.”

    Islam has no central authority, none, unlike Judaism and Christianity that has head-knockers and reigning poobahs telling their adherents what they have to believe. Islam is whatever a group of Muslims agree upon. That’s why Brannon Wheeler says above: “It [Shariah Law] comes from clerics’ and scholars’ interpretations of the Quran and other holy books.” That’s why there’s an IS (21stC Iraq War revenge creation), Wahhabism (a fundamentalist desert tribal 1800 AD creation), myriad Sunni sects, Shia, etc. The only authority a Muslim accepts is his own relationship with the Quran.

    The Shariah Law threat bullshit in this country is a bunch of snake-oil salesmen pulling the wool over American eyes, many of whom have fallen for it like cheap suits. It’s easy to bamboozle the ignorant.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Discard
    Who cares about Sharia? If it can be used as a stick to attack immigration, use it. By the time that enough Americans have had enough personal exposure to Middle Easterners to know how badly they fit into this country, we'll need a war to get them out. If it takes bullshit to save us from inundation by the 3rd World, so be it.
    , @dr kill
    I had a Saudi Judge in Riyadh award me 63k in a contract dispute back in 2006. And my Saudi atty asked me to pay him what I felt he was worth. The most satisfying legal encounter of my life, and there have been plenty. I feel like much of Shariah is common - sense, the objectionable portion is pretty small. Compared to my run-ins here in the USSA. In my opinion, Shariah searches for right and wrong, the US system is is about legal and illegal.
    , @boogerbently
    "You’re either poorly read or poorly educated."

    I am neither.

    Read the Quran sometime. EVERYTHING bad said about it is true. They are told to kill us.
    Period.


    " bullshit, snake-oil salesmen, pulling the wool , like cheap suits, bamboozle.....
    in just 2 sentences. "

    Cliche much ?

    Read what's happening in London, already, with it's first muslim mayor.

    " It’s easy to bamboozle the ignorant."

    As evidenced by the Hillary supporters.
  25. Priss Factor [AKA "Anonymny"] says: • Website     Show CommentNext New Comment

    How does a man become a superhero in this day and age?

    He loses his penis and testicles.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/25/arts/design/in-a-new-comic-a-transgender-superhero-hides-2-identities.html

    Read More
    • Replies: @dahoit
    Homosexual and women combat troops are a time bomb of anti cohesion for the military.
    Yankee come home,to hell with being the Israeli foreign Legion,guard the borders.
  26. @MRW
    "The Founding Fathers and Islam” from the Library of Congress
    http://www.loc.gov/loc/lcib/0205/tolerance.html

    "Thomas Jefferson's Qur'an: Islam and the Founders," by Denise A. Spellberg
    http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/17/books/review/thomas-jeffersons-quran-by-denise-a-spellberg.html?_r=0
    From editorial reviews for the book:

    “Denise Spellberg has done a great thing here by recovering the spirit and the substance of Thomas Jefferson's vision of true religious liberty. For Jefferson and many of his Founding colleagues, the shift from ‘toleration’ to ‘liberty’ marked a profound change, extending protection and, yes, sanctuary to those of any faith whatsoever, including those of no faith. By focusing on the Jeffersonian understanding of Islam, Spellberg tells a fresh story in engaging fashion and shows us that the past, while surely not perfect, still has much to teach us all these years distant.” —Jon Meacham, winner of the Pulitzer prize and author of Thomas Jefferson: The Art of Power
     

    Thomas Jefferson was a brilliant but ineffectual dreamer. He died in debt because he couldn’t manage his affairs well. He was asked to write the Declaration of Independence because he was a good wordsmith, not because he had the soundest judgement. I pretty much dismiss him as a source of wisdom. After all, he would have been in favor of Moslem immigration. What does that tell you about his lack of good sense?

    Read More
    • Replies: @dahoit
    An ineffectual dreamer?sheesh,We,the People,in order to rebut your claim,heartily disagree.
    , @artichoke
    Did he say he was in favor of Muslim immigration? Did he comment on the Barbary Pirates? He had a Koran, but that's because he wanted to understand things, not that he was a weakling.
  27. @MRW
    You’re either poorly read or poorly educated.

    Anti-Muslim crusaders make millions spreading fear By Bob Smietana, Religion Editor for The Tennessean. An investigative report into the financial ‘charity’ scams being pulled by people like Frank Gaffney, Stephen Emerson (these two in league with Pam Geller), Bill French, Robert Spencer, Brigitte Tudor, and Guy Rogers.
    http://www.tennessean.com/story/news/local/2010/10/24/antimuslim-crusaders-make-millions-spreading-fear/28936467/

    The message anti-Islam authors and groups disseminate isn't always accurate.

    Brannon Wheeler, history professor and director of the Center for Middle East and Islamic Studies at the United States Naval Academy, said critics of Islam mistakenly assume that Shariah law is a set of fixed principles that apply to every Muslim, everywhere.

    That's not the case, he said, making clear that he speaks as an expert and not for the Navy or the Naval Academy.

    While French, for example, has put together his Sharia Law for Non-Muslims, no similar book exists for Muslims.

    "There's no text that is entitled The Shariah," Wheeler said. "It's not a code of law. It's not like you could go to the library and get the 12 volumes of Shariah law."

    Instead, Shariah is flexible, and applies differently in different contexts. It comes from clerics' and scholars' interpretations of the Quran and other holy books.

    Wheeler also had harsh words for Gaffney's report, which claims Shariah is an imminent threat to America.

    "He makes the Shariah look absurd and insidious by trolling through and finding outrageous rulings and then making them universal for all time," Wheeler said. "It's ridiculous."
     
    Islam has no central authority, none, unlike Judaism and Christianity that has head-knockers and reigning poobahs telling their adherents what they have to believe. Islam is whatever a group of Muslims agree upon. That’s why Brannon Wheeler says above: "It [Shariah Law] comes from clerics' and scholars' interpretations of the Quran and other holy books.” That’s why there’s an IS (21stC Iraq War revenge creation), Wahhabism (a fundamentalist desert tribal 1800 AD creation), myriad Sunni sects, Shia, etc. The only authority a Muslim accepts is his own relationship with the Quran.

    The Shariah Law threat bullshit in this country is a bunch of snake-oil salesmen pulling the wool over American eyes, many of whom have fallen for it like cheap suits. It’s easy to bamboozle the ignorant.

    Who cares about Sharia? If it can be used as a stick to attack immigration, use it. By the time that enough Americans have had enough personal exposure to Middle Easterners to know how badly they fit into this country, we’ll need a war to get them out. If it takes bullshit to save us from inundation by the 3rd World, so be it.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Priss Factor
    Sharia means nothing in the US and nothing to non-Muslims.

    Even if Sharia were to make inroads into parts of America, it will ONLY apply to Muslims, not to non-Muslims.

    What we should really worry about Gayria that forces homomania on all of us. Homomania is not about Tolerance of homos. It is about forcing Compliance and Obedience on all of us. We must bend over to the holy homo.

    There is also Zioria that ways Jews can do pretty much whatever they feel like. Cheat on Wall Street and get bailouts to cheat some more.
    Start wars all over the world and get white Christian soldiers killed and maimed.
    Push sanctions around the world and increase hardships on countless Russians and Iranians. Shower Israel with hosannas and 4 billion in aid every year no matter what it does.

    And there is Negria. Look at Baltimore and BLM. And all those truth-raping 'hate hoaxes'. Negria means blacks can get away with pretty much any kind of shit. It also means that no matter how much blacks mess up America, Jewish-run Hollywood will feature blacks as holy saints and angels in movies like Selma. And black rage will be presented as so holy and righteous even when murderous toward whites.
  28. @Priss Factor
    https://youtu.be/Bcz16TleLJc?t=23m52s

    People who say "We are at war with RADICAL ISLAM, not with ISLAM" are liars.

    No, the Zio-controlled US is at war with Secular Arab Modernizers. It's not about Islam. Indeed, US has often used radical Muslims against secular Arab/Muslim modernizers.

    Consider the regimes destroyed or destabilized by the Zio-controlled US:

    Afghanistan ruled by secular Soviet-backed regime.

    Iraq ruled by secular modernizer Hussein.

    Libya ruled by secular modernizer Gaddafi.

    Syria ruled by secular western-educated Arab Assad.

    Also, PLO was a secular Arab outfit. If anything, Israel created the radical Islamic Hamas to counter it. Israel also had a hand in creating Hezbollah in Lebanon against secular Arabs.

    US has been working with theocratic Saudis, the main funders of radical Islam.
    US used radical Muslim warlords and terrorists to destroy Libya.
    US used radical Muslims to destroy Syria.
    US has been arming and funding Alqaeda in Syria.
    US has grown esp cozy with Turkey that is becoming less secular and more Islamic.

    So much for US being at war against radical Islam. US has been at war in cooperation with radical Muslims except on the occasion when it led to the blowback of 9/11.
    But notice how Bush II, the puppet of neocons, used that as pretext to wage war on SECULAR ARAB HUSSEIN who had been fighting the likes of Alqaeda and Osama forever.
    Americans are SO DUMB that they cannot tell the difference between secular Arabs and radical Muslims. They are all 'muzzies'. Hussein was no Islamic fundie. If anything, US worked with Islamists to overthrow Hussein. And when Shia regime grew closer and closer to Iran, US turned a blind eye to Sunni radical Muslims to wreak havoc all over Iraq.

    So, US isn't at war with Islam or radical Islam.
    US is at war with modern secular Arab nations hated by Israel.
    Jews prefer backward Muslims such as Saudis who cuck out to the US or Muslims such as ISIS that just create havoc & destroy the modern achievements of secular Arab nations.
    Just look at what radical Muslims did to Libya and Syria and parts of Iraq.
    Surely, Jews were secretly cackling with hideous glee.

    It was Russia that aided secular Syria against ISIS and Alqaeda, whereas US and/or its allies have been funding, arming, or aiding the radical Jihadis at war with Assad and the Christian Arab community.

    So, Islam, radical or moderate, is a secondary issue. It's all smoke and mirrors. The real reason for the mess in the Middle East is that Jews fear and will not tolerated secular and modernizing Arab/Muslim nations.
    After all, the most effective and dogged challenge to Israel always came from secular Arab regimes.

    And in Pakistan, US backed right-wing Zia and radical Muslims against secular modernizers.

    Iran was an anomaly. Shah was a secular modernizer but protected by US and Israel. Why? Because he was such a total running dog of the US. He was such toady that a combination of Iranian Liberals and religious fundies united to overthrow him. But the fundies won cuz there were more of them and they were more impassioned & ruthless.

    Even so, Iranian regime didn't reject science and technology. Much of secular society was left intact as long as it didn't act too defiant of Muslim authority. Iran was a real case of Islam + Modernity in the Muslim world. And that is why Jews used US-led sanctions to utterly destroy its economy. This failed in the end because Iran had the backing of China and Russia. This makes Jews very angry with both great powers.

    The world is made up of so many peoples, but so much of International Crisis is the result of an extreme variation of "But, is it good for the Jews?" Jewish Power has turned psychotic.
    Look at Russia in the 90s. Look at Jewish War on Russia as the New Cold War. Look what Jews did to Ukraine. Look what Jews did to Iraq. Look at Libya and Syria. Look at the 'refugee' crisis triggered off by Jewish-led foreign policy in the Middle East.
    Look how the Iranian economy was hurt real bad by Jews even though Iran has no nukes(whereas Israel has 300 illegal nukes). And all this trouble over North Korea is also about Jews. Jews hate the fact that Norks did business with enemies with Israel. Jews don't care about human rights. They are silent about Palestinians in West Bank and Saudi abuses. And US has become the biggest human rights abuser in its foreign policy, cooking up lies to destroy entire nations through war or sanctions.

    But then, Jews act the same way in the US. So much of US politics, economics, and laws are about "Is it good for the Jews?" Even the homo agenda was cooked up by Jews to serve Jews. Jews wanna end 'hate speech' to snuff all criticism of Jewish power. Jews want to take guns away so Jewish-run state will control all the firepower. Jews in Wall Street could rob us blind and not go to jail but be bailed out to rob some more.

    We need to ask, "Is Jewish Power good for humanity?"

    No, it's been the single most disruptive and destructive force since the end of the Cold War.

    Lebovitzkrieg must end.

    Great comment, I always appreciate when people take the time to write out their beliefs, especially when they fly in the face of the lying media (Zionist). Great post!

    Read More
  29. @MRW
    You’re either poorly read or poorly educated.

    Anti-Muslim crusaders make millions spreading fear By Bob Smietana, Religion Editor for The Tennessean. An investigative report into the financial ‘charity’ scams being pulled by people like Frank Gaffney, Stephen Emerson (these two in league with Pam Geller), Bill French, Robert Spencer, Brigitte Tudor, and Guy Rogers.
    http://www.tennessean.com/story/news/local/2010/10/24/antimuslim-crusaders-make-millions-spreading-fear/28936467/

    The message anti-Islam authors and groups disseminate isn't always accurate.

    Brannon Wheeler, history professor and director of the Center for Middle East and Islamic Studies at the United States Naval Academy, said critics of Islam mistakenly assume that Shariah law is a set of fixed principles that apply to every Muslim, everywhere.

    That's not the case, he said, making clear that he speaks as an expert and not for the Navy or the Naval Academy.

    While French, for example, has put together his Sharia Law for Non-Muslims, no similar book exists for Muslims.

    "There's no text that is entitled The Shariah," Wheeler said. "It's not a code of law. It's not like you could go to the library and get the 12 volumes of Shariah law."

    Instead, Shariah is flexible, and applies differently in different contexts. It comes from clerics' and scholars' interpretations of the Quran and other holy books.

    Wheeler also had harsh words for Gaffney's report, which claims Shariah is an imminent threat to America.

    "He makes the Shariah look absurd and insidious by trolling through and finding outrageous rulings and then making them universal for all time," Wheeler said. "It's ridiculous."
     
    Islam has no central authority, none, unlike Judaism and Christianity that has head-knockers and reigning poobahs telling their adherents what they have to believe. Islam is whatever a group of Muslims agree upon. That’s why Brannon Wheeler says above: "It [Shariah Law] comes from clerics' and scholars' interpretations of the Quran and other holy books.” That’s why there’s an IS (21stC Iraq War revenge creation), Wahhabism (a fundamentalist desert tribal 1800 AD creation), myriad Sunni sects, Shia, etc. The only authority a Muslim accepts is his own relationship with the Quran.

    The Shariah Law threat bullshit in this country is a bunch of snake-oil salesmen pulling the wool over American eyes, many of whom have fallen for it like cheap suits. It’s easy to bamboozle the ignorant.

    I had a Saudi Judge in Riyadh award me 63k in a contract dispute back in 2006. And my Saudi atty asked me to pay him what I felt he was worth. The most satisfying legal encounter of my life, and there have been plenty. I feel like much of Shariah is common – sense, the objectionable portion is pretty small. Compared to my run-ins here in the USSA. In my opinion, Shariah searches for right and wrong, the US system is is about legal and illegal.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Avery
    {I had a Saudi Judge in Riyadh award me 63k in a contract dispute back in 2006. }
    {I feel like much of Shariah is common – sense, the objectionable portion is pretty small. }

    You have found your IslamoParadise.
    You should move to Saudi Arabia.
    Why live with Christian bigots.

  30. @Kiza
    I am not a Trump supporter, but I would vote for him for the reasons of human survival. But even if I were neutral, observing the extremism of his opponents (who I would never call left-wing then just crazies), I would be very worried for the future of the country. This is at all levels, from students to MSM honchos. Just pure garbage is piling up against Trump and all his faults pale when faced with this garbage avalanche. It is his opponents now who are defining who and what Trump is - not them. Good luck Trump.

    I am not a Trump supporter, but I would vote for him for the reasons of human survival.

    Sounds rather like the Republican who said he would vote for Trump but not endorse him.

    Of course you’re a “Trump supporter.” I suppose you just mean that you refuse to deify him.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Kiza
    I am ok with what you say, call me a Trump supporter if you like. Compared with Killary's and establishment's garbage avalanche, Trump is a distinctly lesser evil. But there is a lot of ground for pessimism whoever wins. I wrote before that Trump is a prototypical Populist and the Populists have a tendency to change their talk and actions at a blink of an eye. Thus, I understand why Positive Dennis will skip this one to avoid feeling guilty afterwards for voting Trump.
  31. @Avery
    {... so were Bill O’Reilly’s ancestors from Europe.....}

    European Christians founded this country: not Muslims from Islamistan.
    See the difference?
    Bill O’Reilly's ancestors built this country. Not Zakaria' Muslim ancestors.
    Farid Zakaria is an ingrate parasite, enjoying the hospitality of European/American Christians, while working tirelessly to destroy the culture that he is benefiting from.

    This is a country based on Western, European, Christian culture, values, traditions, and Anglo-Saxon common laws.

    You don't like it here or in Canada, you want to enjoy the benefits of Islam, go back to your Muslim homeland. Lots of peaceful, prosperous, highly advanced, tolerant, Muslim countries for you to choose from. Go, don't wait.

    “European Christians founded this country: not Muslims from Islamistan.”

    So what?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Avery
    {So what?}

    So what?
    So move to your favourite Islamistan.
    Where is the problem.
    Nobody is forcing you to stay in Christandom and shill for IslamoFascists.
    Get out.
    Go home and live with your Muslim kin.
    Send a postcard from your favourite Islamistan paradise.

    , @Jacques Sheete
    “European Christians founded this country: not Muslims from Islamistan.”

    So what?

    Does that mean that Jews from "Judastan" are excluded too?

    How's about atheists from "Atheistastan" ??

    Are Mormons in or out? No Mormons in the FF ya know!

    White male European Christians some of whom held slaves founded this country. None was an auto repairman. Does that mean women and auto repairmen are excluded? Who else goes? Buddhist airplane pilots?

    Should we re-institute chattel slavery?

    , @Marcus
    So they obviously didn't intend for it to be a kind of boarding house for the rest of the world. The "nation of immigrants" bs is a Jewish invention.
  32. @Jacques Sheete
    "European Christians founded this country: not Muslims from Islamistan."

    So what?

    {So what?}

    So what?
    So move to your favourite Islamistan.
    Where is the problem.
    Nobody is forcing you to stay in Christandom and shill for IslamoFascists.
    Get out.
    Go home and live with your Muslim kin.
    Send a postcard from your favourite Islamistan paradise.

    Read More
  33. @MRW
    The first country to acknowledge the United States as a new country was Morocco, a Muslim country.

    Yeah, OK.
    So Morocco recognizing United States means – what?
    Nothing.
    Natha.
    Butkus.
    Zilch.

    Whether any country recognized US or not is irrelevant.
    US declared Independence from the Superpower of the day, England.
    US did no need anybody’s recognition.

    [ The Declaration of Independence: A Transcription

    IN CONGRESS, July 4, 1776.

    The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America,

    When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

    We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.--Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.]

    Some Islamist state sucking up to US, is worth less than pile of camel dung.

    Read More
  34. @MRW
    You’re either poorly read or poorly educated.

    Anti-Muslim crusaders make millions spreading fear By Bob Smietana, Religion Editor for The Tennessean. An investigative report into the financial ‘charity’ scams being pulled by people like Frank Gaffney, Stephen Emerson (these two in league with Pam Geller), Bill French, Robert Spencer, Brigitte Tudor, and Guy Rogers.
    http://www.tennessean.com/story/news/local/2010/10/24/antimuslim-crusaders-make-millions-spreading-fear/28936467/

    The message anti-Islam authors and groups disseminate isn't always accurate.

    Brannon Wheeler, history professor and director of the Center for Middle East and Islamic Studies at the United States Naval Academy, said critics of Islam mistakenly assume that Shariah law is a set of fixed principles that apply to every Muslim, everywhere.

    That's not the case, he said, making clear that he speaks as an expert and not for the Navy or the Naval Academy.

    While French, for example, has put together his Sharia Law for Non-Muslims, no similar book exists for Muslims.

    "There's no text that is entitled The Shariah," Wheeler said. "It's not a code of law. It's not like you could go to the library and get the 12 volumes of Shariah law."

    Instead, Shariah is flexible, and applies differently in different contexts. It comes from clerics' and scholars' interpretations of the Quran and other holy books.

    Wheeler also had harsh words for Gaffney's report, which claims Shariah is an imminent threat to America.

    "He makes the Shariah look absurd and insidious by trolling through and finding outrageous rulings and then making them universal for all time," Wheeler said. "It's ridiculous."
     
    Islam has no central authority, none, unlike Judaism and Christianity that has head-knockers and reigning poobahs telling their adherents what they have to believe. Islam is whatever a group of Muslims agree upon. That’s why Brannon Wheeler says above: "It [Shariah Law] comes from clerics' and scholars' interpretations of the Quran and other holy books.” That’s why there’s an IS (21stC Iraq War revenge creation), Wahhabism (a fundamentalist desert tribal 1800 AD creation), myriad Sunni sects, Shia, etc. The only authority a Muslim accepts is his own relationship with the Quran.

    The Shariah Law threat bullshit in this country is a bunch of snake-oil salesmen pulling the wool over American eyes, many of whom have fallen for it like cheap suits. It’s easy to bamboozle the ignorant.

    “You’re either poorly read or poorly educated.”

    I am neither.

    Read the Quran sometime. EVERYTHING bad said about it is true. They are told to kill us.
    Period.

    ” bullshit, snake-oil salesmen, pulling the wool , like cheap suits, bamboozle…..
    in just 2 sentences. ”

    Cliche much ?

    Read what’s happening in London, already, with it’s first muslim mayor.

    ” It’s easy to bamboozle the ignorant.”

    As evidenced by the Hillary supporters.

    Read More
  35. @dr kill
    I had a Saudi Judge in Riyadh award me 63k in a contract dispute back in 2006. And my Saudi atty asked me to pay him what I felt he was worth. The most satisfying legal encounter of my life, and there have been plenty. I feel like much of Shariah is common - sense, the objectionable portion is pretty small. Compared to my run-ins here in the USSA. In my opinion, Shariah searches for right and wrong, the US system is is about legal and illegal.

    {I had a Saudi Judge in Riyadh award me 63k in a contract dispute back in 2006. }
    {I feel like much of Shariah is common – sense, the objectionable portion is pretty small. }

    You have found your IslamoParadise.
    You should move to Saudi Arabia.
    Why live with Christian bigots.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Drapetomaniac
    "Why live with Christian bigots."

    Because you're safer - they won't bomb their own country, just everyone else's. For at least a half century the "Christian" US has been the most destructive nation on Earth.

    Christians are no less inhuman than all the other people and they have more opportunities to act badly. And it shows.
  36. @Jacques Sheete
    "European Christians founded this country: not Muslims from Islamistan."

    So what?

    “European Christians founded this country: not Muslims from Islamistan.”

    So what?

    Does that mean that Jews from “Judastan” are excluded too?

    How’s about atheists from “Atheistastan” ??

    Are Mormons in or out? No Mormons in the FF ya know!

    White male European Christians some of whom held slaves founded this country. None was an auto repairman. Does that mean women and auto repairmen are excluded? Who else goes? Buddhist airplane pilots?

    Should we re-institute chattel slavery?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Avery
    You are welcome to move to Islamistan and enjoy to joys of Muslim tolerance.
    With all the faults of {“European Christians founded this country: not Muslims from Islamistan So what?}, nobody is forcing you, an IslamoFascist parasite to live in Christandom. You don't like it here? Move to Saudi Arabia, next to your Islamist kin.
    Where is the problem?
    Nobody is forcing youse to stay in US.
    Please go: your IslamoFascist kin await you with sharpened swords.
  37. @boogerbently
    Untrue.
    Over half the muslims living here are in favor of Sharia law HERE.

    Do you really believe the myths of the statist opinion pollers?

    Read More
  38. @Anonymous
    Refugee from Conservatism Inc, exactly my sentiments. Before wading into anything any of them write, pull up a photo of these limp-wristed metrosexual fruitcakes and save yourself the time and exasperation. I used to work a few blocks from Natl Review's office and part of my awakening hit me like having ice water thrown in my face when I stopped by their office only to find everyone I could see there swishy, effeminate preppies. It's gotten worse since today they're mostly swishy, effeminate leftists--junior versions of George Will--posing as conservatives.

    The NR office is just one more piece of evidence that the “terrorism” meme is bullshit.

    That would be the number one target of genuine terrorists.

    Read More
  39. @Jacques Sheete
    “European Christians founded this country: not Muslims from Islamistan.”

    So what?

    Does that mean that Jews from "Judastan" are excluded too?

    How's about atheists from "Atheistastan" ??

    Are Mormons in or out? No Mormons in the FF ya know!

    White male European Christians some of whom held slaves founded this country. None was an auto repairman. Does that mean women and auto repairmen are excluded? Who else goes? Buddhist airplane pilots?

    Should we re-institute chattel slavery?

    You are welcome to move to Islamistan and enjoy to joys of Muslim tolerance.
    With all the faults of {“European Christians founded this country: not Muslims from Islamistan So what?}, nobody is forcing you, an IslamoFascist parasite to live in Christandom. You don’t like it here? Move to Saudi Arabia, next to your Islamist kin.
    Where is the problem?
    Nobody is forcing youse to stay in US.
    Please go: your IslamoFascist kin await you with sharpened swords.

    Read More
    • Agree: Marcus
    • Replies: @Jacques Sheete
    "You are welcome to move to Islamistan and enjoy to joys of Muslim tolerance."


    Funny you should speak of tolerance. Isn't Christianity the religion of "Love yer neighbor?"

    What do you think JC would have to say about your attitude and the way you express yourself?

    Have you ever read the Gospels? Ol St Paul spent large proportions of his time admonishing his flock to act like Christ and it's apparent nothing's changed with today's so called "Christians". I have little doubt that most of today's "Christians" would shout "crucify Him!" if he ever showed His face again. Any wonder why the goyim are held in so much contempt?

    Tolerance? Love? Tsk, tsk.

    PS: Is "Christianity" only for Roman citizens of Middle Eastern descent?

  40. Anonymous says:     Show CommentNext New Comment

    Time for Civil War/Revolution 2.0 is nearing at increasingly rapid rate

    Read More
    • Replies: @Drapetomaniac
    Doubt it. Every new generation breeds more and more dupes and ant-colony worshipers.
  41. @Avery
    {I had a Saudi Judge in Riyadh award me 63k in a contract dispute back in 2006. }
    {I feel like much of Shariah is common – sense, the objectionable portion is pretty small. }

    You have found your IslamoParadise.
    You should move to Saudi Arabia.
    Why live with Christian bigots.

    “Why live with Christian bigots.”

    Because you’re safer – they won’t bomb their own country, just everyone else’s. For at least a half century the “Christian” US has been the most destructive nation on Earth.

    Christians are no less inhuman than all the other people and they have more opportunities to act badly. And it shows.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Avery
    {For at least a half century the “Christian” US has been the most destructive nation on Earth.}

    For half a century, US foreign policy has been infiltrated and highjacked by a foreign virus.
    Leo Straussian, Trotskyite Neoconism: nothing to do with Christian America, or its founding.
    An alien anti-Christian, anti-American virulent disease that has infected the American body politic.

    btw: is Christian Europe also been the most destructive nation on Earth?
    Is that why millions of desperate people risk death to get to Europe and safety?

    btw2: care to guess how many 10s of millions of Christians have Muslims massacred and subjected to genocide? The so-called Muslim lands were originally mostly indigenous Christian. That is until Muslim hordes invaded and wipe them out. The IslamoFascist state of Turkey sits on the bones of millions of murdered indigenous Christians: Armenians, Assyrians, Pontic Greeks. Nomad Muslim invading hordes from East and Central Asia. The same with pretty much all of Middle East: Christian lands, until Muslim invaders massacred the indigenous Christians or forcibly Islamized the ones the savaged did not murder.

  42. Priss Factor [AKA "Anonymny"] says: • Website     Show CommentNext New Comment

    America is no longer about legalism. It is about illegalism. The powers-that-be don’t uphold laws. They bend laws any which way they choose to push their agenda.

    Whether it’s Obama or Merkel or Hillary(all puppets of the GLOB), the laws don’t matter.

    We might as well have Rule of Outlaw.

    Read More
  43. @Anonymous
    Time for Civil War/Revolution 2.0 is nearing at increasingly rapid rate

    Doubt it. Every new generation breeds more and more dupes and ant-colony worshipers.

    Read More
  44. Priss Factor [AKA "Anonymny"] says: • Website     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @Discard
    Who cares about Sharia? If it can be used as a stick to attack immigration, use it. By the time that enough Americans have had enough personal exposure to Middle Easterners to know how badly they fit into this country, we'll need a war to get them out. If it takes bullshit to save us from inundation by the 3rd World, so be it.

    Sharia means nothing in the US and nothing to non-Muslims.

    Even if Sharia were to make inroads into parts of America, it will ONLY apply to Muslims, not to non-Muslims.

    What we should really worry about Gayria that forces homomania on all of us. Homomania is not about Tolerance of homos. It is about forcing Compliance and Obedience on all of us. We must bend over to the holy homo.

    There is also Zioria that ways Jews can do pretty much whatever they feel like. Cheat on Wall Street and get bailouts to cheat some more.
    Start wars all over the world and get white Christian soldiers killed and maimed.
    Push sanctions around the world and increase hardships on countless Russians and Iranians. Shower Israel with hosannas and 4 billion in aid every year no matter what it does.

    And there is Negria. Look at Baltimore and BLM. And all those truth-raping ‘hate hoaxes’. Negria means blacks can get away with pretty much any kind of shit. It also means that no matter how much blacks mess up America, Jewish-run Hollywood will feature blacks as holy saints and angels in movies like Selma. And black rage will be presented as so holy and righteous even when murderous toward whites.

    Read More
    • Replies: @dahoit
    Its all Zionist divide and conquer.
    We are all in this together(not meaning cohabitation particularly),blacks and other minorities are to stay,and the only forward is to enforce our Constitution bring back jobs and lift all boats in prosperity.
    I agree totally that our inner cities and segregated communities are terrible breeding grounds for crime,and yes,blacks can be just as,if not more so, ignorant as whites,but with the civilization norms in their communities what the hell do you expect,especially with all that bribery funding preying upon an impoverished community.
    If this major major problem is not addressed(and it certainly has not by neoliberalism,in fact that is a retrograde)by America,our future is bleak.
  45. Priss Factor [AKA "Anonymny"] says: • Website     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @boogerbently
    Untrue.
    Over half the muslims living here are in favor of Sharia law HERE.

    Buggergently, what do you think of Shoahriah or Shoariah?

    That law says the West pay for the Holocaust forever and worships Jews for all eternity.

    Read More
  46. @Stephen R. Diamond

    I am not a Trump supporter, but I would vote for him for the reasons of human survival.
     
    Sounds rather like the Republican who said he would vote for Trump but not endorse him.

    Of course you're a "Trump supporter." I suppose you just mean that you refuse to deify him.

    I am ok with what you say, call me a Trump supporter if you like. Compared with Killary’s and establishment’s garbage avalanche, Trump is a distinctly lesser evil. But there is a lot of ground for pessimism whoever wins. I wrote before that Trump is a prototypical Populist and the Populists have a tendency to change their talk and actions at a blink of an eye. Thus, I understand why Positive Dennis will skip this one to avoid feeling guilty afterwards for voting Trump.

    Read More
  47. @Priss Factor
    https://youtu.be/Bcz16TleLJc?t=23m52s

    People who say "We are at war with RADICAL ISLAM, not with ISLAM" are liars.

    No, the Zio-controlled US is at war with Secular Arab Modernizers. It's not about Islam. Indeed, US has often used radical Muslims against secular Arab/Muslim modernizers.

    Consider the regimes destroyed or destabilized by the Zio-controlled US:

    Afghanistan ruled by secular Soviet-backed regime.

    Iraq ruled by secular modernizer Hussein.

    Libya ruled by secular modernizer Gaddafi.

    Syria ruled by secular western-educated Arab Assad.

    Also, PLO was a secular Arab outfit. If anything, Israel created the radical Islamic Hamas to counter it. Israel also had a hand in creating Hezbollah in Lebanon against secular Arabs.

    US has been working with theocratic Saudis, the main funders of radical Islam.
    US used radical Muslim warlords and terrorists to destroy Libya.
    US used radical Muslims to destroy Syria.
    US has been arming and funding Alqaeda in Syria.
    US has grown esp cozy with Turkey that is becoming less secular and more Islamic.

    So much for US being at war against radical Islam. US has been at war in cooperation with radical Muslims except on the occasion when it led to the blowback of 9/11.
    But notice how Bush II, the puppet of neocons, used that as pretext to wage war on SECULAR ARAB HUSSEIN who had been fighting the likes of Alqaeda and Osama forever.
    Americans are SO DUMB that they cannot tell the difference between secular Arabs and radical Muslims. They are all 'muzzies'. Hussein was no Islamic fundie. If anything, US worked with Islamists to overthrow Hussein. And when Shia regime grew closer and closer to Iran, US turned a blind eye to Sunni radical Muslims to wreak havoc all over Iraq.

    So, US isn't at war with Islam or radical Islam.
    US is at war with modern secular Arab nations hated by Israel.
    Jews prefer backward Muslims such as Saudis who cuck out to the US or Muslims such as ISIS that just create havoc & destroy the modern achievements of secular Arab nations.
    Just look at what radical Muslims did to Libya and Syria and parts of Iraq.
    Surely, Jews were secretly cackling with hideous glee.

    It was Russia that aided secular Syria against ISIS and Alqaeda, whereas US and/or its allies have been funding, arming, or aiding the radical Jihadis at war with Assad and the Christian Arab community.

    So, Islam, radical or moderate, is a secondary issue. It's all smoke and mirrors. The real reason for the mess in the Middle East is that Jews fear and will not tolerated secular and modernizing Arab/Muslim nations.
    After all, the most effective and dogged challenge to Israel always came from secular Arab regimes.

    And in Pakistan, US backed right-wing Zia and radical Muslims against secular modernizers.

    Iran was an anomaly. Shah was a secular modernizer but protected by US and Israel. Why? Because he was such a total running dog of the US. He was such toady that a combination of Iranian Liberals and religious fundies united to overthrow him. But the fundies won cuz there were more of them and they were more impassioned & ruthless.

    Even so, Iranian regime didn't reject science and technology. Much of secular society was left intact as long as it didn't act too defiant of Muslim authority. Iran was a real case of Islam + Modernity in the Muslim world. And that is why Jews used US-led sanctions to utterly destroy its economy. This failed in the end because Iran had the backing of China and Russia. This makes Jews very angry with both great powers.

    The world is made up of so many peoples, but so much of International Crisis is the result of an extreme variation of "But, is it good for the Jews?" Jewish Power has turned psychotic.
    Look at Russia in the 90s. Look at Jewish War on Russia as the New Cold War. Look what Jews did to Ukraine. Look what Jews did to Iraq. Look at Libya and Syria. Look at the 'refugee' crisis triggered off by Jewish-led foreign policy in the Middle East.
    Look how the Iranian economy was hurt real bad by Jews even though Iran has no nukes(whereas Israel has 300 illegal nukes). And all this trouble over North Korea is also about Jews. Jews hate the fact that Norks did business with enemies with Israel. Jews don't care about human rights. They are silent about Palestinians in West Bank and Saudi abuses. And US has become the biggest human rights abuser in its foreign policy, cooking up lies to destroy entire nations through war or sanctions.

    But then, Jews act the same way in the US. So much of US politics, economics, and laws are about "Is it good for the Jews?" Even the homo agenda was cooked up by Jews to serve Jews. Jews wanna end 'hate speech' to snuff all criticism of Jewish power. Jews want to take guns away so Jewish-run state will control all the firepower. Jews in Wall Street could rob us blind and not go to jail but be bailed out to rob some more.

    We need to ask, "Is Jewish Power good for humanity?"

    No, it's been the single most disruptive and destructive force since the end of the Cold War.

    Lebovitzkrieg must end.

    “Surely, Jews were secretly cackling with hideous glee.”

    When I was paying close attention to Israel, say abut 14 years ago, Israel was widely reported to be very surprised that Hamas , which it had helped create…the story goes…was getting out of hand. That they would have been better off with the old Fatah organization was and is the current view.

    This post by Anonymny says that that the rise of radical Islam was cooked up by the jews and the US. I doubt that and I doubt it because it denies the Arabs their own agency, and implies that they are too out of it to have come up with radical Islam by themselves.

    Whatever the Arabs and muzzies are, and they do have an average IQ of about 84, they do not lack elites who are smart enough to do various things, including develop a more militant Islam.

    We are all familiar with the putative Wahabi contribution to the Islamic stew. Are they just jewish stooges? etc, etc.

    Islam has been very contentious for a long time, internally.

    What I bank on is relative stupidity generally. This includes jews and the Black or Whitehouse.

    It is quite a breathtaking announcement to declare that the US and Israel masterminded the Islamic radical revolt, all the better to destroy Arabia. The Failed State model which I think probably informed the PNAC neocon strategy was a good strategy. A failed state model is perfect to realize Israeli hegemony over the middle east, with or without the US permanently in the jewish hip pocket.

    I would think that a neutral observer would comment that an Islamic Front, or Solid Islamic State religion would be more dangerous to Israel than a bunch of failed states. Thus, the apparent surprise of Israel about a dozen years with regard to having helped create a kind of frankenstein in Hamas would seem to ne a more compelling argument today for what radical Islam has become.

    Palestine militants are now more dangerous in Israel than they were. Individuals acting alone are killing Israelies, just as militant Islamic state warriors in the US are doing the same thing to us.
    This is all part of a plan by cackling jews and dumb goyim in Washington?

    Don’t think so. Islam is quite capable of doing this stuff without jewish , and goyem help. Again, they have agency, and are not just useful idiots for jews or anybody else.

    To state the obvious, the jews started this whole mess, 1948, 1967 and many adventures in Arab killing in the 70s and 80s…think Lebanon, as the best example, and on to the beginning current wars against the Arabs, for Israel and certainly not for oil (inasmuch as we had cozy oil deals all along, or Kuiwait…who cares?) However, here we are , with as the cliche goes, an existential problem.

    We need to throw the Arabs and muzzies out of Europe, here, and wherever they show up in our neck of the woods. After that and various other problems with the third world migrants, we need to collar the jews and make them behave. But that will be the last thing on the immediate agenda.

    I am reminded of 9-11-01, the Arabs did it. O they are too stupid to do it, the CIA, etc. did it. Israel did it (that is possible…that they permitted the Arabs to continue their operation).

    Arabs do not lack agency. They can do things, like just about every other ethnic group except maybe Africans who have the lowest IQ in the world at 67.

    The jews suckered us into racial equality folly. They did this to get themselves into the country, and then to destroy White solidarity by setting the Negroes on their Liberation lunacies. They sucker us today, but seem to be losing their momentum. Whites are sick of the whole thing.

    We don’t want to fight wars for Israel, or anybody else. We hate the pols. We know we are getting hammered by Globalism, we know the culture has been damaged by blacks and jews and cosmopolitans…whites, etc, Hollywood, JewTV, Negro Myth, mexer dirt, chinese rapacity….on and on…Trump may be our last chance.

    Joe Webb

    Read More
    • Replies: @Priss Factor
    "This post by Anonymny says that that the rise of radical Islam was cooked up by the jews and the US. I doubt that and I doubt it because it denies the Arabs their own agency, and implies that they are too out of it to have come up with radical Islam by themselves."

    No, I didn't say the USrael created the rads themselves. I said USrael created the conditions that led to a vacuum that came to be filled by the rads.
    If I break the windows and doors of your house, rats and bugs will get in.

    I didn't say Arabs/Muslims lack agency. My point is some Arab or Muslim nations had some modernizing agency, but USrael undermined it by toppling regimes or destabilizing them.

    Iran's republican regime was toppled by CIA under Eisenhower.
    US, along with USSR, facilitated the creation of Israel over Palestine.
    US aided the the rads in Afghanistan the secular regime backed by Moscow.

    Sometimes, US sided with secular Arab regimes when it suited USrael's purpose. US armed Iraq against Iran.
    US bribed Egypt(by forgiving its loan) into joining the coalition against Iraq in the Gulf War.

    The thing is the regimes in Iraq, Syria, and Libya did have secular modernizing agency. That is what USrael didn't like.
    USrael can tolerate Arab or Muslim secular-modernizers ONLY IF they lack agency and follow the US like toadies or dogs. Like the Shah of Iran or Egypt since Sadat. But if they show defiance or independence, they must go.

    Now, Hussein, Assad, and Gadaffi were not allies. If anything, they often despised one another. But they had one thing in common. Sovereignty and defiance of Washington. That national agency was removed when US toppled or weakened the regimes. To do this, US needed to invade or use proxies on the ground, the unwitting moronic radical Muslims and Jihadis. These Jihadis were not created by USrael directly. But many were created by USrael puppets like the Saudis. And they were often armed by the US. Many Syrian tanks were destroyed by bazookas provided by US and its allies.

    "I would think that a neutral observer would comment that an Islamic Front, or Solid Islamic State religion would be more dangerous to Israel than a bunch of failed states."

    Firstly, Iraq, Syria, and Libya were not failed states prior to USrael's intervention. They were not successful states but there had been real achievements and chances for more.
    So, Arabs had agency to create and maintain modern nations even if backward relative to the West and Far East.

    Also, the nation-state is the most viable and effective unit for governance and unity.
    This idea of Solid Islamic Front may be fearsome if it could be realized but it cannot be.
    Paradoxically, the call for pan-Muslim unity only leads to more strife among the Muslims because there are various sects of Islam. Also Hussein had his hands full keeping Shia, sunnis, and Kurds together in Iraq. And Assad had to be watchful in keeping the various groups in Syria together.
    There was too much diversity within the nation itself. Weakening national borders would have meant even more diversity and strife. Islam has never been a strong glue among the 'muzzies' who think more along clan lines. It's like Christianity and even communism failed to unite European nations together. The main guiding light was national or kingdom's interest. Indeed, Catholic nations often sided with Protestants against other Catholic states. And in WWI, Germans sided with Muslim turks against other Christians. In Russo-Japanese war of 1905, Christian Brits favoed Buddhist Jappers against white Christian Russkies.

    Also, because Iraq under Hussein was minority Sunni-dominant and Syria under Assad is Shia-minority-dominant, call to Islam would have led to more sectarian strife as Shia majority in Iraq and Sunni majority in Syria would grow restless.
    So, the best glue for all groups in those nation was modern secular nationalism.
    Pan-Muslim unity has always been a pipe-dream. It's like pretending that all of East Asia can unite under Buddhism.

    Arabs modernized best under secular nation-state model. If not for the intervention of USrael, Iraq would now even have nuclear power(though maybe not nuclear arms). That is what the Jews feared most. So, the objective has been to undermine secular agency in Arab or Muslim nations independent of the US.
    , @MRW

    This post by Anonymny says that that the rise of radical Islam was cooked up by the jews and the US.
     
    Anonymny is correct. You are misinformed. Read The "Green Peril”: Creating the Islamic Fundamentalist Threat byLeon T. Hadar, August 27, 1992, Cato Policy Analysis No. 177, 29 pages.
    Leon T. Hadar, a former bureau chief for the Jerusalem Post, is an adjunct scholar of the Cato Institute.
    http://www.cato.org/pubs/pas/pa-177.html
  48. @Drapetomaniac
    "Why live with Christian bigots."

    Because you're safer - they won't bomb their own country, just everyone else's. For at least a half century the "Christian" US has been the most destructive nation on Earth.

    Christians are no less inhuman than all the other people and they have more opportunities to act badly. And it shows.

    {For at least a half century the “Christian” US has been the most destructive nation on Earth.}

    For half a century, US foreign policy has been infiltrated and highjacked by a foreign virus.
    Leo Straussian, Trotskyite Neoconism: nothing to do with Christian America, or its founding.
    An alien anti-Christian, anti-American virulent disease that has infected the American body politic.

    btw: is Christian Europe also been the most destructive nation on Earth?
    Is that why millions of desperate people risk death to get to Europe and safety?

    btw2: care to guess how many 10s of millions of Christians have Muslims massacred and subjected to genocide? The so-called Muslim lands were originally mostly indigenous Christian. That is until Muslim hordes invaded and wipe them out. The IslamoFascist state of Turkey sits on the bones of millions of murdered indigenous Christians: Armenians, Assyrians, Pontic Greeks. Nomad Muslim invading hordes from East and Central Asia. The same with pretty much all of Middle East: Christian lands, until Muslim invaders massacred the indigenous Christians or forcibly Islamized the ones the savaged did not murder.

    Read More
  49. @Avery
    You are welcome to move to Islamistan and enjoy to joys of Muslim tolerance.
    With all the faults of {“European Christians founded this country: not Muslims from Islamistan So what?}, nobody is forcing you, an IslamoFascist parasite to live in Christandom. You don't like it here? Move to Saudi Arabia, next to your Islamist kin.
    Where is the problem?
    Nobody is forcing youse to stay in US.
    Please go: your IslamoFascist kin await you with sharpened swords.

    “You are welcome to move to Islamistan and enjoy to joys of Muslim tolerance.”

    Funny you should speak of tolerance. Isn’t Christianity the religion of “Love yer neighbor?”

    What do you think JC would have to say about your attitude and the way you express yourself?

    Have you ever read the Gospels? Ol St Paul spent large proportions of his time admonishing his flock to act like Christ and it’s apparent nothing’s changed with today’s so called “Christians”. I have little doubt that most of today’s “Christians” would shout “crucify Him!” if he ever showed His face again. Any wonder why the goyim are held in so much contempt?

    Tolerance? Love? Tsk, tsk.

    PS: Is “Christianity” only for Roman citizens of Middle Eastern descent?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Avery
    {Authorities in the Austrian town of Mistelbach issued a temporary pool ban for refugees following a sexual assault by a “dark-skinned’ man on a 13-year-old girl.}

    https://www.rt.com/news/348273-refugees-austria-sexual-assault/

    Kindly invite your tolerant IslamoFascist kin to your own home, so they can kindly assault members of your own family.

    Tsk. Tsk. Tsk.
  50. Priss Factor [AKA "Anonymny"] says: • Website     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @joe webb
    "Surely, Jews were secretly cackling with hideous glee."

    When I was paying close attention to Israel, say abut 14 years ago, Israel was widely reported to be very surprised that Hamas , which it had helped create...the story goes...was getting out of hand. That they would have been better off with the old Fatah organization was and is the current view.

    This post by Anonymny says that that the rise of radical Islam was cooked up by the jews and the US. I doubt that and I doubt it because it denies the Arabs their own agency, and implies that they are too out of it to have come up with radical Islam by themselves.

    Whatever the Arabs and muzzies are, and they do have an average IQ of about 84, they do not lack elites who are smart enough to do various things, including develop a more militant Islam.

    We are all familiar with the putative Wahabi contribution to the Islamic stew. Are they just jewish stooges? etc, etc.

    Islam has been very contentious for a long time, internally.

    What I bank on is relative stupidity generally. This includes jews and the Black or Whitehouse.

    It is quite a breathtaking announcement to declare that the US and Israel masterminded the Islamic radical revolt, all the better to destroy Arabia. The Failed State model which I think probably informed the PNAC neocon strategy was a good strategy. A failed state model is perfect to realize Israeli hegemony over the middle east, with or without the US permanently in the jewish hip pocket.

    I would think that a neutral observer would comment that an Islamic Front, or Solid Islamic State religion would be more dangerous to Israel than a bunch of failed states. Thus, the apparent surprise of Israel about a dozen years with regard to having helped create a kind of frankenstein in Hamas would seem to ne a more compelling argument today for what radical Islam has become.

    Palestine militants are now more dangerous in Israel than they were. Individuals acting alone are killing Israelies, just as militant Islamic state warriors in the US are doing the same thing to us.
    This is all part of a plan by cackling jews and dumb goyim in Washington?

    Don't think so. Islam is quite capable of doing this stuff without jewish , and goyem help. Again, they have agency, and are not just useful idiots for jews or anybody else.

    To state the obvious, the jews started this whole mess, 1948, 1967 and many adventures in Arab killing in the 70s and 80s...think Lebanon, as the best example, and on to the beginning current wars against the Arabs, for Israel and certainly not for oil (inasmuch as we had cozy oil deals all along, or Kuiwait...who cares?) However, here we are , with as the cliche goes, an existential problem.

    We need to throw the Arabs and muzzies out of Europe, here, and wherever they show up in our neck of the woods. After that and various other problems with the third world migrants, we need to collar the jews and make them behave. But that will be the last thing on the immediate agenda.

    I am reminded of 9-11-01, the Arabs did it. O they are too stupid to do it, the CIA, etc. did it. Israel did it (that is possible...that they permitted the Arabs to continue their operation).

    Arabs do not lack agency. They can do things, like just about every other ethnic group except maybe Africans who have the lowest IQ in the world at 67.

    The jews suckered us into racial equality folly. They did this to get themselves into the country, and then to destroy White solidarity by setting the Negroes on their Liberation lunacies. They sucker us today, but seem to be losing their momentum. Whites are sick of the whole thing.

    We don't want to fight wars for Israel, or anybody else. We hate the pols. We know we are getting hammered by Globalism, we know the culture has been damaged by blacks and jews and cosmopolitans...whites, etc, Hollywood, JewTV, Negro Myth, mexer dirt, chinese rapacity....on and on...Trump may be our last chance.

    Joe Webb

    “This post by Anonymny says that that the rise of radical Islam was cooked up by the jews and the US. I doubt that and I doubt it because it denies the Arabs their own agency, and implies that they are too out of it to have come up with radical Islam by themselves.”

    No, I didn’t say the USrael created the rads themselves. I said USrael created the conditions that led to a vacuum that came to be filled by the rads.
    If I break the windows and doors of your house, rats and bugs will get in.

    I didn’t say Arabs/Muslims lack agency. My point is some Arab or Muslim nations had some modernizing agency, but USrael undermined it by toppling regimes or destabilizing them.

    Iran’s republican regime was toppled by CIA under Eisenhower.
    US, along with USSR, facilitated the creation of Israel over Palestine.
    US aided the the rads in Afghanistan the secular regime backed by Moscow.

    Sometimes, US sided with secular Arab regimes when it suited USrael’s purpose. US armed Iraq against Iran.
    US bribed Egypt(by forgiving its loan) into joining the coalition against Iraq in the Gulf War.

    The thing is the regimes in Iraq, Syria, and Libya did have secular modernizing agency. That is what USrael didn’t like.
    USrael can tolerate Arab or Muslim secular-modernizers ONLY IF they lack agency and follow the US like toadies or dogs. Like the Shah of Iran or Egypt since Sadat. But if they show defiance or independence, they must go.

    Now, Hussein, Assad, and Gadaffi were not allies. If anything, they often despised one another. But they had one thing in common. Sovereignty and defiance of Washington. That national agency was removed when US toppled or weakened the regimes. To do this, US needed to invade or use proxies on the ground, the unwitting moronic radical Muslims and Jihadis. These Jihadis were not created by USrael directly. But many were created by USrael puppets like the Saudis. And they were often armed by the US. Many Syrian tanks were destroyed by bazookas provided by US and its allies.

    “I would think that a neutral observer would comment that an Islamic Front, or Solid Islamic State religion would be more dangerous to Israel than a bunch of failed states.”

    Firstly, Iraq, Syria, and Libya were not failed states prior to USrael’s intervention. They were not successful states but there had been real achievements and chances for more.
    So, Arabs had agency to create and maintain modern nations even if backward relative to the West and Far East.

    Also, the nation-state is the most viable and effective unit for governance and unity.
    This idea of Solid Islamic Front may be fearsome if it could be realized but it cannot be.
    Paradoxically, the call for pan-Muslim unity only leads to more strife among the Muslims because there are various sects of Islam. Also Hussein had his hands full keeping Shia, sunnis, and Kurds together in Iraq. And Assad had to be watchful in keeping the various groups in Syria together.
    There was too much diversity within the nation itself. Weakening national borders would have meant even more diversity and strife. Islam has never been a strong glue among the ‘muzzies’ who think more along clan lines. It’s like Christianity and even communism failed to unite European nations together. The main guiding light was national or kingdom’s interest. Indeed, Catholic nations often sided with Protestants against other Catholic states. And in WWI, Germans sided with Muslim turks against other Christians. In Russo-Japanese war of 1905, Christian Brits favoed Buddhist Jappers against white Christian Russkies.

    Also, because Iraq under Hussein was minority Sunni-dominant and Syria under Assad is Shia-minority-dominant, call to Islam would have led to more sectarian strife as Shia majority in Iraq and Sunni majority in Syria would grow restless.
    So, the best glue for all groups in those nation was modern secular nationalism.
    Pan-Muslim unity has always been a pipe-dream. It’s like pretending that all of East Asia can unite under Buddhism.

    Arabs modernized best under secular nation-state model. If not for the intervention of USrael, Iraq would now even have nuclear power(though maybe not nuclear arms). That is what the Jews feared most. So, the objective has been to undermine secular agency in Arab or Muslim nations independent of the US.

    Read More
  51. @Jacques Sheete
    "European Christians founded this country: not Muslims from Islamistan."

    So what?

    So they obviously didn’t intend for it to be a kind of boarding house for the rest of the world. The “nation of immigrants” bs is a Jewish invention.

    Read More
  52. @Jacques Sheete
    "You are welcome to move to Islamistan and enjoy to joys of Muslim tolerance."


    Funny you should speak of tolerance. Isn't Christianity the religion of "Love yer neighbor?"

    What do you think JC would have to say about your attitude and the way you express yourself?

    Have you ever read the Gospels? Ol St Paul spent large proportions of his time admonishing his flock to act like Christ and it's apparent nothing's changed with today's so called "Christians". I have little doubt that most of today's "Christians" would shout "crucify Him!" if he ever showed His face again. Any wonder why the goyim are held in so much contempt?

    Tolerance? Love? Tsk, tsk.

    PS: Is "Christianity" only for Roman citizens of Middle Eastern descent?

    {Authorities in the Austrian town of Mistelbach issued a temporary pool ban for refugees following a sexual assault by a “dark-skinned’ man on a 13-year-old girl.}

    https://www.rt.com/news/348273-refugees-austria-sexual-assault/

    Kindly invite your tolerant IslamoFascist kin to your own home, so they can kindly assault members of your own family.

    Tsk. Tsk. Tsk.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jacques Sheete
    You hafta be kiddink.

    Not only was JC likely very dark skinned, but what have you to say about the "sexual assaults" waged on white girls by Stalin's mostly white Christian hordes during WW2? and please remember that the "Christian" USA supported the atheist, Christian and Jew murdering Commies during that war.
  53. @Avery
    {Authorities in the Austrian town of Mistelbach issued a temporary pool ban for refugees following a sexual assault by a “dark-skinned’ man on a 13-year-old girl.}

    https://www.rt.com/news/348273-refugees-austria-sexual-assault/

    Kindly invite your tolerant IslamoFascist kin to your own home, so they can kindly assault members of your own family.

    Tsk. Tsk. Tsk.

    You hafta be kiddink.

    Not only was JC likely very dark skinned, but what have you to say about the “sexual assaults” waged on white girls by Stalin’s mostly white Christian hordes during WW2? and please remember that the “Christian” USA supported the atheist, Christian and Jew murdering Commies during that war.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Avery
    You hafta be kiddink.

    {“sexual assaults” waged on white girls by Stalin’s mostly white Christian hordes during WW2?}

    Any proof of the baseless accusation?
    And what were white Nazis doing to white Russian/Slav women: bringing them flowers when they invaded USSR?

    {please remember that the “Christian” USA supported the atheist, Christian and Jew murdering Commies during that war.}

    Please remember that if it weren't for the Red Army - "commies" - not a single Jew would be left alive in Europe. USSR lost ~25 million human beings defeating the Nazi scourge, and saved European Jewry from complete extermination.
    , @Avery
    {...Jew murdering Commies....}

    Another false accusation.

    On the other hand, here is a piece of historical fact: Jewish Bolshevik leaders in Bolshevik Russia murdered millions of Orthodox Christian Slavs, including the entire family of Orthodox Christian Tsar Nicholas II, including his 5 children. Jews were not the only Bolshevik murderers, of course. But they were over-represented in the criminal Bolshevik leadership.
  54. @Jacques Sheete
    You hafta be kiddink.

    Not only was JC likely very dark skinned, but what have you to say about the "sexual assaults" waged on white girls by Stalin's mostly white Christian hordes during WW2? and please remember that the "Christian" USA supported the atheist, Christian and Jew murdering Commies during that war.

    You hafta be kiddink.

    {“sexual assaults” waged on white girls by Stalin’s mostly white Christian hordes during WW2?}

    Any proof of the baseless accusation?
    And what were white Nazis doing to white Russian/Slav women: bringing them flowers when they invaded USSR?

    {please remember that the “Christian” USA supported the atheist, Christian and Jew murdering Commies during that war.}

    Please remember that if it weren’t for the Red Army – “commies” – not a single Jew would be left alive in Europe. USSR lost ~25 million human beings defeating the Nazi scourge, and saved European Jewry from complete extermination.

    Read More
  55. @Jacques Sheete
    You hafta be kiddink.

    Not only was JC likely very dark skinned, but what have you to say about the "sexual assaults" waged on white girls by Stalin's mostly white Christian hordes during WW2? and please remember that the "Christian" USA supported the atheist, Christian and Jew murdering Commies during that war.

    {…Jew murdering Commies….}

    Another false accusation.

    On the other hand, here is a piece of historical fact: Jewish Bolshevik leaders in Bolshevik Russia murdered millions of Orthodox Christian Slavs, including the entire family of Orthodox Christian Tsar Nicholas II, including his 5 children. Jews were not the only Bolshevik murderers, of course. But they were over-represented in the criminal Bolshevik leadership.

    Read More
  56. @MRW
    The first country to acknowledge the United States as a new country was Morocco, a Muslim country.

    Please cite a source for this. In the early days of US History Islamic pirates did regard us as profitable victims of their extortion racket.

    Read More
    • Replies: @dahoit
    Extortion racket?Were the caliphs? ships here or ours there?Paying duties on imported goods is an example of astute business,which our Yankees didn't want to pay.
    It was our first venture into imperialism in the ME.Didn't we burn our ship on the way out?Another stupid exercise in futility.
    Made a hero though,Decatur.
  57. One of the most striking differences between a cat and a lie is that a cat has only nine lives.
    - Pudd’nhead Wilson

    The press has nine lies and nine lives. It’s like a cat and a lie all in one package.

    Brooker discusses how Islam4UK orchestrated their publicity stunt of a march through Wooton Bassett and how filler reports are structured and padded out. How news airtime is filled with hand bags, social disruption (the truth about ASBOs), health reports, animals and analysing the brains response to various scenes from Britain. With guest stars such as Tim Key and Heather Brooke who discussed how Britain’s journalism is based on anonymous sources. Doug Stanhope examines how America’s newscasts portray the news in a different light as the day progresses.

    Brooker explores the often tedious nature of live coverage. Doug Stanhope wonders why the media aggressively solicits the frequently idiotic opinions of the public. “The Week in Bullshit” looks at coverage of the newfound popularity of leeches, ITV’s acceptance of responsibility in the I’m a Celebrity rat-eating incident, and an ITN report about the decline of the practice of eatings dogs in China. Tim Key presents a poem about disgraced MPs. Other segments examine the media’s hysterical coverage of the John Terry affair scandal, the response to the news that four MPs will face criminal charges in the MPs’ Expenses scandal, and a BBC News series following journalist Nick Robinson’s efforts to solicit voters’ opinions. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newswipe

    It is an election year in bullshit.

    Read More
  58. @joe webb
    "Surely, Jews were secretly cackling with hideous glee."

    When I was paying close attention to Israel, say abut 14 years ago, Israel was widely reported to be very surprised that Hamas , which it had helped create...the story goes...was getting out of hand. That they would have been better off with the old Fatah organization was and is the current view.

    This post by Anonymny says that that the rise of radical Islam was cooked up by the jews and the US. I doubt that and I doubt it because it denies the Arabs their own agency, and implies that they are too out of it to have come up with radical Islam by themselves.

    Whatever the Arabs and muzzies are, and they do have an average IQ of about 84, they do not lack elites who are smart enough to do various things, including develop a more militant Islam.

    We are all familiar with the putative Wahabi contribution to the Islamic stew. Are they just jewish stooges? etc, etc.

    Islam has been very contentious for a long time, internally.

    What I bank on is relative stupidity generally. This includes jews and the Black or Whitehouse.

    It is quite a breathtaking announcement to declare that the US and Israel masterminded the Islamic radical revolt, all the better to destroy Arabia. The Failed State model which I think probably informed the PNAC neocon strategy was a good strategy. A failed state model is perfect to realize Israeli hegemony over the middle east, with or without the US permanently in the jewish hip pocket.

    I would think that a neutral observer would comment that an Islamic Front, or Solid Islamic State religion would be more dangerous to Israel than a bunch of failed states. Thus, the apparent surprise of Israel about a dozen years with regard to having helped create a kind of frankenstein in Hamas would seem to ne a more compelling argument today for what radical Islam has become.

    Palestine militants are now more dangerous in Israel than they were. Individuals acting alone are killing Israelies, just as militant Islamic state warriors in the US are doing the same thing to us.
    This is all part of a plan by cackling jews and dumb goyim in Washington?

    Don't think so. Islam is quite capable of doing this stuff without jewish , and goyem help. Again, they have agency, and are not just useful idiots for jews or anybody else.

    To state the obvious, the jews started this whole mess, 1948, 1967 and many adventures in Arab killing in the 70s and 80s...think Lebanon, as the best example, and on to the beginning current wars against the Arabs, for Israel and certainly not for oil (inasmuch as we had cozy oil deals all along, or Kuiwait...who cares?) However, here we are , with as the cliche goes, an existential problem.

    We need to throw the Arabs and muzzies out of Europe, here, and wherever they show up in our neck of the woods. After that and various other problems with the third world migrants, we need to collar the jews and make them behave. But that will be the last thing on the immediate agenda.

    I am reminded of 9-11-01, the Arabs did it. O they are too stupid to do it, the CIA, etc. did it. Israel did it (that is possible...that they permitted the Arabs to continue their operation).

    Arabs do not lack agency. They can do things, like just about every other ethnic group except maybe Africans who have the lowest IQ in the world at 67.

    The jews suckered us into racial equality folly. They did this to get themselves into the country, and then to destroy White solidarity by setting the Negroes on their Liberation lunacies. They sucker us today, but seem to be losing their momentum. Whites are sick of the whole thing.

    We don't want to fight wars for Israel, or anybody else. We hate the pols. We know we are getting hammered by Globalism, we know the culture has been damaged by blacks and jews and cosmopolitans...whites, etc, Hollywood, JewTV, Negro Myth, mexer dirt, chinese rapacity....on and on...Trump may be our last chance.

    Joe Webb

    This post by Anonymny says that that the rise of radical Islam was cooked up by the jews and the US.

    Anonymny is correct. You are misinformed. Read The “Green Peril”: Creating the Islamic Fundamentalist Threat byLeon T. Hadar, August 27, 1992, Cato Policy Analysis No. 177, 29 pages.
    Leon T. Hadar, a former bureau chief for the Jerusalem Post, is an adjunct scholar of the Cato Institute.

    http://www.cato.org/pubs/pas/pa-177.html

    Read More
    • Replies: @joe webb
    well, insanity reigns. I liked the part where the USSR was only a paper tiger to the rest of the west.

    Free Speech however is great in part cuz it allows us to identify the nut cases out there.

    Meanwhile Bang Bang BoomBoom accompanied by winged body parts zip around letting us know that the Isis types are just stooges, manchurian candidates programmed by The West.

    all of this said, if the jews/israel did not exist, and did not do the jewish wars of the last 20 some years, would the chicken still have crossed the road?

    I dunno, but we now got a bit of a problem . JW
  59. @MRW

    This post by Anonymny says that that the rise of radical Islam was cooked up by the jews and the US.
     
    Anonymny is correct. You are misinformed. Read The "Green Peril”: Creating the Islamic Fundamentalist Threat byLeon T. Hadar, August 27, 1992, Cato Policy Analysis No. 177, 29 pages.
    Leon T. Hadar, a former bureau chief for the Jerusalem Post, is an adjunct scholar of the Cato Institute.
    http://www.cato.org/pubs/pas/pa-177.html

    well, insanity reigns. I liked the part where the USSR was only a paper tiger to the rest of the west.

    Free Speech however is great in part cuz it allows us to identify the nut cases out there.

    Meanwhile Bang Bang BoomBoom accompanied by winged body parts zip around letting us know that the Isis types are just stooges, manchurian candidates programmed by The West.

    all of this said, if the jews/israel did not exist, and did not do the jewish wars of the last 20 some years, would the chicken still have crossed the road?

    I dunno, but we now got a bit of a problem . JW

    Read More
  60. If Israel had not conquered Palestine in 1948, etc, that is, if the Nation of Israel that has been around without territory for nearly two millennia had not conquered Palestine, would there have been a resurgence of political Islam?

    I do not know. But there would seem to be a strong case that the post-colonial Arab states could have kept both maximum “secular” tyranny and an Islam which was not particularly political.

    Any analysis of this would have to start around the 60s and Nasserism or Arab Socialism. One of the arguments here is that Arab Socialism failed, and that Islam was embraced as a result. How political that got and why is important. Certainly, the Fall of the Shah and the Iranian Revolution contributed to the rise of political Islam. Also, the West’s goading the Muzzies into fighting the USSR to contain communism had a lot to do with it as well. Afghanistan, a nothing country, like Vietnam…who cares if they went communist? Now we got a much
    bigger problem. Communism was failing and would have failed anyway,but a totally irrational religion never fails as long as True Believers can win something….like killing civilians in terror operations that cannot be stopped in general. Afghani muzzles thought they beat the USSR…! when the only reason they did succeed in throwing the russians out was our bombs, planes, etc.

    After Israel won the 6 day war, they thought that Jehovah had intervened. After the 1973 Yom Kippur War, they almost got beat and would have been beat if it had not been for US resupply 24-7. That sobered up the jews.

    Hopefully, if Isis, gets beaten in ground warfare everywhere, that might demoralize them. As I recall, after the Jihadis left Afghanistan, lots of them went to the Magreb, forget where, and started killing lots of muzzies who then turned on them, and that was the end of it.

    Only when demoralized will they quit. With every successful hit in the West and consequent acquiescence among the Masses who still support them…they will continue. They have to be socially rejected by muzzles to be stopped. As long as they keep up a Good Show, the muzzies, apparently most of them prefer shariah law…then they will continue the party. We could start taking hostages randomly and killing them. That would escalate matters. Want a civil war? Want to do it now while we got the muscle? First, get the supplies ready for at least a year of constant urban warfare.

    A scorched earth warfare policy is otherwise the only alternative. Kill, kill, kill until they are beaten. Beaten means demoralized. Then ship them home.

    As for Israel, remove it from the the Arab territory. That is the only solution.

    When France goes into civil war with the muzzies, I suppose that it can bomb the banlieus since they are somewhat apart from downtown, etc. Lebanon here we come. The French can starts shipping 50 million muzzies home, accompanied by a lot of killing, and general mayhem.

    Thank you Liberals. The liberals will be killed if they support, aid, and abet the muzzles. Otherwise it will be jail for a few years. This will all take about ten years.

    Then it will be Free at Last! Norman Rockwell America, and ditto for France, etc.

    Joe Webb

    Joe Webb

    Read More
  61. @boogerbently
    Untrue.
    Over half the muslims living here are in favor of Sharia law HERE.

    And all the haredim Jews here want Talmudic law(and I think they live by it in their exclusive enclaves.WTF?).So what?
    This whole shebang is about Israeli expansion and (in)security,since 1948.The Arabs didn’t start this,we USzion did.
    Kirkpatrick?Jean?
    Hopefully this apple fell far from that tree.
    Ideologues suck btw.

    Read More
  62. @Carlton Meyer
    Here is an example of a much bigger fish, from my blog:

    Jan 19, 2016 - Objective Journalism

    I remember when newsmen would never attack or endorse politicians. It was considered unprofessional, unethical, and they'd get fired. Today I read:

    "CNN’s Fareed Zakaria on Sunday pilloried Republicans who have continued to dodge the question of whether they can back their party’s presumptive presidential nominee, Donald Trump, arguing that it’s past time to speak out against him...a 70-year-old megalomaniac, whose entire life has been devoted to ceaselessly promoting himself, and using any means to tear down others, would suddenly develop deep empathy for the party, though so far, he has used it solely as a vehicle for his own personal advancement,” Zakaria continued."

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/donald-trump-republicans_us_5766a7e4e4b015db1bc9a3f8?section=

    ____________________________

    No matter what one thinks of Trump, this discredits CNN as a "news" organization. They never mention that Zakaria is a Muslim immigrant. There are hosts who offer political opinions like Bill O'Reilly, but he makes it clear that he's a commentator and not a newsman.

    Zakaria is a quisling suck up to illiberal values.A demoncrat appartchik?.

    Read More
  63. @Rehmat
    YES - Zakaria is an immigrant from India - so were Bill O’Reilly's ancestors from Europe. Though both are committed Zionists - Zakaria did have upper hand over Bill O’Reilly - his wife is Jewish.

    Bill O’Reilly became darling of CNN for hatred towards Muslims while Zakaria got the job at CNN to "modernize" Islam in the image of the Zionist-controlled West.

    Bill O’Reilly, in his 2013 book "Killing Jesus: A History", claims that Mel Gibson was right – Jews did kill Jesus Christ. Naturally, the America's "Guardian" of the Organized Jewry, Abraham Foxman asked O’Reilly to apologize for the antisemitic statement – but O’Reilly refused to go against his Bible as did Rev. Pat Robertson in 2002 for saying that the prophesized "Anti-Christ will be Jewish".

    https://rehmat1.com/2013/10/11/was-jesus-christ-invented/

    I don’t think people historically blame Jews as killers of Christ,although they were the obvious instigators,the Romans carried out the execution.
    Otherwise it would be they and not Judas who be categorized as the bad guy(s)throughout history.
    I think its a false claim,as I believe the fact that Christ was a Jew did far more for their safety than the former accusation hurt them,by far.
    A feel good myth,as wo that connection they might have been wiped out millennia ago.They are people of the book to the Muslims,so it would have been Europeans who would have done the eliminating.
    The Muslims,who protected and helped Jews throughout history are now the fall guys for zion.What a twist.

    Read More
  64. @Priss Factor
    Sharia means nothing in the US and nothing to non-Muslims.

    Even if Sharia were to make inroads into parts of America, it will ONLY apply to Muslims, not to non-Muslims.

    What we should really worry about Gayria that forces homomania on all of us. Homomania is not about Tolerance of homos. It is about forcing Compliance and Obedience on all of us. We must bend over to the holy homo.

    There is also Zioria that ways Jews can do pretty much whatever they feel like. Cheat on Wall Street and get bailouts to cheat some more.
    Start wars all over the world and get white Christian soldiers killed and maimed.
    Push sanctions around the world and increase hardships on countless Russians and Iranians. Shower Israel with hosannas and 4 billion in aid every year no matter what it does.

    And there is Negria. Look at Baltimore and BLM. And all those truth-raping 'hate hoaxes'. Negria means blacks can get away with pretty much any kind of shit. It also means that no matter how much blacks mess up America, Jewish-run Hollywood will feature blacks as holy saints and angels in movies like Selma. And black rage will be presented as so holy and righteous even when murderous toward whites.

    Its all Zionist divide and conquer.
    We are all in this together(not meaning cohabitation particularly),blacks and other minorities are to stay,and the only forward is to enforce our Constitution bring back jobs and lift all boats in prosperity.
    I agree totally that our inner cities and segregated communities are terrible breeding grounds for crime,and yes,blacks can be just as,if not more so, ignorant as whites,but with the civilization norms in their communities what the hell do you expect,especially with all that bribery funding preying upon an impoverished community.
    If this major major problem is not addressed(and it certainly has not by neoliberalism,in fact that is a retrograde)by America,our future is bleak.

    Read More
  65. @Priss Factor
    How does a man become a superhero in this day and age?

    He loses his penis and testicles.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/25/arts/design/in-a-new-comic-a-transgender-superhero-hides-2-identities.html

    Homosexual and women combat troops are a time bomb of anti cohesion for the military.
    Yankee come home,to hell with being the Israeli foreign Legion,guard the borders.

    Read More
  66. @Discard
    Thomas Jefferson was a brilliant but ineffectual dreamer. He died in debt because he couldn't manage his affairs well. He was asked to write the Declaration of Independence because he was a good wordsmith, not because he had the soundest judgement. I pretty much dismiss him as a source of wisdom. After all, he would have been in favor of Moslem immigration. What does that tell you about his lack of good sense?

    An ineffectual dreamer?sheesh,We,the People,in order to rebut your claim,heartily disagree.

    Read More
  67. @Priss Factor
    https://youtu.be/Bcz16TleLJc?t=23m52s

    People who say "We are at war with RADICAL ISLAM, not with ISLAM" are liars.

    No, the Zio-controlled US is at war with Secular Arab Modernizers. It's not about Islam. Indeed, US has often used radical Muslims against secular Arab/Muslim modernizers.

    Consider the regimes destroyed or destabilized by the Zio-controlled US:

    Afghanistan ruled by secular Soviet-backed regime.

    Iraq ruled by secular modernizer Hussein.

    Libya ruled by secular modernizer Gaddafi.

    Syria ruled by secular western-educated Arab Assad.

    Also, PLO was a secular Arab outfit. If anything, Israel created the radical Islamic Hamas to counter it. Israel also had a hand in creating Hezbollah in Lebanon against secular Arabs.

    US has been working with theocratic Saudis, the main funders of radical Islam.
    US used radical Muslim warlords and terrorists to destroy Libya.
    US used radical Muslims to destroy Syria.
    US has been arming and funding Alqaeda in Syria.
    US has grown esp cozy with Turkey that is becoming less secular and more Islamic.

    So much for US being at war against radical Islam. US has been at war in cooperation with radical Muslims except on the occasion when it led to the blowback of 9/11.
    But notice how Bush II, the puppet of neocons, used that as pretext to wage war on SECULAR ARAB HUSSEIN who had been fighting the likes of Alqaeda and Osama forever.
    Americans are SO DUMB that they cannot tell the difference between secular Arabs and radical Muslims. They are all 'muzzies'. Hussein was no Islamic fundie. If anything, US worked with Islamists to overthrow Hussein. And when Shia regime grew closer and closer to Iran, US turned a blind eye to Sunni radical Muslims to wreak havoc all over Iraq.

    So, US isn't at war with Islam or radical Islam.
    US is at war with modern secular Arab nations hated by Israel.
    Jews prefer backward Muslims such as Saudis who cuck out to the US or Muslims such as ISIS that just create havoc & destroy the modern achievements of secular Arab nations.
    Just look at what radical Muslims did to Libya and Syria and parts of Iraq.
    Surely, Jews were secretly cackling with hideous glee.

    It was Russia that aided secular Syria against ISIS and Alqaeda, whereas US and/or its allies have been funding, arming, or aiding the radical Jihadis at war with Assad and the Christian Arab community.

    So, Islam, radical or moderate, is a secondary issue. It's all smoke and mirrors. The real reason for the mess in the Middle East is that Jews fear and will not tolerated secular and modernizing Arab/Muslim nations.
    After all, the most effective and dogged challenge to Israel always came from secular Arab regimes.

    And in Pakistan, US backed right-wing Zia and radical Muslims against secular modernizers.

    Iran was an anomaly. Shah was a secular modernizer but protected by US and Israel. Why? Because he was such a total running dog of the US. He was such toady that a combination of Iranian Liberals and religious fundies united to overthrow him. But the fundies won cuz there were more of them and they were more impassioned & ruthless.

    Even so, Iranian regime didn't reject science and technology. Much of secular society was left intact as long as it didn't act too defiant of Muslim authority. Iran was a real case of Islam + Modernity in the Muslim world. And that is why Jews used US-led sanctions to utterly destroy its economy. This failed in the end because Iran had the backing of China and Russia. This makes Jews very angry with both great powers.

    The world is made up of so many peoples, but so much of International Crisis is the result of an extreme variation of "But, is it good for the Jews?" Jewish Power has turned psychotic.
    Look at Russia in the 90s. Look at Jewish War on Russia as the New Cold War. Look what Jews did to Ukraine. Look what Jews did to Iraq. Look at Libya and Syria. Look at the 'refugee' crisis triggered off by Jewish-led foreign policy in the Middle East.
    Look how the Iranian economy was hurt real bad by Jews even though Iran has no nukes(whereas Israel has 300 illegal nukes). And all this trouble over North Korea is also about Jews. Jews hate the fact that Norks did business with enemies with Israel. Jews don't care about human rights. They are silent about Palestinians in West Bank and Saudi abuses. And US has become the biggest human rights abuser in its foreign policy, cooking up lies to destroy entire nations through war or sanctions.

    But then, Jews act the same way in the US. So much of US politics, economics, and laws are about "Is it good for the Jews?" Even the homo agenda was cooked up by Jews to serve Jews. Jews wanna end 'hate speech' to snuff all criticism of Jewish power. Jews want to take guns away so Jewish-run state will control all the firepower. Jews in Wall Street could rob us blind and not go to jail but be bailed out to rob some more.

    We need to ask, "Is Jewish Power good for humanity?"

    No, it's been the single most disruptive and destructive force since the end of the Cold War.

    Lebovitzkrieg must end.

    Those “secular Arab modernizers” were brilliant specially selected strongmen that our side had put in place to control the Muslim world. GWB was certainly playing on the side of radical Islam, or Islam generally in starting to knock out the pegs of our control in the Muslim world. His successor Obama plays for the same team, but he’s so obvious about it he wears a Muslim ring on his finger.

    Read More
  68. @Discard
    Thomas Jefferson was a brilliant but ineffectual dreamer. He died in debt because he couldn't manage his affairs well. He was asked to write the Declaration of Independence because he was a good wordsmith, not because he had the soundest judgement. I pretty much dismiss him as a source of wisdom. After all, he would have been in favor of Moslem immigration. What does that tell you about his lack of good sense?

    Did he say he was in favor of Muslim immigration? Did he comment on the Barbary Pirates? He had a Koran, but that’s because he wanted to understand things, not that he was a weakling.

    Read More
  69. @Hibernian
    Please cite a source for this. In the early days of US History Islamic pirates did regard us as profitable victims of their extortion racket.

    Extortion racket?Were the caliphs? ships here or ours there?Paying duties on imported goods is an example of astute business,which our Yankees didn’t want to pay.
    It was our first venture into imperialism in the ME.Didn’t we burn our ship on the way out?Another stupid exercise in futility.
    Made a hero though,Decatur.

    Read More
Current Commenter says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS
PastClassics
The major media overlooked Communist spies and Madoff’s fraud. What are they missing today?
The evidence is clear — but often ignored
Which superpower is more threatened by its “extractive elites”?
What Was John McCain's True Wartime Record in Vietnam?
The “war hero” candidate buried information about POWs left behind in Vietnam.