The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Tobias Langdon Archive
A Flat, Gray, Silent World
How PC and Minority-Worship Cripple the Intellect
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

One of the cleverest and strangest books I’ve ever read is Edwin Abbott Abbott’s Flatland, a Victorian fantasy first published in 1884. It’s about what happens when two worlds collide. One is our own three-dimensional world. The other is a literally two-dimensional world called Flatland, where there are only two dimensions to move in: north-south and east-west. There’s no up-down in Flatland, because there’s no third dimension.

They can’t think in 3D

ORDER IT NOW

The inhabitants of Flatland, known as Flatlanders, are living geometric shapes like triangles, squares and circles. They can perceive only in two dimensions and our three-dimensional world is impossible for them to imagine or understand. Flatlanders see a 3D object passing through their world as a series of infinitely thin slices, so to them a cube can look to them like a square or a triangle or even a hexagon, depending on how it’s orientated. And they can’t understand how human fingers, which look to them like a disconnected series of fleshy circles, can be part of a single, undivided hand.

In short, solidity baffles them. Abbott wanted his readers to see that we humans live in a Flatland of our own. After all, if 2D is flat to a 3D being, then 3D will be flat to a 4D being. Flatlanders can’t see or understand three dimensions of space and we can’t see or understand four. But Abbott wasn’t just writing a very clever mathematical fantasy: he was satirizing Victorian politics and culture. For example, the more sides Flatlanders have, the higher their status: triangles are lowly and circles are exalted. And so arbitrary geometry determines one’s position in life.

Forbidden to perceive reality

That’s a liberal idea, of course, but Flatland could easily be updated as a right-wing satire on the modern West. The point of an update would be this: We’re 3D, but we’re forbidden to think in 3D. Instead, we have to inhabit an intellectual Flatland, a flat, gray, silent world of political correctness and minority worship. Abbott’s original Flatlanders had hearing and colour vision, at least. We don’t have those things in our politics. When we look at the world, we have to turn most of our senses off and stop using reason and logic. We’re forbidden to see unity where it really exists, because the High Priests of PC tell us that phenomena like non-White failure and non-White genetics are entirely separate and unrelated. At the same time, we’re commanded to see unity where it doesn’t exist. “There’s Only One Race — the Human Race!” “Gender is a social construct!” “Whites and Non-Whites, Men and Women are entirely interchangeable!”

And some parts of the real world are strictly off-limits to us twenty-first-century Flatlanders in New Flatland. The Scruton affair, which I discussed in “A Philosopher Falls,” is a good example of how important and closely connected facts float off into an inaccessible hyper-realm. In early April 2019 Sir Roger Scruton, whom some call the greatest living conservative philosopher, was sacked from a government committee for the alleged thought-crimes of anti-Semitism, Islamophobia and racism. Scruton himself and his many supporters have continued to bewail the unfairness and injustice of what happened to him. As Scruton wrote in a neo-conservative and highly philo-Semitic magazine called Standpoint: “Heretics like me should not be silenced by mobs.” But Scruton isn’t a genuine heretic or free-thinker, because he’s writing from New Flatland and certain facts go entirely unmentioned in his article. He doesn’t refer to Jews or his own alleged anti-Semitism even once, let alone discuss the Board of Jewish Deputies and its direct role in his sacking. And what about Lord Finkelstein and Tom Tugendhat, two prominent Jewish “Conservatives” who immediately joined the left-wing “mob” and its heresy-hunt?

Censoring censorship

No, Scruton doesn’t say a word about those two. Instead, he muses on the aetiology and epistemology of censorship:

One way to silence argument is by the invention of thought crimes, which are so vaguely defined that anybody can be accused of them. We thereby seal off areas of inquiry with a warning notice, saying “enter at your peril”. In my view the thought crime of Islamophobia, which [George] Eaton [the left-wing journalist who began the heresy-hunt] tries to pin on me (along with the other isms and phobias of our time), has precluded discussion of the most important issue facing European societies today. (“Heretics like me should not be silenced by mobs,” Standpoint, 25th April 2019)

Scruton is wrong. Muslim immigration isn’t the most important issue facing European societies today. In fact, the most important issue is that of Jewish power and its effects. But Scruton himself has “sealed off” that “area of inquiry.” He’s censored his own discussion of censorship. For example, who was behind the “invention of thought crimes”? And what “thought crime” was the forerunner of Islamophobia and the direct model for it? Scruton doesn’t discuss any of that, because the answers don’t fit into New Flatland. However, the then Chief Rabbi Jonathan Sacks was much more honest in 2007, when he described the origins of identity politics and heresy-hunting like this:

Sacks said Britain’s politics had been poisoned by the rise of identity politics, as minorities and aggrieved groups jockeyed first for rights, then for special treatment. The process, he said, began with Jews, before being taken up by blacks, women and gays. He said the effect had been “inexorably divisive.” “A culture of victimhood sets group against group, each claiming that its pain, injury, oppression, humiliation is greater than that of others,” he said. In an interview with the [London] Times, Sacks said he wanted his book to be “politically incorrect in the highest order.” (Sacks: Multiculturalism threatens democracy, The Jerusalem Post, 20th October 2007)

According to Jonathan Sacks, “the process began with Jews.” He’s right and he’s also right that “blacks, women and gays” have followed the Jewish lead. So have Muslims. But heresy-hunting Muslims aren’t merely imitating Jews: they’re working with direct Jewish assistance. The Jewish heresy-hunter Richard Benson, who formerly headed the Community Security Trust (CST), is now working with the Muslim heresy-hunters at Tell MAMA. (MAMA stands for Measuring Anti-Muslim Attacks.)

Trailblazers of heresy-hunting

Fiyaz Mughal of Tell MAMA welcomed Mr Benson’s arrival at his organization with these words: “CST has been the trailblazer in recording hate crime for the Jewish community and has set the benchmark. Richard spent 12 years building CST and his governance, leadership and support will take Tell Mama through its founding stages to a much higher level, and build confidence with the public.” In short, Fiyaz Mughal agrees with Jonathan Sacks that “the process began with Jews.” The Jewish CST have been the “trailblazer” in the invention of thought-crimes and have “set the benchmark” for the hunting-down of heretics like Scruton.

A possible future prime minister: Sajid Javid grovels at CFI
A possible future prime minister: Sajid Javid grovels at CFI

And when Scruton complained that thought-crimes are “so vaguely defined that anybody can be accused of them,” why didn’t he mention the very vague definition of “anti-Semitism” created by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance? It states that “Antisemitism is a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews. Rhetorical and physical manifestations of antisemitism are directed toward Jewish or non-Jewish individuals and/or their property, toward Jewish community institutions and religious facilities.” This definition has been officially adopted by the Conservative party, whose Chairman is a rich Jew called Lord Feldman and whose Chief Executive is another rich Jew called Sir Mick Davis. Ambitious gentile Tories like Sajid Javid and Priti Patel know that they have to grovel long and hard before Conservative Friends of Israel (CFI), which the Jewish Chronicle has described as “the biggest lobbying group in Westminster, holding lunches for 700 guests, making countless Downing Street visits, and developing contacts throughout Israel and the Middle East.”

Who’s a good goy?

The Tory minister who sacked Roger Scruton is called James Brokenshire, which is a perfect name for a traitorous British politician. Bipartisan support for mass immigration has been breaking the shires of England, Scotland and Wales since shortly after World War II. James Brokenshire himself seems to be a gentile lawyer, but he has a Jewish wife and his goy-grovel is impressive even by Tory standards. In the House of Commons he has grovelled thus: “antisemitism has no place in our society — however it evolves, it is still hatred and bigotry — and we should not be afraid to call it out and to champion our Jewish community, which continues to make a towering contribution to our society without reservation. Indeed, Britain would not be what it is without our Jewish friends, neighbours and cousins.” And in a speech at Conservative Friends of Israel, he has grovelled thus: “In my role as Communities Secretary I’ve seen first-hand how important the contribution of the Jewish community across the United Kingdom is. Whether through community housing, providing education or even emergency services such as Hatzola, the Jewish community is a cherished and an essential part of what makes Britain great.”

Grovelling goy James Brokenshire
Grovelling goy James Brokenshire

Brokenshire is praising the “contribution” of Jews to other Jews, not to Britain as a whole. For example, Hatzola or Hatzalah (Hebrew for “rescue”) is an ambulance service staffed by Jews for Jews in places like London and New York (where it was involved in the Crown Heights Riot of 1991 after allegedly helping an injured Jew and ignoring two Black children injured in the same accident). According to James Brokenshire part of what “makes Britain great” is the presence of Jews working exclusively for Jews. Which simultaneously means working against Whites and against Christianity, of course. Brokenshire is a shameless shabbos goy who will grovel before Jews as hard and as often as it takes to maintain his political career. That’s why he sacked Roger Scruton: “A Board of [Jewish] Deputies spokesperson said: ‘As soon as we saw Roger Scruton’s unacceptable comments we contacted the government to make our concerns heard. We are satisfied the right decision has been made to dismiss him.’”

Not a great philosopher

From the perspective of Roger Scruton and his supporters, the Board of Deputies is “satisfied” that a blatant injustice has taken place. The Board of Deputies is also “satisfied” that argument has been silenced by the invention of vaguely defined thought-crimes and that vital areas of inquiry have been sealed off from scrutiny. But Scruton and his supporters don’t breathe a word of criticism against the Board of Deputies (see here, here, here, here and here). And they don’t criticize Lord Finkelstein and Tom Tugendhat as representatives of mainstream Jewish opinion and activism. After all, Scruton and his supporters live in New Flatland, where Jewish power, influence and ideology can’t be discussed or even mentioned.

That’s why I don’t agree that Scruton is a great philosopher or an effective conservative. A great philosopher should be someone who can transcend his own times and proclaim truths that others don’t see or refuse to mention. The truth in the Scruton affair is that he was sacked on Jewish orders in accordance with Jewish ideology. Scruton himself won’t admit this. Nor will he admit that Jews like Lord Finkelstein and the Board of Deputies actually approve of innocent people being condemned and punished for “anti-Semitism.” Voltaire joked that the English “execute an admiral from time to time to encourage the others.” Such behaviour isn’t a joke for Jews: it’s a highly effective political strategy. They punish “anti-Semites” from time to time to frighten anyone who might think of discussing Jewish power.

Jews decide, goyim obey

And from the Jewish perspective, an obviously innocent victim is even better than a supposedly guilty one. Why so? Because the injustice proves that Jews don’t have to obey any rules or follow any logic. Or rather, it proves that they make their own rules and that goyim have to obey. According to an Israeli newspaper, Jews in Britain “overwhelmingly back” the present Conservative government. Obviously, then, they shouldn’t be supporting a subversive, pro-immigration, anti-Christian leftist like George Soros against a right-wing traditionalist like Roger Scruton.

But so-called conservative Jews do support Soros against Scruton, because in fact they are leftist, pro-immigration and anti-Christian just like Soros. Furthermore, by punishing criticism of Soros they are helping to protect their own subversion and corruption. All these things are obvious in the Scruton affair, but only to those who are prepared to use all of their senses and wits. Sir Roger and his supporters aren’t prepared to do that. They live in New Flatland, a flat, gray, silent world where discussion of Jewish power is forbidden. At best, the Scrutopians are doing nothing effective to defend the West. At worst, they’re complicit in what Jews and their imported allies are doing to destroy the West. When the history of the early twenty-first century comes to be written, they will not be its heroes and its heresiarchs but its dupes and its Wormtongues.

(Republished from The Occidental Observer by permission of author or representative)
 
• Category: Ideology • Tags: Britain, Jews, Political Correctness, Roger Scruton 
Hide 55 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Rational says:

    FREEDOM TO THINK IS FREEDOM TO DISLIKE.

    Thanks for the good article, Sir. You make great points.

    We must all realize that NOBODY has a right to tell us what we can or cannot dislike or hate.

    Eg. If you dislike something Judaists do, they don’t have a right to resort to name calling, like calling people anti-semites, etc.

    I have a right to be anti-anything I don’t like. And if I have a logical or moral reason for my distaste, then my right is absolute.

    To those who tell us we cannot be anti this or anti that, or can’t hate this or can’t hate that, I have only one answer—none of your damn business. And if they don’t understand, I would add that, if you go to the bathroom, you are a hater, so if you tell me who I can or cannot hate, then I have a right to tell you you cannot go to the bathroom anymore, as the same is a sign of hate.

  2. Anon[643] • Disclaimer says:

    Eg. If you dislike something Judaists do, they don’t have a right to resort to name calling, like calling people anti-semites, etc.

    In doing that, they make use of their own freedom of expression, don’t they? It’s the same right you claim for you.

    And if I have a logical or moral reason for my distaste, then my right is absolute.

    Who decides where are or are not logical and moral reasons?
    It all distills down to arm wrestling — and who comes on top of the power struggle has the logical and moral reasons with them. Ugly? Probably. But what other way is there?

    • Replies: @Craig Nelsen
  3. Anon[643] • Disclaimer says:

    That’s a liberal idea, of course, but Flatland could easily be updated as a right-wing satire on the modern West.

    All art could be updated as the perspective of those without power when they face those with the power.
    If the power fell upon the right, the right would behave as the left does when power is falling upon it.

    It’d take very little blog reading to be sure of this — if general knowledge about human nature were not enough of an assurance.

  4. “If you shut up truth and bury it under the ground, it will but grow, and gather to itself such explosive power that the day it bursts through it will blow up everything in its way.” Émile Zola

    • Replies: @Franz
  5. You can blame academics for letting go of the standard of academic freedom without a whimper, with the rest of American society following along behind them like wet noodles, but the attempt to “flatten” discourse can’t be blamed on Jews. It is a widespread thing. The article below gets to the core of it. The gratitude gap between past generations of socially mobile citizens and today’s Woke higher-Ed beneficiaries is applicable to poor, white boys of all types, not just the poor Irish lads who got scholarships in past eras, ascending to higher levels of education.

    He should write the mentioned long article on this subject.

    https://www.unz.com/proberts/insights-from-the-cast-iron-shore/

    I don’t see why idealistic Jews were to blame for promoting things like the civil rights legislation since it was needed to end Jim Crow in 1964. The Wokeness stokers of today aren’t needed to advance a just cause that was settled 50 years ago. They’re just using the trendy, “flat,” two-dimensional, PC jargon of their day to suppress the 3-D thoughts of others in the service of advancing their careers or making money. Some Woke Jews do it, but so do a bunch of Woke Christians, Woke Muslims and Woke secular humanists. The thing that unifies them is opportunism. They are a lot like the 2-D flat Earthers, suppressing Galileo’s 3-D ideas or Victorians, keeping thoughts that couldn’t be smashed into two, prim dimensions out of the public discussion.

    • Agree: TKK
    • Replies: @Anon
    , @James Scott
  6. Wally says:

    All of this horrific Jew Supremacist behavior is now enabled by the fake & impossible ‘6M Jews, 5M others & gas chambers’.

    Without the absurd “holocaust” narrative The Usual Enemies of Free Speech are left without their ‘you’re a Nazi’ weapon & shield.

    “Alone the fact that one may not question the Jewish “holocaust” and that Jewish pressure has inflicted laws on democratic societies to prevent questions—while incessant promotion and indoctrination of the same averredly incontestable ‘holocaust’ occur—gives the game away. It proves that it must be a lie. Why else would one not be allowed to question it? Because it might offend the “survivors”? Because it “dishonors the dead”? Hardly sufficient reason to outlaw discussion. No, because the exposure of this leading lie might precipitate questions about so many other lies and cause the whole ramshackle fabrication to crumble.”

    source: Gerard Menuhin / righteous Revisionist Jew, son of famous violinist.
    Taken from his book, Tell the Truth & Shame the Devil, available at: https://shop.codoh.com/book/406

    http://www.codoh.com

  7. Willem says:

    Semites and anti-semites are similar types of thinking people: they believe that they can distinghuish race, therefore they are racists. The only difference between the two is that where one sees a bogeyman in a ‘Jew’, the other sees a chosen one in a ‘Jew’.

    I have never met a semite or anti-semite in my 3D life before. It appears to me that these types of people only exist in the 2D world: the flat screen and paper world of politicians and writers who want to sell ugly messages to gullible audiences.

    The author shows that the anti-holocaust committee cannot define anti-semitism. Which is exactly the point: it cannot be defined as it does not exist. Same apllies to semitism.

    Now to write about things that do not exist, is another dimension, but a dimension that I can happily live without. I would not say that living without insanity (the definition of the believe in things that do not exist) is crippling to the mind. Roger Scruton cannot say this, however. He was sacked by the government ‘after he appeared to repeat antisemitic statements and denied Islamophobia was a problem’ Google learns me. Which is great for Scruton and his followers, who can now talk endlessly about anti-semitism and islamophobia without hitting the real problem in this world: inequality not because of race, but because of class: the problem of the have nots vs the have most (and those who have little must be kept in their cages by for instance selling them myths of chosen men vs bogeymen who are coming to get you!)

    All this talk about semites and anti-semites is nothing else than Andy Kaufman in a wrestling match: it is for entertainment, a show that is being played by proponents and opponents to disguise the real issue that is at play: the robbing of the audience.

    Of course people can get hurt by such insanity. Witches were burnt, wars were fought, people were swindled…

    PS: Israel is a very large American army base that only exists to disrupt surrounding Nation States to prevent them for selling their oil in another currency than the US dollar (the heresy). And Israel vs Palestine is similar to the schizophrenic situation where ‘All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy’

    • Replies: @TKK
  8. Franz says:
    @The ol' gaffer

    “If you shut up truth and bury it under the ground, it will but grow, and gather to itself such explosive power that the day it bursts through it will blow up everything in its way.”

    Émile Zola wrote that when European nations were run by and for their own people… quite a long time ago as it turns out.

    Now nothing ever can “grow and gather to itself” anything but internal anxiety, which is swallowed up and joins the bile inside till whites either slam each other with it or drink it away with the highest octane alcohol available.

    It’s when you find out that there’s a worldwide epidemic of liver failure among whites that you realize it’s the simple truth. Because it’s truth shut off from any chance of achieving all action except self-demolition.

  9. With all due respect, Scruton is a coward. Who tied his tongue? Who prevents him from speaking up against political correctness specifically linked to Jewish issues? Why isn’t Carl Benjamin backing down from his, far more explicit statements? Why doesn’t Scruton grow a pair?

    Recall, you speak of Jews in a general sense, because the orgs in question represent themselves as being “Jewish,” while the majority of real life Jews have nothing whatsoever to do with them. Your choice if you fall for the trope.

    • Replies: @joeshittheragman
    , @Wally
  10. Flatland is an excellent analogy. It is nice to see it used here.

  11. anon[310] • Disclaimer says:

    “There’s Only One Race — the Human Race!” doesn’t originate from the Left; it is part and parcel to the creationist myth in the Bible.

    Acts 17:26 “He made from one man every nation of mankind to live on all the face of the earth.”

    The following two scholars confirm my assessment that radical egalitarianism is a New Testament myth:

    [MORE]

    “In Western societies, the Judeo-Christian image of humankind—whether you are a believer or not—has secured a minimal moral consensus in everyday life. It has been a major factor in social cohesion. Now that the neurosciences have irrevocably dissolved the Judeo-Christian image of a human being as containing an immortal spark of the divine, we are beginning to realize that they have not substituted anything that could hold society together and provide a common ground for shared moral intuitions and values.” (p. 297)

    -Thomas Metzinger, The Ego Tunnel: The Science of the Mind and the Myth of the Self. (Basic Books, 2009)

    “The liberal belief in the free and sacred nature of each individual is a direct legacy of the traditional Christian belief in the free and eternal souls. Without recourse to eternal souls and a Creator God, it becomes embarrassingly difficult for liberals to explain what is so special about individual Sapiens. […] The idea that all humans are equal is a revamped version of the monotheist conviction that all souls are equal before God.” (p. 231)

    -Yuval Harari, Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind. (Harper Collins, 2015)

    • Replies: @Dave Bowman
  12. an obviously innocent victim is even better than a supposedly guilty one

    The woken zombies have learned a new trick–add new “minorities” and forbidden words and thoughts so quickly that a few weeks away from civilization could lead to career-ending “hate speech” on the return. I call it the “insect on windshield” effect–it happens so fast you don’t know what hit you. That is raw power and evil in its pure form.

  13. anon[310] • Disclaimer says:

    “A shameless shabbos goy who will grovel before Jews” is exactly what Jewish Rabbi Jesus demands in Matthew 15:21-28, when he made the Gentile beg like a bitch to a foreign Jewish “Master” for “crumbs” from a dinner table set “only” for Jews.

  14. TKK says:
    @Willem

    All this talk about semites and anti-semites is nothing else than Andy Kaufman in a wrestling match: it is for entertainment, a show that is being played by proponents and opponents to disguise the real issue that is at play: the robbing of the audience.

    Well said!

    I believe a fantastic job was done from start to finish in taking tax dollars from the middle class to bail out the gambling debts of hedge fund degenerates. None went to prison.

    Privatize gains and socialize their losses- then scold the working class for wanting a cup of coffee and a take out. (Chase)

    None of those CEO(s) have any super powers. Who wouldn’t be a success when Obama and Co. to wipe clean billions of debt from reckless gambling- with middle class pensions.

    They should have been executed. A la Saudi style.

  15. Kind of like Orwells 1984, which is what the zionists have turned America into and have turned free speech into Newspeak and have made political correctness into a tool of censorship that is like the tail wagging the dog.

  16. And how is this 2D world being implemented? It started in America with “The Deliberate Dumbing Down Of America”

    • Agree: DESERT FOX
  17. Republic says:

    The Jewish question was openly debated in the late 19th century in both the US and Europe.
    In the 1920s it was discussed by such prominent Americans as Henry Ford,who even
    purchased a newspaper near Detroit and published for several years a weekly series of
    Articles regarding the Jewish Question. It was later made into a book, entitled The International Jew.

    By the 1930s rising Jewish influence in all areas of American life made open discussion Of the JQ more problematical for gentiles.

    In 1941 Charles Lindbergh made a speech in Iowa in which in mentioned the Jews as behind the push for American intervention in the war in Europe. He was immediately ostracized in elite circles.

    By the 1950s any mention of Jewish influence in American life was immediately shut down.
    An example was the banning of the very famous interwar British journalist, Douglas Reed,when his book Far and Wide was first published.

    Today it is unheard of for any any prominent individual to discuss the JQ. To do so would be certain career suicide.

    A short time ago the Canadian clinical psychologist ,Jordan Peterson was asked a question regarding the JQ in a public forum, which can be viewed on You Tube.

    Jordan hesitated for several long seconds and then said “I can’t do it.”

    The former Catholic professor at Notre Dame university, Dr E Michael Jones is a notable exception To the rule about not discussing the JQ.

    There is now a big push in Jewish circles to shut down any debate regarding BDS, The Boycott Divestment and Sanctions issue.

    Florida recently passed a bill making it illegal to criticize the Jews in K-12 schools as well as universities.

  18. eah says:

    Scruton is wrong. Muslim immigration isn’t the most important issue facing European societies today. In fact, the most important issue is that of Jewish power and its effects.

    Perhaps something of a cart, horse question — but re muslims, looking at their higher levels of criminality, as well as their clearly lower average IQ, resulting in poor academic achievement and significantly below average economic contribution (compared to natives), people like Sarrazin would probably disagree with this conclusion — the malevolent influence of Jews and the obsequiousness of Whites before Jews (perhaps another cart, horse question) can be recognized and combatted — but how do you get rid of tens of millions of economically useless muslims with citizenship in an EU country?

    • Replies: @anon
  19. anon[310] • Disclaimer says:

    If the most important issue is that of Jewish power, then can you address the debilitating belief that White men cannot save themselves, and must seek salvation only from the mightily powerful and divinely chosen Jews? “Salvation is from the Jews.” (John 4:22)

  20. Jake says:

    “But heresy-hunting Muslims aren’t merely imitating Jews: they’re working with direct Jewish assistance.”

    Of course they are. They are each Semitic culturally and linguistically and ethnically rather than European culturally and ethnically, and they each are anti-Christ and anti-Christendom and anti-all peoples and national cultures seen as being part of Christendom. Jews and Mohammedans have far more in common than they do in enmity.

    That does not mean that once the white Christian enemy is reduced to beggary that the Mohammedans would not strike to all but exterminate Jews – they will do that if the opportunity presents itself. Just as Jews would ally with Satan himself to force all Arabs to damn themselves as children of a bondwoman who deserve nothing better than being slaves to Jews. But each has the common enemy based on Semitism versus Christ and Christendom. And that is the goal each will pursue as primary until it is accomplished.

    Christian heresy always breeds pro-Semitism, as does the secularization of a culture that had been part of Christendom. That is front and center. It means that you can’t address this problem worth a third of a flip without right theology and its attendant moral philosophy. You can’t fight this culture war successfully based on race or European vernaculars or attempts to revive pagan European religions or Enlightenment ideas or anything part of or produced by the Reformation or Vatican II.

  21. The Tory Party and Cuckservatives are just Zionism toolkits.

    Blame it on another idiotic female Tory leader, Thatcher.

    Unlike past Tory grandees, Maggie was an über Zionist just because of the so-called Holocaust. Her sister Muriel was pen pals with a Jewess from Austria. She advanced the careers of members of the Tribe as in pedo Leon Brittain, his cousin Malcolm Rifkind, as well as Nigel Leibson (Lawson), Edwina Cohen (Currie), Michael Hecht (Howard) and cryptos like David Levita (Cameron). Thatcherism, itself, was sold to Brit simpletons by the Saatchi brothers.

    Today Cuckservative degenerates are even talking of making another crypto Boris Ali Kemal (Johnson) Prime Minister. This is the same Boris who, according to his sister, once worked on an Israeli Kibbutz in the 1980s.

    Labour is no better with Corbyn and Jon Lansman. Blind David Blunkett even fathered a child with the Evil Empire’s Kimberly Solomon while he was minister much like like John Major who was sleeping with Edwina Currie while they were part of Thatcher’s cabinet. Tony Blair is rumored to have been lovers with Peter Mandelson.

    Nothing short of a violent revolution will remedy this mess. That or the Russians etc nuking the place.

  22. anon[310] • Disclaimer says:
    @eah

    How do you get rid of invaders? Become civilized† and human‡ again. Anything short of that will fail.
    _______________________
    † “A Civilization is a dominant community that imposes its beliefs upon all other communities by violence, which must involve the use of genocide; so any community that recoils from inflicting genocide will suffer genocide.” — Philip Atkinson

    ‡ “Genocide is as human as art or prayer.” — John Gray (Professor of European Thought at the London School of Economics and Political Science, ret.)

  23. anon[310] • Disclaimer says:
    @Jake

    Christian heresy always breeds pro-Semitism, say you? I heartily agree. Here’s your heresy:

    • 1 Cor. 5:7 “Christ, our ✡Passover✡ lamb, has been sacrificed.”
    • Philippians 3:3 “For it is we [Christians] who are the ✡Circumcision✡.”

    And here’s your pro-Semitism:

    • Romans 15:27 “For if the Gentiles have shared in the Jews’ spiritual blessings, they owe it to the Jews to share with them their material blessings.”

    Christianity isn’t any more European than Judaism or Islam. All three Abrahamic religions are middle-eastern desert cults. Christianity has been the Trojan Horse that carried invading Jews into Europe.

    P.S. You’re obviously Catholic. Address the Catholic Church’s Jew-worship: “To the Jews ‘belong the sonship, the glory, the covenants, the giving of the law, the worship…’” (Catechism of the Catholic Church)

  24. Anonymous [AKA "Carlos43"] says:

    Things have gone even madder!

    Enter ” NEURODIVERSITY ” apparantly a severly autistic child who is non verbal, sub normal iq, who smeers shit all over himself, with a life expectancy of 36 is meerly “a difference” .

    Attempting to research a treatment or cure is “ableist” highly offensive to those on the opposite more capable end of the spectrum.

    In other words pull the ladder up jack and fuck the rest

    Sadly this view is spreading into the scientific decision makers scared into silence.

    • Replies: @anon
  25. As it happens, the post-classical mechanics view that became dominant shortly after Abbot’s time, is that we do inhabit a 4D world, of course. And it is precisely our 4th dimension as Whites that Jews tirelessly seek to erase by blackwashing our past and sinking our future in a mindless, obese, brown pessimism. As the perceptive see again and again now, the crude early efforts paraphrased by Orwell, the erasures of Yezhovs, have given way to cultural photoshopping that is much fuzzier, but occurs on a much grander scale.

  26. Wally says:
    @AmRusDebate

    said:
    “With all due respect, Scruton is a coward. Who tied his tongue? Who prevents him from speaking up against political correctness specifically linked to Jewish issues? Why isn’t Carl Benjamin backing down from his, far more explicit statements? Why doesn’t Scruton grow a pair?”

    With all due respect, you and so many here are cowards.

    You hypocritically criticize Scruton’s ‘lack of balls’ while, like a lamb being led to slaughter, you avoid the great enabler, the utterly fake & impossible “holocaust”.

    You and others like you haven’t the backbone to admit what you really already know.

    You will never change anything regarding the oppressive, violent nature of Jew Supremacism until you speak up and reject what empowers it, The Big Lie.

    http://www.codoh.com

    • Replies: @anon
  27. anon[310] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anonymous

    That’s the way the Jewish Savior-Rabbi of White Europeans wants it. Who are you to question him? He’s magically all-powerful.

    “So the last shall be first, and the first last.” -Rabbi Jewsus

    “Christianity, sprung from Jewish roots and comprehensible only as a growth on this soil, represents the counter-movement to any morality of breeding, of race, privilege: it is the anti-Aryan religion par excellence. Christianity—the revaluation of all Aryan values, the victory of chandala values, the gospel preached to the poor and base, the general revolt of all the downtrodden, the wretched, the failures, the less favored, against ‘race:’ the undying chandala hatred is disguised as a religion of love.” -Friedrich Nietzsche

  28. anon[310] • Disclaimer says:
    @Wally

    Shoah First! = Big Lie 2. But before the sequel, “The Jew First!” (Romans 1:16) = Big Lie 1. The Jew Testament was the first Jewish-controlled MainStreamMedia storytelling.

  29. @Anon

    It all distills down to arm wrestling — and who comes on top of the power struggle has the logical and moral reasons with them. Ugly? Probably. But what other way is there?

    This is why we so desperately need a religious revolution to revitalize us. Christianity can provide no answer to you, which is why the church is dying along with the West.

    I believe Christianity has failed because it fails to distinguish the moral (i.e., religious) realm from the artistic and scientific realms. Such a distinction has an effect on religious understanding analogous to the impact it had on scientific understanding when humans rejected the teleological view of the physical universe–revolutionary.

    By making the distinction between the religious, artistic, and scientific worlds, one is, in fact, limiting religion to its proper sphere, which is the same thing as saying one is limiting God–anathema to our present religious view and revolutionary.

    From there, all sorts of things begin to happen. The Devil, too, becomes restricted, which means evil is restricted. It becomes clear that evil is restricted to actions only, which means there is no such thing as an evil thought, or evil opinion, or evil emotion. No such thing as “hate speech” (good-bye, SPLC), no such thing as “anti-Semitism” (good-bye, ADL), and the Board of Deputies is defanged.

    Great article.

    • Replies: @anon
  30. Anonymous [AKA "WorldTravler"] says:

    This topic is so amazing. All over the globe it has astounded an ocean of scholars.

    In most places, especially around the Western world of EuroMan, everyone is fearful of discussing the verboten topic. One has seen this in both American and European universities. It’s no secret.

    Even here it’s envogue for connoisseurs of speech freedom -all in fear, to fall back into the sphere of the nom de guerre. Thus, mankind will continue to suffer and in the end perhaps disappear. This is shown by recent WMD Middle East wars and maybe tomorrow’s “Iran is a danger to the USA” indoctrinational success…

    On the Western front’s right you have Shelden Adelson. In the East it was Proshenko. On the left you have America’s Monsieur Soros and in Europe, for one example, Berlin’s Fraulein Merkel. The profit-gain corporatist kleptocracies love infighting within EuroMan’s family.

  31. anon[310] • Disclaimer says:
    @Craig Nelsen

    Christianity has failed? Actually, it succeeded in subverting the White Roman Caesar’s symbol of victory, the cruxiform tropaeum, replaced with a crucified Jewking.

    On the reverse there is an image which makes one think of a crucifixion with Mary and John beneath the cross. It is the defeated Vercingetorix and the mourning Gallia. On the cruxiform tropaeum hang the weapons of Vercingetorix. Both sides of these coins are still found unchanged on medaillons which the Christians sill carry around the neck with the Madonna on the one side and the cross on the other – 48 years before Christ’s birth!

    Jesus Christ = Julius Caesar
    Lecture by Francesco Carotta, 28 November 2002
    http://www.carotta.de/subseite/echo/tumult-e.html


    The fictional Jewish storytelling character Jesus said so himself in Matthew 22:22, Mark 12:16, and Luke 20:24, referring to this coin.

    Note how the Holohoax and the Christ myth are similar: poor Jews suffering under the European Fascists. “Suffered under Pontius Pilate.” Aww. Always blame whitey!

    P.S. I realize that many Chrsitians have tried to adapt Christianity to be more White-friendly and less Jew-friendly, and I appreciate their efforts. But, ultimately, those efforts have failed, and it’s time to admit it.

    • Replies: @Johnny Walker Read
    , @JP
  32. Anon[154] • Disclaimer says:
    @Endgame Napoleon

    Countless things are charged to Jews that could not last one day if the majority of non-Jews didn’t want them to be as they are.
    It must be more comfortable than reckoning with general human nature, I guess.

    • Replies: @Wally
  33. joe webb says:

    Speaking of one-dimensionality, like a flat earth, the Race one-dimensionality…we are all Equal….just one dimension here folks…

    w: AG Barr’s appearance today…Senate Judiciary Comm, is not only the turning point in the Dem Party attempted coup against Trump, but maybe the signal event beginning
    Yahoo
    /


    Sent: Wednesday, May 1, 2019, 11:22:34 PM PDT
    Subject: AG Barr’s appearance today…Senate Judiciary Comm, is not only the turning point in the Dem Party attempted coup against Trump, but maybe the signal event beginning

    the second stage of the coming US Civil War.

    The minority racists in the Dem Party revealed themselves as a bloc, a black/ brown bloc registering both their hatreds of the Trump Administration, and also as the spear-tip of The Revolution of Darkies targeting White people. Impeachment and its “thousand cuts” (per Barr) to subvert the President and American politics, and then to overwhelm the votes of White people thru Border voters…Mexicans..this is the agenda of the Dems.

    Look at the minority racists and their jewish leadership today at the Barr hearing.

    The Jap halfwit bitch Hirono, the darkies Booker and Harris, actually half balck and half wog…whose father was a communist at Stanford Econ Dept….Don Harris, and the Jew Blumenthal…all of these folks hate White America and all have historical grievances besides their race-based hatreds..

    This is what is coming. They are pure unalloyed haters…. Enemies of White people. Add the House jews and muzzies who hate us, and the Jew Sanders, or perhaps better, the Socialist candidate, old and carrying yesteryear’s Red baggage and Fidel/Che’s souvenirs of the Revolution…they are the Third Worlders United against White Folks, the revenge of the masses of Third World blacks, wogs, spics, and abetted by greying white witch-femmy man-hating hags without children… Amazing..

    Meanwhile the counter-attack against the Dem coup plotters is about to begin. Tucker says he does not want to put Billary in jail. Tucker….find another nice story about Israel.

    One dimensionally…Race does not exist…

    Joe Webb

    • Replies: @anon
    , @Sick of Orcs
  34. Che Guava says:

    I like the article and the analogy.

    Have read Flatland.

    Of the several takes on it (and what introduced me to the original), I read and enjoyed The Planiverse, long ago, according to reviews, it has a mystical dimension that I didn’t notice, the mathematics and thought experiments are interesting. It doesn’t have the same social parody element as the Abbott original.

    It does go deeper into the geometrical or topological ideas. For those so inclined and for Tobias, I would recommend also reading it.

  35. anon[310] • Disclaimer says:
    @joe webb

    Good analysis of Fake Americans.

    • Replies: @joe webb
  36. Alden says:

    off topic. There’s a new word for jail bird, criminal, parolee. It’s System-Impacted.

    It’s like 1968 all over again Let all the black and brown criminals free!!

    In other news, a friend was just banned from facebook. I never joined. I talk to friends and relatives on the phone or in person.

  37. Wally says:
    @Anon

    said:
    “Countless things are charged to Jews that could not last one day if the majority of non-Jews didn’t want them to be as they are.”

    Not quite.

    “The majority of non-Jews” simply do not want to suffer the immediate consequences of resistance to Jew unscrupulous behavior, but then will suffer in the long run because they did not resist the opening volley.

    • Agree: DESERT FOX
  38. @anon

    Yes, Christianity was invented by the Roman Caesars of the Flavian dynasty with the help of their house Jew Titus Flavius Josephus, born Yosef ben Matityahu. The story line of Jesus was based on a military campaign by the Roman Caesar Titus Flavius. And yes the second coming Jesus spoke of has already come and gone in 70AD when the Jewish temple was destroyed by the same Titus Flavius.

    • Replies: @anon
  39. anon[110] • Disclaimer says:
    @Johnny Walker Read

    Was the Flavian dynasty as seditious as the Clinton dynasty?

    • Replies: @Johnny Walker Read
  40. Aside from peculiar ideas such as christianity as Roman invention, I found this interpretation of Flatland a bit forced.

    Though as geometrical dynamic representations go, I take it that the 360 dimensional reality was bypassed because they would seen the matter for what it was “poppycock”. Everyone knows that balls are the ultimate superior beings. As demonstrated by their silence. For they knew any discussion about such things would only led to the inevitable circular reasoning, hair splitting, false comparisons, false causations . . .

    Better to just roll on by . . .

  41. @Endgame Napoleon

    Segregation was needed to keep whites safe from black predators. A cursory glance at black crime in the present should be all it takes for this fact to become apparent. How come you can’t see it? Are you blind?

  42. @joe webb

    #IsraelFirstTrump was the TARGET of the coup but still can’t get excited enough to fight back. Secession of some kind coming after 2024, maybe earlier if he loses next year (a real possibility.)

    • Replies: @joe webb
  43. joe webb says:
    @anon

    thanks…we are a nation of immigrants…funny how the latest non and anti-White “immigrants” refuse to assimilate. This is theorized by the Culturist Left as Difference.

    The Melting Pot has been forgotten. No melting for the minority racists.

    If you follow-up on the Melting Pot in a metals metaphor…the alloy of Europeans worked out just fine.

    That was because of Whiteness, etc.

    Pot-metal is the shop term for just throwing all the junk metal into the melting – pot…hence, a lowest grade of metal used for the cheapest type of consumer junk.

  44. joe webb says:
    @Sick of Orcs

    never thought of that. Could be.

    What accounts for the TDS…derangement…? Probably a number of factors.

    The Culturist Left …the last ditch effort to kill us Whites off.

    It is all Culture and nothing else, except Racism!

    How come this argument?

    Several factors. 1, the absolute failure of blacks. 2. the absolute failure of socialism and communism.
    3. the growing failure of Culturist Left arguments of post-Modernism…all the claptrap of Deconstructionism, etc. 4. the ideology of Race Equality (flat Earth again ) which only the elites and the Left hang onto. ( economically, the global nature of capitalism today, needs the race equality ideology to sell its junk. Thank you comrade Marx…ideology as the superstructure for the base..economics…mode of production)

    The Post-Colonialism Left argument still has some traction I guess. This permits Apologetics for Third World Failure.

    IN short, the Left has virtually nothing left in the way of rational arguments. Thus, Hatreds abound.
    Liberals are suckers for anything that can shore up their essentially Left wing Ideas.

    The Barr Derangement Syndrome…will accelerate the Culture War. Culture is the Big Lie of our time. DNA is the fundamental. Race difference , etc.

    Joe Webb

    • Replies: @Sick of Orcs
  45. @James Scott

    Of course he can’t see it, or at least won’t let on to us that he can.

    His own words: “I don’t see why idealistic Jews were to blame for promoting things like the civil rights legislation since it was needed to end Jim Crow in 1964.”

  46. @James Scott

    Of course he can’t see it, or at least won’t let on to us that he can.

    His own words: “I don’t see why idealistic Jews were to blame for promoting things like the civil rights legislation since it was needed to end Jim Crow in 1964.”

  47. @anon

    “There’s Only One Race — the Human Race!” doesn’t originate from the Left; it is part and parcel to the creationist myth in the Bible.

    “There’s Only One Race — the Human Race!” doesn’t originate from the Left; it is part and parcel to the creationist myth in the… ummm… JEWISH Bible.

    Fixed that for you.

    You’re welcome

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  48. @Dave Bowman

    How do you reconcile that with the reality that it was Christians who eventually abolished the slave trade and then slavery?

  49. JP says:
    @anon

    P.S. I realize that many Chrsitians have tried to adapt Christianity to be more White-friendly and less Jew-friendly, and I appreciate their efforts. But, ultimately, those efforts have failed, and it’s time to admit it.

    Martin Luther unintentionally killed it. Before that, when few could actually read the Bible, the priests could make up whatever they wanted, and while it was always self-serving, it at least occasionally promoted good virtues. Do your duty, protect your people, be fruitful and multiply, etc. When Jesus was portrayed as a warrior (to market to war-loving pagans) Christianity inspired them to unite and to defend Europe against the Muslim hordes. But when people could read the words about “turn the other cheek”, the true doctrine came to the fore, and the benefits were soon drowned out by the poison hidden in it. All three Abrahamic religions value submission to the priesthood above all else, even to the point of self destruction.

    To find real virtues, we have to go back to the stories and philosophy that show the true European soul, and translate these to our modern age. The Iliad, the Odyssey, the Norse Sagas, the Niebelungenlied, Aesop’s fables, and Grimm’s Fairy Tales. Sprinkle in some Plato, Aristotle, and Marcus Aurelius, and you’ve got philosophy and moral teachings that are lightyears ahead of anything some desert wanderers could come up with.

  50. polistra says:

    Wanting to survive is not cowardice. Philosophers or thinkers who want to get their message across have to be ALIVE first. If you stay alive and out of actual jail, you can communicate effectively by example or parable. Readers who are ready to learn will learn. Swift did the same thing in a similar position.

  51. @Jake

    Christian heresy always breeds pro-Semitism, as does the secularization of a culture that had been part of Christendom. That is front and center. It means that you can’t address this problem worth a third of a flip without right theology and its attendant moral philosophy. You can’t fight this culture war successfully based on race or European vernaculars or attempts to revive pagan European religions or Enlightenment ideas or anything part of or produced by the Reformation or Vatican II.

    Robert Spencer of jihadwatch who has it completely correct about islam wrote persuasively in his book Did Muhammad Exist? (he answers in effect maybe to the extent Paul Bunyan did but certainly not with the traits attributed) persuades that the Koran was plagiarized from a heretical Christian lectionary originally written in the Syriac language (copied so literally that “koran” is actually the Syriac word for “lectionary”) which was flawed for its failure to express the true Divinity of Jesus.

    Any insight you might be willing to share about the Vatican II flaws that contributed to The Church’s recent failure to protect Jesus sheep from the Jew wolves would be appreciated. This is asked with awareness of the flaws in LUMEN GENTIUM failing to make clear that accepting Jesus as Divine Savoir is necessary for salvation.

  52. @joe webb

    TDS is no more complex than “Orange Man Bad.”

    To date not a single popular leftard voice has suggested toning things down since now that the Wall ain’t happening, time and demographic terrorism will soon turn TX and FL blue.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Tobias Langdon Comments via RSS