The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
U.S. Senate Debate and Front Page Story in the SF Chronicle
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information


Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

For most of the past year, California’s ongoing U.S. Senate race for the seat held by retiring Sen. Barbara Boxer has received virtually no public attention, partly because the lack of the usual millions in television advertising led few people to even realize it was even happening.

More recently, the total focus on the Republican presidential antics of Donald Trump and his opponents had distracted the media and politically-engaged activists from what was anyway considered one of the safest Democratic senate seats in America.

But with the primary election just six weeks away, such lack of coverage is starting to change, especially after Monday night’s first statewide televised debate, featuring both Democrats Kamala Harris and Loretta Sanchez, as well as the three Republican contenders, including myself as a late entry. Harris, the Democratic Party’s officially endorsed choice, has a wide lead in the polls, so the crucial question is whether any Republican can edge past Sanchez to make it to November under California’s new “Top Two” primary system.

The San Francisco Chronicle had been a co-sponsor of the debate, and naturally gave it the most coverage, with a large front-page story running in Tuesday morning’s edition.

Reading it, I was quite pleased with the coverage, since it seemed that my often provocative and unexpected responses received considerably more coverage than the somewhat more cautious or even stilted statements by front-runner Harris and the other candidates.

Obviously, when a Republican candidate praises Bernie Sanders’s suggested crackdown on Wall Street or describes George Bush’s Iraq War as a total disaster for America or says that raising the national minimum wage to $12 per hour would be among his top priorities, such statements are reasonably newsworthy, especially when that Republican leads all the others, if only by a hair. Donald Trump’s unexpectedly successful presidential campaign certainly benefited early on from the same outrageousness in his statements, although their character was somewhat different in nature.

And since ink is one of the scarcest and most valuable political resources in California campaigns not fueled by millions in television ads, I’d think that stories emphasizing my unique positions on popular issues that cross party lines might boost my numbers a little, giving me a stronger platform to further articulate my positions.

As it happened, the particular handful of questions asked and my responses perhaps made me seem much more like a “liberal Republican” than I actually am, but given the strongly liberal skew of the state electorate and the Chronicle’s Bay Area readership in particular, this is not necessarily something that would draw my complaints at this stage.

With five candidates on stage, I doubt that any of us spoke for more than ten or twelve minutes. So for a much longer and more substantive exposition of my views, here’s a link to a 30 minute discussion that ran the same morning on Michael Krasny Forum show, as well as an earlier 20 minute segment on Los Angeles’s Larry Marino Show. The former appeared on KQED, the local PBS affiliate in San Francisco, which has a strongly liberal skew, while the latter runs on Salem Broadcasting, America’s largest Christian conservative network. Despite such a vast ideological chasm, I think both my responses and the reasonably supportive reaction of the hosts seemed rather similar:

Michael Krasny Forum Show, KQED/PBS

Larry Marino Show, Salem Broadcasting

Meanwhile, all this coverage is conveniently made available on my new campaign website

which also provides a detailed summary of my major policy positions

and also now allows online donations to my campaign (but nothing over $99!)


Even Republicans Swing Left in California U.S. Senate Debate
Joe Garofoli, The San Francisco Chronicle, April 26, 2016, Front Page

Most of the candidates running for California’s up-for-grabs U.S. Senate seat were swaying so far to the left during Monday’s televised debate that even the Republicans were talking about raising the minimum wage, the problem of income inequality and how bad George W. Bush’s foreign policy was.“I think we have to crack down on Wall Street, just like Bernie Sanders is saying,” said Republican Ron Unz, who lamented the “oligarchy” of the “financial elite” while complimenting a position of a Democratic candidate for president.That was just one of the unexpected left turns Monday when, in an unusual moment in California politics, two Democrats and three Republicans shared a debate stage. Co-sponsored by The Chronicle, KCRA-TV of Sacramento and the University of the Pacific, the debate on the Stockton campus was one of only two multiparty primary debates scheduled before California’s June 7 primary and the only one to be televised live across the state and streamed digitally. The top two vote-getters in the primary, regardless of party affiliation, will face off in November.


• Category: Ideology • Tags: 2016 Election, California Senate Race 
Hide 2 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. AndrewR says:

    Hate to say it but looks like Harris has the election on lock. She’s got the [relative] good looks, the multiracial background, the femaleness, the endorsement of Obozo and she talks a good game. Her actual beliefs and past actions are, unfortunately, not very relevant in an American election.

  2. MW says:

    “Unz managed to connect immigration to raising the minimum wage.”

    Managed! Managed! As if it isn’t reality which is interconnected, but merely the rhetoric of this oddball on stage.

Current Commenter

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone

 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS
Personal Classics
Are elite university admissions based on meritocracy and diversity as claimed?
The sources of America’s immigration problems—and a possible solution
What Was John McCain's True Wartime Record in Vietnam?
Hundreds of POWs may have been left to die in Vietnam, abandoned by their government—and our media.
Talk TV sensationalists and axe-grinding ideologues have fallen for a myth of immigrant lawlessness.
The major media overlooked Communist spies and Madoff’s fraud. What are they missing today?