The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 TeasersAudacious Epigone Blog
Google Must Do More to Fight Extremism
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Suggested search completions:

From Trends, results for the top four most queried “it’s okay to be X” phrases suggested by Google, and results for one problematic iteration not included among the ten autofill suggestions:

Even though the assertion that being white is “okay”–when it’s obviously genocidal, exploitative, misogynistic, homophobic, Islamophobic, anti-Semitic, bigoted, racist, transphobic, hateful, supremacist, colonialist, murderous, rapacious, nefarious, and emphatically not okay–generates twice as much search volume as the most queried about phrase helpfully suggested by Google does, we can take some comfort in the fact that the company has affirmatively taken steps to frustrate the troubling organic interest in the evil idea that whites are not inherently evil.

These actions do not go nearly far enough, however. Accounts searching for the phrase should be immediately deleted, the incoming IP addresses blocked, a warning message automatically dispatched to all of the searcher’s contacts–detected by way of other personal information the company has collected–that the searcher is likely a dangerous extremist who should be avoided, and the various US intelligence agencies alerted to the threat of the potential domestic terrorist using the company’s services.

 
• Category: Culture/Society • Tags: Parody 
Hide 120 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. 216 says:

    These actions do not go nearly far enough, however. Accounts searching for the phrase should be immediately deleted, the incoming IP addresses blocked, a warning message automatically dispatched to all of the searcher’s contacts–detected by way of other personal information the company has collected–that the searcher is likely a dangerous extremist who should be avoided, and the various US intelligence agencies alerted to the threat of the potential domestic terrorist using the company’s services.

    We laugh today, but this appears to already be law in New Zealand.

    The police state is a mainstay of imperial multiculturalism, needed to reduce societal tensions. Can we fight it? Or should we exploit it for our own needs?

  2. Rational says:

    IT IS NOT OKAY TO SAY THE OPPOSITE OF WHAT YOU MEAN (SARCASM).

    It is common for conservatives to sarcastically use negative terms against themselves that the liberals use.

    It is not a good idea to do so in writing.

    People read in spurts, between cups of coffee and phone calls and will miss that you mean the opposite of what you are literally saying.

    Secondly, our enemics, the libs can cut and paste and broadcast what we said to the world, and “out” us as liberals and make our supporters confused.

    So, in writing, say what you mean, not the opposite.

  3. The right seems incapable of winning the culture.

    It can win politically though, at least some of the time. What we need are codified legal protections–derived from the heritability of beliefs–for political viewpoints. And from that, we need debilitating punitive damages awarded to those on our side who are harassed and persecuted for their beliefs against those harassers and persecutors. Our best chance at this stage is for Nick Sandmann to be awarded an eight-figure settlement, for Vox to be Gawkered over the Youtube smearing, etc.

  4. 216 says:

    O/T

    Wow

  5. 216 says:
    @Audacious Epigone

    I’d add on that certain cultural positions, mainly university professors in humanities/social science must be allocated on ideological quotas, or else abolished in the public sector.

    The nature of middle class striving is to emulate the views of your economic and credentialed superiors. Once the Ivy League converges, everything else follows.

    For ex: The Left got ROTC removed from the Ivy League during the Vietnam War. The GOP attempted several tries to push it back in, but never went to the extent of threatening the tax-exempt endowments or federal research grants. It took repeal of DADT to bring it back, one reason why neocons cheered it on. Implicit in the desire to see it return was the thought that the “conservative” values of the military would make a return to the Ivies.

    • Replies: @L Woods
  6. @Audacious Epigone

    Unless some dramatic shift in cultural values changes i.e the post world war 2 religious explosion, but personally i think we’re on the path similar to England’s 1500s-1800s which isn’t good

    https://journals.openedition.org/chs/737

  7. @216

    Survey data show that the American public was more liberal in 2018 than it has *ever* been before. That means that adults were even more left-leaning than during the social revolutions of the 60s. Pattern suggests more leftward drift until next D pres

    • Replies: @216
  8. 216 says:
    @Oblivionrecurs

    I’ve engaged in wish fulfillment that a Trump re-election could spur a jump-the-gun shift to creating Bluestans on the Left Coast and Northeast.

    The idea of the pendulum is questionable in a time of mass migration. Contra Feryl and Ron Unz by proxy, I see no reason why the Dems will ever minimize anti-white racism; unless the GOP collapses and a DSA party forms to their left. But the DSA party would likely be even more anti-white, continuing the drift.

    Hawaii has been perfectly content with one-party rule largely decided in Dem primaries and backroom deals. A lot of Democrats have no problem with that for the other 49 states.

    One scenario where we get a stable solution. A Dem wins office in 2020, and passes onerous bans on “hate speech”, and either packs the SCOTUS or blackmails Roberts. The economy goes into recession, leading to a populist GOP candidate winning over a DEM/DSA splinter. President Carlson subsequently uses the hate speech laws to emulate PAP governance in Singapore, shutting down the remnants of the Alt-Right, but also any outbreak of SJWs.

  9. Twinkie says:
    @Audacious Epigone

    The right seems incapable of winning the culture.

    It can win politically though, at least some of the time.

    I share your sentiment – I’d like get some wins where we can. However, what is cultural today is political tomorrow, so that strategy delays the inevitable (so to speak, I don’t think it’s inevitable and there are many contingencies).

    How to initiate a cultural renewal? That to me, is the trillion dollar question. One major problem is that the Left controls almost all the major media institutions. Open battles in the mainstream are futile – because we get crushed by a flood of denunciations and demonization.

    I think we need a two-track strategy: 1) build a dedicated and disciplined cadre and 2) goad the enemies into over-action that alienates the ocean in which we swim as fish (to borrow from Mao).

  10. @Audacious Epigone

    Don’t forget VDare’s suit against the mayor of Colorado Springs – Peter Brimelow explains here, along with more recent legal action against Paypal.

    It’s a damn shame we have to fight via the lawyers, A.E., but it’s the next thing before violence, IMO.

  11. Wow, now do”Es ist OK, Deutsch zu sein.”

    • Replies: @Audacious Epigone
  12. @Twinkie

    How to initiate a cultural renewal? That to me, is the trillion dollar question. One major problem is that the Left controls almost all the major media institutions. Open battles in the mainstream are futile – because we get crushed by a flood of denunciations and demonization.

    All that is the establishment, Twinkie. What the alt-right and just real conservatives need to do is to work OUTSIDE the establishment. Unfortunately, they have been dissing or at least disregarding the Libertarians and Constitutionalist for so long, they just have no concept of freedom anymore.

    Parents starting their own schools is the biggest. Everything starts with the kids. It takes imagination that a lot of conservatives and alt-right unz commenter don’t have to imagine what can be done with ZERO government involved.

    A case in point on this is our area-code 216 up in here. You sound like you really get it, 216, until you go on with that Socialism crap. How do you expect the people to solve any cultural problems with heavy-handed government that’s filled with the ctrl-left and is a tool of the ctrl-left to virtually and literally beat the crap out of you?

  13. lhtness says:

    I entered “it’s ok to be whi”, and the top suggestion was: “it’s ok to be white t shirts”. Similar results for using “okay” .

  14. Edit: This is a reply to Achmed.

    “How do you expect the people to solve any cultural problems with heavy-handed government that’s filled with the ctrl-left and is a tool of the ctrl-left to virtually and literally beat the crap out of you?”

    The premise here seems backwards. The better question is “How do you expect the people to solve political problems with a culture comprised of heavy-handed tribal identities all working towards separate interests?

    The answer is “you can’t” obviously. If one believes that politics is downstream from culture, as I do, then arguing over socialism/capitalism before the culture is addressed is putting the wagon before the horse.

    Mild socialism can work – in an acutely homogeneous, high IQ society where the population is committed to a somewhat singular vision for its country.

    Capitalism can also work with similar parameters. But we see that neither work within the parameters of the globohomo agenda.

    Until the demographics within the US and the West are seriously addressed, the policy is inconsequential.

    • Replies: @Achmed E. Newman
  15. I use Google to spell-check words. Searching for the correct spelling of “eminent” I typed in e then m and out popped Emmett Till.

  16. @Achmed E. Newman

    ” … that Socialism crap.”

    By “Socialism crap” do you mean a mixed economy, the Western norm? What do you have to replace it? The magic of the market? I’ve noticed Libertarians tend to be fuzzy when it comes to details, often using the term market religiously; a magic wand to cure all economic ails.

  17. @Twinkie

    “Open battles in the mainstream are futile … ”

    Agreed. But content creators opposed to the often grotesque mainstream culture can use genre to weave counter-narratives that are entertaining and meaningful. And I’m using “content creators” as a generalized term to include writers, illustrators, video game designers, filmmakers, ect.

    • Agree: Audacious Epigone
  18. Meh.

    Nothing matters except immigration. If you retain the white majority, you retain the country. Otherwise, political bickering is inconsequential. Bitching over minor details or policies like abortion is whitey shit. Meanwhile brown Juan and Spanish Carlos have some disagreements but who cares, geeve us your monee gringo!

    The whole “culture wars” are a smokescreen to keep whitey arguing against himself while the immigration flood continues. Who gives a damn about “It’s OKAY to be White”? Close the damn border! And without changing asylum laws, once Drumpf is out of office the USA will receive a flood of aliens that makes Camp des Saints look like a bedtime story.

    The white proles humiliated the establishment once, and it will not happen again.

    • Replies: @Pampasgrass
    , @Rosie
    , @Twinkie
  19. A remediation drone has been dispatched to your location to ensure the impact of this violation is limited to your own Social Credit Score. If POC in the area wish to file a grievance with the drone, and you interfere, law enforcement agents will be dispatched and your Social Credit may be further negatively impacted.

    • Replies: @Mr. Rational
  20. If SJW style identity politics is indeed religious, its targets are sacrifices. Christianity has JC, other religions there own sacrifices or mortifications. You can see this in extreme veganism and the current trend of sacrificing our fertility and children to an ever hungry “god/belief”. Christians dealt with this long ago and some have the Eucharist to appease what is, essentially, guilt. If pushed to it, they will sacrifice whites to appease guilt, or if non-white, as sacrifice for favourable treatment.

  21. @UrbaneFrancoOntarian

    We can do more than one thing at a time and fight on multiple fronts.

    • Replies: @Rosie
  22. @SunBakedSuburb

    We haven’t had a “free” market in a long time. The globalists fight so hard against nationalist/populist ideas because it potentially threatens the globo strangulation of small markets .

  23. Jason Liu says:
    @Audacious Epigone

    The right will always lose to the left at culture wars because right-wingers don’t have the skillset or aptitude to fight verbal/social battles. It’s practically an HBD thing. So what the right needs is a dictatorship to smash in leftists’ doors.

  24. Apparently, it’s not Okay to be English either… in the true white sense.

    UK must import more blacks to UK to make it more vibrant and lively.

    Result:

    In fact, importation of blacks is the WORST thing for any society. America’s biggest mistake was bringing blacks over. UK made the same mistake. BAMMAMA is real. Blacks are more muscular and more aggressive. Let blacks in, and they will emasculate white men and take white women. It will lead to cuckery.

  25. Rosie says:
    @UrbaneFrancoOntarian

    The whole “culture wars” are a smokescreen to keep whitey arguing against himself while the immigration flood continues.

    Culture warriors: family values for brown people.
    Environmentalists: a healthy environment for brown people.
    Lolbertarians:small government, sound money, civil liberties for brown people.
    IQ fetishists: a liveable society for brown (and yellow) people.

    None of it matters. Sadly, I believe this YouTube crackdown is going to aggravate this problem with the White Right. To save their platforms, content creators will retreat into issues they think they can get away with: punching down at women (especially single mothers), coded attacks on “the welfare state,” abortion, etc. The future looks bleak just now.

  26. Twinkie says:
    @Achmed E. Newman

    Parents starting their own schools is the biggest.

    I homeschool.

    Paul Weyrich was right. We lost the culture war. It’s time for, metaphorically, insurgency. That means we build an alternative infrastructure. But that doesn’t mean we should pass up chances to infiltrate the existing infrastructure, just like the Vietcong built the VCI, but still infiltrated the existing government.

    • Agree: Achmed E. Newman
    • Replies: @Achmed E. Newman
  27. @MikeatMikedotMike

    Sorry for the late replies to you and the SunBaked dude, Mike. Just got to it though I read your comment earlier, but damn sure can’t use my phone for this stuff.

    Until the demographics within the US and the West are seriously addressed, the policy is inconsequential

    Firstly, I agree with you, the UFO, and the rest on this one. I also have written before that the 10’s of millions of foreigners that came in over the last 50 years are not Libertarians, don’t understand a bit of those concepts of limited government, and won’t vote for it.

    What I meant is that if you let the central government get big enough to where it does not listen to the people any more (the case in most countries, but not previously in this one), you will have no control of whether it acts in your best interest or not. I’ll have to say, as a current example with China, that sometimes they do. (China has plenty of corruption and I’m sure most people in government care about getting rich off bribes than helping the people – it’s just that they don’t actively HATE their population and want them replaced.)

    One ne could say, that’s all water under the bridge, now, stuff you should have written on your blog during the Johnson/Goldwater election! Yes, but the ideas still are important today, such as in my one example on childhood education. Even 40 years ago most people had a whole lot more control of their children’s schooling, hence the culture they would be immersed in. The US Feral Gov’t involvement was just getting started. People 40 years later have had the bureaucracy around them for so long, they can’t even imagine “hey, let’s just set up our own school, and teach the kids what we want to teach them.”

    In the financial realm and the cultural, often related together, the US Gov’t has been so overbearing that Americans can’t see a better way.

    • Replies: @MikeatMikedotMike
  28. @Twinkie

    I homeschool.

    Any family who homeschool are damn near heroes in my eyes, Twinkie. Peak Stupidity says homeschooling is “poking the Beast in the eye with a big stick” – Part 1, Part 2, and Part 3.

  29. Twinkie says:
    @UrbaneFrancoOntarian

    Nothing matters except immigration.

    So you’d be happy to live in an all-white dystopia where the homosexual and transgender (read mentally ill) boots are stomping on your face and those of your children forever? Where you get disarmed and are re-educated for your conscience and religion?

    I agree immigration restriction is very important – it’s certainly the issue I consider primary these days. But it is not the only thing. Other things certainly matter. (For me, immigration restriction, along with gun rights and religious freedom, form the triad of the most important political issues of the day).

  30. Twinkie says:
    @Rosie

    To save their platforms, content creators will retreat into issues they think they can get away with: punching down at women (especially single mothers), coded attacks on “the welfare state,” abortion, etc. The future looks bleak just now.

    Or perhaps it will be an impetus toward alternative platforms built by a wide-ranging coalition of people who are against opinion monopoly.

    • Replies: @216
  31. Rosie says:
    @Pampasgrass

    We can do more than one thing at a time and fight on multiple fronts.

    I’m not at all certain that’s true. If you bash women, gays, fat people, etc., eventually you simply are not going to be able to muster enough support to do anything about the racial situation.

    Extinction is forever.

  32. @SunBakedSuburb

    I’ve noticed Libertarians tend to be fuzzy when it comes to details, often using the term market religiously; a magic wand to cure all economic ails.

    I think it’s quite the opposite, SBS. Libertarians have quite clear detailed views, though, with these open-borders Reason-magazine Libertards, they can’t see the forest for the trees. They think that these 10’s of millions of newcomers are going to be on-board with the non-aggression principle, the invisible hand, and the evils of FED-created cheap money, when they’ve probably not gotten but 4 subscriptions to their magazine from the last 20,000,000 of them!

    Were you talk to a Libertarian about my specific example, the right to school your children as you see fit, with your money, and NOT SUPPORT OTHER’S KIDS via COERCION, then you’d get more details than you probably need.

    The Socialism crap, in all countries, even in Socialist-beloved-1070’s-Sweden, is always responsible for near-term future ruination of the nation. You can’t make the rules that determine responsibility doesn’t pay and expect people to act responsibly after that. It all goes wrong … in the US, it only has taken 5 decades, because we were that strong a nation, and “There’s a lot of ruin in a nation”. (See also Part 2 and Part 3.)

  33. 216 says:
    @Twinkie

    Demonetizing political content is not a big deal for youtube, the left has foundation money to subsidize their people.

    What we are seeing moves towards is Conservatism Inc subsidizing the growth of Parler, where the banned conservatives will be allowed as long as they aren’t anti-Semitic.

    Ideally, Trump will ditch Twitter rather than use Parler as leverage. Creating this Alt-Lite ghetto is probably a good thing, because it will reduce the incidence of trolling on the mainstream Big Social platforms. Moderates also tend to loath Trumps “juvenile” tweets, so if they no longer see, his favorability could rebound.

    • Replies: @Twinkie
  34. Twinkie says:
    @Achmed E. Newman

    Thanks for the kind words.

    People often query me on why I homeschool. They usually say something like “But the school system is so good here…” or “Why not prep schools?”

    I always answer thusly: “Value-inculcation. God, country, community, family.” (Obviously not so tersely, but you get the gist.)

    I either get, in response, “That’s great.” Or blank stares/deer caught in a headlight look.

    I should note, however, homeschooling is not for every parent or every child. Parents who are not disciplined or get emotional easily should probably stick to “normal” schools.

    • Agree: Johann Ricke
  35. @Achmed E. Newman

    No worries about the reply time, AEN; it’s the weekend. Government overreach is certainly a huge problem, and it began long before the great replacement did. And you’re absolutely right about China.

    I don’t have a problem with the general libertarian ideology, but I am too much of a protectionist, isolationist, and nationalist to get on board with some of the more laissez faire beliefs of the LP.

    Anyway, I’ll say again for the record I’m no fan of socialism, but at the same time it’s important to recognize when a policy can work, given the proper variables. As you suggest the biggest problem with socialism is that it always seems to lead to more and more socialism until before we realize it half of congress are open communists.

  36. @Jason Liu

    2 years ago I would have said that you’re crazy, but now I agree. You wouldn’t try to “own” a pack of rabid dogs with “factz and logik”. Leftists have a similar mindset.

  37. @Amerikaaner

    I’d love to tag this with “LOL” but given how 1984-ish our society has become I have to view it more as a prediction than a warning.

    • Replies: @UrbaneFrancoOntarian
  38. @Twinkie

    So you’d be happy to live in an all-white dystopia where the homosexual and transgender (read mentally ill) boots are stomping on your face and those of your children forever?

    Hate to trot them out again, but that doesn’t sound like a “white” society to me. I agree that many whites now follow that insane ideology, but really they are just the puppets of those with a similar pigment. Get back sane White elites and the white lunatic liberal problem will go away.

    For me, immigration restriction, along with gun rights and religious freedom, form the triad of the most important political issues of the day

    But you misunderstood my point. Without white people, none of that matters because non-whites a) don’t care about religious freedom, and b) don’t care about gun rights. You are somewhat unique in that as a non-white you support these thing. From my understanding, whites generally have a level of abstract thinking that allows them to ponder and support seemingly broad and arbitrary ideas like that.

    But good luck fighting for the 2A when America is 30% white. As I said, the coloured people just don’t give a shit.

    • Replies: @Twinkie
  39. Wrt 2), the ability to gin up social media mobs at a moment’s notice is scary for the unfortunate target(s) but it does make them susceptible to this. Twitter is not reality, nor is it representative of reality.

  40. @216

    On topic for the previous thread re: the contemporary left’s total lack of concern for the well-being of the working class, though.

    • Replies: @iffen
  41. @The Alarmist

    Is there a similar hysterical dynamic with the phrase in Germany?

  42. @Rosie

    Yeah you’re probably right.

    At the same time, though, you have to take what you can get. For instance, in the Evangelical Church. Yeah, I get so much shit from the “alt-right” and leftists. It really is about ‘punching down at women (especially single mothers), coded attacks on “the welfare state,” abortion’ as you said.

    At the same time, it does promote high fertility among whites.

    So it’s kind of like… do you prefer a shitty future where cucked whites live hedonistically and go extinct? Or do you prefer a shitty future where whites have family values, a robust birth rate, and a strong community while existing as a minority? The answer is pretty clear.

    It’s also clear that whites become more conservative as they start living around non-whites. In some cases it’s literally life and death. Becky can’t go out dressed sluttily when Muhammed and Dae’qwan are lurking around the corner. There is now no escaping the diversity. Conservatism + religion = high fertility rate. Also, the non-white fertility rate is plummeting.

    So, I’m kind of at peace with the fact that the WN and alt-right has failed. The best we can do is promote family values for whites, and pump out as many white babies as possible, raising them properly and shielded from (((their))) influence.

    White people are a special race and should be preserved.

    • Replies: @Audacious Epigone
  43. @Mr. Rational

    It’s true. The left loves China and that is their model for the USA. They Loooove the social credit score.

    Trudeau said he “admires China” the most of all countries. An occasion where the mask slipped.

  44. @Rose

    I’m not denigrating any groups. I’m saying that non-whites don’t give a shit about your stupid ideas like the “right” to bear arms or “freedom of speech”. It’s not denigration, simply a statement. Poll after poll has showed this statement to be correct.

    Country without a white majority = country without such alien concepts.

    • Replies: @Rosie
  45. @Jason Liu

    This mostly makes sense to me, though the right has dominated talk radio–a very verbal medium–for a generation. It’s a battleground owned by the right, even with all the government subsidies for NPR.

    • Replies: @LondonBob
  46. @Rosie

    Twitter has a de facto monopoly because it’s mostly interactive–it’s where blue checkmarks do their song and dance with one another and where dirt people are occasionally able to get into it with a blue checkmark.

    There isn’t really a similar dynamic with Youtube, though. Sure, the comments are an element, but they’re not nearly as important as the videos themselves. The technology isn’t that complicated. So I think YT is pervious in a way that Twitter is not. People will follow personalities they like to bit.chute in a way that they won’t to social media sites like Minds or Gab.

    • Replies: @216
    , @LondonBob
  47. @Achmed E. Newman

    It’s a great example of cultural insurgency turning into a real victory. The powers that be hate homeschooling and tried to snuff it out, but more and more people kept demanding for it to be viable and their states capitulated to some extent. Now homeschooling is, for people with the right temperament, quite feasible.

    • Replies: @Rosie
    , @Twinkie
  48. @UrbaneFrancoOntarian

    It’s also clear that whites become more conservative as they start living around non-whites.

    Is that true? I’ve found localized examples of it, but urban whites–and urban America is now majority non-white–skew very heavily Democrat in the US. It’s the rural predominantly white areas that form conservatism’s backbone.

    • Agree: Twinkie
    • Replies: @UrbaneFrancoOntarian
  49. 216 says:
    @Audacious Epigone

    Part of the power of YouTube is in the “recommends”, which adds an autopilot element to watching. Netflix functions in a similar way, which is how the “binge watching” phenomenon started. Ideally we’d ban such techniques as manipulative.

    PrisonPaul has shifted to Telegram, which isn’t designed in the same manner, and isn’t meant for interaction in the ‘viral’ manner. The main problem for the Gab site is the lack of a phone app.

    • Replies: @Mr. Rational
  50. Rosie says:
    @UrbaneFrancoOntarian

    I’m not denigrating any groups.

    I deleted that comment in light of something else that you wrote.

    In any event, I completely understand your point. Denigration is really not the right word. Still, my point stands. White people shouldn’t have to resort to saying anything about non-whites, good, bad, or indifferent, in order to justify our existence. Our existence should go without saying, but here we are nonetheless.

    • Replies: @UrbaneFrancoOntarian
  51. Rosie says:
    @Audacious Epigone

    The powers that be hate homeschooling and tried to snuff it out, but more and more people kept demanding for it to be viable and their states capitulated to some extent. Now homeschooling is, for people with the right temperament, quite feasible.

    And it is tremendously important to keep in mind that there is no explicit right to homeschool in the Constitution. We should avoid denying the existof implied constitutional rights, especially given that we do not control the hostile behemoth in DC.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meyer_v._Nebraska

    • Replies: @Achmed E. Newman
  52. @Audacious Epigone

    That’s because most of the urban whites are high-income, DINK, gentrified, yuppies, homosexuals, or all of the above. They live in all-white enclaves within the black zones. They stick to their zone of 6 blocks by 6 and that’s it. Blacks seem to respect their power and not go after them. These whites feel guilty about themselves so they displace their guilt onto the prole flyover whites.

    Furthermore, the kind of “diversity” I’m talking about isn’t necessarily black vs. white.

    Going out for women is quite unpleasant in Canada now that there has been an influx of Indian and Arab peoples. They mix in better with the whites but are just creeps at the clubs. The stark segregation that occurs between white vs. black isn’t as present.

  53. @Rosie

    I’m not trying to justify the existence of whites. I’m just saying that whites care about government to a degree that others don’t. So if we do not stop the browning, all will be lost, federally anyways.

    In Canada the debate is “carbon tax” vs. “no carbon tax”. For whites. A brown person doesn’t really care about this tiresome back and forth. Their goal is to use whatever legislation is in the cards to screw whites and other competing brown tribes. Carbon tax is fine. No carbon tax is also dandy. Totally different mindsets.

    • Replies: @Anonn
  54. @Jason Liu

    The alt right cant think in moral terms or at least pretend to play the game
    Is incredible that in this site for example there is not a single article portraying bantu genocide, turk displacement of greeks, muslim expansionism , or chinese dosplacement of native tibetans and uighurs ….to dispell the myth of the european black legend and leverage the balance ( not in resentfull terms of course)
    Not a single article portraying marriage in posite terms and how much the womans thenselfs would be much ha8ppier in a traditionalist family .
    Not a single article embracing the pionners that built america , the ones who fought to liberate it from uk and puuting the emphasis in the unbroken linage of euro americans that worked for 400 years to built this country
    Not a single mention of the root of the western world greek and rome myth and phylosophy that would serve us as a compass like stars in the middle of this tormentuous night.

    ……
    Muuuu iq articles

  55. @UrbaneFrancoOntarian

    Kek

    Because the upper middle class white were already infected with the mind poison of liberalism and had grown soft. The jews came along and used these same principles of liberalism to argue there way into the elite. The old upper class whites elite couldn’t stop them or they would look like hypocrites, and they were too cowardly and soft to just put their foot down and stop the takeover.

    In the end they made a devils bargain. They are allowed to keep their money and comfy lives, but they have given up all their power and influence. They hang out in their own isolated circles and virtue signal at their own bullshit charities. Their kids go to thesame private schools.

    In the end they are all cowards. They all parrot moderate political correctness about saving the environment and diversity and other worthless bullshit just so they can be left alone with their comfy lifestyles. They don’t stand for anything and they barely put up a fight against the jewish/leftist takeover of the society their ancestors built.

    I come from an educated middle class family, so I’m not a member of the upper class but I went to private school with many of them and some of my cousins married into their families. Two of my cousins teach at one of their prestigious boarding schools. So, I’ve seen them up close and personal and they are SPINELESS COWARDS

  56. big egos, overly status obsessed i think, mayority of euros today are basically just women and anyone that was hot was very arrogant and degenerate.
    Of course the middle class and lower class is not free of it either middle class playing as the saviour and lower middle class cimenting their ego with muuu iq over ” niggers” and ” sandnigger”
    Not posite nationslism , the mayority that embrace the alt righ hate others more than love their own people

    the white race must be purificated be proud of itself but not faling for this femine vanity atributes

  57. Anonn says:
    @UrbaneFrancoOntarian

    Rosie & you really want White Paganism for inherent white existence but w/e

    Gotta take what you hae.

  58. Twinkie says:
    @UrbaneFrancoOntarian

    Hate to trot them out again, but that doesn’t sound like a “white” society to me.

    That’s because you believe in white exceptionalism.

    Look at the white bastardy rate in the very white West Virginia, which has had almost no inflow of immigrants/nonwhites in the past several decades. And the overall white out-of-wedlock birth rate today is worse than that of blacks in the 1960’s. Even without immigrants and nonwhites, whites can degenerate too if the prevailing culture becomes rotten.

    I live in a very white area. Here the worst left wing political commissar types are just about all whites and, no, they are not Jews. And they are the ones screaming “We are going to take your kids away!” when the National Organization for Marriage holds a peaceful rally.

    Get back sane White elites

    If wishes were horses.

    Without white people

    It is HIGHLY unlikely that whites will disappear in the United States. There is no such thing as “majority minority.” Yes, whites may not be the majority in the future, but they will be the plurality, a very powerful and influential plurality for the foreseeable future. Indeed, whites may increase in percentage as mixed “white-ish” or “beige” people identify politically and culturally as white.

    because non-whites a) don’t care about religious freedom, and b) don’t care about gun rights. You are somewhat unique in that as a non-white you support these thing.

    First of all, I am not all that unique. Sure, yes, in terms of percentages, more whites support these rights than various nonwhite groups do. But though minority as percentages within these groups, there ARE, in absolute terms, millions of nonwhites who support gun rights and religious freedom. To alienate such people purely based on white exceptionalism is foolish and self-defeating.

    But good luck fighting for the 2A when America is 30% white.

    According to Pew, the current projection is that in 2050, American will be 47% white, 29% Hispanic, 13% black, and 9% Asian. And that is a very linear projection contingent on many factors (in reality, long term demographic projections are almost always badly off). As you know, Asian fertility is already lower than that of whites, and even black and Hispanic rates are dropping rapidly. We may never reach that 30% white America you fear.

    I am certainly not suggesting it’s going to be all peaches and cream. Indeed there may be dark days ahead of us. But as I always say, things are rarely as bad as they look at first glance (and they are rarely as good as appear when the going is good either). Doomsterism is defeatism.

  59. Twinkie says:
    @216

    Demonetizing political content is not a big deal for youtube, the left has foundation money to subsidize their people.

    True. On the other hand, rightists don’t have to create something remotely resembling YouTube to be viable. Remember, insurgency doesn’t require parity, only survival.

  60. Twinkie says:
    @UrbaneFrancoOntarian

    That’s because most of the urban whites are high-income, DINK, gentrified, yuppies, homosexuals, or all of the above. They live in all-white enclaves within the black zones. They stick to their zone of 6 blocks by 6 and that’s it. Blacks seem to respect their power and not go after them.

    I don’t know where you live, but this is not reflective of reality in today’s metropolitan America.

    First of all, in most desirable urban areas, there has been a massive exodus of blacks, who are now re-concentrating in the South, regionally-speaking. The traditional model of white part of the town and the black part of the town has all but disappeared outside of the South.

    Most liberal upper middle class whites in such cities now live intermixed with Asians and, to a lesser degree, Hispanics. And to the extent there are ghettos nearby, these are usually peopled by Hispanics who provide service workers (lawn care, cleaners, restaurant workers, etc.). And these urban whites are not turning conservative because of their close contact with nonwhites (mostly Asians and Hispanics) – if anything they are assimilating the Asians and Hispanics into their political ideology.

    Whites who live in close proximity to a large number of blacks do tend to turn “conservative” (and little wonder since blacks bring massive, negative externalities), but such situations are increasingly rarer in successful urban America.

  61. Twinkie says:
    @Audacious Epigone

    It’s a great example of cultural insurgency turning into a real victory.

    Indeed! This is precisely the model of cultural/political insurgency I have in mind. In politics (and in culture wars), higher intensity is often more salient than widespread, but lukewarm support – in other words, a motivated minority can defeat a lethargic majority.

    An example of a victory of this type for our side in recent years is homeschooling and to a lesser degree gun rights. An example of utter defeat for our side is “gay rights.” Just a few years ago, “gay marriage” would have been unthinkable. It was a movement of a tiny fraction of the population. But they had intensity (and, yes, a lot of assists from the Left in general, but those assists would not have been forthcoming without the intensity in the first place) and won.

    • Replies: @Audacious Epigone
  62. @Twinkie

    He’s right. Nothing matters but immigration.

    Ann Coulter has been saying this for a long time.

    TBH, I think we’ve already lost. Trump isn’t going to deport them.

    So, we have between 12 and 30 MILLION illegals that will one day vote Democrat.

    We are totally fucked.

    Non-white births have surpassed white births. Non-white children are more than 50% now if I am not mistaken.
    CA is gone, Texas and Florida turn blue in the next couple of cycles.

    White people are now officially the new Palestinians, they just don’t know it yet.

    I don’t think there are any political solutions to our problems.

  63. @Rosie

    There is nothing preventing the various States from prohibiting homeschooling, but it is easier to change things in your State (excepting California) than in the Feral Gov’t. The Feral Gov’t is constitutionally prevented from controlling homeschooling, and schooling period, by Amendment X, thusly:

    The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

    Of course, this one has been violated for over 100 years with not much out of the mouths of those black-robed would-be Solomons, but in terms of education, since the time of Jimmy Carter.

    • Replies: @Twinkie
    , @midtown
    , @Rosie
    , @Rosie
  64. Twinkie says:
    @Achmed E. Newman

    Of course, this one has been violated for over 100 years

    You can’t count on the 10th Amendment to protect anything. Very regrettably.

    The reason homeschooling is hard to defeat is because it has a powerful, ardent, devoted, and activist constituency. The general public doesn’t care much about it one way or another (it’d be a different story if homeschooled were to demand property tax rebates or something).

    But the homeschoolers certainly care and will bring their entire families and protest outside elected officials who oppose them (helps the kids don’t have to go to school). Who wants to be against kids? It’s one instance where the right uses children and street theater to good political effect.

    If you want to defend something, you have to show up for the fight in the first place. Again, usually intensity* beats money and numbers in political battles.

    *Smart intensity – stupid intensity such as showing up as screaming “God hates fags!” or something like it doesn’t help.

  65. @Robert Dolan

    White people have been hovering above 50% for the past 5 years… every year it drops just a little more.

    Keep in mind that white includes Jews, MENA, and white mothers with a nonwhite father. Soooooo whites are below 50%.

    • Replies: @LondonBob
  66. iffen says:
    @Audacious Epigone

    re: the contemporary left’s total lack of concern for the well-being of the working class, though.

    I think that you got it right. Expressing concern about the working class is considered racist. It is considered code for concern about the white working class.

  67. @Audacious Epigone

    “What we need are codified legal protections–derived from the heritability of beliefs–for political viewpoints.”

    We could call it a “Bill of Rights,” with freedom of speech, premised on venerable Anglo-Saxon individualism and the marketplace of ideas.

    Nah, just kidding. We don’t need “a well-ordered liberty.” We need a well-ordered Diversity!

  68. LondonBob says:
    @Audacious Epigone

    I looked at Gab but seemed like if you want to read stuff on there you need to register, so I didn’t and don’t. Both Richard Baris and Elijah Magnier started posting there but stopped, I think as I couldn’t read it anyway. Such fatal flaws will sink a supposed open platform.

  69. LondonBob says:
    @Audacious Epigone

    Talk radio has very low barriers to entry. As The Passion showed there is a huge untapped market for traditional films and television but no viable alternative network has started. Even the neocon Fox News showed how quickly an alternative could establish itself. I can’t say I know much about the these industries but there is obviously some mechanism there blocking it, like how advertising pressure, shops refusing to stock and distributor boycotts have stopped the ‘wrong’ newspapers or magazines becoming established.

    What we need is a wealthy benefactor. Just imagine if Bill Gates or Jeff Bezos found religion. Some ways I am disappointed in the founder of IKEA, Ingvar Kamprad was in the Swedish far right when he was young but I am not aware of him doing anything to advance the cause once he made his fortune.

  70. LondonBob says:
    @UrbaneFrancoOntarian

    For the over eighties whites are still ninety percent of that cohort, their dying off now will see the over all percentage decline quickly.

    • Replies: @Rosie
  71. midtown says:
    @Achmed E. Newman

    Agreed. The Ninth and Tenth Amendments cover things like homeschooling. On the other hand, nothing in the Constitution gives fedgov the right to be involved in education.

  72. @Rosie

    Extinction is forever.

    “What was once our death will be our resurrection.” – Degrelle

    • Replies: @Audacious Epigone
  73. Yeah, Google Jews must stop working with far-right Israel that murders Palestinians and sponsors terror and interferes in US politics. And Google Jews must stop colluding with the Far-Jew media that control most of the information in the US. Nothing is more extreme than the 2% controlling the information of the 98%.

  74. Mark G. says:
    @Achmed E. Newman

    Conservatives tend to overestimate the power of the left. They widely believed the Soviet Union was a major threat right up until it collapsed. The American left is not any different. Socialism doesn’t work. You can’t have government agents hold a gun to the head of every productive person in the country 24 hours a day forcing them to work and pay taxes. People can modify their behavior and work less and make less money that can be taxed, they can evade taxes, and they can move elsewhere. I’m not advocating tax evasion but it’s going to happen when taxes are confiscatory. Besides defunding the government this way, people can also set up alternative institutions. They can privately teach their children their beliefs at home, practice their religious beliefs privately at home, use the black market if needed to purchase guns and keep them in their home and so on. The fear that Orwell had of an all powerful future repressive government that could constantly watch everyone and enforce its will turned out to unfounded. The Soviet Union failed, Communist China failed and turned to market reforms under Deng, and the left will ultimately fail here.

    • Replies: @Achmed E. Newman
  75. Rosie says:
    @Achmed E. Newman

    There is nothing preventing the various States from prohibiting homeschooling, but it is easier to change things in your State (excepting California) than in the Feral Gov’t.

    Get a grip, Achmed. You know perfectly well the Left has an unlimited war chest for state-level politics that the rubes could never compete with. Thank God for O’connor’s penumbrae.

    • Replies: @Achmed E. Newman
  76. Rosie says:
    @LondonBob

    For the over eighties whites are still ninety percent of that cohort, their dying off now will see the over all percentage decline quickly.

    And Twinkie will be saying, “Move along. Nothing to see here. Let’s talk about abortion….”

    • Replies: @Twinkie
  77. Rosie says:
    @Achmed E. Newman

    There is nothing preventing the various States from prohibiting homeschooling

    Face palm.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incorporation_of_the_Bill_of_Rights#Reverse_incorporation

    • Replies: @Achmed E. Newman
  78. @216

    The main problem for the Gab site is the lack of a phone app.

    Gab HAS phone apps for both Apple and Android.  The problem is getting them past the SJWs who act as gatekeepers for the app stores.

  79. @Rosie

    The incorporation doctrine is for forcing state laws to comply with US Constitution stipulations that specify only limitations on the Federal Government. How can an Amendment that reads like this (I’ll put it again, as one sentence must be too much for you) in bold:

    The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

    Since this Amendment is all about reserving powers to the States and the people, how can in be incorporated, meaning applying this limit to Federal power to State power? How would State laws be “reverse incorporated” either? Did you read the wiki page that you linked me to?

    I would not at all like my State, or any, to prohibit homeschooling, but there’s nothing in the US Constitution to prevent that. The States were to be “experiments in democracy” in the original working, freedom-oriented U.S. that lasted for 150 to arguably 200 years. Were you in law student B.H. Øb☭ma’s study group by any chance, Rosie?

    • Replies: @Rosie
  80. @Rosie

    Maybe you live in California, Rosie. All the bottom-up money in my state is pretty conservative. The top-down money, poured into Senate races and such is from the Globalist ctrl-left, as everywhere. Amendment XVII, on direct election of US Senators, was another big fuck-up done a century ago. It’s almost like there was a pact made back then to destroy the country via legal means, right at a century ago +/- 10 years.

    O’Conner was another black-robed imbecile, just like 75% of them are these days. The Constitution is in plain English. It shouldn’t be so hard for those people to figure it out.

    All that aside, per A.E. here, what really need to happen is people getting off their asses and getting in the faces of the local politicians. That “for the children” bit works well with homeschooling, but the ctrl-left will use it in an Orwellian fashion in reverse too. Per Michelle Malkin (my first post on the matter), they will take one episode of trouble with some homeschool kids/parents and make a big deal out of, while all the usual shootings, drugging of students, and beatings continue unabated – here is Michelle Malkin (direct link).

  81. @Mark G.

    I agree on most of this, Mark. Starting from your beginning, the people that overestimated the USSR economy and power were of 2 stripes:

    1) The hard-core lefties were sticking to their story, that Communism rocked, and nobody starved there (I mean it was in the NY Times, for cryin’ out loud, written by a Pulitzer Prize winner picked by … Communists!)

    2) The MIC folks, on the conservative side, wanted to keep the public worried about the military strength of the USSR (and there WAS a lot to be worried about), and to justify purchasing cool new toys weapons.

    Your dropping out of the system and even getting off the grid talk is on the right track. However, the Orwellian stuff no longer has to involve a competent spy apparatus, such as that in East Germany (the Stasi). As you say, governments are generally incompetent, and the people in the US Feral Gov’t are especially incompetent due to AA and female involvement. That’s good, but the electronics have made one phone and a server the equivalent of a whole squadron of elite Stasi. No one has to analyze the Capitalist Roader’s stool anymore, as he’ll have listed what he ate last night on Facebook, and his camera is probably filming his ass out of his rear jeans pocket as he’s wiping it.

    Peak Stupidity has more in-depth discussion on this in “The New Stasi – same as the Old Stasi?”

    Yes, Mark, there are things people can do at the local level to stay off the system. One addition that your good comment didn’t include is getting the hell off of the TV. It’s one of the easiest and least expensive moves a family can make.

    One more thing is that all of the previous Communist totalitarian (redundant, I know) systems had was an outside force that a) was a beacon of freedom for those who had the means to see it, and b) had military/economic might to fight them. Will China be our savior? Bottom line? NAH. I don’t think they’d truly understand freedom over there if it came up and bit them in the ass, honestly. It’s not in their 5,000 year culture, anywhere.

    Dang, you just put 2 posts into my head – one on Tienanmen Square, and one on the iEspionage with these “smart”phones.

    I like your optimism, Mark, and with millions more like you we’ll get out of this thing in one piece.

    • Agree: RadicalCenter
  82. “I think it’s quite the opposite, SBS. Libertarians have quite clear detailed views, though, with these open-borders Reason-magazine Libertards, they can’t see the forest for the trees.”

    This is a curious comment given that libertarians are generally in favor of open border economic policy. Clear detailed views . . . interesting perspective

  83. Twinkie says:
    @Rosie

    And Twinkie will be saying, “Move along. Nothing to see here. Let’s talk about abortion….”

    If that were true, I wouldn’t be so immigration-restrictionist. You really ought to stop making things up and attributing them to people you dislike. It is dishonest and petty.

    “Only the best people.”

    • Replies: @Rosie
  84. Rosie says:
    @Achmed E. Newman

    I’m sorry, Mr. Newman, but you don’t know what you’re talking about here. The states cannot do anything that the federal government is prevented from doing by the Bill of Rights, including its “penumbrae.” The Tenth Amendment doesn’t change that.

  85. Rosie says:
    @Twinkie

    Spare me. Twinkie, you minimized the urgency of the immigration problem on this very thread, as if were bot already the eleventh hour.

    • Troll: Mr. Rational
    • Replies: @Twinkie
  86. Twinkie says:
    @Rosie

    You:

    you minimized the urgency of the immigration problem

    Me:

    I agree immigration restriction is very important – it’s certainly the issue I consider primary these days. But it is not the only thing. Other things certainly matter. (For me, immigration restriction, along with gun rights and religious freedom, form the triad of the most important political issues of the day).

    If you have a 5th grade level reading comprehension, you understand the distinction I am making between “the most important” or “primary” versus “only.”

    Human beings and societies they build are multi-variate in nature. No one thing is the only thing.

    • Replies: @Rosie
  87. Rosie says:
    @Twinkie

    Twinkie:

    It is HIGHLY unlikely that whites will disappear in the United States. There is no such thing as “majority minority.” Yes, whites may not be the majority in the future, but they will be the plurality, a very powerful and influential plurality for the foreseeable future. Indeed, whites may increase in percentage as mixed “white-ish” or “beige” people identify politically and culturally as white

    In other words, keep ignoring the issue until you’re totally powerless and dispossessed, Whitey!

    Nobody buys your lip service to White self-preservation, Twinkie.

    • Replies: @Rosie
    , @Twinkie
  88. Rosie says:
    @Rosie

    In other words, keep ignoring the issue until you’re totally powerless and dispossessed, Whitey!

    Actually, this is too generous. You don’t actually counsel ignoring the issue, but rather making it worse by refusing marriage and alienating 80% of White people for one reason or another.

  89. @Twinkie

    The only rallies/protests/etc I’ve ever been to in my life (yes, problem identified) have been two Trump rallies. Like so much else with Trump, the experience has been bittersweet. On the one hand, no wonder it scares the culturally-dominant left–if the enormous crush of humanity Trump is able to bring out everywhere he goes was put to good use, we really could enjoy huge gains–but on the other hand, it’s effectively been a sieve.

    • Replies: @Achmed E. Newman
    , @Twinkie
  90. @Robert Dolan

    Though it’s an autistic point, n-H white births still constitute a majority–or at least births to n-H white women do. Only just, though. We are very close to that no longer being the case.

    • Replies: @iffen
  91. @John Burns, Gettysburg Partisan

    There is some advantage in thinking locally here. If you, and each of your descendants, are at or above replacement, you don’t go extinct!

  92. Twinkie says:
    @Rosie

    In other words, keep ignoring the issue until you’re totally powerless and dispossessed, Whitey!

    It’s pathetically sad that is how you interpret what I wrote.

    Nobody buys your lip service to White self-preservation, Twinkie.

    1. Again, you don’t speak for everyone here.

    2. There can’t be any lip service on my part for “white preservation,” since I don’t subscribe to the hysterics and doomsterism of “white extinction.”

    • Replies: @Rosie
  93. @Rosie

    No, no, no! You’ve got the incorporation of rights and limits on government down, even though the incorporation interpretation of the Constitution was done way later. Your problem is with the “cannot do anything” part. Yes, the States were then prevented from violating the rights against abuse by government as specificed in the Bill of Rights*. Before incorporation, there was no restraint on Maryland, as just a random example, having its own state religion. Going further, there was nothing to prevent the State House in N. Carolina from making laws prohibiting certain speech. Read Amendment I – it says “Congress shall make no law … etc., etc.” That’s the US Congress.

    Amendment X is about the POWERS delegated to the Federal Gov’t – not really very many if you read the whole document and don’t read the General Welfare clause, as “fuck it, this is for your own good, so it’s Constitutional”. That means states could and DID** have income taxes before the odious Amendment XVI was ratified. (It wasn’t by long, but that’s probably what gave people the idea they should do this at a Federal level. I’ll give them credit, at least, for doing it the legal way.)

    Along with this thinking, there’s nothing to prevent West Virginia from enacting a poll tax, though Amendment X specifically prevents the US Fed. Government from doing that. The states ran educational institutions for a long time while it was unconstitutional for the Fed.-Gov. to do that. IT STILL IS, by the way, but nobody even pretends to give a crap when they make cabinet departments, Motherland Security being the latest Big example of this.

    At the more insignificant level, until the Feds blackmailed States about it, based on receipt of highway money, States could enact speed limits themselves but the Feds were understood to not, and the age to drink alcohol was understood to be none of the Fed’s business. All this is based on Amendment X, perhaps the most abused of the Bill of Rights, with many other contenders.

    If I have time after writing a blog post, I will present to you a summary of Peak Stupidity’s proposed Amendment 28, with the right way to do taxes, based on State sovereignty. If you reload, it will come.

    .

    * With all of this, I only mean if the thing were followed, which is just a laugh nowadays.

    ** Wisconsin and Mississippi.

    • Agree: Audacious Epigone
  94. @Audacious Epigone

    I went to one myself. If Trump were any kind of leader, he would lay the hell off of the politics directed against him, and use the bully pulpit, something he’s really good at, to get Americans to get things done for him. Instead of complaining that judges blocked this or that, use those tweets for a freakin’ reason – “Hey Americans in California district XX, Judge ABC must be impeached. To help me get this done, there must be 2,000 people at the courthouse in XYZ City staying day and night protesting this man.”

    etc,
    etc,

    For every step the ctrl-left, D’s and Cuck-R’s make, he should get Americans to counter by rallying wherever will work to stop said step. It’s not like Americans don’t want to help.

    • Agree: Audacious Epigone
  95. Rosie says:
    @Twinkie

    2. There can’t be any lip service on my part for “white preservation,” since I don’t subscribe to the hysterics and doomsterism of “white extinction.”

    Well-known laws of ecology = hysterics and doomsterism.

    https://www.sciencedaily.com/terms/competitive_exclusion_principle.htm

    • Replies: @Twinkie
  96. “There is some advantage in thinking locally here. If you, and each of your descendants, are at or above replacement, you don’t go extinct!”

    No. But they can reduce the influence via immigration, especially by reducing employment opportnuties.

  97. “complaining that judges blocked this or that, use those tweets for a freakin’ reason – “Hey Americans in California district XX, Judge ABC must be impeached. To help me get this done, there must be 2,000 people at the courthouse in XYZ City staying day and night protesting this man.”

    Then you don’t mean impeach, you mean protest.

  98. Twinkie says:
    @Rosie

    https://www.sciencedaily.com/terms/competitive_exclusion_principle.htm

    You really should read things you cite. Various races aren’t separate species. We can interbreed. That alone prevents extinction. Also, humans can cooperate and enlarge the pie unlike animals that simply consumes what nature provides.

    Read a book once in a while and lay off the pop science.

  99. @Rosie

    Proposed Amendment 28 would repeal Amendment XVI as of the date of signing. All money collected by the Federal Government other than as tariffs on imported goods, would be provided by the various States, in amounts proportional the each State’s population as determined by the most recent census.

    Of course, the States could raise the money as they see fit, which they do now for state spending. If this Amendment were passed, the States would regain the rights they have lost over the last century. The state legislators would become VIPs again, as they’d determine, for whatever big sum of money must be ponied up to Fed-Gov, how it would be raised. In addition, the US Senators would become very beholden to their states again, as the population of each would be on their asses to keep their taxes low by voting down any spending that is not strictly necessary.

    The census (think illegal aliens here) would be taken with neither an incentive to inflate, nor and incentive to deflate the numbers. Low numbers would mean less money due but also less representation, as it is today.

    People may argue that the rich states, say Connecticut over Mississippi, would have an advantage, because the population has more money per capita. I don’t see a problem though, as the Mississippi Senators and congresscritters would be very attuned to any wasted money in the Federal budget and more likely to vote down spending due to pressure from the state legislators who’d have to explain any raises in taxes or new types of taxes to their local voters.

    .

    That’s the Peak Stupidity proposal, and just for you, Rosie, NO CHARGE!

  100. Twinkie says:
    @Audacious Epigone

    Trump rallies… bittersweet.

    That’s because elected officials will let you down sooner or later. That’s the nature of such creatures. What works in politics is not personalities, however inspiring or popular. The currency of politics is pressure.

    An elected official taking the wrong line is going to start seeing the light when his office is inundated with irate constituent mails and phone calls and angry protesters our outside his office. Most elected officials are not that brave or principled. They are in “show business for ugly people” (i.e. politics) and have the self-concern and insecurity of an actress.

    A more productive use of your time is mobilizing for issues – immigration, gun rights, religious freedom, abortion, homeschooling, etc. Pick one. Or pick three. And show up.

  101. Rosie says:
    @Twinkie

    Twinkie:

    Whites are a powerless majority with no ability whatsoever to influence public policy, but never fear. Someday, Whites will be a “a very powerful and influential plurality.”

    Lol!

    • Replies: @Twinkie
  102. iffen says:
    @Audacious Epigone

    n-H white births still constitute a majority

    Yes, but take a poll of your commentariat and see what % they believe are the “right kind” of whites.

    • Replies: @Twinkie
  103. Twinkie says:
    @Rosie

    Whites are a powerless majority with no ability whatsoever to influence public policy,

    Stop projecting yourself as “whites.”

    • Replies: @Rosie
  104. Rosie says:
    @Twinkie

    Stop projecting yourself as “whites.”

    Tried and failed.

    • Replies: @Twinkie
  105. Twinkie says:
    @Rosie

    You just don’t seem to realize that the vast majority of whites don’t share your deluded visions of whites behaving more like blacks or the white version of Pakistan.

  106. Twinkie says:
    @iffen

    commentariat

    I’m afraid we – you and I included – are not very representative of the general public, white or otherwise.

    • Replies: @iffen
  107. iffen says:
    @Twinkie

    I’m afraid we – you and I included – are not very representative of the general public, white or otherwise.

    Very true, however, I think that we might be representative of the segment that believes something is terrible wrong with the direction in which our country and society is headed.

    • Replies: @Mr. Rational
    , @Twinkie
  108. @iffen

    I so hate it when I used my hourly “Agree” only 19 minutes ago.  I miss the days of the browser-side opinion timer.

  109. Twinkie says:
    @iffen

    Very true, however, I think that we might be representative of the segment that believes something is terrible wrong with the direction in which our country and society is headed.

    I agree. That’s why I am here, despite my wife’s constant reminder that I am “wasting time arguing with morons.”

    The sad thing is that the disgruntled people here and others like us probably share about 90% common opinions and goals (e.g. immigration restriction, traditional morality, non-intervention, America-first economic policies, etc.) and could be much more effective and useful if united. But unfortunately purity-spiraling reigns and creates more silly squabbles than any semblance of effective, coherent action.

    • Replies: @iffen
    , @Rosie
  110. iffen says:
    @Twinkie

    But unfortunately purity-spiraling reigns and creates more silly squabbles than any semblance of effective, coherent action.

    I suppose that you are talking about the comment sections as well as RL.

    When choosing up sides the most important criterion is making sure your side has an advantage. I used to tell my friends in the wildflower society that they should reconsider their opinions about hunting. I told them that we need the hunters on our side because even combined with them we were still a small segment of the populace that gives a flip about what happens to the natural world.

    • Agree: Mr. Rational
  111. Rosie says:
    @Twinkie

    The sad thing is that the disgruntled people here and others like us probably share about 90% common opinions and goals (e.g. immigration restriction, traditional morality, non-intervention, America-first economic policies, etc.) and could be much more effective and useful if united. But unfortunately purity-spiraling reigns and creates more silly squabbles than any semblance of effective, coherent action.

    I have no interest in uniting with you, Twinkie. We already tried color blind civic nationalism, and it failed. The problem with you is that you repel White people who don’t meet your various criteria for a worthwhile human being, and you therefore are a liability.

    • Replies: @iffen
    , @Twinkie
    , @Twinkie
  112. iffen says:
    @Rosie

    We already tried color blind civic nationalism, and it failed.

    It is failing; It has not yet failed.

  113. Twinkie says:
    @Rosie

    I have no interest in uniting with you, Twinkie.

    I wasn’t referring to you. I was talking to iffen. I may disagree with him on somethings. He may have animosity toward me online and can’t control his temper, but I suspect that upon reflection in real life, he won’t disqualify my children as peers and citizens because of their genetics. At least, he claims so.

    You on the other hand… are a deranged, hysterical woman who wants Pakistan with white people. I don’t mean you harm, but you seek to harm me, because we disagree. You invent straw men to portray me as an enemy, because you can’t stand a nonwhite person coming off as more accomplished and intelligent than you do and because the existence of person like me demolishes your priors.

    Like I said, good luck with all that.

    The sad thing about you as a human being is that, if I were to see that your children are about be be harmed by some criminal on the street, I’d risk harm to myself to intervene to help, while you would just say “Fuck him and his kind. They aren’t white” and move on if you saw my kids being attacked. You like to portray yourself as a Christian, but you don’t even know the first thing about what Christ preached. Good Samaritan you are not.

    • Replies: @iffen
  114. Twinkie says:
    @iffen

    It is failing; It has not yet failed.

    Agreed! And nothing is inevitable.

    The problem with people like Rosie is that they want it to fail, because they don’t like what they have now – all under the guise of caring for other people or the whole country. Anyone who’s been to war and have seen civil strife, instead of getting fat complaining about not having a maid, wouldn’t be so callous about advocating for things like a white ethno-state, which would require much bloodshed and horrors to achieve, if at all.

    I’ve been to all over the world. Contrary to what Rosie thinks, people who want to kill Americans aren’t going to let me off the decapitation train because I’m not white. If you have ever been a part of the American expatriate community overseas, you know instantly that the shared citizenship means so very much when under threat (or even in mildly stressful times).

  115. Twinkie says:
    @Rosie

    you repel White people

    Speak for yourself.

    people who don’t meet your various criteria for a worthwhile human being

    Dont project. I’m not the one with the eliminationist philosophy and rhetoric.

  116. iffen says:
    @Twinkie

    He may have animosity toward me online and can’t control his temper

    Peas in a pod.

  117. @Twinkie

    Species vs race is a distinction without a difference, a white race which has been completely mixed with negroids is extinct. If every surviving polar bear interbreeds with Grizzlies then there are no more polar bears, to pretend otherwise is just perverting the meaning of the term. We are who we are, and our existence as a distinct people is valuable in and of itself, and wanting to preserve that doesn’t imply animus towards non-whites (who often aren’t charitable toward these efforts, given the convenient fact that their own people almost never face the same existential risks in their homelands).

    But ultimately the question of “what % white is white?” will be academic, given that if the lunatics running the globo-homo asylum have their way then we’ll be lucky if the black super-majorities of Eurafrica and North Afrimerica tolerate functioning sub-communities of whites or hu-whites at all.

    I don’t think it will come to that because in the end sanity must prevail, but I really hate this line of argument from non-whites. It’s easy to shrug your shoulders and say that white Europeans being bred out of existence is no big deal when your people aren’t facing that risk. And worse is an appeal to them being in mixed relationships themselves; this still certainly does not provide a reciprocity since personal and group risks aren’t identical, and ethnic self-concern doesn’t end with sleeping with someone of a different race (just look at the derb, or better yet the many rabidly anti-white negroes who lust after white women).

    Fwiw I usually quite enjoy your contributions, and I would even try to save your kids if I saw them attacked on the street (as I would anybody, and I suspect Rosie would too if she didn’t freeze up because she’s of the fairer sex). That said, this line of thought I just can’t stand.

    • Replies: @Twinkie
  118. @iffen

    If the building is engulfed in flame, the sprinklers have failed to contain it. Just because it hasn’t yet burned to the ground doesn’t make their failure incomplete.

  119. Twinkie says:
    @Athletic and Whitesplosive

    Species vs race is a distinction without a difference

    That’s scientifically untrue. Species generally can’t breed and produce non-sterile heirs.

    non-whites

    The biggest human difference, genetically, is that between sub-Saharan Africans and others.

    I have (genetic) news for you – “whites” are a hybrid population of varying mixtures of at least four major population groups: Eurasian hunter-gatherers, Anatolian farmers, steppe pastoralists, and Siberians. And those proportions have been in flux over the millennia. (By the way, East Asians are also hybrids, roughly 1/3 Siberians and 2/3 Southeast Asian farmers.)

    If you take a long view of human groups, changing intermixtures are inevitable given migrations and, yes, war.

    That doesn’t mean all intermixtures or all quantities of mixtures are the same or equally adaptive to civilizations. But it does mean that obsession with a faulty construct of purity is both counter-factual and unhealthy.

    white Europeans being bred out of existence is no big deal when your people aren’t facing that risk.

    1. Whites are not in danger of extinction. 2. East Asians typically have lower fertility than whites.

    I suspect Rosie would too

    I doubt it. She is a WN with eliminations rhetoric.

  120. L Woods says:
    @216

    Lmao @ anyone who thinks the current year military is “conservative” in any meaningful sense beyond “conserving” its massive budget share.

Comments are closed.

Subscribe to All Audacious Epigone Comments via RSS