The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 TeasersRussian Reaction Blog
Russia Elections 2018: Why Did Grudinin Do Well in the East?
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New Reply
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Israel Shamir argues that Pavel Grudinin doing relatively well east of the Urals – then declining in the (much more populated) European Russia – constitutes evidence of fraud.

The first true results coming from the Russian Far East gave over 20% to the Communist, and about 60% to Putin. It seems that the administration overseers who reportedly had backdoor access to the results decided to ‘improve’ them forcefully. The results received after that were already adjusted for desired numbers.

In the far-away Yakut province, with its mind-boggling frost of minus 35 ° below zero, the Communist contender has got almost 30% of the vote. In the Vladivostok province, in the region facing Japan, Grudinin has got over 20%, likewise in the Siberian university city of Omsk. On the other side, in the notoriously dishonest and despotic Muslim republic of Chechnya the contender was given less than 5%.

My guess is that true uncooked results would be between 18% and 25% for the Communist, and correspondingly, around 60-65% for the incumbent, still good enough for Putin’s outright win, but not good enough for his zealous aides.

This is unlikely to be true, since all the statisticians who regularly analyze Russian electoral fraud – needless to say, virtually all of them anti-Putin – agree that this election has been the cleanest one since 2004.

Still, this electoral pattern still needs to be explained, especially since it constitutes a break with the old pattern of Communists doing relatively best in the Russian South, the so-called Red Belt.

map-elections-kharitonov-grudinin-change

Map by Artem Dudin of the change between votes for Kharitonov in 2004 [Russia = 13.8%] and for Grudinin in 2018 [Russia = 11.8%]. Red = Grudinin lost votes, Blue = Grudinin gained votes.

Alexander Kireev has three explanations:

1. Putin’s rating has significantly increased amongst the elderly, which is the core of the Communists’ demographic base.

This is very plausible, e.g. as I pointed out via VCIOM polls – whereas around 82% of the elderly were saying they were going to vote for Putin, this was only 65% amongst 18-24 year olds.

2. TV vs. Internet: In contrast to European Russia, the country east of the Urals relies relatively more on the Internet for news, as opposed to TV.

map-russia-tv-internet

Search popularity for TV (blue) vs. Internet (red).

This is because most live broadcasts are primed for release in the Moscow time zone during the evening, so easterners do more catching up on the news via Internet the following morning.

If Putin dominates TV, and most billboards on the streets were dominated by Zhirinovsky, it was Grudinin who was this election’s “Internet candidate”, up to and including generating its most famous (if ironic) meme: “кандидат от народа” ["candidate from the people"].

3. European Russians are more interested in the Russian Spring (Novorossiya, Igor Girkin, etc.) than in the east.

map-russia-interest-war-in-donbass

Alexander Kireev: Interest in search terms.

As I have often pointed out, Grudinin was easily the most pro-Ukrainian candidate – as in the least interested in supporting the Donbass – besides the liberals Sobchak and Yavlinsky.

And during the debates, Zhirinovsky was there to drive that point in over and over again.

 
Show 4 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. anon[241] • Disclaimer says:

    As I have often pointed out, Grudinin was easily the most pro-Ukrainian candidate – as in the least interested in supporting the Donbass – besides the liberals Sobchak and Yavlinsky.

    “Pavel Grudinin, a presidential candidate from the Communist Party of the Russian Federation, said he was in favor of recognizing the independence of the People’s Republic of Donetsk and the People’s Republic of Lugansk, as well as the possibility of reuniting Donbass with Russia if the residents of the region wanted to do so.

    Of course, the Minsk Agreements played an important role in ending the genocide of the population of these republics. But the fighting there continues, albeit not with so many casualties among civilians. Bandera-lovers daily shell the cities and villages of therepublics, as a result of which ordinary people suffer and die. The Minsk agreements have turned into a sort of screen for the preparation of a forceful solution to the “problem of Novorossia.”

    https://www.fort-russ.com/2018/01/grudinin-kprf-presidential-candidate/

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  2. Why Did Grudinin Do Well in the East?

    Meme candidates always do well in the Russian East, in every election. (Previously Zhirinovsky used to do well there, back when he was the memiest politician in Russia. He’s old and tired now, so Grudinin it is.)

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  3. What’s up colleagues, pleasant article and nice arguments commented at this place, I
    am truly ebjoying by these.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  4. I am genuinely grateful to the owner of this website who
    has shared this enormous paragraph at at this place.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments

Comments are closed.

Subscribe to All Anatoly Karlin Comments via RSS