The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 TeasersRussian Reaction Blog
The Rybka Affair
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New Reply
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

rybka

Timeline of The Rybka Affair:

1. Nastya Rybka (real name: Anastasia Vashukevich, from Belarus; watch her “videos” here), an escort girl who does political inverse-FEMEN “performances” (e.g. a naked protest in support of Harvey Weinstein) under the leadership of “sex trainer” Alex Lesley (real name: Alexander Kirillov, a Belorussian fraudster turned PUA-for-girls guru), did one of their typical viral video stunt at Navalny’s HQ.

2. Navalny & Co. decided to track her down out of curiosity.

3. They discovered that she had published a book in which she described – concealed under fake but obvious identities – cavorting with six other girls with Oleg Deripaska, a Yeltsin-clique oligarch who is well known for his US visa problems and being owed $17 million by Paul Manafort. Also present on board was Sergey Prikhodko, a Deputy PM of Russia and a rumored “gray cardinal” of Russian foreign policy. Although it’s nice to think otherwise, Prikhodko did not participate in any orgies; his meetings with Deripaska were business-like, and Deripaska even seemed to be afraid of Prikhodko, deferring to him and calling him “Papa,” which is very normal and not weird at all.

4. Photos and videos of this deep state tryst were soon found on her Instagram, as well as other evidence (e.g. geolocationary), which confirmed the identities of the two men, and which Navalny packaged into a video.

The funny thing is she wasn’t even a spy as such, just someone in it for the sex, money, and publicity.

As Oleg and Papa discussed high affairs of state, the Belorussian wench – entirely oblivious to political import – was texting Lesley for further seduction advice. All the security a Russian oligarch’s billions can buy!

5. You might think it would be in neither man’s interest to draw attention to an event which:

  1. Formally qualifies as corruption (though to be fair nobody in Russia would care about something so minor as a top bureaucrat getting entertained by a billionaire on his luxury yacht);
  2. Draw even more attention to what can easily be construed as a direct link in the chain from Trump’s campaign to the Russian government.

But apparently ignorant of the Streisand effect, Prihodko proclaimed his desire to deal with Navalny “man to man,” while Deripaska went even further, preparing a lawsuit for violation of privacy against Rybka and Lesley, and got a pocket court in a small town he as good as owns to demand that Instagram and YouTube remove the offending material by February 14.

6. While Instagram caved, YouTube hasn’t taken down anything, and there is no evidence to date that it is going to get blocked. I suppose Russia is not yet such a joke country as to block YouTube on the whims of a single embarrassed oligarch.

However, Navalny’s website is apparently beginning to get blocked, with not even a court order for formality’s sake.

alex-lesley

7. To put the final incarnadine cherry on the cream and meringue pie, it has just emerged that Lesley-Kirillov had a profile on the website of Dmitry Medvedev’s flagship “innovation center” Skolkovo, where this Belorussian fraudster turned gigolo was described as having the following credentials:

Director of science, ideologist, project investor. Patents in the USA, China, Russia. More than ten publications in English-language scientific periodicals (including the Springer Publishing House) on the project’s subject. Participant and speaker at the International Congresses in Harbin, Shenzhen, Hong Kong (twice), Venice, Israel, Detroit (USA, SAE), Milan. Supported by grants from DARPA and NASA. On the recommendation of American scientists, he led the structural session at 8WCEAM & 3rd ICUMAS, World Congress in Hong Kong with “Sessiom Title: PHM Cloud Claster and On-Board Recognotion Automata as Bases for Sel-Maintenance and Self-recovery Engineering” [AK: italics written as-is in English]. Author and developer of Artificial Intelligence systems with increasing K-complexity. Contacts: NASA, DARPA, Rafael, Boeing laboratory in the UK and numerous research centers at universities in the US, China, Western Europe.

I trust this needs no further comment.

It has long been obvious, even before Medvedev departed the Presidency, that the only “innovation” happening in Skolkovo pertains to stealing government money.

Meanwhile, Russia has the scientific output of Belgium and accounts for less than 0.1% of the world’s AI startups.

lesley-jungle

 
• Category: Humor • Tags: Corruption, Russia, Russiagate, WTF 
Show 54 CommentsLeave a Comment
54 Comments to "The Rybka Affair"
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. had a profile on the website of Dmitry Medvedev’s flagship “innovation center” Skolkovo,

    Suffice to say, any of my life interactions with any form of government branch/office/bureaucracy/project/operation in Russia, have had the character of (although on the higher levels this picture would probably need to integrate some imagery of a person walking away with a sack of money):

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  2. Deripaska went even further, preparing a suite for violation of privacy against Rybka and Lesley

    A suit, presumably, unless Deripaska uses an even more dastardly version of the comfy chair notoriously used by the Spanish Inquisition.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  3. Some story, heh. This is the Navalny I can get behind.

    Read More
    • Agree: Felix Keverich
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  4. As Oleg and Papa discussed high affairs of state, the Belorussian wench – entirely oblivious to political import – was texting Lesley for further seduction advice. All the security a Russian oligarch’s billions can buy!

    Digital security is a field that definitely needs more investment and investigation. Perhaps an oligarch could afford a cell phone jammer someday.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  5. It has long been obvious, even before Medvedev departed the Presidency, that the only “innovation” happening in Skolkovo pertains to stealing government money.

    Whereas in the West they also steal private investors’ money.

    Case in point:

    Russia … accounts for less than 0.1% of the world’s AI startups.

    And 98.9% of these startups are going to “research AI” until Kingdom Come or until the government grant/venture capital money dries up, whichever comes first.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  6. Wasn’t Deripaska the richest person in Russia about a decade ago, until the financial crisis hit him while he was extremely leveraged..?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Philip Owen
    He became the world's poorest man. It stopped him buying Rover cars.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  7. But on to more important matters: Would Greasy bang?

    Read More
    • Replies: @iffen
    We'll see if he likes the ghetto nails.
    , @Daniel Chieh
    Her eyes scream of yearning and lust, especially that of the financial kind.

    Maybe Greasy could relate.

    , @Greasy William
    Is that the same girl in both pics?

    In the top pic she is 5/10, and therefor I would not bang.

    In the bottom pic she looks pretty good. Face is only 6/10 but she has a sexiness that is greater than her beauty level.
    , @melanf

    But on to more important matters: Would Greasy bang?
     
    The poor oligarchs. How is it possible that they (having billions) can't find themselves more attractive girls?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  8. @Anatoly Karlin
    But on to more important matters: Would Greasy bang?

    http://cdn.fontanka.ru/mm/items/2018/2/10/0037/rybtit.jpg

    http://udf.by/uploads/posts/2018-02/1518133116_znakcom-1823470-554x486.jpg

    We’ll see if he likes the ghetto nails.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  9. On this topic, does Russia really recruit honeypot spies? I am not talking about hiring some prostitutes and then filming them in action with men to blackmail, I am talking about recruiting females in some spy agency and training them how to spy (and how to seduce). I am assuming that a female that joins a spy agency has a relatively decent education and upbringing, so I find hard to believe that they would really volunteer to have sex with foreign men for “national security” (or whatever the Russian equivalent term they use) reasons.

    Read More
    • Replies: @reiner Tor
    There are highly educated women who also are sluts. (My smartphone doesn’t know the word “slut,” but it proposes “slut-shaming” or “slut-shame” instead. Interesting that they fed the long composite words in it, but not the short and simple word. Apple, I’m not stupid.)
    , @Daniel Chieh
    If you would kill or die for your country, would sleeping with strange yet important men for your country seem that much more terrible to do? If they were able to then be capable of influencing entire countries in thrall through capable blackmail of important figures, I can hardly think of anything more flattering to the female ego(or male ego, for that matter).
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  10. @neutral
    On this topic, does Russia really recruit honeypot spies? I am not talking about hiring some prostitutes and then filming them in action with men to blackmail, I am talking about recruiting females in some spy agency and training them how to spy (and how to seduce). I am assuming that a female that joins a spy agency has a relatively decent education and upbringing, so I find hard to believe that they would really volunteer to have sex with foreign men for "national security" (or whatever the Russian equivalent term they use) reasons.

    There are highly educated women who also are sluts. (My smartphone doesn’t know the word “slut,” but it proposes “slut-shaming” or “slut-shame” instead. Interesting that they fed the long composite words in it, but not the short and simple word. Apple, I’m not stupid.)

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  11. @neutral
    On this topic, does Russia really recruit honeypot spies? I am not talking about hiring some prostitutes and then filming them in action with men to blackmail, I am talking about recruiting females in some spy agency and training them how to spy (and how to seduce). I am assuming that a female that joins a spy agency has a relatively decent education and upbringing, so I find hard to believe that they would really volunteer to have sex with foreign men for "national security" (or whatever the Russian equivalent term they use) reasons.

    If you would kill or die for your country, would sleeping with strange yet important men for your country seem that much more terrible to do? If they were able to then be capable of influencing entire countries in thrall through capable blackmail of important figures, I can hardly think of anything more flattering to the female ego(or male ego, for that matter).

    Read More
    • Replies: @neutral

    would sleeping with strange yet important men for your country seem that much more terrible to do?
     
    If they are married or in a relationship, then it would be more terrible from the perspective of the female agent, at least one can kind of justify murdering foreign enemies but being required to whore oneself out to them is worse.

    Lets however assume that its something like out of the Hollywood movies, they hire cold hearted killers that live to serve only the state and have no life outside of that existence. That still begs the question if they have special classes on what dresses to wear, what perfumes to use, what seduction techniques to use, etc.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  12. @Anatoly Karlin
    But on to more important matters: Would Greasy bang?

    http://cdn.fontanka.ru/mm/items/2018/2/10/0037/rybtit.jpg

    http://udf.by/uploads/posts/2018-02/1518133116_znakcom-1823470-554x486.jpg

    Her eyes scream of yearning and lust, especially that of the financial kind.

    Maybe Greasy could relate.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  13. Serving your country is something men do. Women serve the men who are victorious over other men.

    I’m sure you could find some women who will fuck for Mother Russia (or whatever other country) out of patriotic duty (or, less nobly, cash), but I suspect a more effective model is pimping.

    Make yourself a woman’s entire world and control her mercilessly–then send her out to seduce important foreigners to please you.

    And pimping in the service of the state eliminates typical problems faced by pimps such as the police, rival pimps, whores running away, etc.

    But with this model, why abuse your own country’s women? You can recruit/kidnap foreigners instead of despoiling your own women.

    Read More
    • Replies: @iffen
    You do know that you have problems, right?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  14. @Thorfinnsson
    Serving your country is something men do. Women serve the men who are victorious over other men.

    I'm sure you could find some women who will fuck for Mother Russia (or whatever other country) out of patriotic duty (or, less nobly, cash), but I suspect a more effective model is pimping.

    Make yourself a woman's entire world and control her mercilessly--then send her out to seduce important foreigners to please you.

    And pimping in the service of the state eliminates typical problems faced by pimps such as the police, rival pimps, whores running away, etc.

    But with this model, why abuse your own country's women? You can recruit/kidnap foreigners instead of despoiling your own women.

    You do know that you have problems, right?

    Read More
    • Agree: AP
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  15. However, Navalny’s website is apparently beginning to get blocked, with not even a court order for formality’s sake.

    And that happens when this guy is not wasting everyone’s time.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  16. @Daniel Chieh
    If you would kill or die for your country, would sleeping with strange yet important men for your country seem that much more terrible to do? If they were able to then be capable of influencing entire countries in thrall through capable blackmail of important figures, I can hardly think of anything more flattering to the female ego(or male ego, for that matter).

    would sleeping with strange yet important men for your country seem that much more terrible to do?

    If they are married or in a relationship, then it would be more terrible from the perspective of the female agent, at least one can kind of justify murdering foreign enemies but being required to whore oneself out to them is worse.

    Lets however assume that its something like out of the Hollywood movies, they hire cold hearted killers that live to serve only the state and have no life outside of that existence. That still begs the question if they have special classes on what dresses to wear, what perfumes to use, what seduction techniques to use, etc.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Daniel Chieh

    Lets however assume that its something like out of the Hollywood movies, they hire cold hearted killers that live to serve only the state and have no life outside of that existence.
     

    I would say that its not so much that as the rigors of the job eventually create a very complex idea of morality in agents who have to practice lying and betrayal as part of basic tradecraft. There's very much a "What happens in Vegas" mentality and much is demanded of its employees, especially of field agents, who are under pressure to deliver results by their handlers, in competition to their peers, and with hopes of bettering their family despite personal sacrifice. The memoirs of such individuals show casual alcoholism, an odd mix of patriotism and cynicism, and more than a few burnouts who variously either join criminal organizations or simply kill themselves.

    I don't know if they had "PUA for girls" then, as sensible casework probably is focused more on the specific target and his habits(for example, so-and-so embassy worker is fond of hitting the bar on the weekends, appears unfaithful to his wife, and likes to make the approach) but it should be noted that a lot of men are really fairly easy. I am sure that Alexander Kirillov, though, will say that his "seduction classes" are KGB inspired, and with enough money paid to him, would say that they are divinely inspired too.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  17. @Anatoly Karlin
    But on to more important matters: Would Greasy bang?

    http://cdn.fontanka.ru/mm/items/2018/2/10/0037/rybtit.jpg

    http://udf.by/uploads/posts/2018-02/1518133116_znakcom-1823470-554x486.jpg

    Is that the same girl in both pics?

    In the top pic she is 5/10, and therefor I would not bang.

    In the bottom pic she looks pretty good. Face is only 6/10 but she has a sexiness that is greater than her beauty level.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  18. Pretty much the only thing that sets me off is if somebody says something positive about Iran/Syria, but German Reader’s unprovoked slander that I have “ridiculously high standards” really offended me. I feel the need to offer some clarity.

    The first thing that needs to be established is that it really makes no sense to “bang” a woman who you aren’t attracted to. I feel like that for most guys, if she is female, then that’s good enough for them. Well I’m not wired that way and if you are willing to sleep with a woman who you don’t find attractive then you are subhuman scum. No offense.

    As for the actual accusation that I have high standards, that simply isn’t true and I can prove it. Below I will use female celebrities to illustrate exactly what each point on the scale represents:

    Please not that these ratings are for facial beauty only. When evaluating a woman, your priorities should be face, ass, tits; in that order. This is important because I feel like a lot of guys don’t get that if the face isn’t there, it doesn’t matter what the rest of the package looks like. Conversely, as long as the face is at least a 6, there is nothing wrong with being flexible.

    Looks Scale

    10: The hottest face possible. This is a level of beauty that is hypnotic. In fact, a 10 is actually too beautiful. It would be wrong to say that a 10 is perfection because a true 10 will often have a somewhat other wordly quality, so instead they are like imperfect pefection.

    Examples: Really only one comes to mind, and you already know who it is: Taylor Swift.

    9: As beautiful as possible without being Taylor Swift.

    Examples: Keira Knightley, young Carice van Houten, post plastic surgery Gal Gadot

    8: Super beautiful but not quite at the insane beauty level of a 9 or a 10. The hottest girl in your high school was probably an 8. Although if you went to HS in Russia or Eastern Europe then you may have had some 9s.

    Examples: Prime, fully made up Katy Perry, post plastic surgery Jennifer Lawrence, the chick from Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon

    7: The typical “hot girl”. These are plentiful at any American college campus.

    Examples: Selena Gomez, Anne Hathaway, Dakota Johnson, McKayla Maroney

    6: They typical “cute” or “pretty” girl. The plurality of young, non fat, non deformed, white girls are usually around here somewhere.

    Examples: Pre plastic surgery Mila Kunis (she looked way different before p surge: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QvthUBqH7_k)

    5: Not flawed but simply too plain. 5 does not mean average, as the average white girl is probably a 6. Rather 5 is just your prototypical plain jane.

    Examples: American character actress Jane Adams; it is hard to find famous examples of 5, although you probably knew plenty in high school.

    4: Plain, but whereas a 5 is plain in an attractive way, a 4 is plain in a homely way.

    Examples: American feminist shrew Amanda Marcotte, Heather Matarazzo

    3: Outright ugly, bordering on hideous

    Examples: Sarah Jessica Parker

    There are no famous examples of 2′s or 1′s that I can think of, although I’ve seen plenty in real life.

    So anyway, first of all: you’re welcome. 2nd of all I don’t have high standards. Maybe some of you just have low standards? Ever think of that?

    Read More
    • Replies: @German_reader
    Thanks for writing this up, this is a very informative top quality post. I was somewhat surprised though you rated this Rybka slut as 5/10, that seems unusually generous. Personally I think she looks really hideous in that first picture...almost like some kind of succubus, when the illusion has begun to wear off, just before she's going to devour you. She does look better in the 2nd picture, but still nothing special.
    , @Dan Hayes
    Greasy William:

    I am in agreement with German_Reader that yours is "a very informative top quality post".

    I am in almost complete agreement with your evaluation of Sara Jessica Parker except that I would rate her even lower as -1 (essentially super fugly).
    , @Daniel Chieh
    Your post has been upvoted and tagged as "High-quality, Women, IranProducesGoodAcademics."
    , @melanf

    The hottest face possible. This is a level of beauty that is hypnotic. In fact, a 10 is actually too beautiful. It would be wrong to say that a 10 is perfection because a true 10 will often have a somewhat other wordly quality, so instead they are like imperfect pefection.
    Examples: Really only one comes to mind, and you already know who it is: Taylor Swift.
     
    In my opinion this level of beauty (Taylor Swift) it is possible to find

    http://etsphoto.ru/photocache/87/87dffa29038fc8308c25305f23d76390.jpg

    http://vpleny.ru/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Александра-Петрова.jpg

    https://www.baby.ru/storage/a/5/6/2/328881.94015.jpeg

    http://lovemastery.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/maxim-opublikoval-reyting-top-100-samyh-seksualnyh-rossiyskih-zhenschin-200-foto_78681.jpeg

    , @Dmitry

    The first thing that needs to be established is that it really makes no sense to “bang” a woman who you aren’t attracted to. I feel like that for most guys, if she is female, then that’s good enough for them. Well I’m not wired that way and if you are willing to sleep with a woman who you don’t find attractive then you are subhuman scum. No offense.

     

    Lol since when is girl's looks relevant to whether you sleep with her? Availability has a lot more to do with it.
    , @Chet Bradley
    So Taylor Swift beats young Claudia Schiffer? Seriously? Beauty is indeed subjective.

    Taylor Swift is pretty, but I imagine you'd find many girls of that type, and similarly pretty, anywhere from Czech/Slovak to Russia. Like the girls at 2:39 in this music video (who are also a lot prettier than this Rybka girl, who is really nothing special): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rgox84KE7iY
    , @melanf
    Among the factors determining the beauty of girls forgot one factor.
    The girl to be in the Premier League of beauty must have a beautiful face/figure but also the intelligence and internal energy, because this directly affects the appearance. Face is the mirror of the soul. There a good word "bright" - in order that the girl was really beauty, the girl should be bright. Without it there will be a vegetable, in a beautiful package. I've seen a lot of unattractive, but smart girls, however really beautiful, but stupid and lethargic - I didn't know any.

    In the movie "Gone with the wind" (this film is not yet banned in America?) it is well shown. Sisters of Scarlett O'hara have a great body and face, but who notices? Scarlet overshadows them as the sun overshadows the stars because she is "bright", because Scarlet is illuminated by the fire of her soul.
    Of course movie is art, but good art reflects life

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  19. @Greasy William
    Pretty much the only thing that sets me off is if somebody says something positive about Iran/Syria, but German Reader's unprovoked slander that I have "ridiculously high standards" really offended me. I feel the need to offer some clarity.

    The first thing that needs to be established is that it really makes no sense to "bang" a woman who you aren't attracted to. I feel like that for most guys, if she is female, then that's good enough for them. Well I'm not wired that way and if you are willing to sleep with a woman who you don't find attractive then you are subhuman scum. No offense.

    As for the actual accusation that I have high standards, that simply isn't true and I can prove it. Below I will use female celebrities to illustrate exactly what each point on the scale represents:

    Please not that these ratings are for facial beauty only. When evaluating a woman, your priorities should be face, ass, tits; in that order. This is important because I feel like a lot of guys don't get that if the face isn't there, it doesn't matter what the rest of the package looks like. Conversely, as long as the face is at least a 6, there is nothing wrong with being flexible.

    ...

    Looks Scale

    10: The hottest face possible. This is a level of beauty that is hypnotic. In fact, a 10 is actually too beautiful. It would be wrong to say that a 10 is perfection because a true 10 will often have a somewhat other wordly quality, so instead they are like imperfect pefection.

    Examples: Really only one comes to mind, and you already know who it is: Taylor Swift.

    9: As beautiful as possible without being Taylor Swift.

    Examples: Keira Knightley, young Carice van Houten, post plastic surgery Gal Gadot

    8: Super beautiful but not quite at the insane beauty level of a 9 or a 10. The hottest girl in your high school was probably an 8. Although if you went to HS in Russia or Eastern Europe then you may have had some 9s.

    Examples: Prime, fully made up Katy Perry, post plastic surgery Jennifer Lawrence, the chick from Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon

    7: The typical "hot girl". These are plentiful at any American college campus.

    Examples: Selena Gomez, Anne Hathaway, Dakota Johnson, McKayla Maroney

    6: They typical "cute" or "pretty" girl. The plurality of young, non fat, non deformed, white girls are usually around here somewhere.

    Examples: Pre plastic surgery Mila Kunis (she looked way different before p surge: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QvthUBqH7_k)

    5: Not flawed but simply too plain. 5 does not mean average, as the average white girl is probably a 6. Rather 5 is just your prototypical plain jane.

    Examples: American character actress Jane Adams; it is hard to find famous examples of 5, although you probably knew plenty in high school.

    4: Plain, but whereas a 5 is plain in an attractive way, a 4 is plain in a homely way.

    Examples: American feminist shrew Amanda Marcotte, Heather Matarazzo

    3: Outright ugly, bordering on hideous

    Examples: Sarah Jessica Parker


    There are no famous examples of 2's or 1's that I can think of, although I've seen plenty in real life.


    So anyway, first of all: you're welcome. 2nd of all I don't have high standards. Maybe some of you just have low standards? Ever think of that?

    Thanks for writing this up, this is a very informative top quality post. I was somewhat surprised though you rated this Rybka slut as 5/10, that seems unusually generous. Personally I think she looks really hideous in that first picture…almost like some kind of succubus, when the illusion has begun to wear off, just before she’s going to devour you. She does look better in the 2nd picture, but still nothing special.

    Read More
    • Replies: @for-the-record
    …almost like some kind of succubus, when the illusion has begun to wear off, just before she’s going to devour you.

    You seem quite well-informed about succubi . . .
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  20. @Greasy William
    Pretty much the only thing that sets me off is if somebody says something positive about Iran/Syria, but German Reader's unprovoked slander that I have "ridiculously high standards" really offended me. I feel the need to offer some clarity.

    The first thing that needs to be established is that it really makes no sense to "bang" a woman who you aren't attracted to. I feel like that for most guys, if she is female, then that's good enough for them. Well I'm not wired that way and if you are willing to sleep with a woman who you don't find attractive then you are subhuman scum. No offense.

    As for the actual accusation that I have high standards, that simply isn't true and I can prove it. Below I will use female celebrities to illustrate exactly what each point on the scale represents:

    Please not that these ratings are for facial beauty only. When evaluating a woman, your priorities should be face, ass, tits; in that order. This is important because I feel like a lot of guys don't get that if the face isn't there, it doesn't matter what the rest of the package looks like. Conversely, as long as the face is at least a 6, there is nothing wrong with being flexible.

    ...

    Looks Scale

    10: The hottest face possible. This is a level of beauty that is hypnotic. In fact, a 10 is actually too beautiful. It would be wrong to say that a 10 is perfection because a true 10 will often have a somewhat other wordly quality, so instead they are like imperfect pefection.

    Examples: Really only one comes to mind, and you already know who it is: Taylor Swift.

    9: As beautiful as possible without being Taylor Swift.

    Examples: Keira Knightley, young Carice van Houten, post plastic surgery Gal Gadot

    8: Super beautiful but not quite at the insane beauty level of a 9 or a 10. The hottest girl in your high school was probably an 8. Although if you went to HS in Russia or Eastern Europe then you may have had some 9s.

    Examples: Prime, fully made up Katy Perry, post plastic surgery Jennifer Lawrence, the chick from Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon

    7: The typical "hot girl". These are plentiful at any American college campus.

    Examples: Selena Gomez, Anne Hathaway, Dakota Johnson, McKayla Maroney

    6: They typical "cute" or "pretty" girl. The plurality of young, non fat, non deformed, white girls are usually around here somewhere.

    Examples: Pre plastic surgery Mila Kunis (she looked way different before p surge: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QvthUBqH7_k)

    5: Not flawed but simply too plain. 5 does not mean average, as the average white girl is probably a 6. Rather 5 is just your prototypical plain jane.

    Examples: American character actress Jane Adams; it is hard to find famous examples of 5, although you probably knew plenty in high school.

    4: Plain, but whereas a 5 is plain in an attractive way, a 4 is plain in a homely way.

    Examples: American feminist shrew Amanda Marcotte, Heather Matarazzo

    3: Outright ugly, bordering on hideous

    Examples: Sarah Jessica Parker


    There are no famous examples of 2's or 1's that I can think of, although I've seen plenty in real life.


    So anyway, first of all: you're welcome. 2nd of all I don't have high standards. Maybe some of you just have low standards? Ever think of that?

    Greasy William:

    I am in agreement with German_Reader that yours is “a very informative top quality post”.

    I am in almost complete agreement with your evaluation of Sara Jessica Parker except that I would rate her even lower as -1 (essentially super fugly).

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  21. @Greasy William
    Pretty much the only thing that sets me off is if somebody says something positive about Iran/Syria, but German Reader's unprovoked slander that I have "ridiculously high standards" really offended me. I feel the need to offer some clarity.

    The first thing that needs to be established is that it really makes no sense to "bang" a woman who you aren't attracted to. I feel like that for most guys, if she is female, then that's good enough for them. Well I'm not wired that way and if you are willing to sleep with a woman who you don't find attractive then you are subhuman scum. No offense.

    As for the actual accusation that I have high standards, that simply isn't true and I can prove it. Below I will use female celebrities to illustrate exactly what each point on the scale represents:

    Please not that these ratings are for facial beauty only. When evaluating a woman, your priorities should be face, ass, tits; in that order. This is important because I feel like a lot of guys don't get that if the face isn't there, it doesn't matter what the rest of the package looks like. Conversely, as long as the face is at least a 6, there is nothing wrong with being flexible.

    ...

    Looks Scale

    10: The hottest face possible. This is a level of beauty that is hypnotic. In fact, a 10 is actually too beautiful. It would be wrong to say that a 10 is perfection because a true 10 will often have a somewhat other wordly quality, so instead they are like imperfect pefection.

    Examples: Really only one comes to mind, and you already know who it is: Taylor Swift.

    9: As beautiful as possible without being Taylor Swift.

    Examples: Keira Knightley, young Carice van Houten, post plastic surgery Gal Gadot

    8: Super beautiful but not quite at the insane beauty level of a 9 or a 10. The hottest girl in your high school was probably an 8. Although if you went to HS in Russia or Eastern Europe then you may have had some 9s.

    Examples: Prime, fully made up Katy Perry, post plastic surgery Jennifer Lawrence, the chick from Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon

    7: The typical "hot girl". These are plentiful at any American college campus.

    Examples: Selena Gomez, Anne Hathaway, Dakota Johnson, McKayla Maroney

    6: They typical "cute" or "pretty" girl. The plurality of young, non fat, non deformed, white girls are usually around here somewhere.

    Examples: Pre plastic surgery Mila Kunis (she looked way different before p surge: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QvthUBqH7_k)

    5: Not flawed but simply too plain. 5 does not mean average, as the average white girl is probably a 6. Rather 5 is just your prototypical plain jane.

    Examples: American character actress Jane Adams; it is hard to find famous examples of 5, although you probably knew plenty in high school.

    4: Plain, but whereas a 5 is plain in an attractive way, a 4 is plain in a homely way.

    Examples: American feminist shrew Amanda Marcotte, Heather Matarazzo

    3: Outright ugly, bordering on hideous

    Examples: Sarah Jessica Parker


    There are no famous examples of 2's or 1's that I can think of, although I've seen plenty in real life.


    So anyway, first of all: you're welcome. 2nd of all I don't have high standards. Maybe some of you just have low standards? Ever think of that?

    Your post has been upvoted and tagged as “High-quality, Women, IranProducesGoodAcademics.”

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  22. @neutral

    would sleeping with strange yet important men for your country seem that much more terrible to do?
     
    If they are married or in a relationship, then it would be more terrible from the perspective of the female agent, at least one can kind of justify murdering foreign enemies but being required to whore oneself out to them is worse.

    Lets however assume that its something like out of the Hollywood movies, they hire cold hearted killers that live to serve only the state and have no life outside of that existence. That still begs the question if they have special classes on what dresses to wear, what perfumes to use, what seduction techniques to use, etc.

    Lets however assume that its something like out of the Hollywood movies, they hire cold hearted killers that live to serve only the state and have no life outside of that existence.

    I would say that its not so much that as the rigors of the job eventually create a very complex idea of morality in agents who have to practice lying and betrayal as part of basic tradecraft. There’s very much a “What happens in Vegas” mentality and much is demanded of its employees, especially of field agents, who are under pressure to deliver results by their handlers, in competition to their peers, and with hopes of bettering their family despite personal sacrifice. The memoirs of such individuals show casual alcoholism, an odd mix of patriotism and cynicism, and more than a few burnouts who variously either join criminal organizations or simply kill themselves.

    I don’t know if they had “PUA for girls” then, as sensible casework probably is focused more on the specific target and his habits(for example, so-and-so embassy worker is fond of hitting the bar on the weekends, appears unfaithful to his wife, and likes to make the approach) but it should be noted that a lot of men are really fairly easy. I am sure that Alexander Kirillov, though, will say that his “seduction classes” are KGB inspired, and with enough money paid to him, would say that they are divinely inspired too.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  23. @Anatoly Karlin
    But on to more important matters: Would Greasy bang?

    http://cdn.fontanka.ru/mm/items/2018/2/10/0037/rybtit.jpg

    http://udf.by/uploads/posts/2018-02/1518133116_znakcom-1823470-554x486.jpg

    But on to more important matters: Would Greasy bang?

    The poor oligarchs. How is it possible that they (having billions) can’t find themselves more attractive girls?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Dmitry

    The poor oligarchs. How is it possible that they (having billions) can’t find themselves more attractive girls?

     

    Well Deripaska's wife is 'hardly an oil painting' either, so this could be a matter of his personal tastes.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  24. @Greasy William
    Pretty much the only thing that sets me off is if somebody says something positive about Iran/Syria, but German Reader's unprovoked slander that I have "ridiculously high standards" really offended me. I feel the need to offer some clarity.

    The first thing that needs to be established is that it really makes no sense to "bang" a woman who you aren't attracted to. I feel like that for most guys, if she is female, then that's good enough for them. Well I'm not wired that way and if you are willing to sleep with a woman who you don't find attractive then you are subhuman scum. No offense.

    As for the actual accusation that I have high standards, that simply isn't true and I can prove it. Below I will use female celebrities to illustrate exactly what each point on the scale represents:

    Please not that these ratings are for facial beauty only. When evaluating a woman, your priorities should be face, ass, tits; in that order. This is important because I feel like a lot of guys don't get that if the face isn't there, it doesn't matter what the rest of the package looks like. Conversely, as long as the face is at least a 6, there is nothing wrong with being flexible.

    ...

    Looks Scale

    10: The hottest face possible. This is a level of beauty that is hypnotic. In fact, a 10 is actually too beautiful. It would be wrong to say that a 10 is perfection because a true 10 will often have a somewhat other wordly quality, so instead they are like imperfect pefection.

    Examples: Really only one comes to mind, and you already know who it is: Taylor Swift.

    9: As beautiful as possible without being Taylor Swift.

    Examples: Keira Knightley, young Carice van Houten, post plastic surgery Gal Gadot

    8: Super beautiful but not quite at the insane beauty level of a 9 or a 10. The hottest girl in your high school was probably an 8. Although if you went to HS in Russia or Eastern Europe then you may have had some 9s.

    Examples: Prime, fully made up Katy Perry, post plastic surgery Jennifer Lawrence, the chick from Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon

    7: The typical "hot girl". These are plentiful at any American college campus.

    Examples: Selena Gomez, Anne Hathaway, Dakota Johnson, McKayla Maroney

    6: They typical "cute" or "pretty" girl. The plurality of young, non fat, non deformed, white girls are usually around here somewhere.

    Examples: Pre plastic surgery Mila Kunis (she looked way different before p surge: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QvthUBqH7_k)

    5: Not flawed but simply too plain. 5 does not mean average, as the average white girl is probably a 6. Rather 5 is just your prototypical plain jane.

    Examples: American character actress Jane Adams; it is hard to find famous examples of 5, although you probably knew plenty in high school.

    4: Plain, but whereas a 5 is plain in an attractive way, a 4 is plain in a homely way.

    Examples: American feminist shrew Amanda Marcotte, Heather Matarazzo

    3: Outright ugly, bordering on hideous

    Examples: Sarah Jessica Parker


    There are no famous examples of 2's or 1's that I can think of, although I've seen plenty in real life.


    So anyway, first of all: you're welcome. 2nd of all I don't have high standards. Maybe some of you just have low standards? Ever think of that?

    The hottest face possible. This is a level of beauty that is hypnotic. In fact, a 10 is actually too beautiful. It would be wrong to say that a 10 is perfection because a true 10 will often have a somewhat other wordly quality, so instead they are like imperfect pefection.
    Examples: Really only one comes to mind, and you already know who it is: Taylor Swift.

    In my opinion this level of beauty (Taylor Swift) it is possible to find

    Read More
    • Replies: @neutral

    In my opinion this level of beauty (Taylor Swift) it is possible to find
     
    I am assuming since he took Taylor Swift as the ideal that he is coming from the white nationalist perspective, that the ideal is the Aryan ideal, Slavic girls can thus by definition never make a perfect 10.
    , @Daniel Chieh
    Mr. Unz, can we have a emote for "Greasy Williams Rate 0-10"?
    , @Greasy William
    from top to bottom:

    8, 7, 6, 5's

    The 6 doesn't even look Slavic too me. Maybe Polish but definitely not Russian.

    Who is the 8? I must research her further.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  25. @German_reader
    Thanks for writing this up, this is a very informative top quality post. I was somewhat surprised though you rated this Rybka slut as 5/10, that seems unusually generous. Personally I think she looks really hideous in that first picture...almost like some kind of succubus, when the illusion has begun to wear off, just before she's going to devour you. She does look better in the 2nd picture, but still nothing special.

    …almost like some kind of succubus, when the illusion has begun to wear off, just before she’s going to devour you.

    You seem quite well-informed about succubi . . .

    Read More
    • Replies: @reiner Tor
    Maybe he’s already been devoured by a few of them... hopefully it will never happen after he marries one.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  26. @melanf

    The hottest face possible. This is a level of beauty that is hypnotic. In fact, a 10 is actually too beautiful. It would be wrong to say that a 10 is perfection because a true 10 will often have a somewhat other wordly quality, so instead they are like imperfect pefection.
    Examples: Really only one comes to mind, and you already know who it is: Taylor Swift.
     
    In my opinion this level of beauty (Taylor Swift) it is possible to find

    http://etsphoto.ru/photocache/87/87dffa29038fc8308c25305f23d76390.jpg

    http://vpleny.ru/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Александра-Петрова.jpg

    https://www.baby.ru/storage/a/5/6/2/328881.94015.jpeg

    http://lovemastery.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/maxim-opublikoval-reyting-top-100-samyh-seksualnyh-rossiyskih-zhenschin-200-foto_78681.jpeg

    In my opinion this level of beauty (Taylor Swift) it is possible to find

    I am assuming since he took Taylor Swift as the ideal that he is coming from the white nationalist perspective, that the ideal is the Aryan ideal, Slavic girls can thus by definition never make a perfect 10.

    Read More
    • Replies: @melanf

    I am assuming since he took Taylor Swift as the ideal that he is coming from the white nationalist perspective, that the ideal is the Aryan ideal, Slavic girls can thus by definition never make a perfect 10.
     
    Eeeeeeeee, I have there four different answer.

    1) As far as I know Greasy is quite fond to the beauty of Slavic girls

    2)Anthropological type of Taylor Swift is quite common for Russians or Рoles. Of course such beauties are very rare, but the physical type is quite common among the Slavs.

    3) A Russian living in Northwest Russia are genetically very different from other Russian (and other Slavs). Genetically they ("Northern Russians") are closer to the Scandinavians (especially to the Norwegian) than to the Slavs. Because of this, anthropological type "nordid" prevails in the North of Russia, and a large part of the population looks like hardcore Scandinavians:

    http://i6.pixs.ru/storage/3/1/3/p3Qb1t7Ffc_4609783_29405313.jpg

    4) The girls in the photos (Posting No. 24) are Russian Actresses. But they are not ethnically Russian! You can (without Google) try to guess from what ethno-linguistic (i.e. Slavs, Finno-Ugric, etc.) group each of them has origin. It is even better to guess the nationality, but it is quite difficult.

    , @Dmitry

    I am assuming since he took Taylor Swift as the ideal that he is coming from the white nationalist perspective, that the ideal is the Aryan ideal, Slavic girls can thus by definition never make a perfect 10.

     

    It all shows how subjective this is. I don't even find Taylor Swift be close to beautiful. She looks decent enough, but I would never get a crush on her.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  27. @for-the-record
    …almost like some kind of succubus, when the illusion has begun to wear off, just before she’s going to devour you.

    You seem quite well-informed about succubi . . .

    Maybe he’s already been devoured by a few of them… hopefully it will never happen after he marries one.

    Read More
    • Replies: @for-the-record
    Maybe he’s already been devoured by a few of them [succubi]… hopefully it will never happen after he marries one.

    A propos (or perhaps not ...), bold added (cf. Eugene O'Neill):


    Succubi could appear in the flesh as beautiful, voluptuous women (perhaps an indication of male fantasies). They usually visited men in their sleep — especially men who slept alone — and their sexual activities caused erotic dreams and nocturnal emissions.

    Succubi were not as prevalent as incubi. Because of the inherent evil of women, in the view of Christianity, women were morally weak and therefore more licentious than men. If a man were assaulted by a succubus, it was most likely not his fault.

    The sex act itself with a succubus was often described as penetrating a cavern of ice. There are accounts of men being forced to perform cunnilingus on succubi, whose vaginas dripped urine, dung and other vile juices and smells.

    Succubi appeared often in the records of witchcraft trials. Men accused of witchcraft sometimes were tortured until they confessed having sex with demons, among oth er diabolical crimes. In 1468 in Bologna, Italy, a man was executed for allegedly running a brothel of succubi.
     

    Guiley, The Encyclopedia of Witches, Witchcraft and Wicca, p. 95.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  28. @neutral

    In my opinion this level of beauty (Taylor Swift) it is possible to find
     
    I am assuming since he took Taylor Swift as the ideal that he is coming from the white nationalist perspective, that the ideal is the Aryan ideal, Slavic girls can thus by definition never make a perfect 10.

    I am assuming since he took Taylor Swift as the ideal that he is coming from the white nationalist perspective, that the ideal is the Aryan ideal, Slavic girls can thus by definition never make a perfect 10.

    Eeeeeeeee, I have there four different answer.

    1) As far as I know Greasy is quite fond to the beauty of Slavic girls

    2)Anthropological type of Taylor Swift is quite common for Russians or Рoles. Of course such beauties are very rare, but the physical type is quite common among the Slavs.

    3) A Russian living in Northwest Russia are genetically very different from other Russian (and other Slavs). Genetically they (“Northern Russians”) are closer to the Scandinavians (especially to the Norwegian) than to the Slavs. Because of this, anthropological type “nordid” prevails in the North of Russia, and a large part of the population looks like hardcore Scandinavians:

    4) The girls in the photos (Posting No. 24) are Russian Actresses. But they are not ethnically Russian! You can (without Google) try to guess from what ethno-linguistic (i.e. Slavs, Finno-Ugric, etc.) group each of them has origin. It is even better to guess the nationality, but it is quite difficult.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  29. @reiner Tor
    Maybe he’s already been devoured by a few of them... hopefully it will never happen after he marries one.

    Maybe he’s already been devoured by a few of them [succubi]… hopefully it will never happen after he marries one.

    A propos (or perhaps not …), bold added (cf. Eugene O’Neill):

    Succubi could appear in the flesh as beautiful, voluptuous women (perhaps an indication of male fantasies). They usually visited men in their sleep — especially men who slept alone — and their sexual activities caused erotic dreams and nocturnal emissions.

    Succubi were not as prevalent as incubi. Because of the inherent evil of women, in the view of Christianity, women were morally weak and therefore more licentious than men. If a man were assaulted by a succubus, it was most likely not his fault.

    The sex act itself with a succubus was often described as penetrating a cavern of ice. There are accounts of men being forced to perform cunnilingus on succubi, whose vaginas dripped urine, dung and other vile juices and smells.

    Succubi appeared often in the records of witchcraft trials. Men accused of witchcraft sometimes were tortured until they confessed having sex with demons, among oth er diabolical crimes. In 1468 in Bologna, Italy, a man was executed for allegedly running a brothel of succubi.

    Guiley, The Encyclopedia of Witches, Witchcraft and Wicca, p. 95.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  30. @melanf

    The hottest face possible. This is a level of beauty that is hypnotic. In fact, a 10 is actually too beautiful. It would be wrong to say that a 10 is perfection because a true 10 will often have a somewhat other wordly quality, so instead they are like imperfect pefection.
    Examples: Really only one comes to mind, and you already know who it is: Taylor Swift.
     
    In my opinion this level of beauty (Taylor Swift) it is possible to find

    http://etsphoto.ru/photocache/87/87dffa29038fc8308c25305f23d76390.jpg

    http://vpleny.ru/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Александра-Петрова.jpg

    https://www.baby.ru/storage/a/5/6/2/328881.94015.jpeg

    http://lovemastery.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/maxim-opublikoval-reyting-top-100-samyh-seksualnyh-rossiyskih-zhenschin-200-foto_78681.jpeg

    Mr. Unz, can we have a emote for “Greasy Williams Rate 0-10″?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  31. @melanf

    The hottest face possible. This is a level of beauty that is hypnotic. In fact, a 10 is actually too beautiful. It would be wrong to say that a 10 is perfection because a true 10 will often have a somewhat other wordly quality, so instead they are like imperfect pefection.
    Examples: Really only one comes to mind, and you already know who it is: Taylor Swift.
     
    In my opinion this level of beauty (Taylor Swift) it is possible to find

    http://etsphoto.ru/photocache/87/87dffa29038fc8308c25305f23d76390.jpg

    http://vpleny.ru/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Александра-Петрова.jpg

    https://www.baby.ru/storage/a/5/6/2/328881.94015.jpeg

    http://lovemastery.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/maxim-opublikoval-reyting-top-100-samyh-seksualnyh-rossiyskih-zhenschin-200-foto_78681.jpeg

    from top to bottom:

    8, 7, 6, 5′s

    The 6 doesn’t even look Slavic too me. Maybe Polish but definitely not Russian.

    Who is the 8? I must research her further.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  32. The 6 doesn’t even look Slavic too me. Maybe Polish but definitely not Russian.

    All these girls are not Slavs (or not quite Slavs) by origin. I will not yet write about their origin – It will be interesting what will be guesses (without Google) about their nationality

    Who is the 8? I must research her further.

    It’s a waste of time. She’s already married

    Read More
    • Replies: @Greasy William
    the 8: Finn

    the 7: Lithuanian

    the 6: Latvian

    the 5's: Estonian



    How did I do?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  33. @Greasy William
    Pretty much the only thing that sets me off is if somebody says something positive about Iran/Syria, but German Reader's unprovoked slander that I have "ridiculously high standards" really offended me. I feel the need to offer some clarity.

    The first thing that needs to be established is that it really makes no sense to "bang" a woman who you aren't attracted to. I feel like that for most guys, if she is female, then that's good enough for them. Well I'm not wired that way and if you are willing to sleep with a woman who you don't find attractive then you are subhuman scum. No offense.

    As for the actual accusation that I have high standards, that simply isn't true and I can prove it. Below I will use female celebrities to illustrate exactly what each point on the scale represents:

    Please not that these ratings are for facial beauty only. When evaluating a woman, your priorities should be face, ass, tits; in that order. This is important because I feel like a lot of guys don't get that if the face isn't there, it doesn't matter what the rest of the package looks like. Conversely, as long as the face is at least a 6, there is nothing wrong with being flexible.

    ...

    Looks Scale

    10: The hottest face possible. This is a level of beauty that is hypnotic. In fact, a 10 is actually too beautiful. It would be wrong to say that a 10 is perfection because a true 10 will often have a somewhat other wordly quality, so instead they are like imperfect pefection.

    Examples: Really only one comes to mind, and you already know who it is: Taylor Swift.

    9: As beautiful as possible without being Taylor Swift.

    Examples: Keira Knightley, young Carice van Houten, post plastic surgery Gal Gadot

    8: Super beautiful but not quite at the insane beauty level of a 9 or a 10. The hottest girl in your high school was probably an 8. Although if you went to HS in Russia or Eastern Europe then you may have had some 9s.

    Examples: Prime, fully made up Katy Perry, post plastic surgery Jennifer Lawrence, the chick from Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon

    7: The typical "hot girl". These are plentiful at any American college campus.

    Examples: Selena Gomez, Anne Hathaway, Dakota Johnson, McKayla Maroney

    6: They typical "cute" or "pretty" girl. The plurality of young, non fat, non deformed, white girls are usually around here somewhere.

    Examples: Pre plastic surgery Mila Kunis (she looked way different before p surge: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QvthUBqH7_k)

    5: Not flawed but simply too plain. 5 does not mean average, as the average white girl is probably a 6. Rather 5 is just your prototypical plain jane.

    Examples: American character actress Jane Adams; it is hard to find famous examples of 5, although you probably knew plenty in high school.

    4: Plain, but whereas a 5 is plain in an attractive way, a 4 is plain in a homely way.

    Examples: American feminist shrew Amanda Marcotte, Heather Matarazzo

    3: Outright ugly, bordering on hideous

    Examples: Sarah Jessica Parker


    There are no famous examples of 2's or 1's that I can think of, although I've seen plenty in real life.


    So anyway, first of all: you're welcome. 2nd of all I don't have high standards. Maybe some of you just have low standards? Ever think of that?

    The first thing that needs to be established is that it really makes no sense to “bang” a woman who you aren’t attracted to. I feel like that for most guys, if she is female, then that’s good enough for them. Well I’m not wired that way and if you are willing to sleep with a woman who you don’t find attractive then you are subhuman scum. No offense.

    Lol since when is girl’s looks relevant to whether you sleep with her? Availability has a lot more to do with it.

    Read More
    • Agree: iffen
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  34. @neutral

    In my opinion this level of beauty (Taylor Swift) it is possible to find
     
    I am assuming since he took Taylor Swift as the ideal that he is coming from the white nationalist perspective, that the ideal is the Aryan ideal, Slavic girls can thus by definition never make a perfect 10.

    I am assuming since he took Taylor Swift as the ideal that he is coming from the white nationalist perspective, that the ideal is the Aryan ideal, Slavic girls can thus by definition never make a perfect 10.

    It all shows how subjective this is. I don’t even find Taylor Swift be close to beautiful. She looks decent enough, but I would never get a crush on her.

    Read More
    • Replies: @melanf

    It all shows how subjective this is. I don’t even find Taylor Swift be close to beautiful. She looks decent enough, but I would never get a crush on her.
     
    Yes is true, all see beauty a bit differently.
    Taylor is beautiful, of course, but if anyone asked me, "Name the most beautiful girl," I wouldn't even remember Taylor. Perhaps I would choose this image

    http://www.stile.it/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/01AudreyHepburn_donnebelle_100315spe_1221.jpg
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  35. Some of these women look like puppies or some other kind of animal.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  36. @melanf

    The 6 doesn’t even look Slavic too me. Maybe Polish but definitely not Russian.
     
    All these girls are not Slavs (or not quite Slavs) by origin. I will not yet write about their origin - It will be interesting what will be guesses (without Google) about their nationality

    Who is the 8? I must research her further.
     
    It's a waste of time. She's already married

    the 8: Finn

    the 7: Lithuanian

    the 6: Latvian

    the 5′s: Estonian

    How did I do?

    Read More
    • Replies: @melanf
    Not quite right. Let's ask so - these girls (by origin) belong to four ethnolinguistic groups: Germanic-speaking, Romance , Turkish and Balts. Who is who?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  37. @Greasy William
    the 8: Finn

    the 7: Lithuanian

    the 6: Latvian

    the 5's: Estonian



    How did I do?

    Not quite right. Let’s ask so – these girls (by origin) belong to four ethnolinguistic groups: Germanic-speaking, Romance , Turkish and Balts. Who is who?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  38. the 8: Germanic

    the 7: Turkish

    the 6: Romance

    the 5′s: Balt

    Read More
    • Replies: @melanf
    the 8: Balt (girl - migrant from Latvia )

    the 7: Turkish (Chuvash - people living on Volga river)

    the 6: Romance (Romanian, or rather half-Romanian with an atypical appearance)

    the 5′s: The Germans twins (or rather half-Germans)
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  39. @Dmitry

    I am assuming since he took Taylor Swift as the ideal that he is coming from the white nationalist perspective, that the ideal is the Aryan ideal, Slavic girls can thus by definition never make a perfect 10.

     

    It all shows how subjective this is. I don't even find Taylor Swift be close to beautiful. She looks decent enough, but I would never get a crush on her.

    It all shows how subjective this is. I don’t even find Taylor Swift be close to beautiful. She looks decent enough, but I would never get a crush on her.

    Yes is true, all see beauty a bit differently.
    Taylor is beautiful, of course, but if anyone asked me, “Name the most beautiful girl,” I wouldn’t even remember Taylor. Perhaps I would choose this image

    Read More
    • Replies: @Dmitry

    Yes is true, all see beauty a bit differently.
    Taylor is beautiful, of course, but if anyone asked me,
     
    And it's more subjective, because I find it impossible to see anything special of Taylor Swift. Just a common good looking woman that you see every week in ordinary life.

    She's attractive but only in the way I like most women in their twenties from all different kinds and looks.


    “Name the most beautiful girl,” I wouldn’t even remember Taylor. Perhaps I would choose this image
     
    Most beautiful doesn't exist because are so many beautiful girls which look completely different from each other (white, brown, etc).

    The celebrity ones you like also depends on what happens in real life.

    Last year, I went on a couple of unsuccessful dates with a beautiful Spanish girl (who was a lot above my normal level of girls - which is usually low). I was thinking when I was with her how she looks like Yuliya Snigir in a romantic music video that seems to be advertising Bentley - do skoroy vstrechi.

    I didn't make any move and failed to get anywhere with her - but now afterwards Yuliya Snigir is the ideal celebrity for me. (Probably if I'd got the Spanish girl I'd not even think of her again).

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DF6W1XD25Dc

    , @Mr. Hack
    https://www.connieevingson.com/images/connietraythumbnailopto1.jpg

    Here's an equally nice Swedish/American woman's profile!

    (sorry, I don't know how to enlarge it)

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  40. @Greasy William
    the 8: Germanic

    the 7: Turkish

    the 6: Romance

    the 5's: Balt

    the 8: Balt (girl – migrant from Latvia )

    the 7: Turkish (Chuvash – people living on Volga river)

    the 6: Romance (Romanian, or rather half-Romanian with an atypical appearance)

    the 5′s: The Germans twins (or rather half-Germans)

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  41. @melanf

    It all shows how subjective this is. I don’t even find Taylor Swift be close to beautiful. She looks decent enough, but I would never get a crush on her.
     
    Yes is true, all see beauty a bit differently.
    Taylor is beautiful, of course, but if anyone asked me, "Name the most beautiful girl," I wouldn't even remember Taylor. Perhaps I would choose this image

    http://www.stile.it/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/01AudreyHepburn_donnebelle_100315spe_1221.jpg

    Yes is true, all see beauty a bit differently.
    Taylor is beautiful, of course, but if anyone asked me,

    And it’s more subjective, because I find it impossible to see anything special of Taylor Swift. Just a common good looking woman that you see every week in ordinary life.

    She’s attractive but only in the way I like most women in their twenties from all different kinds and looks.

    “Name the most beautiful girl,” I wouldn’t even remember Taylor. Perhaps I would choose this image

    Most beautiful doesn’t exist because are so many beautiful girls which look completely different from each other (white, brown, etc).

    The celebrity ones you like also depends on what happens in real life.

    Last year, I went on a couple of unsuccessful dates with a beautiful Spanish girl (who was a lot above my normal level of girls – which is usually low). I was thinking when I was with her how she looks like Yuliya Snigir in a romantic music video that seems to be advertising Bentley – do skoroy vstrechi.

    I didn’t make any move and failed to get anywhere with her – but now afterwards Yuliya Snigir is the ideal celebrity for me. (Probably if I’d got the Spanish girl I’d not even think of her again).

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  42. @reiner Tor
    Wasn’t Deripaska the richest person in Russia about a decade ago, until the financial crisis hit him while he was extremely leveraged..?

    He became the world’s poorest man. It stopped him buying Rover cars.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  43. @melanf

    But on to more important matters: Would Greasy bang?
     
    The poor oligarchs. How is it possible that they (having billions) can't find themselves more attractive girls?

    The poor oligarchs. How is it possible that they (having billions) can’t find themselves more attractive girls?

    Well Deripaska’s wife is ‘hardly an oil painting’ either, so this could be a matter of his personal tastes.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  44. @Greasy William
    Pretty much the only thing that sets me off is if somebody says something positive about Iran/Syria, but German Reader's unprovoked slander that I have "ridiculously high standards" really offended me. I feel the need to offer some clarity.

    The first thing that needs to be established is that it really makes no sense to "bang" a woman who you aren't attracted to. I feel like that for most guys, if she is female, then that's good enough for them. Well I'm not wired that way and if you are willing to sleep with a woman who you don't find attractive then you are subhuman scum. No offense.

    As for the actual accusation that I have high standards, that simply isn't true and I can prove it. Below I will use female celebrities to illustrate exactly what each point on the scale represents:

    Please not that these ratings are for facial beauty only. When evaluating a woman, your priorities should be face, ass, tits; in that order. This is important because I feel like a lot of guys don't get that if the face isn't there, it doesn't matter what the rest of the package looks like. Conversely, as long as the face is at least a 6, there is nothing wrong with being flexible.

    ...

    Looks Scale

    10: The hottest face possible. This is a level of beauty that is hypnotic. In fact, a 10 is actually too beautiful. It would be wrong to say that a 10 is perfection because a true 10 will often have a somewhat other wordly quality, so instead they are like imperfect pefection.

    Examples: Really only one comes to mind, and you already know who it is: Taylor Swift.

    9: As beautiful as possible without being Taylor Swift.

    Examples: Keira Knightley, young Carice van Houten, post plastic surgery Gal Gadot

    8: Super beautiful but not quite at the insane beauty level of a 9 or a 10. The hottest girl in your high school was probably an 8. Although if you went to HS in Russia or Eastern Europe then you may have had some 9s.

    Examples: Prime, fully made up Katy Perry, post plastic surgery Jennifer Lawrence, the chick from Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon

    7: The typical "hot girl". These are plentiful at any American college campus.

    Examples: Selena Gomez, Anne Hathaway, Dakota Johnson, McKayla Maroney

    6: They typical "cute" or "pretty" girl. The plurality of young, non fat, non deformed, white girls are usually around here somewhere.

    Examples: Pre plastic surgery Mila Kunis (she looked way different before p surge: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QvthUBqH7_k)

    5: Not flawed but simply too plain. 5 does not mean average, as the average white girl is probably a 6. Rather 5 is just your prototypical plain jane.

    Examples: American character actress Jane Adams; it is hard to find famous examples of 5, although you probably knew plenty in high school.

    4: Plain, but whereas a 5 is plain in an attractive way, a 4 is plain in a homely way.

    Examples: American feminist shrew Amanda Marcotte, Heather Matarazzo

    3: Outright ugly, bordering on hideous

    Examples: Sarah Jessica Parker


    There are no famous examples of 2's or 1's that I can think of, although I've seen plenty in real life.


    So anyway, first of all: you're welcome. 2nd of all I don't have high standards. Maybe some of you just have low standards? Ever think of that?

    So Taylor Swift beats young Claudia Schiffer? Seriously? Beauty is indeed subjective.

    Taylor Swift is pretty, but I imagine you’d find many girls of that type, and similarly pretty, anywhere from Czech/Slovak to Russia. Like the girls at 2:39 in this music video (who are also a lot prettier than this Rybka girl, who is really nothing special):

    Read More
    • Replies: @Greasy William
    I'm saying that Taylor Swift has the world's most beautiful face. That is totally different then saying that she is the hottest, which seems to be what you think I'm saying.

    A young Salma Hayek was 10x hotter minimum than Taylor Swift, but Swift is much prettier.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  45. @Chet Bradley
    So Taylor Swift beats young Claudia Schiffer? Seriously? Beauty is indeed subjective.

    Taylor Swift is pretty, but I imagine you'd find many girls of that type, and similarly pretty, anywhere from Czech/Slovak to Russia. Like the girls at 2:39 in this music video (who are also a lot prettier than this Rybka girl, who is really nothing special): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rgox84KE7iY

    I’m saying that Taylor Swift has the world’s most beautiful face. That is totally different then saying that she is the hottest, which seems to be what you think I’m saying.

    A young Salma Hayek was 10x hotter minimum than Taylor Swift, but Swift is much prettier.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Dmitry

    I’m saying that Taylor Swift has the world’s most beautiful face.


     

    No she doesn't - not even close. Lol our friend, how can we dispel you of this strange illusion?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  46. @Greasy William
    Pretty much the only thing that sets me off is if somebody says something positive about Iran/Syria, but German Reader's unprovoked slander that I have "ridiculously high standards" really offended me. I feel the need to offer some clarity.

    The first thing that needs to be established is that it really makes no sense to "bang" a woman who you aren't attracted to. I feel like that for most guys, if she is female, then that's good enough for them. Well I'm not wired that way and if you are willing to sleep with a woman who you don't find attractive then you are subhuman scum. No offense.

    As for the actual accusation that I have high standards, that simply isn't true and I can prove it. Below I will use female celebrities to illustrate exactly what each point on the scale represents:

    Please not that these ratings are for facial beauty only. When evaluating a woman, your priorities should be face, ass, tits; in that order. This is important because I feel like a lot of guys don't get that if the face isn't there, it doesn't matter what the rest of the package looks like. Conversely, as long as the face is at least a 6, there is nothing wrong with being flexible.

    ...

    Looks Scale

    10: The hottest face possible. This is a level of beauty that is hypnotic. In fact, a 10 is actually too beautiful. It would be wrong to say that a 10 is perfection because a true 10 will often have a somewhat other wordly quality, so instead they are like imperfect pefection.

    Examples: Really only one comes to mind, and you already know who it is: Taylor Swift.

    9: As beautiful as possible without being Taylor Swift.

    Examples: Keira Knightley, young Carice van Houten, post plastic surgery Gal Gadot

    8: Super beautiful but not quite at the insane beauty level of a 9 or a 10. The hottest girl in your high school was probably an 8. Although if you went to HS in Russia or Eastern Europe then you may have had some 9s.

    Examples: Prime, fully made up Katy Perry, post plastic surgery Jennifer Lawrence, the chick from Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon

    7: The typical "hot girl". These are plentiful at any American college campus.

    Examples: Selena Gomez, Anne Hathaway, Dakota Johnson, McKayla Maroney

    6: They typical "cute" or "pretty" girl. The plurality of young, non fat, non deformed, white girls are usually around here somewhere.

    Examples: Pre plastic surgery Mila Kunis (she looked way different before p surge: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QvthUBqH7_k)

    5: Not flawed but simply too plain. 5 does not mean average, as the average white girl is probably a 6. Rather 5 is just your prototypical plain jane.

    Examples: American character actress Jane Adams; it is hard to find famous examples of 5, although you probably knew plenty in high school.

    4: Plain, but whereas a 5 is plain in an attractive way, a 4 is plain in a homely way.

    Examples: American feminist shrew Amanda Marcotte, Heather Matarazzo

    3: Outright ugly, bordering on hideous

    Examples: Sarah Jessica Parker


    There are no famous examples of 2's or 1's that I can think of, although I've seen plenty in real life.


    So anyway, first of all: you're welcome. 2nd of all I don't have high standards. Maybe some of you just have low standards? Ever think of that?

    Among the factors determining the beauty of girls forgot one factor.
    The girl to be in the Premier League of beauty must have a beautiful face/figure but also the intelligence and internal energy, because this directly affects the appearance. Face is the mirror of the soul. There a good word “bright” – in order that the girl was really beauty, the girl should be bright. Without it there will be a vegetable, in a beautiful package. I’ve seen a lot of unattractive, but smart girls, however really beautiful, but stupid and lethargic – I didn’t know any.

    In the movie “Gone with the wind” (this film is not yet banned in America?) it is well shown. Sisters of Scarlett O’hara have a great body and face, but who notices? Scarlet overshadows them as the sun overshadows the stars because she is “bright”, because Scarlet is illuminated by the fire of her soul.
    Of course movie is art, but good art reflects life

    Read More
    • Replies: @Greasy William

    Among the factors determining the beauty of girls forgot one factor.
    The girl to be in the Premier League of beauty must have a beautiful face/figure
     
    We are only talking about facial beauty here. Figure does not factor into the equation.

    but also the intelligence
     
    If I want intelligence, I will read a book. Let's not buy into the ugly lie that women have any value apart from their function as sex objects/birth machines.

    and internal energy, because this directly affects the appearance. Face is the mirror of the soul.
     
    o rly? So Sarah Jessica Parker must be one of the most evil people in human history then. Is that your position?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  47. @melanf

    It all shows how subjective this is. I don’t even find Taylor Swift be close to beautiful. She looks decent enough, but I would never get a crush on her.
     
    Yes is true, all see beauty a bit differently.
    Taylor is beautiful, of course, but if anyone asked me, "Name the most beautiful girl," I wouldn't even remember Taylor. Perhaps I would choose this image

    http://www.stile.it/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/01AudreyHepburn_donnebelle_100315spe_1221.jpg


    Here’s an equally nice Swedish/American woman’s profile!

    (sorry, I don’t know how to enlarge it)

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  48. Well, for the anime fans, such as Robert Spencer (and for the rest – for a laugh): Evgenia Medvedeva as “Sailor Moon”

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=riHSCgHYUUc&feature=youtu.be

    Read More
    • Replies: @Daniel Chieh
    I always was very fond of that video. She even managed a Henshin transformation on ice and clearly is having a lot of fun.I always was very fond of that video. She even managed a Henshin transformation on ice and clearly is having a lot of fun.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  49. Fellas, if you ever find yourself breathlessly acting as stenographer for a Navalny video, or linking to a Wushagate thumbsucker from the New York Times, you’ve taken a wrong turning at some point in your life’s journey.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  50. @melanf
    Among the factors determining the beauty of girls forgot one factor.
    The girl to be in the Premier League of beauty must have a beautiful face/figure but also the intelligence and internal energy, because this directly affects the appearance. Face is the mirror of the soul. There a good word "bright" - in order that the girl was really beauty, the girl should be bright. Without it there will be a vegetable, in a beautiful package. I've seen a lot of unattractive, but smart girls, however really beautiful, but stupid and lethargic - I didn't know any.

    In the movie "Gone with the wind" (this film is not yet banned in America?) it is well shown. Sisters of Scarlett O'hara have a great body and face, but who notices? Scarlet overshadows them as the sun overshadows the stars because she is "bright", because Scarlet is illuminated by the fire of her soul.
    Of course movie is art, but good art reflects life

    Among the factors determining the beauty of girls forgot one factor.
    The girl to be in the Premier League of beauty must have a beautiful face/figure

    We are only talking about facial beauty here. Figure does not factor into the equation.

    but also the intelligence

    If I want intelligence, I will read a book. Let’s not buy into the ugly lie that women have any value apart from their function as sex objects/birth machines.

    and internal energy, because this directly affects the appearance. Face is the mirror of the soul.

    o rly? So Sarah Jessica Parker must be one of the most evil people in human history then. Is that your position?

    Read More
    • Replies: @neutral

    If I want intelligence, I will read a book. Let’s not buy into the ugly lie that women have any value apart from their function as sex objects/birth machines.
     
    Did you happen to have a mother when you were a child? I pray you didn't because if you did then she must of been an awful mother for you to form such an opinion on women.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  51. @Greasy William

    Among the factors determining the beauty of girls forgot one factor.
    The girl to be in the Premier League of beauty must have a beautiful face/figure
     
    We are only talking about facial beauty here. Figure does not factor into the equation.

    but also the intelligence
     
    If I want intelligence, I will read a book. Let's not buy into the ugly lie that women have any value apart from their function as sex objects/birth machines.

    and internal energy, because this directly affects the appearance. Face is the mirror of the soul.
     
    o rly? So Sarah Jessica Parker must be one of the most evil people in human history then. Is that your position?

    If I want intelligence, I will read a book. Let’s not buy into the ugly lie that women have any value apart from their function as sex objects/birth machines.

    Did you happen to have a mother when you were a child? I pray you didn’t because if you did then she must of been an awful mother for you to form such an opinion on women.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  52. @melanf
    Well, for the anime fans, such as Robert Spencer (and for the rest - for a laugh): Evgenia Medvedeva as "Sailor Moon"

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=riHSCgHYUUc&feature=youtu.be

    I always was very fond of that video. She even managed a Henshin transformation on ice and clearly is having a lot of fun.I always was very fond of that video. She even managed a Henshin transformation on ice and clearly is having a lot of fun.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  53. @Greasy William
    I'm saying that Taylor Swift has the world's most beautiful face. That is totally different then saying that she is the hottest, which seems to be what you think I'm saying.

    A young Salma Hayek was 10x hotter minimum than Taylor Swift, but Swift is much prettier.

    I’m saying that Taylor Swift has the world’s most beautiful face.

    No she doesn’t – not even close. Lol our friend, how can we dispel you of this strange illusion?

    Read More
    • Troll: Greasy William
    • Replies: @Daniel Chieh
    Introduce more women to Greasy William. It is a holy purpose.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  54. @Dmitry

    I’m saying that Taylor Swift has the world’s most beautiful face.


     

    No she doesn't - not even close. Lol our friend, how can we dispel you of this strange illusion?

    Introduce more women to Greasy William. It is a holy purpose.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments

Comments are closed.

Subscribe to All Anatoly Karlin Comments via RSS